HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007-0305 Study Session MIN
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
lv/ARCH 5, 2007
PAGE/of3
MINUTES FOR THE STUDY SESSION
ASHLAND CITY COUNCIL
March 5, 2007
Civic Center Council Chambers
1175 E. Main Street
CALL TO ORDER
Council Chair Silbiger called the Study Session to order at 5:20 p.m. in the Civic Center Council
Chambers.
ROLL CALL
Councilors Hardesty, Navickas, Jackson, Silbiger, and Chapman were present. Councilor Hartzell arrived
at 5:25 p.m. Mayor Morrison was absent.
1. Look Ahead Review.
City Administrator Martha Bennett reviewed the items on the Look Ahead and noted this document is
constantly changing. She noted the Green Fleet and Mayor/Council Budget will be presented at the March
19 Study Session; and the March 20 Council Meeting with include the year end reports from Rogue
Valley Council of Governments and Access Inc., appointments to the ODOT Citizen Advisory
Committee, the restaurant grading system, a report from Community Development Director David
Stalheim on priorities and the Zucker Report work, expansion of sewer service to Willow Winds, and a
resolution setting the date for the final assessment of the Nevada Street LID.
2. Discussion of a ProDosed Bear Creek TMDL.
Public Works Director Paula Brown introduced Bill Meyers with the Department of Environmental
Quality. Ms. Brown noted the three primary impacts of the TMDL for Ashland are: 1) temperature
limitations for the wastewater treatment plant, 2) non-point source bacteria in Ashland Creek, and
3) sediment to Reeder Reservoir.
Mr. Meyers provided a presentation to the Council on the Bear Creek Total Maximum Daily Load
(TMDL) and its impacts on Ashland. The following are the key points from his presentation:
· Current data indicates over 300 miles of creeks within the Bear Creek Watershed do not meet the
water quality standards.
· In Ashland, the focus is temperature, bacteria, and sedimentation.
· The temperature standards that apply are 180 Celsius from May 16 to October 14, and 13 0 Celsius
from October 15 to May 15.
· The temperature issues for Ashland include: 1) increasing riparian shade, 2) the treatment plant
discharge temperatures are too high during the summer months, and 3) developing a water quality
implementation plan.
· The implementation plan should include detail methods to prevent bacteria loading in local
creeks.
· The sedimentation standard that applies is "no significant increased delivery of sediment to
Reeder Reservoir above that which would occur naturally is allowed".
· The Bear Creek TMDL process is currently at the 60 day public comment period, which ends
Friday, March 9, 2007.
· The City will be required to submit their implementation plan within 18 months after the EP A
approves the TMDL.
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
MARCH 5, 2007
PAGE 2 of3
Mr. Meyers noted that it is difficult to pin point the exact sources of bacteria in the watershed. He
commented that the TMDL is a shared responsibility and noted the other jurisdictions in the Bear Creek
Watershed are either in the process of writing plans, will need to write plans, or have already submitted
plans.
Councilor Navickas noted the Montgomery Study and briefly noted his concerns with the Ski Area's
treatment plant.
Ms. Brown clarified that staff provided initial comments during the internal review period and, pending
Council discussion, had not planned on submitting additional comments.
3. Discussion of Proposed Electric Rate Increase & BP A Surchare:e Elimination.
Electric Director Dick Wanderscheid provided a brief history on why the City has a BPA surcharge. He
noted staff had previously recommended that the electric rates be raised, however after review, staff is
now recommending no change be made to the electric rates or the BP A surcharge for this fiscal year.
Administrative Services Director Lee Tuneberg submitted an Electric Fund spreadsheet to the Council
and commented on the assumptions that were used. He noted they are meeting the target fund balance for
this fund and will come close to meeting the revenue stream as long as customers continue to consume
energy as normal. Mr. Tuneberg noted the general fund already has a higher amount than the target and it
is not necessary to raise rates to benefit the electric fund.
Mr. Wanderscheid commented on the three mechanisms BPA might utilize during the next three year
period if they need more revenue, which include a CRAC, a NFB Charge, or an Emergency Fish
Surcharge. He stated that with all three mechanisms, the City would have advance warning and would
have time adjust rates or spending practices if need be.
Mr. Wanderscheid stated that staff would continue to analyze numbers and stated he is optimistic that the
City can postpone raising rates for another year or two.
4. Review of Ree:ular Meetine: Ae:enda for March 6. 2007.
City Administrator Martha Bennett asked each councilor to identify which agenda items they have
questions on, and to list those questions for staff so that they can be prepared to provide answers at
tomorrow night's meeting.
Councilor Hartzell stated she has questions regarding the Charter situation, Councilor Navickas stated he
has questions on the Transient Occupancy Tax and the Capital Improvement Plan, and Councilor
Chapman noted he has a question about the Open Burning Ordinance.
City Charter Language
Assistant City Attorney Richard Appicello noted staff had received a ballot title challenge that was filed
in Circuit Court. He explained the Court will review the language for compliance and noted the Judge
could decide to write his own version of the language. He clarified the City will be summoned to court
within the next day or two and this should not have an impact with the timing of the measure.
City Administrator Martha Bennett clarified if the Council decided to change the language that was
adopted at their last meeting, there would not be sufficient time to re-notice and have the language placed
on the May ballot.
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
MARCH 5, 2007
PAGE 3 of3
Open Burning Ordinance
Councilor Chapman requested staff clarify at tomorrow's meeting where the inaccessible acres mentioned
in the staff memo are located.
Transient Occupancy Tax
Councilor Navickas requested clarification on the minimum amount that is required to be spent on
tourism. City Administrator Martha Bennett directed the Council to the TOT Grant Allocation Worksheet
and the Economic and Cultural Grant Allocation information included in their packet materials. She
clarified $218,000 is the minimum amount needed to be spent on tourism and $22,500 of that amount
needs to be spent by the other grantees.
Comment was made that it would be helpful for the Council to know what other communities have done
to allocate these monies.
Capital Improvement Plan
Councilor Navickas questioned if the PMS STP/MPO transportation projects could be consolidated.
Public Works Director Paula Brown clarified the City could aggregate the funds to one and reapply on the
second project. She added this could be done fairly easily for the A and B Street projects.
ADJOURNMENT
Meeting adjourned at 7:00p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
April Lucas, Assistant to City Recorder