Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011-06-22 Housing PACKET Ashland Housing Commission Regular Meeting Agenda nd Wednesday, June 22, 2011: 4:30 – 6:30pm Council Chambers – 1175 East Main Street 1. (4:30) Approval of Minutes (5 min) thth April 27 2011 and May 25 2011 2. (4:35) Public Forum (5 min) 3. (4.40) Pedestrian Places Project (30 min) Brandon Goldman-Long Range Planner 4.(5:10)Manufactured Dwellings and Parks (20 min) Brandon Goldman-Long Range Planner 5.(5:30) Clay Street Options and Recommendation to the Council (30 min) Staff 6.(6:00)Liaison Reports (20 min) Liaison Reports Council (Mike Morris) Parks Commission(Billin & Waters) School Board(Dills) Planning Commission(Pons) Transportation (Ayars) SOU Staff(Linda Reid) th 7.(6:20)July 27, 2011 MeetingAgenda Items (5 min) Commissioner items suggested(5 min) Quorum Check – Commissioners not available to attend upcoming regular meetings should declare their expected absence. 8.(6.25)Upcoming Events and Meetings Homeless Task Force Meeting- July 19, 2011: 10:30-12:00: Housing Authority Conference Room 2231 Table Rock Road, Medford Next Housing Commission Regular Meeting 4:30-6:30 PM; July 27, 2011 9. (6:30) Adjournment In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the Community Development office at 541-488-5305 (TTY phone is 1-800-735-2900). Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to the meeting(28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title 1). ASHLAND HOUSING COMMISSION MINUTES April 27, 2011 CALL TO ORDER ChairRegina Ayars called the meeting to order at 4:32 p.m. at the Council Chambers located at 1175 East Main St. Ashland, OR 97520. Commissioners Present:Council Liaison Nikki PonsMike Morris Regina Ayars Barb Barasa Staff Present: Ben ScottLinda Reid, Housing Specialist James Dills Carolyn Schwendener, Account Clerk Commissioners Absent: Jody Waters, excused Richard Billin, excused APPROVAL OF MINUTES Dills/Pons m/s to approve the minutes of the March 23, 2011 regular Housing Commission meeting. Voice Vote: All Ayes. The minutes from the March 23, 2011 meeting were approved as presented. PUBLIC FORUM No one spoke At the last Housing Commission meeting Pons reported that she would be leaving town and will be resigning from the Commission. Her plans have since changed and she is not leaving town at this time and has decided to remain on the Commission. She did not submit a letter of resignation. The Commissioners discussed the idea of reducing the required amount of members on the Commission from nine to seven. Morris said the Planning Commission is also discussing the idea of reducing their members to seven from nine. Barasa/Scott m/s that we ask City Council to reduce the number of voting members from nine to seven. Morris will move the motion forward to the Council and bring back the decision to next month’s meeting. ASHLAND COMMUNITY LAND T-UPDATE ON ACTIVITIES Krista Bolf, Board member of ACLT spoke. Bolf explained that the Land Trust was originally formed almost fifteen years ago as a collaboration between the Housing Commission, the City of Ashland and ACCESS, Inc. with a mission to provide affordable housing in the City of Ashland. The concept of the Land Trust was that the land remains in a trust so that upon resale the entity; (ACLT) would keep the land affordable by having the right of first refusal and basically the controller of the land. ACLT does this on behalf of the City of Ashland as almost all of the funding has been provided through CDBG funds. ACLT has been able to do the projects using volunteer Board members rather than paid staff. It is becoming more and more difficult for the volunteers to maintain the work that needs to be done as well as doing their real jobs. Krista presented the idea to the Commission of doing a merger or changing their status. ACLT is considering merging with another non-profit housing organization, most likely ACCESS or possibly Groundwork’s. Krista said they welcome ideas and suggestion from the Commissioners. Steve Ennis, Board member of ACLT gave an overview of their properties. Currently ACLT has sixteen different units with two more under construction for a total of thirty-eight occupants, six land leases and ten rentals. The rentals vary in rent from $350 to $620. All tenants or lease holders fall within the fifty to sixty percent AMI range. ACCESS manages most of 1 the ACLT properties at this time. Mr. Ennis acknowledged that the Bridge Street property (410 & 412 Bridge) is coming along quite nicely and is scheduled to occupy by June of this year. Currently the project was designed for rentals but in the long term might be for sale. SOUTHERN OREGON HOUSING RESOURCE CENTER-OVERVIEW Karen Cooper, Housing Resource Specialist with ACCESS Inc and Kari Davis from Rogue Federal Credit Union KDRV and the Home Builders Association were present to discuss their programs and their resources for Foreclosure Prevention. ACCESS has been the Community Action Agency for Southern Oregon since 1976 and the HUD certified Housing Counseling Agency since 1991. They are the resource for Foreclosure Prevention. ACCESS has served thirty-five home owners last year and expects to exceed those numbers this year. Examples of assistance are; Loan modifications, special forbearance, repayment agreements, short sales, deed-in-lieu of foreclosure and foreclosure timelines. ACCESS has affordable rentals available for those who might need another place to live. ACCESS served six hundred and twenty-one home owners in their Housing Resource Center. They are seeing an increase in Ashland residence seeking their help. In 2009 RVCU partnered with KDRV and Jackson County Home Builders Association to form a program called Building Hope. Since the program began they have had over 3200 people attend their classes. Three classes are offered. 1. Crisis Budgeting 2. Modification process, updates regarding new laws and resources 3. Attorney, John Hanson, discusses the foreclosure process, home owner rights, what to watch out for, how to avoid scams, options, short sales, bankruptcy. It becomes like a town Hall meeting with questions for free legal advice. The Commissioners would like to be able to offer these classes locally for Ashland residents. What would be needed is a venue in order to have them. COMMUNITY AND SHELTER ASSISTANCE CORPORATION MEETING-OVERVIEW Commissioner Barasa gave a short update regarding her past presentation on Manufactured Housing and Manufactured Home Parks. Barasa’s vision is that individual people could use manufactured housing for cheaper housing by putting the homes on their own lots or build a land trust model where an agency would own the land and lease the land at a reduced amount. In her exploration of what was available Barasa found two options ROC USA, (Residential Owned Communities) and CASA (Community and Shelter Assistance Organization). Barasa met with the executive director of CASA,Peter Hainley. Hainley directed her to two promotional videos. Barasa showed one of the videos to the Commissioners explaining their program. Barasa had three suggested goals for the Commissioners 1. Include language in the Comprehensive Plan stating that preservation of manufactured housing is a priority. 