HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-0202.REG.MIN MINUTES FOR THE REGULAR MEETING
ASHLAND CITY COUNCIL
February 2, 1999
Civic Center Council Chambers, 1175 E. Main Street
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Shaw called the meeting to order at 7:07 p.m., in the Civic Center Council Chambers.
ROLL CALL
Councilors Laws, Reid, Hauck, Wheeldon and Fine were present. Councilor Hanson was absent.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Councilors Reid/Wheeldon m/s to approve the regular meeting minutes of January 19, 1999 as presented. Voice
vote: All AYES. Motion passed.
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS & AWARDS
1. Mayor's presentation of retirement plaque to Dennis Barnts.
Mayor Shaw read a brief history of Dennis Barnts' employment with the City, and presented him a retirement plaque.
2. Mayor's presentation of Certificate of Appreciation to Alan DeBoer.
Mayor Shaw spoke of Alan DeBoer's contribution to the City and community, and presented him with a certificate of
appreciation for his service on the Ashland City Council, the Budget Committee and Airport Commission.
3. Mayor's proclamation of "Acknowledgment of Historical Discrimination."
Mayor Shaw read the proclamation in its entirety.
4. Mayor's proclamation of "National Girls & Women in Sports Day."
Mayor Shaw read the proclamation in its entirety.
CONSENT AGENDA
1. Minutes of Boards, Commissions and Committees.
2. Monthly Departmental Reports.
3. Approval of Liquor License Application from Cordan Rickert dba/Wild Goose Caf~ and Bar.
4. Confirmation of Mayor's appointments of Russell Silbiger and Wes Brain (terms to 4/30/00), Candice
Chapman and Lenny Neimark (terms to 4/30/01), Thomas Pyle, Cathy Carrier and Tom Garland (terms
to 4/30/02) to the Ashland Fiber Network Programming Committee.
Reid requested that item #4 be pulled for discussion.
Councilors Reid/Hauck m/s to approve items #1-3 of the consent agenda. Voice vote: All AYES. Motion passed.
Reid questioned the omission of Wes Brain's resume, and it was explained that it was included, but the labeling made
it difficult to discern.
Fine noted the high caliber of the applicants for the Ashland Fiber Network Programming Committee, and both Shaw
and Hauck concurred, noting not only the impressive backgrounds but the diversity of those who have applied.
Wheeldon asked for clarification of the standards to which the committee will be subject. It was explained that they
are constrained only by the original resolution forming the committee and the programming available from the provider
chosen. Noted that the Electric/Telecommunications Department staff will be available as liaisons, and a special
consultant who is well-versed in cable television, channels and line-ups will be available as a resource for a short period
at start-up. Shaw noted that Councilor Hauck would also be serving as Council liaison.
CiO' Council Minutes 02/02/1999 1
Reid questioned the appointment of Thomas Pyle who had a Medford mailing address and will be living in Phoenix.
Shaw noted the difficulty in choosing between so many highly qualified applicants, and stated that she intended to
appoint Steve Belsky to the first vacancy. Discussion of removing Pyle from the appointment list if he is living outside
of Ashland, with Councilors indicating they would prefer he be replaced by appointing Steve Belsky.
Councilors Hauck/Fine m/s to confirm the Mayor's appointments, with Steve Belsky substituted in place of
Thomas Pyle. Voice vote: All AYES. Motion passed.
Councilors Hauck/Laws m/s to place a resolution dealing with outdoor burning, as required by the Ashland
Municipal Code, on the agenda as item #9 under "Ordinances, Resolutions and Contracts". Voice vote: All
AYES. Motion passed.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Public Hearing regarding a request for annexation of parcel located east ofthe end of Jefferson Avenue
(Planning Action 99-006; Applicant Doug Neuman).
Mayor Shaw read the guidelines for a land use public hearing. Laws explained the way the timer for speakers works
to members of the audience, noting that the timer first sounds at four minutes, and at the second sounding at five minutes
speakers should stop.
Public hearing opened at 7:33 p.m.
