HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009-0504 Documents Submitted at Meeting
,"
I<~,:
fi~
;
".~" .
Piolleen' @ E Malin
,.~;r;" "',
, "", '
'~..~: '_~'."".J:,"
, .
.'
<;Ii.
,-' ~;
,"
,-,'.. ....
f' ~ '. ,'.
'</. ":~ -, ~ '>
~;t~-~~~ ;~,t
,~"".~'-:.<': ~ .
,
'..f" ,
-",'.
"
_~:.~-.d""
,; '-
<~'"
i',/",
,..."
."" _l~"''::f(;;"
~~i_~.~'
{".. o.
~J<:,~ .'"f,.
';('."':'''',:.1'.
- .<~ ~
. ~~,~<...~ ':~'~
,:;~<t.,-" !
.:;,l '.i,
-:l
"~!~-~:~-
.t~- '.
',"--'!','
,':fr'
.:....
lj) ~'. ."
''''I
,y':."
:-:
~'{j
"
r:~':;~~'~?~'~."""
11 I" "'; "~
.~ ;"/
~~.~,\t ::
........,
,P.
.,;'
."'~
",.:~ {<~~;;
-; ,-".' '" " . ~.
~,,-
,,'
.:,,,..-
" ~~,'1
.
'. ,
, ~'r
'"
'j
/
~I
>
"
-.",
"
'.. ~.
>f' '"
:~ ' i?
.. ,
~.., ",-
~ :'~~'i.,~~:'~;; ~:'),~~,!?,
'>,1 ~,"
,
'-."j'::~,~
I.-
.:.~ 'I""
"
, ,,'
,-.... ,~
;,
I;;. j,'
'", ,Ill I
-".:\1.1\:}" {'- '
. "'~!'l'"
~. ~ ;1 I
.: i
,
'''=,.
'c. If 'i.'1
{it /'
:~v,!l
/~
//fJl'
.
\
,.
;,J~, .
)0 "
.
.
"",'i'.
'.<
~
~ ,i} ,
,;
"').. .
, v
" \~.
--<'S'-:
'.:::i ;'"4
"."
.'
-:'[.
(>..~
.,
,.
...\>.,
:) '^-Io"", ~-\.l eA --t S5
S" /4 - !\--,,\lL ~w."i~
-ft,'
.'
. i&I!:, 0
~
.~: ~.
...........
.G!i'
~~.
-'.,
,',.
~,~-,.
'""".
-~#
-."
, J} ,,0 'Jf;:
~
't<j
.;
.
~
,\)",
,,-
'.
OJli,\l.
'~
"J'
$I
"
,0
~:'9"
"
o
.?
,
,
.r,,'p.
l"~,,,';;.
..'<I",
\.~
"
l
,
"
~~
<.,~
J:.
J\
0,
" ~,
",.'
'.,.,
,,"
';"~~~~i~..tj,.'J
~ i~.ifj:l/
, ! "';~,i:'~'
./ ,.-~~..
~T
o
,.
,
. ,.;1'1.." )>' , ~ '....r " ",r. .. .,:f.r.J J~S:'" ;./C
'\<"~<""f;' ",\;&"'0" <~.... ~"'t , .,.~ft'l' ~5,;. ." l.f.../.~ .u.~
",(F~p~" </. ''l'l,f''~';!'~~'~~"".. '~'~"l.'" . ,.;#'f11'ft. l'(2'4r "
.~ .:g;, ~i" ~ ~r" 'J' ~'. ;~. 1.11 r :. . .oJ .... ~ r<I:l'J~o ~> ~' 0
i>",q,~\..... 'I;<f,ll '.,'> l\~.. ~ ;h"""'''~''''}'''iI ,.,,-~l) ~ - --"7)' ~
':~~,'~~l... J'''',<f'lf'';',,~ t~.-,,~~ 'j "J ''''~I.Ii'(.j' ""~j:/ ~,'
<"'~~}T~'i\c';;' '<;::,~ -.;~', .... ~ '" .(u ;".' . :<PO " .
",':G, '~.... ',~).\;. ...{<1 ~ ~ 1\~o-"". ,~< " "'; ":.,~.,.' ~,!> ';;"'!J
~.., ~ I h',,<\O ~"'~'. J :;\,it . ~I' '-. ,_f: _ ~"~,_ ~j . '.", .>
,1, ~".t>~,~~~..~;~ ....~ ~ '1/cJtI/), '\ (2'
<to" 'I - :.>~' ..t~ ~rW.", " ,_'~ ~..::..., " :'"{iU"Jti\: :"';' . ~
. ,j {~. ',.--:lo>' ~'i~f .~~ ~ """ .~. eJi~~."'. rlf
' .,', -,"" ~' " Y', ~ ~ '0 ,. ,. ,.;", "!?fj" :.!'.Jlil"l1,rc..