2. Find out how the City can facilitate conversion of existing parks to ROC when possible 3. Review and possibly change LUO for manufactured housing. Reid acknowledged that at the regular planning staff meeting inconsistencies found throughout the land use code and specifically the Manufactured Home sections were discussed. Reid will find out when those updates will be completed. ACTION PLAN REVIEW AND APPROVAL The City of Ashland is an entitlement community under the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) CDBG Program. Reid reported that for the 2011 program year the City has received notification from HUD that it anticipates a funding reduction to the CDBG program of approximately 16.5%. The Housing Commission is charged to hold this public hearing to take comments regarding the use of CDBG funds and to make a recommendation regarding the 2011 Action Plan for the use of CDBG funds in order to fulfill the HUD requirements for public participation and review. No public input was given. 2 Dills/Scott m/s to approve the motion suggested by staff.“To approve the 2011 CDBG Action Plan with grant awards as presented with the understanding that final awards may be modified to reflect an anticipated 16.5% reduction in 2011- 2012 CDBG program funding as presented in the memo dated 4/26/2011 or in accordance with the final funding amount from HUD.” Voice Vote:All Ayes. Motion passed. HOUSING COMMISSION GOAL REVIEW AND DISCUSSION 1. Evaluate Housing/Demographic mix to better promote needed housing types that match the demographics of the Ashland community. Pons will work with Reid on an Ad-Hoc committee to address this goal. Reid said that the rental registry and ordinance has gone forward as part of the business license registry. 2. Preservation of vulnerable properties. Last year the Commissioners took a tour of the properties. Reid will update the list of vulnerable properties and bring it back to next month’s meeting. 3. Clay Street – remaining acre developed as workforce housing. The City Planning Department will be coming presenting option to the Council. Reid will send out an email to the Housing Commissioners with an update of what the options are. Ayars is interested in following through with this goal. 4. Foreclosure Prevention – Put together an informational brochure of resources for homeowners facing foreclosure. Provide education and outreach to homeowners facing foreclosure to insure that they are able to maintain stable housing options. It was suggested to host a presentation by Karen Cooper and Kari Davis the two ladies in Ashland to share with the public the information that they provided for the Commissioners. Perhaps at the Library. Reid will find out when they will be available. Maybe two separate times to meet everyone’s schedule. 5. Identify a permanent funding source for the Housing Trust Fund. Dills and Billin are working on this goal. They will have an update at next month’s meeting. The Commissioners have agreed to have a Request For Proposal in the CDBG cycle next year. Funds would be awarded in the Spring. REPORTS AND UPDATES Liaison Reports Council – Morris reported that at last month’s Council meeting the Councilors discussed the property at Bud’s Dairy off of Dollarhide. The Councilors concern was that the property can only be used for affordable housing so why was it so expensive? Wondered if the price had been negotiated at all. Parks– No report School Board – No report Planning – No report Transportation – Ayars attended the Transportation commission meeting though nothing on their agenda was related to housing. Their main topic was about the upcoming North Main Road Diet. SOU- No report Staff – No report MAY 25, 2011 MEETING AGENDA ITEMS Quorum Check – everyone will be here. UPCOMING EVENTS AND MEETINGS Homeless Task Force Meeting – May 17, 2011: 10:30-12:00 Housing Authority Conference Room 2231, Table Rock Rd, Medford City Council Meeting (ad-hoc Committee appointment & final grant awards)-April 5, 2011: 7:00 PM Council Chambers Next Housing Commission Regular Meeting 4:30-6:30 PM; May 25, 2011, Council Chambers, 1175 East Main Street ADJOURNMENT - The meeting was adjourned at 6:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted by Carolyn Schwendener 3 ll housing. Ý Nbsdi!3122 UTQ!Vqebuf Djuz!pg!Btimboe Qfeftusjbo!Qmbdf Potential for growth as a neighborhood center with civic, educational and arts uses plus affordable in- O/!Npvoubjo!Bwfovf!boe!F/!Nbjo!Tusffu! eld to remain. Ý ll housing. Provide a new ÓgridÔ of walking routes to the center. Ý Priority Streetscape ImprovementsOpportunities for Future ConnectionsGathering PlacePedestrian Crossing Enhancements small arts neighborhood.educational communities. Wjtjpo!Tubufnfou;!Potential for growth as a neighborhood center with civic, educational and arts uses and affordable in-Tipsu!Ufsn!Pqqpsuvojuz!Tjuft;Pqqpsuvojuz!Tjuf!B!¤ Privately owned mostly vacant property. ¤ Could provide affordable housing choices and live/work spaces. ¤ Could provide educational related employment or neighborhood retail. Pqqpsuvojuz!Tjuf!C!¤ Arts Academy building re-use.¤ Potential for future studio space and classroom space, which could anchor a Pqqpsuvojuz!Tjuf!D¤ Existing under-utilized single family residential homes.¤ Could expand affordable housing and live/work opportunities. Pqqpsuvojuz!Tjuf!E¤ High school ball ¤ Potential to improve the pedestrian environment at the intersection.Pqqpsuvojuz!Tjuf!G¤ Civic center fore court.¤ Potential gathering place for civic related activities.Mpoh!Ufsn!Pqqpsuvojuz!Tjuft;Pqqpsuvojuz!Tjuf!F¤ Existing single-family residential homes.¤ Potential for mixed commercial and residential uses. Pqqpsuvojuz!Tjuf!H¤ Public works buildings.¤ Could provide housing choices for people who are part of the artist, civic, or Mfhfoe O/!Npvoubjo!boe!F/!Nbjo!Qfeftusjbo!QmbdfOfjhicpsippe!Efwfmpqnfou!boe!Djsdvmbujpo!Pqqpsuvojujft !fme!Qbsl HbsÑ Pqqpsuvojuz!Tjuf!H Pqqpsuvojuz!Tjuf!GPqqpsuvojuz!Tjuf!F Pqqpsuvojuz!Tjuf!E High School O/!Npvoubjo!Bwf Ijhi!Tdippm Pqqpsuvojuz!Tjuf!C Pqqpsuvojuz!Tjuf!D / u Pqqpsuvojuz!Tjuf!B l mT ! b o j X ! b f u N v ! / o j F N ! 