HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024-10-02 Historic PACKET
HPACCommittee Agenda
Note: Anyone wishing to speak at any HPAC meeting is encouraged to do so. If you wish to speak, please rise and, after you have been
recognized by the Chair, give your name and complete address for the record. You will then be allowed to speak. Please note the public
testimony may be limited by the Chair. Times noted for each item are approximate…
October 2, 2024
AGENDA
(4:00) CALL TO ORDER: Meeting held in person at 51 Winburn Way and via Zoom at:
READING OF LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I.(4:05) APPROVAL OF AGENDA
II.(4:10)APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Minutes of September 4, 2024
III.(4:15) PUBLIC FORUM
IV.(4:30) LIASON REPORTS
A.Council Liaison - Jeff Dahle
B.Staff Liaison – Derek Severson
VI.(4:45) DISCUSSION ITEMS
A.Review Board
B.Goal Setting
VII.(5:30) PLANNING ACTION REVIEW
PLANNING ACTION: PA-T1-2024-00247
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 77 Fifth Street
OWNER/APPLICANT: Asher Homes
DESCRIPTION: A request for a Conditional Use Permit approval for an addition to an existing non-
conforming structure at 77 Fifth Street. The proposal is for a 295 square foot addition to the rear of
the existing residence. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Multi-Family Residential; ZONING: R-2; MAP:
391E09AC; TAX LOT: 6,900
VIII.(6:00) ADJOURNMENT
Page 1 of 1
HPAC Committee Minutes (Draft)
September 4, 2024
4:00PM – 6:00PM
Community Development/Engineering Services Building – 51 Winburn Way
**See presentation from this meeting at the end of the minutes**
4:00PM CALL TO ORDER
Scharen called the meeting to order at 4:03
Commissioners Present: Council Liaison:
Shostrom Jeff Dahle
Skibby - Zoom Staff Present:
Repp -Zoom Derek Severson; Planning Manager
Bonetti Regan Trapp; Admin Support
Scharen
Whitford
Emery
Brouillard
Commissioners Absent: ALL PRESENT
READING OF LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Land Acknowledgement was read by Scharen.
(4:05) APPROVAL OF AGENDA (5 min)
Commissioner suggested amendments to Agenda.
No suggested amendments were made to the agenda until later in the meeting. The
o
planning action review was moved up as the Climate Friendly Areas discussion took
longer than expected.
(4:10) APPROVAL OF MINUTES (5 min)
Historic Commission meeting of August 7, 2024
(4:15) PUBLIC FORUM (15 min)
There was no one in the audience wishing to speak.
HPAC Committee Minutes (Draft)
(4:30) LIAISON REPORTS (5 min)
Councilor Dahle gave liaison report. Items discussed were:
Sabrina Cotta has been officially appointed as City Manager.
Severson gave the staff report. Items discussed were:
Report of Ross Johnson Tires being demolished without the approval of the demolition
application. The findings are currently unknown.
(4:45) DISCUSSION ITEMS (10 min)
A.Climate Friendly Areas discussion – Deadline for decision is December 31, 2023.
See Power Point presentation given by Severson (attached after the minutes)
o
The state-adopted Climate Friendly & Equitable Communities (CFEC) rules require the city
to select and zone Climate Friendly Areas (CFAs) to accommodate 30 percent of Ashland’s
future population in mixed- use, pedestrian-friendly areas served by a robust multi-
studied the former Croman Mill site, the Transit
modal transportation system. Ashland has
Triangle, the Railroad Property and the historic Downtown as potential Climate Friendly
Areas and must select and re-zone sufficient land area to satisfy the CFEC rules by the
end of December 2024.
In considering the CFA Project, the Historic Preservation Advisory Committee (HPAC) discussed:
That the mandated CFA rules at a minimum allow an additional ten feet/one-story over
current height limits, and that many historic resources in the downtown are well below
the current maximum heights. The CFA rules would also remove maximum density
limits. The HPAC discussed whether additionalheight and density allowances might
encourage the demolition of historic resources, or incompatible additions, due to
increased redevelopment potential.
Staff noted that inclusion of the downtown as a CFA was not necessary to meet
the population requirements for a CFA, and that it would be reasonable for HPAC
to recommend against CFA designation for the downtown if they had concerns over
detrimental impacts to the district’s historic character.
