HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021.02.24 Conservation Commission Minutes Minutes for the Conservation and Climate Outreach Commission
February 24, 2021
Page 1 of 4
MINUTES FOR THE CONSERVATION AND CLIMATE OUTREACH COMMISSION
Wednesday, February 24, 2021; Held Electronically
1. Call to Order (item starts at 00:06 on the meeting video)
Chair Rebecca Walker called the meeting to order at 3:03 p.m. Commissioners Risa Buck, Larry
Cooper, James McGinnis, Jamie Rosenthal, and Bryan Sohl were present. Council liaison Tonya
Graham and staff members Bridgette Bottinelli and Stu Green were also present. Commissioner
Marni Koopman was absent.
2. Consent Agenda
2.1. January 27, 2021 Meeting Minutes (00:18)
Buck/Cooper moved/seconded to approve the minutes from the January meeting. Further
discussion: none. All ayes; motion passed unanimously.
3. Announcements
3.1. Next Regular Meeting: March 24, 2021
3.2. Other Announcements from Commissioners (1:27)
Buck announced an upcoming electric landscaping equipment demo day at Ashland Hardware.
The exact date is still being decided. Buck asked if there were any Commissioners who would
like to participate in the event. Cooper and Sohl offered to participate along with Buck.
Buck/McGinnis moved and seconded that CCOC (Climate and Conservation Commission
supports the eventual event demo day at the Ashland Hardware store. Further discussion: none.
All ayes; motion passed unanimously.
3.3. Reports from Members of Other Commissions
None
4. Public Forum (10:09)
Walker acknowledged receiving Southern Oregon Climate Action Now's (SOCAN) written
testimony regarding support for reducing the speed limits. Sohl reminded everyone that the
Siskiyou Velo Club also submitted a letter of support for reducing the speed limits before last
meeting.
5. Reports/Presentations
5.1. Council Update (11:00)
Graham announced that the budget process will begin in March and will have to address the
City's financial issues. Cooper encouraged the Council to engage the community with a forum to
determine budget priorities. Council will hold a session reviewing staff work for the next year to
help with budget prioritization. There will be no opportunity for a forum before the session due
to timing, but a possible forum could be held later. Sohl asked if Climate and Energy Action Plan
(LEAP) initiatives for City government would be placed on hold due to lack of funding. Graham
said that staff has worked on including CEAP considerations in many facility decisions and
funding for current conservation programs will be included. New programs will be harder to find
funding for and will most likely not be included. Council is still in support of climate efforts and
chose a more efficient UV system for the Wastewater facility even though the cost was more.
5.2. Staff Update (24:04)
Minutes for the Conservation and Climate Outreach Commission
February 24, 2021
Page 2 of 4
Bottinelli reminded the Commission about the Adapt Your Home campaign listed in the packet.
The new CEAP website will be live next week. Bottinelli announced the Commissioner's who
volunteered to help with the outreach:
• Facebook—Koopman and Rosenthal through Recology
• Nextdoor— Sohl
• Email— Cooper
• Flyers—Rosenthal through Recology, Buck, and Bottinelli
Sohl asked how the information would be sent out by the City. Bottinelli said the content will be
published on Facebook, the CEAP website, and City Source newsletters where appropriate.
Green asked for the Commissioners to act as a multiplier for the content posted and all the
..........................m ormation can e oun at t e new we site,, , I.A.n.-d� ,�
Green mentioned the possibility for a pilot program for small electric engines or landscaping
equipment. Funding for the pilot would be available after July 1 using the clean fuels credits and
anyone interested can help develop the program. There are four new electric vehicle public
chargers at the Grove. The conservation loan program is expanding to include more
electrification efforts. The zero emission vehicle incentives are going well and the equity
component is also working to help achieve social equity. The State Senate committee on energy
and environment will be holding final hearings on the recycling modernization bill tomorrow in
case any Commissioners would like to give testimony.
6. Old Business
6.1. Commission Monthly Column in Sneak Preview (34:14)
The E-Bikes (and E-Cars) for A-Town article was published in February. The Water
Conservation article will be published in March with the Hazardous Waste Event published in
April. Rosenthal asked if there were additional suggested changes to the article other than the
respelling of fluorescent. Buck/McGinnis moved/seconded to approve the hazardous waste
article Jamie wrote for Conservation Corner. Further discussion: none. All ayes; motion passed
unanimously. Walker and Bottinelli will write an article on the Adapt Your Home campaign for
publication in May. Rosenthal suggested to have the Adapt Your Home campaign also listed as
events in the Sneak Preview. Walker will write an article for June on COVID-19 and
sustainability.