1; .. I't\.'i"<.l ;.~ '>~ (>f <; ~ -i,'~l.', '" ">,,<0,:00' r.';Q~"" ~ _
.,>, -, O,'-""";I.#>'~""""-1,,.. ~ -,I !,(_~/..: ..'~: ":,'''',J'~~' ,'>> .'
"", "",l " iC~ ",,<". ~,,~ oj ,'~!.'~, . n . Pi..,"l.'j)' . '. ~
. ''':;;l - I'~'',,~~ >!-~~'t. (. U~~, t,,,., ." ~ c _
' ,'\". I>, --.- -. . ~\ -:r>,rii1>;'.12; '.:",
~ '" <-' 6-G.. ,p:<r ~ h. ~ ~<l- V_.e 7l.
',n ~;""". 'fl.<'(,~:'f~' ,f" ."~",": ..!..~. ':W .
.' "';1"'~,',__t<.,,-" '-y" ....._....~,~. '~~j:. " .;,
. ~.;'~.i~~ (""' -~'~~\i\, ::,";' -}{j~"'" ~ '0.:":' '~.
". e .
~. ",
......,
",
.~ .', .
'"
'I" ~."
J,i0
~~~%,
UtNa @ Jli1Jrs4: St:
"
, '.
.;"
.y.,
" u
,iJr}' ,/"
't7 ,. c/J
'<::'"".o7r ,';"'.11
~ .->" ~(. ~.
." ~ . '. ',,,,.,.
", " ~"" ". .1l7";f2'"
'" ~~~ ,. ,o'l; ~..
' '~~ ,.'k~, , "
' "'em;; "" "'~
'~E':'~' r,ci~' ': ,:~t<,,~fit:
". . 'h~ ~ '00;..1;, f~,",.
'" ,'" '..,:.,,~,,;,> @'<;'~. "
>, , "". },. ";1>" .~
'/,.7" 1<,>';:.' .:' .;;~
".. . r"., d ,
. I;.:" .. .'1-~
,'~\/.. '1i:
"..;~~
~',,/'.'7~
'}I' :''',
". ,
..:.. "
.-~.
"
"'\..
'"
,4,
'-:..':.
'",
'-.."
;. '"'"
".'.,
.
.' "'-~
<:
':' > ~o'
"
""
"
'"
.
"-.....~..
. " , .. ..0:>. ~
, '7<')
".,,-<"
I:'
.~ '.
.
.~ 'h
~ ~ '5' c
'.
""""0 ~-
~. '-;':4
'ir,,~
('~,~,"~t",. ''1.,
. 0\ .~.
,
;0"" .
. , .,,'\....~t,~ ~'
""""',
;, , , , '<i"
- - J,,~~" .", "::,
.... '.' , '. dC. ,.' '. ''JI'" }~;;:~ '.'..iW< /~.' ...~. ., .,'.""
';:<<i:""\"';;"';~"i' ":~~*,i;<~4'\~,,< '''0' ....
.',~., N:>o....,.. . , ,'. ....;,;.+,'. ".
. '~Q ...,...'r'.;.., ;:" ", ",', ""~' ',.J '.:,'
. 4'''''= ',,, " \R l'!Il.'.; ,
,- i "l '/.", .' " ";''''''0
'..~ "'.C ""~\~,,''''~ '
.. .:', ,.;0<. ""-, . " ~ f' 1,;~ ~~~': . .
,~ '~', " ",,",. '",,,,,,, "":7.'::,:";;,-.
~-,;iin A:Jr_~ " . IJ, ~\-.~"
'~:~$' ".~):-~-
~. ",~~:"", ':> ; :>
';~": ~,/~. -~:' p, .
'k',;., .
~" ~..
;'.~t~'
'f'". p
,."t""~".'
''',:(''
..'"
,~ -~,
, >~::
'i_',,""
. ,;#,. ~
,", -~','
''..
,,~
",'
~~
~~
~~
~~
~~
~~
~~
~~
<::,~
;/
;/
IJ
,
,
,
"
......
31
28
27
26
2,q
20
7
8
9
6
11
1 2
1 3
1LJ
1 5
16
17
22
1 9
29
30
LEGEND
60
57
1
55
56
'" Curb
'" S i dewa I k
I Bu i I ding face
) Whee I cha i r Xwa I k
',Xwalk Striping
, 5 ft offset from
, bu i I d i ng/s i dewa I kedge
56
I Down Guy
.. Elec Pole
~ Elec Vault
o Hydrant
(> Trfc Light
o St Lamp
" St Light
~ Bike Rack
o Trash Can
121 Tree
J Flowe, Pot
.. Sign Post
. Fountain
]J Bench
L::l P I ante,
R News stand
o Phone booth
o Ma i I box
o Tobie
= Concrete Wa I I
= Deck
.s,-\:,\^-:~ S'ILI s:.s
iY\. '1"''-'-'> I->\.
