Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003-04-26 Budget Committee Minutes Budget Committee Meeting Agenda April 26, 2003, 8:00am Civic Center Council Chambers, 1175 East Main Street CALL TO ORDER Chairperson Marty Levine called the meeting to order at 8:07am. ROLL CALL Present: Budget Committee Members Cate Hartzell, John Morrison, Don Laws, Russ Silbiger, Jacquie Christensen, Marty Levine, Jim Moore, Kate Jackson, Ray Olsen, Alan DeBoer, Dave Williams, Alex Amarotico, Regina Stepahin and Chris Hearn. Staff: Gino Grimaldi, Lee Tuneberg, Ken Mickelson, Paula Brown, Paul Nolte, Keith Woodley, Dick Wanderscheid, Scott Fleuter, John McLaughlin, Mike Bianca, Mike Ainsworth, Richard Holbo, Tina Gray, Greg Case, Dave Hard, Scott Johnson, Sharon Laws and Kirsten Bakke. Others: Parks and Recreation Commissioner Jim Lewis, Jack Hardesty and Carl Hilton. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Approval of minutes from previous budget meetings dated: 12/12/02 Budget Committee - Introduction 03/05/03 Economic & Cultural Development Grant Presentations 03/12/03 Social Services Grant Presentations 03/13/03 Social Services Grant Recommendations DeBoer/Jackson m/s to accept the minutes as corrected. Voice Vote: ALL AYES. PUBLIC INPUT Jack Hardesty/575 Dogwood Way/ Represented the Citizens for Responsible Government (CRG). He suggested that the City’s operating costs could be reduced by eliminating the City Source Newsletter. He also suggested three ways to cut back on projected personnel costs for the FY03-04 Budget: 1) eliminate the position of Communications Manager, 2) not fund the Housing Program Specialist position, 3) not fund the Assistant Attorney position. Carl Hilton/2705 Takelma Way/Spoke about the benefits and future applications of AFN. Committee Member Cate Hartzell handed out letters from herself and a citizen regarding the need for the Housing Program Specialist position. DEPARTMENTAL PRESENTATIONS Public Works (continuance) 3-51 to 3-81 Public Works Director Paula Brown addressed the questions from the last budget meeting regarding equipment replacement and vehicle purchases. She referred to a handout that detailed the Police vehicles and the AFN bucket trucks. She clarified that the bucket trucks were small panel vans with bucket extensions. She noted that the Police Chief and the Electric Director could speak directly to these equipment replacements in their presentations. Levine asked for clarification on the accounting of replaced equipment. Tuneberg explained that the value of an asset’s proceeds is recognized in the trade-in as revenue and the full value of the new equipment is expensed or depreciated in the Equipment Fund. There was a discussion regarding the replacement and typical life of city vehicles. Brown clarified that the rate of replacement is determined by the use, number of miles and maintenance of the vehicle. X:\\Shared City Files\\Council Packets\\Commissions\\Budget Committee\\2003 Minutes\\4-26-03 Minutes.doc8/28/2024 1:19 PM Page 1 of 7 Williams asked how the GIS program is used and if it was a good financial investment. Brown responded that the GIS (Geographic Information Systems) program produces maps, however, the real application links with the City’s utility programs for accuracy when designing. Also, GIS is used for tracking the age and application for replacement of water and sewer lines. The information base behind all the other layers is used for many applications, including wild lands and flood plains maps. She concluded saying that the program is widely used and asked for by citizens for information and typography. Parks and Recreation 3-103 to 3-117 Parks and Recreation Director Ken Mickelson and Parks and Recreation Commissioner Jim Lewis presented. Lewis began by reviewing the Commission’s commitment and core goals on page 3-104. He pointed out the seven year history of Property Tax Rates for Parks on page A-4. He detailed the Commission’s priorities for Capital Outlay. Mickelson thanked staff and gave an overview of the Parks and Recreation’s FY03-04 budget. He referred to page 3-106 and additional handouts. He talked about the extension of the Bear Creek Greenway (Dog Park to Mountain Avenue Park), referring to the grants applied for and partnerships developed. He discussed future trends and challenges, specifically declining fund balances and increasing costs of PERS and healthcare. In addition, he pointed out that the Parks Department needs to eliminate the funding of two police positions. He outlined contractual services and noted that if those were eliminated from their budget, it could drop by almost $400,000. Williams asked about the maintenance of the school grounds continuing. Mickelson clarified that