HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025-04-01 Council Mtg MINASHLAND CITY COUNCIL
BUSINESS MEETING MINUTES
Tuesday, April 1, 2025
6:00 PM Business Meeting
Council Present: Mayor Graham, Councilors Knauer, Dahle, DuQuenne, Kaplan, and Hansen.
Council Absent: Bloom
Staff Present:
Sabrina Cotta
City Manager
Doug McGeary
Acting City Attorney
Alissa Kolodzinski
City Recorder
Brandon Goldman
Community Development Director
Aaron Anderson
Senior Planner
Tighe O'Meara
Police Chief
Mark Shay
Fire Marshall
Scott Fleury
Public Works Director
Rocky Houston
Park and Recreation Director
Jordan Rooklyn
Deputy City Manager
I. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Graham called the meeting to order at 6:01 p.m.
a. Land Acknowledgement"
Councilor DuQuenne read the land acknowledgement.
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Councilor Dahle led the pledge of allegiance.
III. ROLL CALL
IV. MAYOR'S CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENT
a. A Proclamation in honor of Arbor Day 2025- Graham read the proclamation
b. A Proclamation in honor of Independent Media Week 2025 - Graham read the
proclamation
V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
a. Minutes of March 17, 2025, Study Session Meeting
b. Minutes of March 18, 2025, Business Meeting
Motion made to accept the minutes agenda as is.
Motion: DuQuenne Second: Knauer
Roll Call Vote: Councilor Knauer, Dahle, DuQuenne, Kaplan, and Hansen. YES. Motion passed.
VI. CONSENT AGENDA
a. 2025 Slurry Seal Award of Bid -Contract
b. Committee Appointment Term Extensions
c. Resolution 2025-03 Authorizing Property Line Adjustment and Conveyance of City -
Owned Property (Imperatrice Property)
April 1, 2025
Page 1 of 6
Motion made to approve the consent agenda.
Motion: Hansen Second: Kaplan
Roll Call Vote: Councilor Knauer, Dahle, DuQuenne, Kaplan, and Hansen. YES. Motion passed.
VII. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
a. Jackson County Library District
Board Member Marta Tarantsey and Library Director Kari May presented information on the Jackson
County Library District Board (see attached).
• Has served residents for over 100 years, and for 10 years as a special district funded by
property tax levy at 60 cents per $1,000 assessed value.
• Currently in year four of a five-year strategic plan which outlines four goals:
o Energize library services and resources - collection includes a 'library of things'.
o Expand access to the library - Ashland is now open 7 days a week and until 7PM,
Monday through Thursday with a book locker at the YMCA for after-hours pickup.
o Engage community to ensure services are responsive to community wants/needs
through partnerships that extend services beyond branches including a mobile
technology van provides a hotspot and technology classes at Ashland Senior Center.
o Nurture the library's infrastructure with adequately trained staff.
Vill. PUBLIC FORUM - Citizen spoke on the importance of Ashland's Parks and in favor of fees.
IX. PUBLIC HEARING
a) Public Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance 3259: "An Ordinance Annexing Property and
Withdrawing an Annexed Area from Jackson County Fire District No. 5 (300 Clay Street -
Planning Action #PA-T3-2024-0010)
Goldman and Anderson provided a presentation regarding the context and process of this item as a
quasi-judicial land use hearing (see attached).
o Part of a broader site review for approval of a 4.8-acre annexation to accommodate a mixed
residential use development with 21 single-family home lots and 16 units within fourplexes.
o The agenda packet includes the full packet presented to the Planning Commission in February
as well as Planning Commission and Staff recommendations.
o Staff broadly outlined how the annexation request meets the approval criteria and spoke that
the development includes the required percentage of affordable housing.
o Provided a detailed review of how the application met the approval criteria. The Planning
Commission approved the application with a condition of approval that the final plan shall
identify a mix of bedrooms for the affordable units comparable to the bedroom mix of the
market rate units and include necessary deed restrictions to ensure compliance. The applicant
is seeking an exception to this requirement and met with staff after this conditional approval.
Staff believe the exception criteria is met because of the nature of the development and that
the affordable housing portion will be built out first while exceeding phasing standards.
o Recommendation is for City Council to approve the annexation and the exception regarding
the bedroom mix as it satisfies the applicable criteria.
April 1, 2025
Page 2 of 6
o Discussion about the potential for increased vehicle traffic in the area. Specific streets in the
Transportation System Plan were identified as being capable of handling increased traffic.
While the development was not large enough to trigger a Transportation Impact Analysis, each
application is reviewed for trip -generation which was provided by the applicant.
The applicant Amy Gunter with Rogue Planning & Development Services provided a presentation (see
attached).
o Highlighted minor changes to the site plan including reduction of some building heights to
accommodate solar access, and the widening of the main internal new street.
o Provided detail of the trip generation assessment and trip dispersal routes.
o Clarified how the wetland buffer zone will function after development.
o Final plan submittal will include conceptual elevations of contemporary craftsman style plans
with alternatives and the Homeowners Association's CCNR's (Covenants, Conditions, and
Restrictions), and Architecture Review Board will oversee standards.
Public hearing open
No comments
Public hearing closed
Discussion: none
Decision:
Motion made to approve the first reading of Ordinance No. 3259, an ordinance annexing property
and withdrawing an annexed area from Jackson County Fire District No. 5, and direct staff to
prepare findings for Planning Action #PA-T3-2024-00010 reflecting the approval of the applicant's
requested exception to the bedroom mix standard under AMC 18.5.8.050.G.3, while incorporating
the remainder of the Planning Commission's March 11, 2025 recommended conditions of approval
and schedule a second reading for April 15th, 2025.
Motion: Dahle Second: Kaplan
Roll Call Vote: Councilor Dahle, DuQuenne, Knauer, Kaplan, and Hansen. YES. Motion passed.
Recess from 7:26 - 7:35PM
b. First Reading-ORD 3258 An Ordinance Amending AMC Chapter 10.30 to Prohibit
Hazardous Fire Use
O'Meara & McGeary provided information on the reason for the ordinance with updated language
(see packet for proposed language).
• There is no current criminal liability for someone that starts an unlawful fire that spreads if the
fire department extinguishes it before any real property damage.
• The intent is to provide for criminal sanctions under certain circumstances. Currently, this
circumstance would result in a violation.
• The proposed ordinance provides for a misdemeanor during fire season if the fire department
is called to extinguish an unlawful fire.
• Enforcement language includes clarification that nothing shall be construed to prohibit the
lawful use of portable cooking devices
Discussion:
April 1, 2025
Page 3 of 6
Case law does support criminal sanctions in situations without real property loss and other
municipalities have made similar changes.