,
DO.:M.""""~t 0.""b""t!~.( ski sJ
~ j() 't.R.-f.Ro
, ,PPc I T Y 0 F
ASHLAND
Downtown Task Force
Summary Report
August 21, 2008
At the initiation of Mayor John Morrison and in conjunction with the Ashland
Chamber of Commerce, a Downtown Task Force was created and charged with
reviewing and providing remedies to address the following issues affecting
downtown merchants:
. The current policy on parking restrictions within the downtown area;
. A review of.the City sign provisions related to the requirements for
temporary signs and the use of three-dimensional representations as sign
structures and education of business merchants and community with
respect to city sign code requirements; and
. Permissible encroachment upon downtown public sidewalk,
At the first of what turned into five consecutive Monday afternoon meetings in
July and August, Mayor Morrison explained his view on the charge of the Task
Force, and encouraged the members to focus on immediate concerns that can
be addressed within a "fast track" timeline,
At the request of Task Force members, City Staff presented a list of issues for
discussion and potential options to consider that may resolve or at least alleviate
impacts associated with each particular issue. Over the course of the five
meetings, the Task Force solicited public input, received information and
potential options from City staff, discussed the variety of options and ultimately
voted on a recommendation for each issue,
The following summary is divided into two pieces. The first piece includes
immediate fixes to some of the most visible and controversial issues. This has
been presented in the format of an issue statement, Task Force recommendation
and supporting reasoning, In the second piece, the summary report identifies
two issues that the Task Force recommended warranted additional review by
City staff, These items were believed to be outside the initial charge of the Task
Force, as well as beyond the expedited time table set for addressing the three
immediate issues affecting downtown merchants,
Suggested Immediate Solutions
Downtown Task Force
Summary Report
1
Issue #1
Particularly in the Downtown area, the current limitation of two exempt signs per
business, with each sign not exceeding a size of two square feet, does not seem
to meet the needs of many local merchants,
Recommendation:
Increase the number of exempt signs from two to three in the
Downtown Area, The allowable area of the third sign would
be increased to three square feet, rather than the current two
square feet allowed for the other two signs
~
"
Reasoning:
The additional exempt sign will permit businesses increased
flexibility in how they allocatesignage, providing an
opportunity for a merchant to adapt when there are changes
in services and/or merchandise-offered, Additionally, the
change would address specific concerns raised by
restaurant owners regarding the need for increased flexibility
with respect to posted "menu" signs,
Issue #2
The Sign Code currently prohibits three ~imensional statues, caricatures or
representations of persons, animals or merchandise from being used as a sign or
incorporated into a sign structure,
Recommendation: For properties within the Downtown or one of Ashland's four
Historic Districts, allow one of the three exempt signs to be
three-dimensional. Accordingly, the 3-D sign would be
limited to a maximum size or volume of 3 cubic feet.
Recommendation: Allow an additional exempt 3-D sign for properties outside
the Historic Districts with a volumetric maximum (for
example, 20 cubic feet), This would create an additional sign
category and sign area in addition to the total sign area
allotment under the current code, The three-dimensional
. sign would be required to be ,setback from the public street,
and standards would be established for sign placement,
size, height, surface detailing, illumination. materials and
construction methods to assure any such sign would be of
durable materials and quality construction consistent with
Ashland's existing sign standards,
Reasoning: The removal of the prohibition of three dimensional objects
for signage provides unique and creative options for
Downtown Task Force
Summary Report
2
businesses to connect with their customers and the
community, Through the sign code amendment process,
additional limitations could be placed upon the 3-D signs in
order to ensure that th~ community is adequately protected
from an emergence of 3-D objects that are out of scale with
the building or that create too large of a visual distraction.
Issue #3
Some businesses, by virtue of their physical location and entrances, such as
smaller side streets and alleys, have limited signage opportunities along the main
streets within the downtown area,
Recommendation: Increase the maximum distance that a sign can project from
the building face from the current 18 inches, to 24 inches
from the building face. Existing State Building Code
addresses the minimum height above grade (sidewalk level)
needed for any structure or sign to project over the public
right of way or sidewalk.
