Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Coffee_568_PA-T1-2024-00226
I T Y OF ................................... I 1,A N D April 8, 2024 Notice of Final Decision On April 8, 2024, the Community Development Director approved the request for the following: Planning Action: PA -T1-2024-00226 Subject Property: 569 Coffee Lane Applicant: Rogue Planning for CMI Development Description: A request for land use approval for a three -lot partition of a 0.636 -acre lot located at 568 Coffee Lane, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-5; MAP: 39 1l 05 AD; TAX LOT: 213 The Community Development Director's decision becomes final and is effective on the 12"' day after the Notice of Final Decision is mailed. Approval is valid for a period of 18 months and all conditions of approval identified on,theattached Findings are required to be met prior to project completion. The application, all associated documents and evidence submitted, and the applicable criteria are available for review at the Ashland Community Development Department, located at 51 Winburn Way. Copies of file documents can be requested and are charged based on the City of Ashland copy fee schedule. Prior to the final decision date, anyone who was mailed this Notice of Final Decision may request a reconsideration of the action as set forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO) 18.5.1.050(F) and/or file an appeal to the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in ALUO 18.5.1.050(0), The ALUO sections covering reconsideration and appeal procedures are attached. The appeal may not be made directly to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals. If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Veronica Allen in the Community Development Department at (541) 488-5305. cc: Parties of record and property owners within 200 ft COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 51 Winburn Way Tel: 541.488.5305 Ashland, Oregon 97520 Fax: 541.552.2050 fis Wcm)Uc an TTY: 800.735.2900 a 3 ASHLAND PLANNING DIVISION FINDINGS & ORDERS PLANNING ACTION: PA -T1-2024-00226 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 568 Coffee Lane OWNER: CMK Development LLC APPLICANTS: Rogue Planning for Taylored Elements DESCRIPTION: A request for land use approval for a three -lot partition of a 0.636 - acre lot located at 568 Coffee Lane. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-5; MAP: 39 1E 05 AD; TAX LOT: 213 SUBMITTAL DATE: February 12, 2024 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: March 6, 2024 STAFF APPROVAL DATE: April 8, 2024 APPEAL DEADLINE (4:30 P.M.) April 20, 2024 FINAL DECISION DATE: April 21, 2024 APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE: October 21, 2025 DECISION Subject Property The subject property is located at 568 Coffee Lane, on the west side of Coffee Lane, between Randy Street to the North and Otis Street to the South and is part of the West Village Subdivision. The property is zoned R-1-5, a single-family residential zoning with a 5,000 square foot minimum lot size. The rear of the property abuts the Billings Ranch Subdivision, an unnamed alley, and the adjacent pedestrian path. Background The subject property is Lot 16 of the West Village Subdivision, a 25 -lot subdivision which received Final Plan approval under Planning Action PA -TI -2020-00132. As part of that subdivision approval, two lots (#15 and 916) were identified for to be further divided in the firture. Lot #15 was subsequently developed with 12 cottages under the Cottage Housing provisions of AMC 18.2.3.090. The current request is to partition the original Lot #16 into three parcels. As part of the original West Village Subdivision's Final Plan approval, it was required that the alley and multi -use path from the Billings Ranch Subdivision to the west be continued through the subdivision with Condition 49c which read, "That prior to signature of the final survey plat for Phase II of the subdivision, the folloii,ing conditions shrill be rnet: That all easewents including but not limited to public access easenrents.for the multi -use path and alley►s,ay extensions, public and private utilities, drainage, irrigation, crud free apparatus access shall be indicated on the final survey plat as required by the Ashland Engineering Division. The easement,for the rrrulti-rise path shall be ten feet wide and the irrrproved installed to a ten foot width to match the existing path to the west. The originally proposed easement for the extension of the multi -use path parallel to the railroad tracks shall also be retained on the plat to preserve the potential for a continuous rnulti- use path on the northside of the tracks ftorn Jackson Road to Laurel Street, as envisioned in the Transportation System Plan (TSP). If/when this easement is utilized, the path through Lot #16 568 Coffee Ln / VA PA #T1-2024-00226 Page 1 1 it,ould be vacated " The alley and adjacent multi -use path were proposed by the applicant to be private but with public access casements. Condition #811 also required that the subdivision's CC&Rs were to make clear the "...clelails oj'fhe oii,ners' associations resj)onsibiIiIj)fior the inaintenance cif all common use-improvenients inclucling landscaping, driveimij)s, planting strips Band street trees, crud fear the aIle}, and adjacent niulti-itse path ii,hich are to be provided on private properljl but inaintainedfor public use. " The alley and multi -use path are illustrated in Staff Exhibit S-1 below, and conditions are included below to reiterate that while the alley is to be provided as private, the partition plat will need to identify public access easements for both the alley and multi -use path. (Note: A short section o the alle)� (apI)roxiniatel) 70- �f .1 ftei) has not been conil-Veted iiithin the Billings Raneh Subt-livision to the ii)est. This section is not part of the West Village Subelivision and is not part of the current application) - — --------- 7 LOT I j I LOr2 I N LOT 3 N If IN Etc, PA -Tl -2024-00226 568 Coffee Lane Fasemont to conttnue Multi -Use Path Na the South a RR Tracks if1whannn coectIvityis Obtained to the sou'thN.111 (If completed, Tetnp Path Easeniont would bo vacaLeer & Ptivate Alley would ryas win.) Staff Exhibit S-1 -- -6-.. -- - ......... 568 Coffee Ln / VA PA #TI -2024-00226 Page 12 0 0aw - — --------- 7 LOT I j I LOr2 I N LOT 3 N If IN Etc, PA -Tl -2024-00226 568 Coffee Lane Fasemont to conttnue Multi -Use Path Na the South a RR Tracks if1whannn coectIvityis Obtained to the sou'thN.111 (If completed, Tetnp Path Easeniont would bo vacaLeer & Ptivate Alley would ryas win.) Staff Exhibit S-1 -- -6-.. -- - ......... 568 Coffee Ln / VA PA #TI -2024-00226 Page 12 Proposal The application requests Land Partition approval to create three parcels including one flag lot from the existing property at 568 Coffee Lane. Parcel 1 is located at the South of the parent parcel, approximately 13,066 square feet in area, with approximately 126' of frontage along Coffee Lane. Along the Northern property line of Parcel 1 is the multi -use path easement and adjacent alley. Parcel 2 is approximately 6,400 square feet in size with access taken from the alley. Parcel 3 is a flag lot that is approximately 8,249 square feet in size and is proposed to contain the private alley and public utility easement within the shared driveway on this lot. The proposed alley and access easement would be for the benefit of all three proposed parcels, and while provided on the private lots will include easements for public use as required in the original subdivision approval. Land Partition The first approval criterion for a Land Partition is that "The frtture rise for• urban purposes of the r•ernainder• of the tract will not be impeded " The application materials assert that the size of these parcels mean that no additional development is anticipated. In staff's assessment, with completion of the subdivision as proposed here, the parent parcel is fully developed as envisioned in the Comprehensive Plan. The second approval criterion is that "The development of the remainder of any adjoining land or - access thereto will not be impeded " All properties within the immediate vicinity developed as envisioned in the Comprehensive Plan, and the current application will not alter that fact. The third criterion is that "The partition plan confor•rns to applicable City -adopted neighborhood or district plans, if any, and any previous land use approvals for the subject area. " The subject property here is not part of any City -adopted neighborhood or district plans. The West Village Subdivision envisioned that this lot, and Lot #15, would further develop and neither of these lots were included in the original density calculations of the subdivision. As previously proposed with the parent subdivision, the applicant has proposed to build all units to be Earth Advantage certified. The partition incorporates the requirements of the original subdivision approval, including the extension of the alley and multi -use path connecting to the Billings Ranch Subdivision. The fourth criterion for approval is that "The tract of land has not been partitioned for 12 months. " The West Village Subdivision was last partitioned in 2020. The fifth criterion is that the "Proposed lots confoj•rn to the requirements of the underlying zone, per part 18.2, may applicable over•la)} zone requirements, per part 18.3, and any applicable development standards, per- part 18.4 (e.g., parking and access, tree preservation, solar access and orientation). " The application materials provided explain that the lots have been designed to meet the dimensional standards of the base zoning and not to exceed the density of the West Village Subdivision. The application describes solar envelopes for each of the three parcels to demonstrate compliance with the Solar Access Performance Standard from AMC 18.4.8,040 for Solar Access Standard A. A condition has been included below to require calculations be provided with the building permit for each parcel demonstrating compliance with Solar Access Standard A. (Staff note here that the original West Village Subdivision plat showed a 40 -foot -wide gas pipeline easement along the south property line of the parent parcel, which, with the standard setbacks would limit the options for solar compliance on proposed Parcel 1; the applicant has indicated that they have worked with 568 Coffee Ln / VA PA #TI -2024-00226 Page 13 i the gas company to reduce the extent of this easement and that this is reflected in the current submittals. They have further indicated that they do not believe the pipeline easement will pose a problem. The boundaries of the modified easement will need to be identified clearly on the partition plat by the project's professional land surveyor.) The size and dimensions of the proposed Parcels I and 2 meet the requirements for the zone. Parcel 3 meets the requirements of the zone for width versus depth with the southern property line, adjacent to the alley, used as the front yard and required setbacks will need to be determined on that basis. All buildable envelopes otherwise meet the requirements of the zone and will be conditioned upon how they are presented in this application and as described herein. The sixth criterion is that "Accesses to indit,idual lots confortn to the standards in section 18.4.3.080 Vehicle Area Design. See also, 18.5.3.060 Additional Preliminary Flag Lot Partition Plat Criteria. " In this instance, there is a shared driveway, curb cut, and private alley to allow for access to all three lots. The application materials state that the surfacing of the driveway will exceed the flag driveway standards and will be paved to 15 -feet of asphalt and 20 -foot clear width. This meets the minimum required standards of a flag drive. As conditioned in the subdivision approval, there is to be no parking on the south side of the alley other than a single-family residential garage to limit potential conflicts with pedestrian and bicycle traffic on the alley and easement. If parking is provided off the flag drive, cars are to be able to turn and exit forward. Flag lots are also required to provide a usable yard area of at least 20 feet wide by 20 feet deep. The applications explain that there is ample useable yard area within the floodplain portion of the lot, outside of the building envelopes, to satisfy this standard. The seventh: approval criterion for a Land Partition is that "The proposed streets, utilities, and surface water drainage facilities conform to the street design standards and other requiretnents in part 18.4 and allort, for transitions to existing and potential frature development on adjacent lands. The preliminmy plat shall identify all proposed public improt,ements and dedications. " Coffee Lane is improved with paving, curbs, gutters, a narrow park row planting strip and sidewalks in this vicinity. The eighth approval criterion has to do with unpaved streets. In this case, the parent parcel fronts on Coffee Lane which is fully paved and as such this criterion does not apply. The ninth approval criterion is "Where -in alley exists adjacent to the partition, access may be required to be provided f-onr the alley and prohibited fi•oin the street. " There is a private alley here, with easements required to allow public use, and all access is proposed to be taken from the alley via the shared easement. The alley and multi -use path are to be designed to the applicable city street standards, which require a 16 -foot right-of-way with 12 feet of centered paving for an alley and a 10- to 18 -foot right-of-way with a 10 -foot paved path centered in the right-of-way between two- to four -foot buffer strips. As approved in the West Village Subdivision's Final Plan, the alley is to be private but allow public use, installed to fill city alley standards, and maintained in perpetuity by the West Village subdivision homeowners' association. Compliance with the subdivision approval is required here (i.e. a city standard alley installation to the west property line, and access from the alley rather than individual driveways). In discussions with the Public Works Department about the potential for this becoming a public alley (i.e. shifting the long-term 568 Coffee Ln / VA PA #T1-2024-00226 Page 14 maintenance responsibilities from the HOA to the city) they've indicated they would be willing to take on the alley as a public facility provided that the applicant first completed the short section of alley that remains unfinished through the adjacent.Billings Ranch subdivision. That is not part of the current proposal. The tenth and final approval criterion for a Land Partition is that "Required State and Federal permits, as applicable, have been obtained or can reasonably be obtained prior to development. " As required under local ordinances, the proposal identifies building envelopes which limit the buildable area of the new parcels to areas entirely outside of the wetland on the property located across the street to the East, and as such staff do not believe that state or federal permits are likely to be required here. The approval criteria for the approval of a Preliminary Partition Plat are detailed in AMC Section 18.5.3.050 as follows: A. The fixture usefor urban purposes of the rentainder of the tract will not be impeded. B. The development of the remainder of any adjoining land or access thereto will not be irnrpeded C. Tile partition plan conforms to applicable City -adopted neighborhood or district plans, if any, and any previous land use approvals for the subject area. D. The tract of land has not been partitioned,for 12 months. * Proposed lots conform to the requirements of the underlying zone, per part 18.2, any applicable overlay zone r•equireinents, per part 18.3, and any applicable development standards, per part 18.4 (e.g., parking and access, tree preservation, solar access and orientation), F. Accesses to individual lots con form to the standards in section? 18.4.3.080 Vehicle Area Design. See also, 18.5.3.060 Additional Prelinrrinary Flag Lot Partition Plat Criteria. G. The proposed streets, utilities, and surface seater drainage facilities confor•ni to the street design standards and other requirements in pant 18.4 and allow far transitions to existing and potential fitture development on adjacent lands. The pr•elitninar y plat shall identify all proposed public iniprovements and dedications. H. Unpaved Streets. 1. Minin an Street Iinprovennent. When there exists a 20-foot-wlde access along the entire street frontage ofthe parcel to the nearest frdly improved collector or arterial street, as designated in the Corrrprehensive Plan, such access shall be improved with an asphaltic concrete pavenient designed for- the use of the proposed street. The minimum width of the street shall be 20•feet with all work done under perinit of the Public Works Department. 