HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005-04-06 Historic MIN
ASHLAND HISTORIC COMMISSION
Minutes
April 6, 2005
Community Development/Engineering Services Building – 51 Winburn Way – Siskiyou Room
Historic Commissioners Present:
Dale Shostrom, Keith Swink, Rob Saladoff, Tom Giordano, Terry Skibby,
Jay Leighton, Alex Krach, Sam Whitford and Henry Baker
Absent Members:
None
Council Liaison:
Absent - Jack Hardesty
High School Liaison:
None Appointed
SOU Liaison:
None Appointed
Staff Present:
Maria Harris, Senior Planner, Bill Molnar, Planning Manager, Billie Boswell, Administration
CALL TO ORDER – SPECIAL MEETING
At 5:03 p.m., Chairman Dale Shostrom called the meeting to order.
SELECTION OF “DISTINQUISHED ARCHITECTURAL PRESERVATION” AWARDS
Civic/Institutional Award: Trinity Episcopal Church, 44 N. Second Street
Ashland First Congregational Church, 717 Siskiyou Boulevard
Commercial, Interior Renovation/Exterior Restoration: 125 East Main Street, Paddington Station
Residential, Historically Compatible New Construction: 310 High Street (Traditional);
765 Iowa Street (Non-Traditional)
Residential, Accessory Structure/Detached Garage: 117 Church Street (New);
159 Nob Hill (Renovation/Conversion)
Residential Restoration: 364 Hargadine
477 Allison
Individual: Carol Samuelson, SOHS, Librarian/Archivist
Chairman Shostrom asked staff to provide owner, builder/developer, and architect/designer information to
Commissioners so they can notify and interview the winners.
CALL TO ORDER – REGULAR MEETING
At 7:06, Chairman Dale Shostrom called the regular meeting to order.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Leighton moved to approve the March 2, 2005 minutes as amended. With a second by Swink, the motion was
approved unanimously.
Ashland Historic Commission Minutes 1
8/17/2005
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Planning Action 2005-00084
Site Review & Administrative Variance
Archerd & Dresner, LLC & Redco, LLC
165 Lithia Way & 123 North First Street
Chairman Shostrom described the request for Site Review approval of two 3-story mixed-use commercial and
residential buildings and six row houses. A total of 14,736 square feet of retail and 41 residential units are
included in the proposed development. The site is subject to the Detail Site Review Standards and to the
Downtown Design Standards. In addition, the proposal is subject to the Large Scale Development Standards
because it exceeds 10,000 square feet in size and includes buildings greater than 100 feet in length. The
applicants are also requesting an Administrative Variance to Ashland’s Site Design and Use Standards relating to
the required distance between buildings. A Tree Removal Permit is requested to remove four trees on site.
Bill Molnar, Planning Manager, highlighted the main aspects of the proposal and then detailed staff’s concerns:
1. Lack of public space including insufficient public space between the two large buildings.
2. Limited traffic impact analysis that does not include the higher numbers related to potential medical
services as described in the application.
3. The buildings’ design does not meet the requirements of the Downtown Design Standards as it relates to
staggering building heights, breaking up large building masses and including distinct changes in depth
and elevation between the features that make up the façade to soften the exterior mass of each building.
Mr. Molnar said staff recommends the application be continued to allow resolution of these concerns.
Commissioner Giordano asked staff for clarification of the difference between C-1 and C-1-D commercial zones.
Mr. Molnar explained that they share the same design standards except that C-1-D has no parking or landscape
requirements. This project is in the C-1 zone and is subject to the parking and landscape requirements.
George Kramer, representing the applicants, detailed the history of Lithia Way and its relationship to the
downtown core. Gene Cowan and Craig Stockbridge of GBD Architects described the design of the buildings
emphasizing the two distinct looks. It was noted that the buildings would be a LEEDS certified design.
The majority of the Commissioners questioned the minimal 18-inch recessed entries on the two large buildings.
They felt larger, more substantial covered entries or arcade-type public space was needed to break up the façade
and make the buildings more pedestrian friendly.
