Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-07-08 Historic PACKET HISTORIC COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA July 8, 2015 at 6:00 P.M. I. REGULAR MEETING - CALL TO ORDER: 6:00 p.m. SISKIYOU ROOM in the Community Development/Engineering Services Building, located at 51 Winburn Way II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Historic Commission regular meeting of June 3, 2015 III. PUBLIC FORUM: Business from the audience not included on the agenda. (Total time allowed for Public Forum is 15 minutes. Speakers are limited to 5 minutes or less, depending on the number of individuals wishing to speak.) IV. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORT: Carol Voisin V. PLANNING ACTION REVIEW: PLANNING ACTION: PA-2015-01163 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 868 A Street OWNER: Linda Millemann, Steven & Harriet Saturen APPLICANT: Mark Lackey DESCRIPTION: A request for a Site Design Review to add a covered front porch to the structure at 868 A Street. The structure is a residence in the Employment (E-1) zone. In the E-1 zone, additions to existing structures are subject to Site Design Review regardless of the use of the structure. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Employment; ZONING: E-1; 39 1E 09AA; TAX LOT: 6800. PLANNING ACTION: PA-2015-00980 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 637 B St. OWNER: Larry and Deborah Lapkin APPLICANT: Coleman Creek Construction DESCRIPTION: A request for a Conditional Use Permit to modify the shape and size of an existing non-conforming garage from a shallow shed to a gable roof. The pre-existing garage does not meet current setbacks, and, is therefore a non-conforming structure which requires a conditional use permit for any modifications that change the three- dimensional shape. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Multi-Family Residential; ZONING: R-2; 39 1E 09AB; TAX LOT: 3800 PLANNING ACTION: PA-2015-00797 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 266 Third Street OWNER/APPLICANT: Tanima Bhadra & Brandon Mathew DESCRIPTION: A request for a Conditional Use Permit to operate a four- at 266-268 Third Street. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density, Multi-Family Residential; ZONING: R- 9500. VI. OLD BUSINESS: VII. NEW ITEMS: A. Introduction of new staff liaison, Mark Schexnayder (Maria Harris will be interim staff liaison) B. Review Board schedule. C. Project Assignments for planning actions. D. Railroad Park Tour update Commissioner Skibby E. Election of new officers VIII. DISCUSSION ITEMS: A. Butler-Perozzi Fountain - Commissioner Ladygo IX. COMMISSION ITEMS NOT ON AGENDA: X. ADJOURNMENT: ASHLAND HISTORIC COMMISSION Meeting Minutes June 3, 2015 Community Development/Engineering Services Building 51 Winburn Way Siskiyou Room REGULAR MEETING - CALL TO ORDER 6:02 p.m. SISKIYOU ROOM in the Community Development/Engineering Services Building, located at 51 Winburn Way Historic Commissioners Present: Mr. Skibby, Mr. Whitford, Mr. Giordano, Ms. Kencairn, Mr. Ladygo, Mr. Emery, Ms. Renwick, Mr. Swink Commission Members Absent: Mr. Shostrom (E) Council Liaison : Carol Voisin, absent Staff Present: Staff Liaison: Amy Gunter, Clerk: Regan Trapp APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Ms. Renwick motioned to approve minutes from May 6, 2015 and Ms. Kencairn seconded Mr. Swink abstained, no one opposed. PUBLIC FORUM: There was no one in the audience wishing to speak. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORT: The Council Liaison was not present so no report was given. Mr. Skibby read aloud the procedures for public hearings PLANNING ACTION REVIEW: PLANNING ACTION: PA-2015-00680 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 237 N. First St. OWNER: Ashland Food Cooperative APPLICANT: KenCairn Landscape Architecture (agent for owner) DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Review approval to reconfigure the landscape and patio areas along A Street to provide more water-efficient landscaping, improve the employee break area, and provide secure employee bicycle parking for the Ashland Community Food Store located at 237 N First Street. The application includes requests for a Tree Removal Permit to remove two trees. (The property is located within the Ashland Railroad Addition Historic District and the Detail Site Review Zone, and because of the building size is also subject to additional standards for large scale projects.) