The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutEast Main_62 (PA-2009-00526) CITY OF ASHLAND August 20, 2009 Oregon Architecture Attn: Mark McKechnie 221 West lOth Street Medford, OR 97501 Re: P A #2009-00526 Land Use Approval Compliance Motif Door Dear Mr~ McKechnie, The new door for the recently modified entry at Motif located at 62 East Main has been painted with a metallic silver finish. The land use approval for the entry modifications included a condition requiring: #4-2) That a single three-foot zero-inch natural finish wood door with two sidelights be used to match the others on the building fayade, including styfes and rails. With the natural wood finish now painted over, the installation is in violation of your land use approval and the Site Design and Use Standards which prohibit bright paint colors to draw attention to the use. The door will need to be returned to the approved natural finish wood treatment required in the approval, or a modification of the land use approval and an Administrative Variance to the Site Design and Use Standards obtained. Given that the natural finish was required both to comply with Site Design and Use Standards and to satisfy Historic Commission recommendations relative to compatibility with the existing building and surrounding National Register Historic District, it may prove difficult to obtain approval of a modification. Please contact me as soon as possible to let me know how you'll be proceeding to bring this into compliance with the approval and the applicable standards. I can be reached by phone at 552--2040 or via e-mail to seversod@ashland~or~us ~ Sincerely, .~c:~ f\ /4 Derek Severson Associate Planner Cc: File; Code Compliance; Motif Oregon LlC; 6Q.68 East Main Street LLC PiInnIng DtwIIion 20 E. Mail SIreet Ashland, 0nIg0n 97520 www.ashmnd.or.us Tel: 541-552-2{)40 Fax: &4.1-552-2050 TiY: 8(X). 735---29OJ seversodO astAndTOf.US r., ~~GCOMMlSSION FlNDINGS A ORDERS PLANNING ACI10N #2009-00S26 is 8 n:quest for modification of the existing Site Review approval from Planning Action #96-063 to allow modifications to the ground floor entry of the property located at 62 East Main Street. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Retail Commercial; ZONING: C-I-D; ASSESSOR'S MAP #: 39 1 E 09 DB TAX LOT ,: 60000 & 60001 APPLICANT: Mark McKechnie for Oregon Architecture SUBMI1T AL DATE: DEEMED COMPLETE DATE: STAFF APPROVAL DATE: FINAL DECISION DATE: APPROVAL EXPIRA TION DATE: April 24, 2009 May 1 t 2009 May 21, 2009 June 3, 2009 June 3, 2010 DECISION The application is a request for 8 modification of the existing Site Review approval granted under Planning Action #96-063 to allow modifications to the ground floor entry of the property located at 62 East Main Street, the former Kat Wok building. The subject parcel is an approximately 3,797 square foot lot located on the south side of East Main Street, just west of the intersection of Pioneer and East Main within the Ashland Downtown Historic District. The pucel is rectangular, and contains a zero-lot line building constructed in 1997. The existing two and 0110- half story bride and stucco veneer building is identified u the Kat Wok Building in historic district inventory documents. and was constructed in 1997. Thil historic district inventory describes the building u . compatible, non-historic, non-contributing resource in the Ashland Downtown Historic District, and notes that the buildins provides a rccesscd entry on Main Street IS well as rear access from the Oreaon Shakespeare Festival's brick courtyard area, and is generally compatible in mass, volume md materials with the historic character of the downtown. The building's entry incorporates a main entry door that leads to a stairway providing access to the upper floors, and two otha' entrances constructed at anaIes to the sidewalk providina entries to the ground floor busiDesses. In the staff report describina the building in Plannina Action #96-063, it wu noted _ the ground floor desip aloDl East Main Street provides. strong sense of entry IDd orientation toward the ICIeet by incorporatins an arched main alCrancc with awniDp IDd teCb8ck II'CIde to add anphasis to the cIoonva)oa. With the CW'I'eDt application, the new tenants about to occupy ODe of the ground floor IJ*oCI propote to modify one of the existing auglod ground floor entries by instaIIina . new qe wooden door with two equal sidelights in the araa cum:ody occupied by. bay wiDdow. The Iarpr paneoftbc ~ baywiDdow is to be relocated to the current door. s location, and the new door is to be rccesscd three feet back from the sidewalk. Building brick is to be maintained, and the private sidewalk IdjlCCDt to the new entry it to be brick pavers to match those in the existing alcove. The existiua awnins is to be refUrbished IS well. P A 12009-00'26 62 E~ MaiD StJddI Pqel The application explains that the curreIlt entry is somewhat hidden by its angled placement, and that with the proposed modifications. recessed entry win be retained but the entry will be made a more prominent fean:we in the ~e desip The application goes on to DOte that the existing borizontallDd vertical rhythms oftbe building ~ lie maintained, and explains that by moving the entry behind the existing soldi<< course, the horizontal element actually becomes more prominent The application materials explain that the ~ bas four prominent vertical col~ and suggests that the proposed entry works within one of the bays leaving the main vertical rhythms uninterrupted while providing secondary vertical elements which hint at internal building columns flRn~ng each side of the ratry opening. The application argues that the proposed alteration alters one component of the fa~e, but that the ovcraJJ visuaJ integrity of the entire fi9ade is maintained. Subsequent to the pre--applicatioD conference for this project, where aluminum double doors were initially proposed, the applicant met on-site with the Historic Commission's Review Board. Membcn of the Review Board provided four recommendations for the proposal: )) That the existing 36-inch window be moved to the existing door location, and that the same details as used for the existing windows be provided for the brick inset; 2) that a single 3-foot O-inch wood door with side lights be used to match the others OD the building fa~~ including styles and rails; 3) that new brick modular colwnns be provided at a 16-inch width and 8, depth as needed; and 4) that the awning remain to add to the building's sense of entry and the symmetry created by having awnings at both ends of the building. These recommendations were incorporated in the final application submittal, which was reviewed by the full Historic Commission on May 14, 2009. During that meeting, the Commissioners questioned the applicant regarding the Review Board's third recommendation, noting that the brick columns were shown in the submittal with only a 1 S-inch widtlL The applicant assured Commissioners that the comers of the colwnns would not be mitered, and that full bricks would be used and "toothed-in" at the comer. Commission Chair Dale Shostrom asked that the detail drawings submitted for building permits be modified to reflect the necessary I-foot 4-inch dimension for the use of full bricks. The applicant .also confirmed