2. Unpaved Streets. The Public [Forks Director may allow an unpaved street _for access far a land partition when all of the following conditions exist. a. The unpaved street is at least 20 -feet wide to the nearest fitll}1 improved collector or arterial street. The city may require the street to be graded (crit and filled) to its standard physical width, and surfaced as required in chapter 18.4.6 prior to the signature of the final partition plat by the City. 568 Coffee Ln / VA PA #T1-2024-00226 Page 15 b. The centerline grade on any portion of the unpaved street does not exceed ten percent. c. The final elevation of the street shall be established as specified by the Public Works Director except where the establishment of the elevation would produce a substantial variation in the level of the road surface. In this case, the slope of the lot shall be graded to meet the final street elevation. d. Should the partition be on an unpaved street and paving is not required, the applicant shall agree to participate in the costs and to waive the rights of the owner of the subject property to remonstrate both with respect to the owners agreeing to participate in the cost of fall street improvements and to not remonstrate to the, formation of a local improvement district to cover such improvements and costs thereof. Full street improvements shall include paving, curb, gutter, sidewalks, and the undergrounding of utilities. This requirement shall be precedent to the signing of the final survey plat, and if the oimer declines to so agree, then the application ,shall be denied. I. Where an alley exists adjacent to the partition, access may be required to be provided from the alley and prohibiled f vin the street. J. Required State and Federal permits, as applicable, have been obtained or can reasonably be obtained prior to development. The Additional Flag Lot Partition Plat Criteria are detailed in AMC Section 18.5.3.060 as follows: A. The criteria of section 18.5.3.050 are met. B. For the purpose of meeting the rninirnurn lot area requirement, the lot area, exclusive of the flag drive area, must meet the minimum square footage requirements of the zoning district. C Flag drives shall be in the same ownership as the flag lots served Where two or more lots are served by the same flag drive, the flag drive shall be owned by one of the lots and an easement.for access shall be granted to the other lot or lots. D. Except cis provided in subsection 018..5.3.06M below, the flag drive serving a single flag lot shall have a minimum width of 15 feet and contain a 12 foot wide paved driving srrrfcice. For drives serving two flag lots, the flag drive shall be 20_feet wide, with a 15 foot amide driving sinface to the brick of the first lot, and a 12 foot wide driving surface to the rear lot. Drives shared by adjacent properties shall have a width of M feet, with a I5 foot paved driving surface. Width shall be increased on turns where necessary to ensure fire apparatus remain on a paved surface during travel. E. Curb cuts have been minimized, where possible, through the use ofcorrmlon driveways. No more than hila flag lots are served by the flag drive. F. Flag drive grades shall not exceed a maximum grade of 15 percent. Variances may be granted for flag drives for grades in excess of 15 percent but no greater than 18 percent 568 Coffee Ln / VA PA #T1-2024-00226 Page 16 for not more than 200 feet. Stich variances shall be required to meet all of the criter•ia.for approval in chapter J b'. 5.7 Variances. G. Flag drives shall be constructed to prevent surface drainage from flowing over sidewalks or' other public ways. H. Flag lots adjacent to an alley shall meet all of the requirements ofthis section, except that: 1. Vehicle access shall be from the alley only where required cis a condition of approval. 2. Aro screening and paving requirements shall be required for the flagpole. 3. A four foot pedestrian path shall be installed within the flagpole and improved and maintained with either a concrete, asphalt, brick, orpaver blocks iar face connecting the street to the buildable area of the flag lot. 4. The flag pole width shall be no less than eight feet wide and the entrance of the pole at the street shall be identified by the address of the flag lot clearly visible from the street on a four -inch by four -inch post that is 3Y2 feet high. The post shall be painted white with black numbers three inches high running vertically down the front of the post. For flagpoles serving two or more dwellings, the addresses of such dwellings shall be on a two foot by three foot white sign clearly visible from the street with three-inch black numbers. I. Flag drives and fire work areas shall be deemed Fire Apparatus Access Roads under the Oregon Fire Code and subject to all requirements thereof. J. When required by the Oregon Fire Code, flqg drives greater than 150 feet ill length shall provide a turnaround (see Figure 118, . 1. () i0. G. S). Tlae StcrffAdvisor•, in coordination with the Fire Code Qfficial, may extend the distance of the turnaround requirement up to a maximum of 250 feet in length cis allowed by Oregon Fire Code access exemptions. K Each flag lot has at least three parking spaces situated to eliminate the necessity for vehicles backing out. L. There shall be no parking within ten feet of the centerline of the drive on either side of the flag drive entrance. M. Flag drives serving structures greater- than 24 feet in height, as defined in par! [AA(—) shall provide afire work area of 20.feet by 40 feet clear of vertical obstructions and within 50 feet of the structure. The fire work area requirement shall be waived if the structure served by the drive has an approved automatic .sprinkler systent installed N. Both sides of the flag drive have been screened with a sight -obscuring fence, wall or fire- resistant broadlearf evergreen sight -obscuring hedge to a height of from four to six feet, except in the f tont yard setback area where, starting five, feet from the property line, the height shall be fa•om 30 to 42 inches ill the remaining setback area. Stich fence or landscaping shall be placed to ensure fire apparatus access is not obstructed by the encroachment of mature landscaping. O. The applicant has execrated and filed with the Coimnunity Development Department an agreement behveen applicant and the City for paving and screening of tae flag drive. Such an agreement shall specify the period within which the applicant, or agent.for applicant, 568 Coffee Ln / VA PA #T1-2024-00226 Page 17 P or contractor, shall complete the paving to standards cis specified by the Public TVorks Director and screening as required by this section, and providing that if applicant should fail to complete such work within such period, the City may complete the same and recover the full cost and expense thereof f,oru the applicant. An agreement shall also provide for' the maintenance of the paving and screening pin-suant to this section, and assurance ongoing maintenance. P. Flag lots shall be required to provide a useable yard area that has a minimal dimension of 20 feet wide by 20 feet deep. As used in this chapter, the ler,m "useable yard area" means. a private yard area which is unobstructed b}r a structure or automobile from the ground upward. (Orel 3158 § 9, amended, 09/1812018) Public Comments Four public continents were received prior to the end of the public comment period on March 20, 2024 at 4:30 p.m. The comments addressed the following concerns: not enough open, green, "useable" space for the density of the subdivision; repair and replace any damage to the sidewalk and driveways prior to turning over the development to the HOA; extending the bike path and alley and who will be responsible for the maintenance of it; concerns over the age and material of the gas line; concerns over the retaining wall along the bike path; upkeep of grass along the path; and concerns of leveling the area where the property abuts the current bike path for paving. These comments were submitted to the applicant and property owner, and no response was received. In considering the concerns raised, staff would note the following: With regard to there not being enough open space for the density of the subdivision, the Performance Standards Options Chapter (AMC 18.3.9) required at least five percent of the total lot area of the parent subdivision be provided as cormnon open space. As pant of that original subdivision approval, there were 4.76 acres proposed for single family lots. This equated to 207,345.6 square feet and required 10,367 square feet of open space (207,345.6 square feet x 0.05 = 10,367.28 square feet). With the subdivision, two separate common open space parcels were provided totaling more than 17,855 square feet, significantly exceeding the open space requirement for the subdivision. With regard to repair and replacement of any damage to the sidewalk and driveways prior to turning over the development to the homeowners association, the city does not play any role in the hand-off of responsibility from the developer to the homeowners association. If sidewalks were observed to be damaged prior to signature of the Partition Plat, the Public Works/Engineering Division has the authority under AMC 13.04 to require repairs. As a condition of the subdivision approval, the applicant is required to extend the alley and multi -use path from the subdivision's west property line out to Coffee Lane. The applicant has proposed that the alley be private and maintained by the Homeowners Association, but easements will are required to be provided to enable public use. The applicant will need to work within the parameters of the gas pipeline easement. It is staff's understanding that the applicant did work adjacent to the pipeline and worked with Avista during the subdivision infrastructure installation, and the applicant has not suggested that this will pose any issue moving forward with the current request. Should the easement or pipeline pose unforeseen issues which prevent compliance with the 568 Coffee Ln / VA PA 4T1-2024-00226 Page 18 t conditions of approval here, the decision would need to be modified through a subsequent land use action. Conditions have been included below to require that the civil drawings for the project, including the alley and multi -use path and any transition from the existing multi -use path improvements to those proposed to be installed, be reviewed and approved by the Public Works, Engineering and Planning Divisions prior to signature of the final plat or installation of any improvements. Decision In staff's final assessment, the application with the attached conditions complies with applicable ordinances and meets all applicable approval criteria. Planning Action #PA -T1-2024-00225 is therefore approved with the following conditions. Further, if any one or more of the following conditions are found to be invalid for any reason whatsoever, then Planning Action #PA -T1 -2024- 0022b is denied. The following are the conditions, and they are attached to the approval: 1. All proposals of the applicant, including that all units receive Earth Advantage certification and are included in the homeowners association and subject to the Contracts, Covenants and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise specifically modified herein. 2. The requirements of the Ashland Fire Department including but not limited to approved addressing, fire apparatus approach & access; limitations on gates, fences or other obstructions; firefighter access pathway; hydrant distances & clearance; fire sprinkler system {if applicable); and wildfire hazard area & fire season limitations shall be complied with prior to the use of combustible materials on-site. Fire Department requirements shall be included oil the engineered construction documents for public facilities, and if a fire protection vault is required, the vault shall not be located in the sidewalk. 3. A Fire Prevention and Control Plan addressing the General Fuel Modification Area requirements in AMC 18,3.10.100.A.2 of the Ashland Land Use Ordinance shall be provided prior to bringing combustible materials onto the property, and any new landscaping shall comply with these standards and shall not include plants listed ori the Prohibited Flammable Plant List per Resolution 2018-028. 4. For any construction within the adjacent public rights-of-way, including but not limited to utility installations or driveway, curb or sidewalk installation or repairs, the applicant shall obtain necessary permits and inspections from the Ashland Public Works Department. 5. The tract of land shall be surveyed, and the Partition Plat shall be submitted to the city for review and signature within 18 months of the final decision date of the preliminary partition plat. b. That the alley and multi -use path, while proposed to be privately owned and maintained, shall be improved to city standards from Coffee Lane to the Western property line and easernents provided to allow public use of both facilities. 7. That the three parcels are to share vehicular access via the alley as proposed by the applicant, and no new curb cuts are to be allowed from Coffee Lane. The driveway/alley curb cut shall be installed under permit from the Public Works/Engineering Division, inspected and approved prior to signature of the Final Plat. 568 Coffee Ln / VA PA #T7.-2024-00226 Page 19 s 8. That all exterior lighting shall be directed on the property and shall not directly illuminate adjacent proprieties. 9. The southern property line for Parcel 3 shall be considered its front lot line for the purposes of determining required yard areas/setbacks. Building permit submittals shall identify setbacks for Parcel 3 on this basis, and shall include the required 20 -foot x 20 -foot useable yard area. 10. That building permits for all of the three parcels shall demonstrate compliance with the solar envelopes described by the applicant herein and with Solar Access Standard A. Solar setback calculations demonstrating that all new construction complies with Solar Setback Standard A in the formula [(Height —6)/(0.445 + Slope) = Required Solar Setback] and elevations or cross section drawings clearly identifying the highest shadow producing point(s) and the height(s) from natural grade shall be included with the permit drawings. 11, Prior to the submittal of a Partition Plat for signature: a. All easements including but not limited to public and private utilities, fire apparatus access, public pedestrian access and reciprocal utility, maintenance, and access shall be indicated on the final survey plat as required by the Ashland Engineering Division. b. That final civil drawings for the parcels shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning, Public Works/Engineering, Electric and Building Divisions prior to signature of the final Partition Plat. The utility plan shall include the location of connections to all public facilities including the locations of water lines and meter sizes, fire hydrants, sanitary sewer lines, storm drain lines and electric services. New or relocated transformers and cabinets shall be located in areas least visible from streets and sidewalks, while considering the access needs of the Electric Department. The civil drawings for the project shall include details of the installation of the alley and multi -use path according to applicable city standards and detail the transition from the existing multi -use path improvements to those being installed Dere. Civil drawings shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works, Engineering and Planning Divisions prior installation of any improvernents, and the improvements installed, inspected and approved prior to the signature of the final plat. C. That the location and final engineering for all storm drainage improvements associated with the project, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Departments of Public Works, Planning and Building Divisions prior to signature of the final survey plat. d. If parking is voluntarily provided off of the flag drive, it shall be designed to meet the applicable standards of AMC 18.4.3.080 and situated so that cars can turn and exit forward to the street. Building permits plans shall include details of voluntarily proposed automobile parking as well as required bicycle parking per AMC 18.4.3.070. 12. Prior to the signature of the Partition Plat: a. That street trees, one per 30 feet of street frontage, shall be installed with irrigation in the parkrow planting strip along the full Coffee Lane frontage of the parent property. All street trees shall be selected from the Recommended Street Tree 568 Coffee Ln / VA PA #T1-2024-00226 Page 110 Guide's "4 -Foot Parkrow" list and planted and irrigated in accordance with the Guide's planting instructions and the standards in AMC 18.4.4.030.E. b. That the flag drive shall be paved to 15 -feet centered within a 20 -foot clear width with vertical clearance of at least 13 -feet, 6 -inches and be able to withstand 44,000 pounds prior to the signature of the final survey plat. The flag drive shall be constructed so as to prevent surface drainage from flowing over the private property lines and/or public ways in accordance with AMC 18.5.3.060. C. That the separate electric services shall be installed underground to serve all three parcels prior to signature of the final survey plat. At the discretion of the Staff Advisor, a bond niay be posted for the full amount of underground service installation (with necessary permits and connection fees paid) as an alternative to installation of service prior to signature of the final survey plat. In either case, the electric service plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Ashland Electric Department and Ashland Engineering Division prior to installation. d. That the sanitary sewer laterals and water services including connection with meters at the street shall be installed for all three parcels prior to the signature of filial survey plat. 13. That, as proposed by the applicant, prior to the issuance of a building permit for any unit, the applicant shall provide evidence that the Earth Advantage10, certifications are being pursued, and prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy the applicant shall provide evidence of the required Earth Advantage®R certification. 