HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021.01.14 Climate Policy Minutes Minutes for the Climate Policy Commission
January 14, 2021
Page 1 of 6
MINUTES FOR THE CLIMATE POLICY COMMISSION
Thursday, January 14, 2021; Held Electronically
1.Call to Order (meeting starts at approximately 00:03 on the video)
The meeting was called to order at 4 p.m. by Chair Rick Barth. Commissioners Chris Brown,
Bob Kaplan, Ray Mallette, Gary Shaff, Jeff Wyatt, Council liaison Tonya Graham and staff
members Stu Green and Bridgette Bottinelli were present. Commissioner Julian Bell arrived
shortly after the meeting started.
2.Consent Agenda
2.1. December 10, 2020 Minutes (00:13)
Shaff stated that under the Other Annoucements from Commissioners section "equitable
communications rule" needed to be changed to "equitable communities rule". Shaff/Mallette
moved/seconded to approve the minutes as amended. Further discussion: none. Ayes: Barth,
Brown, Graham, Kaplan, Mallette, Shaff, Wyatt. Nays: none; motion passed unanimously.
3.Announcements
3.1. Next Meeting: February 11, 2021
3.2. Staff Update (1:46)
Julian Bell arrived at 4:03 p.m.
Green and Bottinelli gave an update on the following items:
• The new Climate and Energy Action Plan (LEAP) website;
• The Adopt Your Home Campaign focusing on renewable energy, responsible
consumption, switching from fossil fuels, and preparedness;
• Zero emission vehicle incentives and outreach;
• Progress indicators and CEAP update planning; and
• Reach building code.
3.3. Other Announcements from Commissioners (6:19)
Barth stated that after the last meeting he met with one of the members of the Conservation and
Climate Outreach Commission (CCOC). Four suggestions for interaction between the
Commissioners are: Chairs and Vice Chairs meet regularly to discuss project overlaps,
appointing one member to reach out to the other Commission on specific projects, utilize the
Reports from Representatives of Other Commissions agenda item to give updates, and
participate as citizens on other Commissions projects. Mallette asked about having another
joint meeting with CCOC and Barth stated that he would like the Chairs to meet first. Kaplan
asked if the Chairs were able to meet regularly and Barth said that there have been other
pressing issues that have prevented this.
3.4. Reports from Representatives of Other Commissions (9:03)
Mark Brouillard from the Transportation Commission spoke on behalf of Chair Linda Peterson-
Adams who wanted to encourage the Climate Policy Commission (CPC) to support the work
group's recommendations to reduce maximum speeds. Having three of the cities Commissions,
Transportation, Climate, and Conservation, united in their support to clearly demonstrate to the
Council the importance of quickly moving forward and thus achieving in the short term the many
benefits of reduced maximum speeds. This will be discussed later on agenda item 5.4.
Minutes for the Climate Policy Commission
January 14, 2021
Page 2 of 6
4.Public Forum (10:04)
Two items were submitted as written testimony from Lorrie Kaplan with Southern Oregon
Climate Action Now(SOCAN) Ashland Climate Action Project and Harlan Bittner the president
of Siskiyou Velo Bicycle Club (see attached). In addition, Barth acknowledged the Commission
previously received an email sent in December from Sue Lundquist to Mayor Stromberg and an
email from Taffy Clarke Pelton regarding leaf blowers.
Wyatt asked if he should reach out to SOCAN directly regarding the development of a new
community survey. Louie Kaplan stated that SOCAN plans on the survey to be a community
effort and welcomes volunteers for their expert panel. Mallette asked if the Commission and City
should take a formal position on safe cities and reducing fossil fuels. Barth said if there is interest
to add these items to a future agenda let him know.
5.Old Business
5.1. Action Items Volunteer (13:54)
Kaplan volunteered to take the action items for this month and Wyatt volunteered for next
month.
52. Commissioner Recruitment (14:50)
One voting position is open. Graham mentioned that there might be an applicant from December
and she will follow up on the status.
5.3. Comprehensive, Master, Capital Planning (16:00)
Mallette announced the plans close to Council adoption: Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
scheduled from March 2, Talent Ashland Phoenix (TAP) Interne Master Plan scheduled for
March 16, Stormwater Master Plan scheduled for April 6. The Electric Master Plan is still in
progress. Mallette is waiting to hear from Michael Black, Ashland Parks and Recreation(APRC)
Director on a date to discuss the Daniel Meyer Pool. Mallette also asked if he should add the
Economic Development Strategy to the tracking list and Barth agreed.