it wasn’t included in the Park’s budget. Williams talked about the seven year property tax rate history saying that it has actually increased 38%. He asked for clarification about the need for two horticulturist positions and exotic plantings. Mickelson spoke about the history of ballot measure 50 in relation to property taxes. Williams complimented volunteer use. Discussion ensued regarding dropping fund balance trends and the anticipation of needs in future years for new sources of revenue. Jackson clarified that the revenue from the Food and Beverage Tax is used to purchase park land. Hearn clarified that Parks borrowed against the Food and Beverage Tax until it sunsets in 2009. Morrison asked about the projections of lower levels of usage in the area of programs. Mickelson said he thought it was a result of demographics. Moore pointed out that city employees have grown by 15% since FY94-95 and Parks has grown by 60%; Parks has gone from 22 FTEs to 35.4 FTEs. He noted concern that the additional land purchases cause maintenance costs to rise. Moore asked about the Golf Division future. Mickelson gave a brief history of the Golf Course. Discussion ensued about the Municipal Golf Course and the development of a marketing strategy. Hartzell asked about the grounds maintenance of the schools. Mickelson stated that the $150,000 for 2 FTEs to maintain the school grounds was not included in the FY03-04 budget. The Committee continued discussing the possibility of continuing school ground’s maintenance with 1 FTE, even if no additional help was provided from the Schools. Hartzell asked about a plan to revise SDCs, if the Youth Activities Levy (YAL) doesn’t pass. Lewis confirmed the Park Commission’s support of the Levy. Morrison asked about school ground’s maintenance efficiencies. Hearn clarified that the maintenance of the Briscoe School grounds would continue, even if the school was closed. Jackson clarified field maintenance. Discussion ensued. Jackson mentioned concern about the increase in staff without the correlation of services provided. Mickelson responded that park acreage has grown. Jackson asked if parkland increase is related to increase in Personal Services. Discussion continued regarding parkland maintenance. Stepahin asked if it was the sense of the Commission that there were costs included in the Parks budget that were contributing to the inaccuracy of the true cost of other departments needs. Lewis responded that it made sense for the Parks to handle the maintenance issues, but the security issues should probably be handled by the Police Department. Mickelson addressed the history of the collaboration with the Police Department. He said currently that the Central Patrol position patrols the downtown area as well. Williams/Hearn m/s to ask the City to recommend the same relief to continue funding the school’s maintenance for the next budget year. Discussion: Committee discussed continuing school ground’s maintenance and potential funding. Voice Vote: Motion passed 13 to 1; Silbiger Opposed. Tuneberg said he would provide recommendations for ongoing school ground’s maintenance funding at the next budget meeting. X:\\Shared City Files\\Council Packets\\Commissions\\Budget Committee\\2003 Minutes\\4-26-03 Minutes.doc8/28/2024 1:19 PM Page 2 of 7 DeBoer pointed out that the Park’s CIP reflected $1.2 million through FY09, and there was only $450,000 left. He noted that on page 4-66 in the Long-Term section, in the Parks fund, there was an excess of $120,000. Laws commended the Parks Department on their budget presentation. Hearn said as this community fulfills its infill policy, parks help to preserve and enhance the quality of life in Ashland. Morrison requested that Tuneberg recommend funding for school ground’s maintenance for additional years. There was discussion of contracting outside services for school ground’s maintenance. Silbiger asked about the $64,000 difference in the adopted FY02-03 budget from last year’s to this year’s. Tuneberg said he would check that difference. Morrison/Olsen m/s to accept the Parks and Recreation Department budget as presented, and as amended to include the City’s recommendation to continue funding the school ground’s maintenance for the coming year and beyond. Voice Vote: ALL AYES. Motion passed. Levine called for a 10-minute break. Administration 3-3 to 3-13 City Administrator Gino Grimaldi, City Attorney Paul Nolte and Administrative Services/Human Resources Manager Tina Gray presented for the Administration Department. Grimaldi referred to page 3-3 and gave an overview of the Administration Department. He talked about the elimination of the Administrative Services Director position and combining Administrative Services with