There was also discussion of whether it might be possible to treat the downtown as a
secondary CFA, forgoing the prescriptive requirements dealing with height and density
in favor of a demonstration that the existing standards meet more performance-based
standards in the CFA rules.
HPAC discussed how CFA requirements might impact the implementation of existing
historic district and downtown design standards in the National Register-listed
noted that current Historic District Development
Downtown Historic District. HPAC
Standards seek heights to conform with buildings in the immediate vicinity (AMC
18.4.2.050.B.2) while the Downtown Design Standards call for a slightly dissimilar heights
to maintain a traditional staggered streetscape (AMC 18.4.2.060.C.1). The prescriptive
CFA rules appear to require an outright allowance of at least 50 feet that does not
readily accommodate limits imposed through design standards.
The CFA rules allow single-use residential development when a minimum density of 15
per acre is achieved, which could result in apartments or townhomes
dwelling units
in otherwise commercial areas. The CFA rules may allow cities to require a percentage
of ground floor space be retained as commercial similarly to current city rules in the
commercial uses. (Staff
C-1-D district requiring that 65 percent of the ground floor be
HPAC Committee Minutes (Draft)
also noted that recently adopted state laws independent of the CFA rules require
cities to allow affordable housing in commercial zones and to allow conversion of
vacantcommercial space to residential use; both circumstances would override any
commercial space requirements.)
local ground floor
The relationship of the potential Railroad Property Climate Friendly Area (CFA) to the historic
Railroad Addition Historic District, noting that the two are separated by the existing Union Pacific
Railroad tracks and that development of the Railroad Property will very much be visible from the
Railroad District.
Following this discussion, HPAC members generally indicated:
That they were supportive of the purposed and intent of the Climate Friendly & Equitable
Communities rules and specifically with the Climate Friendly Areas project.
That they believed that the other three potential Climate Friendly Areas at the Railroad
Property, the Transit Triangle and the former Croman Mill site seemed to make sense in the
big picture for Ashland.
That while new development in the Downtown would likely to be limited to a few vacant lots and
parking lots, the new CFA requirements would nonetheless pose concerns if they in any
way supplanted existing Historic District and Downtown Design Standards which have been
crafted over the years in cooperation between the City and the State Historic Preservation
Office (SHPO) to minimize the impacts of new development on the National Register-
listed Downtown Historic District. HPAC members generally seemed willing to support the
new CFA requirements in terms of heights and densities for the vacant lotswithinthe
downtown but noted that they would have concerns if the new requirements increased
pressures to redevelop existing historic resources in the downtown.
Historic Preservation Advisory Committee members also expressed concerns that, if the
goal of the CFEC rules is to provide housing within CFAs, allowances for short-term rentals in
Accommodationsor Hotel/Motel uses should be restricted or
the form of Travelers
townhomes and apartment buildings developed as single-use residential would quickly
convert to short-term rentals and the intended climate-friendly benefits of the district
designation lost.
Emery/Scharen m/s to express HPAC's support for the designation of the Downtown as
a secondary Climate Friendly Area provided that such a designation would not result in
the alteration existing approval criteria or design standards. Voice vote: All AYES, Repp
abstained. Motion passed.
(4:35) PLANNING ACTION REVIEW (20 min)
PLANNING ACTION:PA-T2-2024-00050
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 113 Pine St.
APPLICANT & OWNER: Rogue Development for Charlie Hamilton
DESCRIPTION: Outline & Final Plan Performance Standards Option subdivision to create four-lots
including three residential lots and one common space. Also includes: a request for an
Exception to Street Design Standards to not install park row and retain the curbside sidewalk;
and a request to remove seventeen trees, five of which are ‘significant’. Conceptual building
HPAC Committee Minutes (Draft)
designs have been provided; final home designs will be developed as each lot is sold. \[Note:
Demolition of the existing ‘E.E. Phipps House’ as a dangerous building has been approved by
the Building Division. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-
7.5; MAP: 39-1E-08-AD; TAX LOT: 2600
Severson gave the staff report for PA-T2-2024-00050.
There was no conflict of interest or ex-parte contact indicated by the Committee.