EXPARTE CONTACT:
Councilors Wheeldon, Fine, and Reid noted site visits.
STAFF REPORT:
Director of Community Development John McLaughlin noted that the applicable criteria are from the Ashland
Municipal Code chapter 18.106, and are included in packet. Stated that information has been mailed to those in the
notice area. Noted that this annexation involved seven acres from the City's urban growth boundary to accommodate
the relocation of Oak Street Tank and Steel.
McLaughlin explained that under City ordinance, the Planning Commission has final authority on site reviews and land
partitions, and that the Council has jurisdiction in annexations. Noted that annexation criteria had been revised relative
to locating of businesses and creating jobs, as is the case here. Explained the location of the annexation, noting the
proximity to the I-5 corridor and the railroad right of way. Noted that issues with annexations are normally related to
site review and these have been settled by the Planning Commission's decision to approve.
Explained that the applicant will make improvements to Washington Street, with City water, sewer and electric to be
extended. Emphasized that full street improvements will occur, and the there will be a "sign-in-favor" agreement to
participate in future improvements.
McLaughlin stated that there is some concern on the part of the surrounding property owners due to the potential impact
on their wells. Noted that some wells in the area are failing, while others seem to be fine. Emphasized that because of
the annexation, some neighbors would be able to receive City water, but that others have indicated that they do not want
to be annexed. Stated that there will probably be some testimony to this effect tonight, and noted that there would be
costs involved for additional connections. Suggested that other could apply to be annexed separately in the future, as
the issue before Council is only the current application.
Shaw asked for clarification of how failing water systems related to this application. McLaughlin explained that the
Council could choose to expand the boundaries of this annexation to encompass the surrounding area with failing
services. Shaw indicated that she was inclined to limit tonight's hearing to this annexation, as others would need to be
separate and meet requirements of the planning process, as this applicant has done.
CiO' Council Minutes 02/02/1999 2
Reid questioned not having coordinated this process with the surrounding neighborhood. McLaughlin explained that
the City's annexation policy is a passive one, and that staff has not tried to force annexations when no interest is
expressed on the part of residents. The issues mentioned only came up after the Planning Commission hearing, and staff
has not had time since then to address them. Reid emphasized that the Council has asked for a holistic approach to
prevent the formation of "islands". McLaughlin explained that annexations are normally done only with full consent,
and because some neighbors are not interested in being annexed, a larger annexation is not logical. Also noted that this
annexation does not create an island, as the area annexed will be contiguous. Illustrated this with an overhead, noting
that the railroad tracks and part of the freeway corridor will be within this annexation, to make some areas across the
freeway contiguous.
Discussed Jefferson and Washington Streets, and the City's street standards. McLaughlin noted that the situation will
be complex, as Washington in one area will be in the state highway right of way for the freeway, and a dedicated
portion, which will be included in the annexation, belongs to Jackson County. Stated that in the future, more of the area
will be annexed with streets included.
Discussed of the possibility of including other properties, with McLaughlin noting that the larger parcels do not fit
criteria, and other neighbors have not been approached. Emphasized that the City ordinance does not require forced
annexations.
Fine questioned the approval standards in AMC 18.106 (c) which require the annexation to be currently contiguous, and
McLaughlin explained that because the railroad right of way is included here, the whole parcel to be annexed is
currently contiguous with the City limits.
Shaw noted that the annexation of the railroad right of way created the opportunity for future pedestrian and bike trails.
Emphasized that other properties are not before the Council at this time, and explained that this annexation contains
primarily M 1 lands which are lacking in the C ity's inventory. The inclusion of other parcels in this annexation would
circumvent the City's own planning process and possibly create a problem with LUBA. For tonight, because the
adjacent lands were not part of the Planning Commission's hearings, all that will be touched on will be the annexation
of the M I/E 1 land that is before the Council tonight. Others wanting to be annexed would need to go back through the
planning process.
