HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-08-13 Hearings Board MINASHLAND PLANNING COMMISSION
HEARINGS BOARD
MINUTES
AUGUST 13, 1996
CALLTO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Commissioner Peter Finkle at 1:35 p.m. Other Commissioners
present were Howe and Giordano. Staff present were Molnar, Madding and Yates.
TYPE II PUBLIC HEARINGS
PLANNING ACTION 96-096
REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONVERT A PORTION OF AN EXISTING
RESIDENCE FOR USE BY THE RELIGIOUS SOCIETY OF FRIENDS.
543 N. MOUNTAIN AVENUE
APPLICANT: MARJORIE & OGDEN KELLOGG
Site Visits and Ex Parte Contacts
Site visits were made by all.
STAFF REPORT
Madding reported that the uses surrounding the site are indicated on an area map that is included in the
record. Most of the uses relate to SOSC. The area to the south is primarily residential. The applicant
wishes to enclose the carport which will leave an area for about 50 seats in the upstairs. The remainder
of the upstairs will remain the same. The downstairs rooms will remain the same but be more of a
church use. There will be a caretaker on site so the residential character will be retained. Meeting times
are Sunday from 10:00 a.m. until noon. During the week there are about two to three meetings with
fewer members in attendance. With 50 seats, 12 parking spaces are required. The applicant has
worked with SOSC and they have agreed to allow the church to park in their lot.
The target use of the zone is one residential unit. The surrounding uses are heavily Impacted by parking
and traffic for SOSC. Staff feels the parking impact by people attending meetings during the week will
be minimal. The most intense use will be on Sunday which is the day SOSC is least impacted. Staff is
requesting that the applicant ask their parishioners to park in the SOSC parking lot on Sunday.
There is no sidewalk on the street. The applicant will be required to install a sidewalk since
transportation is required to and through the development. Staff has recommended approval of this
application with the three attached Conditions.
Giordano wondered if the City should require a formal agreement asking for use of the parking from
SOSC. Molnar said it could be added as a Condition. This is a Conditional Use Permit and if the
college ever rescinded their parking agreement, that would invalidate the CUP or other arrangements
would need to be made for parking.
PUBLIC HEARING
MARJORIE KELLOGG, 2180 Sardine Creek Road, Gold Hill, OR and
VINCE OREDSEN, 640 Pracht Street, Ashland, OR were available for questions.
Kellogg said parking is available at the Neuman Center even for non-students. At present, their group
does not meet in the evening. They are looking into the future for maximum needs. Giordano
wondered if it would be difficult to get a formal agreement with SOSC regarding the parking. Kellogg
assumed it was on file and a binding agreement.
Oredsen noted that the SOSC parking lot is totally vacant on Sunday morning.
BEATRICE NEWBY, 149 Almeda, agreed with the statements that have been made.
COMMISSIONERS DISCUSSION AND MOTION
Howe said as far as impacts the church is already meeting close by and a half block is not going to
have that much impact. Even if there was an agreement for ten to 15 years, it would be highly unlikely
to get an agreement in perpetuity. Is it a valuable project without the SOSC parking?
Finkle lives in the neighborhood and during the week, the lots and streets are filled with college students
cars. There are very few cars on Sunday and even without the parking lot, it would be less impact on
the neighborhood.
Giordano will go along with an approval but he believes the parking agreement is too loose and a cause
for concern. Molnar suggested wording for a Condition: That the applicant provide some additional
information prior to occupancy of the use of how the formal arrangements for parking and permitting of
vehicles on SOSC property will occur.
RE-OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING
KELLOGG said when she talked with SOSC they said the letter was all they needed as no one patrolled
the parking lot on Sunday anyway.
COMMISSIONERS DISCUSSION AND MOTION
Howe suggested Staff approve any additional agreement between SOSC and Friends Society to address
the use of the parking lot. Giordano moved to approve PA96-096 with the added condition. Howe
seconded the motion and it carried unanimously.
PLANNING ACTION 96-100
REQUEST FOR A MINOR LAND PARTITION TO DIVIDE A PARCEL INTO TWO LOTS FOR THE
PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE ALLEY BETWEEN MORTON AND HARRISON STREETS. A
VARIANCE IS ALSO REQUESTED TO CREATE A NEW LOT WITHOUT FRONTAGE ON A PUBLIC
STREET (OTHER THAN AN ALLEY).
APPLICANT: ERIK WALLBANK
Site Visits or Ex parte Contacts
Site visits were made by all.
STAFF REPORT
This parcel is located on an alley between Morton and Harrison Streets. It is currently a vacant, land-
locked lot with public street frontage. The zoning is R-2 but the neighborhood surrounding the parcel
ASHLAND PLANNING COMMISSION
HEARINGS BOARD
MINUTES
AUGUST 13, lgg6
appears to be single family residential. The alley is the property's only access. The right-of-way is 16
feet, however, the driveable portion of the alley in some places is only 12 feet. There is a lot of
vegetation growing into the alley.
The base density of the whole lot is five units. In dividing the way the applicant is asking, pamel I could
hold two lots and parcel 2 could hold three. The overall density will not necessarily reduce the density.
A variance is required since the lot does not have public street frontage. There are unique and unusual
circumstances that apply to this site because of alley access. The parcel was created many years ago,
therefore, the conditions of this property have not been willfully and purposefully self-imposed.