This ordinance focuses on the wildfire season, when the City is most vulnerable.
Public hearing open
No comments
Public hearing closed
Decision:
Motion made to amend Ordinance No. 3258 as presented for first reading by adopting the red -lined
changes including the clarification in AMC 10.30.060.A.3 that exempts authorized cooking fires and
campfires, and the added definition AMC 10.30.005 confirming that lawful use of portable cooking
devices such as propane stoves and grills is permitted in designated picnic or recreation areas
unless otherwise restricted by fire danger or burn bans.
Motion: Kaplan Second: Hansen
Roll Call Vote: Councilor Dahle, DuQuenne, Kaplan, Knauer, and Hansen. YES. Motion passed.
X. ORDINANCES, RESOLUTIONS AND CONTRACTS
a. Second reading of Ordinance 3257, update to AMC 9.04 Weeds and Noxious
Vegetation
Fire Marshall Mark Shay presented the updated language (attached) - no changes from first reading.
Discussion: none
Decision:
Motion made to approve the second reading of ordinance 3257, an amendment to AMC 9.04 weeds
and noxious vegetation.
Motion: DuQuenne Second: Kaplan
Roll Call Vote: Councilor Dahle, DuQuenne, Knauer, Kaplan, and Hansen. YES. Motion passed.
XI. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
XII. NEW BUSINESS
a. 2025-2027 Capital Improvement Program Adoption & 2028-2031 Look Ahead
Parks Director Rocky Houston provided a presentation (included in the agenda packet).
• 2026-2031 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for Parks includes the following project types:
preventative maintenance, major maintenance, park enhancements, planning, land
acquisitions, and vehicles & equipment.
Discussion:
• Parks is responsible for the fountain restoration which is slated for completion by next summer.
• The Kestrel Pedestrian Bridge Project did not move forward due to lack of funding. The Nevada
Street Bridge Project was identified in the 2012 Transportation System Plan (TSP) as a Public
Works project, but the Transportation Commission and Council decided to not move forward,
and the project will be re-evaluated for consideration in the next TSP.
• Discussion about the process of identifying and funding new trail development.
• Discussion about the difference between the six -year CIP and the two-year biennial budget.
April 1, 2025
Page 4 of 6
Fleury outlined the CIP process for Public Works projects including service goals, regulatory
requirements, priorities, project efficiency, lifecycle replacement, and population growth while
taking into consideration risk and resilience (see attached presentation).
• Each project adopted in the 2-year CIP will include a narrative outlining project description,
cost & funding, timing & duration and compiled into a Capital Dashboard by the City's
Geographic Information System (GIS) team.
• Consideration will be given to timing /phasing of road projects to not contribute to congestion
in peak summer months, and consolidation of projects for efficiency in coordination with
utilities.
• Discussion about the central bike path project - potential allocation of system development
charges to fund a feasibility study to explore that project.
• Discussion about the facilities planning study that is underway - will include recommendations
for consolidation and/or divestment of properties.
• Discussion about the Clay Street Road improvement project and related budget.
• Piping the TO ditch has not been included as a project since 2018 when no direction was given
from Council to move forward. Recommendation for piping both front and back sides if taking
this project back up in the future.
• Funding to execute Council's direction for 2200 Ashland Street improvements have been
identified. Council will need to provide direction for any use beyond a severe weather shelter to
be included in the Capital Improvement plan.
• Discussion of HVAC improvements to Briscoe School property as part of the facilities plan -
lease revenue will address paving restoration needed at that site.
Citizen spoke about distracted driving concerns and the importance of protected bike lanes and
improvements to the central bike path for connectivity.
Decision:
Motion made to accept the two (2) year Capital Improvement Plan with the six -year overview.
Motion: Hansen Second: Knauer
Roll Call Vote: Councilor Knauer, Dahle, Kaplan, and Hansen: YES. DuQuenne: No. Motion passed.
b. 2025-2027 Transient Lodging Tax (TLT) Revenue Use for Tourism Promotion
Rooklyn spoke about bringing this item forward for continued conversation and feedback for
incorporation into the budget.
• The goal is to increase overnight visitors for a year-round economy and diversify our visitor
persona.
Strategies include developing a strategic marketing plan with other organizations that have a
substantial visitor draw.
Target audience includes the drive market (those that live within a two - six hour drive
to Ashland)
Those that have direct flights to Medford and will be reached through various
channels/publications that cater to the tourist persona.
Marketing support for businesses to market themselves, recruiting medium-sized
events (300-800 person events), and keeping local dollars local whenever possible.
April 1, 2025
Page 5 of 6
Discussion:
• General agreement with the strategies as presented.
• The event grant program will aim to attract events such as conferences with 300-800 visitors.
• Ongoing conversations with OSF aim to better coordinate marketing efforts to diversify and
amplify outcomes. Other businesses bringing in visitors include Oregon Cabaret and Websters.
• Request for direct feedback from businesses along the way to allow for changes as needed.
• Infrastructure investment includes things like wayfinding signage and parking. Request for
beautification in south Ashland.
• OSF is working with EPIC Ashland and StoryTown to create more events
XIII. CITY MANAGER REPORT
XIV. OTHER BUSINESS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS/REPORTS FROM COUNCIL LIAISONS
XV. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 9:30 p.m.
A �] �-&ft
City Recorder Alissa olodzinski
Mayor Tonya Graham
April 1, 2025
Page 6 of 6
CITY OF 4kSHLAND
A Proclamation in honor of Independent Media Week 2025
WHEREAS, an informed citizenry is a cornerstone of democracy, and
WHEREAS, an informed citizenry depends on unrestrained press, which provides
greater access to information, more points of view and greater diversity of thought and
fact, and
WHEREAS, the trend toward the consolidation of media ownership has resulted in journalistic
practices that hinder public awareness by excluding or marginalizing minority and dissenting
viewpoints, and
WHEREAS, fewer media voices can result in homogenized messaging and the silencing of
many points of view, and
WHEREAS, Democratic principles support the case for more independent media in this
country, not less.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Tonya Graham, Mayor of the City of Ashland, Oregon, on behalf of the City
Council, do hereby proclaim the week of April 13-19 as INDEPENDENT MEDIA WEEK and
encourage all citizens to seek out and explore the rich diversity of independent media
available within, and to our community.
Dated this Ist day of April 2025
Tonya Graham, Mayor
Alissa Kolodzinski, City Recorder
Oa1�
(De"4JuyeAeA
X
July
August
September
October
November
December
A
January
February
N
U
March
N
A
April
May,
June
1 my ■®
August
N
September
October ■
N
November
December ■�
o
January -■_®
N
Februa ry
r
July
August
�
September ■_�
October
November
December
N
A
January
February
N
O
March
N
A
April
May
June
July
August
September ■®
A
October ■�
November
December
January
b
N
M
February
CO
3
O U
July
July
August
%
August -_
September
September,-.
n�
w
October
Z
w
October
November.
