HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-1105 REG MINMINUTES FOR THE REGULAR MEETING
ASHLAND CITY COUNCIL
November 5, 1996
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Golden called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m., Civic
Center Council Chambers.
ROLL CALL
Councilors Laws, Reid, Hauck, Hagen, Wheeldon and Thompson were
present.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the Regular meeting of October 15, 1996 were
approved with amendment to page 5, paragraph 6; first sentence
should read; Councilor Hagen suggested "we as a society" .....
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS & AWARDS
1. Presentation by Jan Janssen and LA CASA Committee regarding
the proposed skatepark in Ashland.
Presentation by member Eric Frye and Rubin Davis of LA CASA
Committee (Community for Alternative Sports in Ashland) proposing
a skatepark in Ashland. Council was given update on their
activities on raising monies for the park and expressed high
public interest. Explained that skateparks have been associated
with bad media, but is a big part of youth culture which may help
to deter youth from bad elements. Felt the park is a necessity
in our area. Reported that the Parks Department has located an
area for the park on Water Street, next to the recycling center.
Explained that when LA CASA has finalized its plans for the park
and are able to meet 50% of the needed funds, the city Parks
Department has indicated their willingness to help with the
additional 50% funding.
Council questioned the use of the park and if this would help to
lessen the skateboard use in areas that skating is prohibited.
Davis felt that he could not guarantee that skateboard traffic
would be less, but felt this could help. An estimate cost for
the park is $75,000 to $100,000.
Jan Janssen, Ashland Police Department, stated that this project
has been youth inspired and youth driven. Commented that very
seldom has youth been involved to this extent. Janssen reported
that she is dealing more and more with skating youth that have no
place to skateboard. If the park is built, it would be a very
active park. Felt that the means is as important as the end and
is a way to honor the communities commitment to our youth in
keeping them active.
Council Meeting 11-05-96 1
Davis reported that there would be posted rules for the
skatepark.
CONSENT AGENDA
1. Minutes of boards, commissions, and committees.
2. Monthly Departmental Reports - October, 1996.
3. Quarterly Report from Finance Director.
4. Report of Ferrero Geologic regarding feasibility of well for
Oak Knoll Meadows subdivision/Oak Knoll Golf Course.
5. Letter from City Attorney to OWRD requesting re-notice of
proposed final order for well in Oak Knoll Meadows
subdivision.
6. Authorization for the Mayor and City Recorder to sign
Quitclaim Deeds for two easements.
7. Confirmation of Mayor's appointment of Dartell Gee to
Bicycle Commission.
8. Ad HOC Citizens' Communication Draft Plan.
Councilor Hagen requested that items #4, #5 and #S be pulled,
Councilor Wheeldon requested that items #2, #3 and #6 be pulled
and placed under New and Misc. Business.
Councilors Laws/Hagen m/s to approve consent agenda items #1 and
#7. Voice vote: all AYES. Motion passed.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Proposed levy of assessments of Oak Street Local Improvement
District.
PUBLIC HEARING OPEN: 7:27 p.m.
City Attorney Paul Nolte reminded council that this was the time
to hear testimony on written objections which had previously been
filed. Nolte reported that there had been no written objections
submitted.
Mike Uhtoff/633 Roca/Spoke regarding his concern and question on
how the Oak Street Local Improvement District came about and
would have liked to have had discussion regarding the cost of the
LID sooner.
Pete Lovrovich, Director of Electric Department explained the
choices regarding the undergrounding of utilities and how it was
proposed to property owners. The property owners on the west
side chose not to be included in the original proposed LID
initiated by Lance Pugh. Lovrovich explained that because of the
overall savings by doing the undergrounding of utilities on the
west side at the same time the Oak Street LID was being
completed, the property owners agreed to the expense of
undergrounding. The expenses of the west side undergrounding was
Council Meeting 11-05-96 2
not included in Oak Street LID and was treated as a separate
project.
Lovrovich reported that in order to remove all the poles on the
east side they had to make a crossing to the west. It was the
only way to accomplish the goal of the LID as far as the
petitioner was concerned.
Wheeldon questioned when the sidewalks would be completed and who
was responsible. Lovrovich reported that property owner Lance
Pugh, is responsible and has been notified with no response.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED: 7:36 p.m.
PUBLIC FORUM
Care Hartze11/SS1 E. Main/Questioned the plan for removing and
replacing trees on Ashland Street.
City Administrator Brian Almquist reported to council that he has
been speaking to Oregon Department of Transportation. Almquist
also has spoken to the Tree Commission and it was determined that
the trees do need to be removed because of the damage to the
sidewalks and the possibility of liability.
John McLaughlin, Planning Director reported that based on the
proposed new designs for Ashland Street, the trees would need to
be removed anyway. Because of acquiring additional right-of-
ways, it would not be possible to leave the trees where they are.
Susan Broadus-Wilson, Public Works Director reported that due to
current work schedule, the trees are scheduled to be removed the
end of November.
Rick Landt/487 Rock/Reported that he had called the Planning
Department previously inquiring about the saving of the trees on
Ashland Street. Pointed out that there is no plan at this time
for Ashland Street and questions the removal of the trees.
