The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2016.06.15 CEAP Agenda Packet 1r , Climate and Eriergy.Action Plan Climate and Energy Plan Committee Meeting Agenda Junc 151 2016- 5:30..........7:30 Community I)cvclopmcnt F3uilding A...9'.-)e-ri..da .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 5 min Call to Order Roxane • Approval of Minutes—May 18, 2016 • Icebreaker Question 15 min public Forum 20 min Review/Discussion of Open House #1 All Committee Survey in Packet to min Committee Decision Making Process R°xa�e 6o min Vision,Goals & Targets - Committee Recommendations All • Draft Vision statement in packet • Goals/Targets question breakdown in packet • Goals/Targets discussion guide in packet 10 min Upcoming Meetings (Committee meeting July 6 and Council meeting July ivy Adam ,-� cIrr or CASCADIA ,NSHLAND Minutes for the Climate and Energy Action Plan ad hoc Committee May 18,2016 Page 1 of 4 MINUTES FOR THE CLIMATE & ENERGY ACTION PLAN ad hoc COMMITTEE Wednesday, May 18, 2016 Siskiyou Room, 51 Winburn Way 1. Call to Order Councilor Rich Rosenthal called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. Committee members James McGinnis, Cindy Bernard, Greg Jones, Isaac Bevers, Jim Hartman, Bryan Sohl, Marni Koopman, Louise Shawkat, Roxane Beigel-Coryell, and Claudia Alick were present. Staff member Adam Hanks was present. Consultant Andrea Martin and Eugene City Councilor Alan Zelenka participated in the meeting by phone. 2. Approval of minutes Bevers clarified names of public speakers from previous minutes. Minutes were approved with amendments made by Bevers. 3. Around the Room Group did around the room team building regarding their favorite part of their morning routine. 4. Public Input Huelz Gutchen: Stated he has been talking at City Council meetings for a while and recently has been putting those discussions on YouTube. He stated that Commissioner Hartman recently called him a bulldog—he doesn't believe he is, but that he is just a community development director"wanna be."He wants this position because climate issues are so important. He stated that in China there are over 1 billion people, all on one grid. There is one set of rules for all aspects of electricity use, solar panel installation, etc. We can regulate similarly here. He stated that Exxon recently got into trouble for hiding climate issues for years. Robert Block-Brown: He is here representing Rogue Climate and is in support of all the youth presentations and participation in this process. He offered appreciation for the group's work. He encouraged the group to have the plan be science-based, socially equitable, and something that protects Ashland's quality of life. He also encouraged the group to have an ordinance in order to make sure there is plan accountability. He and Rogue Climate are looking forward to the open house and they, along with the Interfaith Social Justice Coalition, have been putting out information about the open house to encourage participation. Ken Crocker: Stated that he has been sitting with two things since the last meeting: 1) that it seems like we're on a path to set targets of where we want to be in 2050 but we should avoid focusing on targets which may change. He instead encouraged the group to focus on how to change Ashland culturally to meet the challenge of climate change. In other words, be focused on what we can do to be more adaptable. 2) The plan relies on the City of Ashland to help implement and this might be scary for city staff. The group needs to build into the plan sufficient resources for city staff to implement effectively. He encouraged Hanks in his role as the liaison to city staff. Minutes for the Climate and Energy Action Plan ad hoc Committee May 18,2016 Page 2 of 4 5. Review of Climate Assessment Document Hanks stated the document is currently still in draft form. Some of the document will be adjusted for the sake of public understanding and inclusion in the upcoming open house. Consultant Martin reviewed some of the plan and requested the group give input on what might be missing. This document is related to the "primary" climate impacts, but doesn't take the next step to say how these impacts might affect specific sectors in the community. Martin reiterated that there will be