3
November
C7
December
(D
December
A
Janus ry _
January
N
February
�
February _-
H
March
�•
3
r�
March
N
N
A
A
April
April
May
May
June
June
July
July
August
August
September
1,
September
"o
O
A
A
October
October
+�
N
�
November
November
December
December
January
January
February
February
79
Z�\ LA
M
n
Q
Q•
O
Q
M
(A
Ashland
FY25: Digital Circulation by Cardholder's Branch
Category i Digital Circulation: Hoopla *Digital Circulation: Kanopy •Digital Circulation: Overdrive
12,164
12K
11,364
11,679
11,180
10,649 10,392
10,282
10,706
10K
8K
6K
4K
2K
OK
July August
September
October
November
December
January
February
2024
2025
FY25
FY
FY25
Year
2024
2025
Category
July
August
September
October
November December January
February
Digital Circulation: Overdrive
8,405
8,298
$166
8,632
8,935
9,257 9,722
11952
Digital Circulation: Kanopy
512
422
437
460
622
618 632
565
Digital Circulation: Hoopla
1,732
1,662
1,679
1,614
1,807
1,804 1,810
1,663
Total
110,649
10,382
10,282
10,706
11,364
11,679 12,164
11,180
Ashland
FY25 Total Circulation - Physical and Digital Together
Category *Digital Circulation: Hoopla *Digital Circulation: Kanopy *Digital Circulation: overdrive *Physical Circulation
40K 37,947 39,586
36,912 36,152 35.104 36,019
30K
20K
10K
CK
July August September October November December January February
2024 2025
FY
FY25
Year
2024
2025
Category
July
August
September
October
November
December
January
February
Physical Circulation
26,263
25,770
23,700
24,398
24,655
26,268
27,422
22,827
Digital Circulation: Overdrive
8,405
8,298
8,166
8,632
8,935
9,257
9,722
8,952
Digital Circulation: Kanopy
512
422
437
460
622
618
632
565
Digital Circulation: Hoopla
1,732
.1,662
1,679
1,614
1,807
1,804
1,810
1,663
Total
136,912
36,152
33,982
35,104
36,019
37,947
39,586
34,007
Program Highlights: Ashland Library
Programs
02J0812025 - 01:00 PM: Build With LEGO Bricks, 5+ YRS
02/13/2025 - 03:30 PM: Magazine Pickup Day,13+ YRS
02/25/2025 - 03:30 PM: Art to -go: Rock Painting, 5+ YRS
02/22/2025 - 03:00 PM: Oregon Shakespeare Festival On The Radio: Changing Ashland and the Festival,l8+ YRS
02123/2025 - 01:00 PM: Board Game Day!, 3+ YRS
02/09/2025 - 01:00 PM: Build With LEGO Bricks, 5+ YRS
02/122025 -12:00 PM: Windows in Time: The Blue Ledge: From Scandals to Superfund,l8+ YRS
02/09/2025 - 01:00 PM: Make Your Own Cactus Rock Garden, 5+ YRS
02/10/2025 - 02:30 PM: Creative Writing Workshop,l8+ YRS
02/02/2025 - 01:00 PM: Tween D&D, 9-13 YRS
02/162025 - 01:00 PM: Tween D&D, 9-13 YRS
02/242025 - 02:30 PM: Creative Writing Workshop,l8+ YRS
02/272025 - 03:00 PM: Tissue Paper Stained Glass Candle Holders,l2+ YRS
02/22/2025 - 01:00 PM: Board Game Day!, 3+ YRS
02/19/2025 - 03:30 PM: Rogue Reads: Kanopy Kreature Feature and Popcorn Bar,12+YRS
02/12/2025 - 02:30 PM: Teen Hangout: Video and Board Games, 13-19 YRS
02/252025 - 04:00 PM: Rogue Reads: Fandom Collaging,l2+YRS
02/192025 -11:00 AM: Babies and Wobblers 0-36MOS
02/102025 -11:00 AM: Preschool Storytime 3-5 YRS
02/242025 -11:00 AM: Preschool Storytime 3-5 YRS
02/262025 -11:00 AM: Babies and Wobblers 0-36MOS
02/122025 -11:00 AM: Babies and Wobblers 0-36MOS
02/032025 -11:00 AM: Preschool Storytime M YRS
0226/2025 - 02:00 PM: Babies and Wobblers 0-36MOS
02/122025 -02:00 PM: Babies and Wobblers0-36MOS
02/192025 - 02:00 PM: Babies and Wobblers 0-36MOS
38
31
31
27
21
20
18
15
9
8
8
6
6
6
5
3
2
50
49
48
32
23
12
9
7
3
C I T Y O F
SHLAND
CITY Of
ASHLANI
CITY COUNCIL
300 Clay Street Annexation APRIL 1, 2025
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR, COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
I
I
sea
X 4 , - x
A. That the annexed area is within the City's
Urban Growth Boundary.
B. That the annexation proposal is consistent
with the Comprehensive Plan designations.
C. That the annexed area is contiguous with the
city limits.
D. That adequate City facilities are available as
determined by Public Works.
E. That adequate transportation can and will be
provided to serve the annexed area.
Aaron
Anderson
135 m ,Ju '— 150
115 165 1% i
J i 200 i 155 142 171 162 i
----------- 166 t71$3 16$
+ i ABBOTT AV 175 2361 2376 2X174
186 2335 190
I 2202 222D 2238 2256 226$ A860r 186 1
--------�----------------------- 22� TAV 1 1
I I
369 2110 � 229 > 2203 2215 2227 2a45 2263 2275 23oe 2324 234$ 2372 23ea
367 i 236 2122 2132 233
363 '{ 237 237 U DOLARHIDE WY
361 ` 241 242 239
243 244 241
248 r----- 2204 2222 224b_
�y 247 ----- 2274 2280 r
367 251 i ------ ----------------------- 0e
253 2A9.r
` 256 r _.
361
I
I Q
289287 283281 1 *9 267 263 ; 295
I 1
MEADOW DR i AUDRY CR 1 r
r
2$2 290 i 301
7290 n. 264 262 I r I
_ - r -
I
At
1
-. 295
1
r
1
1
1
300 Clay Street
Annexation/Zone Change for a 4.8-acre property, along with adjacent right-
of-way (ROW). Annexations require that at least 25 percent of the base density
be provided as affordable housing. Here, eight affordable housing units are
proposed at 80 percent of area median income (AMI) to meet this
requirement.