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Employment; ZONING: E-1; 39 1E 09BA; TAX LOT: 13401 Ms. Gunter gave the staff report on PA-2015-00680. Mr. Skibby opened the public hearing to the applicants. Ms. Kencairn had conflict of interest and ex-parte contact but wanted to present PA-2015-00680. Ms. Gunter checked to make sure this was appropriate to do. After some research Ms. Kencairn presented as requested. Ms. Kerry Kencairn, Landscape Architect at 545 A Street Suite 3, presented to the Commission. She said the biggest change that people will see when walking up will be an elaborate ornamental landscape screen with an entry arbor creating a sense of welcome for customers. This structure will give employees a place to be without being in view of the public. The bikes will be secured by individual bike loops behind the wall and the break area will be shielded by hog fencing, shrubs, and a wooden fence that is 3 ft tall. There will be only one access point for employees as the set of stairs on First Street will be taken out. Mr. Skibby closed the public hearing and opened to the Commission. Mr. Giordano motioned to approve as presented PA-2015 00680 and Mr. Swink seconded, no one opposed. PLANNING ACTION: PA-2015-00878 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 35 S. Pioneer St. OWNER: City of Ashland APPLICANT: Oregon Shakespeare Festival DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Review approval to allow exterior modifications to the Oregon modifications are associated with adding an elevator to the Bowmer Theater building as part of broader accessibility improvements and will involve an approximately 202 square foot addition to the theater building. The application also includes a request for a Tree Removal Permit to remove a 16-inch diameter maple tree. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial Downtown; ZONING: C-1-D; 39 1E 09; TAX LOT: 100 Ms. Gunter gave the staff report on PA-2015-00878. Mr. Skibby opened the public hearing to the applicants. George Cramer of 386 N. Laurel, representative of the Oregon Shakespeare Festival, spoke about the project. Mr. Cramer stated that the only exterior change is the loss of one of the exterior windows. This project is a compatible addition that will minimize the visual impact of the Historic Bowmer Theater. The portion of the lobby windows will project into the bricks but the roofline will not change. The entire addition sits under the eaves of the existing building. Mr. Skibby closed the public hearing and opened to the Commission. Mr. Whitford motioned to approve as presented PA-2015-00878 and Ms. Kencairn seconded. No one opposed. PLANNING ACTION: PA-2015-00821 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 315 High Street OWNER/APPLICANT: Kenneth & Sara Pearson DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Review approval to convert the existing 922 square foot guest house with attached garage into an Accessory Residential Unit. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-7.5; 39 1E 05DD TAX LOT: 7300; Ms. Kencairn recused herself from discussion as she worked on this project. Ms. Gunter gave the staff report on PA-2015-00821 Mr. Skibby opened the public hearing, since there was no one wishing to speak, he closed to the applicant and opened to the Commission. Mr. Giordano motioned to approved as presented PA-2015-00821 and Mr. Giordano seconded. No one opposed. OLD BUSINESS: There was no old business to discuss. . NEW ITEMS: A. Review Board schedule. B. Project Assignments for planning actions. C. Historic Preservation Week wrap up Mr. Skibby spoke about the tour and said that he had 19 people. He spoke about the fact that he would like to do weekly tours that could be advertised. These could happen mid-June through August. Parks and Recreation and the different hotels could be notified. Railroad Park would be the meeting spot for the walking tour that would happen every Friday at 10am starting on June 19, 2015. An advertisement will be placed in the city source and as well as on the city website. DISCUSSION ITEMS: A. Butler-Perozzi Fountain Commissioner Skibby Mr. Skibby talked to Jim Lewis on the parks commission and he said that they are not going to discuss what to do with the Butler-Perozzi Fountain for about 2 years. Mr. Skibby thought it would be nice to have someone from the Parks Commission come and speak about it. Ms.Kencairn spoke that her firm is looking into the restoration of the fountain. Ms. Gunter suggested that someone from Historic attend the Parks Commission meeting and discuss the fountain project with them at the June 22 meeting. Mr. Ladygo volunteered to attend the meeting and represent for the Historic Commission. Mr. Ladygo will report back to the Commission during the July meeting. COMMISSION ITEMS NOT ON AGENDA: Ms. Gunter reported that the red painted asphalt in front of Pioneer Hall is temporary and Public Works is working on a plan of action for repair. Once the plan is devised, the proposal will be brought before the commission. Ms. Gunter announced to the Commission that she will be leaving the City of Ashland and that this is her last meeting with the Historic Commission. At this time, it is unknown who will be taking over as staff liaison. Review Board Schedule June 4th Terry, Kerry, Andrew th June 11 Terry, Tom, Bill th June 18 Terry, Andrew, Allison th June 25 Terry, Sam, Bill nd July 2 Terry, Keith, Kerry Project Assignments for Planning Actions PA-2014-01956 Lithia & First All PA-2014-00710/711 143/135 Nutley Swink & Whitford PA-2014-01283 172 Skidmore Shostrom PA-2014-00251 30 S. First St Whitford BD-2013-00813 374 Hargadine Swink