Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutEast Main_255 (PA-2009-00785) August 14, 2009 CITY Of ASHLAND Ashland Elks #944 P.O. Box 569 Ashland, OR 97520 Notice of Final Decision On August 14, 2009, the Staff Advisor for the Ashland Planning Division administratively approved your request for the following: PLANNING ACTION: 2009~00785 SUBJECT PROPERTIES: 255 E Main Street APPLICANT: Ashland Elks #944 DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Review approval to add a 17 x 35 foot deck and screening of existing mechanical equipment on the rear of the existing Elks Lodge building located at 255 E Main Street. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Downtown; ZONING: C~I~D; ASSESSOR'S MAP #: 39 1 E 09 BD; TAX LOT: 4400 The Staff Advisor's decision becomes final and is effective on the 13th day after the Notice of Final Decision is mailed. Prior to that date, anyone who was mailed this Notice Of Final Decision may request a reconsideration of the action by the Staff Advisor as set forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO) 18.1 08.070(BX2Xb) and/or file an appeal to the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in the ALUO 18,108.070(BX2Xc). An appeal may not be made directly to the Land Use Board of Appeals. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that issue. Failure to specity which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court. The application, all associated documents and evidence submitted, and the applicable criteria are available for review at no cost at the Ashland Community Development Department, located at 51 Winburn Way. Copies of file documents can be requested and are charged based on the City of Ashland copy fee schedule. [fyou have any questions regarding this decision, please contact the Department of Community Development between the hours of 8:00 am and 4:30 pm, Monday through Friday at (541) 488-5305. cc: Property Owners Within 200 feet of Subject Property Urban Development Services Jac Nickels DEPT. Of COIiIMUHITY DEVELOPMENT 20 E. Main Stroot Ashland. Oregon 97520 WlWt.ashland.or.us Tel: 541488-5305 Fax: 541-552.2050 ITY: 800-735-2900 ~A' ASHLAND PLANNING DIVISION FINDINGS & ORDERS PLANNING ACTION: 2009-00785 SUBJECT PROPERTIES: 255 E Main Street APPLICANT: Ashland Elks #944 DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Review approval to add a 17 x 35 foot deck and screening of existing mechanical equipment on the rear of the existing Elks Lodge building located at 255 E Main Street. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Downtown; ZONING: C-I-D; ASSESSOR'S MAP #: 39 1 E 09 BD; TAX LOT: 4400 SUBMITTAL DATE: DEEMED COMPLETE DATE: ST AFF APPROVAL DATE: FINAL DECISION DATE: APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE: June 17,2009 July 23, 2009 August 14, 2009 August 27, 2009 August 27,2010 DECISION The site is located at 255 E Main Street on the northeast side of the street. The lot is approximately 11,760 square feet and is divided by the Will Dodge Way alley. The portion between the alley and the street is largely covered by the existing building. The property is relatively flat with an approximately 6 percent slope downhill to the northeast. There are no trees on the lot. The property has a zoning designation of Retail Commercial- Downtown Overlay (C-I-D) and is located in the Downtown Historic District. Surrounding properties are also zoned C-I-D. The building contains the Ashland Elks Lodge. The application is for a second-story deck on the alley side of the building, The deck is approximately 600 square feet and is to be used as a small outdoor seating area. On the other side of the alley is the parking lot for the Lodge. Additionally, the applicant is proposing to screen some existing mechanical equipment on the back of the building with perforated metal panels to improve the appearance of the building. The Historic Commission has recommended that the project be approved as proposed. Tbe criteria for Site Review Approval are described in AMC Chapter 18.72.070, as follows: A, All applicable City ordinances have been met or will be met by the proposed