visuals (charts, graphs, etc.) added to make the document more readable before it is finalized. Group discussed the possibility of including low and high climate predictions. Some thought that Cascadia's choice of moderate and extreme predictions were well chosen. Most of the group agreed that using standard scenarios is important for consistency between the plans of various communities in the northwest. There was some concern that much of the information is very global—which is important for framing—but not much is reflective of our specific area. Group discussed the desire to have the specific data sources referenced better in the document. Group requested inclusion of both night-time temperature and freezing temperature predictions. Martin agreed to see if those could be included. Group discussed possible inclusion of analysis of demographic shifts due to climate change (climate refugees). Martin stated that there likely isn't data available for this. Group discussed why the climate science primer is on page 28, rather than at the beginning of the document. Martin stated this was done because most of the people who will be looking at this document are looking for the hard science, and won't need the primer. Group determined that including a brief primer in the executive summary might help. 6. Open House #1 Martin thanked the group for the input they gave at the last committee meeting. She stated they are working on getting a videographer to record the event and participate in one of the stations. She gave details of when the committee needs to arrive and how they will be used at the open house. Group gave their general preferences regarding which station they would like to be assigned. Group thanked Martin for her work. Martin's conference call ended. 7. Goals and Targets in Ordinance Form Group discussed whether it would be appropriate to let the Council know at the scheduled July update that there is a strong possibility of an ordinance proposed as part of this plan. Group discussed what timeline would be most appropriate. Minutes for the Climate and Energy Action Plan ad hoc Committee May 18,2016 Page 3 of 4 Eugene City Council member, Alan Zelenka,joined the group via conference call to discuss how the ordinance in Eugene came to be, what has been positive from the ordinance and what challenges they have faced due to the ordinance. Some of what he encourage the group to consider when drafting/proposing an ordinance: • Having an ordinance has the force of law and public hearings are required for changes to the ordinance. • Use the ordinance (or discussions of the ordinance) to engage the community to participate in the plan. • Be specific on timelines for every piece of the plan. • Have scientifically-based actions. "Having an unrealistic goal is worse than having no goal." • Short-term goals need to be consistent with long-term goals. Having an ordinance helps keep that consistency. • Think about the overall costs—focus on the lowest cost options for achieving goals. In other words, having either social or economic costs too high will cause the plan to fail. • Make sure that the reporting requirements are realistic. Group discussed with Zelenka if there has been any negativity from the plan or the ordinance. He stated there hasn't been much, other than people frustrated by the perception that nothing is being done. He stated that Cities aren't good at letting people know what they have achieved, and encouraged the group and the city to be transparent about every achievement and to frequently report what they are doing well. Group asked if Eugene included consumption in their plan. He stated the next update to the plan will include some of that, it's just harder to track accurately. Group asked if the ordinance helped to make funds available for city projects (or staffing). Zelenka stated that there was no real additional funding but that it has helped create a "core staff' team who help focus and implement projects in each department. It also helps with selecting what projects will get funded in the CIP. Group asked if the Eugene plan considered including carbon offsets to achieve goals. Zelenka stated they are now considering using offset to achieve the 2020 goals (up to 40% of the goal). They are looking into focusing