5.4. Light Weight Vehicles -Reducing Maximum Speed (20:48)
The 20's Plenty group members Gary Shaff, Mark Brouillard, and Bryan Sohl gave a
presentation on the benefits of lower maximum speeds report (see attached).
Discussion included:
• If fuel saving from five percent reduction in vehicles per mile travel was a result of
people switching from automobiles to walking or biking. Also if the five percent is from
implementing more than just new speed limit signs. Shaff stated that enforcement,
education, and lowering of the speed will need to be enacted in order to see results.
• The need for education and increased enforcement so that people will follow the new
speed limit.
• How the new speed limit would be rolled out, starting with residential and then petition to
have arterial streets (that are not state highways) changed later. Some streets can already
be turned into bike lanes like "B" street which would reduce the speed limit to 20 mph.
• Whether there is data on how reducing speed limits affects those who ride electric bikes
and other small motorized vehicles.
• If speed bumps and other traffic calming measures would be used to help implement the
new speed limit. Brouillard stated that speed bumps have been studied and they do not
Minutes for the Climate Policy Commission
January 14, 2021
Page 3 of 6
help reduce CO2 emissions or noise pollution; therefore will not be recommended in this
proposal.
• If more initiatives like painted crosswalks at more intersections, additional bike lanes,
and roundabouts could be implemented. Shaff stated that those items could be a part of
the upcoming Transportation System Plan.
• What the timeline for implementing new signs, enforcement, and education would be?
Shaff stated the timeframe would depend on the Transportation Commission working
with the Public Works Department once endorsed by City Council.
• What experiences other communities who implemented the reduced speed were? Shaff
stated that in Portland the increase in bicycle use happened within the same year the
reduction in speed occurred.
• If discussions with the Police and Fire Departments have been made regarding the
proposal. Brouillard stated that Transportation has been speaking with the Police
Department. The main speed enforcement officer stated that there would not be a
problem implementing a lower speed in residential areas, but issues with traffic could
occur on main streets like Siskiyou Boulevard and County roads.
Bell/Kaplan moved/seconded to direct the Public Works Department to pursue reducing
maximum speeds within the City to the maximum extent allowed by Oregon Revised Statute
810.180 with the idea that we will be aiming for 20 mph throughout the city. Further discussion:
Mallette amended the motion to be the same as the first recommendation to Council bullet listed
on the agenda: motion to recommend to the Council to direct the Public Works Department to
pursue reducing maximum speeds within the City to the maximum extent allowed by Oregon
Revised Statute 810.180. The amendment was considered and a vote was taken with all in favor;
amendment to original motion passed unanimously. With no further discussion, a vote was taken
on the newly amended motion. Ayes: Bell, Brown, Graham, Kaplan, Mallette, Shaff, and Wyatt.
Nays: Barth. Motion passed.
The second half of this item to "Request that the Southern Oregon legislative delegation ensure
that Ashland is included among the jurisdictions which would be empowered, as Portland
currently is, to set speed limits on roadways under the City's jurisdiction pursuant to a
reintroduced HB 4103 (2020 legislative number)" will be discussed at the February meeting.
5.5. Carbon Note (1:06:45)
Shaff would like to work with staff on implementing the carbon note rather than making a
request to Council. He initially asked if Adam Hanks, City Manager Pro Tem, could give a
progress report to the Commission every three months. Green suggested that Graham could
give a report instead and Graham agreed due to the lack of staff time. Shaff volunteered to track
this item and check in with Hanks and Green as needed. Barth mentioned that this was also to
be in the memo to Council along with budget recommendations. Green stated that he has been
working with Hanks on budget recommendations, but that they do not need to go to Council
before the budget process.
6.New Business
6.1. CEAP Update (1:13:27)
Barth explained the three possible approaches for the update: 1) have a climate plan technical
document as part of the Comprehensive Plan Element 11 Energy/Air/Water, 2) modify the
original CEAP document 3) rewrite and replace CEAP.
Minutes for the Climate Policy Commission
January 14, 2021
Page 4 of 6
Discussion included:
• Leaving CEAP as is and focusing on incorporating the document or a CEAP
implementation document into the Comprehensive Plan starting with Element 11
Energy/Air/Water
Graham stated that the Community Development Department did not have a schedule to update
the Comprehensive Plan. Barth clarified that Bill Molnar, Community Development Director,
committed Planning staff to help facilitate an update to Element 11 once the Electric Utility
Master Plan was created. Shaff wanted to ensure that both would be integrated into Element 11
instead of being attached as reference documents. Green reminded the group that the Planning
Division would help facilitate the Element 11 update, but most of the content would need to be
provided by himself and the Commission.