14. That all public improvements including but not limited to the sidewalk, street trees, and street lighting shall be installed to City of Ashland standards under permit from the Public Works Department and in accordance with the approved plan prior to Certificate of Occupancy. Brandon Goldma in, Dii-ector Department of Community Development April 5, 2024 Date 568 Coffee Ln / VA PA #TI -2024-00226 Page 1 11 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON County of Jackson The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2. On April 8, 2024 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #PA -T1-2024-00226, 568 Coffee Lane. MichaeCSuCCiyan Signature of Employee GAcomm-0ev';ann g1Pia"Ad6ens%Ms6yStreeCOWee',Cot'eeLane_568�aLane_568_PA-T1-2024-0OY1Ehb3c+ngWW,Coree_5&8_PA-TI-2024-0022i_-N00_ATfdaAc l.Ea ngdax4,"24 � • T PA -T1-2024-00226 ALLISON CLARK/COLIN FORD 339 RANDY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2024-00226 391 E05AD1100 ASHLAND COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 1505 S HOWARD AVE STE TAMPA, FL 33606 PA -T1-2024-00226 391E05AD5900 PA -T1-2024-00226 391E05AD300 BILLINGS RANCH HOMEOWNERS ASSO BRABANT HALEY ET AL 241 MAPLE ST STE 100 375 OTIS ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2024-00226 391E05AD6200 CASELLI RENATO JR/BARBARA 1467 SISKIYOU BLVD 214 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2024-00226 391 E05AD227 COFFEE LANE RENTALS LLC 4919 KANE CREEK RD CENTRAL POINT, OR 97502 PA -T1-2024-00226 391 E05AD208 DEWITT SUSAN ARLENE 387 RANDY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2024-00226 391 E05AD703 EPSTEIN WILLIAM S/SARAH J 648 N MAIN ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2024-00226 391 E05AD802 HWANG ALICIA 668 N MAIN ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2024-00226 391E05AD204 ONEAL SHARI A REV LIVING TRUS 355 RANDY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2024-00226 391E05AD502 STOUT TRINA CASSANDRA 356 OTIS ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2024-00226 WOLFGANG & SHIRLEY PETSCH 601 VANSANT ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2024-00226 CHERYL BENTLEY 363 OTIS ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2024-00226 391 E05AD226 DELAMORE SPENCER 597 COFFEE LN ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2024-00226 391E05AD211 EBERHARD TODD TRUSTEE ET AL 388 RANDY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2024-00226 GRIESINGER V1CK1 607 VANSANT ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2024-00226 391 E05AD700 ASHLAND MEDICAL CENTER ASSOC] 648 N MAIN ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2024-00226 CAROLYN SPROGIS 492 LINDSAY LN ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2024-00226 391 E05AD225 CMK DEVELOPMENT LLC 1679 JACKSON RD ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2024-00226 391E05AD205 DEWIT-SMITH LIANA L TRUSTEE E 363 RANDY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 3 PA -T1-2024-00226 391E05AD206 ENFANTINO MICHAEL 371 RANDY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 i PA -T1-2024-00226 391 E05AD5800 HAWKINS MARILYN E TRUSTEE ET 607 VANSANT ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2024-00226 391E05AD210 PA -T1-2024-00226 391E05AD5700 MARGOLIES CHERYL K TRUSTEE ET MILTIER RANDY ET AL 396 RANDY ST 613 VAN SANT ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2024-00226 391 E05AD6000 PETSCH WOLF GANG/SHI RLEY PO BOX 1028 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2024-00226 SUSAN DEWITT 387 RANDY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 568 Coffee Ln NOD '04/08/24 28 PA -T1-2024-00226 391 E05AD207 SACKS DAVID A TRUSTEE ET AL 379 RANDY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2024-00226 391 E05AD209 CURRENT RESIDENT 395 RANDY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 From, David Silva To: Veronica Allen: David Silva: Liana & Bruce de Wit -Smith Subject: Minor Land Partition- Coffee Street and Randy Street -Tailored Elements Date: Wednesday, March 20, 2024 4:24:32 PM [EXTERNAL SENDER] Hi Veronica - My husband and I, Todd Eberhard and David Silva, recently purchased a single family home on Randy street in Ashland from Taylored Elements. We received a document from the city of Ashland, a proposal for a change in land use. Thank you for letting us know about the plans for the 2 HOAs. Todd and I object to the plan to build a private driveway/alley for what was presented to us as the location of several small homes. With their own HOA. Now, if I understand correctly, the house HOA will include the driveway/alley and three additional homes. It is said that the house HOA will pay for the upkeep of the driveway/alley. At our expense. This is all new to us. Not fair and possibly may amount to a financial burden. Please meet the two HOA members ( tiny home and house) and discuss everything town hall style so we will understand what night or will happen. I will be timely in answering any email. Thanks, David Silva and Todd Eberhard 388 Randy Street dsil14244U( gmail.com From: Zoe Livinoston To: Veronica Allen Subject: New Driveway Date: Wednesday, March 20, 2024 3:37:10 PM [EXTERNAL SENDER] Dear Veronica, We are sending this email to state that the private driveway that will be for the three (3) new homes being built on the flag lot should be maintained by the City of Ashland or the three homeowners living in those homes and not the financial responsibility of our HOA on Randy Street, Very truly yours, Zoe Livingston and David Sacks 379 Randy Street Ashland, OR F From: Susan Dewitt To: Veronica Allen: randi.solvak0ashland.comor.us Subject; Driveway for properties being developed by Taylored Elements (CMK) Date: Wednesday, March 20, 2024 3:52:04 PM [EXTERNAL SENDER] I am opposed to adding costs to our small community in Ashland know as "West Village" by adding a long driveway supporting 3 proposed new homes on Coffee Lane for which our Homeowners Association will become responsible for costs to maintain such driveway. This property was originally approved to build Cottages which would have their own Homeowners Association. I vote "No" on this proposal. Susan Dewitt 387 Randy St Ashland. OR 97520 541-930-9554 From: Allison Clarfc To: Veronica Allen Subject: Comment re: CMK lot ib proposal Date: Wednesday, March 20, 2024 157:28 PM [EXTERNAL SENDER] Hi Veronica, I'm reaching out because I was notified by a neighbor that all comments regarding CMK's (Taylored Elements) proposal for subdividing Lot 16 should be directed to you. I'm concerned about CMK's proposal, as it is a significant departure from the land use presented to us (we are current homeowners at 395 Randy in this same Taylored Elements West Village subdivision). I am just learning about the proposal to change the the land from small cottages to multiple single family homes today, with a private alley that is maintained by the single family homes HOA. As a homeowner within the HOA, we received no notice regarding this proposed change, increasing HOA membership with additional homes, etc. We are strongly opposed to building a private alley whose cost is passed onto the HOA. When purchasing our home from CMK, they were explicit that no such codes would be incurred within the HOA (as it only covers basic communal road landscaping). All the best, Allison Clark and Colin Ford 339 Randy St Ashland, OR 97520 From To: Veronica Plen Subject: West Village plan Date: Wednesday, March 20, 2024 3:16:43 PM [EXTERNAL SENDER] I am writing to you regarding the proposed changes to the West Village pla►r. I am opposed to having a private driveway for the proposed three houses to be built on Coffee Lane. This chmige in plans ftorn cottages to private driveway would have financial consequences for me and the other homeowr►ers of West Village, I do not want to be responsible financially for a driveway that does riot abut my property. Thank you, Cheryl Bentley 363 Otis Street, Ashland From: To,2� aLi "n Subject- West Village, Planning Action PA -TI -2024-00226 Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 8:05:53 PM [EXTERNAL SENDER] March 19, 2024 City of Ashland Planning Division Planning Action PAJI-2024-00226 Subject Property: 568 Coffee Lane Dear Commissioners: I am a resident of the Billings Ranch subdivision immediately adjacent to the Subject Property and have seen the posted Notice on the Property ,aid the related documentation. While it is, in ni), opinion, preferable to substitute three single family hornes for the originally proposed six cottages, the lack of any useable green space is troubling. This is a very dense development wilb virtually no common area for the use of its residents. Perhaps the proposed Parcel I of Lot 16 could be developed as a park instead of a dwelling. Green space such as a park, useable by the residents of West Village would reduce the Visual tension of the dense development and provide all outdoor respite in keeping with the beauty and tranquility of Ashland, Sincerely, Carolyn Sprogis 492 Lindsay Lane Ashland, OR 97520 From: Lid IrL dL1J3-rJ LLJL-W-1 L -,Lr U. 1. t i b To: Veronils, .,All g.r.1 Subject: Re: PA -T1-2024-00226, 568 Coffee Lane Date: Wednesday, March 20, 2024 2:44:30 PM Attachments: [EXTERNAL SENDER] Lastly, When we purchased the house at 363 Randy we were told that the 2 areas designated for cottages would have their own HOA and the houses their own separate HOA.. Since the proposal at hand removes cottages from the property and adds houses in its place to be included in the existing HOA for all the houses, we never anticipated being financially responsible for maintenaiice/repair/replaceiiient of a private road (the private long driveway). We would prefer the driveway (iiiaititenance/repair/replaceiiieiit) to be the responsibilit), of the City of Ashland or if not the City, then the financial responsibility of the three proposed new home owners. If it is to be the new home owners (the 3 of them), it should be stipulated on their contract with CMS that they are solely responsible for the iiiaintenaiice/repair/replacenieiit of their driveway, and not the responsibility of the home owners 140A. Regards, Bruce Smith Liana deWit-Smith On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 1:30 PM Liana and Bruce de Wit-Srnith <5 - ilsism> wrote: Also, our first preference is it to be a public street versus a private street. On Wed, Mar 20, 2424 at 10:55 AM Liana and Bruce de Wit-Sii-iith <'$ )m> wrote: -Dijihu-ni i�s55 ), 41Q- � I would like to suggest that there is no through traffic from the private Billings Ralich back alley way onto the private driveway in West Village out to Coffee Lane. If Billings Ranch residents are allowed through traffic, the private West Village section will get much more wear and tear by Billings Ratich residences that the West Village HOA will have to maintain. The Billings Ranch private alley already has street access onto Vansant. Bruce Smith 363 Randy St On. Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 8:11 AM Veronica Allen <Yox i) a iL, ai-,idl hemi wrote: Hello Bruce, Let me look into that and get back to yogi. Much thanks, Veronica Allen, CFM, Associate Planner p _LOL�i�ourLs ShelHer City of Ashland Community Development 51 Winburn, Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 541.552.2042 1 TTY 800.735.2900 online km id,orus: social media (Facebook @CityOfAshland0regon I Twitter pCityofAshland) This email transmission is official business of the City of Ashland, and it is subject to Oregon Public Records Low for disclosure and retention. if you have received this message in error, please contact me at 541.5522042. From: Liana and Bruce de Wit-Sr-nith <5 "rsl LErtLaJ => Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 4:08 PM To: Veronica Al le n -II -Q r �a),- s b la �n. ou�,,ic.> Subject: Re: PA -TI -2024-00226, 568 Coffee Lane [EXTERNAL SENDER] Veronica, we've just been actually reading the 17 page document referenced in the letter from City of Ashland. Question: the extended "alley" going from existing Billings Ranch through West Village to Coffed Lane - is that open to thru car traffic? In other words, can a car drive from Coffee Lane and connect to the alley that extends behind the existing Billings Ranch development? Thanks very much. Bruce Smith On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 1:05 PM Veronica Allen <vvtIT. .t jg,,a1len6-6isbiajt, w > wrote: Your public coninient has been received. It will be added to the planning action file and included in the record. Much thanks, Veronica Allen, CFM, Associate Planner L)r0r) t s, She/Her QL� City of Ashland W"= 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 541552.2042 1 TTY 800.735.2900 Y(;, .-ro caLi laua-)a-5h1cl rl.QuM aL i -- --- -o-� - - Online ig, social media (Facebook @City0f Ashland0regon I Twitter @CityofAshland) This email transmission is official business of the City of Ashland, and it is subject to Oregon Public Records Low for disclosure and retention. if you have received this message in error, please contact me at 541.552.2042. From: Liana and Bruce de Wit -Smith Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 12:35 PM To: Veronica Allen <verorka,Callen a -:Iandor js> Subject: PA -TI -2024-00226, 568 Coffee Lane [EXTERNAL SENDER] Veronica, we received the notice of application for the above. Please keep us posted on future actions for this property. Our comments at this tirne are for CMK to provide plans/details on the open space at top of Coffee Lane, and also that CMK repair/replace any sidewalk/driveway damage prior to turning over the development to the HOA. Thanks very much. Bruce Smith and Liana deWit-Smith smi -dir imI2crs Michael Sullivan From: Wolfgang Petsch <223ws@mtashland.net> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2024 10:30 PM To: planning Subject: Planning action PA -T1-2024-00226 [EXTERNAL SENDER] March 15, 2024 To: City of Ashland From: Wolfgang & Shirley Petsch, 601 Vansant Street, Ashland Residents and homeowners at Billings Ranch There are questions that were addressed to you from Vicki Griesinger, president of the HOA at Billings Ranch. Our concerns are as follows: Is the bikepath going to be extended? Who will be in charge of maintenance for the alley or bikepath? We are also concerned that the major gas line at the back of parcel 1 would be periodically checked for any leaks or erosion. How old is the gas line and what material was used in the construction? Please refer to the photos Ms. Griesinger emailed to you. As you can see the retaining wall is in poor condition and needs to be rebuilt. What are your plans for leveling the path? The grass in the area needs to be cut every summer due to possible fires. The city needs to maintain that yearly. Sincerely, Wolfgang & Shirley Petsch 501 Vansant Ashland, OR Ph. 541482 1521 Sent from my iPad March 15, 2024 To: City of Ashland Written Comments for PA -TI -2024-00226 From: Vicki Griesinger, 607 VanSant St., Ashland and President, Billings Ranch HOA Board Thank you for the notice of application for West Village which adjoins Billings Ranch, We appreciate the quality of West Village but have specific questions around the extension of the alley and bikepath from Billings Ranch (BR) through West Village. From the writeup, it is not clear that the alley or bikepath will be extended, a fence instead? But it appears from the diagrams in the Minor LandPartition (attached) that the alley and bikepath will extend from BR, and angle between Parcel 2/3 and Parcel 1, Having been here for 4 years, I've watched the development of West Village, and know about the major gas line at the back of Parcel 1, thus the angling of the alley. I personally and the Billings Ranch Homeowners Association Board of Directors would like it entered' into the record that we support the extension of the Central Bike Path through West Village and oppose any action to remove said extension from the plans. We would like confirmation of the plan, for extension. Questions: 1. If the alley is to be extended', what happens with the 70 ft. of grassy alley area oin the BR side? From the photo (attached), you can see that a retaining wall would need to be built (not at HOA expense) from the existing retaining wall up to the West Village border to hold the earth in place. 2. Behind the 601 VanSant St. fence, the ground is sloped upwards and sideways. What are the plans for leveling that area to prepare for paving? Thank you. Vicki Griesinger (206) 999-4579 p t 1, ..�r.esj d e..0 .......... �in ranchhoa,corn _Fm.- !, —__ . ...... . ...... ► 10119 103 *410-100 PLANNING ACTION: PA -T1-2024-00226 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 568 Coffee Lane APPLICANT/OWNER: Rogue Planning for CMK Development DESCRIPTION: A request for land use approval for a three -lot partition of a 0,636 -acre Pot located at 568 Coffee Lane. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-5; MAP: 39 1E 05 AD; TAX LOT: 213 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: March 6, 2024 DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: March 2a, 2024 _... ._._.._.._............... I I Ald Y r 1 a , E J e,111 ic I °w "I�'! h k x tl COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 51 Winburn Way Tel: 541.488,5305 Ashland, Oregon 97520 Fax: 541.552.2050 �p Lksli"STTY: 800.735.2000 C11'Y OF S1,41 --,AND The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted on Page I of this notice. A copy of the application, including all documents, evidence and applicable criteria are available online at "What's Happening in my City"' at httos:Hais.ashIand.or.us/(Ievelopmentorop_gsals�/. Copies of application materials will be provided at reasonable cost, if requested. Application materials may be requested to be reviewed in-person at the Ashland Community Development & Engineering Services Building, 51 Winburn Way, via a pre -arranged appointment by calling (541) 488-5305 or emailing plannin ashland.or.us. q@L_ Any affected! property owner or resident has a right to submit written comments within the 14 -day comment period to plan ni ng6�ash land. OF. LIS or to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m. on the, deadline date shown on Page 1 Ashland! Planning Division Staff determine if a land use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a notice lis sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting the application. After the comment period and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to the Planning! Commission of the Planning Division Staffs decision must be made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC 18,6,1,050.0 The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specificity to allow this, Department to respond to the issue precludes an action, for damages in circuit court. If you have questions or comments concerning this request:, please feel free to contact Veronica Allen at 541-552-2042 or ve,ronica.WlenOwashland.orms In compliance with the American with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Administrator's office at 541-488-6002 (TTY phone number 1-800-735-2900). Notification, 72 hours prior to the meeting willl enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to the meeting. (28 CFR 35.102.-35.104 ADA Title 1). PRELIMINARY PARTITION' PLAT 18.5.3.050 The approval authority shall approve an application for preliminary partition plat approval only where all of the following criteria are met, A. The future use for urban purposes of the remainder of the tract will not be impeded, B. The development of the remainder of any adjoining land or access thereto will not be impeded. C. The partition plan conforms to applicable City -adopted neighborhood or district plans, if any, and any previous land use approvals for the subject area, D. The tract of land has not been partitioned for 12 months. E. Proposed lots conform to the requirements of the underlying zone,, per part 18.2, any applicable overlay zone requirements, per part 18.3, and any applicable development standards, per part 18,4 (e,g,, parking and access, tree preservation, solar access and orientation). R Accesses to individual lots conform to the standards, in section 18.4.3,080 Vehicle Area Design, See also, 18,5.3.060 Additional Preliminary Flag Lot Partition Plat Criteria. G. The proposed streets, utilities, and surface water drainage facilities conform to the street design standards and other requirements in part 18.4, and allow for transitions to existing and potential future development on adjacent lands. The preliminary plat shall identify all proposed public improvements and dedications, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 51 Winburn Way TeL 541.488.5305 Ashland, Oregon 97520 Fax: 541552,2050 inva4m, gA.�b.'Rod _r)LLJ,5 TTY; 800.735.2900 G F ASHLAND Unpaved Streets, 1. Minimum Street Improvement. When there exists a 20 -foot wide access along the entire street frontage of the parcel to the nearest fully improved collector or arterial street, as designated in the Comprehensive Plan, such access shall be improved with an asphaltic concrete pavement designed for the use of the proposed street. The minimum width of the street shall be 20 -feet with all work done under permit of the Public Works Department, 2, Unpaved Streets, The Public Works Director may allow an unpaved street for access for a land partition when all of the following conditions exist. a. The unpaved street is at least 20 -feet wide to the nearest fully improved collector or arterial street, The City may require the street to be graded (cut and filled) to its standard physical width, and surfaced as required in chapter 18,4,6 prior to the signature of the final partition plat by the City. b. The centerline grade on any portion of the unpaved street does not exceed ten percent, c, The final elevation of the street shall be established as specified by the Public Works Director except where the establishment of the elevation would produce a substantial variation in the level of the road surface. In this case, the slope of the lot shall be graded to meet the final street elevation. d. Should the partition be on an unpaved street and paving is not required, the applicant shall agree to participate in the costs and to waive the rights of the owner of the subject property to remonstrate both with respect to the owners agreeing to participate in the cost of full street improvements and to not remonstrate to the formation of a local improvement district to cover such improvements and costs thereof. Full street improvements shall include paving, curb, gutter, sidewalks, and the undergrounding of utilities. This requirement shall be precedent to the signing of the final survey plat, and if the owner declines to so agree, then, the application shall be denied. Where an alley exists adjacent to the partition,, access may be required to be provided from the alley and prohibited from the street. Required State and Federal permits, as applicable, have been obtained or can reasonably be obtained prior to development. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 51 Winburn Way Tel: 541.488.5305 Ashland, Oregon 97520 Fox: 541.552.2050 tkw Ldgux TTY: 800.735.2900 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON County of Jackson The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2. On March 6, 20241 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #PA -T1-2024-00226, 568 Coffee Lane. Nichae[Suffivan. Signature of Employee DocoxAl 1"24 sjElege67exAiane P tally PA -T1-2024-00226 391E05AD1100 ASHLAND COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 1505 S HOWARD AVE STE TAMPA, FL 33606 PA -T1-2024-00226 391 E05AD300 BRABANT HALEY ET AL 375 OTIS ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2024-00226 391E05AD225 CMK DEVELOPMENT LLC 1679 JACKSON RD ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2024-00226 391 E05AD205 DEWIT-SMITH LIANA L TRUSTEE E 363 RANDY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2024-00226 391 E05AD206 ENFANTINO MICHAEL 371 RANDY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2024-00226 391E05AD802 HWANG ALICIA 668 N MAIN ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2024-00226 391E05AD5700 MILTIER RANDY ET AL 613 VAN SANT ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2024-00226 391E05AD700 ASHLAND MEDICAL CENTER ASSOCI 648 N MAIN ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2024-00226 391E05AD6200 CASELLI RENATO JR/BARBARA 1467 SISKIYOU BLVD 214 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2024-00226 391E05AD228 COFFEE LANE RENTALS LLC 4919 KANE CREEK RD CENTRAL POINT, OR 97502 PA -T1-2024-00226 391E05AD208 DEWITT SUSAN ARLENE 387 RANDY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2024-00226 391 E05AD703 EPSTEIN WILLIAM S/SARAH J 648 N MAIN ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2024-00226 LJ FRIAR & ASSOCIATES PO BOX 1947 PHOENIX, OR 97540 PA -T1-2024-00226 391 E05AD204 ONEAL SHARI A REV LIVING TRUS 355 RANDY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2024-00226 PA -T1-2024-00226 391 E05AD207 ROGUE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SACKS DAVID A TRUSTEE ET AL 1314-B CENTER DR PMB #457 379 RANDY ST MEDFORD, OR 97501 ;ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2024-00226 391E05AD502 i568 Coffee NOC STOUT TRINA CASSANDRA 03/06/24 356 OTIS ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 25 PA -T1-2024-00226 391 E05AD5900 BILLINGS RANCH HOMEOWNERS ASS 241 MAPLE ST STE 100 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2024-00226 CEC ENGINEERING PO BOX 172 MEDFORD, OR 97501 PA -T1-2024-00226 391 E05AD226 DELAMORE SPENCER 597 COFFEE LN ASHLAND,` OR 97520 PA -T1-2024-00226 391E05AD211 EBERHARD TODD TRUSTEE ET AL 388 RANDY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2024-00226 391 E05AD5800 HAWKINS MARILYN E TRUSTEE ET 607 VANSANT ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2024-00226 391 E05AD210 MARGOLIES CHERYL K TRUSTEE ET 396 RANDY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2024-00226 391 E05AD6000 PETSCH WOLFGANG/SHIRLEY PO BOX 1028 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2024-00226 391 E05AD209 SOBEL SHEREEN TRUSTEE ET AL 395 RANDY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 0916 AZI AV ta.L Ajany as0 so "L'dm@i/W0:)'AJ0AP o 0 PA -T1-2024-00226 391 E05AD5900 BILLINGS RANCH HOMEOWNERS ASS 241 MAPLE ST STE 100 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2024-00226 CEC ENGINEERING PO BOX 172 MEDFORD, OR 97501 PA -T1-2024-00226 391 E05AD226 DELAMORE SPENCER 597 COFFEE LN ASHLAND,` OR 97520 PA -T1-2024-00226 391E05AD211 EBERHARD TODD TRUSTEE ET AL 388 RANDY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2024-00226 391 E05AD5800 HAWKINS MARILYN E TRUSTEE ET 607 VANSANT ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2024-00226 391 E05AD210 MARGOLIES CHERYL K TRUSTEE ET 396 RANDY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2024-00226 391 E05AD6000 PETSCH WOLFGANG/SHIRLEY PO BOX 1028 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2024-00226 391 E05AD209 SOBEL SHEREEN TRUSTEE ET AL 395 RANDY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 0916 AZI AV U4b� l -f Planning Division 51 Winburn Way, Ashland OR 97520 Phone: 541-488-5305 Fax: 541-488-6006 ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION Ennaii: Planning@ashland.or.us FILE # DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Minor Land Partition to create two lots and one flag lot DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Street Address 568 Coffee Lane Assessor's Map No. 391E 05AD Zoning R -1-5-P APPLICANT Name Taylored Elements Address 1679 Jackson Road PROPERTY OWNER Name CMK Development LLC Address 1679 Jackson Road Pursuing LEEDS Certification? ❑ YES ❑ NO Tax Lot(s) 213 Comp Plan Designation Single Family Residential Phone 541 -690 -161'E -Mail office@tayloredelements.com city Ashland Phone E -Mail Zip 95720 kyle@tayloredelements.com city Ashland Zip 97520 SURVEYOR ENGINEER ARCHITECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OTHER Title Surveyor Name LJ Friar & Associates Phone 541-772-2782 E -Mail Ijfriar@associates@ Address PO BOX 1947 Title Planning City Phoenix Zip 95740 Rogue Planning & Develop phone 541-951-4020 E -Mail amygunter.planningi Address 1314-B Center Dr., PMB#457 City Medford Zip 97520 I hereby certify that the statements and information contained in this application, including the enclosed drawings and the required findings of fact, are in all respects, true and correct. t understand that all property pins must be shown on the drawings and visible upon the site inspection. In the event the pins are not shown or their location found to be incorrect, the owner assumes full responsibility. I further understand that if this request is subsequently contested, the burden will be on me to establish: 1) that I produced sufficient factual evidence at the hearing to support this request; 2) that the findings of fact furnished justifies the granting of the request,- 3) equest;3) that the findings of fact furnished by me are adequate; and further 4) that all structures or improvements are properly located on the ground. Failure in this regard will result most likely in not only the request being set aside, but also possibly in my structures being built in reliance thereon being required to be removed at my expense. If f have any doubts, I am advised to seek competent professional advice and assistance. fele Ta�ko 2/14/2024 App 1can�Signaure Date As owner of the property involved in this request, t have read and understood the complete application and its consequences to me as a property owner. kC le Tai loi- 2/14/2024 Property Owner's Signature (required) Date [To be -nTWed by C?ly Stag Date Received zoning Permit Type Filing Fee OVER N G lcomm-dnlpl=infforms & Hm&uts%Zoning Pcmtit Application doc ZONING PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS APPLICATION FORM must be completed and signed by both applicant and property owner. PLANNING FEES FORM must be completed and signed by both applicant and property owner. ® FINDINGS OF FACT -- Respond to the appropriate zoning requirements in the form of factual statements or findings of fact and supported by evidence. List the findings criteria and the evidence that supports it. Include information necessary to address all issues detailed in the Pre -Application Comment document. © TRUE SCALE PDF DRAWINGS -- Standard scale and formatted to print no larger than 11x17 inches. Include site plan, building elevations, parking and landscape details. ® FEE (Check, Charge or Cash) * LEEDO CERTIFICATION (optional) — Applicant's wishing to receive priority planning action processing shall provide the following documentation with the application demonstrating the completion of the fallowing steps: • Hiring and retaining a LEEDO Accredited Professional as part of the project team throughout design and construction of the project; and • The LEEDO checklist indicating the credits that will be pursued. NOTE: • Applications are accepted on a first come, first served basis. • Applications will not be accepted without a complete application form signed by the applicant(s) AND property owner(s), all required materials and full payment. • All applications received are reviewed for completeness by staff within 30 days from application date in accordance with ORS 227.978. • The first fifteen COMPLETE applications submitted are processed at the next available Planning Commission meeting. (Planning Commission meetings include the Hearings Board, which meets at 1:30 pm, or the full Planning Commission, which meets at 7;00 pm on the second Tuesday of each month. Meetings are held at the City Council Chambers at 1175 East Main St). • A notice of the project request will be sent to neighboring properties for their comments or concerns, • If applicable, the application will also be reviewed by the Tree and/or Historic Commissions. Wcomm-dei' p1=ing Forms & fl ndou[s4Zoning Permit ApplicaUon.da Zoning_Permit-Application_CoffeeLN 3 lots Final Audit Report 2024-02-14 "Zoning,Permit—Application_CoffeeLN 3 lots" History 5 Document created by Amy Gunter (amygunter.planning@gmail.com) 2024-02-12 - 11:24:51 PM GMT- IP address: 69.9.138.74 C' Document emailed to Kyle Taylor (kyle@tayloredelements.corn) for signature 2024-02-12 - 11:24:56 PM GMT 5 Email viewed by Kyle Taylor (kyle@tayloredelements.com) 2024-02-13 - 6:23:04 AM GMT- IP address: 146.75.154.0 4 Document e -signed by Kyle Taylor (kyle@tayloredelements.com) Signature Date: 2024-02-14 - 5:35:27 PM GMT - Time Source: server- IP address: 97.94.246.114 10 Agreement completed. 2024-02-14 - 5:35:27 PM GMT 0 Adobe Acrobat Sign West Village Subdivision — Lot 1.6 Minor Land Partition 7aylored Elements/ CMK Development LLC ROBUE PLANNING B DEVELUMENT SERVICES, LLC February 12, 2024 Three lot partition of Lot 16, West Village Subdivision Subject Property; 568 Coffee Lane 39 1E 05AD; 213 Property Owner: CMK Development LLC 1679 Jackson Road Ashland, OR 97520 Applicant: Taylored Elements 1679 Jackson Road Ashland, OR 97520 Engineering Services: CEC Engineering PO BOX 172 Medford, OR 97501 Land Surveying: U Friar & Associates PO BOX 1947 Phoenix, OR 97535 Planning Consultant: Rogue Planning & Development Services, LLC 1314E Center Dr. PMB#457 Medford, OR 97501 Comprehensive Plan Designation: Single Family Residential Zoning: R-1-5 (5,000 square foot lot minimum) Adjacent Zones: R-1-5; HC (Healthcare); E-1 and R-3 Performance Standards Overlay Overlays: Performance Standards Overlay 568 Coffee Lane Minor Land Partition February 12, 2024 Page 1 of 14 Request. Request to allow the partition of Lot 16 within the West Village Subdivision to allow for the creation of three residential lots including one flag lot. Property Description: The subject property is Lot 16 of the West Village Subdivision. The vacant, 27,715 square foot (.636 acre) property is on the west side of Coffee Lane. The southern property line abuts the railroad tracks. A small wetland created by un -piped irrigation was located near the southeast property line in the West Village Subdivision Open space to the southeast of the subject property. The West Village Subdivision was approved as two phases in 2019 and 2020 through Outline and Final Plan Procedures (PA -T2-2019-00017 and PA -T1-2020-00132). The West Village Subdivision Phases I and II were platted in 2020. The Cottages at West Village Outline Plan was approved in December 2020 (PA -T2-2020-0021) and Final Plan approval (PA -T1-2021-00142). The cottages have been constructed and some have sold. The subject property and all adjacent properties to the east, west and north are zoned R-1-5 (Single Family Residential). Development to the north of the subject property are Lots 1, 2 and 3 of the West Village Subdivision, across Coffee Lane is the West Village Cottages and development Lot 13. Properties to the east are part of the Billings Ranch Subdivision. The adjacent properties include a single- family parcel, an alley right-of-way and pedestrian/bicycle easement. The properties to the east and the west are also within the Performance Standards (P) Overlay. 