for Commissioners that the doon used would be a full wood assembly, although an aJuminmn threshold wouJd be used. Based on these assurances and on the modifications meeting the original recommendations provided by the Review Board, the Commission recommended that the application be approved, noting that the final submittal had effectively incorporated the Review Board recommendations, and that while the modifications resulted in some asymmetry between the two ground floor use entries, they resulted in an improved symmetry and sense of enDy within the impacted bay. The ~rlterla fer Site Review Approval are deserlbed Ja AMC a..pter 18.72.070, .. loDo,": A~ AU tlfJPlicable City ordlru:mcu Ittzve ~e" met or will be met by tlte proposed developmetll. B. All requiremenb of IIN Sit~ Review Chapter Itave been 1Mt or will be IMt. C. lie developmDII compliu wltle 1M Sit~ Duign Sttmdardr adopted by lite City COIIItCi/ /Or ImpkmDtkuio" of tIIb cluzptg. D~ 77Ial tu/equllte CDpaCity of City facllltia for wat~r, sewer, paved acct!U to and through . development, ekctricity, IITbtm 3torm drailUlge, and tu/equllle lratuportQtio" CQ1I and will be provU/<<I to and t/uougJl 1M subject property. P A #12009..00'26 62 E.. MaiD StJdds Pue2 The application with the attached conditions complies with a1J applicable City ordinances. Planning Action #2009-OOS26 is approved with the foUowing conditions. Furthert if anyone or more of the foUowing conditions are found to be invalid for any reason whatsoever, then Phmning Action #2009-00526 is denied. The following are the conditions and they are attacbed to the approval: 1) That all proposals of tile applicant shall be amditions of approvaJ unless otherwise modified herein. 2) That all COnditiODS of Planning Actions #96-063 sbaJJ remain in effect unless otherwise modified herein. 3) That the plans submitted for the building pamit shall be in substantial conformance with those approved u part of this application. If the plans submitted for the building permit are not in substantial confonnance with those approved as part of this application, an application to modify the Site Review approval shaH be submitted and approved prior to issuance of a building permit. 4) That all recommendations of the Ashland Historic Commission, with final approval of the Staff Advisor, shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise modified herein. These recommendations are: S) 1) That the existinl36-inch bay window be moved to the existing door location, and that the same details used for the existing windows be provided for the bricJc inlet 2) That . single tbrcc-foot ~iDch natural fiDiJh wood door with two sidelights be used to match the others on the building f894de, including styles md rails. 3) That new brick modular colWllDl be provided at a J 6-inch width and a depth u needed, and that the 16-inch width necessary to allow full bricks to be "toothed-in" at the column comer be clearly identified in the buiIdina permit submittaIl. 4) That the awnina remain to add to the buildingt. salle of entry and the symmetry created by having a'Nllinp at both ends. That a sign permit shall be obtained prior to alteration of the awning or installation of any new signagc. All signagc shall meet the requirements of Chapter 18.96t and sip. permit submittals shall · ewed and approved by the Historic Commission t s Review Board prior to issuance. ",..-/ ~ P A #2009.:00'26 62 E. MaiD SLldds Paac 3 P A#2009-00526 60-68 EAST MAIN STREET LLC POBOX 306 ASHLAND, OR 97520 P A#2009-00526 OREGON ARCHITECTURE ATIN: MARK McKECHNIE 221 WEST 10th ST MEDFORD, OR 97501 P A#2009w00526 MOTIF OREGON LLC A TIN BUSINESS OWNER 62 EAST MAIN ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 CODE COMPLIANCE FILE - ):;) C::, ~ 00 (:) \ \)- ~ ~ \l CITY OF ASHLAND April 21 t 2009 Oregon Architecture Ine for Motif Oregon LLC 221 W 10 St Medford, OR 97501 Notice of Final Decision On May 21,2009, the Staff Advisor for the Ashland Planning Division administratively approved your request for the following: PLANNING ACTIONS: 2009-00526 SUBJECT PROPERTIES: 62 East Main Street APPLICANT: Mark McKechnie, Oregon Architecture DESCRIPTION: A request for a modification of the existing Site Review approval from Planning Action #96-063 to allow modifications of the ground floor entry of the property located at 62 East Main Street. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Retail Commercial; ZONING: C~ 1-0; ASSESSOR'8 MAP #: 39 1 E 09 BB; TAX LOT: 60000 & 60001 The Staff Advisor's decision becomes final and is effective on the 13th day after the Notice of Final Decision is mailed~ Prior to that date, anyone who was mailed this Notice Of Final Decision may request a reconsideration of the action by the Staff Advisor as set forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO) 18.1 08.070(B)(2)(b) and/or file an appeal to the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in the ALVa 18.1 08~070(B)(2)(c). An appeal may not be made directly to the Land Use Board of Appeals. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court. The application, all associated documents and evidence submitted, and the applicable criteria are available for review at no cost at the Ashland Community Development Department, located at 51 Winburn Way. Copies of file documents can be requested and are charged based on the City of Ashland copy fee schedule. If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact the Department of Community Development between the hours of8~OO am and 4;30 pm, Monday through Friday at (541) 488....5305. cc: Property Owner; Parties of Record; Neighbors within 200 feet DEPT. Of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 20 E. Main Street Ashland, Oregon 97520 YfWrII.ash~nd.or.us Tel: 541488-5305 Fax: 541-552-2050 TTY: 8006735.2900 rA' ASHLAND PLANNING COMMISSION FINDINGS & ORDERS PLANNING ACTION #2009...00526 is a request for modification of the existing Site Review approval from Planning Action #96-063 to allow modifications to the ground floor entry of the property located at 62 East Main Street~ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Retail Commercial; ZONING: C-I-D; ASSESSOR'S MAP #: 39 IE 09 BB TAX LOT #: 60000 & 60001 APPLICANT: Mark McKechnie for Oregon Architecture SUBMITTAL DATE: DEEMED COMPLETE DATE: ST AFF APPROVAL DATE: FINAL DECISION DATE: APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE: April 24, 2009 May 1, 2009 May 21, 2009 June 3, 2009 June 3, 2010 DECISION The application is a request for a modification of the existing Site Review approval granted under Planning Action #96-063 to allow modifications to the ground floor entry of the property located at 62 East Main Street, the former Kat Wok building. The subject parcel is an approximately 3,797 square foot lot located on the south side afEast Main Street, just west of the intersection of Pioneer and East Main within the Ashland Downtown Historic District. The parcel is rectangular, and contains a zero-lot line building constructed in 1997. The existing two and one- half story brick and stucco veneer building is identified as the Kat Wok Building in historic district inventory documents, and was constructed in 1997. This historic district inventory describes the building as a compatible, non-historic, non-contributing resource