• Having the CEAP update and the integration into the Comprehensive Plan be separate
projects.
Graham wanted to have the implementation plan update to CEAP different from including CEAP
into the Comprehensive Plan. Shaff agreed with Graham that the two items should be separate
projects while also making LEAP more action oriented with an update.
Mallette expressed interest in adjusting some goals in LEAP especially ones that pertained to
carbon. Green stated that the existing CEAP would not need to have long term goals modified.
Instead creating a short term implementation technical document could be beneficial and
included in the Comprehensive Plan as an addendum. Shaff also wanted to see more measurable
and explicit items in LEAP as the current document is focused on aspirational and broad goals.
• Creating community engagement plans for the update.
Graham asked what the plans for community engagement would be and if feedback from the
public was considered. Barth stated that the work plan has a communication section that will
need to be addressed later on. Bell mentioned that he had content for the natural gas
measurement section. Barth asked Bell to review the content and resend to him.
With general agreement that the CEAP update outline worked, Barth asked if the authors he
assigned on the outline were correct. Barth also asked that a one page paper be written up on
each section to be included in the next meeting's packet. Kaplan asked for clarification on what
should be included in the one page. Barth wanted each authors interpretation of what their
section meant. Green added the one page should also identify near term actions. Mallette asked
for clarification on the timeline in the outline. Barth said that at each of the four dates listed there
should be a description of progress made or should be made. The Commissioners agreed to their
portions of the outline and Barth was open to serving as the editor.
Shaff asked if there was a template for the one page. Barth stated that he would make the
template to send to everyone. Shaff and Mallette wanted to be involved in the goals section of
the outline. Barth agreed to have them join him and Green on the goals section. Shaff asked if
there was an updated inventory for LEAP. Green stated not right away as there has not been
much change year after year. Barth expressed interest in measuring items locally for the
inventory. Shaff wanted to make sure the work done in the watershed was included in the new
inventory.
Minutes for the Climate Policy Commission
January 14, 2021
Page 5 of 6
6.2. Energy Retrofit Loan Program(1:51:45)
Kaplan explained that he, Graham, Green, and Bottinelli have been working on possible loan
options for the program. The options include:
• Focusing more on electrification while continuing to support building envelope
improvements;
• Increasing the current loan amount to $15,000 over ten years with a five percent interest
and allowing for the current loan amount of$7,500 over five years to have a three
percent interest amount (currently the loans have zero interest);
• Allowing low income households to take advantage of both the low interest loans and
the cash rebates;
• Doubling the loan amount for the next biennium to $320,000 and adding $100,000 from
the clean fuel credits totaling $420,000 for the next biennium or $210,000 for each year;
and
• Allowing for the City to offer loan participations to investors so that the City can reloan
the money in a shorter period of time while still providing on bill financing to those who
originally took out the loan.
Discussion and suggestions included:
• Defaults on the current loan program—there had been two defaults in the past that
occurred during the housing crisis; one has been resolved and one was partially forgiven.
The City would be able to put a note on the house deed and can pursue repayment if the
homeowner cannot pay the loan back.
• Source of increased funding—the funding would come from the Electric Fund. As the
Electric Fund is separate from the General Fund (where budget issues mainly occur) there
is a potential for the increase to be granted. The proposed programs will focus more on
electrification efforts which will increase the revenue of the Electric Utility in the long
run overall helping the fund.
• The program being only used for electrification efforts—Both programs will need to be
reviewed and will probably have more focus on electrification. If the programs were
exclusively for electrification that would eliminate weatherization and other energy
efficiency programs.
• Return on investment calculations— Some have been done, but not all electrification
efforts have a high return. For example, switching to an electric automobile or electric
water heater has a simple payback of three to five years. However, there are equity
concerns with only focusing on projects with a quick payback.
• Rental properties—Currently, owners of rental properties are not allowed to take
advantage of either program. As Commissioners expressed interest in allowing rental
properties to be eligible, the group will discuss this with staff.
The group will take into consideration the suggestions from the Commission, continue to work
with staff, and bring back another proposal in February.