McLaughlin explained the creek which passes through the property at Councilor Wheeldon's request. Noted the creek
path, and that the City will improve the drain along the street as an engineered ditch. Wheeldon questioned access
management due to the large trucks pulling out, and whether there has been any traffic analysis. McLaughlin noted that
this had been discussed when the state moved the "Welcome Center", and an analysis had occurred at that time. Noted
that only 4-5 trucks per day were expected, and employee traffic would have a greater impact. However, because most
trips will be turning right to go to the freeway the traffic impact will be lessened.
APPLICANT:
Doug Neuman/4240 Clayton Road/Applicant noted that only 2-5 trucks per week were expected.
Dave Richardson/Architectural Design Works, 1105 Siskiyou Boulevard./Stated that they had little to add to the
staffs report, but would be happy to answer any questions the Mayor and Council might have.
Reid questioned whether the railroad might play a role in Oak Street Tank & Steel's operation. Neuman stated that it
might, as Croman Corporation had used it in the past. Laws questioned if there would be room for a siding off of the
railroad tracks. Neuman noted that there would, and Richardson stated that they may purchase additional property to
provide railroad access.
City' Council Minutes 02/02/1999 3
OPPONENTS:
Frank Baratta/770 Washington Street/Wanted to mention items from the Planning Commission meetings that were
agreed on, but are not included in the annexation proposed. Feels that there needs to be signage indicating "Private
Road, No Turn-Around" to reduce traffic. Also concerned with the traffic at Jefferson Street, and feels that the Yield
sign would be better as a Stop. Noted that he is opposed to this annexation. Explained that he works for Jackson County
Public Works, and he feels that the expansion is illogical and creates an impact on other residents. There are sites just
north, on Washington Street and Highway 66, that would be better suited. Emphasized that there are seven residences
around this site that will be affected, and their wells will be affected as well. Feels that the presence of this company
will affect water levels, and suggested that a hydrological study of the water table was needed. All surrounding wells
are failing, and have been affected by other development in the area. Also concerned with sound levels, and feels there
needs to be a berm as a sound barrier to shield neighbors from industrial noise. The planned industrial area is not
developed, and the area is now mostly residential. Shaw explained that these issues would be better addressed to the
Planning Commission, as the annexation before Council only involves specific criteria. Pointed out that the issues raised
are site review matters. Baratta expressed concern that the annexation will have a high impact on residents, and this
doesn't suit city's expansion plan. Laws noted site review occurred in Planning Commission. Hauck noted that the
signage requested were included in the criteria.
Don Wolff/760 Washington Street/Noted that he is concerned with noise and the effect this annexation will have on
the established residential area. Stated that noise will carry to Oak Knoll residents as well. Recognized that there is
noise from both the freeway and the railroad, but he is concerned with more noise being added. Emphasized that he
has nothing against the Morrises or Oak Street Tank & Steel, but feels that the new construction needs to be sound-
proofed to insulate neighbors from the noise. Also noted that the Talent Irrigation District (TID) has requested piping
of the TID ditch on both sides of the building, though he believes this was overlooked at Planning Commission. Shaw
stated that she would follow up on this issue with staff. Concluded by expressing concerns that when the street is
im proved, property will be taken from property owners' lands rather than from the applicant' s property. Shaw explained
that this would depend on the existing right-of-way.
Ann LeRoy/450 Timberlake Drive/Washington Street property owner. Feels this will negatively impact her property.
Explained that Benson Way improvements affected the water table. If paving and guttering are put in place, residents
will lose the water they need for their wells. If the City allows this effect, there needs to be some remedy provided.
Paving affects the watertable by limiting percolation.. Explained that she is not opposed to development, but is
concerned with noise and negative impacts on the water table. Feels that the cost for annexation is too high for the
average family, but recognized that this annexation might make it easier to have her property annexed later. Stated that
if this is to be annexed, she would like to see it done well to prevent a loss in property value to the existing residents.
