Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-1215 Regular Meeting 7 J,;PORT ANT: : ~~ Any ci;ti.ze.n CLttendi~1g Cowlul mee:ting.6 may .6peak on a.ny dem on the agenda, w'lte;),6 Lt..La :the. -Du..bjea 06 a public. he.aJzing which hal> bee.n UO.6e.d. 16 you w-iAh to "~.IJtak, plea.6e ~~e and a6:ten you have bee.n ne.c.ognized by the. Chain, give youn name. m~d addltu.6. The. ChcUn w.{1..t then ai1.ow you to .6pe.ak and wo ..tnnoJun you a.6 to the amount 06 .time allotte.d to you.. The..tUne. gJz.a.n:te.d will be. de.pendent to .6ome ex,tCJlt. on the. na.tWte 06 .the item Wtde.n dWc.U6.6-ton, the numbeJt 06 people. who w,t,6h to be he.aJtd, and the length 06 the age.nda. REVISED --,~..-..- AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING ASHLAND CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 15, 1987 I. ExicUTIVE SESSION: 7:00PoMo, Civic Center Conference Room Re: PP&L vSo Ashland II. PL~DGE O~ .ALLEGIANCE: 7:30 PoM. Council Chambers III. ROLL CALL .... ...............,.. ......... J. ............... IV. E.Y.!..o.YAL, OF MINtJTES: Regular meeting of December 1, 1987 v. p.dB"iTc: .H..E_~I.N G:S:: 1. Request from the Ashland Y.M.C.A. for Community Development Block G~ant funds. ___..............~~ 4 . A ........ .4.............~. L_..A 4. .1 . .J .Il. . VI . i?~~IOliS_~.l'~T}l!.~l'iS.__L~MONSTRANCETS : 10 Appeal from a decision of the Planning Commission concerning a site review for a proposed multi-family development on Grant Street (set date for public hearing on January 5, 1988). "I -. Liquor license request from Little Caesar's Restaurant, 1253 Siskiyou Blvd~ VI I. llifW-&,}fis'c'EiLANEOUSBUSINESS: II' T ........ 1. Memo from City Attorney regarding cou. rt of Appeals, ~~cision on PP&L vs. pshland. /... Memo from Airport Commission recommending amendment' to lease with FEO rel~.it:i.ve to City-owned tiedown or hangar space~ Memo from City Administrator regardlng electric utility budget forecast for ! Fiscal Year 1988-89. 2. 3. 4. Memo from Finance Director requesting that supplemental budget h€aring date be set for January 21, 1988 at 7:30 P.M. VIII. E)~JrI< F()]R~: Business from the audience not included on the agenda. IX. OP:nIN'Ai~CESr, RESOLlIT"r'ONS "& CONTRACTS: ......... r r 1 T T r I r 1 ................_ 1. First reading by title only of an ordinance amending Chapter of the Land-use Title of the Municipal Code. furnished in accord with the Charter) 2. First reading of an ordinance amending the Bicycle Ordinanceo the Sign Ordinance (Copies previously 3~ First reading of an ordinance relative to water and sewer connection fees. 4. Second reading by title only of an ordinance setting a public hearing on a proposed\annexation (Albertson Annexation). 5. Resolution transferring appropriations with funds. . X. OTHER BUSINESS FROM COUNCI~MEMBERS .. 1 ~ 1.11 .- Tf . XI. ADJ OURNMENT Attachments: I'" Minutes of Boards, Commissions & Committees 2. Monthly Departmental Reports" Nov~~.ber 1987 / /' ,/ ,.' ROLL CALL SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS: Drunk & Drugged Driving Awareness Week Ashland High School Grizzlies Football Team APPROVAL OF MINUTES UNFINISHED BUSINESS: Community Center 'Board MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ASHLAND CITY COUNCIL December 1, 1987 Mayor L. Gordon Medaris led the Pledge of Allegiance and called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. on the above date in the Council Chambers. Elerath, Reid, Williams, Acklin, Laws and Arnold were present. Mayor Medaris read a proclamation designating the week of December 13 - 19, 1987 as "NATIONAL DRUNK AND DRUGGED DRIVING AWARENESS WEEK". The Mayor also read a letter from the Mayor and Council to the 1987 Ashland High School Grizzlies Football Team congratulating them on their Southern Oregon Conference Championship win, and winning the games which take them closer to the State champion- ship. Councilor Elerath asked that the word "he" on page 4, first sentence of the last paragraph be changed to "we". Acklin moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of November 17, 1987 as corrected; , Reid seconded the motion which passed unanimously on voice vote. Councilor Reid said she had met with the Ashland Folkdance group and discussed the need for an inventory of available space for community use. She feels a full-time board may not be necessary at this time. Reid would also like to look at the ordinance which gives the Parks Department authority to rent available spaces. Williams agreed that the ordinance should be reviewed. John Fregonese and Reid would like public input on the issue. Laws suggested appointing an informal committee including Reid, Fregonese and a Parks Commissioner, along with a subcommittee of citizens who use the buildings, to inventory available spaces, review the aforementioned ordinance and review rental policies. This will then be brought back to Council for input. Acklin so moved, Reid seconded the motion which passed unani- mously on voice vote. NEW & MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS: Computerized Planning Director John Fregonese reported on the Accident Reporting City's computerized accident reporting system which System was purchased with a grant the City received in 1986. He showed slides of information which is obtained from the State, entered into the computer and analyzed to 12/01/87 P. 1 . r r Regular Meeting Ashland City Council 12/01/87 P. 2 NEW & MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS: (Continued) Accident Reporting give data for such things as locations of accidents, System driver errors, times of accidents, etc. It's a very valuable system and will enable the City to take measures necessary to reduce accidents. This computer system also does graphics for other departments in City government. Financial Commentary Bicycle Ordinance Liquor License - ,Northlight Restr. Liquor License Thai Pepper Restr. Bridge Constr. over Neil Creek Acklin moved to accept and place on file the monthly financial commentary for the period ending October 31, 1987, Laws seconded the motion which passed unanimously on voice vote. A memo was read from Dir. of Public Works Al Alsing requesting modifications to the Bicycle Ordinance to bring it into conformance with the Oregon State Vehicle Code. Elerath feels the audible warning device should be standard for all bikes. Councilor Williams explained that the Bike Committee discussed this but felt it would create more controversy to require standardized warning bells. Laws felt it would cause enforcement problems. Acklin made a motion to ask Staff to revise the ordinance as suggested and bring it back to the next meeting; Reid seconded the motion which passed unanimously on voice vote. Police Chief Vic Lively's memo recommending approval of a liquor license application for the Northlight Restaurant at 36 S. Second St. was read. Arnold moved to approve the recommendation, Reid seconded the motion which passed unanimously on voice vote. Reid moved to place a liquor license application on the agenda for the Thai Pepper Restaurant, 84 N. Main Street, Acklin seconded the motion which passed unani- mously on voice vote. A memo from Police Chief Lively was read recommending approval, Laws moved to approve the application and Reid seconded the motion. It passed unanimously on voice vote. A memo was read from Public Works Director Alsing concerning a proposal to relocate a bridge from the Lithia Springs property to cross Neil Creek near the airport. Alsing explained that the County is proceeding with design of a bikepath on East Main and the bridge would be a major link between the airport and Ashland Hills Inn. He said the bridge is of historical significance and, if moved, this could be designated on the bridge. On a question from Mayor Medaris, Alsing said the funds of approximately $5200, 12/01/87 P. 2 . r , Regular Meeting f\. ;:::u.. ... __ _ -.4ficil 12/01/87 P. 3 NEW & MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS: (Continued) Bridge Constr. which include $3,000 for abutments, would have to come out of the Airport Fund, but would not be done this year. On a question from Elerath, Alsing said the path would be three-foot wide pavement. Arnold asked when the County would know if their grant was approved and Alsing said in February. Arnold said it might be better to wait until the grant was approved, and Acklin said it could be included in the budget preparations for next year if the concept is approved now, and deleted later if bikepath was not built. Elerath moved to approve the concept and authorize staff to proceed with preliminary design and funding; Acklin seconded the motion which passed unanimously on voice vote. Clay St. Annex. (Albertson) Human Resources Subcomm. Meeting PUBLI C FORUM First reading of an ordinance setting a public hearing for January 5, 1988 concerning annexation of land on Clay Street between Highway 66 and East Main Street. Acklin moved to second reading; Laws seconded the motion which passed on roll call vote as follows: Elerath, NO; Reid, Williams, Acklin, Laws and Arnold, YES. A letter was read from Budget Committee member Sabra Hoffman, 345 Scenic Dr., requesting a meeting of the Human Resources Subcommittee to discuss the process for reviewing requests for funding from Human Resource agencies. After a brief discussion, Arnold moved to call a special meeting of the Subcommittee for Tuesday, February 16, 1988 at 4:00 P.M. Acklin seconded the motion which passed unanimously on voice vote. The Mayor opened the public forum and again welcomed Jim Watson, new Administrator/C.E.O. of Ashland Community Hospital. There being no comment from the audience the public forum was closed. ORDINANCES, RESOLUTIONS & CONTRACTS: Clay St. Annex. First reading of an ordinance on the Clay Street annexation was held earlier in the meeting. Reeder Annexation (1660 Peachey Rd.) Second reading by title only of an ordinance annexing a contiguous area (Reeder Annexation). Reid moved to adopt the ordinance; Laws seconded the motion which passed unanimously on roll call vote. (Ref. Ord. #2433) 12/01/87 P. 3 q T Regular Meeting - . Ashland City Council 12/01/87 P. 4 .. ~-, ORDINANCES, RESOLUTIONS & CONTRACTS: (Continued) Reeder Annexation Second reading by title only of an ordinance (1660 Peachey Rd.) withdrawing recently annexed land from Jackson County Fire District No.5 (Reeder Annexation). Laws moved to adopt the ordinance; Acklin seconded the motion which passed unanimously on roll call vote. (Ref. Ord. #2434) Reeder Annexation (1660 Peachey Rd.) Second reading by title only of an ordinance rezoning certain recently annexed land (Reeder Annexation). Laws moved to adopt the ordinance; Arnold seconded the motion which passed unanimously on roll call vote. (Ref. Ord. #2435) Street Plugs Second reading by title only of an ordinance concerning street plugs and reserve strips. Laws moved to adopt the ordinance; Arnold seconded the motion which passed unanimously on roll call vote. (Ref. Ord. #2436) Bank Signature Cards A memo was read from Director of Finance Nelson concerning an attached resolution designating banking depository and City officers authorized to withdraw money from same. It was noted that Karen Huckins, Supervising Accountant, had been left off the original resolution and a revised copy was presented at the meeting. Acklin moved to approve the Resolution; Williams seconded the motion which passed unanimously on roll call vote. (Ref. Reso. #87-49) OTHER BUSINESS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS: Letters to Mayor Medaris told Council of thank you letters sent Christmas Decora- to those involved in the acquisition of the new tions Providers Christmas Decorations, including Emile Cloutier, Mac McCarley, Western Oil & Burner, Handyman Plumbing & Electric Supply, and Harrison Parts Co. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:50 P.M. L. Gordon'Medaris Mayor Nan E. Franklin City Recorder 12/01/87 P. 4 .. I }I " .i( J (' ~ Main Street Development Co. Memo to : Brian Almquist City of Ashland Re: Planning Commission Action 87-144 Site Review From: Allan Sandler & Harvey Davis owners of 255 Grant Street Date: 12/10/87 I request a hearing before the City Council on their January 5, 1988 meeting regarding the Planning Commissions tie vote on approving our Site Review which without action indicates a turn down and they gave us no recommendations. As a matter of fact we have met or will meet all requirements of the Building & Planning Dept. as was stated by the Planning Dept. in their Criteria for Site Review: A) All applicable city ordinances have been met and will be met by proposed development. S) All requirements of the Site Review have been met. C) The Site design complies with the guidelines adopted by the City Council for implimentation of this chapter. During the meeting we felt that certain members of the Commission were out of their sphere of authority in what sounded like they were trying to change the rules as have previously been abided by. One point of contention: Our architect and the City Planning Dept stated that we met the requirements for public and private open space and certain members of the Commission stated that they should no longer consider private open space such as patios and balconies calculating open space and they said we did not meet the require- ment when in fact we did. Another point of contention: They did not want us to remove the house on the property when in fact we have every right to remove the house. The house is not on the Historic List, we are not in the Historic Distric4 the house is not up to code based upon your building inspectors. The house is one third remodeled and the cost of fixIng it up Is $42,711.18. While at $40.00 per foot of the 850 sq. ft. of the old portion of the house, it would cost $34,000.00 to rebuild from scratch. 762 A. Street ..~shland, ()R 97520 (503) 488-2025 TELE:X: SANDLR - TWX 5106001711 ..' T Memo to: Brian Almquest City of Ashland Date: 12/10/87 Page -2- The Historic Commission did not put special historic significance on the house. The third point of contention: The Planning Commission said our buildings were to high, when in fact they are no higher than nor- mal two story homes and are within height guidelines. However when they brought up this point and a few neighbors were concerned about the height we offered to reduce the height by five feet in order to please the neighborhood. Again they arbitrarily said no with no consideration for our rights under the code. We therefore request that you approve our request and over turn their tie vote and give us some recommendations. Thank you, . . T 'if'. ).c<'~' ':' ~emorandum September 10, 1987 <(Uo; Jtf rom: Mayor and Council Vie Lively, Pol.ice Chief ~ ~ubjett; Liquor Licf~nse An application for Change of Ownership has been received from William Charles Reichard dba Little Caesar's, 1253 Siskiyou Blvd. A background check has been completed on the applicant and approval of this license is recommended. VL~mm t, : f i 1 e ..' T {.iCC[jlJr~T H 1 ::' 8;1- () 3 ~/-77 ~ e (,; ;~e;l ,PI c,;{t.. S Pi ... T I !"JCHJ I F~Y 1''t'IEt'JU (t--1AF' SEQUEJ'JCE) r:;;9-+EI'()CC . ';' ,~;,::\t\2()2,,: j' CIJDE 5--() 1 M. ~.~ II ':?";.-~"BASE YF: 84'!"lR" PL. T 46 AF'FJF~t1= ::~~. t.-{ Ivl ~3 T PI F' F'I._ *r (:r () () () () () (> () () () () () (i (> () () (:1 (; (j () () C: - 1 , F' F~ 0 F' C L S :: () 1 F A C B~::: (l40 S I ~US (H)(H) 1253 S I S.~::I Y,OU "',~L VD./ 97520 COML LND 10890 UNTS OvJrJEF.~ 1'.~}AL_l_E\/ Er".JTEF~F'F~ I SE~3 A 1::1 E rJ T C/IJ t:.,33 IOl,.JPi E;1' A E r1 L j;':l j\j I) [)F.: )}': :,y :t. * :t. >t: it. 1(. I t..,~ F (J F~ t"1?'~ -r I IJ ~ ~ t"'1 E: hltJ :t. >r: )t: )t. )Y. it. * * 1. ASSESSMENT INFORMATION '-' . J C) I..J F~ r',,~ PI 1._ \/ CJ I..J C: 1",1 E F~ I t'.~ F (J F~ I'~'I {~ T I 0 ~~ 4 ~ 1- {.::; X I I"'J F' CJ F::~ 1"'1 {:} ,.. I [J t'.1 5 II C: (] "'1 1"1 f::. F~ C: I P'll_ / ::3 (~ L_l:: ~3 I 1\1 I=- 0 F;~ 1'1 (~l 'r I 0 I\~ IJ F' -r I [I t'..J : C t1 D : ~) 1 '-F.::?2c{;:. t t'"1i~n Lt ()=~~~=:e3r' c h L~; t 1. :~-P'C ct. ~)E'~q u ..... I) f C1 t'- ~; T t. e f1 t i CI n" .. f'1 t. c, E; t\) i t. c h c:: \::t p t L.\ 1"- e CJ f f I'-IELF' k e';/ I\J Lll1t i2 t- i c A C: C~ C] IJ ".J 'r # 1 -;: 8 .:1~) 3 [I L'.Jl\JE F~ l,.,' {:iL_!_ E~'/ Er-'~TEF~F'F~ I E:E E: T {:i :< I ~.~ F ~J F~ I'Tl {~ T' I 0 !"..,., 391 E 1 <)CC (i\1f~~Ft :3EQlJEt\JC~E) 12()2 [:[IDE TF~ ~::; -- (:! ~:; .::: E t. ~ 'T .::.. ::: ::: I [I VJ pj ~3 'r L. CJ (~ t'.J F:- [I F: C L C) t:; It it 1- C: 1...,.1 : L_ D r" I r; ,_~~. '_.i (.i S l-~ L_ ?"i l' J [) [jF~ e;'l 7 5 :2 () E:ll'"'' ,~ :-j 3 lq () I ""'1 ;S 5 ~~ .q. () I I'~I () SF'I~ (~~c 85()(H) '-IJT 15(!3. f35<)()() 1-[11- 15()~~: . (H) 1- X F~ J~ -r E: 1 8 . l ri t:: I) : t_ I) T X "/ F.. C [1 [:1 E -, [: \.' 1/ (:1~: f::; [I f"; [) 1../ ;i L 1- (:'1 X ~-:; F' E C: {:'l ~::; f.:~ I"/I-r ~:; T Fl I~i 'V r"1 E: i\~ -r T () T {4 L 1- {i X U t'J F';; I [I 1" (~ X :=: -y -- ~~~~ ~? t::4-E:::; ~sn 1 :5(:'1 ~jO 1 ~::~ () 1 1 5 () 3.::1 () :2:3(j':) . E~:3 a () () . () () 1 .:t 4,3~:() ::: 3 E: () a ,(:1 (:r a () () a () () II (:1 () 28(H) . 8::; ~68(). 56 :256(}. 29 ::38<).. ()() :-~t3C'~) a E:3 E: ':::' - E: ~'7 1. =; () ::;:':'1- () 1 5 Cl ::: ,q () :2 ~S E:~ () a ~~)!.::.. II () U II () () :~68()" ~56 p ~ - :=~ /'-, .- -- ..--- :: 5 t~~l () II :~ C? .. () () 251~Ci a 29 :::::S(). (:'(:1 TX'/F: 5 () 1 1. 1:5 6 E: () :2 1 1 :~ . :~~:~ FIRST SECOND THIRD 9 '"=:: a ;~~. 1 '::;:' ::~: . IS 1 (~) ::~!. .. 6 1 .. () () II () () ~2 1 1 :: . ~~: 2 . () () r:- [j LI F: T ~"l . f.:; [: I I\~ Mr E f~~ E:: s -r 1- [I T A LM [) LI E .<)0 9.34 281(J.17 F -7" -- ~=: Lt ...- - -oo {.-', ,..,- ;-~ i.~! .-. '--'- -..... . . . ~ . ........ ..- ...- E:b-E7 E: C;:' -.:: . ~5 ~ E: <7'::: a :5:2 f3 ~,1 :::: It 5 ::: a () () :.~ t,,8 II (! '~J :2 \~) {"l f3 II !:;::2 c: ~~1 D : 0 1 - P 1'2 (J ':: t p-ll~ n Lt (1 :2 -.. E E:3. ~M' C h L '~. t () :::.- I n q \.- ".,"1"1';21'1 Lt U 4. - ~.i=,=. ;2 .:=. :;:. ;Tl Ii t (:! ~5 .~. I n t:. [i E' t .~~ i 1 () IS .-.. I) ';;;, ~=l 1 ".,: I"" S (~ .;;:, () '~) -- ~=: I (3 r~ C) F F' 1 :2--PiC ct. ~~.3€0q . 15-H{:;d dIll [l~\}n .. ..... D .F D t- (i T t ;?:: n tic n " ..., {'.":\ t. c! E; l~J i t. c: h C\:tP t Ltr- E' [If 1: ~"IEL..F' k E~'/ t--J Lt en E:;} r' i c . .' T ~ , ,,-4 ,,'./ ~ //' RONALD L. SALTER ATTORNEY AT LAW 94 THIRD STREET ASHLAND. OREGON 97520 (503) 482-4215 December 7, 1987 Mr. Brian Almquist City Administrator C.ity Hall Ashland, Oregon 97520 Re: P.P.& L. vs. Ashland Dear Brian: Enclosed is my memo to the Mayor and Members of the Council, which I suggest be given to the Council for its next meeting, and also that we call an executive session. Very truly yours, /.'...} / i' ~,/' oor-~ \t L~0 <:_) RONALD L. SALTER City Attorney RLS/pc Enclosure - . T ,t1t. MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Members of the Common Counil DATE: December 7, 1987 FROM: Ronald L. Salter City Attorney SUBJECT: P.P. & L. vs. Ashland Ladies and Gentlemen: The recent Court of Appeals decision in the above matter dealt with two questions. One was whether the City has the right to condemn P.P.& L. 's facilities in areas annexed, and then continue to serve the customers with electricity. The Court held that we do have such a right. This is a very impor- tant holding to the City, and was by a two to one decision in the Court of Appeals. The other question was whether the City was legally and properly serving customers in areas annexed to it since 1965, where those areas had been allocated previously by the PUC to P.P.& L. In our opinion, the Court's holding is that we do have such a right, provided we exercise our statutory right to "exclude or eject" P.P.& L. As those areas were vacant and not being served by anyone with electricity, it is our position that the act of serving was the act of exclusion, and thus we have properly served such customers. The Court of Appeals held that this question of fact "exclusion or ejection" had not been decided, and thus it remanded the case to the trial court for determination. Mr. Almquist and I, along with our attorney in Portland, Don Stark, met with ranking representatives of Pacific Power & Light in Portland on December 2, 1987, and at their request. This was for the purpose of working towards settlement of the matter. We look forward to discussing this with you in an executive session at the meeting of December 15, 1987. Respectfully submitted, RLS/pc -- /" .....---.