HomeMy WebLinkAbout2913 Measure 37
ORDINANCE NO. 2913
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ASHLAND, OREGON, REGARDING CLAIMS
FOR JUST COMPENSATION ARISING OUT OF THE ENACTMENT OF BALLOT
MEASURE 37, MAKING CERTAIN PROVISIONS THEREFORE, AND DECLARING
AN EMERGENCY.
THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF ASHLAND DO ORDAIN AS FOllOWS:
SECTION 1. A new Chapter 110, Ballot Measure 37 Claims, shall be added to Title 18
of the Ashland land Use Ordinance (AlUO) which shall read as follows:
ALUO 18.110.001: Purpose. The purpose of this Chapter is to establish the contents of
a demand for just compensation under 2004 Measure 37 in order that the merits of
claims under Measure 37 be adequately evaluated; to provide procedures for
processing such demands; to provide a fair, just and expeditious evaluation of Measure
37 claims by the City; and to protect the citizens of the City of Ashland from the
detrimental effects to public health, safety and welfare that would result from the
granting of non-meritorious claims. The provisions of this Chapter are adopted pursuant
to the City of Ashland's home rule authority under the Oregon Constitution, Article XI,
Section 2, and apply to those demands for just compensation that are or may be
allowed under Measure 37, enacted by the electors of the State of Oregon as a statute
of the State of Oregon on November 2, 2004.
ALUO 18.110.010: Definitions. For the purposes of this Chapter, and the evaluation,
assessment and processing of Measure 37 claims, the following mean:
A. Affected Property: the private real property that is alleged to have suffered a
reduction in fair market value as result of the City's regulation restricting the use of that
property and for which a property owner seeks compensation for the reduction in value.
B. Appraisal: a written statement of an opinion of the value of real property prepared by
an appraiser licensed by the Appraiser Certification and Licensure Board of the State of
Oregon, and who holds the applicable certification for the type of appraisal.
C. Claimant: the property owner who submits a written claim for just compensation
under Section 18.110.020.
D. City Adnlinistrator: the City Administrator of the City of Ashland, or the City
Administrator's designee.
E. Comm()n and Historically Recognized Public Nuisance Under Common law:
unreasonable interferences with rights common to the general public in the use and
enjoyment of land, as recognized in judicial decisions applying common law rules.
Under comnlon law rules, an interference is unreasonable if the harm to the public right
is significant, and the particular public use interfered with is' well suited to the character
of the locality and the owner's conduct or use of the land is unsuited to the character of
that locality.
F. Current ()wner: the present fee simple owner of real property that is the subject of the
demand for compensation, as reflected in the deed records of Jackson County, Oregon,
C:\DOCUME....1\christeb\LOCALS-1\Temp\M37 Process Ordinance (final).doc
Page - 1
or the present owner of any interest in real property that is the subject of the demand for
compensation, as reflected in a written instrument conveying or creating the interest.
G. Demand for Just Compensation: A written demand for just compensation by a
current owner pursuant to Measure 37 that fulfills the requirements of ALUO
18.110.020"
H. Enforced: to compel conformity with a land use regulation by the issuance of a final
order in a contested judicial or quasi-judicial proceeding; to issue a final decision
denying an application to use private real property, or interest in real property, for a
stated purpose through the application of a land use regulation as an approval criterion.
I. Exempt Land Use Regulation: A land use regulation that:
1. Restricts or prohibits activities commonly and historically
recognized as public nuisances under common law;
2. Restricts or prohibits activities for the protection of public health and safety,
such as fire and building codes, health and sanitation regulations, solid or hazardous
waste regulations, and pollution control regulations;
3. Is required in order to comply with federal law;
4. RE~stricts or prohibits the use of property for the purpose of selling
pornography or performing nude dancing; or
5. W'as enacted prior to the date of acquisition of the property by the owner or a
family member of the owner.
J. Fair Market Value of the Property: the minimum amount of cash which could
reasonably be expected to be paid for the purchase of a current owner's real property or
interest in real property, by an informed buyer, acting without compulsion, to an
informed sE~lIer, also acting without compulsion, in an arms-length transaction.
K. Family nlember: a member of the current owner's family, as defined by Measure
37.