on local offsets to also use it as a "mini economic development tool." Group thanked Zelenka for his information and his phone call ended. Group discussed whether it was appropriate to move forward with an ordinance at this time. Most agreed it was too early in the process to create a specific ordinance but it shouldn't be left out of the process. Most felt it was important to get more community input and to let the Council know that this concept will likely be coming to them as part of the action plan. Group expressed concerns with rushing to an ordinance without getting the details correct. Minutes for the Climate and Energy Action Plan ad hoc Committee May 18,2016 Page 4 of 4 8. Geos Project Update Koopman stated that Geos is moving forward with their polling project. They have incorporated the comments from the committee and will be doing a test run of the poll next week. Geos is also doing five vulnerability meetings with local community leaders. They are hoping to schedule most of these meetings in early June. Rosenthal departed the meeting at 7:21 p.m. Koopman stated that the vulnerability assessment information will be used in the group's process, mostly during the development of adaptation strategies. Hopefully the information gathered will make the adaptation strategies more robust. 9. Next Meeting Hanks stated that there have been some adjustments to the meeting schedule (shown in packet) to reflect a better connection between the projects such as the open houses and other group activities. The next full-committee meeting is June 15, 2016 at 5:30 p.m., though members are encouraged to attend the city staff and committee member workshop on May 251h at 2:00 p.m. 10. Adjournment Meeting adjourned at 7:28 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Diana Shiplet, Executive Assistant AC',O%EA1"` � �� After A��~��i I�ev,iewl � ��-�- �=��° � � � � � 0 �� =�0�� N (AA1�� N� I� ��N ~ Meet'i" I"IIII,ig �� N�� results)� ��N ~� ��_ ~� � \� ~= �� I 'li ["i �� J9),, ~�� N �� u ri�� What went well in the meeting and why? w There was a great turnout as far as the number of people and how engaged they were in the issue. The meeting went smoothly and was well staffed and the booths were easy to navigate and there were lots of people to answer questions and got information. The city staff and council attendance was impressive and reflected the importance of the issue. Specifically, Adam Hanks and Diana Ship|et should be commended for their organization and logistical preparation - it was due to o lot of work on their end that things went so smoothly. 6/6/2O161O:27AM View respondent's answers w Nice turn out. 6/a/2O1812:23PM View respondent's answers w The event was well-promoted and generated an excellent turnout. The robust attendance appeared to produce the intended outcome: lots of citizen feedback. s/5/2O168:28AM View respondent's answers w There was good turn out from the public and the stations provided e convenient vvey to supply information and receive feedback/input from the public without causing too much of e cluster. 8/1/2O1611:m7AM View respondent's answers w Introductions and talks by the Mayor. Rich Roaentha|, Adam Hanks. 8/1/2010 10:47AM view respondent's answers w Sorry, but could not attend. Hovvavar, from my read of the local press and comments from otheno, it eppaona to have been e successful event. 0V1/2016 7:41 AM View respondent's answers w The layout with the placement of the vvG|Co0e table-was inviting the p|@Oe[DeDt of the tables: seemed crowded togothor, space for folks to gather would have been better to have more space from one table and easel to another. Demonstrated waste reduction with reusable p|ohoo/oupa. The main speaker from the consultant company was not dynamic-no enthusiasm, too long and technical. The room temperature was about right--usually too cold. Asking for help putting evvey chairs was good. Introduction of the ceep committee good. appreciated the oitv'a outreach-in news services etc... 8/1/oO167:3QAM View respondent's answers w /\ lot of people enthusiastically showed up. They were interested in learning about the science of climate change, the projected effects on Ashland and the surrounding area, and in visioning on Ashland's future. 