6.2. Reduced Maximum Speeds Report (46:35)
Walker introduced the 20's plenty group including Transportation Commission Chair Linda
Peterson-Adams, Transportation Commissioner Mark Brouillard, and Climate Policy
Commissioner Gary Shaff. Brouillard gave a brief overview on the plan on reducing greenhouse
gas emissions and addressed previous concerns from the last meeting.
McGinnis was concerned about public support and wanted to see if public input could be taken
before the proposal moves forward. Brouillard mentioned that a large part of downtown is 20
mph and residential areas are 25 mph so the decrease would not be that large of a change for the
public to adopt. McGinnis stated that the North Main corridor redesign saw many complaints
from the public after completion and did not give the public enough opportunities for input.
Peterson-Adams stated the intent for the 20's plenty proposal is to educate the public on the
benefits of the reduced speeds. Shaff added the Transportation Commission will be the lead and
Minutes for the Conservation and Climate Outreach Commission
February 24, 2021
Page 3 of 4
the responsibility for public input is part of their work plan. Peterson-Adams requested that the
Commission continue their support by helping with outreach.
Sohl asked if the Commission needed to make the second motion listed in the packet. Walker
wanted to move forward with general endorsement similar to the first motion. Buck/Rosenthal
moved/seconded that the CCOC supports 20's plenty. Further discussion: none. All ayes; motion
passed unanimously. Cooper asked if there needed to be a letter drafted to make this official.
Walker said the minutes will reflect the support and if an additional statement is needed the
Commission can do so later. McGinnis commented that next time he would like more time for
further discussion on a motion as he would have voiced his concern. Walker said she would take
that into consideration next time and his concerns were also captured before the motion was
made.
6.3. Update on Different Channels for Articles and Future Outreach (1:05:48)
Walker asked the Commission how to track the projects requested from other Commissions and
community groups. Buck suggested that current work groups or individuals not working on
active projects could be assigned these external projects. Walker agrees since some work needs
to be collaborative and might affect this Commissions time. Walker will compile a list of project
requests the Commission is asked to be involved with for the next meeting to help determine
what is being asked of CCOC.
6.4. CEAP Project Update
• Responsible Consumption and Single Use (1:13:22)
Buck stated that the group has created a table of common single use items with goals, actions,
and prioritizing. The table will be used to educate the public on alternatives for those items and
could be added to the CEAP website for more exposure. There will also be a responsible
consumption webinar on April 29 as part of the Adapt Your Home campaign. Buck, Rosenthal,
and Walker will be panelists for the webinar through their roles outside of the Commission.
McGinnis wanted to acknowledge the group as also being on CCOC and having the commission
support this. The rest of the Commissioners did not object to this.
• Climate Resilience (1:19:3 9)
Sohl stated that the group have been working on CEAP education and outreach to the new City
Council and staff. The group also prepared a document to send to the City Council regarding
CEAP education which will be available for the next meeting for approval. This might be in lieu
of doing a presentation to the whole Council since time is running out.
The group also discussed changing the climate resilience as the group's topic. Koopman told the
group at their last meeting that she wanted to work mostly on resilience but is open to expanding
to mitigation projects if they are resilience related. Sohl wanted to focus on projects from CEAP
and collaborating with CPC. Walker said if the group wants to change the project scope that they
bring back a project proposal to the whole Commission for approval.
Graham suggested that CCOC combine efforts with CPC and the Wildfire Safety Commission
when educating Council since all three groups are working on CEAP. Walker was interested in
CCOC working with the Wildfire Safety Commission on adaptation projects. Graham stated that
the Wildfire Safety Commission has a wildfire preparedness campaign for the Spring. Graham
also suggested reaching out to Councilors individually after sending the document out to help
educate Council.
Minutes for the Conservation and Climate Outreach Commission
February 24, 2021
Page 4 of 4
• Water Use and Conservation (1:39:11)
Cooper thanked Sohl for help with the water conservation article approved at the last meeting.
Cooper was concerned that the water conservation analyst position might not be filled. If the
position was not filled, Cooper stated that CCOC has the potential to help with outreach on water
conservation programs. Cooper also saw a need for both CCOC and CPC to educate Council and
staff about right-sizing future projects and reducing emissions.