L. Just Compensation: an amount of money equal to the reduction in the fair market
value of real property that is the direct result of the future enactment of a land use
regulation or enforcement of an existing land use regulation which provides the basis for
a demand for just compensation, as of the date a current owner makes the demand for
just compensation. A reduction of the fair market value of property shall exclude any
reduction resulting from events, actions or occurrences other than the restriction of uses
permitted by the land use regulation. A reduction in fair market value shall not include
reductions resulting from depreciation, changes in local, state or national economic
conditions, failures by the current owner to gainfully use the real property, lack of public
services to the real property, reductions in fair market value resulting from the existence
of a historically or commonly recognized public nuisance or private nuisance on or
about the property or surrounding property, changes in the value of the real property
resulting from fluctuations in the real estate market, or conditions on surrounding
property, changes in value resulting from the existence of any private covenants,
conditions and restrictions, changes in value caused by any other easements or
restrictions on the property or the use thereof or reductions related to any other factors
other than reductions which are the direct result of the enactment or enforcement of a
land use regulation.
M. Land Use Regulation: a land use regulation as defined by Measure 37.
N. Interest in Real Property: any legally recognized, alienable interest in real property,
C:\DOCUME....1\christeb\LOCALS-1\Temp\M37 Process Ordinance (final).doc
Page - 2
having monetary value, which is less than a fee simple absolute.
O. Measure 37 claim: a claim for just compensation arising from the circumstances set
forth in Ballot Measure 37, adopted by the people of the State of Oregon on November
2, 2004.
P. Real Property: privately held lots, parcels or tracts, as described in the deed
conveying the real property, or the interest in real property as conveyed in such lots,
parcels or tracts, owned by a current owner.
Q. Restricts the Use of Property: prohibiting a particular use of the property or making
that use on~y permissible under certain conditions. Standards that regulate the form of
development, how a structure must be constructed, or how grading or fill is to be
conducted, such as yard setback requirements, height limitations, erosion control
measures and building code standards, are not restrictions on the use of property.
Regulations requiring or setting fees to be charged are not restrictions on the use of
property.
ALUO 18.110.015. Measure 37 Demands; Ripeness; Claim Accrual.
A. The current owner of real property may submit a demand for just compensation
under Measure 37 if the City enforces a land use regulation, other than an exempt
regulation, against the property; the land use regulation was enacted after the date the
current owner, or, in proper case, a family member of the owner as defined in ALUO
18.110.010, acquired the real property; the land use regulation restricts uses permitted
on the real property; and the restriction imposed by the land use regulation has the
effect of causing a reduction in the fair market value of the real property.
B. Any current owner who intends to assert a Measure 37 claim shall make that
intention known at the time the current owner submits an application for any permit that
would result in the use of the land use regulation that would be the basis for the
Measure 3~r claim as an approval criteria.
C. No enforcement shall be deemed to have occurred merely because the current
owner has submitted a demand for just compensation to the City and the demand for
just compensation was denied. Nothing in this subsection shall be deemed to prevent
the City from engaging in any action that would result in the resolution of a potential
claim unper Measure 37 prior to the date the land use regulation is enforced against the
current owner's real property.
ALUO 18.1i 10.020. Contents of Demands for Compensation; Filing.
A. In order to adequately, completely and expeditiously assess the validity of a current
owner's demand for compensation, and to protect the public interest when determining
whether to compensate for, modify, remove or not apply a land use regulation, any
demand for compensation submitted to the City shall consist of and include the
following:
1. A completed demand for just compensation signed by the current owner and
all others having an ownership interest in the property. The demand shall be submitted
upon forms prescribed by the City Administrator.
2. Copies of all deeds and other instruments conveying interests in the affected
real property to the current owner.
3. A title report issued not more than thirty days prior to the submission of the
C:\DOCUME-1\christeb\LOCALS-1\Temp\M37 Process Ordinance (final).doc
Page - 3
demand for just compensation, which shall include the title history, the date the current
owner acquired title to the real property, the interests held by any other current owners,
an identification of any restrictions on use of the real property unrelated to the land use
regulation against which just compensation is sought, including, but not limited to, any
restrictions established by covenants, conditions and restrictions; easements, other
private restrictions, or other regulations, restrictions or contracts.