- ~.i~ !: \ ~~-h i.. Ro~ALD L. SALTER City Attorney RONALD L. SALTER ATTORNEY AT LAW 94 THIRD STREET ASHLAND, OREGON 97520 .. T ~emorandum December 7, 1987 <(If 0: Brian L. Almquist '> Jff rom: jy Allen A. Alsing ~ubjett; Recommendation fro:m Airport Conunission The purchase of the airport hangars was recently completed. Since the City did not own the hangars at the time that the lease with Ashland Air, Inc. was executed, no mention of the hangars was included. In order for Ashland Air to become the City's agent for collection of the hangar rental fees, it will be necessary to modify the lease agreement. Attached is a copy of the portion of the lease that deals with fees and fee collection. The Airport Commission has recommended that lO.e be modified to"read as follows: A monthly facilities charge administered by the Lessee of 80% of the gross income from any City-owned tiedown or hangar space administered by the Lessee, excluding those spaces designated for use by the Lessee for aircraft owned or leased to the Lessee; and I presume that this will need Council action. Would you please place this on the next Council agenda? - . T 9. Lessee further agrees to k ep the leased area and premises I~, a neat and orderly manner, free of offensive or dangerous materials or conditions. 10. Lessee agrees to pay to the/City on or before the tenth d4; of each calendar month during the te~ of this Lease, the following ;fA ,^?S and amounts: ) a. The rental of $ $750.00 per month during th~ term of this Lease; and b. A flowage free of $0.05 ( 5 (:) per gallon on all r~~l products (aviation fuel and Mogas) delivered to the Lessee at the A$11and Airport. Said fee is payable on fuel used by the Lessee or sold 't ~o~the publici and c. A monthly freight handlers fee administered by the --e...~see of '80 % of the gross collecj:edi d. A monthly Mogas license fee administered by the Lessee ~f 80 % of the gross collected. e. A monthly facilities charge administered by the Lessee o~ 80 % of the gross income from any City-owned tiedown space adminis- '-. ~F' te~ed by the Lessee, excluding those spaces designated for use by the Le~see for aircraft owned 6r leased to the Lessee; and f. If revenue from shop activities, including general a\~craft maintenance, engine overhaul, aircraft painting, radio and air- Crfft parts sales, exceed a gross of TWO HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DO~LARS (~;50,000.00) in anyone calendar year, beginning in 1988, Lessee shall JAY to the City, on January 21st of the following year, a sum equal to O~~ percent (1%) of the gross in excess of $250,000.00. The monthly rental rate in "a" above shall be adjusted yearly (-:f.~ follows: The monthly rental shall increase, but not decrease, in accord w,!h the increase in the Consumer Price Index. The year 1967 shall e9lAlal 100 and the index used shall be Consumer Price Index for all urban ~~msumer. for the Portland, Oregon area. The base period shall be for ~e period ending July 1987, and if information for that month, is not ~v 'ail.able, it shall then be the next preceding month for which, informa- . '.,~. . lIon is available. Th~ increase in the rent shall be determined and ~A~e effective on an annual basis, with the first period being one (1) !ear from the date this Lease commences, and on a yearly.basis there- a~ter. Further, in no event is the rent to decrease'even if the Consumer f~ice Index decreases. A T~~en ~n~oomo~+ . . T ! 1,. I ; , t I ~~ t , .u j, ~ l ~ &. ?~ , . I ; 'j '\ H 'I q ~ IJ ;l : ! i r i I i ; f ! ~i i~ rn r t~ ~ ~~ t4' ,'. ~emorandum December 10, 1987 mo: Honorable Mayor & City Council Jf rom: ~ubjett: Brian L. Almquist, City Administrator /1 1988 Electric Rate Forecast State law in O.R.S. 222.230 requires the administrator of each municipal utility to annually: (1) make an estimate of operating expenses for the corning fiscal year; (2) project rates sufficient to meet those expenses; and (3) maintain a reserve fund to meet future system requirements. This analyses and report are to be submitted to the City Council by December 31 of each year, but need not be acted upon until the budget is presented later in the year. Therefore, in accord with State law, the Staff has prepared the attached estimate of Electric Fund revenues and expenditures for 1988-89. Preliminary indication from B.P.A. is that there will be no increase be-fore January 1, 1989. My belief, based on discussions with knowledgeable people in the Northwest, is that there will not be an increase during the 1988-89 fiscal year. The 1988-89 budget which will be presented in the Spring will therefore propose to maintain electric rates at their current levels. Attachment/ November 30, 1987 !fO: FROM: SUBJECT: Brian L. #Almquist, City Administrator Robert D. Ne'lson, Dir~ctor of Finance PRELIMINARY ELECTRIC UTILITY FORECAST - 1988-89 Pursuant to ORS 225.230, the annual preliminary estimates for the electric utility have been prepared. Bonneville has indicated that no wholesale power rate changes will occur prior to January 1, 1989. At that time, rates might be adjusted in either direction. There are many variables, such as precipitation, temperatures, aluminum industry economics, crude oil prices and the like, so neither Bonneville nor I predict any change. Therefore, assuming no rate increases, the summary below gives rise to the hope that no retail rate increases will be needed for 1988-89. Respectfully submitted, # Robert D. Nelson Director of Finance RDN:paw Electric Utility Fund 1988-89 Preliminary Forecast (In Thousands of Dollars) Resources 87/88 Budget $1,047 300 5,750 147 $7.244 88/89 Estimates $1,020 250 5,750 180 $7,200 1. Beginning Fund Balance 2. Grants 3. Sales 4. Miscellaneous Revenues 5. Total Resources Requirements 6. Personnel Services $ 745 $ 750 7. Purchased Power 3,500 3,500 8. Materials & Services 892 900 9. Capital Outlay 328 288 10. Franchise Tax 590 593 11. Conservation Expense 300 249 12. Debt Service (Incl. Fiscal Agent) 77 93 13. Operating Contingency 172 187 14. Unappropriated Ending Balance 640 640 15. Total Requirements $7,244 $7,200 J ~emorandum December 8, 1987 ijI 0: Brian Almquist, City Administrator Jff rom: Robert Nelson, Director of Finance ~uhjett: NEED FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET Permission is requested to call a meeting of the Budget Committee at 7:30 p.m. on Thursday, January 21, 1988, in the Civic Center, for the purpose of electing officers, considering a supplemental budget, and discussing other matters of concern to the Budget Committee. The proposed supplemental budget document will be made available in the near futur~. Respectfully submitted, ~~.)1d Robert Nelson Director of Finance kah cc: Honorable Mayor and City Council Nan Franklin, City Recorder Jill Turner, Assistant Director of Finance * * * * * * * * * P. s. - Attached is a copy of the proposed supplemental budget. The Fire Department budget needs to be increased because of forest firefighting, and the Airport Fund should be amended - because of the arrangements with the new fjxed base operator. l.b ./1. SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET 1987-88 GENERAL FUND Resources Fire Department Service $10,200 $10,200 Total resources Requirements - Fire Department Personnel Services - salaries (o.t.) 6,700 Personnel services - employee benefits 2,200 Materials and services - maint. of equip. 1,300 Total requirements $10,200 .... * -1: -;': .'. -;': * .t.- .'. ..... .t.- #~ #, ^ #~ ^ #~ AiRPORT FUND Resources Airport lease revenues $ 6,900 Requirements Materials and services - utilities 4,100 Materials and services - maintenance $ 2,800 Total requirements $ ~,900 -;" -I: -;': -;': ...... -;': -;': * * -1: ..'. " ^ ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 14 OF THE ASHLAND MUNICIPAL CODE RELATIVE TO WATER AND SEWER CONNECTION FEES. THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF ASHLAND DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Section 14.04.040 E. of the Ashland Municipal Code shall be amended by amending the third and fourth lines of the seconq paragraph to read as follows: "addition to the fees set forth herein, pay a fee of $10.00 per lineal foot of frontage to reimburse said developer for said main, which ..." SECTION 2. Section 14.08.020 D. of the Ashland Municipal Code shall be amended by amending the third and fourth lines of the second paragraph to read as follows: "addition to the fees set forth herein, pay a fee of $6.40 per foot of frontage to reimburse said developer for said main, which ..." The foregoing Ordinance was first read on the 15th day of December, 1987 and duly PASSED and ADOPTED this 5th day of January, 1988. Nan E. Franklin City Recorder SIGNED and APPROVED this day of January, 1988. L. Gordon Medaris Mayor ~emnrandum November 25, 1987 Wo: Brian L. Almquist, City Administrator JIf rom: ~ubjttt: Robert D. Nelson, Director of Finance REQUEST FOR TRANSFE1{S". OF APPROPRIATIONS Several transfers of appropriations within funds are needed: 1. The Seniors bus required some large, unanticipated repairs to its transmission. 2. S.O.S.C. will reimburse the City for its share of the cost of the access television feasibility study, but an appropriation is needed. 3. Unanticipated elections cost approximately $6,200. 4. The down payment and closing costs of the "B" Street property {see October 6 Minutes) will total about $4,500. 5. Parks & Recreation 1987-88 wage, salary and benefit adjustments need to be appropriated, as requested by A.P. & R.C. Attachedlis ~ proposed Resolution for Council consideration. .I Respectfully submitted, ~ RDN/td cc: Hon. Mayor & City Council Barbara Dunlap Nan Franklin John Fregonese Ken Mickelsen Robert D. Nelson Director of Finance ... RESOLUTION NO. 87- A RESOLUTION TRANSFERRING APPROPRIATIONS WITHIN FUNDS WHEREAS, due to circums tances record,ed in the Direc tor of Finance's memorandum dated November 25, 1~87, the Mayor and City Council of the City of Ashland hereby determine that it is necessary to transfer appropriations as follows: 1. From General Fund Operating Contingency to Senior Program Katerials & Service (Bus Expense) - $1,200. 2. From Gener~l Fund, . Operating Contingency to Communi ty Development Materials & Service (Consulting Services) - $400. 3. From Central Services Operating Contingency to Materials & Services (Elections) - $6,200. 4. From Street Fund Materials & Services (Street Maintenance) to Capital Outlay (Improvements Other than Buildings) - $4,500. 