Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/17/1994 NEWS ARTICLELOCAL The Mail Tribune, Friday, Feb. 4, 1994 3A Measure 5's author calls Ashland plan illegal By RUSSELL WORKING of the Mail Tribune The author of Measure 5 says Ashland schools can't legally slip the net of the 1990 tax limitation by financing activities through a city levy. Don McIntire, the owner of a Gresham fitness club and co-author of the Measure 5 property tax limit, said Ashland's pro- posed $970,000 "youth activities levy" violates the law. And it is likely to face a constitutional challenge, he said. "If this measure flies, they're flaunting the intent of the will of the people (of Oregon)," McIntire said. "And second, they're going to get some extra work for their city attorney." But Ashland City Attorney Paul Nolte said the levy request is perfectly legal and would stand up in court. "These are not funds raised exclusively for school purposes," Nolte said. The proposed levy, to be voted on May 17, would raise 98 cents per $1,000 in assessed property valuation. By 1995-96, Measure 5 would cut total school taxes to $5 per $1,000, but local government taxes to $10 per $1,000 assessed value. Because of the higher ceiling, the Ash- land City Council has more flexibility to tax, and has agreed to finance school sports and extra-curricular activities through the levy. A similar city activities levy failed in June 1993, but sponsors say the political climate has changed. McIntire said the levy won't work con- stitutionally. "Ashland, of course, is really out of touch," McIntire said. "It seems to me the city council didn't read the constitution. ... I think any man on the street would tell you that what they are doing is skirting the intent of Measure 5." Medford resident Carl Bartlett, Jack- son County coordinator for the 1990 Measure 5 campaign, echoed McIntire's comments. Bartlett said thq~sports, debate teams, and other programs that would be fi- nanced by the levy request are all educa- tional. Bartlett is impatient with comments by parents and others who have backed the levy, saying Ashland shouldn't have to suffer just because the rest of the state passed Measure 5. Ashland precincts sup- ported a November attempt to pass a state sales tax that would have funded schools. "I just feel like why does Ashland have to pick themselves out among all the school districts there are and say, 'we're special,' you know what I mean? ... I think they should sit down and go by the law of the state." But Nolte said the state Legislature and Attorney General's office have ruled actions like Ashland's to be legal. "The drafters of Ballot Measure 5 didn't define what they meant, and the Legislature has," Nolte said. "That's what we've gone by, is what the Legisla- ture said." The levy will include non-school activ- ities as well, he said. But Bartlett said, "They'll try to tell you it's for the football team and this and that, but it's all education, you know what ! mean?" McIntire said that because some areas of the Ashland School District lie outside city limits, the tax would be unfair. "Well, how are they going to deal with that?" McIntire said. "Now they've got a uniformity issue. Is it possible some peo- ple will be receiving services for which they are not taxed if this passes?" Nolte said such an objection is spe- cious. "Cities forever have constructed facili- ties that non-city people use and pay no fees for: libraries, swimming pools, tennis courts," Nolte said. "People outside cities use city streets. I don't see that as any argument at all unless we want to rein~ vent our system of government." MeIntire said people are spending all their efforts trying to skirt Measure 5. "Ever since the passage of Measure 5, every spare moment has been spent on ways to keep bringing in more revenue, rather than ways to give us adequate gov- ernment and sufficient government with the amount of money that's available," he said.