PA-2013-01828 310 Oak St. (Thompson) Shostrom PA-2014-02206 485 A Street Renwick PA-2015-00178 156 Van Ness Ave Kencairn PA -2015-00374 160 Lithia Way Emery PA-2015-00541 345 Lithia Way Giordano & Renwick PA-2015-00493 37 N. Main Skibby PA-2015-00878 35 S. Pioneer Ladygo ANNOUNCEMENTS & INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: Next meeting is scheduled for July 8, 2015, 6:00 pm. There being no other items to discuss, the meeting adjourned at 7:15 pm Respectfully submitted by Regan Trapp Planning Department, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 541-488-5305 Fax: 541-552-2050 www.ashland.or.us TTY: 1-800-735-2900 NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING ACTION: 2015-01163 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 868 A Street OWNER: Linda Millemann, Steven & Harriet Saturen APPLICANT: Mark Lackey DESCRIPTION: A request for a Site Design Review to add a covered front porch to the structure at 868 A Street. The structure is a residence in the Employment (E-1) zone. In the E-1 zone, additions to existing structures are subject to Site Design Review regardless of the use of the structure. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Employment; ZONING: E-1; 39 1E 09AA; TAX LOT: 6800. NOTE:The Ashland Historic Commission will also review this Planning Action on Wednesday, July 8, 2015 at 6:00 PM in the Community Development and Engineering Services building (Siskiyou Room), located at 51 Winburn Way. NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: June 23, 2015 DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: July 7, 2015 The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted above. Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submit written comments to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m. on the deadline date shown above. Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for a 14 day comment period. After the comment period and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC 18.108.040) The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court. A copy of the application, all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be provided at reasonable cost, if requested. All materials are available at the Ashland Planning Division, Community Development & Engineering Services Building, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520. If you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contact the Ashland Planning Division at 541-488-5305. G:\\comm-dev\\Commissions & Committees\\Historic Commission\\Packets\\2015_packets\\2015-7-8\\868 A Street\\PA-2015-01163.docx SITE DESIGN AND USE STANDARDS 18.5.2.050 Approval Criteria The following criteria shall be used to approve or deny an application: A. Underlying Zone: The proposal complies with all of the applicable provisions of the underlying zone (part 18.2), including but not limited to: building and yard setbacks, lot area and dimensions, density and floor area, lot coverage, building height, building orientation, architecture, and other applicable standards. B. Overlay Zones: The proposal complies with applicable overlay zone requirements (part 18.3). C. Site Development and Design Standards: The proposal complies with the applicable Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4, except as provided by subsection E, below. D. City Facilities: The proposal complies with the applicable standards in section 18.4.6 Public Facilities and that adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage, paved access to and throughout the property and adequate transportation can and will be provided to the subject property. E. Exception to the Site Development and Design Standards. The approval authority may approve exceptions to the Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4 if the circumstances in either subsection 1 or 2, below, are found to exist. 1.There is a demonstrable difficulty meeting the specific requirements of the Site Development and Design Standards due to a unique or unusual aspect of an existing structure or the proposed use of a site; and approval of the exception will not substantially negatively impact adjacent properties; and approval of the exception is consistent with the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design; and the exception requested is the minimum which would alleviate the difficulty.; or 2.There is no demonstrable difficulty in meeting the specific requirements, but granting the exception will result in a design that equally or better achieves the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design Standards. G:\\comm-dev\\Commissions & Committees\\Historic Commission\\Packets\\2015_packets\\2015-7-8\\868 A Street\\PA-2015-01163.docx 6/15/15 Ashland Planning Division 51 Windburn Way Ashland Oregon 97520 Application for porch extension at 868 A. Street Ashland, OR 97520 Findings of Fact: Applicable Land Use Ordinances to review in this request: Land Use Ordinance: Findings Of Fact: 18.5.2.050. Approval Criteria: A. The proposal of a porch addition to the residence at 868 A Street meets requirements of the underlying zone. Though a non-conforming use, residences are expectable and existing the E1 commercial zone. B. Overlay zone. Non-applicable. C. City Facilities. All utilities, parking, and access to remain as existing and meeting current city criteria. E. Exception to the Site Development and Design Standards. No exceptions are required under the current proposal. All standards are to be me per preapproved plans. 