Reasoning: Increasing the amount of projection may provide better
angles of visibility for businesses located on side streets or
public 'alleyways, The increased projection provides an
opportunity for the sign to function as an architectural
element of a building while still having a scale that is not
disproportionate and overpowering to a business frontage,
Issue #4
Sign Code compliance efforts have included enforcing the current prohibition on
off-premise signs, generally consisting of the placement of temporary, movable
signs (Le, sandwich boards) upon the public sidewalk or other public property,
Some merchants feel that due to specific characteristics associated with location
of their business frontage they lack adequate exposure, Off-premise signage is
one means of drawing attention to the business location,
Recommendation:
Create a set of policies and implementing guidelines for the
placement of informational/directional signs by the City in the
right of way or other publicly controlled property. The
guidelines should specify standards for the signage, which
may include maximum size, color, font, content (name,
arrow, type of business, etc), materials and location, For
example, an informational sign could be installed at the
entrance to an alley with the words "more shops" or
Downtown Task Force
Summary Report
3
"restaurants" or "galleries". In situations where physical site
constraints limit visibility from the primary public right of way,
an option for integrating a specific business name as an
element of the City informational signage could be included
into the guidelines,
Reasoning:
This is in recognition of the fact that there exist unusual
situations where, through no fault of a business owner, the
location and exposure of a particular business frontage may
be uniquely constrained.
Issue #5
The use of the public right of way for private commercial use is limited by the
Municipal Code to Sidewalk Cafe's (AMC 6.44), which may not be the most
equitable method for allocation of our limited public resource, downtown public
sidewalks,
Recommendation: Amend the Sidewalk Cafe ordinance to allow any abutting
property (within a commercial or employment district) the
opportunity to obtain a permit for private use of a portion of
the public sidewalk, as long as specific public safety and
access standards have been met. The permit fee would
consist of a base charge and an additional charge for each
square foot of public sidewalk space being privately utilized.
Reasoning: In the absence of some compelling issue related to the
public interest, there should be an equitable allowance for
use of public sidewalks for private use, The broader issue is
one of fairness and, specifically, whether or not restaurants
should be the only business with use of public sidewalk
space,
Issue #6
The business community has noted that there is inconsistency within the
encroachment permit process, which does not have clear standards for what
types of functional objects are encouraged, allowed or legal for placement upon a
city sidewalk or within the public right of way
Recommendation: Create an ordinance or other appropriate approval process
by which specific functional items (planter boxes, benches,
trash cans, safety items, etc) may be established upon the
City sidewalk, This would be contingent upon the items
meeting city specifications, as well as retaining minimum
Downtown Task Force 4
Summary Report
Reasoning:
Issue #7
clearance, public safety and placement standards, Individual
permits for items meeting such standards would not be
required, while'items that do not conform to the standards
could be eligible for some sort of review and permit
procedure, Additionally, the Task Force recommended that
the City Council direct staff to explore an exemption to have
free use of the shy zone, the area along the sidewalk within
12 to 18 inches of the building face, for placement of such
amenities as flower boxes, door stops, spittoons, etc,
The Task Force was very intent on solving this issue in a
way that encouraged the "right stuff' to be able to be placed
upon public sidewalks to help beautify the streetscape,
increase pedestrian comfort and also allow some individual
expression within the constraints of public safety and access
considerations. Creating a list of the types of "functional
objects" that would be permitted, accompanied by minimum
standards and specifications to assure quality, would
eliminate the need for individual permit requirements that
could easily result in discouraging businesses from
enhancing the streetscape,
The proliferation of newspaper and other miscellaneous publication racks within
the downtown is creating a variety of problems, both functional and aesthetic,
Recommendation: Create an ordinance specific to installation of newspaper
and other publication racks, Standards could be included
related to rack placement, maximum size and dimensions,
allowance for grouping of racks, distance between
groupings, etc, The ordinance would also address aesthetic
standards such as materials, maintenance and use to
ensure durability and public safety, as well as to eliminate
ongoing problems of litter, abandonment and use of racks for
displaying materials not qualifying for placement upon the
public right of way,
Reasoning: It was unanimously agreed that the proliferation of newspaper racks
in the downtown area has reached a point where regulation on use and
placement is critical. The current lack of regulation and oversight has led to
somewhat of an "anything goes" situation, and City staff has minimal ability to
address the issue.
Downtown Task Force
Summary Report
5
Issue #8
Downtown business owner and employees are frustrated with the seemingly
inconsistent enforcement of the downtown employee parking ban and also have
expressed concern over its potential overreaching effect of limiting owner and
employee access to the downtown area while not at Work.
Recommendation: Remove the existing seasonal ban on employee parking in
the Downtown Area.