in the Ashland Downtown Historic District, and notes that the building provides a recessed entry on Main Street as well as rear access from the Oregon Shakespeare Festival's brick courtyard area, and is generally compatible in mass, volume and materials with the historic character of the downtown.. The building's entry incorporates a main entry door that leads to a stainvay providing access to the upper floors, and two other entrances constructed at angles to the sidewalk providing entries to the ground floor businesses. In the staff report describing the building in Planning Action #96-063, it was noted that the ground floor design along East Main Street provides a strong sense of entry and orientation toward the street by incorporating an arched main entrance with awnings and setback arcade to add emphasis to the doorways. With the current application, the new tenants about to occupy one of the ground floor spaces propose to modify one of the existing angled ground floor entries by installing a new single wooden door with two equal sidelights in the area currently occupied by a bay window. The larger pane of the existing bay window is to be relocated to the current door's location, and the new door is to be recessed three feet back from the sidewalk. Building brick is to be maintained, and the private sidewalk adjacent to the new entry is to be brick pavers to match those in the existing alcove. The existing awning is to be refurbished as well. P A #2009-00526 62 E. Main St.ldds Page 1 The application explains that the current entry is somewhat hidden by its angled placement, and that with the proposed modifications a recessed entry will be retained but the entry will be made a more prominent feature in the fayade design. The application goes on to note that the existing horizontal and vertical rhythms of the building fa~de are maintained, and explains that by moving the entry behind the existing soldier course, the horizontal element actually becomes more prominent The application materials explain that the fa~de has four prominent vertical columns, and suggests that the proposed entry works within one of the bays leaving the main vertical rhythms uninterrupted while providing secondary vertical elements which hint at internal building columns flanking each side of the entry opening. The application argues that the proposed alteration alters one component of the fa~adet but that the overall visual integrity of the entire fayade is maintained~ Subsequent to the pre-application conference for this project, where aluminum double doors were initially proposed, the applicant met on...site with the Historic Commission's Review Board. Members of the Review Board provided four recommendations for the proposal: 1) That the existing 36-inch window be moved to the existing door location, and that the same details as used for the existing windows be provided for the brick inset; 2) that a single 3-foot O-inch wood door with side lights be used to match the others on the building fa<;ade, including styles and rails; 3) that new brick modular columns be provided at a 16-inch width and a. depth as needed; and 4) that the awning remain to add to the building's sense of entry and the symmetry created by having awnings at both ends of the building. These recommendations were incorporated in the final application submittal, which was reviewed by the full Historic Commission on May 14, 2009. During that meeting, the Commissioners questioned the applicant regarding the Review Board's third recommendation, noting that the brick columns were shown in the submittal with only a I5-inch width. The applicant assured Commissioners that the comers of the columns would not be mitered, and that full bricks would be used and "toothed-in" at the corner~ Commission Chair Dale Shostrom asked that the detail drawings submitted for building permits be modified to reflect the necessary l....foot 4..inch dimension for the use of full bricks.. The applicant -also confinned for Commissioners that the doors used would be a full wood assembly, although an aluminum threshold would be used. Based on these assurances and on the modifications meeting the original recommendations provided by the Review Board, the Commission recommended that the application be approved, noting that the final submittal had effectively incorporated the Review Board recommendations, and that while the modifications resulted in some asymmetry between the two ground floor use entries, they resulted in an improved symmetry and sense of entry within the impacted bay. The criteria for Site Review Approval are described in AMC Chapter 18.72.070, as follows: A. All applicable Ctty ordinances have been met or will be met by the proposed development. B~ All requirements of the Site Review Chapter have been met or will be met. C. The development complies with the Site Design Standards adopted by the City Council for implementation of this Chapter~ D. That adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, paved access to and through the development, electricity, urban storm drainage, and adequate transportation can and will be provided to and through the subject property. P A #2009.00526 62 E. Main St/dds Page 2 The application with the attached conditions complies with all applicable City ordinances. Planning Action #2009-00526 is approved with the following conditions. Further, if anyone or more of the following conditions are found to be invalid for any reason whatsoever, then Planning Action #2009-00526 is denied. The following are the conditions and they are attached to the approval: 5) 1) That all proposals of the applicant shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise modified herein. 2) That all conditions of Planning Actions #96-063 shall remain in effect unless otherwise modified herein. 3) That the plans submitted for the building pennit shall be in substantial confonnance with those approved as part of this application. If the plans submitted for the building pennit are not in substantial confonnance with those approved as part of this application, an application to modify the Site Review approval shall be submitted and approved prior to issuance of a building permit. 4) That all recommendations of the Ashland Historic Commission, with final approval of the Staff Advisor, shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise modified herein. These recommendations are: 1) That the existing 36M inch bay window be moved to the existing door location, and that the same details used for the existing windows be provided for the brick inset. 2) That a single three...foot zero...inch natural fmish wood door with two sidelights be used to match the others on the building fa~ade, including styles and rails. 3) That new brick modular columns be provided at a 16..inch width and a depth as needed, and that the 16-inch width necessary to allow full bricks to be '~oothed-in" at the column comer be clearly identified in the building permit submittals. 4) That the awning remain to add to the building's sense of entry and the symmetry created by having avmings at both ends~ That a sign permit shall be obtained prior to alteration of the awning or installation of any new signage. All signage shall meet the requirements of Chapter 18.96, and sign permit submittals shall ......