7.Wrap Up
7.1. Topic Tracking and Potential Meeting Schedule (2:21:34)
The following items will be added to the next meeting.
• New CEAP website launch (Green)
Minutes for the Climate Policy Commission
January 14, 2021
Page 6 of 6
• Feedback on Clean Fuels Credit budget appropriation(Green)
• Draft communication to Avista (Mallette and Bell)
• Residential Construction Standards for PV Reservation(Brown)
• Update on Housing Capacity Analysis (Brown)
• Update on Electric Utility Master Plan (Wyatt)
Barth will send out a reminder after the meeting with the deadline when packet materials are due.
Items that were discussed, but will not be on the next agenda include:
• Building Energy Home Scores (Kaplan)
• Municipal Facilities Plan (Kaplan)
• Natural Gas Appliance Phase Out(Barth)
Bell volunteered to help Barth with the Natural Gas Appliance Phase Out. Shaff asked that the
name be changed from phase out to emissions reduction.
7.2. Topic Prioritization
Chair Barth adjourned the meeting at 6:27 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Elizabeth Taylor
J ,
i
January 13, 2021
To: Rick Barth, Climate Policy Commission
Linda Peterson Adams, Transportation Commission
Beca Walker, Conservation and Climate Outreach Commission
From: Harlan Bittner, President, Siskiyou Velo
The Siskiyou Velo bicycle club, incorporated in Ashland and representing 240 members,
urges you to reduce vehicle speeds in the city to enhance bicycle and pedestrian safety.
Siskiyou Velo has long supported policies that make cycling safe for riders of all ages
and abilities. Studies from across the country show that with a safe and convenient
bicycle network, more people will choose to cycle--including currently underrepresented
parts of our community such as people of color, women, children and seniors. More
people cycling results in improved health among our citizens, reduced reliance on
automobiles, cleaner air, increased tourism and a more vibrant economy. The same
benefits also result from a safer and more comfortable pedestrian experience; lower
traffic speeds encourage more people to walk.
There are many ways to increase bicycle safety all need to be considered, including
constructing safe bicycle facilities such as standard, buffered and separated bike lanes
as well as dedicated bicycle paths. However, the least expensive and fastest method to
improve bicycle safety is to reduce vehicle speeds. Both the frequency and severity of
collisions between automobiles and bikes decrease dramatically with reduction of motor
vehicle speeds. Similar findings apply to car/pedestrian collisions.
Siskiyou Velo strongly supports efforts to reduce maximum speeds in Ashland. Lower
speeds contribute to safe and convenient bicycle and pedestrian networks and will
significantly enhance the livability of our cities.
Harlan Bittner, President
Siskiyou Velo
cc: Elizabeth Taylor
Full Name: Lorrie Kaplan
Phone: 240-676-0040
Email: lorrie@socan.eco
Subject: Working together in 2021
Message: The purpose of this communication is to update you on our plans for 2021 and welcome the
opportunity to work together to advance local climate action. In particular,we advise you we will be
conducting another community survey in 2021 in partnership with SOU's Office of Sustainability, and
will be forming an expert panel and sending out an invitation to submit proposed topics and suggestions
in the coming weeks. Our goals for this year are to increase community engagement, and enhance our
survey methodology and its strategic value to Ashland's climate work. Input and representation from the
CPC and the Conservation and Climate Outreach Commissions would be particularly valuable to this
work. Please contact Lorrie Kaplan if you would like to be considered for our expert panel, and keep a
look out for our invitation for survey topics. Thanks!
S;0 C
on-fronting Climate Change
To: City of Ashland Public Commissions
From: SOCAN-Ashland Climate Action Project
Date: ]anuary2O2l
Re: Working Together in2O2l
The Ashland Climate Action Project ofSouthernOregonC|inmateActionNowv is
community-based organization of local residents engaged in advocacy, education, and
community organizing tOsupport the full and timely implementation Of Ashland's Climate and
Energy Action Plan (CEAP) in city operations and in the community at large. As you know, the
plan was approved unanimously bythe City Council in 2Ol7, and city Ordinance 9.4O states that
"'Achievement of the Climate Recovery Goals for city Operations...shall be part ofthe goals for
city Operations."
The climate plan provides important guidance for every sector of our city operations and our
community, including every Ashland public commission. We urge all commission members to
fully acquaint themselves with and embrace the plan, and consider it an essential resource to
guide decision-making. We also urge every commission to schedule periodic discussions
about how best to help achieve the goals of the climate plan within the purview of the
commission. Please let us know if and how we can assist you in this effort.