6 Djuz!pg!Btimboe-!UTQ!Vqebuf 3 4 Djuz!pg!Btimboe-!UTQ!Vqebuf -6 Parking Spaces (.75 spaces/unit)-7 Parking Spaces (1.5 spaces/1,000 sf)-12 Parking Spaces (.75 space/unit)-7 Parking Spaces (1.5 spaces/1,000 sf)-12 Parking Spaces (.75 space/unit) Bsut-!Fevdbujpo!boe!Bggpsebcjmjuz¤ Adaptive re-use of two buildings to support local art¤ Outdoor spaces for installation of public art¤ Modestly sized, affordable apartments ¤ Civic and educational uses nearby Usbotqpsubujpo!boe!Tusffutdbqf!Jnqspwfnfout¤ Enhanced sidewalks and intersection ¤ 10 opportunities for additional neighborhood connectivity¤ Transit-supportive densities for restoring bus service¤ Reduced parking areas¤ Pedestrian-friendly building design¤ Transportation and Streetscape Improvements Dpodfqu!Qmbo Efwfmpqnfou!Tvnnbsz Cvjmejoh!B;!3.Tupsz!Bqbsunfou!Cvjmejoh¤ 8 Apartments Cvjmejoh!C;!3.Tupsz!Njyfe.vtf!Cvjmejoh¤ General Retail Space Ï 1-2 shops¤ 16 Apartments Cvjmejoh!D;!3.Tupsz!Njyfe .vtf!Cvjmejoh¤ General Retail Space Ï 1-2 shops ¤ 16 Apartments Ijtupsjd!Ipnf!bt!Qpufoujbm!Tuvejp!0!Hbmmfsz!Tqbdf¤ 6 Parking Spaces Bdijfwbcmf!Efotjuz¤ 22 Ï 24 duelling units / acre (With preservation of historic home¤ FAR= 0.66:1 Gjfme Btimboe! Ijhi!Tdippm! Qspqptfe!Sfubjojoh!XbmmQbslspx!xjui!Qpufoujbm!gps!Tupsnxbufs!QmboufstDvssfou!Qspqfsuz!Mjoft)Uzqjdbm*1É.21É!Cvjmejoh!TfucbdlQfeftusjbo!Dspttjoh O/!Npvoubjo!Bwf Cvjmejoh!D Fyjtujoh!Bsut! Bdbefnz!Cvjmejoh Usfbunfou!Bsfb Qpufoujbm!Tupsnxbufs! F/!Nbjo!Tusffu Bebqujwf!Vtf!pg!Fyjtujoh!Ijtupsjd!Ipnf!bt!Bsu!Hbmmfsz Cvjmejoh!BCvjmejoh!C up!Sfnbjo Gvuvsf!Dpoofdujpo Tfnj.qvcmjd! Fyjtujoh!Usfft! Qpufoujbm!Ofjhicpsippe! Hbuifsjoh!Tqbdf! xjui!Pvuepps!Bsu Public Art Psobnfoubm!Tusffu!Mjhiujoh!)Qfs!Djuz!Tuboebse* Section A Qfeftusjbo!Qmbdf!Tusffutdbqf!Gfbuvsft O/!Npvoubjo!Bwf Cjdzdmf!Qbsljoh Tusffu!Gvsojtijoht!Bsfb F/!Nbjo!Tusffu Section B Dpsofs!Fousz!Sfrvjsfe Cvt!Tupq!xjui!Tifmufs Bqqspyjnbufmz!8.gffu Tjefxbml!Dpssjeps!Efejdbujpo f 9É9É TjefxbmlTjefxbml 26É 32É 8É8É QbslspxQbslspx Qfeftusjbo!Qmbdf!Cvggfs!\[pof Qfeftusjbo!Qmbdf!Cvggfs!\[pof Usbwfm!MboftUsbwfm!Mboft Bqqspyjnbufmz!81ÉBqqspyjnbufmz!81É Gvuvsf!Sjhiu.pg.XbzGvuvsf!Sjhiu.pg.Xbz Tfdujpo!B!—!Mppljoh!OpsuiTfdujpo!C!—!Mppljoh!Xftu Fyjtujoh!Spbexbz!boe!Dvsc!Dpoejujpot!up!SfnbjoFyjtujoh!Spbexbz!boe!Dvsc!Dpoejujpot!up!Sfnbjo O/!Npvoubjo!Bwfovf!Gvuvsf!JnqspwfnfoutF/!Nbjo!Tusffu!Gvuvsf!Jnqspwfnfout 7É7É Cjlf!GbdjmjuzCjlf!Gbdjmjuz 8É8É 32É QbslspxQbslspx 26É Bqqspyjnbufmz!8.gffu 9É9É Qfeftusjbo!Qmbdf!Cvggfs!\[pof Tjefxbml!Dpssjeps!Efejdbujpo Bqqspyjnbufmz!4.gffu TjefxbmlTjefxbml Tjefxbml!Dpssjeps!Efejdbujpo Qfeftusjbo!Qmbdf!Cvggfs!\[pof Djuz!pg!Btimboe-!UTQ!Vqebuf 5 Tusffutdbqf!boe!Qvcmjd!Bsu 6 Djuz!pg!Btimboe-!UTQ!Vqebuf Eftjhojoh!uif!Qvcmjd!Sfbmn Xfbuifs!Qspufdujpo)Sbjo!ps!Tvo*Tusffu!Gvsojtijoh!\[pof!)Cvt!Tifmufs-!Cjlf!Sbdl!fud/*Ejtqmbz!Xjoepxt 7É.21É Tfbujoh!\[pof Cvjmejoh!Gspoubhf!boe0ps!Pvuepps! oor galleries visible Þ oor windows for the Þ across from a revitalized Arts Academy. ork spaces with ground 7É!up!21É Qfeftusjbo!Uispvhi!\[pof ow-through stormwater planters and building articulations with ground Þ 6É!up!9É Usfbunfou!\[pof Gvsojtijoh!boe!Tupsn!Xbufs! Qvcmjd!Sfbmn!Gfbuvsft Primary streetscape character elements are the Green Street design with shops located near the intersection and residential units located near mid-block. The residential units could be artist live/wfrom street. Near the intersection a paved sidewalk furnishing zone accommodates a bus shelter, bike racks and outdoor seating Cjdzdmf!Mbof Tupsn!Xbufs!Usfbunfou mercial uses. Nbsdi!3122 UTQ!Vqebuf Djuz!pg!Btimboe Qfeftusjbo!Qmbdf Creating a pedestrian-friendly environment requires improved pedestrian connectivity, and a balance between residential and com Upmnbo!Dsffl!Spbe!boe!Btimboe!Tusffu gured Ý Neighborhood CirculationPriority Streetscape ImprovementsOpportunities for Future ConnectionsGathering PlacePedestrian Crossing Enhancements commercial uses.commercial uses.uses of sites. Wjtjpo!Tubufnfou;!Creating a pedestrian-friendly environment requires greatly improved pedestrian connectivity, a more block-like street pattern, and a balance between residential and commercial uses.Tipsu!Ufsn!Pqqpsuvojuz!Tjuft Pqqpsuvojuz!Tjuf!B¤ Privately owned under utilized property (one parcel not in city limits).¤ Could provide housing opportunities to balance the preponderance of Pqqpsuvojuz!Tjuf!C!¤ Privately owned under utilized property.¤ Could provide housing opportunities to balance the preponderance of ¤ Could diversify retail and employment uses.Pqqpsuvojuz!Tjuf!D¤ Privately owned under utilized property.¤ Could provide employment uses or incubator spaces for small businesses. Mpoh!Ufsn!Pqqpsuvojuz!Tjuft Pqqpsuvojuz!Tjuft!E- !F-!boe!G¤ Primarily parking areas for existing uses.¤ These sites could potentially accommodate new buildings or recon¤ Creating new retail or mixed use opportunities.Mfhfoe * Street connection to be coordinated with TSP update. Upmnbo!Dsffl!Spbe!Qfeftusjbo!QmbdfOfjhicpsippe!Efwfmpqnfou!boe!Djsdvmbujpo!Pqqpsuvojujft * Pqqpsuvojuz!Tjuf!D Btimboe!Tusffu Pqqpsuvojuz!Tjuf!G Pqqpsuvojuz!Tjuf!F Upmnbo!Dsffl!Spbe ZNDB l m b X ! f u v o j N ! 6 Pqqpsuvojuz!Tjuf!B Pqqpsuvojuz!Tjuf!E Djuz!pg!Btimboe-!UTQ!Vqebuf Pqqpsuvojuz!Tjuf!C 3 4 Djuz!pg!Btimboe-!UTQ!Vqebuf ce and retail complementary to existing commercial uses ce Space Ï 15,000 sf. Ý Ý -45 Parking Spaces (.75 spaces/unit)-23 Parking Spaces (1.5 spaces/1,000 sf)-15 Parking Spaces (1 space/1,000 sf) Cbmbodjoh!Sftjefoujbm!boe!Dpnnfsdjbm!Vtft¤ Housing choices and locations not currently available¤ Of¤ Modestly sized, affordable apartments Usbotqpsubujpo!boe!Tusffutdbqf!Jnqspwfnfout¤ Enhanced sidewalks and intersection ¤ 12 opportunities for additional neighborhood connectivity¤ Transit-supportive densities for frequent service¤ Reduced parking areas¤ Pedestrian-friendly building design Dpodfqu!Qmbo Efwfmpqnfou!Tvnnbsz Cvjmejoh!B;!3.Tupsz!Bqbsunfou!Cvjmejoh¤ 60 Apartments Cvjmejoh!C;!3.Tupsz!Njyfe.vtf!Cvjmejoh¤ General Retail Space Ï 6-10 shops ¤ Of Bdijfwbcmf!Efotjuz¤ 25 Ï 30 duelling units / acre¤ FAR= 0.67:1 Fyjtujoh!Po.tusffu!Qbsljoh!up!Sfnbjo1“.21“!Cvjmejoh!TfucbdlQsjwbuf!Pvuepps!TqbdfQbslspx!xjui!Qpufoujbm!gps!Tupsnxbufs!QmboufstDvssfou!Qspqfsuz!Mjoft)Uzqjdbm* Upmnbo!Dsffl!Spbe Cvjmejoh!BCvjmejoh!C Btimboe!Tusffu Qfeftusjbo!Dspttjoh Fyjtujoh!Cblfsz !hvsfe! bddftt* Xbmlxbz Beejujpobm! Qfeftusjbo! Pqqpsuvojujft Tibsfe!Qbsljoh! qbsljoh!tqbdft!up! bddpnnpebuf!tjuf! Psobnfoubm!Tusffu!Mjhiujoh!)Qfs!Djuz!Tuboebse* Tqfdjbm!Joufstfdujpo!Qbwfnfou Section A Upmnbo!Dsffl!Spbe Qfeftusjbo!Qmbdf!Tusffutdbqf!Gfbuvsft Stormwater Planter with On-street Parking Section B Cjdzdmf!Qbsljoh Tusffu!Gvsojtijoht!Bsfb Stormwater Planter Dpsofs!Fousz!SfrvjsfeBtimboe!Tusffu Cvt!Tupq! xjui!Tifmufs Bqqspyjnbufmz!8.gffu Tjefxbml!Dpssjeps!Efejdbujpo 9“ Tjefxbml 32“ 8“ Bqqspyjnbufmz!8.gffu Gvsojti!\[pof Tjefxbml!Dpssjeps!Efejdbujpo Qfeftusjbo!Qmbdf!Cvggfs!\[pof 9“ 7“ Tjefxbml Cjlf!Gbdjmjuz 32“ 8“ Qbslspx Qfeftusjbo!Qmbdf!Cvggfs!\[pof Usbwfm!Mboft Usbwfm!Mboft Bqqspyjnbufmz!85“ Bqqspyjnbufmz!211“ Gvuvsf!Sjhiu.pg.Xbz Gvuvsf!Sjhiu.pg.Xbz Tfdujpo!B!—!Mppljoh!OpsuiTfdujpo!C!—!Mppljoh!Xftu Fyjtujoh!Spbexbz!boe!Dvsc!Dpoejujpot!up!Sfnbjo Fyjtujoh!Spbexbz!boe!Dvsc!Dpoejujpot!up!Sfnbjo Btimboe!Tusffu!Gvuvsf!Jnqspwfnfout Upmnbo!Dsffl!Spbe!Gvuvsf!Jnqspwfnfout 7“7“ Cjlf!GbdjmjuzCjlf!Gbdjmjuz 8“ 32“ Qbslspx Bqqspyjnbufmz!:.gffu 7“ Tjefxbml!Dpssjeps!Efejdbujpo 9“ Qfeftusjbo!Qmbdf!Cvggfs!