HomeMy WebLinkAbout1972-1212 SPECIALMINUTES OF SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING
December 12, 1972
CALL TO ORDER:
PURPOSE:
AFSETH, JACOBS
AND SHMITZ
VINCENT
OREDSON
PATTERSON,
LANGFORD, &
STEWART
A special meeting of the Ashland City Council was called
to order at 7:15 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City
Hall by Mayor Charles McKeen. Councilmen Conklin,
McCannon, Roble, and Soderberg were present; Roberrs
and Willstatter were absent.
The purpose of the meeting was to interview four
architectural firms for the preparation of preliminary
plans and site selection studies on construction of a
Justice Center.
Gary Afseth, D. Lorin Jacobs, and Peter Schmitz said
their firm, based in Medford, was founded in 1968. They'
reported that they had worked on projects funded by
government grants and were familier with requirements
on cost estimating, feasibility studies, etc. They
showed slides of projects they had worked on (some of
them by other firms the individuals were associated with
before their partnership). They reported that they usually
contact Elmer Savikko or Marquess & Marquess for
consulting engineering.
Mr. Oredson, who has office at 236 E. Main, Ashland, said
he has "been in Ashland for a long time", and has a
feeling for the community and what its aspirations are. He
said he had worked in conjunction with Hamlin, Martin,
Schultz, and Geyer from Eugene, and if successful in
again. On question from Roble, he said he uses
Marquess and Marquess for consultants. Mayor-elect Fries
(in audience) asked if his association with a firm in
Eugene would make it difficult to meet the April 1 dead-
line, and Oredson replied that he saw no problems in
that respect. He pointed out that he had worked on the
Ashland Business District Revita!ization Study, served
on citizens advisory committee for Ashland Comprehensive
Plan, and had been the local contact for CH2M on the
Central Area Plan, He showed slides of the S. O. C.
Music Building which he designed in conjunction with the
Eugene firm, and explained his architectural procedure
from preliminary study to completed building. On
question from Conklin concerning his preference in material,
0redson replied that a building of this nature should
look permanent, and he leans toward concrete, but feels
wood should also be used. He said he is very conscious
of costs, and that a building should be "efficient" in
cost, the most building for the least amount of money.
Phil Patterson of Patterson, Langford, & Stewart, a Medford
firm, said they have been together for six years. He
showed sketches of projects they had worked on, including
studies for Medford, Corvallis, and Josephine County, all
of which concerned Justice Buildings. He said they were
experienced in working with Federal funding. He stressed
the need for a close working relationship with the Justice
Center Committee and City officials. In answer to Roble
concerning consultants, he said they have used a number
of consulting firms, including Savikko and Marquess and
Marquess. Conklin asked if he could stay within the
budget, and his reply was affirmative, Soderberg asked
if he was aware of the need to meet a time schedule, and
he answered, "I know you do."
HIATT & ROUNDS
AWARD
Bob Hiatt and Don Rounds, who had made ~ survey of
Justice Center requirements for District 8, said they
have been in partnership for six years in Medford. They
emphasized programming to insure that City's needs are
incorporated in the building. They showed slides of
three of their recent projects. Mr. Hiatt said he had
recently spent a week in Urbana, Illinois, at a symposium
on the design of correctional facilities, and discussed
the needs of society in handling criminals. In answer
to questions, he said they rely on engineering consultants
when required, that they would meet City timetable if
city officials have time to work with them, and that there
is a need to sell both the plan and the program to L.E.A.A.
Roble said all firms interviewed were capable, but he felt
because Oredson's office was so near, it would be easier
to communicate with him and thus meet the time schedule,
and also felt that with Oredson's past experience in City
affairs, he had a better feeling for our needs. Soderberg
and McCannon agreed to some extent, but felt that the
knowledge gained by Hiatt and Rounds in their research
would be an aid in programming. Roble and Conklin pointed
out that all of the firms use consultants in areas where
needed. Roble moved that Vincent Oredson be chosen for
the Justice Center architect. Conklin seconded. After
more discussion of qualifications of architects, a roll
call vote was taken on the motion, with Conkiln and Roble
YES, McCannon and Soderberg NO. Mayor McKeen broke the
tie by voting YES. Motion passed.