the Administration Department. He pointed out that due to these changes the budget may be difficult to follow, but he assured the Committee of the accuracy in the collapse of these two budgets. He noted an error in the Central Services Fund where $30,000 had been double budgeted. He spoke to the issue of the Communications Manager and said he was looking at the functions of the Administration and shifting duties of the positions in that department. He pointed out the issues the City is facing and explained that he is reallocating resources, but not proposing increased staffing. Moore clarified the reclassification of Administrative Services/Human Resources Manager. The Committee discussed the history of the Administrative Services Director position. Williams asked about the percentage of time the Communications Manager spent on the City Source Newsletter. Grimaldi said roughly 10% of the positions time was spent on the City Source. There was discussion regarding the history, intention, cost and priority of the City Source newsletter. Silbiger commented that the Communication Manager position gets re-imagined every year and he recommended the elimination of the position, saying that the job qualifications for that position were more on an administrative assistant level. Silbiger/Olsen m/s to eliminate the Communications Manager position from the Administration budget. Discussion: The Committee discussed reexamining the Communications Manager position. Grimaldi responded that he will get back to the Committee in a week regarding the City Source, but he would like a minimum of six months to take a look at the Communications Manager position. Laws/Moore m/s to postpone the vote on the motion regarding the Communications Manager position, tabling it until next week, to hear the recommendations of the City Administrator. Voice Vote: Motion passed 12 to 2; Amarotico and Hearn opposed. Legal City Attorney Paul Nolte gave an overview of the Legal Division’s budget reflecting an increase in staff and relocation costs. He talked about external requirements that are out of their control. He stated that they are still providing legal advice on the American Disabilities Act (ADA) even though it is over 10 years old and are still spending considerable time proving the City’s compliance. He noted an increase in workload due to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) a new law imposed by the Federal Government. Nolte pointed out other labor laws imposed by the Federal Government and the legal work that is involved in each of those. He talked about internal requirements that are somewhat within their control, saying that Ashland is a full service entrepreneurial city, and each program and function takes some legal review. For example, everything from the Airport, the Ski Resort, Ambulance Services, the Food and Beverage Tax and AFN require some legal review during the course of the year. Nolte admitted concern over issues that they are not able to address. He informed that the Departments need a legal audit and the programs need reviewing. He spoke of preventative law, reviewing programs before a complaint is made. He talked about improving Food and Beverage Tax collections. He pointed X:\\Shared City Files\\Council Packets\\Commissions\\Budget Committee\\2003 Minutes\\4-26-03 Minutes.doc8/28/2024 1:19 PM Page 3 of 7 out that the Legal Education program of elected and appointed officials could be improved. Nolte commented on the importance of working with Planning in the development and implementation of ordinances. For example, they are just now seeing legal issues in relation to trails and affordable housing. He mentioned that they have recently assumed again, the preparation of formal complaints for the Municipal Court, which had been done for a period of time by Police Department, due to time constraints in Legal. Dispatch has now been combined and moved to the Medford Dispatch. He clarified that even though it is something that Legal should be doing, it increases workload and a significant number of hours are being devoted to formal complaints and Municipal Court. Nolte commended the work of his Assistant. In conclusion, he said that the Legal Department should also be assisting with Labor issues. The Committee discussed the impact of a part-time rather than full-time position, the option of contracting services, health benefits and the reduction of the Assistant Attorney position cost in the budget. Hartzell/Hearn m/s to accept the Legal Division budget as presented, with the change that less salary be dedicated to the Attorney position, by reducing the Legal budget for the position by $20,000. Discussion: Committee discussed the possibility of getting an experienced attorney