development, B. All requirements of the Site Review Chapter have been met or will be met. C. The development complies with the Site Design Standards adopted by the City Councilfor implementation of this Chapter. D. That adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, paved access to and through the development, electricity, urban storm drainage, and adequate transportation can and will be provided to and through the subject property. The application with the attached conditions complies with all applicable City ordinances. PA # 2009-00785 255 E Main St./AB Page I Planning Action 2009-00785 is approved with the following conditions. Further, if anyone or more of the following conditions are found to be invalid for any reason whatsoever, then Planning Action 2009- 00785 is denied. The following are the conditions and they are attached to the approval: 1) That all proposals of the applicant shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise modified here. 2) That the plans submitted for the building permit shall be in substantial conformance with those approved as part of this application. If the plans submitted for the building permit are not in substantial conformance with those approved as part of this application, an application to modify the Site Review approval shall be submitted and approved prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) That all exterior lighting shall be directed on the property and shall not directly illuminate adjacent proprieties. 4) Exterior building colors shall be muted colors, and sample exterior building colors shall be provided with the building permit submittals for review and approval of the Staff Advisor. Bright or neon paint colors shall not be used in accordance with II-C-2f) I) of the Detail Site Review Standards. Bi Moln ,Director Department of Community Development 8. I'), 4JO r Date PA # 2009-00785 255 E Main St./AB Pajl;e2 PL-2009-00785 391 E09BD 4400 PL-2009-00785 391 E09BA 10300 PL-2009-00785 391E09BD 90007 ASHLAND LODGE #944/B PO E BROWN ERIK/NORTH JAMIE BURNS E SHEILA TRUSTEE ET AL POBOX 569 15 N FIRST ST 275 GRANDVIEW DR ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 PL-2009-00785 391 E09BA 9800 PL-2009-0D785 391 ED9BD 4500 PL-2009-00785 391 E09BD 90001 CORNITIUS LLC CRATER NATL BANK OF MEDFORD DRESCHER ALLEN G 1355 CORA LN PO BOX 4900 POBOX 760 AUBURN CA 95603 SCOnSDALE AZ 85261 ASHLAND OR 97520 PL-2009-00785 391 E09BA 10500 PL-2009-00785 391 E09EA 10301 PL-2009-00785 391 E09ED 4300 GARLAND GERALD G TRUSTEE KENNEDY KATHERINE M TRUSTEE ET LANDEM INVESTMENTS INC 921 MOUNTAIN MEADOWS CIR AL 2415 THURMAN ST ASHLAND OR 97520 132 GREENWAY CIR PORTLAND OR 97210 MEDFORD OR 97504 PL-2009-00785 391 E09ED 4200 PL-2009-00785 391 E09BD 4600 PL-2009-00785 391 E09BD 4000 MAIN & 2ND STREET LLC NEUMAN PROPERTIES & DEV LLC PROVOST PROPERTIES LLC 295 E MAIN ST 1 953 EMIGRANT CREEK RD 4224 HWY 66 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 PL-2009-00785 391 E09BD 4700 PL-2009-00785 391 E09BD 4900 PL-2009-00785 391 E09ED 3800 SAVAGE K LYNN/ORELL GAIL E TEITELBAUM ALBERT TRSTE FBO TRINITY PARISH/ASHLAND 2773 BUSH ST 237 ALMOND ST 44 N SECOND ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94115 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 PL-2009-00785 391 E09BA 9900 PL-2009-00785 391 E09BA 10400 PL-2009-00785 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERV YAMAOKA RONALD/CARRIE Jac Nickels 8055 E TUFTS AVE 400 2422 33RD AVE 1105 Siskiyou Bd DENVER CO 80237 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94116 Ashland, OR 97520 PL -2009-00785 18 Mark Knox, Urban Development Services 255 E Main St 485 W Nevada St 7/23/2009 Ashland, OR 97520 HISTORIC COMMISSION Meeting of August 5, 2009 PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW PLANNING ACTION: 2009-00785 SUBJECT PROPERTIES: 255 E Main Street APPLICANT: Ashland Elks #944 DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Review approval to add a 17 x 35 foot deck and screening of existing mechanical equipment on the rear of the existing Elks Lodge building located at 255 E Main Street. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Downtown; ZONING: C-I-D; ASSESSOR'S MAP #: 39 1 E 09 BD; TAX LOT: 4400 Recommendation to Planning Commission: Recommend approval of the proposed plans as presented. Department of Community Development 20 East Main St. Ashland, Oregon 97520 www.ashland.or.us Tel: 541-488-5305 Fax: 541-552-2050 TTY: 800-735-2900 ~'''~ ;"i'9f".. Q) (;5 N o o to Q) -.. (o.l N o o to iil < roO :ii: 0> ~ o o CD Q) {;5 N o o CO Q:l -- v:> N o o <D Q:l W N o o <D Q:l (;) N o o <D Q:l W N o o <D r~' Planning Department, 51 WinL . Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 541-488-5305 Fax: 541-552-2050 www.ashland.or.us TIY: 1-800-735-2900 CITY OF ASHLAND NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING ACTION: 2009-00785 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 255 E Main OWNER/APPLICANT: Ashland Elks #944 DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Review approval to add a 17 x 35 foot deck and screening of existing mechanical equipment on the rear of the existing Elks Lodge building located at 255 E Main Street, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Downtown; ZONING: C-1-D; ASSESSOR1S MAP #: 391E 09 SD; TAX LOT: 4400, NOTE: The Ashland Historic Commission will also review this Planning Action on August 5, 2009 at 7:00 PM in the Community Development and Engineering Services building (Siskiyou Room), located at 51 Winburn Way. NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: July 23,2009 DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: August 6, 2009 (tow Feel: Fn:>~rJoq l~.,(!"" <I'-",e fo-r rt:fi:r~<:c ,:,nly, Y.I-<>I "",,,,Ir;abi., The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted above. Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submit written comments to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m. on the deadline date shown above. Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the pr~perty submitting application which allows for a 14 day comment period. After the comment period and not mOre than 45 days from the application being deemed complete. the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to the Planning Commission of the Planning Division Staffs decision must be made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC 18.108.040) The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notica. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBAl on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinal1ce criterion the objection is based on alS() precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise conStitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action' for damages in cirCuit court, A copy of the application, all docu ments and evidence relied upOn by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be provided at reasonable cost, if requested. All materials are available at the Ashland Planning Division, Community Oevetopment& Engineering Services Building, 51 Winburn Way. Ashland, Or$gon 97520. If you have questions or comments concerni ng this req uest, please feel free to contact the Ashland Planning Division at 541-488-5305. u:\.comm-acv'.p annlng'~Notl-ces. Mal \ "=.000 SITE DESIGN AND USE STANDARDS 18.72,070 Criteria for Approval The following criteria shall be used to approve or deny an application: A. All applicable City ordinances have been met or will be met by the proposed development. B. All requirements of the Site Review Chapter have been met or will be met. C. The development complies with the Site Design Standards adopted by the City Council for implementation of this Chapter. D, That adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, paved access to and through the development, electricity, urban storm drainage, and adequate transportation can and will be provided to and through the subject property, All improvements in the street right-of-way shall comply with the Street Standards in Chapter 18.88, Performance Standards Options. (ORD 2655, 1991; ORD 2836, 199 G:\comm-dOI"'pianning'.Noticcs Mailcd,2009'2009.00785 .doc PL-2009-00785 391 E09BD 4400 ASHLAND LODGE #944/B PO E POBOX 569 ASHLAND OR 97520 PL-2009-00785 391 E09BA 9800 CORNITIUS LLC 1355 CORA