HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009-07-15 Croman Advisory_MIN
CROMAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE
MINUTES
JULY 15, 2009
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 5:00 p.m. in the Siskiyou Room, 51 Winburn Way.
Committee Members Present: Staff Present:
Alan DeBoer (attending for R. Hendrickson), Airport Commissioner Bill Molnar, Community Development Director
Eric Navickas, City Councilor Maria Harris, Planning Manager
Russ Chapman, Conservation Commissioner Brandon Goldman, Senior Planner
Keith Swink, Historic Commissioner
Graham Lewis, Housing Commissioner
Jim Lewis, Parks & Recreation Commissioner
Larry Blake, Planning Commissioner
Matt Warshawsky, Transportation Commissioner
Zane Jones, Tree Commissioner
Pam Hammond, Chamber of Commerce Representative
Rylan Heyerman, Neighborhood Representative
Mary Kay Michelsen, Neighborhood Representative
Paul Steinle, SOU Representative
Absent Members:
Richard Hendrickson, Airport Commissioner
David Wilkerson, Public Arts Commissioner
Ben Bellinson, Neighborhood Representative
INTRODUCTIONS & SELECTION OF CHAIR / VICE CHAIR
Community Development Director Bill Molnar welcomed everyone and the members took turns introducing themselves.
The selection of the Committee Chair and Vice Chair was moved to the end of the agenda.
CROMAN MILL SITE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN / REVIEW OF LAND USE AND STREET FRAMEWORK REFINEMENTS
Planning Manager Maria Harris explained the Plan Overview and Land Use/Street Framework Refinements would be
combined in a single staff presentation. She explained the presentation would cover: 1) Background on future employment
centers in Ashland, 2) Plan development and implementation strategy process, 3) Overview of the Croman Mill Site
Redevelopment Plan, and 4) Review of the latest refinements to the land use and street framework plans.
Future Employment Centers in Ashland
Mr. Molnar presented the segment addressing the future employment centers in Ashland. He familiarized the Advisory
Committee with the inventory of employment lands within the City and the types of developments that are influenced by the
zoning code and specific design standards. Following this segment, a discussion of the current M-1 Industrial zoning of the
majority of the Croman Mill site took place. Comment was made questioning if residential was prohibited in the M-1 or E-1
zones, and Mr. Molnar clarified residential has been allowed in these zones through the addition of residential zoning overlays.
It was also questioned if the City had to maintain a certain supply of employment lands under State law. Mr. Molnar explained
the Statewide Planning Goal requirements and indicated the Economic Opportunity Overlay (EOA) identified a need for 160 to
170 acres to meet the City’s employment projections for the next 20 to 50 years. Staff also clarified whether the zoning of the
site was on the table for potential change and stated the proposed zoning adjustments would be covered in tonight’s
presentation.
Croman Advisory Committee
July 15, 2009
Page 1 of 3
Plan Development / Overview of Plan
Ms. Harris presented the planning and public review process that led to the development of the Plan. She discussed the series
of public workshops that were held in which concerns were identified and alternative plans were presented and evaluated. Mr.
Molnar provided examples of employment density, noting that the long term viability of transit will require higher employment
densities. As examples in the presentation he cited Modern Fan as employing approximately 10 people on a 1-acre property,
and Blackstone Audio which employs 120 employees on 2-acres. Ms. Harris spoke of the proposed Neighborhood Center in
the location of the existing ODOT yard, and identified a number of its elements, including: openspace, daylighting of Hamilton
Creek, a transit plaza, and the pedestrian and bicycle framework.
Comment was made questioning the realignment of Tolman Creek Road and the signature street cross section. Ms. Harris
explained minimizing the impacts to Tolman Creek Rd. and the route to Bellview School was identified early on as a concern
and lead to the idea of building the boulevard through the Croman property to direct that traffic to the site and keep Tolman
Creek Rd. as the smaller collector street. Ms. Harris provided the group with a description of the cross section of the signature
street, and in response to whether anyone had looked at the traffic on Siskiyou between Crowson and Walker, she clarified a
traffic impact analysis was completed with the Plan, and the intersections that needed work are shown on the Plan map
(Tolman Creek Rd. and Ashland St., Tolman Creek Rd. and the new street, and the new street and Siskiyou Blvd.)
Comment was made questioning the height restrictions in the Airport Overlay Zone. Mr. Molnar clarified the Croman site is
100 ft. above the airport approach zone. He stated the City’s Public Works Department had initially indicated multi-story
buildings are feasible for this site and provide accommodations for the airport, such as lights. He added the Public Works and
Community Development Departments would be working together to finalize this possibility.
Review of Land Use and Street Framework Refinements
Staff presented the proposed land use and street framework adjustments and then opened the floor to questions from the
group.