Suggested that the city get easements for sidewalks rather than
for trees so sidewalks could go around the trees. Felt that the
emphasis should be on saving the trees. Volunteered his help in
trying to save any of these trees and urges council to reconsider
the removal of these trees.
Almquist commented that Don Todt from the Parks Department has
been consulted on this project. Explained that even if the
sidewalk is moved 5 feet, it would still be effected by the
growth of the trees. Landt requested that there be a second
opinion done by a certified horticulturist.
Council Meeting 11-05-96 3
Laws commented on his initial reservation on the removal of trees
and after looking at proposals for redesigning Ashland Street
thought it may be possible to save some of the trees. Laws would
like to look at alternatives to possibly saving the trees based
on the fact that there is no plan at this time for Ashland
Street.
Reid commented on past meetings where testimony was taken
regarding the dangers that the trees have presented. Commented
that there is a history of process concerning this issue and that
there is a need to move forward rather continued discussion.
Gave example of two types of worst government. One, where
decisions are made without public input and two, failure to make
decisions even with public input. Felt this falls in the second
category, where public input has been taken over several years
and council is still unable to make a decision. Reid does not
agree with re-opening this process and possibly stopping the
process.
Hagen agreed that alternatives should be checked out and property
owners contacted to see what may be done with the trees and
sidewalks.
Almquist clarified for council that the trees will continue to
raise the curbs and paving on Hwy 66 regardless of where new
sidewalk may be poured. The trees need to be removed which is
concurred by the Tree Commission and Don Todt from the Parks
Department.
Council discussed the cost and need of repairing the sidewalks
and the issue of removing the trees. Broadus-Wilson explained
that waiting and or starting removal of trees on one side of the
street would not impact the overall schedule of the Street
Department.
Council consensus that time would be made available in the next
two weeks for Mayor Golden, Councilors Laws and Reid to meet and
speak with those individuals involved and concerned with the
removal/saving of the trees on Ashland Street. This issue would
be placed on the next council agenda of November 12th.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Decision on request for refund of appeal fee on P.A. 96-047
Birnam Woods Subdivision.
Dorothy Smith/708 Indiana/Requested waiver or refund on appeal
fee. Submitted letter to council outlining her request based on
the errors she felt was made at the Planning Action level.
Council Meeting 11-05-96 4
Wheeldon commented that the cost for the appeal should stand.
Appeal has to do with those who feel there was a mistake done and
it is difficult to backtrack on exactly where the situation took
place.
Hauck commented that this situation may be unique and confusing
enough to warrant consideration of refund for the appeal fee.
Council discussed and explained how planning actions may happen.
Councilors Laws/Hagen m/s to deny request for refund. Roll Call
vote: Reid, Hagen, Wheeldon, Thompson and Laws, YES; Hauck, NO.
Motion passed: 5-1.
NEW & MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS
1. Proposals for the restoration of bus service for the City of
Ashland.
Council agreed to Councilor Laws proposal that staff publicize a
Public Hearing for November 19th and that a committee composed of
Councilors Laws, Hagen and City Administrator be empowered to
negotiate a tentative agreement with one of the two proposers
subject to council approval on November 19th.
Council Hauck clarified that information in the newspaper stating
that the proposal from RVTD would be cheaper than if the levy
would have passed, is only partially true. He explained that
all that is being done with either one of the proposals is trying
to bring back the level of service to Ashland before the failure
of the levy. Had the levy passed it not only would have been at
the same level of service, it would have added an additional
route and extended hours.
Update by Cascade Earth Sciences, Ltd. on status of
demonstration Wetlands/Soil Filtration Project.
Waste Water Treatment Plan Coordinator, Paula Brown updated
council on the conceptional design and the public awareness
program for the Wetlands/Soil Filtration Project.
Presentation on the public involvement aspect and project
timeline. Timeline noted project management, public involvement,
predesign, final design, construction, monitoring, maintenance,
operation, evaluation and recommendation. Noted educational
opportunities and physical access to the wetlands by providing
trails. Commented on the need for community involvement.
Representative from Cascade Earth Sciences presented picture of
what the wetlands may look like.
Council Meeting 11-05-96 5
Memorandum from City Attorney regarding city liability to
employees for PERS pickup after the demise of Measure 8.
For council information only, no action needed.
4. Recommended changes to LID policies.
Public Hearing set for December 2nd Council meeting and requested
that all information be made available to interested parties.
Item #2, Consent Agenda - Monthly Departmental Reports -
October, 1996.
Pete Lovrovich, Director of Electric Department clarified for
council the difference between consumption and demand on the
graph in the Electric Departments report. Explained that demand
and consumption is same, but that demand is based on overall
cost. Stated that the method of pricing will be changing.
Item #3, Consent Agenda - Quarterly Report from Finance
Director.
Jill Turner, Director of Finance clarified for council that the
percentages is only on the very last line and that percentages
normally don't add up. This fund is a reimbursement
fund, where money is spent and then reimbursed by the Federal
Government.
