Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutClinton_345_PA-T1-2023-00214I T Y 0 F AA SFILAND November 3, 2023 Notice of Final Decision On November 3, 2023, the Community Development Director approved the request for the following: Planning Action: PA -TI -2023-00214 Subject Property: 345 Clinton St. Applicant: Rogue Planning & Development Services Description: The Ashland Land Use Ordinance has two required steps to Performance Standards Options Subdivision: Outline Plan and Final Plan. This application is a request for Final Plan approval for a 12 -lot, I 1 -unit residential subdivision, The Subdivision Outline Plan was approved by the Ashland Planning Commission as PA -T2-2023-00043, on June 15, 2023. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-5; MAP: 39 lE 04 DB; TAX LOT: 404 The Community Development Director's decision becomes final and is effective on the 12"' day after the Notice of Final Decision is mailed, Approval is valid for a period of 18 months and all conditions of approval identified on the attached Findings are required to be met prior to project completion, The application, all associated documents and evidence submitted, and the applicable criteria are available for review at the Ashland Community Development Department, located at 51 Winborn Way. Copies of file documents can be requested and are charged based on the City of Ashland copy fee schedule. Prior to the final decision date, anyone who was mailed this Notice of Final Decision may request a reconsideration of the action as set forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO) 18.5.1.050(F) and/or file an appeal to the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in ALUO 18.5.1.050(G). The ALUO sections covering reconsideration and appeal procedures are attached. The appeal may not be made directly to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals. If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Aaron Anderson in the Community Development Department at (541) 488-5305. cc: Parties of record and property owners within 200 ft COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 51 Wunburn Way Tel: 541.488.5305 Ashland, Oregon 97520 Fax: 541.552.2050 rash 1Qn,d-o1f'-1t1M TTY: 800.735.2900 ASHLAND PLANNING DEPARTMENT FINDINGS & ORDERS PLANNING ACTION: PA -TI -2023-00214 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 345 Clinton Sty` OWNER: Magnolia Heights LLC APPLICANT: Rogue Planning & Development Services DESCRIPTION: The Ashland Land Use Ordinance has two required steps to Performance Standards Options Subdivision: Outline Plan and Final Plan. This application is a request for Final Plan approval for a 12 -lot, I I -unit residential subdivision. The Subdivision Outline Plan was approved by the Ashland Planning Commission as PA -T2-2023-00041, on June 15, 2023. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-5; MAP: 39 1E 04 DB; TAX LOT: 404 SUBMITTAL DATE: September 15, 2023 DEEMED COMPLETE DATE: October 10, 2023 STAFF APPROVAL DATE: November 3, 2023 DEADLINE TO APPEAL (4:30 p.m.): November 15, 2023 FINAL DECISION DATE: November 16, 2023 APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE: May 16, 2025 DECISION The City of Ashland has adopted a two-step procedure for Performance Standards Options (PSO) Subdivisions which require 1) Outline Plan Approval followed by 2) Final Plan Approval. For developments of fewer than ten lots, the outline plan may be filed concurrently, however for developments of ten or more lots, prior outline plan approval is mandatory. Outline Plan approval is always a Type -II procedure which requires a public bearing before the Planning Commission. The Outline Plan for this Subdivision, following public hearings, was approved by the Planning Commission as PA -T2-2023-00014. On June 15, 2023, findings were signed and were mailed along with the notice of decision the same day. The code provides that a Type lI decision becomes effective ten days after the City mails the notice of decision unless a notice of appeal is timely filed. There was no appeal to Council and the City's decision became final on June 26, 2023. To summarize the outline plan approval `Magnolia Meadows,' is a twelve -lot subdivision including eleven residential lots and one lot for open space. The property has been previously described as "2.66 acres in area and zoned R-1-5 (Single Family Residential) and within the Performance Standards Option Overlay. The property is currently vacant. Tile property was created in its current configuration on Partition Plat No. P-30-2022 recorded as CS 23736 and approved as City of Ashland Planning Action PA -T1-2020-00109." The outline plan includes the * 345 Clinton St. is the Situs address to the parent parcel of tax lot 404 when it was partitioned (see P30-2022). Assessors neap 39-1 E -04 -DB #404, the subject of this planning action and the previous outline plan approval, has yet to be assigned a Situs address. PA -TI -2023-00214 345 Clinton Magnolia Meadows/aa Page 1 construction of an extension of both Phelps and Briscoe Streets to create a new block similar in size to the western block of Riverwalk Subdivision to the east. The outline plan included several other requests including: an exception to the Street Design Standards to not install a park row planting strip in the southwest corner of the subdivision due to an immediate change in grade; a minor amendment to the adopted Physical and Environmental Constraints map; a wetland delineation demonstrating that there were no regulated wetlands in the project area; and tree removal permits for trees that are located in the proposed right of way. All of these items were approved concurrently with the outline plan as detailed in the adopted findings for PA -T2-2023- 00014, and by their reference are incorporated herein as if set out in full. Where the final plan is not done concurrently with the outline plan the final plan approval is a Type -1 decision. The code provides at AMC 18.3.9.040.13.5 that "Final plan approval shall be granted upon finding of substantial conformance with the outline plan" The approval criteria are based on a comparison of the outline plan with the final plan with regard to the following: a. The number of dwelling units/lots b. The yard sizes C. The open space sizes d. The building sizes e. The building elevations f. The additional standards which resulted in the awarding of bonus points are met g. The development complies with the (approved) Street Standards. In reviewing the application materials staff finds that: the number of lots and capacity for number of dwelling units is identical, there is no proposed change to yard size, open space, building size or elevations. There were no additional standards required as there were no bonus points used. The application includes the street exceptions that were previously approved with the outline plan and all other streets comply with the required standards. The final plan application materials include a comprehensive set of findings addressing each of the approval criteria, and by their reference are incorporated herein as if set out in full. The application discusses lot coverage in an `average' over the development with calculations suggesting a reallocation of lot coverage from excess open space dedication. Staff communicated with the applicant that the code does not support such a reallocation and informed the applicant that all building permits will need to demonstrate compliance with the standard that no more than 50 -percent lot coverage is allowed in the zone. A condition of approval to that effect has been included below. PUBLIC COMMENT Subsequent to the mailing of a Notice of Complete Application, neighboring property owners Diana Standing and Bob Weibel submitted written cornment largely concerned with the potential development of duplexes, and noting that the neighborhood has been "zoned for single-family residences for many years." Staff would note that state law has effectively eliminated single family housing by the adoption of `House Bill 2001' which the City's land use code fully complies with. From the outline plan findings [footnotes included]: PA-Tt-2023-00214 345 Clinton Magnolia Meadows/aa Page 2 1 The Planning Commission notes that State Law commonly referred to as "HB2001 `r" requires, among other things, that cities of our size "shall allow the development of a duplex on each lot or parcel zoned for residential use that allows for the development of detached single-family dwellings." The Planning Commission fiirther notes that following extensive public hearings: the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 3199 in June of 2021 amending several chapters of the Land Use Ordinance to be compliant with 1-1132001. The Planning Commission further notes that the special use provisions governing duplexes at AMC 18.2.3.110,C which states that "duplexes are not subject to the maximum density or minimum lot area requirements of the zone". The Planning Commission concludes that the 11 -lot proposal is consistent with the densities allowed in the zone and further notes that should the developer wish, a duplex could be built on each of the residential lots Additionally, during the public comment period staff had correspondence with Mr. Eric Elerath twice via email. The first email, received Thursday October, 121', requested to "make an appointment to see the application materials ... at your earliest convenience" and went on to state that he had not received "notice of the City Council's schedule and agenda to approve the outline plan." In reply to the first email, sent Friday 10113, it was explained that the file was available for review at any time between gam - 3pm on Monday through Friday, and planning staff offered three days the following week that would be most flexible for a personal appointment if requested. Additionally, it was explained that there was no meeting before City Council for which a notice would have been required to be mailed. As mentioned above the Planning Commission's approval of the outline plan was not appealed to Council'.Finally, it was made clear to Mr. Elerath in the correspondence that, "ifyou Intend to appeal you need to raise specific issues with enough clarity so that staff can address them." In a second email, also received Friday October 131', from Mr. Elerath there were no substantive comments about the application or relevant approval criteria, but rather raises general concerns about application completeness, allegations of applicant materials being prepared without professional licenses, the length of public comment period being too short, and concerns about the potential development of duplexes. He concluded by stating that he requested the public comment period time to be extended "until sueh tune as the City provides the appointment tune and date for review of the application." With regard to the completeness of the application, upon initial review staff determined that the application was incomplete. Staff issued a formal incomplete determination on October 3rd making the applicant aware of specific items that were missing including details on project schedule, building design, and complete civil plans. Oar October 10`1 following the receipt of the required items the application was deemed complete, and the Notice of Complete Application (NOC) was mailed. Due to an office error the files that were available online at the time of the NOC mailing only included the originally submitted materials and not those that were received following the incomplete determination. House Bill 2001 An Act Relating to housing; creating new provisions; amending ORS 197.296, 197.303, 197.312 and 455.6 t0 and section 1, chapter 47, Oregon Laws 2018 See littps://www.ashland.or.tis/duplexcode for complete records § Additionally, staff has correspondence following the Planning Commission's approval with Mr. Elerath on June 19, 2023, in which lie acknowledged receipt of the Notice of Decision, inquired about timelines and process for appeal to City Council. Staff replied the sante day answering all of his questions. PA -TI -2023-00214 345 Clinton Magnolia Meadows/aa Page 3 In response to Mr. Elerath's second email, staff explained the error with regard to the files that were available online and again reiterated that the assigned planner was available to meet any time on either Tuesday the 17"', Wednesday the 18"', or Thursday the 19`h the following week. Following the second exchange, later that same day, Friday the 13'x', Mr. Elerath came into the Community Development office to review the physical file which contained the complete application and record. Despite having offered multiple meeting options for Mr. Elerath we received no further communication or remarks from him after he inspected the physical file in person. The approval criteria for a Final Plan are in AMC subsection 18.3.9,040.13 as follows. 5. Approval Criteria for Final Plan. Final Plan approval shall be granted upon finding of substantial conformance with the Outline Plan. This substantial conformance provision is intended solely to facilitate the minor modifications from one planning step to another. Substantial conformance shall exist when comparison of the outline plan with the final plan meets all of the following criteria. a. The number of dwelling units vary no more than ten percent of those shown on the approved outline plan, but in no case shall the number of units exceed those permitted in the outline plan. b. The yard depths and distances between main buildings vary no more than ten percent of those shown on the approved outline plan, but in no case shall these distances be reduced below the minimum established within this Ordinance. c. The open spaces vary no more than ten percent of that provided on the outline plan. d. The building size does not exceed the building size shown on the outline plan by more than ten percent. e. The building elevations and exterior materials are in conformance with the purpose and intent of this ordinance and the approved outline plan. f. That the additional standards which resulted in the awarding of bonus points in the outline plan approval have been included in the final plan with substantial detail to ensure that the performance level committed to in the outline plan will be achieved. g. The development complies with the Street Standards. h. Nothing in this section shall limit reduction in the number of dwelling units or increased open space provided that, if this is done for one phase, the number of dwelling units shall not be transferred to another phase, nor the open space reduced below that permitted in the outline plan. 6. Any substantial amendment to an approved Final Plan shall follow a Type I procedure in section 18.5.1.050 and be reviewed in accordance with the above criteria. In staff's assessment, the application with the attached conditions complies with applicable ordinances and meets all required criteria. Planning Action #PA -T1-2023-00214 is approved with the following conditions. Further, if any one or more of the following conditions are found to be invalid for any reason whatsoever, then Planning Action #PA -TI -2023-00214 is denied. The following are the conditions of approval and they are attached to the approval: PA -TI -2023-00214 345 Clinton Magnolia Meadows/aa Page 4 1. That all proposals of the applicant shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise modified herein. 2. That all conditions of the Outline Plan approval PA -T2-2023-00014 shall remain in effect. 3, That prior to submittal of the final subdivision survey plat for review and signature the following conditions of approval shall be met: a. The final survey plat shall be submitted within 12 months and approved by the City of Ashland within 18 months of the Final Plan approval. b. That the applicant shall file an application for all new addresses including those required for utilities only to support common areas. c. All easements including but not limited to public and private utilities, drainage, irrigation, public and private pedestrian access shall be indicated on the final survey plat as required by the Ashland Engineering Division. d. That the subdivision name and all street names shall be approved by the City of Ashland Engineering Division. e. That no utility easements or above -ground equipment such as utility pedestals or transformers shall be located in the common open space area f The electric service plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Ashland Electric, Building, Planning and Engineering Divisions prior to installation. The electric service plan shall include locations of all primary and secondary electric services including line locations, transformers (to scale), cabinets, meters and all other necessary equipment. Transformers, cabinets and vaults shall be located in areas least visible from sheets and shall not be located in the common open space, while considering the access needs of the Electric Department. Any required private or public utility easements shall be delineated on the civil plans. g. Electric services shall be installed underground to serve all lots, inspected and approved. The electric service plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Ashland Electric Department and Ashland Engineering Division prior to installation. h. Subdivision infrastructure improvements including but not limited to utility installations, street and alley installation shall be completed, or bonded for, according to approved plans prior to signature of the final survey plat. 4. That the building permit submittals for each lot shall demonstrate compliance with no more than 50% lot coverage as allowed for the base zone, and solar setback (standard A) calculations for each of the individual lots. randon Goldman, C mmunity Development Director 114-512 Date PA -TI -2023-00214 345 Clinton Magnolia Meadows/aa Page 5 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON County of Jackson The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department, 2. On November 3, 2023 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #PA -T1-2023- 00214, 345 Clinton Street. 'Al ich aeCsuCCivan Signature of Employee 0 Acf�DmTAsbyS4ie,PfL'Lknsm;CrT:An_3451C�i)1?n_345_PA-T1-2023-09214-FWAL PLAff-140ktnyN,'MC(.nWR_345_PA-T1-2023a214_t,00AfEdZi2ofMa+Tsg,dXX111312023 1 7 PA -T1-2023-00214 391E04DC4400 PA -T1-2023-00214 391E04DC105 PA -T1-2023-00214 391E04DC4100 BATES WILLIAM L TRUSTEE ET AL BEEBE MILAN ET AL BOYARSKY STEPHEN J TRUSTEE ET 414 BRISCOE PL 350 CLINTON ST 408 CLINTON ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2023-00214 391E04DC4200 PA -T1-2023-00214 391E04DC108 PA -T1-2023-00214 391E04DC205 CALKINS KEVIN DEAN TRUSTEE ET CHAMBERS LINDA G EBERLE BROOKE 414 CLINTON ST 527 ANN ST 304 CLINTON ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2023-00214 391E04DD1607 PA -T1-2023-00214 391E04DC109 PA -T1-2023-00214 39lE04DC101 ELERATH ERIC J ET AL ENDORA PROPERTIES ORE LLC FIEDLER RITA 419 CLINTON ST 371 PATTERSON ST 3260 BRYCELER DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 EUGENE, OR 97405 PA -T1-2023-00214 391E04DC216 PA -Ti -2023-00214 391E04DC103 PA -T1-2023-00214 391E04DC206 FINDLEY LINDSEY ATHERTON TRUS FUNK ROGER P TRUSTEE ET AL GUSS MICHAEL R 328 CLINTON ST 7033 RAPP LN 316 CLINTON ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 TALENT, OR 97540 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2023-00214 391 E04DC4000 PA -T1-2023-00214 PA -T1-2023-00214 391 E04DB522 HILLIGOSS LAWRENCE O/LINDA A ICHIKAWA DEAN JACKSON WILLIAM BISARA J 534 ANN ST 521 N MOUNTAIN AVE 411 BRISCOE PL ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2023-00214 PA -T1-2023-00214 391E04DC208 PA -T1-2023-00214 391E04DC4500 JODI FORGIONE LANGE KELLY M TRUSTEE ET AL LAWSON SCOTT DOUGLAS TRUSTEE PO BOX 589 557 PHELPS ST 406 BRISCOE PL AURORA, OR 97002 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2023-00214 PA -T1-2023-00214 391 E04DC209 PA -T1-2023-00214 LJ FRIAR & ASSOCIATES LONG BRIAN PATRICK LONGHURST GORDON PO BOX 1947 547 PHELPS ST 515 ANN ST PHOENIX, OR 97535 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2023-00214 391E04DB401 PA -T1-2023-00214 391E04DB404 PA -T1-2023-00214 MACE PAUL B/KATHLEEN KAHLE MAGNOLIA HEIGHTS LLC MAGNOLIA HEIGHTS LLC 345 CLINTON ST 2974 CHAPMAN LN 619 ELKADER ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2023-00214 391E04DC100 PA -T1-2023-00214 PA -T1-2023-00214 391E04DB521 MARTIN NANCY ELIZABETH ET AL MCLANE BETSY MOZINGO GEORGE L TRUSTEE ET A 343 PATTERSON ST 419 CLINTON ST 28 ANTHEM CREEK CIR ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 HENDERSON, NV 89052 PA -T1-2023-00214 391 E04DB523 PA -T1-2023-00214 391 E04DC3900 PA -T1-2023-00214 MURPHY WHITNEY MIPAUL JB IV OHANA LIVING TRUST ET AL POWELL ENGINEERING & CONSULTING 403 BRISCOE PL 533 FAIRVIEW ST 100 E MAIN ST, SUITE 0 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 MEDFORD, OR 97501 PA -T 1 -2023-00214 391 E04 DA3900 PA -T1-2023-00214 PA -T1 -2023-00214 391 E04 DC3700 REIPURTH HELLE ET AL ROGUE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SENDAR STEPHEN MIMELIKIAN LIN 435 BRISCOE PL 1314-B CENTER DR, PMB#457 413 CLINTON ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 MEDFORD, OR 97501 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2023-00214 391E04DC4300 SHIVERS JACQUELYN C TRUSTEE E 422 BRISCOE PL ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2023-00214 391 E04DD3100 VITCOV BARRY/SHIRLEY 430 BRISCOE PL ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2023-00214 TERRAIN LANDSCAPING 310 OAK ST, UNIT #3 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2023-00214 391E04DC107 WEIBEL ROBERT W 394 CLINTON ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2023-00214 391 E04DC3800 TYLER FAMILY 2021 TRUST ET AL 407 CLINTON ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2023-00214 391E04DC110 WILSON VIRGINIA 361 PATTERSON ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2023-00214 391E04DC106 PA -T1-2023-00214 391E04DC109 345 Clinton NOC YASUTAKE KIM UP HERDKLOTZ DOUGLAS RYAN B ET AL 11/03/23 384 CLINTON ST 371 PATTERSON ST 41 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 \%� \ . . : � \ ( � � � LL October 24, 2023 To: Developer Gil Livni, Planner Aaron Anderson, and Planning Commission Members Thank you for all you do to improve the quality of life for Ashland residents. In the neighborhoods surrounding the proposed development on 345 Clinton Street there are neighbors feeling anxious. This area has been zoned for single-family residences for many years, some of us living here at least 23 years. What will this change mean for us? If the development becomes all duplexes it would be 11 lots and 22 residences. This could mean 44 cars added to our neighborhood. How will this affect parking and traffic safety? Families live in our neighborhoods and we hope this subdivision would encourage more families by providing yard space and keeping in mind that when duplexes have shared wall space it isn't always conducive to family life. Many neighbors have expressed a desire for a development that stays in character with what has been here for many years. The housing varies throughout our neighborhoods, from our neighbor's small single story one bedroom, to bigger homes in Riverwalk. During Covid we all had a much needed self contained living space and yard. There's an understandable need for affordable housing and there are what could be defined as affordable housing units already in our neighborhoods, including homes that have Accessory Residential Units. For many of us we would really appreciate the possibility of staying with a variety of housing options, some houses with Accessory Residential Units, and houses of varying sizes; perhaps two smaller homes can be on one lot. We realize that there are many challenges in your jobs that require a balancing act. When making your final decisions please keep in mind the concerns of the neighbors who surround the proposed subdivision and the possible concerns of prospective residents. Sincerely, A Diana Standing Bob Weibel Aaron Anderson From: Aaron Anderson Sent: Friday, October 13, 2023 1:19 PM To: Eric Elerath Cc- planning; Brandon Goldman; legal -division Subject: RE: Appointment Request to see Application Materials re: PA -T1-2023-00214 Mr. Elerath, Please re -read my original email: "The Civil drawings are quite large and are not included here...". The materials that were posted online only had the original submission, the subsequent submittals are being updated now. Again I am more than happy to set an appointment with you as I offered before anytime on Tue, Wed, or Thursday of next week. Which ever of those three days work for you please let tne know when you would like to meet. If in the alternative you'd prefer to come in this afternoon or Monday the entire file is sitting at the front counter available for your review. Aaron Anderson CFM, Sr. Planner Community Development 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 541.552.20521 TTY 800.735.2900 ciaron.anderso!) 05hlancf,or.us Online ashlancIorMS; social rnedia (Faceboo,k pCityOf Ashland Oreg a n I Twitter @CityofAshland) This entail' transmission is official business of the City of Ashland, and it is subject to Oregon Public Records Low for disclosure and retention. if you have received this message in error, please contact me at 54552.2052 From: Eric Elerath <eelerath@verizon.net> Sent: Friday, October 13, 2023 12:55 PM To: Aaron Anderson <aaron.ariderson@asliland.or.us> Cc: planning <pIanning@ashIand.or,us>; legal division <Iegal_division@aslilaiid.or,us>; Brandon Goldman <bra ndon.goldman@ashland.or.us> Subject: Re: Appointment Request to see Application Materials re: PA -TI -2023-00214 [EXTERNAL SENDER) Mr. Anderson The pdffiles donot include civil drawings which you cb1mare included. I've loaded the drawings online M/look xtthem |nmybrowser, I've downloaded them fromthe website and opened them inPreview and loAdobe Acrobat, I've done the same with the email attachments you just sent. The civil drawings pages are blank. I note also that the online documents are provided subject to the caveat that they are not msUaWe. The obvious and reasonable inference is that the application is not cornplete. Claims have been made that past applications have been incomplete as well. | note also that the public has avery short period oftime toreview and comment onavery large body ufinformation with ayears-long fmcivai|and procedural history. Thisinformadmnnbputpmstdedsionc-suchmsuonditionsnfpdor approvals -does riot appear to be referenced in the map located at h Igis,asWand.or.L, o men Itbnow the 13thofOctober. The public issupposed to, have 14days toreview the completed application and asofthis date, the materials comprising the 'complete application' are still not available for public review. My request for an appointment was replied to with information about how to request an appointment instead of proposing a time and date. Earlier this week, | left a phone message with my eye doctor and staff called me back the next morning with a choice ofatleast two different times. [ write also imnote that during a prior public hearing, I challenged the credentials of the the so-called 'professional' who coordinated and prepared and application materials. Amy Gunther isnot now and never has been aLandscape Architect, but the functions she performs meet the criteria for the services which Landscape Architects provide and perform. The purpose of licensing land use professional is to establish a minimal threshold of competence, but the City appears to willfully ignore this basic requirement, both in the present and in the past. The one Landscape Architect whose company appears to have performed some set -vices is clearly riot in responsible control of the application materials orthe overall design. Frankly, I think the City is reckless and negligent for not requiring parties submitting an application to be licensed in their fields, especially ifdesign defects give rise tofuture legal claims. | note that there appears tohave been motraffic study performed, for example, even though traffic entering the project site along Briscoe can easily heexpected tohave potential problems. Frommemony, the City has failed toaddress the issue oftraffic, which maybepartly due iothe fact that the number nfnew expected resident -drivers has never been offered bythe mppUcantnra8en1. The application clairns to be for 11 'units' on twelve lots, but the proposed CCRs have extensive descriptions of party walls, suggesting that the applicant intends to construct duplexes and call thern single units because the two units are attached. Reputable architects or persons whose professional career is at stake Would clarify this. | object and request that the 14day period beextended, not tobegin until such tKmoasthe City provides the appointment time and date for review ofthe application. Thank you. Eric Elerath On Oct 13, 2023, at 9:11 AM, Aaron Anderson <aaron.aniderso a s i i,!.a. nd.or.us> wrote: <Clinton_345_AA-T2-2023-00041_NOD—Cover Letter.pdf> Aaron Anderson From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: [EXTERNAL SENDER] Mr. Anderson, Eric Elerath <eelerath@verizon,net> Friday, October 13, 2023 12:55 PM Aaron Anderson planning; legal division; Brandon Goldman Re: Appointment Request to see Application Materials re: PA -T1-2023-00214 The pdf files do not include civil drawings which you claim are included. I've loaded the drawings online to look at then) in my browser. I've downloaded them from the website and opened them in Preview and in Adobe Acrobat. I've done the same with the email attachments YOU just sent. The civil drawings pages are blank. I note also that the online documents are provided subject to the caveat that they are not reliable. The obvious and reasonable inference is that the application is not complete. Claims have been made that past applications have been incomplete as well. I note also that the public has a very short period of time to review and comment on a very large body of information with a years -long factual and procedural history. This information about past decisions - such as conditions of prior approvals - does not appear to be referenced in the map located at httpsl is, as hja rid. or, us/deve lo pin enI12!�qr�sals It is now the 13th of October. The public is supposed to have 14 days to review the completed application and as of this date, the materials comprising the 'complete application' are still not available for public review. My request for an appointment was replied to with information about how to request an appointment instead of proposing a time and date. Earlier this week, I left a phone message with my eye doctor and staff called me back the next morning with a choice of at least two different times. I write also to note that during a prior public hearing, I challenged the credentials of the the so-called 'professional' who coordinated and prepared and application materials. Amy Gunther is not now and never has been a Landscape Architect, but the functions she performs meet the criteria for the services which Landscape Architects provide and perform. The purpose of licensing land use professional is to establish a minimal threshold of competence, but the City appears to willfully ignore this basic requirement, both in the present and in the past. The one Landscape Architect whose company appears to have, performed some services is clearly not in responsible control of the application materials or the overall design. Frankly, I think the City is reckless and negligent for not requiring parties submitting an application to be licensed in their fields, especially if design defects give rise to future legal claims. I note that there appears to have been no traffic study performed, for example, even though traffic entering the project site along Briscoe can easily be expected to have potential problems. From memory, the City has failed to address, the issue of traffic, which may be partly due to the fact that the number of new expected resident -drivers has never been offered by the applicant or agent. The application claims to be for 11 'units' on twelve lots, but the proposed CCRs have extensive descriptions of party walls, suggesting that the applicant intends to construct duplexes and call them single Units because the, two units are attached. Reputable architects or persons whose professional career is at stake would clarify this. I object and request that the 14 day period be extended, not to begin until such tine as the City provides the appointment time and date for review of the application. Thank you, Eric Elerath On Oct 13, 2023, at 9:11 AM, Aaron Anderson <aaron,and shIand,,or,,us> wrote: ..L- L�rso n — <Clintoti-345–PA-T2-2023-00041–NOD–Cover Lette,r.pdf> Aaron Anderson From: Aaron Anderson Sent Friday, October 13'20239:12AM To: EricE|mrath Cc: planning; legal division; Brandon Go|drman Subject: RE: Appointment Request tosee Application Materials re: PA -T1-2023'00214 Attachments: Q|ntmn_345_PA-T1-2023-00214_Apcdican1Subm|ttaipdt0mtmm_345_PA- T1-2823-00214_ZoningApp|icuhom.pdtOin\on_345_P4-T2-1023-00041_NOD_Cnwer Let1er.pdf Hello Mr. Elerath, Responses below. > I'd like tumakennappointment tosee the application materials for 345Clinton St. /PA-T1282]-00214oLyour earliest convenience. our front office are open tothe public from and the files are available fu�ryourreview. For your convenience | have also attached the applicant submittal here. Tile Civil drawings are quite large and are not included here but are available both online and for review in the hard copy at our office. My schedule is fairly flexible so if you would like to make an appointment to me personally to discuss the aipplication materials I arn more than: happy !m do that. Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday are typically my most flexible days. �, I was not noticed of the City Council's schedule and agenda to approve the Outline Plat), The Outline Plan approval baTwpc~2Decision that bmadebythe Planning Commission with the opportunity cfappeal to the City Council. There were two hearings (one of which you attended and participated in). Then oil June 15th following the second hearing anotice ofdecision was mailed tuyou which include the information unappeal opportunities. There was noappeal toCity Council. }+ I therefore ask you in advance to establish a schedule that can be relied on, and request that I be notified of ALL response dates and ALL hearing dates up through final approval, in writing, by mail. The Present application for Final Plan Approval (PA -Tl -2023-00214) is a Type -1 land use action as prescribed by AMC 18.5,1,0S0,(4dnmim|stradiveDecision with Notice)" The Schedule for a type 1 land use action is that following a notice of complete application (which you have received) there is a 2 -week public comment period which will conclude oil 10/25. Tile code requires that the Staff advisor shall render a decision within 45 Days. Once the notice of decision is mailed there is a 12 day appeal window with an opportunity for anyone who has participated in in the proceedings to appeal to Planning Commission. Following ally proceedings at the Planning Commission there is an opportunity to Appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (not to Council). In all cases the City is required to complete its final decision by state law within 120 days. (Complete code section onDecision oftype 1provided he|ow,] As I mentioned above the Public comment period is presently open for this application and will continue to be open thnoughtheemdofdaynmVVednexdayOctober25.|vvU||ndudeyourenmaUimtherecond.Tha1said,lfyou|mtemVto appeal you need to raise specific issues with enough clarity so that staff can address thern. Please let meknow |fyou have any questions nrwould like toset upa time tospeak about this further. Yours, Aaron Anderson Complete Decision Schedule for type I AMC 18.5.1.050.0: L At the conclusion of the comment period, the Staff Advisor shall review the comments received and prepare a decision approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application based on the applicable ordinance criteria. The Staff Advisor shall prepare a decision within 45 days of the City's determination that all application is complete, unless the appli:cant agrees to a longer time period. Alternatively, the Staff Advisor may transmit written comments received along with a copy of the application to the Planning Commission for review and decision at its next regularly scheduled meeting. 2. Where the Staff Advisor refers a Type I application to the Planning Commission, the Commission shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application through the Type 11 procedure based on the applicable ordinance criteria. The Commission may continue its review to the next meeting to allow the applicant time to respond to questions, provided the Commission must make a final decision within the 120 -day period prescribed under State law (ORSF2 :7) and as described in subsection of this ordinance. 120 Day Rule AMC 18.5,1,090.8, "Time Limit - 1:20 -day Rule. The City shall take final action on Administrative and Quasi -Judicial land use applications, pursuant to this chapter, including resolution of all appeals, within 120 days from the date the Staff Advisor deems the application complete for purposes of processing, unless the applicant requests an extension in writing. Any exceptions to this rule shall conform to the provisions of ORS Aaron Anderson CFM, Sr. Planner Pr�onoLw")s he, him Community Development 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 541.552.2052 Q TTY 800.735.2900 a a r . a n Wqtjaorus Online oshlarid,,olF us,; social media (Facebook @CityOfAshland0regon I Twitter @CityofAshland) This email transmission is official business of the City of Ashland, and it is subject to Oregon Public Records Low for disclosure and retention. If you have received this message in error, please contact me at 541.552.2052 From: Eric Elerath <eelerath@verizon. net> Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2023 4:31 PM To: Aaron Anderson <aaron.anderson@ashland.or.us> Subject: Appointment Request to see Application Materials re: PA -T1-2023-00214 [EXTERNAL SENDER) Mr. Anderson I'd like to make an appointment to see the application materials for 345 Clinton St. / PA -T1-2023-00214 at your earliest convenience. was not noticed of the City Council's schedule and agenda to approve the Outline Plan. As such, I was not provided noticed opportunity to speak to the City Council to raise and repeat prior objections raised during the Planning meetings. It appears that the Planning staff is incompetent to identify those parties who have already been noticed and to provide them with minimal notice of ongoing dates for decisions which affect their property, and to speak to the elected decision makers. I therefore ask you in advance to establish a schedule that can be relied on, and request that I be notified of ALL response dates and ALL hearing dates up through final approval, in writing, by mail. In light of these events, note also that I intend to raise any objections directly with the Mayor, City Council, City Attorney, City Manager and/or other parties who have oversight authority over the relevant issues. Dates to respond: • 1st date: October 24 • 2nd date: ? • 3rd date: ? • 4th date: ? • 5th date: ? Thank you. Eric Elerath 419 Clinton St. Ashland, OR 97520 3 Aaron Anderson From: Eric Elerath <eelerath@verizon.net> Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2023 4:31 PM To: Aaron Anderson Subject: Appointment Request to see Application Materials re: PA -T1-2023-00214 [EXTERNAL SENDER] Mr. Anderson I'd like to make an appointment to see the application materials for 345 Clinton St. / PA -T1-2023-00214 at your earliest convenience. I was not noticed of the City Council's schedule and agenda to approve the Outline Plan. As such, I was not provided noticed opportunity to speak to the City Council to raise and repeat prior objections raised during the Planning meetings. It appears that the Planning staff is incompetent to identify those parties who have already been noticed and to provide them with minimal notice of ongoing dates for decisions which affect their property, and to speak to the elected decision makers. I therefore ask you in advance to establish a schedule that can be relied on, and request that I be notified of ALL response dates and ALL hearing dates up through final approval, in writing, by mail. In light of these events, note also that I intend to raise any objections directly with the Mayor, City Council, City Attorney, City Manager and/or other parties who have oversight authority over the relevant issues. Dates to respond: • 1st date: October 24 • 2nd date: ? • 3rd date: ? • 4th date: ? • 5th date: ? Thank you. Eric Elerath 419 Clinton St, Ashland, OR 97520 NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING ACTION: PA -T1-2023-00214 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 345 Clinton St. OWNER: Magnolia Heights LLC APPLICANT: Rogue Planning & Development Services DESCRIPTION: The Ashland Land Use Ordinance has two required steps to Performance Standards Options Subdivision: Outline Plan and Final Plan. This application is a request for Final Plan approval for a 12 -lot, 11 -unit residential subdivision. The Subdivision Outline Plan was approved by the Ashland Planning Commission as PA -T2-2023.00043, on June 15, 2023, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-5; MAP: 391E 04 DB; TAX LOT: 404 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: October 10, 2023 DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: October 24, 2023 a. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 51 Winburn Way 1pl, 541,488,5305 Ashland, Oregon 97520 Fax: 541.552.2050 as, TTY: 800.735,2000 lo Ise y The Ashland Planning Division, Staff has received acomplete application for the property noted mnPage 1cfthis notice Acopy cfthe application, including all documents, evidence and applicable criteria are available online sd"VVhmCs Happening in my City" at http asli.land.or.us/develo mer als/. Copies nfapplication materials will beprovided at reasonableomut.|fmequeeted. Application materials may berequested tobereviewed in-person otthe Ashland Community Development & Engineering Services Building, 51 Winburn Way, via a pre -arranged appointment by calling (541)488-5305oremai]|mg Any affected property owner or resident has u right tosubmit written comments within the 14 -day comment period to or to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.nn.mnthe deadline date shown onPage 1. Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a land use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a notice is mamt to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property nVbn1&Wmg the application. After the cornmentperiodandmotmmmethan45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff mho|U make a Mne| decision on the application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to the Planning Commission of the Planning Division Staffs decision must be made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12days from the date of the mailing of final decision, (AMC 1&5.1 .050.G) The ordinance criteria applicable to this oNm|imutiom are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise on objection concerning this application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issum, precludes your right nfappeal to the Land Use, Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your riglht of appeal to LUBA on that criterion, Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed oomclitionm of approval with sufficient specificity to allow this Department torespond to the issue precludes an actino for damages in circuit court. |fyou have questions nrcomments concerning this request, please feel free tocontact Aaron Anderson, st 541-552-2052 or In compliance with the American with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Administrator's office at 541-488-6002 (TTY phone number 1-800-735-2900). Notification 72 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to the meeting. (28 CFR 35.102.-35.104 ADA Title 1),. APPROVAL CRITERIA FOR FINAL PLAN 18.3.8.0403.5 Final Plan �m����[boQomh�upon Qn&g����h��n�������o0u��e��.This �b���m�m�� ���d���h tn�n�o�the 'nninmmmdifioafim)efrom one planning step toanother, Substantial conformance shall exist when comparison ofthe outline plan with the final plan meets all ofthe following criteria, m. The number of dwelling units vary no more than ten percent of those shown on the approved outline plan, but in no case shall the number of units exceed those permitted inthe outline plan. b. The yard depths and distances between main buildings vary no more than ten percent of those shown on the approved outflne plani, but in no case shall these distances bamdunnd b*|mmtheminimummotaN|ohodwithin this Ordinance. c. The open apaoou vary no more than han percent ofthat provided on the outline plan, d. The building size does not exceed the building size shown on the outline plan by more than ten percent. w. The building elevations and exterior materials are in conformance with the purpose and intent of this ordinance and the approved outline plan. [ That the add|hnom| standards which mouihd in the awarding of bonus points in the outline plan approval have been included in the Ume| pion with substantial detail to ensure that the performance level committed to in the outline plan will be achieved. U. The development complies with the Street 0mndpnJo. h. Nothing in this section mhoU limit reduction in the number nfdwelling units or increased open space provided that, if this is done for nue phauo, the number nfdwelling units shall not be transferred to another phase, nor the open space reduced below that permitted in the outline plan. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT mvw^*vmWay Tel: 54/88.5305 Ashland, Oregon ursoo Fax! *wosz,ovao uohbuuqruo rrt 800735.2900 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON County of Jackson The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2. On October 10, 2023 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #PA -T1-2023- 00214, 345 Clinton Street. M ichaeBuffivan Signature of Employee G:Umm-del&nre-q lannngAcfonsTAs6y57eettCIC!nlon'Cn�n_345Crn�n_345_PA-T1-2023-00214-FF1ALPLW o1kin'C!non_345_PA-TI-2023-00214_UOC—MaatofL-ngdo"1pfi0OD .IV 1peqeqdn-dod • •i. \i PA-T1-2023-00214 391E04DC4400 PA-T1-2023-00214 391E04DC105 PA-T1-2023-00214 391E04DC4100 BATES WILLIAM L TRUSTEE ET AL BEEBE MILAN ET AL BOYARSKY STEPHEN J TRUSTEE ET 414 BRISCOE PL 350 CLINTON ST 408 CLINTON ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2023-00214 391E04DC4200 PA-T1-2023-00214 391E04DC108 PA-T1-2023-00214 391E04DC205 CALKINS KEVIN DEAN TRUSTEE ET CHAMBERS LINDA G EBERLE BROOKE 414 CLINTON ST 527 ANN ST 304 CLINTON ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2023-00214 391E04DD1607 PA-T1-2023-00214 391E04DC109 PA-T1-2023-00214 391E04DC101 ELERATH ERIC J ET AL ENDORA PROPERTIES ORE LLC FIEDLER RITA 419 CLINTON ST 371 PATTERSON ST 3260 BRYCELER DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 EUGENE, OR 97405 PA-T1-2023-00214 391E04DC216 PA-T1-2023-00214 391E04DC103 PA-T1-2023-00214 391E04DC206 FINDLEY LINDSEY ATHERTON TRUS FUNK ROGER P TRUSTEE ET AL CUSS MICHAEL R 328 CLINTON ST 7033 RAPP LN 316 CLINTON ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 TALENT, OR 97540 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2023-00214 391 E04DC4000 PA-T1-2023-00214 PA-T1-2023-00214 391 E04DB522 HILLIGOSS LAWRENCE OILINDA A ICHIKAWA DEAN JACKSON WILLIAM BISARA J 534 ANN ST 521 N MOUNTAIN AVE 411 BRISCOE PL ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2023-00214 PA-T1-2023-00214 391E04DC208 PA-T1-2023-00214 391E04DC4500 JODI FORGIONE LANGE KELLY M TRUSTEE ET AL LAWSON SCOTT DOUGLAS TRUSTEE PO BOX 589 557 PHELPS ST 406 BRISCOE PL AURORA, OR 97002 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2023-00214 PA-T1-2023-00214 391E04DC209 PA-T1-2023-00214 LJ FRIAR & ASSOCIATES LONG BRIAN PATRICK LONGHURST GORDON PO BOX 1947 547 PHELPS ST 515 ANN ST PHOENIX, OR 97535 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2023-00214 391E04DB401 PA-T1-2023-00214 391E04DB404 PA-T1-2023-00214 MACE PAUL B/KATHLEEN KAHLE MAGNOLIA HEIGHTS LLC MAGNOLIA HEIGHTS LLC 345 CLINTON ST 2974 CHAPMAN LN 619 ELKADER ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2023-00214 391E04DC100 PA-T1-2023-00214 PA-T1-2023-00214 391E04DB521 MARTIN NANCY ELIZABETH ET AL MCLANE BETSY MOZINGO GEORGE L TRUSTEE ETA 343 PATTERSON ST 419 CLINTON ST 28 ANTHEM CREEK CIR ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ' HENDERSON, NV 89052 PA-T1-2023-00214 391E04DB523 PA-T1-2023-00214 391E04DC3900 PA-T1-2023-00214 MURPHY WHITNEY MIPAUL JB IV OHANA LIVING TRUST ET AL POWELL ENGINEERING & CONSULTING 403 BRISCOE PL 533 FAIRVIEW ST 100 E MAIN ST, SUITE 0 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 MEDFORD, OR 97501 ,. .�. PA -T1-2023-00214 391E04DA3900 PA -T1-2023-00214 PA -T1-2023-00214 391E04DC3700 REIPURTH HELLE ET AL ROGUE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SENDAR STEPHEN M/MELIKIAN LIN 435 BRISCOE PL 1314-B CENTER DR, PMB#457 413 CLINTON ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 MEDFORD, OR 97501 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2023-00214 391 E04DC4300 PA -T1-2023-00214 PA -T1-2023-00214 391 E04DC3800 SHIVERS JACQUELYN C TRUSTEE E TERRAIN LANDSCAPING TYLER FAMILY 2021 TRUST ET AL 422 BRISCOE PL 310 OAK ST, UNIT #3 407 CLINTON ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2023-00214 391E04DD3100 PA -T1-2023-00214 391E04DC107 PA -T1-2023-00214 391E04DC110 VITCOV BARRY/SHIRLEY WEIBEL ROBERT W WILSON VIRGINIA 430 BRISCOE PL 394 CLINTON ST 361 PATTERSON ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2023-00214 391E04DC106 345 Clinton NOC YASUTAKE KIM LIP HERDKLOTZ 10/10/23 384 CLINTON STS ASHLAND, OR 97520 i a6P3 dn;dod asodra oq aui� fiva� pc�8 MiAVI ,. 09 slagvj ssalppV load.. sy3 up�r �+�°44&` L "� X:: �;�% f.." S -ld NV LN3W3AOIJdW] onand SMOUV3W VI-10N!DVW MI I z \}) \ Q \\\ K d 292 !}. LL aa:Lu u 'p- 0 I NODM[O'ClNVlHSV'I&NOiNllD- IS NNV-3NVI nOOSINS 604 101 XVI'sa-Po-av6s dvw SNVId lN9W9AOMdLAJl oi -isnd 6i)IM SAAOUV3W VI'10NE)VIN of 0d,1gs. 0, M, M up 9 2 sr S 9 P I E 2 0 4 H H U) LL, Lu m NMH,� i W WMR 'MI w S -n k LU S0 as a0 � 26 M -6. n H -H U) p MH ��Eni -6 6 of s 5�1 1 os cn HN uj z -t ga. L Lu 0 g LU ss e < N N H w I M-8 F- C) H �Hllp M t g H� of TiBuda_ws-Y ❑ F. FM. U to cn -621 p < 2 9 NNW-, 8 5 g .'1 0 --,6a R t Ca,R-5 r H i R . ...... Mp Lu -'0 F. - H� 4 0 —sm 5�n g M uj 5 z < -0. M H H < go. Lu (L z Ho'xis 5 --H M H K 6� LLJ 0 X LU CL LLJ � � LU Z Z F - uj LU LU CL 0 z Cl) waw ui S2 Z -H oc CL (D W > F jL 61 N QY 0 0 W(n LL, � uj F- CO LLJ 0 X < L) of Z H PNIIk Z 0 uj U. I H�M, I�H� w Z',_ MM 0 F- 0 cn CL Rai- fA ZL- " Z CL N093WGNb HSV'IS NOIN170.iS NNV' 9NH' OOSW9 '. t07 .-4 1- — SNV-1d INAVYAAOI!]dVUI orend SMOOV3W VI-IONE)VW 6� 0 0 X LU CL LLJ � � LU Z F - uj LU LU Nxaex 0 UJ Cl) waw LU -H X < L) of Z H PNIIk Z 0 uj U. I H�M, I�H� w Z',_ MM 0 F- 0 cn CL Rai- fA ZL- " Z CL N093WGNb HSV'IS NOIN170.iS NNV' 9NH' OOSW9 '. t07 .-4 1- — SNV-1d INAVYAAOI!]dVUI orend SMOOV3W VI-IONE)VW HN 9, 8 9c; 61" -M, X uj 5 1.1".1 g 6 , 5 LLJ � � LU Ga F - LU LU Nxaex 0 Lu waw < of O Lu Lu d F jL iry N QY 0 0 3 LL, � uj F- D� 5g C� Ix NM - t -Tall aI uj A, 0 T P: z 2 0 Co Z) 0 qv z 8 I 'o ss z 0 me z O LL uj (L HN 9, 8 9c; 61" -M, X uj 5 1.1".1 g 6 , 5 LLJ � � LU Ga F - LU LU Nxaex 0 Lu waw < of O Lu Lu d F jL iry N QY 0 0 3 LL, � uj F- D� 5g Ix NM - t -Tall aI T P: z Co Z) 0 HN 9, 8 9c; 61" -M, X uj 5 1.1".1 g 6 , 5 LLJ � � LU Ga F - LU LU Nxaex 0 Lu waw < of O Lu Lu d jL iry N QY 0 0 LL, uj F- D� 5g HN 9, 8 9c; 61" -M, uj 5 1.1".1 g 6 , 5 LLJ � � LU Ga F - 0 Lu < of O Lu Lu jL iry N QY 0 0 HN 9, 8 9c; 61" -M, Hhj Ga 0 Lu Lu iry N QY 0 0 uj D� 5g Ix NM C) c? aI P: z Co Z) 0 z 0 HN 9, 8 9c; 61" -M, I NOORUO 'GNtl HSVIS NCLLN[IO- IS NNV- 3Nn 300SIES 709101 XVI'80T0-3L- dVW SNV-ld 1NMAJ3AO'MdLN1 � '-sf �m"",; T\ z'S�' ,A �4 dssw >1 wa zLL, HU say HIN -4 " H w LL, sp a 'N ml ml LLJ C/) uj I NOORUO 'GNtl HSVIS NCLLN[IO- IS NNV- 3Nn 300SIES 709101 XVI'80T0-3L- dVW SNV-ld 1NMAJ3AO'MdLN1 orisnd SMOOVAW VI-IONE)VW �4 HU -W HIN -4 " H w 'N -4 LLJ MH N �-H H Ilk -0 z < . . ......... ---TM n" L— -- — -- wkul N003i10'GNH HSVIS NOIN110- IS NNV, aNV 300SI82 2 40410'1—'9x-40-3 -t dVW IcyX SNYId INAWAAOMdWi onand -10NOVW SMOUV3W V1 Rn M4H Hit PH" -M hw E MGH co 3 A ME g a wig- m unma, CL m Hm H CD U) M9 U Nab Mg LU LU H CL m . m R CL H H i—ug m 1E El EE EE El ff] U) LU MHz .R' —�15 STREET T- I qe o LU U) H, 06 LU LU /i = LU f F.. 4� Cj) Co I / _ ZZ/ UJ I -133-I15t - S�l N00380'aNVIHSV'ISNOINII0-ISNNV-3NV 300SIN9 vorioi wi'e0,0 -SC dVW SNV-1d1N3W3AMJdWl oriand smoavaiN VI-IONE)VW A Hiq W HE HN txw 6�M H I H. mML q2M �H 'Insw o". -s Lu CL Lj H Vis HH E �?o z 0 U toZ 0 L) L) P x � LU 0 ui LLI ui CL 0 LU ILOLI I ED ED 1�1 El El Egi El 3: N00380'aNVIHSV'ISNOINII0-ISNNV-3NV 300SIN9 vorioi wi'e0,0 -SC dVW SNV-1d1N3W3AMJdWl oriand smoavaiN VI-IONE)VW A Hiq W HE HN txw 6�M H I H. mML q2M �H 'Insw o". -s Lu CL Lj H Vis HH E �?o z 0 U toZ 0 L) L) P x � LU NOEM1O'CNV1HSV'IS NOIN110- IS NNV-aNVI 200SR19 I I I I L ...Io' SNV-1d 1N3VUE1AOMdVU1 onand SAAOUV3VJ VI-IONE)VVM -2 0 IL aj - 71 as g es z£ea \ .0 LLI, iE 17 N Ir zi F#F, COD Z_ z (L f CL Lu LU F "ma If j M� A I mill! Ili, ; R 1 1 m1 I M I Pill! gM 111 0 it 1111 IN! 1111 UV , IHMIU.� Z 2 it < lVibill, j M LLI U, !IHI :7 !It C) L) 2 in j It M , 1 a 11 N003NO'aNV1HSV'IS NCIN110- IS NNV- aNn aOOSwS COV 101% I'Sa-C 3 V6t dVW S -ld INAWBAMIdWi onsn NV d SAAOGV3WVl-lON0VW A— MU W Z z 11115=1. OZ w `g 3 0 100 F: IW ul 0 H, 3 Z Lu `g 3 ul 0 Z NOOaUO'GNI�HSV'IS CINIIO-lSNNV'3NVI300SIN9 OV 101 XVI'90-2 VOS dVW SNV-Id IN3W3AO'&IdW1 onand o SMOaV3W VI-ION!E)VWwINwo T ----------- -------------- -------------- -- - ------- - - ------------- --- - - - ----------------------- - 7 — ---------- -- — --------- — -- ------------ 11 ---------- - — - — ------- — --- - — ------ — — --- - — ---- — --- — — — ------ — — - — -------- 7z --- — - — ------------- — - — - — - - - - ------ - % i' — ------------------— -------- -------------- — 11 ------------------ — CL I ------ — ---— — —1 --------- Ei ----- — ---------------------- ---------- - - -------------- ------ - --- IE3 LU > Y 'd000 NOEMO'ONtlVIHSV'15 NO1NIIO.1SNNV-3NVI1 Oosas 6.1101XN1'80-Ytr3✓6C dtlW y` SNH7d 1N3W3AONdW] ona ld SMOUVEIW �dI10NJb'W oo_� m l W o F [d t \ 31ba N011alacG3o NOI56L3tl ou I uopenel3 uope.nal3 F- W W F rn uope1el3 Elevation IN 4 1. m M V LL O Y U Q [a a O =U) _< M a W h W W f - N U) IL W x a W_ �3 W LLO E, \ I 1 \ Kw Y alo I ISL O w' ' `. I pp1 F, I (n 8 SF i I I II •i\ I cl I of . SF LLa LL n n - \ LL y \ d a uopenel3 uope.nal3 F- W W F rn uope1el3 Elevation IN 4 1. m M V LL O Y U Q [a a O =U) _< M a W h W W f - N U) IL W x a W_ �3 W LLO E, m i; I NII0II0'GNVI18'1'11101.NII0-IINI'1'11 30011 11 SNV-Id 1N3VV3A021dW1 orisnd SAA00VAW VI—IONOVW El—tion --!1-1-13 EEMER Elevation 999LE ' Y W 1,100380'ON DOHWI NOOlea-Vo-IS ENV-3Ntl1300SIN8 8 8@ SNtl1d1NAW9AMAdW1OI19fld w _ SMO0V3W VI—IONE)VW I I I I SII II. a� Elevation 17 \L1r .. x .. .. a � S 1C] Eli astl a • a _ - e- I I I I 0.5 I e e //i iii�i 5 S� ISI— Y I_ �•n \\\ ``.. m°.- . I..x z � t 4' I I � • e n I I ' III I e i / j• nx n dRF I I..-. .. ,I µ ..._ I .'.............. $ Ly �� I rig \�.F _ � - N I.. �IY^ .... r e s - Y R ; r 1 - ...... R.a O s ,z a d fI €: O g z -leI p� EL e ° I � -k`L J .�' JIsi J., OOZE O g �. WLu Lu a a. xa i W 3 1 kl f ] a s I I I r ,CL I i 1=JL nolle nal3 goz ---------------- I�u ONVl06 �01 �1'iS NOI90 N110-iS NNV- aNVI 300SIila - �o Aa� to mw;P SNV-ld IN9WaAO)AdWl oriand SMOOV3W VI-ION!DVW agh uh, H�q qim- MHM, --fige HM mw� fig uj CL Z N L) s M, °w g 0 E LLI F - z Z w M (Doe 00®OM0G < 29 —�IS NNVorr 4' ---------- ----------- sus ---------------------- 7- L ----------- ---- - -- - ----- ---------- ----------- s --j -------------- i ---------------------- ------------ --------------------------------- I - ------------------------------- ------------ ------------------ ------------------- - -- - ------- 11 ----------------------- ---------- - -- — -- — -- — -- / - -------------------------------------- 4Z4 - ----------------------------------------------- - — — --------- ------------------------- - -- - - ------------------- --------- -------- - ------- ------------- - ---------------------- CL 0 < — - - - --------------- - - -- ------ — ----------------------- - — - ------------------ - - - At LU - ---------- --------- --------------- ------- Wn — - — - — - — - — - — - 4f,"' N00310'111tlINStl'15 1101N110- 1S NNV-3Ntl'13009I118 0— 01 % 1'80'TO'3L-0E dtlW 40 p p w �E s COI °r g X300 opi�yRE SNVId lN3WAAOUdW1 01-19f1d a x° SMOa`d3 W Vl'IONJb'W o dld..3auol.l3a o o'' o i 0 a z O F- a N S ❑ q av) a Q h < CL O z u p Y O � P f b z N N w \ K O J \ �tt -- .....-O H vs >w> z I Q N p Z ' ap LuJ o O r Z N g w V t a e 1 w \ i i 0 a z O F- a N S ❑ q av) a Q h < CL O z u p Y O � . - Il •L i a II � o6N f & F z N N \ K O J \ �tt -- .....-O Ta 5a vs >w> z I Q N p Z ' X H O j ZO r Z N g w a LU F .I LU /� / ....... 0 O� ❑yj w O ww Ow �ooy 0 z LU z I Q ' S� Y a N003N0'ONViHSV'1S NOINIIO-1SNNV-3NnaOOSItl8 60>LO"I XVl'80atr3 L- c dVW ca p� r, y C 0 0 - SNV Id 1NEIMAOUdW1 JI79fld q g > E$9 a U SMOUVMAI VI-IONJb'W ................ S� a ca 0 0 - E$9 a U Z ' I _ i v a ca 0 0 - E$9 a U Z W a» v NOE13 0'INVIHSI'1l NOIN110'IS NW -3141 111CMfl. —101 dV. SNV-Id 1N9W9AOUdLAll onand FwUWFooU H —10NOVW SMOUV3WVlwa R IM �jml,j 1ptillhi Ih Ills g, p jtT All. Nzl! 3", it 1 1 r� a Ile ll a-4 it 12 t �!;QQIIi{ r5 i -IS NNV -a NVI �OOSINS N00380'GNV;HSV'IS OIN110 OVID-1XV1,80— 9eoa n SNV -1d IN3W3A02idW1 onand SMOOV3W VI-10NE)VUM JiT ti g`a tt N, �n Rul Hill li Milisc tt ,Jill i 1) JiT ti g`a tt N, �n Rul Hill li Milisc tt 1) 11H g13 A JiT ti g`a tt N, �n Rul Hill li Milisc tt A JiT ti g`a tt N, �n Rul Hill li Milisc A N, �n Rul Hill A A II j g0 ifitl liji N, �n Rul Hill A !!IIgi I lfl NC03'd0'aMVlHSV'1 N0iNI10-iSNNVvw-RNn303S1'da Q "viol XV1'sal`,)-3 V5Z d C (\ghC a d� Lgz�sy9 SNVId 1NAVU3A0MdW1 oi-isnd ii Ji -IONE)VW SAAO(]V=IW V1 !!IIgi I lfl Q Sy >N' ii Ji to 3e Q Sy J.tl I =vs u�WN .--Rwn7ww� M, ms<e :ro �i `wwe"�`ikis 'Boa r � rwz �'d 'suvo0ss a area 'n sz-oc-s aLro 1+xawa . axBr alnoa -0'd S31b700SSH 08 ad T-7 s GIH a S3Wr 'Ntl�d0 1Vid SIHL aid 1N3W3SV3 SS3OOV NYa1S3md O118nd 3Vdd 9964 'L4 Alnf N0.^ia0 1V7d 9191 aid 1NC3Y3SV3 ANLLn OnSnd - 3nd onW31 - sai and 'ZZOz-0£-d ,dd aid .,L9VLNVY Oasts aO 'ONb7FISV Snan '00!`a0 ££ZO-16 10 83d N3 Z30S'(301M 04) OOM £999:-9L '000 aid 31 3 3NIla3W3J = £3S6 3Nb'7 NHWdHHO 4L6Z NMM'0 S3WOH 30 V170N91+W x0� N003a0 NOSMOVf'j0 SON003a SOa003a 0330 AlNn00 NOSNOVf a0 f 40>71 9060316£ ?J 0J3�af1S aNHI 'OOSSV 3' aWbi "f7 'Oyn evo WNNIWnw .7 Nld NOW ,O£ X .9/9 13S - 0 'OOSSV 'f7 'ONW a dmsxassav 1VN01SS3d0Jd 032131SI0321 00. S J a aero 00 �s< 009 } t lo-"\ n Z iol o^ ^ m$ o ^ 'NOUVA373 IWANI - 31 3A'IOd AJSN3O H0114® 3dCH 7V13W 03LV9naa00 - dNO 380N00 03Oda-mea - dW at *0 0 00 ba 73A*0 d0.3003 = a3 1 1N3N Vd .i0 3903 = d3 °J '=60NOJ 1NHdsV = Otl 'AVM NaMO 5nm3015 - MS 'sanO7VO!la3A = W 'a3uns v sono = 9no '3NI7 NWO Wa01S = OS- HO1M""AMO Wbols m SOUS Eu Z0 Wa01S a 1905 OHN` Va0 fi, HAGS BanO Nwda Zoos IOUs !n AL'711f1 O Ha3A0 = -nHO- 3MOd ONn0a0a3ONn !n 83MOd Ob3Ha3A0 - - HO- '3Nn NOIS7A3731 - -AL- 7V13303d AL 37S - 03d A.VO '3Nn 3NOHd3731 m -1- 7V1S303d 3NOHd3131 ^ 03d 73L 3N17 sMJ = 0- 3WASr0- no .l9 ul a3M3S Aa Nb5 m Iss- INn a3M3S AaVlINVS = -sS- 3'/O a3ALS AaVLNVS = OOSS vYW 83M3S AW.UVVS - HYW '3Nn a31VM = -M- 3A7VA 3SV373a WV - AdV 1NMUH 3HL4 ® Hd 3AWA 831VM AM 'a313W a3LVM m AM 7'A:10.87 0JFd67I00d0S SL ' 40'09L t 'L861 '{ 3NM 031V0 SL000 0600L4 Wald OIa0151H tlYL3d aid M& NO '103 03S>S 9S/6LOAON •WWV9 LYOLZVA373 0zt 0r o 09 oz I I 9'£Z s-cz il '004-,l 37VOS 133d - :N3Y13anSVJn 30 LNn No3a3H NMOHS SV 9192 t 'ON A3Aans NO 03SVS SSNWa M 3MU WON 0DAM 8.d0 099 1Vid SIHL aid 1N3W3SV3 SS3OOV NYa1S3md O118nd 3Vdd 1V7d 9191 aid 1NC3Y3SV3 ANLLn OnSnd - 3nd onW31 - sai and 'ZZOz-0£-d ,dd aid .,L9VLNVY Snan '00!`a0 ££ZO-16 10 83d N3 Z30S'(301M 04) OOM £999:-9L '000 aid 31 3 3NIla3W3J = £3S6 3NI7 30N3d -X- 'i A3nans a37m _ SJ '(s,".) N.,""ns N7tlMa3Na = sxa v., a, SIM 'ALNn00 N003a0 NOSMOVf'j0 SON003a SOa003a 0330 AlNn00 NOSNOVf a0 f 378V1 tl1V0 35anOO 33S = MIO y uodaap Tlzrno,g 77Qs.'7 'OOSSV 3' aWbi "f7 'Oyn evo WNNIWnw .7 Nld NOW ,O£ X .9/9 13S - 0 'OOSSV 'f7 'ONW Lnr paergsy jo d11 0 NA ;fir :96CZ 3` Wad dY OUSVId Nld NOW ,OF X „B/S 13S - 0 Oossr 'n ' t' oas :Fo t/T :7S Gill uz b' 2'2'02'—%v—d x ar ad OW dv° OUd NO NOW ,bZ X ,B/S 19S - O 'SMG 'fioszt '"s 'L990z 0�7 7eld Z7'0fjf7aed dad 2' Iaored ;o .pejdai �' do 9£L£z 4l Ome"i a3d '9OSSV S aVlad '!`7 'ON" dVO OUSV7d V Nld NOW �8/9 'ad = O 5M OQY'.�I'!� T�IT0111J I�R� 'aoor '66S '0d '£9Z 7W aid 3dld NOW ,9'L 'O3 - 0 'SMa 83d TSM NOW NI 'OOSSV > aVlad 'f"7 'ONW d* SSVUS 'Od - 0 SNV-ld JNI2J33NIJN3 IUVO OZ9Z6 dO'CINVIHSV'B NOIN113 -iS NNV - 2NVI 103MIS LLJFo SMOCIV:-M VIIO'4SVN -2 E . . . . . . M IN -4Y p 6H g 2, zc) 133iiS S813Hd i=HaiS NNV 8a 6 LL -u� I I u I zc) 133iiS S813Hd i=HaiS NNV a OZSL6 bO'aNVIHSV'1S NO1NIlO -1S NNV - 3NVl 3OOSIdso1i0b iM XVl'KI10 31-6£ dVWr-;„; SMOGVIW VIIONOVW „ 3AMIJ U�M �dO'ONVIHSV'IS NOiNl—.