4. A list of the names and addresses, according to the most recent property tax
assessment role, of all property owners owning land within three hundred feet of the
exterior boundaries of the property for which a demand for just compensation is being
made.
5. A copy of the land use regulation(s) that is(are) the basis for the demand for
just compensation. All potential claims of the current owner must be consolidated at the
time a demand for just compensation is made.
6. A copy of the land use regulation(s), showing the uses which were allowed at
the time the current owner, or in relevant case the family member, acquired the property
for which a demand for just compensation is being made.
7. For a Measure 37 claim based on descent, proof that the prior owner was
a family me!mber of the current owner.
8. Copies of any leases, easements, contracts or covenants, conditions and
restrictions (CCRs) applicable to the real property, if any, that impose restrictions or
other encurnbrances on the use of the property.
9. The amount of the alleged reduction in fair market value of the real
property that the current owner believes is the amount of just compensation, together
with the methodology for arriving at the alleged reduction in fair market value and any
supporting documentation such as an appraisal by an appraiser licensed by the
Appraiser Certification and Licensure Board of the State of Oregon.
10. Any other facts the current owner believes are material to the evaluation and
assessment of claim for just compensation.
11. A $250 application processing fee.
B. Demands for just compensation shall be submitted to the City Administrator. No
demand for just compensation shall be deemed submitted until all materials required by
this section have been provided to the City Administrator by the current owner. A notice
of submissiion shall be sent to the current owner at the time the City Administrator
determines the current owner's demand for just compensation has been deemed
submitted.
C. Notwithstanding a claimant's failure to provide all of the information and/or the
application processing fee required by subsection (A) of this section, the city may review
and act on a claim.
ALUO 18.1110.025. Notice of Demand for Just Compensation.
A. The City Administrator shall mail notice of demand to any other owner with an
interest in the current owner's real property, to all owners of real property located within
three hundred feet of the current owner's real property, as listed on the most recent
property tax assessment rolls, to neighborhood groups and community organizations
whose boundaries include the current owner's real property and to those requesting
notice. The notice shall:
C:\DOCUME-1\christeb\LOCALS-1\Temp\M37 Process Ordinance (final).doc
Page - 4
1. State the basis of the demand, the amount of the compensation sought and
the land USE~ regulation which is the basis of the demand;
2. IdE~ntify the current owner's real property by the street address or other easily
understood geographical reference;
3. State that persons noticed may provide written comments on the demand, and
provide the date on which written comments are due;
4. Idl~ntify a city representative and telephone number to contact to obtain
additional information; and
5. State that a copy of the demand and the supporting documents submitted by
the current owner are available for inspection at no cost, and that copies will be
provided at reasonable cost.
B. Written comments regarding a demand may be submitted to the City Administrator.
Comments must be received by the City Administrator within 14 days from the date of
mailing of the notice of demand for just compensation.
ALUO 18.110.030. Claim Processing and Evaluation.
A. After the current owner's demand for just compensation is deemed submitted or is
processed as provided in ALUO 18.11 0.020( c), the City Administrator shall review and
evaluate the demand and determine whether the demand meets the requirements, and
satisfies the criteria, of Measure 37. The City Administrator may obtain other appraisals
and opinions of the value of the real property for the purposes of evaluating the current
owner's estimate of the reduction in the fair market value.
B. The current owner has the burden of proof to demonstrate to the City by a
preponderance of the evidence that just compensation is due under Measure 37.
C. The City Administrator may deny a claim for just compensation based upon one or
more of the! following findings:
1. The regulation that is the subject of the claim does not restrict the use of the
private real property.
2. The fair market value of the property is not reduced by the enactment or
enforcement of the regulation.
3. The claim was not timely filed.
4. The Claimant is not the current property owner.
5. The Claimant or family member of Claimant was not the property owner at the
time the regulation was adopted.
6. The regulation is a historically and commonly recognized nuisance law or a
law regulating pornography or nude dancing.
7. The regulation is required by federal law.
8. The regulation protects public health or safety.
9. The City is not the entity responsible for payment. The City is not responsible if
the challenged law, rule, ordinance, resolution, goal or other enactment was not
enacted by the City.