5. From Parks Division Operating Contingency - $18,050, and from Capital Outlay (Other Projects) - $13,199; to Personnel Services - $31,249 (Salaries - $23,183, and Employee Benefits - $8,066) From Recreation Division Operating Contingency - $1,500, and Materials & Services (Program Expense) - $2,466; to Personnel Services - $3,966 (Salaries - $2,585, and Employee Benefits - $1,381). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that appropriations are hereby transferred as indicated above. The foregoing Resolution was READ and DULY ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the C~ty Council of the City of Ashland on the day of , 1987. Nan E. Franklin City Recorder day of ,1987 SIGNED and APPROVED this L. Gordon Medaris Mayor -.' T .- ~. :! ASHLAND COMMUNITY HOSPITAL MINUTES OF TIIE BOARD OF DIRECTORS' MEETING October 23, 1987 The Board of Directors of Ashland Community Hospital met at 12:45 p.m. on Friday, October 23, 1987t in the Conference Room of the Hospital. During lunch, Mack Banner, Chuck Baker, and Ed Weidman of RCA Management Company presented the findings of an operational survey their company had performed. (A written report is on file in Administration.) PRESENT: Those present were: B. Doyle Greene, presiding; Linda Jackson, Michael Jewett, Frank Billovits, Jerry Cooper, Jean Keevil, M.D., Stephen Lunt, and Frances Wiley, Board members; Allen Johnson, M.D., Medical Staff representative; Pat Acklin, City Council liaison; Michael McGraw, CFO; and Carolyn Johnson, pro tern executive secretary. GUESTS: Robert Strawbridge, interim administrator; and James Watson, appointed administrator. ABSENT: Those absent were: Walt Roffbuhr, president; Beth Barnet, Foundation president; and Jennie Dunbar, Auxiliary president. \, CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 1:50 p.m. by B. Doyle Greene. APPROVAL OF BOARD MINUTES: It was moved by Linda Jackson and seconded by Mike Jewett that the minutes of the September 25, 1987, "meeting be approved as received. Motion carried. It was then moved by Linda Jackson and seconded by Frances Wiley that the minutes of the Board's Executive Sessions on Tuesday, September 22, 1987, and Wednesday, September 30, 1987, be approved as distributed. Motion carried. FOLLOW-UP DISCUSSION: Several questions regarding follow-up to issues addressed in the minutes were raised: Mr. Strowbridge reported that he had discussed the perceptions of the ambulance company employees toward our Emergency Room with the owner Gordon Brown who identified that there are some personal feelings between himself and one of the physicians but that these feelings do not influence his decision regarding destination of transport. He specified that these "personal feelings" were not a question of quality of care. Ashland Life Support brings to our Emergency Room all patients who request ACH and all patients except those who have injuries that the hospital has predetermined are not appropriate such as patients with head injuries. Stephen Lunt requested a copy of the report that Mike McGraw had used in his report on the status of our inventory control program. McGraw responded that these were a series of memos not a formal report and that he will get copies to Mr. Lunt. In answer to questions regarding the status of the Pharmacy BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING - October 23, 1987 Page 2 inventory, McGraw responded that Joe Sayre, chief pharmacist, was at a meeting in Bend today to negotiate contract prices. However, the real problem is that each physician, especially in anesthesiology, wants a special selection of medications which are currently not in the hospital's Formulary. Dr. Keevil informed the Board that the problem had been discussed at the General Medical Staff meeting this month and physicians had been asked to follow the formal process of requesting the addition of their special drug orders through the Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee. It is hoped that the physicians will voluntarily comply and limit their special requests. Stephen Lunt also wished to know if the Auxiliary had been reimbursed by the vending company. McGraw reported that the vending company is current with its reimbursement to the Auxiliary. COMMITTEE REPORTS AND MINUTES: Strategic Planning Committee Report B. Doyle Greene reported that the Strategic Planning Committee had spent its meeting time listening to two proposed affiliations between ACH and the Ashland View Manor. The first was, a proposal for a lease or sublease of the facility to continue its purpose as a retirement home but perhaps to assure better utilization of our dietary, housekeeping, and pharmacy services as well as gaining some office space for programs that could be run from outside the hospital. The second was a proposal by John Gilmore from Jackson County Mental Health that the hospital lease Ashland View Manor and administer a 24-bed inpatient, short-stay, psychiatric facility by contracting for psychiatric counselo~s and technicians with the county. This proposal is contingent upon a state funding grant of $750,000. It was moved by Jean Keevil, M.D., and seconded by Mike Jewett that the minutes be approved as received. Motion carried. MarketinR and Finance Committee Report 'Jerry Cooper reported that the Marketing and Finance Committee had decided to move its meetings to the second Thursday of each month to accommodate the chairman's faculty responsibilities. Discussion at the meeting included the development of a marketing plan for the Emergency Room which will be done by an sose student, the decision to discontinue the KOBI-TV program when the current contract expires, and the discussion of criteria for selection of an advertising agency. Carolyn Johnson reported that she had shown the Committee a series of professionally produced conunercials called "Technically Speaking" which are available if this is a direction the Committee wishes to pursue after the completion of the strategic plan. It was moved by Frank Billovits and seconded by Mike Jewett that the minutes be approved as received. Motion carried. FINANCIAL REPORT: Mike McGraw reviewed the financial report for the month of September, pointing out that. the figures reflect a low census. Net operating revenues for the month were $447,472, while total operating expenses were $535,512, leaving a net loss after interest of $75,741. Year-to-date loss is $146,395. Frank Billovits asked if we were purposely "stretching out" the payables. Mike McGraw responded that each bill is paid in the month it is received. However, . . , ..; BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING - October 23, 1987 Page 3 the amount in receivables is increasing because of a slow-down in Medicare reimbursement. He explained that by law Blue Cross of Oregon, our intermediary for Medicare, is required to pay in 28 days. However, Blue Cross had adopted a policy of sending all records to OMPRO for review and then after review they start counting the 28 days. Potentially, this could hold up payment for 60-90 days. The Board was dismayed by this practice. Mr. Watson was asked if he felt that our financial situation can be turned around. He responded that this hospital traditionally has low census in the fall and that losses will probably be offset by profits in the winter months. However, he feels that overall the Board has three alternatives in addressing the future of Ashland Community Hospital: (1) the Board can choose to do nothing, in which case he would predict closure in three years; (2) the Board could take a conservative approach, eliminating services and pulling back, in which case he would predict closure six months sooner; or (3) the Board can elect to take some risks and attempt to increase our utilization, which should guarantee financial success. The Board appreciated his advice. MEDICAL STAFF REPORT: 'Dr. Allen Johnson reported the Medical Staff was s~eking approval of credentials for Thomas R. Holbert, M.D., for Courtesy Staff privileges ih gynecology. It was moved by Mike Jewett and seconded by Frances Wiley that these credentials be approved. Motion carried. In response to the Board's request for input from the physicians on a "Smoke-Free Fac'ility" policy for Ashland Community Hospital, Dr. Johnson reported that based on the experiences of Providence Hospital and Rogue Valley Medical Center, the Medical Staff recommends that patients ,be allowed to smoke in their rooms with a doctor's ..prder. APPROVAL OF EXPENDITURES: Frances Wiley moved and Linda Jackson seconded a motion to approve the October expenditures. Motion carried. CEO'S REPORT: Bob Strowbridge reported that he continues to find good morale and effective day- -to-day management of the hospital on his visits to Ashland Community Hospital. Since this will probably be his last Board meeting, he thanked the Board for the opportunity to serve them and the community, stating that it had been a pleasure. The Board expressed their appreciation to Mr. Strowbridge for stepping in to provide stability during a difficult time. OTHER BUSINESS: Formal Acceptance of New Administrator/CEO: B. Doyle Greene read a letter of acceptance from James Watson and requested a motion for the Board's acceptance of Mr. Watson as Administrator/CEO of Ashland Community Hospital with his assuming full responsibilities on November 16, 1987. Mr. Strowbridge will continue in the role of consultant for as long as deemed necessary by this Board. The motion was made by Stephen Lunt and seconded by Frances Wiley. Motion carried. .