29-lot (37 dwelling unit) Outline Plan approval for a Performance Standards
Option (PSO) subdivision.
Limited Activities & Uses Permit for public utilities within the Water Resource
Protection Zone (WRPZ).
Tree Removal Permit to remove four non -hazard trees within proposed rights -
of -way or building envelopes. (Tree MAC had no issues.)
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION
CALDERA OAKS
A PF:NI.OR MANa5rANDAPDSSUBDIVIG0N
=� W i
-----------------
--------------
BMW
NOW
T6RRASURV6Y,INC.
_ -_ - _ i II .,•�^.�.. rwna3sla..uu.�` �rvcrcas
iil�� S� QYIM � LT
i amp«.
Figure 5: Wetland Delineation=°-
---.SBG/78's3'E 355.62"- S`RSbE iIIYiB �. ---- - - - - SBD'3a'42'E 331.35'-F rE(F i6Twb---------------
ALLEY (PUBLIC)al
aw.eo M6eC aaww' M0.00' aom' 160D'_ n58
• I - r-- 1 Let to / Lot1i B(
aad SM .woca Y wsr 4' a.
r Let1 ' - lelj �yLj ,_. ��a - $' $.-f'---- --- 3, i // t.ocovoc —,—our
wln
h 41w6 art a 4n1 c., re 5 .1.1 e. rt .)5) wit 4e4]
Id F
E \
Cos ULM
m4 ew / � - t
ry�-\ IliiiillFF'( ,e. aoAo' a w ftw � w a. tztt• \ \aas. `
le `1 � zNwvro�
v-�(PNACALDERA LANE (PUBLCALD CIHT
�
-} I 1�s5t -P 9.>--ss(n �ks�n womart �a»• _ss[19ac suv - �.— j Mwloo•at u.aa;� \z' '& YR toizi g f
1.. L CLw- -aiew- ..ttv .zoo' arty - ` 42M .i0 " +�e�\\'I " /
�, I �=mot 11,4 --socP � \ \ � \ S \\ ��si/��h =� •�C-�>� / / /
�.o : Q LaLR yyss 'LAA t}■ LaLm 2- LnL11 - taL12 - Mee is r L.,. a,�u` L \� \\ „t,
5561 Sest• N'ti06a e e .7-SOn Sant -SM Serf. p5101 Snrt � stt4 Snit slf) u st K75'i1i 1ttI7�
13 S&E t�\ \ -'nWS �
e LLLs L11 a Zy r
rJ .nn re \ A.enm- $ / snit J
as v 1 i seu
N.SY� -W .2ww .zwn .zw0' 4ZW .zwc \ aau ' „/ 110"w' / sRs'ars easr
AL
n R D RESER�V nTfON \ r
carrrcrro
wnneune
LEVEL SPREADER DISPERSION
TRENCH IN WETLAND BUFFER
-------------------------
10' SWR
PSMT
— — _ — SDCB —
b
— — — — — — — —
SSMH --'
PROPOSED DETENTION POND
AND WATER QUALITY
TREATMENT
V
TO
\TION
iRANT
oneie enoueo __ __
Application includes examples of various proposed unit types
Propose Site Design Review concurrently with Final Plan
300 Clay Street
The Planning Commission conditionally approved the
application including the following condition of
approval:
"That the final plan submittal shall identify a mix of
bedrooms for the affordable units comparable to the
bedroom mix of the market rate units and include
necessary deed restrictions to ensure compliance."
300 Clay Street — Request to exception*
Exception to AMC 18.5.8.050.G.3 which requires the affordable
units to have a comparable mix of bedrooms to the market rate
units.
,.Market rate units are a mix of attached and detached 2-, 3- &
4-bedroom units.
❑Affordable are proposed as only 2-bedroom townhomes.
❑The applicant proposed to complete the 8 affordable units
prior to C of O for any market rate homes
Applicant asserts they are building townhomes as rentals and
cannot control future development of SFR Lots.
i
6,1616M
6. Exceptions to the requirements of subsections
18.5.8.050.G.2 through 18.5.8.050.G.5, above, may be
approved by the City Council upon consideration of one
or more of the following:
a. That an alternative land dedication as proposed
would accomplish additional benefits for the City,
consistent with the purposes of this chapter, than
would development meeting the on -site dedication
requirement of subsection 18.5.8.050.G.2.
b. That the alternative phasing proposal not
meeting subsection 18.5.8.050.G.4 provided by the
applicant provides adequate assurance that the
affordable housing units will be provided in a timely
fashion.
c. That the materials and amenities applied to the
affordable units within the development, that are not
equivalent to the market rate units per
subsection 18.5.8.050.G.5, are necessary due to
local, state, or federal affordable housing standards
or financing limitations.
4. A development schedule shall be provided that
demonstrates that the affordable housing units per subsection
18.5.8.050.G shall be developed, and made available for
occupancy, as follows:
a. That 50 percent of the affordable units shall have
been issued building permits prior to issuance of a
certificate of occupancy for the last of the first 50
percent of the market rate units.
b. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the final ten
percent of the market rate units, the final 50 percent of
the affordable units shall have been issued certificates
of occupancy.
300 Clay Street - Staff Recommendation
Staff recommend that the City Council approve the Annexation,
which will allow the conditionally approved Outline Plan
Subdivision, Limited Uses & Activities Permit and Tree Removal
Permit (x4)
Staff also recommends that the City Council approve the
exception regarding bedroom mix as these eight units will be
constructed first and be completed prior to any market rate
dwellings and satisfies the required approval criteria in terms
of `alternative phasing'.
300 Clay Street — Planning Commission
Recommendation
The Planning Commission conditionally approved the
application including the all of the proposed conditions
of approval and rather than approved the exception
included the following condition of approval:
"That the final plan submittal shall identify a mix of
bedrooms for the affordable units comparable to the
bedroom mix of the market rate units and include
necessary deed restrictions to ensure compliance."
o L1V1 two
- '
r r „
.r
h.9ej. µ19�•
•
Approval Criteria
ANNEXATION, OUTLINE PLAN, LIMITED ACTIVITIES & USES
PERMIT
A. The annexed area is within the City's Urban Growth Boundary
B. The annexation proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
designations applicable to the annexed area, including any
applicable adopted neighborhood, master, or area plan, and is an
allowed use within the proposed zoning.
C. The annexed area is contiguous with the City limits.
D. Adequate City facilities for the provision of water to the annexed
area as determined by the Public Works Department; the transport
of sewage from the annexed area to an approved waste water
treatment facility as determined by the Public Works Department;
the provision of electricity to the annexed area as determined by the
Electric Department; urban storm drainage as determined by the
Public Works Department can and will be provided from the
annexed area. Unless the City has declared a moratorium based
upon a shortage of water, sewer, or electricity, it is recognized that
adequate capacity exists system -wide for these facilities. All
required public facility improvements shall be constructed and
installed in accordance with subsection 18.4.6.030.A.