6.5. Compost Recommendation Update (1:43:00)
City Manager Pro Tem Adam Hanks responded to Walker regarding the initial email sent out.
There might be a future meeting with City and Recology staff, but nothing has been scheduled
yet.
6.6. Outreach to New City Council (1:43:33)
This item was covered under 6.4. Project Update.
7. New Business (1:43:46)
Walker recapped the new items presented earlier in the meeting. This included the electric
landscaping equipment demo day and how CCOC can support the day. Walker mentioned that
she emailed the City Council regarding the City Manager job description as agreed upon at the
last meeting. Graham responded that the job description does include climate. The job
description has been approved and the recruitment firm has been chosen. Including Climate staff
in the selection process could be determined with the recruiter and Council.
8. Wrap Up (1:47:37)
8.1. Items to be added to future agendas
Sohl asked to have an agenda item on the next meeting for interacting with CPC. Chair Walker
adjourned at 4:55 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Elizabeth Taylor
.............
L t I
�l 1�„J !r � J;`U t �f!r� � �` � � r /li 0 r l�!r ! �IFG� �i,,,
S;0 C
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
d�l 6 er
on-fronting Gima Change
To: Conservation and Climate Outreach Commission (CCOC)
From: SOCAN-Ashland Climate Action Project
Date: February 16, 2021
Re: Urging Commission Endorsement of the 20's Plenty Initiative
The Ashland Climate Action Project of Southern Oregon Climate Action Now (SOCAN-Ashland),
is a community-based organization of local residents engaged in advocacy, education, and
community organizing to support the full and timely implementation of Ashland's Climate and
Energy Action Plan (CEAP) in city operations and in the community at large.
We have reviewed the report, "Evidence Demonstrating the Efficiency, Safety, & Economic
Benefits of Lower Maximum Speed Limits in Ashland, Oregon," presented at the CCOC's
January 2021 meeting. We support the conclusions and recommendations of the report. We
second the statement contained in the written testimony submitted by Siskiyou Velo in support
of this proposal that "Lower speeds contribute to safe and convenient bicycle and pedestrian
networks and will significantly enhance the livability of our cities."
In the Urban Form, Land Use &Transportation focus area of the CEAP, Strategy ULT-2 calls for
us to "make Ashland more bike- and pedestrian-friendly." "On-road transportation generates
nearly one-fifth of Ashland total emissions. It is difficult to substantially improve the fuel
efficiency of existing cars and trucks, so one of the most feasible methods of reducing
emissions is to make other forms of transportation more desirable. A city that supports people
walking and biking not only reduces the need for residents to drive but also offers the public
health co-benefit of encouraging exercise." (p.65)
We understand that both the Climate Policy Commission and the Transportation Commission
have approved the motion to recommend that the City Council direct the Public Works Department
to pursue reducing maximum speeds within the City to the maximum extent allowed by Oregon
Revised Statute 810.180. Both Commissions have also approved a companion motion to "Request
that the Southern Oregon legislative delegation ensure that Ashland is included among the
jurisdictions which would be empowered, as Portland currently is, to set speed limits on roadways
under the City's jurisdiction pursuant to HB 3055 (2021 legislative number)" was approved by the
Transportation Commission and the February Climate Policy Committee meeting.
We have considered the discussion that occurred during the January 2021 CCOC meeting on this topic.
We heard Commissioners express concerns about how this recommendation from the Commissions
would be implemented. Considerations around implementation are outside of the jurisdiction of this
Commission, but rest instead with the City Council.
We believe it is critical that the CCOC join with the climate policy commission and Transportation
Commission in supporting this recommendation to the City Council.
Please contact Lorrie Kaplan, Chair of SOCAN-Ashland Climate Action Project at lorrie@socan.eco or
240-676-0040 for more information.