5/31/2O1G11:OuPM View respondent's answers What would VOU suggest for areas Of improvement in future public meetings, and why? w The feedback that | have heard from folks that came included: 1) It was really exciting to see so many people there engaged in the plan and they felt like the event had great energy. 2\ People liked the booths, and liked that way of ongaging, others also felt like a more traditional public forum would have been good vvhena people could have heard each others nornrnenbs, and brought up ideas publicly. It would be good to have more opportunity for people to speak and be heard. 3) Some people were hoping for more details regarding what options the city is considering for the plan so that they could respond directly to actual programs/policies/and plans as opposed to just general ideas. 4) The science presentation was hard to follow and hard to understand how the findings actually related to our community. The style of presentation was extremely dry. More of a story telling style with important take home messages would be more effective, especially if given by a dynamic speaker who is trusted by the community. 5) It seemed like a lot of the usual suspects in attendance. - it would be great to see more effort in getting other community members to engage in different ways. 6/6/2016 10:27 AM View respondent's answers • We needed to give the public 3 choices of goals, and let them vote on them. Also, the issue was not properly framed globally in terms of what is needed to avoid a 2 degree C increase, why that 2 degree limit is chosen by all countries in Paris, and why they are even hoping to strive for 1.5 degrees. 6/5/2016 12:23 PM View respondent's answers • The PA system at the Armory was inadequate for the crowd assembled; there needed to be a dynamic MC to introduce speakers and to convey process context. 6/5/2016 9:28 AM View respondent's answers • The presentation was very boring and dry. I would suggest having different presenters and maybe being more mindful about what information is important to present and what can be discussed on a smaller scale with expert groups. I would also suggest having an opportunity for an open forum Q&A. People didn't really have an opportunity to ask questions, other than at the stations, but it probably would have been beneficial to have open Q&A. • 6/1/2016 11:57 AM View respondent's answers • Have some time, 30-45 minutes for open forum with perhaps a panel of Ad-Hoc members and the audience having a discussion. 6/1/2016 10:47 AM View respondent's answers • Try to reach out to other constituents. Events and topics such as this have a tendency to bring out the same people. Need to figure out a way to engage others. 6/1/2016 7:41 AM View respondent's answers • some education on how to access city website and how to navigate-this is not easy put address on big screens while folks are milling around. a new flyer will have to be developed eliminating the first date with reason for having the Sept meeting clear. There were few Council members present-they need to show up.. Representatives from commissions should be evident. 6/1/2016 7:39 AM View respondent's answers • The stations were good. It would be better to have station facilitators in front of the tables interacting with the public. This way they"feel" our commitment. The speakers for the presentations were not inspiring. Lots of data was presented but in a dry and unappealing manner. Passionate speakers make for engaged audiences. We definitely need to change how speakers engage with the public at future events. Design future meetings that engage the audience in active Q&A during or after each speaker. People feel heard this way. 5/31/2016 11:02 PM View respondent's answers General Comments • There seems to be a lack of understanding about how the science feeds into the planning process in general, and the public outreach more specifically. Presenting the science in a really engaging and educational manner is a fantastic tool for community engagement. Yet communication of the science needs to come from trusted and dynamic experts, it needs to come in forms that are easy to understand and that tell a story (such as online short illustrated videos or a short handout with take home messages), and it needs to be clear how the science leads the