E. Adequate transportation can and will be provided to serve the
annexed area. For the purposes of this section, "adequate
transportation" for annexations consists of vehicular, bicycle,
pedestrian, and transit transportation meeting the following
standards:
31
For vehicular transportation a minimum 22-foot-wide paved access exists, or
can and will be constructed, providing access to the annexed area from the
nearest fully improved collector or arterial street. All streets bordering on the
annexed area shall be improved, at a minimum, to an applicable City half -street
standard. The approval authority may, after assessing the impact of the
development, require the full improvement of streets bordering on the annexed
area. All streets located within annexed areas shall be fully improved to City
standards unless exception criteria apply. Where future street dedications are
indicated on the Street Dedication Map or required by the City, provisions shall be
made for the dedication and improvement of these streets and included with the
application for annexation.
2. For bicycle transportation, safe and accessible bicycle facilities according to the
safety analysis and standards of the governing jurisdiction of the facility or street
(e.g., City of Ashland, Jackson County, Oregon Department of Transportation)
exist, or can and will be constructed. Should the annexed area border an arterial
street, bike lanes shall be constructed along the arterial street frontage of the
annexed area. Likely bicycle destinations within a quarter of a mile from the
annexed area shall be determined and the approval authority may require the
construction of bicycle lanes or multiuse paths connecting the annexed area to the
likely bicycle destinations after assessing the impact of the development proposed
concurrently with the annexation.
32
For pedestrian transportation, safe and accessible pedestrian facilities
according to the safety analysis and standards of the governing jurisdiction of the
facility or street (e.g., City of Ashland, Jackson County, Oregon Department of
Transportation) exist, or can and will be constructed. Full sidewalk improvements
shall be provided on one side of all streets bordering on the proposed annexed
area. Sidewalks shall be provided as required by ordinance on all streets within
the annexed area. Where the annexed area is within a quarter of a mile of an
existing sidewalk system or a location with demonstrated significant pedestrian
activity, the approval authority may require sidewalks, walkways or multiuse paths
to be constructed and connect to either or both the existing system and locations
with significant pedestrian activity.
4. For transit transportation, should transit service be available to the annexed
area, or be likely to be extended to the annexed area in the future based on
information from the local public transit provider, the approval authority may
require construction of transit facilities, such as bus shelters and bus turnout
lanes.
5. Timing of Transportation Improvements. All required transportation
improvements shall be constructed and installed in accordance with
subsection 18.4.6.030.A.
33
For all residential annexations, a plan shall be provided
demonstrating that the development of the annexed area
will ultimately occur at a minimum density of 90 percent of
the base density for the zone, unless reductions in the total
number of units are necessary to accommodate significant
natural features, topography, access limitations, or similar
physical constraints. The owner or owners of the annexed
area shall sign an agreement, to be recorded with the
County Clerk after approval of the annexation, ensuring that
future development will occur in accord with the minimum
density indicated in the development plan. For purposes of
computing maximum density, portions of the annexed area
containing unbuildable lots, parcels, or portions of the
annexed area such as existing streets and associated
rights -of -way, railroad facilities and property, wetlands,
floodplain corridor lands, slopes greater than 35 percent, or
land area dedicated as a public park, shall not be included.
G. Except as provided in subsection 18.5.8.050.G.7, below,
annexations with a density or potential density of four
residential units or greater and involving residential zoned
lands, or commercial, employment or industrial lands with a
Residential Overlay (R-Overlay) shall meet the following
requirements:
1. The total number of affordable units provided to
qualifying buyers, or to qualifying renters, shall be equal
to or exceed 25 percent of the base density as calculated
using the unit equivalency values set forth herein. The
base density of the annexed area for the purpose of
calculating the total number of affordable units in this
section shall exclude any unbuildable lots, parcels, or
portions of the annexed area such as existing streets and
associated rights -of -way, railroad facilities and property,
wetlands, floodplain corridor lands, water resource areas,
slopes greater than 35 percent, or land area dedicated as
a public park.
a. Ownership units restricted to households earning
at or below 120 percent of the area median income
shall have an equivalency value of 0.75 unit.
b. Ownership units restricted to households earning
at or below 100 percent of the area median income
shall have an equivalency value of 1.0 unit.
c. Ownership or rental units restricted to households
earning at or below 80 percent of the area median
income shall have an equivalency value of 1.25 unit.
2. As an alternative to providing affordable units per
section 18.5.8.050.G.1, above, the applicant may provide title to a
sufficient amounto buildable land for development complyying
with subsection 18.5.8.050.G.1.b, above, through transfer to a
non-profit (IRC 501 (NO
a or a le housing developer or public
corporation created under ORS 456.055 to 456.235.
a. The land to. be transferred shall be located within the
project meeting the standards set forth in
sections 18.5.8.050.G.5 and 18.5.8.050.G.6.
b. All needed public facilities shall be extended to the area
or areas proposed for transfer.
c. Prior to commencement of the project title to the land
shall be transferred to the City. an affordable housing
developer which must either be a unit of government, a non-
profit 5P01(c)((3) orgganization or a public corporation created
under ORS 456.055 to 456.�35.
d. The land to be transferred shall be deed restricted to
comply with Ashland's affordable housing program
requirements.
e. Transfer of title of buildable land in accordance with this
subsection shall exempt the project from the development
schedule reqquirements set forth in
subsection 18.5.8.050.G.4.
3. The affordable units shall be comparable in bedroom mix with
the market rate units in the development.
a. The number of bedrooms per dwelling unit in the
affordable units within the residential development shall be
in equal proportion to the number of bedrooms per dwelling
unit in the market rate units within the residential
development. This provision is not intended to require the
same floor area in affordable units as compared to market
rate units. The minimum square footage of each affordable
unit shall comply with the minimum required floor area
based as set forth in Table 18.5.8.050.G.3, or as established
by the U.S. Department of ousman Ur an Development
(HUD) for dwelling units developedg under the HOME
program.
4. A development schedule shall be provided that demonstrates
that the affordable housing units per
subsection 18.5.8.050.G shall be developed, and made available
for occupancy, as FoTows:
a. That 50 percent of the affordable units shall have been
issued building permits prior to issuance of a certificate of
occupancy for the last of the first 50 percent of the market
rate units.
b. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the final ten
percent of the market rate units, the final 50 percent of the
affordable units shall have been issued certificates of
occupancy.