\[pof Cjlf!Gbdjmjuz Tjefxbml 8“ 32“ Gvsojti!\[pof Djuz!pg!Btimboe-!UTQ!Vqebuf Bqqspyjnbufmz!8.gffu 9“ Qfeftusjbo!Qmbdf!Cvggfs!\[pof Tjefxbml!Dpssjeps!Efejdbujpo Tjefxbml 5 Hsffo!Tusffu!boe!Joufstfdujpo!Eftjho!Gfbuvsft 6 Djuz!pg!Btimboe-!UTQ!Vqebuf Eftjhojoh!uif!Qvcmjd!Sfbmn Psobnfoubm!Tusffu!Mjhiu!.!Qfs!Djuz!TuboebseTusfffutdbqf!Dibsbdufs!FmfnfoutTupsn!Xbufs!Usfbnfou!)Tubsut!bu!51“!Gspn!Joufstfdujpo*Tusffu!Gvsojtijoh!\[pof!)Cvt!Tifmufs-!Cjlf!Sbdl!fud/*Dzdmf!Mbof 6“!up!9“try and building setback, Usfbunfou!\[pof Gvsojtijoh!boe!Tupsn!Xbufs! 7“!up21“ Qfeftusjbo!Uispvhi!\[pof ow-through stormwater planters, ornamental street lights with banners and a Þ Ejtqmbz 21“!Bmmpxbcmf! Tfucbdl!gps!Tfbujoh0 oor windows help create a more comfortable pedestrian environment alongside an inhospitable street. Þ Dpsofs!Qmb{b 21“!Bmmpxbcmf!Tfucbdl!boe! Qvcmjd!Sfbmn!Gfbuvsft Primary streetscape character elements are the Green Street design with paved sidewalk furnishing zone near the intersection to accommodate bus shelters, bike racks and outdoor seating. The corner enbuilding articulations and large ground Usfbunfou Dpsofs!Qmb{b )Sbjo!ps!Tvo* Dpsofs!Fousz Xfbuifs!Qspufdujpo Dpsofs!Bsdijufduvsbm! Nbsdi!3122 UTQ!Vqebuf Djuz!pg!Btimboe Potential to become a university district neighborhood hub. Qfeftusjbo!Qmbdf Xbmlfs!Bwfovf!boe!Btimboe!Tusffu! tness center are a great mix of places to Ý Priority Streetscape ImprovementsOpportunities for Future ConnectionsGathering PlacePedestrian Crossing EnhancementsPlanned SOU Master plan choices.support the campus needs, but these existing uses lack connectivity and a cohesive site plan.create gathering places, and provide more retail entertainment uses.university development. Mfhfoe Wjtjpo!Tubufnfou;!Potential to become a university district neighborhood hub. New development and streetscape changes will tie the north and south areas of the SOU campus together with places for people to gather, shop, live, and work.Tipsu!Ufsn!Pqqpsuvojuz!Tjuft;Pqqpsuvojuz!Tjuf!B!¤ Privately owned vacant property. ¤ Could provide neighborhood-scale employment and affordable housing Pqqpsuvojuz!Tjuf!C!)qpufoujbm!qibtf!efwfmpqnfou*!¤ Phase 1: Could provide additional commercial mixed-use development. ¤ Phase 2: Could retain and intensify affordable housing choices. Mpoh!Ufsn!Pqqpsuvojuz!Tjuft;Pqqpsuvojuz!Tjuft!D-!E-!F!'!G¤ Grocery, retail, restaurants, and a ¤ Redevelopment over time could improve streetscape, pedestrian-scale design, !Tpvuifso!Psfhpo!Vojwfstjuz!Efwfmpqnfou!Nbtufs!Qmbo¤ Explore opportunities to integrate pedestrian place features into future Xbmlfs!Bwfovf!boe!Btimboe!Tusffu!Qfeftusjbo!QmbdfOfjhicpsippe!Efwfmpqnfou!boe!Djsdvmbujpo!Pqqpsuvojujft Pqqpsuvojuz!Tjuf!B Btimboe!Tu/! Pqqpsuvojuz!Tjuf!C!)qibtf!3* Pqqpsuvojuz!Tjuf!C!)qibtf!2* Xbmlfs!Bwf/ Tpvuifso!Psfhpo!Vojwfstjuz!Efwfmpqnfou!Nbtufs!Qmbo Pqqpsuvojuz!Tjuf!G l m b X ! f u v o j N ! Pqqpsuvojuz!Tjuf!F 6 Pqqpsuvojuz!Tjuf!E Pqqpsuvojuz!Tjuf!D Djuz!pg!Btimboe-!UTQ!Vqebuf 3 4 Djuz!pg!Btimboe-!UTQ!Vqebuf locations not currently availablemaster planservice Mpoh!Ufsn!Dpodfqu!Qmbo Efwfmpqnfou!Tvnnbsz Cvjmejoh!B;!3.4!Tupsz!Njyfe.vtf¤ 7 shops¤ 30 apartments Cvjmejoh!C;!2!Tupsz!Sfubjm¤ 1-2 shops Cvjmejoh!D;!2!Tupsz!Sfubjm!¤ 1-2 shops Cvjmejoh!E;!3!Tupsz!Sft jefoujbm¤ 16 apartments Cvjmejoh!F;!4!Tupsz!Njyfe.vtf¤ 6 shops¤ 34 apartments Cvjmejoh!G;!2.3!Tupsz!Hspdfsz!Tupsf¤ 20,000-30,000 sf.Cvjmejoh!H;!3!Tupsz!Gjuoftt!Dmvc¤ 8,000 sf.Qbsljoh;¤ Reduced parking ratios.GBS>!1/6:;2 Dsfbujoh!b!Vojwfstjuz!Ivc¤ Multiple, affordable housing choices and ¤ New retail, grocery and entertainment uses¤ Potential to complement SOU long-term ¤ Festival street for public gathering Usbotqpsubujpo!boe!Tusffutdbqf!!!!!!!!!Jnqspwfnfout¤ Enhanced sidewalks and intersection ¤ Enhanced connectivity and street crossings¤ Transit-supportive densities for frequent ¤ Reduced parking areas¤ Pedestrian-friendly building design Cvt!TupqGftujwbm!TusffuHspdfsz!Tupsf Xbmlfs!Bwfovf Cvjmejoh!G Cvjmejoh!F Qmb{b Qbsljoh 3!Tupsz!Sftjefoujbm!Cvjmejoh4!Tupsz!Njyfe.vtf!Cvjmejoh Qbsljoh Btimboe!Tusffu E Cvjmejoh! Cvjmejoh!H / e w m C ! v p z j l t j T D Cvjmejoh!C Cvjmejoh! Gjuoftt!Dmvc Qbsljoh Cvjmejoh!B 2!Tupsz!Sfubjm!Cvjmejoh Tibsfe!Tqbdf!Tusffu 3.4!Tupsz!Njyfe.vtf!CvjmejohPo.tusffu!Qbsljoh!xjui!Tupsnxbufs!Qmboufst guration of all parking to promote new Ý Qpufoujbm!TPV!Cvjmejoh!boe!Qmb{b-!Dpnqmfnfoubsz!up!Gftujwbm!TusffuTqfdjbm!Joufstfdujpo!QbwfnfouWfoepst-!Dbsut!ps!CppuitQpufoujbm!Qsjwbuf!Tqbdf-!Dpnqmfnfoubsz!up!uif!Gftujwbm!TusffuTibsfe!Tqbdf!gps!Us vdl!Efmjwfsz!boe!Pddbtjpobm!Gftujwbmt!)Tff!Opuf!2*Xbmlfs!Bwfovf!Gftujwbm!Tusffu!xjui!Gmvti!DvsctDvssfou!Qspqfsuz!Mjoft)Uzqjdbm*Qpufoujbm!gps!Gvuvsf!EfwfmpqnfouFyjtujoh!Xbmm Note 1: Location of vendors, carts or booths coordinated with delivery schedules of market. Truck ingress and egress from Walker Street. Note 2: Scenario assumes minor re-development and re-conpedestrian connections Xbmlfs!Bwf t t f o u j G f d j p i D ! g p ! u f l s b N Qbslspx!xjui!Qpufoujbm! gps!Tupsnxbufs!Qmboufst m f u p N ! t s f c n j U Qspqptfe!Qfeftusjbo! Dspttjoh!Foibodfnfou / e w m C ! Qpufoujbm!Qfeftusjbo! v p z Xbmlxbz!)Tff!Opuf!3* j l t j Sfoubm T Tibsfe!Tqbdf!gps! Qfeftusjbot!boe!Dbst Sftubvsbou!0!Wjefp! Dsfbujoh!b!Vojwfstjuz!Ivc¤ Potential to complement SOU long-term master plan¤ Plaza space for food carts and vendors¤ Festival street for public gathering Usbotqpsubujpo!boe!Tusffutdbqf!Jnqspwfnfout¤ Enhanced sidewalks and intersection ¤ Enhanced connectivity and street crossings¤ Pedestrian-friendly street corners Djuz!pg!Btimboe-!UTQ!Vqebuf Btimboe!Tusffu 5 Ofbs!Ufsn!Dpodfqu!Qmbo 6 Festival Street Btimboe!Tusffu Section A Psobnfoubm!Tusffu!Mjhiujoh!)Qfs!Djuz!Tuboebse*Tusffu!Gvsojtijoht!BsfbCvt!Tupq!xjui!Tifmufs Djuz!pg!Btimboe-!UTQ!Vqebuf Xbmlfs!Bwfovf Qfeftusjbo!Qmbdf!Tusffutdbqf!Gfbuvsft Gftujwbm!Tusffu!boe!Joufstfdujpo!Eftjho!Gfbuvsft Section B Bqqspyjnbufmz!5.gffu Tjefxbml!Dpssjeps!Efejdbujpo 9“ Tjefxbml 32“ 8“ Qbslspx Bqqspyjnbufmz!3.gffu Tjefxbml!Dpssjeps!Efejdbujpo Qfeftusjbo!Qmbdf!Cvggfs!\[pof 7“ Cjlf!Gbdjmjuz 26“ Qfeftusjbo!Pomz Gmvti!Dvsc Tibsfe!TqbdfUsbwfm!Mboft Bqqspyjnbufmz!75“ Bqqspyjnbufmz!211“ Gvuvsf!Sjhiu.pg.Xbz Gvuvsf!Sjhiu.pg.Xbz Tfdujpo!B!—!Mppljoh!TpvuiTfdujpo!C!—!Mppljoh!Xftu Fyjtujoh!Spbexbz!boe!Dvsc!Dpoejujpot!up!Sfnbjo Xbmlfs!Bwfovf!Gvuvsf!JnqspwfnfoutBtimboe!Tusffu!Gvuvsf!Jnqspwfnfout 26“ Qfeftusjbo!Pomz Bqqspyjnbufmz!3.gffu Tjefxbml!Dpssjeps!Efejdbujpo 7“ Cjlf!Gbdjmjuz 8“ Qbslspx 32“ 9“ Bqqspyjnbufmz!9.gffu Qfeftusjbo!Qmbdf!Cvggfs!\[pof Tjefxbml!Dpssjeps!Efejdbujpo Tjefxbml Ashland Land Use Code Manufactured Homes R-2 and R-3 Permitted use: I. Manufactured homes on individual lots, subject to the following criteria: 1. The portion of the lot on which the manufactured home is to be located shall not exceed a slope of 10% prior to excavation or fill on the parcel. 