HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005-0202 Study Session MIN
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
FEBRUARY 2.2005
PAGE I 01'3
MINUTES FOR THE STUDY SESSION
ASHLAND CITY COUNCIL
Wednesday, February 2,2005 at 12:00 p.m.
Council Chambers, 1175 East Main Street
CALL TO ORDER:
Mayor Morrison called the Study Session to order at 12:04 p.m. in the Civic Center Council Chambers.
ATTENDANCE:
Councilor Hardesty, Amarotico and Silbiger were present.
Councilor Jackson and Hartzell arrived at 12:12 p.m.; Council Hearn arrived at 12:18 p.m.
Public Works Director Paula Brown and City Administrator Gino Grimaldi were also present.
1. Talent Ashland Phoenix (TAP) Intertie PiDeline UDdate on Preliminary En!!ineerin!! and
Future Water Line Construction from Talent to Ashland.
Public Works Director Paula Brown explained that the purpose of the Study Session was to provide an
update on the progress of the TAP Intertie. Laura Dutt of Carollo Engineers and Ed Olson, who will be
filling in for Ms. Brown while she is on military leave, were introduced. Also present were City
employees Pieter Smeenk, Mike Morrison and Keith Woodley.
Status of the TAP Proiect:
Ms. Brown eXplained that for the TAP pre-design, Staff has evaluated the different alignments, the City's
water system needs, the compatibility issues, and have discussed where they would bring in the TAP
pipeline. Ms. Brown noted that Highway 99 was the obvious choice to connect to the TAP. Ms. Brown
explained that currently, the TAP pipeline runs from Medford through Talent and stops at the end of
Talent near Suncrest. She stated that the TAP system for Talent and Phoenix was up and running, and
that currently all of Talent and Phoenix's water comes from the Medford Water Commission. Ms. Brown
reminded the Council that the TAP project for Ashland would not replace the City's water, but would
only supplement the current supply by 1.5 mg per day. During an emergency, the TAP would provide
enough water to sustain the water needs for the City of Ashland. Ms. Brown stated that one of the most
important things they have done to date was the completion of the water model. She explained that the
model was used to measure how the water from the City's water treatment plant was distributed and how
that would change with the new TAP pipeline. It was noted that Carollo Engineers helped to develop the
water model and that it has been used extensively.
Reservoir Storage Analysis:
Laura Dutt of Carollo Engineers eXplained the existing conditions and stated that based on a maximum
usage day, the water demand was 7.5 mgd (million gallons per day) and that overall, the system has a
deficit of .65 mg. At this rate, by the year 2050, there will be maximum daily demand of 10 mgd and the
overall system deficit will be 2.52 mg. Ms. Brown explained that the City was currently in a storage
deficit and that Staff has been aware of this issue. She also noted that there was a line item related to this
issue in the budget and that the deficit would be corrected by next year by adding a second distribution
reservoir. She added that the deficit was not a result of a water supply issue, but had to deal with
distributing the water to the right locations. Ms. Dutt explained the Reservoir Storage Analysis and
stated that some of the service areas have a surplus while others are deficient. Overall, the City currently
has a storage deficit of .65 mg. To help even out the water supply, the City could extend the service areas
that are having a surplus.
Ms. Brown clarified that the City was already working to correct the existing deficit, and that the TAP
was a separate issue and would help to accommodate the City's water needs in the future.
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
FEBRUAR Y 2. 2005
PAGE 201'3
Ms. Dutt explained the four recommendations that Carollo Engineers has proposed:
1) Install a new 2.5 mg TAP Reservoir that would service Zones 1 & 7.
2) Reconfigure the system for Strawberry Reservoir to service Zone 6.
3) Install an additional .75 mg reservoir to service Zone 5.
4) Utilize the surplus in the Alsing Reservoir by increasing the service size of Zone 2.
It was noted that the larger reservoir would not need to be constructed right away, but would be necessary
for the TAP project. Ms. Dutt stated that there are two alternatives for the location of the TAP Reservoir.
