HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-0209 Council SS MIN
MINUTES FOR THE STUDY SESSION
ASHLAND CITY COUNCIL
February 9, 2006
Civic Center Council Chambers
1175 E. Main Street
crTY COUVC/L \'T{ D V 5.LS:;,/( IN
FEBRUAR'r <J,20or)
p ^lC;r~: ! of 2
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Morrison called the meeting to order at 5: 15 p.m. in the Civic Center Council Chambers.
ROLL CALL
Councilors Jackson, Silbiger, Amarotico and Chapman were present. Councilor Hardesty and Hartzell arrived
at 5:32 p.m.
PUBLIC FORUM
Art Bullock/791 Glendower/Spoke regarding Council goals and noted the following issues: 1) Staff is
executive branch, not legislative branch; 2) Staff is overloaded; 3) Legislative is not staff priority; and 4)
Citizen task force solves the continuing problem of "lack of direction." He requested that the council put the
project where the passion and priorities are, with the Citizen Task Forces.
1. Discussion of Draft Charter and Draft City Mana!?:er
Consultant Tom Sponslor began his review by noting areas of concern as following:
1) Current wording regarding a quorum and voting method;
2) Mayor's job description, vetoing authority; and administrative authority; and
3) City Manager
He briefly noted other areas that would require fundamental policy decisions.
Rich Rosenthal/1228 Rose Lane/Shared a concern from a financial aspect and how the proposed charter does
not provide for a financial stream for the Parks and Recreation and the City Band.
JoAnne Eggers/221 Granite Street/Parks Commissioners/Ms. Eggers brought to the attention of the council
her concern that the Parks Commission has taken on the responsibility of the Senior Center and the City Band
and the importance of funding for these programs. She requested that the council be aware, that by taking out
programs, the Commission needs to have assurance that they would have adequate resources to run these
programs.
It was suggested that the Parks Commission bring back language they could recommend for charter language
that would give the assurance they are looking for.
Art Bullock/791 Glendower/Spoke on his concerns of the draft proposed charter. He did not support the draft
charter and noted that it increased the power of the corporation. Mr. Bullock voiced his disappointment on the
lack of discussion on this issue. He felt that the changes need to have come from the voters and the only way
to assure that this is not a wasted projected is to make it grounded in the will of the people. He does not feel
that this document is supported. He stated that there should not be a charter amendment at the same time that
there are initiatives before the voters. Suggested that the council not do "dog and ponies" but to have open
citizen discussion.
Councilor Chapman requested a specific place in the proposed charter where there is an increase of power.
Mr. Bullock gave the example of the proposed changes to Public Utilities, specifically water. He also noted the
CITY COUNCIL 50 [jf) Y SL'.'S/();V
FEBRtAR'r 9, ](}()f>
f',IUE:; oj;:
ability of the council to remove a councilor and that it should only be the voters who should have the ability to
do this.
Councilor Hartzell commented that the current charter allowed for distinction between water and fire. It was
also noted that the proposed charter does have subtleties where there is a shift in power.
Councilor Amarotico left at 6:20 p.m.
Further discussion and concern was voiced on the issue of the Mayor voting and his/her authority to veto.
Suggestion was made that council have more input or a more formal process in regards to the appointments of
commission/committee members.
It was clarified that the council supported leaving the election of the council as it is in the current charter.
Mr. Sponslor commented that the charter should be a base and all else should be handled by ordinance.
It was suggested that if council has any further questions, to submit them to either the City Administrator or
City Attorney.
Concern was raised that the community was not being properly included and that more advertising needs to be
done in order to reach the community. Discussion was held in regards on how to move this forward and when
to schedule a meeting. It was determined that the council would prefer a 3-hour evening meeting beginning at
6 p.m.
ADJOURNMENT
Meetin adjourned at 6: 45 p.m.
~