STAFF:
McLaughlin noted that condition 15 on page 16 requires piping of the TID ditches, as open ditches would not be
appropriate for this design. Stated that the Washington Street right of way is twenty feet wide and three hundred feet
long in the county portion, and explained that a survey will be necessary to determine what properties will be affected
by the street improvement. Noted that additional property will also be required from the annexed property for the right
of way.
McLaughlin explained for Reid that the road was put in with chip seal in 1964 and there has been no maintenance since,
under state ownership. The next three hundred foot portion is county, followed by private easements. He understands
that these easements exist, but stated that he had not yet reviewed them. Noted that the street will be improved to a
twenty foot width, with resurfacing, a ditch, and a pedestrian path. The road across the applicant's property will also
be to standards, with sidewalks, as will the intersection. Stated that this will eventually connect to Jefferson.
Council Minutes 02/02/1999 4
Reid questioned sound level limits under M 1 zoning, and McLaughlin explained that they must be measured from the
nearest residential zone in the City limits, which in this case would be from Oak Knoll across the freeway. Suggested
that an appeal of the Planning Commission's findings would be the appropriate way for the residents to have their
concerns addressed.
McLaughlin explained that for a berm to be effective, it must be in the line of sight, which would be difficult.
Emphasized that this area is zoned to eventually serve as manufacturing and industrial land, and recognized that this
is an awkward time during re-development where conflicts do occur.
Laws questioned zoning of the houses here which are in the urban growth boundary. McLaughlin explained that they
are in an E1 zone, and that the area will eventually be phased out of residential use. Confirmed for Councilor Hauck
that residential use will not be allowed in this zone because there is no residential overlay, as some of the industrial and
manufacturing uses might not be appropriate near houses.
Laws questioned if it would be appropriate to attach conditions to the approval of an annexation. Both McLaughlin and
City Attorney Paul Nolte confirmed that this would be appropriate.
Wheeldon questioned the "to and through" criteria for requiring street improvements. McLaughlin ac noted that future
plans accommodate this standard, and the property owners will be involved in the eventual connection to Washington
Street.
REBUTTAL:
Doug Neuman emphasized that Oak Street Tank and Steel only operates during daylight hours, and as such noise
concerns would not be a factor at other times. Stated that building a berm could tend to exaggerate freeway noise, but
that the steel building will be insulated and this should tend to reduce some noise.
Discussion of whether it was appropriate to discuss attempts to work with the neighbors, with Shaw and Nolte
concurring that this issue is not before Council, as the neighboring properties have not been through the planning process
and cannot be addressed at this point. Neuman noted that as this went through the process, through the application and
noticing there were no contacts until the Planning Commission meeting. He talked to concerned neighbors during and
after that meeting, but there was not enough consensus to move forward with their inclusion in the annexation. Stated
that he feels the availability of City water will improve things for the neighbors.
Public hearing closed at 8:31 p.m.
Councilors Reid/Hauck m/s to annex the property and direct staff to bring back the appropriate resolution
formally annexing the property. Roll call vote: Laws, Reid, Hauck, Wheeldon, and Fine. Motion passed.
2. Public Hearing to consider proposed assessments for lots within the Dogwood Way LID No. 75; Orange
Avenue LID No. 76; Ann and Clinton Streets LID No. 71; and North Mountain Avenue LID No. 72.
Public Works Director Paula Brown gave a brief background, noting the letters of concern that were received, and a
handout of supplemental information, had been distributed to the Council. Noted that four letters were received from
Orange Street residents, and their primary concerns were with drainage, which will be fixed. One letter was regarding
a general dislike of the improvements, and two had questions about the comer lots. In the Ann-Clinton district, stated
that concerns expressed by Elaine McBennett regarding the need for a retaining wall were beyond the scope of staff.
One concern had to do with a twenty foot section of the Richey property. And one concern was received from a resident
in the Dogwood district who was concerned with drainage, but the design has done everything possible to address this
without creating a hump. Noted that there was an error in the Fordyce mailing, and stated that a revised mailing had
gone out today, with reduced assessments.