�) — IS NNY — 3NVI 300SI�19 Lu... '70t' iOl XVI 'UG -VO -3L -6Z d VN GF-- SMOOVIA VI]ONE)VVq �ell 7 p P q to (D�C (D, 0 O� 0 C) 'D C. 0 0 0 0 0 C) OZSL6 60'(INVIHSV'iS NOINIIO -1S NNV-3NVI30OSI ALij o w :oa,404101 XV1'8a110-11-6£dVW SMOaVIW VIIONJVW ;36 1 SO U 2� 6 Ct a3 - �t 00 doo � a � - Boa = 300 8a» HNR 8 ' 4» HB<W a N = QOQ C wQ p O v4 tai , o 93 u o a a5 io w`ep5o'o _ Upoi OS �4 ap y O 5504 '¢u p4Qo� not az B O O n o�5c 42r p' Qg OapLLuc �z� o yw 4U 5 3=amu. o° G o ft - Q 13381S NNV A - 133815 Shc3Hd W5 GARAGE 1910 X 21/0 TED Copyright 0 2008 Alan Mastoid Design Associates, Inc. All Rights Reserved BR. 3 11/8 X Q/0 BR. 2 13/0 X 11/4 WFIN MECH 1710 xWe , L - 218 X 17/0 IW' CLall IIv L -- ----- ------ - I DINING RM..WE 01 x 1510 ocr WP STOnAGF cc o GREAT R G 2110 x17/0 "0. CILG I VAL16ED STUDY ALAN MASCORD DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC 2187 NW Reed St, Suite 100, Portland, OR 97210 • 503,225,9161 mascord.corn I liouseplans.co Copyright 0 2008 Alan Mastoid Design Associates, Inc. All Rights Reserved BR. 3 11/8 X Q/0 BR. 2 13/0 X 11/4 WFIN MECH �l, Aaron Anderson From: Amy Gunter <ar-nygunter-.plaiiiiitig@gmail.cot-n> Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2023 11:49 AM To. Aaron Anderson Cc: Derek Severson; Gil Livn! - Helman; Todd Powell; Mirni Fucini Subject: Re. Magnolia Meadows Subdivision Final Plan application Attachments: 345 Clinton Street Duplex concept plans,pdf Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged [EXTERNAL SENDER] Hello Aaron, Sorry for the delay. We are awaiting the civil drawings that incorporate the Public Works Dept. comments and are reformatted to their requirements. I've cc'd Todd Powell Engineering here. As for the lot coverage calculation, I'd rather change the single finding from the landscape plan compliance on pg. 45 from the Outline Plan findings, and use the lot coverage average as detailed' in the Final Plan application finding addressing 18.3.9.404B.5.d. This is to not further restrict the development of residential lots with residential homes, driveways, patios, pathways, decks, etc., and continue to encourage larger common open spaces. With this interpretation, the property owner/developer understands that the city's previous interpretation of Performance Standards Subdivisions and the development flexibility built into that code applies to nearly all standards, except lot coverage and solar. The development of the lots and all impervious surfaces as defined by the city of Ashland will be at or less than 50 percent of the lot area oil the plat. Addressing the other submittal items: L. Elevations of typical residences are attached. M. The subdivision will be financed using traditional methods such as residential development tract lending. Ni. Timing of the development is largely predicated upon the decision-making process, the necessary 12000 permit required by the Department of Environmental Quality, and the timeline of the public utility materials for installation of the infrastructure and future public rights-of-way. A grading permit for the subdivision site work will be obtained following approval of the 12000 permit to begin the grading and trench work for the infrastructure. Historically, when development permits were obtained and inspections received, the decision did not expire. It appears that within one year of the approval of the Final Plat, an extension to the tirneline may be necessary due to potential materials procurement issues. Thank You, Amy Amy Gunter Rogue Planning & Development Services 541-951-4020 Y, , El This communication, including any attachments hereto or I Inks contained herein, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential or legally protected Information. If you are riot the intended recipient, YOU are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copying, dissemination, distribution, or use of this communication is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-inaH message and delete the original and all copies of the communication, along with any attachments from your system. On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 9:17 AM Aaron Anderson <aaron,a de an( |nreviewing the final plan submission for Magnolia meadows itdoes not appear toinclude what islisted asattachment 4—the civil plans. Also missing are items, LM,and N. |fYOU can provide acouple nfphotos for typical elevations ofthe proposed residences, a staternent about financing and schedule we can move on. Next, with regard tolot coverage. Your narrative document discusses allocating back additional lot coverage to the individual lots. This is not allowed in performance standard subdivision despite the fact that there are old subdivisions where this was aU|owed. Also itconflicts what was Submitted and approved with the outline plan with regard tmlot coverage as well as what is listed on the landscaping plans that state the following. Page 46 of 48 of your submittal under landscape narrative, 0 Once you get me these items I should be able to make a completeness determination and notice the application. Let rne know if you want me to prepare a formal incompleteness letter or if expect to SUbrnit these items shortly. Thank you! Aaron Anderson CFNY,�r.Planner Prc)noiulishe, him FE] Community Development 20 E Main, Ashland, Oregon 97520 541,552,2052 1 TTY 800.735.2900 . ... .. . . ....... nn.r I. . . lin..w social media (Facebook @C!tyOfAshlandOregon I Twitter @CityofAshland) This email transmission is official business of the City of Ashland, and it is subject to Oregon Public Records Low for disclosure and retention. if you have received this message in error, please contact me at 54).5522052 From: Amy Gunter <a -al conl> Sent: Friday, September 15, 2023 2:11 PM To: planning <pj-gtij�ii� Gil Livni - Heiman <WrL�LI!),sKLnI.', (a n) conl> D --- -L - _2 L2L _jL Subject: Magnolia Meadows Subdivision Final Plan application [EXTERNAL SENDER] Hello, Attached is the Final Plan application for the Magnolia Meadows Subdivision. The civil drawing file will be sent separately as the file is very large. Gil is cc'd on the email and he will pay the invoice. Thank you, Arny Arny Gunter Rogue Planning & Development Services 541-951-4020 -1. _gill This communication, including any attachments hereto or links contained herein, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential or legally protected information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copying, dissemination, distribution, or use of this communication is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail message and delete the original and all copies of the communication, along with any attachments from your system. ,C I T Y 0 F" 4 4 LA N D October 3, 2023 Rogue Planning & Development Attn: Amy Gunter 1314 Center Dr,, PMB#457 Medford, OR 97501 RE: Incompleteness Determination for PA -TI -2023-00214 346, Clinton St. Final Plan [Application Date: 9/15/23] Dear Ms. Gunter, After reviewing the application submittal requesting Final Plan review for the property at 345 Clinton St., Planning staff has determined that the application is incomplete. Incomplete applications are subject to delay in accordance with state law (ORS 227.178), and cannot be further processed until the missing information listed below is turned in. The application submission requirements for a Performance Standards option Subdivision are at AMC 18.3,9,040.8.4, The Following items have been, determined to be missing: C. Road cross-sections and profiles, clearly indicating the locations of final cuts and fills, and road grades. Elevations of typical proposed residential structures. Elevations should be to scale and should include the approximate dimensions of the proposed structures and all attached exterior hardware for heating and cooling. M. Manner of financing. Development time schedule. P. Final plans for location of water, sewer, drainage, electric and cable T.V. facilities, and plans for street improvements and grading or earth -moving improvements. To continue review of your application, you must either: Submit all of the missing information listed above; 2. Submit some of the requested information and give the City of Ashland written notice that the remaining information will not be provided; or 3. Submit written notice to the City of Ashland indicating that no additional information will be provided. Please note that failure to complete one of the three options within 180 days of the original application submittal date will result in your application being deemed void. (March 13, 2024) Planning staff will expedite review of the requested materials once they are received. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 51 Winburn Way Tel: 541,488,5305 Ashland Oregon 97520 Fax: 541.552.2050 Ashland.or.us TTY: 800.735,2900 'CITY or -ASHLAND I have enclosed a form, entitled the "Applicant's Statement of Completeness." Please review the enclosed form and return it to me with any additional material you will be submitting. Your application cannot be further processed until the Applicant's Statement of Completeness form is completed and received by the City of Ashland Planning Division along with any additional submittals addressing the completeness issues above. If you have questions, please don't hesitate to contact me at (541) 552-2052 or via e-mail to aaron.anderson@ashland.or.us. 2.w�,• Aaron Anderson CFM, Senior Planner City of Ashland, Planning Division (541) 552-2062 or aCr rontl -_21____. . . ................ ............ :r. CC: File, Gil Livni COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 51 Winburn Way Tel: 541.488.5305 Ashland Oregon 97520 Fox; 541.552.2050 Ashland orms TTY: 800.736.2900 V 0 V -ASHLAND Applicant's Statement of Completeness (To be completed by the Applicant and returned to the City of Ashland Planning Division) Re: PA -TI -2023-00214,345 Clinton St. Date Application Expires: March 13, 2024 Pursuant to an incompleteness determination, 1, the undersigned applicant or agent for the applicant, elects one of the three options below by initialing: ( - ) 1. Submit All of the Missing information (Initial if elected) I am submitting all of the information requested in the Incompleteness Determination letter. Unless checked below, I am requesting that the City of Ashland Planning Division review this additional information within 30 days of submission to determine whether the application is complete. I understand that this 30 -day review for completeness period for the new information preserves my opportunity to submit additional materials, should it be determined that the application is still incomplete after the second review. (Note: The 120 -day period for the City of Ashland's final determination of compliance with applicable criteria does not commence until the additional review for completeness period is completed.) Check if desired - I waive further review of the information submitted for completeness and direct review of the information submitted for compliance with the Community Development Code criteria, regardless of whether the application is, in fact, later determined by the staff to be incomplete. I understand that by checking the above statement the application will be evaluated! based upon the material submitted and no notice of any missing information will be given. If material information is missing from the application, the application will fail to meet the burden of showing that all criteria are met, and the application will be denied. (- ) 2. Submit Some of the Requested Information: (initial if elected) Decline to Provide Other information I am submitting some of the information requested and declining to submit other information requested in the Incompleteness Determination letter. I understand that by declining to submit all information the City of Ashland believes necessary, the Ashland Planning Division may conclude that the applicable criteria are not met and a Denial will be issued or recommended. (_--) 3. Decline to Provide any of the Requested Information (initial if elected) I decline to provide any of the information requested. I understand that the Community Development Department may conclude that the applicable criteria are not met and a Denial will be issued or recommended. ----------------------- -------- Signed and Acknowledged Date (Applicant or Applicant's Agent) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 51 Winburn Way Tel: 541,488.5305 Ashland Oregon 97520 Fax: 541,552,2050 Ashland.orms TTY: 800.735,2900 Planning Division 51 Winburn Way, Ashland OR 97520 Phone: 541-488-5305 Fax: 541-488-6006 ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION Emaill: Planning @Dashland.orms WYV 1VT A FILE # QW W3 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Final Plan Application DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Street Address 345 Clinton Street Assessor's Map No. 391 E 04 DA Zoning R -1-5-P APPLICANT Tax Lot(s) Comp Plan Designation Pursuing LEEDO Geaificalion? El YES W NO Single'Family Residential Name Rogue Planning & Development Services Phone 541-951-4020 E -Mail Address 1314-B Center Dr., PMB#457 PROPERTY OWNER Name Magnolia Heights LLC Address 619 Elkader Street amygunter.planning@gmail.com city Ashland Phone 510-913-5110 E -Mail magnoliafinehomes@gmail,coni City Ashland Zip 97520 SURVEYOR, ENGINEER, ARCHITECT, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, OTHER Title Surveyor Name LJ Friar & Associates m Phone 541-772-2782 E -Mail lifriarandassociates@ciiarter.net Address PO BOX 1947 Title Civil Engineer City Phoenix ame Powell Engineering & Consulting Phone 541-613-0723 E -Mail Address 100 E Main Street, Suite 0 Zip 97535 City Medford Zip 97501 I hereby certify that the statements and information contained in this application, including the enclosed drawings and the required findings of fact, are in all respects, free and correct: I understand that all property pins must be shown on the drawings and visible upon the site inspection. In the event the pins are not shown or their location found to be incorrect, the owner assumes full responsibility. I further understand that if this request is subsequently contested, the burden will be on me to establish: 1) that I produced sufficient factual evidence at the hearing to support this request; 2) that the findings of fact furnished justifies the granting of the request; 3) that the findings of fact furnished by me are adequate; and further 4) that all structures or improvements are properly located on the ground. Failure in this regard will result most likely in not only the request being set aside, but also possibly in my structures being built in reliance thereon being required to be removed at my expense. If I have any doubts, I on7 advised to seek competent professional advice and assistance. 9.1 4.2023 — — --- - _-- - - -- Applicant's Signature Date As owner of the property involved in this request, I have read and understood the coniplete application and its consequences to me as a property oviner. 9.14 2023 Property nuinn& Signature (required) Date [Tote cowpleW by Gq, Stall DateReceived, Zoning Permit Typel, 4.o, Pling Fee $ 3 IVERM, G lconirn-da,,lpl­in,,Wornis & Ha dou"%7ofting Pei wi I Application doc ZONING PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS E APPLICATION FORM must be completed and signed by both applicant and property owner. Lei PLANNING FEES FORM must be completed and signed by both applicant and property owner. m FINDINGS OF FACT — Respond to the appropriate zoning requirements in the form of factual statements or findings of fact and supported by evidence. List the findings criteria and the evidence that supports it. Include information necessary to address all issues detailed in the Pre -Application Comment document. o TRUE SCALE PDF DRAWINGS — Standard scale and formatted to print no larger than 11x17 inches. Include site plan, building elevations, parking and landscape details. V1 FEE (Check, Charge or Cash) Li LEEDO CERTIFICATION (optional) -- Applicant's wishing to receive priority planning action processing shall provide the following documentation with the application demonstrating the completion of the following steps: • Hiring and retaining a LEEDO Accredited Professional as part of the project team throughout design and construction of the project; and • The LEEDO checklist indicating the credits that will be pursued. NOTE: • Applications are accepted on a first come, first served basis. • Applications will not be accepted without a complete application form signed by the applicant(s) AND property owner(s), all required materials and full payment. • All applications received are reviewed for completeness by staff within 30 days from application date in accordance with ORS 227.178. • The first fifteen COMPLETE applications submitted are processed at the next available Planning Commission meeting. (Planning Commission meetings include the Hearings Board, which meets at 1:30 pm, or the full Planning Commission, which meets at 7:00 pm on the second Tuesday of each month. Meetings are held at the City Council Chambers at 1175 East Main St). • A notice of the project request will be sent to neighboring properties for their comments or concerns, • If applicable, the application will also be reviewed by the Tree and/or Historic Commissions. G_lcumm-dev'planningVFornos k Rf doUbVouing Purnil Application doc Magnolia Fine Homes LLC Magnolia Meadows Subdivision Final Plan 345 Clinton Street ROGUE PLANLJING 9 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. LLC September 15, 2023 Magnolia Meadows Subdivision Final Plan Application Property Owner: Magnolia Heights LLC Gil Livni 619 Elkader Street Ashland, OR 97520 Planning Consultant: Rogue Planning & Development Services 1314 -Center Dr., PMB#457 Medford, OR 97501 Surveyor: LJ. Friar & Associates P.C. PO Box 1947 Phoenix, OR 97535 Civil Engineering: Powell Engineering + Consulting 100 E Main Street, Suite 0 Medford, OR 97501 Landscape Architecture: Terrain Landscape Architecture 310 Oak Street, Unit #3 Ashland, OR 97520 Map & Tax Lot: 39 1E 04DB: Tax Lot: 404 Property Zoning: R-1-5 Adjacent Zones: R-1-5 Overlay Zones: Performance Standards Overlay Water Resource Protection Zones FEMA Floodplain Ashland Modified Flood zone Magnolia Meadows Subdivision Final Plan Page 1 of 10 September 15, 2023 p Request., A request for approval of the Final Plan for the Magnolia Meadows Subdivision, a twelve lot, Performance Standards Subdivision of a vacant, 2.6 -acre parcel of land at the northwest intersection of Clinton Street and Ann Street. Subject Property Map & Tax Lot: 39 1E 050AD; Tax Lot 200 Comprehensive Plan Designation: Single Family Residential Zoning: R-1-7.5 Adjacent Zones: R-1-5; HC (Healthcare); E-1 and R-3 Overlay Zones: Performance Standards Wildfire Overlay Proposal: A request for Final Plan approval of the Magnolia Meadows Subdivision, a 12 -lot Performance Standards Subdivision. There are 11 residential lots and one open space tract. The Outline Plan approval included an exception to street standards, tree removal permits to remove two significant trees and a minor map amendment to the adopted Physical and Environmental Constraints map. The Outline Plan application (PA -T2-2023-00041) was approved by the Ashland Planning Commission on Jun 18, 2023. There are no changes between the Outline Plan approval and the Final Plan approval that alter the decision of the Ashland Planning Commission more than the allowed limitations expressed herein. Wetlands Delineation: With the Outline Plan application, it was noted that there may be wetland area present on-site in the northeast portion of the subject property. Schott & Associates, Ecologist & Wetlands Specialist, performed a preliminary wetlands delineation that was submitted to the Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD). The DLCD has concurred that there are no wetlands present on the property (see attached Agency Determination by the DLCD). Magnolia Meadows Subdivision Final Plan Page 2 of 10 September 15, 2023 Parking, Access, Circulation: The proposed subdivision development under this chapter conforms to the parking standards found within the Performance Standards Option Subdivision Chapter, in addition to the requirements of chapter 18.4.3 Parking, Access, and Circulation. The proposal extends Phelps Street, Neighborhood Street into the property from its current intersection at Clinton Street. Phelps Street is proposed to be improved as a %2 street +12' of additional travel lane. The built up improvements of curb, gutter, curbside sidewalk, then park row and sidewalk extend along the frontage of the subject property from Clinton to the new intersection with Briscoe Place. Briscoe Place, also a Neighborhood Street presently terminates into the east property boundary. Briscoe Place is proposed to be improved along the subject property frontages on the north and south side of Briscoe Place. The frontage improvements along the north side of Briscoe Place will terminate at the southwest property corner of Lot 11. Ann Street is present along the east property boundary and is improved with % street improvements across the right of way from the subject site. This proposal extends the travel lane, builds up curb, gutter, landscape park row and sidewalk. A public alley is proposed to extend between the new street block that intersects with the public alley across Ann Street from the subject property. Vehicular access to the individual lots 1-10 is via the public alley. There are no curb aprons proposed. Lot 11 on the north side of Clinton Street will have a driveway apron. Additionally, the access pathway through the open space is proposed to have a bollard protected driveway apron to retain city of Ashland public works utility vehicle access to the public utilities below grade on the subject site and to the north in Riverwalk Park. There are 22 -on -street parking spaces required with the development (one on -street space for each dwelling unit, excluding cottage housing developments). There are more than 22 parking spaces parallel to the curb. Due to recent legislation, these spaces may not be required by Ashland Land Development Ordinance. The street is the minimum widths allowed in the development standards regardless of the parking situation on -street and this discussion becomes moot. Solar Access Ordinance: Solar Access (18.4.8,040): Assignment of solar factor. Proposed lots 1-10 are subject to Solar Setback Standard A. Lot 11 has an unbuildable area (Riverwalk Park) to north and is subject to Solar Setback Standard B. Compliance with the solar setback assignment will be demonstrated on the individual building permit submittals for each residence. The slope of each lot varies slightly between two to four percent downhill to the north (-.02 to -04). Lots with slopes of two to four percent require a minimum north to south (N/S) lot dimension of 67.76 Magnolia Meadows Subdivision Final Plan Page 3 of 10 September 15, 2023 feet up to 74.07 feet. Each of the proposed lots in the subdivision substantially exceeds the minimum N/S lot dimension required for the purposes of calculating the solar setbacks. Additionally, there are public rights-of-way on the north side of Lots 1-10 allowing for structures greater than 21 -feet at the shade producing point. Lots 1— 6 and 9 —11 have a slope of two percent downhill to the north. .445 -.02 = 0.43 = 30/.43 = 69.76' is the minimum N/S lot dimension. Lots 7 and 8 have a slope of three percent downhill to the north. .445 -.04 =.405 = 74.07' is the minimum N/S lot dimension. The average N/S lot dimension of Lots 1— 5 is 124.23 feet. The average N/S lot dimension of Lots 6 —10 is 132.52 feet. Lot Coverage: The property is zoned R-1-5 which allows for 50 percent site coverage +200 SF of permeable patio area. To allocate the actual area of development for the individual lots and to provide a more equitable lot coverage across the individual lot development, and not lose the coverage area dedicated to the open space lot, an average coverage area has been proposed. The average coverage for each parcel is 3,616.5 square feet of impervious surface coverage +200 SF of permeable patio/deck areas. Average tot Area and Averaged Lot Coverage: Total lot area of 12 lots excluding right of way: 82,198 square feet. 82,198/ 12 = 6,894.84 average lot area of 12 lots 6,894.84 / 2 = 3,424.92 (50 percent coverage area of average lot area) Lot 12 open space coverage: 3,424.92 —1,318 (coverage area in open space) = 2,106.92 remaining coverage area 2,106.92 / 11= 19154 square feet of coverage area remaining of open space lot allocated back to each building lot 3,424.92 + 191.54 = 3,616.5 square feet of lot coverage per lot Subdivision Infrastructure: Detailed civil engineering plans for the extension of the infrastructure from the existing termini in the public right of ways to and through the subdivision and providing adequate service for each of the development lots have been prepared and had preliminary review from public works. Magnolia Meadows Subdivision Final Plan Page 4 of 10 September 15, 2023 The individual lot utility plans include utility extensions for potential development of allowed to have separate utilities to allow for second dwelling unit or duplex development as desired. Public right of way improvements: Two public streets terminate into the boundaries of the property and the unimproved half of Ann Street is adjacent to the east property line along the subject property frontage. The development proposal connects the public streets, creating a gridded street pattern of interconnected, neighborhood streets. The proposed right-of-way widths and most improvements to the proposed rights-of-way conform to the standards for residential neighborhood streets. An exception to the street standards was permitted with the Outline Plan approval to allow for a curbside sidewalk along Clinton Street due to the topography approximately 10 feet behind the existing street curb line. The majority of the lots take vehicular access from the alleys. Lot 11 has a driveway. There are no other driveways within 24 feet. Municipal Water: The Public Works Department has indicated that the property is currently served by a 6 -inch water main in Clinton Street and an 8 -inch water main in Ann Street. There is adequate water pressure for the residences, common area irrigation and fire hydrants. The civil engineering documents provide adequate water supply. These plans have been provided for review to the Public Works Department. Sanitary Sewer: The property is currently served by an 8 -inch sanitary sewer main in Clinton Street and by a 10 -inch sanitary sewer main in Ann Street. Proposed sewer lines extensions and connections are shown on the civil utility improvement plans. A sanitary sewer main line is present in a public utility easement along the northeast property boundary with the Riverwalk Subdivision. Access to this line and easement is protected through the development of the open space pathway. Urban Storm Drainage: The property is currently served by 30 -inch storm sewer main in Clinton Street, and by a 36 -inch storm sewer main located in Ann Street. A storm drainage system plan has been designed with below grade collection systems that lead to a large open space tract that has a dry pond storm drain facility. This facility is not a water storage pond, and the area will typically remain dry except during extreme weather events. The storm drainage plan demonstrates that post -development peak flows are less than or equal to the pre -development peak flow for the site which means that the site is designed to have no additional Magnolia Meadows Subdivision Final Plan Page 5 of 10 September 15, 2023 impacts to the city's stormwater system. The required storm water quality mitigation has been addressed through the final design. The 1200C permit is in review with the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. Electricity: The proposed electric distribution plan provided in the civil engineering documents meets the needs of the Ashland Electric Department. Streetlights are proposed on the civil engineering documents that comply with the type of design and the spacing standards that are consistent with the city of Ashland Standards. Conclusion: The project team believes that it can be found that the Magnolia Meadows Final Plan application demonstrates substantial compliance with the Outline Plan approval. That the number of lots, the density, lot layout, open space development, public infrastructure improvements all conform to the Outline Plan proposal and address the conditions of approval. The open spaces and final landscape plan demonstrate compliance with the standards for both area of open space provided, number of street trees and irrigation systems for the street trees and the open space area. Thank you for your consideration. On the following pages, findings of fact addressing the criteria from the Ashland Municipal Code are provided. For clarity, the criteria are in Times New Roman font and the applicant's responses are in Calibri font. Magnolia Meadows Subdivision Final Plan Page 6 of 10 September 15, 2023 FINDINGS OF FACT PERFORMANCE STANDARDS SUBDIVISION 18.3.9.040.B.5. - Final Plan Approval Criteria Final Plata approval shall be granted upon finding of substantial conformance with the Outline Plan. This substantial conformance provision is intended solely to facilitate the minor modifications from one planning step to another. Substantial conformance shall exist when a comparison of the outline plan with the final plan meets all of the following criteria. Finding; The proposed Final Plan application for Phase 1 of the West Village Subdivision demonstrates substantial conformance with the Outline Plan. There are a few minor modifications necessary these are detailed below. a. The number of dwelling units vary no more than ten percent of those shown on the approved outline pian, but in no case shall the number of units exceed those permitted ill the outline plan. Findin The Final Plan for the Magnolia Meadows Subdivision proposes 11 residential lots, and an open space parcel. This is consistent with the Outline Plan decision. b. The yard depths and distances between main buildings vary no more than ten percent of those shown on the approved outline plan, but in no case shall these distances be reduced below the minimum established within this Ordinance. Finding; The residential lots 1- 4 and 6 —11 are proposed to have typical setbacks as allowed in the zone. Lot 5 has an area of 35 percent, and the building envelope is outside of the 35 percent slope. These include a 10 -foot setback for unenclosed, covered front porches that are more than 6 feet deep by 8 feet wide; 15 -foot front yard setback; 6 -foot side yard setbacks (internal lots); 10 -foot side yard on the corner lots abutting the street; 10 -foot per story rear yard setback. Additionally, detached accessory structures or accessory residential units that are less than 15 -feet tall are allowed to have a setback of four feet from the alley and three feet from side yards. Magnolia Meadows Subdivision Final Plan Page 7 of 10 September 15, 2023 Standard Lot Setbacks Standard Yards R-1-5 - Front — Standard, except: 15 ft - Front — Unenclosed Porch, 8 ft - Front —Garage Opening 20 ft - Side — Standard 6 ft - Side — Corner Lot Adjacent to Street 10 ft - Rear — Single -Story Building 10 ft - Rear— Multi -Story Building 10 ft per Bldg Story, 5 ft per Half Story c. The open spaces vary no more than ten percent of that provided on the outline plan. Finding: The location of the open space and the area of the open space is the same on the Final Plan submittals as the Outline Plan. d. The building size does not exceed the building size shown on the outline plan by more than ten percent. Finding: The individual building sizes are determined based on the lot area, the setbacks from the property lines and the lot coverage allowances. Lot 5 includes an alternate envelope due to the slope adjacent to the street. The individual building permit submittals will demonstrate compliance with the building standards for residential development in the zone. The average coverage for each parcel is 3,616.5 square feet of impervious surface coverage +200 SF of permeable patio/deck areas. Average Lot Area and Averaged Lot Coverage: Total lot area of 12 lots excluding right of way: 82,198 square feet. 82,198/ 12 = 6,894.84 average lot area of 12 lots 6,894.84 / 2 = 3,424.92 (50 percent coverage area of average lot area) Lot 12 open space coverage: 3,424.92 —1,318 (coverage area in open space) = 2,106.92 remaining coverage area 2,106.92 / 11= 191.54 square feet of coverage area remaining of open space lot allocated back to each building lot Magnolia Meadows Subdivision Final Plan Page 8 of 10 September 15, 2023 3,424.92 + 191.54 = 3,616.5 square feet of lot coverage per lot e. The building elevations and exterior materials are in conformance with the purpose and intent of this ordinance and the approved outline plan. Finding: The proposed conceptual elevations provided with the Outline Plan Submittals include a variety of modern residences to a contemporary craftsman. The proposed residences, at the time of individual building permit, will demonstrate compliance with the heights, standard setbacks, confirmation of compliance with the solar setback standards, and orientation as required AMC 18.2.5.030, Standards Urban Residential Zones and the standards from 18.2.5.090, Standards for Single Family Residences. For purposes of solar setbacks (SSB) from north property line (or north side of right of way) the following equations apply. Lots 1— 6 and 9 —11 have a slope of two percent downhill to the north. H — 6 = X /.43 = SSB Lots 7 and 8 have a slope of three percent downhill to the north. H — 6 = X /.42 = SSB f. That the additional standards which resulted in the awarding of bonus points in the outline plan approval have been included in the final plan with substantial detail to ensure that the performance level committed to in the outline plan will be achieved. Finding: No density bonuses were requested at Outline Plan. g. The development complies with the Street Standards. Finding: The proposed development complies with the street standards including the exception to the design standards to allow for a curbside sidewalk along Clinton Street that was approved during the Outline Plan approval process. h. Nothing in this section shall limit reduction in the number of dwelling units or increased open space provided that, if this is done for one phase, the number of dwelling units shall not be transferred to another phase, nor the open space reduced below that permitted in the outline plan. Magnolia Meadows Subdivision Final Plan Page 9 of 10 September 15, 2023 Finding: No changes that affect the number of dwelling units or open space area are proposed. 18,4.6.020.11. Exceptions and Variances. Requests to depart from the requirements of this chapter are subject to chapter 18.5.5 Variances, except that deviations frorn section 18.4.6.040 Street Design Standards are subject to 18.4.6.020.8.1 Exceptions to the Street Design Standards, below. Finding No new exceptions or variances are requested that were not addressed in the Outline Plan application. Attachments: 1) DLCD Water Resource Division—Agency Determination 2) Draft HOA and CC&Rs for Magnolia Meadows Subdivision 3) Magnolia Meadows Subdivision Tentative Plat 4) Magnolia Meadows Subdivision Civil Improvement Plans 5) Magnolia Meadows Subdivision Landscape and Irrigation Plans Magnolia Meadows Subdivision Final Plan Page 10 of 10 September 15, 2023 all Departnietcif' f 1n State ,ads 775 Surnmer Street NJ.",.,, Su to 100 Salem, OR 97301 -1279 (503) 986,-5200 FAX (503) 378-4844 August 30, 2023 wwvw,oregon.gov/cisI State 1,and Board Magnolia Investment, LLC Attn: Gil Livni Id 441 Talent Avenue Unit 60 Tina Koteh, Talent, OR 97535 Governor Re: WD # 2023-0023 Approved LaVonne Griffin-Valade Wetland Delineation Report for Magnolia Meadows Secretary of State Jackson County; T39S R1 E S4DI3 TL401 (Portion) Ashland Local Wetlands Inventory, Wetland PW 'Fobias Read State Dear Gil Livni Id! The Department of State Lands has reviewed the wetland delineation report prepared by Schott & Associates, Inc., for the site referenced above. Please note that the study area includes only a portion of the tax lot described above (see the attached map). Based upon the information presented in the report, and additional information submitted upon request, we concur that there are no jurisdictional wetlands or other waters of this state within the study area, as indicated on, the attached Figure 6. Please replace all copies of the preliminary wetland map with this final' Department -approved map. This concurrence is for purposes of the state Removal -Fill Law only. We recommend that you attach a copy of this concurrence letter to any Subsequent state permit application to speed application review. Federal, other state agencies or local permit requirements may apply as well. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will determine jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act, which may require Submittalof a complete Wetland Delineation Report. Please be advised that state law establishes a preference for avoidance of wetland impacts. Because measures to avoid and minimize wetland impacts rnay include reconfiguring parcel layout and size or development design, we recommend that you work with Department staff on appropriate site design before completing the city or county land use approval process. This concurrence is based on information provided to the agency. The jurisdictional determination is valid for five years from the date of this letter unless new information necessitates revision. Circumstances under which the Department may change a determination are found in OAR 141-090-0045 (available on our web site or upon request). In addition, laws enacted by the legislature and/or rules adopted by the Department may result in a change, in jurisdiction; individuals and applicants are subject to the regulations that are in effect at the time of the removal -fill activity or complete permit application. The applicant, landowner, or agent may submit a request for reconsideration of this determination in writing within six months of the date of this letter. Thank you for having the site evaluated. If you have any questions, please contact the Jurisdiction Coordinator for Jackson County, Matt Unitis, at (503) 986-5262. Sincerely, ncer Peter Ryan, SPWS Aquatic Resource Specialist Enclosures ec: Jodi 1~orgione, Schott & Associates, Inc. City of Ashland Planning Department (Maps enclosed for updating LWI) Kirsten Hines, Corps of Engineers Lauren Stebbins, PWS, DSL WETLAND D, INEATION /DETERMINATION REPORT CuvER FORM A complete report and signed report cover form, along with appHcaWe reMew fee, are required before a report review timeline can be initiated by the Department of State Lands. All applicants will receive an emailed confirmaVon that includes the report's unique file number and other information. Ways to submit report: Ways to pay review fee: v Under 50MB - A single unlocked PDF can be emailed to: By credit card on M.'s, epaynenporW after receiving %vettarid,de.lineaflort)�@dsl.oregoin,gc)iv, the unique file number from DSL's emailed confirmation. 50MB or larger - A single unlocked PDF can be uploaded to DSL's Br: xxorn website. By check payable to the Oregon Department of State After upload notify DSL by email at: wyetlauiel,delineai[ior C(Aids�,oF(egorii.gov. Lands attached to the unbound mailed hardcopy, gR OR a hard copy of the unbound report and signed cover form can be mailed to: Oregon attached to the complete signed cover form if report Department of State Lands, 775 Summer Street NE, Suite: 100, Salem, OR 97301-1279, submitted electronically. Contact arid Authorization Information X Applicant [9 Owner Name, Firm and Address: Business phone# (510) 913-5440 Magnolia Investment, LLC Mobile phone # (optional) Attw Gil Livni Id E-mail: magnoliafinehonies@gmail.coni 441 Talent Avenue Unit 60 Talent, Oregon 97535 F] Authorized Legal Agent, Name and Address (if different): Business phone # Mobile phone # (optional) E-mail: I either own the property described below or I have legal authority to allow access to the property. I authorize the Department to access the property for the purpose of confirming the information in the report, after prior notification to the primary contact. Typed/Printed Name: Gil 1-Nni Signature: 9dlelz� Date: 1/17/23— Special instructions regarding site access: Pr9ject,and Site Information Project Name: Magnolia Meadows Latitude: 42,203863 Longitude: -122.704385 decimal degree - centroid of site or start & end points of linear project Proposed Use: Tax Map # 391 E4DB Residential Development Tax Lot(s) 401 (portion of) -------------------------------------------------------------------- Tax Map # TaxxlLat(s)...............--------------------------------------------------------------- Project Street Address (or other descriptive location): 345 Clinton Street Township 39S Range 1E Section 4DB QQ Use separate..sheet for additional tax and location information I Waterway: River Mile: I City: Ashland County: Jackson Wetland Delineation Information Wetland Consultant Name, Firm and Address: Phone # (503) 678-6007 Schott & Associates, Inc Mobile phone # (if applicable) Attn: Jodi Forgione E-mail: Jodi@schottandassociates.coni PO Box 589 Aurora, Oregon 97002 The information and conclusions on this form and in the attached report are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Consultant Signature: I Date: 01/17/2023 Primary Contact for report review and site access is El Consultant El Applicant/Owner E] Authorized Agent WetlandMaters Present? El Yes X No I Study Area size: 2.59 Total Wetland Acreage: 0,0000 Check Applicable Boxes Below E] R -F permit application submitted' ❑ Fee payment submitted $ n Mitigation batik site E] Resubmittal of rejected report ($100) n EFSC/ODOE Proj, Mgr: E] Request for Reissuance. See eligibility criteria. (no fee) EJ Wetland restoration/enhancement project DSL # Expiration date not mitigation) nx Previous delineation/application on parcel nX LWI shows wetlands or waters on parcel If known, previous DSL 4 WD2022-0219 Wetland ID code PW For Office 'Use Only DSLReviewer: kA LJ Fee Paid Date: 1_/ DSL WD # 2023-0023 Date Delineation Received: 0 1/ 17 / 2023, DSL App.# October 2021 idy Site :titian Clinton Street Project Site: S&A #3027 0 11,000 2,000 4,000 Feet I AT) 16 1 r I t'l Po' q: 0 Study Site Location A0,I sI Ashland t' Ok 7'p Z A I l#'I N I A, AS;I P4, -I x. P. 0, A Date: 12/20/2022 M" 4u 1. Location Map Data Source: ESRI, 2022 Clinton Street Project Site: S&A #3027 0 11,000 2,000 4,000 Feet I AT) Date: 12/20/2022 Figure 2. Jackson County Tax Map - Data Source: Jackson County CIS Dept, 2022 391E4DB A C Clinton Street Project Site: S&A # 3027 0 loci 200 400 Feet Date: 1/12/2023C '�� 002'3Figure 6. Wetland Data Source: ESRI, 2020 Jackson Comity'�ty Approval �ssued 8/3012023 " pproval Expires 8'/30/2028 Delineation Map GIS, Dept., 2019; DOGAIMI, 2009 � � � � ",0 -1 VICI If , Clinton Street Project Site: S&A # 3027 p a 50 too 200 Peer DRAFT" After Recording Return to: Magnolia I leights, LLC 619 Elkader Ashland, OR 97520 Grantor: Magnolia Heights, LLC Grantee: Magnolia Meadows Homeowners' Association DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS MAGrNOLIA MEADOWS SUBDIVISION A P1,ANNED COMMUNITY MAGNOLIA HEIGHTS, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company, is tile Owner ill fee simple of real prol)erty commonly referred to as Magnolia Meadows Subdivision, a Planned Community, (hereinafter referred to as "tile Project") located in the City of Ashland, County of Jackson, State of Oregon, more particularly described in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, and made a part liereof. RECITALS, INTENT, AND PURPOSE A. Magnolia Meadows Subdivision is a Class 11 Planned Community and is subject to the Planned C011111lUnity Act (ORS 94.550-94.783,). B. Tile Bylaws have been adopted under ORS 94.625 and shall be recorded herewith. C. It is the desire and intention of Declarant to subject file Project to the covenants, conditions and restrictions set forth in this Declaration. DECLARATION Now, therefore, Declarant hereby declares that the Project shall be field, conveyed, hypothecated, enCLImbered, leased, rented, used, occupied, and improved, subject to the follo"ving covenants, conditions and restrictions, all of which are in furtherance of plan for the subdivision, improvement and stile of the Project as an interrelated development, and which are established for the purpose of enhancingand perfecting the value, desirability and attractiveness of the Project. All of the covenants, conditions and restrictions herein set forth shall rL11l With the 1 — CCRS — MAGNOLIA MEADOWS SUBDIVISION mmm Project and shall be bincling on all parties having or acquiring any right, title or interest ill the Project or any part thereof and shall be for the benefit of" each Owner of any portion of (lie Project, or any interest therein, and shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon each successor in interest of stich Omiers. NAME The name by which the Projject shall be known is Magnolia Meadows Subdivision, ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS In addition to the terms defined in ORS Chapter 94 and elsewhere defined herein, the following terms shall have the following meanings whenever LISCd in this declaration. 1.1 Articles; Bylaws. The Bylaws are recorded herewith in the Official Records of Jackson County, attached as Exhibit "C," and incorporated herein by reference and made a part thereof, 1.2 Association. The Magnolia Meadows Homeowners' Association. 1.3 Attached Units. The Dwelling Units in tile Project that are connected to all adjacent. Dwelling Unit. 1.4 Board. Tile Board of Directors of the Association. 1.5 Ci ly Cod . 'File code and any other relevant ordinances, laws, Or regulations of the City of Ashland, Oregon. 1.6 Common Area/Open Space. All of the Project less the Lots as defined ill Section LI I below, as depicted oil the Plat which includes open space, street trees, planter strips, stormwatcr detention facility and public pedestrian access easements. A conceptual site plan showing approximate location of such common area/open space is attached hereto as Exhibit "B", incorporated herein by reference. Full scale size print copies are available for review upon request by Association Members. 1.7 Declarant. Magnolia Heights, LL(", its successors and assigns. 1.8 Declaration. This Declaration as from time to time amended or supplemented. 1.9 Dwelling Unit. 'File residential structure, including any patio, porch, or other physical appLirtenance to SLICII structure, constructed oil a Lot by the Declarant or by a successor Owner. Dwelling Unit is also referred to as a "Dwelling" or "Unit". 1.10 Fiscal Year. The fiscal year shall rUll from January I through Deceinbcr 31. 2 — CCRS — MAGNOLIA MEADOWS SUBDIVISION DRAF�T 1.11 Lot. That portion of the Project conveyed or to be conveyed by the Declarant to all individual Owner in fee simple. For the purposes of this Declaration, a Lot shall exist from and after the (late of recording an instrument making such Lot subject to this Declaration. 1.12 Mortgage. Mortgage or a deed of trust of record encumbering a Lot. The term '"mortgagee"" shall include the beneficiary under a deed Of trust and the vendor under a recorded land -sale contract Or recorded memorandum of a land -sale contract. 1.13 Owner. The record Owner or Owners, if more than one, of a Lot, including Declarant and including a vendee under a recorded land -sale contract or recorded memorandum of land -sale contract. 1.14 Plat. That final plat for Magnolia Meadows Subdivision recorded in the Official Plat Records of Jackson County, Oregon oil , 2023 in Volume _, Page _ 1.15 Private Outdoor Space. The portion of a Lot not occupied by tile Dwelling Unit, subject to maintenance by the Lot Owner including front, side and rear yards. 1.16 PUE. Public Utility Easement as shown on the final Plat. 1.17 Solai-ReserveArea(SRA). A Solar Reserve Area is an area oil a Dwelling's roof, which is optimally designed to accommodate solar panels without disruptions by vents or other penetrations. Each Dwelling within the Project has been designed with a SRA, upon which solar panels, may be installed at the time of initial construction of the Dwelling. 1.18 Successor Owner. The owner of a Lot purchased from Declarant or purchased from another Successor Owner. ARTICLE 2 ASSOCIATION 2.1. Organization. 'File Association is a nonprofit corporation charged with the duties and vested with the powers prescribed by law and set forth in the Articles, the Bylaws, and this Declaration. Neither the Articles nor Bylaws shall, for any reason, be amended or otherwise changed or interpreted so as to be inconsistent with the Declaration. In the event of all), such inconsistency, the provisions of this Declaration shall prevail, The Board, and SLICII officers as the Board away elect or appoint, shall conduct the affairs of the Association in accordance with the Articles and Bylaws as fn-om tinic to time amended. 2.2 Membership, Each Owner shall be a Member of the Association and shall be entitled to one membership for each Lot owned. Each Member shall have the rights, duties, and obligations set forth in this Declaration, the Articles, the Bylaws, and the Association Rules as the same may from time to time be amended. The membership of each Owner in the Association shall be appurtenant to the Lot giving rise to such membership and shall not be assigned, transferred, pledged, conveyed, or alienated in all), way except upon the transt'er of title to such Lot and then only to the transferee of title thereto. Any transfer of title to a Lot shall operate automatically to 3 — CCRS — MAGNOLIA MEADOWS SUBDIVISION DFIAF�'�T' transfer tile membership in the Association appurtenant thereto to the new Owner thereof. For purposes of membership, the recording of a land -sale contract or memorandum thereof shall constitute a transfer of the title to a Lot, 2.3 Voting. (a) Members Entitled to Vote. Only Members of the Association shall be entitled to vote. The voting privileges of Members shall be as provided herein. Any action by the Association which must have the approval of the Association membership before being Undertaken shall expressly reqUil-C the vote or written assent of a prescribed percentage of the total voting power of the Association as more particularly stated within the Declaration, The Association shall have two classes of voting: (1) Class A Members. Class A Members shall have one (1) vote for each Lot. When more than one person owns a single Lot, all Owners shall be Members of the Association. However, the vote for each Lot must be cast as a unit, and fractional votes shall not be allowed. In the event that joint Owners are unable to agree among themselves as to how tile i r vote or votes shall be cast, they shall lose their right to vote on the matter in question. If any Owner (or Owners) casts a vote representing a certain Lot, it will thereafter be conclusively presumed for all purposes that such Owner(s) was acting Nvith the authority and consent of any other Owners of said Lot. The right to vote may not be severed or separated from the Lot ownership to which it is appurtcriant, and any sale, transfer, or conveyance of such Lot to a new Owner(s) shall operate to transfer the appurtenant vote without the requirement of any expressed reference thereto. (2) Class B Member. The Class B Member shall be the Declarant, its successors and assigns. The Class B Member shall be entitled to three (3) votes for each Lot in which it holds the interest required for membership as provided in Section 2.3(a) above. Class B membership shall be converted to Class A membership and shall forever cease to exist when one hundred percent (100%) of the Lots are conveyed to retail Owners other than Declarant. (b) Voting Procedures. Any vote may be cast in person or by proxy. All proxies shall be in writing, dated, ail(] signed by the Owner giving the proxy and filed with the Secretary before the commencement of ail), meeting, The proxy shall terminate eleven (11) montlis after its date unless the proxy specifies a shorter term. Every proxy shall automatically Cease Up011 the sale or the Lot by the ONviler and upon the death or incapacity of the Member who executed the proxy. (c) Declararit's Right to Vote. Notwithstanding ail), other provision of this Declaration, and except as provided in Section 10. 1, any provision of this Declaration that provides for approval by a prescribed percentage of Members' votes, other than the Declarant, shall be effective ail(] COIlStrUed also to require the affirmative vote of a majority of the total votes of all Members, including the Declarant. (d) Suspension of Voting Riglits. Tile voting rights of ail Owner shall be SUSI)CIRIC(I during such period as any assessment clue hereunder from SLIC11 Owner remains unpaid; provided, however, that the Board shall give any such Owner at least fifteen (15) days" notice prior 4 -- CCRS — MAGNOL.IA. MEADOWS SUBDIVISION ME= to SUCII SUSpellSi011 and SLICh Owner shall be entitled to a hearing before the Board in accord with Section 3A of the Bylaws. 2.4 Initial Boai-d of Directoi-s. The initial Board shall be appointed by Declarant. Thereafter, the Board shall be elected as provided in the Bylaws, 2.5 Duties of the Association, The Association shall have the obligation and duties subject to and in accordance with this Declaration to do and perform the following acts for the benefit of its Members, and for the maintenance and improvement of the Common Area as follows: (a) Common Area Maintenance and Qpei-ation. To maintain and otherwise manage the Common Area, after such property is conveyed or otherwise transferred to it, all improvements and utilities located thereon, all casements for operation and maintenance purposes over the Common Area, and all easements for the benefit of Members and the Association within the Common Area. The Common Area includes but is not limited to, landscaped open space, street trees, preservation trees, park rows adjacent to public right-of-way, open space on Lot 12, and storniNvater detention facility,. The Association's duty to maintain tile Common Area includes: (1) Removal of any debris deposited by winter storms; (2) Annual (spring) inspection and start-up of irrigation system; (3) Annual (fall) maintenance of the irrigation system, including inspection of heads, winterization, and coverage; (4) Maintenance of park strips, itICILIClilIg PrUllifIg street trees to provide at least 8-fect of clearance above sidewalks and 12 -feet of clearance above roadway surfaces; (5) Regular mowing/weeding of landscaped open space; (6) Maintenance of all pedestrian access easements identified on the Plat for bicycle and pedestrian access; (b) Utilities. To acquire, provide and/or pay for water, sewer, garbage disposal and pickup, electrical, telephone, gas, and other necessary utility services for the Common Area. (e) Signage, Lighting, Mailboxes. The Association shall, after C011StRICtiOn thereof by Declarant as a part of the initial development of the PrQject, maintain, repair, replace, reconstruct and/or relocate lighting, street signs, any clustered mail and post boxes, as initially designated on the plans filed with the Association or as initially constructed by Declarant, (d) 11ther. To perform SLICII other acts whether or not expressly authorized by this Declaration as may be reasonably necessary to enforce any of the provisions of this Declaration, the Bylaws, and the Association RUIeS. 2.6 Powei-s and Autliqi-jty_2f.the .Associat oar. The Association shall have all of the powers of a nonprofit corporation organized under the general nonprofit corporation laws of the State of Oregon subject only to such limitations upon the exercise of such powers as are expressly, set forth in the Articles, Bylaws, or this Declaration. The Association shall have the power to (to any and all lawful things which may be authorized, required, or permitted to be done by the 5 — CCRS — MAGNOLIA MEADOWS SUBDIVISION mum Association Under this Declaration, the Articles, and the Bylaws and to do all(] to perform any an(] all acts which may be necessary and proper for or incidental to the exercise of any of the express powers of the Association, including without limitation: (a) Assessments. To levy assessments on the Owners and enforce payment of such assessments all in accordance with the provisions ol'Sections 3 and 4 of this Declaration. (b) Right of Entry and Enforcement. To enter Upon any Lot for the purpose of performing the duties of the Association set forth in Section 2,5 of this Declaration; in enforcing by peaceful means any of the provisions of this Declaration; and maintaining or repairing any area on a Lot in a neat and attractive manner required to be maintained by an Owner if for any reason such Owner fails to maintain or repair such area. Such entrance upon a Lot shall be after seventy- two (72) hours' prior written notice to the Owner; provided, however, that such entrance shall be permitted Upon Consent Of at least one Board Member without any prior notice in the event of all emergency. Ali emergency shall be deemed to exist when there is a condition causing peril or threat to persons or property. The Association shall also have the power and authority from time to time in its own name, on its own behalf, or oil behalf of any Owner or Owners who consent thereto to commence and maintain actions and Wits to restrain and enjoin any breach or threatened breach of this Declaration and to enforce by mandatory injunction or otherwise all the provisions hereof. These rights will be exercised in such a manner as reasonable to minimize any adverse impact upon the Owner's right of enjoyment of his/her Lot. (c) Easements and Rights -of -Way. To grant and convey to any third party casements and rights-of-way in, oil, over, and under the Project for the IRII-POSC Of constructing, erecting, operating, or maintaining thereon, therein Or thereunder, overhead, or underground lilies, cables, wires, conduits, or other devices for the transmission of electricity for lighting, heating, power, telephone, and other purposes; public sewers; storm water drains -,in(] pipes; water systems; sprinkling systems; water and gas lilies or pipes; cable T,V. lines; security system lines; and any similar public or quasi -public improvements or facilities. (d) Emplpymelt of Manager. To employ the services of a person or firm to manage the Project and the affairs of the Association (the "Manager") to the extent deen-led advisable by the Board, as well as other SLICII personnel as the Board shall deem to be necessary or proper for the operation of the Project, whether SLICII personnel are employed directly by the Association or are furnished by the Manager. (e) Services. To contract for materials and/or services for the Project or the Association. Ali), such service contract or management contract pursuant to Section 2.6(d) of the Declaration shall be subject to termination by either party without cause upon thirty (30) days' notice in writing to tile other party. (f) Rules. By majority vote of the Board an(] from time to time to adopt, amend, enforce, and repeal such rules and regulations as the Board shall determine to be necessary or proper to the operation of the Project (tile "Association Rules"), The Association Rules shall govern the use of the Project by any Owner, by the family of such Owner, or by any invitee, licensee, or tenant Of SLICII Owner; provided, however, that the Association Rules may not 6 -- CCRS - MAGNOLIA MEADOWS SUBDIVISION BE= discriminate among Owners and shall not be inconsistent with this Declaration, the Articles, or Bylaws. A copy of the Association RUICs, as they may fron-i time to time be adopted, amended, or repeated, shall be mailedor otherwise delivered to each Owner. Upon such mailing or delivery, tile Association Rules shall have the same force and effectt as if set forth in and a part of this Declaration. The Association Rules shall not materially cliange the rights, or privileges of any person or the restrictions our any Lot as herein set forth. AfMCLE 3 FUNDS AND ASSESSMENTS 3.1 Operating Fund. 'File Association shall establish and maintain ail operating fund into which shall be deposited all moneys paid to the Association as regular, special, and emergency assessments and miscellaneous fees and from which fund the Association shall make disbursements in the performance of its rights and duties as provided for in this Declaration. 