Chairman Shostrom asked for comments from the audience.
Colin Swales of 1282 Old Willow Lane stated his calculations showed only 17% of the total square footage would
be commercial or retail use. He felt that land available in the C-1 zone should be maximized for commercial and
retail use and not residential. Mr. Swales was also opposed to the overall bulk and scale of the project saying it
was too massive and was not compatible with the predominately 2-story historic buildings in the downtown core
and the historic residential neighborhood of modest homes off “B” Street.
Bill Street of 180 Mead explained how the project was in conflict with several of Ashland’s Design Standards
including the orientation and scale of the large 3-story buildings, the lack of pedestrian and public space, and the
incompatibility of the row houses as they relate to the existing residential neighborhood. He also cited the
absence of a strong sense of entry, the narrowness of the public breezeway and its lack of windows and
openings, and minimal streetscape amenities for pedestrians.
Chairman Shostrom asked for rebuttal comments from the applicants.
Ashland Historic Commission Minutes 2
8/17/2005
Mr. Stockbridge explained that Mr. Swales calculations of the percentage of commercial space were inaccurate,
that the entire ground floor of both buildings was commercial and retail use including the office studios.
The applicants also spoke of the contribution the development makes in not only providing additional commercial
space but providing very desirable housing to those wanting to be within walking distance of the downtown
amenities. He also spoke to the concern of the height of the buildings, pointing out that the code put in place by
the City is 40-feet which supports a 3-story structure. He pointed out that the residential units are not high-end
condominiums, but modest studios and apartments including 10% affordable housing. Mr. Kramer agreed that
the comments about the minimal sense of entry were valid and they would work on improving that area.
Mr. Molnar explained Mr. Swales calculation was based on total square footage of all floors of all buildings. The
Design Standards require 65% of the “ground-floor” space be commercial, which this project meets.
Mr. Swink asked the applicants about the ratio of low-income housing planned in this project. Mr. Archerd
confirmed they would meet the requirements.
Ms. Leighton expressed her appreciation to the applicants in designing LEEDS certified buildings.
Chairman Shostrom closed the Public Meeting.
After Commission discussion of the various design elements of the development project, Mr. Skibby made a
motion to recommend the action be continued and that the following issues be incorporated into the design and
brought back to the Historic Commission. The general areas of discussion/concern are creating pedestrian
friendly spaces; mass, bulk and scale; building facades; and row houses. (all comments pertain to Buildings 1
and 2 except for last two items)
1. Use more recessed entries both on the street facades of Buildings 1 and 2, and towards the breezeway.
Also recess at a greater depth than shown on current plans.
2. Suggest use of arcade on Building 1, sweep in at ground floor as shown in "Moderne" photographs and
provide more protection from weather (rain and sun).
3. Increase breezeway width between buildings.
4. Lower canopies, 14 feet isn’t intimate and is too high. Also increase depth of canopies.
5. Recess third-story in different areas to minimize and vary building height.
6. Blank walls in breeze way are a concern, create stronger pedestrian connection to ground floor both in
street elevations and breeze way.
7. North facades of Building 1 and 2 are the same. Change design on the back of Building 1 to mimic the
Moderne design on the front.
8. Add texture or artistic expression on Building 2, west wing elevation, to break up blank wall facing parking
and Lithia Way.
9. The Commission felt it is important to have residences in the downtown to create a 24-hour presence and
synergy
10. Add more residential style landscaping around row houses.
11. The majority of the Commission felt the scale and design of the row houses was appropriate, but there
was a minority that felt the design was problematic in the transition between the commercial zone and
existing residential neighborhood (height, mass, and roof form discussed).
Mr. Krach seconded the motion and a roll call vote was unanimously in agreement.
A motion was made by Ms. Leighton and seconded by Mr. Swink to continue the meeting to 10:30 pm. Approval
was unanimous.