Ci,ty Council Minutes 02/02/1999 5
Brown explained for Reid that these LIDs precede the current ordinance, but noted that they take into account sidewalk
credits and the 10% discount requested by Council. Stated that the $4000 cap is not in effect, and noted that some units
on Ann-Clinton and Orange exceed this amount. Reid questioned the use of frontage feet in the calculation for these
LIDs. Brown explained that calculations for LIDs can be done a number of different ways, and stated that the option
chosen by Council for Orange Street at the LIDs formation in January of 1997 was frontage feet. Brown also noted that
the total assessment for Orange was considerably lower than the original assessment, plus residents were given the 10%
discount.
Public hearing opened at 8:40 p.m.
EIlie Read/398 N. Laurel Street/Included in the Orange Street LID as she is on the border. Believed that she had paid
for the improved street when she purchased her property. Would like Council to address if there has been any attempt
made to rectify the sign-in-favor agreement situation so buyers are aware of this up front. Explained that she feels real
estate agents should address this when property is sold. Questioned if there has been any consideration for comer lots
on Orange Street, or any of the other existing LIDs, as she was assessed for Laurel and is now being assessed for Orange
Street.
Public hearing closed at 8:45 p.m.
Shaw questioned Read paying for Laurel Street improvements. Brown stated that there are no records before 1970, and
there is no record of Read being assessed since that time. Similarly, Shaw noted that the Deans wanted to know if they
would be levied for Helman Street improvements as well. Brown stated that this would be a Council decision. Shaw
stated that she believes Helman was done in the last twenty years, and the Deans would have paid. Council discussion.
Brown was asked to verify whether the Deans were previously levied for Helman improvements.
Wheeldon stated that a policy was needed to address comer lots. The existing policy relative to comer lots was
discussed, noting that typically residents of corner lots are charged only half of their costs if they have already paid on
an LID for the street providing access to their property. Wheeldon questioned if the Deans should be relieved of a
portion of their current assessment due to previous paving.
Reading by title only of "A Resolution Levying Special Benefit Assessments in the Amount of $23,291.28
for Curbs, Gutters, and Paving Improvements in the Dogwood Way Local Improvement District No.
Councilors Wheeldon/Fine m/s to adopt Resolution #99-08. Roll call vote: Laws, Reid, Hauck, Wheeldon and
Fine, YES. Motion passed.
Reading by title only of "A Resolution Levying Special Benefit Assessments in the Amount of $57,836.42
for Curbs, Gutters, Storm Drain, Sidewalk, and Paving Improvements in the Orange Avenue Local
Improvement District No. 76."
Councilors Wheeldon/Fine m/s to adopt Resolution #99-07. Roll call vote: Laws, Reid, Wheeldon and Fine, YES.
Hauck, NO. Motion passed 4-1.
Reading by title only of "A Resolution Levying Special Benefit Assessments in the Amount of $137,517.53
for Curbs, Gutters, Storm Drain, Sidewalk, and Paving Improvements in the Ann and Clinton Streets
Local Improvement District No. 71."
Councilors Wheeldon/Fine m/s to adopt Resolution #99-05. Roll call vote: Laws, Reid, Wheeldon and Fine, YES.
Hauck, NO. Motion passed 4-1.
City, Council Minutes 02/02/1999 6
Reading by title only of" A Resolution Levying Special Benefit Assessments in the Amount of $351,327.11
for Curbs, Gutters, Storm Drain, Sidewalk, and Paving Improvements in the North Mountain Avenue
Local Improvement District No. 72."
Councilors Laws/Wheeidon m/s to adopt Resolution #99-06. Roll call vote: Laws, Reid, Hauck, Wheeldon and
Fine, YES. Motion passed.
Wheeldon questioned the retaining wall item, and Brown explained that she felt the property owner wanted an additional
retaining structure which staff did not feel was necessary.
Break called at 8:56 p.m. Meeting resumed at 9:11 p.m.
PUBLIC FORUM
Opened to public comment at 9:11 p.m.