decision making process (a science-based plan). Also, some of the science was presented in a misleading manner(specifically wildfire)that could affect decision making regarding that topic. The science presentation at the public workshop caused me to tune out and disengage rather than want to learn more. At the workshop with the city, the science was again cast aside, rather than explored and discussed so that everyone is on the same page as to what the science is telling us and what it is not telling us. This can create confusion later, as different people will be recommending different strategies based on their very different understanding of what climate change really means for Ashland. Having Mark Yaconelli, Jeff Golden, or another beloved Ashland leader address the topic and act as the MC can really change the dynamics of the meeting. Plus, it is worth including art, music, and/or something out of the ordinary to keep peoples' attention and make it more fun. 6/6/2016 10:27 AM View respondent's answers • The committee needs to have a speaker at the next meeting with key talking points agreed to by the group. 6/5/2016 12:23 PM View respondent's answers • Open House No. 2 should be held at a different venue with more comfortable seating and a more audible PA system, such as the Rogue River Room at SOU. The most dynamic speakers on the committee should be utilized to explain key information to attendees. 6/5/2016 9:28 AM View respondent's answers • Many people at the event mentioned how boring and dry the presentation was. 6/1/2016 11:57 AM View respondent's answers 1 have spoken with many people who simply could not make it to the 1st public forum. They are very interested in having an opportunity to review material and give their input,just as those who were at the event had an opportunity to do so. After each open house we should post a replica of what went on at each open house for a period of time after the public event (including video and ppts of speakers). A website should contain all of the material and a link to a survey for each of the questions brought before the public during the open house and allow others who were unable to attend the meeting to give their input as well. 2) Speakers at the public meetings should have a more dynamic interaction with the audience. Some speakers at the first public meeting presented data in a very dry and possibly overwhelming way. We need lively, engaging speakers when presenting material and data. 6/1/2016 10:50 AM View respondent's answers • Need to have some time to discuss "The Vision". Not just go over projected temps and data. Get people involved with sharing specific ideas, or present specific ideas and see how the community reacts. 6/1/2016 10:47 AM View respondent's answers • Potential strategies: this is going to be a selling event to get folks on board...really important to point out the benefits of potential strategies...what is in it for'me' 6/1/2016 7:39 AM View respondent's answers 1 appreciate the intent of the contractor and the city staff in making this a great event. Kudos to both. And, we have an opportunity to improve public engagement and passionate involvement in our next two public meetings. Additionally, We should take advantage of an electronic media opportunity for further and new public involvement. A poll like this one with the same questions posed as at the event would expand our reach to the public for critical input. Creating a new poll and sending out an invite to all of the mailing lists, and referenced in other ways, is warranted. 5/31/2016 11:02 PM View respondent's answers c ~�� Vi�sibir'i� �� Goall Settiiing�� Arne 15, 2016 �� The vision and goals are preliminary and will be communicated to City Council and the public as the plan development process moves forward. The vision and goals will be the basis by which the plan elements are constructed. Through the plan development process, the goals and targets are subject to revision by the committee as the CEAP is further defined ��CE)d i i ire The committee will attempt to reach consensus on all decisions and recommendations. If consensus cannot be reeohod, decision-making will occur using the motion/second and committee member voting on each component. Caiimirriittee [""Roles aind 1. Members accept the responsibility to oorno to meetings prepared for the discussion. Members will work between meetings to educate themselves on issues. 