18.4.2.050 Historic District Development: The proposed porch addition does meet Historic District Standards and plans have been preapproved in meetings with the Ashland Historic District Commission. Historic Design Standards are to be met per plans approved by the Commission. 18.4.2.050 Part B: Entrances to remain the same as historic architecture. Imitation of Historic Features to be met with siding, trim, and craftsman detailing remaining the same as the original structure. Additions: Standards to be met include the replication of roof line and wall systems towards the front of house. No obtrusive lines or features are to be created as per plans. Part C: Rehabilitation Standards. To be met using historic architectural style and features. To include horizontal siding, craftsman detailing, imitative materials, same roof pitch and form. The new porch shall be compatible with the historic character of the building. Mark W. Lackey Integrity Building Contractors Planning Department, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 541-488-5305 Fax: 541-552-2050 www.ashland.or.us TTY: 1-800-735-2900 NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING ACTION: PA-2015-00980 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 637 B Street OWNER: Larry and Deborah Lapkin APPLICANT: Coleman Creek Construction DESCRIPTION: A request for a Conditional Use Permit to modify the shape and size of an existing non- conforming garage from a shallow shed to a gable roof. The pre-existing garage does not meet current setbacks, and, is therefore a non-conforming structure which requires a conditional use permit for any modifications that change the three-dimensional shape. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Multi-Family Residential; ZONING: R-2; 39 1E 09AB; TAX LOT: 3800. NOTE: The Ashland Historic Commission will also review this Planning Action on Wednesday, July 8, 2015 at 6:00 PM in the Community Development and Engineering Services building (Siskiyou Room), located at 51 Winburn Way. NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: June 26, 2015 DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: July 10, 2015 The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted above. Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submit written comments to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m. on the deadline date shown above. Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for a 14 day comment period. After the comment period and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC 18.108.040) The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court. A copy of the application, all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be provided at reasonable cost, if requested. All materials are available at the Ashland Planning Division, Community Development & Engineering Services Building, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520. If you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contact the Ashland Planning Division at 541-488-5305. G:\\comm-dev\\Commissions & Committees\\Historic Commission\\Packets\\2015_packets\\2015-7-8\\637 B Street\\PA-2015-00980.docx CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS 18.5.4.050.A. Approval Criteria A Conditional Use Permit shall be granted if the approval authority finds that the application meets all of the following criteria, or can be made to conform through the imposition of conditions. 1. That the use would be in conformance with all standards within the zoning district in which the use is proposed to be located, and in conformance with relevant Comprehensive plan policies that are not implemented by any City, State, or Federal law or program. 2. That adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage, paved access to and throughout the development, and adequate transportation can and will be provided to the subject property. 3. That the conditional use will have no greater adverse material effect on the livability of the impact area when compared to the development of the subject lot with the target use of the zone, pursuant with subsection 18.5.4.050.A.5, below. When evaluating the effect of the proposed use on the impact area, the following factors of livability of the impact area shall be considered in relation to the target use of the zone. a. Similarity in scale, bulk, and coverage. b. Generation of traffic and effects on surrounding streets. Increases in pedestrian, bicycle, and mass transit use are considered beneficial regardless of capacity of facilities. c. Architectural compatibility with the impact area. d. Air quality, including the generation of dust, odors, or other environmental pollutants. e. Generation of noise, light, and glare. f.The development of adjacent properties as envisioned in the Comprehensive Plan. g. Other factors found to be relevant by the approval authority for review of the proposed use. 4. A conditional use permit shall not allow a use that is prohibited or one that is not permitted pursuant to this ordinance. 