Applicants present:
Amy Gunter, applicant’s representative
Charlie and Kasey Hamilton, owners
DISCUSSION ITEMS (Continued after Planning Action Review)
B.Cabinet Replacements – ODOT
Bonetti/Repp
C.Review Board – Sept/Oct
Sept 5 - Canceled
th
Sept 19 – Whitford, Brouillard, Emery
th
Oct 3 – Scharen, Emery, Repp
rd
Oct 17 – Brouillard, Shostrom, Scharen
th
ADJOURNMENT
Next meeting is scheduled October 2, 2024, at 4:00pm at, 51 Winburn Way
There being no other items to discuss, the meeting adjourned at 5:45 pm
Respectfully submitted by Regan Trapp
Oct 2024
HPAC Review Board
Meet at 3:00pm - Lithia Room
Every other week
**Staff to email if there is anything to review on the off weeks**
DATE COMMITTEE MEMBERS ATTENDING
Oct 3rd Scharen Emery Repp
Oct 17th Brouillard Shostrom Scharen
*Call 541-488-5305 to verify there are items on the agenda to review
Nov2024
HPAC Review Board
Meet at 3:00pm - Lithia Room
Every other week
**Staff to email if there is anything to review on the off weeks**
DATE COMMITTEE MEMBERS ATTENDING
Nov 7th
Nov 21st
*Call 541-488-5305 to verify there are items on the agenda to review
Memo
DATE: October 2, 2024
TO:Historic Preservation Advisory Committee (HPAC) Members
FROM: Derek Severson, Planning Manager
RE: HPAC Priorities & Workplan Preliminary Discussion
Background
The City Council’s “LookAhead” tentatively includes a study session on Monday,
December 16 to consider advisory committee workplans and celebrate volunteers.
th
Assuming this will be handled like other study sessions, it will be held at 5:30 p.m. at
the Council Chambers. I’ll make you aware once final details are announced.
HPAC held a retreat early in 2023 and developed workplan and list of priorities that
were provided to the City Council noting that these would be the focus of HPAC
meetings when there were not multiple land use actions to consider. The 2023
priority list included:
Restart the HPAC Weekly Review Board
The Review Board resumed weekly in-person meetings on Thursday afternoons
by appointment and has reviewed building permit submittals and pre-
applications and provided consultations with property owners, designers and
contractors by appointment as needed. Permits and planning actions within
the districts have been relatively slow compared to prior years, and the Review
Board shifted to meeting every other week earlier in 2024. Scheduled members
are notified in advance if there are no items to review or appointments
scheduled.
Implement Residential Site Design Review
With the passage of House Bill 2001, which required cities to allow accessory
residential units and duplexes with the same procedural requirements for
review as detached single-family homes, HPAC no longer reviews a substantial
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
51 Winburn Way Tel: 541.488.5305
Ashland, Oregon 97520 Fax: 541.552.2050
ashland.or.usTTY: 800.735.2900
portion of the new construction in the four National Register-listed historic
districts which previously required review. HPAC members conveyed to Council
that they would like to see residential Site Design Review requirements
implemented so that the designs for new Single-Family Residences, Accessory
Residential Units and Duplexes in the historic districts could be reviewed for
compliance with Historic District Development Standards.
In staff’s assessment, this could be difficult to accomplish as the current long-
range workplan in implementing new state laws and rules along with local
priorities has Ashland’s limited staffing scheduled at least 18-24 months out (i.e.
Climate Friendly & Equitable Communities (CFEC) rules Climate Friendly Areas
(CFAs) including Re-Zoning CFAs and developing new land use regulations,
crafting new Walkable Design Standards required under CFEC, completing
Multi-Modal Gap Analyses and Highway Impact Summaries for the CFAs;
completing a new city-wide Economic Opportunities Analysis; developing a
new Manufactured Home Park Ordinance, and creating a new Transportation
System Plan (TSP) which will require a greater Planning role in response to CFEC
requirements, and continuing to work on large scale developments including
the Townmakers’ masterplan of the former Croman Mill site and the potential
third iteration of the Grand Terrace annexation.)
Updatethe city’s Historic Preservation Plan.
The current Preservation Plan was completed in 2008 using consultant services
funded by a Certified Local Government (CLG) grant. The plan speaks to the
cities planned preservation activities from 2009-2018, and in 2023 HPAC
members indicated it was overdue for an update.