-.---tre viewed and approved by the Historic Commission's Review Board prior to issuance~ Bi Mol , Director Department of Community Development P A #2009~526 62 E. Main St.ldds Page 3 Easy Peele Labels Use AveryrtJ Template 5160Gtt P"AJf200990526 100 39lE09 ~A.SHL./\.}ID CITY OF CITY H~\LL ~A.SHL~u\ID, OR 97520 P A#2009-00526 13000 391 E09BB FIRST INTERST ATE BANK/OR POBOX 2609 CARLSBAD, CA 92018 PJ,-#200900526 14200 391E09BB ~A..8HLp~~ CITY OF CITY Hf..LL ~A.SHL.fJlUl\lD, OR 97520 PA#2009-00526 14500 391E09BB OR SHAKESPEAREAN FEST ASSN PO BOX 158 ASHLAND, OR 97520 P A#2009-00526 60001 391 E09BB 60-68 EAST MAIN STREET LLC POBOX 306 ASHLAND, OR 97520 P A#2009-00 526 Oregon Architecture c/o Mark Mckechnie 221 West 10th Street Medford, OR 97501 ~tlquettes facies a peler , . _ ." ~ ~ ...J9I. _ ~ ..._. .. Feed Paper Bend along line to expose Pop--Up Edge"" P A#2009-00526 11300 391 E09BA THOMPSON BRENT E POBOX 201 ASHLAND, OR 97520 P"Ajf200900526 14000 391E09BB ~Ar.SHL4\ND CITY OF CITY H.j;A.LL "A.SHLAND, OR 97520 PfJf200900526 14300 391E09BB ~A.SHLf....'ID CITY OF CITY Hl\LL .iAI>8HL:\~ID, OR 97520 PA#2009-00526 14600 391E09BB SACKS STEPHEN 50WNEVADA ASHLAND, OR 97520 P A#2009-00526 1000 391 E09BC OREGON SHAKESPEAREAN 15 S PIONEER ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 P A#2009..00526 Thomas Avalon Construction 200 Oregon Terrace Medford, OR 97504 .. 5ens de I Repliez lIla hachure afin de I . t _ . ~ I _.. 1_ __ L _...... ft_ _ I ,_ TU t I @ AVERY@ 51608 1 P A#2009-00526 10200 391 E09BB CONKLIN JAMES TRUSTEE ET AL POBOX 246 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA#2009~00526 14100 391E09BB OREGON SHAKESPEARE 19 S PIONEER ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA#2009-00526 14400 391E09BB 58 E MAIN STREET LLC 391 DEAD INDIAN MEM RD ASHLAND, OR 97520 P"AJf200900526 1-1700 391EQ9BB ~Ar.SHL"A...ND CITY OF CITY H,,\LL f.SHLAND, OR 97520 P~\#2009 00526 1100 391 E09BC I\SHLAND CITY OF PO BOX 1360 .iA.SHLi\ND~ OR 97520 www.avery.com 1 onn_t:t"\_ ^ \1 CDV HISTORIC COMMISSION Meeting of May 14,2009 PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW PLANNING ACTION: 2009-00526 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 62 E Main OWNER/APPLICANT: Mark McKechnie, Oregon Architecture DESCRIPTION: A request for a modification of the existing Site Review approval from Planning Action #96-063 to allow modifications of the ground floor entry of the property located at 62 East Main Street; COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Retail Commercial; ZONING: C-1-D; ASSESSOR'S MAP #: 39 1E 09 BS; TAX LOT: 60000-60001 Recommendation to Planning Commission: Recommend approval of proposed plans as presented. Department of Community Development 20 East Main St. Ashrandt Oregon 97520 w\vw.ash land.or. u~ Tel; 541-488.5305 Fax: 541-552*2050 TIY: 800-735-2900 ~.;.,..-. ;'.. '1 r~' CITY OF ASHLAND Planning Departmentl 51 Wtn~. , Ways Ashfand, Oregon 97520 541..488.5305 Fax: 541-552-2050 www.ashfand,or.us TIY: 1.800-735-2900 NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING ACTION: 2009-00526 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 62 E Main OWNER/APPLICANT: Mark McKechnie, Oregon Architecture DESCRIPTION: A request for a modification of the existing Site Review approval from Planning Action #96-063 to allow modifications of the ground floor entry of the property located at 62 East Main Street. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Retail Commercial; ZONING: C-1-D; ASSESSOR'S MAP #: 39 1E 09 BS; TAX LOT: 60000-60001 NOTE:The Ashland Historic Commission will also review this Planning Action on May 14,2009 at 11:15 PM in the Community Development and Engineering Services building (Siskiyou Room), located at 51 Winburn Way. NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: May 1, 2009 DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: May 15, 2009 The Ash I and PI an n i ng Division Staff has received a campi ete appl icatio n for th e property noted above. Any affected property owner or resident has a rig ht to submit written comments to the City of Ash land Planning Division, 51 Win bu rn Way, Ash land, 0 regon 97520 prior to 4:30 p~m. on the deadli ne date sh own above. As h f and Plan n in 9 Oivisi on Staff determine if a Land Use appl ication is campi ete with in 30 days of su bmittal. U po n determination of completenessr a notice is sent to $U rrou nding properties with in 200 feet of the property su bmitti ng appl icatian which a I Jaws for a 14 day comment peri od~ After the comment period a nd not more th an 45 days from the appl ication being deemed completer the Planni ng ~ivision Staff s haf I make a fi na I decision on th e appl icati on. A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties withi n 5 days of decision~ An appeal to the PI an n i ng Commission of the Pi anni ng Division Staffs decision must be made in writi n9 to the Ash I an d PI anni 09 Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision~ (AMe 18.108.040) The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice.. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerni"g this appl icationl by letter, or failu re to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportu nity to respond to the issue.. precludes your right of appeal to the land Use Boa rd of Appea Is (LU SA) on that issue.. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also preclu des you r ri 9 ht of appeal to LU SA on that criteri on~ Fai lure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues rei ati ng to proposed conditions of approva I with sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respon d to th e issue precludes an action for damages in circuit cou rt.. A copy of the application; all dacu ments and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteri a are available for inspection at no cost and win be provided at reasonabl e cost if requested~ AI f materials are availabl e at the Ash I and Pia nni ng Division, Community Development & Engineering Services Building, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520~ If you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contact the Ashland Planning Division at 541 ~5305. G ;\comm *dev', plann ing\N ot ices Mai ted \2 009\2009 ~OO5 26. doc SITE DESIGN AND USE STANDARDS 18t72.070 Criteria for Approval The following criteria shall be used to approve or deny an applicatfon: A. All apprfcable City ordinances have been met or will be met by the proposed development. B. All requirements of the Site Review Chapter have been met or will be met. C. The development complies with the Site Design Standards adopted by the City Council for implementation of this Chapter. D. That adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, paved access to and through the development, etectricity, urban storm drainage) and adequate transportation can and witt be provided to and through the subject property. All improvements in the street right..ofwway shall comply with the Street Standards in Chapter 18t88~ Performance Standards Options~ (DRD 2655, 1991; ORD 2836, 1999) G: \comm -de \ "-"plann ing\Not ices Mail cd ',200 9 ~,2 009 -005 2 6. do c P~^}.1f2009 00526 100 391 E09 ~A~SHL~^~rJD CITY OF CITY HJ\.LL 1\SHL1\ND, OR 97520 PA#2009-00526 13000 391E09BB FIRST INTERSTATE