568 Coffee Lane Minor Land Partition February 12, 2024 Page 2 of 14 The properties to the south across the railroad tracks are commercial zones and uses including HC (Healthcare) and E-1(Employment) with a Residential (R) Overlay. Beyond the commercial properties to the south is R-3 (High Density Multi -Family Residential) zoning. The average slope of the entire tract is approximately six percent, from south to north. The site is sloped from the southwest to northeast. Proposal: The proposal is for a three -lot partition including one flag lot. Three lot partition including one flag lot. The previously dedicated 16 — 26.41 -foot alley would be dedicated to the city of Ashland. Proposed Parcel #1 is on the south side of the property. It is trapazoidal in area. The parcel has approximately 126 feet along Coffee Lane. The property extends 131.18 -feet to the west along the dedicated public alley. The property is proposed to be 13,066 square feet in area. The parcel has adequate area for the development of a residential dwelling. There is ample area on the property and unbuildable area to the north to accommodate a 21 -foot -tall structure. The slope of Parcel #1 for the purposes of solar setbacks is approximately nine percent downhill to the north. Along the north property line of Parcel #1 is the temporary pedestrian/bicycle access easement that parallels the private alley. Proposed Parcel #2 is 80 feet by 80 feet and is 6,400 square feet in area. Vehicular access is from the private alley easement. Proposed Parcel #3 is 8,249 square feet in area flag lot. This lot is proposed to have the private alley, and public utility easement within the shared driveway for the three proposed parcels. All necessary public utilities were stubbed to the property with the development of the West Village Subdivision infrastructure and the creation of Coffee Lane and the public utility easements adjacent to the right of way. There are no capascity issues with any of the public infrastructure. Coffee Lane along the frontage of the property is improved with new public street improvements as required with the West Village Subdivision approval and issuance of the subdivision plats. A private driveway within the private alley easement will be installed to serve the three residential lots. A public alley is preferred by the applicant but not by the Public Works Department. This is because the 568 Coffee Lane Minor Land Partition February 12, 2024 Page 3 of 14 public alley does not extend beyond the last residence in the Billings Ranch Subdivision, with the existing improvements terminating approximately 70 -feet to the west. Private alley easement and a temporary bike and pedestrian easement extend from Coffee Lane to the subject property boundary with the public alley are dedicated on the plat from the subdivision. Solar, Setback Standard A: New lots are required to demonstrate that a 21 -foot -tall structure can be constructed on the subject lot and not exceed the lots N/S lot dimension, or provide a solar envelope. Each of the proposed parcels are subject to Solar Setback Standard A and either outright conforms to solar lot dimensions like Parcels 1 and 3 or has a solar envelope as shown on Parcel 2. CC&Rs, HOA and Storm, Water Sewer System Maintenance plan: The three lots will be included in the Homeowners Association and subject to all standards thereof. The three parcels will be included by description in the West Village, CC&Rs, HOA documents. The property area as part of the West Village Subdivision was engineered to be part of the community stormwater detention, retention and treatment facility as a cottage house development and the area of impervious surfaces was accounted for in the facility area capascity calculations by the project engineer. 568 Coffee Lane Minor Land Partition February 12, 2024 Page 4 of 14 FINDINGS OF FACT Ashland Municipal Code 18.5.3.050 Preliminary Partition Plat Criteria A. The future use for urban purposes of the remainder of the tract will not be impeded. Finding The future use of the remainder of the tract as will not be impeded by the proposal. Lot 16 proposed for partition is a vacant lot within the West Village Subdivision that was initially conceived to be a future cottage house development. The development of three residential lots that comply with minimum lot area requirements are the final development lots for the tract. B. The development of the remainder of any adjoining land or access thereto will not be impeded. Finding: The development of the remainder of any adjoining land or access to adjacent residential lands will not be impeded by the proposal. Adjacent properties are developed with residential homes and associated outbuildings or are vacant lots for residential development. C. The partition plan conforms to applicable City -adopted neighborhood or district plans, if any, and any previous land use approvals for the subject area. Finding: The subject lot is Lot 16 of the West Village Subdivision that was approved in October 2019. Though originally considered for cottage housing, the topography and solar access ordinance created development difficulties that could not be overcome. This proposal has no impact on the approvals that allowed West Village Subdivision. The area of the parcel was not included in the density calculations of the West Village Subdivision due to the cottages. The lot area and the development of it into three parcels is supported by the density of the overall subdivision area. Total area of West Village = 5.92 acres. The West Village Cottage area is .86 acres (37,541 square feet) leaving 5,05 acres within the West Village Subdivision. The density of the residential portion of the subdivision was 21.42 dwelling units with a conservation density bonus for Earth Advantage Housing that allowed for 24.63 dwellings. There are 22 residential lots (excluding cottage and open space lots) platted within the subdivision. The area of Lot 16 (27,715 square feet) allows for the three partitioned lots based on minimum lot area alone. Minor Land Partitions are not subject to the Performance Standards density criteria even when within the Performance Standards Overlay. 568 Coffee Lane Minor Land Partition February 12, 2024 Page 5 of 14 The homes will also be Earth Advantage and if the area was originally included in the subdivision area, with the allowed Conservation Density Bonus, the base density of the subdivision area 5.05 acres with a Conservation Density Bonus is 26.134 dwelling units. The three lots in addition to the 22 platted lots is less than 26. The partitioning of Lot 16 complies with both minimum lot areas in the zone, each lot in excess of 5,000 square feet for standard subdivision approval as made herein. Additionally, the partition does not exceed density allowed in the R -1-5-P zone within the West Village Subdivision. The dedication of the private alley for the eventual connection to the platted public alley within the Billings Ranch Subdivision to the west and connection of the public pedestrian and bicycle easements were requirements of the West Village Subdivision, These easements and dedications are shown on the attached West Village Subdivision Plat (PA -T-2-19-00013 and Tl -2020-00111). At the direction of the Public Works Director, this application does not propose a public right of way for the public alley, or the bicycle and pedestrian easements because the city of Ashland is not going to complete the approximately 70 feet of improvements to connect the alley from the subject property boundaries to the termination of the alley within the public right-of-way. The dedication of public pedestrian and bicycle access easements remain within the private alley proposed to access the three lots proposed in this partition application, but the improvements will terminate at the property boundaries. Functionally, the alley and the easements remain the same. The improvements will extend from Coffee Lane to the terminus of the private driveway access to Parcel 3. The parcels will be included in the Subdivision Nome Owners Association and subject to the terms and conditions thereof. D. The tract of land has not been partitioned for 12 months. Finding: The tract of land has not been partitioned for the past 12 months. E. Proposed lots conform to the requirements of the underlying zone, per part 18.2, any applicable overlay zone requirements, per part 18.3, and any applicable development standards, per part 18.4 (e.g., parking and access, tree preservation, solar access and orientation), Finding The proposed parcels exceed the requirements of R -1-5-P zone. The three parcels will have more than 5,000 square feet of area. 568 Coffee Lane Minor Land Partition February 12, 2024 Page 6 of 14 Parcel 1: Proposed Parcel 1 is on the south side of the property. Along the north property line, there is a the temporary pedestrian/bicycle access easement that parallels the private alley and further north is a 16 foot private alley easement. Parcel 1 is trapezoidal in area. The parcel has approximately 138 feet of frontage along Coffee Lane. The property extends 131.18 feet to the west along the dedicated private alley to the rear property line. The rear property line is 15.9 feet in length. In the case of a triangular lot, the rear property line is at least ten feet in length within the lot, parallel to and at a maximum distance from the front property line. Parcel 1 exceeds the lot width to depth ratio requirement. From the midpoint of the front lot line to the mid -point of the rear lot line, the parcel is 180 feet in lot depth. The average horizontal distance between the side lot lines measured parallel to the front property line is 74.95 feet. The property is proposed to be 13,066 square feet in area. The parcel has adequate area for the development of a residential dwelling outside of the standard setbacks in the zone. The potential lot coverage for Parcel 1 is 6,533 square feet of impervious surfaces +200 square feet of porous solid surfaces. The slope of Parcel 1 for the purposes of solar setbacks is approximately ten percent downhill to the north. For the purposes of solar setbacks, the average north /south dimension is 80 feet. For the purposes of solar setbacks, the required north /south dimension is 86.96 feet. There is ample area on the property and the 16 feet of unbuildable area to the north (private alley and public utility easements) to accommodate a 21 -foot -tall structure. H - 6 = Shade Producing Point (-) allowed shadow height at north property line then divided by angle of sun (.445) (-) slope of shadow slope to north (345). A 21 foot shade producing point requires a 43.48 foot setback from the north easement line. 15/.345 = 43.48 An 18 -foot -tall shade producing point requires a 32.61 foot setback from the north easement line. 12/.345 = 34.78 A 16 -foot -tall shade producing point requires a 28.98 foot setback from the north easement line. Vehicular access is from the private alley easement. Parcel 2: Proposed Parcel 2 is 80 feet by 80 feet and is 6,400 square feet in area, exceeding minimum lot area in the zone. The lot exceeds minimum lot width in the zone by 30 feet to provide for solar setbacks. The lot 568 Coffee Lane Minor Land Partition February 12, 2024 Page 7 of 14 meets minimum lot depth in the zone. The parcel has adequate area for the development of a residential dwelling outside of the standard setbacks in the zone. The potential lot coverage for Parcel 2 is 3,200 square feet of impervious surfaces -x200 square feet of porous solid surfaces. For the purposes of solar setbacks, the property has a slope of 7.7 percent down hill to the north. The required lot width for the purposes of solar must be 81.5 feet where 80 feet is provided. To achieve Solar Access Performance Standard, 18.4.040.B. and the following height requirements are determined. H - 6 = Shade Producing Point (-) allowed shadow height at north property line then divided by angle of sun (.445) (-) slope of shadow slope to north (.368). A 21 foot shade producing point requires a 40.76 foot setback from the north property line. .15/.368 = 40.76 An 18 -foot -tall shade producing point requires a 32.61 foot setback from the north property line. 12/.368 = 32.609 A 16 -foot -tall shade producing point requires a 27.17 foot setback from the north property line. A 10 -foot -tall shade producing point requires a 10.87 foot setback from the north property line. Vehicular access is from the private alley easement. Parcel 3: Proposed Parcel 3 is 8,249 square feet in area and is proposed as flag lot. This lot is proposed to have the private alley, and public utility easement within the shared driveway for the three proposed parcels. The lot area independent of the flagpole area is in excess of R-1-5 minimum lot area standards. The lot complies with minimum lot standards in 18.2.4.010 because the lot abuts a public street where as part of an approved flag lot partition. The flag parcel has adequate area for the development of a residential dwelling and uses an envelope that provides the 'front setback" from the South, rear to the North property line, and side yard setbacks from the east and west property lines. This allows for adequate setback for vehicular access to and through the site and allows for solar setbacks where required to be larger by virtue of the lot orientation standards within the 10 foot per story rear yard. The back yards of the properties to the north are also oriented on a South to North axis and the rear yards will be oriented to each other. The potential lot coverage for Parcel 3 is 4,.124.5 square feet of impervious surfaces x-200 square feet of porous solid surfaces. For the purposes of solar setbacks, the property has a slope of 9 percent downhill to the north. The required lot width for the purposes of solar must be 84.5 feet where 95.7 -feet is provided. To achieve Solar Access Performance Standard, 18.4.040.B. and the following height requirements are determined. 568 Coffee Lane Minor Land Partition February 12, 2024 Page 8 of 14 H - 6 = Shade Producing Point (-) allowed shadow height at north property line then divided by angle of sun (.445) (-) slope of shadow slope to north (.355). A 21 foot shade producing point requires a 42.25 foot setback from the north property line. 15/.355 = 42.25 An 18 -foot -tall shade producing point requires a 33.8 -foot setback from the north property line. 12/.355 - 33.8 F. Accesses to individual lots conform to the standards in section 18.4.3.080 Vehicle Area Design. See also, 18.5.3.060 Additional Preliminary Flag Lot Partition Plat Criteria, Finding: A shared driveway and curb cut provides a shared access to the three parcels. The surfacing of the driveway will exceed the flag driveway standards and will be paved with 15 feet of asphalt and 20 foot clear width. The driveway is consistent with the standards of AMC 18.4.3.080. The future development proposal will provide adequate parking for the future single-family residences, and if any future proposed accessory residential unit or duplex. Additionally, a third parking space for the flag lot will be provided. The surface will be installed in a manner that does not allow for the surface waters to drain across any public right-of-way or adjacent properties. G. The proposed streets, utilities, and surface water drainage facilities conform to the street design standards and other requirements in pant 18.4, and allow for transitions to existing and potential future development on adjacent lands. The preliminary plat shall identify all proposed public improvements and dedications. Finding: All public utility improvements are within the public right-of-way of Coffee Lane. According to the civil plans, there is a new, eight -inch water main within Coffee Lane. A hydrant is provided approximatly 60 feet to the south. There is substantial water pressure and pressure reduction valves are provided as necessary. There is a 12 -inch storm drainage line within Coffee Lane. When the subdivision was engineered, this property was assumed to have 50 percent coverage of the area of Lot 16 included in the future stormwater retention, detention and treatment pond and new facilities are not required for this portion of the subdivision development. 