The first would be at an elevation of 1,970' on Ashland Mine Road and the other would be at a higher
elevation of 2,160' on Grandview Drive. It was noted that because Ashland was at a higher elevation
than Talent, the TAP water would need to be pumped uphill to the new reservoir regardless of where it
was located. Ms. Dutt explained the pros and cons for each site. She stated that the construction costs
would be the same for each alternative, but that there were other considerations including maintenance
and operational costs.
Water Quality:
Ms. Brown explained that contrary to public belief, there is no quality difference between Medford and
Ashland water. She explained that when hooked up, the TAP water would blend with Ashland's water
and that most of it would stay in Zone 7.
Water Rights:
Ms. Brown stated that the City of Ashland would have a 450 mg water supply deficit by the year 2050 if
nothing was done. To address this problem, the City has endorsed the TAP project and has purchased
1,000 acre-feet of stored water in Lost Creek Lake. Additionally, the City intends to purchase 384 acre-
feet in FY09. However the City still needs to gain a "water right" before it can begin to use the water.
Ms. Brown explained that Staff has delayed the water right application pending the results of litigation
that challenges the need for beneficial use within 5 years of gaining a permit.
Scheduling:
Ms. Brown eXplained that the TAP pre-design was scheduled for completion in March 2005. Between
July 2005 and January 2006 the location of the TAP Reservoir would be determined and the land
purchased. The TAP final design would be completed between April 2008 to April 2009, and the
construction should begin between July 2009 and July 2010. For the Zone 5 Reservoir, the design should
be completed between July and December 2005 and construction will begin between July 2006 and May
2007.
Ms. Brown explained that Staff was recommending that they proceed with the TAP project as scheduled.
The next step is to identify a location for the TAP Reservoir and Ms. Brown recommended that they
follow Alternative 1 and locate a site on Ashland Mine Road. She eXplained that this location was closer
to Highway 99 and it would be easier to install the pipes at this location.
Questions & Answers:
Ms. Brown clarified that a pump station would need to be constructed in Talent and explained that there
was not enough pressure to get the water from Talent to Ashland due to the elevation change.
Ms. Brown clarified that the reservoir would likely be a concrete structure. In regards to the site, Staff
will test the soil conditions and perform other necessary tests before a site is purchased.
Ms. Brown stated that due to the uncertainties of the future, she is recommending that the City continue to
work on this project and complete the TAP ahead schedule. She stated that the City would not have to
crry COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
FEBRUAR Y 2. 2005
PAGE 301'3
turn the water on until it was needed, but that it was important to have the groundwork completed in case
there was a need for the TAP water before 2016. She also mentioned that the annual escalation of
construction costs was approximately 4-5%.
A comment was made expressing concern with the "build it, but not turn it on" concept.
Ed Olson stated that after the TAP was ready, the City of Ashland would most likely only use it only a
few days a year during the peak times and would increase usage as needed until 2016.
Additional comment was made requesting a clear assessment of the costs. Ms. Brown stated that they are
still in the preliminary design stage and stated that Staff will provide these figures to Council before they
are required to make their next decision. She added that this issue will not come back before Council for
a decision until 2007. She stated that she understands Council's request for hard numbers, but explained
that Staff will not have those figures until some of the preliminary decisions have been made.
Conservation:
Ms. Brown displayed a graph that compared peak water usage in July of 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, and
2004. She noted that typically July is the hottest month of the year and stated that water usage usually
increases when temperatures reach over 95 degrees.
Ms. Brown mentioned the Talent Irrigation District (TID), and stated that Staff would like to put more
money toward the TID and that it is currently under-funded.
Public Works Superintendent Mike Morrison informed the Council that there are approximately 300 TID
users on the City side. He also spoke regarding Reeder Reservoir and stated that it has been filling with
organics for several years. He stated that the organics are starting to rot and deteriorate and that this will
affect the quality of water in the reservoir. Mr. Morrison recommended that Council look into options for
cleaning out Reeder Reservoir.
Council questioned what was being done by the Conservation Department to encourage water
conservation. Comment was made that every drop of water saved is one that the City will not have to pay
for in the future. Ms. Brown stated that she has met with the City Administrator in regards to the
Conservation Dept. and has discussed the possibility her having more involvement with that department.
ADJOURNED: Meeting adjourned at 1 :51 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
April Lucas, Assistant to City Recorder