for the proposed wage. Voice Vote: Motion passed 12 to 2; Laws and Moore opposed. Administrative Services Human Resources Manager Tina Gray gave an overview of the Administrative Services Division budget. She noted the overall reduction of $158,000, saying that it reflected the move of the Communications, salary and functions to Administration. She said that Contractual Services increased due to dedicated extra resources to Labor Negotiations. Hartzell clarified the .5 FTE move from conservation to Administrative Services. Jackson asked about the proposed $45,000 in Contractual Services. Gray explained that $20,000 is for labor negotiations for Police and Fire, $20,000 is for wellness expenses, and $5,000 is for safety inspections. Municipal Court Gray continued the presentation giving an overview of the Municipal Court budget. She talked about an increase in Personal Services. Silbiger asked about the decrease in positions and the $20,000 increase in salaries. Gray explained that the increase was due to a reclassification of a Court Clerk position, another position being filled and other step increases. Senior Programs Gray talked about a $12,000 increase in Personal Services and $1,000 increase for temporary help. Moore asked about the Benefit increase of $10,000. Gray said it was due to the PERS increase. DeBoer stated that it might be a mistake because the previous year’s was understated. Tuneberg agreed to check the calculations. Grimaldi reminded the Committee to include the $30,000 reduction in the Central Services Fund when making their motion, because it was double budgeted. Silbiger asked about the Administration budget changes in website hosting and development. Grimaldi responded that he will get back to the Committee next week regarding the website. Hartzell/Moore m/s to table the motion to accept the Administration Department budget, including the error of $30,000 double budgeted in the Central Services Fund and the changes to the Legal budget; and also wait to hear the recommendations from the City Administrator regarding the Communications Manager position and the City website. Voice Vote: ALL AYES. Fire and Rescue 3-41 to 3-49 Fire Chief Keith Woodley, Assistant Fire Chief/Fire Marshal Dave Hard and Fire/EMS Division Chief Greg Case presented for the Fire Department. Woodley followed up on the value of the GIS program talked about earlier in the Public Works presentation. He gave an overview of the Fire Department budget. He discussed performance measurement goals, fire safety, accident prevention and instruction of 100% of the students in K-5 classrooms throughout the City with 80% meeting competency. He talked about providing Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) Training to 60 citizens, the five day turn around for fire safety plans review. He talked about their goal to insure 100% of the Department employees meet annual and continuing recertification and education requirements. In addition, he mentioned that they are still working on computerization of the Fire Department records management program. He talked about wild fire fuels reduction efforts and funding. X:\\Shared City Files\\Council Packets\\Commissions\\Budget Committee\\2003 Minutes\\4-26-03 Minutes.doc8/28/2024 1:19 PM Page 4 of 7 He continued discussing the goals for each division. He noted that in the Fire Operations Division they are looking at integrating shift personnel into code enforcement work, continuing work on Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) compliance and they are redistributed administrative workloads. He talked about the Thermal Imaging Camera donated by the hospital. He said for the Emergency Medical Services Division their goals were to upgrade medical capabilities through the purchase of Auto ventilator technology, continuing to meet ambulance service response times required by law, implement an electronic data collections system and develop a system for the new HIPPA legislation. He said the only significant budget change is the new position from the Baseline. Fire Operations Division Assistant Fire Chief/Fire Marshal Dave Hard presented the budget for the Fire Operations Division. He noted that the budget was up significantly over the Baseline. He gave an overview of the Operations budget and noted the position in the Baseline for the Fire Protection Plans Examiner. Emergency Medical Services Division Fire/EMS Division Chief Greg Case began the presentation by giving an overview of the Emergency the Medical Services budget, noting that they are reporting electronically. He talked about grant funding for the Ventilator program and pointed out a decrease in the volume with the addition of the CERT Training Coordinator. He mentioned that