3.2 Reserve Fund. The Association shall also establish and maintain a reserve fund for replacement of all items of Common Area which will normally require replacement in whole or in part in more than three (3) and less than thirty (30) years including but not limited to: exterior painting, ifthe Common; and for such other items as may be required by this Declaration or the Bylaws. Declarant may deter payment of accrued reserve assessments for a Lot until the Lot is conveyed to a third party. However, Declarant may not defer payment of' accrued reserve assessments beyond the (late of the Turnover Meeting. The books and records of the Association shall reflect the all)01,111t OWilig fl -0111 Declarant for all reserve assessments. Tile Board annually shall review and, if 11CUSSary, Update the reserve study and existing maintenance responsibilities for the Common Area to determine the reserve account requirements as provided in ORS 94.595 as it may be amended frons time to time. The operating fund and the reserve ftuid shall be kept in separate accounts. 3.3 Regu la i-, Assessments. Within forty-five (45) days prior to the beginning of each fiscal year, the Board shall estimate the costs and expenses to be incurred by the Association during such fiscal year in performing its rights and duties under this Declaration, including a reasonable provision for unanticipated expenses ail(] replacements and less any anticipated surplus from a prior year's fiend provided that the Board may not, MlitllMlt the vote or written assent of the majority of the voting power of the Association residing in Members other than the Declarant, impose a regular annual assessment per Lot which is more than twenty percent (20%) greater than the Regular Assessment for the immediately preceding fiscal year. Such estimated amount shall be assessed equally to the Owners. The amount per Lot so assessed to each Owner is called the "Regular Assessment." 3.4 Special oi- Emergency A sessments. In addition to the Regular Assessments and Reserve Assessments, the Board may levy during any fiscal year a special or emergency assessment applicable to that year only for the purpose of defraying in whole or in part the cost of any construction, reconstruction (including ITCOFISUL[Cti011 costs in excess of insurance proceeds), repair of any common watered areas or utilities, unexpected repair or replacement of a capital improvement, ilICILIClilIg the necessary fixtures and personal property related thereto, or any extraordinary cxpenses not contemplated by this Declaration of whatsoever nature provided that 7 — CCRS — MAGNOLIA MEADOWS SUBDIVISION �f mum in any Fiscal year the Board may not, without the vote or written assent of a majority of the voting power of the Association residing in Members other than the Declarant, levy special or emergency assessments to defray the costs of any action or undertaking our behalf of the Association which in the aggregate exceeds rive percent (5%) of the budgeted gross expenses of the Association for that fiscal year. No special or emergency assessment stall be levied Nvith respect to the initial construction of the Project, it being understood that all such construction shall be at the sole cost and expense of the Declarant. Except as otherwise provided herein, special and emergency assessments shall be assessed to the Owners equally, and shall be paid as the Board shall determine. 'file provisions herein with respect to special and emergency assessments do not apply in the case where the special assessment against a Member is a remedy utilized by the Board to reimburse the Association for costs incurred in bringing the Member and his/her Lot into compliance with the provisions of this Declaration or the Bylaws. 3.5 Reinibin-sement Assessment. The Board shall levy an assessment against ally Owner who has failed to comply with or has breached this Declaration or the Association Rules or Bylaws for whom moneys or expenses were expended or incurred by the Association from the operating fund in performing its functions or enforcing the provisions of this Declaration, the Association Rules, or Bylam,s. Such assessment shall be for the purpose of reimbursing the Association and shall be limited to the amounts so expended or incurred, along Nvith any penalties or interest, and shall be due and payable to the Association when levied, 3.6 Payment of Assessments. Each Owner shall be obligated to pay Regular Assessments and Reserve Assessments made pursuant to this Article 3 to the Association in eqUal monthly installments our or before the first day of each month in advance or in such other manner as the Board shall designate. The Board shall provide each Owner with a statement of the annual assessment within ten (10) days prior to the beginning of each fiscal year but shall not be obligated to provide monthly statements to any Owner thereafter. Special assessments shall be payable in such manner as the Board shall designate. 3.7 Commencement of Assessments. The Regular Assessments and Reserve Assessments shall commence as to each respective Lot upon the close of the sale of the Lot to someone other than the Declarant. The first RCgLflar Assessment shall be adjusted according to the IlUmber of months remaining in the fiscal year, and the initial payment due with respect to a partial month from an Owner, other than the Declarant, shall be prorated as of [lie close of escrow for the purchase of such Owner's Lot. Notwithstanding any other provisions herein, in the event that assessments benefit fewer than all of the Lots such costs may be assessed exclusively against those benefitted Lots. 8 — CORS — MAGNOLIA MEADOWS SUBDIVISION DRAFFT ARTICLE 4 ENFORCEMENT OF ASSESSMENTS 4.1 Covenant to Pay Assessments. Declarant covenants for each Lot owned and each Owner, other than Declarant, by acceptance of a deed to a Lot, shall be deemed to covenant to pay assessments levied ill accordance with Article 3. 4.2 Enforcement. Each assessment levied hereunder shall be a sepal -ate, distinct, and personal debt and obligation of the person who is the Owner of such Lot at the time such assessment became due and payable. in the event of a dCf-,AL]lt ill payment of any such assessinctit, the Association may enforce each such obligation by any and all remedies provided by law. In the event the Association brings all action to enforce each SLICII assessment obligation, any judgment rendered in any such action sliall include a sum for reasonable attorney fees ill such arTIOUnt as the court may adjudge against the defaulting Owner, including reasonable attorney fees on appeal. At any time when an assessment of any type provided for by this Declaration or all installment thereof is delinquent, the Association, by and through its Board or designated agent, may file a notice of lien ill the deed records of Jackson County, Oregon, against the Owner and Lot to which the assessment pertains as provided by ORS 94.709. Notwithstanding ally other provision of this document, any general, special or other assessment levied under the authority of this document against a property in Magnolia Meadows do s Subdivision shall at all times be second, inferior and subordinate to tile lien of a mortgage or deed of trust and related loan documents, in favor of a bank or lending institution, and this provision may not be altered or amended without the express approval of a lender holding any such mortgage, deed Of tI'LISt or other loan doCUIllelltS. ARTICLE 5 LANDSCAPE AND ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL 5.1 Board Review of Landscape and Arehitectin-al Plans. It shall be the duty of the Board to consider and act upon any and all proposals or plans submitted to it pursuant to tile terms hereof to ensure that overall building designs, roof pitch, painting or exterior coverings, window placements and sizes, or improvellICIII[S C011StrLICted, which shall also include landscaping and plantings, ill the project by anyone other than Declarant, conform to plans approved by the Board. No person shall make any alterations to the exterior of a Dwelling Unit until the complete plans and specifications showing the location, nature, shape, height, and form of change (including without limitation any other information specified by the Board) have been submitted to and approved in writing as to overall appearance and harmony of design and location in relation to the surrounding structures and topography by the Board. 5.2 Ambitectural Rules. Tile Board may, from time to time, in its sole and absolute discretion, adopt, amend, and repeal rales and regulations to be known as "Arebitectural Rules." Said I'LlIeS shall interpret and implement this Declaration by setting flortli the standards and procedures for any Board review and the design guidelines for architectural design, placement of buildings, landscaping, exterior finishes, and materials, and similar features which are 9 — CCRS -- MAGNOLIA MEADOWS SUBDIVISION DRAFT" recommended for use within the Preject. These RfleS shall 110t C011fliCt with the Special HillitatiOlIS set forth in this Declaration. 5.3 Application for Approval of Improvements. Any Owner, except the Declarant and its designated agents, proposing to perform any work of any kind which requires the prior approval of the Board pursuant to any provision in this Declaration, shall apply to the Board for approval by notifying tile Boat-([ of the nature of the proposed work in writing and furnishing such information as the Board may require. 5.4 Approval/Disapproval '. All approvals given under this Article 5 shall be in writing, If a requested approval has not been granted within forty-five (45) clays from the date of submission of all information requested by the Board, the proposal shall be c1ccirled approved. The Boat-ci's decision shall be final. 5.5 Completion of Wor-k. Ali Owner shall complete the constrUCti011, reconstruction, refinishing, or alteration of any such improvement within twelve (12) months after commencing construction thereof, except for so long as such completion is rendered impossible or will result in great hardship to the Owner due to strikes,, fires, national emergencies, natural calamities, or other supervening forces beyond the control of the Owner or his/her agents. If the Owner fails to comply with this Section 5.5, the Board shall proceed in accordance with the provisions of Section 5.6 as though the failure to complete improvement were noncompliance with approved plans, 5.6 Inspection of Work. Inspection of work and correction of defects therein shall proceed as follows: (a) Upon the completion of any C0l1StrLlCti0l1 or reconstruction or the alteration or refinishing of the exterior of any improvements or upon the completion of any other work for which approved plans are required under this Article 5, the Owner shall give written notice thereof to the Board. (b) Within forty-five (45) days thereafter, the Board or its ditty authorized representatives may inspect such improvement to determine whether it Was C011SU'Lleted, reconstRIcted, altered, or refinished to substantial compliance with the approved plans. If the Board finds that such construction, reconstruction, alteration, or refinishing was not done ill substantial compliance with the approved plans, it shall notify the Owner in writing of such noncompliance spceifying particulars of noncompliance and shall require the Owner to remedy S4IC11 noncompliance, (e) If upon the expiration of thirty (30) days from the date of such notification, the Owner shall have failed to remedy such noncompliance, the Board shall set a date on which a hearing before the Board shall be held regarding the alleged noncompliance. The hearing date shall be not more than thirty (30) days nor less than fifteen (15) clays after notice thereof by the Board to the Owner, and in the discretion of the Board, to any other interested part),. The hearing procedure shall conform to subsection (d) below and any Rules aclopted by the Board pursuant to tile Bylaws. 10 — CCRS — MAGNOLIA MEADOWS SU13DIVISION mum (d) At the hearing, the Owner, and in tile Board's discretion, ally other interested person, may present information relevant to the question of tile alleged noncompliance. After considering all SLICII information, the Board shall determine whether there is a noncompliance, and if so, the nature thereof and tile estimated costs of remedying the noncorripliance. If noncompliance exists, tile Board shall require tile Owner to remedy or remove the same within a period of not more than forty-five (45) days from the date of the Board I'Llfirig. If the Owner does not comply with the Board ruling Nvithill such a period or within any extension of such period tile Board, in its discretion, may either remove the noncompliant improvement or remedy the noncompliance and the Owner shall reimburse the Association for all expenses incurred in connection therewith upon demand. If such expenses are not promptly repaid by the Owner to the Association, the Board shall levy a reimbursement assessment against such Owner IMUSLiant to Section 3.5 hereof, (e) If for any reason the Board fails to notify the Owner of any noncompliance within forty-five (45) days after receipt of said notice of completion from the Owner, the improvement shall be deemed to be in accordance Nvith the said approved plans. 5.7 Liability. Neither the Board nor ally member thereof or their delegates shall be liable to the Association or to any 0\vner for any damage, loss, or prejudice suffered or claimed oil account of (a) the approval or disapproval of plans, drawings, and specifications whether or not defective; (b) the COr1St1'LJCti01l or performance of any work whether or not pUrStMilt to approved plans, drawings, and specifications; (c) the development of any property within the PUD; or (d) the execution and filing of an estoppel certificate whether or not the facts therein are correct, provided, however, that such member has acted in good faith oil the basis Of such itIfOrIllati011 as may be possessed by said Board member. Without in any way limiting the generality or tile foregoing, tile Board or all), member thereof may, but is not required to, consult with or hear the views of, the Association or any Owner with respect to any plans, drawings, specifications, or any other proposal submitted to the Board. Approval by the Board does not mean the Board is warranting or incurring any liability for the structural adC(ILJaCY of the plans, drawings, and specifications submitted to and approved by said Board. Plans, specifications, and drawings may require building permits and other entitlements from the appropriate governmental agencies. ARTICLE 6 PROPERTY RIGHTS AND EASEMENTS 6.1 Conveyance of Common Area. Declarant hereby covenants for itself, successors, and assigns that prior to or at the turnover meeting provided for in the Bylaws, it will convey fee simple title to any Common Area to the Association Erce and clear of all licns and encumbrances except the covenants, conditions, and restrictions herein set forth, easements, and utility rights-or- Nvay then of record. All said facilities shall be for the use and benefit of the ONvners, tenants, gLJCStS, and licensees in the Project. 6.2 Easements in Common Area. Every Owner within the PUD shall have a right and nonexclusive casement of enjoyment in and to the Common Area and any easements shown on the final plat, and a iloilexCILISiVe casement for ingress and egress over and through the Common Area. Such easements shall be apPL11-tenant to tile right of the Association to sell, transfer, or I I -- CCRS — MAGNOLIA MEADOWS SUBDIVISION DRAFT encumber all or any portion of (lie Common Area to a person, firm, or entity, whether public or private, and the right of the Association to dedicate or transfer all or any part of the Common Area to ally public agency, authority, or utility for such purposes and subject to such conditions as may be agreed to by the Owners. No such sale, transfer, encumbrance, or dedication shall be effective except upon compliance with the City's Land Use Ordinance and current final order of approval for the Project, and the prior vote or written consent of Members representing seventy-five percent (75%) of the total voting power of Members without any weighted vote; provided, however, that a dedication required by a governmental agency as a condition to recording a final plat covering any portion of the ProJect shall require no such prior vote or written consent. 6.3 Utility Easements. Each Lot shall be conveyed to Owners, other thall Declaralit, subject to any and all easements of record for the use and benefit of several authorized public and/or other utilities, including but not limited to cable T.V,, internet, sanitary sewer, water, gas, electrical, and drainage easements, and no Owner shall damage or interfere with the installation or maintenance of such utilities or in any manner change the direction or flow of drainage channels in any such easements or in any manner C011StrUCt or retard the flow of water through drainage channels in ally such easement, 6.4 Easements Granted _by Owners of 1.,ots. Declarant hereby declares a non- exclusive casement of ingress and egress to the Association, on behalf of Owners accepting title to Lots, their successors and assigns, to that portion of an Owner's Lot as may be reasonably required by the Association to exercise and otherwise perform its rights Under Section 2.5. 6.5 Delegation. Any Owner may delegate his right of use and enjoyment to the Comnion Area to the Members of his family or tenants who reside oil such Lot, Tenants shall not have the right to further delegate the Owner's right to use and enjoy the Common Area. As to tenants, such Owner shall notify the Association in writing of such delegation and the names of such delegees. The rights and privileges of any delegee shall be in accordance with and subject to this Declaration; provided, however, that the Owner making such delegation (and his Lot) shall remain liable for the assessments herein provided for and SLIk�jCd to all of the terms and conditions of this Declaration. ARTICIX, 7 ATTACHED UNITS This section is applicable to Attached Units. 7.1 Maintenance; Repair of Attached Unit. 0xvners of Attached Units shall be jointly and proportionally responsible for the repair and maintenance of the exterior of the shared building as well as the Party Wall (collective]), "Attached Unit Common Elements"). Maintenance and repair responsibilities shall inClUde, but are not limited to, exterior paint, siding, roof gutter and roof repair, and Party Walls. 12 — CCRS — MAGNOLIA MEADOWS SUBDIVISION DRAFT (a) Definition; General Rules of Law to Apply. Each wall that is built as a part of the original C0JlStl-LlCti011 Of two Attached Units, and that is placed oil the dividing line between the two Attached Units shall constitute a Party Wall, Party Walls shall include the studs, blocking, insulation, cement and airspace lying between the wallboard of one Dwelling Unit and tile wallboard of the other Dwelling Unit sharing the wall. Party Walls shall not include the wallboard, paneling, sheetrock, tiles, wallpaper and paint on the interior of the Party Wall, all of which shall be considered part of the Dwelling Unit and the maintenance of which shall be tile responsibility of the Owner of the Dwelling Unit. General rLlJeS of law regarding Party Walls shall apply to the Party Walls of the two attached Dwelling Units to the extent that such rules are not inconsistent with the provisions of this Declaration. (b) Utility,, Easements. Each Owner small have an casement through the Party Wall fOr the purpose of installing, repairing, replacing or maintaining utility lines, wires, pipes and conduits. 7.2 Common Elements; Damage Caused by Ow nen Notwithstanding ail), other provision of this Declaration, ail Owner who by his or any of his OCC1.11),1111S, gLICStS, tenants, licensees, agents, or Members of his family's negligent or willful act causes the Attached Unit Common Elements to be exposed to the elements, or otherwise be damaged, shall bear the whole cost of furnishing the necessary protection against SLICII elements and all repair, subject, however, to reirribursement and/or contributions from available insurance policies. 7.3 Condemnation. Ill the event that all or any portion of a Part), Wall, Attached Unit, and/or a Lot is appropriated as the result of condemnation or threat thereof, the f0l[OWillg Rile and guidelines shall apply: (a) Allocation of Condemnation Award. Any condemnation award received by the Owners with respect to a Party Wall, Attached Unit(s), or a Lot shall be allocated to tile Owners in proportion to the diminution in fail- market value incurred by them with respect to their respective Lots and Dwelling 'Units as a result of said condemnation. (b) Repair and Restoration. Any such condemnation award shall be used to repair and restore the D,.velling Unit(s), Party Wall, or Lot if such repair or restoration is feasible. (e) Retention of Rights. No provision of this Article shall be C011Sti-Lied as negating the right of the individual Owners to such incidental relief as the law may provide as a result of the condemnation of a Party Wall, D\velling Unit(s), Lot, or any portion of the foregoing. 7.4 I'meedure for Maintenance of Attached Units by Owners. When, ill the reasonable opinion of an Owner, maintenance, repair or replacement of an Attached Unit Common Element is needed, such Owner shall notify the other Owner(s) of such need and the Owners together shall determine ]low to complete the work. If the adjacent Owner is Unable to agree oil timing, cost, terms, or other details regarding maintenance and repairs, the Adjacent Owner demanding maintenance or repairs shall submit a list of three arbitrators to the other Adjacent Owner(s). The three potential arbitrators shall all be Oregon licensed general contractors. The other Adjacent Owner(s) shall select one arbitrator from the list within tell clays. If the other 13 -- CCRS — MAGNOLIA MEADOWS SUBDIVISION DRAFT Adjacent Owner(s) fails to notify the demanding Adjacent Owner of their/its choice of ail arbitrator in writing within ten days, or multiple owners cannot agree on one arbitrator, the demanding Adjacent Owner shall select the arbitrator. Such arbitrator shall be retained to arbitrate the dispute by determining the appropriateness of any proposed maintenance and repairs, including, but not limited to, cost and whether SLIC11 maintenance and repairs are appropriate. The arbitrator's decision shall be final. 'File Adjacent Owners shall pay half of the arbitrator's fee. If one Adjacent Owner performs maintenance or repairs that are determined to be tile joint responsibility of the other Adjacent Owner(s), the Adjacent Owner performing the maintenance or repairs shall be entitled to a lien oil the other Adjacent Owner(s)s property in the amount or 50% of the cost of maintenance or repairs, plus all costs incurred in filing or foreclosing the lien, and a pro rata share of the arbitrator's fee. The lien shall be foreclosed in the manner provided by ORS Chapter 87, Tile prevailing Adjacent Owner shall be entitled to attorney fees and half of any funds expended for maintenance or repairs agreed upon or deemed appropriate by ail arbitrator. Such funds shall aCCRIC interest at the rate of 15%, per annum from the date such funds were initially incurred by the Adjacent Owner. 7.5 Pr-ocedure for- Maintenance of Attached Units by Board. Notwithstanding the provisions contained in Section 7.4 above, in the event that the Board determines that maintenance, repair, or replacement of ail Attached Unit Common Element is needed, the Board shall notify all Owners of said Attached Unit of such need and the Owners shall determine flow to complete the work. If, however, SLICII work is reasonably needed and all Owners refuse to proceed with such Nvork, the Board may initiate arbitration to compel repair and maintenance of the Attached Units, The B0aFCI shall submit a list of three arbitrators to the Owners of the Attached Units. The three potential arbitrators shall all be Oregon licensed general contractors. 'file Owners shall collectively select one arbitrator from the list within ten days. If the Owners fail to notify the Board of their choice of ail arbitrator in writing within ten days, tile Board shall select the arbitrator. In the event the Owners cannot agree oil the arbitrator, the Board shall select the arbitrator. Such arbitrator shall be retained to arbitrate the dispute by determining the appropriateness of any proposed maintenance and repairs, including, but not limited to, cost and whether SLICII maintenance and repairs are appropriate. The arbitrator's decision shall be final. Tile Board shall pay the arbitrators fee. If the Board performs maintenance or repairs that are determined to be the responsibility of the Actiacent Owners, the Board shall be entitled to a lien on the Owners' property in the amount of the cost of maintenance or repairs, plus costs incurred in filing or foreclosing the lien. The lien shall be foreclosed in the manner provided by ORS Chapter 87. The Board shall be entitled to attorney fees and ail), funds expended for maintenance or repairs agreed upon or deemed appropriate by ail arbitrator. Such funds sliall accrue interest at the rate of 15% per annum from the date such funds were initially incurred by Board. 7.6 Owners' Individual Maintenance Responsibilit Each Owner sliall be responsible for ail([ shall bear the costs of maintaining, repairing and replacing elements, which are not deemed Attached Unit Common Elements including: Nvindows within ail Owner's Dwelling Unit; Private Outdoor Space; the fence or rences enclosing the private yard of an. Owner's Dwelling Unit; structural elements of the Dwelling Unit, other than Attached Unit Coilinion Elements; and the interior elements of the Dwelling Units. Such maintenance, repair, and replacement sliall be clone in accordance with applicable laws, ordinances and regulations and in a workmanlike manner, lit—CORS — MAGNOLJA MEADOWS SUBDIVISION DRAFT Notwithstanding the above, fences that border a common property line between two, Lots are deemed an Attached Unit Common Element. 7.7 Damage or Destruction to Dwelling Units - Insurance Pi-oceeds Sufficient to Cover Loss. In case of fire, casualty or any other damage or destruction to any Attached Unit(s), the proceeds of the Owner's or Owners' applicable insurance policy, if sufficient to pay for the repair or reCO1lStrLlCtiO11 of the Dwelling Unit(s), shall be applied to such reconstruction. 7.8 Damage or, Destruction to Dwelling Unit - Insurance Pi-occeds Insufficient to Cover Loss. SLIbjeCt to the other provisions of this Section 7.8, if the proceeds of the Owner's insurance policy are inSLIffiCient to pay for the repair or rCCOnStrL1CtiOn of the damaged or destroyed Dwelling Unit(s), it shall, nonetheless, be promptly repaired. The proceeds of any Owner's or Owners' insurance policies shall be contributed to the repair or reconstruction costs of the Attached Unit(s) so insured,, and each Owner shall be liable for his share of any SLICII cost that is not paid for by insurance proceeds. 7.9 Architectural Changes after- Damage_or Desti-tiction. RcconstrUCtiOn Of tile damaged or destroyed DNvelling Unit(s), as used in this Article 7, means restoring the Attached Unit(s) to substantially the same condition and design in which it existed prior to the fire, casualty or disaster. In any event, any architectural changes shall conform to the Declaration, Design Guidelines, and any other rules or regulations promulgated by the Board or Architectural Committee. 7.10 Enforcement of Party gall. Provisions, An Owner or the holder of any first mortgage, trust deed or land sale contract on any Lot shall have the right to enforce all of the covenants, conditions, restrictions, reservations, casements, liens, and charges now or hereinafter imposed by any of the provisions of this Declaration as may appertain specifically to such parties or Owners against the Owner of the Attached Unit. Failure by any Owner or Mortgagee to enforce any covenant or restriction herein contained shall in no event be deemed a waiver of his or its right to do so thereafter. ARTICLE 8 USE RESTRICTIONS The use of the Lots and the Common Area shall be restricted in accordance ,vith the following provisions in addition to all other covenants, conditions, and restrictions herein contained. 8.1 Residential Use. The Lots and Dwelling Units shall be used for residential purposes only,, except as specifically provided for in this Declaration. 8.2 Ownei-s Obligations of Maintenance/Insurance. Each Owner shall maintain and keep his or her Dwelling (including exterior paint, siding and root) and Lot in a clean, sanitary, and attractive condition. Landscaping oil each Lot shall be maintained in at least as good or better quality in design and nature of planting as is required by file Board at the time of initial construction of a Dwelling Unit on the 1,ot. If the Owner fails to maintain their Dwelling Unit, landscaping and Lot, as required herein, the Association shall have the right to go upon the Owner's Lot and perform SLIC11 maintenance pursuant to the Association's authority set forth in Section 2.6 hereof The costs 15 --- CCRS —MAGNOLIA MEADOWS SUBDIVISION mmm incurred by the Association shall be assesscd against the Lot as a reimbursement assessment pursuant to Section 3.5. In order to provide for repair or reconstruction f6110Wing casualty damage, Owners shall Call)' SUCII insurance coverage as required by the Bylaws of the Association. 8.3 Commercial or ALricultural Use. No industry, business, trade, occupation, or profession of any kind shall be conducted, maintained, or permitted on any part of the Project, Unless specifically allowed by this Declaration or approved as a ]ionic occupation by the City of Ashland and any other applicable governmental authority. No agricultural barns or sheds shall be permitted UnICSS otherwise permitted by the City of Ashland. 8.4 Animals. Household pets, in a reasonable number, may be kept if they are solely household pets for private use and not for commercial purposes, No animal shall be allowed to make an unreasonable amount of noise or otherwise to become a nuisance. No dog shall be permitted outside of the Lot of such Owner or OCCUPant Unless it is under the control of a respomible person. Upon request of any Owner, the Board shall determine, in its sole discretion, whether for the purpose of this Section, a particular animal shall be considered a house pet or a nuisance. The Ownerofany pet shall be responsible for cleaning tip after said pet on any property Within the Project, Any permanent outdoor StRICtUrC for the care, housing, or confinement of any pet shall be approved by the Board for its design and placement on each Lot. 8.5 Outside Storage. Storage of any materials or equipment on porches or other outdoor areas visible from the Common Area or right-of-way is prohibited. Nothing herein is intended to prohibit placement of patio furniture or d6cor. 8.6 Trash Receptacles. All trash shall be retained in appropriate receptacles. Trash and recycling set -vice for the Project is the responsibility of Lot Owners. 8.7 Growing of Marijuana Prohibited, The Association desires to enSLIrc the peace and enjoyment of Owners within their Lots and to reduce nuisance Created from odors as a result Of growing, cultivating and/or prOCILICing marijuana, and to protect the safety, welfare and benefit of existing and ruture Owners of the Lots within the Project. To that end, all Outdoor growth, cultivation and production of marijuana is prohibited within the Project. In the event this provision is challcriged in a court of law or other proceeding, the Board may, in its sole discretion, amend this Declaration xvithout a vote of the Members to delete this restriction, if it determines that it would be in the best interest of the Association to avoid the costs of such defense. 8.8 Fire Protection Plan. The Association and the Members shall comply with the Fire Prevention and Control Plan requirements Of City Code. A copy of such Fire Prevention and Control Plan is on file with the Association and available upon request. 8.9 Firearms. No firearms or archery eqUipment shall be Used or discharged on any Lot or Common Area. However, such items may be kept inside any residence as legally permitted, 8.10 Lighting. No invasive outdoor lighting within the Project shall be permitted. All outdoor lights shall be shielded from point SOUrCe glare aincl shall not be directed towards adjacent parcels. All overhead Or other arca lighting shall be shielded to cast a downward glare. 16 — CCRS — MAGNOLIA MEADOWS SUBDIVISION [YRAFT" 8.11 Fencin . Fences shall be SUbjCd to approval of file Board and shall be consistent with the approved fencing plan. I"ences within Common Area shall remain unlocked to permit Association maintenance. New or replacement fences shall be subject to prior approval of the Board and shall be consistent with the fencing plan and the provisions of the "Felice and Walls" I-CCILdrements in the Ashland Municipal Code, Section 18.4.4.060, Fences around common open space shall not exceed 4 -feet, except for deer fencing. A fence permit is required from the City of Ashland prior to installation. A copy of the Fencing Plan is oil rile with file Association and available upon request. 8.12 Tree Protection Plan. Any deviation from the Tree Protection Plan is deemed a violation of file planning application approval and may be subject to penalties under City Code. Any proposed deviation to the plan must receive prior written approval from the City of Ashland's Planning Department. 8.13 Water Resource Protection Zone Mitigation and Management Plan. All), deviation from the Water Resource Protection Zone Mitigation and Management Plan is deemed a violation of the planning application approval and may be subject to penalties Under City Code. Any proposed deviation to the plan must receive prior written approval from the City of Ashland's Planning Department. 8.14 Common Area Maintenance. No Lot Owner shall do any alteration, Nvork, or maintenance within file Common Area without the approval of file Board. 8AS Nuisances. No machinery or equipment of ally kind shall be placed, Operated, or maintained upon or adjacent to any Lot except SLICII machinery or equipment, such as private workshop equipment, as is usual and customary in connection with the use or maintenance of a Dwelling Unit. No noxious or offensive condition, including activity causing excessive smoke, dust, noise, or debris, shall be permitted upon any part of file Project. 8.16 Diseases and Insects. No Owner shall permit any condition or filing to exist Upon his Lot which shall induce, breed, or harbor infectious plant diseases or noxious insects, 8.17 Mineral Exploration. No property shall be used in any manner to explore for or to remove any water, oil, or other hydrocarbons, minerals of any kind, gravel, earth, or any other such substance or other mineral of all), kind except for any excavation that may be done in C0111leCti011 With file construction of a dwelling in the Project. 8.18 Tenant 1.,eases. All Owners shall supply tenants with a copy of this Declaration, as well any adopted Riles and regulations that are provided to each Lot Owner. 8.19 Cojistruction Debris. The Owner of each. Lot is responsible for tile temporary containment and permanent removal of all construction debris oil the Lot and any debris which is windblown or in any way displaced from the construction site to adjoining property. The Owner is also responsible for the cleanup ofally dirt 01' 11111d tracked into public streets during the course of construction of improvements on his property. 'File ONviier shall not allow the accumulation of large quantities of debris, on or offsite, during file COUrSC Of COIlStRIC0011, 17 — CCRS — MAGNOLIA MEADOWS SUBDIVISION mmm 8.20 Solai- Pi-otection. Each Unit's Solar Reserve Area shall remain free fi-om shading by any Plantings the Project. No person owning or in control of a property within the Project shall allow vegetation to be placed or if placed to grow on property or neighboring property in such a manner as to shade the identified neighbor's Solar Reserve Area, 8.21 Solar Panels. Solar panels within private yard areas (gr0L111(l mounted or fence mounted) are not permitted. 8.22 Riglit of Inspection. Upon seventy-two (72) hours' written notice (emergencies excepted) and during reasonable hours, any authorized Member of the Board, or any authorized representative of any Board Member, shall have the right to enter capon and inspect the Lot and the exterior of the DNvelling Unit or any of the improvements thereon for the purpose of ascertaining whether or not the provisions of these covenants, conditions and restrictions, the Bylaws and the Riles and regulations adopted by the Board, have been or are being complied with, and SLIC11 persons shall not be deemed guilty of trespass by reason of such entry or inspection. These rights shall be exercised in SLIC11 a manner as to reasonably minimize any adverse impact uport the Owner's right to enjoyment of his/her Lot. A report shall be made to the full Board, and the Board shall determine the appropriate action to be taken. ARTICLE 9 DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS 9.1 Limitations of Resti-ictions. Declarant is Undertaking the Nvork of constructing improvements identified for the Project. The completion of that work and the sale, rental, and other disposal of Lots is essential to the establishment and welfare of said property as a residential community, fit order that said work iria), be completed and said property be established as a fully occupied residential 001111111.111ity as rapidly as possible, nothing in these restrictions shall be Understood or construed to: (a) Prevent Declarant, its contractors, subcontractors, or permittees from obtaining reasonable access over and across the Common Area of the Project or From doing, on arty Lot or any portion of the Project, 'whatever is reasonably necessary or advisable in connection with the completion of said work; or (b) Prevent Declarant or its representativcs from erecting, constructing and maintaining on ail), part or parts of the Project, SLICII strUCtUrcs as may be reasonabty necessary for the conduct of its business of completing said work and establishing said property as a residential community and disposing of the same in parcels by sale, lease, or otherwise; or (e) Prevent Declarant from conducting on any part of the Project, its bLISilICSS of completing said Nvork and of establishing said property as a residential community and of disposing of said property in parcels or lots 1)), sale, lease or otherwise, including the right to maintain model homes and sales offices; or 18 — CCAS — MAGNOLIA MEADOWS SUBDIVISION (d) Prevent Declarant from maintaining such signs within the Project, as may be necessary for tile sale, lease or disposition of the lots therein, including the right to maintain a sales and resale office in or on some portion of the Project owned by Declarant. 9.2 Declarant's Development Rights. Notwithstanding any other provision herein contained, Declarant expressly retains unalterable rights to develop the Project subject to this Declaration. Nothing in the Declaration shall limit the right of Declarant to cornmence and complete construction of improvements to the Project, or to alter the foregoing or to C011ARICt SLICII additional improvements as Declarant deems appropriate prior to the sale of all of the Project described in Exhibit "A". ARTICLE 10 AMENDMENTS 10.1 Period of Declarapt Control. Until Declarant shall sell all Lots in the Project, no amendment to this Declaration shall be effective to curtail or eliminate Declarant's development rights set forth herein without Declarant's consent. Prior to the turnover meeting, any such amendment shall be approved by seventy-five percent (75%) of the total voting power of the Association and by Declarant; provided that the Declarant shall have the unilateral power and authority to amend this Declaration when required by a governmental agency as a condition to obtaining a permit. Upon approval pUrSUant to this section, the amending instrument shall be signed by the President and Secretary of tile Association, certifying that the amendment has been approved as provided herein. The instrument shall be recorded in the official records of Jackson C01111ty, Oregon and shall be effective upon recording. 10.2 Post-Deelarant Control. After the turnover meeting, any such amendment shall be approved by seventy-five percent (75%) of the total voting power of the Association. Upon approval pursuant to this section, the: amending instrument shall be signed by tile President and Secretary of the Association, certifying that the amendment has been approved as provided herein. The instrument shall be recorded in the official records of Jackson County, Oregon and sliall be effective Upon recording, ARTICLE 1.1 GENERAL PROVISIONS 11.1 Binding Effect; Term. The covenants, conditions, and restrictions of this Declaration shall run with the land and shall inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the Association or any Owner, their respective legal representatives, heirs, successors, and assigns. 11.2 Nuisance. Every act or omission whereby any provision of this Declaration is violated in whole or in part is hereby declared to be a 111.1isance and may be enjoined or abated, whether the relief sought is 11Cgative or affirmative action, by Declarant, the Association, or any Owner. 11.3 Violation of La -*N,. Any violation of any federal, state, 111U11icipal, local law, regulation or ordinance, or regulation pertaining to the ownership, occupation, or use of the Project 19--- CORS -- MAGNOLIA MEADOWS SUBDIVISION ME= or all), part thereof is hereby declared to be a violation of this Declaration and subjcct to all), and all of the enforcement procedures set forth herein. 11.4 Condemnation of Common Area. If at ally time all or any portion of any Common Area, or ally interest therein, be taken for all), pUblic or quasi -public Use under ally statute, by right of eminent domain, or by private purchase in lieu of eminent domain, the entire award in condemnation shall be paid to the Association. Ally such award to the Association shall be deposited into the operating fund of the Association. No Owner shall be entitled to ally portion of such award, and no Owner shall be entitled to participate as a party, or otherwise, in any proceedings relating to SUCII CorldC111nation, such right of participation being herein reverted exclusively to the Association or other holder of the fee title which shall, in its name alone, represent the interests of all Lot Owners to the extent such Lot Owners have all), interest. 11.5 ObliLgations of Owner. No Owner may avoid the bUrclens or obligations imposed oil them by this Declaration through non-use of the Common Area or by abandonment of their Lot. Upon the conveyance, sale, assignment, or other transfer of a Lot to a new Owner, the transferring Owner shall not be liable for ally such assessments levied with respect to such Lot after the date of such transfer, and no person, after the termination of their status as are Owner and prior to their again becoming all Owner, shall hictir ally of the obligations or enjoy all), of the benefits of all Owner under this Declaration. 11.6 Notice of Sale. Within five (5) bLISilICSS clays after the consummation of the sale of any Lot under circumstances whereby the transferee becomes all Owner thereof, the transferee shall notify the Association in writing of such sale. SLICII notification shall set forth (a) the name of the transferee and his/leer transferor; (b) the street address of the Lot purchased by the transferee; (c) the transferee's mailing address; and (d) the date of sale, Prior to receipt of such notification, all), and all communications required or permitted to be given by the Association or the Board shall be deemed to be (11,11y oracle and given to the transferee if duly and timely made and given to his/her transferor. 11.7 Notices.. Any written notice or other documents relating to or required by this Declaration may be delivered either personally, by electronic delivery (including email and facsimile) orb), mail. If by mail, sLICII notice ice or document shall be cleemect to have been delivered and received five (5) calendar days after a copy thereof has been deposited in the United States Postal Service, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: (a) If to the Association, to the address designated by the Association as its principal office address in the Articles. (b) If' to all Owner, to the address of any Lot owned in whole or in part by him/her or to any other address last furnished by all Owner to the Association. (c) If to Qcclarant: Magnolia Heights, LLC 619 Elkader Ashland, Oregon 97520 20 — CCRS — MAGNOLIA MEADOWS SUBDIVISION 1 11 )RAFI` Provided, however, that any such address may be changed at any time by the party concerned by delivering a written notice of change of address to the Association. Each Owner of a Lot shall file the correct mailing address, of SLICII Owner with the Association and shall promptly notify the Association in writing of any, subsequent change of address. 11.8 Cumulative Remedies. Each remedy provided by this Declaration is cumulative and not exclusive. 11.9 Partial Invalidity. The invalidity or partial invalidity of any provision of this Declaration shall not affect the validity of, or enforceability of, any other provision. 11.10 Number; Gender. As used herein, the singular shall include the plural and the plural the singular U111CSS the Context requires the contrary; and the masculine, feminine, and neuter shall each irICILIde the masculine, feminine, or neuter as tile context requires. 11.11 Diset-iiiiiiiatioiiProhibited _(ORS 93.270). TlieseCoveiiajits(lonot contain any restrictioli, rule or regulation against the use of the community or the lots by a person or group of persons because of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, national origin, marital status, familial status, source of income, disability, or the number of individuals, including family members, persons of close affinity or unrelated persons who are simultaneously occupying a dwelling unit within occupancy limits, or genetic information as set forth in applicable state and federal law and the Association and its Members are prohibited from discriminating against any individuals based on the foregoing. 11.12 Ci !y Enforcement. 'I'lic City of Ashland reserves the right to enforce and assess the Association for maintenance of common areas. 11.13 Mediation and Arbitration. (a) Meet and Confer. In the event of ,in), dispute concerning this Agreement, excepting disputes involving non-payment of assessments or other fee, the parties shall, at the request of either of them, meet and confer in an effort to resolve the dispute. If the parties cannot resolve the dispute within thirty (30) days following the initial rcqLICSt to meet and confer, the dispute shall be submitted to arbitration as provided in Section I I .13(b), below. (b) Arbitration. Except for claims and controversies involving non-payment of assessments or fees, all controversies or claims arising out of or relating to, this Agreement, which are not resolve(] as provided in Section 11.13(a) above, including, without limitation, the making, performance, or interpretation of this Agreement, shall be settled by binding arbitration. Unless otherwise agreed, the arbitration shall be conducted in the county of the state where the Association is located, in accordance with the rules of the Arbitration Service of Portland. Judgment on the award rendered by the arbitrator may be entered in the circuit court in the county in which the arbitration occurs, and the resolution of the disputed matter as determined by the arbitrator shall be binding on the parties. The arbitrator's fee will be SI)lit equally between the parties and promptly paid to the arbitrator as required by the arbitrator. The prevailing party is entitled to 21 — CCRS — MAGNOLIA MEADOWS SUBDIVISION DRAFT" reimbUrsement for its share of the arbitrator's fee expended, as well as its reasonable attorney's fees and court costs, in addition to any other relief the prevailing party may be entitled to. IN WITNESS THEREOF', Declarant has exeCUted this Declaration oil the (late set forth below. Magnolia Heights, LLC an Oregon limited liability company 13 y: Gil Livni, Manager STATE 017 OREGON ss, 2023 County of Jackson Oil this day of.. 2022, before me, the undersigned Notary Public in and for- said State, personally appeared GIL LIVNI, Manager of MAGNOLIA I 1EIGHTS, LLC, known or identified to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within illStrUillellt, and acknowledged to me that said instmlllellt was signed and scaled oil behalf of' said company by authority of its members, and he acknowledged said illStR1111ell't to be its VOILUltal'y act all(] deed. Notary Public for the State of Oregon My Commission Expires 22 — CCRS — MA(3NOLIA MEADOWS SUBDIVISION DRAFT' Exhibit "A" Legal Description of Prqject 23 — CCRS — MAGNOLIA MEADOWS SUBDIVISION DRAF-l" Exhibit "B" C011CCIALial Site Plan 24 - - CCRS — MAGNOLIA MEADOWS SUBDIVISION Exhibit "C" Bylaws 25 -- CCRS -- MAGNOLIA MEADOWS SUBDIVISION The comments of this pre -app are preliminary in nature and subject to change based upon the submittal of additional or different information. The Planning Commission or City Council are the final decision marring authority of the City, and are not hound by the comments trade by the Staff rrs part of this pre -application. ASHLAND PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRT -APPLICATION CONFERENCE COMMENT SHEET May 18, 2022 PLANNING STAFF COMMENTS: SITE: 345 Clinton Street APPLICANT: Gil Livni / Eric Bonetti OWNER: Mace & Kahle REQUEST: 15 lot PSO Subdivision; Limited Use/Activity in-WRPZ; This pre -application conference is intended to highlight significant issues of concern to staff and bring them to the applicant's attention prior to their preparing a formal application submittal. PA -TI -2020-00109 The findings upholding the original approval and denying the appeal were signed 10/13/2020 and was valid for a period of 18 months expiring 4/13/2022. On 11/15/2021 an application for an extension was received extending the approval for an additional 24 months past the initial expiration. Therefore, the approval is valid until 4/13/2024. 1t was approved with the following condition of approval: That the par-tition plat shall be adjusted such that the north -south property litre behe een parcel I and parcel 2 is shifted to allow a f rture extension of Phelps St. consistent a th the standards for- a neighborhood street and in alignment ii,ith Phelps St. to the south, and that the dove imy accessing the larger parcel be relocated to meet minimum spacing requirements. While it is possible to begin anew with an application for the entire 12 ac parcel that subdivision would be required to address frontage improvements along the entirety of Clinton Street. Therefore, staff is presuming that the partition that was approved will be recorded prior to application for outline plan approval. The proposed western edge of the project as shown on the tentative layout dated 4/11 would be acceptable as meeting the condition of approval regarding the alignment of Phelps St, as shown below. 345 Clinton Street May 18, 2022/aha Page i V. n 345 Clinton Street May 18, 2022/aha Page i The proposal would be required to utilize the Performance Standards Options chapter (AMC 18.3.9). Staffs main concerns are with regard to subdivision the proposed open space and wetland protection. The proposal indicates a desire to "mitigate the wetland" unfortunately our code does not allow for the wholesale mitigation of identified wetlands except for certain specific circumstances (developments of roads etc.). The focus of a PSO application should be on the sensitive addition of new homes to the neighborhood, with thoughtful site planning which considers multi -modal connectivity, and lot lay -out and home designs that are compatible with the existing, established neighborhood while maintaining and protecting the site's significant natural features (i.e. wetlands, ponds, streams, trees, steeply sloped areas, rock outcroppings and floodplain corridor lands). There is a two-step process for approval of a Performance Standard Subdivision: first, all application for Outline Plan approval and, secondly, a Final Plan approval. The initial Outline Plan approval request must be reviewed under a single "Type Il" procedure through a hearing before the Planning Commission. There are a number of issues that will need to be further explored before making a formal application here, including: o Natural Features —Natural features to be carefiilly considered in the planning of the site include the Bear Creek floodplain & WRPZ, the Mook/Clear Creek WRPZ, the identified wetlands' WRPZ, trees and any other natural features. With the wetland delineation completed the subdivision will be required to establish a building envelope for each lot outside the Water Resource Protection Zone o Open Space: The open space will be required to have pedestrian access proposed. Additionally with a phased subdivision 50 percent of the value of the common open space shall be provided in the first phase and all common open space shall be provided when two-thirds of the units are finished. o Street System & Required On -Street Parking --- The application should carefully consider the necessary street width needed to accommodate required on -street parking in an R-1 PSO subdivision, as well as required sidewalk installation and alley connectivity. Staff believe an Exception to allow curbside sidewalks may be appropriate in the steepest area of Clinton west of the existing driveway. Remaining sections should include standard park rows. o Neighborhood Character — The application should consider the impacts to the Clinton Street strectscape and neighbors, and might look at limiting street -facing elevations along Clinton Street. Once natural features, street system details on on -street parking, we would suggest a follow-up meeting with staff to review the proposal prior to submitting for outline plan. Significant Natural Features: A key element of the Performance Standards Options subdivision chapter (AMC 18.3.9) is its intent to identify and preserve significant natural features. Specifically, the chapter notes, "The existing and ]natural features of the land, such as wetlands, • floodplain corridors, ponds, large trees, rock outcroppings, etc., have been identified in the plan of the development and significafnt features have been included in the open space, common areas, and unbuildable areas." The final application will need to clearly identify the significant natural features of the site and address their treatment in keeping with the requirements of the ordinance. 345 Clinton Street May 18, 2022/aha Page 2 Bear Creels 1 Mook Creep Riparian Water Resource Protection Zone (WRPZ): Bear Creek is a fish -bearing (i.e. Riparian) stream, and there is a WRPZ extending 50 feet from the top of bank for the full extent of the stream corridor through the property. Mook Creek or Clear Creek is an intermittent or ephemeral stream, and there is a WRPZ extending 30 feet from the centerline for the full extent of the stream corridor through the property. The extent of the floodplain corridor on the subject property is shown on the provided plans, however staff believes that the boundary between the 100 year and 500 year floodplain is actually further to the north.. E r Wetland Water Resource Protection Zone (WRPZ): The provided wetland delineation shows a A acre wetlands. In addition to regulations set forth by the state and federal government and DSL they are also regulated by Ashland Land Use Ordinance in chapter 18.3.11 — Water Resources Protection Zones and protected along with other natural features through the Performance Standards Options chapter. All wetlands area preserved and protected as part of the development. Any restoration and enhancement of the wetland, or other allowed alteration, will require a Limited Activities/Uses Permit at detailed in AMC 18.3.11.060. Wetland buffer: An average buffer width of 50 feet may be utilized around the perimeter of a significant wetland upon submission of evidence and a detailed plan by a natural resources professional demonstrating that equal or better protection of the functions and values of the resource will be ensured, and that there will be an enhanced buffer treatment through the implementation and maintenance of a restoration and enhancement plan within the buffer area Limited Activities and Uses included: 18.3.11.060.A.3.a. New Public Access and Utilities. The location and construction of public streets, bridges, trails, multi -use path connections, and utilities deemed necessary to maintain a functional system and upon finding that no other reasonable, alternate location outside the Water Resource Protection Zone exists. Approval Standards for Land Divisions on Properties with Water Resources: Planning actions and procedures containing Water Resource Protection Zones and involving the division of land or property line adjustments shall comply with the following provisions and shall include the plan requirements in subsection 18.3.11.100.A.3. o Building Envelope Established. Each lot shall contain a building envelope entirely outside the Water Resource Protection Zone of sufficient size to permit the establishment of the use and associated accessory uses. o Conservation Area. Performance Standards Option Subdivision applications shall include the Water Resource Protection Zone in a Conservation Easement or other recorded development restriction which stipulates that the use or activity within the Water Resource Protection Zone shall be consistent with the provisions of the Water Resource Protection Zones Ordinance. The Planning Commission may require that the Water Resource Protection Zone be included in a separate tract of land managed by a homeowners' association or other common ownership entity responsible for preservation. 315 Clinton Street May 18, 2022/alra Page 3 r` o Management Plan. Longterm conservation, management, and maintenance of the Water Resource Protection Zone consistent with the requirements of this chapter shall be ensured through preparation and recordation of a management plan as described in AMC 18.3.11.110.0. o Mitigation Requirements. The approval authority mov require a mitigation plan in accordance with the requirements of AMC 18.3.11..110 "Mitigation Requirements" to mitigate impacts resulting from a land division o Exemptions for a Public Purpose. An exemption to the requirements described above shall be granted for lots created for public park purposes, or privately -owned tracts created for the sole purpose of conserving in perpetuity the natural functions and values of the lands contained within the Water Resource Protection Zone. Density Transfer: Applicants should be aware that the land use ordinance provides for some measure of density transfer from unbuildable lands (see AMC 18.3.10.120 which provides for up to two times the density when tranaferreel from severe constraints or regulated floodplain lands) and water resource protection zones (see AMC 18.3.11.090.0 which provides far up to 1 % trines the normal density when transferred f •om a TYRPZ). Tree Protection and Preservation: For all planning actions, an inventory of all trees six -inches in diameter at breast height and greater oil the property and within 15 feet of the property boundaries is required with the application under AMC 18.4.5. The inventory must include detailed information including but not limited to species, diameter at breast height, condition, and drip line/protection area of each tree. The plan must clearly identify trees to be preserved and those to be removed, and address the tree removal permit requirements in AMC 18.5.7 for significant trees to be removed. Within the Performance Standards Options Chapter, trees receive significant additional consideration. Trees should be identified and carefully considered in the site planning and thoroughly addressed in the application materials. Open Space Required: The Performance Standards Options chapter (AMC 18.3.9) requires that developments with a base density of ten or more units provide at least eight percent of the parent property as Open Space. The final application would need to respond to this requirement in terms of the parent property and portion proposed for current development — i.e. identify likely phases and how open space requirements are to be addressed for each. The application will need to make clear how the proposed lots relate to the open space areas and preserved natural features. Street/Sidewalk Improvements: Clinton Street, Ann Street and Briscoe Place are considered under Ashland's Transportation System Plan (TSP) to be residential Neighborhood Street. Applicants are typically required to install full street improvements including curb, gutter, paving, parking, storm drains, park row planting strips, sidewalks, and bike lanes (where applicable). Any variation from the standard required improvements would require an Exception to the Street Standards. The standard required cross-sections are shown below. 