2. Members will recognize the legitimacy of the concerns and interests of others, whether or not they are in agreement with them. yWeDlbenQ will participate in the spirit of giving the same priority to solving the problems of others as they do to solving their own problems. 3. Members will share discussion time and encourage everyone to participate fully. yW8DlbBnS will attempt to present their views in 8 succinct 08DDer and will cooperate with the facilitator to ensure that everyone is given equitable time to state their views. 4. Members will never interrupt another and will listen respectfully to others, even VVhi|B disagreeing. Only One person will speak at 8 time. Members will not participate in Side conversations. 5. Members will look for common ground and 8R38s of agreement 88 the foundation for building consensus recommendations. Members will communicate their concarno, needs, and diverse opinions but will not give ultimatums. 6. After the meeting, be respectful of the deCiSiOD~n0@kiDg pnOC8SS and other COn00Oitt8G members even if you may not completely agree with the outcome(s) l 1 IIIIs IIIbIIII' Discuss and approve the following vision statement: Ashland leads on climate action to foster a resource-efficient, diverse, and prosperous community with secure and sustainable access to clean air, water, food, and green spaces for future generations. p Iir IIII IIIrri IIII IIrii a.r" a Using the breakdown of questions provided below, discuss and vote on your preference for Ashland's long-term community emissions reduction goal. 1. Which type of inventory would you like to include in Ashland's emission reduction goal? a. Sector-based emissions b. Consumption-based emissions 2. Do you think Ashland should include purchasing of offsets as an option to reach its emission reduction goal? a. Yes b. No 3. Do you think Ashland should have a specific goal for reducing emissions from City operations? a. Yes b. No 4. If yes to #3, should the targets be fossil fuel reductions or GHG? a. Fossil Fuel b. GHG c. Both 5. Which year do you think Ashland should use as a base year for its greenhouse gas reduction goal? a. 2011 b. 2015 6. What do you think Ashland's reduction goal for 2050 should be? a. <80% reduction by 2050 b. 80% reduction by 2050 c. 90% reduction by 2050 d. 100% reduction by 2050 (i.e., carbon neutral) e. >100% reduction by 2050 7. Which years should be used for intermediate targets? a. 2018, 2025, 2040 b. 20201 2030, 2030 c. 20221 2028, 2034, 2040 d. 2025, 2035 e. Other combo 2 3 nno� pnnou IIII Illu � ��m� III °,n ° ��°�� m b III Ii lily arl 1. Should plan include recommendation for goals/targets to be adopted by Ordinance? f. Yes g. No 2. If yes, should ordinance match the plan goals/targets or be something different (i.e. absolute vs aspirational) a. Match b. Different 3. If Different, how should the goals/targets in ordinance be structured? nnnnnn°nni ii "l ii nnnnnnnnno � o rn W Goall Set Guide Sector Based vs. Consumption Based Emission Targets (Excerpt from City of Ashland GHG Inventory—February 2016) Ashland's community greenhouse gas (GHG) inventory includes both "sector-based" and "consumption-based" emissions. Sector-based emissions include local emissions from building energy use in residential, commercial and industrial sectors, transportation energy use, methane emissions from solid waste disposal, wastewater treatment, and fugitive leakage of refrigerants from cooling systems. Consumption-based emissions are generated outside the community in order to produce the goods and food consumed by Ashland residents. Together, they make up a community's total emissions. The community has greater control over the sector-based emissions sources, as well as better data, which is why these emissions are typically the primary accounting methodology used to set emissions mitigation goals. While the community does not control the means of production for the majority of goods and food it consumes, there is local control and choice in the quantity of demand; the types of products; and vendors who supply the products. Ashland GHG Emissions, Past and Future • Trends: Total emissions