they are noticing an increase in people taking the CERT Training program. Case said they are working with the City Attorney in developing the HIPPA compliance program. Jackson asked for clarification regarding paperwork for HIPPA. Case replied that HIPPA directly relates to how personal health information is handled and released, which involves a number of forms and policies. Woodley said that essentially the budget impact is staff time for policy development, staff training and coordination for implementation of the Act. Jackson clarified that there was cost recovery for Ambulance Transports. Case noted on page 4-8 a reduction of recoverable costs for Medicare. There was discussion regarding rate increases and dispatch service fees. There was discussion regarding the need for the Fire Plans Examiner and the difference between the position in the Baseline and the proposed position. Woodley pointed out that growth for administrative positions in the Department has been nearly zero. There was discussion regarding budgeting for technology. DeBoer/Amarotico m/s to approve the Fire Department budget as presented. Voice Vote: Motion passed 13 to 1; Hartzell opposed. Electric 3-91 to 3-101 Electric Director Dick Wanderscheid, Telecommunications Engineer Richard Holbo, Cable TV Manager Mike Ainsworth and Electric Operations Superintendent Scott Johnson presented for the Electric Department. Wanderscheid began by giving an overview of the Electric Department. Conservation Wanderscheid referred to page 3-101 and gave an overview of the Conservation budget. He pointed out the move of .5 FTE to the Water Conservation budget from the Electric Conservation budget, resulting in a shift of funding. He noted that the Conservation program dollars were down, reflecting less money coming from Bonneville for conservation programs. He stated that otherwise it was a status quo budget. Jackson asked about the $275,300 for programs on page 3-101 line item 610. Dick explained that those program dollars go to customers for energy conservation rebates. Discussion ensued. Computer Services Wanderscheid gave an overview of the Computer Services Division budget. Telecommunications Engineer Richard Holbo addressed software and replacement cycle upgrades. He talked about database support for Fire, Building, Police and Public Works. He explained they are also working on HIPPA security issues, which include regulations involving the transmission of data. He referred to the earlier discussion with the Administration Department regarding the website cost, and mentioned that there would be costs associated with the change either way. X:\\Shared City Files\\Council Packets\\Commissions\\Budget Committee\\2003 Minutes\\4-26-03 Minutes.doc8/28/2024 1:19 PM Page 5 of 7 Wanderscheid mentioned that this fall they were developing a 5-year technology plan for the City, involving all departments, where they will come up with a vision for the City, cost and timeline. Silbiger asked about the $50,000 increase in Personal Services. Holbo clarified that the increase was related to increases in PERS and Healthcare costs. Wanderscheid added that there was $40,000 in the budget for a temporary Database Programmer. Discussion ensued regarding the temporary Database Programmer. Jackson said that she would have preferred to see the temporary Database Programmer listed in the position profile. Holbo clarified that Computer Services provide support for all computer software systems used by the City. Discussion continued regarding the temporary Database Programmer. Silbiger clarified that the drop in Contractual Services was due to the move of the website hosting and development to Administration. Levine asked about the $7,000 not reflected in the change in the website shift. Hartzell asked about the line 602, Rental Repair and Maintenance, $67,000 expense disappearing after the Baseline. Wanderscheid said he was not sure, but it could be a coding error. Tuneberg said he would check for errors. Discussion continued regarding the Conservation program and the new program, Earth advantage, which supplements the Super Good Sense program. The Committee also talked about reducing rebate amounts. Hartzell noted that it would be good to look at in a Council study session. Electric Utility Wanderscheid referred to page 3-95 noting line item 612 saying that the Franchises generate over a million dollars in revenue. He noted that almost $3.2 million of revenue from Electric Utility. He walked through the proposed increases in Electric Rates. He gave a history of the Bonneville contracts and the BPA surcharge, saying that wholesale power costs have been increased by about $1.3 million a year. He directed the Committee to page 4-42 pointing out