345 Clinton Street May 18, 2022/alta Page 4 Controlled Access Standards: Controlled access standards require a driveway separation of 24 feet along residential neighborhood streets. The application will need to demonstrate compliance with this standard through the careful placement of driveways. Driveway placement should also be carefully considered to minimize conflict points and provide for required on -street parking. On -Street Parking Requirement: As detailed in AMC 183.9.060, in addition to required off-street parking, Performance Standards subdivisions in R-1 zones are required to provide at least one on -street parking space per dwelling unit. These oil -street parking spaces shall be immediately adjacent to the public right-of-way on publicly or association -owned land and be directly accessible from public right-of-way streets. On -street parking spaces shall be located within 200 feet of the dwelling that it is intended to serve, and the application should detail street improvements, driveway placement, etc. to accommodate required parking. Adequate Capacity of Public Utilities: The applicant is responsible for determining if water, sanitary sewers, storm sewer, electricity and transportation are available or can be extended to serve the proposed development. The Site Plan must show the location and size of the public facilities that will serve the proposed parcels and detail service locations for each proposed lot. Storm Drainage: The applicants will want to carefully address storm drainage in the application submittal including providing preliminary engineering design for storm drainage which addresses on-site detention and a system design that insures that post development peak flows will not exceed pre -development levels, which plans for a 25 -year storm event, and which addresses the potential for flooding. Applicants should also be aware that D.E.Q. requirements which include holding pre -construction conferences and incorporating low impact development best management practices into each project involving more than 5,000 square feet of disturbance Solar Setback and Envelopes: The final application will need to identify building envelopes and provide elevation drawings for proposed buildings, taking into consideration height limitations and solar access requirements. The application will have to demonstrate that a twenty-one foot high structure is able to meet to meet Solar Setback Standard A that has a setback which does not exceed fifty percent of the lot's north -south lot dimension in accordance with AMC 18.4.8 or propose solar envelopes complying with Standard A. Site Visit: Given the scope of the property and constraints to easy access, it will likely be helpful to arrange a Planning Commission Site Visit prior to a Planning Commission hearing. Neighborhood Outreach: Staff always recommends applicants approach the affected neighbors to discuss proposals and try to address any concerns as early in the process as possible. Notices will be sent to owners of neighboring properties within a 200 -foot radius, signs posted on the site and advertised in the local newspaper once an application is deemed complete. In many cases, it is better if neighbors hear of the proposal from the applicants rather than by a formal notice from the city. Written Findings/Burden of Proof: Applicants should be aware that written findings addressing the ordinance and all applicable criteria are required, and are heavily depended on in the decision making process for a planning action. In addition, the required plans are explained in writing below. The burden of proof is on the applicant(s) to ensure that all applicable criteria are addressed in writing and that all required plans, written findings, and other materials are submitted even if those items were not discussed in specific, itemized detail during this initial pre -application conference. 345 Clinton Street May 18, 2022/aha Page 5 OTHER DEPARTMENTS' COMMENTS BUILDING: No comments at this time. Please contact the Building Division for any building codes -related questions at 541-488-5305. CONSERVATION: For more information on available water conservation programs, including any available appliance rebates or assistance with landscaping and irrigation system requirements, please contact Water Conservation Specialist Julie Smitherman of Conservation Division at 541-552-2062 or via e-mail to iulie.smitherman a,aslilaifd.or.tis . For information on any financial or technical assistance available for the construction of Earth Advantage/Energy Star buildings, please contact Conservation Analyst/Inspector Dan Cunningham at 541-552-2063 or via e-mail to dan.cunnin hamr ashland.or.us ENGINEERING: No comments at this time. Please contact Karl Johnson of the Engineering Division for any Public Works/Engineering information at 541-552-2415 or via e-mail to karl..ioliiisoii@aslilaiid.oi-.us . FIRE: Ralph Sartain of the Fire Department provided written comments. See attached. Ralph is available at 541-552- 2229 or via e-mail to ralph.sartain@ashland.or.us. WATER AND SEWER SERVICE: Please Contact Steve Walker at 541-552-2326 or ( walkers cr,ashland.onus ) to discuss the intended use of the facility or property and any potential cross connection hazards associated with it or for any questions regarding water connections." ELECTRIC SERVICE: Please contact the Electric Department for service and meter location requirements and fee information at (541) 552-2389 or via e-mail to tvgcrsod@ashland.or.us . Dave will arrange an on-site meeting, and develop a preliminary electrical service plan for the site. Please allow additional time to accommodate scheduling of this on-site meeting and preparing the preliminary plan. Submittals will not be deemed complete without a preliminary approved plan from the Electric Department. ■ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a f a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a i a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 0 ZONING DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS Zoning: R-1-5 Single Family Residential Landscaping Requirements: 50 percent of the lot area. Size- and species-specific landscaping & irrigation plan required for parkrows and open space at time of formal application. Avoid using lawn. Provide irrigation system. Include street trees, one per 30 feet of street frontage. Parking, Access and Internal Circulation: Residential dwellings require one off-street parking space per studio or one -bedroom unit less than 500 square feet; 1'/2 spaces per one -bedroom unit greater than 500 square feet; 13/4 spaces for two-bedroom units; and two spaces for units with three of more bedrooms as further detailed in AMC 18.4.3. Drives in excess of 50 feet in length are considered to be "flag drives" and subject to all the development standards thereof-- see AMC Lot Coverage: A maximum of 50 percent of the lot may be covered with building footprints, driveways, parking spaces and other lot coverage. Compliance with lot coverage standards should be demonstrated in the application. 345 Clinton Street May 18, 2022/alta Page 6 Setbacks: front yards shall be a rninimurn of 15 feet, excluding garages which require a 20 -font front setback. Unenclosed porches shall be permitted with a minimurn setback of eight feet. Side yards require six feet; the side yard of a corner lot abutting a public street shall have a ten -foot setback; rear yard, ten feet plus ten feet for each story in excess of one story. In addition, the setbacks must comply with Chapter 18.4.8 which provides for Solar Access. M W r W r r r ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ W ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ W W 1 ■ W ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ W z W W W W W W W W M a W A ■ W W W W Nit It a W W W W ■ W N ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ W APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Application Requirements: Applications for Outline Plan subdivision approval are processed as a "Type 11" procedure which requires a quasi-judicial decision through a public hearing at the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission is subject to on -the -record appeal to the City Council. The application is required to include clear, legible, scalable drawings of the proposal (i.e. plan requirements) as well as written findings addressing the applicable approval criteria in accordance with the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO), Chapter 18 of the Ashland Municipal Code. The following sections include the requirements for plans and approval criteria which are applicable to the proposal as described in the pre -application submittals. When more than one planning approval is required for the proposal, multiple sections of the ALUO may apply. The burden of proof is on the applicant(s) to ensure that all applicable criteria are addressed in writing and that all required plans, written findings, and other materials are submitted even if those items were not discussed in specific, itemized detail during this initial pre -application conference. All submittals must also include: 1. Application Forin and Fee. Applications for Type 11 review shall be made on forms provided by the Staff Advisor. One or more property owners of the property for which the planning action is requested, and their authorized agent, as applicable, must sign the application. The required application fee must accompany the application for it to be considered complete. 2. Submittal Inforination. The application shall include all of the following information. a. The information requested on the application form. b. Plans and exhibits required for the specific approvals sought. C. A written statement or letter explaining how the application satisfies each and all of the relevant criteria and standards in sufficient detail. d. Information dernonstrating compliance with all prior decision(s) and conditions of approval for the subject site, as applicable. e. The required fee. PLAN & EXHIBIT REQUIREMENTS: Two (2) copies of the plans below= on paper no larges• tharz I1 ",x 17". Note: These copies maj, be used for the Planning Commission packets and for the notices mailed to neighbors -please submit clear, readable, reproducible copies. Two (2) Copies of the materials required for a Performance Standard Subdivision Outline Plan approval as detailed in chapter 18.3.9.040. Application Submission Requirements. The following information is required for a Performance Standards Subdivision Outline Plan application submittal. a. A topographic map showing contour intervals of five feet. b. The proposed land uses and approximate locations of the existing buildings to be retained, the proposed structures on the site, the proposed and existing property lines and easements on the site, and existing buildings, structures, and trees greater than six inches in diameter measured at breast height on the properties adjacent to the site, and all buildings within 160 feet of the site boundaries. 345 Clinton Street May 18, 2022/aha Page 7 C. The locations of all proposed thoroughfares, walkways, and parking facilities, d. Public uses, including schools, parks, playgrounds, open spaces, and trails. e. Public or private utilities. f. General areas of cuts and fill. g. The location of natural features such as rock outcroppings, marshes, wooded areas, and isolated preservable trees. h. The location and direction of all watercourses and areas subject to flooding. i. Plans shall indicate building envelopes for all proposed lots, which show the area and maximum height of improvements, including solar access and view protection where required. J Elevations of typical proposed residential structures. Elevations should be to scale and should include the approximate dimensions of the proposed structures and all attached exterior hardware for heating and cooling. k. A written statement containing an explanation of: i. The character of the proposed development and the manner in which it has been designed to take advantage of the Performance Standards concept. ii. The proposed manner of financing. iii. The present ownership of all the land included within the development. iv. The method proposed to maintain common open areas, buildings and private thoroughfares. V. The proposed time schedule of the development. vi. The findings of the applicant showing that the development meets the criteria set forth in this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. Two (2) Copies of the materials required for a Physical Constraints Review Permit as detailed in chapter 18.3.10.040. An application for a Physical Constraints Review Permit shall be submitted by the owner of the subject property or authorized agent on a form prescribed by the City and accompanied by the required filing fee. The application shall include a plan or drawing meeting the requirements below. A. Project name. B. Vicinity map. C. Scale (the scale shall be at least one inch equals 50 feet or larger) utilizing the largest scale that fits on 22 -inch by 34 -inch paper. Multiple plans or layers shall be prepared at the same scale, excluding detail drawings. The Staff Advisor may authorize different scales and plan sheet sizes for projects, provided the plans provide sufficient information to clearly identify and evaluate the application request. D. North arrow. E. Date. F. Street names and locations of all existing and proposed streets within or on the boundary of the proposed development. G. Lot layout with dimensions for all lot lines. H. Location and use of all proposed and existing buildings, fences, and structures within the proposed development. Indicate which buildings are to remain and which are to be removed. L Location and size of all public utilities affected by the proposed development. J. Location of drainage ways or public utility easements in and adjacent to the proposed development, and location of all other easements. K. Topographic map of the site at a contour interval of not less than two feet nor greater than five feet. The topographic map shall also include a slope analysis, indicating buildable areas, as shown in Figure 18.3.10.040.K. L. Location of all parking areas and spaces, ingress and egress on the site, and on-site circulation M. Accurate locations of all existing natural features including, but not limited to, all trees as required inl8.3.10.090.D.1, including those of a caliper equal to or greater than six inches in diameter at breast height (DBH), native shrub masses with a diameter of ten feet or greater, natural drainage, swales, wetlands, ponds, springs, or creeks on the site, and outcroppings of rocks, boulders, etc. Natural features on adjacent properties potentially impacted by the proposed development shall also be included, such as trees with drip -lines extending across property lines. In forested areas, it is necessary to identify only those trees that will be affected or removed by the proposed development. Indicate any contemplated 345 Clinton Street May 18, 2022/aha Page 8 modifications to a natural feature, including trees, method of erosion control, water runoff control, and proposed tree protection for the development as required by this chapter. N. Building envelopes for all existing and proposed new parcels that contain only buildable area, as defined by this chapter. O. Location of all irrigation canals and major irrigation lines. P. Location of all areas of land disturbance, including cuts, fills, driveways, building sites, and other construction areas. Indicate total area of disturbance, total percentage of project site proposed for disturbance, and maximum depths and heights of cuts and fill. Q. Location for storage or disposal of all excess materials resulting from cuts associated with the proposed development. R. Applicant name, firm preparing plans, person responsible for plan preparation, and plan preparation dates shall be indicated on all plans. S. Proposed timeline for development based on estimated date of approval, including completion dates for specific tasks. T. Additional plans and studies as required in sections 18.3.10.080, 18.3.10.090, 18.3.10.100 and 18.3.10.110 of this chapter. Two (2) Copies of a Tree Protection Plan as required chapter 18.4.5.030. A tree protection plan shall be approved by the Staff Advisor concurrent with applications for Type 1, Type 11, and Type III planning actions. If tree removal is proposed, a Tree Removal Permit pursuant to chapter 18.5.7 may be required. B. Tree Protection Plan Submission Requirements. In order to obtain approval of a tree protection plan; an applicant shall submit a plan to the City, which clearly depicts all trees to be preserved and/or removed on the site. The plan must be drawn to scale and include the following. 1. Location, species, and diameter of each tree on site and within 15 feet of the site. 2. Location of the drip line of each tree. 3. An inventory of the health and hazard of each tree on site, and recommendations for treatment for each tree. 4. Location of existing and proposed roads, water, sanitary and storm sewer, irrigation, and other utility lines/facilities and easements. 5. Location of dry wells, drain lines and soakage trenches. 6. Location of proposed and existing structures. 7. Grade change or cut and fill during or after construction. 8. Existing and proposed impervious surfaces. 9. Identification of a contact person and/or arborist who will be responsible for implementing and maintaining the approved tree protection plan. 10. Location and type of tree protection measures to be installed per section 18.4.5.030.0. C. Tree Protection Measures Required. 1. Chain link fencing, a minimum of six feet tall with steel pasts placed no farther than ten feet apart, shall be installed at the edge of the tree protection zone or dripline, whichever is greater, and at the boundary of any open space tracts, riparian areas, or conservation easements that abut the parcel being developed. 2. The fencing shall be flush with the initial undisturbed grade. 3. Approved signs shall be attached to the chain link fencing stating that inside the fencing is a tree protection zone, not to be disturbed unless prior approval has been obtained from the Staff Advisorfor the project. 4. No construction activity shall occur within the tree protection zone, including, but not limited to dumping or storage of materials such as building supplies, soil, waste items, equipment, or parked vehicles. 345 Clinton Street May 18, 2022/alfa Page 9 i 5. The tree protection zone shall remain free of chemically injurious materials and liquids such as paints, thinners, cleaning solutions, petroleum products, concrete or dry wall excess, and construction debris or run-off. 6. No excavation, trenching, grading, root pruning, or other activity shall occur within the tree protection zone unless approved by the Staff Advisor. 7. Except as otherwise determined by the Staff Advisor, all required tree protection measures set forth in this section shall be instituted prior to any development activities, including, but not limited to clearing, grading, excavation, or demolition work, and shall be removed only after completion of all construction activity, including landscaping and irrigation installation. D. Inspection. The applicant shall not proceed with any construction activity, except installation of erosion control measures, until the City has inspected and approved the installation of the required tree protection measures and a building and/or grading permit has been issued by the City. Two (2) Copies of the plans required for a Tree Removal Permit as required in chapter 1.8.5.7.030 (if tree removal is proposed). An application for a Tree Removal Permit shall be submitted by the owner of the subject property or authorized agent on a form prescribed by the City and accompanied by the required filing fee. The application shall include a plan or drawing meeting the requirements below. A. General Submission Requirements. Information required for a Ministerial or Type I review, as applicable (see sections 18.5.1.040 and 18.5.1.050.), including but not limited to a written statement or letter explaining how the application satisfies each and all of the relevant criteria and standards. B. Plan Submittal. An application for all Tree Removal Permits shall include the following. 1. Plans drawn to scale containing the number, size, species, and location of the trees proposed to be removed or topped on a site plan of the property. 2. The anticipated date of removal or topping. 3. A statement of the reason for removal or topping. If a prior planning approval requires that the subject tree(s) be preserved, a modification request, pursuant to chapter 18.5.6, may also be required. 4. Information concerning proposed landscaping or planting of new trees to replace the trees to be removed. 5. Evidence that the trees proposed for removal or topping have been clearly identified on the property for visual inspection. 6. A Tree Protection Plan that includes trees located on the subject site that are not proposed for removal, and any off-site trees where drip lines extend into proposed landscaped areas on the subject site. Such plans shall conform to the protection requirements under section 1.8.45.030. 7. The Staff Advisor may require an arborist's report to substantiate the criteria for a permit. 8. Any other information reasonably required by the City. Two (2) copies of a Site Development Plan Map, drawn to scale, to address the requirements for the approval Standards for Land Divisions on Properties with Water Resources, as detailed in AMC 18.3.11.100.A; 3. Site development plan map, drawn to scale. The application shall include a site map of the subject property prepared by a licensed surveyor, civil engineer, or other design professional that includes the information described below. The Staff Advisor may request additional information based upon the character of the site or the specific nature of the proposal. a. All watercourses identified (Including any drainage ways, ponds, etc). b. Surveyed location of the Water Resource Protection Zone, as described in section 98.3.91.040 Establishment of Water Resource Protection Zones. For applications involving single-family residences or Limited Activities and Uses, in lieu of a surveyed location, the Staff Advisor may approve a field determination of the Water Resource Protection Zone by the Staff Advisor or his/her designee in which the applicant shall be required to stake the top -of -bank or the upland - wetland edge and the boundary of the Water Resource Protection Zone. C. For activities and use proposed within a Stream Bank Protection Zone: identification of the stream 345 Clinton Street May 18, 2022/aha Page 10 as being either fish -bearing or non -fish -bearing; identification of the top -of -bank or center line as required, and surveyed location of the stream's floodway and floodplain, if applicable. d. For activities and uses proposed within a Wetland Protection Zone: a wetland delineation (with an accompanying site map) prepared by a natural resource professional and that has been concurred with by the Oregon Department of State Lands (DSL); and an aerial photo with the wetland boundaries identified. e. Topographic information at two foot contour increments identifying both existing grades and proposed grade changes. f. Surveyed locations of all trees six inches in diameter at breast height (DBN) or greater located in the Water Resource Protection Zone and within 15 feet of the Water Resource Protection Zone, identified by edge of canopy, DBN, and species,- 9. pecies,g. The outlines of non -tree vegetation, with a dominant species and any occurrence of non-native, invasive species identified. h. Location of existing and proposed development, including all existing and proposed structures, any areas of fill or excavation, stream or wetland crossings, alterations to vegetation, or other alterations to the site's natural state. i. The location of natural features, proposed and existing structures, and other proposed and existing improvements associated with lands within 100 feet of the Water Resource Protection Zone. I Proposed and existing land uses within 100 feet of the Water Resource Protection Zone. k. The location of temporary fencing and erosion control measures installed to prevent encroachment and flow of material into the Water Resource Protection Zone, such as sediment fencing and hay bales, etc. I. North arrow and scale. M. Sources of information (federal, state, and local). 4. Mitigation Plan prepared in accordance with the requirements described in section 18.3.11.190 Mitigation Requirements. 5. Management Plan prepared in accordance with the requirements described in subsection 18.3. 11. 110. C., except a management plan is not required for residentially zoned lots occupied only by a single-family dwelling and accessory structures. RELEVANT CRITERIA AND STANDARDS: Applicants are advised that in addition to required plans, written findings addressing how the ordinance criteria are satisfied in narrative format are required. The applicable criteria are included below. The Ashland Land Use Ordinance in its entirety may be accessed on-line at: http:llii,tt,►t,.ashlaridor.us/SIBI leslA IC Clipt 18 eurrent.pdf Two (2) copies of written findings addressing the following criteria from chapter 18.3.9.040.A.3 for Outline Plan approval. The Planning Commission shall approve the outline plan when it finds all of the following criteria have been met. a. The development meets all applicable ordinance requirements of the City. b. Adequate key City facilities can be provided including water, sewer, paved access to and through the development, electricity, urban storm drainage, police and fire protection, and adequate transportation; and that the development will not cause a City facility to operate beyond capacity. C. The existing and natural features of the land; such as wetlands, floodplain corridors, ponds, large trees, rock outcroppings, etc., have been identified in the plan of the development and significant features have been included in the open space, common areas, and unbuildable areas. d. The development of the land will not prevent adjacent land from being developed for the uses shown in the Comprehensive Plan. e. There are adequate provisions for the maintenance of open space and common areas, if required or provided, and that if developments are done in phases that the early phases have the same or higher ratio of amenities as proposed in the entire project. f. The proposed density meets the base and bonus density standards established under this chapter. 345 Clinton Street May 18, 20221alia Page 11 g. The development complies with the Street Standards. Two (2) copies of written findings addressing the approval criteria for a Limited Use/Activity as detailed in chapter 18.3.11.060. All Limited Activities and Uses described in section 18.3.11.060 shall be subject to a Type I procedure in section 18.5.1.050. An application for a Limited Activities and Uses Permit shall be approved if the proposal meets all of the following criteria. 1. All activities shall be located as far away from streams and wetlands as practicable, designed to minimize intrusion into the Water Resources Protection Zone and disturb as little of the surface area of the Water Resource Protection Zone as practicable. 2. The proposed activity shall be designed, located and constructed to minimize excavation, grading, area of impervious surfaces, loss of native vegetation, erosion, and other adverse impacts on Water Resources. 3. On stream beds or banks within the bank full stage, in wetlands, and on slopes of 25 percent or greater in a Water Resource Protection Zone, excavation, grading, installation of impervious surfaces, and removal of native vegetation shall be avoided except where no practicable alternative exists, or where necessary to construct public facilities or to ensure slope stability. 4. Water, storm drain, and sewer systems shall be designed, located and constructed to avoid exposure to floodwaters, and to avoid accidental discharges to streams and wetlands. 5. Stream channel repair and enhancement, riparian habitat restoration and enhancement, and wetland restoration and enhancement will be restored through the implementation of a mitigation plan prepared in accordance with the standards and requirements in section 18.3.11.110 Mitigation Requirements. 6. Long term conservation, management and maintenance of the Water Resource Protection Zone shall be ensured through preparation and recordation of a management plan as described in subsection 18.3.11.110.0, except a management plan is not required for residentially zoned lots occupied only by a single-family dwelling and accessory structures. Two (2) Copies of written findings addressing the approval criteria for a Physical Constraints Review Permit as detailed in chapter 18.3.10.050. A Physical Constraints Review Permit shall be granted if the approval authority finds that the application meets all of the following criteria, or can be made to conform through the imposition of conditions. A. Through the application of the development standards of this chapter, the potential impacts to the property and nearby areas have been considered, and adverse impacts have been minimized. B. That the applicant has considered the potential hazards that the development may create and implemented measures to mitigate the potential hazards caused by the development. C. That the applicant has taken all reasonable steps to reduce the adverse impact on the environment. irreversible actions shall be considered more seriously than reversible actions. The Staff Advisor or Planning Commission shall consider the existing development of the surrounding area, and the maximum development permitted by this ordinance. Two (2) copies of written findings addressing the following criteria from chapter 18.5.7.040.B.2. for Tree Removal Permit to remove a tree that is not a hazard (if applicable to the final proposal). 2. Tree That is Not a Hazard. A Tree Removal Permit for a tree that is not a hazard shall be granted if the approval authority finds that the application meets all of the following criteria, or can be made to conform through the imposition of conditions. 1. The tree is proposed for removal in order to permit the application to be consistent with other applicable Land Use Ordinance requirements and standards, including but not limited to applicable Site Development and Design Standards in part 18.4 and Physical and Environmental Constraints in part 18.10. 2. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on erosion, soil stability, flow of surface 315 Clinton Street May 18, 2022/alfa Page 12 waters, protection of adjacent trees, or existing windbreaks. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on the tree densities, sizes, canopies, and species diversity within 200 feet of the subject property. The City shall grant an exception to this criterion when alternatives to the tree removal have been considered and no reasonable alternative exists to allow the property to be used as permitted in the zone. Nothing in this section shall require that the residential density to be reduced below the permitted density allowed by the zone. In making this determination, the City may consider alternative site plans or placement of structures of alternate landscaping designs that would lessen the impact on trees, so long as the alternatives continue to comply with the other provisions of this ordinance. The City shall require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each tree granted approval pursuant to section 18.5.7.050. Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit. Two (2) copies of written findings addressing the following criteria from chapter 18.4.6.020.B.1. for an Exception to Street Standards (if applicable to the final proposal). The approval authority may approve exceptions to the standards section in 18.4.6.040 Street Design Standards if all of the following circumstances are found to exist. a. There is demonstrable difficulty in meeting the specific requirements of this chapter due to a unique or unusual aspect of the site or proposed use of the site. b. The exception will result in equal or superior transportation facilities and connectivity considering the following factors where applicable. i. For transit facilities and related improvements, access, wait time, and ride experience. ii. For bicycle facilities, feeling of safety, quality of experience (Le., comfort level of bicycling along the roadway), and frequency of conflicts with vehicle cross traffic. iii. For pedestrian facilities, feeling of safety, quality of experience (i.e., comfort level of walking along roadway), and ability to safety and efficiency crossing roadway. C. The exception is the minimum necessary to alleviate the difficulty. d. The exception is consistent with the Purpose and Intent of the Street Standards in subsection 18,4,6,040,A. NEXT APPLICATION DEADLINE: First Friday of each month UPCOMING PLANNIGN COMMISSION MEETING: Second Tuesday of each month FEES: Outline Plan Approval for 10+ Lots: $2,245.50 + $150/lot Limited Use Permit (WRPZ) $1.,1.20.25 Physical & Environmental Constraints Review: $1,120.25 Exception to Street Standards: $0 Tree Removal Permit: $0 *NOTES: Applications are accepted on a first come -first served basis. All applications received are reviewed by staff, and must be found to be complete before being processed or scheduled at a Planning Commission meeting. Applications will not be accepted without a complete application form signed by the applicant(s) and property owner(s), all required materials and full payment. Applications are reviewed for completeness in accordance with ORS 227.178, and the the first COMPLETE applications submitted are processed at the next available Planning Commission meeting. For further information, please contact: Aay 18 2022 Aaron Anderson, Associate Planner Date City of Ashland, Department of Community Development Phone: 541-552-2052 or e-mail: aaron.anderson@ashland.or.us 345 Clinton Street May 18, 2022/alfa Page 13 Public Works/Engineering Pre -Application Comments Public Works Conditions of Approval 1. Engineered Plans - Where public improvements are required or proposed, the applicant's engineer shall submit design plans for approval of all public improvements identified on the approved plan or as specified in conditions of approval. One set of these civil plans MUST be submitted DIRECTLY to the Public Works/Engineering Department. All design plans must meet the City of Ashland Public Works Standards. Engineered construction plans and specifications shall be reviewed and signed by the Public Works Director, prior to construction. All public facilities within the development will be designed to the City of Ashland Engineering Design Standards for Public Improvements. The engineered plans shall also conform to the following: • If drawings are submitted to the City of Ashland digitally, they shall be true scale PDF drawings. If AutoCAD drawings are also submitted, they shall be compatible with the AutoCAD release being used by the City at that time and shall be located and oriented within the Oregon State Plain Coordinate System (NAD83- 89). • Drawings sizes shall comply with ANSI -defined standards for page width and height. Review drawings may be submitted in B size (11x17). Bidding and construction documents may also be printed at B size; however, all final as -constructed drawings must be submitted to scale on D -size (24x36) Mylar. Digital files of the as - constructed drawings shall also be submitted. Drawings shall be drawn such that reduction of plans from full size (D sized) to half size (B sized) can be done to maintain a true scale on the half -sized plans. TIA (Transportation Impact Analysis) — No TIA will be required for this project. 3. Street Improvement — No additional street improvements, beyond those necessary to comply with City Street Standards, will be required at this time. The applicant proposed improvements must be reviewed and permitted by the City of Ashland Engineering Department. 4. Public Pedestrian Access — A handicap access ramp will be required at all new intersections of the development. Where handicap access ramps are required as part of a proposed project, the ramps shall meet current United States Access Board Public Rights -of -Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG) and shall be designed in accordance with the current Oregon Department of Transportation design guidance. Use of the ODOT Standard Drawings for curb ramps as guidance for design is recommended however a curb ramp detail sheet, similar to ODOT DET 1720 -Example of Minimum Sidewalk Ramp Details, is required for each curb ramp corner that is being proposed. Referencing standard drawings for curb ramps in pians in lieu of curb ramp detail sheets is no longer acceptable. An ODOT ADA Curb Ramp Design Checklist shall also be completed and submitted with the civil design drawings. If the following items are not submitted with the civil design drawings the City of Ashland Engineering Department will view the submittal as incomplete. Required ADA submittals: a. ODOT ADA Curb Ramp Design Checklist b. Curb Ramp Detail, similar to ODOT DET 1720, for each proposed curb ramp 5. Right of Way — No additional right of way dedication, beyond that necessary to comply with City Street Standards, will be required at this time. Sanitary Sewer - The property is currently served by an 8 -in sanitary sewer main in Clinton Street and a 345 Clinton Street May 18, 2022/aha Page 14 F 10 -in sanitary sewer main in Ann Street. The applicant proposed improvements must be reviewed, approved and permitted by the City of Ashland Engineering Department. 7, Water - The property is currently served by a 6 -in water main in Clinton Street and an 8 -in water main in Ann Street. City of Ashland Water Department shall tap existing water main and install any new water services and water meter boxes that are proposed by development. City of Ashland Water Department must be contacted for availability, placement and costs associated with the installation of the new water service. Service & Connection Fees will also be required for any new water services installed as part of this project. 8. Storm Drainage - The property is currently served by a 30 -in storm sewer main in Clinton Street and a 36 -in storm sewer main in Ann Street. City of Ashland Engineering Department must review an engineered storm drainage plan. Storm Water Facility Design Requirements All development or redevelopment that will create or replace 2,500 square feet or more of impervious surface (buildings, roads, parking lots, etc.) area that discharges to an MS4 (municipal separate storm sewer systems), must comply with the requirements of the DEQ MS4 General Permit phase 2. Applicant MUST follow the guidance and requirements set forth in the current Rogue Valley Stormwater Quality Design Manual which can be found at the following website: https://www.rvss.us/pilot.asp?pg=StormwaterDesignManual All stormwater calculations, reports, drawings, etc. shall be submitted to the City of Ashland Engineering Department for review. Erosion & Sediment Control - The following requirements shall be met: ;Ian All ground disturbances exceeding 2,500 square feet shall implement an Erosion and Sediment Control (ESCP). • A 1200-C permit will be secured by the developer where required under the rules of the Oregon State DEQ. City of Ashland Engineering Department must receive a copy of this permit before any construction shall begin. • Erosion Prevention and Sediment control measures that meet the minimum standards set forth by the City of Ashland Public Works/Engineering Standard Drawing CD282 must be in place before any construction related to the project begins. • Pollution, track out, and sediment dumping into storm water are strictly prohibited per AMC 9.08.060. • Drainage from automotive use areas shall be limited to oil concentrations of 10 mg/l by a pre -approved means. Trash storage areas shall be covered or provide additional storm water treatment by an approved means. Off street parking areas shall conform to Ashland Municipal Code 18.4.3.080.6.5, including provisions to minimize adverse environmental and microclimatic impacts. 10. Driveway Access — No additional improvements/requirements will be requested at this time, but the applicant proposed improvements must be reviewed and permitted by the City of Ashland Engineering Department, 345 Clinton Street May 18, 20221alia Page IS 11. Permits — Any construction or closure within the public right of way will require a Public Works permit and before any work in the right of way commences all necessary permits MST be obtained 12. As-Builts - Where public improvements are required or completed, the developer shall submit to the City of Ashland, reproducible as -built drawings and an electronic file of all public improvements constructed during and in conjunction with this project. Field changes made during construction shall be drafted to the drawings in the same manner as the original plans with clear indication of all modifications (strike out old with new added beside). As -built drawings shall be submitted prior to final acceptance of the construction, initiating the one- year maintenance period. 13. Addresses — Any new addresses must be assigned by City of Ashland Engineering Department. 14. Sign &Traffic Control Devices—Sign installation and visibility must be maintained to the requirements of the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). The applicant proposed signage must be reviewed and approved by the City of Ashland Engineering Department. Street Names — Any new street names must be approved by the City of Ashland Engineering Department and Planning Department. 345 Clinton Street May 18, 2022/alfa Page 16 345 CLINTON PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUBMITTAL. MITIGATED WETLANDS I PARTITION I TWO PHASE SUBDIVISION SUBJECT PROPERTY 345 Clinton Street, Ashland OR 97520 PROPERTY OWNER Paul Mace and Kathleen Kahle 345 Clinton Street, Ashland, OR 97520 katkahle@gmail.com paul.mace@gmail.com 541.840.2994 APPLICANT Gil Livni 441 Talent Ave #60, Talent, OR 97540 magnoliafinehomes@gmail.com 510.913.5110 PLANNING CONSULTANT Amy Gunter Rogue Planning & Development Services 33 North Central Ave., Suite 213, Medford, OR 97501 amygunter.planning@gmail.corn 541.951.4020 MAP AND TAHLOT 39 1 E 04DB: Tax Lots: 401 Account 1-063523-1 <- I�� I wv' 441 Talent Ave #60, Talent, OR 97540 1 of 6 345 CLINTON ZONING R-1-5 ADJACENT ZONES R-1-5 OVERLAY ZONES Performance Standards Overlay Water Resource Protection Zones Ashland Modified Flood Zone FEMA Floodplain LOT AREA Parent parcel 12.293 acres Upon completion of partition area to be developed 3.622± acres PLANNING ACTION Type Il 441 Talent Ave #60, Talent, OR 97540 2of6 345 CLINTON NARRATIVE The 12.29 -acre property is on the North side of Clinton Street. The properties to the Fast are part of the Riverwalk Subdivision with Ann Street abutting a portion of property. The North boundary of the property abuts City of Ashland property that is an extension of Riverwalk Park. The properties to the West are generally uphill, above the property. The adjacent properties not owned by the City of Ashland and dedicated as parkland, are primarily single family residentially zoned lots occupied by single family residences and associated accessory buildings. The property and the adjacent properties are zoned R-1-5, Single Family Residential. The property is within the Performance Standards Overlay. The property is occupied by a single-family residential home and associated outbuildings that were constructed in the mid-1990s. The residence is accessed via a private driveway that extends from Clinton Street to the North. The larger property area is affected by the presence of the FEMA 100 -year floodplain, FEMA 500 -year floodplain, and Ashland Modified Floodplains for Bear Creek which is to the North and east of the property. Mook "Clear" Creek also traverses the property from north to south. According to the City of Ashland Water Resource Protection Zone maps, Mook Creek is an intermittent/ ephemeral stream. There are historical irrigation rights on the property. Over the years ponds for irrigation water storage have been created. Some of the pond areas of developed into wetlands. In addition to the ponds, according to the Local Wetlands Inventory (LWI), there is a potential wetland located to the east of the ponds on the property. Schott and Associates, Wetlands Biologist have been retained and have begun preliminary delineation of the areas identified on the local wetlands inventory and on the riparian drainage maps. These areas include historic irrigation ditch water from the Million Ranch ditch which has historically flood irrigated the site without property piping and is dispersed through a series of drain tubes that are laid upon the surface. The pond areas, the areas on the LWI reaps and other areas of the property where wetland characteristics are present. The property has varying degrees of slope with a clear road slope along Clinton Street and the driveway, there are minor variations across the larger property area with the average slope approximately four percent downhill from the Southwest to Northeast. 441 Talent Ave ##60, Talent, OR 97540 3 of 6 345 CLINTON There are smaller stature trees either on or directly adjacent to the subject property. Retention of the highest number of trees in the landscape areas is an important aspect of the project and as many trees as possible will be able to be retained and still provide a buildable area for a new residential. Clinton Street is paved with partial street improvements along both sides of the street that include curb, gutter, sidewalk and park row. Ann Street to the East and Briscoe Place are improved with curb, gutter, park row and sidewalk on the East side, the street side abutting the property has curb and gutter, no park row and sidewalk. The property is subject to solar setback standard A. 441 Talent Ave #60, Talent, OR 97540 4 of 6 345 CLINTON 119M81Z61-U-11 The proposal is for the property owner to mitigate for the delineated wetlands on the parent parcel and to partition an approximately a 3.622 acre parcel that can be developed with a future single-family residential development through the City of Ashland's Type lI review and approval process per applicant. The partitioned area provides an approximate area of 2.441 acres for residential units, .820 acres for roads and public right of way, and .364 acres for open spaces. The area of proposed development has the potential for (17-18) units as a base density, but the applicant is only seeking (14) at this juncture. Potential lot areas could range from 6,419± square feetto 11,003± square feet in area. Within the open space area identified, the natural areas of the property are protected. These areas are under further study for presence of wetlands. According to the city of Ashland Water Resource Protection Zone maps there are riparian drainages found near the East property line where Briscoe Place intersects Ann Street. These drainages are not present on the site and the applicant needs direction as to how to address areas of protection for resources that are not present. The proposal is for a two phased subdivision development plan, first to mitigate forthe delineated wetlands, then partition the parcel in a manner that allows for the development of a 3.622± acre portion of the physically constrained 12.29 acre parcel. Following the topographical surveying, wetlands surveying and possible delineation, the exact areas of the proposed partition will be determined and a partition plat survey created by an Oregon licensed surveyor will be provided with the Minor Land Partition application. Please see attached files. SITE PLAN Please see attached files ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Please see attached files 441 Talent Ave #60, Talent, OR 97540 5 of 6 1 345 Clinton Property profile.pdf 2 345 Clinton Lot Areas.pdf 3 345 Clinton Layout With Topo.pdf 4 345 Clinton Layout Without Topo.pdf 5 345 Clinton Subdivision Layout Without Topo Phased development.pdf 6 345 Clinton Mapped Easements 7 345 Clinton Proposed Plat to be modified.pdf 8 345 Clinton Wetland Delineation_SCHOTT.pdf 22509 APfRaVAL�) LAND PARTITIO SURVEY PLAr N o ' PARr�rroR QU Property Llae ua won PA-ants-aalc7 Pavt7rrr ue<iaysr�ein In the & 14 of Sactfon 4, TSAR, PUA irm, CYty of Ashland Jacia7a Lbunt , Ongna (ASYUAND PA A?18-A?iB7 APPROVAL' FFA. .r oBER SLRSTSS ne EksnoNm NIle4 lit PARS ARE 9,0W IN TMDR APPAamu T avnvrr FOR ECAl10E➢ .Vo APPIAh® 116 2 7 �" OlY OF MAL o H . M-15-- CRY *F AS4LW R ocknefu K*" .�✓L.� ` lisw/.._ 3r rOew fur ASIAYI CR 97320 UELMARATION # # DAIS P]A7e'.Yl. LEl1 tH 71GY PPESO(r4 BiIT PAIR a wm Mani H mikE" m cr AWA'A 7H5 Pzo, PERI. FEDRLI 4Y IA 2910 A11 CBECOR ueran.V. [P'tl10RARPFi APF o1. . a .. 3lDE7f CW ig1R'E PARnaAABEY D SatlBED x ]1{ SS . "Y ATE Mm MOT GY/32n M S4YE M K M4trrXP1E0 ?M PC PABCt7A AS StAMf CH 51EET 2 AAO m N4'£ AW ESTMSH »E AGf M0 KWti7i4VCf CASbI FOR RE 000 7 OF PARCIE Z SVRi7fY 8Y _ i 'j le `aii/ MY 147 (A.-1 NtoE) EF!!d FAME) � 01Y PAStE.A'D� D PiK�F1a4 C4i 0]3.70 t7i Sr l fT2 � sure cr CClHl1' OF KAYL M0 AGOpWIaJ�L ADMIE 94" PIAAW foft'GO .G r M 0E i VOL AACC" p lH. (m�AE "day P104 - OW- Cans,boon tis sure OF arrsr oo r P[Iai2i42Y APP"%% nE ABOW MU0'0 J V W 57FOXE c AM ACA040W[n CIr TAT FP FOOW7 P6TAI.VCM M Be is 7VLtAifARY ALT Aro DEW Alp FAS S[xfA�f CH/RVWF Or TTE CT' rr A92MD. IO 8-il PIYa ly+dl Li\ .2Q.717...__. Wm tkNAY RbrC - CrrOw, Camrr.bn lit Vl CarrnS.Yw, T•Pi'.• * # # REVROlNO # _ J! •sv..............DY 0CPr— .M, MD IWCCMM AS PMMXN INATOF 'MM 7FCCC.'i�P��C�F PAg.�MRXM PUW of 3WXM CnLNfT, OUPOOL POLY 5S11.0 PA^L 05 . DOG r ...... WXa ilsiilunl�. 1►�k►Y I�I�i L.�4D�� Eb1.HFT AiM1'2lSNsx�rar nc 1� 2 2 5 0 4 ###1AxSrArE" AYT#*# ILL wn FEES Assum"m CR WhER 044ACE5 AS RIEM11D BY 9R4 02"S N" Fal P//M//O����,,,,ASrtOF —, A. ,q 2ci 1f' l.�l../•"'f SiDI)[% { t3 � LldiL.. TAC CCilEC7oR ol€ # # * SURVEYOR'S CERr1 NIT # * # 1 � FW OQV FLYwREPRCSfPM A S"LRLCYOI OE IF m /mi REGA.II06 FOR PM77rD1G AAo RumsolIS LAW TIE aTrum Cr W*W OCMJ A00AWELY CESCf2B® AS YMLOMS p.r P.rCc;en Fm N. P-20-2013. m 1/.. 0"— , plat P.W. nom of naa,'d, 1. lbA.:r 20. Popp M of kmd o/ Por08on PM. M JdWa, R+D+ e� Oacvnrd r4o. 2015-41"34 aw-w &—w d J.c — c dy, trpm r1 w SiMj tb. 211Y5 h It. CR a Judav, Oav^h' S re. o,. ATAGL..t _ T.4i f S4 i, m. Ob t Nx Pi -124!5, mtw Mm -d er .6�tia1 P.t.s4'. Phgv+ B+. .&"v fAv eo,o.ac1',eA "56,25• Em. T4S63 rest (.—i l/_vP WWI?, Cod I W7 f.0 tA.nea SodA W2AW r µ 236}3 r d %roved 3o NA m23'17• rat. moo f.1); owu. jb,,, Y5• 0737Cwl 4zatlr NA c—d N ih "svir r -I, 4nm o.* u,.x. s ALI o ... r.d 7Pl4 r..t (--c $o < os25'1r w..t, eom f..* U— se al 0.,wW* tYwt. 024.7! rrr .rows swAA 9oo7Ye• r.d 01/01 r..e) to Ba eo.lwy d» � .dd PwcN 2v4 r; 0r.c. Wn0 E f.4 cv 0,. foo w t. o, eovark o r- Jou r..0 e+ac. NxE, F.A )rdL47 MSN, 1Y0.2A N. B1w..-e So W, .L 01-' r..t. 3P0o r.., 2 -3 W" .0, 114' rwt, -.— r..f: 027 RarL4 530370" M.µ aRSR tf 0Wl lf' 4rd2}0• r.d 703.(2 fwt• 14700 l4' 2771'42• f- 03.00 N.C' 230 tbru 5 n- • r d 7}f 1 /MI- w.n. pf' /;00+3/• M.µ (0367 k fArjh Ny{A 2TYLYSr W.O. fjO T..t poW 1 &# OFW'37• rut, eaxs3 t..t 2Mn<. Huth PO70'fi• Meµ 7}p2 rat b e. psivl d ASOuva+g JWFZY JURRlrrrl 217 WAMY 71M OAS EM" Pt> ro S\RYEY .NO IIOIR.010rf CORM 0.'YdEl6 Cr 700 ALA mA PM[a3 CREAYW fIvW" A LAW PMB7lOR�PR>p[RTY L0E APAbROfi. SET A9EA'D PA -2010-[V 187. PROCLLCRE MW ALS M CEFAW I72"W YOMIAEVrS OF ICW P AS S7DOJ LW Si[ 2 TO CMIRM THS "U'f 0ET iMY"o"S AT iFE A0ut.1s'Tm PROPD7N CVA@¢S AS � 6Y AE 521cf 0P)M PARCELS ARE LWI;IR TIM ACRESmramm AW A4 �)rL HAS Rw4xivI0 iDR 7 7 d FADF0" X9 TW M o � sf7 P FFA. .r oBER SLRSTSS ne EksnoNm NIle4 lit PARS ARE 9,0W IN TMDR APPAamu T N! 6 �� re �sny tw,.or, oe QPcrra rrorca. J4cxs@v YOP sueYV�nR a� Pc ovm+� Fuz c An as SHEET 1 OF 2 — 42509 e�aur suuver ank tvr uo + L.LSEMVrr nW &LA aUW LAND PARTITI�YEY fd raw PG rraxaxr IC Po -le PART1TlON PLAT N eas.ema cAW CUM i IBff nuft ssssr: n3,amv NO 63 RINUN w PO Om 19 7 Proparly U i& u8 men PAR I et ,tr, se.n `ao s`n .cMAA OR eux rri ai a7!!! 1n [be & W 01 5Lx t/bir 4, T,.Y9.Q R -M X M. of n� rc 401 IM aily o1 Asblend laakenn Cbun! , Ongon PA f1719 IX1167f szs sm u. ` 8 (ASIILiND a•�^^^ vuerx xixnm 3HIItYl► ae� u. 1'1 "! I rslHr3a umear laH Saw ,a tlat r1'!n i am, .lm C4ii6G r [� PHA aLm W 8!lR9IR24 3s ee 3w Lt531eA! roe rnalcc rp Kf16 rlsx .wH oalcr lam. sou 33ec �m.a ism a nmcr an rnu u am rant ew.ev c ,mem evoz a a,¢ c�s3 m r:sc rn �. nwne w. rlat n 3sa ru GGe .r-ual, nem CwN d<Geenrr. uer sY IO:aa93s� - rt3r mu f wr - �1 5,y �ip3 1 r ss rw w,s 4o ly w n; n _ _YAWI .iweairrawcsc: u 1M41 PN GCC. .f-ISi6S. p�N Z Styr r>s i ,3C., 9 PMy f otR Pp/ P_x_�vf5 P7RGf77�1Rpp��yypppp � �` rew sus / W31'Pm - 1_ swc.'ar� __:uN � GGc �C:s-Fiae dti3tif PAR I Blas yl t` V rc 401 IM ACK50}1 8 SVRYETl1t ae� e��° "! I rslHr3a � [3 s/l131� �1 Poi. rs3Nr f p - m !/!' aPx m 1'R au saga !lp+eSl e ' ■ . m f/:' 3a3rf xl rGx au Doan namnae g Irs..rr sr33 ,n.rst rcva xu y . ra yr ss ,e..wu w ..a Tarte rri nam . o - ra VII'+�I ree lee rsNn + - ra soexse rta 6/7314 fm, . esx K - m {/Y I%3e rx i rt.czx w IrRI Gs>a rae rsan Ga eNl. �[ - 3n W segs rsl i Hunt rr fiG. esleae rea fsulae ■ - rn Vs' mil Irc • R,n� cw .sn 3SYA ru 35Ardf a -reef, l,�aY mlW�fX Ir�4ISN iMWG rLe rSYAA _ O - lai 3h• l A' 1®1 rw t tier's C,r 313 [1 rrmR i ,,tSpC JCLR . J�UQ�pI GG�' 14n'eA a,�ry . CRe.I IKLOB7S CF iPIC➢'JV CPUC pFi�l '� Pnxss� s¢n �i�y-"r�ie €fu eo'F'rlef,� r ep: Gxr31 wlm asG3e3W r3e ea�c, n"'�ii lie i =4 CQ'RAtrC 4VPLKgY�lGRE W{O31.JRiT rEe�GOC. G!-lMSi MN w�GK/=71-0O CG1 iCAp) Qv7 r[Q. ve . aGvl'slxew l4eGrteae � _ �a 1 o4:a3caH rae r3.xat 1 3(F vrs Rct _ S"Mzorz r 22509 F1b Strom/ fuv6# V ACK50}1 8 SVRYETl1t ae� e��° "! wvn [3 s/l131� �1 3s,1)e L 4�o fOf h ss rw w,s rx wua saaxea eesr seNas wcv lu, w f p - m !/!' aPx m 1'R au saga !lp+eSl e ' ■ . m f/:' 3a3rf xl rGx au Doan namnae g Irs..rr sr33 ,n.rst rcva xu y . ra yr ss ,e..wu w ..a Tarte rri nam . o - ra VII'+�I ree lee rsNn + - ra soexse rta 6/7314 fm, . esx K - m {/Y I%3e rx i rt.czx w IrRI Gs>a rae rsan Ga eNl. �[ - 3n W segs rsl i Hunt rr fiG. esleae rea fsulae ■ - rn Vs' mil Irc • R,n� cw .sn 3SYA ru 35Ardf a -reef, l,�aY mlW�fX Ir�4ISN iMWG rLe rSYAA _ O - lai 3h• l A' 1®1 rw t tier's C,r 313 [1 rrmR i ,,tSpC JCLR . J�UQ�pI GG�' 14n'eA a,�ry . CRe.I IKLOB7S CF iPIC➢'JV CPUC pFi�l '� Pnxss� s¢n �i�y-"r�ie €fu eo'F'rlef,� r ep: Gxr31 wlm asG3e3W r3e ea�c, n"'�ii lie i =4 CQ'RAtrC 4VPLKgY�lGRE W{O31.JRiT rEe�GOC. G!-lMSi MN w�GK/=71-0O CG1 iCAp) Qv7 r[Q. ve . aGvl'slxew l4eGrteae � _ �a 1 o4:a3caH rae r3.xat 1 3(F vrs Rct _ S"Mzorz r 22509 I/P TM! Ic 1-1'�"R T1 LE COMMERCIAL DATA PACKAGE 345 CLINTON Ticar Customer Services 15551=. McAndrews Road Ste. 100 Medford OR, 97504 541.779A111 0 R-ttc-medf ordc u stonn e rservice(cDticortitle.com 744 NE. 7th Street Grants Pass, OR 9752'6 541.476.1171 OR-ttc-grantspassciistor-nerservice,ticortitle.com Thank you for the confidence you have placed in us. We appreciate the opportunity to serve you. Please call us with any questions. This title information has been furnished, without charge, in conformance with guidelines approved by the State of Oregon Insurance Commissioner. The isurance Division cautions that indiscriminate use only benefiting intermediarie will not be permitted. No liability is assumed for any errors in the record. he following information contains restricted, confidential, and/or person private information intended only for designated recipient please ensure direct delivery. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately at the number listed above. TICOR TITIE'" Todays Date: Owner Name: Imm 11 =rmi- 11 Property Address: Reference Number.- Account Number: 10635231 MMW 22 1555 E McAndrews Rd,, Ste 10073539 Heathrow Way, Ste 100 180 Lithia Way, Ste 101 744 NE 71h St "s Medford,, OR 97504 Medford, OR 97504 Ashland, OR 97520 Grants Pass, OR 97526 730 541,24, , 1. . 541.779, 2811 54 245.76730 541,488,2240 541.476.1171 This title information has been furnished, without charge, in conformance with guidelines approved by the State of Oregon Insurance Commissioner. The Insurance Division cautions that indiscriminate use only benefiting intermediaries will not be permitted, No liability is assurned for any errors in this record. The information compiled in this report(s) was imported from a vendor -provided database source. Although the information is deemed reliable and every effort has been taken to correct data imperfections, Ticor Title cannot be held responsible for any inaccuracies. Jackson County Parcel Information Parcel Information Parcel #.,10635231 Tax LoV'391E04DB00401 Site Address. 345 Clinton St A,shtand OR 97520 - 1243 Ownec Mace, Paul B Clwner2: Kathleen, Kahle Owner Address:'345 Clinton St Ashland OR 97520 - 1243 Twn/Range/Section: 39S / 01 E 1041 SE Parcel Size: 12.29 Acres (535,352 SgFt) Plat/Subdivision: kLest: IBlock: Census Tract/Block: 001800 12018 IWaterfront: Land mprovement DF, TICOR TITLE COMPANY Assessment Information $2,228,580.00 $1,162,610.00 $3,391,190.00 $489,010.00 $931,330.00 $1,420,340.00 Tax Information j, Lein Code Area: 0501 j; Levy Rate: 15.7831 Tax Year, 2021 Annual Tax: $21,764.57 Legal 191 - Residential - Potential development - Land Use Std;•RSFR - Single Family Residence Improved (typical of class) Ashland -R-1- - Residential - Single Family Recreation: 5 - Ashland Primary School: Walker Elementary School Ashland Middle School High School Ashland High School 1990 (1991) 3„387 f' Roof Covering: TILE Heat; Heat Pump Transfer Information Rec. ICia to 04/05/2018 Owneri City Of Ashland Fier, SgFt:4,650 Floor 2 SgFt.1,263 Sale Price: $380,,000.00 163 1 Bedrooms:3 Bathrooms,. 3.5 Carage:,1,136 SgFt 1 Attached/detached [<M 10641 icor; Type.,; Deed MACE PAUL B 1ST AMERICAN Finance Type:' Loan Type. fender* Sentry Dynamics, Inc. and its customers make no representations, warranties or conditions, express or implied', as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. R N Assessmont Year 12022 vPTimt iPYpndDYY los,0 i 6ndoN -'fa T XdQNssessoRtlnfaNl 523 As'ss'smenPu o'esTri CV77;'22 , M. . --- Pay TaX4s QnlCns T'axCure Tay'l 39IE04DB40.9 TAwN�a fhi.. r 1y9 a any Owmw M,NACEPAWI.ITWATHL.EEN..KAHL.E 345 CLINTON S7 ASHLAND TaxReport Tax 5taton'aASHLAND vmei aa'a . 11.14 Ac MACE PAUL BASATI#LEENd KAMLE Ssvznd Tri Statcrrant 345 CLINTON ST R,dmlN4ra9 Atdtlwmss Tax I-Hmor m SYa& C ®ss� 7 ASHLAND OR, 975201243 Tax Daka{I.s ND 2899091. u 17ut7 . _. Appraiv:.r 168' iTax Rakaer' .. },NBdPi10 rice Area. 289 _ NzLghtyart�nud .0306 .. .._._; Study Area, C}3 Account Status. cr r,rE Tax Statua... Asaesaeb4a_ i ....,......._._._.. SWhType, %�SBIeS CIaC� �A54aa� Last Seta Sela D6W I NumberHts{ory $15500000 711811988 k ..._ , .. . , �V -..,. 4 Vali?e 5un1TAa M7elall li�._`_wm___. a�„a` ._ . CD. Value Sourca Coda Arca I SA Stat Class Rural Flea Dist, size She Type 11 HOME SITE 5-01.... 0 R. 4;35 A.� 1 MARKETOSD 5111. _ 0 R.. ..... ...... _....- 1 MARKET.OSD °._....5451.. 0 R __ .......- .......w -..w. 2 :'RURALTRACT 541 0 R 3.51 A. _ .,__i____._.__m__ ._..___._.. .__..._._...d_.....:.._.._.......m_.__..____...Y____—.____�._..._....� 3 "RURAL TRACT 501 0 R 8.43 A IR � _......_. 1 SING —FAMILY RES 541 —D-162--'— Uta'Valve Satawa'e RIAV I35 Exc,,plLon Vapue Parwvtleus Max AW F+ravivmffi ld�a„r SAV Mdax A"1 1 HOME SITE $ 291,970 _1,191,970 $ 0 $ 122,046 1 NaARKET 4SD $ 43,160 $ 49,760• $ 6 x$10 290 S 0 $ 10,290 .._ ._ i IU,ARKET 0ki0 .6 28 Y3C+ $ 28134 4.. $ 11,750 4. $ 11,760 j ... .... .._. _. . _ �' 104,5'94 $ iL4,6D0....�. $ iM,•..m._.. Z �?2WRA.L TRACT $ 43,750 $0, $ 43,764 �3 RURAL TRACT$1,75Q„030 $1„,760.,030. .� $ 0 '$ 735,530 $ 0 ,$ 735,530 N _ SING FAMILY' RES $ 1,112,G10 $1,152,610 _ $ 0 `$ 450,010 $0 $ 489,010 '.. 'r” �” %�dbdl87"kefl'U'a1Ue SDITHINIB �'�i'O,C�>'fi��''N�1M'<N3'k".��,,,�1�,�4��i�u00`Nlui�!f'Vf0"�1.�..,.._..<.;,...._.__,._.,..•,._._.,.,.,.;..��:,.....>._..................�,,,,,..v .� .�. Crya1,a Area TyrP,n, Ae aaq¢ RMfiV h!6 $97,NAV 5a01 1,AN0 fl229 $2228,580 $2226580 37930 $931330 6431 N7dPR .600 $1,182610 $1162610 $489670 $48+3010 Value 51114Yi' Total$3,391,590 J$ 3,39 V,1901$ 1,420,344 $1,420,340 S B eYldrri5 # .._ _..�._ Area Y�aa Cotiar B, d Yaar Ctaax Descrllt5fun Typo SrIF1 CnruPlete outt fl 6.01 1990 1991 162 sto Residaruco 44650 100 h SY „ , ,P�rgles 4nd.Scah TO V46Nr1flens, Type 41eua tlrumlaar P1'11 nge FkPcs' ACCOUNT PHOTO 1 1 ACCOUNT PHOTO 2 1... ACCOUNT PHOTO 3.. 1 :ACCOUNT PN#OTO 4 1 SCANNED ASSESSOR DOCUMENTS (5eenem t5aennvrT."I Xtao ,, �,,,,��1n1,(31'dAVOtTl6n'��:0411411011�5 ---.,, ,.•...,,.�,,...w..,._..,., ...__.....,.., 10MIN6 DET GARAGE. ESTFROM EXTER70R TO BE. FIN,.CHO STAT CLON GARAGE-EXCPTH, ADDED PLUS CLASS ADJ TO HOUSE -NO EXCPTN, UPDATED LNVENTORY x.4445>>>0�8PI5110 CONSOLtDATED TL 700 INTO401, MOVE WP #Y 33>>>OIMW01Y ADD AUTO GATE#151 »>0312.1d2018:.. PER AA NCC 6168>>> _..,„. .;,,, P 9BL_pinCf3L1dnC8 .».,. 2011 • VALID RESIDENTLAL R.T. (!SEGREGATION REVIE "la 20Y8 • RESIDERTLAL R T t3S A COMPiMINOR CHG SA.N DSCPj. 2019 HISTORY ONLYR T,FIVSTOR :. 202# HISTORY DI#LYRT QHN3iORYp �i, �4�c�counk Cxtmrnanl>z �� " PRAISED 4'JLTH THE HOUSE EVEN! THONLGM TT' IS O7N TL 40B�01 �031"28M37: 54fl AC IN THE 9657 FLOODPLAIN,, NET VALUE BASED CMN'. RURALILAND VAIUESTHE BALANCE OF THETL NS SWBDIVNOABLE.