5. For the purposes of reviewing conditional use permit applications for conformity with the approval criteria of this subsection, the target uses of each zone are as follows. a. WR and RR. Residential use complying with all ordinance requirements, developed at the density permitted by chapter 18.2.5 Standards for Residential Zones. b. R-1. Residential use complying with all ordinance requirements, developed at the density permitted by chapter 18.2.5 Standards for Residential Zones. c. R-2 and R-3. Residential use complying with all ordinance requirements, developed at the density permitted by chapter 18.2.5 Standards for Residential Zones. d. C-1. The general retail commercial uses listed in chapter 18.2.2 Base Zones and Allowed Uses, developed at an intensity of 0.35 floor to area ratio, complying with all ordinance requirements; and within the Detailed Site Review overlay, at an intensity of 0.50 floor to area ratio, complying with all ordinance requirements. e. C-1-D. The general retail commercial uses listed in chapter 18.2.2 Base Zones and Allowed Uses, developed at an intensity of 1.00 gross floor to area ratio, complying with all ordinance requirements. f.E-1. The general office uses listed in chapter 18.2.2 Base Zones and Allowed Uses, developed at an intensity of 0.35 floor to area ratio, complying with all ordinance requirements; and within the Detailed Site Review overlay, at an intensity of 0.50 floor to area ratio, complying with all ordinance requirements. g. M-1. The general light industrial uses listed in chapter 18.2.2 Base Zones and Allowed Uses, complying with all ordinance requirements. h. CM-C1. The general light industrial uses listed in chapter 18.3.2 Croman Mill District, developed at an intensity of 0.50 gross floor to area ratio, complying with all ordinance requirements. i.CM-OE and CM-MU. The general office uses listed in chapter 18.3.2 Croman Mill District, developed at an intensity of 0.60 gross floor to area, complying with all ordinance requirements. k. CM-NC. The retail commercial uses listed in chapter 18.3.2 Croman Mill District, developed at an intensity of 0.60 gross floor to area ratio, complying with all ordinance requirements. l.HC, NM, and SOU. The permitted uses listed in chapters 18.3.3 Health Care Services, 18.3.5 North Mountain Neighborhood, and 18.3.6 Southern Oregon University District, respectively, complying with all ordinance requirements. G:\\comm-dev\\Commissions & Committees\\Historic Commission\\Packets\\2015_packets\\2015-7-8\\637 B Street\\PA-2015-00980.docx Planning Department, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 541-488-5305 Fax: 541-552-2050 www.ashland.or.us TTY: 1-800-735-2900 NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING ACTION: PA-2015-00797 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 266 Third Street OWNER/APPLICANT: Tanima Bhadra & Brandon Mathew DESCRIPTION: A request for a Conditional Use Permit to operate a four- at 266-268 Third Street. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density, Multi-Family Residential; ZONING: R-2; MAP: 39 1E 09AB; TAX LOT: 9500. NOTE: The Ashland Historic Commission will also review this Planning Action on Wednesday, July 8, 2015 at 6:00 PM in the Community Development and Engineering Services building (Siskiyou Room), located at 51 Winburn Way. NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: June 30, 2015 DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: July 14, 2015 The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted above. Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submit written comments to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m. on the deadline date shown above. Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for a 14 day comment period. After the comment period and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to the Planning Commission of the Planning date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC 18.108.040) The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court. A copy of the application, all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be provided at reasonable cost, if requested. All materials are available at the Ashland Planning Division, Community Development & Engineering Services Building, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520. If you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contact the Ashland Planning Division at 541-488-5305. G:\\comm-dev\\Commissions & Committees\\Historic Commission\\Packets\\2015_packets\\2015-7-8\\266 Third\\PA-2015-00797.docx CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS 18.5.4.050.A. Approval Criteria A Conditional Use Permit shall be granted if the approval authority finds that the application meets all of the following criteria, or can be made to conform through the imposition of conditions. 