- ~.. , .. r ~ BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING - October 23, 1987 Page 4 Formal Request of Appointment: B. Doyle Greene requested a motion that a letter be sent to Mayor Medaris and the Ci~y Council requesting formal approval of the appointment of James Watson as Administrator/CEO of Ashland Community Hospital. The motion was made by Linda Jackson and seconded by Michael Jewett. Motion carried. Consultation PrivileRes: B. Doyle Greene reported that the Board had received a letter requesting that Mr. Watson be granted telephone consultation privileges to Pacific Communities Hospital until January 10, 1988. A motion to grant this privilege at the discretion of the Board was made by Frank Billovits and seconded by Mike Jewett. Motion carried. Check SiRninR Resolution: B. Doyle Greene requested a motion to change the names of those authorized to sign checks from Thomas M. Mack, Michael S. McGraw, or Sharlene Stephens to James Watson, Michael S. McGraw, or Peggy Cockrell. It was moved by Frances Wiley and seconded by Linda Jackson that the resolution be adopted. Michael Jewett abstained from voting. Motion carried. Employee Gift Certificate: B. Doyle Greene informed the Board that it was time to discuss the annual holiday gift certificate. He explained that the hospital used to give each employee a turkey in December but had changed that custom several years ago and in the recent past has given a $10 gift certificate to a local market. A motion to carry on~the tradition of the $10 gift certificate was made by Linda Jackson and seconded by Frances Wiley. Motion carried. Change of Date of Board Meeting: The November Board meeting is scheduled on the day after Thanksgiving. A motion was made by Mike Jewett and seconded by Frank Billovits to move the Board meeting to Monday, November 30, 1987, at 12:30 p.m. Smoke-Free Facility Policy: Carolyn Johnson reported that a memo had been sent out to all employees requesting their input into a suitable designated smoking area outside the hospital and away from main entrances. The only responses was from the Coordinator of Obstetrics who requested that OB patients and visitors be allowed to smoke outside the back door to that unit as they are currently doing and from the Health Appraisal Coordinator, Roberta Kaiser, who proposed that site plus one outside the Dining Room and one outside Sports Medicine. Johnson felt that since Pacific Communities Hospital had already adopted a policy, Mr. Watson should have input into our policy. Discussion was tabled. Mr. Watson will bring a policy statement. to the December Board meeting. BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING - October 23, 1987 Page 5 Recognition of Executive Secretary: Linda Jackson informed the Board that Executive Secretary Sharlene Stephens is not planning to return to work from her maternity leave. Jackson recommended that the Board give her special recognition at the Employee Recognition Dinner on November 19, 1987. The Board agreed and appointed Linda Jackson to select an appropriate gift. Pat Acklin volunteered to consult. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 2 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ~dtJ 9a~ Linda ackson Board Secretary Approved: Walt Hoffbuhr Board President <1(, -./' ",. ASHLAND PLANNING COMMISSION HEARINGS BOARD MINUTES November 12, 1987 CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairman Pro Tern Brent Thompson at 2:00 p.m. Commissioners present were Bernard, and Bingham. Staff members present were Fregonese, McLaughlin, Molnar, and Honts. TYPE II PUBLIC HEARINGS PLANNING ACTION 87-140 REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR TEMPORARY USE FOR CHRISTMAS TREE SALES LOT PIONEER AND "C" STREETS APPLICANT: BARBARA MUMBLO STAFF REPORT Staff reported that a similar application had been processed for the past several years. The Christmas tree lot has been operating on this site for .the past nine years. There was no written objections for this type of use. The sales will be conducted only in the month of December. McLaughlin read the criteria for approval of a conditional use permit. Staff recommended approval of this application. PUBLIC HEARING BARBARA MUMBLO, 4900 Yale Creek Road, Jacksonville, OR, felt she would be doing a service to the community with the Christmas tree lot. COMMISSIONERS DISCUSSION AND MOTION All commissioners made a site visit. Bernard moved to approve and Bingham seconded the motion. The motion was carried unanimously. PLANNING ACTION 87-147 REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMI'r FOR TEMPORARY USE FOR CHRIS'l'MAS TREE SALES LOT CORNER OF NORTH MAIN AND CHURCH STREETS llllilf~~!;~. IJORR.J~~_Ll\MBER! STAFF REPORT McLaughlin stated that this application was very similar to the Mumblo application (PA87-140). The applicant operated a Christmas tree lot last year on "e" street. Staff recommended approval. . . r PUBLIC HEARING There was no public testimony. COMMISSIONERS DISCUSSION AND MOTION All commissioners made a site visit. Bingham moved to approve the planning application and Bernard seconded it. The motion was carried unanimously. PLANNING ACTION 87-142 REQUEST FOR SITE REVIEW FOR EIGHT UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX 655 PARK STREET APPLICANT: GEORGE COTA STAFF REPORT Staff reported that in 1980, the Planning Commission approved a conditional use, site review and minor land partition for an 18 unit, 2-story condominium complex on this site. The applicant was granted an extension that lapsed and nothing was built. The applicant recently gained approval for a similar complex on adjoining property accessing off Normal Avenue. The applicant is proposing to put eight single story units on the site with access off Park Street and joining the existing development. Landscaping just meets the requirement~ In order to provide extra buffering along the accessway, Staff has suggested that five feet be taken out of pavement and landscaped. Staff recommended approval of this application. McLaughlin read the criteria. Fregonese added that with regard to the rear yard landscaping, that the ordinance requires that 25 percent of the floor space be in recreational landscaping, therefore, Staff recommended that the applicant consider the use of decking, concrete, or some patio type development rather than simply decorative landscaping. McLaughlin showed slides. PUBLIC HEARING GEORGE eOTA, 1030 Ivy Lane, assured the Commission that the rear yard landscaping would consist of shrubs, trees, barkdust and 8'x 10' patio. He also indicated he would be flexible as far as the rear yard landscaping. Commissioner Thompson suggested the use of grass in the rear yards, but McLaughlin indicated that it was difficult to bring a lawnmower through the unit to mow the back yard. Cota could not see a problem with the landscape buffer. MRS. BLANKENSTEIN, 635 Park Street, a neighboring property owner, requested that proper drainage be put in her yard as well as a retaining wall. She stated that every year her garage is under water. She also asked for a fence to buffer the noise from the project. MCLaughlin, said a six foot wood fence has been proposed along the property llne. She also wanted Cota to clean up debris from construction along her property line. Cota answered Blankenstein's requests by stating that plans have been made for a storm sewer and sewer system which runs from his proposed project all the way down Park. He did not feel the retaining wall was his responsibility. BILL SPRINGS, 654 Park Street, said that traffic was his main concern. He did not want extra congestion on Park Street and Normal Streets. GARY ELLIS, 717 Park Street, said that his backyard faced the west side of the proposed development. He requested a fence on the property line. At this time, he has access to Talent Irrigation District water from Normal to the south edge of his pasture to his property. He said Cota had indicated he would put a PVC pipe in so Ellis could receive his water. BILL SPRINGS added testimony that he wanted to know where the mailboxes would be placed. The Commissioners felt this should be left up to staff to work out. COMMISSIONERS DISCUSSION AND MOTION Bernard and Bingham made site visits. Bingham wondered what debris was in Blankenstein's yard and Cota said an old fence was down and he would remove it. Thompson thought the drainage was addressed in Condition 6. Fregonese said that 65 percent of the rain water will be taken care of with the roofs and gutters and directed to the storm drain in the street and will no longer be soaking into the lot. Fregonese went on to say that this area has been found to have a very high water table and that when the first three clusters of units were built by eota, the water table was at about 2 1/2 feet below the surface in August. Special considerations were made in the foundations to accommodate a high water table and to adequately drain the buildings. Fregonese speculated the water was probably a natural spring that runs off the Siskiyou mountains. Thompson questioned Cota regarding the TID ditch and Cota said he would lay PVC pipe for Ellis and bear the expense of such work. Thompson thought a condition should be added, stating in the rental agreements that the parking spaces should be used for parking and that this intent should be carried through. Bingham was uncertain whether the drive should be continuous between Normal and Park Streets. Thompson said he did not think there should be any barriers as it would be nice to have the option of going either way. Cota commented that LeRoy King, Fire Chief, wanted the area kept open between streets and said a speed bump would not be a problem to install. Bernard moved to approve Planning Action 87-142 with the attached oonditions and with the addition of a pipe being installed by the developer for the neighbor so TID use will not be cut off, a speed bump to be installed on the property line, and adding to the rental agreement that the garage will only be used for parking. Bingham seconded the motion and it was carried unanimously. PLANNING ACTION 87-143 REQUEST FOR MINOR LAND PARTITION TO DIVIDE LOT INTO TWO PARCELS 2225 SISKIYOU BOULEVARD A~PLICA~T: ART & HARRIET WASSERMAN STAFF REPORT McLaughlin reported that earlier this year the Planning Commission approved a site review for a 53 unit apartment complex. It appeared that the proposal is no longer going forward and the applicant is now proposing a minor land partition. The partition involves splitting off of a parcel approximately .6 acre from the parent parcel of 3.6 acres. The house located on the parcel is not presently on the city sewer system. Since the drain field for the .house will be on the new parcel, the sewer system is required to be connected to the city sewer system which would require an easement. Zoning is R-2. McLaughlin read the criteria for approval. Staff recommended approval. PUBLIC HEARING ROGER KAUBLE, 173 E. Hersey, said his client was aware of the requirement to connect to the city sewer system. He stated that the purpose of this request is to separate the house from the large parcel so the larger parcel could be developed. Kauble thought the easement