Staff believes that by dividing this lot, the outcome may not be that much different than by developing
the entire lot. By having two lots, it will create the opportunity possibly for two single family homes. The
applicant has agreed that if a house is built on the lot, he will go to the Historic Commission for approval
as well as approval from the Staff Advisor.
The Fire Department is requiring the alley be improved to its full width. Additionally, the applicant
maintain the alley in a driveable form during construction of the service lines and at the end of
construction, grade the alley in addition to signing in favor of alley improvements at a future date.
Molnar explained that partitioning does not require paving but if further development takes place (more
than one single family residence on each lot) then the alley would require paving.
Add a sixth Condition that the applicant sign in favor of paving the alley.
PUBLIC HEARING
ERIK WALLBANK, 2025 Tolman Creek Road, said he has no plans to build more than two single family
residences on these two lots. He checked with the neighbors who accessed the alley and along the
approximately 800 lineal feet of the alley, five neighbors did not want the alley paved, one wanted it
paved, and one neighbor was indifferent. By dividing the lot in this manner, the lot sizes will be similar
to the lots in the area. Wallbank agreed to have a hydrant installed at the comer of the alley and
Morton. He has made provisions for other services. Giordano wondered what the address would be
(Morton or Harrison Street or something else).
TOM FRANTZ, 237 Fourth St., said his mother-in-law's home adjoins this lot and they have looked at this
area as a meadow. He is happy about Erik's development because he has been concerned about
maximum density. It is nice to have historic quality override the infill.
CARMEN FERGUSON, 670 Siskiyou Blvd., stated she favored the proposal with a reservation. She said
the alley is very poorly maintained. All of the alleys from Harrison to the library with the exception of a
quarter of a block is paved. She feels that the alley portions that are currently paved are better
maintained with less trash, less dog droppings; people seem to respect the paved portions more. It is a
congested area because everyone parks on the alley and it can be muddy.
CAROLE HOWSER, 192 Harrison, said she prefers an unpaved alley with open greenery, not hot asphalt.
No paving should encourage slower driving.
ASHLAND PLANNING COMMISSION
HEARINGS BOARD
MINUTES
AUGUST 13,
Rebuttal
WALLBANK talked to all the neighbors and heard comments from people who have lived them a long
time say they did not want the alley paved. They have watched the town change so much that it is a
little bit of nature left between the streets. Most thought cars would drive faster if the alley were paved
and more people would use it to get from one place to another.
Molnar said a Condition could be added to resurface with gravel and grade to the full physical width.
Wallbank thought it was important not to end up with a spongy gravel alley that is different than all the
other alleys. He would like to work with Staff to see how much gravel is necessary. Molnar thought
after a ditch is run, the alley might need to be patched with something matching the granite already in
the alley.
COMMISSlONER,~ DISCUSSION AND MOTION
Giordano moved to approve PA96-100 and add to Condition 5 that the alley be graded and resurfaced.
Add Condition 6 to sign in favor of future alley improvements. Howe seconded the motion and it
carried.
TYPE I PLANNING ACTIONS
PLANNING ACTION 96-059
REQUEST FOR A MINOR LAND PARTITION TO DIVIDE THE PROPERTY INTO TWO LOTS WITH
THE REAR PARCEL BEING A FLAG LOT. AN APPROXIMATELY 26 FOOT WIDE DRIVEWAY
EASEMENT PRESENTLY EXISTS FROM CLAY STREET.
702 CLAY STREET
APPLICANT: DOUG NEUMAN
This application was approved.
PLANNING ACTION 96-093
REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF UNITS FROM SiX
TO SEVEN WHICH INCLUDES THE OWNER'S UNIT.
451 NORTH MAIN STREET.
APPLICANT: WAYNE E. AND ELISABETH M. JONAS
This application was withdrawn.
PLANNING ACTION 96-097
REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO OPERATE A THREE UNIT (INCLUDES OWNER'S
UNIT) TRAVELLER'S ACCOMMODATION LOCATED AT 467 SCENIC DRIVE.
APPLICANT: CYNTHIA WRIGHT AND PETE JAEGER
This application was approved.
ASHLAND PLANNING C~MMI~ION
HEARINGS BOARD
MINUTES
AUGUST 13, 1996
PLANNING ACTION 96-098
REQUEST FOR A SITE REVIEW TO CONSTRUCT A TWO STORY BUILDING, INCLUDING 1784
SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL SPACE ON THE FIRST FLOOR AND TWO RESIDENTIAL UNITS
(500 SQ. FT. EACH) ON THE SECOND FLOOR.
190 OAK STREET.
APPLICANT: DOYLE BRIGHTENBURG
This application was approved.
PLANNING ACTION 96-102
REQUEST FOR FINAL PLAN APPROVAL, UNDER THE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OPTION, FOR
PHASES II AND III OF THE SKYCREST HILLS SUBDIVISION. INCLUDES A MINOR AMENDMENT
INVOLVING THE SHIFTING OF SOME INTERNAL LOT LINES AND BUILDING ENVELOPES.
200 SKYCREST DRIVE
APPLICANT: CHARLES WILEY
This application was approved.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Howe moved to approve the July 9, 1996 meeting. Finkle seconded and the Minutes were approved.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 3:15 p.m.
ASHLAND PLANNING COMMISSION
HEARINGS BOARD
MINUTES
AUGUST 13, 1996