5. That affordable housing. units shall be constructed using
comparable building materials and include equivalent amenities as the
market rate units.
a. The exterior appearance of the affordable units in any
residential development shall be visually compatible with the
market rate units in the development. External building materials
and finishes shall be substantially the same in type and quality
for affordable units as for market rate units.
b. Affordable units may differ from market rate units with regard
to floor area, interior finishes and materials, and housing type;
provided that the affordable housing units are provided with
comparable features to the market rate units, and shall have
generally comparable improvements related to energy efficiency,
including plumbing, insulation, windows, appliances, and heating
and cooling systems.
6. Exceptions to the requirements of subsections 18.5.8.050.G.2
through 18.5.8.OSO.G.5, above, may be a proved y e i ouncil
upon con on erg a of one or more of the ollowing:
a. That an alternative land dedication as proposed would
accomplish additional benefits for the City consistent with the
purposes of this chapter, than would development meeting the
on -site dedication requirement of subsection 18.5.8.050.G.2.
b. That the alternative pphasing proposal not meeting
subsection 18.5.8.050.G.4 provided by the applicant provides
adequate, as`s_u_ra_-n-c—eTFa-Uhe affordable housing units will be
provided in a timely fashion.
c. That the materials and amenities applied to the affordable
units within the development ,that are not equivalent to the
market rate units per subsection 18.5.8.050.G.5, are necessary
due to local, state, or federal afro arcT ebT o> g standards or
financing limitations.
7. The total number of affordable units described in this subsection
shall be determined by rounding upfractional answers to the nearest
whole unit. A deed restriction or similar legal instrument shall be used
to guarantee compliance with affordable criteria for a period of not less
than 60 years for units qualified as affordable rental housing, or 30
years for units qualified as affordable for -purchase housing.
H. One or more of the following standards are met:
1. The annexation proposal shall meet the requirements of
subsection 18.5.8.050.B. above.
2. A current or probable danger to public health exists within the
proposed area for annexation due to lack of full City sanitary sewer or
water services in accordance with the criteria in ORS chapter 222 or
successor state statute.
3. Existing development in the proposed area for annexation has
inadequate water or sanitary sewer service, or the service will become
inadequate within one year.
4. The proposed area for annexation has existing City water or
sanitary sewer service extended, connected anti in use, and a signed
Consent to annexation agreement has been tiled and accepted by the
ty.
5. The proposed area for annexation is an island surrounded by lands
within the City limits.
I. Exceptions and Variances to the Annexation Approval Criteria and
Standards. The approval authority may approve exceptions to and variances
from the approval' criteria and standards in this section using the criteria in
section 18.4.6.020.B.1, Exceptions to the Street Design Standards, or
chapter�anances.
A. The development meets all applicable ordinance requirements of the city.
B. Adequate key city facilities can be provided including water, sewer, paved access
to and through the development, electricity, urban sform drainage, police and fire
protectionand adequate transportation; and that the development will not cause
a city facility to operate beyond capacity.
C. The existing and natural features of the land; such as wetlands, floodplain
corridors ponds, large trees, rock outcroppings, etc. have been identified in the
plan of the development and significant features have been included in the
common open space, common areas, and unbuildable areas.
D. The development of the land will not prevent adjacent land from being developed
for the uses shown in the comprehensive plan.
E. There are adequate provisions for the maintenance of common open space and
common areas, if required or provided, and that if developments are done in
phases that the early phases have the same or higher ratio of amenities as
proposed in the entire project.
F. The proposed density meets the base and bonus density standards established
under this chapter.
G. The development complies with the street standards.
H. The proposed development meets the common open space standards
established under section 18.4.4.070. Common open space requirements may be
satisfied by public open space in accordance with section 18.4.4.070 if approved
by the city of Ashland.
40
1. All activities shall be located as far away from streams and wetlands as practicable,
designed to minimize intrusion into the Water Resource Protection Zone and disturb as
little of the surface area of the Water Resource Protection Zone as practicable.
2. The proposed activity shall be designed, located and constructed to minimize
excavation, grading, area of impervious surfaces, loss of native vegetation, erosion, and
other adverse impacts on water resources.
3. On stream beds or banks within the bank -full stage, in wetlands, and on slopes of 25
percent or greater in a Water Resource Protection Zone, excavation, grading,
installation of impervious surfaces, and removal of native vegetation shall be avoided
except where no practicable alternative exists, or where necessary to construct public
facilities or to ensure slope stability.
4. Water, storm drain, and sewer systems shall be designed, located and constructed to
avoid exposure to floodwaters, and to avoid accidental discharges to streams and
wetlands.
5. Stream channel repair and enhancement, riparian habitat restoration and enhancement,
and wetland restoration and enhancement will be restored through the implementation
of a mitigation plan prepared in accordance with the standards and requirements in
section 18.3.11.110, Mitigation Requirements.
6. Long-term conservation, management and maintenance of the Water Resource
Protection Zone shall be ensured through preparation and recordation of a
management plan as described in subsection 18.3.11.110.C, except a management
plan is not required for residentially zoned lots occupied only by a single-family dwelling
and accessory structures.
41
a) The tree is proposed for removal in order to permit the application to be
consistent with other applicable Land Use Ordinance requirements and
standards, including but not limited to applicable Site Development and
Design Standards in part 18.4 and Physical and Environmental
Constraints in part 18.3.10.
b) Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on
erosion, soil stability, flow of surface waters, protection of adjacent trees,
or existing windbreaks.
c) Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on the
tree densities, sizes, canopies, and species diversity within 200 feet of
the subject property. The City shall grant an exception to this criterion
when alternatives to the tree removal have been considered and no
reasonable alternative exists to allow the property to be used as
permitted in the zone.
d) Nothing in this section shall require that the residential density to be
reduced below the permitted density allowed by the zone. In making this
determination, the City may consider alternative site plans or placement
of structures of alternate landscaping designs that would lessen the
impact on trees, so long as the alternatives continue to comply with the
other provisions of this ordinance.
e) The City shall require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each
tree granted approval pursuant to section 18.5.7.050. Such mitigation
requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit.
42
CALDERA OAKS
ANNEXATION, SITE DESIGN REVIEW, STREET STANDARDS
EXCEPTION AND PERFROMANCE STANDARDS SUBDIVISION
OUTLINE PLAN REVIEW
..; -~" - •_,ate
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION
CALDERA OAKS
A PI:Rf'ORMANCL' Sl'ANDAROB SUBDIVISION
IIBIr1ElA.A LLL }
s�.y ti.. awlale__
\ II 1
i
Property adjacent to the city limits on three
sides.
Comprehensive Plan Designation of the
property is Suburban Residential.
Annexation request is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan Designation
Q
.' Z.