Reasoning:
The conclusion of the group was that the ordinance was put
in place primarily at the request and benefit of the business
cqmmunity, If local merchants believe the employee parking
ban is cumbersome and difficult to effectively enforce, it
would be reasonable to remove it and leave the matter to the
business owners to self regulate through informing their
employees,
Issue #9
The City has several parking management items that need to be resolved to
more efficiently administer the downtown parking program,
Recommendation: Create ordinance language that allows the City to tow
vehicles that have either five unpaid parking tickets or a total
unpaid parking ticket balance of $250, Additionally, the City
should develop a final, very visible, warning placard to be
placed upon a vehicle at least 24 hours prior to the vehicle
being towed. The Task Force does not recommend the use
of a booting/immobilization device over the option of towing
the vehicle,
Reasoning: While this aspect of the parking issues downtown wasn't
specifically part of the charge of the Task Force, the
recommendation for the removal of the employee parking
boundary created the need to address related parking issues
so the Task Force added their recommendations in these
areas as well,
The Task Force believes the City needs effective tools to
assist with the collection of unpaid parking fines from flagrant
parking violators, The use of a boot or other immobilization
technique, however, is a very noticeable means of deterring
violations and may not send the appropriate type of
message to members of the community as well as visitors,
Downtown Task Force
Summary Report
6
. Additionally, the booUimmobilization renders the parking
space unusable until the operator contacts the City and pays
the fine due or until it gets towed, which most likely results in
a 12 to 24 hour time period,
Additional Suggested Considerations
Before concluding their charge, the Task Force identified two issues where
additional follow-up work would be necessary, The following items for Council
consideration were believed to be outside the initial charge of the Task Force, as
well as beyond the expedited time table set for addressing the three issues
immediately affecting downtown merchants, Nevertheless, the Task Force
recommended that the Council allocate staff resources to conduct follow-up work
in these areas,
Recommendation for Two-Year Review of Sign Code Amendments
The Task Force recommended that any amendments to the sign code be
reviewed and evaluated after two years, This would provide an opportunity to
assess the effectiveness. and implications associated with the committee's
proposed changes,
Recommendation to Exempt Public Art from City Sign Code
The Task Force recommended that the City sign code should be amended to
include an exemption for Public Art once an appropriate process is adopted for
reviewing and approving the installation of public art. The proposed change to
the sign code would be completed simultaneously with the adoption of a public
art ordinance, which establishes processes and criteria for the acquisition and
location of public art within the city limits.
Recommendation for Sign Code Review/Education
While the Task Force supports the intent of the existing sign code and
appreciates the positive impact it has had on downtown Ashland, there was
general agreement that, as currently written, is difficult for the business
community to understand, leading to unintentional non-compliance as "sign
creep" over time, The Task Force recommended a possible review of the code
to simplify its design and, at a minimum, consider developing illustrated
educational materials, Additionally, city staff would be available at a merchant's
request for on-site review in order to increase awareness and reduce future
violations,
Downtown Task Force
Summary Report
7
D(X, JV-b~ I ~ 3/ Lj [f
(2...}'Qffi(.~
Repealed Chapter 6.44 set forth below for the convenience of the reader,
6.4 4 Sidewalk Cafes
6.44.010 Purflose
The purpose of this chapter is to permit lIRd encomage sidewalk dining tllat is compatible
,.vith other uses oftlle public side'Nalk. The City finds tllat sidev,'alk caf~!i. encoHrage a
d . , d' hi' II ...."...- "'II d
pe estnan onente envlfonment, e p to create a 'ilsua y attractr,'e'atmosp ere an
streetscape, and promote overall commeree.
T-.';'
V''''f~
"~';;j4'
6.44.020 Permit Required . , "'~
~~
. '{ 'Th..
Private commercial ase of public sidewalks for tlle purpose of operating a sidewGl$"~afe in
tile City is prohibited unless a permit is obtained from't.he Pubi.!e'Works DepartmeR{as
'd d' II' II ."'"
proVI e m t IS c apteL' .
6.44.030 Definitions
. "-:;j.t'k
...".{'>:'i>1~i' '.
w~,':Y,'._ ""~,
04f"~;)~1(~*~~
. 'Yt\" ,.->:!,-', ":'Jii0,,"\i;j;ji'
abuts the subject sidewalk,cafe site e)(clading:fJ!ililic right of;\\-ay.
~. _ f;~~-'V --"~- ~'::J~>' ~~_- Jf
B. .^.djacent s1~e.;(i,\,lk ar-ea. \~~ portion of th~,public sidewalk between tlle cmb line and
the property line <ieffi,<li'cfited b);,~J(tending the sid~!building lines ofthe premises until they
intersect tile cmb, "';;, ,", . 'c'\;~ .:rc.... .P
~~'.:., ., :...~:.:::;(',' .
d1i'ri"',}':t9J;f~t::;':c~, " : ",'. ""-:~_"'t:,
C. i)perate'a'sidi:Jwalk cafe: Serving food or beverage from a restaurant to patrons seated
~ rJJ' -''''"- ""V,"-'~C'a .~ ",.". ',,"
at~bles located witl!in'tfle adjaeeHtsidewalk area, including, in the case of a permittce in
"pif~~~sion ef a valict"l1t~~e f-or iR~~~le'of alcohol be','erages covering sacA sidewalk, tlle
'4.,~!1<.f hb ""... 'd" 'i< ' h Ef 'd II
sernce:o suc everages;:or pre','1 mg seatmg or patrons III tea Jacent 51 ewa (area,
'"~ m,s/) ,.,-
~""'~" ,:......'.