the 7.5% proposed rate increase for base electric rates. He then spoke of the second component in the rate increase, the surcharge increasing from 16% to 20.8%, which generates the difference in the wholesale power bills caused by the BPA surcharges. He explained that the 7.5% rate increase is for other cost increases in PERS, healthcare, Central service Fees, transmission costs and Franchise Fees. He explained that the Ending Fund Balance requirement was only met by raising rates. He said that Bonneville is implementing another cost recovery clause that would be effective in October 2003. He noted that every 10 million acre feet of water in the Columbian River drainage is the equivalent of about $100 million in Bonneville revenue. He explained that they won’t know the impact of this until August. There was discussion about the 1.5 FTE positions returning from AFN to the Electric Utility. Discussion continued regarding Electric Supply, Distribution and Transmission. Silbiger noted an error in Transmission. Moore asked about the Reeder Gulch employee costs. Electric Operations Superintendent Scott Johnson said it runs about $7,000 a year. Telecommunications Wanderscheid presented a status quo budget for AFN. He noted the reduction of one installer and the return of 1.5 FTE to the Electric Utility. He said that Materials and Service were up by $148,000 due to higher Central Services Fees, increased programming costs, Franchise Fees and bandwidth costs. He stated that Capital Outlay is reduced reflecting the end of construction, and Debt Service is up due to interest on loans. He referred to Page 4-46 explaining the Interfund Loans and internal borrowing. He gave a history of the AFN Advisory Committee, and an update on High Speed data accounts. He related the importance of updating the Business Plan for AFN and detailed changes and assumptions. He spoke of the partnership with Rio Communications to provide high speed telephony for the School Districts, saving them over $30,000 for the next three years. He alluded to unrealistic targets set in the original Business Plan and the impact of the recession on Ashland’s economy. He expressed their desire to revise the Business Plan based on all of the new factors and bring it back to the Advisory Committee to rethink their strategy. He concluded saying that $8.6 million has been spent on building the AFN infrastructure, and unfortunately at the end of this fiscal year 200 service addresses would still not be serviceable. He talked about the AFN Service Agreement requirements. He estimated that to finish the build out would cost about $400,000 and stated that it was not in the budget. Discussion ensued regarding AFN construction loans. Silbiger provided charts detailing the loans and internal borrowing, and revenue projections. Silbiger gave an overview of the charts on the overhead projector. Tuneberg clarified construction loans, detailing principal and interest payments. Discussion X:\\Shared City Files\\Council Packets\\Commissions\\Budget Committee\\2003 Minutes\\4-26-03 Minutes.doc8/28/2024 1:19 PM Page 6 of 7 ensued regarding loans and internal borrowings. Tuneberg pointed out that the internal borrowing roughly approximated the difference in revenues and expenses on a budgetary basis from FY99 through this time. He clarified that operational costs contributed to internal borrowings. Silbiger suggested putting the revisions in the proposed budget. Discussion sustained. Wanderscheid confirmed that the AFN budget is as lean as possible and the only answer is to increase revenue. He concluded that he would come back to the Committee with revised numbers. Laws asked if the laws required the City to pay the Franchise Fees to themselves. Wanderscheid responded that it would be difficult to compete with private sector companies without having the same rules. Discussion ensued about Franchise Fees and pole attachments. Cable TV Manager Mike Ainsworth gave an overview of the marketing efforts and statistic for AFN. He informed that technology hadn’t been used as a tool to promote economic growth. Tuneberg proposed shifting $400,000 from Charge for Services down to Interfund Loans, which would reflect the revision requested. Discussion continued regarding the market share percentage and marketing strategy. Laws/Jackson m/s to accept the Electric Department budget as revised. Voice Vote: Motion passed 13 to 1; Morrison opposed. Discussion ensued regarding AFN marketing. rd The Committee agreed to start the next Budget Committee Meeting on Saturday, May 3 at 8:30am. ADJOURNMENT Meeting was adjourned at 2:16pm. X:\\Shared City Files\\Council Packets\\Commissions\\Budget Committee\\2003 Minutes\\4-26-03 Minutes.doc8/28/2024 1:19 PM Page 7 of 7