EtKr�TV��.C�
TERRASURVEY. INC
vrcarslmu uro scRrcrorzs
a� rac11n1 s/lllrr
�aunn aamnr snap
--
I l7Ci TN=L;
LOT le
LOT 17
LOT 16
T
IT
PLAM VIEW FNOLr ATOWWr
TRACTA
LOT
15
=674 LOT 14
• Due to the limited number of Peak Hourwicle trips, aTranspoR`ation° . Analysis is not refired per
Oregon Department of Transportation standards, City of Ashland standards nor Jackson County Standards.
• 24 AM Peak Hour trips and 31 PM Peak Hour trips with multiple dispersal points (Engle St. North to Abbot,
then East to Tolman or West to Clay, Clay north to East Main and Clay south to Ashland Street).
• Clay Street is a Neighborhood Collector has a typical average daily trips for between 1,500 and 5,000
average daily trips.
• According to the Transportation Impact Analysis for a recent project in the vicinity (East Main Street Park)
there were 1,500 vehicle trips on Clay Street at Abbott Avenue.
I Aw I-
f 7!
m
iL
-7
V
a
V
a
J
i
i
i
•1■1/■11■■■■■■■///■/////////11/1/111/11111■1■
•
• t/[
•
1
t■
i
a
� auafoa. :tlI0Y0M :xrwoa.
arrP n+.
a
•
PHASE 02
SITE - PLAN 1
SGGLlEE 1• - an Gn.P 1O. 1111,1ta a'I;
•' P•1�1
300 CLAY STREET
CONCEPT DESIGN
ZONING INFORMATION
Maatil. n.iJ.+i�50ErM.. Y�WPl.ni
OHIYVa••!
W araIM 1C ae+ff+fP.++n-
alaRap. ra.fOfS=A:'1.�
LEGEND -SITE PLAN
+:war
cxsfe
uHwwc
AUTOMO&LE PARKING
aRi�P ev.wn,. n•r
twa.+�ar` ••a r..a+wa..n uaP
SITE AREA
OPEN SPACE
Neighborhood Street - Figure 18.4.6.040.G.4 b
via --
Shared Street • Figure 18.4 6040 G.8
Alley -Figure 18.4.6.040.G.6
r
G.
SITE PLAN & ZONING SUMMARY A0.1
SITE - PLAN
SCALE: 1'= W-OP (N %38)
SCALE. 1'=W.T (11 x 17/
awcr
tva mo• ua fur
300 CLAY STREET
CONCEPT DESIGN
xnlma
ZONING INFORMATION
wnow: slataeuerrw.waawn
owtutaa:
awena o.mern
oosauzza: s1c11a-1w
aena:. .arr�ttorrat
LEGEND - SITE PLAN
..,anuT
catcatre
unos�,RE
AUTOMOBILE PARKING
11 HE 1" 1•St9MCe8
TOfN-10 /Kef ER RIU10• W St4CE3
SITE AREA
aaaa.-aoaso.
OPEN SPACE
�» a
.ua
Neighborhood Street - Figure 18 4.6.040.G.4.b
Shared Street - Figure 18. 4. 8.040. G.8
Alley - Figure 16.4.6.040.G.6
folio
SITE PLAN & ZONING SUMMARY A0.1
Ordinance 3257
Revision to AMC 9.04 Weeds and Noxious Vegetation
Revisions
9.04.005 Definitions
B. Fire Chief: the City of Ashland Fire Chief or hisiber their authorized designee.
�I
Ordinance 3257
Revision to AMC 9.04 Weeds and Noxious Vegetation
Revisions
9.04.005 Definitions
G. Summer season: between May 45 Ist and September- N October 15th of any year, or the end of
fire season as declared by the Oregon Department of Forestry, whichever is later.
n
Ordinance 3257
Revision to AMC 9.04 Weeds and Noxious Vegetation
Revisions
9.04.020 Responsibility of Owner — Removal of Weeds
The owner of any lot or parcel of land within the limits of the City of Ashland shall cut and/or remove
weeds growing thereon, and on adjacent and abutting rights -of -way, between May 4-5th I st and June
+5th 1st of each year. it shall be the duty of an owner to continue to cut and remove the weeds
throughout the summer season, or any other time of year when deemed a fire, health, or traffic hazard.
(Ord. 3159 § 1, amended, 09/18/2018; Ord. 3009, amended, 04/20/2010)
Ordinance 3257
Revision to AMC 9.04 Weeds and Noxious Vegetation
Revisions
9.04.040 Notice to Abate - Contents
In case of failure or neglect of any such agent, owner or occupant to cut weeds and grass and
shrubbery as herein provided, the City-Reeer-der Code Compliance Officer shall cause to be served
on such agent, owner, and/or occupant a notice, describing the property with convenient certainty by
its legal description or by the street number of the house, requiring such owner or agent and/or
occupant to cut said weeds, grass, and shrubbery within ten (10) days from the service thereof, or that
the City will require the same to be done, and the cost thereof charged as a lien against said property.
(Ord. 3159 § 1, amended, 09/ 18/2018; Ord. 1141 § 4, amended, 1951)
F - A 71---
Ordinance 3257
Revision to AMC 9.04 Weeds and Noxious Vegetation
Revisions
9.04.050 Notice to Abate — Service — Removal by City — Lien
....Fire Chief (or authorized designee) shall cause the same to be done and shall file with the
Couneil City Recorder and Finance Department a verified itemized statement of the expenditure
occasioned thereby, and the Recorder shall cause notice to be served upon the owner, agent, or
occupant in the manner hereinbefore described, such statement will be considered...
n
Ordinance 3257
Revision to AMC 9.04 Weeds and Noxious Vegetation
Revisions
9.04.050 Notice to Abate — Service — Removal by City — Lien
...determined by the Coune-il City Recorder and a lien declared upon the property involved;:
Anneals shall be filed with the municipal court no more than 10 days following the placement of
said lien, in accordance with AMC 2.30. the time of which meeting shall be speeified On the
s
Thank you
Capital Improvement Plan: Adoption
Ashland City Council Meeting I April 2, 2025 FAR
2026-2031 CIP
Acknowledgment
• Rachel Dials, Deputy Director
• Kevin Caldwell, Parks Superintendent
• Bill Miller, Parks Supervisor
• Wes Casale, Parks Supervisor
• Jason Minica, Parks Supervisor
• Brian Weaver, Golf Manager
• Brandon Terry, Senior Administrative Analyst
2026-2031
ASHLAND PARKS & RECREATION
CAPITAL PLAN
/ PSN<,
r v1
Capital Improvement Plan
Capital Budget Capital Program
Biennial budget for captial projects Four year plan beyond capital
budget
iq ppp .gin.,
G
Project Types
Process
1. System Inventory & Project Scoring
1. September to November 2024
2. Presentation of Draft CIP
1. 11/13/2024
3. Public Comment Period
• 1. 30 days online (11/15-12/15 2024)
4. Public Testimony
1. December 7, 2024 APRC Meeting
5. Final CIP Drafting
1. After public comment period ends
• 6. Review and Adoption by APRC
1. January 8, 2025 APRC Meeting
7. Review and Adoption by City Council
1. April 2, 2025 City Council Meeting
Identified
Total by •.