1. That the use would be in conformance with all standards within the zoning district in which the use is proposed to be located, and in conformance with relevant Comprehensive plan policies that are not implemented by any City, State, or Federal law or program. 2. That adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage, paved access to and throughout the development, and adequate transportation can and will be provided to the subject property. 3. That the conditional use will have no greater adverse material effect on the livability of the impact area when compared to the development of the subject lot with the target use of the zone, pursuant with subsection 18.5.4.050.A.5, below. When evaluating the effect of the proposed use on the impact area, the following factors of livability of the impact area shall be considered in relation to the target use of the zone. a. Similarity in scale, bulk, and coverage. b. Generation of traffic and effects on surrounding streets. Increases in pedestrian, bicycle, and mass transit use are considered beneficial regardless of capacity of facilities. c. Architectural compatibility with the impact area. d. Air quality, including the generation of dust, odors, or other environmental pollutants. e. Generation of noise, light, and glare. f. The development of adjacent properties as envisioned in the Comprehensive Plan. g. Other factors found to be relevant by the approval authority for review of the proposed use. 4. A conditional use permit shall not allow a use that is prohibited or one that is not permitted pursuant to this ordinance. 5. For the purposes of reviewing conditional use permit applications for conformity with the approval criteria of this subsection, the target uses of each zone are as follows. a. WR and RR. Residential use complying with all ordinance requirements, developed at the density permitted by chapter 18.2.5 Standards for Residential Zones. b. R-1. Residential use complying with all ordinance requirements, developed at the density permitted by chapter 18.2.5 Standards for Residential Zones. c. R-2 and R-3. Residential use complying with all ordinance requirements, developed at the density permitted by chapter 18.2.5 Standards for Residential Zones. d. C-1. The general retail commercial uses listed in chapter 18.2.2 Base Zones and Allowed Uses, developed at an intensity of 0.35 floor to area ratio, complying with all ordinance requirements; and within the Detailed Site Review overlay, at an intensity of 0.50 floor to area ratio, complying with all ordinance requirements. e. C-1-D. The general retail commercial uses listed in chapter 18.2.2 Base Zones and Allowed Uses, developed at an intensity of 1.00 gross floor to area ratio, complying with all ordinance requirements. f.E-1. The general office uses listed in chapter 18.2.2 Base Zones and Allowed Uses, developed at an intensity of 0.35 floor to area ratio, complying with all ordinance requirements; and within the Detailed Site Review overlay, at an intensity of 0.50 floor to area ratio, complying with all ordinance requirements. g. M-1. The general light industrial uses listed in chapter 18.2.2 Base Zones and Allowed Uses, complying with all ordinance requirements. h. CM-C1. The general light industrial uses listed in chapter 18.3.2 Croman Mill District, developed at an intensity of 0.50 gross floor to area ratio, complying with all ordinance requirements. i.CM-OE and CM-MU. The general office uses listed in chapter 18.3.2 Croman Mill District, developed at an intensity of 0.60 gross floor to area, complying with all ordinance requirements. k. CM-NC. The retail commercial uses listed in chapter 18.3.2 Croman Mill District, developed at an intensity of 0.60 gross floor to area ratio, complying with all ordinance requirements. l.HC, NM, and SOU. The permitted uses listed in chapters 18.3.3 Health Care Services, 18.3.5 North Mountain Neighborhood, and 18.3.6 Southern Oregon University District, respectively, complying with all ordinance requirements. chapter 18.5.4, are subject to Site Design accommodation in part 18-6. A. all of the following requirements. 1. An accommodation must meet all applicable building, fire, and related safety codes at all times and must be inspected by the Fire Department before occupancy following approval of a Conditional Use Permit and periodically thereafter pursuant to AMC 15.28. 2. The business-ess license and pay all transient occupancy tax in accordance with AMC 4.24 and AMC 6.04 as required. 3. Advertising for an accommodation must include the City planning action number assigned to the land use approval. 4. Offering the availability of residential property for use as an accommodation without a valid Conditional Use Permit approval, current business license and transient occupancy tax registration is prohibited and shall be subject to enforcement procedures. G:\\comm-dev\\Commissions & Committees\\Historic Commission\\Packets\\2015_packets\\2015-7-8\\266 Third\\PA-2015-00797.docx B. ll meet all of the following requirements. 