2. The manufactured home shall be multi-sectional, no less than 28 feet in width, and have a minimum enclosed floor area of 1,000 sq. ft. 3. The manufactured home shall have a roof pitch of a minimum of 14 degrees (3 feet in height for each 12 feet in width). 4. The manufactured home shall have no metal siding or roofing, and shall have wood or wood-product siding and composition roofing, or approved equivalent. 5. The manufactured home shall have an auxiliary storage building or garage at least 14 x 20 feet in area, constructed of similar materials as that used on the exterior of the manufactured home. 6. The manufactured home shall be certified by the manufacturer to meet the thermal envelope requirements equivalent to those for a single-family dwelling constructed under the State Building Code. 7. The manufactured home shall be placed on an excavated and back-filled foundation and enclosed at the perimeter such that the manufactured home is located not more than 12 inches above grade, and complying with the minimum set-up standards of the adopted state Administrative Rules for Manufactured Dwellings, Chapter 918. 8. The foundation area of the manufactured home shall be fully skirted. 9. The manufactured home shall not be located in the Ashland Historic Interest Area, as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. 10. The manufactured home shall incorporate at least two of the design features listed in 18.20.020 A. above. 1. Dormers 2. Gables 3. Recessed entries 4. Covered porch entries 5. Cupolas 6. Pillars or posts 7. Bay window (min. 12" projection) 8. Eaves (min. 6" projection) 9. Off-sets in building face or roof (min. 16") R-2 and R-3 Conditional Use: C: Manufactured housing developments subject to Chapter 18.84. 18.84 Manufactured Housing Developments 18.84.010 Purpose The purpose of this chapter is to encourage the most appropriate use of land for manufacturing housing development purposes, to encourage design standards which will create pleasing appearances, to provide sufficient open space for light, air and recreation, to provide adequate access to and parking for manufactured housing sites, and to refer minimum utility service facilities to appropriate City codes. 18.84.020 General Provisions A. No person shall establish, operate, manage, maintain, alter or enlarge any manufactured housing development contrary to the provisions of this ordinance. B. In addition to the requirements of this chapter, all manufactured housing developments shall conform to the regulations of ORS Chapter 446, together with such administrative rules as may be adopted from time to time, except where such regulations are exceeded by the requirements of this chapter, in which case the more stringent requirements shall apply. C. Manufactured housing developments shall be subject to regulations of this chapter and shall be located only on sites approved for use under the provisions of such chapter. D. Manufactured housing development may be located or relocated only in R-1-3.5 and R-2 zones. 18.84.025 Definitions The following terms are defined for the purpose of this Chapter and do not otherwise apply to the Land Use Ordinance: A. Building Envelope. An area, within the property boundaries of a lot or space, within which a permitted manufactured housing or structure, can be placed. B. City Facility. A public service or facility provided, owned and controlled by the City. C. Diameter Breast Height. The outside diameter of the trunk of a tree, measured 4.5 feet above ground level. D. Homeowners Association. A homeowners association is an organization formed for the maintenance and operation of the common areas of the development. The membership in the association must be automatic with the purchase of a dwelling unit or other property in the planned development. The association's principal source of funds shall be an assessment levied against each dwelling unit or other property, which assessment shall be enforceable as a lien against the property. E. Open Space. A common area designated on the final plans of the development, permanently set aside for the common use of the residents of the development. The open area may be landscaped and/or left with a natural vegetation cover, and in which area no thoroughfares, parking areas, or improvements other than recreational facilities are located. All developments shall provide a minimum of 5% of the total lot area in Open Space. F. Pedestrian Path. A graded cleared way, adjacent to the curb at curb level, for individuals who travel on foot. G. Unbuildable Area. All areas outside of building envelopes and within open space. 18.84.030 Procedure for Approval A. Outline Plan: 1. Application for subdivision approval under this Chapter shall be accompanied by a proposed Outline Plan. For developments of less than 10 lots, the Outline Plan may be filed concurrently with the Final Plan, as that term is defined in 18.84.030 B. 4. However, for developments of 10 lots or more prior Outline Plan approval is mandatory. 2. A Type II procedure, as defined in this Ordinance, shall be used for the approval of the outline plan. 3. Contents. The contents for an outline plan shall be as follows: a. A topographic map showing contour intervals of five feet. b. The proposed land uses and approximate locations of the existing buildings to be retained, the proposed structures on the site, the proposed and existing property lines and easements on the site, and existing buildings, structures, and trees greater than six inches in diameter measured at breast height on the properties adjacent to the site, and all buildings within 160 feet of the site boundaries. c. The locations of all proposed thoroughfares, walkways, and parking facilities. d. Public uses, including schools, parks, playgrounds, open spaces and trails. e. Public or private utilities. f. General areas of cuts and fill. g. The location of natural features such as rock outcroppings, marshes, wooded areas, and isolated preservable trees. h. The location and direction of all watercourses and areas subject to flooding. i. Lots or areas for the location of the manufactured housing, with building envelopes showing the permissible location of the dwelling unit. j. Architectural elevations of proposed structures other than manufactured homes, if any. The elevation should be to scale and should include the approximate dimensions of the proposed structures and all attached exterior hardware for heating and cooling. k. A written statement which will contain an explanation of: i. The character of the proposed development and the manner in which it has been designed to take advantage of the Performance Standards Concept. ii. The proposed manner of financing. iii. The present ownership of all the land included within the development. iv. The method proposed to