Preventative Maintenance
-. Need
$
1,465,040
Major Maintenance
$
21,050,310
Park Enhancements
$
13,186,000
Planning
$
407,000
Acquisitions
$
14,339,920
Vehicles / Equipment
$
303,000
-''Total Deferred/Capital
Ne•.
$
50,751,270
Fin
CIP - Budget
Ashland Parks & Recreation Department - Capital Improvement Program
j Category FY 26
to fV Mth�,a•fifY 3l Darks CeDl[+tl
�para�,ntl. arr KhRfrrlcd ha •rvt
Annual Totals b c
�•. Parks. with citizen input reco
.-------------------------------------------
Preventative Maintenance
fa<.•1 ury
Major Maintenance
'+v+ntatnr+ M+intC Hance
Park Enhancements
rx knhancrmwus
Planning
Vehicles / Eauinment
Key Projects
Preventative Maintenance
• Pavement Preservation Projects
• Hazard Trees
• Building & Facilities
$_ 275,000
$
5 1,800,000
S
$ 1,900,000
$
$ 75,000
$
$ 250,000
S
5 118,000
Is
Annual CIPI $ 4
Annual Allocation
Major Maintenance
• Hunter Park - Tennis Courts Rehabilitation
• Lithia Park - Butler-Perozzi Fountain Restoration
• Irrigation Controllers
• ADA Improvements
• Siskiyou Mountain Trail re-route
5
FY 27
275,000
525,000
750,000
10,000
250,000
1,810,000
hil-
off,
n
Key Projects
Park Enhancements
• East Main - Phase I
Planning
• Parks, Recreation, Open
space & Seniors Plan
p, S IY !.
II 7
XII. New Business
2025-2027 Capital Improvement Plan Adoption & 2028-2031
Lookahead
■ Capital Planning "The Roadmap" -Master Plans & Facility Plans
■ Identify System Needs - 20 Year Window
■ Define Level of Service Goals
■ Prioritize - Regulatory, Life Cycle, Deficiency, Capacity
■ Reduce Risk and Increase Resiliency
■ Update every 7-10 years
• Include Council Goals and Priorities
■ Assess Regulatory Changes
■ Assess Changes in Growth and Development
■ Financial Analysis
■ Evaluate and Make Appropriate Changes Every Budget Cycle
■ Layer Project Priorities
■ Assess Utility Components with Street Improvements
2025-2027 Capital Improvement Plan Adoption & 2028-2031
Lookahead
■ Capital Program 2-year, 6-year
■ Budgeting - 2025/27 Budget Biennium
■ 2-year appropriation; forecast spending
■ Distinct Council Project Approvals
■ Master Plans
■ CIP Adoption
■ Budget Adoption
■ Rate Analysis & Project Funding
■ Feasibility Studies
■ Preliminary Engineering
■ Final Engineering
■ Construction & Construction Administration
2025-2027 Capital Improvement Plan Adoption
■ Project Description
■ Project Cost & Funding
■ Project Timing & Duration
■ 2 - Year Narrative Book
0 2/6 year spreadsheets
Street Fund - Roadway
omje Name: Cley street- FeRh avenue to Sisklyou Fioulmerd Pml k. 302—
Total ?royect C= Two Y— Cest £Total ft j t59,1901191 Duradon: Mulch kk
veers
Mfi fYi1
Eayenses'
Des+p+ $1.711.311 $1,731111
�nstrp�;pn
0.avenuc:
Fees $1P.761 $—.141
SD
Grant $1,339,s69 $1,535,469
Cnne.
Upl.p'Other: Funded by a Roue Valley Metropolrtee.Oreanrzahon Grard —h Jackson Counh
prwidine a percentage of the total match as W rt of the jorisdilb—1 hansfer agreement.
AMkp.he EonQ Term Eap 1: Protect, pant funded wdh-u --.n Drowdineaportion of the
cored match and the Gh, rovidine fhe remaining. AddiH.- grant funding I— need to be
shed once theinmal project developments ht of ray acgo — and design ph. have been
ompkted After completion dK unPravem<nt wall become prt of the sreet Fund and costs will include
werlry'z es rewired for. Dave ,preservation yo{nm.
Descrption: Existing C y $t from firth Ave. to $Wry. tHvd. is nominally 19-f—ride roatl wRh ro
bikeorpedfacilRks The street serves lor, medium and hi{h-0ensAy M1ousing,a city p+h enda p—h,
elemmtary school,— conrrcts the neghborhood h, Ashland St. and Sis Blvd. Thepurposeofthe
project u to add bike and Pedeshi.n ha ld- with curb. {utter, uder.lk, end under d d—i . to
fatilitat<Ne adtlition of the bgze antl pedestrian facdtkx. Per Me Ashland TSD, the bhe facility rig be a
bike boulevard, a shared One wkh •speed reduction to SB MPH. The earshot shtt will also be
m.provad to match the new fasilibes.
2025-2027 Capital Improvement Plan Adoption
Capital Dashboard
•• I • ? t' 65 Capilal Proj,_,_7 7
....r..=., •
l Tohl Cost RGett Tyco
sfv i ;
$91.09M,
�n 1
2025-2027 Capital Improvement Plan Adoption
Critical Projects
Water
■ Water Treatment Plant Project
■ Dam Safety Project
■ East and West Forks Transmission Line
Wastewater
■ Wastewater Headworks
Transportation
■ North Mountain Rehabilitation
■ Oak Street Rehabilitation
■ Clay Street Improvements
Planning Efforts
• Safe Streets For All Action Plan
• Transportation System Plan Update
• Central Ashland Bike Path Feasibility Study
.- -fwc.. Yip v.+• R.
eo.e..,
/W
fe.w P
TrwyrYOaw/uD
S•ar.f n a•. Sr riw.DR`�
SNrweVMbW
UD
f /ee:e
Srwfa fq,.wniwa. SW Nw-KI
Urwr•.MweW
rr�..
YYr fwroMe+pw....w
2025-2027 Capital Improvement Plan Adoption
Next Steps
■ Move through budget adoption process
■ Begin project implementation
■ Continue with projects underway
F_ h
2025-2027 Capital Improvement Plan Adoption
I move to accept the two (2) year Capital Improvement Plan with the six -year
overview.
.r-
A 1ALI