In the absence of available consultant services funds, HPAC had discussed
revisiting the plan and updating it through regular meetings or as a
subcommittee project but there seemed to be limited interest after initial
discussions last year.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
51 Winburn Way Tel: 541.488.5305
Ashland, Oregon 97520 Fax: 541.552.2050
ashland.or.usTTY: 800.735.2900
UpdateHistoric Surveys.
The documents inventorying the four existing historic districts are decades old,
and do not reflect new development within the districts or buildings which were
not eligible to be considered historic resources at the time the districts were
adopted but may now be considered historic due to their age. In addition, there
may be additional areas, such as the Quiet Village Subdivision, which are now
qualified for nomination as historic districts.
Historic Surveys are a substantial undertaking and typically rely heavily on
consultant services because they are so time and labor intensive.
DigitizeText & Photos of Existing Historic Surveys/Make Available On-Line.
The photos used in the existing survey were taken on film originally. Digitizing
them would require obtaining negatives from the original consultant who
prepared the original historic district survey documents, having them scanned,
and then creating a user-friendly, searchable webpage. It might also involve
the creation of a “story map” through the city’s Geographic Information System
(GIS).
Currently, there are not funds budgeted to support such an undertaking.
Updating the HPAC Webpage.
In 2023, HPAC members noted that they would like to see the committee’s
webpage updated to be more comprehensive and user friendly and to contain
all documents relating to the historic districts and historic preservation in
Ashland in a single convenient on-line location.
In 2024, Maureen Batistella of the Jackson County Heritage Association
provided some recommendations for a webpage update. In mid-2024, the
city’s webpage was fully replaced and now has the web address of
http://www.ashlandoregon.gov. Pages associated with individual departments
and divisions, as well as commissions and committees, are being rebuilt
individually as staff time allows. If the Commission wanted to make this a
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
51 Winburn Way Tel: 541.488.5305
Ashland, Oregon 97520 Fax: 541.552.2050
ashland.or.usTTY: 800.735.2900
project, we could review the current page at a regular meeting item to identify
needed changes, or consider forming a subcommittee.
As previously discussed, it would be worthwhile to consolidate historic
documents on a single HPAC page including the current survey information in
as much detail as possible for the four National Register-listed historic districts,
and to ultimately look at the potential for using GIS Story Maps.
Continuing education opportunities for HPAC members
Last year’s discussion suggested that when meeting time was available, HPAC
could take advantage of the extra time to provide some continuing education
on the information that HPAC members should know in order to carry out their
responsibilities, such as:
Review the Ashland Municipal Code to understand HPAC’s role and
o
responsibilities as an Advisory Body to the City Council. (Note: The
ordinance establishing advisory committee roles and responsibilities will
be updated at Council in the coming months, and a training
manual/guidebook is being developed by the City Manager.)
Become familiar with the regulations for Building Placement, Orientation,
o
and Design for residential and non-residential developments, as well as
Historic District developments, and Downtown Ashland (AMC 18.4.2).
Provide a short workshop on how to read the monthly packets, which
o
include becoming familiar with the definition of terms related to Planning
Actions reviewed by HPAC. For example, understand the difference
between a contributing and non-contributing property, conforming and
non-conforming property, etc.
Become familiar with the different kinds of planning actions, such as site
o
reviews, or conditional use permits, etc.
Review the national standards for historic preservation from the National
o
Park’s Service’s National Register of Historic Places.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
51 Winburn Way Tel: 541.488.5305
Ashland, Oregon 97520 Fax: 541.552.2050
ashland.or.usTTY: 800.735.2900
Become familiar with the responsibilities of being designated as a
o
Certified Local Government under the State Historic Preservation Office
(SHPO).
If the HPAC would like to move ahead with continuing education items like this,
they could be scheduled whenever regular meeting time is available.
Raise Public Awareness of Historic Preservation and HPAC’s Role
HPAC discussion of promoting preservation and the committee included:
Plan special events and activities that educate the general public about
o
the role historic preservation plays in revitalizing neighborhoods and
promoting tourism that highlights the historic and cultural heritage of
Ashland, such as the annual Historic Preservation Week in May.
(Preservation Week in May 2024 included a number of events promoting
the Railroad Addition Historic District as highlighted through the Marking
Ashland Places (MAP) Project and the HPAC’s role in partnering with the
Public Arts Advisory Committee, Ashland Chamber of Commerce,
Southern Oregon University and WalkAshland.)
