HomeMy WebLinkAboutMore Bemis (1/22)
. . . ~ .
!. John mclau hi in - REJECT TURN DOWN STOP THE BEMIS PROJECT!!!!!!!!!
Pa e 1 .1
From: <Marlaestes1955@aol.com>
To: <Awdb@aol.com>, <donlaws@mind.net>, <cate@mind.net>, <jmorrison@rvcog.org>,
<Cehearn@aol.com>, <katejackson@opendoor.com>, <grimaldg@ashland.or.us>,
<mac@ashland.or.us>, <alex@standingstonebrewing.com>
Date: 1/21/042:23PM
Subject: REJECT, TURN DOWN, STOP THE BEMIS PROJECT!!!!!!!!!
We are Ashland residents and want it to be known that we are absolutely
against the Bemis Project.
Marla & Tom Estes
1601 Ashland Mine Road
Ashland, OR 97520
5414824948
. I II I
f'johrl 'mdau' hlin~ Bemis s(' 'Box
"Pa 'e 1 :
From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
"Anita Nevison" <nevison@ashlandhome.net>
<mac@ashland.or.us>
1/21/042:30PM
Bemis Big Box
Dear Mayor and Councilors:
In politics, perception is reality. I am concerned that a major project
that would not pass muster on September 23, 2003 is acceptable four days
earlier. Please give a clear explanation of events. It's a matter of
integrity.
Anita Nevison
. . II
. ..
:. ~o~_~..~~I~~.~~~i~ -,",~.I~~.~~ d!?.~'t ~~I.~~..t.~~. _~.~~.is .P'~<?j~~t!. .
.. .... . .~~g~..~ .:
From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
"Kathy Lewis" <LewisKM@jacksoncounty.org> .
<mac@ashland.or.us>
1/22/04 9: 19AM
Please don't allow the Bemis project!
. . II
"
--
.....
...,J
~
~
~
(
Julm Norman
S96 Helman
Ashland
Oregon
USA
r~r? (>: c,'.. 'r
i .
t "
.~ ~,.<i'
r .
, ,
i.it__'i. '.'.' ',,'.. . ._".....~ ; " i '
_. .........-'-.-.......
Ashland Mayor and City Council
Ashland, Oregon
January 18, 2004
Honorable city councilors, please resist the temptation to make a
speedy approval of the Bemis multi..story building downtown as
currently proposed. The fivejiistory visual mass close to Ashland
Creek, as well as the building's shadow, are of great concern to me.
This proposal to replace a natural outdoor eating area, with a multi...
story wall, is significant to our future as a tourism~based community_
This project will effect Ashland's visual and climatic environment
on a primary street corner of tourism activity. This decision needs
time, to protect this environment from degradation.
This proposal needs to be revised and resubmitted, under current
planning department guidelines. Considering this current proposal
under old guidelines would invite controversy_ This building project
should set a good precedent, not a bad one.
I would respect the City's right to choose experts among the
community to fully explore the environmental impacts of the proposed
building and then make an informed decision. I recommend that
John Fields be part of that team.
Thanks so much for your hard work,
Julie Norman
i. . III I