568 Coffee Lane Minor Land Partition February 12, 2024 Page 9 of 14 A new 8 -inch public sanitary sewer line is within Coffee Lane. Electric infrastructure was extended into the West Village Subdivision and capascity is available within the infrastructure to service the new residences. A street tree selected from the Recommended Street Tree Standards will be planted in the landscape park row as necessary prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy if needed. H. Unpaved Streets. Finding: Coffee Lane is a paved public street. I. Where an alley exists adjacent to the partition, access may be required to be provided from the alley and prohibited from the street. Finding: At the direction of the public works director, due to the lack of connectivity beyond the subject property, a private alley is required and not a public alley. The three parcels proposed access from the shared private alley. J. Required State and Federal permits, as applicable, have been obtained or can reasonably be obtained prior to development. Finding: No state or federal permits are required. K. A partition plat containing one or more flag lots shall additionally meet the criteria in section 18.5.3.060. Finding See additional findings addressing the partition plat criteria for a flag lot below. 18.5.3.060 Additional Preliminary Flag Lot Partition Plat Criteria 568 Coffee Lane Minor Land Partition February 12, 2024 Page 10 of 14 The approval authority shall approve a preliminary plat application for a flag lot partition only where all of the following criteria are met, A. The criteria of section 18.5.3.050 are met. Finding: The applicant finds that the criteria of section 18.5.3.050 are met or can be met through the imposition of conditions. B. For the purpose of meeting the minimum lot area requirement, the lot area, exclusive of the flag drive area, must meet the minimurn square footage requirements of the zoning district. Finding: The minimum area in the zone is 5,000 square feet. The proposed flag lot is substantially more than 5,000 square feet in area excluding the flag pole area. C. Flag drives shall be in the same ownership as the flag lots served. Where two or more lots are served by the sarne flag drive, the flag drive shall be owned by one of the lots and an easement for access shall be granted to the other lot or lots. finding: The flagpole is proposed to be owned by Parcel 3, the flag lot, which has a .10.57 foot connection to the public street frontage. The remaining surface width of the private driveway surface is within the ownership of Parcels 3 & 2 and easement is provided through the dedicated private alley easement. The pole, which connects the flag to the street; provides the only street frontage for the lot and the driveway is shared assess with a private alley and the adjacent properties. D. Except as provided in subsection 18.5.3.060.H, below, the flag drive serving a single flag lot shall have a minimum width of I5 feet and contain a 12 -foot -wide paved driving surface. For drives serving two flag lots, the flag drive shall be 20 feet wide, with a 15 -foot -wide driving surface to the back of the first lot, and a 12 -foot -wide driving surface to the rear lot. Drives shared by adjacent properties shall have a width of 20 feet, with a 15 -foot paved driving surface. Width shall be increased on turns where necessary to ensure fire apparatus remain on a paved surface during travel. Finding: 568 Coffee Lane Minor Land Partition February 12, 2024 Page 11 of 14 The private alley, when installed, will comply with the required flag drive surface widths. The surface of the driveway is proposed to be a 20 foot wide clear width with a 15 foot wide paved width. E. Curb cuts have been minimized, where possible, through the use of common driveways. No more than two flag lots are served by the flag drive. Finding: The proposed flag lot is accessed via the private alley and the other Parcels will also take vehicular access from the private alley eliminating all other driveways. F. Flag drive grades shall not exceed a maximum grade of 15 percent. Variances may be granted for flag drives for grades in excess of 15 percent but no greater than 18 percent for not more than 200 feet. Such variances shall be required to meet all of the criteria for approval in chapter 18.5.5 Variances. Finding: ding: The grade of the property within the flagpole is less than 15 percent. G. Flag drives shall be constructed to prevent surface drainage from flowing over sidewalks or other public ways. Finding: At the time of the construction and surfacing of the driveway, surface drainage will be collected to prevent surface drainage from flowing over sidewalks or other public ways. H. Flag lots adjacent to an alley shall meet all of the requirements of this section, except that: Finding The private alley is 15 feet wide with a 10 -foot -wide temporary bike and pedestrian access. The flag lot will have an address that is clearly visible from Coffee Lane as per the Oregon Fire Code. 1. Flag drives and fire work areas shall be deemed Fire Apparatus Access Roads under the Oregon Fire Code and subject to all requirements thereof. Finding: 568 Coffee Lane Minor Land Partition February 12, 2024 Page 12 of 14 The drivewas will be deemed a Fire Apparatus Access Road and subject to the requirements of afire apparatus access as determined by the Fire Marshall. I When required by the Oregon Fire Code, flag drives greater than 150 feet in length shall provide a turnaround (see Figure 18.4.6.040.G.5), The Staff Advisor, in coordination with the Fire Code Official, may extend the distance of the turnaround requirement up to a maximum of 250 feet in length as allowed by Oregon Fire Code access exemptions. Finding: The flag driveway is not greater than 150 feet in length. A turnaround should not be necessary as the fire truck can back into Coffee Lane from the driveway. K. Each flag lot has at least three parking spaces situated to eliminate the necessity for vehicles backing out. Finding: Adequate area is provided for the flag lot to have any provided parking spaces situated in a manner that eliminates the necessity for vehicles to back out, Compliance with this standard will be addressed with the building permit submittals. L. There shall be no parking within ten feet of the centerline of the drive on either side of the flag drive entrance. Applicant's Finding No on -street parking will be within ten feet of the centerline of the drive on either side of the driveway entrance. M. Flag drives serving structures greater than 24 feet in height, as defined in part 18.6, shall provide a fire work area of 20 feet by 40 feet clear of vertical obstructions and within 50 feet of the structure. The fire work area requirement shall be waived if the structure served by the drive has an approved automatic sprinkler system installed, Finding: When the new structure for the flag lot is proposed, demonstration of compliance with the requirements of the Building and Fire Officials will be addressed. The length of the flag driveway may 568 Coffee Lane Minor Land Partition February 12, 2024 Page 13 of 14 necessitate automatic fire suppression installed in the new residential dwelling as determined by the fire officials. N. Both sides of the flag drive have been screened with a site -obscuring fence, wall or evergreen hedge to a height of from four to six feet, except in the front yard setback area where, starting five feet from the property line, the height shall be from 30 to 42 inches in the remaining setback area. Such fence or landscaping shall be placed at the extreme outside of the flag drive in order to ensure adequate fire access. Finding_ A site -obscuring fence or wall will be installed along both sides of the driveway. O. The applicant has executed and filed with the Community Development Department an agreement between applicant and the City for paving and screening of the flag drive. Such an agreement shall specify the period within which the applicant, or agent for applicant, or contractor shall complete the paving to standards as specified by the Public Works Director and screening as required by this section, and providing that if applicant should fail to complete such work within such period, the City may complete the same and recover the full cost and expense thereof frorn the applicant. An agreement shall also provide for the maintenance of the paving and screening pursuant to this section, and assurance ongoing maintenance. Finding: An agreement will be executed for the surfacing and screening of the driveway if not installed prior to platting. The property owner is not proposing to develop the flag lot parcel at this time. The screening fencing along the property boundary, and grading/compaction of the driveway will be completed prior to issuance of a signature of occupancy for the residence on the flag lot. P. Flag lots shall be required to provide a useable yard area that has a minimal dimension of 20 feet wide by 20 feet deep. As used in this chapter, the term "useable yard area" means a private yard area which is unobstructed by a structure or autornobile from the ground upward. Finding: The are no development plans for the proposed flag lot. There is substantially more than a .20 X 20 area for outdoor space that is outside of the buildable area and unobstructed by structure or automobile. 568 Coffee Lane Minor Land Partition February 12, 2024 Page 14 of 14 LOT1, WVi-2 LOT 2, WV1-2 LOT 3, WVi-2 I BASIS OF EARINGJS I N89'50'36"W 162.50 0 52.00 52. 58.50 0 m 82.50 80.00. wm a o ii0 a co Ki Lo rn PARCEL 3 o I I 8249 SF m PARCEL 2 I o 28.3 qF •,c d ` LOT 16, o WV1-2 I q 0 9p 80.00 m C19 - PRIVATE ALLEY & PLIC'10.57 INITIA o WEST TMPE 131.18 I POINT WEST 124.11 --^ \ \ 110 Eo'71 Zco m I PARCEL 1 I `° 00 13066 SF \ (a I 28.3 l \ 20 / �'OF\ �' 0 1 0 40 PUE = PUBLIC U71UTY EASEMENT PER WVI —2. JCDR = JACKSON COUNTY DEED RECORDS. ORJCO = OFFlCIAL. RECORDS OF JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON. WV 1-2 = WEST VILLAGE, PHASES 1 do 2 (FS23343). C1 /L 1 = SEE COURSE DATA TABLE. FS = FILED SURVEY. TMPE — TEMPORARY P LIC MULTI—PURPOSE PATH EASEMENT PER WVI-2. \ GFF2 = GAS FACILITIES EASEMENT PER DOC.2021-023174 ORJCO. WPE = PUBLIC MULTI—PURPOSE PAIN EASEMENT PER WI -2. BRS = BILLINGS RANCH SUBDIVISION (FS18207). rrTLE DATE: REGISTERED TENTATIVE PARTITION PLAT 10 NOV 2023 PROFESSIONAL ASSESSOR'S W /: sc". LAND SURVEYOR 391 EO5AD TL213 I Inch : W feet FOR: CMK DEVELOPMENT, LLC DRAWN BY: JEH 588 PARSONS DR., SUITE H CHK BY.• OREGON MEDFORD, OR 97501 ORCIN: JULY 17, 1986 JAMES E. HIBBS 2234 L.J. FRIAR & ASSOCIATES P.C. r?oranON: a RENEWAL DATE B -3D-25 F a CONSULTING MIND SURVEYORS JOB/: 19141FM P60 -11a a s4ij 7' 2� 27b OR 97515 C LJ. FRIAR do ASSOCtAM, A.C. 2423 Email: Ilis49 daseoclatasOcharter.net Page The connnenis of this pre -app are preliminary in nature and subject to change based upon the subinittal of additional or different information. The Planning Commission or City Council are the final decision making authority of the 001, and tire not bound by the coinnientv nuide by the Staff as part of this pre-appfleation. ASHLAND PLANNING DIVISON SITE: 568, Coffee Lane PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE APPLICANT: Rogue Planning for CMK COMMENT SHEET December 6, 2023 Development LLC REQUEST: Land Partition PLANNING STAFF COMMENTS: This pre-cil)I)lication conference is inlencled to highlight sign�fieanf issues of concern to staff and bring them to the cy)j)licant's aftention Drier to 1heirlweparing afirmal cillplictilion subminal. Suniniary: Staff are generally supportive of the partition proposal, with specific comments/issues noted below. Land Pit rti tiolLAL)L) roval Criteria (AMC 18.5.3.05(J�, The final application submittal would need to address the approval criteria for a Land Partition as detailed below: A. The future use for urban purposes of the remainder of the tract will not be impeded, B. The development of the remainder of any adjoining land or access thereto will not be impeded. C. The partition plan conforms to applicable City -adopted neighborhood or district plans, if any, and any previous land use approvals for the subject area. o Previous Land Use Approvals: The final application submittal will speak to how the proposed partition conforms to the applicable conditions of the West Village subdivision approvals. D. The tract of land has not been partitioned for 12 months. E. Proposed lots conform to the requirements of the underlying zone, per part Ll any applicable overlay zone requirements, per partM8 and any applicable development standards, per part �S. (e.g,, parking and access, tree preservation, solar access and orientation). • Lot Width: The final application would need to include details demonstrating that the proposed Parcel I meets the width and depth requirements of AMC 18.2 • Solai- Setback: The final application submittal will need to demonstrate that a honk can be located on the new vacant lots and meet the solar access performance standards in section 18.4.8.040. The application should carefully consider how the gas pipeline easement on the proposed Parcel I will affect solar access compliance, F. Accesses to individual lots conform to the standards in section aLliaJ Vehicle Area Design. See also, Additional Preliminary Flag Lot Partition Plat Criteria, 568 Coffee Lane November 27, 2023 / VA Page I G. The proposed streets, utilities, and surface water drainage facilities conform to the street design standards and other requirements in part M, and allow for transitions to existing and potential future development on adjacent lands. The preliminary plat shall identify all proposed public improvements and dedications. 1. Where an alley exists adjacent to the partition, access may be required to be provided from the alley and prohibited from the street, * Alley: As approved in the subdivision, the alley is to be private but allow public use, installed to full city alley standards, and maintained in perpetuity by the West Village subdivision homeowners' association. Compliance with the subdivision approval's requirements would be the expectation here (i.e. a city standard alley installation to tile west property line, and access frorn the alley rather than individual driveways). In discussions with the Public Works Department Obout the potential for this becoming a public alley (i.e. shifting the long -terns rnaintenance responsibilities from the HOA to the city) they've indicated they would be willing to take oil the alley as a public facility provided that the applicant first completed the short section of alley that remains unfinished through the adjacent Billings Ranch subdivision. Planning and Public Works staff are open to further discussion of this possibility. * Parking off of the Alley: As conditioned in the subdivision approval, there is to be no parking on the south side of the alley other than a single family residential garage to limit potential conflicts with pedestrian and bicycle traffic on the alley and easement. J. Required State and Federal permits, as applicable, have been obtained or can reasonably be obtained prior to development, K. A partition plat containing one or more flag lots shall additionally meet the criteria in section 18 Additional A_L 18.5 . 3 1 )60 - The final application subiuittal would --- —.(�_ also neeYto address the applicable criteria for a flag partition, as listed below: A. The criteria of section HEIN are met. B. For the purpose of meeting the minimum lot area requirement, the lot area, exclusive of the flag drive area, must meet the minimum square footage requirements of the zoning district. C. Flag drives shall be in the same ownership as the flag lots served. Where two or more lots are served by the some flag drive, the flag drive shall be owned by one of the lots and an easement for access shall be granted to the other lot or lots. D. Except as provided in subsection 18 5. g 8. i below, the flag drive serving a single flag lot shall have a minimum width of 15 feet and contain a 12 foot wide paved driving surface, For drives serving two flag lots, the flag drive Shall be 20 feet wide, with a 15 foot wide driving surface to the back of the first lot, and a 12 foot wide driving surface to the rear lot. Drives shared by adjacent properties shall have a width of 20 feet, with a 15 foot paved driving surface. Width shall be increased on turns where necessary to ensure fire apparatus remain on a paved surface during travel, E. Curb cuts have been minimized, where possible, through the use of common driveways. No more than two flag lots are served by the flag drive, F. Flag drive grades shall not exceed a maximum grade of 15 percent. Variances may be granted for flag drives for grades it) excess of 15 percent but no greater than 18 percent for not more than 200 feet. Such variances shall be required to rneet all of the criteria for approval in chapter Lg.5Variances. 