Identify target professional groups, such as realtors, developers,
o
designers and architects, to inform them of the design standards, as
well as building materials, that are required in properties located within
the Historic Districts. This information is already available in pamphlet
form.
Strategize ways to make new homebuyers moving into Ashland’s historic
o
districts aware of the City’s process in regards to making exterior
improvements to their properties (See attached Historic Building Brief #1
“Living With Historic Buildings”).
(There was an initial mailing of the Living With Historic Buildings brief to
new homeowners within the districts. This could be repeated.)
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
51 Winburn Way Tel: 541.488.5305
Ashland, Oregon 97520 Fax: 541.552.2050
ashland.or.usTTY: 800.735.2900
HPAC also noted “Preservation Planning for Local Governments” from
o
) as a reference item.
Oregon Heritage (http://www.oregonheritage.org
Next Steps
The December 16 study session will provide an opportunity to communicate HPAC’s
th
priorities and proposed workplan to the Council and hear any feedback.
Staff felt that tonight’s meeting was a good opportunity for an initial review and
discussion of the items from last year’s priority list, and we’ll plan to have an agenda
item for the November 6 meeting to craft a priority list/work plan to send to the
th
Council for their December study session.
REFERENCES & ATTACHMENTS
None.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
51 Winburn Way Tel: 541.488.5305
Ashland, Oregon 97520 Fax: 541.552.2050
ashland.or.usTTY: 800.735.2900
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
PLANNING ACTION: PA-T1-2024-00247
SUBJECT PROPERTY:77 Fifth Street
OWNER/APPLICANT:Asher Homes
DESCRIPTION: A request for a Conditional Use Permit approval for an addition to an existing non-
conforming structure at 77 Fifth Street. The proposal is for a 295 square foot addition to the rear of the existing
residence. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION:Multi-Family Residential; ZONING:R-2; MAP: 391E09AC;
TAX LOT:6,900
NOTE:The Ashland Historic Preservation Advisory Committeewill review this Planning Action on Wednesday, October 2, 2024at 5:00 PMat 51
Winburn Way.
NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: September 26, 2024
DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: October 10, 2024
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
51 Winburn Way Tel: 541.488.5305
Ashland, Oregon 97520 Fax: 541.552.2050
ashland.or.usTTY: 800.735.2900
The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted onPage 1of this notice.
A copy of the application, including all documents, evidence and applicable criteria are available online at “What’s
.Copies of application materialswill be provided
Happening in my City” at https://gis.ashland.or.us/developmentproposals/
at reasonable cost, if requested. Application materials may be requested to be reviewed in-person at the Ashland
Community Development & Engineering Services Building, 51 Winburn Way, via a pre-arranged appointment by calling
(541) 488-5305 or emailing planning@ashland.or.us.
Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submit written comments within the 14-day comment period to
planning@ashland.or.usorto the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30
p.m. on the deadline date shown on Page 1.
Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a land use application is complete within 30 days of submittal.Upon
determination of completeness, a notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting the
application. After the comment period and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning
Division Staff shall make a final decision on the application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5
days of decision. An appeal tothe Planning Commission of the Planning Division Staff’s decision must be made in writing to
the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC 18.5.1.050.G)
The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice.Oregon law states that failure to raise an
objection concerning this application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an
opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue.
Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that
criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with
sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court.
If you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contactJennifer Chenoweth at 541-552-2045
or Jennifer.chenoweth@ashland.or.us
In compliance with the American with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City
Administrator’s office at 541-488-6002 (TTY phone number 1-800-735-2900). Notification 72 hours prior to the meeting will enable the
City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to the meeting. (28 CFR 35.102.-35.104 ADA Title I).
)
CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS (See https://ashland.municipal.codes/LandUse/18.5.4.050
A Conditional Use Permit shall be granted if the approval authority finds that the application meets all of the following criteria, or can be made
to conform through the imposition of conditions.
1.That the use would be in conformance with all standards within the zoning district in which the use is proposed to be located, and in
conformance with relevant Comprehensive plan policies that are not implemented by any City, State, or Federal law or program.
2.That adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage, paved access to and throughoutthe
development, and adequate transportation can and will be provided to the subject property.