LN AUBURN CA 95603 PL-2009-00785 391 E09BA 10500 GARLAND GERALD G TRUSTEE 921 MOUNTAIN MEADOWS CIR ASHLAND OR 97520 PL-2009-00785 391 E09BD 4200 MAIN & 2ND STREET LLC 295 E MAIN ST 1 ASHLAND OR 97520 PL-2009-00785 391 E09BD 4700 SAVAGE K L YNN/ORELL GAIL E 2773 BUSH ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94115 PL-2009-00785 391 E09BA 9900 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERV 8055 E TUFTS AVE 400 DENVER CO 80237 PL-2009-00785 Mark Knox, Urban Development Services 485 W Nevada St Ashland, OR 97520 PL-2009-00785 391 E09BA 10300 BROWN ERIK/NORTH JAMIE 15 N FIRST ST ASHLAND OR 97520 PL-2009-00785 391 E09BD 4500 CRATER NATL BANK OF MEDFORD PO BOX 4900 SCOTTSDALE AZ 85261 PL-2009-00785 391 E09BA 10301 KENNEDY KATHERINE M TRUSTEE ET AL 132 GREENWAY CIR MEDFORD OR 97504 PL-2009-00785 391 E09BD 4600 NEUMAN PROPERTIES & DEV LLC 953 EMIGRANT CREEK RD ASHLAND OR 97520 PL-2009-00785 391 E09BD 4900 TEITELBAUM ALBERT TRSTE FBO 237 ALMOND ST ASHLAND OR 97520 PL-2009-00785 391 E09BA 10400 YAMAOKA RONALD/CARRIE 2422 33RD AVE SAN FRANCISCO CA 94116 PL-2009-00785 391 E09BD 90007 BURNS E SHEILA TRUSTEE ET AL 275 GRANDVIEW DR ASHLAND OR 97520 PL -2009-00785 391 E09BD 90001 DRESCHER ALLEN G POBOX 760 ASHLAND OR 97520 PL-2009-00785 391 E09BD 4300 LANDEM INVESTMENTS INC 2415 THURMAN ST PORTLAND OR 97210 PL-2009-00785 391 E09BD 4000 PROVOST PROPERTIES LLC 4224 HWY 66 ASHLAND OR 97520 PL-2009-00785 391 E09BD 3800 TRINITY PARISH/ASHLAND 44 N SECOND ST ASHLAND OR 97520 PL -2009-00785 Jac Nickels 1105 Siskiyou Bd Ashland, OR 97520 18 255 E Main St 7/23/2009 }Jeb ~-iil-01 "12500' ~,1~// I 12100:': .fi '.. ..::t . . . 'f2~.1;700,' & S4OO. . 5500, ,'5300 ' ' . ,,'5200 i ,/ 400() i " /5100;: /SOO(J i .. 4300 .2jOO 12900 ..12000,"'~2100/ : . '-. ,~220() , ,. 11900 '. , 12300/ . /12400 ...... .11800 .<' '-'~ 11500 /.11101 i 11601 5600 10100 5100 i 5:900 .i MOO '.... ............ .., .. .. ....'... . <. ,.-,' ,'60.00. ' . ~ .. , -'.. .., "94100 ,'6100," , /6200." 63(iO . 11400, "',11200 11:KK),~11.~~ 9500 o ,~ ',i (] & 9300 9600 ,11201 .11100 .1'1000 10800 . " ' . ". , . "</10900 7~~~ ,. .. 9100 ' 8600 10600 8900 c '.'2100 5200 ". ,~.. , 2$00 ;2SOO . ilQO o ct' "i< :: 5800"" /.' . S300 5900 ,: MOO Ir '/.. .~~...., . '. ..~...; """.. .~100 . ~,'-' -' ;' i 7??oo / S600 16500 16400 16300 .: .5900 . i.. 5800'/6000-.. 6500 ao:1 6201 , 16100 . T, '. ',"1 9400 - i".". i.....,,,,, .....i. ! 9100 .........v .m 93to ! 9300 i 9200 . . .'..".'-'e8'VClt ??oo i~ n:~ .. ".J.. ti! !0 6100 '..9600- t1'&< 16200 16000 ,.-' \ "1,'15900, <:,~,~:~t1:'~.' r'~""".::".~.::.:1"1"""~ 1 'Blt..,L.,i - · .xrvv LUVV 11~ . . 22(11 ,1".. JACKSON COUNTY INFORMATION TECHNOl.OOY ./ Map Maker Application Front Counter Legend C Highlighted Feature 'Ii;!!:)) theBuffer lheBufferTarget Tax Lot OuUines Tax Lot Numbers ;' .' d JACKSON COUNTY oregoll : 1??oo 10100 10200 @I:'~;;::;' Thls map ~ baSOO on a ~al dat.a.baS9 : 8960 :,,~by:=~':=~~: , ~ rtl$p:lflSbily lor en-ors, om-~f"I$. Of ..w . ".,_..,.~.. ".]i1~ ; I 1 posilJooa1 Bro_nu:)'. 1'here an:- no ~;.:~;;.;-~~;';~~~'~:~-:~""'6;~;~ -1 If " nffilrui-8$, Elxpressed or implied. C<OOI~ ""'h MapMal<.o, Map CfOO""J on 712312009 '~3o-23 AM uslngweb.jacl<oonooUflty.org t7:/;; P~lJasr- nx:)'c!~ ~',~Hl-c\"J!<l-red Qfflc(! Qrado pilp\?I '_~'.J , PROJECT DESCRIPTION FOR ~ 00 .247 E. MAIN STREET "ASHLAND ELKS LODGE #944" FORA SITE REVIEW PERMIT D C SUBMITTED TO CITY OF ASHLAND PLANNING DEPARTMENT ASHLAND, OREGON SUBMITTED BY URBAN DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, LLC. 485 w. NEVADA STREET ASHLAND, OR 97520 JUN 1 ., I. PROJECT INFORMATION: PLANNING ACTION: The applicants are requesting a Site Review Pennit to construct a small deck and mechanical equipment screening in the rear of the building at 247 E. Main Street (adjacent to Will Dodge Way alley). The deck and screening do not add additional floor area as there is no roof structur~roposed, ,~5'- ADDRESS & LEGAL DESCRIPTION: WEast Main Street, 391E09BD TL #4400 OWNER: Ashland Elks Lodge, #944 Chris Garcia, Exalted Ruler 247 East Main Street Ashland, OR 97520 ARCHITECT: Architectural Desibl'J.1 Works. J ac Nikels, Architect 1105 