BANK/OR POBOX 2609 CARLSBAD, CA 92018 P L\ff2 009 00526 11200 391 E09BB ~^J.SHL~\~m CITY OF CITY H.t^).LL llo-SIILi^}.tlD, OR 97520 P A#2009-00526 14500 391 E09BB OR SHAKESPEAREAN FEST ASSN PO BOX 158 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA#2009-00526 60001391E09BB 60-68 EAST MAIN STREET LLC POBOX 306 ASHLAND, OR 97520 P A#2009-00526 Oregon Architecture c/o Mark Mckechnie 221 West 10th Street Medford, OR 97501 P A#2009-00526 11300 391 E09BA 1'HOMPSON BRENT E POBOX 201 ASHLAND, OR 97520 P A#2009-00526 10200 391 E09BB CONKLIN JAMES TRUSTEE ET AL POBOX 246 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ~09 00526 14000 391ED0BB fJLSHLLA~ND CITY OF Cll'Y I-L^~LL L^1.SHL~^J'ID, OR 97520 P A#2009-00526 14100 391 E09BB OREGON SHAKESPEARE 19 S PIONEER ASHLAND, OR 97520 Pi^Jt200900526 11300 391E09BB ll.SHLJ\ND CITY OF CITY H~\LL j\SHLi\~ID, OR 97520 P A#2009-00526 14400 391 E09BB 58 E MAIN STREET LLC 391 DEAD INDIAN MEM RD ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA#2009-00526 14600 391E09BB SACKS STEPHEN 50 W NEVADA ASHLAND~ OR 97520 P~^Jt2009 00526 1 ~ 700 391 E09BB .l\SHL~\ND CITY OF CITY H,\LL .(\SI-IL~\}JD, OR 97520 P A#2009-00526 1000 39 I E09BC OREGON SHAKESPEAREAN 15 S PIONEER ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 P ~\ff2009 00526 1100 391 E09BC L^~SHLfJ"rD CITY OF PO BOX 1360 ~\SHL~\ND, OR 97520 P A#2009-00526 Thomas Avalon Construction 200 Oregon Terrace Medford, OR 97504 (-"" Cf <;; N~ ,~\ ~'vAJ ./ \/ J t\'~~J l:~'(} 0 \ \fl AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Jackson ) The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. I am employed by the City of Ashlandf 20 East Marn Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520) in the Community Development Department. 2. On May 1 , 2009 I caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fulty prepaid~ a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each personls name for Planning Action #2009-00526, 62 East Main. ,//., / ~ /) ('~ -' / ~ ~ i- ,.c. .~-t/L<_4L~ /L(;.. c;~/{"A..e/ vu-- k,"",\_ Signature of Employee SIGNED AND SWORN TO before me this 1 st day of May, 2009. .7,~ A Nota t Public for State of Oregon My Commission Expires: 3 ,/0- 15 OFFlC IAL SEAL CAROLYN MARlENE SCHWEMDENER NOTARY PUBUC.oREGQN COMMiSSION NO, 436232 MY COMMISSiON EXPIRES MAR. 20,2013 Com m ~Dev\Plan ni ng\ T em plates -. lJaa ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION FILE# L::>~oo9- 005;:;0 Planning Department 51 Winburn Way, Ashland OR 97520 CITY OF -ASH LAN D 541-488-5305 Fax 541-488-6006 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Street Address DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (b~ &. yVJAI;U 71. Assessorr 5 Map No. 39 1 E Tax Lot{s) Zon ing Camp Plan Designation APPLICANT t!) ~P1D 4. KL-W 11 ~ 0 t2k I AJC, f' L)L WlAI2JL-ttE.. 0"- ~ Nam~ D/ I f 0 ~D10 ~ Phone 1 7 Z'" 4 ::, 7 L E-Mail AR-cJ.J J1 ~ OK&: ,C4 Address -2- '7--1 W I b 1".0 ~ 1'. City /111f-o F D!2-b Zip 9756/ PROPERTY OWNER LL- Name ~ Z-",CV t. VV] 411\) /i? -r; L- Phone Address P.D. ~y ~ljp E-Mail City A {; f.I LA. }lJ D Zip cr7 5 2L. SURVEYOR5 ENGINEER. ARCHITECTt LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTt OTHER TjtleA~ 11~1 Namen1lL~lA1~HAJ/t?hone Address q..AM~ A6 A~Ve -SA t\1k:: -A~ail A ~VE City Zip TWe Name Phone E-Mait Address City Zip J hereby certify that the statements and information contained in this application, including the enclosed drawings and the required findings of fact are in all respects~ true and correct. I understand that all property pins must be shown on the drawings and visible upon the site inspection. In the event the pins are not shown or their location found to be incorrect. the 0 wner assumes full responsibility. I further understand that if this request is subsequently contestedj the burden will be on me to establish: 1) that I produced sufficient factual evidence at the hearing to support this request; 2) that the findings of fact furnished justifies the granting of the request~< 3) that the findings of fact furnished by me are adequate: and further 4) that all structures or improvements are properly locafed on the ground. Date As owner of the property involved i " is request, I have read and understood the complete application and ds consequences to me as a property :::f~:erl SS~) t~~~" Date?! ~ > e /- c) cr fT 0 be C()(I'll-~ by City Staff} Date Received Zoning Permtt Type Filing Fee $ OVER ~ r; I....,\n~m .tlf'-\'''f\l :::Innio.,', j:,~~U~<: /(, J l~ mtl\l.hl,1 nnin" P""mir .\ onhj.;u fl\1"I Fnf"n~ AIV' Co ntractor: Add ress: Owner's Name: 60-68 EAST MAIN STREET LLC Ph one: Customer #: 05207 S tate Lie No: MARK MCKECHNJE City Lie No: Appl ica nt: 221 WEST TENTH ST Ad dress: MEDFORD OR 97501 S u b-C ontractor: THOMAS A V ALON Phone = Ad dress: Applied: 04/27/2009 Issu ed : Expires; 10/24/2009 Phone: (541) 292-2580 . 000\ 5 tate Lie No: Map lot; City Lie No; DESCRIPTION: Motif Restaurant Site Review for change to front entry. Fee Descri ptio n Type I Amount Fee Description 917.00 Amount COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 20 East Ma rn St. Ashland, OR 97520 VNIW. ashla nd. OLUS Tel: 541 M488*5305 Fax: 541-488-5311 TTY: 800-735-2900 Inspect io n Req uest U ne: 541-552 -2080 CITY OF ASHLAND I hereby certify the conte nts of th j s ap p I i catton to be co rrect to the best of my knowredge~ and furthermore, that I have read~ understood and agreed to the following: 1. This permit shall remain valid onty in accordance with code or regulation provisions relating to time lapse and revocation (180 days). 2. Work shall not proceed past approved inspection stage. All required inspections shall be called for 24 hours in advance. 3. Any modifications in plans or work shall be reported in adva nee to th e de pa rtment. 4. Responsibility for complying with all appHcable federal~ state~ or Jocallawsl ordinances, or regulations rests so~ely with the applicant. Applicant Date Fee Summary Paid Amounts Building: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 State Su rch a rge: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 Deve lopme nt Fees: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 Systems Develo pment C ha rges: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 Utii ity Con nectio n Fees: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 Public Works Fees: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 Plann ing Fees: $ 917.00 $ 0.00 Sub~Total: $ 917.00 Fees Paid: $ 0 Total Amount Due: $ 917.00 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 20 East Main St. Ashland~ OR 97520 WW"W.8sh land .or .us Tel ~ 541-488-5305 Fax: 541~488~5311 TTY: 800~735~2900 Inspection Request Line: 541-552-2080 CITY OF ASHLAND CITYOF ASHLAND Planning Department 51 Winburn Way Ashland. OR 97520 541-488-5305 Ashland Historic Commission Design Review Form Applicant MDTlf fZ€L;TIt1J~ Date A. Z"2 .01 Address b 2., ~. t1l A-PJ ?I; Ii ~r;r4 IM>~ Proposed Action fNrtZ...^( ~l-tE.~ v' ~ · \VEl---J .fi'Commercial 0 Mixed Use 0 Multi-Family 0 Residential ~bO)- ---'./<(~ . ... D New Construction 0 Changes to Existing Structure ../ ~w >~, .<: \\ (1,'> '-------'i? ~ ~ ~~ ) 11;. · '- - - ~~ Historic Review Board Comments: . 5"IPWe.iffi...___.\ r._/::i- . ..... ~ ~ II" r~) 1 -..-.:;- (Lr' --._....-..~----~.-.Jl-K.(~-r-__JJl-WOl>."tJ._.