The purpose of this communication is to update you on our plans for 2021 and welcome the
opportunity to work together to advance local climate action.
First we'd like to highlight some specific projects that might be of most interest to you.
* 2021 Community Survey. You may bG familiar with our Summer 2O2O survey, "Lessons
LearnedfrornRecentCC)V|ORestrictions: |mmaginingtheFutureofAsh|and." Here is a link to
the final re ort on our findin . VVe will be conducting another community survey in2O2lin
partnership with SOU's Office of Sustainability, and will be forming an expert panel and
sending out an invitation to submit proposed topics and suggestions in the coming weeks.
Our goals for this year are to increase community engagement, and enhance our survey
methodology and its strategic value to Ashland's climate work.
* Spotlight in the Ashland Tidings. We now have a biweekly column on local climate action in
the Ashland Tidings called "Spot|ight." Asa sample, check out "
on climate action," from January 4, 2021. If you know of people and programs focused on
riii�ip 1!
)t1i h armail com .
climate that you feel may be newsworthy, contact us at
• Zoom Spotlight Conversations. In 2021, we are hosting a series ot"Zoom Conversations to
spotlight local climate issues and spark ongoing dialogue and community-based action. Our
first program, on Thursday January 14,, 2021, from 7-8pm, is "Spotlight on Local Food: A
Zoom Conversation," focuses on issues and challenges facing local growers and how we can
further strengthen our locally grown food network. Panelists include Elise Higley of Our
I
Family Farms, Lanita Witt and Suzanne Willow of Willow-Witt Ranch, and Alison Hensley
Sexauer of Rogue Valley Food System Network.
• Transit Equity Day,, February 4, has been an annual event since 2018, in commemoration of
the birthday of Rosa Parks. Transit Equity Day connects Ms. Parks' act of resistance with the
rights of all people to high-quality public transportation powered by clean/renewable
energy. We will host a panel program on February 4.
Lastly, we would like to update you on our strategic plan for the year:
• Goal 1: ADVOCACY. We will work with the city to increase climate funding and climate
action progress in Ashland's 2021-2023 biennial budget, city master plans, updates to the
climate plan, and matters coming before the City Council.
• Goal 2: EDUCATION. Through Spotlight in the Ashland Tidings., Zoom Spotlight
Conversations, and a community survey on local climate action and attitudes, we will
provide education and information on local climate issues and opportunities for action.
When appropriate, we will provide education, information, and advocacy to complement
the climate priorities of the city, the Climate Policy Commission, and the Conservation and
Climate Outreach Commission, and others.
• Goal 3: ORGANIZATION. We will support development of local working groups focused on
important local climate issues. We will form an Action Team of those interested in
participating in local climate advocacy opportunities.
Please feel free to contact ACAP Chair Lorrie Kaplan at lorrie@socan.eco or 240-676-0040 to
discuss how we can best work together to achieve the goals for city operations and the
community at large laid out in the Ashland Climate and Energy Action Plan.
J
LLI
LLI
un 0
N
• X Z
LLI
OLIM
Q
o
it Z
O �
J
4==J a
J
4�
a
z
a
z
m LIM
m
L
O
-
O
s
a�
N O
s
V -
� � s
La ZAm
O
� Q
O a,
V - i
V - �
s � �
O > CL
Los - M0 x
CL
O °401
•— _
4mJ 0 V W
>% > 4J
� V m cn c
O m
O
� �
�' V 4�
O
> O O V 4
O
'i
> tw0
cn
a�
V .