would be directed via Clay street. ELVA KNIGHTEN, 2804 Lisonbee Lane, pointed out that the applicant's irrigation water drains onto her property and interferes with her septic tank. She stated that the sewer is on the opposite side of Clay Street. COMMISSIONERS DISCUSSION AND MOTION Bernard and Bingham made a site visit. Thompson suggested that Knighten discuss her irrigation problem with her nei~hbor or TID. Bingham moved to approve with the attached conditions. Bernard seconded it and it was carried unanimously. PLANNING ACTION 87-144 ~EQUEST FOR SITE REVIEW FOR 2l-UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX LOCATED BETWEEN GRANT AND SHERIDAN STREET 255 GRANT STREET APPLICANT: MAIN STREET DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT The applicant has requested a site review for 21 apartment units looated on three tax lots being combined for this project. The maximum density allowed under the R-2 zoning calculations for this lot would be 21 units. The property is between Grant and Sheridan Streets which have been previously paved and are under a no-cut moratorium (Sheridan - 10/22/91, Grant - 12/15/88). The lot slopes with the north slope at approximately 13 percent. The proposed end units, with dormers, are rather tall and could be too high to comply with the solar criteria. Staff recommended that the dormers face the south side to decrease the height. The surrounding uses are generally single family, however, an old motel on Grant Street has been converted to apartments. Parking meets the requirements. Several curb cuts are proposed to meet the parking requirement. There is an, existing craftsman style house on the lot that is proposed to be removed with parking in that location. Staff had a concern over open space. The applicant has shown that the open space will be met with private patios, balconies, and single level decks and a common area throughout the units. Staff believes this proposal meets the site design criteria. McLaughlin read the criteria for approval. There was no energy information provided and no color samples for the structures, but staff feels these can be met. McLaughlin showed slides. The public works department is not certain whether there is adequate sewer and water to meet what is required. Fregonese said he did not believe it would be practical to move the house now existing on the site. PUBIJIC HEARING JIM LEWIS, 51 Gresham, represented the Historic Commission. The Historic Commission subcommittee looked at the house on the site and concluded that the house was a well-maintained, 1920's bunglalow era house in good condition. The subcommittee felt that if this house were removed, it would destroy the feel of the area, t11erefore, the sq.bcommi t tee recommended a lower densi ty and to split the house off~ Lewis pointed out that Don Greene saved a Victorian style house on Wimer and incorporated the design of the house into the units he built. DAVE RICHARDSON, 699 Anderson Creek Road, architect for the project, did not feel the historic house would fit into the whole development and thought it best to demolish the structure. Richardson indicated he had not spoken to any of the neighbors while conceptualizing the site, when questioned by Thompson. HARVEY DAVIS, 4311 Coleman Creek Road, Medford, OR, one of the owners of the project, did not believe the house was movable and that the quality of the work was not conducive to moving. Douglas McKee was the contractor who looked at the house. Bingham asked Davis to comment on the compatibility of the project with the rest of the neighborhood. Davis reasoned that the plan being proposed was a unique type of architecture and added that he and his partner are very environmental conscious. The units will be 1200 square feet and rent to upper income ($575 to $6DO/mo.). BARBARA HILDEBRANDT, 289 Grant Street, did not feel the proposed buildings would not fit into the area and they would have a tremendous visual impact. She was concerned if the project was built, that it would affect the water pressure in the area. She was also concerned with the traffic problems that would be created on North Main and Gr,ant Streets with 21 added units. WALT HARVEY, 276 Grant Street, was concerned with the height of the proposed structures. Several neighbors have done extensive work in the past few years to upgrade their existing homes and he maintains that these proposed units will not be compatible. Harvey does not mind sharing his view, but he does not want to lose it. His view, at this time, would be important to the resale value of his house. He would like to see an extensive traffic study done as Wimer and Grant Streets are main arterials and even without this d.evelopment traffic has increased. LOURAINE BOLLONG, 267 Sheridan Street, lives on the northwest corner of the proposed development. Her main concern was the traffic impact of the project and on-street parking for guests. She was also concerned about the water supply. LEWIS LANER, 282 Sheridan, an abutting property owner thought that the proposed development would tower over his house. He will be surrounded on three sides with buildings that are higher than his house. He also had traffic concerns and did not want to see this developed to its maximum density. GREG NICHOLS, 289 Sheridan, was troubled by the increased traffic, the size of the buildings, and the dangerous intersection at North Main and Sheridan. COMMISSIONERS DISCUSSION AND MOTION All commissioners made a site visit. Bingham had an exparte contact with Mrs~ Hildebrandt and another neighbor at 289 Grant. Thompson stated that according to the camp plan, the applicant had been consistent in his proposed development being compatible in character and appearance with the neighborhood, however, he did not like seeing an older building being torn down, but rather, incorporated into the project. Bingham also did not want to lose the house. He thought the proposed apartments seemed fairly attractive, but did not think they were at all compatible and were too high. He thought the views would be destroyed for the neighbors up the hill. Bernard favored the plan because property owners have the right to develop property. He felt the design was attractive and even though they are at the maximum density, that density is in force for a reason, therefore, the applicant is within his rights. It was determined that there were no set rules for requiring the applicant to design the proposed structures to be compatible with the existing historic house already on the site. Fregonese suggested that better findings needed to be submitted regarding what is historically significant about the structure. Thompson had a concern about parking, on Sheridan Street and suggested some type of parking bay. Fregonese thought that a sidewalk was planned for Sheridan street. At this point, it was discussed that this application should be heard at the December 9, 1987 Planning Commission meeting and that ~he ap~licant might find a way to incorporate the existing house Into hIS plan and to allow the Historic Commission time to develop more information with regard to the historic home on the site. Bingham moved to continue the hearing before the full Planning \ .~ Commission on December 9, 1987. Thompson seconded the motion and it was carried with Bernard casting a dissenting vote. PLANNING ACTION 87-146 REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO OPERATE TRAVELER'S ACCOMMODATION 261 W. HERSEY APPLICANT: ARTHUR & AUDREY SOCHOR STAFF REPORT The applicant is proposing a four-unit traveler's accommodation on an unpaved portion of W. Hersey. The proposal involves four rooms that will be designed for handicapped access. The lot could support a total of 14 units. Guest parking will have handicapped spaces provided. McLaughlin read the criteria for approval. Staff recommended approval of this application with the conditions included in the staff report. McLaughlin noted that under Condition 2 it should be added that the work be done under permit of the Public Works Department. The Historic Commission has given the applicant input on restoration. PUBLIC HEARING ARTHUR SOCHER, 261 W. Hersey, felt they would be offering something worthwhile in Ashland and that the house is being restored. COMMISSIONERS DISCUSSION AND MOTION Site visits were made by all commissioners and Bingham spoke with the applicant. The commissioners concurred that this would be a very good use for the house and appreciated accommodations for the handicapped. Bernard moved to approve the application with the conditions attached to the staff report with the added portion of Condition 2. Bingham seconded the motion and it was carried unanimously. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 4:15 p.m. ....,.... t4"t1' ASHLAND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES November 12, 1987 CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Chairman Carlyle Stout. Other members present were Bernard, Bingham, Thompson, Bridges, Lavagnino, and Winthrop. (Bridges had to leave the meeting following Planning Action 87-135.) Staff members present were Fregonese, McLaughlin, and Honts. APPROVAL OF MINUTES AND FINDINGS The minutes were approved as corrected (page 3 - Carol Oates testimony, the word invading should read invaded). TYPE II PUBLIC HEARINGS PLANNING ACTION 87-135 REQUEST FOR OUTLINE PLAN APPROVAL OF A 14 UNIT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT VARIANCE TO CHANGE FRONT YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FROM 20 FEET TO 10 FEET ALONG GUTHERIE STREET NEAR THE CORNER OF GUTHERIE AND HOLLY STREETS Commissioner Winthrop stepped down because of a conflict of interest. SFJ:'l-\FF REPORT Fregonese read the criteria for approval. All commissioners made site visits. Staff reported that this action was postponed last month because there was a discrepancy in the acreage. The county estirrated the acreage at 3.01 acres. The applicant will be receiving a 20 percent density bonus. This is the only vacant parcel in the area and it is consistent with the density in that neighborhood. Traffic flows will increase approximately 100 cars per day. Staff recommended approval with the original conditions plus added attached conditions with the exception of the original condition 1 that should be deleted. Staff is questioning the need for the