GROUP DISCUSSION
Comment was made questioning whether the existing Mistletoe Rd. and Siskiyou Blvd. intersection should go away or be
realigned. Mr. Molnar clarified that ODOT had expressed concerns in the past regarding this intersection and that this is an
area that would be looked at further.
Senior Planner Brandon Goldman provided clarification on the 25% reduction for public improvements and explained the
standard deduction taken from the gross acreage to allow for the development of streets and utilities. Staff also provided
clarification on the proposed Plexis facility, which would be located in the northern part of the Croman property. It was noted
that there have been preliminary discussions about the possibility of Plexis taking access from Mistletoe Rd, should they want
to build their facility prior to the larger street being built. Comment was made that Plexis had previously talked about the
importance of openspace in their vision for their business. Ms. Harris noted that once a fairly high-end building is built, there
will be a desire to have similar buildings and uses surrounding it. Mr. Molnar added that Plexis has discussed the possibility of
having restrictions on the property surrounding their potential site that would insure a similar level of building and site
development.
Concern was expressed that they may be creating a situation where the developer will have to apply for an exception to the
Street Standards to build in the area next to Hamilton Creek, and suggestion was made for this area to be possibly be
openspace. Staff noted the Street Standards require new streets to run along natural features to provide visual access, such
as Winburn Way along Ashland Creek. Comment was made questioning if the area next to Hamilton Creek was dedicated as
open space, how would this impact lands for job creation? Mr. Molnar said this would have to be looked at in terms of
potentially increasing the business floor area somewhere else on the site. Comment was made that in order to turn that area
into openspace, it would need to be purchased. Ms. Harris concurred and clarified this area is not owned by the Croman
property owners. Statement was made noting that the path along Hamilton Creek is identified as part of the Trails Master Plan.
The Neighborhood Center was briefly discussed and it was questioned if there is anything the group needs to know about
ODOT’s future plans. Staff clarified the City has had discussions with ODOT and they have indicated they are open to moving
Croman Advisory Committee
July 15, 2009
Page 2 of 3
their operations due to some incompatibilities with the surrounding residential neighborhood. Mr. Molnar added ODOT has
asked for the City’s help in finding another location.
Support was voiced for the new permutation of the Plan. Since this area is focused on jobs and will have to be served by
trucks, suggestion was made for the on-street parking to be backed away from the corners so that trucks will be able to make
the turning radius. Comment was made questioning if the 10-story buildings were still on the table for consideration, and staff
clarified that they have not yet gotten to this element; however they have received concerns regarding the potential height of
the buildings.
Comment was made questioning the need for a parking garage and noting the problems with the unused structures in
Medford. A discussion followed regarding moving the parking garage and making it more of a flexible location. Comment was
made that the revised Plan was an improvement and locating the parking structure off of the main street looks to be an effort
to create a streetscape on the main boulevard. Additional comment was made that this situation is not comparable to Medford.
Suggestion was made for the bulk of the parking structure to be reduced by putting it partially below grade with potential
access from the top and bottom utilizing grade changes on site.
It was noted that the Plan is looking to create 2,000 to 3,000 new jobs and questioned if there is enough land for 2,000
additional residents within the City’s UGB. Mr. Molnar clarified that yes, there is enough land; and Ms. Harris noted that the full
build-out of the Plan would take some time.
Opinion was voiced that the central boulevard should not run through the industrial area and that the industrial area should be
preserved as a 20-acre site for a large user. Opposing comment was made that smaller, light industrial uses are more typical
of Ashland and anyone wanting a 20-acre site would likely go to Medford or White City due to cost.
Concern wad expressed with straightening out the intersection with Siskiyou Blvd and trucks using Tolman Creek Rd. instead.
The Committee concluded their deliberations by holding a brief discussion regarding the existing trailer park off Crowson Rd.
Comment was made that this area has historic significance and value as affordable housing and suggestion was made to
bring this into a zoning that allows for it to remain.
SELECTION OF CHAIR / VICE CHAIR
The selection of the Committee Chair and Committee Vice Chair was discussed, and staff asked for volunteers. Matt
Warshawsky volunteered to serve as Chair, and Graham Lewis volunteer for Vice Char.
SCHEDULE NEXT MEETING DATE
Staff suggested the potential dates of August 12, 20 and 26 for the next Croman Advisory Committee meeting. Matt
th
Warshawsky noted the Transportation Commission is meeting on the 20, and Russ Chapman stated the Conservation
th
Commission meets on the 26. Mr. Molnar asked what days and times worked best for people and there seemed to be
general consensus that Wednesdays work well. Most of the group indicated the August 12 date would work for them.
Chapman indicated that he would be out of town on this date but encouraged the group to not let that hold them up.
ADJOURNMENT
Meeting adjourned at 6:45 p.m.
Croman Advisory Committee
July 15, 2009
Page 3 of 3