. r:;; . t'!f~1
". ..... \1"
.~~'~, . i
and adjusted annu:;-lly by the cpr for the previous calendar year.
6.44.0S0 Permit i\pplieation
.^., .^.pplioation f-or a permit to operate a side'Nalk cafe shall be made at the Public Works
Department on a form provided, TlIe reql1est for permit shall minimally contain:
Repealed Provisions
Page I
I. ,A. completed applioatian;
2. }\ soale diagr-am af the area for sidewalk oafe use, '.vith dimensians sha'lm;
3. f. certificate af insmance afld endarsement farm; afld
4, The lacatian and descriptian af the tables and materials requested to be in the right af
way,
B. Other infarmation shall be provided as required by the Public Works Director to carry
aut the purpose of this ohapter.
Ii.H.OliO Notice Reljuired
Prior ta rendering a decisian, the Public Works Directot~Gll ~ail abutti~g' praperty owners
and occupants natice that an ajJplication far a side1:~lk caf-e has been filed, Th~~n,(Jtice shall
~a~in a capy af the diagnun submitted by, the"J@,!\iant, state~'hether ar nat tlle,;fJ:\!j,iness.
IS lic~nsed ta se~v~ alcahalic bever-ages whlOhmay ll~~..tr..ed ~ansumed at th::09Iaewall(
cafc If the permit IS granted, and state that all camment~,:'caacernlHg the propased' Sidewalk
cafe must be received by the Public Works Departmem'1;'lJiiliia 15 calendar days fram the,
'W,~~..
date afmailing the natice, The applicMtshall alsa be require(i~WUlast a capy afthe public
natice in a readily ...isible lacatian an the[roatage afthe appl):i~gbusiness establishment f-or
15 calendar days, . ' ' .
011"
Ii. H.070 LocatioR Rulesi$1~:,~cview Criteri~.".1'
4~".\ ",
.,\, The Publio We'i-1.s Dire~;~~~hall review ~lie application for its campliance with the
fallawing criteria:. 1JJ!j ,~
J:h .
~'" tJ"
,~'(,< fl" .
. .~'... 'd..;'-';~?", - ',.'
:fh 'f ~'d- . 1I~~r ' d < h' h 'd' h' Ii
1. e.?p':?~l1gn a a SI.J~X~ (ca e;!~~~!.!' :ta structures w.w are.slte V"I~ 1R ten eet
af a pubIHrslae'lIlllk,.and ....4iJch,are lacatei!ll~ne af the fallawmg zanlng dIStrIcts: C I D
.:j_ot' '-"'>:3,' -' . '\"(f,1d';,..
(C~~mercial Da\Vfl!g:~Ii)), C 1'(Sg~eroial), ar E I (Emplayment),
. .'. !i!!k;*"".~1"
(. ; .~'->'''',. . '" . ~0.;Ef;;W
.' 2. ".,The aperatian af a sidewalk cafe~ shall be lacated such that there is at least sil( feet clear
and Uf1iJitstructed passage,~..ay bet\feen the sidewalk caf tables, chairs and barriers and
street tr~'e~: bike racks, lamp pasts, sign pasts, and any ather fil(tures ar abstructians. The
Public W orlt~;~jr,ectar mil)' require mare than sil( fcet if necessary ta protect the public
safety, The Publi'e';Warks'Directar may alsa reduce this requiremeRl where unusual
circumstances eJ;;Stima \",'here public safety wauld nat be jeapardized,
::-::i'
3. The sidewalk cafe may anly be lacated in the adjacent sidewalk area to the applicant's
business, but may el(tend in front af adjacent businesses with the ....Titten cansent af bath the
property O'.\'ner aAd the business awner, subject to review by the Public Works Director.
4, The sidewalk cafe shall be located fi'..e feet from driveways and alleys, and ten feet
from intersections, These requirements may be modified by the Public Works Director
where unusual circumstances clcisl.
Repealed Provisions
Page 2
5, The location of the sidewalk cafe shall be as approved by the Public \Vorles Director.
B. The PHblic Works Director shall f-orward all applications for review by the Police
Chief f-or any lmsiness 'Nbo holds a valid liqHor license, or in which aleoholic beverages are
intended to be served.