Sophia McDonald/475 N. Main Street #1/Representing the Associated Students of Southern Oregon University
(ASSOU)/Provided Council with an update, noting that they have been busy with state legislative issues and have been
in Salem lobbying. Stated that she was available to answer any questions the Council might have.
Closed to public comment at 9:12 p.m.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None.
NEW AND MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS
1. Council Meeting Look Ahead.
City Administrator Mike Freeman explained that this item was for informational purposes only, and that he was willing
to answer any questions the Council may have.
ORDINANCES, RESOLUTIONS AND CONTRACTS
1. Second reading by title only of "An Ordinance Amending Chapter 18.88, Chapter 18.72, Chapter 18.76,
Chapter 18.80, Chapter 18.82, and Chapter 18.92 of the Ashland Municipal Code - Land Use Ordinance,
Adopting New Street Standards."
Councilors Hauck/Laws m/s to adopt Ordinance #2836. Roll call vote: Laws, Reid, Hauck, Wheeldon and Fine,
YES. Motion passed.
First reading by title only of "An Ordinance Amending Section 13.20.050.C and Adding Section 3.20.145
to the Ashland Municipal Code to Validate Remonstrances and to Provide for Deferral of Certain
Assessments."
Wheeldon stated that it was viewed as important to have the opportunity to pause the LID process with remonstrances
and make neighborhood voices heard. Feels that this is good public process.
Fine noted that with his late entry in this process, he will vote in favor and will not nit-pick now as it is a package deal
and he respects the process that occurred. Stated that he might prefer some minor improvements in some areas.
Ci0' Council Minutes 02/02/1999 7
Hauck stated he was opposed to allowing those who have already paid to remonstrate. Emphasized that this is not a free
speech issue, and that those who have already paid should give up the right to delay a project for six months. Expressed
his objection to this issue, and suggested that language was needed to address pre-payment waiving one's right to
remonstrate.
Shaw explained that she was concerned with creating an awkward situation between neighbors, as those who have pre-
paid may be urged to remonstrate by their neighbors.
Wheeldon suggested that those who have already paid would be in favor of beginning projects immediately.
Laws stated that many people do not want development to destroy their neighborhood's rural atmosphere, and while
they may pay to get improvements, they still do not want paving. Feels that this issue is a fine point of law for the
Council, but it is not perceived as such by the citizens. While this has little affect on the City, the inclusion of the right
to remonstrate gives citizens the means to slow down what many feel is an overwhelming process.
Hauck stated that pre-payment will be voluntary, and this is different in his mind. Suggested that giving up the right
to delay the process is not unreasonable.
Wheeldon raised the issue of a developer potentially dividing a property and selling it. Stated that she feels the right
to remonstrate should be included as a courtesy, and she hopes that this will not diminish the Council's will in
completing individual LID projects.
Councilors Laws/Wheeldon m/s to move the ordinance to a second reading. DISCUSSION: Hauck noted that
he will propose amended wording at the second reading. Roll call vote: Laws, Reid, Hauck, Wheeldon and Fine,
YES. Motion passed.
Reading by title only of "A Resolution Relating to Local Improvement Districts (LIDs) and establishing:
The City's Participation in LIDs; The Potential Unit Method to Determine Assessments; the Maximum
Assessment for Residential Lots and Required Process to Include Neighborhoods in LID Planning."
Dennis DeBey/2475 Siskiyou Boulevard/Questioned the new ordinance's $4000 cap as it applies to the E-1 zone.
Nolte stated that it does not apply for E-1 zoning, as the ordinance is directed at residential lots. Hauck questioned what
the situation would be for an E-1 zone with a residential overlay. McLaughlin stated there is a residential overlay for
Mr. DeBey's property, and this will require some "art" on the part of Council. Suggested that it might be possible to
relate costs to traffic generation proportional to a single residential unit, or find some other means to achieve a fair
solution. Stated that because commercial use generates more traffic it should pay more.
McLaughlin explained that this ordinance will apply to residential lots, and the Council will need to look at innovative
approaches to fairly address commercial properties based on their knowledge and the facts of each individual situation.
