HomeMy WebLinkAboutCDBG Program
CITY OF
ASHl~AND
Staff Report
To:
Title:
Dept:
Date:
Submitted By:
Housing Commission
Community Development Block Grant Program Year Change
Planning Department
July 28, 2004
Brandon Goldman, Housing Program Specialist
Synopsis
The Housing Commission and City Council is to review a proposed change in the Comnlunity
Development Block Grant (CDBG) program year to shift from a calendar year to a fiscal year. The
Housing Commission shall forward a recommendation to the City Council for review at a public hearing
scheduled for September 7th, 2004. In the coming year the City will have $214,877.33 to reprogram due
to the City buy-out of the CDBG contribution to the Grove facility. This in addition to $200,000 in
2005 year competitive award funds, and approximately 60,000 in prior year funds, we anticipate
approximately a total $475,000 in CDBG funds that can be applied to a selected project{s) in the
coming year. Depending on the option selected these funds could be available in various ways.
Recommendation
Staff recommends Option 1 as presented below, to change the CDBG program year to be based on the
Fiscal Year (July 1 -June 30th.)
The proposed change in the CDBG program year is intended to coordinate Ashland's CDBG program to
match regional, state, and federal grant funding cycles, to streamline the City's internal budgeting process,
and to ensure awarded CDBG funds are available soon after the award selection.
Option 1
This proposed change would shift the beginning.. of the program year from January 1,
2005 to July 1, 2005. As a result of this change, a 6 month delay in the competitive award
process for the 2005 CDBG is anticipated. In lieu of issuing a request for proposals
(RFP) in August of2004 for an award to be made in November, the change to a fiscal
year would mean the RFP would not be issued until February 2005 with an award to be
made in April-June, to distribute funds after July 1st, 2005 upon approval of the City's
annual CDBG Action Plan..
In past years awards were made in November, but due to the fact that the funds are not
made available to the City for distribution until the Congress (federal) makes its
appropriations to the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), such funds
are not typically available until April or May. -This delay, from when a property is..
initially identified in the RFP in August, to receiving funds in Mayor June of tht:
following year has been a hardship on property owners willing to sell to a CDBG funded
project. Given Ashland's competitive real estate market such delays place CDBCi land
acquisition projects at risk. The shift from a calendar year to a fiscal year is exp(~cted to
~~
@.
reduce this delay from when an award is made to when funds are available from 6-7
months to 1-2 months.
Another impetus for the proposed change to a fiscal year is to coordinate the City of
Ashland's CDBG program with that of the City of Medford, the County and the State as
well as A.shland's own budget year. There exists opportunities for the City to eventually
help forrn a consortium with Medford and the County to become an entitlement entity for
HOME funds. These funds that are used to support affordable housing projects require a
coordinated consortium and in sYnchronizing our program years that will simplify the
coordination necessary. Furthermore, it.is staffs beliefby providing an award cycle
consistent with the State and the City of Medford, local housing providers can coordinate
their activities and applications for funds more effectively.
In this option all funds would be aggregated into one award in the amount of
approxirnately $475,000 to be awarded in May-June 2005, to be available upon approval
of the 2005 Action Plan and completion of other regulatory requirements (Environmental
Review), in late August or September 2005 for distribution. The selected project needs to
be a project that is ready to proceed to ensure the funds are expended in a timely manner.
Option 1
The City can opt to retain the existing program year (January I-December 31) with no
change. This option would then have the City immediately issue an RFP for the award
selection process to begin. Of the anticipated $475,000 only $275,000 would be available
until April-May of 2005, when the City could expect to receive its 2005 allocation from
HUD-.
Option :!
The City can approve of the program year shift to a Fiscal Year, yet immediately issue an
RFP for the $275,000 amount through the existing process. These funds would be
available for distribution upon approval <?f a modified 2004 Action Plan by HUD and
applicable environmental review and other regulatory requirements being met depending
on the project selected. The City would then issue a new RFP for approximately
$200,0010 for the 2005 program year. The selected project would then receive funding
upon approval of a 2005 Action plan and review of applicable environmental review and
other regulatory requirements being completed in August or September 2005.
_..111I
t:;\
CITY OF
ASHL~AND
August 5, 2004
Affordable Housing Providers,
The Ashland Housing Commission held a public hearing on July 28th to determine whether Ashland
should change its program year (from a calendar year to a July 1 Fiscal Year) and also recommend
whether past accumulated carryover and program income would be awarded. The Housing
Commission has recommended that the program year be changed to a fiscal year, and further that the
available $274,000 CDBG funds (past carryover and program income) be made available through a
Request for Proposals.