Ashland Historic Commission Minutes 3
8/17/2005
DISCUSSION ITEM:
Planning Action 2005-00039
Conditional Use Permit
Applicant: Stan Potocki and Bruce McLean
150 N. Pioneer Street
Mr. Saladoff asked to be recused from the hearing due to a conflict of interest. Chairman Shostrom disclosed he
had made contact with the applicants to review their new plan.
Chairman Shostrom explained that this project was approved at the March 2, 2005 meeting subject to the
applicants returning with a revised plan addressing the eleven conditions of the motion to approve.
The applicants, Stan Potocki and Bruce McLean, reviewed with the Commissioners the revised plans showing
they met most of the conditions requested with two exceptions.
1. The Planning Commissioners had required the applicants retain the original parking spaces and add one
more. The handicap space was moved closest to the new residential unit with the expanded handicap
space on the side closest to the porch. A railing was added to the porch to visually define a buffer. This
left only 1 foot between the parking lot and the back stoop coming out of the existing office/residence.
2. The back staircase on the existing office/residence, that was requested to be removed by the Historic
Commission, was left in place due to concerns of building and fire safety.
There being no further questions of the applicant and no one in the audience, the public meeting was closed.
Ms. Leighton moved to modify the original motion to include three additional conditions:
1. Remove brackets and have a 5 ½” exposure on the siding to match the original house
2. Windows to have 6” trim to match original house
3. Eliminate Condition #10 to allow the South staircase to remain.
Mr. Skibby seconded the motion and it passed unanimously.
OLD BUSINESS
–
A. Review Board Following is the month’s schedule for the Review Board, which meets every Thursday from
3:00 to at least 3:30 p.m. in the Planning Department:
th
April 7 Skibby, Shostrom, Swink
th
April 14 Skibby, Whitford, Saladoff
st
April 21 Skibby, Giordano, Saladoff
th
April 28 Skibby, Baker, Krach
th
May 5 Skibby, Swink, Leighton
B. Project Assignments for Planning Actions
PA #2000-120 485 “A” Street (Steve Hoxmeier) Shostrom
PA #2002-100 142 East Main Street (Earthly Goods) Leighton
PA #2004-026 81 Central Avenue (Wes & Lucinda Vail) Giordano
PA #2004-018 322 Pioneer Street (Al & Sandra Carlson) Swink
PA #2004-100 80 Wimer (Tom & Kathy Petersen) Whitford
PA #2004-102 832 “A” Street (Ilene Rubenstein) Saladoff
PA #2004-110 150 Church St (Robert M. Saladoff) Whitford
Ashland Historic Commission Minutes 4
8/17/2005
PA #2004-115 724 Iowa St (Dave and Jamie Kaufman) Swink
PA #2004-138 234 Vista St (Sid & Karen DeBoer) Saladoff
PA #2004-150 87 Fourth St (Unitarian Universal Fellowship Church) Shostrom
PA #2004-154 180 Lithia Way (Archerd & Dresner) Leighton
PA-#2004-160 685 A Street (William Reeves) Krach
PL#2005-00039 150 N. Pioneer (Stan Potocki & Bruce McLean) Leighton
C. National Historic Preservation Week, May 8-14, 2005 - (See above minutes of 5:00 PM meeting)
D. Co-Sponsorship with Conservation Commission for Fall Workshop – No report
E. Lithia Springs National Register Nomination – Ms. Harris informed the Commissioners that the Parks
th
Commission’s Joint Study session with the City Council on April 18 at 7:00 PM was postponed.
F. Multiple Listing Survey for National Register of Historic Places - No report
G. Single Family Residential Design Standards – No report
NEW BUSINESS
COMMISSION ITEMS NOT ON AGENDA
ANNOUNCEMENTS
The next Historic Commission meeting will be on May 4, 2005 at 7:00 pm in the Siskiyou Room.
ADJOURNMENT
With a motion by Leighton and second by Baker, it was the unanimous decision of the Commission to adjourn the
meeting at 11:05 p.m.
Ashland Historic Commission Minutes 5
8/17/2005