Comments and discussion on how water is charged out and that this
schedule needs to be revisited. Comments on how the purpose of
the current schedule was to conserve water, not to take in
additional revenue.
Turner was requested to look at another rate schedule for water
and report back to council.
Item #4, Consent Agenda - Report of Ferroro Geologic
regarding feasibility of well for Oak Knoll Meadows
subdivision/Oak Knoll Golf Course.
Council questioned the well output and projection of anticipation
and requested update from staff on how to proceed.
Councilor Laws questioned what would be the cost of irrigating
the golf course if only treated water was used as an alternative
if no other water source is available. Requested this
information before a decision is made.
Council Meeting 11-05-96 6
Item #5, Consent Agenda - Letter from City Attorney to OWRD
for requesting re-notice of proposed final order for well in
Oak Knoll Meadows subdivision.
Paul Nolte, City Attorney reported to council that all was
proceeding smoothly with the 45 day process request.
Item #6, Consent Agenda - Authorization for the Mayor and
City Recorder to sign Quitclaim Deeds for two easements.
Councilor Wheeldon questioned easement on Water Street and why
bridge was not widened to allow more pedestrian access. Why
there is a need for the easement and if there is a chance to
continue the sidewalk.
John McLaughlin, Planning Director explained that this is a
utility easement, which is required, and that the sidewalk issue
would be addressed during the site review process. In a
commercial zone there is less park rows because it is a different
type of environment.
Councilor Reid commented on the last easement that was given up
and that she had asked if the easement could be used as a lever
with property owner, Lloyd Haines. Reid reluctant to give up
anything in this area without having a lever to get Central
Street put in as soon as possible. Regrets giving up last
easement because of this.
McLaughlin stated that tying this property owner's easement with
improvement on Central Street would be difficult.
10.
Item #8, Consent Agenda - Ad Hoc Citizen's Communication
Draft Plan.
Communication Draft Plan will be presented and discussed at the
next council study session on November 20th.
Councilors Hagen/Reid m/s to approve items 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 8 of
the consent agenda. Voice vote: all AYES. Motion passed.
ORDINANCES, RESOLUTION8 AND CONTRACTS
Memorandum of Understanding between City of Ashland and
Ashland Parks and Recreation Commission for Wetlands
Demonstration Project.
Councilors Reid/Wheeldon m/s to approve Memorandum of
Understanding. Voice vote: all AYES. Motion passed.
Council Meeting 11-05-96 7
Reading by title only of a Resolution exempting the
Wightman/Fordyce Improvement Project from standard
competitive bidding procedures.
councilors Wheeldon/Reid m/s to approve Resolution # 96-45. Roll
Call vote: Laws, Hauck, Reid, Hagen, Wheeldon and Thompson, YES.
Motion passed.
Reading by title only of a Resolution reinstating PERS
pickup for certain elected officials in order to comply with
the invalidation of Ballot Measure S (1994).
Councilors Hauck/Hagen m/s to approve Resolution #96-44. Roll
Call vote: Hauck, Reid, Hagen, Wheeldon and Thompson, YES;
Councilor Laws abstained. Motion passed.
Authorization for City Administrator to sign Fund Exchange
Agreement with ODOT for E. Main Widening Project.
Councilors Hauck/Wheeldon m/s to authorize signing of Fund
Exchange Agreement. Roll Call Vote: Reid, Hagen, Wheeldon,
Thompson, Laws and Hauck, YES. Motion passed.
Authorization for City Administrator to sign Engineering
Services Contract for Phase I of the WWTP Upgrade Project.
Councilors Hauck/Laws m/s to authorize signing of Engineering
Services Contract. Roll Call Vote: Hagen, Wheeldon, Thompson,
Laws, Hauck and Reid, YES. Motion passed.
Reading in full of Resolution levying assessments of Oak
Street Local Improvement District.
City Administrator Brian Almquist read resolution in full.
Councilors Hauck/Reid m/s to approve Resolution # 96-46. Roll
Call vote: Wheeldon, Thompson, Laws, Hauck, Reid and Hagen, YES.
Motion passed.
Councilors Hauck/Reid m/s to add discussion regarding SDC's to
agenda. Voice vote: all AYES. Motion passed.
7. Updated information regarding SDC's.
Jill Turner, Director of Finance reported for council that going
back to the City of Ashland's Comprehensive Water Plan in 1980,
it put together a list of projects that were compiled down for
the SDC project. In the report there was 43 projects listed and
14 of them had elements of growth. The population projection was
reviewed and how it had been determined. It was determined that
Council Meeting 11-05-96 8
looking at the growth and changing the population number was
inappropriate.
Larry Medinger, committee member commented that information
presented to council had not been available to him and questioned
the validity. Felt that staff was missing the point as to what
he was talking about. He clarified that the idea was in changing
from a 24 inch pipe to a 36 inch pipe coming down from the main
water source. That the size is not sized to a 21,000 population
but only practical.
OTHER BUSINESS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS
None
ADJOURNMENT
Meeting was adjourned at 9:25 p.m.
City Recorder
Mayor
Council Meeting 11-05-96 9