variance as stated in condition 2 due to the fact that other developments in this area have had the same kind of slope problems and have had to deal with the same requirements. McLaughlin showed slides. PUBLIC HEARING RUTH S. PICKETT, 402 Holly Street, opposed the variance and density. She felt it should be the duty of the Planning Commission to protect neighborhoods from being ruined by development. She pointed out that the setbacks on other homes in the area range from 32 feet to 54 feet. She believes it will be -- r 4.. dangerous having garages so close to the street. pickett also commented that if the area were adequately drained, the willow tree would die. Her sketch of the development surrounded by the existing homes was entered into the record. DAVE ALEXANDER, 1780 Crestview, is most concerned with the totality of Ashland. He did not want to see further growth until what is already being built can be managed. CLARA FADER, 338 Holly Street, thought this project was too dense. The street is steep and there have been accidents on the jog from Gutherie and Holly Streets because cars travel at high rates of speed down Gutherie, therefore, the increased traffic will increase the risk of accidents. She hoped there would be plans for'a stop sign o.n ,Guther ie. She did no.t believe there was a valid reason for requesting a variance. DOROTHY BERNHARDT, 414 Holly Street, addressed the variance request. She presented photographs of other homes that depict the proposed area to be developed and concluded that there were no unique or unusual circumstances according to the criteria that warrant tile var iance. Bernhardt ma inta ined that it would destroy and create a negative impact on the area. She felt that criteria (18.88.030) paragraph b-f were being violated. She said that the proposal did not meet neighborhood compatibility with the overall plan because it is going to be built where the neighbor's view used to be. On Holly Street, she would be looking at backyards and garages. She would much rather see one-half acre parcels. Bernhardt is also interested in saving her solar access. ROBERT WINTHROP, 347 Gutherie Street, said there was much neighborhood concern as had been shown by 11 letters of opposition. The neighbors have not been opposed to the PUD but felt there were serious flaws in the layout, partially because of topography drainage. Winthrop contended that the variance request failed on two points. There is nothing unique and unusual in the topography the applicant has encountered. Winthrop submitted photos showing a number of houses that successfully dealt with exactly the same type of topography as the applicant, while conforming to the setback requirements. Winthrop also felt the applicant failed to meet the burden of proof. He was concerned that the closer the houses are to the curb, the more the view of the mountains would be impaired for the houses across the street. A major part of the value of the house lies in the view and this would be directly affected. ,Winthrop had a concern over saving the willow tree as it is a v~ry prominent feature of the landscape. He pointed out that according to the Performance Standards Guidelines that the homes in the proposed area should eonform to the 22 foot maximum height limitation. He requested that when a proposal was approved for this area that it would be appropriate for the street trees to be of a type that would not grow to excessive height. Winthrop was also disturbed about the absence of open space, even though it is not required, however, he brought to the commission's attention, Comp Plan Policy 8-8 which addressed the need for common open space in residential developments lito offset the demand for additional public parks." BILL JONES, 414 Holly Street, reiterated Winthrop's comments regarding open space. He would like to build quality homes that look good. There is no other open space in that area. He believes the underground springs are keeping the willow alive. DAN THOMAS, 18227 Highway 66, stated that he understood the concerns of neighbors. He said the variance was suggested by the Planning DepartmentG He thought it would look better than bridges and would he is interested in developing this project with the fewest complications. He thought the variance would be easier and more feasible. Thomas contended that the closer the houses are to the curb, the more underneath they will feel to those neighbors across the street. He was not planning to build two-story homes. He felt the requirement to plant trees every 30 feet would impair the views more than anything else. Thomas has planned to control excess drainage and allow the willow tree to remain, thus the name "willow Heights". He did not believe open spa.ce was a necessity. MORRIES GARBARINI, 416 Gutherie Street, questioned what a "quality horne" was in the developer's mind. He thought lots 3, 4, and 7 were not usable. He explained that the problem that the applicant has in this area without the variance is very similar to Weller Lane and it worked for them. DON LEWIS, 442 Gutherie Street, was opposed to the variance. He felt it would degrade the neighborhood and would not enhance the neighboring properties. MARILYN HORTON, 399 Gutherie Street, and ANNA WINTHROP, 347 Gutherie explained that the willow tree and the lot across the street is used as it is the only open space in the neighborhood. Anna testified that many children play in the open space. Thomas interjected at this time, that any open space in his development would be for the homes in the development. LARRY VANDEMl\N, 228 West Street, has been building a house on Courtney. He has be~n required to meet all the guid~lines and believed the PUD should meet the guidelines also. He was concerned about the additional traffic and no sidewalks. MARY GARBARINI, 416 Gutherie Street, testified that her main concern was the variance. With increased traffic activity and cars traveling at high rates of speed, the possibility of accidents will greatly increase -- a 10 foot. var.iance would be unsafe, a 20 foot variance would be more apt. COMMiSSIONERS DISCUSSION AND MOTION Bridges was in favor of denying the variance and approve the 14 units. Bernard felt the houses being built with steeper driveways was more of an advantage and that the density was calculated appropriately and should be allowed. Lavagnino agreed with denying the variance and thought that the developer might only have three lots that would need to be filled. Bingham wanted to see the willow included in an open space. He thought 14 units seemed crowded. Thompson was concerned about drainage and thought the maximum 14 units would be acceptable provided all other conditions were perfect. Fregonese said the willow tree should be put outside the building envelope. Stout questioned whether the development was compatible with the neighborhood. After discussion, it was decided that lot 1 could be accessed off Merrill Lane. Thompson moved to approve Planning Action 87-135 with the original conditions 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, to deny the variance, and add a condition that lot 1 be accessed off Merrill Lane, that the willow tree on lot 11 be outside the building envelope, and add to condition 3 of the addendum that street trees be installed every 30 feet and selected from the list of small stature trees in the Site Design and Use Guidelines. The motion was seconded and carried unanimously with Winthrop abstaining. PLANNING ACTION 87-145 REQUEST FOR SITE REVIEW AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A 23 UNIT MOTEL 2255 ASHLAND STREET APPLICANT: SAM PATEL STAFF REPORT Two prior applications have been processed at this location but plans did not proceed. The motel proposed is two-story in design. The applicant has met the parking requirement and exceeded the amount of required landscaping. The exterior of the structure is proposed to be a log design. Staff recommended approval of the conditional use portion of the request, however, found some problems with the design. The concrete block that will be used will be seen by traffic coming in from the freeway. Staff also objected to the metal mansard roof. In considering the surrounding uses, staff felt it should be perhaps a shake roof or something with more texture. Staff did not recommend approval of the site review since over half the building did not comply with the guidelines and, therefore, recommended that site review be delayed and handled as a Type I before the Hearings Board. However, staff thought the applicant had prepared new elevations for tonight's meeting. McLaughlin read the criteria for approval. McLaughlin showed slides. All commissioners made site visits. (Bridges left the meeting at 9:30 p.m.). PtlBLIC HEARING JAY ROBINSON, 2180 Griffin Creek Road, Medford, Oregon, represented the applicant. After doing research, he felt the cedar shake roof would be most appropriate. The applicant also changed the east elevation and the north elevation to log siding or ~ole logs so the building will be the same all the way around. Roblnson also concurred that the street trees should be increased in ~ize from five gallon to 8-10 feet in height and a minimum calIper of 1 1/2". At this point, Robinson said he would like to use the junipers on the eastern property line as he was concerned about tree roots interfering with TID pipe and also blocking Ray's Garden Center greenhouses from the sun. He said he would like to work with staff on this problem in order to break up the long view of the building. Robinson explained they wanted a motel that was totally unique and something that people will be able to stay in with a rustic atmosphere with at least one wall in each room with log siding. Winthrop objected to the log design and felt it would be more appropriate in a rural setting. Robinson answered by saying that by using the post and beam type of construction, it does not create the same visual effect as if it were the cross- corner Lincoln logs. He felt the log design created a warm feeling. ROBERT KAUFMANN, 3100 Bellinger Lane, Med.ford, OR, described the finish ma'ter ial to be used on the logs. The exter ior product is from Holland and has been tested and certified in this country. He also pointed out that logs are energy efficient. RON KELSO, 220 Patrick Lane, heard the logs would be filled