//
/Ir�lu
Ji,Fi, �1J,�r"�J��l
nn miuu �•,
I�������1o�llil��������11'�`���IVUIu�I�I�I��IIVIVIII�III�IIIIIII������ll�ll�l II�nuMl�lidnVIVIIIIII�IIVIu�uVlVlluomulhl�pouillUl'll�lulllllll F` a �',
uouvuvuuouuinuiououuuuiuiouuu�uoiuiouuuuuiuiuuuouu�IN� oiu 1,^w��
uuuu � 1 ii
��1�iinn000iuuunniuunimouuiuuuuluiiumuw�II�IIuU� gull 4�°°"
filly %/,;1a
iouuuoui��l��
SUSTAINA, 11111111uiou�mnii�� uuuuuuuuu �;irrarrrf r(rrf��rrra %%
AT SOUTHERN O R E O O N UNIVERSITY Confronting Climate Change
Ashland Communit Climate Action2021Surveyy
FEBRUARY 3,2021. The SOU Office of Sst i ili and the-SOCAN-Ashland Climatecti r ct invite
community members to help Ashland reach its climate goals by helping to create the 2021 Ashland Community
Climate Action Survey. The survey will be designed to help us gather community views and increase our
understanding of: 1) how we can work together to take action in the community,2)where to focus on our efforts
and 3) how Ashland can be a leader in climate action. Bringing this information together will help us to effectively
deliver Ashland's climate goals.
Community members are invited to g2plyto serve on the survey Advisoryc or submits s
ics s r rc The project also offers opportunities for volunteers.
Ashland's Climate Goals
The City of Ashland,Oregon,approved a Climate and Energy Action Plan (CEAP)in 2017 establishing goals and
targets to reduce Ashland's emissions of climate pollution and prepare the city for unavoidable impacts.
Attaining the goals and targets requires commitment from the Ashland community and the City government.The
primary community goal of the CEAP is to reduce overall Ashland community greenhouse gas emissions by eight
percent on average every year to 2050.The primary goals for City of Ashland operations are to attain carbon
neutrality by 2030 and reduce fossil fuel consumption by 50%by 2030 and 100%by 2050.
The Ashland Community Climate Action 2021 Survey
SOCAN-Ashland and the SOU Office of Sustainability are partnering to sponsor the Ashland Community Climate
2021 Survey.The overall survey purpose is to continue to build effective,sustained climate action in Ashland.
We are committed to:
• Embracing our responsibility to address climate change with urgency,optimism,and care for all members
of our community, our natural environment,and future generations
• Building momentum for effective community action and results aligned with the Ashland Climate and
Energy Action Plan
• Bringing forth the voices of all members of our community, in all its diversity.Send your survey
5tl 5 t r
• A thoughtful, professional,and transparent process
• Using best practice survey methodologies,engaging expertise and survey technology from SOU
• Learning from other cities, nongovernmental organizations, research/academic institutions and scholarly
publications
Role of the Advisory Panel
The Advisory Panel will be a key resource to guide the project,serving for the duration of the project(through
December 1).There will be active and relatively inactive phases of work for the panel.
The Panel is expected to meet weekly from April 1-May 30 to provide input on the goals,focus,and questions of
the survey,as well as on strategies for community outreach.The expected time commitment during this design
phase is expected to be 1-3 hours per week,with opportunities for greater participation for those who have the
interest and time to contribute.
The other active phase for the Advisory Panel will be in October and November,when the Panel will review survey
results and identify key findings,and advise on how best to disseminate the survey findings for maximum impact.
Members of the community and local organizations can use this annlication to be considered for the Advisory
Panel or to serve as a project volunteer.
Key Dates
March 7: Deadline to propose survey scope (topics)--please use this form
March 7: Deadline to apply for the Community Survey Advisory Panel
August 1-September 15: Data collection phase;survey open to the community
November 15: Publication of survey report
Who We Are
The Ashland Climate Action Project of Southern Oregon Climate Action Now(SOCAN-ACAP) is a community-based
organization providing advocacy,education, and community organizing to support the full and timely
implementation of the CEAP. In 2020,SOCAN-ACAP conducted a community survey entitled, "Lessons Learned
from Recent COVID Restrictions: Imagining the Future of Ashland."Of the 225 survey respondents,61%stated that
they are extremely concerned about climate change,while 29%described themselves as"very"concerned. Nearly
86%have taken action to reduce their own climate impact. Read the full survey_Lqgort.
The SOU Office st i it leads the University's commitment to sustainable practices,environmental
stewardship,and research that advances understanding of local, regional, and global environmental issues.
Through this partnership,SOCAN-Ashland and SOU-Sustainability seek to build on the 2020 survey by expanding
community engagement and response; enhancing the survey design and methodology,and ensuring that the focus
of the survey is on priority information that will help advance achievement of the goals of the CEAP.
All correspondence related to this project should be sent to Lorrie Kaplan, Chair,SOCAN-Ashland Climate Action
Project-lorrie@socan.eco,and Becs Walker,SOU Sustainability and Recycling Manager,walkerr6@sou.edu.