Siskiyou Boulevard Ashland, OR 97520 LAND USE PLANNING: Urban Development Services Mark Knox, AICP 485 W. Nevada Street Ashland, OR 97520 Tel: 482-3334 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Downtown ZONING DESIGNATION: C-1-D LOT AREA: Total Area: .27 acres APPLICABLE ORDINANCES: Site Design & Use Standards, Chapter 18,72 Site Design & Use Standards (Design Standards) Basic Site Review, Section II Detail Site Review, Section II Historic District Design Standards, Section IV Downtown Design Standards, Section VI ADJACENT ZONING/USE: WEST: C-1-D; Commercial Downtown EAST: C-l-D; Commercial Downtown SOUTH: C-l-D; Commercial Downtown NORTH: C-I-D; Commercial Downtown SUBJECT SITE: C-I-D; Commercial Downtown 2 II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Introduction: In response to Senate Bill #571, Oregon's indoor smoking ban, the Elk's Lodge fi:aternal membership is proposing to construct a small deck for outdoor gathering. The deck is proposed to be located at the rear of the building, adjacent to Will Dodge Alley, directly above the building's mechanical equipment located at the second floor level. The proposal also includes screening of the mechanical equipment below the deck with perforated metal panels to improve the elevation's appearance. The space is likely to be used on a limited basis as there is no permanent roof structure, but the applicants are proposing some chairs and tables with umbrella covering for membership convenience. A written narrative and findings of fact as well as a Site Plan, Building Elevations, Floor Plan and pictures are enclosed. This infonnation is provided in the application materials and address the submittal requirements of Chapter 18.72,060. ').S~ Site: The subject property at ~7 East Main Street is known as the Elk's Building with its building frontage facing East Main Street and its rear facing the Elk's parking lot along Lithia Way. The property extends from East Main Street to Will Dodge Way (existing public alley). The Elk's rear parking lot, Tax Lot #3900, is on a separate tax lot and is also partially leased by the City of Ashland for public parking. Typical of historic commercial buildings in the Downtown area, the building's footprint covers 100% of the parcel. Downtown Commercial District: The property is within the C-I-D zoning district (Chapter 18.32, Retail - Commercial, Downtown Overlay District) which is intended to provide a more urban development pattem. The property is also located in the Downtown Design Standards overlay which is intended to guide development in the downtown to be designed in context with its surroundings, and in general, a "Main Street" type of development pattern as exists on East Main Street and within the Plaza Area. The C-I-D zoning allows a variety of commercial uses such as office, retail, eating, drinking, entertairunent, and theaters as well as residential. The proposed addition and its intended use is in concert with the uses listed. Architecture: The proposed architecture is relatively straight-forward as the goal of the design was to provide an affordable deck with mechanical equipment screening that improves the existing rear fayade which is now a cluster of emergency stairs and visible mechanical equipment. The applicant's Architects have provided elevations that significantly improve the rear elevation of the building as the proposed deck is to be even/flush with the building's west side volume and elevated to the same floor height. When combined with the mechanical equipment screening, the proposed changes will significantly improve the rear of the building's view - both from the deck out towards GIizzly Peak and from Lithia Way looking at the deck. Overall, the team members contend the rear deck and screening addition is an improvement and is consistent with other Main Street buildings where the rear of the building fronts onto an alley. 3 JtJ!