0 O
c� � ° ._
•—
E a�
E
a� a, -0 > -0 -
4�
-0 cu w E w
cn w > > a
`l ca V O O O
-0 4� D
CL CL CMM mo
(A0 LM
o E E
._ O
�l
(ArliIIIIIIIIIZ4, c6
C. >
0 w r-I E
> r-I 0
0
m V-1
r-A E 0
v �0 V)
�
4-; Ln
Ln 4-j
m V) C%*4
M u DE
Q) E
E 1111111111110 0 x
u 0
M Ln w
CL
LM
w r*4
CL :0% E
0
E Q)
U cn
M x
v
0
L � M •Lm r.L —
r.L � � Qm E
0 mom% C: (on
� N O ro
O 0 Lr)
ca � � � 0 �
2O N � m ._ N O
r-I N M I1')
V �
4-a
V fa
U -0
0
6� Soo
> 0
m 0
FM > b.0 0
V� .p U
U V
Ln E
70 >%
N
U
Ln C: W
Jc:
V'f Ln � � a)
- Q O
0
0 E
In
� E N o
o -0
0
Lm
� CL M 4-J
m NN °
Vcli
N Jc:
N
O
• U O ca
�, C t�A •—
cn 4� O
4�
E 00 �
O .— > � Ln
+-' X
N .— ca �
U O 4�
cr U ^ >
V Ln
c� � O
N U
4� in•
70
cn O � O i
N � 00 cr
�.,
� 4� +
O `� O CL ca `n t0
V cn U -
L L M E
D M
Ln E E
O 0 ._
'— X 4J X Jc:
I� � 4j Ln p0 E
+
c- 3: Ln
4mlM Jc: ul Ln c Ln
4-j 0
p .— c6 ca O
a� •— a� w cn O
o EN O O
Ul a� O +� �
�
4�
. 0 MO L/) (IJ Lr) +-i
O U � -0 cn
� - -
U C U U O 4J O O
D O O O � U
O �
0 +1
�a� O � +, � �
v
}+ — o o E
ON Q) m : � •—
LLn U U -0 -0 O
O �.. C
O p Jc: Q J c6
• QJ Q Q ca
> Q)V0 � �, 4 4—c6 �
O
m — +j
ca O
ca ca
— v� E '— ca
C:
(A
4- p u 4 �
O v� � p �
o
0 Ln -1-j
cn E U M
m 0 E
c:
N � •— 4�
EO n p p
C� U 2 w Ni ai
•_ O to O
O
4-1
LLI Jc:
N � S
L � L
LM
c m
V (1) �
m Gl
uA 3 a
�a a�
L
IIIII N �
L
t
U
N �
- > O
•v i m
'j M
un
(a Ln
E 4-j
L � � .O N ro
Ln
Nr-I �
• lipLn
Ln
Q1 �>
� O canGE
x 0
O �
0 fB ULI) to
X
C*4 .0 0 >%
�o o Ln E
Ln 4-j
M obn "W E w
of0 N c��a � � o
Ln
E CL 0
.fa c N N �
G0
s via > ft%(1) (1) o
N
401 o r-I
E > 0
C- 0
b�A Q a Jc: E
�
4ma L > O
(A
(1) U
u 4-J
- J
m oo
i �n
mw w (A %n
M a
U m
m =1
LM E
cr
� O qq
j�dnnil'iYfuu� L � 3 1aA i�
��k rid om
Lm
LM
o
E
0 O
fp
GJ
c 3
E �
a,
c
N �
GJ
DC
i W W W W
L L L L
^o
E E E E E
0
0 0 0 0
U U U U U
Ln
low
Vmm
n
r
i
Iu
j
o
u
N LrII )
..........
i
ii
i
a
i i
o
i
o
i
i
i
...................„c
PEA Im pow
CL No
PLO PLO
KJO
0 �I
r Cc
"Novo NN""wool, w, e
"ww ";� amol It "s,
wo w Qj 44mmoopol ;* � �j
Poo
cz cz w M�4 cz ALMA cis
cz
■Pon
mid
PO
tin
Piz
J a--r
4� to C C:
00 Q (1)
Q. . 4 i L
L
� V
E a--� O
0 . . �.j
0) � �
E +-jm C�
O .- D �
FM 4-j X Ul
0
E V)
E C: Ln
t�A O
mmmm•V
1 '- M 70 O
ago a� •—
O
W v
— .-
4� o � �
CU O .�
�■■� 4� txW Q
s . . W > .�
L. 4-j E
V C0
4� Q - >
E > >• ,cn 4� a--j
O O -0 E0 n '-
0 Q U -0 _
0. 4U D 4�
+� O O +�
U E o -
U �
V U 4� L Jc: 4�
J Q 0 •V .0
0 r a--' E
ro4-a Ul
o
s - 3: 4u
O
+, 0 -�-j
O E - •>
4-j
m 3: •- 0 c�
E E X Ul C:
� E —
.—
EO � O 4�
:3
V � �--� —
V in.
� cn
O Jc: � s N
0
V s �
+ Ul - N
U O w %%�
Q V� � �� O M
>` CTO
O - � 4� Q rl
U DC ca cn
O •—
._ 4-j
}' O
V �
a >
V � O
a s E
V � —