568 Coffee Lane December 6, 2023 / dds VA Page 2 G. Flag drives shall be constructed to prevent surface drainage from flowing over sidewalks or other public ways. H. Flag lots adjacent to an alley shall meet all of the requirements of this section, except that: 1. Vehicle access shall be from the alley only where required as a condition of approval. Z No screening and paving requirements shall be required for the flagpole, 3, A four foot pedestrian path shall be installed within the flagpole and improved and maintained with either a concrete, asphalt, brick, or paver block surface connecting the street to the buildable area of the flag lot, 4. The flag pole width shall be no less than eight feet wide and the entrance of the pole at the street shall be identified by the address of the flag lot clearly visible from the street on a four -inch by four -inch post that is 3% feet high, The post shall be painted white with black numbers three inches high running vertically down the front of the post. For flagpoles serving two or more dwellings, the addresses of such dwellings shall be on a two foot by three foot white sign clearly visible from the street with three-inch black numbers, 1. Flag drives and fire work areas shall be deemed Fire Apparatus Access Roads under the Oregon Fire Code and subject to all requirements thereof J. When requi ' red by the Oregon Fire Code, flag drives greater than 150 feet in length shall provide a turnaround (see Figure 18,4,6,040,G., , The Staff Advisor, in coordination with the Fire Code Official, may extend the distance of the turnaround requirement up to a maximum of 250 feet in length as allowed by Oregon Fire Code access exemptions. K. Each flag lot has at least three parking spaces situated to eliminate the necessity for vehicles backing out. Note: Under the state'Clunate fri Lq/y. IuitjbILCoqyiynities rules fio offstreet autoaL� _J�y tie Ler ua i thej2L for pro _P-rIJ_Q!.LLJnY_z n7e of RVTQ's Route 1@1._ it is anticipated that the Council will adopt a new ordinance on December 19th which would eliminate off-street automobile parking requirements citywide. Where voluntarily provided, parking will need to meet city standards and bicycle parking continues to be required. L. There shall be no parking within ten feet of the centerline of the drive on either side of the flag drive entrance. M. Flag drives serving structures greater than 24 feet in height, as defined in part EB shall provide afire work area of 20 feet by 40 feet clear of vertical obstructions and within 50 feet of the structure. The fire work area requirement shall be waived if the structure served by the drive has an approved automatic sprinkler system installed M Both sides of the flag drive have been screened with a sight -obscuring fence, wall or fire-resistant broadleaf evergreen sight -obscuring hedge to a height of from four to six feet, except in the front yard setback area where, starting five feet from the property line, the height shall be, from 30 to 42 inches in the remaining setback area. Such fence or landscaping shall be placed to ensure tire apparatus access is not obstructed by the encroachment of mature landscaping. 0. The applicant has executed and filed with the Community Development Department an agreement between applicant and the City for paving and screening of the flag drive. Such an agreement shall specify the period within which the, applicant, or agent for applicant, or contractor shall complete the paving to standards as specified by the Public Works Director and screening as required by this section, and providing that if applicant should fail to complete such work within such period, the City may complete the same and recover the full cost and expense thereof from the applicant, An agreement shall also provide for the maintenance of the paving and screening pursuant to this section, and assurance ongoing maintenance. 568 Coffee Lane December 6, 2023 / (ids VA page 3 A Flag lots shall be required to provide a useable yard area that has a minimal dimension of 20 feet wide by 20 feet deep. As used in this chapter, the term 'useable yard area" means a private yard area which is unobstructed by a structure or automobile from the ground upward. (Ord. 3158 § 9, amended, 0911812018) Gas Line Easement: As detailed on the West Village subdivision plat, there is a 40 -foot wide gas pipeline casement along the south property line of the parent parcel which, with the standard setbacks, would pose substantial limitations on the developability of tile proposed Parcel I and which could make cornpliance with the solar ordinance difficult. The final application should speak to how these limitations are proposed to be addressed, Tr-ee Pr-esei•i,atiorr/Protection/RernoNal: All planning actions are required to include a tree inventory and tree preservation/protection plan in accordance with AMC 18.4.5. This is intended to ensure that trees are protected during all site disturbance (including demolition, construction, driveway/parking installation, staging of materials, etc. Should the application include requests for tree removal, tree removal permits would also need to be requested as required in AMC 18.5."x. Wildfire Lands: Like all properties in the city, the parent parcel is located in the wildfire lands overlay. As a result, the application to divide the lot into three parcels requires a fire prevention and control plan to be submitted with the application. Tile approved plan is then required to be implemented prior to the issuance of a building permit for structures located oil the lots created by the partition. See subsection 18.:1.111, l00 A for the fire prevention and control plan requirements. Neighborhood Outreach: Projects involving changes to established neighborhood patterns can be a concern for neighbors, and staff always recornniends that applicants approach the affected neighbors, make them aware of the proposal, and try to address any concerns as early in the process as possible. Notices are sent to neighbors within a 200 -foot radius of the property. Written Findings/Burden of Proof: Applicants should be aware that written findings addressing the ordinance and all applicable criteria are required and are heavily depended oil when granting approval for a planning action. In addition, the required plans are explained in writing below, 'File burden of proof is oil the applicant(s) to ensure that all applicable criteria are addressed in writing and that all required plans, written findings, and other rnaterials are submitted even if those iters were not discussed in specific, itemized detail during this initial pre -application conference. ■ ■ M a ■ 9 ■ ■ ■ ■ R a ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ M ME ■ ■ M M N 0 M 0 0 M M 0 M 0 0 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ M ■ ■ ME ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 0 M 0 R a a M M 0 A M M a ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ BUILDING DEPT: No specific comments provided. Please contact Building Official Steven Matiaco in the Building Division for any Building Code -related information at 541-488-5305. ETRE ETS/PUBLIC WORKSX NGINEERING DEPTS: See comments at the end of th is document. Please contact Dail Johnson of the Engineering Division for any further information at 541-552-2415 or via e -rail to kai-l.joliiisoii(ti),,:tslilatid,oi-.us . 568 Coffee Lane December 6, 2023 / dds VA page 4 FIRE DEPARTMENT: No specific comments provided. Please contact Fire Marshal Mark Shay with Ashland Fire & Rescue for any Fire Department -related information at 541-552-2217 or via e-mail to ljjjij<.Apra �a glfland.onus. CONSERVATION: There may be current City of Ashland rebates for the installation of high efficiency toilets (HET) as well as some appliances Such as refrigerators, dishwashers and washing machines. Appliances may also be eligible for state tax credits through the Oregon Department of Energy. There may also be opportunities for homes to be built more sustainably or more energy -efficiently with financial and/or technical assistance from the City. For more information on currently available Conservation programs, please contact the City of Ashland Conservation Division at (541) 552-2062 or e-mail Q'g-L(,Lgltl I Ig! gs. Conservation staff are available to provide any further information or assistance oil these programs. WATER AND SEWER SERVICE: Please Contact Steve Walker at 541-552-2326 or via c -mail to walkers ashland.orms with any questions regarding water utilities. STORM WATER DRAINAGE: See comments provided at the end of this document. Please contact Karl Johnson of the Engineering Division for any further information at 541-552-2415 or via e-mail to jjLtL[,L0!jL1b tlf �,11�1S[11,1111IMrMS . ELECTRIC SERVICE: Please contact Rick Barton in the Electric Department at (541) 552-2092 to discuss service requirements and fees. All approved electric set -vice plan is required to be included in the final application submittal for the application to be deemed complete. Rick can arrange all oil -site meeting to assess service requirements and will prepare a schematic service plan to be incorporated into the applicants' civil drawings. Please allow additional time for scheduling an on-site meeting with Rick Barton, subsequent preparation of a schematic plan, and incorporation of this plan into your, submittals. Aj,q)licalions will not be cleemed complete without eni eippi-oved electric ser0ce plan. 0 m 0 m m m 0 0 0 0 0 m m m m m a m m 0 N a a m 0 m 0 a m m N N N Im a N m m 0 0 0 0 X 0 0 m m a m m 0 0 0 a a N 0 A l'.0 m; 0: 0 m 0 " 0 m m m m m 0 m Is * 5 0 0 0 ml m 0 a ZONING: r-1 -5, Single Family Residential with a 5,000 square foot minimum lot size for non -corner lots and a 6,000 square foot minimum lot size for corner lots. Minimum lot width is 50 feet. Lot depth 80-150 feet. Lot width shall not exceed lot depth. OVERLAYS: The pippeily is locyled in the iNLefln-e lyn(Is overly E & the pei:&i-monce styncicircls oyer -!cry. SETBACKS: Eight feet for unenclosed porches, 15 feet for front yards, and 20 feet for front -facing garages. Six feet for side yards but ten feet for side yards abutting a public street. Teti feet Pei, story and five feet Pei- half -story for real- yards. In addition, the setbacks must comply with the solar access requirements, LOT COVERAGE: A maximum of 50 percent of the lot may be covered with illIPCI-ViOUS Surface. Please identify oil site plan and in text all areas of landscaping, impervious surface, patio space, outdoor recreational space, etc. 568 Coffee Lane December 6, 2023 / dds VA Page 5 M A 0 0 M A IN M M M 9 0 E 0 9 0 M M M M 0 M M M M M M E M 5 A M M 0 0 0 0 0 M V a * M M M N a a A K 0 K M:M Him a A 9 A M a M a a M M 0 *W M M 0 0 M M M as as a K a PROCEDURE: Land use regulations provide for administrative ("Type V) decisions oil land partition applications, however there is the possibility for a public hearing if all appeal is requested. Application Requirements. The application is required to include: 1) clear, legible, scalable drawings of the proposal (ie. plan requirements), and 2) written findings addressing the applicable approval criteria ill accordance with the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO), Chapter 18 of the Ashland Municipal Code. The following sections include the requirements for plans and approval criteria which are applicable to the proposal as described in the pre -application submittals. When more than one planning approval is required for the proposal, multiple sections of the ALUO may apply. The burden of proof is on the applicant(s) to ensure that all applicable criteria are addressed in writing and that all required plans, written findings, and other materials are submitted even if those items were not discussed in specific, itemized detail during this initial pre application conference. All submittals must also include: 1.Appflcat on Form and Fee. Applications for Type I review shall be made on forms provided by the Staff Advisor. One or more property owners of the property for which the planning action is requested, and their authorized agent, as applicable, must sign the application. The required application fee must accompany the application for it to be considered complete. 2. Submittal Information. The application shall include all of the following information. a. The information requested on the application form. b. Plans and exhibits required for the specific approvals sought. c. A written statement or letter explaining how the application satisfies each and all the relevant criteria and standard's in sufficient detail. d,. Information demonstrating compliance with all prior decisions) and conditions of approval for the subject site, as applicable, e. The required fee, 1. PLAN & EXHIBIT REQUIRE MENTS: One digital cop), qf1he plans OR one (1) copy of the Plans below on pqper no larger- than 11 "x 17 ". Note: These copies may be used for the Plainihig Commission packets arra fat the notices mailed to neighbors - please submit clear, readable, ivproducible copies. • One (1) Copy of the preliminary plat as i-equired in section 18.5.3.040. • One (1) Copy of a Ti-eelii,%,eiitoi-y/Reiiioval/Pi-otectioii Plan as required in chapter 18.4.5.030 2. RELEVANT CRITERIA AND STANDARDS: Applicants are advised that in addition to required plaiis, wi1llen findings addressing hoit, the omfintince erilei*ia are satisfied in narrative fibrinal ale )-equirecl. The applicable criteria are included below, The Ashland Laird Use Ordinance in its entirety nia)) be accessed on-line at:ies/AMC L.'hLit 18 Llcurrenu)(If ---- — • One (1) copy of written findings addressing the pirelfininai-y pat-tition plat criteria found in section 18.5.3.050. and .060 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 K K a ON N a 9 N N N a 0 0 a N 0 K N a 0 9 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 X 0 a M 0 K 9 a M a H 0 4 M 0 M M M a M as M a M 0 E E E K 0 R M M E M 0 M 568 Coffee Lane December 6, 2023 / dds VA Page 6 FEES (non-),efumrluble): Land Partition $ 1,271.25 4- 84.50 per lot *NOTE: Applications are accepted on a first come -first served basis. All applications received are reviewed by staff and must be found to be complete before being processed or scheduled at a Planning Commission meeting. Applications will not be accepted without as complete 'affi2lication. form signed by the applicant(s) and property owner(s), all required materials and full payment. Applications are reviewed for completeness in accordance with ORS 227.178. The first fifteen COMPLETE applications submitted are processed at the next available Planning Commission meeting. For further information, Wease contact: December 6, 2023 Derek Severson, PlanningAlanager, Date City of Ashland, Department of Community Development Phone (541) 552-2040 or e-mail ibas dere1c.sever—mson, hlandAIS —(—. I.- -.CW-- Veronica Allen, Associate Planner City of Ashland, Department of Community Development Phone (541) 552-2042 or e-mail veroni le land'01%us ...... . ........... . ...... LCA 568 Coffee Lade December 6, 2023 / dds VA Page 7 Public Works/Engineering Pre -Application Comments 1. Engineered Plans - Where public improvements are required or proposed, the applicant's engineer shall submit design plans for approval of all public improvements identified on the approved plan or as specified in conditions of approval. One set of these civil plans MUST be submitted DIRECTLY to the Public Works/Engineering Department. All design plans must meet the City of Ashland Public Works Standards. Engineered construction plans and specifications shall be reviewed and signed by the Public Works Director, prior to construction. All public facilities within the development will be designed to the City of Ashland Engineering Design Standards for Public Improvements. The engineered plans shall also conform to the following: If drawings are submitted to the City of Ashland digitally, they shall be true scale PDF drawings. If AutoCAD drawings are also submitted, they shall be compatible with the AutoCAD release being used by the City at that time and shall be located and oriented within the Oregon State Plain Coordinate System (NAD83-89). • Drawings sizes shall comply with ANSI -defined standards for page width and height. Review drawings may be submitted in B size (11x17). Bidding and construction documents may also be printed at B size; however, all final as -constructed drawings must be submitted to scale on D -size (24x36) Mylar. Digital files of the as -constructed drawings shall also be submitted. Drawings shall be drawn such that reduction of plans from full size (D sized) to half size (B sized) can be done to maintain a true scale on the half -sized plans. 2. Street Improvement — No additional street improvements, beyond those necessary to comply with City Street Standards, will be required at this time. The applicant proposed improvements must be reviewed and permitted by the City of Ashland Engineering Department. 3. Right of Way — No additional right of way dedication, beyond that necessary to comply with City Street Standards, will be required at this time. 4. Sanitary Sewer - The property is currently served by an 8 -in sanitary sewer main in Coffee Lane and an 8 -in sanitary sewer stubbed into the NE corner of the property. The applicant proposed improvements must be reviewed, approved and permitted by the City of Ashland Engineering Department. 5. Water - The property is currently served by an 8 -in water main in Coffee Lane. City of Ashland Water Department shall tap existing water main and install any new water services and water meter boxes that are proposed by development. City of Ashland Water Department must be contacted for availability, placement and costs associated with the installation of the new water service. Service & Connection Fees will also be required for any new water services installed as part of this project. 558 Coffee Lane December G, 2023 / dds VA Page 8 6. Storm Drainage The property is currently served by 12 -in storm sewer main in Coffee Lane and aI2-imstorm sewer stubbed into the NIEcorner ofthe property. City mfAshland Engineering Department must review anengineered storm drainage, plan. Storm Water Facility Design Recluirements Applicant MUST follow the guidance and requirements set forth in, the current Rogue Valley Stormwater Quality Design Manual which can be found at the following website: AJUmbormnvvater calculations, reports, drawings, etc. shall besubmitted tothe City mf Ashland Engineering Department for review. 