HomeMy WebLinkAboutRecreation Overview
RECREATION OVERVIEW AND EXISTING/ACCEPTABLE CONDITIONS
FOR ASHLAND INTERFACE
INTEGRATED RESOURCE ANALYSIS AREA
SUMMARY OF EXISTING CONDITIONS:
The Ashland Interface is an area of high intensity recreation due to the
proximity to town. Management of the area emphasizes watershed protection,
fire prevention and fuels management. No camping or fires are allowed in the
Ashland Watershed portion of the interface lands, and much of that area is
closed to motor vehicle access November-May. The watershed lands are also
frequently closed to all entry during periods of high fire danger. Off road
vehicle (including bicycle) travel is prohibited except on trails designated
for biycle use. Traditionally, little emphasis has been placed on managing the
recreation setting other than actions implemented to attempt to resolve
conflicts with the resource emphasis areas previously mentioned. The only
recreation developments in existence are the recently completed Eastview
Mountin Bike Trail, and the "unofficial" Toothpick Trail.
Current recreation uses include: Mountain biking, hiking/walking/jogging, some
horseback riding, recreational driving, hunting, camping (illegal in Ashland
Watershed), and organized events such as foot and bicyle races. Mountain
biking and pedestrian activities are by far the most predominant uses.
Mountain bike use off of roads and trails (particularly on shaded fuel-breaks
and private land adjacent the National Forest) is contributing to soil erosion
and conflicts with private landowners. A safety hazard is posed when
automobile traffic and fast descending mountain bikes share narrow winding
roads in the interface such as the 2060 and the 2080 road.
Nuisance activities not necessarily classified as "recreation", but generally
associated with public use of the area are: dumping of trash; illegal overnight
camping; homeless encampments; night-time use of the area for parties which
involves illegal bon fires, consumption of alcohol by minors, and vandalism.
Tolman Creek road (2080 rd) up to Mt. Ashland and the Siskiyou Gap area is a
popular route traveled by sightseers. This area is viewed from the 1-5
corridor as well as being the scenic backdrop for most of Ashland.
RECREATION ISSUES
Access to the interface lands for recreation poses a planning challenge for the
future. The need for "Open Space" adjacent to the increasingly urban
environment of the city will have to be considered in the context of a variety
of other issues.
Any consideration of increased opportunities for public use must examine the
kinds of activities and the potential values at risk (i.e, increased potential
for human caused fire, soil stability, water quality, and conflicts between
users) .
"'''''''
Th~ lack of managed trail opportunities for mountain bikers and hikers places
recreationalists in the position of finding their own opportunities. Often
these are in areas where use is not desireable do to resource degradation,
safety concerns, or tresspass on private lands. Many connections between the
city and the National Forest are not guaranteed rights of way; without
planning, conflicts on these "informal" connections will increase.
Recreationists who use the area may not understand the need for area closures
enforced during times of extreme fire danger (usually summer or early fall).
There is a need to "demystify" the Interface and Watershed lands through
education and interpretation.
ACCEPTABLE RANGE OF CONDITIONS
In order to define an acceptable range of conditions for an area , one must
first understand what range of conditions or trends exist. The ecosystem is
dynamic. Over a period of time vegetation grows and dies, populations of
plants and animals flucuate from over abundant to sparse. Both managed and
natural disturbances affect these trends in the ecosystem. Once you have
defined the trends (or range of conditions) the issues or values one places on
the resources within an area will begin to set side boards on what range of
conditions would be acceptable. For example....
Recreation use is managed in a manner that compliments or is compatible with
fire management and other watershed and resource values. Opportunities for
compatible uses will be developed and expanded to provide alternatives to
present unmanaged and non-conforming uses. User awareness of fire prevention
and watershed issues will be increased through interactions with visitors and
user groups, signing, education and interpretation.
Potential interpretive opportunities include viewpoints, the RNA off of Lamb
Mine Trail, fuel breaks and the role of fire, watershed protection and the City
drinking water supply, historical features such as old mines, and probably alot
more. Environmental Education programs involving local schools and guided loop
tours is another opportunity.
Mountain bikes constitute the largest and fastest growing use of the interface
lands, and the most controversial. By providing managed trails that deliver
the desired experience, illegal and conflicting uses can be discouraged. This
will involve working with the mountain bike community to better understand the
desired experience levels and connections that, if managed properly, will
reduce tresspasses and riding on problem areas such as steep shaded fuel
breaks. The Ashland Ranger District has a map and inventory of informal and
designated trails in the Interface and Watershed as well as proposals gathered
from members of the mountain bike community. Emphasize and provide the
greatest variety/density of loops/connections in the areas closest to town.
Increased patrols, community involvement and education should strive to further
reduce vandalism, dumping and illegal camping on public and private lands.
n~
Th~ type of camping that occurs in the Interface is not that of a recreational
type of experience. The typical camper here does not wish to pay for developed
facilities and is simply looking for a free spot to park a car or van and
snooze, get up in the morning and drive off. RV parks and Camping areas are
provided by the private sector at Emigrant Lake (County and nearby KOA
campgrounds), Jackson Hot Springs, and several RV Parks along 1-5 in the
Talent/Phoenix area. A large scale development site in the Interface would
compete with the private sector and probably would have little effect in terms
of channeling these roadside bivouacs to a managed area.