I, The Police Chief upon review of the application will sign the application f-or
eoncurrence with granting the permit, or;
~
2. Submit a memorandum of concerns to the Public Worles Direettrr~fur eonsideration.
&~
C, The Publie Works Director shall forward all apPlicatio~ir~~1~j~~: by the Director of
Community Development. The Director shall determine ~he~0ning oftl:i"e"I'~quest, and
d . h . h h d" 1<' h It' . , """" . f h b d
eterml~e 'II et er t e propose use IS IH eon ormanc~ WIt. t. e,reqlmeme~t~~_ t e an
Use Ordmance, \ ;'0~"
' ~~.3.&f".,
" "~fuh.tA'
-.r!"
j/
(1,41.080 Lillbility IInd Insurllnce
\.,
f.-.
Prior to the issuance of permit, Permittee shall:
'il!:~ ;,;"
!.. Furnish a signed statement, with 1We;~fipH~ion, that th~'~~iln(tte\l shall defend,
indeffiRify and hold harmless the City, its'\~ffieeiS~~;JLd employees;fr,om any claims for
damages to projlerty or injury to persons t,\,jlich ~y~~n connection with an activity
carried on under the ~e~~y;;(t~e permit.\~ . 'V'~
B. Furnish and m!ijntain sHcnpublic liability~food products liability, liquor liability and
property damage{iIi~urance as'.Vi,ll protect jleniilitee and City from all claims fer damage to
-r ;-,.,;,.,.., . '0Jit~A . . .
property or bodily IIljl,lry, IHcludlRg death, WlllCh'~y arise from ojleratJens under the jlermlt
or in cOHflection there'/iit~;'~,lleb.'ifl~i~~,~,~_a!lJfovide coverage of flOt less than the
amoun10f~h;eil?al tort lialJility undert-lle:Qr~gon Tort Claims :\ct. Such insurance shall
be ,.viili~jitdil~;t~,co'ierage,f',therwise elcisting, and shall name the City, its officers and
CI~~ityees, as addilieA~tiHsureas,.a!l<!.shall further provide that the policy shall not
,tiffil'ihate or be cllflceUiafRrior to tile'el(piration of the permit without 30 days wi"itten notice
~0fc~~'1[~~ '!.
,:~i-.; W
(1.11.090 Forms:& CORditioRs of Permit
~Jr
!.. Requirements:fotall sidewalk cafes:
, JY
I. Each permit issued shall terminate December 31st of the year in ,<,mich it is issued,
Requests f-or rene'Nab shall be filed with the Public 'Vorles Department after lanulll')' I. The
Public Viorlm Dir-ector may approve, approve with additional conditions, or deny the request
for renewal. No application fee shall be required for renewals, An ar.nual permit fee based
on the number of seats authorized is due at the time of the initial application and each
renewal.
. .'. ^ ~
.
Repealed Provisions
Page 3
2. The permit issued shall be persOl'la1 to the permittee only and is not traflsferable in any
manner,
3. The permit may be temporarily suspended by the Public Worles Director if the public
interest re(fuires use of the right of 'Nay for a public event, construction, repair, or any other
purpose,
4, The permit is specifically limited to the area approved or as modified by the Publio
Works Director, and will inelude a diagram indicating the area approy~dJor the side'Nalk
/"-0~"""N<.,1t.
caf and the location of the tables and materials permitted to be in.tIle riglkof way.
. ,,,:~<t'
, .~,~"
5. The operatIOn of the Sidewalk cafe shall be such that there IS at:least Sl)( f-eet from the
. ,,*0tT( . """V+Y'" ..
olliermost edge of the Sidewalk cafe to the street curb, that al~p moludes,~.p'lRlmum of five
feet clear and unobstmcted passageway between the side;:VWk~afe table!;liil'iairs and barriers
and street trees, bike racks, lamp posts, sign posts, and~~y ~ther fixtures oi"ijb~st.-uctions.. .
The Public Works Director may re(fuire increasedei~arance distances if necei!l~'Jo protect
the public safety, The Public Works Director m~y!al~o,reduce'-i-hese requirement\'11i~
lHlusual circumstances eJcist and where Pllblic safet;':'-{i/~uld 'mJ;l"~'j eopardiZied. }fT
" ;~'f',/'':)'~'
6. The sidewalk and all things placed thcre shall at all tiffi'1rs.be maintained in a clean and
~'. "::4,
orderly condition. Only those things allt1fo~~ed by the permi(~d shov.-n on the diagram
may be stored in the public right of 'NJy~\'li,lftl,1lt sidewalk Caflds.not in operation, ghollld
the permittee not lItiliZie the sidewalk as ~llihon2e'a~fer a period of 4 g hours or more, all the
'Wi; ;'~<;}>~:~ .
tables and materials shall be removed therefrom, il:;l~i':tl~.,.",'
"'. ";.:;;,r",:"j'4\sf
.,j, <, ~iit/'"
!"''-'{"-,, "" J;?J?' .