-I4i~,.. g~-CtLU1~1b(.--~~lcl.).- ~~.__________.~~ I c1) :s~ \)JDe)f) OooL TO ItA ~-.- otM~lL} t J gLJ)tj. ~"T ( ~riu.-s ~ ~ u; ). .~--...--.-iiJn,iJ~---5t~o--ii_mt.:,~ t+~~--li)----------_._--------~--- --~---~- tJJ~----fJltu:,r-L!~;,:.r$-.1O--i~.-~--~~._-j~07.f\JLA1C --..~---I~.~!-VJ,~i:--~-._-. ---- - - . ...---~___12~: ..-A%;...J~bi&D.--.._.-- -------.-____.__ __ __.____. .. .____~__.______ __. ~_ m.__________.. __.._ B? '12 fwJ~' Al4t7 ~ tz.e.MA-] tJ IV .4-1)", flJ >FA),1'fL tPF fictJrp-r ANt? --'.. - - - ... .. $'-1- n4-I--1~---- - -~_.... -/AVJ r..;-}-jJ6f~' ...-@;- -- ...-~f---~~--.;.~-- ----.-. m._.____ .__._.__u --- --- ~ -. - - .... - - - - - ~ - . r. .. -.... - - -....- r ...........- -- -... - - .~---_. . .. - - ......... . ~. .... .. . _. ..... r-. ~.. ___ . _ . _ _~.- ,................ . _ _ __. _. _ ~_ ~ _... N _ . _ __ _. _ -r .- . . .. . ... .. ., ...... ,....~ .... ... - - -, r r . - - . -. - ... r _ . _ _. r...... _ _ _. _ _ r .. _ _ ., ..... ...... . ~. . . _ _. _ _ .....- . _~.. _. .. _ ..-. ~ _ _ _. .. In the spirit of protecting the historic design and compatibility of your project. if you wish to amend your building plan in order to apply any recommendations of the Historic Review Board, we encourage you to prepare an addendum and resubmit ~ to the Building artment . I~~/ It Histone Review Board Signature G:_ & Col'mIaees\HsD1c Cotm'i:Won'Msc MTln-fORMS\RtMew Fotm+ t-iSbi: Rw;ew Boa1f.doc 6i3I2OO8 NPS Form 1 Q-90Q-A OMS At'proval No. 1024-0018 (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section Number: ---L-Page: ~ Ashland Downtown Historic District, Ashland! OR The entire upper story of the new Allen-McNair block which will be divided into 18 fine rooms has been leased as an annex to the Oregon Hotel. ~ ~of the two fine storerooms on the ground floor of the new building, the south one has been leased by C. H~ Vaupel, one of our leading dry goods merchants~ (Tidings,6-Dec-1909) The Vaupel Store/Oregon Hotel Building went through a succession of ownerships and was serially remodeled but uniformly remained in storefront/hotel use. Typical was a 1931 project, undertaken during a period when the building was known as the HBergner Bu ilding. n Plans for the improvement call for a central entrance into the large store room, formerly occupied by Issac's StoreH~The Oregon Hotel is one of the small well patronized businesses of this city, drawing both a considerable commercial and transient trade~ Addition of the small, attractive lobby is expected to stimulate this business. (Tidings, 9-Mar~1931, 2:1..2) By the mid-1970s the building was occupied by an antique store and a transient hotel when it was declared unsafe by the City. In 1977 the Oregon Shakespearean Festival purchased the building and remodeled it for office use~ Despite some inappropriate storefront alterations, notably the large planters, the Vaupel Store/Oregon Hotel retains its original transom band and other exterior details~ In combination with the First National Bank Building, the building was individually listed on the NRHP in 1979~ "', i,,<./;(){) \ .' j'"'" F\('.; () ... z,:.jc., -.' J D# 53.0 Survey# 302 [SITE} () L. -' L/ ...,"-- -" KAT WOK BUILDING 1997 J ," 62 MAIN ST E 391E09BC 1600 ?(l)~\ ,. Architect: Architectural Design Works (David Richardson) Builder: Bemis Construction lEd Bemisl ((:: \\ !/ ./,'L {(' Modern Period: Late 20th C Historic Period Compatible, Non-Historic, Non-Contributing C'.:C./ J This two and one half story brick and stucco veneer building was constructed following the essential demolition of the previous single story building at this location~ Providing a recessed storefront entry on Main Street, as well as rear access from the aSF A Courtyard area, it is generally compatible in mass, volume, and materials with the historic character of downtown~ ID# 54.0 Survey #303 MACARONI RISTORANTE BLDG 1993 54 MAIN ST E 391E09BC 1700 Arch itect: Arch itectu ra I Design Works (Nickels & Richardson) Bu ilder: Bemis Construction (Ed Rem is J Modern Period: Late 20th C Historic Period Non-Compatiblet Non...Historic, Non...contributing A two and one-half story stucco building with a projecting second floor balconYl the Macaroni Ristorante Building was built in 1993 as a massive remodel/addition to the earlier (post-1928) single story structure that stood on this lot~ . . . . . .. . ... ... .... ....... ........~.. ... ......... ......_...........~..... .._.~........._.~...:.....,....~..,_....~~.,., 11_........ .~I"" ....,...~.~...~......... .. .~..~.....-..... ~ ~ & ~ :' rAJ~I-;~~_.~..~~.<.u.__._~~J rlO~~>-~u i.l B 'f II _ _ _ := J...:~..::!~.....~~:~..==~,~L.=~.:J.::..~~:~!.::...~ ....... .i~.~~~.::L~=::."L:::=.::i:::.:::::~.===: i..::..:~:.~.:.:.:.:,:L.~~:::i. ~=~=i ~ 8 D- 2009.004 7 4 62 E Mai n ) Revised front entry plans submitted per Historic Comm & Maria's request j .. ..... .... .......... .. ........... Line: 1 (ok 1 (\1 odi fi ed I~~i/~ ~ I:. l~~_~~_ au IIH nll III I ltll un 1111 I1ll 1m HI: ~m nn ml ~B !(~ ~ OREGON ~ ~ I ARCHITECTURs'- (541 ) 7724372 221 WEST 10TH ST · MEDFORD. OR 97601 · FAX: (541) 499~6329 · WWW.ORKARCHITECTURE..COM April 23, 2009 Maria Harris, Planning Manager City of Ashland Planning Department 51 Winburn Way Ashland, OR 97520 Re: Design Narrative for New Entry for 62 East Main Street Amy; The new tenants soon to occupy the space identified above are requesting a modification to the existing entryway to the space, as indicated on the attached plan and elevationa They propose to install a new double door with small side light in clear coat aluminum within the area currently occupied by a bay window. The rationale for the change is noted below: The City of Ashland Downtown Design Standards apply to this change. In my view, specific Standards that apply to this proposed entry change are VI-S, VI-D, VI-E, VI-F, VI-HI VI-I and VI-J~ VI-B - Setbacks The building face is at the property line, as required by this Standard~ The existing entries are set back from the building face and this proposed change will set the new entry back from the building face as well, also required by this Standard. The existing entries are actually hidden and hard to findl minimizing the sense of entry and confusing patrons. The proposed entry is intended to improve that fault of the original design and make the entry a more prominent feature of the fa~ade design. The standards do not proscribe a required setback for an entry, however the Building Code requires that the extended door not encroach on the public right-of-waYa We believe the 3-0" setback proposed meets the intent this standard and the requirements of the Building Code~ The proposed change in the location of the entry win also improve interior flow and safety. VI~D - Openings The proposed entry change works within the existing building framework to meet the Standard for openings. Opening up this bay of the fa~ade enhances pedestrian level transparency over the existing condition, which is a condition of this Standard~ VI-E - Horizontal Rhythms The existing horizontal rhythms of the building fa~ade are maintained~ The fa~ade has a soldier course defining the top of the first level ~ By movi ng the proposed entry back behind this soldier course, this horizontal element becomes more prominent. /~ ~) H, r",. i~;: '-". :" J City of