Forest Road 2080 is currently the best for scenic drives and will require less
maintenance. It offers the best views of the valley, Emigrant Lake and the
distant Cascades. Fire risk with regard to watershed values is much lower
because of prevailing wind direction and topography. Many roads in the
interface should be considered for closure or conversion to non-motorized
trails to reduce road maintenance costs and erosion, and decrease illegal
dumping, camping, and the risk of fire.
n
Project List Development: [NEED TO COMPLETE]
1. Emphasize Non-Motorized Access (This is a multi-resource benefiting
project)
Close the Loop Road (2060) from the gate above Granite/Glenview to
Four Corners year-round. Provide managed trailhead parking and
visitor information/education at both ends of closure.
The benefits of a year round motorized closure would include, but are
not limited to the following:
*
Enhances recreation experience/use of the Interface (and
watershed) by pedestrians and bicyclists which are the
predominant and appropriate uses. Motor vehicle access to
outlying National Forest areas is adequate, while the unique
aspect of this urban/forest interface is the opportunity to walk,
jog, or ride a bike from a doorstep in the community to adjacent
forest lands. Absence of dust and passing vehicles increases
enjoyment of the outdoor setting and provides a contrasting
"escape" from the city. The significant safety issue of fast
descending mountain bikes and motor vehicles sharing a narrow,
winding, forest road would be ameliorated to a large degree in
the road closure area.
*
Risk of human caused fire would be greatly reduced. Motorized
use is the highest risk category for a number of reasons:
Internal combustion engine/catalytic converters are an ignition
source; majority of illegal camping, bonfires, smoking, and
fire-risk associated behaviour occur in conjunction with motor
vehicle access.
*
Illegal dumping, toxic spills and oil pan leaks would be
practically eliminated along the 2060 road. Most illegal camping
in the watershed portion of the interface occurs out of motor
vehicles driven up the loop road late in the evening, to pull off
to the side somewhere and camp, then leave the next morning.
*
Restricting motorized access to administrative uses will reduce
road maintenance costs and erosion.
*
Motorized access is not required for hunting. Many watersheds
and closure areas have instituted game retrieval policies. The
2060 road is often closed during deer season anyway. Many
non-hunters repeatedly ask about areas where they can go for a
walk in the woods, experience fall colors, and not feel
intimidated by all the hunting activity.
*
There would be no significant dollar expenditure needed; in fact,
savings from reduced road maintenance needs would offset cost of
implementation. Biggest "bang-for-the-buck" in terms of enhanced
-
recreation, expansion of trails without capital cost, reduced
erosion from roads, and reduced risk of human caused fire.
RECREATION PROJECTS:
1. Mountain Bikes constitute the largest and fastest growing use of the
interface lands, and the most controversial. By providing managed trails
that deliver the desired experience, illegal and conflicting uses can be
discouraged. Education and enforcement will still be needed. Some of the
projects and emphasis that are needed to implement a pro-active mountain
bike program in the interface are:
*
Provide an off-road bicycle trail from Four Corners (junction of
2060, 2080200 and 2060600) down to the Forest Boundary at road
2060. This particular stretch of road 2060 contitutes the
highest hazard for a potential collision between descending
mountain bikes and motor vehicles coming up the road. Pieces of
this route exist very informally, construction would be required
for other segments. Assuming that planning for the Ashland
watershed may propose a year round closure of the 2080200 road
from Bull Gap down to Four Corners, this route would provide a
non-motorized trail link from Mt. Ashland to town with
connections to the Lamb Mine Trail, Toothpick Trail, the proposed
Hamilton Trail from National Forest to City of Ashland lands to
Park Street, and also connecting with the Alice in Wonderland
Trail on City land.
*
Construction of the Hamilton Mountain Bike Trail from the landing
at the Forest Boundary on the 2060 road through the Hamilton
Creek Coordinated Resource Management Area to Park Street.
*
Work with the mountain bike community to better understand the
desired experience levels and connections that, if managed
properly, will reduce tresspasses and riding on problem areas
such as steep shaded fuel breaks. The Ashland Ranger District
has a map and inventory of informal and designated trails in the
Interface and Watershed as well as proposals gathered from
members of the mountain bike community.
*
Development of a "Trials" or "Challenge" course and possibly one
or two managed downhill "banzai" runs as alternatives to illegal
uses now occuring on fuel brakes and other areas. No location is
proposed at this time, but the closer to town the better.
*
Work with the City and private landwoners to find alternatives or
secure access and right of way to informal trails such as "Hitt
Road," "Alice in Wonderland," and "Toothpick."
2. Manage camping in the Interface through:
*
The majority of illegal camping can be controlled by closing the
2060 road from the Forest Boundary above Granite Street to Four
Corners.
*Provide a free mlnlmum development camping area with toilet,
picnic tables and fire rings at the landing spot on Tolman Creek
Road (2080) across from the junction of 2080700.
3. Interpretation
*
Develop a sign for the Lamb Mine Trail to interpret the adjacent
Ponderosa Pine Research Natural Area.
*
Develop Environmental Education programs involving local schools
and guided walk-in loop tours on the City's Winburn parcel
(Suggested by Ashland Forest Commission?) The concept would
endeavor to foster an understanding and appreciation of the
Ashland Watershed. The relationship between the police firing
range and any recreation plans for the Winburn area needs
assessment.
4. Accessability for Persons with Disabilities
*
There is limited opportunity for disabled access in the
interface, but the upper 2060 road west of the proposed motorized
closure at Four Corners is relatively level and could provide
some excellent non-motorized opportunities for adventurous
physically challenged folks.
*
(Neil - Accessability study for Hamilton/Park Street area?)
*
The Lamb Mine Trail could be reconstructed to achieve
accessability standards, but access to that site via poor
existing roads reduces it's attractiveness.
TI