7. The operation ofiisidei,valk cafe requires that trash containers be pro'iided on site,
- ".'.. \1>
8, f.ll reqllirect'~iii1:ling modifi"eations or parl~ill,g.improYements shall be completed prior
"i,~, '~'~"", -; \'\:,;:;1.'
to the commencement pf~~ ?f:!eratjo~~!:he sid~valk cafe,
1l'7< , -""',,~\::;E,,<"_" , ~;:"""";::"",":""~:::;;' .
9. }~~~~Ir~ll'be atta~h'ed,to an): f~i=ilituj{ lImbrellas, avmings, or other structme
A <;'l.;,l;;?<t?J\,,~ ,-y<,~,
related to tHe opeffitisn.oftHe side',valk cafe,
h~~ . ~~~~~ " '"
#JO:'i\~ng shall no\:~~allowedin;approved sidewalk safe areas, .
11. SiJe'v/~ cafes sHal~~e continuously supervised by employees of tHe establishment.
~.,;t~ ~V
";,~~ Nt
12, Sidewallfeafes SHall meet all requirements of the Jackson County HealtH Department.
.",,~ .
,',r~ .
13. Tables, cha~: and other struotures associated witH tHe sidewalk cafe shall be kept free
of litter and other debris at all times,
14. Sidewalk caf-es and adjoining sidewalks shall remain clear oflitler, food scrilps, and
soiled dishes at all times. Where establishments provide take out or self service, an adeqllate
number of employees mUGt be maintained to clear sidewalk cafes on a reglllar basis,
Side'Nalk and flooring areas mllst be cleaned daily, inclllding adjacent side'Nalk areas.
15. The sidewalk cafe permit must be visibly displayed dmiflg business hOllrs.
Repealed Provisions
Page 4
I B. The City of :\silllmd has tile right to repeal or amend this Chapter and thereby
terminate or modify all sidewalk caf~ operations. No permittee shall obtain any property
right in the contifllled private commercial Hse of the public side'Nalk.
B, BHsinesses 'Nhicil intend to serve alcoholic beverages at the sidewalk cafe must meet
the following additional ref/Hirements:
I, The business shall hold a 'lalid Oregon Lif/uor Control Commissisn lif/Hor license,
2, Storage of containers commonly Hsed for dispensing alcohalic beverages ta customcrs
inclHding but Hot limited ta bottles, pitcilers, and caraf~s mustbe kElpt iB.side the bHsiness
unless an employee is stationed in the oHtside area at all times, No tap~,](egs, coolers, ar
other alcoholic be'/erage storage devices are allowed out~ide on the side'lfalk.
.1 ,'r'-"'~"
~ ~. ~
3, Sidewalk cafe where alcoholic beverages areAt~rved and{onsHmed ref/Hir-e sHpen)sion
a I f il r a' , iif"'il G . G I";'
y emp oyees 0 t e Icense HSIHess, as ref/U1f,e ; y tl e regop."Llquor ontro' ,X..
Commission liqHor license,
4. :\11 sen'ice and consHmption of alcoholic beverages at;siaewalk cafes silall discontinue
by II p,m,' ....,;, '\~~
. . '-"--~:!~f;~~>:: 1-. .~~~~r.. .
5. ,'.II alcohohc beverage sen'lee providers mus!:!ll~o,provlde f-ooe sen'lce IH tile hcensed
,,~ ..~.<. '," '," ,
aFea-:- .f ~L'"- _ :. ';
~
,',
",- ,.. ": .j
fI L +:,-. ,,->I
.'., The PHblic Works [)ir.e'!ta:,wlY;:dtl~y,~reYo~f:r sHspend the permit Hpon finding that
any prO'lisioHefthis chail'f~r'6r condili6if"ef:r~ro'lal will be or has aeen 'liolated,
,';' .' ';';"fc'.""." '*
R:Upon denial:'~~~;~~a,~ion, o:~p.ension the Public Works Director sh~ll give notice of
slieil ac\ion to the applieant or periilitt"ire in ',,,,riting stating the action wilicil ilas lleen taken
and iil~,fellSon tllOrefor. Tli:.e, action/fhall be effective immediately, aHt the applicant or
permitteelffiP.,' make writt~R;ref/Hest, within 10 caleHdar days after the notice is issHed, for a
ilearing bytIt~'ic:it)' Council! Upon hearing the matter, tile City COHncil silall render a final
decision concerning the pelmit. '
-\\LP;--" ::"~. j'
(i.H.110 Penalties
."'ny violation ohhis eilapter shalllle an infraction as defiHed lly ,"'MC 1.08,020, and
pHnisilallle lly a fine as set forth in that section, The city f.dministrator or designee is
aHthorized to issue a ciffition to any person '/iolating the proyisions of this ehapter. ,^ofter t'NO
infractions, the sidewalk caf", permit shall be revoked for a period of at least one year.
Repealed Provisions
Page 5