10. The City has not taken final action to enforce or apply the regulation to the
property for which compensation is claimed.
11. The Claimant is not legally entitled to compensation for a reason other than
those listed in subsections 1 through 10. The basis for this finding must be clearly
explained.
C:\DOCUME-1\christeb\LOCALS-1\Temp\M37 Process Ordinance (final).doc
Page - 5
12. The City Council has not established a fund for payment of claims under
Measure 37'.
D. The City Administrator shall maintain a record of all costs, including personnel costs,
incurred by the City in processing the demand for just compensation. The City shall bill
the current owner for all costs incurred, less the $250 application fee provided for in
ALUO 18.1'1 0.020(a)(11). The current owner shall remit to the City an amount equal to
such costs 1Nithin thirty days after the date of billing. In the event the City determines
that just cornpensation should be paid, the costs, less the $250 application fee shall be
refunded. In the event the current owner files an action in circuit court and prevails, the
claim processing costs, less the $250 claim processing application fee provided for in
ALUO 18.11 0.020(a)(11), shall be added to the judgment as a cost or disbursement, so
long as the current owner has timely paid those costs.
ALUO 18.110.035. Notice to City Council and Council Decision.
A. In the event the City Administrator has denied the demand, or in the event the City
Administrator has recommended a determination that the demand is valid, the City
Administrator shall forward the decision to the City Council, supported by findings. If the
City Administrator recommends the demand be granted, in whole or in part, the City
Administrator shall include a recommendation whether just compensation should be
paid and the amount of such compensation, or whether the land use regulation be
modified, removed or not applied to the real property.
B. If the City Administrator's decision is to deny the demand in whole, and the City
Administrator does not receive a request from at least two or more Councilors to hold a
hearing regarding the demand within ten days after receiving notice of the decision, the
City Administrator may issue a summary denial.
C. The City Administrator shall schedule a public hearing before the City Council on any
demand for just compensation, other than demands for which a summary denial has
been issued under subsection (B) of this section. Notice of the public hearing shall be
provided to the current owner, to all persons entitled to notice under ALUO 18.110.025,
to neighborhood groups and community organizations whose boundaries include the
current owner's real property and to those requesting notice. Notice may also be
published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City, at the City
Administrator's discretion.
D. After public hearing, the City Council may:
1. Deny the demand for just compensation based upon one of the grounds for
denial set forth in ALUO 18.11 0.030(C).
2. Award compensation, either in the amount requested, or in some other amount
supported by the evidence in the record. Payment of any compensation is subject to the
availability and appropriation of funds for that purpose.
3. Modify the regulation.
4. R.emove the regulation.
5. Not apply the regulation.
6. Acquire the affected Property through negotiation or eminent domain.
7 . Take such other actions as the Council deems appropriate consistent with
Measure 37.
E. The City Council's decision to modify, remove or waive the land use regulation shall
C:\DOCUME-1\christeb\LOCALS-1\Temp\M37 Process Ordinance (final).doc
Page - 6
be based on whether the public interest would be better served by either paying just
compensation to the current owner or by modifying, removing or waiving the land use
regulation and shall be in the form of a resolution.
F. The Owner shall bear the burden of proof relating to the Demand and entitlement to
just compensation. The city shall bear the burden of proof to show that the regulation is
exempt under Measure 37, or ALUO 18.110.010(1). The standard of proof shall be by a
preponderance of the evidence.
G. A copy of the City Council decision or the City Administrator's summary denial shall
be sent by rnail to the Current Owner, to each person with an ownership interest, and to
each individual or entity that participated in the review process, provided a mailing
address or lemail address was provided to the city as part of the review process. The
City Council may establish any relevant conditions of approval for compensation, should
compensation be granted, or for any other action taken under this subsection.
H. Failure to comply with any condition of approval is grounds for revocation of the
approval of the compensation for the Demand, grounds for the City to recover any
compensatilon paid and grounds for revocation of any other action taken under this
Section.
I. A decision to remove, modify or not apply a land use regulation is personal to the
Owner, and shall automatically become void and invalid if the Owner conveys the
Property to another person before development of the Property consistent with the
removal of, modification of or decision to not apply the land use regulation is completed.