This recommendation if approved by the City Council results in two RFPs, one for $274,000 for
reprogramming past funds at this time, and a second RFP for $200,000 at a later date (Feb 2005). If you
would like to respond to the RFP, copies are available on the City of Ashland web page, '.
www.ashlalld.or.us.Click on Document Center in the left hand bar, then click on "2004 Reprogrammed
CDBG RFP". Printed copies are available at the Community Development and Engineering Services
building at 51 Winburn Way. The completed RFP is due by 3 :00 p.m on Monday, Septelnber 6th, 2004.
As the program year change, and RFP process issues are still the matter of a public hearing, if you are
unable to respond to the current RFP or would otherwise like to provide comment regarding the change
in Program Year and resulting RFP process, please forward your comments to:
Brandon Goldman
RE: CDBG Program Year Change
20 East Main Street
Ashland, OR, 97520
The City Council will hold a public hearing on September 7th to review whether the reallocation of the
$274,000 noted in this RFP shall be awarded in November of2004, or potentially be conabined with the
City's 2005 CDBG award allocation.
The City Council can, at the September 7th, 2004 meeting, decide to aggregate funds into one $474,000
award. This RFP is being issued to ensure a timely award process and a month for applicants to
complete a proposal, should the Council choose the alternative to issue two RFPs as recommended by
the Housing Commission. In the event the Council elects to issue only one RFP for the combined total
of $474,000, in February of 2005, this RFP will be nullified and applicants will be able to submit revised
proposals for the 2005 program year.
Thank you and please call should you have any questions,
~L PL~
Brandon Goldman . .
From the Desk of:
Brandon Goldman
Housing Program Specialist
Department of Community Development
20 East Main Street
Ashland, Oregon 97520
WWN.ashland.or.us
Tel: 541-488-5305
Fax: 541-488-5311
TTY: 800-735-2900
r~'
~
APPLICATION SCHEDULE AND DEADLINES
August 6, 2004
RFP applications available to the public.
September 6,2004
Applications due by 3:00 p.m.
September 07, 2004
- Public Hearing before the Ashland City Council at 7:00 p.m. at the
City Council Chambers, 1155 E. Main St. Council to determine
whether the CDBG past funds are to be awarded under this RFP
award process, or aggregated into the 2005 award RFP process.
Septembera..10,2004
Staff review and ranking of applications.
Staff will assess if the proposal is aneligibleCDBG activity and if it
addresses a Consolidated Plan spending priority. This assessment
wiUbeprovided to the AShland Housing Commission at the Public
Hearing.
'SeptEmlb~r22t2()04
A PubHcHearin~'Nillt>e hf!Jd . at4:()Opm~7f()r~tq~ A*,t1Jand.. Housing
Com.mission in~heat t~e8ommuniW[)ev~I()Pmrr1t~qildin9'
Siskiyou Room, at 51 Winburn Way. Th~HolJsingQqmmjssionwi1l
provide recom mendations for. awards to theCityC6uhcil.
Octob~r19,~O()4
PublicH~aripgll~f?r~t~e AshlandCity~o~:~pil~tZ:qOJ?'n1<attt1~
City COlJncil 'Chambers, 115SE.MaInSt.Oo'uncil tq..makeflnatawar{j
selecti6h(S) .
Ques.tions?
Contac:t. Brandon Goldmal1J . AssistantPlal1ner
City 01 AShlan d Planning Division
552.2076~ orGoldnlanB@ashland.or.us
CDBG RFP 2004-reprogram
City of Ashland
Page 3
fi'.
LBr()rl9gnGOldrnan -.CDBG he()ring
I...."..".".""=."...c.....,,,.~~............. ........ ....... . ..... . .."
J-Jage 1 ;
_'^_~,~._.~"-~~~._"-._...c..'~_.__.~:._, ., .
From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
"Merry Hart" <mhart@access-inc.org>
"Brandon Goldman" <BrandonG@ashland.or.us>
7/28/04 10:12:59 AM
CDBG hearing
Brandon,
In response to changing the CDBG year, we have no problem with the timing
change but we would like to see the applications sent out to interested
parties at least two months in advance of when they are due. If any Board
actions are needed before application can be made, that gives enough time
for a board to act at it's monthly meeting. I believe the overall quality
of application would be better as well.
We do want to keep in touch about the potential for the HOME money being
diverted from OHCS and sent girectly to the area. We would like to be
included in discussions about how that would impact the communities, the
benefits and things of such a move.
Thanks,
Merry
{C;';