1. The property is located within 200 feet of a boulevard, avenue, or neighborhood collector as identified on the Street Dedication Map in the Comprehensive Plan. Distances to the property from a boulevard, avenue, or neighborhood collector shall be measured via a public street or public alley to a lot line. 2. During operation of a traveler business-owner. "Business-owner" shall be defined as a person or persons who own the property and accommodation outright; or who have entered into a lease agreement with the property owner(s) allowing for the operation of the accommodation. Such lease agreement must specifically state that the property owner is not involved in the day-to-day operation or financial management of the accommodation and that the business-owner has actual ownership of the business and is wholly responsible for all operations associated with the accommodation, and has actual ownership of the business. 3. The primary residence on the site must be at least 20 years old. including expansion of floor area. Additional structures may be allowed to accommodate additional units, but must be in conformance with all setback and lot coverage standards of the underlying zone. a. The total number of units, including the business-owner's unit, shall be determined by dividing the total square footage of the lot by 1,800 square feet. Contiguous lots under the same ownership may be combined to increase lot area and the number of units, but not in excess of the maximum established by this ordinance. The maximum number of accommodation units shall not excee designated boulevard, but within 200 feet of a boulevard, avenue, or neighborhood collector street, the maximum number of units shall be seven. Street designations shall be as determined by the Street Dedication Map in the Comprehensive Plan. Distances to the property from a boulevard, avenue, or neighborhood collector shall be measured via a public street or public alley to a lot line. b. Excluding the business-owner's unit and the area of the structure it will occupy, there must be at least 400 square feet of gross interior floor space remaining per unit. 5. Each accommodation must have one off-street parking space and the business- in conformance with chapter 18.4.3. 6. Only one ground or wall sign, constructed of a non-plastic material, non-interior illuminated, and a maximum of six square feet total surface area is allowed. Any exterior illumination of signage shall be installed such that it does not directly illuminate any residential structures adjacent or nearby 50.C.1. 7. An annual inspection by the Jackson County Health Department shall be conducted as required by the laws of Jackson County or the State of Oregon. 8. Transfer of business-nts of this section and conform with the criteria of this section. Any further modifications beyond the existing approval shall be in conformance with all requirements of this section. C. following requirements. primary residence. The op isting of two or fewer bedrooms. Meals are not kitchen cooking facilities for the primary residence. must not exceed two people per bedroom. 4. The property must have two off- must not exceed one. 5. Signs are not permitted in conjunction wit G:\\comm-dev\\Commissions & Committees\\Historic Commission\\Packets\\2015_packets\\2015-7-8\\266 Third\\PA-2015-00797.docx PROJECT ASSIGNMENTS FOR PLANNING ACTIONS PA-2014-01956 Lithia & First All PA-2014-00710/711 143/135 Nutley Swink & Whitford PA-2014-01283 172 Skidmore Shostrom PA-2014-00251 30 S. First St Whitford BD-2013-00813 374 Hargadine Swink PA-2013-01828 310 Oak St. (Thompson) Shostrom PA-2014-02206 485 A Street Renwick PA-2015-00178 156 Van Ness Ave Kencairn PA -2015-00374 160 Lithia Way Emery PA-2015-00541 345 Lithia Way Giordano & Renwick PA-2015-00493 37 N. Main Skibby PA-2015-00878 35 S. Pioneer Ladygo -7-8\\Historic Commission Membership.doc 6/22/2015 2015 @ashland.or.us 9761) - 621 Mail - EAddressallison@mind.netshobro@jeffnet.org(Cell kswink@mind.netkerry@kencairnlandscape.comskwhippet@mind.netterryskibby321@msn.comtomarch@charter.netbill@ashlandhome.netallad@ashlandhome.netcarol@cou ncil.ashland.or.usmark.schexnayder@ashland.or.usregan.trapp 20442233 -- \\Commissions & Committees\\Historic Commission\\Packets\\2015_packets\\ dev WorkPhone552552 \\comm- G: HomePhone Membership List ASHLAND HISTORIC COMMISSION nning Dept. Mailing AddressCity of AshlandPlaCity of AshlandPlanning Dept. 7 20152015201620162015201620120172017 --------- 303030303030303030 --------- TermExpiration444444444 arol Voisin NameAllison RenwickDale ShostromKeith SwinkKerry KencairnSam WhitfordTerry SkibbyChairmanTom GiordanoBill EmeryAndrew LadygoCCouncil LiaisonMark SchexnayderRegan TrappAdmin. Staff July 2015 Ashland Historic Review Board Schedule Meet at 3:00pm, Lithia Room* July 9th July 16th July 23rd July 30th August 6th *Call 541-488-5305 to verify there are items on the agenda to review