maintain common open areas, buildings and private thoroughfares. v. The proposed time schedule of the development. vi. The findings of the applicant showing that the development meets the criteria set forth in this Ordinance and the Ashland Comprehensive Plan. 4. The Planning Commission shall approve the outline plan when it finds the following criteria have been met: a. That the development meets all applicable ordinance requirements of the City of Ashland. b. That adequate City facilities can be provided including water, sewer, paved access to and through the development, electricity, urban storm drainage, and adequate transportation; and that the development will not cause a City facility to operate beyond capacity. c. That the existing and natural features of the land; such as wetlands, floodplain corridors, ponds, large trees, rock outcroppings, etc., have been identified in the plan of the development and significant features have been included in the open space, common areas, and unbuildable areas. d. That the development of the land will not prevent adjacent land from being developed for the uses shown in the Comprehensive Plan. e. That there are adequate provisions for the maintenance of open space and common areas, if required or provided, and that if developments are done in phases that the early phases have the same or higher ratio of amenities as proposed in the entire project. f. That the proposed density meets the base and bonus density standards established under this Chapter. 5. Approval of the Outline Plan. a. To the extent allowed by statute, the Planning Commission may extend the public hearing to gather more information. b. The Planning Commission may approve or disapprove the Outline Plan and application or require changes, or impose conditions of approval which it finds necessary to conform with the standards of this ordinance and the purpose of this Chapter. Approval of the Outline Plan and application, and conditions of approval are final to all issues resolved at that time unless appealed. c. After an outline plan, which has had a public hearing, is approved, the developer may then file a final plan in phases or in its entirety. However, a final plan may not be filed until the Council adopts any zone change necessary for the development. d. If an outline plan is phased, 50% of the value of the recreational amenities shall be provided in the first phase and all recreational amenities shall be provided when two-thirds of the units are finished. B. Final Plan. 1. Procedure for approval. Type I procedure, as defined in this Title, shall be used for approval of final plans, unless on outline plan has been filed, in which case Type II procedure shall be used, and the criteria for approval of an outline plan shall also be applied. 2. The final plan may be filed in phases as approved on the outline plan. 3. If the final plan or the first phase of the outline plan is not approved within eighteen (18) months from the date of the approval of the outline plan, then the approval of the plan is terminated and void and of no effect whatsoever. Extensions may be granted as a Type I procedure. 4. Contents. The final plan shall contain a scale map or maps and a written document showing the following for the development: a. A topographic map showing contour intervals of five feet. b. Location of all thoroughfares and walks, their widths and nature of their improvements, and whether they are to be public or private. c. Road cross sections and profiles, clearly indicating the locations of final cuts and fills, and road grades. d. The location, layout, and servicing of all off-street parking areas. e. The property boundary lines. f. The individual lot lines of each parcel that are to be created for separate ownership. g. The location of easements for water line, fire hydrants, sewer and storm sewer lines, and the location of the electric, gas, and telephone lines, telephone cable and lighting plans. h. Landscaping and tree planting plans with the location of the existing trees and shrubs which are to be retained, and the method by which they are to be preserved. i. Common open areas and spaces, and the particular uses intended for them. j. Areas proposed to be conveyed, dedicated, reserved or used for parks, scenic ways, playgrounds, schools or public buildings. k. A plan showing the following for each existing or proposed building or structure for all sites except manufactured housing on approved sites and single-family, detached housing which meets the parent zone setbacks: i. Its location on the lot and within the development. ii. Its intended use. iii. The number of dwelling units in each residential building. iv. Elevation drawings of all proposed structures except manufactured homes and single-family, detached residences which meet parent zone setback requirements. The drawings shall be accurate and to scale, including all attached exterior hardware for heating and cooling. l. Manner of financing. m. Development time schedule. n. If individual lots are to be sold in the Planned Unit Development, a final plat, similar to that required in a subdivision section of the Land Use Development Ordinance. o. Final plans for location of water, sewer, drainage, electric and cable T.V. facilities and plans for street improvements and grading or earth-moving improvements. p. The location of all trees over six inches diameter at breast height, which are to be removed by the developer. Such trees are to be tagged with flagging at the time of Final Plan approval. 5. Criteria for Final Plan Approval. Final plan approval shall be granted unless it is found that it fails to substantially conform with the Outline Plan, and conditions, previously approved. Nothing in this provision shall limit reduction in the number of dwelling units or increased open space provided that, if this is done for one phase, the number of dwelling units shall not be transferred to another phase, nor the open space reduced below that permitted in the outline plan. This substantial conformance provision is intended solely to facilitate the minor modifications from one planning step to another. Substantial conformance with reference to the matters below listed shall be deemed to exist when comparison of the outline plan with the final plan shows that: a. The number of dwelling units vary no more than 10% of those shown on the approved outline plan, but in no case shall the number of units exceed those permitted in the outline plan. b. The yard depths and distances between main buildings vary no more than 10% of those shown on the approved outline plan, but in no case shall these distances be reduced below the minimum established within this Title. c. The open spaces vary no more than 10% of that provided on the outline plan. d. The building size does not exceed the building size shown on the outline plan by more than 10%. e. The building elevations and exterior materials are in conformance with the purpose and intent of this Title and the approved outline plan. f. That the additional standards which resulted in the awarding of bonus points in the outline plan approval have been included in the final plan with substantial detail to ensure that the performance level committed to in the outline plan will be achieved. 