Reid questioned the use of the front footage method of calculation. McLaughlin confirmed that staff' s understanding
is that Council has not formally stepped away from the use of straight front footage methodology until the LID
Committee recommendations, and straight front footage was the logical method to use for the Orange Street LID.
McLaughlin confirmed for Mr. DeBey that the new ordinance will only apply to purely residential districts.
Wheeldon questioned whether Council needs to look further at policies to address other zones. Laws suggested that
these types of situations are more unique than residential situations, and the Council should retain the flexibility to
address situations which arise outside of residential zones.
Ci.ty Council Minutes 02/02/1999 8
Councilors Hauck/Laws m/s to adopt Resolution #99-09. Wheeldon looks forward to addressing in budget along
with other transportation items. Roll call vote: Laws, Reid, Hauck, Wheeldon and Fine, YES. Motion passed.
4. Reading by title only of "A Resolution Levying Special Benefit Assessments in the Amount of $23,291.28
for Curbs, Gutters, and Paving Improvements in the Dogwood Way Local Improvement District No.
75."
Dealt with under "Public Hearings" above.
5. Reading by title only of "A Resolution Levying Special Benefit Assessments in the Amount of $57,836.42
for Curbs, Gutters, Storm Drain, Sidewalk, and Paving Improvements in the Orange Avenue Local
Improvement District No. 76."
Dealt with under "Public Hearings" above.
6. Reading by title only of"A Resolution Levying Special Benefit Assessments in the Amount of$137,517.53
for Curbs, Gutters, Storm Drain, Sidewalk, and Paving Improvements in the Ann and Clinton Streets
Local Improvement District No. 71."
Dealt with under "Public Hearings" above.
7. Reading by title only of "A Resolution Levying Special Benefit Assessments in the Amount of $351,327.11
for Curbs, Gutters, Storm Drain, Sidewalk, and Paving Improvements in the North Mountain Avenue
Local Improvement District No. 72."
Dealt with under "Public Hearings" above.
8. Reading by title only of "A Resolution of the City of Ashland, Oregon authorizing the Reimbursement
of Expenditures with Reimbursement Bond Proceeds."
Shaw asked for confirmation that this was to reimburse spending to get to the bond measure. Nolte confirmed this,
explaining that expenditures made within 60 days of this resolution's passage are reimbursable.
Councilors Hauck/Laws m/s to adopt Resolution #99-10. Roll call vote: Laws, Reid, Hauck, Wheeldon and Fine,
YES. Motion passed.
9. Reading by title only of "A Resolution Authorizing Outdoor Burning Under Certain Conditions Between
March and October 1999."
Councilors Hauck/Reid m/s to adopt Resolution #99-11. DISCUSSION: Reid noted for citizens that concerns over
specific instances of burning can be addressed to the Ashland Fire Department. Emphasized that there are
ordinances in effect to control smoke in neighborhoods. Wheeldon noted that she would not burn again due to
the difficulty it caused for a neighbor with asthma. Roll call vote: Laws, Reid, Hauck, Wheeldon and Fine, YES.
Motion passed.
OTHER BUSINESS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Wheeldon noted that Fran has requested that each Councilor provide their current availability for study sessions, which
will take 1 V2 hours during the week. Reid noted that she had already submitted her availability in writing to Mike. Shaw
stated that she would be unavailable for study sessions for the remainder of February, and may not have office hours
in February after the 3rd.
CiO' Council Minutes 02/02/1999 9
Hauck stated that at the next meeting, he would move to reconsider the Ann-Clinton LID resolution passed earlier in
the evening. Explained that he wanted to make staff aware so they could keep this in mind in handling the assessments
for this district.
Freeman confirmed for Laws that any information left by Council would be picked up and recycled, and indicated that
there was a recycling bin near the door as requested by Councilor Hauck.
ADJOURNMENT
Meeting was adjourned at 9:41 p.m.
Don Laws, Council Chairperson
ci.ty Council Minutes 02/02/1999 10