Ashland April 23, 2009 Page 2 VI-F - Vertical Rhythms The existing vertical rhythms of the fa~ade are maintained. The fa~ade has four prominent vertical columns. The proposed entry works within one bay of the fa~ade leaving the main vertical rhythm uninterrupted~ Within the bay there is a secondary vertical element which hints at an internal building column fianking each side of the entry opening. VI-H - Materials The materials and finishes proposed for this entry are consistent with those recommended by this Standard. The private sidewark is proposed to be brick pavers to match adjacent work. Building brick is proposed to be maintained. The new entry is proposed to be wood to be consistent with the other entry doors on the building~ It wilJ be a single door with two equal sidelights, which is consistent with the building's other entry doors and the design of the buiJding. VI-I - Awnings The fa~ade has an existing awning that will be refurbished as part of the proposed construction project. The current awning meets this Standard and the owner is proposing material (fabric and color) changes only. VIM] - Other This Standard requires that the visual integrity of the buildjng be maintajned~ This proposed entry alteration works within the existing framework of the original design by altering one component of the fa~ade contained by two vertical elementsl one horizontal element and the plane of the sidewalkl maintaining the visual integrity of the entire fa<;ade. I believe these comments address all the applicable Standards for the proposed change to the fa~ade of 62 East Main Street~ I am available to answer any questions you might have~ Regards, Mark McKechnie, AlA cc: Allan Sandler, Building Owner Teresa Nguyen, Tenant /\ j._; i< . c. '... j ~~~D Al?c: s~ 0 " ~ /:;] MARK MCKIGINIT ~ ~~~~~ ~ MEDFORD. OREGON ~ ~ 4666 GO fJ: Of O~~ DRAWING IN[t~X GENERAL r~m~G 0 . g__fCOVE R S~H E ET~~~~==-~~=:=-,~~:,~,=.=:] ARCH ITECTU RAL l~~c.~-J SID EWALK PLA'N~-'-:=:=::=.~:::c::=:.=:::] I A2.2 I ENLARGED PLAN VIEWS r ~. M_. _.~~~.....~..-.-.-._~~--. Ic_c~i.~i-li~i~~f~~~~~~~=~ OREGON ARCHITECTUR~. 22 1 VVEST TENTH STREET MEDFORD. OREGON 97501 PHONE:: 54 1 .772.4372 FAX: 54 1 .499.6329 J_J ,; . ; '1\~ C~~~::~~::~~~~~l i;~ . '-.'; MEDFORD, OR 97504 ~'" -' " '. .~ PH: 541.292.2580 " . -. ,J.~"" tla valonconstruction@charte..,net UJ <-) c::( a... en t-- Z <( Z W l- <.9 Z ~ (f) X w z <( lL o >- 0::. I- :z: W Z :;;: ~ o I- Z o i= <!: t.) u: o o ~ Z o F <( > o :z w a::: ..s::I ::::I - U -c::s C fa .... C e ::::I ra ..... U) ~ . U .... ....I ) ..:;- jQJ~ .C1J~ ~-:?~ a.. en c-"""'c <~ ~ 0 ~-............... en ~C~ W.n; 0 :e:~ .... ..... -5i .~ (.ft <C to LLI~ ~ CO (V) ~'f>~ 0=0 ~\Co..: --.J C) C) CJ ("'.J CJ Lr) - I"""--. T"""'I 0"\ \.D c-o o c: O'1ro ~C> 08 - c=J.... -g~ ro .. ~ - +-J ..c 0 Vl - <eX ro If- ~ Q)-.::j- Q)co .PCCl U1 CT\ cC) Om UJ :ET""'i ,.J.....J Q"'\ U') ('V') co UJ c.. ("'.JfO \..O::E: Renovationl Modification to Main Entry of an Existing Tenant Space Located at : 62 EAST MAIN STREET... ASHLAND, OREGON MAP: 39 IE 09BB4 TAXLOT/s: 60,000 & 61,000 LL. ..... I- o :E TENAN REVISIONS . ~ MOTIF Plot Date: 4/23/2009 5: 10: 17 PM 04-01-09 T. WHITNEY 4329 Issue Oate: Drawn By~ Job No.; RESTAURANT AND CLUB Sheet COV,ER SH~ET f -1 l' f 61(;o:o~ (~ FOR PERMIT REVIE'W' THIS DOCUME~T, lDEAS. AND DESIGNS CONTAINED HEREIN, ARE INSTRUMENTS OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AND ARE PROPERTY OF OREGON ARCHITECTURE, INC. - DOCUMENTS NOT TO BE USED IN WHOLE OR IN PART. FOR ANOTHER PROJECT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZAT!ON OF OREGON ARCHITECTURE INC. - COPYRIGHT 2009 ~~C~T o/va r:J". ~. 5 ~y> ~ t5 0 ~ ~ j:.W ~ 0 ~ 0\,0 r-.. U~p.-~P9 ~ ~ r:x::""" 0 ~ p.c 0 ~ ~ ~p ~ < ~ ~J ~ ~ Sf ~d~ <;'\- '?>- ~ ~ ti.. g Q .,.. o. $E ~~, -, ~~ "-J,..." 8~ (/.~'~ ~~ ~ .'.~ @ :z ~ ... :z O. ~ss 0)- ~ei ~~ ~~ ~ (fl ~~ r:a i~ ::l; g ~; < 5i ~ ~ :~ 0-" $~ ~~ i!:~ I~ i! E ~ ~ 3 i; ~ ~ is ~ ~ ~ III ~ i gil5 ~ ~~ ~ ~ w~ ~ l;{ ~~ ~ ~ 8~ (J ~ g~ ; [;1 ~vI !Ii t::5 ~ d 8 ~~ IE ~ ~ g ~: I ~ ~ *~ ~ ~ t>. --,2 ~ <:r: ~ ~8 ~ ~ ~.:ie:: 0 W ~ W Illw <t Cl ~ci ~ ~I ~ Vi ~~~~ 8 :~ : ~;Ii ~ &~ ~ 15~i.i>Cl <:;> z1i1 8 ~"":~~ g 5;"- ~ ffi~~?S ffi li:~ ~ ~~~~ i g~ i ~~~~ fil !ij! ~ ~~:~ g ~~ : ~~~: ~ !~ ~ I~:: ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~C:i [;;: l:'l ?n ~ o M S e> z - 10 ~ ~~ w~ :: ~ (9<J; z~ w~ en Ol> ::cg> a:Q: 01 ~i o~ :=;1 (I)~ ~~ >noo ~~ ~ ~ ~ o (:) <) ~ ..::>t:: -a i i' ~ ~~ ~ ;;; ~; ~~ ~e ~::i Q.:L: i~ Ul~ ~8 ~ i u{: a c E- ;:: d) () '" ;.s < W~ 0:: ::l 5t ljW ~t: OI u 0:: <( 1-.... Wo WI!) tr:['. ~(J) I Z !-O ZCl WW I-It ~ O. w 0 $~ li. .... 0 Nw N:;E ~ U 1j ~~ ~ >-;Z; lil <0 (.< ..j ~ :3 u g ~~ f5 ;;E-< ~~ [-<8 .~\ :~: 38VdS 1NVN31 8Nl1SIX3 NY:lO ACl1N3 NIVVIl 01 NOll \r'::.1I:1100Vll/NOI1YAON3Cl OZSL6 uo6aJO puelLls\t - 90E XOS 'O'd -:>11 J:aaaJ:as u!ew :ase3 89-09 :JaUMO! pJOIPuel 000'19 pue 000'09 :~olxel v8860:H 6E :dew OlSL6 uOfiaJO 'PUEILlS\j - ~aaJlS U!EW ~se3 19 qnlJ pue :iueJne:iSall - :lI~OW .rtltllli..S NIVW .LSVtl s w :> w 0:::: ~~ Qffi 000... :> ~~ M N ~ro~'. .J. -* 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0:: us 0 ::2: en >- 0') 0... 9 ~ ~ ~ 9 I- v m v I o C) S ~ t-= o o ~ (V') ~ -.;;t z ::i n.. ~ ---1 ~ ill ~ Q3Q .0 J!:. CI) o (J) N . ~ -< Q ~ E == E-c """" ~ = ~ = o ~ en G) " ftS .. c.:I ~ Ci ~ G) " -- UI " m 9 en .~ 'II ~ II: "t""" l3:3:}{lS NIVW .LSV3 Z <( 0::--.1 00... u.Z NQ 0.i1- ~~ w~ wW 000 Q en m " ca .. " ~ - ftS ~ CD " .- en aI c 9 .- .... ~ en .- >< ~ 1&1 "t""" .Oot>,y .u v~ ..:~;...:EXISTING : .,/~.:: P A,! E R S ~',' .,.~'TO~'-:" '" , _ . REMOVE AND :~ji~~~~~-~~; !~~~~~~:~~T~~~ EXISTING _ ~?f: . '1,<',', ' __~_,_~,__:I- ?~~,-_.~_._~~~~_.-;{~ 1 I A3,1 l CR EA TE NEW TH RES HOLD! WALL LI ~ >.r,' .' , .:, ,,'. ,..( ': : :-' ''''. ',"", ' . '. ,.. "', " "". ,--C.-- ';,,".1 '. \ (- r ro, 1 :-\ ..:. ~ ~'I f> '-." ..'.><~.. tSAW CUT AND REMOVE:~' ~. .': '- ,~=, . REMOVE AND SALVAGE LARGE CENTEf), -i~ ~I~'~-:";!.l-l ;;\: .';.:'\i<,:::EXISTING CONCRETE:';"~:.:,:-:-:;:\ ;':':1. . ~ \ F:- '+'".~ '.- -:- i 11~ 'y ~.: 'OUT TO BACKSIDE OF - -......: '.,'~ '"J Z. DEMOLISH EXISTING SAY WI N DOWS ~-f~~~'~,~:~:,' ~~:~":~_'~~~':~~'<';~'EXISTI NG CU RB TO RE'~'J\ft;J\ ..:',~<~~ '. (j) AND WALL FROM GEl LI NG DOWN TO ~ l-.::~ X.,.~ - "; '{:-',; -y- :'~:~.' DOWN TO SUBSTRATE .:'_....~ ,;' .:'~' '-:'i - g CON CRETE BR I C K LEDG E BELOW ( G:..: :~~. -~;. \ -<.,C,. ~-- ~,~ ~.- .:.:: .> ; ~..~'~,- ,:';, .:. :~\< ":F~ --";, -"~ -,<,-' ,~,;. ': ~ - ';.: ~ -'.~ .:~ :.:', :"~" ''<J. ~ 1 J ~sE~~~~~~~h~~~g ~I~~~W) ~ J~_:"~': Y:' ~:,~~),::~~":~:.kCtRL~16~~~~~Af6..:__,~~:,;.'~'<:'::~'<:~',~::~~'~:. . ~ \ ~ ~ . m~(:sLJ.,"'..:j'\~,::\i\':[~i;~JJ~i~~Ti~~~i~:~'~;{."!}I : f\~:) J ~";:~~.,~:'~~,~>,->:SJDEWALK CLOSED SIG~~~~~~. .<~ 1 '.' -, '~AT EACH END OF BLOCK _ '-.' '. -., \ NOTES: CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY STRUCTURE ABOVE EXISTING CLOSED CEILlNG AND SHALL CONSULT W!TH ARCHJTECT SHOULD ADDITIONAL SHORING/BRACING BE REQUIRED PROVJDE TEMPORARY PLYWOOD CLOSURE WALL TO PREVENT UNWANTED ENTRY UNTIL NEW CONSTRUCT'ON IS SECURED! INSTAllED. ACCESS DOOR OPTIONAL IF NO OTHER SUITABLE ENTRY IS AVAilABLE. . . , PUBLIC SIDEWALK . o Demolition Plan 1/4" = 1 '_0" ^\.~~tD Al?C<$r ,S /."A :;] MARK MCKECHNIE ~ ~~~~~ ~ MEDFORD. OREGON ??; ~ 4666 GO /'l} OF O~~ ~~ ~.~ _.".". ~ -.. ~ .'