(5,25 ACj »>05!'tl 5110 FOLL01NNNG CONSOLNDATION OF T1..700, N04"A IMPROVED LOT 4NYTH CL 6 H(573E, UPDATED PC #133»>01Au512011 NLC#151»>.03I2112018 PER A13 NLC #158»s � � V�Ex�¢n�s4pDns ��e45B� ASSessn1k71; s,r'!�okall9n9 P Pa��DtiB1 iLiagii�ily �.. °., ,. _ .,. .. _..�.�..�... .���✓� . 7latallsora DeseKYp}{j41T., i.3x ArnGllril YN^-ad A016rd VaIt143 ,tYx➢'Y4AI11.i ALTERNATIVE ENERGY SYSTEM EXEMPTION, ORS 307.175 :2018 BALANCE PERMANENTLY 2018 CARTOGRAPLdICACTIVt'TY' '2018 BALANCE PERMANENTLY 2015: �........._...........�..... .w...__.�..,..W-.... w... CARTOORAPHIO ACTRNTY :. : 2415.. IARTOGRAPHNCACTfWNT'r' 2016 CARTOGRAPHW ACTIVITY 2010 YR. END TRC—AGDj_IONW_C' ILL SENT ...........�. _._20Yb.._ CARTOGRAPHIC ACTIVITY RE_CALC_ULATNON..: 2008 CARTOGRAPHIC ACTIVITY "'_.._.. _.....m...�.___ _......_._.._._._... _._..._._.w..�___ .m _.. STATEMENT OF TAX ACC OUNT JACKSON COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR JACKSON COUNTY COURTHOUSE MEDFORD, OR 97501 (541) 774-6541 Chek hereto make aU)ent L _ Tax Account P 10635231 Lender Name Account Status A Loan Nuniber Roll Type Real Property ID 0501 Situs, Address 345CLINTON ST' ASHLAND, OR 97520 Interest To Apr 27, 2022 27 -,Apr -2022 Tax Summary Tax Tax Total Current Interest Discount Original Due War Type Due Due Due Available Due Date 2021 ADVALORENI $7,254.85 $7,254.85 $0.00 $0,00 521,76437 Nov 15, 2021 2020 ADVALOREM 50100 S0.00 $0.00 50.00 521,153,36 Nov 15, 2020 2019 ADVALOREM SOM 50.00 $0.00 $0.00 $20,819,36 Nov 15, 2049 2018 ADVALORENI 50.00 SOM 50.00 $0.00 519,667,06 Nov 15, 2018 7.017 ADVALOREM 50.00 S0,00 50.00 50.00 $22,424.96 Nov 15, 2017 2016 ADVALORENI SOM 50,00 50,00 50.00 $21,840.01 Nov 15, 2016 2015 ADVALORENI 50.00 50.00 50,00 S0.00 520,995.43 Nov 15, 2015 2014 ADVALORENI 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 520,119,83 Nov 15, 2014 2013 ADVALOREM SOM SOM 50,00 50.00 519,097.96 Nov 15, 2013 2012 ADVALOREM 50.00 SOHO $0.00 SO.00 518,638.52 Nov 15, 2412 2011 ADVALORENI SOM SO.00 $0.00 SO.00 S18.1X81 Nov 15, 2011 2010 ADVALOREM 50.00 50.00 54.00 50,00 517,721,22 Nov 15, 2010 2009 ADVA 1,0143M S0.00 SO.00 SO.00 50,00 S2,288. f I Nov 15, 2009 2008 ADVALORENI 50.00 SO.00 SO.00 S0,00 52,177.60 Nov 15, 2008 2007 ADVALOREM 50,00 SO.00 SO.00 SO.00 $2,127,40 Nov 15, 2007 2006 ADVALOREM SOM WOO $0.00 50.00 51,961,48 Nov 15, 2006 2005 ADVALOREM SO.00 50,00 SO.00 $0.00 $1,855.36 Nov 15, 2005 7.004 ADVALOREM 80.00 50,00 SO.00 $0.00 51,828.99 Nov 15, 2004 2403 ADVALOREM 50.00 50,00 54.00 50.00 $1,849.84 Nov 15, 2003 2002, ADVALOREM SO.00 SO.00 SUO 50,00 S 1,791.53 Nov 15, 2002 2001 ADVALOREM $0.00 50.00 MOO 50,00 S 1,776. 19 Nov 15, 2001 2000 ADVALOREM 50.00 50,00 50.00 $0.00 51,744,67 Nov 15, 2000 IM ADVALOREM $0.00 50.00 50.00 SO.00 51,597A9 Nov 15, 1999 1998 ADVALOREM $0.00 S0.00 $().Of) $0.00 51,553.91 Nov 15, 1998 1997 ADVALOREM 50,00 50.00 $0,00 50.00 51,539.64 Dec 15, 1997 1996 ADVALOREM 50.00 50-00 $0,00 $0.00 53,434,96 Nov 15, 1996 Twat 57,254.95 57,254.95 50.00 50.00 Jackson county,raxation PO BOX 1569 F�mmem;m"' im!"amm" MEDFORD OR 97501-0242 10635231 MACE PAUL B/KATHLEEN KAHLE 345 CLINTON ST ASHLAND OR 97520-1243 CODE: 0501 MAP: 39IE04-DB-00401 SITUS: 345 CLINTON ST ASHLAND VALUES: REAL MARKET (RMV) LAND STRUCTURES TOTAL RMV MAXIMUM ASSESSED VALUE TOTAL ASSESSED VALUE VETERAN/MISC EXEMPTION NET TAXABLE: TOTAL PROPERTY TAX: ACRES: 12.29 LAST YEAR THIS YEAR 2,007,690 2,228,580 1,058,110 1,174,520 3,065,800 3,403,100 1,338,820 1,378,980 1,338,820 1,378,980 1,338,820 1,378,980 2,1,153,36 21,764.57 PAYA I ENT QUESTIONS (541) 774.6541 VALUE QUESTIONS (541) 774-6059 REAL PROPERTY TAX STATENIENT , I I ULY 1, 2021 TO JUNE 30, 2022 ii,ii,ii!.I.iclisoiicotiti(l,.oi-g/(ax 'FAX ACC'OUN"I'; 10635231 EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRICT 485.95 RCC 707,14 ASHLAND SD 5 5,736.69 ASHLAND SD 5 LOCAL OPTION 1,778.88 ''EDUCATION TOTAL: 8,708.66 JACKSON COUNTY 2,771.61 4-H EXTENSION SERVICE DISTRI 58.74 VECTOR CONTROL 59.16 RVTD 244.36 RVTD LOCAL LEVY 179.27 JACKSON SOIL & WATER CONS 68.95 JACKSON COUNTY LIBRARY DIS' 717.07 CITY OF ASHLAND 5,911.00 GENERAL GOVT TOTAL 0,010.116, JACKSON COUNTY BONDS ECSC 109.35 RCC BONDS 128.52 RCC SHARED BONDS 63.71 CITY OF ASHLAND BONDS 99.70 ASHLAND SD 5 BONDS 2,644.47 BONDS - OTHER TOTAL: 3,045,75 TOTAL TAXES DQ111cludes discount) 21,111.63 Please include this coupon with payment. NO STAPLES, PAPER CLIPS, OR TAPE! Elue Novevn]�)er 15th, 2021 Mailing address change on back 10635231 Check Payable To: Jackson County Taxation 3% Discount[] 21,111.63 2% Discount[] 14,219.52 Next Pipneii(Due: 05/16/2022 Trimester Option[] 7,254.86 Next Payment Due: 02/15/2022 MACE PAUL BIKATHLEEN KAHLE 345 CLINTON ST ASHLAND OR 97520-1243 JACKSON COUNTY TAXATION PO BOX 1569 MEDFORD OR 97501-0242 Improvement Inventory Description qty/Size Improvement Summary Qty/Size COOKTOP 1 LAVATORY JACKSON County DISHRKASHER 1 SINGLE FP I For Assessinent Year 2022 1 TILE Account ID 10635231 3357 TILE 330 Map 391E04 -DB -00401 Situs 345 CLINTON ST ASHLAND OR 97520 806 Malling MACE PAUL BIKATHLEEN KAHLE TOILET 4 TUB/SHOWER 345 CLINTON ST ASHLAND OR 97520-1243 Code Stat Year Bldg Area Class Built Comp % Description Sqft l 0501 162 1990 l00 162 - Two story 4,650 Rooms: 3 - BD, 3 - FB, I - HB, 1 - FP Floors Description Class Comp % C111% Sqft First Floor 6 + 100 3387 Second Floor 6 + 100 1263 Garane 6 + 100 330 Garage 6 + 100 806 Improvement Inventory Description qty/Size Description Qty/Size COOKTOP 1 LAVATORY 6 DISHRKASHER 1 SINGLE FP I DISPOSAL 1 TILE 3387 HEAT PUMP 3357 TILE 330 HEAT PUMP 632 TILE 806 JET TUB I TOILET 4 TUB/SHOWER 1 Accessories Description Size Qty ASPHALT 5000 PORCH-CONC-HVY COMP COVER 163 SINROOAI 1246 SWIMMING POOL, ] ROOF COVERILEAN TO 1656 140T TUB/SPA 1 PORCH-CONC-NO COVER 250 DECK-RW/TREX-NO COVER 208 GATE -AUTOMATIC E Total RMV 51,162,610 4/27/2022 Page 1 of 1 Close 9Windvw, 1 Print Window I Ai 6 a scar �4c unrwk 1 3 23 t aurrk ,1+�iliie los#ran instrwwrneirt1p, Pee�3wne� Sale 0�„ `,Vold I/111%I 1y ;,;, clluch� - rerPoke' ;;; Urxkb' Texjot , &,.?age .,, , 1990125'8 1211911900 715119900150 Ep391 EO4D401 $0.88 1.57 w 0811111988 711811988 301E04DB MACE PAUL $155,000.00 401 B1KATHLEEN KAHLE 1984»01676 1212811983 120211983 1963w22090 11d D 0 1111LSI ERNI BANK $0.00 SHLINN-TIUTTLi 1 01/1011983 121911962 8 wU7� LID0 $350,000.00 DEVELi"1P141ENT' GR7 1982-043.97 0411611982 418111982 1982-050305030 FSM ILLUS CLINTON 0 $0.00 .Ut6G.JNfiPri'lr17LE 77, EY�e% 7777 77, -77 „iilgA J w irr�ai "oill� r N kp/,,,,in rift f, N' uirMi r, It s ruin+ iak T p �M l'�iypie' ' e 1982-64397 1982.05030 Glc ' 1', 19030/921 1982-178114 w13 1 1984.61676 1983.22090 WD 1 . 1990.12589 12119119913 1990.00000 lip 2 1-57 1988.095968 08111/1986 198844118 WD 1 Close Window Prink Window AMERiCAN PACIFIC TI11F, . �al� ����.. . • i MIMI R..l]0❑1r--WAI,r1ANIV0110 a.nrare'ar Cvyutl.1, srA}[er-o/u. _-.-4 6c OL7�'�"lJ.1L7 WA1kAN1T BE[a •� �� B 7L O/ Y .3 /E 1114-M//O may KNOW ALL MEN ByTHESE PRESENTS, Tha1._41g0,!1T13., a.Cl4r-..pp„Orego0,_bn0tC1.0B,.roiporntion ..........,.....................,....................,....,...........,..,......,........................,......,.............,............. . /Wretnatfor [alien ilia grantor, for the cansfderaffan hlereinnflar sfnted, to grantor pnld by..4.13f1.......•..• Kc.><�lk..K.�.hk.Q,..htssbmnd..a¢Td.wife.................................,..........................,.............................., herainnfler coffee] Out grantee, does hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the sAfd grantee, and gtanica's heirs, successors and Assigns, lhat certain real properly, with the tenements, haredifamants And nppurhenonces thereunto befongind or OP - Pertaining, Ailudied in the Qaunly of. ...... ,1.a..G)P.T..1................ and Stale of Oregon, described ns follosys, to-rvif; Property located in Section G Township 39 South, Range I East of the liillanette Base and HaridiaTiltJackson County, Oregon, more particularly described In the attached Exhibit 'A' which by reference herein forms and is Blade a part hereof .., 11 ref frACT INSUMCILW, CONI!.; oucr fnON UI M1251 Stan To Have and to Hold the same unto the said grant'* and granfee s heirs, successors and assigns forever. And said grantor hereby covenants to and with sriid grantee and grentea's heirs, successors and assigns, that grantor is lawfully seized in fee simple of the above granted premises, tree from all ancumbrancesexcept as detailed In the attached"4xhibit 'B' which by reference heraill forms and Is made a part hereof ... tend Offal grantor will warrant and forever defend the said premises and every part and parcel !hereof against the lawful claims and demands of all persons whamsoever, except those claiming under the above described encumbrances. The true and atfuel consideration paid for this transfer, staled in terms of dollars, is $._U400.0_0.0 . ..... sPxic�zxaizxst r "r' a 0o y�dxlelTOR(indicefe whiCh)OCTlw«nlenu bat ream the tyrt 6af+O,nnat rpplfcaG°e,.bqu7d 6r drlele 1. Sea ORS93A30.) in construing thus deed and where the context so requires, the singular includes the plural and all grammatical changes shall be implied to make the provisions hereof apply equally to corporations and to individuals. In Witness Whereof; the grantor has executed this instrument this....l.Z thday aL.....----all] t' � -} , OA8...; if a corporate grantor, it has caused its name to be signed and seat affixed by its officers, duty abtho�rrec� tiferFf0 6y order of its board of directors. @' 'ion, THIS 7Hla lNSTRUMENT WILL HOT ALLOW USE PF THE PROPERTY DE •--NIs-!er IBank an.. OI`$ -(1 �1:�°g..cP II"Y4ra}I SCRIBED IN TrtIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OFAPPLtcABLE LAHO -- r USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS, UVORE SIGHING OR ACCEP71HG ,. gj!;,,,` 4' . !='T' >/r �r'r Y- THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON -ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE l r F.�,, 'r 1' PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR J e R.. licK. o.. - F .¢� en PROPERTY COUNTY PLAHNIHG D[PARTMeV TO VEgIFY APPROVED USES. -• """'"-'""" ""- .. ..5 STAT4 OF OREGON, - r[. Cooney of .._..------- __—_-....__..____. 19..-._..., Parsana9y aPFeAred the alone nsarcd.._.»»...-.-_._ .......... arknoniedtrd ria Iaefolrgt inlrru- masr to ba.__--_- ---------------- vorunfary ser end dad. Belaro rna: ' SEAL) NoruY Pablic for OrrQan My canvnfruan erpiresr q uMTOA•a eLtM[ AHa A60Ala[ ,, 2auLll.�iac.e�_Ka th 1cgn�Sah1�___-__ 9nA A 1Teia Avenue „Ashland,_QrR8On ...-42520_-- ' s. tro R_AaaA x.* MM4 Ms r.n.aoea[As, xlr STATE of OTiEGOH, Cautery Penal-+lrr aaPrered ....aT?f € X.��- .�K LlOQ]L.r= -Xii C Uil duty s+rarn. a�xd huxai>F>aY, fYifTReS JEx1LaJa[1L7u, d r Say 'hut 11WI5S15•' LW" is elm -------------•y_iee...„„.prtddenr s?XW.Z-,NwYli3G>',-0 7 W erd dh/r JF ...I affixed to the lareeaAt Inure of acid —"All” and thea raid fwhvu lar wj hard at raid eorpora Iran h� sutherilY of its bail N*m Ecktxnrkdded wed /rife—ear fo kis IN v' Before res Ndferylp.bfle k, Oredan Afy eamnersrlon erpl-1 fes- [>,[1, >H%1 � �N M ..4'a•.e ai M a.Na.aY .fall ![ Ear h 14 1�NY.f�! x•r_ _2.O,fi-"A ti4i STATE OF OREGON, sr. Countyf....._....�......................... I c'r'y that hho within instru- ment was re 'ved far reca J on the .... day al...........,.,, ., f9..,....., of ......... ..... . a clock .. .,and recorded taA[[alr [.v.o ra[ in booklreelwolul, E �................'ej,. an Itlelias R[G9Aq U'3 ar[ page .----.-•-••••��--•�•• or esY�e/fru- W? Deeds of acid count witness my hand and al of ratified. r..M[ T.— _Aahiand,.�z�gor�_9Z5�0ay-............. ... ........................... Deputy k.h T. AOauae.i.e i Title No. 606742 B&-�1A11H exnIBIaT 'n' Commencing at a found 2. inch diameter galvanized iron pipe with a 3 inch diameter bronze cap monumenting the Northeast corner of Donation Land -claim No. 40 in Section 4, Township 39 South, Range I East of the Willamette Rase and Veridian, Jackson CoulttY, Oregoni thence South 57' 001 27' East (Deed Record South 57' 03' Bast 574.65 feek) 574.65 feet to a point on the Easterly right of way of Oak Street, thence South 00' 25' 17" West (need. Records South 00" 271.West) along the Easterly right. of way of. Oak Street, 508.78 feet to a found 5/8 inch iron pin, for the true point of beginning; thence leaving said right of way, along that boundary line by agreement- and recorded as Doc:urient Ito. 76-02704 of the Official Records Of Jackson County, Oregon, North 89050' 17" Ea;:t 300.00 feet.to a fount] 5/0 inch iron pin; thence Borth 00' 25' 17" Past and parallel -to Oak Street, 481.63 feet Lo a point on the Southerly boundary line of the Reeder Tractl-thence Horth 09 58 _ 17" Bast (Deed Record East) 690.00 feet; thence South 00' 2.5' 17" West ( Deed Record South aa' 271 West 255.0`feet) and parallel to Oak Street, 255.00 feet; thence North 89' 58' 17" East (Deed Record East 429.0 feet) 429.00 feet; thence south 00' 25' 17" West (Deed Record South and parallel to Oak Street) 80.00 feet; thence south 00' 07' 05' West (Deed Record South 792 feet) 795.04 feet to a found 3/4 'ihch pipe situated at the I7orthwest corner of the nelsman Tract recorded in Volume 263, Page 599 of the Deed Records of Jackson County, Oregon; thence, along the Westerly boundary line of said Delsman 'Pratt, South 00'-11' 33" East (Deed Record South) 570.66 feet to the Northerly boundary line of the Patterson -Phelps Tracts, "blandi Oregon, as now recorded; thence along said subdivision boundary, Horth.61' 30' 04" West (record North 61' 36' West 391.72 feet) 391.96 feet, thence north 73' 15' 04' West( Record North 73' 20' west 401.78 feet) 401.63 feet to Cl point on the Southeasterly boundary line of Volume 258, Page 406 Qf the Deed Records of Jackson County, Oregon; thence North 69° 36' 53" East, along the .last recited volume and Page, (Deed Record Northeasterly) 133.03 feet; thence fdorth 14' 52' 23" East (Deed Record North 14' 52' East 247.5 feet) 247.50 feet; thence Horth 89' 59' 37"Aleat (Deed Record Sdest) 403. 14 feet to the Southeast-' corner of Volume 260, Page 263 of the Deed Records of Jackson - County, Oregon; thence North 00' 00' 23" East (Deer] Record North) along the Easterly boundary line of the last recited V01u11,e and Page and the northerly extension_. thereof, 120.68feet to a Poinnow on the Easterly boundary line of the Oak Court ubdivial recorded; thence along said Easterly boundary line, North 14' 48' 7.0' East (record North 14' 52' Bast) 334.87 feet to the Northeasterly corner thereof, situated in the Southerly boundary line of that tract recorded in Volume 163, Page 22 of the Deed Records of Jackson County, Oregon; thence south 89" 58' 17" Wert, along said common boundary line, 290.76 feet; thence, leaving said common line,'North 00' 01' 43' west 74.245 feet; thence Scutt, 89' 58' 17" Wert 192.00 feet to a point in tile 'Easterly right of way of Oak Street-; thence North 00' 25' 17" East ( Deed Record Horth 00° 27' Eaat) -120.00 feet; thence, leaving.said right of way, North 09' 58' 17' East (Deed Record Eant 150.0 feet) 150.00 feet; Tl.tlo Pio, 606742 i 88-14218 - thence North 00' 25' 17" East {Deed Record Nortih 00° 27` East 50,00 feot) 50.00 feet;thence South 89° 58' 17" West (peed Record West 150.0 feet) 150.00 feat to a point in the Easterly right of tray of Oak Street; thence North 00' 25' 171 East (Deed Record North 000 271 -East) 22.37 feet to the true point of beginning, EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following; Cotnt€sencing at a point on the Easterly line of Oak Street in the City of hshland, JOCRIM County, Oregon,%said point being South 57' 00' 27" Eact (Deed Record South 574 031 East) 574. 65 feet frOA1 the NOrtheast corner of Donation.Lund Claim No. 40 In Township 39 South, Range 1 East of the Willamette Meridian in Jacknon County, Oregon; thence along said street -line, South 00' 7.5' 17" West (Deed Record South 0° 27' West) 107.15 feet- to the southwest corner of Elie Reeder Tract as described in Volumo'65, Page 603_ of the Deed Records of Jackson County, Oregonj thence continue along said street line., South 000 251 17" West (Deed Record South 0°-27' West) 424. 0 feet to the true point of beginning] thence Borth 00° 25' 17' East ( Deed Record Forth),- along the Easterly line of Oak Street,a distance of 22.37 feetj thence North 890 58' 17" East a distance of, 300.0 feet; thence' North 00° 25' 171, East a distance of 150.00 feet; thence North'e9' 58' 17" EasE a distance of 120.00•feeE; thence South 00° 25' 17" West a distance of 169.00 feet, store or less, to the Northerly:line of that tract described in Document No. 77-21118 of the.Official Records of Jackson County, Oregon; thence South 89° 58' 17" West a distance of 270.00 feet, more or less, to an iron pin as'monuasented in volume I, Page 78 of Minor nand Partitiuns, recorded Ma 19, 1977 in Jackson County, Oregon; tlience South 00* 25' 17" West 2.76 feet; thence South 091 58' 17" West 150.00 feet,to the point of beginning. ALSO, EXCEPTING THEREFROM that -portion lying Within the limits of sleepy Hollow_ Subdivision, a retarded plat of Jackson County, Oregon. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion of Elie above described tractlyingNortheasterly of the following described centerlines Coi�menc;ng at a point from which the Southwest corner of Donation Land Claim No. 41 in Township 39 Soutb, Rage 1 East of the Willamette Meridian in Jackson County, Oregon, bears South 375.01 feet and West 788.65 feet; thence East 789.99 feet; thence South 84° 06' East 319.65'feet to a point oil the SYest line of tract described in Volume 263, Page 599 of the Deed Records of Jackson County, Oregon; thence Horth 00° 11' 33" West 794.2.7 feet for the true point of beginning;. thence North, along the West line of said tract, a distance of 180 Peet, more or less, to the initial point of cehterline described in volume 1, Page 7C 'of Minor Land Partitions i -n Jackson County, Oregon, recorded Nay 19, 1.977; thence West; 38.49 feet;-tlience North 20' 471 31" Nest 120.22 feet; thence South 800 00' 00" West 30.40 feet; thence North 35' ' 56' 46" West 76.47 feet; thence North 55' 031 26" West 62.29 feet; lI thence Horth•211 32' 20'West 183.62 feet; thence North 27° 29' 431. West 95.06. feet; thence North 561 15' 17" West 78.11 feet; 1 thence North 42° 09' 55" West 195.67 feet; thence North 230 05' 57" West, 72.54 feet]thence North 010 091 37" West 165.93 feet; thence Horth .20° 03'47" West 73.05 feet to the point of terminus. 1 s I 1, ]988-89 005, a Ilan in an aRoutst to be dcL*iMinedr but Flat yet duo and payable,' 2, Ti:e rigghts of the public in and to that ivrttoIlof the herela Jeserlhad property lying vithin tine limits or itublio [00'10, stream or 111,rlhveye. 3, Regulations, inciudin. levlae, PePaoenontPt vatar and ilrlgatlon rights and easenents Jot dltehos rind canals at Lisa Went irrigation District. _ The a6sea anento for this district ale included with the ad -valorem taxes. 4. An casepont created by Inotrument, including the tares and peovfelons the re0fl Voluse€ 289 Faget 101 In pavar'ori The Caliroilsla Oregon FouoC Company For i TIPFk6MiP6fOn and distribution of electricity {Overt t Cenctal descrlpLlon over pnrL of Southeast • (IW-.Itcl In Section 4 (Affects Tax Lot '011 5. An easement created by lnstrurent, including the terms and provisions thereof, Dated t February 3r 1948 Recorded rebIoary lir 1946 voluner 291 Page€ 249 In•raVor Of; The California Oregon Po"r COlspnny (Over). : General description over Part- of Southeast - gua[Ler of section 4 lhffectc'Tax Lot 4011 ., . 6. An easement croated by instrumolitt Including tha Larms and ttrovisians thereof, Dated € October 10, 1961 Recorded February 20, 1962 Docu.ent Ila. 66-D6915 In Favor of€ The City of Ashland fit Northeastfeetcorner atby OLote1,ln Tax stock 400rlOak CreatCFnbdlvlrkiongand the running East 300 feet. 7. An easenent created by iueLtuxast, including the terms and 1:rOyisiOnn thereof, Dated, October 10, 1961 Recorded : February 20, 1962 volume: 521 Page: 7-71 , • In, Favor of; Tl€e City or Ashland Overt'20 feet over Tax Lot 110, 391114CA, and Tax Lot 401 39194D0; Deginntng 450 feet t:ast of the 11orthvest corner or Tax Lot 110 and tunning southerly and Easterly over said Rex Lota 110 and 401. C An easement created by Instrusentr including the terns and provisions thereof, _ Dated r August 76, 1976 RecorJed : Septemher 10, I976 Dotur,ent Lia. 76-15853 In Favor of; The City or hahland ' (Over) r East 10 feet of southerly 500 feet of Tax Lot 401 in 391E4DB 9.An easement created by iastrumentr including the terns and provisions thereat, Docurent Ila. 71-0909D In Favor oft TheCity of Ashland- For- t Sturm sever and draln title purposes over: 7.0 feet by 300 feet of Tax Lot 110, IMAICA1 Beginning at the Ilotkheant corner of Lot 1, Dlock 4 of oak CourL subdivision and running East 300 feet. lo.Ditch maintenance and upkeep agreement, including the teras and proviklons thereof, as evidenced byt Volume 140 Pages 607 s 608 Affects the tlortlr 271.75 feet of Tax Lot 110 In 391WA. ' ll.Ditch maintenauce and upkeep agreement, Including the teems and _ pn:ovlsione thereof, as eviclenceJ byr Volume: 163 Pagel 22 Affects the southerly 222.75 feet or the Vuttherly 445.so'reet of Tax Lot 110 in 391E4CA 12.An eaaerent created by inattunentt Including th_e terms and provisions ' thereof,. Dated r February 17, 1978 Recorded r February 21, 1978 Document Na. 70-03814 In Favor oft N i s Construction Inc. For r 15 foot slope easement along Lha Rest bovn4ary or S lvia Street an0 tlorth boundary of - Black 3 1n 51eai3Y itollov cutnitvislon yactson couaty,Ocegoa Recorded O..MCML RECORDS a M- 9 JUL -18-M8, �. CORM IIr., t1.s„r7 I X4514S.E.I M SECA T.3 i'S. R. I V. ib'AL 19WAIIH JAC K SL N C'ti'ii a yy i'Y A S I H ANN n:' is o 'i a i � r r m � r a wn� rwmn F ri 0.-o•r. 1 Y`' h6. 6c rYlth'F'I � !Jp 1 RI y u A " w„�u u c ta3at. ASI It AND Mk: 4 i W. yA N IVTax M�+��t TITLE COMPANY 10635231 TaxAccount #: 391E0413800401 Clinton 5t, Ashland OR 97520 This map/pl!at is being furnished as an aid in locating the herein described landin relation to adjoining streets, natural boundaries and other land, and is not a survey of the land depicted', Except to the extent a policy of title insurance is expressly modified by endorsement, if any, the company does not insure dimensions, distances, location of easements, acreage or other matters shown thereon. LLOW DR. 9 tUka � a�regrw c � w rs'"arys -, 401 `+ 1� Yw � C, r "4 iP IS+"fir, � � , � � Fauns d r.P FWD CP M5 ' C52AN ITOO r r � `a y,r 4 x w r lot,Nu r, p• d w441 PM re IBM A'o � hii, "+lAl' YM lr, Milk w r a ^' ,.o tr~�t ParceREA 10635231 TICOR TITLE CO MPMPA"Y Tax Account N 3911004131300401 345 Clinton St, Ashland OR 9750 This map/plat is being furnished as an aid in locating the herein described land it) relation to adjoining streets, natural boundaries and other land, and is not a survey of the land depicted, Except to the extent a policy of title insurance is expressly modified by endorsement, if any, the company does not insure dimensions, distances, location of easements, acreage or other matters shown thereon. Aerial Map Parcel ID: 10635231 TICOR TITLE COMPANY Sentry Dynamics, Inc. and its customers make no representations, warranties or conditions, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. Flood Map ParcelID: 10635231 ffil TICOR TITLE COMPANY Sentry Dynamics, Inc. and Its custorners make no representations, warranties or conditions, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. Contour Map 19 TICOR TITLE COiMPANY Parcel ID: 10635231 Sentry Dynamics, Inc. and its customers make no representations, warranties or conditions, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained @n this report. f Sail Map Parcel II]. 10635231 ICOR TITLE COMPANY Sentry Dynamics, line, and its customers make no representations, warranties or conditions, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. Zoning Map Parcel ID: 10635231 TICOR TITLE COMPANY Sentry Dynamics, Inc. and its customers make no representations, warranties or conditions, express or Implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of Information contained in this report. esn* 345 Clinton St, Ashland, Oregon, 97520 Prepared By Ticar Title Customer Service Ring Band: 0 - I rnile radius L,iWudc� dz.)01/5 2000-2010 20100 2010 Annual Rate Population 7,908 8,343 0.54% Households 3,664 4,183 1.33% Housing Units 3,949 4,699 1.75% Population Iby Race Number Percent Total 8,343 100.0% Population Reporting One Race 8,034 963% White 7,584 901.9% Black 88 L1% American Indian 69 0.8% Asian 168 2.0% Pacific Islander 17 0.2% some Other Race 108 1,311/a Population Reporting Two or More Races 309 3,70/a Total: Hlspanmc Population 381 4 , 6 0/a Population by Sex Male 3,813 45.7% Fernale 4,530 54.3% Population by Age Total 8,342 100.0% Age 0 -4 316 3.8% Age 5 - 9 399 4.8% Age 10- 14 393 4.7% Age 15 - 19 518 6.2% Age 20 - 24 681 8.2% Age 25 - 29 569 6.8% Age 30 - 34 460 5.5% Age 35 - 39 424 5.1% Age 40 - 44 430 5.2010 Age 45 - 49 493 5 .90/0 Age 50 - 54 633 7,6% Age 55 - 59 784 9.4% Age 60 - 64 728 8.7% Age 65 - 69 475 5.7% Age 70 - 74 314 3,8% Age 75 - 79 234 Mcl/b Age 80 - 84 210 2.5% Age 85+ 281 3.4% Age 18+ 6,953 833% Age 65-1- 1,514 18.1% Data Note: Hispanic population can be of any race. Census 2010 medians are computed from reported data distributions. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary Fele 1, Esri converted Census 2000 data into 2010 geography. April 27,2022 esr*i* MEMEMMEMMEMEM 345 Clinton St, Ashland, Oregon, 97520 Prepared By Ticor Title Customer Service Riing Band: 0 - I mile radius 11."fl:ituder d2A )0'1/1�1 I ongilijck,�: -t 32.7063:3 Households by Type 2,255 10010% Total 4,183 10010% Households with I Person 1,697 40.6% Households with 2+ People 2,486 59.4% Family Households 1,928 46.1% Husband -wife Families 1,359 32.5% With Own Children 435 10,40/a Other Family (No Spouse Present) 568 13.6% With Own Children 388 9.3% Nonfamily Households 558 13,30/0 All Households with Children 871 20.8°/o Multigenerational Households 38 0,9% Unmarried Partner Households 352 M% Male-female 301 7.2% Same-sex 51 1,2% Average Household Size 1,94 Family Households by Size Total 1,927 10010% 2 People 4o075 55,8% 3 People 454 23.6% 4 People 273 14.2% 5 People 85 4.4% 6 People 28 115% 7+ People 12 0.6% Average Family Size 2.59 Nonfamily Households by Size Total 2,255 10010% 1 Person 1,697 75.3% 2 People 413 18.3% 3 People 99 4.4% 4 people 35 1,6% 5 People 10 0,4% 6 People 0 0.0% 7+ People 1 010% Average Nonfamily Size 1,30 35,2% Population by Relationship and Household "Type Total 8,343 I0010% In Households 8,124 97.4% In Family Households 5,187 62.2% Householder 1,892 22.7% Spouse 1,342 16.1% Child 1,640 19.7% Other relative 127 1.5% Nonrelative 188 23% In Nonfamily Households 2,937 35,2% In Group Quarters 219 2,6% Institutionalized Population 24 0.3% Noninstitutionalized Population 195 23% Data Note: Households with children include any households with people under age 18, related or not. Multigenerational households are families with 3 or (nare parent-child relationships. Unmarried partner households are usually classirled as nonfamily households unless there is another member of the household related to the householder. Multigenerational and unmarried partner Kouseholds are reported only to the tract level, Esri esUrnated block group data, which Is used to estimate polygons or non-standard geography. Average family size excludes nonrelatives, Source; U.S, Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. April 27,2022 -Q(P') Fs" 11�igo 2 uf I 111 11 lill i! I � 1 111ii 1 1111111,11,1,101111 0§11 111!, J 11 i IN IN Ellin: esdir 345 Clinton St, Ashland, Oregon, 97520 Prepared By TJ Title Customer Service Ring Band: 0 - I mile radius '12,20-1/5 Longilludc122,/0633 Family Households by Age of Householder Total 4,184 1,927 100.00/1) Householder Age 15 - 44 613 31„8°/n Householder Age 45 - 54 422 21.9% Householder Age 55-64 465 24.1% Householder Age 65 - 74 252 13.1% Householder Age 75+ 175 9A% Nonfamily Households by Age of Householder Total 4,184 2,256 100.0% Householder Age 15 -44 788 34.9% Householder Age 45 -54 293 13,0% Householder Age 55 - 64 513 22.7% Householder Age 65 - 74 290 12.90/b Householder Age 75+ 372 16.5% Households by Race of Householder Total 4,184 100.0% Householder is White Alone 3,899 93.2% Householder is Black Alone 42 1.0% Householder is American Indian Alone 29 0.7% Householder is Asian Alone 66 Li Householder is Pacific Islander Alone 8 0.2% Householder is Some Other Race Alone 39 1 Householder is Two or J Races 101 2,4% Households with Hispanic Householder 142 3.4% Husband -wife Families by Race of Householder Total 1,360 100.0% Householder is White Alone 1,295 95.2% Householder is Black Alone 3 J Householder is American Indian Alone 6 0A% Householder is Aslan Alone 23 1.7% Householder Is Pacific Islander Alone 3 0.2% Householder is Some Other Race Alone 13 1.0% Householder is Two or More Races 17 1,20/0 Husband -wife Families with Hispanic Householder 38 2.8% Other Fail (No Spouse) by Race of Householder Total 568 100.00/0 Householder is White Alone 506 89.1% Householder is Black Alone 3 0.5% Householder is American Indian Alone 9 1,6% Householder is Asian Alone 13 2.3% Householder is Pacific Islander Alone 0 0.0% Householder is Some Other Race Alone 11 1,9% Householder Is Two or More Races 26 4.6% Other Families with Hispanic Householder 32 5,6% Nonfannily Households by Race of Householder Total 2,256 100.0% Householder is White Alone 2,099 93 l Householder is Black Alone 36 1.6% Householder is American Irl Alone 14 0.6% Householder is Asian Alone 30 13% Householder is Pacific Islander Alone 4 0.2% Householder is Some Other Race Alone 15 0.7% Householder is Two or More Races 58 2.6% Nonfamily Households voith Hispanic Householder 72 3,2% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 summary File 1. April 27, 2022 E ,, , 'j � a E4 esri* 345 Clinton St, Ashland, Oregon, 97520 Prepared By Ticor Title Customer Service Ring Band: 0 - 1 mile radius i,di itm)e! ^12.�.04/5 longiuv"ie: 122'Y(X'6'3 Total Housing Units by occupancy Total 4,677 100.0% Occupied Housing Units 4,183 89.4% Vacant Housing Units For Rent 127 2.7% Rented, not Occupied 12 0.30/a For sale only 67 1.4% Sold, not Occupied 17 0,4% For Seasonal/Recreational/Occasional Use 186 4.00% For Migrant Workers 0 0,0% other Vacant 85 1.8% Total Vacancy Rate 11.0% Households by Tenure and Mortgage Status Total 4,183 100,00/0 Owner Occupied 2,065 49.4% Owned with a Mortgage/Loan 1,320 31.6% Owned Free and Clear 745 17.80/0 Average Household Size 2.05 1.5% Renter Occupied 2,118 50.6% Average Household Size 1.84 0.6% Ow"er-occupled Housing Units by Race of Householder Total 2,065 10010% Householder is White Alone 1,993 96.5% Householder is Black Alone 3 0,1% Householder is American Indian Alone 9 0.4% Householder is Asian Alone 31 1.5% Householder Is Pacific Islander Alone 1 0.0% Householder is Some Other Race Alone 13 0.6% Householder is Two or More Races is 0.7% Owner -occupied Housing Units with Hispanic Householder 44 2.1% Renter -occupied HousIng Units by Race of Householder Total 2,118 100.0% Householder is White Alone 1,906 90.0% Householder is Black Alone 39 1.8% Householder Is American Indian Alone 19 0.9% Householder Is Asian Alone 36 1.7% Householder is Pacific Islander Alone 7 03% Householder is Some Other Race Alone 26 1.2% Householder Is Two or More, Races 85 4.0% Renter -occupied Housing Units with Hispanic Householder 98 4.6% Average Household Size by Race/Hispanic Origin of Householder Householder is White Alone 1.93 Householder is Black Alone 1,52 Householder is American Indian Alone 2,07 Householder Is Asian Alone 2.24 Householder is Pacific Islander Alone 2.50 Householder is Some Other Race Alone 2.59 Householder is Two or More Races 2.08 Householder Is Hispanic 2,12 Soumer U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 SurnrnM Re 1. April 27,2022 esri' 345 Clinton St, Ashland, Oregon, 97520 Ring Band: 0 - 1 mile radius TOTALS Total Population Total Households Total Hous+ng Units POPULATION AGE S+ YEARS BY SCHOOL ENROLLMENT Total Enrolled In school Enrolled in nursery school, preschool Public school Private school Enrolled in kindergarten Public school Private school Enrolled in grade 1 to grade 4 Public school Private school Enrolled in grade 5 to grade 8 Public school Private school Enrolled in grade 9 to grade 12 Public school Private school Enrolled in college undergraduate years Public school Private school Enrolled in graduate or professional school Public School P6vate school Not enrolled In school' POPULATION, AGE 65+ BY RELATIONSHIP AND HOUSEHOLD TYPE Total living in Households Living In Farnily Households Householder Spouse Parent Parent -in-law (other Relative Nonrelative Living In Nonfamily Households. Householder Non..relative Living, in Group Quarters Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2015-2019 Amer°ican Community Survey Reliability: high Lfl', mectunt, I low April 27, 2022 ;.1I?I� "" tl�sri I"i„i.. d ani ti3 Prepared By Ticar Title Customer Service 1 fSngfl kvfi.'.: I'))./0033 2015-2019 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(f) Reliability 8,525 371 4,320 174 I 4,917 175 8,411 100.00/0 367 1,714 20,40/a 154 j 72 0.90/0 32 7 0.10/a 30 65 0,8% 32 72 0.90/0 24 I' „ 72 0.9% 24 (I 1 0.0% 14 316 3.80/a 63 �� V 286 3.4% 64 ED 29 013%a 22 244 2.9% 57 I„ 233 2,80/a 59 11 0.1% 13 273 3.2% 55 � u 222, 2.6% 49 CSD 51 0.6% 34 645 7.7% 143 586 7.0% 132 59 0.7%a 45, 92 1.10/a 33 77 0.9% 31 15 0..20/1 15 6,697 79.6% 280 2,340 100.00/0 165 2,301 98.30/a 165 1,315 56.2% 133 737 31.5% 74 513 21.9% 69 22 0.9% 34 2 0.1% 8 34 1,50/0 30 7 0.3%a. 12 986 42.1,0% 125 938 40.1%® 109 48 2..1% 41 39 1.7% 24 � V Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2015-2019 Amer°ican Community Survey Reliability: high Lfl', mectunt, I low April 27, 2022 ;.1I?I� "" tl�sri I"i„i.. d ani ti3 Em Gesri* 1111!11 345 Clinton St, Ashland, Oregon, 97520 Prepared By Ticor Title Customer Service Ring Band: 0 - I mile radius Labtude kmglLudet 922J0033 2015-2019 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(*) Reliability HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE AND SIZE Family Households 1,910 44,2% 118 2 -Person 1,092 25,3% 93 3 -Person 380 818% 74 4 -Person 340 7.9% 52 S -Person 67 1 k%b 46 6 -Person 25 0.6% 24 7+ Person 6 0.10/0 13 Nonfamily Households 2,410 55.8% 176 1 -Person 1,883 43.6% 171 2 -Person 398 9.2% 96 3 -Person 101 2.3% 39 4 -Person 27 0,6% 30 5 -Person 0 0.0% 0 6 -Person 0 0.00/0 0 7+ Person 0 0.0% 0 HOUSEHOLDS BY PRESENCE OF PEOPLE UNDER IS YEARS BY HOUSEHOLD TYPE Households with one or more people under 18 years 664 15.4% 69 Family households 651 15.10/0 67 Married -couple family 401 9.3% 54 Male householder, no wife present 46 1.1% 22 Female householder, no husband present 204 4.7% 39 Nonfamily households 13 0.3% 21 Households with no people under 18 years 3,655 84.6% 187 "N Married -couple family 1,093 25.3% 107 Other family 165 3.8% 53 Nonfamily households 2,397 55.5% 175 HOUSEHOLDS BY PRESENCE OF PEOPLE 65 YEARS AND OVER, HOUSEHOLD SIZE AND HOUSEHOLD TYPE Households with Pop 65+ 1,836 42.5% 122 1 -Person 881 20.4% 108 24. Person Family 877 20.30/a 83 2+ Person Nonfamily 78 1.8% 42 Households with No Pop 65+ 2,484 57,5% 156 1 -Person 1,002 23.2% 139 2+ Person Family 1,032 23.9% 98 2+ Person Nonfamily 449 10,411/6 97 Source: U,S, Census Bureau, 2015-2019 American Community Survey Reliability: LW' high U1 medium I low April 27, 2022 Source:: U.S. Census bureau, 2015-2.019 American Community Survey ReRabilty: high 00 mediurn I low April 27, 20122 ,J202�� F°;11 Vagc "3, of 8 elesdi, 345 Clinton St, Ashland, Oregon, 97520 Prepared By Ticor Til Custorner Service Ring Band: 0 - I mile radius la6hidr ,; 12,)0,17S 2015-2019 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(+), Reliability POPULATION AGE S+ YEARS BY LANGUAGE SPOKEN AT HOME AND ABILITY TO SPEAK ENGLISH Total 8,336 100,0% 365 5 to 17 years Speak only English 775 9.3% 95 Speak Spanish 81 MM 53 Speak English "very well" or "well' 77 0,90/0 54 Speak English "riot well" 4 0.00/0 12 Speak English "not at al a 0.00/0 0 Speak other Indo-European languages 3 0.00/0 13 Speak English "very well" or "well' 3 0.00/0 13 Speak English "not well' 0 0100/0 0 Speak English "not at all" 0 0.00/0 0 Speak Asian and Pacific Island languages 0 0.0% 3 Speak English "very well" or "well' 0 0.00/0 3 Speak English "not well" 0 0.00/a 0 Speak English "not at all" 0 M% 0 Speak other languages 0 010% 0 Speak English "very well" or "well' 0 0.00/0 0 Speak English "not well" 0 0.0% 0 Speak English "not at all" 0 0.0% 0 18 to 64 years Speak only English 4,622 55.4% 324 LW Speak Spanish 267 3.2% 96 Speak English "very well" or "well"' 231 2.8% 87 Speak English "not well" 14 0,2% 19 Speak English "not at all" 22 0.3% 36 Speak other Indo-European languages 150 1.8% 51 Speak English "very well" or "well' 127 1.5% 48 Speak English "not well" 23 0.3% 35 Speak English "not at all' 0 010010 0 Speak Asian and Pacific island languages 70 0.8% 23 Speak English "very well" or "well' 68 0.80/0 23 Speak English "riot well" 1 10.0% 5 Speak English "not at all" 0 0.00/0 0 Speak other languages 27 0.3% 45 Speak English "very well" or "well" 27 0.3°/a 45 Speak English "not well" 0 0.0%0 0 Speak English "not at all" 0 0.00/0 0 65 years and over Speak only English 2,188 26,20/a 158 Speak Spanish 24 0.3% 35 Speak English "very well" or 'well" 0 0.0% 0 Speak English "not well" 24 0.3% 35 Speak English "not at all' 0 0.0% 0 Speak other Indo-European languages 73 0.9% 39 Speak English "very well' or "well' 64 0.8% 31 Speak English, "not well' 9 0.1010 14 Speak English "not at ail" 0 0.00/0 0 Speak Asian and Paclfx Island languages 55 0,70/a 38 Speak English "very well" or "well' 55 030/0 31 Ell Speak English "not well" 0 0.00/0 0 Speak English "not at all" 0 0.00/0 0 Speak other languages a 0.01/0 0 Speak English "very well" or 'well" 0 0.0% 0 Speak English "not well" 0 010% Speak English "not at all' 0 0.0% 0 Source:: U.S. Census bureau, 2015-2.019 American Community Survey ReRabilty: high 00 mediurn I low April 27, 20122 ,J202�� F°;11 Vagc "3, of 8 eesri' 345 Clinton St, Ashland, Oregon, 97520 Prepared By Ticor Title Customer Service Ring Band: 0 - I mile radius I;AJwdeIJ ,til^"615 1 om'*ud��: 1 22,7063�3 2015-2019 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±) Reliability WORKERS AGE 16+ YEARS IBY PLACE OF WORK Total 3,822 100.00/0 261 Worked In state and in county of residence 3,644 95.3% 259 Worked In state and outside county of residence 146 3,8% 107 Worked outside state of residence 32 0.8% 19 SEX BY CLASS OF WORKER FOR THE CIVILIAN EMPLOYED POPULATION 16 YEARS AND OVER Total: 3,957 100.0% 261 Mate: 1,962 49.6% 182 U Fmployee of private company 1,064 26.9% 147 Self-employed In own incorporated business 186 4,7% 47 Private not-for-profit wage and salary workers 147 3.7c% 37 Local government workers 102 2.6% 39 [0 State government workers 81 2.0% 35 Federal goverarnerit workers 13 0.3% 13 Self-employed in o%,jn tint incorporated business workers 368 9,3% 89 J Unpaid family workers 0 0.00/- 5 Female: 1,995 50.4% 154 1W Employee of private company 873 22.1% 114 Self-employed In own incorporated business 89 2.2% 32 Private not-for-profit wage and salary workers 410 10,4% 71 Local government workers 162 4,1% 34 State government workers 70 1.8% 21 Federal government workers 21 0.5% 22 Self-employed In own not Incorporated business workers 371 9.4% 74 Unpaid family workers 0 010% 0 POPULATION IN HOUSEHOLDS AND PRESENCE OF A COMPUTER Total 8,376 100.0% 371 Population <18 In Households 1,048 12.5% 99 Have a Computer 1,048 12.5% 106 Have NO Computer 0 0.00/0 0 Population 18-64 in Households 5,027 60.0% 322 Have a Computer 5,024 60.0% 322 Have NO Cornputer 4 0.0% 10 Population 65+ in Households 2,301 27,50/a 165 Have a Computer 2,093 25.0% 163 Have NO Computer 208 2.50/0 71 HOUSEHOLDS AND INTERNET SUBSCRIPTIONS Total 4,320 100.0% 174 With an Internet Subscription 3,953 91.5% 174 Dial -Up Alone 0 0.00/0 3 Broadband 3,600 833% 169 Satellite Service 147 3.4% 46 Other Service 42 1.00/0 28 Internet Access with no Subscription 103 2.40/c 57 With No Internet Access 264 6.1% 62 Source:: U.S. Census Bureau, 2015-2019 American Community Survey Reliability: E , W, high FSJ medium I low April 27, 2022 � ?(),12 1- �, u i Il'lqo 4 of 8 esri** emommma= MENNEN= 345 Clinton St, Ashland, Oregon, 97520 Prepared By Ticor Title Customer Service Ring Band: 0 - 1 mile radius L � i t i 1, �, j d 1),2 01 /5 i.(mg�tude: 22. �0611 2015-2019 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±) Reliability WORKERS AGE 16+ YEARS BY MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION TO WORK Total 3,822 100.0% 261 Drove alone 2,267 59.3% 181 carpooled 268 710% 73 Public transportation (excluding taxicab) 120 3.1% 74 Bus or trolley bus 120 3.1% 74 Light rail, streetcar or trolley 0 0.0% 0 Subway or elevated 0 0,0% 0 Long-distance/Commuter Train 0 0.0% 0 Ferryboat 0 0,00/5 0 Taxicab 0 0.00/0 0 Motorcycle 0 0,00/0 0 Bjcycle 165 4,30/a 59 Walked 397 10.4% 90 LEI other means 0 0.00/5 0 Worked at home 605 15.80/0 132 WORKERS AGE 16+ YEARS (WHO DID NOT WORK FROM HOME) BY TRAVEL TIME TO WORK Total 3,216 100.00/0 228 "N Less than 5 minutes 153, 4.80/5 54 �(1 5 to 9 m1nutes, 729 22.7% 107 LW 10, to 14 minutes 586 18.2% 112 15 to 19 minutes 328 10.20/a 57 20 to 24 minutes 365 11.30/, 61 L W11 25 to 29 minutes 257 8.0% 54 30 to 34 minutes 396 12.30/,,) 87 35 to 39 minutes 59 1.8% 28 40 to 44 minutes 63 2.09/. 22 45 to 59 minutes 227 7.1% 117 60 to 89 minutes 10 0. 3 9/b 21 90 or more MIMItes 42 1.30/a 30 Average Travel Time to Work (in minutes) N/A N/A FEMALES AGE 201-64 YEARS BY AGE OF OWN CHILDREN AND EMPLOYMENT STATUS Total 2,771 10010% 179 Own children under 6 years only 136 4.9% 47' In labor force 98 3.5% 37' Not in labor force 37 1.30/a 30 Own children urider 6 years and 6 to 17 years 70 2.50/a 21 In labor force 34 1.2% 21 Not In labor force 36 1.3% 19 Own children 6 to 17 years only 391 14.1% 54 In labor force 301 10.9% 47 Not in labor force 90 3.2'% 52 No own children under 18 years 2,175 78.5% 184 In labor force 1,476 53.3% 151 Net in labor force 699 25.2% 98 Source: U.S. census Bureau, 2015-2019 American Community Survey Reliability: UR high ffi medium I low AprH 27, 2022 ')?0;12 cs4i lloq(" of 8 esn" MEN= 345 Clinton St, Ashland, Oregon, 97520 Prepared By Ticor Title Customer Service Ring Band; 0 - 1 mile radius tri3Ohide: °12,2017'j 1_on+'Rude: -122 'Y7(,:33 2015-2019 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±) Reliability CIVILIAN NONINSTITUTIONALIZED POPULATION BY AGE &TYPES OF HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE Total 8,501 100.00/0 371 Under 19 years: 1,178 13.9% 132 One Type of Health Insurance: 1,088 12.80/0 129 Employer -Based Health ins only 425 5.0% 87 Direct -Purchase Health ins Only 171 2.00/0 42 Medicare Coverage Only 0 0..00/a 0 Medicafc! Coverage Only 491 5.8% 115 TRICARE/Military Hith Coy Only 1 0.00/0 37 VA Health Care Only 0 0,00/0 0 2+ Types of Health Insurance 25 0..30% 30 No Health Insurance Coverage 66 0,80/a 41 19 to 34 years: 1,538 18.10/0 227 One Type of Health Insurance: 1,246 14.7%a 197 Employer -Based Health Ins Only 786 9.20/0 181 Direct -Purchase Health Ins Only 218 2,60/. 11 Medicare Coverage Only 0 0.00/0 0 Medicaid Coverage Only 239 2.8% 56 TRICARE/Military Hlth Coy Only 3 0,00/0 13 VA Health Care Only 0 0100/0 0 2+ Types of Health Insurance 59 0,70/a 30 No Health Insurance Coverage 234 2.8% 87 35 to 64 years: 3,468 40.8% 222 One Type of Health Insurance: 2,849 33.5% 203 Employer -Based Health ins only 1,606 18.190/0 137 Direct -Purchase Health Ins Only 657 7.7% 91 Medicare Coverage Only 2 0.00/0 72 Medicaid Coverage Only 567 6.70/. 140 TRICARE/Milltary Hlth Coy Only 2 0.01/0 37 VA Health Care Only 16 0.2% 26 2+ Types of Health Insurance 235 2.8% 62 No Health Insurance Coverage 384 4.50/a 95 65+ years: 2,316 27.2% 165 One Type of Health Insurance: 810 9.50/0 119 Employer -Based Health Ins Only 51 0.6% 29 Direct -Purchase Health Ins Only 0 010% 0 Medicare Coverage Onilly 759 8,9% 118 TRICARE/Military Hlth Coy Only 0 0.00/0 0 VA Health Care Only 0 0.00/0 0 2+ Types of Health Insurance: 1,506 1717% 144 Employer -Based & Direct -Purchase Health Insurance 0 010% 0 Employer -Based Health & Medicare Insurance 362 4.3% 59 Direct -Purchase Health & Medicare Insurance 584 6.9% 99 Medicare & Medicaid Coverage 88 1.00/0 39 Other Private Health Insurance Combos 0 0,00/0 0 Other Public Health insurance Combos 15 0.20/0 36 Other Health Insurance Combinations 457 5.4% 78 No Health Insurance Coverage 0 0.0% 0 I W, Ed I W11 IM ED I I I I Source: U,S, Census Bureau, 2015-2019 American Community Survey Reliability: high medium I low April 27, 2022 Gesn" 345 Clinton St, Ashland, Oregon, 97520 Prepared By Ticor Title Customer Service Ring Band: 0 - I mile rad"sus Latilodo longn.ude� 1_0,706"33 2015-2019 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(:t) Reliability POPULATION BY RATIO OF INCOME10 POVERTY LEVEL Total 8,393 100.0% 371 U, Under.50 480 5.7% 130 C 11'"] '50 to '99 569 6.8% 94 1,00 to 1,24 486 518% 91 1.2.5 to 1,49 212 2.5% 63 1.50 to 1,84 443 5.3% 180 1.85 to 1,99 427 5.1% 265 all 2.00 and over 5,776 68.8% 312 CIVILIAN POPULATION AGE IS OR OLDER BY VETERAN STATUS Total 7,476 100.0% 343 Veteran 480 6.4% 81 Nonveteran 6,996 93.6% 327 Male 3,314 443% 223 Veteran 397 5.3% 75 Nonveteran 2,917 39.0% 217 L'W' Female 4,162 55.7% 203 IM Veteran, 83 1A% 35 U'l Nonveteran 4,079 5 4. 6 199 [W CIVILIAN VETERANS AGE 18 OR OLDER BY PERIOD OF MILITARY SERVICE Total 479 100.0% 81 Gulf War (9/01 or later), no Gulf War (8/90 to 8/01), no Vietnam Era 20 4.2% 24 Gulf War (9/01 or later) and Gulf War (8/90 to 8/01), no Vietnam Era 74 15.4% 46 Gulf War (9/01 or later), and Gulf War (8/90 to 8/01), and Vietnam Era 12 2.5% 21 Gulf War (8/90 to 8/01), no Vietnam Era 32 6,70/0 23 Gulf War (8/90 to 8/01) and Vietnam Era 11 2.,3% 19 Vietnam Era, no Korean War, no World War Il 172 35.9% 55 Vietnam Era and Korean War, no World War 11 0 0.00/0 0 Vietnam Era and Korean War and World War 11 a 0.00/0 0 Korean War, no Vietnam Era, no World War 11 32 6.7% 18 Korean, War and World War II, no Vietnam Era 0 0.011/0 0 World War 11, no Korean War, no Vietnam Era 4 0.8% 13 Between Gulf War and Vietnam Era only 65 13.6% 29 Between Vietnam Era and Korean War only 58 12.1% 30 Between Korean War and World War 11 only 0 0.0% 0 Pre -World War II only 0 0..0aJ0 0 HOUSEHOLDS IBY POVERTY STATUS Total 4,320 100X% 174 Income in the past 12 months below poverty level 579 13.4% 102 Married -couple family 29 0.7% it DO Other family - male householder (no wife present) 21 0,5% 19 Other family - female householder (no husband present) 31 0.7% 21 Nonfanilly household - male householder 144 3.3% 83 Nonfamily household - female householder 353 8.2% 75 E0 Income in the past 12 months at or above poverty level 3,741 86.6% 167 Married -couple family 1,465 33.90/0 110 Other family - male householder (no wife present) 66 1150/0 33 Other family - female householder (no husband present) 297 6,9%a 55 Nonfamily household - male householder 706 163% 110 Nonfamily household - female householder 1,2n7 27.9% 1.2,1 L W, Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2.015-2019 American Community Survey Reliability: U high [J] medium 0 low April 27, 2022 ,, � 20,",12 Fd i Rxy'/ jai �8 esirr 345 Clinton St, Ashland, Oregon, 97520 Prepared By Ticor Title Customer Service Ring Band: 0 - I mile radius I atihide: 't)'204 /5 Longlmde: -122,/063,3 2015-2019 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(±) Reliability HOUSEHOLDS BY OTHER INCOME Social Security Income 1,685 39.0% 126 No Social Security Income 2,635 61.0% 150 Retirement Income 1,190 27.5% 109 No Retirement Income 3,130 72.5% 172 ILI GROSS RENT AS A PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS <10%n of Income 53 2.7% 31 10-14.9% of Income 92 4.7% 55 15-1.9.9% of Income 151 7.6% 63 20-24,9% of Income 201 10.2% 3? 25-29.9% of Income 275 13.9% 63 30-34.9% of Income 179 9.1% 76 35-39.9% of Income 109 5.5% 46 40-49.9% of Income 246 12,4% 58 50+0% of Income 536 27.1% 101 Gross Rent % Inc Not Computed 133 6.7% 87 HOUSEHOLDS BY PUBLIC ASSISTANCE INCOME IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS Total 4,320 100.0% 174 With public assistance income 78 1.8% 33 No public assistance income, 4,242 98.2% 174 HOUSEHOLDS BY FOOD STAMPSISNAP STATUS Total 4,320 100.0% 174 With Food Stamps/SNAP 482 11.2% ?S With No Food Stamps/SNAP 3,837 88,80/0 181 HOUSEHOLDS BY DISABILITY STATUS Total With I+ Persons, w/CifsabilitV With No Person w/Disability 4,320 100.00/0 795 18.4% 3,524 81.6% 174 109 181 Data Note: N/A means not available. Population by Ratio of income to Poverty Level represents persons for whom poverty status is determined. Household hri represents income in 2017, adjusted for inflation. 2015-2019 ACS Estimate: The American Community Survey (ACS) replaces census sample data. Esrl is releasing the 2015-2019 ACS estimates, five-year period data collected monthly from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2019. Although the ACS includes many of the subjects previously covered by the decennial census sample, there are significant differences between the two surveys inciluding fundamental differences in survey design and residency rules. Margin of error (11i The MOE is a measure of the variability of the estimate due to sampling error. MOEs enable the data user to measure the range of uncertainty for each estimate with 90 percent confidence, The range of uncertainty is called the confidence interval, and it is calculated by taking the estimate +/- the MOE. For example, if the ACS reports an estimate of 100 with an MOE of +/- 20, then you can be 90 percent certain the value for the whole population falls between 80 and 120, Reliability: These symbols represent threshold values that Esri has established from the Coefficients of Variation (CV) to designate the usability of the estimates. The CV measures the amount of sampling error relative to the size of the estimate, expressed as a percentage. High Reliability; Small CVs (less than or equal to 12 percent) are flagged green to indicate that the sampling error is small relative to the estimate and the estimate is reasonably reliable. Medium Reliability: Estimates with CVs between 12 and 40 are flagged yeliow-ulse with caution, Low Reliability: Large CVs (over 40 percent) are flagged red to Indicate that the sampling error is large relative to the estimate, The estimate Is considered very unreliable. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2015.2019 American Community Survey Reliability: high M medium J low April 27, 2.022 � ,20 1 i lloq�" 8 �"f 8 eisri, 345 Clinton St, Ashland, Oregon, 97520 Ring Bands: 0-1 mile radii Prepared By Ticor Title Custorner Service J 2010 Residential Population: 8,343 2021 Total Sales ($000) $614,122 2021 Residential Population: 8,891 2021 Total Employees 6,315 2026 Residential Population: 9,195 Employee/Residential Population Raflo. 0.71:1 Annual Population Growth 2021 - 2026 0,67% Total Number of Businesses: 857 sic Distance From Code Business Name Franchise site In miles Employees Sales ($000) 273101 TAME PRE PRESS 0.19 SE 1 $135 PATTERSON ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 365103 TECH13TYI-E SOUND CO 0.19 SE 1 $233 PATTERSON ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 737801 TAME YOUR MAC 0.19 SE 1 $60 PATTERSON ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 999977 TERRIE MARTIN 0.20 SW 0 $0 OAK ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 874899 NOVAK CONSULTING LLC 0,20 SW 1 $78 CRISPIN ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 539901 MERCHANT OF MARVELS 0.20 Sw 2 $396 PATTERSON ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 594712 UNICORN GIFTS Ea TOYS 0.20 SW 4 $315 PATTERSON ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 412101 UBEP 0.21 SW 5 $198 OAK ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 999977 SOUTHARD PEGGY-DEE 0.23 SW 0 $0 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 573608 BELLWOOD VIOLIN 0,26 SE 1 $173 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 594141 UNITED BICYCLE TOOL SUPPLY LTD 0.26 SE 5 $804 WILLIAMSON WAY ASHLAND, OR 9,7520 753801 DAN WOLFF AUTO REPAIR 0.26 SE 2 $198 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 764109 ED'S UPHOLSTERY 0.27 SW 1 $45 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 599933 BIO SKIN 0.27 SW 2 $227 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 Datai Note: Businesses are listed based an their proximity to the study area location, A maximum of 250 records can be displayed on one report. Data on the Business Locations report is based on the businesses whose location falls within the area of study. Total Sales, Total Daytime Business PopulaUcn, Total Number of Businesses, and the Daytime Business (pop)/Residential Ratio are calculated using the collection of business points that fall within the area of study, Source: Copyright 2021 Data Axle and Esri, Esh Total Residential Population forecasts for 2021. Data Axle, Business Locations (Q4 2021), April 27, 2022 [ m i of 16 rig moms EM M mm� 345 Cliinton St, Ashland, Oregon, 97520 Prepared By Ticor Title Customer Service Ring Bands: 0-1 mile radii sic Distance From Code Business Name Franchise Site in Miles Employees Sales ($000) 233501 STUART GRAY STUDIO 0.27 SW 1 $87 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 999977 QUEST OVERLAND LLC 0.27 SW 0 $0 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 557106 ZEN ELECTRIC BIKES 0.27 SW 0 $0 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 275902 AZTECH SCREEN PRINTING -DESIGN 0.27 SW 1 $106 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 489903 SELTZER COMMUNICATION 0,27 SF 4 $1,346 N MOUNTAIN AVE ASHLAND, OR 97520 483201 KSKQ 2 0.27 SE 1 $52 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 999977 GALLI GROUP 0,27 SE 0 $0 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 999923 BELOVED MINERALS 0,27 SE 5 $0 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 804918 JACKSON COUNTY PHYSICAL TH RPY 0,27 SE 11 $752 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 152144 GOLDEN FIELDS CONSTRUCTION 0.27 NW 2 $695 OAK ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 999977 FUNCTIONAL BOTANICALS LLC 0.28 SE 0 $0 WILLIAMSON WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 721704 EAST -WEST ORIENTAL RUG CLEAN 0.28 SW 1 $77 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 472402 ROGUE TRAVEL 0.28 SW 1 $81 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 804918 JACKSON COUNTY PHYSICAL THRPY 0.28 SW 4 $274 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 653118 ABSOLUTE REALTY 0.28 SW 3 $301 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 872102 ROGUE ACCOUNTING 8+ TAX INC 0.28 SW 3 $330 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 Data Note, Businesses are fisted based on their proximity to the study area location. A maximum of 250 records can be displayed on one report, Data on the Business Locations, report Is based on the businesses whose location falls within the area of study, Total Sales, Total Daytime Business Population, Total Number of Businesses, and the Daytime Business (pop)/Residential Ratio are calculated using the collection of business points that fall within the area of study. Souirce: Copyright 2021 Data Axle and Esri, Esr! Total Residential Population forecasts for 2021, Data Axle Business Locations (Q4 2.021)�. April 27, 2022 01 345 Clinton St, Ashland, Oregon, 97520 Prepared By Ticor Title Customer Service Ring Bands: 0-1 mile radH lalkijd�': 1) )0'1/5 sic Distance From Code Business Name Franchise Site in Miles Employees Sales ($000) 729917 ROOTS MASSAGE 0,28 SW 1 $24 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 729917 JUDITH SANFORD CRANIAL 0.28 SW 1 $24 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 641198 WORK COMP -LESS INC SVC 0.28 SW 2 $261 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 581208 ABC KITCHEN 0.28 SW 7 $308 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 653108 LITHIA PROPERTY MANAGFMENT 0.28 SW 2 $201 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 999977 HEART MOUNTAIN LLC 0,28 SW 0 $0 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 999977 FREEDOM SOL LLC 0.28 SW 0 $0 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 653108 PFG PROP MGMT 0.28 SW 2 $201 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 273101 WHITE CLOUD PRESS 0.28 SW 5 $675 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 975201 679999 SCHILLER ENTERPRISES INC 0.28 SE 2 $663 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 738902 ATHENA INTERIORS LLC 0.28 NW 3 $233 OAK ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 354501 DARER CORP 0.29 SW 65 $6,135 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 399903 DRILL DOCTOR 0.29 SW 1 $118 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 999966 MW MOONEY & CO INC 0.29 SE 3 $0 WILLIAMSON WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 801101 MOONEY & CO 0.29 SE 5 $927 WILLIAMSON WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 729917 CHRYSALIS MASSAGE CLINIC 0,29 SW 5 $24 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97'520 Data Norte: Businesses are listed based on their p(oxiailLy to the study area location. A maximum of 250 records can be displayed on one report. Data on the Business Locations report is based on the businesses whose location falls vdtMn the area of study. Total Sales, Total Daytime Business Population, Totat Number of Businesses, and the Daytime Business (pop)/Residential Ratio are calculated using the collection of business points that fall Wthin the area of study. Source. Copyright 2021 Data Axle and Esri, Esrl Total Residential Population forecasts for 2021, Data Axle Business Locations, (Q4 2021). April 27, 2022 Gesr*i* 2`i"`:­:iI 1111 1111 '111 345 Clinton St, Ashland, Oregon, 97520 Prepared By Ticor Title Customer Service Ring Bands, 0-1 mile radii 42,2(015 Lt�otr�if�i�ley:-flti'�".�4.➢tla',E:I sic Distance Froin Cade Business Name Francitise site in Miles Employees sales ($000) 525115 TOGNAR TOOLWORKS 0.29 SW 6 $1,271 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 791101, ASHLAND DAN'CEWORKS 0.29 SW 1 $28 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 874899 PINNACLE CONSULTNG' & SVC INC 0.29 SW 2 $78 E HER5EY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 804942 VITTORIA HEALING ARTS 0.29 SW 7 $0 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR. 97520 999977 SANITEC'H LLC 0.30 SE 0 $0 WILLIAMSON WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 506315 MASSIF 0.30 SE 5 $4,204 WILLIAMSON WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 272.198 OWL CREEK PRESS 0.30 SE 4 $567 WILLIAMSON WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 871111 DOUGLAS ENGINEERING PACIFIC, 0.30 SE 3 $281 WILLIAMSON WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 809907 MONARQUE HEALTH & WELLNESS LLC 0.30 SW 9 $536 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 801.1.01 ASHLAND FAMILY HEALTH CARE PC FN 0.30 SE 4 $742 WILLIAMSON WAY ASHLAND,, OR 97520 801101 YASMIN MAL,DONADO MD LLC 0.30 SE 3 $0 WILLIAMSON WAY ASHLAND, OR 9752.0 799951 NORTH MOUNTAIN PARK NATURE CTR 0.31 SE 4 $0 N MOUNTAIN AVE ASHLAND, OR 97520 822298 UNITED BICYCLE INSTITUTE 0.31 SE 6 $0 WILLIAMSON WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 999977 RIDE ROGUE VALLEY MTB COACHING 0.31 SE 0 $0 WILLIAMSON WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 274105 BELOVED PUBLICATIONS 0.32 SE 1 $91 PARK RIDGE PL ASHLAND, OR 97520 599969 HOUSTON'S CUSTOM FRAMING -FINE 0„32 SW 2 $227 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 Data Note: Businesses are listed based on their proximity to the study area location, A maximum of 250 records can be displayed on one report. Data on the Business Locations report its based on the businesses whose location falls within the area of study. Total Sales, Total Daytinne Business Population, Total Number of Businesses, and the Daytime Business (pop)/Residential Ratio are calculated using the collection of business points that fall within the area of study„ Source: Copyright 2021 Data Axile and Esri. Esri Total Residential population forecasts for 2021. Data Axle Business Locatfons (Q4 2021). April 27, 2022 (,2022 i Mri ; of 16 , ;?0),. C's I I Paqo 5 (A 16 esri" 345 Clinton St, Ashland, Oregon, 97520 Prepared By Ticar Title Customer Service Ring Bands: 0-1 mile radii I aLRuch'; '1:).)0'1/5 Lunoitljde� 12)AiWi3 sic Distance From Code Business Name Franchise Site in Miles Employees Sales ($000) 799982 LE CIRQUE CTR 0.32 SW 2 $133 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 999977 SPARK FRAMES 0.32 SW 0 $0 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 791101 ASHLAND ECSTATIC DANCE LLC 0.32 SW 1 $28 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 729931 ASHLAND ELECTROLYSIS 0.32 SW 1 $24 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 628203 RAYMOND JAMES R 0.32 SW 5 $1,481 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 804101 WELL SPRING CTR FOR BODY BLINC 0.32 SW 7 $698 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 801104 GOLDEN WAY CLINIC INC 0,32 SW 8 $1,483 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 804913 CLEAR CREEK HEALING ARTS 0,32 SW 3 $206 CLEAR CREEK DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 999977 AMMA ROSAVALON 0.33 SW 0 $0 CLEAR CREEK DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 999977 SELIN PETROSIAN CLINICAL 0.33 SW 0 $0 CLEAR CREEK DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 571201 REGENESIS ECOLOGICAL DESIGN 0.33 NW 12 $1,754 OAK ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 872103 EXCEL MEDICAL BILLING 0.33 SW 4 $440 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 873303 COURAGEOUS HEART FOUNDATION 0.33 SW 4 $0 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 832228 ALLEGRO HOMES REFERRAL 0.33 SW 6 $264 F HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 506336 SULA TECHNOLOGIES 0,33 SW 1 $841 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 871301 POLARIS LAND SURVEYING LLC 0.33 SW 2 $168 CLEAR CREEK DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 Data Note: Businesses are listed based on their prox4nity to the study area iocation. A maximum of 250 records can be displayed on one report, Data on the Business Locations report Is based on the businesses whose location, falls within the area, of study. Total Sales, Total Daytime Business Population, Total Number of Businesses, and the Daytime Business (pop)/Residential Ratio are calculated using the collection of business points that fail within the area or study. Sources Copyright 2021 Data Axle and Esri, Esd Total! Residential Population forecasts for 2021, Data Axle Business Locations (Q4 2021). Aprfl 27, 2022 , ;?0),. C's I I Paqo 5 (A 16 EM (&esr*i* b - 111i sa 345 Clinton St, Ashland, Oregon, 97520 Prepared By Ticor Title Customer Service, Ring Bands: 0-1 mile radii L c�tiju 1 b 2, i'l /5 I_t',rrtriit�lul¢v^:-iJr,.