7. Erosion & Sediment Control The following requirements shall bemet: * All ground disturbances exceeding 2,500 square feet shall implement an Erosion and Sediment Control Piam/E5CP\, • A 1200'C permit will be secured by the developer where required under the rules of the Oregon State DEQ. City of Ashland Engineering Department must receive a copy mfthis permit before any construction shall begin. • Erosion Prevention and Sediment control measures that meet the minimum standards set forth by the City of Ashland PVb|icWorks/Eng|meerinQ Standard DFaxvimQ CD282 must be in place before any construction related tothe project begins. • Pollution, track out, and sediment duropFmginto storm water are strictly prohibited per AMC 9.08.060. w Drainage from automotive use areas sha||belimited tooil concentrations of10rmQ/|6wapre' app[Vvodrncans. w Trash storage areas shall be covered or provide additional storm water treatment by an approved means. w Off street parking areas ohVUl conform tu Ashland Municipal [ode 18.4.3.080.B.5, including provisions to minimize adverse environmental and mm|c[oo|U[Dat|c impacts. 8. Ohmemuay Accems—The proposed driveway shall be installed to meet the same standards and cross-section, of the public alley to the west of the property so that the two can connect in a contiguous manner at some point in the future. The applicant proposed improvements must be reviewed' and permitted bythe City ofAshland' Engineering Department. S. Peynm|tn—Any construction or closure within the public right-of-way will require a Public Works permit and before any work in the right of way commences all necessary permits MUST be obtained. 18. As-Builts - Where public improvements are required or completed, the developer sha:ll submit to the City of Ashland, reproducible as -built d[anVlnBS and an electronic file of all public improvements constructed during and in conjunction with this project. Field changes made during construction shall be drafted to the drawings inthe same manner asthe original plans 568CoMmLane December 6,2023/ddo_VA Page with clear indication of all modifications (strike out old with new added beside). As -built drawings shall be submitted prior to final acceptance of the construction, initiating the one-year maintenance period. 11. Sign & Traffic Control Devices — Sign installation and visibility must be maintained to the requirements of the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MiUTCD). The applicant proposed signage must be reviewed and approved by the City of Ashland Engineering Department. For any further questions about the Public Works/Engineering comments here, please contact Karl Johnson with the Engineering Division via e-mail to k.ar,liighilLcliLaLLh,land,or,us or by phone at (541) SS2-241S. 568 Coffee Lane December 6, 2023 / dds VA Page 10 City of Ashland Planning Division — 51 Winburn Way - Ashland, OR 97520 Phone (541) 488-5305 - Fax (641) 488-6066 DESCRIPTION OFPROJECT Project Description Three lot partition APPLICANT Name Rogue Planning & Development Services, LLC Address 1O14-BCenter Drive PK8B #457 � PROPERTY OWNER Phone 541-951-4020 E -Mail armygunter.plannimg@gmaiioom Narne CIVIIK Development LLC Day Time Phone Address 1O79Jackson Road Street Address 568 Coffee Lane City Ashland Zip 97520 AO Tax �1� Asaoaeo�o&�3pNo, 381E`u�axLmKt SUBMITTAL, REQUIREMENTS To request a conference, submit this form with true scale PDF drawings to The application will need toinclude plans addressing the appUcaflonoubmission requirements including site and landscaping plans drawn h3astandard scale and formatted k]print to scale onpaper molarger than 11 -inches by17-|nche:. 1. Completed Application. 2. Narrative — Provide a written description of proposal and request, (If in Historic District, provide pictures of existing structures, elevations of proposed structures and details of planned exterior design features and m8hHha|a\ 3. Site Plan — The site plan should oon1olm all applicable elements iniheSito Plan Checklist (see page 2) plus any other information pertinent to this proposal. The site plan will be checked to insure all applicable information is included at the time the pre -application date is set. 4. Additional information ~ Provide inthe narrative orwith the site plan: 1\ Number ofacres indevelopment 2\ Total gross square footage ofall structures 3\ Number O{stories Oneach structure 4\ Indicate number Vfand square footage ot a\ Dwelling Units (include the units by the number of bedrooms in each unit — e,g. 10 1 -bedroom, 25 2 -bedroom, etc) b\ Office Spaces d Retail Units d) Other Spaces City of Ashland Planning Division 51 Winbuirn Way - Ashland, OR 97520 Phone (541) 488-5305 - Fox (541) 488-6066 Email: P�cinr -biosh�cind.or,Ljs, 5) Percentage of lot coverage by: a) Structures e) Landscaping b) Streets & Roads f) Number of parking spaces c) Parking Areas/Driveways g) Total square footage of landscaped areas. d) Recreation Areas h) Other pertinent information of the proposed development 5. LEEDO Certification - Indicate whether project will be pursuing LEED@ certification. 6. Submittal Fee - $200.00 PRE -APPLICATION SITE, PLAN CHECKLIST YES NO 1. Project Name 2. Owner Name 3. Site Address and Map & TaxIot Number 4. Vicinity Map - with street names and locations of all existing and proposed streets within or on the boundary of the proposed development V 5. Scale & North Arrow V 6. Lot Layout with approximate dimensions for all lot lines 7, Zoning Desi nations in proposed development and surrounding properties 8. Locaflon & Use of alll roposed and existing building, fences and structures 9. 10. Indicate which buildings are to remain and which are to be removed' Location of all landscaped areas. indicate existing trees, size, species, and approximate drip line (outer branch location). Identify trees to be removed. 11, Location and size of all public utilities in and adjacent to the proposed development including water line and'; meter size, sewer lines, storm drain lines, nearest fire hydrant. V 12. Locations of drainage ways or public utility easements in and adjacent to proposed develo:went. V 13. Location, size and use of all contemplated and existing public areas 14. Approximate topography (slope) of the site V 15. Location of all parking areas and individual and handicap parking spaces, ingress and egress on the site and on-site circulation V 16, Use designation for the areas not covered by buildings (e.g. loading, storage, vacant, opens ace, etc.) V 17., Elevations of the building(s) V 18. Construction materials - wood frame, masonry, etc. (if project is in a Historic District provide pictures of existing structures and indicate proposed exterior materials for siding, windows, trim and roofing) V RDGUE PLANNINP 6 DEVELOPMERT SERVICES, LLC November 15, 2023 PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE Three Lot partition of Lot 18, West Village Subdivision Subject Property: 568 Coffee Lane 39 1E 05AD; 213 Property Owner: CMK Development LLC 1679 Jackson Road Ashland, OR 97520 Applicant: Taylored Elements 1679 Jackson Road Ashland, OR 97520 Engineering Services: CEC Engineering PO BOX 172 Medford, OR 97501 Land Surveying: U Friar & Associates PO BOX 1947 Phoenix, OR 97535 Planning Consultant: Rogue Planning & Development Services, LLC 1314-8 Center Dr. PMS#457 Medford, OR 97501 Comprehensive Plan Designation: Single Family Residential Zoning: R-1-5 (5,000 square foot lot minimum) Adjacent Zones: R-1-5; HC (Healthcare); E-1 and R-3 Performance Standards Overlay Overlays: Performance Standards Overlay Lot Area: .64 Acres 1 RRGUE PLANNING G IIEVELUMENT SERVICES, LLC Request: Request to allow the partition of Lot 18 within the West Village Subidivions to allow for the creation of three residential lots. Property Description: The subject property is Lot 16 of the West Village Subdivision, The vacant, 27,715 square foot (.636 acre) property is on the west side of Coffee Lane. The southern property line abuts the railroad tracks. A small wetland created by un -piped irrigation was located near the southeast property line in the West Village Subdivision Open space to the southeast of the subject property. The West Village Subdivision was approved as two phases in 2019 and 2020 through Outline and Final Plan Procedures (PA -T2-2019-00017 and PA -T1-2020-00132). The West Village Subdivision Phases I and II were platted in 2020. The Cottages at West Village Outline Plan was approved in December 2020 (PA -T2-2020-0021) and Final Plan approval (PA -T1-2021-00142). The cottages have been constructed and some have sold. The subject property and all adjacent properties to the east, west and north are zoned R-1-5 (Single Family Residential). Development to the north of the subject property are Lots 1, 2 and 3 of the West Village Subdivision, across Coffee Lane is the West Village Cottages and development Lot 13. Properties to the east are part of the Billings Ranch Subdivision, The adjacent properties include a single- family parcel, an alley right-of-way and pedestrian/bicycle easement, The properties to the east and the west are also within the Performance Standards (P) Overlay. The properties to the south across the railroad tracks are commercial zones and uses including HC (Healthcare) and E-1(Employment) with a Residential (R) Overlay, Beyond the commercial properties to the south is R-3 (High Density Multi -Family Residential) zoning. 2 f ROGUE PLANNING N DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, LLC The average slope of the entire tract is approximately six percent, from south to north. The site is sloped from the southwest to northeast. Proposal: The proposal is fora three -lot partition including one flag lot. There are two potential layouts and though not typically allowed, both are provided herein as they are very similar. Option 1: Three lot partition including one flag lot. The previously dedicated 16 — 26.41 -foot alley would be dedicated to the city of Ashland. Proposed Parcel #1 is on the south side of the property. It is trapazoidal in area. The parcel has approximately 126 feet along Coffee Lane. The property extends 131,18 -feet to the west along the dedicated public alley. The property is proposed to be 13,066 square feet in area. The parcel has adequate area for the development of a residential dwelling. There is ample area on the property and unbuildable area to the north to accommodate a 21- foot tall structure. The slope of Parcel ##1 for the purposes of solar setbacks is approximately nine percent downhill to the north. Along the north property line of Parcel #1 is the temporary pedestrian/bicycle access easement that parallels the alley. There are existing public utility and access easements on all four sides of the property. Vehicular access for the parcel is from the proposed public alley. Parcel #2 is on the north side of the public alley. The parcel has 66,57 feet of frontage proposed on Coffee Lane and extends 80 feet to the west along the alley. The parcel is 5,334 square feet in area. Vehicular access to the property would be from the public alley. Parcel #2 has an approximately three percent slope downhill to the north. This lot has an eight foot unbuildable are along the north property line and a 21 -foot tall shade producing point is less than the north south dimension of the parcel and the eight foot flag pole. Parcel #3 is to the west of proposed Parcel #2. Parcel #2 is a flag lot that is also accessible from the public alley. Parcel #2 has an area of 5,789 square feet that is exclusive of the flagpole connection to Coffee Lane. When adjacent to a public alley or access easement, an 8 -foot flagpole is permitted as the public street frontage. A solar envelope will be created for Parcel #3. 3 ROGUE PIANIONG 6 OEVELOPMENT SERVICES, ILC Option 2: Very similar to Option 1, Option 2 does not dedicate the alley as public right of way. The alley way area becomes the flag pole for proposed Parcel 3. There is no right-of-way dedication in Option 2, therefore the areas of Parcels #2 and #3 changes. Parcel #1 remains the same as described in Option 1 above. Proposed Parcel #2 is 80 feet by 80 feet and is 6,400 square feet in area. Vehicular access is from the shared driveway easement. Proposed Parcel #3 is an 8,249 square, feet in area flag lot. This lot is proposed to have the private alley, and public utility easement within the, shared driveway for the three proposed parcels. All necessary public utilities were stubbed to the property with the development of the West Village Subdivision infrastructure and the creation of Coffee Lane and the public utility easements adjacent to the right of way. There are no capascity issues with any of the public infrastructure. In both cases, it is requested that the vehicular surface area of the afley whether public or private not be installed beyond the functions of a private driveway. This is because the public alley does not extend beyond the last residence in the Billings Ranch Subdivision with the improvements terminating approximately 70 -feet to the west. Thank you, and we look forward to your feedback. Cl ,k ROGUE PLANNING G DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, LLC 9 LOT1, WV1-2 LOT 2, WV1-2 LOT 3, WV1�--2 I W BASIS OF JEARINJIs I a I �- N89'50'36"W 162.50 n like e O f100 00m 80.00 o 110 00 rn q I c PARCEL 2 I A, gllF� c PARCEL 6R 9ESF a 5334 SF I 14 to 04 a LOT 16, o)WV1- 2 I d o, c?o :to to I rs z 24.54(l)80.00 I o tai '9p a rn cog PUBLIC ALLEY &PUE INITIA a WEST TMPE 131.18 I •- POINT --"-- WEST -124.11 ---- �I 10 PARCEL 1 w Z \ \ 13066 SF coo m Iw zo 0 40 \ Ln cl NUM DELTA ARC RADIUS 0 C3 03'31'15" 213.10 3467.87 C18 23'39'51" 44.03 106.60 A �QF\ Co C19 38'56'39° 33.985 50.00 C20 4x'41'49" 63.22 89.00 NUMI BEARING DISTANCE L8 I S44'38'42"W 22.05 l,A PUE = PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT PER WV i -2. �'9p c JCDR = JACKSON COUNTY DEED RECORDS. 41 . ORJCO = OFFICIAL RECORDS OF JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON. WVI-2 = WEST VILLAGE, PHASES 1 do 2 (FS23343). Ci/L1 = SEE COURSE DATA TABLE. FS = FILED SURVEY TMPE = TEMPORARY PUBLIC MULTI --PURPOSE PATH EASEMENT PER WV1-2. \ GFE2 = GAS FACILITIES EASEMENT PER DOC.2021-023174, ORJCO. WPE = PUBLIC MULTI-PURPOSE PATH EASEMENT PER WV1-2, BRS = BILLINGS RANCH SUBDMSION (FS18207). Tnic. DAYE: REGISTERED TENTATIVE PARTITION PLAT (OPTION 1) 14 NOV 2023 PROFESSIONAL AssmoRs MAP p SCALE: LAND SURVEYOR 391 E05AD TL213 I Fnch M feet FOR: CMK DEVELOPMENT, LLC D JEH . 588 PARSONS DR., SUITE H CHK BY. OREGON MEDFORD, OR 97501 OWN. JULY 17, 1986 JAMES E. HIBBS ROTA? 0M 0' 2234 L.J. FRIAR &ASSOCIATES P.C. ,�, tst4fAf RENEWAL DATE 6-30-25 F A CONSUL77NO LAND SURVIMRS R0.q Bo 1847 AhoenFx OR 87535 £mall ' 1 riafmndo soeatesDchartor.net Page 1 C U. FRIAR do ASSOCIATES, P.C. 2023 9 LOT1, WV1-2 LOT 2, WV1-2 I LOT 3, WV1--2 w BASIS OF EARINGS � d JCDR = JACKSON COUNTY DEED RECORDS. �o . ORJCO = OMCIAL RECORDS OF JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON. WV1-2 = WEST VILLAGE, PHASES 1 & 2 (FS23343). C1/0= SEE COURSE DATA TABLE. FS = FTLED SURVEY 20 GFE2 = GAS FACILITIES EASEMENT PER DOC.2021--023174 ORJCO. WPE = PUBLIC MULTI—PURPOSE PATH EASEMENT PER WI -2. BRS = BILLINGS RANCH SUBDIVISION (FS18207). ca 0 40 LOT1, WV1-2 LOT 2, WV1-2 I LOT 3, WV1--2 w BASIS OF EARINGS � d 162.50 I 58.50 80.00 1 110 PARCEL 2 Q to I WV1--2 80.0© T CIg ,;::,PRIVATE ALLEY do PU 10.57 o WEST TMPE 131.18 1 \ --- ---- WEST 124.11 \ 110 w \ I 00 PARCEL 1 1 2 13066 SF I \ (w \ Ia_ � a 0 28.3 28.3 0 0 m m� PUE = PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT PER WVi-2. JCDR = JACKSON COUNTY DEED RECORDS. �o . ORJCO = OMCIAL RECORDS OF JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON. WV1-2 = WEST VILLAGE, PHASES 1 & 2 (FS23343). C1/0= SEE COURSE DATA TABLE. FS = FTLED SURVEY 82.50 GFE2 = GAS FACILITIES EASEMENT PER DOC.2021--023174 ORJCO. WPE = PUBLIC MULTI—PURPOSE PATH EASEMENT PER WI -2. BRS = BILLINGS RANCH SUBDIVISION (FS18207). ca AT1.E u c c o 0 °0 TENTATIVE PARTITION PLAT c Loto 0) PARCEL 3 `c LAND SURVEYOR 8249 SF 1* ti9 Fy � �r qo LOT 16, IN o z Rte` c co 162.50 I 58.50 80.00 1 110 PARCEL 2 Q to I WV1--2 80.0© T CIg ,;::,PRIVATE ALLEY do PU 10.57 o WEST TMPE 131.18 1 \ --- ---- WEST 124.11 \ 110 w \ I 00 PARCEL 1 1 2 13066 SF I \ (w \ Ia_ � a 0 28.3 28.3 0 0 m m� PUE = PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT PER WVi-2. JCDR = JACKSON COUNTY DEED RECORDS. �o . ORJCO = OMCIAL RECORDS OF JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON. WV1-2 = WEST VILLAGE, PHASES 1 & 2 (FS23343). C1/0= SEE COURSE DATA TABLE. FS = FTLED SURVEY iMPE = TEMPORARY P LIC MUL71—PURPOSE PATH EASEMENT PER WV1-2. \ GFE2 = GAS FACILITIES EASEMENT PER DOC.2021--023174 ORJCO. WPE = PUBLIC MULTI—PURPOSE PATH EASEMENT PER WI -2. BRS = BILLINGS RANCH SUBDIVISION (FS18207). AT1.E DATE: REGISTERED TENTATIVE PARTITION PLAT 10 NOV 2023 PROFESSIONAL ASSESSOR'S W f: Ste: LAND SURVEYOR 391 E05AD TL213 1 Inch : 50 feet FoR: CMK DEVELOPMENT, LLC DRAWN W: JET! qo 588 PARSONS DR., SUITE N CNK Er MEDFORD, OR 97501 MICK- OREGON JULY 17, 1986 JAMES E. HIBBS RENEWAL DATE 6-31)-25 ROTATION: a M; rsr4rFlu L.J. FRIAR & ASSOCIATES P.C. F A CONSULTING LAND SURVEYORS P.O. 130 1947 PhoanFz OR 97535 `l72-278 C L.J. FRIAR & AS40CIATES, P.C. 2023 Phvnar 541) Email: 1 fnQrandQsaoclQtaeOchartar.not Page 1