6. Any substantial amendment to an approved final plan shall follow at Type I procedure and be reviewed in accordance with the above criteria. 18.84.040 Setback Requirements A. Exterior Setbacks. Manufactured housing sites along the exterior boundary of the court shall be so designed so that any part of a manufactured housing unit shall be set back at least 20 feet from any street or exterior property line. B. Interior Front Yard Setbacks. There shall be a front yard on each manufactured home lot or space of at least 10 feet. C. Interior Side and Rear Yard Setbacks. There shall be side or rear yards of at least six feet. There shall be a minimum separation of 12 feet between manufactured housing units. 18.84.050 Design Standards A. Minimum Court Size. A manufactured housing development shall occupy a site of not less thanone acre in size. (ORD 2810, 1998). B. Density. The maximum density permitted shall be eight manufactured housing units per acre of developed court area. Manufactured housing which is 14 feet wide or less, or which is less than 800 square feet in size will count as .75 units for this calculation. C. Manufactured Housing Sites or Lots. All manufactured housing sites or lots must be at least 2,000 square feet in size, at least 35 feet wide, and at least 40 feet deep. D. Lot Coverage. Maximum lot coverage of any individual manufactured housing lot or site shall be 65% in the R-2 zone and 55% in the R-1-3.5 zone. In addition, the general lot coverage requirements of the parent zone shall also be complied with for the entire project site. E. Landscaping. 1. All areas of the development not occupied by paved roadways, pathways, parking areas, or not occupied by other facilities shall be landscaped. Areas which contain significant natural vegetation may be left in a natural state, if approved on the final landscaping plans. 2. Manufactured housing developments located in an R-1-3.5 zone shall have 45% of the entire site landscaped. Developments located in the R-2 zone shall have 35% of the entire site landscaped. F. Fencing. Fencing shall comply with all fencing requirements as per Section 18.68.010 of this Title. G. Utilities. Provisions for electric, water and sanitary service shall be made in accordance with established City procedures and law, including number, size, quality and location of fixtures, connections and facilities. Telephone and electric lines shall be placed underground. H. All developments are required to provide a minimum of 5% of the total lot area in Open Space. 18.84.060 Manufactured Housing Standards All manufactured housing units located in approved manufactured housing developments shall comply with the following requirements: A. Manufactured housing units shall be a minimum of 650 square feet in size. B.Manufactured housing units shall be at least 12 feet wide. C. Manufactured housing units shall have the Oregon Department of Commerce "insignia of Compliance." The manufactured housing unit shall be inspected by the City's Building Official and occupancy shall be approved only if the Building Official has determined that the manufactured housing unit has a valid insignia of compliance and has not deteriorated beyond an acceptable level of compliance. D. Manufactured housing units shall be placed on permanent foundations, with wheels and hitches removed, be fully skirted or bermed, and shall have no uncovered open spaces except for vents of sufficient strength to support the loads imposed by the manufactured housing unit, based on accepted engineering design standards, as approved by the Building Official. E. Manufactured housing units shall be provided with City water, sewer, electricity, telephone and storm drainage, with easements dedicated where necessary. F. Manufactured housing units shall comply with the thermal envelope requirements for heat loss required buy the Oregon State Building Code for single family detached homes. G. Manufactured housing units shall have a deck or patio area adjacent to the home. The deck or patio shall be constructed of a permanent material and shall be at least 80 square feet in size, with a minimum width of eight feet in its least dimension. H. Each manufactured housing unit shall have a one parking space located on or adjacent to the unit space. The parking space shall be setback at least 20 feet from the street. I. Not withstanding the above, any manufactured home legally located within the Ashland Urban Growth Boundary prior to July 1, 1990 may be relocated to an approved manufactured home development, subject to a fire and life safety inspection by the Ashland Building official. 18.84.070 Roadway, Parking and Sidewalk Standards A. Street Standards. Public streets shall comply with the design standards contained in Chapter 18.88. B. Private streets shall be a minimum of 20 feet in width, and constructed to the same standards as specified for an alley by the Ashland Public Works Department. A private street may be a dead-end street no more than 300 feet in depth from a higher order road. Adequate turn-around shall be provided according to standards established by the Planning Commission. C. Sidewalk Standards. Every manufactured housing development shall have a permanent pedestrian walkway at least 48 inches wide connecting all manufactured housing units to public or private streets, common open spaces, recreational areas and commonly-owned buildings and facilities. D. Off-Street Parking Standards. Each manufactured housing unit shall be provided with one off-street parking space on each manufactured housing site, setback 20 feet from the street. In addition, guest parking facilities of one parking space for each manufactured housing site shall also be provided on the project site, within 200 feet of the units they are intended to serve, either adjacent to the road or in a off street parking lot. Parking space construction, size, landscaping and design requirements shall be according to Chapters 18.72 (Site Review) and 18.92 (Off-Street Parking). 