�d'NfL:,3 Sic Distance From Code Business Nance Franchise Site in Mlles Employees Sales ($000) 999977 ECOPIGGY 0.34 SW 0 $0 E HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 172101 TOBIAS COOK PAINTING CO 0.34 NE 2 $259 PLUM RIDGE DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 569913 MASSIF MOUNTAIN GEAR CO LLC 0.34 SW 35 $4,337 OAK ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 999966 SAMT'ECH LLC 034 SW 4 $0 OAK ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 873303 LEELA FOUNDATION 0.34 SW 6 $0 HELMAN ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 999966 FLOWJO LLC 0.35 SE 36 $0 WILLIAMSON WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 596102 TREE STAR INC 0.35 SE 2 $1,761 WILLIAMSON WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 723106 LOTUS HAIR BODY & SOUL 0.35 NE 3 $123 FAIR OAKS AVE ASHLAND, OR 97520 507405 TRUE SOUTH SOLAR 0.35 SW 1 $1,017 CLEAR CREEK DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 873303 GANGAJI FOUNDATION 0.36 SW 3 $0 HELMAN ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 871202 RICHEY BRUCE ARCHITECT AIA 0.37 SW 1 $95 CLEAR CREEK DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 839998 DBT CENTER OF SOUTHERN OREGON 0.37 SW 4 $0 CLEAR CREEK DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 811103 SAMANTHA D MALLOY PC HNRS 0.37 SW 3 $547 CLEAR CREEK DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 15210,3 GOLDEN -FIELDS CONSTRUCTION 0.37 SW 6 $2,084 CLEAR CREEK DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 809907 RUDER JANET L 0.37 SW 3 $536 CLEAR CREEK DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 8011.04 NORTHWEST MEMORY CTR 0.37 SW 8 $1,483 CLEAR CREEK DR. ASHLAND, OR, 97520 Data Note: Businesses are listed based on their proximity to the study area location.. A maximum of 2541 records can be dispRayed on one report. Data on the Business Locations report is based on the businesses whose location falls within the area of study. Total Sales, Total Daytime Business Population, Total Number of Businesses, and the Daytime Business (perp)/Residential Ratio are calculated using the collection of business points that fall within the area of study, Source: Copyrdght. 2021. Data Axle and Esd. Esrr Total Residential Population forecasts for 2021. Data Axie Business Locations (Q4 2421). April 27, 2022 170?" E ori esr*i* 345 Chriton St, Ashland, Oregon, 97520 Prepared By Ticor Title Custorner Service Ring Bands: 0-1 mile radii 122J0633 sic Distance From Code Business Name Franchise Site in Miles Employees Sales ($000) 729917 HOLLY HUTCHISON HEALING MSSG 0.37 SW 1 $24 CLEAR CREEK DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 832201 AUTHENTIC ESSENCE COUNSELING 0.3,7 SW 6 $264 CLEAR CREEK DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 811103 ROGUE FAMILY LAW 0.37 SW 3 $547 CLEAR CREEK DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 804922 PATRICIA L MONTOYA PSY D LLC 037 SW 1 $0 CLEAR CREEK DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 5499.13 EVES HERBS 0,37 NW 2 $136 OAK MEADOWS PL ASHLAND, OR 97520 804101 DAVID CAMPANELLA 0.37 NW 2 $200 OAK MEADOWS PL ASHLAND, OR 97520 866107 ASHLAND CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP F 0.38 SW 15 $0 W MERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 651.301 ASSOCIATION DOMUS CONDOMINIUM 0.39 SIN 2 $203 CLEAR CREEK DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 804913 CENTER FOR TRADIATION CHINESE 0,39 SW 2 $137 CLEAR CREEK DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 152112 PORCHLIGHT HOMES 0.39 NE 1 $348 PATTON LN ASHLAND, OR 97520 804946 NORTHWEST ALTERNATIVE HEALTH 0,39 SW 3 $206 CLEAR CREEK DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 804946 ASHLAND ALTERNATIVE HEALTH 0.39 SW 3 $206 CLEAR CREEK DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 871111 CIOTA ENGINEERING 0.39 SW 1 $94 CLEAR CREEK DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 621105 SAVAGE & CO WEALTH MGMT LLC 0.40 SW 1 $5601 CLEAR CREEK DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 628205 SAVAGE CO WEALTH MANAGEMENT 0.40 SW 2 $593 CLEAR CREEK DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 999977 GRENAVE 0.40 SW 0 $0 OHIO ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 Data Note: Businesses are listed based on their proximity to the study area iDcation. A rnax4nuni of 250 records can be displayed on one report, Data on the Business Locations report is based on the businesses whose location falls within the, area of study. Total Sales, Total Daytime Business Population, Total Number of Businesses, and the Daytime Business (pop)/Residential Ratio are calculated using the collection of business points that fall within the area of study. Source: Copyright 2.021 Data Axle and Esd. Esd Total ResEdentjal Population forecasts for 2021, Data Axle Bustness Locations (Q4 2021). April 27, 2022 "M) Fsli floq'� of t6 eisiri" m 345 Clinton, St, Ashland, Oregon, 97520 Prepared By Ticor Tkle Customer Service Ring Bands: 0-1 mile radii IaUllldl': 42. )01/' sic Distance From Code Business Nanne Franchise Site In Miles Employees Sales ($000) 521142 ASHLAND LUMBER CO INC 0.40 SW 8 $2,453 OAK ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 804918 DIRECT PHYSICAL THERAPY LLP 0.42 NE 4 $274 PATTON LN ASHLAND, OR 97520 832282 ASHLAND CENTER FOR COUPLES LLC 01.42 SE 6 $264 RUSSELL ST ASHLAND, OR 975201 799928 FLY WATER TRAVEL 0,42 SE 12 $795 RUSSELL ST ASHLAND, OR 9,7520 628205 BALL JONES GOWEN INC 0L42 SE 3 $889 RUSSELL ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 653118 MADELINE HILL REALTY 0.43 NE 5 $5011 MOUNTAIN MEADOWS DR ASHLAND, Oft 97520 805904 MOUNTAIN MEADOWS REALTY 0.43 NE 2 $155 MOUNTAIN MEADOWS DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 152103 KEN KRUMDIECK INC 0.43 SW 7 $2,432 HELMAN ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 804913 SAGE MEDICINE 0,43 SW 2 $137 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 802101 JONES FAMILY DENTAL 2 0.43 SW 7 $911 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 334104 ASHLAND INDEPENDENT FILM FSTVL 0.43 SW 1 $782 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 804913 ASHLAND HOLISTIC HEALTH 0.43 SW 5 $342 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 999977 ACUHUB 0.43 SW 4 $0 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 832221 ERIN KELLER LCSW 0.43 SW 6 $264 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 598406 AMERICAS PROPANE EXCHANGE 0.43 SW 0 $0 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 519115 GRANGE COOPERATIVE 0.43 SW to $15,537 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 Data Note: Businesses are listed based an I proximity to the Study area location.. A rnaxirnurl of 250 records can be displayed on one report. Data on the Business Locations report Is based on the businesses whose Location falls within the area of study, Total Sales, Total Daytime Business Population, Total Number of Businesses, and the Daytirne Business (pop)/Residential Ratio are calculated using the collection of business points that fall within the area of study, Source: Copyright 2021 Data Axle and Esri, Esri Total Residential Population forecasts for 2021, Data Axle Business Locations (Q4 2021). April 27, 2022 lo q'2 8 o`l 6, I MORRIS! esn'IM 345 Clinton St, Ashland, Oregon, 97520 Prepared By Ticar TWe Customer Service Ring Bands: 0-1 mile radii ialtk,udoe SIC Distance From Code Business Name Franchise Site in, Miles Employees' sales ($000) 274105 CASHFLOW HEAVEN PUBLISHING 0.44 NE 1 $271 F NEVADA ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 839998 CRATER LAKE NATL PARK TRUST 0.44 NW 0 $o EASTBROOK WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 171.105 LATHAM PLUMBING 0.44 NW 2 $259 OAK ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 525104 ASHLAND GENERAL HARDWARE 0.44 SW 23 $4,871 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 152103 IOVICK CONSTRUCTION LCC 0.44 SW 4 $1,390 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 999977 SIMPLE LLC 0.44 SW 3 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 598406 BLUE RHINO H 0,44 SW 0 $o A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 628205 A STREET FINANCIAL ADVISORS 0.45 SW 3 $889 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 594141 PICCADILLY CYCLES 0.45 SW 4 $643 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 628203 LPL FINANCIAL 0.45 SW 2 $593 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 809907 ELEMENTS OF HEALTH OREGON LLC 0,45 SW 5 $892 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 809907 SUNNY DAY HEALTH LLC 0.45 SW 3 $536 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 177105 ASHLAND CONSTRUCTION -SOUTHERN 0.45 SW 9 $1,164 WATER ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 809907 NATURA HEALTH PRODUCTS INC 0.45 SE 6 $1,071 RUSSELL ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 873303 MEDERI FOUNDATION 0.45 SE 11 $0 RUSSELL ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 809909 CENTRE FOR NATURAL HEALING 0.45 SE 7 $1,249 RUSSELL ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 Data Note: Businesses are listed based on their proximity to the study area location, A maximum of 250 records can be displayed on one roport. Data on the Business Locations report is based on the businesses whose location fall's within the area of study, Total Sales, Total Daytime Business Population, Total Number of Businesses, and the Daytime Business (pop)/Residential Ratio are calculated using the collection of business points that fall within the area of study, Source: Copyright 2021 Data Axle and Berl, Esri Total Residential Population forecasts for 2021. Data Axle Business Locations (Q4 2021). April 27, 2.022 11 esri* 345 Clinton St, Ashland, Oregon, 97520 Prepared By Ticar Title Customer Service Ring Bands: 0-1 mile radii '1").'104/5 lowlitude! -12,-),/0633 SIG Distance From Code Business Nanne Franchise Site in Miles Employees Sales ($000) 809907 NATURA HEALTH PRODUCTS 0.45 SE 3 $536 RUSSELL ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 653141 BOOKAIRHOP 0,45 SE 1 $101 RUSSELL ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 651303 ACME SUITES 0.45 SE 2 $203 RUSSELL ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 729901 OSTEOSTRONG 0,45 SE 3 $536 RUSSELL ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 809907 PLEXIS HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS INC 0.4s SW 105 $18,727 OAK ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 628203 RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL SVC 0.45 SW 2 $593 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 737206 METAMORPHO-SYS 0.45 SW 3 $720 AST ASHLAND, OR 97.520 871298 KISTLER SMALL WHITE ARCHITECTS 0.45 SW 3 $284 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 804913 SUZANNE E SKY L AC MTOM 0.45 SW 2 $137 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 653118 PATTIE MILLEN JOHN L SCOTT 0.45 SW 4 $401 AST ASHLAND, OR 97520 628203 RAYMOND JAMES R 0.45, SW 2 $0 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 999977 VERDE VILLAGE 0.45 NW 0 $0 HELMAN ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 243401 NEW HORIZONS WOODWORKS 0.45 SW 18 $969 HELMAN ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 074201 A STREET ANIMAL CLINIC 0.45 SIM 3 $250 AST ASHLAND, OR 97520 804918 MOVING INTO HARMONY INC 0,45 SW 4 $274 A ST' ASHLAND, OR 97520 866110 INTEGRATED HEALTH CARE MNSTRS 0.45 SW 0 $0 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 Data Note: Businesses are listed based on their proximity to the study area location. A rnaxfirnum of 250 records can be displayed on one report, Data on the Business LocaUons report is based on the businesses whose location (ails within the area of study. TotaT Sales, Total Daytime Business Population, Total Number of Businesses, and the Daytime Business (pop)/Residential RaUo are calculated using the collection of business points that fall within (lie area of study, Source; Copyright 2021 Data Axle and EsH. Esrf Total Residential Population forecasts for 2021. Data Axle Business Locations (Q4 2021), April 27, 2022 +,20? 2 1- Paqo 10 of U, 111 J 1 �lil,iiiii III IN I I'll 1! 1: migil Is 1111 iii at 1 ii 111i eeisri, 0, a Z a 345 Clinton St, Ashland, Oregon, 97520 Prepared By Ticor Title Customer Service Ring Bands: 0-1 mile radii I r u t o i I j d I In: ,, '") 017,-) 0cu)010'udo� -42'./063'31 SIG Distance From Code Business, Name Franchise Site in Miles Employees Sales ($0001) 801101 LISA BAILEY MD LLC X 0.45 SW 0 $0 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 999966 KRAMER & CO 0.45 SW 4 $0 N LAUREL ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 799101 CROSSFIT INCONCEIVABLE 6 0.46 SW 4 $151 W HERSEY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 821103 HELMAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EKN 0.46 NW 38 $0 HELMAN ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 799949 ASHLAND YOGA CTR 0.46 SW 6 $332 4TH ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 641112 ASHLAND INSURANCE INC )% 0.46 SE 9 $1,171 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 999977 ARK I TEK 0.46 SW 0 $0 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 614101 PAWN LOAN LLC 0.46 SW 3 $1,519 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 506507 LITHIA SOUND 0.46 SW 1 $1,316 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 599502 CLEAR LIGHT OPTICAL 0.46 SW 2 $170 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 599929 WELLNESS PET SUPPLIES 0.46 SW 4 $454 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 829918 RHYTHMSOUL DRUMMING 0.46 NW 1 $0 N LAUREL ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 722101 BRISCOE PHOTOGRAPHY 0.46 SW 1 $31 4TH ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 653,118 COMMUNITY RESALES ASSOC 046 SW 3 $301 4TH ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 999977 GROW2GIVE LLC 0.46 SW 0 $0 4TH ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 594709 OLD WORLD ARTIFACTS 0.46 SW 2 $158 4TH ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 Datai Note: Businesses are listed based on their proximity to the study area location. A maximum of 250 records can he displayed on one report. Data an the Business Locations report is based on the businesses whose location falls within the area of study, Total Sales, Total Daytime Business Population, Total Number of Businesses, and the Daytime Business (pop)/Residential Ratio are calculated using the collection of business points that fall within the area of study. Source: Copyright 2021 Data Axle and Fsri. Esd Total Residential Population forecasts for 2021. Data Axle Business Locations (Q4 2021). April 27, 2022 (A 6 eisri" mm- a • 345 Clinton St, Ashland, Oregon, 97520 Prepared By Ticar Title CLIStomer Service Ring Bands: 0-1 mile radii sic Distance From Code Business Name Franchise Site in Miles Employees Sales ($000) 999977 COLE STANTION LLC 0.46 SW 0 $0 4TH ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 799107 ASHLAND PRIVATE PILATES 0.46 SW 2 $76 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 791101 COMMUNITY DANCE SCHOOL 0.46 SW 1 $28 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 599927 ASHLAND CUSTOM FRAME 0.46 SW 2 $227 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 799972 GATHERING GLASS STUDIO 0.46 SW 4 $265 N PIONEER ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 999977 MAGFAN USA 0.46 SW 0 $0 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 733603 STUDIO AB 0,46 SE 1 $64 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 571210 SHEPHERD'S DREAM LLC 0,46 SE 4 $585 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 513603 YALA 0.46 SW 14 $15,972 HELMAN ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 873111 LOMAKATS1 RESTORATION PROJECT 0.46 SW 4 $0 HELMAN ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 399903 DESALVO CUSTOM CYCLES 0.46 SW 1 $118 HELMAN ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 514905 MATE REVOLUTIONS INC 0.46 SW 3 $3,611 HELMAN ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 799945 BLADE & FIST MARTIAL ARTS 0,46 SW 1 $67 HELMAN ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 762927 ECONOMY PLUMBING INC 0.47 SW 2 $104 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 653108 ALLENORTH PROPERTIES 0,47 SW 3 $301 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 729101 C A O'CONNOR TAX SVC 0.47 SW 2 $69 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 Data N'ote: Businesses are listed based on their proximity to the study area location. A maximurn of 250 records can be displayed on one report. Data an the Business Locations report is based on the businesses whose location falhs within the area of study. Total Sa$es, Total Daytime Business Population, Total Number of Businesses, and the Daytime Business (pop)/Residential RaUo are calculated using the collection of business points that fall within the area of study. Source: Copyright 2021 Data Axle and Esri, Esri Total Residential Population forecasts for 2021. Data Axle Business Locations (Q4 2021), April 27,2022 ,20?2 Lsio 1 "7:,,- l ,, rjf Ii es,r*i* m a 345 Clinton St, Ashland, Oregon, 9752.0 Prepared By Ticor Title Ctistomer Service Rind Bands: 0-1 mile radiiw I 'Akmjd 22(Yll"S Cangilode^: ..l)),,fC)ti"13 sic [Distance From Cotte Business Name Franchise Site In Mlles Employees Sales ($000) 762207 AURALTECHNOLOGY 0.47 SW 1 $42 AST ASHLAND, OR 97520 811103 EMIGRANT LAKE LLC 0.47 SW 3 $547 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 534901 ]MW SALES INC 0,47 SW 3 $594 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 503202 BLUE MARBLE 0,47 SW 4 $2,552 AST ASHLAND, OR 97520 205198 LA BAGUETTE/HARDWARECAF'E 0,.47 SW 8 '$1,699 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 594113 GET' N GEAR, 0.47 SW 1 $161 AST ASHLAND, OR 97520 999971 MASSIF MOUNTAIN GEAR 0.47 SW 0 $0 AST ASHLAND, OR 97520 871301 TERRASURVEY INC 0.47 SW 3 .$252 4TH ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 871106 CIOTA ENGINEERING 0.47 SW 1 $94 4TH ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 733603 CARTERWORKS 0.47 NW 1 $64 MOUNTAIN VIEW DR ASHLAND, OR 47520 581208 COQUINA 0.47 SW 7 $308 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 999977 DEL MAR GROUP LLC 0.47 SW 0 $0 A ST ASHLAND,, OR 97520 489903 INSTITUTE FOR COMMS RESOURCES 0.47 SW 4 $1,346 AST ASHLAND, OR 97520 628205 RETIREMENT PLANNING 0.47 SE 5 $1,481 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 593201 ROUGE VALLEY FREE 0.47 SW 5 $1,992 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 781902 MEDIA 14 PRODUCTIONS 0.47 SW 1 $89 AST ASHLAND', OR 97520 Data Note: Businesses are listed based on their prox°mit;r to the study area location, A maximum of 250 records can be displayed on one. report. Data on the Business Locations report is based on the businesses whose location falls within the area of study, Total Sales, Total Daytime Business Population, Total Number of Businesses, and the Daytime Business (pop)/Residential Ratio are calculated using the collection of business points that fall within the area of study. Source: Copyright 2021,Data Axle and Fsri,, Esri Total Residential Papulation forecasts for 2021, Data Axle Business Locations (Q4 2021), April 27, 2022 l sri k'cfcP 0 M LC, el esr*i* 345 Clinton St, Ashland, Oregon, 97520 Prepared By Ticor Title Customer Service Ring Bands: 0-1 rnfle radii 41,1-)0,1/1� Lunqftudc: -I J2. /Oh3 1' sic Distance From Code Business Name Franchise Site in Miles Employees Sales 444902 A STREET PRINT & PARCEL 0.47 SW 1 $316 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 999977 AUTHENTIC HEALING 0.47 SW 0 $0 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 722121 30SEPH LINASCHKE PHOTOGRAPHY 0.47 SW 1 $31 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 593217 ASHLAND RECYCLED FURNITURE 0.47 SW 2 $797 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 729943 GALAXY INK TATTOOS 13.47 SW 1 $24 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 734904 CLEANING CREW LLC 0.47 SW 1 $84 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 821103 GOLDEN DRAGON ELEMENTARY E 0,47 SW 55 $0 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 999977 HILLSTATION 0.47 SW 0 $0 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 861102 HOLISTIC SCIENCE INSTITUTE 0.47 SW 3 $0 A ST ASHLAND, OR 975,20 809909 EMBODY HEALING CTR 0.47 SW 7 $1,249 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 999977 SONIC ALCHEMY U 0.47 SW 0 $0 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 829959 CIFIT LLC 0,47 SW 0 $0 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 753201 SOUTH VALLEY AUTOBODY & REPAIR 0.47 SW 3 $362 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 174301 TILE & STONE DESIGN CTR INC 0,47 SW 2 $259 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 549922 NOBLE COFFEE ROASTING 0.47 SW a $541 4TH ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 5661,01 URBAN SKETCHERS OF SOUTHERN OR 0.47 SW 2 $298 4TH ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 Data Note: Businesses are listed based on their prol to the study area location, A maximum of 250 records can be displayed on one report, Data an the Business Locations report. Is based on the businesses whose location, fats within the area of study. Total Sales, Total Daytime Business Population, Total Number of Businesses, and the Daytime Business (pop)/Residential Ratio are calculated using the collection of business points that fall within the area of study, Source: Copyright 2021 Data Axle and Esri, Esrj Total Residential Popu9aVon forecasts for 20,21, Data Axle Business Locations (Q4 2021)v April 27, 2022 I l sl[I RiJ,l 14 0 ll", • Oesn' owwommic, I 1 SEEM! 01 jill'11111 !11 i ii i I ill iiiiii'loommom sililliIiiiII1111111111M 345 Clinton St, Ashland, Oregon, 97520 Prepared By Ticar Title Customer Service Ring Bands: 0-1 mile radii 0.2047" sic Distance From Code Business Name Franchise! Site in Miles Employees sales ($000) 839998 LOMAKATS1 RESTORATION 0.48 SW Is $0 VAN NESS AVE ASHLAND, OR 97520 641112 AMERICAN FAMILY INSURANCE )8 0.48 SE 3 $391 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 152.103 8ROOKSEA CONSTRUCIO,N LLC 0,48 NW 2 $695 IN LAUREL ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 653118 CARLSON PROPERTIES 0.48 SIN 3 $301 4TH ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 802101 ASHLAND DENTAL & ORAL HEALTH 2 0.48 SE 7 $911 5TH ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 802101 DR DANIEL DEWEY JACKSON DDS 2 0.48 SE 6 $781 5TH ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 723106 LEON DANIELLE HAIR CUTTERS 0.48 SE 3 $123 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 723106 LINDA& VON DA AT STRANDS 0.48 SE 5 $205 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 799949 ROSE YOGA CTR 0.48 SE 3 $199 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 722101 PAM DANIELLE PHOTOGRAPHY 0.48 SE 3 $93 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 799101 SNAP FITNESS S 0.48 SW 2 $76 OAK ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 864108 SISKIYOU MOUNTAIN CLUB 0.48 SW 1 $0 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 555111 INDIGO CREEK OUTFITTERS 0.48 SW 4 $1,231 OAK ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 736103 GOODWILL 30B CONNECTION CTR 0.48 SW 1 $40 OAK ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 799949 EMERGE HOT YOGA 0.48 SW 3 $199 OAK ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 599201 DRI FLOWER LLC 0.48 SW 4 $316 OAK ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 Data Note:: Businesses are listed based on their proximity to the study area location, A maximum of 250 records can be displayed on one report. Data an the Business Locations report is based on the businesses whose location rails within the area of study. Total Sales, Total Daytime Business Population, Total Number of Businesses, and the Daytime Business (pop)/Residential Ratio are ca[ClLflatedl Using the collection of business points that fair within the area of study. Source: Copyright 2021 Data Axle and Earl. Esri Total Residential Population forecasts for 2021, Data Axle Business Locations (Q4 2021). April 27, 2022 oe'WN' Lsfi Voq'� 1,; cA 16 *i* i 1 0 345 Clinton St, Ashland, Oregon, 97520 Prepared By Tl[cor Title Customer Service Ring Bands: 0-1 mile radii I d�llkiijd sic Distance From Code Business Name Franchise! Site in Miles Employees Sales ($0001): 581208 FOUR & TWENTY BLACKBIRDS 0.48 SIN 3 $132 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 549913 BANYAN BOTANICALS 0.48 SE 5 $338 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 866107 CHURCH THE HOLY LIGHT -THE QN 1 0.48 SE 2 $0 A ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 581208 PEERLESS RESTAURANT 0.49 SW 14 $615 4TH ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 171105 SOS PLUMBING 0.49 SW 3 $388 WATER ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 738902 REVIVE HOME DECOR 0,49 SW 3 $233 4TH ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 999977 LIVING TECHNOLOGIES 0.49 SW 0 $0 N IST ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 549935 ASHLAND FOOD CO-OP 0.49 SW 120 $8,112 N 1ST ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 836105 SKYLARK ASSISTED LIVING l NE 73 $0 SKYLARK Pl- ASHLAND, OR 97520 804918 AUTHENTIC HEALING 0,50 SW 2 $137 N LAUREL ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 599961 DELUXE AWNING CO 0.50 SW 7 $795 4TH ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 729943 MORI INK 0.50 SW 1 $24 N 2ND ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 D�ata Notril Businesses are listed based on theTir proximity to the study area location. A maximum of 250 records can be cliqpiayed an one report. Data on the Business Locations report is based on the businesses whose location falls within the area of study. Total Sales, Total l Business Population, Total Number of Businesses, and the Daytime Business (pop)/ResldentW Ratio are callculated using the collection of business points that fail within the area of study., Source. Copyright 2021 Data Axle and Esd. Evi Total Residential Population forecasts for 2021. Data Axle Business Locations (Q4 2021 April 27, 2022 '1;r;01 2'2 l. ", � i Pir"', g , � i t n of 16 -I NQ AR -I a o -I -1 .9 -1 .2 R -1 .9 -1 -1 RRR UN lll rl 0] Iq 1t C 11: N r'% li rl: Lq 4: r4r" k5 V7 Cf fT C N C? Ck r-� 07 IR Lq CJ C) H N (D 0 C) 0 0 u 0 H 0 N t' 0, - 0 0 T, � It 0 0 0 pi �v C� 0 4) CflM 6 m rq co m o) Ln Ln co r, Lo t co cc m a) Lf) r, r, 0 0 00 C) 0 0 H ID q V 'd- m " a �D m N m m w m N M rl 0 M 0 �o (14 C, ID N rl v- in co N 10 al N rl N 04:7 'n w E u oj 0, 'P3 F 0Cs 0T tt C.7'q M1: '1 M CD 0 N CD CA rl 0 H H H All N fn u Co cn M m 0 0 ci rn r m N rl N It It m It m rl w m N q 0 rl H co 0 q M rl (3) a w et �t N N 10 Ln r' 0 N N LO rq r, r4 M� M ro E CL (D z C> 04 m rn 0 C) -0 f2 c M ar -C- 0 .0E 0 E '- 0- :3 - ai Ln :a cc, LM c Cc -0 E 0 0 C: 75 'L cc) 9 :1. cc, cu 19 Fli L5 E u o' 0 a -3 L E 00 qi 0 c:b cn pj u -Y -E 0 i!' C I 4-3 0 0 m 0 Ln y c E U) 8 (D w a' -a) '?s ow '5m Co'a j E ? V, 'E 0 qj re 0 0 0 E X _0 u m �) t .L- — m 'Y 'D _0 U) o- (n ci �2 Ln IV ai 2) (n VA , , Ln LU E 0 0- dj u tj _Q ca to C� o 0 u U 2vtac W �2-Eco-aE-:-," c A E Al = a i�� 0 "das ea < E AL m 'Ln r - < 7a Ax.Lu N: co U) > as as ar E ai 0 c Lli 4 () 2 () (n (D D 9 0 CL R S -I S -I S -I . -I -1 .9 .11 .11 .11 -1 .2 R e -I -I ll } m li H r� Ci 1i i ©Y rl� N M ri 1\ 1L7 1. Ln h -i CL 9 17 1D 0h ll� m H V1 u Ll7 C] 0 0 0 (N 0 to 0 0 0 0 Lr5 N 0 0 N 0 0 N N 0 0 ko 'Al n C3 It cc Cr cD r-4 m � 0 0 o 71 t m o m mm q m N m c> co N tn o) to tn ci o r, m Lo ca c) m m cn o t w o3 o U) M H at rq 0 ID N 0 ID Ln N N It en Ln w m N rl m w 0 N 0 m n " In 10 N a, 0 �o 6U) E cn N H H N N c! 'D r, m N um ll� lih z Y. C b -.R u 47 N 19 1a li Ci It M lD N rl 1l7 CT 10 1n 1D I Iq Ci CY 9 9 V' I C! N lCY 0! C! 1D V: r. M .-r. q o 0 o Ca N 0 N 0 M 0 N 'r Ln 0 N 0 . N N M M cn M M M m Ci tii N N N m N 't 0 N 0 m 0 0 m m w Ln 't ko w N m q N kD r, rlj N N r, Ln 0 .0 0 cz U1 IV zu v E 0 t u < 06 un - ea fan nE LO rU, j LnPIS i 0 cz c -FA .0 u LM 12 '13 ga an W M v C, v 0 Q) w W UO v Q. F-r.L CO o 0 _0 CL 0 LL m U 0) j, tr 0 a Lj - c 'o CL 0 'o 4) 'Ir E �E , C, c CS E B% u o v 0 (v (2 '0 0 Pi (2 tn 0 -Fa 0 0 u Ln 16 M CJ d) M ,In 12 C21, C: > Ci 0 Cf -2 �Y <OU C7 c 6 B IL V) o o i! 'Li 'c Far w 0 E,-ow '�-OEwi�-oE 0 12 Z-, Ln 0 u t 2 F m QJ E -Fu E ci , 4) 0 m Gui w 0 0 �o Ln :1 cn o C: u c cn w E u E u 0 5 a) C) 0, z S- Ln :j L2 m o t, 0 E < -Fu 8 u cn T; o u �o M u U- 0- < w < <u :CD Population Summary 2000 Total Population 2010 Total Population 2021 Total Population 2021 Group Quarters 2026 Total Population 2021-2026 Annual Rate 2021 Total Daytime Population Workers Residents Household Summary 2000 Households 2000 Average Household Size 2010 Households 2010 Average Household Size 2021 Households 2021 Average Household Size 2026 Households 2.026 Average Household Size 2021-2026 Annual Rate 2010 Families 2010 Average Family Size 2021 Families 2021 Average Family Size 2026 Families 2026 Average Family Size 2021-2026 Annual Rate Housing Unit Summary 2000 Housing Units Owner Occupied Housing Units Renter Occupied Housing Units Vacant Housing Units 2010 Housing Urifts Oviner Occupied Housing Units Renter Occupied Housing Units Vacant Housing Units 2021 Housing Units Owner Occupied Housing Units Renter Occupied Housing Units Vacant Housing Units 2026 Housing Units Owner Occupied Housing Units Renter Occupied Housing Units Vacant Housing Units Median Household Income, 2021 2026 Median Horne Value 2021 2026 Per Capita Income 2021 2026 Median Age 2010 2021 2026 345 Clinton St, Ashland, Oregon, 97520 Ring Bands: 0-1 mile radii Prepared By Ticar Title Customer Service 0 - I mile 7,908 8,343 8,891 332 9,195 O67% 10,903 6,321 4,582 3,664 2.09 4,183 1.94 4,486 1.91. 4,642 1191 0 .690/a 1,928 2.59 1,994 2.S7 2,047 2.58 0.53% 3,949 45.1% 47.7% 7.2% 4,699 43.9% 45A% 11,0% 5,015 44,0% 45.4 °/a 10.5%a 0/0 5,183 449°/a 44.70/a 10.4% $61,383 $71,148 $549,115 $611,864 $43,974 $50,680 44.8 48.9 49.2 Data Note: Househoid Population includes persons not residing In group quarters,. Average Household Size is the household papulation divided by total households. Persons In families include the householder and persons related to the householder by birth, marriage, or adoption. RN, Capita Income represents the Income received by all persons aged 15 years and over divided by the total population, Source* U.S, Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File L Esd forecasts for 2021 and 2026 E5ri converted Census 2000 data Into 2010 geography. April 27, 2022 � y2 02'� L:'i i i' p- I of , Commilunit, Prc 345 Clinton St, Ash and, Oregorn, 97520 Prepared By Ticar Title Customer Service Ring Bands: 0-1 mile radii i ol'Ji'Wo: tolim4flude: -1'� 0 - 1 mile 2021,Households by Income Household income Base 4,486 <$15,000 11.50/0, $15,000 - $24,999 7.10/a $25,000- $34,999 10.20/b $35,000- $49,999 11.70/a $50,000- $74,999 17.20/c $75,000- $99,999 1 6.20/b $100,000 - $149,999 11.80/0 $150,000 - $199,999 5.5% $200,000+ 8.70/a Average Household Income $89,106 2026 Households by income Household Income Base 4,642 <$15,000 9.60/a $15,000- $24,999 5,50/0 $26,000 - $34,999 8.90/0 $35,000 - $49,999 11,4% $50,000 - $74,999 16.7% $75,000 - $99,999 16.6% $100,000 -$149,999 14.0% $150,000 -$199,999 7,1% $200,000+ 10,30% Average Houschoid income $102,678 2021 Owner Occupied Housing Units by Value Total 2,209 <$50,000 018% $50,000 - $99,999 0.1% $100,000 - $149,999 010% $150,000 - $199,999 0.211/0 $200,000 - $249,999 1.6% $250,000 - $299,999 4.3% $300,000 - $399,999 13.90/a $400,000 $499,999 19.6% $500,000 $749,999 48,60/0 $750,000-$999,999 6.3% $1,000,000 - $1,499,999 2.10x0 $1,500,000 - $1,999,999 0.4% $2,000,000 + 2J% Average Home Value $593,145 2026 Owner Occupied Housing Units by Value Total 2,326 <$50,000 0,00/0 $50,000- $99,999 0.00/0 $100,000 - $149,999 M% $150,000 - $199,999 0.0% $200,000 - $249,999 0.0% $250,000 - $299,999 0.4% $300,000 - $399,999 5.0% $400,000 - $499,999 16,,3% $500,000 - $749,999 63,40/a $750,000 - $999,999 8.6% $1,000,000 - $1,499,999 2.4% $1,500,000 - $1,999,999 0.6% $2,000,000 + 3.4% Average Home Value $679,299 Data, Note: Income represents the preceding year, expressed in current dollars. Household income includes wage and salary earnings, interest dividends, net rents, pensions, SSI and welfare payments, child support, and alimony, Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary Hle 1., Esrl forecasts for 2021 and 2026 Esd converted Census 2000 data into 2010 geography, April 27,2022 MEMO I IM rig 345 Clinton St, Ashland, Oregon, 97520 Prepared By Ticor Title Customer Service Ring Bands: 0-1 mile radii '12')04/11a 0 - I imile 2010 Population by Age Total 8,342 0-4 3.8% 5-9 4.8% 10 - 14 4.7% 15-24 14.4% 25-34 12.3% 35-44 10.2% 45-54 13.5%® 55- 64 18.1% 65-74 9.5% 75-84 5.3% 85+ 3.4% 18+ 83.3% 2021 Population by Age Total 8,893 0-4 3.3% 5 - 9 3,8% 10-14 3.9% 15 - 24 13.50/0 25-34 123% 35 -44 9.3% 45- 54 M6% 55 - 64 173% 65-74 14.6% 75 - 84 7J% 85 + 4.0% 18 + 86.0% 2026 Population by Age Total 9,196 0-4 3.4% 5-9 3,8% 10 - 14 3.8% 15 - 24 12.8% 25 -34 12.,3% 35 -44 10,10/0 45 -54 919% 55 -64 15.8% 65 -74 14.7% 75-84 9.1% 8s+ 4.3% 18 + 86.4% 20�10 Population by Sex Males 3,813 Females 4,530 2021 Population by Sex Mates 4,071 Females 4,821 2026 Population by Sex Males 4,219 Females 4,976 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary Ffle 1. Esd forecasts for 2021 and 2026 Esri converted Census 2000 data Into 2010 geography. April 27,2022 �x!02'L�.�q P'i�Y:10 1 esdr, on EM, Em"11111111111M 345 Clinton St, Ashland, Oregon, 97520 Prepared By Ticor Title Customer Set -vice Ring Bands: 0-1 ri radii /06 i;3 0 - 1 imile 2.010 Population by Race/Ethnicity Total 8,343 White Alone 90,9% Black Alone 1.1% American Indian Alone 0,8% Asian Alone 2.0% Pacific Islander Alone 0.2% Some Other Race Alone 1.3% Two or More Races 3,7% Hispanic Origin 4.6% Diversity Index 24.5 2021 Population by Race/ Et hmilclity Total 8,890 White Alone 88.211/0 Black Alone 1.50/a American Indian Alone 0.9% Asian Alone 2,80/a Pacific Islander Alone 0.2% Some Other Race Alone 1.7% Tilivo or More Races 4.7% Hispanic Origin 6.3% Diversity Index 313 2026 Population by Race/ Ethnicity Total 9,195 White Alone 86.7% Black Alone 1.7% American Indian Alone 0.9% Asian Alone 3.294, Pacific Islander Alone 0,30/9 Some Other Race Alone 2.0% Two or More Races 5.2% Hispanic Origin 7,4% Diversity Index 350 2010 Population by Relationship and Household Type Total 8,343 In Households 97.4% In Family Households 62,20/a Householder 22,70/a Spouse 16.1% Child 19.7% Other relative 1.5010 Nom -dative 2,30/a In Nonfamily Households 35,20/a In Group Quarters 2,6% institutionalized Population 0.3% Noninstitutionall Population 2� 3% Data Note; Persons of Hispanic Origin may be of any race. The Diversity index measures the probability that two people from the same area will be from different race/ ethnic groups, Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1, Esrl forecasts for 2021 and 2026 Esti converted Census 2000 data into 2010 geography, April 27,2022 'Q022' ls6 Pogo 4 of 7 esn' 345 Clinton St, Ashland, Oregon, 97520 Prepared By Ticor Title Customer Service Ring Bands: 0-1 mile radii I ai, r i k I (1 4 04'i" Lonq�Wd'�: 0 - 1 mile 2021 Population 25+ by Educational Attainment Total 6,721 Less than 9th Grade 1.7% 9th - 12th Grade, No Diploma 0.7% High School Graduate 8,0% GED/Alternative Credential 1.8% Some College, No Degree 21.,4% Associate Degree 43% Bachelor's Degree 30.2%© Graduate/Professional Degree 31.5% 2021 Population 15+ by Marital Status Total ,918 7 Never Married 36,7% Married 42.0% Widowed 6.6% Divorced 14.70/c 2021 Civilian Population 16+ in Labor Force Civilian Population 164- 4,587 Population 16+ Employed 94.8% Population 16+ Unemployment rate 5.,2% Population 16-24 Employed 12.8% Population 16-24 Unemployment rate 2.8% Population 25-54 Employed 54.7% Population 25-54 Unemployment rate 5.5% Population 55-64 Employed 20.9% Population 55-64 Unemployment rate 8.7% Population 65+ Employed 11.6% Population 65+ Unemployment rate 0,0% 2021 Employed Population 16+ by Industry Total 4,348 AgriculLure/Mining 1.4%® Construction 3.8% Manufacturing 6,00/a Wholesale Trade 2.7% Retail Trade 10.10/0 Transportation/Utilities 0.8% Information 2.1% Finance/Insurance/Real Estate 7,2% Services 60.5% Public Administration 5.2% 2021 Employed Population 16+ by Occupation Total 4,348 White Collar 75,6% M anageme nt/Bu sine ss/Fi n ancla 1 20.5% Professional 37.2% Sales 9.9% Administrative Support 7.9% Services 15.8% Blue Collar 8.6% Farming/Forestry/Fishing 03% Construction/Extraction, 4,0% Install'at!OYI/1laintenance/Repair 019% Production 2.4% Transportation/Material Moving 1.0% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary Me 1, Esd forecasts for 2021 and 2026 Esd converted Census 2000 data Into 2010 geography, April 27, 2022 ,)R)2� L.sl� S of 7 IN illioEMMEM 345 Clinton St, Ashland, Oregon, 97520 Prepared By Tilcor Title Customer Service Ring Bands: 0-1 mile radii I ahWdo: 4"�.1)04/" 0 - :11. mile 2010 Households by Type Total 4,183 Households with 1 Person 40.6c/lb Households with 2+ People 59.40/a Family Households 46.1% Husband -wife Families 32.5% Wfth Related Children 10.7% Other Family (No Spouse Present) 13,6% Other Family with Male Householder 3.4% With Related Children 2.3% Other Family with Female Householder 10.2% With Related Children 7.3% Nonfarnily Households 13.3% All Households with Children 20.80/0 Multigenerational Households 0.90/0 Unmarried Partner Households 8,40/a Male-fernale 7.20/a Same-sex 1.20/o 2010 Households by Size Total 4,182 1 Person Household 40,60/c 2 Person Household 35.60% 3 Person Household 13.20/c 4 Person, Household 7,40/c 5 Person Household 2.3% 6 Person Household 0.7% 7 + Person Household 0.3% 2010 Households, by Tenure and Mortgage Status Tota 1 4,183 Owner Occupied 49.4% Owned with a Mortgage/Loan 31,6% Owned Free and Clear 17,8% Renter Occupied 50,15% 2021 Affordability, Mortgage and Wealth Housing Affordability Index 62 Percent of Income for Mortgage 37.5% Wealth Index 96 2010 Housing Units By Urban/ Rural Status Total Housing Units 4,699 Housing Units Inside Urbanized Area 98.4% Housing Units Inside Urbanized Cluster 0.0% Rural Housing Units 1.6% 2010 Population By Urban/ Rural Status Total Population 8,343 Population inside Urbanized Area 98.10/0 Population Inside Urbanized Cluster 0.0% Rural Population 1.9% Data Nater Households with children include any households with people under age 18, related or not. C-Iuftigenerafiunaj households are families with 3 or more parent- chlid relationships, Unmarried partner households are usually classified as nonfamily households unless there is another member of the household rented to the householder. Multigenerational and unmarried partner households are reported on9y to the tract Bevel. Esri estimated block group, data, which Is used to estimate polygons or non-standard geography, Source: U.S, Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2021 and 2026 Esrf converted Census 2000 data into 2010 geography. April 27, 2022 �)2022 Ls� i loq;' 6 0 ) u mmmummomi EM''i OEM= 345 Clinton St, Ashland, Oregon, 97520 Prepared By Ticor Title Customer Service Ring Bands: 0-1 mile radii lalihld't i orl<pmde ,q,2,' /06 0 - I mile Top 3 Tapestry Segments 1, Emerald City (8B) 2. Golden Years (9B) 3. College Towns (14B) 2021 Consumer Spending Apparel & Services: Total $ $9,293,191 Average Spent $2,071.60 Spending Potential Index 98 Education: Total $ $8,009,092 Average Spent $1,785.35 Spending Potential Index 103 Entertainment/Recreation: Total $ $13,860,028 Average Spent $3,089.62 Spending Potential Index 96 Food at Home: Total $ $23,244,622 Average Spent $5,181,59 Spending Potential Index 95 Food Away from Home: Total $16,520,150 Average Spent $3,682.60 Spending Potential Index 97 Health, Care: Total $ $26,536,422 Average Spent $5,915.39 Spending Potential Index 95 HH Furnishings & Equipment. Total $ $9,710,299 Average Spent $2,164.58 Spending Potential Index 96 Personal Care Products & Services: Total $ $3,955,574 Average Spent $881.76 Spending Potential Index 98 Shelter: Total $ $89,053,188 Average Spent $19,851.36 Spending Potential Index 98 Support Payments/Cash Contributions/Gifts in Kind: Total $ $10,412,217 Average Spent $2,321.05 Spending Potential index 97 Travel: Total $ $11,020,770 Average Spent $2,456,70 Spending Potential Index 97 Vehicle Maintenance & Repairs: Total $ $4,801,525 Average Spent $1,07'0.34 Spending Potential Index 97 Data Note; Consumer spending shows the amount spent on a variety of goods and services by households that reside in the area. Expenditures are shown by broad budget categories that are not mutually exclusive. Consumer spending does not equal business revenue. Total and Average Amount Spent Per Household represent annual figures, The Spending Potential Index represents the amount spent in the area relative to a national average of IM Source* Consumer Spending data are derived from the 2018 and 2019 Consumer Expenditure Surveys, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Esri. Source. U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2021 and 2026 Esri converted Census 2000 data into 2010 geography. April 27, 2022 0 Oesirr 345 Clinton St, Ashland, Oregon, 97520 Prepared By Ticor Title Customer Service Ring Band: 0 - 1 mile radius latihido kmg0md,,-,: t)2,/W'>J3 Summary Census 2010 2021 2026 Population 8,343 8,891 9,195 Households 4,183 4,486 4,642 Families 1,928 1,994 2,047 Average Household Size 1.94 1.91 1.91 Owner Occupied Housing Units 2,065 2,209 2,326 Renter Occupied Housing Units 2,118 2,277 2,316 Median Age 44.8 48.9 49.2 'Trends: 2021-2026 Annual Rate Area State National Population 0.67% 1.02% 0.,71% Households 0.69% 1.02% 0.71% Families 0.53% 0.90% 0,64% Owner HHs 1,04% 1.180/0 0.91°/a Median Household Income 3.00,% 3.03% 2.41% 20,21 2026 Households by Income Number Percent Number Percent <$15,000 517 11.5% 445 9.6% $15,000 - $24,999 318 7.1%a 253 5,5% $25,000 - $34,999 458 10.2% 411 8.9% $35,000 - $49,999 526 11.7% 527 11.4% $50,000 - $74,999 773 17.2% 773 163% $75,000 - $99,999 727 16.2% 772 16.6c/a $100,000 - $149,999 529 11,8% 652 14.0% $150,000 - $199,999 246 5.50/0 331 7.1%© $200,000+ 392 8.,7% 478 10,3% Medoan Household Income $61,383 $71,148 Average Household Income $89,106 $102,678 Per Capita Income $43,974 $50,680 Census 2010 20,21 2026 Population by Age Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent 0 -4 316 3.8%a 291 3.3% 309 3.4% 5-9 399 4,8%a 339 3.8% 347 3.8% 10- 14 393 4.7% 344 3.9% 351 3.8% 15-19 518 6.2%a 538 6.0% 504 5.5% 20- 24 681 8.2% 660 7.4% 676 7.4% 25-34 1,029 12,3% 1,132 12.7% 1,130 12,3% 35-44 854 111.2% 827 9.3% 926 10.1% 45-54 1,126 115% 942 10,6% 914 9.9% 55 -64 1,512 18.1% 1,542 17.3% 1,455 15.8% 65- 74 789 M% 1,298 14.6% 1,354 14.7% 75 -84 444 5,3% 628 7.1% 835 9.1% 85+ 281 3.4% 352 4,0% 395 4.3% Census; 2,010 2021 2026 Race and Ethnicity Number Pei -cent Number Percent Number Percent White Alone 7,584 90,9% 7,843 88.2% 7,976 86,7% Black Alone 88 1.1% 131 1.5% 160 1.7% American Indian Alone 69 M% 79 0.9% 85 0.9% Asian Alone 168 M% 247 2.8% 291 3.2% Pacific Islander Alone 17 0,2% 20 0.2% 24 0.301a Some Other Race Alone 108 13% 153 L7% 181 2.0% Two or More Races 309 3.70/0 417 43% 478 5.2% Hispanic Ori;lgin (Any Race) 381 4.6% 563 6.3% 682 7.4% Data Note: Income is expressed in Current dollars, Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 summary rile 1. E$ri forecasts for 2021 and 2026. April 27, 2022 Vane i u� 2 lll N'll'ill 1 esru me 345 Clinton St, Ashland, Oregon, 97520 Prepared By Ticor Title Customer Service Ring Band: 0 - I mile radiu;s lall(ud+ , Trends 2021-2026 3- 2- 1.5 - Area 0.5- State USA Population Households Families Owner HHS Median HH Incorne Population by Age 16 14 12 41 C: 10 cu8 CL 6 4 2 A 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75-84 85+ 2021 Household Income $25K -$34K $35K -$49K $15K -$24K 11.715 71155 $50K -$74K. 17.2% $75 16.2% J20OKt 8.71". 6K -$199K 515�/. $100K -$149K 11.8% 2021 Population by Race 2021 2026 Pacific Other Two+ Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File L Esd forecasts for 2021 and 2026. April 27, 2022 7 0 "l) !:'; f I: ll�rqo 2 oP 2 e s ri, EMENEEMEMENNEEMEM 345 Clinton St, Ashland, Oregon, 97520 Prepared By Ticor Title Customer Service Ring Bands: 0-1 mile radii LiLihOP: 42,201,171 k)nqq�ldn: 1?)J06 �:" 0 - i mile Population Summary 2000 Total Population 7,908 2010 Total Population 8,343 2021 Total Populaton 8,891 2021 Group Quarters 332 2026 Total Population, 9,195 2021-2026 Annual Rate 0.670/a 2021 Total Daytime Population 10,903 Workers 6,321 Residents 4,582 Household Summary 2000 Households 3,664 2000 Average Household Size 2.09 2010 Households 4,183 2010 Average Household Size 1.94 2021 Households 4,486 2021 Average Household Size 1.91 2026 Households 4,642 2.026 Average Household Size 1.91 2021-2026 Annual Rate 0.69% 2010 Families 1,928 2010 Average Family Size 2.59 2021 Families 1,994 2021 Average Family Size 2.57 2026 Families 2,047 2026 Average Family Size 2.58 2021-2026 Annual Rate 0,530/a Housing 'Unit Summary/ 2000 Housing Units 3,949 Owner Occupied Housing Units 45.1% Renter Occupied! Housing Units 47,70/a Vacant Housing Units 7.29% 2010 Housing Units 4,699 Owner Occupied Housing Units 43.9% Renter Occupied Housing Units 45,1% Vacant Housing Units 11.00/0 2021 Housing Units 5,015 Owner Occupied Housing Units 44.0% Renter Occupied Housing Units 45,40/h Vacant Housing Units 10,50/0 2026 Housing Units 5,183 Owner Occupied Housing Units 44.9%a Renter Occupied Housing Units 44.7% Vacant Housing Units 10.4% Median Household Income 2021 $61,383 2026 $71,148 M'ed'ian Home Value 2021 $549,115 2026 $611,864 Per Capita Income 2021 $43,974 2026 $50,680 Median Age 2010 44.8 2021 48.9 2026 49.2 Data Note: Household population Inducles persons not residing in group quarters. Average Household Size is the household population divided by total households, Persons in families Include the householder and persons related to the householder by birth, marriage, or adoption, Per Capita Income represents the income received by all persons aged 15 years ands over divided by the Iota$ population. Source: U,S, Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1, Esd forecasts, for 2021 and 2026 Esri converted Census 2000 data into 2010 geography. April 27, 2022 ,,1,10)' Esri Poqo I of 7 MINE (felsri MEN! 345 Clinton St, Ashliand, Oregon, 97520 Prepared By Ticor Title Customer Service Ring Bands: 0-1 mile radii Lahllode loingil'ude: 0 - i mile 2021 Households by Income Household Income Base 4,486 <$15,000 11.5% $15,000 - $24,999 7.1% $25,000 - $34,999 10.2% $35,000 - $49,999 11.7% $50,000 - $74,999 17.20% $75,000 - $99,999 16.2% $100,000 - $149,999 11.811/0 $150,000 - $199,999 5.5cl/b $200,000+ 8,7% Average Household Income $89,106 2026 Households by Income Household Income Base 4,642 <$15,000 9.6% $15,000 - $24,999 5.5% $25,000 - $34,999 8.,9% $35y000 - $49,999 11,4% $50,000 - $74,999 16.7% $75,000 - $99,999 16.6% $100,000 - $149,999 14.0% $150,000 -$199,999 7.1% $200,000+ 10„3%n Average Household Income $102,678 2021 Owner Occupied Housing Units by Value Total 2,209 <$50,000 0.8% $50,000 - $99,9199 0.1% $100,000 - $149,999 0,0% $150,000 -$199,999 01.2% $200,000 -$249,999 1.6% $250,000 -$299,999 4,3% $300,000 - $399,999 13.9% $400,000 - $499,999 191,6% $500,000 -$749,999 48,6% $750,000 -$999,999 6.,3% $1,000,000 - $1,499,999 2.1% $1,500,000 - $1,999,999 0.,4% $2,000,000 + 2JIN Average Home Value $593,145 2026 owner occupied Housing Units by Value Total 2,326 <$50,000 0,0%© $50,000 - $99,999 0.00/0 $100,000 -$149,999 0.0% $150,000 -$199,999 010% $200,000 - $249,999 010% $250,000 -$299,999 0.4% $300,000 -$399,999 5.0% $400,000 - $499,999 16,3% $500,000 - $749,999 63.4% $750,000 - $999,999 8.6% $1,000,000 - $1,499,999 2.4% $1,500,000 - $1,999,999 0.6% $2,000,000 + 3.4% Average Home Value $679,299 Data ]i Income represents the preceding year, expressed in current dMars. Household income Includes wage and salary earnings, Jnterest dividends, net rents, pensions, SSI and welfare payments, child support, and alimony!, Source. I Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esd forecasts for 2021 and 2026 Esri converted Census 2000 data Into 2010 geography. April 27, 2022 �Q022 F16 ll')(w 2 of I 11 ing 11� !'I! n' cm= Em Em lmmm� 345 Clinton St, Ashland, Oregon, 97520 Prepared By Ticor Title Customer Service Ring Bands: 0-1 mile radii I 4),)047S lonqitiu(lo: i'?'/0633 0 - I mile 2010 Population by Age Total 8,342 0- 4 3,80/a 5 -9 4.8% 10 -14 4.7% 15 - 24 14.4% 25 -34 123% 35 -44 10.2% 45- 54 13.5% 55-64 18.1% 65-74 9'.5110 75 -84 5.3% 85+ 3.4% 18+ 83.3% 2021 Population by Age Total 8,893 0-4 3.3% 5 - 9 3.8% 10 - 14 3.90/1 15- 24 13.5% 25- 34 12.7% 35-44 9.30/1 45- 54 10.6% 55 - 64 17.3% 65- 74 14.611/a 75- 84 7.1% 85+ 4.00/1 18 + 86.00/1 2026 population by Age lbtal 9,196 0-4 14% 5- 9 180/b 10- 14 3,80/1 15- 24 12.8% 25 - 34 123% 35-44 10.1011 45 - 54 9.90/0 55 - 64 15.80/1 65- 74 14,711/a 75- 84 9.10/1 85+ 4.3% 18+ 86.4% 2010 Population by Sex Males 3,813 Females 4,530 2021 Population by Sex Males 4,071 Females 4,821 2026 Population by Sex Males 4,219 Females 4,976 Source; U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary FHe 1. Esri forecasts for 2021 and 2026 Esd converted Census 2000 data Into 2010 geography. April 27, 2022 C) ) 0? L S I d w 3, 7 III! 111 if 1 twomi iii 10i NO 1 mal 11 11; 1 esr*i* CMEM 345 Clinton St, Ashland, Oregon, 97520 Prepared By Ticor Title Customer Service Ring Bands; 0-1 mile radii I 'r r, I I k I d 4).°)01 / 5 Low'paukl 0, /()() 33 0 - I mile 2010 Population by Race/lithnicity Total 8,343 White Alone 90L90/0 Black Alone 1j% American Indian Atone 0.8% Asian Alone 2.0% Pacific Islander Alone 0.2% Some Other Race Alone 1,3% Two or More Races 17% Hispanic Origin 4.6% Diversity Index 24,5 2021 Population by Race/Ethnicity Total 8,890 White Alone 88.2% Black Alone 1.5% American Indian Alone 019% Asian Alone 2,8% Pacific Islander Alone 0.2% Some Other Race Alone 1.7% Two or More Races 4.7% Hispanic Origin 6.3% Diversity Index 31.3 20,26 Population by Race/Ethnicity Total 9,195 White Alone 86.7% Black Alone 1.7% American Indian Alone 0.9% Asian Alone 3.2% Pacific Islander Alone 0.3% some Other Race Alone 2.0% Two or More Races 5.2% Hispanic Origin 7.4% Diversity Index 3S.0 2010 Population by Relationship andl Household Type Total 8,343 In Households 97,4% In Family Households 62.2% Householder 22.7% Spouse 16,10.1/4 Chfld 19.7% Other relative I.S% Nonrelative 2.3% In Nonfamily Households 35.2% In Group Quarters 2,6% Institutionalized Population 031% Norimstitutionalized Population 2.30/c Data Note., Persons or Hispanic Origin may be of any face, The Diversity Index measures the probability that two people from the same area wN be from different race/ ethnic groups. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2021 and 2026 Esrl converted Census 2000 data Into 2010 geography. April 27, 2022 � 01 , 2 i f1w3c 'I of / esri** emom 345 Clinton St, Ashland, Oregon, 97520 Prepared By Ticor Title Customer Service Ring Bands: 0-1 mile radii 0,175 0 - I mile 2021 Population 25+ by Educational Attainment Total 6,721 Less than 9th Grade 1.7% 9th - 12th Grade, No Diploma 0.7% High School Graduate 8,0% GED/Alternative Credential 1.8% Some College, No Degree 21.4% Associate Degree 4,7% Bachelor's Degree 30.2% Graduate/Professional Degree 31,5% 2021 Population 15+ by Marital Status Total Never Married 36.71/10 Married 42.0% Widowed 6.6% Divorced 14,7% 2021 Civilian Population 16+ in Labor Force Civfllan Population 16+ 4,587 Population 161 Employed 94.8% Population 16+ Unemployment rate 5.2% Population 16-24 Employed 12•8% Population 16-24 Unemployment rate 2.8% Population 25-54 Employed 54.7% Population 25-54 Unemployment rate 5.S% Population 55-64 Employed 20.9% Population 55-64 Unemployment rate 8.7% Population 65+ Employed 11.6% Population 65+ Unemployment rate 0.0% 2021 Employed Population 16+ by Industry Total 4,348 Agriculture/Mining 1.4% Construction 3.80/0 Manufacturing 6.0% Wholesale Trade 2.7% Retail Trade 10.1% Transportation/Utilities OXQ/O Information 2.1% Finance/Insurance/Real Estate 7.2% Services 60.5% Public Administration 5.2% 2021 Employed Population 16+ by Occupation Total 4,348 White Collar 75.6% Management/Business/Financial 20.5% Professional 37.20% Sales 9,9% Administrative Support 7'.9% Services 15.8% Blue Collar 8.6% Farming/Forestry/Fishing 0.3% Construction/Extraction 4.0% Install'atiori/Maintenatice/Repair 0.90/0 Production 2.4% Transportation/Material Moving 1.00/0 Source; U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esd forecasts for 2021 and 2026 Esri converted Census 2000 data into 2010 geography. April 27, 2022 rY 2 022 1: 5 r 'i il,uw'joi/ gi 111 1 a I Jill (flesri' 345 Clinton St, Ashland, Oregon, 97520 Prepared By Tlcor Title Customer Service Ring Bands: 0-1 mile radii 0 - 1 mile 2010 Households by Type 0.9010 Total 4,183 Households with 1 Person 40.6% Households with 2+ People 59.4% Family Households 46.1% Husband -wife Families 32.5% With Related Children 10.7% Other Family (No Spouse Present) 13.6% Other Family with Male Householder 3,4% With Related Children 2.3% Other Family with Female Householder 10.2% With Related Children 7.3% Nonfarnily Households 13.3% All Households with Children 20,8% Mul l ene ration all Households 0.9010 Unmarried Partner Households 8.40/0 Male-female 7.2% Same-sex 1.2% 2.010 Housebolds by Size Total 4,182 1 Person Household 40.6% 2 Person Household 35.6% 3 Person Household 13.2% 4 Person Household 7.4% 5 Person Household 2.3% 6 Person Household 0.7% 7 + Person Household 0.3% 2010 Households by Tenure and Mortgage Status Total 4,183 owner occupied 49,40/a owned with a Mortgage/Loan 31.6% owned Free and Clear 17.80/a Renter Occupied 50.60/0 2021 Affordability, Mortgage and Wealth Housing Affordability Index 62 Percent of income for Mortgage 37.50/b Wealth Index 96 2010 Housing Units By Urban/ Rural Status Total Housing Units 4,699 Housing Units Inside Urbanized Area 98.40/a Housing Units Inside Urbanized Cluster i Rural Housing Units 1.6% 2010 Population By Urban/ Rural Status Total Population 8,343 Population Inside Urbanized Area 98.1% Population Inside Urbanized Cluster 0.0% Rural Population 1.9% Data Note: Households with children Include any households with people under age 18, related or not, flultigenerational households are families with 3 or more parent- child relationships. Unmarried partner households are usually classified as nonfarrilly households unless there is another member of the household related to the householder, Hultigenerational and unmarried partner households are reported only to the tract level. Esrl estimated block group data, which Is used to estimate polygons or non-standard geography, Source; U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1, 1 forecasts for 2021 and 2,026 Esd converted Census 2000 data Into 2010 geography, April 27, 2022 11 A g ; i" of 7 eesrr 345 Clinton St, Ashland, Oregon, 97520 Prepared By Ticor Title Customer Service Ring Bands: 0-1 mile radii I,dikvk,: 42,20425 1)2.10633 0 - 1 mile Top 3 Tapestry Segments 1. Emerald City (BB) 2. Golden Years (913) 3. college Towns (143) 2021 Consumer Spending Apparel & Services: Total $ $9,293,191 Average Spent $2,071.60 Spending Potential Index 98 Education: Total $ $8,009,092 Average Spent $1,785.35 Spending Potential Index 103 Entertainment/Recreation: Total $ $13,860,028 Average Spent $3,089.62 Spending Potential Index 96 Food at Home: Total $ $23,,244,622 Average Spent $5,181.59 Spending Potential Index 95 Food Away from Home: Total $ $16,520,150 Average Spent $3,682,60 Spending Potential index 97 Health Care: Total $ $26,536,422 Average Spent $5,915,39 Spending Potential Index 95 HH Furnishings & Equipment: Total $ $9,710,299 Average Spent $2,164.58 Spending Potential Index 96 Personal! Care Products & Services: Total $ $3,955,574 Average Spent $881.76 Spending Potential Index 98 Shelter: Total $ $89,053,188 Average Spent $19,851.36 Spending Potential Index 98 Support Payments/Cash Contributions/Gifts in Kind: Total! $10,412,217 Average Spent $2,321.05 Spending Potential Index 97 Travek Total $ $11,020,770 Average Spent $2,456.70 Spending Potential index 97 Vehicle Maintenance & Repairs: Total $ $4,801,525 Average Spent $1,070.,34 Spending Potential Index 97 Data Note., Consumer spending shows the amount spent on a variety of goods and services by households that reside in the area, Expenditures are shown by broad budget categories that are not mutually exclusive. Consumer spending does not equal business revenue. Total and Average Amount Spent Per Household represent annual figures, Tile Spending Potentia[ Index represents the amount spent In the area relative to a national average of 100, Source; Consumer Spending data are derived from the 2018 and 2019 Consumer Expenditure Surveys, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Esri. Source: U,S, Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2021 and 2.026 Esd converted Census 2000 data Into 2010 geography. April 27,2022 li Q0"U, f 'm '? of 7 ........... Jill J11 345 Gunton St, Ashland, Oregon, 97520 Prepared By Ticar Title Costoliner Service Ring 13ands, 0-1 mile radii ............ . . April 27, 202'� 14 A1, j 14 1 h ov ","I 6d /p tn tf !,I t It Y, 21 0 W/N i fww* gr IE T, h Ov P h M I Ashlang #4 491 kidC"Y vi dreiAn, ". "o MA 10 ut t t 0 '1 0,3 f Te ortg2,ngv;�kri us, F0,1"ll e(VIC(I 9 April 27, 202'� esnTraffic Count Map 345 Clinton St, Astiland, Oregon, 97520 g Bands: 0-1 mile radii I rr Oz4b�16 Z'S Prepared By Ticor Title Custorner .43ervic( 1 fww�,,�z lk ul 1. A 2N, I V/ an G C d o 1 1,3 'Not Vi N,wp./d,� Y"t E W,,n�rJ, I�T '(4 1 o 'A J g ✓C, 4 14 ei Y 14/Q// x" I N4 O/o,ty 5 %2 r WQg c✓"o d T3 CMA Q1 S/ G/ Vla 1v 'I f 0 A "A"t" 1 Ido. rGx6 t, 1" A 0;ef"I o,Id, n K 'we A Wan1VllvroH"w6"" aA pan , �rrc�lvd o; �T 4t &: lo A 14 t0� vQi lk, r Own �J go ✓/"�', ell m 4 011f WIA �V, Ct)univ of Jiacksoq '60F adcjt-tan,� ��JH,W E, Gal III [;I GL)CITLA l 111 ol f 0� �j I &OiO, IIAL 011101 1116 0 WA ILr,M1 hlry M Q Average Daily rrafflo Volume da Up to 6,000 vehicles per day A ,,,7 A,6,0011 - 15,00o A 15, DOI - 30, 000 A30,001 - 5,0,000 A501001 - 1001000 A More than 100, WO Per daY April 2,7, 2022 ,I (, fS, t6 of Ot'�qow6,Eb, state iii s; sill esn" 345 Clinton St, Ashland, Oregon, 97520 Prepared By Ticor Title Customer Service Ring Bands: 0-1 mile radii iehhjdL U_,1W1'/5 V. n (P I e: 1,) 2. /06 3 Distance* Street, Closest Crass -street! Yea:r of Count.