decreased 6% between 2011 and 2015, and sector-based emissions decreased 10%. These decreases are largely attributable to increased renewable electricity on the regional grid, decreased residential electricity use, and decreased natural gas use due to warmer winters. Reductions are greater on a per- capita basis (12% and 8% for sector- and consumption-based, respectively). • Composition: Buildings and transportation are the largest contributors to sector-based emissions (contributed 27% and 23% to overall emissions in 2015, respectively), while household goods and food contributed 48% to the overall emissions. City government operations, refrigerant leakage, and solid waste and wastewater contributed a relatively small amount to overall emissions (2% each). • Public perception: Initial public response to the GHG inventory reveal a desire to be bold, ambitious, and show leadership in setting goals and actions and motivating the community. There is also an emphasis on changing personal habits and behaviors, as well as instituting a legally-binding emissions reduction goal. The highest-priority emissions sources are buildings and energy and transportation and land use. 3 • Projections: As shown in Figure 1, preliminary modeling shows that, assuming expected increases in CAFE standards and state renewable portfolio standards, Ashland can expect a 28% reduction in GHG emissions from 2015 to 2050 under a business as usual scenario. Meeting an 80% reduction by 2050 goal would require an additional 40% reduction in vehicle miles travelled, 40% reduction in building energy use, and 55% reduction in refrigerant leakage and waste emissions, as shown in Figure 2. Figure . Preliminary emissions forecasting for Ashland 0 :1, 75 by203O •m I^N5Jil11Il➢llW UINl161(WtlIuiVIVNI�w nNWf 44N11'Sdiil�m9Nlll UNI@I(f 1py.GWI UIVIVNifi6pip 3 �,� A ��. 5��11�rNVI�YIu 141�",4lf PupAN�f N9lVififllw!yp�liGfiwII1UI1.VfW@;��IfIw19WIiWUIW.piNNN114u4dVW w�i)gIVNiGwglllUNifiIIiIVNNJU N91VIflliip�9llNlil9ilpWWlilfiu.p��rypflfililVlNIViIWiw�iP,y�1�11�41ll1NNBIlii "q 150 � ., i�m��4ti�1S1 rm reduction WI+^^ ��p�` ry�^^hq^1II n,d' ��p�0 ��4�nNnwril7p��. �u�ouaoiuuu,�wowmNnin�uwNur�airvioiim�imuo�o�aa�i.rwirum�mmrai- ooioioioioioioioioioioioioioioioioioioioioioioioioioioioioioioioioioui��m�o q�imummoioi "e '°`"`''"` n'""�" ^m10�M •M« on�iwwmu�wmuwwu�muwuawwu�manuuwwwu�muwum ,�� u�"iwwitmuunmonuu�aomi mnmoirt�uoumw�ijIIIIIIINNp.�m nnaoowum��y�mR 1AulYINMl�tlflll�' q� F by 20SO immmmmmmmmui�iwmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmu �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIVIVIVUIOIOII q Y 154 ... 1,0 0 126 LLJ / i f f / r � r / r r i i r.l /i r 0 CAFE, Figure m Preliminary wedge analysisfor Ashland 0 180 H�ufdrrrrrJt,uriurU�r ,1J9Aireugy7 rj ,r Reniewable Portfolio 5tandlard 1,60 ., riifli�r�r 140 r i/f y r / r r i A„A ,rrrrrr/ Standard p,��ryI (� rrrriiii /////// CIS' 4FE rlr V 0.�N /rrrr///// rrrrrrrrrr yI'�y J;�iiriiiirriiiiiiiiriiiirirri/ ///////%//)lfT r 7 0%Renewable F u 1..:,III s, ii r, ;rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr,,rrrrrrrrrr,,rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr 40�.��'IM T F�ed u t i�rl n �n.0 r� r rrrrrrr, /rrrrrrrrrrrrrrr/�/��y;;rrrrrr, jp rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrrrrrr r��„rrirrriirriiirrr%////////////////////� irrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrrrrrr;,;;,/rrrrr� ,,rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr 401%Redaction in, //rrrrrrr/ ,,rrrrrrr Building Energy U s e r rrvi 55�,�Reduction in ,n 80%reductii,un bar� � Refrigerant Leakage LU cc () &Waste E rn i s s i o n Q9 ��ppqq IIdIgq�pp IIII IIdIgp�pq IIygp IIdIgp�pq Ap y�I��q(IIygp Ap y�I"mII^� yq Ap y�I q/ryy q�^y�I ryy�q�qp Iry{^� ryy�q�qp 21,WX��A 1,5 I WX A M��I..'0 u�WX A M I..�� '�'Y':.✓3'0 �'0 x�.A'5 1"Y:.✓""'R�0 iG��4��W'4 5 iG��4��W'50 Other Jurisdictions ICLEI and WWF's 2015 Measuring Up 2015 report summarizes greenhouse gas reduction targets set by 132 local governments for their communities. The report revealed the following trends: • 25% of examined communities set 80% or greater by 2050 or earlier (largely from IPCC recommendation). • 46% set target equal or greater than US target of 26-28% below 2005 levels by 2025. 