\J III. FINDINGS OF FACT: The following information has been provided by the applicants to help the Planning Staff, Planning Commission and neighbors better understand the proposed project. In addition, the required findings o.ffact have been provided to ensure the proposed project meets the Site Design & Use Standards as outlined in the Ashland Municipal Code CAMe), Section 18.72.070 and Site Design & Use Standards (Design Standards Booklet, adopted August 4th, 1992). For clarity reasons, the folloVl'ing documentation has been formatted in "outline" form with the City's approval criteria noted in BOLD font and the applicant's response in regular font, Also, there are a number of responses that are repeated in order to ensure that thefindings olfact are complete. CHAPTER 18.72.070. SITE DESIGN & USE STANDARDS: A. All applicable City Ordinances have been met or will be met by the proposed development. To the applicant's knowledge all City regulations are or will be complied with. The applicants are not requesting any exceptions or variances. B. All requirements of the Site Review Chapter have been met or will be met. As noted below, all requirements listed in the Site Review Chapter (18.72) have or will be complied with. C. The development complies with the Site Design Standards adopted by the City Council for implementation of this Chapter. As noted below, all requirements listed in the Site Design Standards (booklet) have or will be complied with, Specifically, the applicants have addressed the periinent requirements of the Basic Site Review Standards, the Detail Site Review Standards, Historic District Design Standards and the Downtown Design Standards. D. That adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, paved access to and through the development, electricity, urban storm drainage, and adequate transportation can and will be provided to and through the subject property. All improvements in the street right-of-way shall comply with the Street Standards in Chapter 18.88, Performance Standards Options. No additional utilities are necessary for the deck and screening, but adequate public facilities are available within the adjacent rights-of-way, All improvements within the alley right-of-way, including construction detouring, will be completed under the direction of the Ashland Engineering Department. ~JLJ~.J.~ /L~ 4 II-C BASIC SITE REVIEW STANDARDS: II-C-la) Orientation and Scale Buildings shall have their primary orientation toward the street rather than the parking area. Building entrances shall be functional~ and shall be shall be accessed from a public sidewalk. Public sidewalks shall be provided adjacent to a public street frontage. Buildings that are within 30 feet of the street shall have an entrance for pedestrians directly from the street to the building interior. This entrance shall be designed to be attractive and functional~ and shall be open to the public during all business hours. These requirements may be waived if the building is not accessed by pedestrians~ such as warehouses and industrial buildings without attached offices, and automotive service uses such as service stations and tire stores. The subject building already exists and complies with the above standards. 111e standards are not applicable to the proposed deck addition. II-C-Ib) Streets cape 1) One street tree chosen from the street tree list shall be placed for each 30 feet of frontage for that portion of the development fronting the street. There are two existing trees along East Main Street. The subject building already exists and complies with the above standards. II-C-lc) Landscaping 1) Landscaping shall be designed so that 50% coverage occurs after one year and 90% coverage occurs after 5 years. 2) Landscaping design shall use a variety of low water deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and flowering plant species. 3) Buildings adjacent to streets shall be buffered by landscaped areas at least 10 feet in width, except in the Ashland Historic District. Outdoor storage areas shall be screened from view form adjacent public rights-of-way, except in M-1 zones. Loading facilities shall be screened and buffered when adjacent to residentially zoned land. 4) Irrigation systems shall be installed to assure landscaping success. 