18.84.080 Storage and Temporary Occupancy of Manufactured Homes A. A no-charge permit from the Staff Advisor is required for the storage of any manufactured housing unit on the home premises of the owner for any length of time when not used for living purposes; provided, however, that all units so stored shall abide by the yard requirements for accessory buildings in this chapter. B. No manufactured housing unit shall be stored on a public street except for temporary maneuvering purposes. C. Temporary occupancy of a manufactured housing unit on premises which do not meet the requirements of this chapter for a manufactured housing development, may be permitted for a period not to exceed ninety (90) calendar days upon the granting of a permit by the City Building Official. Such occupancy may only be allowed in conjunction with the construction of the applicant's residence on the site. Said permit shall not be renewable within a six-month period beginning at the first date of issuance, except with approval of the Staff Advisor. 18.84.090 Non-Conforming Manufactured Housing Developments A manufactured housing development and an individual manufactured housing unit utilized for living purposes on the effective date of this ordinance or of amendments thereto, which do not conform to the regulations of this chapter, shall be deemed to be non-conforming and may be continued, subject to the following regulations: A. Routine maintenance and repairs may be performed within the manufactured housing development or upon individual manufactured housing units. B. No non-conforming manufactured housing development shall be enlarged, remodeled or modernized except in conformance with all requirements of this chapter, except that an area of less than two acres for a development to be enlarged, remodeled or modernized may be approved through the conditional use permit procedure contained in this Title. C. No manufactured housing unit shall be located on the site of, or substituted for, a non-conforming manufactured housing unit, the use of which has been discontinued, except within a manufactured housing development holding a certificate of sanitation issued by the Board of Health, State of Oregon, issued prior to the effective date of this chapter. Relocation of existing units within the City Urban Growth Boundary are exempted as provided in Section 18.84.060 (I) D. If a non-conforming manufactured housing development holding a certificate of sanitation issued by the Board of Health, state of Oregon, ceases operation for a period of six months or more, said development shall be considered abandoned and shall be reinstituted only in conformance with the requirements of this chapter. 18.84.100 Special Conditions A. For the mitigation of adverse impacts, the City may impose conditions. Restrictions may include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Require view-obscuring shrubbery, walls or fences. 2. Require retention of specified trees, rocks, water ponds or courses, or other natural features. B. No manufactured housing developments may be located within the Ashland Historic District. C. No manufactured housing developments may be located, relocated, or increased in size or number of units, within any zones designated for commercial use -- C-1, C-1-D, E-1, CM or M-1. (Ord 2662, 1992; Ord 3036, 2010) Housing Commission Memo Title:Clay Street Property Options Date: June 22, 2011 Submitted By: Linda Reid, Housing Program Specialist Question Would the Housing Commission like to forward one of the recommendations proposed by staff or separate option proposed by the commission to the City Council regarding the options for the remaining Clay street property. Background At their goal setting retreat in 2009 the City Council identified a Social Equity goal regarding the remaining property located at 360 Clay Street. The Council Goal was to decide whether to develop or sell the remaining land. In 2008 the City partnered with the Housing Authority of Jackson County (HAJC) to purchase a 10 acre property located on Clay Street for the joint purposes of creating affordable housing, and increasing Parks property. As part of the requested purchase price the City traded three lots on Strawberry Lane and the Lithia Way Parking Lot. The Strawberry Lane properties had previously been designated by the City Council to be sold or traded to utilize the proceeds to support City affordable housing goals. The Housing Authority developed a 60 unit affordable housing complex on a 4 acre parcel. At the time of acquisition the Council also voted to allow the Parks Department up to two years to obtain the funding necessary to purchase a portion of Clay Street intended to be utilized as parkland. In February of 2011 approximately 3.18 acres of land was acquired by the Parks Department. The acquisition price for the property includes compensation for approximately .57 acres of land area originally acquired by the City and dedicated as Public Right of Way which was necessary to provide access to the proposed Park property. The combined 3.75 acres in land area is being purchased at the original purchase price value of $360,000 per acre for a total of $1,350,000. Upon final partition of the original City-owned property, the land ownership would be as follows: Parks Department = 3.18 acres City = 0.92 acres Wetland (City) = 1.0 acres Housing Authority of Jackson County (owned) = 3.46 acres Engle Street Right of Way (dedicated) = 0.64 acres Villard Street Right of Way (dedicated) =0.50 acres A total of 1.92 acres of property will remain in City ownership. A one acre area in the North-west corner is a delineated wetland which will remain under City ownership. Approximately 0.92 acres is zoned for multifamily housing (20 units per acre) and could accommodate up to 18 dwelling units. (The entire 10 acre parcel was annexed as multi-family residential R-2 zoned property, at 13.5 units per acre base density. The 0.92 acre site has a base development potential of 12 units. Utilizing a density transfer from the parks portion of the property, or through the application of affordable housing density bonuses, staff believes the site could accommodate 15-18 units depending upon the size and configuration. Housing Commission Options Option #1: Land Bank-Given current land values, in the event the property is to be sold in whole or in part for market rate development the Commission, and ultimately the Council, may want to consider delaying a sale until a later date when market conditions have improved in order to maximize returns. Further, delaying a final decision on disposition may be an alternative should the Commission or Council desire to complete a detailed analysis of housing needs prior to determining the mix of income and unit types to be provided. Option #2: Sell the land for Market Value- Determine market value of property (see comparable property estimates attached) Public hearing on disposition of public property Execute purchase and sale agreement Option #3: Soliciting a proposal for an affordable/mixed-income development- Determine development potential Develop RFP for property HC review of RFP Council review and issuance of RFP Developer selection HC recommendation/Council decision Public hearing on disposition of public property Execute purchase and sale agreement Project Development phase Potential Motions ?????