- Count, 0.24 East Hersey Street Phelps St (0,03 miles E) 2018 5,630 0,28 N Mounta,in Avenue Fast Dr (0.0 miles NE) 2020 2,239 0.29 Oak St E Hersey St (0,04 miles S) 2012 3,400 0.31 E Hersey St Oak St (0,02 miles W) 2012 3,650 0,33 E Hersey St Oak St (0,01 miles SE) 2018 3,500 0,34 N Mountain Ave F Hersey St (0.03 miles S) 2012 2,400 0.34 Oak St Clear Creek Dr (0.02 nodes SW) 2012 3,200 0.35 F Hersey St Starflower Ln (0.02 miles W) 2012 4,350 0.38 Ohio Street Ohio St (0.0 miles SW) 2018 2,540 0.39 N Mountain Ave Larkspur to (0.03 mlies SE) 2012 5,950 039 Oak St E Nevada St (0.03 miles N) 2.012 2,800 O.41 East Nevada Street Overlook Dr (0.05 miles E) 2020: 38 O.41 E Nevada St Oak St (0.04 miles W) 2018 210 0.42 Oak Street Clear Creek Dr (0.04 miles NE) 2020 2,783 0,42 Heiman Street Randy St (0.04 miles N) 2020 1,623 O.43 East Nevada Street Patton Ln (0.0 miles SW) 2018 40 0,43 E Nevada St Oak St (0.03 miles E) 2012 1,600 O.45 Oak St E Nevada St (0.03 miles S) 2,012 3,2001 0.47 Heiman Street Van Ness Ave (0,02 miles SW) 2,020 1,273 0,51 North Laurel Street Otis St (0.01 miles S) 2018 1,160: 0.52 Oak Street (0.0 miles ) 2018 2,900 0.52 W Hersey St W Hersey St (0.01 miles NE) 2020 1's 19: 0.53 Orange Avenue Drager St (0.02 miles SE) 2018 460 O.54 B Street 4th, St (0.03 miles E) 2020 2,697 0.54 North Mountain Avenue Village Green Dr (0.03 miles S) 2018 3,600 O.55 West Nevada Street Voris Ave (0,03 miles W) 2018 1,600 0.55 West Hersey Street N Laurel St (0,04 miles SE) 2018 2,400 0155 B Street 5th St (0.01 miles F) 2018 2,800 0.58 E Nevada St N Mountain Ave (O.02 miles NW) 2016 889 0.61 Oak St Lithia Way (0.03 miles SW) 2018 2,980 Data Note:The Traffic Profile displays up to 30 of the closest available traffic counts within the largest radius around your site. The years of the counts In the database range from 2020 to 2000, Esri removes counts that are older than 2000 from the Kallbrate provided database. Traffic counts are Identified by the street on which they were recorded, along with the distance and direction to the closest cross -street, Distances displayed as 0,00 miles (due to rounding), are closest to the site. A traffic count is defined as the two-way Average Daily Traffic (ADT) that passes that location., Source: @2022 Kalibrate Technologies (Q1 2022), April 27, 2022 345 Clinton, Lot Areas A 535,488 � 12.293 parent parcel B. 157,7861 3,622 100% partitioned parcel C 35,706 0,820 22.63% roads and public right of way to be dedicated 1 6,,452 0.148 4.09% residential 2 6,444 0.148 4.08% residential 3__ 6,444 OA481 4.08% residential 4. 6,4441 0.148 1i 4M% residential 5. 6,495 0.149 {� 4x12% i residential 6 6,490 4.11% residential 7 6,4441 ....0.149 0.148 1 4.08% f residential 8 6,444 0.148 _. 4.08% residential 9 6,444 0.148 4.08% residential 10 6,419 0.147 4.07% residential _ 11 11,003 0.253 6.97% residential 12 110,762 0.247 6.82% residential 13 10,263 0,236 p 6.50 d residential 14 9,788 0.225 6.20% residential 106,336 2.441 67.39D/Q 15 15,844 1 0.364 110.04% � openspace 1 �S _ 1 I x, or m r— �j TITLE DATE REGISTERED TENTATIVE LAYOUT Tt APR 2022 SCAM I Inch : T '°at PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR ASSESSOR'S MAP #: 391 E04DB TL401 FOR: ERIC BONETTI 1330 SENNA LANE DRAWN en Jai CHK BY. ASHLAND, OR 97520 ORIGIN: OREGON JULY 17, 1986 JAMES E. HIBBS 2234 RENEWAL DATE: 6-30--23 RorATION: o J48:22i30Fhf L.J. FRIAR & ASSOCIATES P.C. CONSULTING LAND SURVEYORS F A P.o. so 1947 Phoenix OR 9x535 y72-278 C L.J. FRIAR & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 2022 Phone:54t� Email: tlirinrandasaoclatesOchorter.net Sheet 1 of 1 i rr i foo soo�� w Trrrf: OAM- ` I o TENTATIVE LAYOUT ASSMORS WP /: 39 ] E04DB TL40 ] 11 APR 2022 SCALL 1 Inch : 1 feet FOR; ERIC BONETTI ] 330 SENNA LANE DRAWN BY- JEH ct1K BY.qan±�� • 1106 LOT 15841 S 4 F ` ASHLAND, OR 97520 oRrcrN: OREGON JULY 17, 1986 JAMES E.ief3s 2234 RENEWAL DATE; 6-30-23 RDTA1roN: o JOB#: 22130f1 f L.J. FRIAR & ASSOCIATES P.C. ccw - itNoLAND SURVEYORS F A P.O. 80 1847 Phoenix OR 97535 x/72- 2782 C LJ. FRIAR do ASSOCIATES, P.C. 2022 Phone; r) Emau: r narondasaoctatea�chorter..et Sheet 1 of 1 97T 1SF N r .0 \` LOT 13 �-�__ 10263 SF \ w 8 72F:� II 10081 S 9 S sv 11 49 LOT 11003 S �,rq co LOT 6 SF7Z jN 6490 L (� 6444 SF D WF.3 LOT 8 6444 SF 60 .0 6444 SF 10 6485 SF 6 0 ` BS 0 LOT 10 8419 SF _ 6444 SF ss 660 o ss r x444 SF 66 0 �Wr I 1: ` m 6 F 6S ¢ rn 66 0 444 S wr 1s m \ 660 (A452 SF o 6 W to _ Z i� 0, STR\ 60 FE% _ o v s6o w o Lor,o z LaT 20 i rr i ?, Trrrf: OAM- CREGISTERED PROFESSIONAL SAN � SURVEYOR TENTATIVE LAYOUT ASSMORS WP /: 39 ] E04DB TL40 ] 11 APR 2022 SCALL 1 Inch : 1 feet FOR; ERIC BONETTI ] 330 SENNA LANE DRAWN BY- JEH ct1K BY.qan±�� • 06� ASHLAND, OR 97520 oRrcrN: OREGON JULY 17, 1986 JAMES E.ief3s 2234 RENEWAL DATE; 6-30-23 RDTA1roN: o JOB#: 22130f1 f L.J. FRIAR & ASSOCIATES P.C. ccw - itNoLAND SURVEYORS F A P.O. 80 1847 Phoenix OR 97535 x/72- 2782 C LJ. FRIAR do ASSOCIATES, P.C. 2022 Phone; r) Emau: r narondasaoctatea�chorter..et Sheet 1 of 1 Standard Scale I A r ---i Item No. 14 - EasarnaM fee Disifibution of Elocuichy t1fopoftf In Mosbort - VOID Ili 01,10NI%$ VAI 269P�t 113 of (AcWl Koccfds 1:1 The o"Cl location of INt bdsanieti,t carvi 0 be ... ...... . 119m No to dotormIned and ts nol plonMa 111 0R28?1I9;2 V;dI 140 Pq607 of Offieiai Returdt Item No. 15 - CaramurA (cc DIsAribludorl of Elect(icity 11119 OX00 I(KaIllon of the Oww4nt 4wtaot, be If) (12M 111948 V'ol 2.1U1 PD2,49 of 01110WI ROCCXdS doterm'wried unJ is ndi pialiahle El- Tbe exact loraUun W Owl, lmsuniur'A runuol be r ---n flent No. 11 - Easement Mr Tmnsrrf�,ssl�on & detormirad and 4 nc4 plottatgo LVielflbmni of Elodr,10y Itern: No. 16 , Ea"rnum (w Sewer Pipe J In 00211923 Val 144 Pgisq or Cff.,#6al Rouwds� I n, 0212tW I W2 Vol 62 1 P921 1 of Official NO c ",Os The owA IQcalfon of "o owARiont 4wnot be Affeds said po4on at; deocribed in the docurnuni MortnIned and ir, nut pUtablu Item No- 12, Easernent for Irzigaling DIdws Item No, 17 - Eawnioni tof S#wer Pipe in I i 04� 1 VA V61 163 f1gn (A orklol wc;ords In (IN I W1 D66 111ulk 66"06936 1:10111 Record's The exacl lacalian of lite eatatnuitt catiml: be Affoda se)d portoo as doscrIbM oi On, d000rnem 01(wm4lod end Is not ploltWo Item No18 - Easonionl for Slormgowor & DrMtTufe flans Nu� 13," Ewwmont for Dutribullon of Elut;lricity In 07122M 971 Inst N 71,09090 of official Rocccds in WON'194B Vol 28U PgWotl M10 H*oorde E j Affetts amd poibori As dosceitted In lite docurnurA F-171to exact lucaliun of lite cataincutcavrYtit be oatefmoed slid 18 not plotWbla WvLlwo No 440rd W.wiw 14l WJ I Nw, rq OM IM071121 �� FW h",)wr6 RuM W. � I? 1E. 4W SAT OHM F � qkvP� : V4 F. UM: m 6W (4. MW i M � Oq 4762 D WA: tor Thle, Company I L 110 Woo, Ult Irl !*vA LM4 W?'�un 4466�WO W Cde),VJ?-tb1W ry m4wi vews ttwq ril StvA v fj f PAA C E L I W' l 'Aft I I w+4 I 11A t N U - 11 -z!'L51j I # A C Co IWIM; 10 'WL U, V� I U Ltd 9NA t I p i L (Wi f,%Ve� Ut RE Wl'W M W "OtCLA;l C41 fW01',uh N.At s, 011 j0s�,KWN COLMY, <4400,14 Ah.1 FIEW111kri M.'Rbi jo, Iota ASL_,,..� t, WMR -47M) 29% 010 12 l. OFF rW. RK0M : CF WKW4 CA,14rY, M MAIN AND FAA0 M VAWY P7,27M N TPF C';FrA0FTW. JA1rF*0%4,0,JN'TY*J.MYFYQ3 I SCHOTT & ASSOCIATES Ecologists & Wetlands Specialists 21018 NE Hwy 99E • RO. Box 589 • Aurora, OR 97002 • (503) 678.6007 • FAX: (503) 678-6011 JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT FOR 345 Clinton St. Partition Ashland, OR T39S, RIE, 4DB, TL 401 (portion) Prepared for Kathleen Kahle 345 Clinton Street Ashland, Oregon 97520 Prepared by Jodi Reed Juniper Tagliabue of Schott & Associates, Inc. Date: March 2020 Project #: 2736 TABLE OF CONTENTS (A) LANDSCAPE SETTING AND LAND USE.............................................................. I (B) SITE ALTERATIONS................................................................................................. I (C) PRECIPITATION DATA AND ANALYSIS.............................................................. I (D) SITE SPECIFIC METHODS ...................... .............. 3 (E) DESCRIPTION OF ALL WETLANDS AND OTHER NON -WETLAND WATERS ........................ ................ ................................................................................................ I.... 4 (F) DEVIATION FROM LWI OR NWI............................................................................ 5 (G) MAPPING METHOD.................................................................................................. 5 (H) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION................................................................................ 6 ( I) SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS........................................................................... 6 (J) DISCLAIMER............................................................................................................... 6 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1. PRECIPITATION SUMMARY FORTHE DATE OF FIELDWORK AND PRECEDING WATER YEAR (OCTOBER 1, 2019 -- JANUARY 28, 2020) .............................................. 2 TABLE 2. PRECIPITATION SUMMARY FOR THREE MONTHS PRECEDING FIELDWORK AND COMPARISON TO WETS AVERAGE AND NORMAL RANGE ........................................... 2 TABLE 3. SOIL SUMMARY TABLE......................................................................................... 3 LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A: FIGURES.......................................................................................... I FIGURE1: LOCATION MAP................................................................................... 2 FIGURE2: TAX MAP............................................................................................... 3 FIGURE 3: NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY MAP ...................................... 4 FIGURE 4: USDA/NRCS SOIL SURVEY MAP ...................................................... 5 FIGURE 5A: RECENT AERIAL IMAGE -JUNE 29, 2018 .................................... 6 FIGURE 513: HISTORICAL AERIAL IMAGE - AUGUST 5, 1994 ........................ 7 FIGURE 6: WETLAND DELINEATION MAP ........................................................ 8 APPENDIX B: DATA FORMS................................................................................. 9 APPENDIX C: SITE PHOTOGRAPIIS.................................................................. 10 APPENDIX D: ASHLAND LWI....................................................I........................ 11 APPENDIX E: LITERATURE CITATIONS.......................................................... 12 (A) Landscape Setting and Land Use Schott & Associates (S&A) was contracted to conduct a wetland delineation on a 3.55 - acre study site located on a portion of the approximately 12 acre property located at 345 Clinton Street in Ashland, Oregon (T39S, RIE, Section 4DB, portion of TL401). The onsite field work was to document existing wetlands and other waters that may be regulated under the Clean Water Act (CWA) by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and under the Removal -Fill Law by the Oregon Department of State Lands (DSL). This report complies with all standards and requirements set forth in Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR) 141-090-0035 (1-17) for wetland delineation reports and jurisdictional determinations for the purpose of regulating fill and removal within waters of the state, This report will be used to fulfill federal and state regulatory requirements for project permitting. The study site encompassed the eastern 3.55 -acres of the subject property. The western study area boundary was defined by an existing paved roadway which extended north from Phelps Street and essentially divided the property in two from east to west The undeveloped study site is flat to gently sloping, with a gentle Swale extending southeast to northwest along the northern portion of the property. The Swale was historically dominated by Himalayan blackberry (Rubes armeniacus, FAC), which had recently been cleared. A shallow road ditch was observed along the northern portion of the roadway extending downslope to the north into a small depression. A culvert extended from the western edge of the depression tinder the road to the west, to an offsite pond/wetland. The site was generally snowed grasses with portions consisting of old orchard planted to pear trees (Pyres sp.; NOL). Dominant grass species were tall fescue (Schedonorus aiwndinaceus; FAC) and perennial ryegrass (Lolizan perenne; FAC). Also present in wetter areas were swaths of slough sedge (Carex obrtttpta; OBL) and poison hemlock (Conittnt maculattan; FAC). A residential home was located to the west on the unincluded portion of the tax lot. Surrounding land use is residential. Adjacent to the north is North Mountain Park Nature Center which is preserved open space and includes Bear Creek. (B) Site Alterations Aerial photographs for the time period between 1994 and 2018 were reviewed, available from Google Earth. Aerial photographs indicate that study site conditions have remained relatively stable during that timeline (Figure 5a -5b). (C) Precipitation Data and Analysis Precipitation data for the date of fieldwork and the time period preceding it were reviewed to evaluate observed wetland hydrology conditions relative to actual and statistically normal precipitation. Precipitation that deviates from normal ranges can affect site conditions and impact observed wetland hydrology indicators. Precipitation Schott & Associates Ecologists and Wedwid Specialises YO Box 589, Aurora, OR. 97042 (503) 678-6007 Page I S&A r` 2736 data was acquired from the Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) Agricultural Applied Climate Information System (AgACIS). Significant data was missing from the closest stations. Data was obtained from the Ashland 0.5N, OR (CoCoRaHS) station to provide context for observed hydrological conditions of the study area at the time of the site visit (AgACIS 2019). Table I provides the precipitation data for the date of field work, the two weeks preceding, and the water year with comparison to the normal water year. WETS table data was not available for the 0.5N station. Table 2 provides a precipitation summary for the entire month of January as well as the three months preceding fieldwork and comparison to average and normal monthly ranges of precipitation representing 70% probability as reported for the Ashland MRCS WETS station (MRCS 1981-2010). Table 1. Precipitation Summary for the Date of Fieldwork and Preceding Water Year *Data provided by MRCS AgACIS data front Ashland 0.5 N, OR, 2019-2020 Table 2. Precipitation Summary for Three Months Preceding Fieldwork and Comparison o WETS Average and Normal Rant~e Data provided by NRCS AgACIS data from the Ashland 0.5 N, OR station 2019-2020. November data missing from this set. November 2019 data from Ashland, OR station. **Data provided by NRCS NETS station for Ashland OR, 1981-2010 Fieldwork took place ori January 28, 2020 when 0.07 inches of precipitation were recorded. In the t-wo weeks preceding fieldwork, 1.55 inches of precipitation were recorded. Precipitation for the entire month of January was above the WETS range. Precipitation observed in the months of October and November was well below both the WETS average and range. Precipitation for December was within the WETS range but below the average. Precipitation for the water year thus far (October 1, 2019 -January 28, 2020) was 62% of normal. Based on these measures, with a very dry October and November, followed by a December within normal range and a wetter than average January, it is assumed that observed surface water levels were high and groundwater levels were normal for time of site assessment. Schott & Associates Ecologists and Wetland speciolisls PO Bos 589, Aurora, OR. 97002 (503) 678-60117 Page 2 Sc-zl4 2736 Total WETS WETS Normal Month Pt eeipitation Average ' Range Normal inches * ` niches January 3.23 2.26 1.26-2.73 143% December 2.06 3.44 1.80-4.26 60% November 0.49 3.00 1.99-3.62 16% October 0.50 1.41 1.81409 35% Data provided by NRCS AgACIS data from the Ashland 0.5 N, OR station 2019-2020. November data missing from this set. November 2019 data from Ashland, OR station. **Data provided by NRCS NETS station for Ashland OR, 1981-2010 Fieldwork took place ori January 28, 2020 when 0.07 inches of precipitation were recorded. In the t-wo weeks preceding fieldwork, 1.55 inches of precipitation were recorded. Precipitation for the entire month of January was above the WETS range. Precipitation observed in the months of October and November was well below both the WETS average and range. Precipitation for December was within the WETS range but below the average. Precipitation for the water year thus far (October 1, 2019 -January 28, 2020) was 62% of normal. Based on these measures, with a very dry October and November, followed by a December within normal range and a wetter than average January, it is assumed that observed surface water levels were high and groundwater levels were normal for time of site assessment. Schott & Associates Ecologists and Wetland speciolisls PO Bos 589, Aurora, OR. 97002 (503) 678-60117 Page 2 Sc-zl4 2736 (D) Site Specific Methods Prior to visiting the site, the following existing data and information was reviewed: • Jackson County tax snap (Figure 2) • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetland Inventory (NWI) and Oregon Department of Forestry (ODF) stream snapping (Figure 3) • Ashland Local Wetland Inventory (LWI; Appendix D) • U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) gridded Soil Survey Geographic (gSSURGO) database for Jackson County (Figure 4) • Recent and historical aerial photographs provided by Google Earth. (Figures 5a - 5b) • U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) National Elevation Data (NED), 119 arc -second, (2012; Figure 6) Three soil series were mapped within the study site boundary according to the USDA NRCS soil survey for Jackson County. Medford silty clay loam was mapped along the northeastern edge of the site, Coker clay was snapped within the middle portion of the site and Carney cobbly clay was snapped in the southwestern corner of the site, Onsite soils are summarized in Table 3 below. 1 ante -5. post sumtnary i ante Schott & Associates visited the site oil January 28, 2020 to assess for the extent of onsite wetlands and waters. Formal delineation data were collected according to methods described in the 1987Ifanual and the Regional Sulrplement to the Coes o f Engineers Delineation Iranual: TVestern Mountains, Tralleys and Coast Region (Tlersion 2.0) to determine boundaries of wetlands subject to state and federal jurisdiction. Due to a wetter than average January and recent rainfall, significant surface water was present throughout the site at the time of the site visit. Twenty sample plots were established to identify presence or absence and boundaries of wetland criteria. Data on vegetation, hydrology, and soils were collected, recorded in the field and later transferred to data forms (Appendix B). Plant wetland indicator status was determined using the 2016 National Wetland Plant List (Lichvar et al. 2016). Schott & Associates Ecologists and wetland Specialist,, PO BON 581)_ Aurora, OR. 97002 (503) 678-6007 Page 3 Sc�,.•[ ' 2736 Hydric Rating {% Table Map Unit Name ; ° Inclusions Medford silty clay 0-3 Predominantly loam nonh dric 3 Coker clay 0-3 Predominantly nonh dric 8 Carney cobbly clay 20-35 Predominantly nonh dric 7 Schott & Associates visited the site oil January 28, 2020 to assess for the extent of onsite wetlands and waters. Formal delineation data were collected according to methods described in the 1987Ifanual and the Regional Sulrplement to the Coes o f Engineers Delineation Iranual: TVestern Mountains, Tralleys and Coast Region (Tlersion 2.0) to determine boundaries of wetlands subject to state and federal jurisdiction. Due to a wetter than average January and recent rainfall, significant surface water was present throughout the site at the time of the site visit. Twenty sample plots were established to identify presence or absence and boundaries of wetland criteria. Data on vegetation, hydrology, and soils were collected, recorded in the field and later transferred to data forms (Appendix B). Plant wetland indicator status was determined using the 2016 National Wetland Plant List (Lichvar et al. 2016). Schott & Associates Ecologists and wetland Specialist,, PO BON 581)_ Aurora, OR. 97002 (503) 678-6007 Page 3 Sc�,.•[ ' 2736 The ordinary high-water mark (OHW) of the onsite ditch was delineated in the field based on elevation and change in vegetation communities. Identified wetlands and waters are classified according to the USFWS Classification of O'etIcinds and Deeptt,ater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al. 1979). Representative ground level photographs were taken to document site conditions (Appendix C; Figure 6). (E) Description of All Wetlands and Other Non -Wetland Waters Based on soil, vegetation and hydrology data collected onsite one 0.41 -acre palustrine emergent (PEM) wetland (Wetland 1), one 0.004 -acre PEM wetland (Wetland 2) and one ditch were identified within the study site. Wetland boundaries, sample plot locations, and photo point locations are shown in Figure 6, FP'etland 1: Wetland I was a broad shallow swale extending northwest along the northern extent of the site. The swale was bordered by gentle to moderate slopes. The depression impounds precipitation and surface water runoff; no inlet or outlet was observed, Tile wetland contained several inches of surface water within the center of the wetland (SP4). The edges and southeastern extent of the wetland documented saturated soils with a high- water table along the edges. Vegetation was dominated by slough sedge (SP4, 6, 9, 11, 14, 16) with meadow foxtail and poison hemlock as subdominants. Soils were generally dark (10YR2/1) but not meeting any hydric soil indicators. Alpha, alpha-dipryridyl was used with no reaction evident. However, soils may lack hydric indicators due to the area being seasonally ponded and high clay content of soils. Problematic procedures, as outlined in the regional supplement were followed to determine the area to meets wetland criteria. 1. Hydrophytic vegetation is present. 2. Primary hydrology indicator was present. 3. The topography is a concave surface (swale/depression). 4. The area is a depression/coneave surface and soils are seasonally ponded. Based oil these problematic procedure soil criteria was determined to be met. Redox Dark Surface (176) hydric soil indicator was met at SP9, SPI I and SPI 6. Wetland I was assessed as a depressional closed permanent "GM class with a Cowardin classification of seasonally flooded/saturated palustrine emergent (PEME). Adjacent upland vegetation was similar, including high cover of slough sedge, but 110 hydrology indicators were present and soil criteria could not be inferred based on site conditions. ff'etland 2: Wetland 2 was a small depression located downslope and northwest of Wetland 1. Wetland 2 was separated from Wetland 1 by a large berm. A culvert inlet extending under the access road to the northwest facilitated connection to an offsite wetland/pond. Wetland 2 appears to pond hydrology during highwater events. Surface Schott & Associates Ecologists and Welland 5picia isLs YO Box 587, Aurora, Ott. 97002 (503) 678-6007 Pulte 4 S&11.'! 2736 water was approximately 4" deep at the time of the site visit. It is assumed this was high based on January precipitation levels. The depression was entirely bare ground with blackberry rooted outside along the margins. Vegetation conditions were considered problematic due to the season (Sparse and patchy vegetation). It is likely that 5% or more of hydrophytic vegetation cover would be present in the high point of the growing season and vegetation criteria was considered to be met. No hydric soil indicators were observed but soils were dark with a value of 2.5 or less and a chroma of I to 10 inches (10YR2/1). It is possible that the soils meet the Thick Dark Surface (Al2) hydric soil indicator. Soils were determined to be hydric based on topographic position and presence of other criteria via problematic methods as described above. Wetland 2 was assessed as a depress iona Us lope HGM class with a Cowardin classification of seasonally flooded/saturated palustrine unconsolidated bottom (PUBS). The adjacent upland had the same soil and vegetation however no topographic depression was present, and no hydrology indictors were observed (SP2). Ditch: The onsite ditch was a shallow (less than I foot deep) road ditch extending downslope to the north. The feature was not well defined and ranged in width from I to 3 feet wide. The ditch was dominated by mowed grasses consisting of meadow foxtaii and tall fescue. The ditch extended north into TYetland 2. (F) Deviation from LWI or NWI NWI mapping shows a persistent seasonally flooded palustrine emergent (PEMIC) wetland snapped in the northern part of the study area, roughly corresponding with the location of 1'Petland 1. ODF streams identifies a stream extending onsite in the northwestern corner of the study area. The City of Ashland Local Wetland Inventory (Appendix D) shows two ponds, a possible wetland and stream within the vicinity of the study area. Only the possible wetland (PW) appears to be within the designated study area. The onsite delineation refined the boundaries of the identified feature along the northern boundary and identified the road ditch. Identified resources were mapped based on site conditions. G Mapping.Method The mapped wetland was based on soil, vegetation and hydrology data gathered in the field. The onsite ditch was mapped based on field indicators of OHW including elevation and vegetation. Wetland boundaries, OHW, sample plot locations, and photo point locations were flagged and recorded with a handheld Trimble GPS unit capable of sub- meter accuracy following differential correction with Pathfinder Office desktop software. "These data were converted to ESRI shapefile and mapped using AreMap 10.6 desktop software. Schott & Associates F.eoloi,ists and wetland Specialists YO Box 589. Aurora_ OR. 07002 (503) 678-6007 Page 5 S&A R 2 736 (H) Additional Information None. (1) Summary and Conclusions Based on vegetation, soils, and hydrology data gathered onsite, 0.414 -acre of wetland and one ditch were identified within the study site, il'etland I was a swale extending northwest across the northern portion of the study. A berm separated Welland 1 and Tf'etland 2. ffetland 2 was a sthhall depression which drained into a culvert under the roadway at the western study area boundary. TVetland 2 appears to pond hydrology during highwater events. Vegetation and soils were consistent throughout the project area and wetland boundaries were defined primarily on hydrology and topography. Sample plots placed in the southern portion of the study site did not indicate the presence of any additional wetlands/waters, (J) Disclaimer This report documents the investigation, best professional judgment, and conclusions of the investigators. It is correct and complete to the best of our knowledge. It should be considered a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination of wetlands and other waters and used at your own risk unless it has been reviewed and approved in writing by the Oregon Department of State lands in accordance with OAR 141-0900005 through 141-090- 0055. Schott & Associates Ecologists and wetland Spt6ahsls PO Box 539, Aurora, OR. 97002 503 678-6007 Page 6 S&,,I "# 2736 APPENDIX A: FIGURES FIGURE 1: LOCATION MAP Date: 2/14/2020 Figure L Location Map Data Source: E51t1, 2020 Clinton Street Project Site: S&A #2736 C0 0.25 O 5 1 Miles 'HOTT 3Stu,4 Sate Loc tion"' ' V, nvaAp tri Ing kh Ml lie^Is V. Study Si , i6 oca ion Lt v Ashland As, RO, U Ch 91 7, �7, d 0, J non Y Z. A, t 1, t V/ 6 k v, 64- A T, e,n o a Kmotmb Poo Date: 2/14/2020 Figure L Location Map Data Source: E51t1, 2020 Clinton Street Project Site: S&A #2736 C0 0.25 O 5 1 Miles 'HOTT FIGURE 2: TAX MAP CS 2 9 CA P2 IN, C S 7441 GS MIS CS 12487 CS 11918 CS 18052 L, CS 18338 7 ' PT. OF2 P' 01 --- --------- Date: 2/14/2020 Data Source: Jackson Coutity GIS Dept:, 2.020 C, S 1T 1i tT I 0 Legetid Study Site Boundary: 3.55 acres Tax Lot Boundary DR. A 2 110�O 11. 5-01, 021 i� �;l 3 027 m P3. 400 D WC da CS W35 401 a 4 12-29M. P, 6 0 29 A ps 7 024M ✓ § r CS 6779 P 6 �. 08 033 Os 12094 CS 20570 CS 20677 CS 21725 CS 2 9 CA P2 IN, C S 7441 GS MIS CS 12487 CS 11918 CS 18052 L, CS 18338 7 ' PT. OF2 P' 01 --- --------- Date: 2/14/2020 Data Source: Jackson Coutity GIS Dept:, 2.020 C, S 1T 1i tT I 0 Legetid Study Site Boundary: 3.55 acres Tax Lot Boundary — — — — — — — — — — — — - L — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — PCL 2 PCL. I CS -1 2103 aA ,�V 523 11 '`m ;, 522 0 145 AC Figure 2. Jackson County Tax Map - 391E4DB Clinton Street Project Site: S&A 2736 0 50 100 200 Feet A — — — — — — — — — — — — - L — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — PCL 2 PCL. I CS -1 2103 aA ,�V 523 11 '`m ;, 522 0 145 AC Figure 2. Jackson County Tax Map - 391E4DB Clinton Street Project Site: S&A 2736 0 50 100 200 Feet FIGURE 3: NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY MAP Date: 3/13/2020 Data Source: ESRI, 2020; Jackson County GIS Dept, 2019'; USFWS, NWI, 2019; ODF, 2019 & ASA)(TAITS' hIF" Figure 3. Wetland Inventory Map Clinton Street Project Site: S&A # 2736 0 50 100 200 Feet FIGURE 4: USDA/NRCS SOIL SURVEY MAP Date: 2/13/2020 Figure 4. USDA/NRCS Soil Survey Map Data Source: ESRJ, 2020; Jackson County GIS Dept, 2019; Soil Survey Staff, USDA, NRCS, 2/1312020 for Jackson County Clinton Street Project Site: S&A # 2736 50 100 200 Fed FIGURE 5A• RECENT AERIAL IMAGE--JUNE 29 2018 Date: 2/13/2020 Figure 5 a. Recent Aerial Image - Data Source: ESR1, 2020; Jackson Comity GIS Dept, 2019 June 29, 2018 TClinton Street Project Site: S&A # 2736 100 200 Feet i SCHOT o' �ssocilvrrs, jm'It 140- 1 - 11 FIGURE 5B; HISTORICAL AERIAL IMAGE --- AUGUST 5 1994 Date: 2114/2020 Figure 5b. Historical Aerial Image - Data Source: Google Earth, 2020; Jackson County GIS Dept, 2019 August 5, 1994 Clinton Street Project Site: S&A 2736 A, OCIA',11KS, 0 50 100 200 Feet I'', S( �1'1 FIGURE 6: WETLAND DELINEATION MAI' Date: 3/6/2020 Figure 6. Wetland Data Source: ESRI, 2020 Jackson County Delineation Map GIS, Dep(., 2019; USGS, NED, 2012 Clinton Street PrQject Site: S&A # 2736 "'c S 0 50 FOO 200 Feet APPENDIX B: DATA FORMS T I WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast Region Project/Site: Clinton St. City/County: Ashland/Jackson Sampling Date: 7/28!2020 Applicant/Owner. Kathleen Kahle State: OR Sampling Point: 1 Investigator(s): JRR, MRS Section, Township, Range: 4DB, 395, 1E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0-2 Subregion (LRR): Northv.,est Forests and Coast (LRR A) Lat: 42.20455201 tong: -122.7049832 Datum: WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: Coker Clay 0-3% NWl Classification: None Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this Time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" Present? Yes X No Are Vegetation Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area Yes X No within a Wetland? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Remarks: Plot was located in a small deep depression. A culvert extended under the driveway to the test, hydrology backs up within the depression under high water events and ponds. Precipitation in January was wetter than average, it is assumed that observed surface water levels were high and groundwater levels were normal for time of site assessment, VEGETATION Liz) Fumy corps or t-ngineers western mountains, vaueys ana roast - version z.0 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status? Number or Dominant Species 7 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) 2, Total Number of Dominant 3, Species Across All Strata: (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species Total Cover, 0 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (AIB) Shrub Stratum Prevalence Index Worksheet: 1. Total % Cover of. Multiply by: 2. OBL species x1 = 0 3. FACW species x2 = 0 4, FAC species x3 = 0 5. FACU species x4 = 0 Total Cover. 0 UPL species x5 = 0 Herb Stratum Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B) 1. Prevalence Index = BIA = 2. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 3. 4. 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 6. 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0' 7. 4 - Morphological Adaptation'! (Provide supporting 8, data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9. 5 - Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' 10. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 11. Total Cover. 0 Woody Vine Stratum 'Indicators of hydric soil and %ttland hydrology must 1. be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic 2. Total Cover. 0 Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 100 % Cover of Biotic Crust 0 Present? Yes No X Remarks:RUAR had been mmved and is rooted outside the sample plot (depression). Liz) Fumy corps or t-ngineers western mountains, vaueys ana roast - version z.0 SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Calor (moist) % Calor (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks 0-10 10YR211 100 C 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solls3: _ Histosol (Al) Sandy Redox (SS) 2 cm Muck (A10) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) x Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) W� Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Muck Mineral (S1) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Sandy gleyed Matrix (54) Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Water Marks (131) ^_ Type: Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Remarks: Soils have no indicators. Soils are very dark and did not exhibit recognizable redoximorphic features. Soil and landscape were documented thoroughly. Problematic procedue being used: 1. Hydrophytic vegetatation is present. Area was dominated by RUAR (rooted outside of the depression). 2. Primary indicator of hydrology was present as surface water within the depression. 3. The topography is a concave surface (depression). The soils may lack hyric indicators based the area being seasonally ponded and high clay content of soils. Alpha, alpha-dipryridyl was used with no reaction evident. BPJ used Ito determine soils. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) X Surface Water (Al) Water -Stained Leaves (69) (except Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, _ High Water Table (A2) MLRA 1, 2, 4A and 413) 4A and 4B) Saturation (A3) Salt Crust (611) Drainage Patterns (610) Water Marks (131) ^_ Aquatic Invertebrates (613) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (132) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (63) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Geomorphic Position (132) Algal Mat or Crust (134) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ShallowAquitard (133) _^ Iron Deposits (135) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC -Neutral Test (135) Surface Soil Cracks (136) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) Other (Explain in Remarks) Frost -Heave Hummocks (137) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 4" Water table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast -Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast Region Project/Site: Clinton St. City/County: Ashland/Jackson Sampling Date: 1/28/2020 Applicant/Owner: Kathleen Kahle State: OR Sampling Point: 2 Investigator(s): JRR, MRS Section, Township, Range: ADB, 39S, 1E Landform (hiIlslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace/Mounded Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): Subregion (LRR): Northwest Forests and Coast (LRR A) Lai: 42.20452206 Long: -122.7049338 Datum: WGS 84 Sal Map Unit Name: Coker Clay 0-3% NWI Classification: PEM1C Are climatic! hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (if no, explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" Present? Yes X No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X is the Sampled Area Yes No X within a Welland? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Remarks: Plot located on a mounded area separating ponded features. Plot was higher in elevation VEGETATION uS Army Corps of t=ngineers vvestern mountains, vaueys ano ucast - version z.0 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Cover Species? Status? Number of Dominant Species 1 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across All Strata 1 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species Total Cover: 0 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (AIB) Shrub Stratum Prevalence Index Worksheet: 1. Rubus armeniacus 100 Y FAC Total % Cover of Multiply by: 2. OBL species x1 = 0 3. FACW species x2 = 0 4. FAC species x3 = 0 5. FACU species x4 = 0 Total Cover: 100 UPL species x5 = 0 Herb Stratum Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B) 1. Prevalence index = B/A = 2. 3, Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. X 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 6. 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01 7. 4 - Morphological Adaptation) (Provide supporting 8. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9, 5 - Wetland Non -Vascular Plants1 10. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 11. Total Cover. 0 Woody Vine Stratum 'Indicators of hydric soil and watland hydrology must 1 be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 2. Hydrophytic Total Cover: 0 Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 0 % Cover of Biotic Crust 0 Present? Yes X No Remarks:RUAR had been mowed. uS Army Corps of t=ngineers vvestern mountains, vaueys ano ucast - version z.0 SOIL J' Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type) Loc' Texture Remarks 0-16 10YR211 100 Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except C 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Sol[ Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solls3: Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (TF2) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Geomorphic Position (D2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) Depleted Matrix (F3) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Redox Dark Surface (176) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Muck Mineral (S1) u Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Surface Water Present? Yes No X Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks: Water table Present? Yes No X HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) _ Surface Water (Al) Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except Water -Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, High Water Table (A2) u_ MLRA 1, 2,41A and 4B) 4A and 4B) Saturation (A3) Salt Crust (1311) _ Drainage Patterns (1310) _ Water Marks (61) _ Aquatic Invertebrates (813) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (132) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits (133) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Algal Mat or Crust (84) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) Iron Deposits (B5) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (06) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) _ Surface Soil Cracks (86) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) Raised Ant Abounds (D6) (LRR A) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (Inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast -Version 2.0 1 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast Region ProjectlSite: Clinton St. City/County: Ashland/Jackson Sampling [late: 1/2812020 ApplicantlOwner: Kathleen Kahle State: OR Sampling Point: 3 Investigator(s): JRR, MRS Section, Township, Range: 4DB, 39S, 1E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace/Mound Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): Subregion (LRR): Northwest Forests and Coast (LRR A) Lat: 42.2044625 Long: -122.7048943 Datum: WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: Coker Ciay 0-3% NWI Classification: PEM1C Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" Present? Yes X No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area Yes No X within a Wetland? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Remarks: Plot located on a mounded area separating ponded features. Plot was higher in elevation. VEGETATION uzj Krmy corps or engineers vvastelrl !vivid U111to, VdIICyJ d11V k UCSI - vul Jluil G.0 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) %clover Species? Status? Number of Dominant Species 1 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across All Strata: 1 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species Total Cover. 0 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B) Shrub Stratum Prevalence Index Worksheet: 1. Rubus armenlacus 100 Y FAC Total % Cover of. Multiply by: 2. OBL species X1 = 0 3. FAGW species x2 = 0 4. FAC species x3 = 0 5. FACU species x4 = 0 Total Cover: 100 UPL species x5 = 0 Herb Stratum Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B) 1. Prevalence Index = B/A = 2, 3. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4, 1 - Rapid Test for Hydfophytic Vegetation 5. X 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 6. 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0' 7, 4 -Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting 8. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) g, 5 - Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' 10, Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 11. Total Cover: 0 Woody Vine Stratum 'Indicatofs of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 1. be pfesent, unless distufbed or problematic. Z Hydrophytic Total Cover: 0 Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 0 % Cover of Biotic Crust 0 Present? Yes X No Remarks:RUAR had been mowed. uzj Krmy corps or engineers vvastelrl !vivid U111to, VdIICyJ d11V k UCSI - vul Jluil G.0 SOIL r Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks 0-3 10YR211 100 Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except C 3-16 10YR212 100 MLRA 1, 2, 4A and 48) C Type e: C= Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (Al) Sandy Redox (S5) 2 em Muck (A10) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (TF2) _^ Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl) (except MLRA 1) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Depleted Below Dark Surface (All 1) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) Test (D5) ^_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Redox Dark Surface (F6) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Muck Mineral (S1) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy gleyed Matrix (84) Redox Depressions (178) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Surface Water Present? Yes No x Depth (inches): Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Surface Water (Al) Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except Water -Stained Leaves (89) (MLRA 1, 2, High Water Table (A2) MLRA 1, 2, 4A and 48) 4A and 413) Saturation (A3) Salt Crust (1311) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (131) Aquatic Invertebrates (813) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (B3) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Geomorphic Position (132) Algal Mat or Crust (134) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Iron Deposits (B5) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6)FAC-Neutral Test (D5) _ Surface Soil Cracks (136) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Other (Explain in Remarks) Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No x Depth (inches): Water table Present? Yes No x Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No x Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers vvestern mountains, vaneys ano toast -version z.v r WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast Region Pro;ecusite: Clinton St. City/County: Ashland/Jackson Sampling Date: 1128120 ApplicantlOvmer: Kathleen Kahle State: OR Sampling Point: 4 Investigatof(s): JRR, MRS Section, Tm%nship, Range: 4DB, 39S, 1E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 4 -Feb Subregion (LRR): Northwest Forests and Coast (LRR A) Lat: 42.20443778 Long: -122.7048663 Datum: WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: Coker Clay 0-3% NWI Classification: PEM1C Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' Present? Yes X No Are Vegetation , Sail or Hydrology naturally problematic? (!f needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydfophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X Na Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area Yes X No within a Wetland? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Remarks: VEGETATION u5 Amy Uofps or Lngineers vvesrern mountains, vaifeys allu Uuasc - vulbluii Z.0 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Cover Species? Status? Number o€ Dominant Species 1 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Acfoss All Strata: 1 (B) 4• Percent of Dominant Species Total Cover. 0 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (AIB) Shrub Stratum Prevalence Index Worksheet: 1. Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species xi = 0 3. FACW species x2 = 0 4. FAC species x3 = 0 5. FACU species x4 = 0 Total Cover: 0 UPL species x5 = 0 Herb Stratum Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B) 1. Carex obnupta 40 Y OBL Prevalence Index = BIA= 2. 3. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4, 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. X 2 - Dominance Test is X50% 6. 3 - Prevalence Index is :-3.0' 7. 4 - Morphological Adaptatienl (Provide supporting 8. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9. 5 - Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' 10. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 11. Total Cover: 40 Woody Vine Stratum 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 1, be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 2. Hydrophytic Total Cover: 0 Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 60 % Cover of Biotic Crust 0 Present? Yes X No Remarks: Bare ground/Open water. u5 Amy Uofps or Lngineers vvesrern mountains, vaifeys allu Uuasc - vulbluii Z.0 SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Calor (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-16 10YR211 100 C 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: _ Histosol (Al) _ Sandy Redox (S5) 2 cm Muck (A10) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (TF2) _ Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) X Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Redox Dark Surface (176) 31ndicators of hydrophyfic vegetation and Sandy Muck Mineral (S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Sandy gleyed Matrix (84) Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): _ Water Marks (B1) _ Type: Dry -Season Water Table (02) Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Remarks: Soils have no indicators. Soils are very dark and did not exhibit recognizable redoximorphic features- Soil and landscape were documented throuroughly. Problematic procedue being used: 1. Hydrophytic vegetatation is present. Area was dominated by RUAR (rooted outside of the depression). 2. Primary indicator of hydrology was present as surface water within the depression. 3. The topography is a concave surface (depression). The soils may lack hyric indicators based the area being seasonlly ponded and high clay content of soils. Alpha, alpha-dipryridyl was used with no reaction evident. BPJ used to determine soils. HYDROLOGY Wetiand Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) X Surface Water (Al) Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, High Water Table (A2) MLRA 1, 2,4A and 48) 4A and 4B) Saturation (A3) Salt crust (811) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) _ Water Marks (B1) _ Aquatic invertebrates (B13) _ Dry -Season Water Table (02) Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (B3) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Algal Mat or Crust (134) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) Iron Deposits (B5) — Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) _ Surface Soil Cracks (136) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 3" Water table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wetiand Hydrology Present? Yes X No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: u5 Army corps of i=ngineers Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast -Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast Region Project/Site: Clinton St. City/County: AshlandlJackson Sampling Date: 1128120 Applicant/Owner. Kathleen Kahle State: OR Sampling Pant: 5 InvesUgator(s): JRR, MRS Section, Township, Range: 4DB, 39S, 1E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): TerracelSlope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 5 -Feb Subregion (LRR); Northwest Forests and Coast (LRR A) Lat: 42.2044691 Long: -122.7046829 Datum: WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: Coker Clay 0-3% NWl Classification: PEMiC Are dimafic l hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" Present? Yes X No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -- Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area Yes No X within a Wetland? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Remarks: Plot is paired plot to wetland. Higher in elevation on slope. RUAR was rooted vrithin the area, but recently mowed. VEGETATION US Army Corps or engineers western mountains, vaueys ane coast - version z.0 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Testworksheet: Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) °/a Cover Species? Status? Number of Dominant Species 1 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species Total Cover: 0 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/8) Shrub Stratum Prevalence index Worksheet: 1. Rubus armeniacus 5 Y FAC Total % Cover of. Multiply by: 2, OBL species x1 W 0 3. FACW species x2 = 0 4. FAC species x3 = 0 5. FACU species x4 = 0 Total Cover: 5 UPL species x5 = 0 Herb Stratum Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B) 1. Carex obnupfa 40 Y OBL Prevalence Index = BlA= 2. Schodonorus arundinaceus 50 Y FAC 3. Daucuscarofa 10 FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. X 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 6. 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0' 7. 4 - Morphological Adaptation) (Provide supporting 8, data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9. 5 - Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' 10. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 11. Total Cover: 100 Woody Vine Stratum 'Indicators of hydric soil and v egand hydrology must 1 be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 2. Hydrophytic Total Cover. 0 Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 0 % Cover of Biotic Crust 0 Present? Yes X No Remarks: RUAR had recently been mowed. US Army Corps or engineers western mountains, vaueys ane coast - version z.0 SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type} Loc' Texture Remarks 0-18 10YR212 100 LC Typ�Concentfatfon, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (Al) Sandy Redox (S5) 2 cm Muck (A10) Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (171) (except MLRA 1) Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Matrix (F3) ^_ _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Redox Dark Surface (F6) 3indicators of hydrophoo vegetation and _ Sandy Muck Mineral (S1)Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Sandy gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): ShallowAquitard (D3) Iron Deposits (135) Type: FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Surface Soil Cracks (136) Depth (inches): Raised Ant Mounds (06) (LRR A) Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks: Tested alpha alpha and did not make it. Plot is higher in elevation. Not ponded. BPJ. HYDROLOGY Wetfand Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Surface Water (Al) Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except Water -Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, _ X High Water Table (A2) MLRA 1, 2,4A and 4B) 4A and 48) X Saturation (A3) _ Salt Crust (611) Drainage Patterns (1310) Water Marks (131) Aquatic Invertebrates (613) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (133) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Geomorphic Position (D2) ^ Algal Mat or Crust (134) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ShallowAquitard (D3) Iron Deposits (135) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Surface Soil Cracks (136) Stunted or Stressed Plants (01) (LRR A) Raised Ant Mounds (06) (LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) Other (Explain in Remarks) Frost -Heave Hummocks (137) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Plaid Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 12" Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 11" Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers vvestern mountains, vaneys ane toast -version z -u WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast Region Project/Site: Clinton St. CitylCounty: Ashland/Jackson Sampling Date: 1/28/2020 AppticantlOvmer. Kathleen Kahle State: OR Sampling Point: 6 Investigator(s): JRR. MRS Section, Tovmship, Range: 4DB, 39S, 1E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief {concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): Subregion (LRR): Northwest Forests and Coast (LRR A) Lat: 42.20444277 Long: -122.704707 Datum: WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: Coker Clay 0-3% NWI Classification: PEMiC Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" Present? Yes X No Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any ansvrcrs in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area Yes X No within a Wetland? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Remarks: VEGETATION US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast - Version 4U Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status? Number of Dominant Species 1 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across Ail Strata: 1 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species Total Cover. 0 That Are DBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (AIB) Shrub Stratum Prevalence Index Worksheet: 1. Total % Cover of Multi y by: 2. OBL species x1 = 0 3. FACW species x2 = 0 4. FAC species x3 = 0 5. FACU species x4 = 0 Total Cover. 0 UPL species x5 = 0 Herb Stratum Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B) 1. Carex obnupta 90 Y OBL Prevalence Index = BIA = 2. Conium maculatum 5 FAC 3. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. X 2 - Dominance Test is X50% 6. 3 - Prevalence Index is :101 7. 4 - Morphological Adaptation) (Provide supporting 8. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9. 5 - Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' 10. Problematic Hydrophylic Vegetation' (Explain) 11. Total Cover. 95 Woody Vine Stratum 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 1. be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 2. Hydrophytic Total Cover: 0 Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 5 % Cover of Biotic Crust 0 Present? Yes X No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast - Version 4U SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc? Texture Remarks 0-18 10YR2/1 100 LC 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (Al) Sandy Redox (S5) 2 cm Muck (A10) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (TF2) ^_ Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) X Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Matrix (F3) _^ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Redox Dark Surface (F6) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Muck Mineral (S1) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Sandy gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Water Marks (81) Type: Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Remarks: Soils have no indicators. Soils are very dark and did not exhibit recognizable redoximorphic features. Soil and landscape were documented throuroughly. Problematic procedue being used: 1. Hydrophytic vegetatation is present. Area was dominated by RUAR (rooted outside of the depression). 2. Primary indicator of hydrology was present as surface water within the depression. 3. The topography is a concave surface (depression). The soils may lack hyric indicators based the area being seasonlly ponded and high clay content of soils. Alpha, alpha-dipryridyl was used with no reaction evident. BPJ used to determine soils. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) _ Surface Water (Al) _ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except Water -Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, x High Water Table (A2) MLRA 1, 2,4A and 4B) 4A and 4B) x Saturation (A3) _ Salt Crust (t311) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (81) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (132) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (63)_ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) Iron Deposits (135) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) _ Surface Soil Cracks (136) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) Raised Ant Mounds (136) (LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) Other (Explain in Remarks) Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 8" Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 11" Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast -Version 2.0 f p WETI..AND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast Region Project/Site: Clinton St. City/County: AshlandlJackson Sampling Date: 1/2812020 Applicant/Owner­. Kathleen Kahle State: OR Sampling Point: 7 lnvestigator(s): JRR, MRS Section, Township, Range: 4DB, 39S, 1E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0-1 Subregion (LRR): Northwest Forests and Coast (LRR A) Lat: 42.20416999 Long: -122.704304 Datum: WGS 84 Sal Map Unit Name: Coker Clay 0-3% NWI Ciassification: PEM1C Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" Present? Yes X No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Hydric Sal Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area Yes No X within a Wetland? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Remarks: Plot loacted in shallow depression. VEGETATION US Army corps of Engineers vvesrern mounrafns, vaEieys ana i oasr - version z.0 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status? Number of Dominant Species 1. Pyrus SP. 10 Y NOL That Aro OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species Total Cover: 10 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50% (AIB) Shrub Stratum Prevalence Index Worksheet: 1. Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x1 = 0 3. FACW species x2 = 0 4. FAC species x3 = 0 5. FACU species x4 = 0 Tota/ Cover: 0 UPLspedes x5 = 0 Herb Stratum Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B) 1. Schedonorus arundrnaceus 90 Y FAC Prevalence Index = BIA = 2. Dacus carota 5 FACU 3. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 6. 3 - Prevalence Index is X3.0' 7. 4 - Morphological Adaptationl (Provide supporting 8, data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9. 5 - Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' 10. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 11. Total Cover: 95 Woody Vine Stratum 'Indicators of hydric sail and wetland hydrology must 1. be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 2. Hydrophytic Total Cover-. 0 Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 0 % Cover of Biotic Crust 0 Present? Yes No X Romarks: 5% Litter US Army corps of Engineers vvesrern mounrafns, vaEieys ana i oasr - version z.0 SOIL t Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc' Texture Remarks 0-16 10YR212 100 Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except LC 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM -Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: _ Histosol (Al) Sandy Redox (S5) 2 cm Muck (A10) Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Stripped Matrix (56) Red Parent Material (TF2) _ Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Algal Mat or Crust (84) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Matrix (F3) Iron Deposits (135) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Redox Dark Surface (F6) 3€ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Muck Mineral (Si)Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Sandy gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Field Observations: Type: Depth (inches): Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks: Water table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Surface Water (Al) Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except Water -Stained Leaves (69) (MLRA 1, 2, _ High Water Table (A2) MLRA 1, 2,4A and 4B) 4A and 4B) _ Saturation (A3) _ Salt Crust (B11) Drainage Patterns (B10) _ Water Marks (Bi) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (132) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits (133) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Algal Mat or Crust (84) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Iron Deposits (135) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) _ Surface Soil Cracks (136) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Water table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Wetiand Hydrology Present? Yes No X (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers western Mountains, valleys ana toast -version z.0 f s WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast Region Pro*USite: Clinton St. CitylCounty: AshlandlJackson Sampling Date: 1/2812020 Applicant/Owner: Kathleen Kahle State: OR Sampling Point: 8 Investigator(s): JRR, MRS Section, Township, Range: 4DB, 39S, 1E Landform (hNslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0 Subregion (LRR): Northwest Forests and Coast (LRR A) Lat: 42.20406661 Long: -122.704321 Datum: WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: Coker Clay 0-3% NWI Classification: PEM1C Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" Present? Yes X No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area Yes No X Within a Wetland? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Remarks: Plot located adjacent to schruNshrub orchard area. Orchard area is heavily dominated by RUAR. VEGETATION US Army Corps of Engineers western Mountains, Valleys ano toast - version z.0 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status? Number of Dominant Species 1. Pyrus sp. 20 Y NOL That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) 4• Percent of Dominant Species Total Cover: 20 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50% (A/B) Shrub Stratum Prevalence Index Worksheet: 1. Rosa eglanteria 10 Y NOL Total °/a Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x1 = 0 3. FACW species x2 = 0 4. FAC species x3 = 0 5. FACU species x4 = 0 Total Cover: 10 UPL species x5 = 0 Herb Stratum Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B) 1. Schedonorus arundinaceus 60 Y FAC Prevalence Index= B/A= 2. Alopecurus pratensis 30 Y FAC Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 3. 4. 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 6. 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01 7. 4 - Morphological Adaptationl (Provide supporting 8. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9. 5 - Wetland Nan -Vascular Plants' 10, Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 11. Total Cover: 90 Woody Vine Stratum 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 1, be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 2. Hydrophytic Total Cover: 0 Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 0 % Cover of Biotic Crust 0 Present? Yes No X Remarks: 10% Litter US Army Corps of Engineers western Mountains, Valleys ano toast - version z.0 SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) {inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks 0-16 10YR2i2 100 Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except CL 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Deplefion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solis': Histosol (Al) Sandy Redox (S5) 2 cm Muck (A10) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Black Histic (A3) ^_ _^ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Matrix (F3) ^_ _ Iron Deposits (B5)Recent Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Redox Dark Surface (F6) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Muck Mineral (S1) Depleted Dark Surface (177) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Sandy gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Field Observations: Type: Depth (inches): Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks: Water table Present? Yes No x Depth (inches): HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) _ Surface Water (Ai) Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except Water -Stained Leaves (89) (MLRA 1, 2, _ High Water Table (A2) MLRA 1, 2, 4A and 48) 4A and 413) Saturation (A3) Salt Crust (811) Drainage Patterns (1310) _ Water Marks (131) Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ^_ _ Sediment Deposits (82) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (133) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Geomorphic Position (D2) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Shallow Aquitard (133) _ Iron Deposits (B5)Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) _ FAC -Neutral Test (135) Surface Soil Cracks (136) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Other (Explain in Remarks)_ Frost -Heave Hummocks (137) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No x Depth (inches): Water table Present? Yes No x Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No x Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys and coast -version z.0 \f WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast Region Project/Site: Clinton St. City/County: Ashland/Jackson Sampling Date: 1/28/2020 Applicant/Owner.. Kathleen Kahle State: OR Sampling Pant: 9 Investigator(s): JRR, MRS Section, Tovmship, Range: 4DB, 39S, 1E Landform (hiflslope, terrace, etc.): Swale Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): Subregion (LRR): Northwest Forests and Coast (LRR A) Lat: 42.20400153 Long: -122.7044329 Datum: WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: Coker Clay 0-3% NWI Classification: PEM1C Are climatic hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" Present? Yes X No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area Yes X No within a Wetland? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Remarks: Plot placed on slope, toe of slope to broad shallow Swale VEGETATION Lib Army corps or engineers vvcaLUM FY UM)LP111J, --ya olr� vo�i- vclawrl Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Use scienfific names.) % Cover Species? Status? Number of Dominant Species 1 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2, Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) 4• Percent of Dominant Species Total Cover: 0 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (AIB) Shrub Stratum Prevalence Index Worksheet: 1. Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x1 = 0 3. FACW species x2 = 0 4, FAC species x3 = 0 5, FACU species x4 = 0 Total Cover. 0 UPI - species x5 = 0 Herb Stratum Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (i3) 1. Carex obnupta 60 Y OBL Prevalence Index = B/A 2. Alopecurus prafensis 20 Y FAC 3. Conium maculafum 10 FAC Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5, X 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 6. 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0' 7, 4 - Morphological Adaptationl (Provide supporting 8. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9. 5 - Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' 10. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 11. Total Cover. 90 Woody Vine Stratum 'Indicators of hydric soil and vretiand hydrology must 1 be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 2• Hydrophytic Total Cover: 0 Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 0 % Cover of Biotic Crust 0 Present? Yes X No Remarks: Recently movied. 10% Litter Lib Army corps or engineers vvcaLUM FY UM)LP111J, --ya olr� vo�i- vclawrl SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features Primary indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Locz Texture Remarks 0.4 10YR211 100 _ Water -Stained Leaves (89) (except LC 4-16 10YR2/1 95 10YR3/3 5 C M LC 'Type: C=C once ntration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains ocatiom PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix, Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Probfematic Hydric Soils': _ Histosol (Al) Sandy Redox (S5) 2 cm Muck (A10) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al t) Depleted Matrix (F3) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (CB) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) X Redox Dark Surface (F6) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Muck Mineral (S1) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Sandy gleyed Matrix (84) Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Field Observations: Type: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Hydric Soff Present? Yes X No Remarks: Depth (inches): 10 HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Surface Water (Al) _ Water -Stained Leaves (89) (except Water -Stained Leaves (69) (MLRA 1, 2, X High Water Table (A2) MLRA 1, 2,4A and 413) 4A and 413) XSaturation (A3) Salt Crust (B11) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (131) _ Aquatic Invertebrates (813) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) _^ Sediment Deposits (62) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (83) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Iron Deposits (B5) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (CB) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Surface Soil Cracks (136) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _^ Other (Explain in Remarks) Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No x Depth (inches): Water table Present? Yes x No Depth (inches): 10 Saturation Present? Yes x No Depth (inches): 7 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast -version zu f WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast Region ProjecUSite: Clinton St. City/County: Ashland/Jackson Sampling Date: 1/28/2020 ApplicanVChmer. Kathleen Kahle State: OR Sampling Point: 10 Investigator(s): JRR, MRS Section, Township, Range: 4DB, 39S, 1E Landform (htllslope, terrace, etc.): Hiltslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 5 -Feb Subregion (LRR): Northwest Forests and Coast (LRR A) Lat: 42.20402182 Long: -122.7043962 Datum: WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: Coker Clay 0-3% NWI Classsfication: PEM1C Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" Present? Yes X No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site reap showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is tate Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Remarks: Upslope from SP9. Higher in elevation. VEGETATION ub army corps or engineers Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast - Version 2.0 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status? Number of Dominant Species 1 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3_ Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species Total Cover: 0 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (AIB) Shrub Stratum Prevalence Index Worksheet: I . Total % Cover of Multiply by: 2. OBL species xi = 0 3. FACW species x2 = 0 4. FAC species x3 = 0 5. FACU species x4 = 0 Total Cover. 0 UPL species x5 = 0 Herb Stratum Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B) 1. Schedonorus arundinaceus 60 Y FAC Prevalence Index = BIA -- 2. 2. Alopecurus pratensis 30 Y FRC Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 3. Plantago lanceolata 5 FACU 4. 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5, X 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 6. 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01 7. 4 - Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting 8. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9. 5 - Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' 10. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 11. Total Cover: 95 Woody Vine Stratum 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 1, be present, unless disturbed of problematic. Hydrophytic 2. Total Cover. 0 Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 0 % Cover of Biotic Crust 0 Present? Yes X No Remarks: Recently mowed. 5% Litter ub army corps or engineers Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: 10 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc' Texture Remarks 0-16 10YR212 100 Water -Stained Leaves (69) (except LC 'TyConcentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand GrainLacatian: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. pe: C= Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solls3: Histosol (Al) Sandy Redox (S5) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (56) u Red Parent Material (TF2) Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (171) (except MLRA 1) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Loamy ^_ Gleyed Matrix (172) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) Depleted Matrix (F3) ^_ Iron Deposits (B5) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Redox Dark Surface (F6) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ^ Sandy Muck Mineral (S1) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Field Observations: Type: Depth (inches): Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks: Water table Present? Yes No x Depth (inches): 14 HYDROLOGY Welland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Surface Water (Al) Water -Stained Leaves (69) (except Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, _ High Water Table (A2) MLRA 1, 2, 4A and 4B) 4A and 48) X Saturation (A3) Salt Crust (1311) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (63) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Geomorphic Position (D2) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Iron Deposits (B5) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Solis (C6) _ FAG -Neutral Test (D5) Surface Soil Cracks (136) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) Raised Ant Mounds (136) (LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial imagery (137) Other (Explain in Remarks)_ Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No x Depth (inches): Water table Present? Yes No x Depth (inches): 14 Saturation Present? Yes x No Depth (inches): 12 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers vvestern mountains, Vafieys ano coast -version x.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -- Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast Region ProjecUSite: Clinton St. CitylCounty: Ashland/Jackson Sampling Date: 1/28/2020 ApplicantlOvmer. Kathteen Kahle State: OR Sampling Point: 11 Investigator(s): JRR, MRS Section, Tovrnship, Range: 4DB, 39S, I Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Swale Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): Subregion (LRR): Northwest Forests and Coast (LRR A) Lat: 42.20393916 Long: -122.7045453 Datum: WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: Coker Clay 0-3% NWI Classification: PEMtC Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" Present? Yes X No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any ansvrers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area Yes X No within a wetland? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Remarks: VEGETATION u5 Army corps of Engineers western moumains, vaEieys ano uoas[ - version z.0 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status? Number of Dominant Species 1 That Are OBI., FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species Total Cover: 0 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (AIB) Shrub Stratum Prevalence Index Worksheet: 1. Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x1 � 0 3. FACW species x2 = 0 4. FAC species x3 = 0 5. FACU species x4 = 0 Total Cover 0 UPL species x5 � 0 Herb Stratum Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B) 1. Carex obnupta 70 Y OBL Prevalence Index = BIA -- 2, Alopecurus pratensis 2, 20 Y FAC 3. Conium maculatum 10 FAC Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. X 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 6. 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0' 7. 4 - Morphological Adaptation'! (Provide supporting 8, data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9. 5 - Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' 10, Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 11. Total Cover. 100 Woody. Vine Stratum 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 1. be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic 2. Total Cover: 0 Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 0 % Cover of Biotic Crust 0 Present? Yes X No Remarks: u5 Army corps of Engineers western moumains, vaEieys ano uoas[ - version z.0 SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loci Texture Remarks 0-6 10YR211 100 LC 6-16 10YR211 98 10YR3l3 2 C M LC 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Dep€etion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. Limon: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soll Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 2 cm Muck (A10) Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) _fled Parent Material (TF2) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (171) (except MLRA 1) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) X Redox Dark Surface (176) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Muck Mineral (S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Sandy gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Solis (C6) _ FAC-Neutrai Test (D5) Type: Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) Depth (inches): Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Surface Water (Al) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (except Water -Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, _ x High Water Table (A2) MLRA 1, 2,4A and 413) _ 4A and 413) x Saturation (A3) Salt Crust (1311) Drainage Patterns (1310) Water Marks (61) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Dry -Season Water Table (02) Sediment Deposits (132) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Oder (C1) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (63) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Geomorphic Position (D2) Algal Mat or Crust (134) Presence of Reduced Iron (04) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Iron Deposits (135) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Solis (C6) _ FAC-Neutrai Test (D5) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Other (Explain in Remarks) Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No x Depth (inches): Water table Present? Yes x No Depth (inches): 12 Saturation Present? Yes x No Depth (inches): 11 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: U1 ; Army Corps of Engineers vvesrern rviournains, varieys anu uuasi-vertiwri z.0 I WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast Region Praject/Site: Clinton St. City/County: Ashland/Jackson Sampling Rate: 1/28/2020 Applicant/Owner. Kathleen KaMe State: OR Sampling Point: 12 Investigator(s): JRR, MRS Section, Tovmship, Range: 41313, 39S, 1F Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hiilslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 5 -Feb Subregion (LRR): Northwest Forests and Coast (LRR A) Lat: 42.20392283 Long: -122.7045698 Datum: WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: Coker Ciay 0-3% NWI Classification: PFM1C Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' Present? Yes X No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X Weiland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Remarks: Piot located upslope and higher than paired plot. VEGETATION U5 Army t;crps of Lng:neers vvesrern moumains, vaueys ana uuam - versrun z.v Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status? Number of Dominant Species 1 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across All Strata: 1 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species Total Cover: 0 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B) Shrub Stratum Prevalence Index Worksheet: I . Total % Cover of. Multiply by: 2. OBL species xi = 0 3. FACW species x2 = 0 4. FAC species x3 � 0 5. FACU species x4 = 0 Total Cover: 0 UPL species x5 = 0 Herb Stratum Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B) 1. Carex obnupta 60 Y OBL Prevalence Index = B/A 2. Alopecurus pratensis 10 FAC 3. Conium maculatum 10 FAC Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. Daucus carota 10 FACU 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. X 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 6. 3 - Prevalence index is 53.0' 7. 4 - Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting 8. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9. 5 - Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' 10. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 11. Total Cover: 90 Woody Vine Stratum 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 1 be present, uWess disturbed or problematic. 2. Hydrophytic Total Cover: 0 Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 0 % Cover of Biotic Crust 0 Present? Yes X No Remarks: 10% litter U5 Army t;crps of Lng:neers vvesrern moumains, vaueys ana uuam - versrun z.v SOIL Sampling Point: 12 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-16 10YR211 900 LC Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. ocation: PI -=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (Al) Sandy Redox (S5) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (TF2) v Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Matrix (F3) _ _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Redox Dark Surface (F6) 3indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Muck Mineral (S1) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Sandy gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox Depressions (178) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Shallow Aquitard (D3) Iron Deposits (B5) Type: FAC -Neutral Test (D5) _ Surface Soil Cracks (136) Depth (inches): Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks: Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Surface Water (A1) Water -Stained Leaves (69) (except Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, _ High Water Table (A2) MLRA 1, 2,4A and 4B) 4A and 41B) _ Saturation (A3) Salt Crust (B11) Drainage Patterns (1310) Water Marks (B1) _ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) _ Sediment Deposits (132) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (133) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Geomorphic Position (D2) Algal Mat or Crust (134) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Iron Deposits (B5) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) _ Surface Soil Cracks (136) Stunted or Stressed Plants (Di) (LRR A) Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) Other (Explain in Remarks) Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No x Depth (inches): Water table Present? Yes No x Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No x Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers western mountains, vaiteys ana Voast -version z.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast Region Project/Site: Clinton St. City/County: Ashland/Jackson Sampling Date: 1/28/2020 Appllcant/O=er: Kathleen Kahle State: OR Sampling Point: 13 investigator(s): JRR, MRS Section, Township, Range: 4DB, 39S, 1E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 5 -Feb Subregion (LRR): Northwest Forests and Coast (LRR A) Lat: 42.20388277 Long: -122.70422 Datum: WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: Coker Clay 0-3% NWI Classification: PEM1C Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" Present? Yes X No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site neap showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Remarks: Plot located upslope of paired plot, Plot higher in elevation. VEGETATION US Army t;orps or engineers vves[ern mounceuis, valleys aria k vase - veiswn Z.J Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status? Number of Dominant Species 1 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species Total Cover: 0 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (AIB) Shrub Stratum Prevalence index Worksheet: 1. Total % Cover of. Multiply by: 2. OBL species x1 = 0 3. FACW species x2 = 0 4. FAC species x3 = 0 5. FACU species x4 = 0 Total Cover: 0 UPL species x5 = 0 Herb Stratum Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B) 1, Carex obnupta 40 Y OBL Prevalence Index = B/A = 2. Schedonorus arundinaceus 30 Y FAC 3. Daucus carota 15 FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. X 2 - Dominance Test is X50% 6. 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0' 7. 4 - Morphological Adaptationl (Provide supporting 8, data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) g, 5 - Weiland Non -Vascular Plants' 10. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 11. Total Cover: 85 woody.vine Stratum 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 1. be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 2. Hydrophytic Total Cover. 0 Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 0 % Cover of Biotic Crust 0 Present? Yes X No Remarks: 15% litter US Army t;orps or engineers vves[ern mounceuis, valleys aria k vase - veiswn Z.J SOIL. Sampling Point: 13 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loci Texture Remarks 0-7 10YR311 100 CL 7-16 10YR311 100 SCL 'Type: C=Concentration, 13 -Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol (Al) Sandy Redox (S5) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) ^_ Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6)Red Parent Material (TF2) _ Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl) (except MLRA 1) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)Redox _ Dark Surface (F6) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Muck Mineral (S1) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Recent iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Type: Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) Depth (inches): Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks: HYDROLOGY Welland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Surface Water (Al) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (except Water -Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, _ _ High Water Table (A2) MLRA 1, 2,4A and 413) 4A and 413) Saturation (A3) Salt Crust (1311) _ Drainage Patterns (1310) _ Water Marks (131) Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) _ Sediment Deposits (132) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (133) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Geomorphic Position (132) _ Algal Mat or Crust (134) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) Iron Deposits (135) _ Recent iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) _ Surface Soil Cracks (136) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) Other (Explain in Remarks) Frost -Heave Hummocks (137) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (136) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No x Depth (inches): Water table Present? Yes No x Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No x Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, valleys ano L;oast -version Z.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast Region Project/Site: Clinton St. City/County: AshlandMackson Sampling Date: 1/28/2020 ApplicantlOwner: Kathleen Kahle State: OR Sampling Pant: 14 Investigator(s): JRR, MRS Section, Township, Range: ADB, 39S, 1E Landform (hit#slope, terrace, etc.): Swale Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0-2 Subregion (LRR): Northwest Forests and Coast (LRR A) Lat: 42.20370372 Long: -122.7042686 Datum: WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: Coker Clay 0-3% NWl Classification: PEM1C Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" Present? Yes X No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explafn any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area Yes X No within a Wetland? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No VEGETATION uJ Army Vorps or Lngmeers vvessern mounraam, va¢uys aria i.oasc - vwniuri z.0 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status? Number of Dominant Species 1 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across All Strata: 1 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species Total Cover. 0 That Are 0BL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (AIB) Shrub Stratum Prevalence Index Worksheet: 1. Total % Cover of. Multiply by: 2. OBL species xi = 0 3. FACW species x2 = 0 4. FAC species x3 = 0 5. FACU species x4 = 0 Total Cover: 0 UPL species x5 = 0 Herb Stratum Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B) 1. Carex obnupta 90 Y OBL Prevalence Index = BIA = 2. Conium maculatum 5 FAC 3. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. X 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 6. 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0' 7. 4 - Morphological Adaptation (Provide supporting 8. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9. 5 - Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' 10, Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 11. Total Cover: 95 Woody Vine Stratum 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 1. be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 2. Hydrophytic Total Cover: 0 Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 5 % Cover of Biotic Crust 0 Present? Yes X No Remarks: uJ Army Vorps or Lngmeers vvessern mounraam, va¢uys aria i.oasc - vwniuri z.0 SOIL Sampling Point: 14 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc'_ Texture Remarks 0-16 10YR211 100 C Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (Al) Sandy Redox (S5) 2 cm Mucic (A10) ^_ _ Histic Epipedon (A2)_ Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) X Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ^_ _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Redox Dark Surface (F6) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Muck Mineral (S1) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox Depressions (FS) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Water Marks (131) Type: Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Remarks: Soils have no indicators. Soils are very dark and did not exhibit recognizable redoximorphic features. Soil and landscape were documented thoroughly. Problematic procedue being used: 1. Hydrophytic vegetatation is present. Area was dominated by RUAR (rooted outside of the depression). 2. Primary indicator of hydrology was present as surface water within the depression. 3. The topography is a concave surface (swale). The soils may lack hyric indicators based the area being seasonally pond edlsaturated and high clay content of soils. Alpha, alpha-dipryridyl was used with no reaction evident. BPJ used to determine soils. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) _ Surface Water (Al) Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except Water -Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, x High Water Table (A2) MLRA 1, 2, 4A and 413) 4A and 4B) x Saturation (A3) _ Salt Crust (1311) Drainage Patterns (1310) Water Marks (131) Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits (133) _ Oxidized Rhiaospheres along Living Roots (C3) Geomorphic Position (D2) Algal Mat or Crust (134) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Shallow Aquitard (133) Iron Deposits (135) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) _ FAC -Neutral Test (135) _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Stunted or Stressed Plants (131) (LRR A) Raised Ant Mounds (136) (LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) Other (Explain in Remarks) Frost -Heave Hummocks (137) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No x Depth (inches): Water table Present? Yes x No Depth (inches): 12 Saturation Present? Yes x No Depth (inches): 11 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast -Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -- Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast Region Pro)ectlSite: Clinton St. City/County: AshlandlJackson Sampling Date: 1/28/2020 Applicant/Ovrner: Kathleen Kahle State: OR Sampling Point: 15 Investigatof(s): JRR Section, Township, Range: 4DB, 39S, lE Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): Subregion (LRR): Northwest Forests and Coast (LRR A) Lai: 42.2036811 Long: -122.7043014 Datum: WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: Coker Clay 0-3% NWI Classification: PEM1C Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (if no, explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation Sail or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" Present? Yes X No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area Yes No X Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Remarks: Plot higher in elevation. The swale ends just southeast VEGETATION us Army t;orps of trtgineers vvesrefn rvmouniains, vaiieys ana toast - version c.0 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.} Cover Species? Status? Number of Dominant Species Pe 1 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across All Strata: 1 (B) 4- Percent of Dominant Species Total Cover: 0 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B) Shrub Stratum Prevalence index Worksheet: 1. Total % Cover of. Multiply by: 2, OBL species x1 = 0 3. FACW species x2 = 0 4. FAC species x3 = 0 5. FACU species x4 = 0 Total Cover. 0 UPL species x5 = 0 Herb Stratum Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B) 1. Carex obnupfa 70 Y OBL Prevalence Index = B/A 2. Conium maculatum 10 FAC 3. Unk fort 10 FAC Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. X 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 6. 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01 7. 4 - Morphological Adaptationl (Provide supporting 8, data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9. 5 - Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' 10. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetations (Explain) 11. Total Cover. 90 Woody Vine Stratum 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 1 be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 2• Hydrophytic Total Cover: 0 Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 10 % Cover of Biotic Crust 0 Present? Yes X No Remarks: Unk forb assumed FAC us Army t;orps of trtgineers vvesrefn rvmouniains, vaiieys ana toast - version c.0 SOIL Sampling Point: 15 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks 0-16 10YR211 100 CL 'Type: C=Concentration, DmDepletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pero Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric 5oils3: Histosol (Al) Sandy Redox (S5) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Matrix (F3) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Redox Dark Surface (F6) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Muck Mineral (S1) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Sandy gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Shallow Aquitard (D3) Iron Deposits (B5) Type: FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Surface Soil Cracks (86) Depth (inches): Raised Ant Mounds (136) (LRR A) Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks: Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) uvnRnt nr:Y Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Surface Water (Al) Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, _ High Water Table (A2) MLRA 1, 2,4A and 413) 4A and 48) Saturation (A3) Salt Crust (B11) Drainage Patterns (1310) Water Marks (B1) Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (132) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (Cg) Drift Deposits (B3) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ _ Geomorphic Position (D2) Algal Mat or Crust (134) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Iron Deposits (B5) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) _ FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Surface Soil Cracks (86) Stunted or Stressed Plants (131) (LRR A) Raised Ant Mounds (136) (LRR A) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial imagery (137) Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No x Depth (inches): Water table Present? Yes No x Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No x Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers vvestem mountains, vaueys ane coast -version c.0 fr WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast Region Project/Site: Clinton St. City/County: Ashland/Jackson Sampling Date: 112812020 Applicant/Owner: Kathleen Kahle State: UK Sampling Point: 16 Invesfigator(s): JRR, MRS Section, Township, Range: 4DB, 39S, 1 E Landform (hNslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslopo Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 2-5 Subregion (LRR): North%est For and Coast (LRR A) LaL 42.20426883 Long: -122.7049682 Datum: WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: Coker Clay 0-3% NWI Classification: PEM1C Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' Present? Yes X No Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. -hytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Soil Present? Yes X No is the Sampled Area Yes X No within a Welland? d Hydrology Present? Yes X No ks: Plot located on hillslope, shallow concave surface. Appears to be a seep, hydrology seeping from the hillside. VF{,FTATI()N uo iumy corps oT rngineers vaca cis—1-..wno, --Y. .— vvau. - ­..... f... Absolute Domsnant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (lase scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status? Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) I 2. Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across All Strata: 1 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species Total Cover: 0 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAG: 100% (AIB) Shrub Stratum Prevalence Index Worksheet: 1, Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species xi = 0 3, FACW species x2 = 0 4. FAC species x3 = 0 5, FACU species x4 = 0 Total Cover. 0 UP species x5 = 0 Herb Stratum Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B) 1. Carex obnupta 90 Y OBL Prevalence Index = BIA W 2. Dipsacum fuflonum 5 FAC 3, Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. X 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 6, 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0' 7, 4 - Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting 8. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) g. 5 - Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' 10. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 11. Total Cover: 95 Woody Vine Stratum 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must I be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 2. Hydrophytic Tota4 Cover: 0 Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 5 % Cover of Biotic Crust 0 Present? Yes X No Remarks: uo iumy corps oT rngineers vaca cis—1-..wno, --Y. .— vvau. - ­..... f... MT Sampling Point: 16 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to docurnent the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-4 10YR211 90 10YR314 10 C M C 4-18 10YR211 100 x High Water Table (A2) C 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 21-ocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol (Al) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Matrix (F3) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) X Redox Dark Surface (F6) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Muck Mineral (S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Field Observations: Type: Surface Water Present? Yes No x Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Remarks: Depth (inches): 4 HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Surface Water (Al) Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except Water -Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, x High Water Table (A2) MLRA 1, 2,4A and 413) _ 4A and 413) x Saturation (A3) Salt Crust (B11) Drainage Patterns (1310) Water Marks (139) _ Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (B3) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Geomorphic Position (D2) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) Iron Deposits (135) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) _ Surface Soil Cracks (136) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) Other (Explain in Remarks) Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No x Depth (inches): Water table Present? Yes x No Depth (inches): 4 Saturation Present? Yes x No Depth (inches): surface Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Water seeping out of hillside. US Army Corps of E=ngineers western rviaurnarns, varieys anu Uva5r-versiuri Z.v i WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast Region Project/Site: Clinton St. CitylCounty: Ashland/Jackson Sampling Date: 1/28/2020 Applicant/Owner: Kathleen Kahle State: OR Sampling Point: 17 tnvestigator(s): JRR, MRS Section, Township, Range: 4DB, 39S, 1E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 7 Subregion (LRR): Northwest Forests and Coast (LRR A) Lat: 42 20425518 Long: -7.22705E+11 Datum: WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: Coker Clay 0-3% NWI Classification: PEM1C Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" Present? Yes X No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Remarks: VFr.t=TATIf)hl u5 xrmy corps ar rngineers Absolute Dominant Indicator Dom! nance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status? Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAG: 3 (A) 1 2. Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species Total Cover: 0 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1600/0 (AIB) Shrub Stratum Prevalence Index Worksheet: 1. Rubes armeniacus 5 Y FAC Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x1 = 0 3, FACW species x2 = 0 4. FAC species x3 = 0 5 FACU species x4 w 0 Total Cover. 5 UPL species x5 = 0 Herb Stratum Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B) 1. Carex obnupta 40 Y OBL Prevalence Index = B/A = 2. Schedonorus arundinaceus 40 Y FAC 3. Daucus carota 5 FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. X 2 - Dominance Test is >50% g. 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01 7, 4 - Morphological Adaptation) (Provide supporting 8. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) g, 5 - Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' 10 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 11. Total Cover. 85 Woody Vine Stratum 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 1 be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 2 Hydrophytic Total Cover. 0 Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 10 % Cover of Biotic Crust 0 Present? Yes X No Remarks: Mowed. 5% litter u5 xrmy corps ar rngineers SOIL Sampling Point: 17 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc' Texture Remarks 0-16 10YR2/1 100 C 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': _ Histosol (Al) _ Sandy Redox (S5) 2 cm Muck (A10) Histic Epipedon (A2) _ _ Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (TF2) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) . _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (All 1) Depleted Matrix (F3) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Redox Dark Surface (F6) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Muck Mineral (S1) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Sandy gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox Depressions (178) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Shallow Aquitard (133) Iron Deposits (B5) Type: FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Surface Soil Cracks (136) Depth (inches): Raised Ant Mounds (tab) (LRR A) Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks: Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) HvnRnr nry Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Surface Water (Al) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (except Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, High Water Table (A2) MLRA 1, 2, 4A and 4B) 4A and 4B) _ _ Saturation (A3) Salt Crust (1311) _ Drainage Patterns (810) Water Marks (131) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits (B3) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) Algal Mat or Crust (134) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Shallow Aquitard (133) Iron Deposits (B5) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) W____ FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Surface Soil Cracks (136) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) _ Raised Ant Mounds (tab) (LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) Other (Explain in Remarks) Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No x Depth (inches): Water table Present? Yes No x Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No x Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers vvestern moumains, vaireys anu uuasi-veraaun c.0 t WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast Region Pfgect/Site: Clinton St. CitylCounty: Ashland/Jackson Sampling Date: 1/2812020 Applicant/Owner: Kathleen Kahle State: OR Sampling Point: 18 Investigator(s): JR; MRS Section, Township, Range: 40B, 39S, 1E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%}; 10 -May Subregion (LRR): Northwest Forests and Coast (LRR A) Let: 42.20341917 Long: -122.7050108 Datum: WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: Coker Ciay 0-3% NWI Classification: None Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" Present? Yes X No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. hytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Soil Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area withinYes No X a wetland? d Hydrology Present? Yes No X ks: Plot located in soutwestern portion of the site. Documenting conditions VFGFTATION US Army Corps of Engineers vvesiUin ivivui aI.au w, vanoya al iu �Vaak- Vol 0v 11 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status? Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) 1 2, Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across All Strata: 1 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species Total Cover: 0 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (AIB) Shrub Stratum Prevalence index Worksheet: 1. Total % Cover of. Multiply by: 2. OBL species x1 = 0 3. FACW species x2 = 0 4, FAC species x3 = 0 5. FACU species x4 = 0 Total Cover: 0 UPL species x5 = 0 Herb Stratum Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (13) 1. Lolium perenne 80 Y FAC Prevalence Index = BIA -- 2. Schedonorus arundinaceus 2. 5 FAC 3. DISY 5 FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation indicators: 4. Lactuca serriola 5 FACU 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. X 2 - Dominance Test is >50% g. 3 - Prevalence Index is 253.0' 7. 4 - Morphological Adaptation (Provide supporting 8, data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9. 5 - Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' 10. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Exp#ain) 11. Total Cover: 95 Woody Vine Stratum 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 1 be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 2• Hydrophytic Total Cover: 0 Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 5 IN, Cover of Biofic Crust 0 Present? Yes X No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers vvesiUin ivivui aI.au w, vanoya al iu �Vaak- Vol 0v 11 SOIL Sampling Point: 18 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks 0-15 10YR3I2 100 SiCL 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Repletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. ocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (Al) Sandy Redox (S5) 2 cm Muck (A10) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (TF2) _ Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) 3tndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and W Sandy Muck Mineral (S1) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): .. Shallow Aquitard (D3) Iron Deposits (135) Type: FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Surface Soil Cracks (136) Depth (inches): Raised Ant Mounds (116) (LRR A) Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks: Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) HYr)Rnt C]f3Y Wetland Hydrology indicators: Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Surface Water (A1) Water -Stained Leaves (89) (except Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, _ High Water Table (A2) MLRA 1, 2,4A and 4B) _ 4A and 4B) Saturation (A3) _ Salt Crust (1311) _ Drainage Patterns (1310) Water Marks (131) Aquatic Invertebrates (613) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) _ Sediment Deposits (132) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (133) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) Algal Mat or Crust (134) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) .. Shallow Aquitard (D3) Iron Deposits (135) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) T FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Surface Soil Cracks (136) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) _ Raised Ant Mounds (116) (LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) Other (Explain in Remarks) Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No x Depth (inches): Water table Present? Yes No x Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No x Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers vvesiern mounta€ris, vaneys a€w UUd:5L-VVINVI€ c.v WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -- Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast Region Project/Site: Clinton St City/County: AshlandIJackson Sampling Date: 112812020 Applicant/Owner: Kathleen Kahle State: OR Sampling Point: 19 investigator(s): JRR, MRS Section, Township, Range: 4DB, 39S, 1E Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 10 -May Subregion (LRR): Northwest Forests and Coast (LRR A) Lat: 42.20340416Long: -122.7050108 Datum: WGS 64 Soil Map Unit Name: Coker Clay 0-3% NWI Classification: None Are climak c 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances" Present? Yes X No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Sal Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Remarks: VEGETATION US Army Corps of Lrigineefs vvestern moun[ains, vaueys ana uuesc - vuisiuu z.0 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status? Number of Dominant Species 1 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across All Strata: 1 (B) 4• Percent of Dominant Species Total Cover: 0 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A1B) Shrub Stratum Prevalence Index Worksheet: 1. Total % Cover of. Multiply by: 2. OBL species x1 = 0 3. FACW species x2 = 0 4. FAC species x3 = 0 S. FACU species x4 = 0 Total Cover: 0 UPL species x5 = 0 Herb Stratum Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B) 1. Lolium perenne 80 Y FAC Prevalence Index = BIA -- 2. Conium maculatum 2. 15 FAC 3. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5, X 2 - Domfnance Test is >50% 6. 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01 7. 4 - Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting 8. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9. 5 - Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' 10. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 11. Total Cover. 95 Woody Vine Stratum 'indicators of hydric soil and Y etland hydrology must 1 be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 2. Hydrophytic Total Cover: 0 Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 5 % Cover of Biotic Crust 0 Present? Yes X No Remarks: US Army Corps of Lrigineefs vvestern moun[ains, vaueys ana uuesc - vuisiuu z.0 SOIL Sampling Point: 19 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks 0-16 10YR212 100 SiL 'Type: C=Concentration, D -Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grain Location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (Al) Sandy Redox (S5) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (TF2) _ Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Redox Dark Surface (176) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Muck Mineral (S1) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Shallow Aquitard (D3) Iron Deposits (135) Type: FAC-Neutfal Test (D5) _ Surface Soil Cracks (Bfi) Depth (inches): Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks: Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Surface Water (Al) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (except _ Water -Stained Leaves (69) (MLRA 1, 2, _ High Water Table (A2) MLRA 1, 2,4A and 413) 4A and 48) _ Saturation (A3) Salt Crust (611) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (131) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (132) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (63) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Algal Mat or Crust (134) Presence of Reduced iron (C4) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Iron Deposits (135) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutfal Test (D5) _ Surface Soil Cracks (Bfi) Stunted or Stressed Plants (131) (LRR A) ^_ Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) Other (Explain in Remarks) Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No x Depth (inches): Water table Present? Yes No x Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No x Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers western Mountains, valleys ano coast -version z.0 ,i r WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast Region Preject/Site: Clinton St. City/County: AshlandMackson Sampling Date: 112812020 Applicant/Owner: Kathleen Kahle State: OR Sampling Point: 20 Investigator(s): JRR, MRS Section, Township, Range: 4DB, 39S, 1E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 10 -May Subregion (LRR): Northwest Forests and Coast (LRR A) Lat: 42.20322184 Long: -122.7043501 Datum: WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: Coker Clay 0-3% NWI Classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" Present? Yes X No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks,) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X 1s the Sampled Area Yes No X within a Welland? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Remarks: VEGETATION US Army corps OT Lngineers vvesrern mounrains, valleys anu %.oabc - veitilun Z.0 Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status? Number of Dominant Species 1. Pyrus sp 20 Y NOL That Are DBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species Total Cover: 20 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 67% (A/B) Shrub Stratum Prevalence Index Worksheet: 1. Total % Cover of. Multiply by: 2, OBL species xi = 0 3. FACW species x2 = 0 4. FAC species x3 = 0 5. FACU species x4 = 0 Total Cover: 0 UPL species x5 = 0 Herb Stratum Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B) 1. 5chedonorus anundinceus 10 Y FAC Prevalence Index = BIA 2. Conium macufatum 30 Y FAC 3. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4, 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. X 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 6, 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0' 7. 4 - Morphological Adaptationl (Provide supporting 8, data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9. 5 - Wedand Non -Vascular Piants' 10, Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 11. Total Cover. 40 Woody Vine Stratum 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 1 be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 2• Hydrophytic Total Cover: 0 Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 40 % Cover of Biotic Crust 0 Present? Yes X No Remarks: 20 percent litter US Army corps OT Lngineers vvesrern mounrains, valleys anu %.oabc - veitilun Z.0 SOIL Sampling Point: 20 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators,) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Calor (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' L002 Texture Remarks 0-14 10YR2/1 100 SiL Types e: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. zLocatiow PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': _ Histosol (Al) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (TF2) _ Black Fustic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (171) (except MLRA 1) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Muck Mineral (31) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): ShallowAquitard (133) Iron Deposits (B5) Type: FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Surface Soil Cracks (86) Depth (inches): Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks: Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) HYDROLOGY Wetland hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Surface Water (At) Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except Water -Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, _ _ High Water Table (A2) MLRA 1, 2,4A and 4B) 4A and 4B) Saturation (A3) Salt Crust (B11) _ Drainage Patterns (810) _ Water Marks (81) _ Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (B3) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Geomorphic Position (D2) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ShallowAquitard (133) Iron Deposits (B5) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Surface Soil Cracks (86) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No x Depth (inches): Water table Present? Yes No x Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No x Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys and Loast -Version 2.0 APPFNDIX C: SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Photo Point I. Facing south, upslope, showing vegetated roadside ditch. Photo Point 1. Facing cast. APPENDIX C: GROUND LEVEL PHOTOGRAPHS :Schott & Associates P.0, Box 589 Clinton Street Aurora, OR, 97002 S&A42736 503.678.6007 Photo Point 1, Facing northeast, showing vegetated roadside ditch. Photo Point 2. Facing south. Showing seep area located on slope, of Welland 1. APPFNDIX C: GROUND LLVEI. PHOTOGRAPHS 5chott A Associates P.O. Box 589 Clinton Street Aurora, OR. 97002 S&A#2736 503,678.6007 Photo Point 2. Facing SOLItheast, across Wetland 1. Photo Point 2. Facing cast, across TVetland 1. APPENDIX C: GROUND LEVEL PHOTOGRAPHS 5chott & Associates P.O. Box 589 Clinton Street Aurora, OR. 97002 S&A#2736 503.678.6007 Photo Point 2. Facing north, showing bermed area between 1,11ellond.1 and lf'etland 2. Photo Point 2. Facing west. APPENDIX C: GROUND LEVEL PHOTOGRAPHS Schott A Associates P.O. Box 589 Clinton Street Aurora, OR. 97002 S&A42736 503.678.6007 Photo Point 3. Facing northwest, along JVeticind 1. Photo Point 3. Facing Nvest, across JVellond 1. Al-'IILNDIX C: GROUND LEVEL PHOTOGRAPHS 5chott & Associates P.O. Box 589 Clinton Street Aurora, OR, 97002 S&A#2736 503,678.6007 Photo Point 3. Facing south, the dotted line is demarcating the wetland boundary, beyond the boundary, the property extends upslope. Photo Point 3. Facing southeast, showing 11'elland 1. APPENDIX C: GROUND LEVEL PHOTOGRAPHS Schott (& Associates P.O. Box 589 Clinton Street Aurora, OR. 97002 S&A#2736 503,678,6007 I'lloto Point 3. Facing northeast, showing overgrown orcheard. Photo Point 4. Facing northwest, showing berm between ff,etland I and TYeflond 2. APPENDIX C: GROUND LEVEL PHOTOGRAPHS Schott & Associates P.O. Box 589 Clinton Street Aurora, OR. 97002 S&A#2736 1 503.678,6007 Photo Point 4. Facing sonthwest, across ffetlond 1, Photo Point 4. Facing southeast, showing Wellond 1. APPENDIX C: GROUND LEVEL PHOTOGRAPHS Schott A Associates PD. Box 589 Clinton Street Aurora, OR. 97002 S&AR2736 1 503.678,6007 1 Photo floint 5. Facing SOLItlINVeSt. APPENDIX C: GROUND LEVEL 111-IOTOGRAPHS Schott & Associates P.O. Box 589 Clinton Street Aurora, OP. 97002 S&A#2736 503,678.6007 Photo Point 5. Facing northeast. Photo Point 5. Facing southeast. APPENDIX C: GROUND LEVEL PHOTOGRAPHS Schott A Associates P.O. Box 589 Clinton Street Aurora, OP. 97002 S&A#2736 503.678.6,007 APPENDIX D: ASHLAND LWI I OF4, LI "ryor �ASHLANJD WEnAlz� City of Ashland Local Wetlands Inventory T39S RIE 4 I'm Legend EM Wetands. not fdd urban Gromh Bmpj,a,y -d dkh- wff�d PasS'Nle "let, vds Te,knt Wg4w UMfid Can.] EM P -d se't"Cns Riwn COTHdof 50, tWbor (50 f�et) V,1 -VO 4 Vkt-d UM • S.Inrlt. Mt FW ..d a. Ob—e-n Pa',t aw !idv area is conWned i0hn the Bear Creek waWshed APPENDIX E: LITERATURE CITATIONS Enviconn-teirtal Laboratory, 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, Technical Report Y-87-1, U.S. Army Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS, Environmental Laboratory, 2008 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Mountains and Valleys West (Version 2.0), Wetlands Regulatory Assistance Program ERDC/EL TR -10-3 U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center. Vicksburg, MS. Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland Delineation, 1989. Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C. Cooperative technical publication. 138 PP Federal Register, 1980. 40 CFR Part 230: Section 404(b)(1), Guidelines for Specificatron of Disposal Sites of Dredged or Fill Material, Vol. 45, No. 249, pp. 85352-85353, U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Federal Register, 1982. Title 33, Navigation and Navigable Waters; Chapter 11, Regulatory Programs of the Corps of Engineers. Vol. 47, No. 138, p. 31810, U.S. Govt. Printitig Office, Washington, D.C. Federal Register, 1986. 33 CFR Parts 320 through 330, Regulatory Programs of the Corps of Engineers; Final Rule, Vol. 51, No. 219 pp. 41206-41259, U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Kollmorgen Corporation, 1975. Munsell Soil Color Charts. Macbeth Division of Kollmorgen Corporation, Baltimore, MD. Lichvar, R.W., D.L Banks, W.N. Kirchner, and N.C. Melvin. 2016. The National Wetland Plant List: 2016 Wetland Ratings. Phytoneuron 2016-30: 1-17. Published 28 April 2016. ISSN2153 733X. Natural Resource Conservation Service Water Agricultural Applied Climate Information Center: Portland International Airport. 1981-2019. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Available: littp:Hagacis.rcc-acis.org Oregon Department of State Lands. 2012. A Guide to the Removal -Fill Permit Process. Salem, OR. April 2012. Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Web Soil Survey. Available online at llttp://websoilsurvey,nres.risda.gov/. Accessed [2/11/201