. .EXlSTING .....,..',>~ '::<. "'~:~'_'~~~ V.EeS .'>. "R E MAl N..<','~i " .'. ... / 1 8 EXISTING NEW EXPANSION BOARD '7~ ~~< .' . 4V ~RE~i JOINT TO MATCH J'(':(;~~<?'f.~~:~~~,:. 'l.K~~~~;T~ NTgt :;:'. :,:, .:::.../:~::, :':'::. ,'.:' 'ih", )ll~~ ~!~~~Si~~:~~~~~~~;\ . .. .... '~]'~;/;~,T~ ;:?: ~ ,~R,<,-,\"'r.:;i':?,:~:~~ ;(,/> ?):::/: ~d~~ ~~~,J ~{~tH~~6H B~6~ A~C~ TO _ \ _ ~, ... ~ - , t:(:.:j"_I.;~~',-? ?':':;~f'??,,,,,, . :':::'~.~.':f'{:.;\\.i:: '-- C~ = \ A3.2 / NEW 361 WOOD)ENTRY DOOR ..~~...~m~ ~ AND SID ~l11:S - JNFI LL RESULTING VOl DIN SOFFIT -----------.---. ABOVE WITH 2x4 FRAMING! BLO ~G --,. ~~ ~~~~~~Jj!UiX~2TT~G MSA6~F~T (Cb~~~' . '.. ..... ''''...........:~: . ii.~~:::.;~<,~,:.!:.~:':,:;:t ~:'; r;:/::,:,:,>': <:\~,:'~~'\/::.:'.'~ ~ ..~ ~ UJ . lUx~. - . - ?k, - ) - - - '-. I,.. ... . '. ,-' (f) U') x w I 'jf,;;~~I~~5:~:=~:;~::1 221 YVEST TENTH STREET MEDFORD. OREGON 97501 PHONE: 54 1 < 772.4372 FAX; 541 .499.6329 ;II':~;: :.;.;.:~::: ".~~,~,,,;;~ THOMAS L. AVALON ~;~~ .~i: ;:-;-/:CONSTRUCTION, LLC~ ~~ j'01 2oo~~;g?i~1;~~~i~1 . .. . tla\';.1:1onconstruction@chnrter.net w (.) <:( CL (f) l- :z. <r:. z w l- <.9 :z j::: U) x UJ :z <:( lL o >- a::: l- z UJ z :;,;: ~ o I- Z o i= <( <.) [i: B o :2 Z o ~ ~ o :z w a:: NEW CONCRETE SIDEWALK - -SCORE TO MATCH/ ALIGN WITH EXISITINGI SURROUNDING SIDEWALK SEE CITY OF ASHLAND ENGINEERING DETAILS AND GRADES (SHEET A1 1) REPLACEI RE-LEVEL EXISITNG CONCRETE WATER METER BOX AS REQUIRED NEW EXPANSION BOARD JOINT TO MATCH , FLUSH TO . EXISTING .CI ::::I - U -a c res ..... c ta a.. :::J fa ...., U} ~ C) C) C) N c::> L...n ... r--... .......-! ~\..D c:"'O o c: cnro ~C> 08 "'0 -g\.O ro .... - ..J....1 -C. 0 U') - c::t:X ,~ ..+,...J GJ-.q- ruc:o .bee (f) 0"\ cO .- W ~T-i ~ 0"'\ Vl (Y") ro UJ 0.. NfO \.O:E: . U ....I ..... ~ CIJ~ G)LrJ I..~ ..... c ~o C1 C ~ -- 0 ta"'C :E:~ ...,..c: f.I)~ fa L&.I?g ~ 00 (V") ~ \D ~ 12 I co ~ Q 0 ffi \D c..: .....J Revised Plan REVISIONS 4--23..09 PERMIT REVIEW o Plot Date~ 114ft = 1 '....0" Jssue Date~ o rawn By~ Job No.: u.. .... I- o :e: 4/23/2009 5:09:57 PM 04~O 1-09 T.WH~TNEY 4329 Sheet ENLARGED PLAN VI EWS FOR PERMIT REVIEW A2 2 . THIS DOCUMENT, IDEAS, AND DESIGNS CONTAINED HEREIN, ARE lNSTRUMENTS OF PROFESSIONAL SERVlCES AND ARE PROPERTY OF OREGON ARCHITECTURE, INC. - DOCUMENTS NOT TO BE USED IN WHOLE OR IN PART. FOR ANOTHER PROJECT VVlTHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF OREGON ARCHlTECTURE INC. - COPYRlGHT 2009 ,,~~C~T o !va & ~ ~ ~~ ~ t5 0 ~ "4 j;.W ~ 0 ~ 0'..0 f". U ~ -~ hI9 P=1 ;:: ~~ 0 p...J. ~ 0 ~ ~ ~o ~ -< ~ ""'~ ~ ~ S'/ :)g~ S"- "?> J-,.... Wo WID tl::f' fum I Z ]-0 zG WW f-a: ]-0 U) - w 0 $~ Ii. .....0 NIIJ N~ ~u ~~ >z ..-to .j&:: u ~;:> <;::t:; :;;E- om :rZ E-O U .:~:.':/:/:::};>.'".:': ".:.'. ,': "'~."'-'. . ,:" ': .:rc.,ilic' ~<r:E-i ~O~ .1 I -: r -"" -"" -"".: -"" -"" .: -"" -"" -"".:~ 1 I I I I : ~_nn_~~_n_J h ~ - _nn ~~,~ - n J: 5; j 8j :;; ~<C >U)$:tJ WSo::::z n::::ow. i=OI-W zzZO::: ~~~ffi (I)Will=> ~~~~ ~o::in::: wz<co O<((I)LL I j j j~ I I I I I 0:: I :8~i -1- LL(v) en _ I T""" T""" ."\ (9 z i= (f) ><0:: Wo IO (1)0 =:i>- 00::: :2:1- wz Ow :JaUMOI pJOIPuel S ill :> W 0::: CJ)t: Z2 00::: -ill UJo.... :> Wm 0:::0 M N ~ OZ5L6 uofiaJO puell1S\f - 90E xos .0. d -:>1' J:JaaJ:JS U!I?,^, :tS1?3 89-09 000'19 pue 000'09 :~olxe.l t8860 31 6E :dew OZ5L6 uofiaJO 'puel4SV - laaJlS u!ew lse3 19 qnlJ pue :JueJne:tSall - ::II~OH ...... Z 0 - .... - ... 0 :is w CI ...... c 0 .. ca > Q) - W - 9 ca .- ~ .. II a- m ~ a. T""" ~ w ~----- ~ ill z: m~ ~~I= ~~ NO') Zi= W I SO) -=:::: - <( X ..::: ex) S ill '\ ~5 --.J ~ ~ o n:: ro S ill Z (J) N M v ~ (f) · 0::: z.,..., Q~~ 0:: <( ~ w> o I--w ~ ~~ uj o (F) ~ ~ =: ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ <8 ~ CI w II) 5: UI II: ...... c o .- .... ra > Q) - W Cis> :e~ as ~ a. T""" <8 \ .fyf~ ?y/\,r/\~ ' f2 . \ ~rl-------'--' ~I \ \ I 1 @ I! \ (- ~i~i I ~ i~ c i ~ ~~ ( z~ . I ~~ \ I ~frl ~ Oc =\ I~rl rc--- ------- -- 'I II ~~ ~ ~ U...j L~~~~_=_::"'~"'::=-,===_'=----""J i @ J II i ) ~ ~~'__../,J~~~~,/~ ,..... 0>> C .- .... en .- >C W ....- C 0 .- .... ca > CD - III .c .... J. 0 Z - - as ~I J. CD > w 0 ~I<o 0:::1 ~l o...~ ~ 3:J\fdS lNV'N318NllSIX3 NV' ~o ACl1N3 NIV'VIl 01 NOll\f:)I~IOOVII/NOIl\f^ON3Cl 1-- ~ ~ () o o en ~ .......~ J ~ ~ . .. .. .... ..1 REMOVE EXISTJNG AWNfNG FABRfC FRAME TO BE REUSEDI RECOVERED -COORDINATE W!TH AWNING CONTRACTOR FOR REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF FRAME. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY STRUCTURE ABOVE EXJSTJNG CLOSED CEILING AND SHALL CONSULT WITH ARCHJTECT SHOULD ADDJT~ONAL SHORfNG/BRACJNG BE REQUIRED -REMOVE AND SALVAGE BRICK -DEMOLtSH WALL FRAMJNG -SAWCUT AND REMOVE CONCRETE SJDEWALK AND PORTION OF FLOOR SLAB FINISHED FLOOR -~~~~l REFERENCE O.QDtI EXISTING ulOEWALK GRADE ----\ AT BUJLOING LJNE \ REVISED SIDEWALK _--m~t \ GRADE AT BUILDING \ ~ AT 8% SLOPE \\\ \\ EXISTJNGI REMAJNING E~~~6~~ GRADE AT \ \ !e .. tv '( :::~; t F' L (-_) C\ F< '\ [f-" ~i Ii ~ ') \:'-' .." j : ___~~J~"~.~~_~_J~ j I~~~,L~~_...J :rf! <I)':ol > T II ~~/",-_~~_?7:~-=---~.L~-==---~"--~_.~_~_~_~-= r;\ Sidewalk Section ,& \.J 1/4" = 1'-0" -,...-..-.-~--......_---.-,-~_-..........-.......-_~- -~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-1J o Section · Demolition 1/2H = 1'-on .s~~~:'~~X<~~W~~\'X~f~~;:~;,~ , ~ ....1-- j/.! I::; J ~ :.~ ~ ~ :: ~ :.~ ~ ~ ~: ~ .~.-".-l i NEW AWNING FABRIC ON EXISTING METAL FRAME --,w~ PATCH SOFFIT AS REQUIRED - MATCH EXiSTING/ SURROUNDING STUCCO FINISH WO-OD ___~--~----_.-~~--- N EW A~T ASSEM BL Y r- NEW ALUMJNUM ACCESSIBLE 1/21lH THRESHOLD INSET BRICK PAVER TO MATCH EXISr'NG (SEE PLAN) PROVIDE EXPANSJON JOINT BETWEEN BUILDING LJNE AND PUBLJC SIDEWALK NEW CONCRETE SIDEWALK INFJLL ,-.- ELEV -0.25" 1/2 n = 1'-0 H Section · Revised r- f ". [ FLUSH TO EXjSTfNG CURB LINE ~~tD A/(c s~ ~/ " ?> U MARK MCKECHNIE ~ ~ n 7J;I~~~~ ~ MEDFORD. OREGON ~ ~ 4666 GO f-E' OF o~~ C)R:E:GON ARCH ITECTURS: 2. 2. 1 "'\/VES-r TENTH SrR E ET MEDFORD. OREGON 97501 PHONe:: 54 1 .772.4372 FAX: 54 1 .499+6329 ;_::~- ue::~~ ~. .;(,;.~ THOMAS L. A V ALON ~.;;:~.. .'~.: ~ ~;:.: .~~\'-'_'.: CONSTRUCTION, LLC. j :&,;G1 200;::;;'i'gl,~r~~;~~ ./ . . .~ PH; 541.292.2580 . -.. -. ,. ...~H_ Un vnionconstn,u::don@chartct'.net w u <( a... (J) l- Z <( .Q ::z . w :::s 0 U I- <.9 - 00 ..... Z U ('J 0 F Lr') ... .... U) r--.. "....,-t X -C ~~ ...:r w c C'=' z: o c: G.J~ c:t: tc:I ClfU u- Q.)LJ') 0 ...., ~O ...~ >- 08 0:: c ...., c ....... "l:::J.... CJ.... (J) z: n:J 0 w c~ 01 z: a- rc ... C Q) :;x: ::s - +J 1- ...c 0 .- 0 :2 fa V) - ftS 0 <( >< -0 t- ...., l~ :E: c z 1ft ro 0 ~ ...... ...c ~ Q)v ..... (l)cc V') <( (.ft <:I: 0 bee IT: c.n 0'"\ fa 0 I c:Ct LLI \.0 0 LL. .- UJ 0 ~ ~-r--i ID CO ('V') z ..... c: >< 0 I- ...... 0"'1 3= \0 0 j:: U') ('V') Q CO CI: 0 ro "E I > u.J c.. 0 0 q 0 :E ('Jro :0 z \0 w ~:E: c: 0- m 0:::: ---3 REVISIONS 4- 23-09 PERMIT REVIEW Plot Date: 4/23/2009 5: 10:02 PM Issu e Date: 04-01-09 Drawn By: T.WHITNEY Job No,: 4329 Sheet BUILDING SECTIONS A3.2 THIS DOCUMENT, !DEAS, AND DESIGNS CONTAINED HERE !N, ARE I NSTRUM ENTS OF PROFESSlONAL SERVICES AND ARE PROPERTY OF OREGON ARCHITECTURE, iNC, - DOCUMENTS NOT TO BE USED ~N WHOLE OR l N PART, FOR ANOTHER PROJECT WlTHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF OREGON ARCHITECTURE INC. _ COPYRIGHT 2009 ; ~ . . . :.". FOR PERMIT REVIEW