3.That the conditional use will have no greater adverse material effect on the livability of the impact area when compared to the
development of the subject lot with the target use of the zone, pursuant with subsection 18.5.4.050.A.5, below. When evaluating the effect of
the proposed use on the impact area, the following factors of livability of the impact area shall be considered in relation to the target use of the
zone.
a.Similarity in scale, bulk, and coverage.
b.Generation of traffic and effects on surrounding streets. Increases in pedestrian, bicycle, and mass transit use are considered beneficial
regardless of capacity of facilities.
c.Architectural compatibility with the impact area.
d.Air quality, including the generation of dust, odors, or other environmental pollutants.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
51 Winburn Way Tel: 541.488.5305
Ashland, Oregon 97520 Fax: 541.552.2050
ashland.or.usTTY: 800.735.2900
e.Generation of noise, light, and glare.
f.The development of adjacent properties as envisioned in the Comprehensive Plan.
g.Other factors found to be relevant by the approval authority for review of the proposed use.
4.A conditional use permit shall not allow a use that is prohibited or one that is not permitted pursuant to this ordinance.
5.For the purposes of reviewing conditional use permit applications for conformity with the approval criteria of this subsection, the
target uses of each zone are as follows.
a.WR and RR. Residential use complying with all ordinance requirements, developed at the density permitted by chapter 18.2.5
Standards for Residential Zones.
b.R-1. Residential use complying with all ordinance requirements, developed at the density permitted by chapter 18.2.5 Standards for
Residential Zones.
c.R-2 and R-3. Residential use complying with all ordinance requirements, developed at the density permitted by chapter 18.2.5
Standards for Residential Zones.
d.C-1. The general retail commercial uses listed in chapter 18.2.2 Base Zones and Allowed Uses, developed at an intensity of 0.35floor
to area ratio, complying with all ordinance requirements; and within the Detailed Site Review overlay, at an intensity of 0.50 floor to area ratio,
complying with all ordinance requirements.
e.C-1-D. The general retail commercial uses listed in chapter 18.2.2 Base Zones and Allowed Uses, developed at an intensity of 1.00
gross floor to area ratio, complying with all ordinance requirements.
f.E-1. The general office uses listed in chapter 18.2.2 Base Zones and Allowed Uses, developed at an intensity of 0.35 floor to area
ratio, complying with all ordinance requirements; and within the Detailed Site Review overlay, at an intensity of 0.50 floor to area ratio,
complying with all ordinance requirements.
g.M-1. The general light industrial uses listed in chapter 18.2.2 Base Zones and Allowed Uses, complying with all ordinance
requirements.
h.CM-C1. The general light industrial uses listed in chapter 18.3.2 Croman Mill District, developed at an intensity of 0.50 gross floor to
area ratio, complying with all ordinance requirements.
i.CM-OE and CM-MU. The general office uses listed in chapter 18.3.2 Croman Mill District, developed at an intensity of 0.60 gross
floor to area, complying with all ordinance requirements.
k.CM-NC. The retail commercial uses listed in chapter 18.3.2 Croman Mill District, developed at an intensity of 0.60 gross floor to area
ratio, complying with all ordinance requirements.
l.HC, NM, and SOU. The permitted uses listed in chapters 18.3.3 Health Care Services, 18.3.5 North Mountain Neighborhood, and
18.3.6 Southern Oregon University District, respectively, complying with all ordinance requirements.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
51 Winburn Way Tel: 541.488.5305
Ashland, Oregon 97520 Fax: 541.552.2050
ashland.or.usTTY: 800.735.2900
shelby@scharendesignstudio.com
jeff.dahle@council.ashland.or.us
Derek.Severson@ashland.or.us
ashlandoregon@gmail.com
regan.trapp@ashland.or.us
Kaylynnrepp@gmail.com
skwhippet@charter.net
bill@ashlandhome.net
terryskibby@gmail.com
mtbrouillard@msn.com
shobro@jeffnet.org
Web
5.1.2024
-
List
Updated
Mail
HPAC
-
Membership
E
4/30/274/30/254/30/264/30/26
4/30/264/30/274/30/264/30/26
Term
Name
Commissioner
Support
Shelby Scharen
Liaison
Derek Severson
Mark Brouillard
Shostrom
Whitford
SkibbyLiaison
Eric Bonetti
Trapp
Katy Repp
Emery
Jeff Dahle
Council
Admin
Regan
Terry
Staff
Dale
Bill
Sam