with polyurethane and wondered if it was similar to the formaldehyde foam. Kaufman answered that the polyurethane foam does not have formaldehyde in it. Kelso also questioned the R value of the logs. Kaufman answered that pine log has R-20.21. ROGER KAUBLE, Hersey Street, the engineer for the project answered Bingham's question regarding wood preservative by stating that there are approximately 100 preservatives that would be acceptable for the exterior and that the logs should have an approved sealer on the inside. Pentachlorophenal is poisonous and is not an acceptable sealer. COMMISSIONERS DISCUSSION AND MOTION Chairman Stout liked the appearance of logs as did Bernard. Thompson moved to approve the planning action with the attached staff report conditions. Bernard seconded the motion. Winthrop felt that by approving the proposed structure, it would be creating something very instrusive and it should, in fact, be something very harmonious with the surroundings. Winthrop read from the Site Design and Use Guidelines, "designs used to attract attention create an undesirable effect upon the streetscape." Under Specific Policy Items, Building Materials, "Building materials and paint colors should be compatible with the surrounding areas." Thompson said he cannot fault all wood structures and felt this would be a welcome addition. The motion was carried with Winthrop casting the only dissenting vote. PRESENTATION OF THE DOWNTOWN PLAN Fregonese presented the rough draft of the downtown plan. During the discussion of the plan, Thompson moved to direct Staff to include a paragraph in the plan regarding the retention of City Hall downtown in its present location or another location to be worked out later. The motion was carried unanimously. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 11:30 p.m. ;;.-! BUILDING ACTIVITY REPORT f' .,,.." 1" ~ DATE November 1987 PROJECT 11 OF - VALUATION PERMITS Residential A. SFR 11 S843 740 B. Mechanical (Woodstoves = 11) 22 24,393 c. Foundation 2 4-000 D. Garage 1 14,000 R CAroort to Garaae 1 10 000 F. Retaining Wall 1 2,500 G. Rp _.:Jp} 2 4 000 H. studio 1 12,000 I . Caroort 1 2_000 J. Addition 3 2,9 , 2 0 0 K. Drv Rot Reoair 1 400 L. Satelite Dish 1 500 M.. Shed 1 800 Commercial A. Remodel and Addition 1 45,000 B. Pave a oarkinq lot 1 45,000 C. Shop \ 1 17,000 ~ D. Reroof 1 3,600 E. Mechanical 3 850 "- I 375 F. Plumbina TOTAL THIS MONTH 61 1,049,620 rrOTAL THIS MON1'H LAST YEAR 28 233,280 ~OTAL THIS YEAR 19 87- 19 88 310 6,125,050 rrOTAL LAST YEAR 19 86- 19 87 261 5,699,529 TOTAL FEES THIS MONTH THIS 110NTH 12~859.79 THIS YEAR 68,237.30 LAST YEAR 3,389.06 TOTAL INSPECTIONS 'rH I S MONTH THIS }'lOi~Tf 347 THIS YEAR 1,503 LAST YEAR 178 NOTE: "This year" refers to the total so far for the current fiscal year. , J' NOVEMBER 1987 NEW CONSTRUCTION RESIDENTIAL Single Family Residence Contractor Valuation 112 N. Wightman 585 Nyla Ln. 565 Weller Ln. 2948 Grizzly Dr. 1070 Beswick Wy 1042 Bellview 1091 Beswick Wy 973 Morton 381 Beach 2975 Grizzly 1139 Dover Medinger Canst. Steve Snura McCoy Canst. Buck Munson Jerry Toney Rick Brink Adroit Canst. Park Estates Buck Munson Darken Canst Larry Jones $ 70,000 130,000 90,316 48,343 76,000 70,000 80,500 111,803 38,174 50,000 78,631 COMMERCIAL 725 Terra S & B Jalnes 17,000 ./ ~/ (Uo: ~~mornndum December 2, 1987 Gordon Medaris, Mayor ~ ront: L.F'.. ring, Fire Chief c:::/.i?L. ~uhject: ~ 987 DEPAF'.Tt-1I:NTAL F'.I:POF'.T A3h~and Fire Department weathered the worst year in the history of the Rogue Valley in terms of \"\}ildlarld fires wi thout any rnaj or fires within the City or watershed. However, for 7 straight days and nights our firefighters manned 2 pumpers in 12 hour shifts helping protect structures endangerec as fires raged out of control to the North of us. Nearly $19,000 in overtime and equipment costs was recently reimbursed to the City from the State of Oregon for our part in the firefighting efforts. Aga~n this year, with cooperation of the U.S. Forest Service and Oregon State Department of Forestry, a closure of Ashland Watershed was accomplished which helps reduce the danger from fire to our most precious water gathering area. Fire Prevention Week, October 4-10 found Ashland Fire DepartDent personnel on the plaza, handing out :lre p~evention lite~ature and answering querles about fire safety, smoke detectors, exit drills in home and other fire related auestions. The Department was finally brought to full manning ~n l~ovembel'"\ when vacancies were filled of emplo~lees wl10 had recently retired. A new Fire Safety Program for all school children kindergarten through 12th grade was implemented. This program adopted by the Oregon State Superintendent of Schools was prepared by the Oregon State Fire Marshals Office and is taught by the students regular teacher with help from the local Fire Department. A serious fire at Croman Corporation was averted by the quick action of the fire department and mill employees when several stacks of finished lumber was ignited by sparks from a cutting t0rch. The fire was confined to the stacKS immediately adjacent to the boiler house, but without the quick action, could have involved 'several thousand dollars worth of lumber and logs. LITIGATION REPORT - December 9, 1987 Ashland vs. Cooper: This is the case involving collection from Mr. Cooper of some $9,000 for money owed by him for work done by the City some years ago. Mr. Cooper has attempted to remove the case to the Federal District Court, with the trial court denying that motion, and it is presently on appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco. The City has filed its brief, and we anticipate a decision by the Federal Court in the next few months. Pacificorp vs. Ashland: We reported to you by memo of December 7, 1987, indica- ting that basically we had prevailed in the trial court. Ashland vs. Lithia Homes of Ashland, Inc.: This case is one filed in 1984 to require the Defendant to maintain the erosion prevention work on the property. We have requested the Defendant to do current maintenance, and it is pre- sently scheduled for a show cause hearing on December 21, 1987, in the Circuit Court if that work is not done. Ashland vs. Lithia Homes, Mark Cooper & G. Jefferson Campbell: This case concerns the foreclosure of delinquent assess- ments. As the lots have been sold, the Defendants have been paying the City for the assessments on the particular lots. It is presently set for our motion for summary judgment on December 14, 1987. Respectfully submitted, ...... S2 M'.' . 12- ~NALD L. SA .r City Attorney RLS/pc RONALD L. SALTER ATTORNEY AT LAW 94 THIRD STREET ASHLAND. OREGON 97520 ASHLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT ACTIVITIES FOR NOVEMBER, 1987 PATROL Officers investigated 2 major burglaries, there were 17 drunk driving arrests, a missing person, a drug overdose and a SID's death. Officers assisted with the Special Olympics during the week end they were in town. Officers also assisted with the bringing in of the Christmas tree for the Plaza and assisted Santa in making a safe appearance and getting the tree lighted. Officer Bianca spoke to the Ashland Business and Professional Women's Club on the subject of "Latch Key Children". There were several groups taken on tours of the Police Department and one group of Cub Scouts were all fingerprinted as part of their merit badge program. Two Youth and the Law classes were conducted at the Middle School. Sgt. Van Blarcom spent a week at the Police Academy assisting with the firearms training for new officers. He also conducted a firearms shoot for the Ashland officers this month. INVESTIGATIONS The investigators are continuing to concentrate on drug enforcement and made several arrests this month for possession of cocaine; possession, delivery and conspiracy to deliver cocaine and arrested three out of state men for selling marijuana to a police officer. Officer Janet Chilcote, who has worked as an undercover officer since her hire in July, is now undergoing orientation and will be assigned to work child abuse and sexual abuse cases. Lt. Clements and Officer Chilcote attended a school in Bend on child abuse and exploitation investigation techniques which was sponsored by the National Center of State and Local Law Enforcement Training. EXPLORERS Our Explorer group participated in the Scout-o-rama at the Jackson County Expo and received the President's Award for their presentation. They have contributed 85.5 volunteer hours this month. COMMUNITY SERVICE VOLUNTEERS Forty-two volunteers reported 880 volunteer hours in November. / ASHLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT ACTIVITIES FOR OCTOBER, 1987 PATROL Officers assisted at both the Ashland High School and SOSC homecoming games during October. The High School also had a Homecoming Parade. There was a fatal motor vehicle accident this month, involving an elderly Couple. Officer Thomas conducted several Bike Rodeo's at the elementry schools and officers participated in a number of personal appearances at the schools to discuss drugs, safety, etc. Extensive preparations were made for the Halloween night activities, all personnel were on duty that night and there was relatively little trouble. INVESTIGATIONS Officers investigated a reported rape of a young woman jogging early in the morning. The man responsible was apprehended within a few hours of the report and it turned out he was a fugitive out of California where he was being sought on a murder and escape charge. MUNICIPAL COURT There were a total of 1,582 cases filed with the Court, which includes 332 traffic violations, 34 formal complaints and 1,216 perking citations. There were 1,541 cases closed, which includes 140 traffic violations, 16 formal complaints, 84 fines suspended, 25 dismissed, 2 found not guilty, 1 work detail for a total of 6 days and 7 jail sentences totaling 38 days. There were 994 parking citations paid and 272 dismissed. There were 184 appearances before the Violations Bureau and 80 appearances before the Court. There were 11 trials held, 1 person was placed on probation and 33 persons placed on diversion. COMMUNITY SERVICE VOLUNTEERS During October 41 volunteers reported a total of 1,046 volunteer hours. Watershed Patrol totaled 136 hours and volunteers assisted with patrol on Halloween night for a total of 14 hours.