HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/05/1996 NEWS ARTICLEDon't cast a shadow on recorder's office
In response to the letter in the Ashland Daily
Tidings from Stephen V. Landreth on Sept. 30,
and his concern that the Ashland City
Recorder's office is not fulfilling the responsibil-
ity of conducting fmancial audits: I called Mr.
Landreth directly after reading his letter, as I
was just as concerned as he was that he had
been given incorrect information regarding the
Office of City Recorder.
For a long time, I debated with myself as to
whether or not I should write a letter to the edi-
tor regarding the past discussion on the duties
and responsibilities of the Office of City
Recorder versus the debate on the cost commis-
sion measure. What I felt was important at the
time was to stay on neutral ground so that those
involved would feel comfortable speaking freely
with me. I believe, now, I can continue to stay on
"neutral" ground, but clear up misunderstand-
ings regarding my office.
The city of Ashland charter gives the Office
of City Recorder the power to conduct account.
ing audits -- not operational audits, not full~
scale financial audits, only accounting audits. ff
it were to appear necessary to conduct an
Commentary
Barbara Christensen
accounting audit, my office has and will contin-
ue auditing accounting expenditures and
income.
There seem to be a lot of questions and con-
fusion surrounding the proposed cost commis-
sion, and whether or not it duplicates current
auditing powers of the Office of City Recorder.
In my interpretation of the measure, I agree that
the proposed commission may duplicate duties
and responsibilities, if it is proposed that the
commission perform accounting audits.
In a past article, the Tidings stated incorrect-
ly the responsibilities of my office included call-
ing for financial audits and operational audits of
departments. I believe that the citizen-elected
body of the city council is the only body to have
the power to call for financial or operational
audits. And "operational audits," to me, are
equal to the "Strategic Planning" that depart-
ments are continuing to produce. This is what I
believe the article in the past Tidings meant
when it stated: "She thinks departments con-
duct their own audits." Again, as this was the
last sentence in the article, I believe there was
an abbreviation made in the editing of this arti-
cle, which made my answer look very vague and
rather uninformed.
The Office of City Recorder is very important
to me and to a great number of citizens. Don't let
the debate over hhe proposed measures cast a
shadow on the only city~lected office that is
independent of the city administration and city
council. This office provides valuable informa-
tion and service to our community.
Please, feel free to stop by my office anytime
for conversation, information, or discussion. I
would love to havethe opportunity to share the
accomplishments of my off'me and explain the
duties and responsibilities of the Office of City
Recorder.
I can also be reached through my new home
page on the Internet at BarbaraC.ashland.or.us.
Barbara Christensen is the recorder for the
city of Ashland.
TODAY
Detaiis
Page 8
City Ilot
error can't
fixed
Argument in favor
of cost commission
cites non-existent
panels in two cities
By Damon Fouts ,
A~hland Daily Tidings
An error in the Voter's Pam-
phlet information on Ashland's
city cost commission ballot mea-
sure will have to go out uncorrect-
ed, according to Jackson Cbunty
Clerk Kathy Beckerr.
The error involves ballot mea-
sure 1561. If passed in November,
the measure would create an elect-
ed, five-person commission with
the authority to audit Ashland
city deparhnents. Citizens Right
to Know Committee (CRKC) mem-
ber Joe Eckhardt submitted an ar-
gument in favor of the measure
that implies there are sh'nilar citi-
zen~lected comrrdssions in Port-
land and Palo Alto, Calif.
Officials from both cities stated
that no such commissions exist.
But the deadline for correcting
Eckhardt's argument was Sept. 9,
Beckett said.
A copy ofthe text Eckhardt sub-
mitted states, "Citizen elected
commissions have precedent
throughout the pation including
Portland Metro and Palo Alto.
These commissions save their
cities minions of dollars in taxpay-
ers' money."
"To my knowledge, that's in-
correct," said Palo Alto City Audi-
sible for conducting fmancial and
operational audits of city depart-
menks. There are no elected com-
missions auditing city finances,
he maintained. Operational audits
determine if a depmlment is usin~
resources such as vehicles or oth-
er equipment in a cost~icient
Inanner.
"Where Palo AI~ came ~
I'm riot exactly. sure," said Eck-
hardt~ "We may havenamed the
wrong town."
Eckhardt said his informatio~
ab0Ut Portland came from a col-
unto in the June 3 issue of the Ore-
gonian. But the column actually
refers to city and county auditors
in the Portland area, not citizen-
elected commissions.
' Portland City:Economist Drew
Barden said the only elected city
official.~ that have the authority to
can for financial or operational
audits, or review department bud-
gets, are Portland City Auditor
Barbara Clark and the city council
members. The Ore~onian column
cites Clark as saving Portland
money by performing operational
audits.
Vinson's and Clark's responsi-
bilities are sil~ilar to tho6e of ASh-
land City Recorder Barbara Chris-
tensen, although Christensen and
Clark are elected and Vinson is ap-
pointed.
Christensen her responsibili-
ties include c,2llir~ for financial
and operational audits of depart-
ments, although she said she has
never performed an operational
audit on an Ashland city depart-
ment. She added that she thinks
2.41.100 Recorder Responsibilities. The recorder shall:
A. Adopt rules as necessary to carry out the provisions of sections 2.41.040
to 2.41.090.
B. Prescribe forms for declarations required by section 2.41.050, and furnish
the forms to persons required to file.
C. Investigate when appropriate under the provisions of sections 2.41.040 to
2.41.090.
2.41.110 Publication.
A. The recorder shall:
1. For each candidate and political committee described in section
2.41.050, publish a statement in a newspaper of general
circulation and published in the City, and any other medium the
recorder shall deem appropriate, indicating whether or not the
candidate has agreed to limit expenditures under section 2.41.050.
2. Include the statement described in subsection 1 on the nominating
petitions of all prospective candidates for public office.
B. If a candidate or political committee described in section 2.41.050 has
agreed to limit expenditures, but is not bound by the agreement because
an opponent or opposing political committee of the candidate or political
committee for the same office or measure at the same election has not
agreed to limit expenditures or has exceeded the applicable expenditure
limit, the published statement described in subsection 2.41.110.A. 1 shall
indicate that the candidate or political committee has agreed to limit
expenditures and that the candidate or political committee is not bound
by the agreement because an opponent of the candidate or opposing
political committee for the same office or measure at the same election
has not agreed to limit expenditures or has exceeded the applicable
spending limit.
Title 2 Page 65
If the recorder or the city attorney finds under section 2.41.080 that a
candidate described in section 2.41.050 filing a declaration of limitation
on expenditures under section 2.41.050 has exceeded the applicable
expenditure limit, at the next election at which the candidate is a
candidate for election to public office, the recorder shall publish a
statement, in a newspaper of general circulation and published in the
City, indicating that the candidate violated a previous declaration of
limitation on expenditures under section 2.41.050. The statement required
by this subsection shall identify the date of the election at which the
candidate exceeded the applicable expenditure limit.
Title 2 Page 66