Development of the Property under this sub-section shall not be deemed to be
completed until a certificate of occupancy or other appropriate certificate indicating
completion is issued by the City of Ashland building official.
J. In the event the Owner (or the Owner's successor in interest, if the development is
completed as described in ALU018.11 0.035(1)) fails to fully comply with all conditions of
approval or otherwise does not comply fully with the conditions of approval, the city may
institute a revocation or modification proceeding before the city council.
ALUO 18.1110.040. Modification, Removal or Waiver of Land Use Regulation.
A. If the Cijty Council directs that the land use regulation be modified, removed, not
applied or 'Naived, then the current owner shall be allowed to use the real property for a
use permitted at the time the current owner acquired the property. Successors in
interest to the current owner shall acquire their interests in the real property subject to
such land use regulations as are in effect as of the date of the successor's acquisition of
the real property, as provided by Subsection (3)(E) of Measure 37, and such interests
shall have the legal status otherwise provided by law.
B. A copy of any City resolution compensating for, modifying, removing or waiving the
land use regulation shall be recorded in the deed records of the county wherein the real
property lie~s.
C. A copy of all claims submitted and the final decision and action taken in response to
it will be provided by the City Administrator at least annually to the State of Oregon-
designated agency tracking cases related to Measure 37.
ALUO 18:110.045. Private Cause of Action.
A. In order to protect the reasonable investment-based expectations of other property
C:\DOCUME-1\christeb\LOCALS-1\Temp\M37 Process Ordinance (final).doc
Page - 7
owners who have relied upon land use regulations in purchasing real property, if:
1. The modification, removal or waiver of the land use regulation pursuant to
Measure 37' results in a private nuisance on other owners' real property, then the
affected owner or owners shall have a cause of action in circuit court against the current
owner to abate the nuisance or to recover an amount equal to the diminution of value in
that owner or owner's real property as a result of the nuisance;
2. The City Council's approval of a claim by removing or modifying a land use
regulation causes a reduction in value of other property located in the vicinity of the
Property, the owner(s) of the other property shall have a cause of action in the
appropriate Oregon Circuit Court to recover from the Owner(s) (of the Property subject
to the Demand) in the amount of such reduction in value.
B. The prevailing party in an action set forth in subsection A of this section shall be
entitled to n~asonable attorney's fees and costs at trial and upon appeal.
ALUO 18.110.050. Attorney Fees. If a Demand under Measure 37 and this Section is
denied or not fully paid within 180 days of the date of filing a completed Demand, and
the Owner commences suit or action to collect compensation, and, if the City is the
prevailing party in such action, then City shall be entitled to any sum which a court,
including any appellate court, may adjudge reasonable as attorney's fees. In the event
the City is the prevailing party and is represented by "in-house" counsel, the prevailing
party shall nevertheless be entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees based upon the
reasonable time incurred and the attorney fee rates and charges reasonably and
generally accepted in Ashland, Oregon, for the type of legal services performed.
SECTION :z. Severability. The sections, subsections, paragraphs and clauses of this
ordinance are severable. The invalidity of one section, subsection, paragraph, or clause
shall not affect the validity of the remaining sections, subsections, paragraphs and
clauses.
SECTION :3. Emergency. The City Council of the City of Ashland finds that the health,
safety and welfare of the City of Ashland requires this ordinance to have immediate
effect. Therefore, the City Council hereby declares the existence of an emergency and
this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from the time of its passage by the Council
and approval by the Mayor.
The foregoing ordinance was first read by title only in accordance with Article X,
Section 2(C) of the City Charter on the 30th day of November 2004,
and duly PASSED and ADOPTED this 30th day of November, 2004.
"
C:\DOCUME-1\christeb\LOCALS-1\Temp\M37 Process Ordinance (final).doc
Page - 8
u.~~
Barbara Christensen, City Recorder
SIGNED and APPROVED this 1st day of December, 2004.
Alan W. DeBoer, Mayor
C:\DOCUME'''1\christeb\LOCALS~1\Temp\M37 Process Ordinance (final).doc
Page - 9