4 • 3% of examined communities (n=4) set a 100% or net zero emissions target. • Those communities with 5-year targets range from 4-25% reductions. • Those communities with 2030 targets range from 35% to 50% reductions. • Those communities with 2050 targets range from 50% to 100% reductions (80% is by far most common) Emissions targets for other Oregon jurisdictions are summarized below: City of Eugene • Reduce community-wide greenhouse gas emissions 10% below 1990 levels by 2020 and 75% by 2050 • Reduce community-wide fossil fuel use 50% below 2005 levels by 2030 City of Corvallis • Reduce overall community fossil fuel use 30% below 2012 levels by 2020 • Reduce overall community fossil fuel use 55% below 2012 levels by 2030 • Reduce overall community fossil fuel use 85% below 2012 levels by 2050 State of Oregon (House Bill 3543) • Reduce greenhouse gas emissions 10% below 1990 levels by 2020 • Reduce greenhouse gas emissions 75% below 1990 levels by 2050 • Targets derived from IPCC recommendations at the time City of Portland/Multnomah County • Reduce local carbon emissions 40% from 1990 levels by 2030 • Reduce local carbon emissions 80% from 1990 levels by 2050 5 (3) 0 O O 4-0 O N U � -C O p ° 4-0 to N .° a)p cn 0- m 0 -t %-...Io 0E N > U O O Nch U O p •— O + U 4-0 '— _ N O N >� cn4-a O cn O � a U E � MCM 0 m � L o o � � � .( � 0 � 0 0 m a) cn U O U }' O O ff" -0 0)Z, = N p N O U >1 O N O O OD a) O> U) a) }, — � � O 0 O0 E a)> -_0 4-1 N cn N > p CD L N0)4-, -0 a) 'F >,a) -iF.2: 0) a) G N U � O N > C� 'a) N = L L 4-0a) N L " 4-0 U �, Q V N p L CL� 0 0 =3 " pocn op o a) o � ° DLm0 W .- — -0 u) 0 M o 0 W " 0 a) 0 ° mo o ° m ° op - 0 0 0 0 O :•� O m O Co O •— O o N o o m 0 O U N alp ZJU m � C) -0Z (n U UU Z � U2 � �� U ca � � �plllollllllllllulp qq uuuu L) L) a) }' •(n a) O ° m L a) a) N cn j . >' p > O E4-0 O '� p L m w a) m — .�4-0 O N — cn0 m p L }, 0 > L — cn ALE � 00CM 0 � o o � c� 0 0 0 0 Cl O N +- —0 O O ._ O w cn � cn � Q N �— '� � � � � > v cn a� c� a� j j U ° L �m o •— (m U N to -Ne O (n O p M p .p U N I IIIIIIII �pl In CD 0 O O m CIO c •U) "III IIIIIIII U) � IIIIIIIII �'� c� � N � Alp IIII ' � a) _0 p IIII UIII IIIII . p0�1lll O IIII I p I ' � U U m Q Q� i�lllll III � � � � � IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII � � ._ ._ ��I IIIIIIII�� 4-0N 4-0 a) �-j ° cn cn 4) -0 O 0 _0 O Illllllp pll^IIII` }, � A :3 C: ` All' O E � V O o O �``�pllllll IIIIIIII �uuSU� (f� U a) O 0 Q I �--+ +-+ to 0 to 0 4-0O o oC: U O U V V co Q O m m 'E to O 0 � c E 0 — O E O OtnO � � • o 'FJ % O � a) c � •V � o U oCU Z3 � > a) U) cu O � oa) 0 �� ' E o}' } o�' O >,> N cuQ Ca coCa 0 > — � O �O O OO � N �cu O � � cnC: >% 4-j 0O U O O 0 N 0 + 4-j -0CU -0 _0 Q N U _0 4-0N4-1 a) -C 0 cu CU cu CU O O -Fu 0L O cu a) •- > Q to N N O N 'U) m 0 U >1 !E U 'U N O �N N N '� a) N }, >, O >, 0 L L }, cn }, Q cu cn co U cu U Q O 0 Q Q cu '� 0 Z � U) M Cl) 2t. 2! Z a) —i ZD N N N N O to cn O C:: co: � tin --� � O tci � � o -� o 0 0 � a� O o '� O 0 4-j -0 -0 -0 -0 cu -r— ca a� U N � O _ UN 0 N � cu _0 }' , Q — o 0) CU E 00 0 .� U) U > O to _0 cu C: 00 0 O Ocm c6 c6 }, a) ^}, to N }, - O cn 0 -0 }V—, 4-j N >, O too U 0 r L cn � >, O � � }, •(n }, •cn N N O O (� O •O Ca N N N N Ca — � cu CU N to �� +� U U >> L 0 0 U a) F +� c� O N m O N to l .L 1 '(ncu CD ^ S U N '� o N 0E 0) O +� +—� Ec cu E O O O > cu N 0 X (UO 'i M 0 U M O O U O � o r- " a) N � 2ca w -0U -00 a) U � -0 ()� E "o25o 2 =3o c� 0-1 o. o. muuoouuui 1u^lumio1, {u V♦(a L r 0 � O uuIlk O O o 11111101111LO IC)m N N N � coo coo � n IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�I�� .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ........ ul 0 73 m„1-j Kai gi 0 . CCL IIIIIIIIIIVIn" cc:Ip�o��oip �� I' IIIIIIIIIIIIIIV" ai n "%m� au &dam m m ,,,,,,,, cm va co Woo lu 3ra 0 moon 0 Gi �Illllllll p ... w„ III...... cc 0 a) Wo v c: EE m w,,,,,� CCU ,,, ,,,3m CZ m„ :1 LJ ..I w ................... ...... „ .............. �IIIIIIIIIIII mm ii 0— Mmfl- fl- fl- ,,,,,. m ,,,,,, Cam u CL LID I� oi�ulluil Gi 00 14 C�,4 ou E: Im ZFM MII. kc) EE C� ,,, 2 2 y `i,...,uuul 11 TA n I luuull� m louuu Il10�n"lip° u�lnnni�uuu u� lUuuuuoo ,mioouuu n II Uuuul Vol 0110 EE II 2.L= III III p��I 2 nnlll I��nlllllnn � flu ��s �„�» oIDmml W e 3: �,,,rere iluwll s x mEl- U a- II,,,N,,j II..i I LLJ W LLJ LLJ ll s® ..., .........;