5) Efforts shall be made to save as many existing healthy trees and shrubs on the 5 JUN 1 '7 site as possible. Landscaping is not a requirement within the Downtown Design Standards area and the building's lot line to lot line footprint already exists. This issue was recognized during the adoption of the Design Standards as it often conflicted with other "Main Street" type of goals and was seen more as a distraction rather than a benefit II-C-ld) Parking 1) Parking areas shall be located behind buildings or on one 01' both sides. 2) Parking areas shall be shaded by deciduous trees, buffered from adjacent non- residential uses and screened from non-residential uses. Not applicable. Parking is not required in the C-I-D Zoning District and no parking is being proposed with this application. II-C-Ie) Designated Creek Protection 1) Designated creek protection areas shall be considered design clements and incorporated in the overall design of a given project. 2) Native riparian plant materials shall be planted in the adjacent to the creek to enhance the creek habitat. Not applicable. There is no creek associated with the subject propeliy. II-C-lt) Noise and Glare 1) Special attention to glare (AMC18.72.110) and noise (AMC9.08.170(c) & AMC 9.08.175) shall be considered in the project design to insure compliance with these Standards. The proposed use of the deck will not generate noise beyond what is legally pennitted. The applicant is proposing wall mounted lights directed downward so as not to provide direct light and glare onto adjacent propelties. II-C-lg) Expansions of Existing Sites and Buildings 1) For sites which do not conform to these requirements, an equal percentage of the site must be made to comply with these standards as the percentage of building expansion, e.g., if the building area is to expand by 25%, then 25% of the site must be brought up to the standards required by this document. This standard is not applicable as the site does confonn to the Basic Site Design and Use Standards. 6 II-C-Z. DETAIL SITE REVIEW: Developments that are within the Detail Site Review Zone shall, in addition to complying with the standards for Basic Site Review, conform to the following standards: II-C-2a) Orientation and Scale 1) Developments shall have a minimum Floor Area Ratio of .35 and shall not exceed a maximum Floor Area Ratio of .5 for all areas outside the Historic District. Plazas and pedestrian areas shall count as floor area for the purposes of meeting the minimum floor area ratio. Not applicable as the site is within Downtown Historic District. 2) Building frontages greater than 100 feet in length shall have offsets, jogs, or have other distinctive changes in the building facade. Not applicable as the front facade is not being modified. 3) Any wall which is within 30 feet of the street, plaza or other public open space shall contain at least 20% of the wall area facing the street in display areas, windows, or doorways. Windows must allow views into working areas or lobbies, pedestrian entrances or display areas. Blank walls within 30 feet of the street are prohibited Up to 40% of the length of the building perimeter can be exempted from this standard if oriented toward loading or service areas. Not applicable as there are no walls proposed with this application. 4) Buildings shall incorporate lighting and changes in mass, surface of finish to give emphasis to entrances. Not applicable as the addition is for a small open air deck. 5) Infill of buildings, adjacent to public sidewalks, in existing parking lots is encouraged and desirable. The building already exists and the application is for a small deck located above an existing first floor area. 6) Buildings shall incorporate arcades, roofs, alcoves, porticoes and awning that protect pedestrian from the rain and sun. Not applicable as the addition is for a small open air deck. J\J " .' 7 II-C-2b) Streets cape 1) Hardscape (paving material) shall be utilized to designate "people" areas. Sample materials could be unit masonry, scored and colored concrete, grasscrete, or combination of the above. Not applicable as the addition is for a small open air deck above an existing first floor volume. 2) A building shall be setback not more than 20 feet from a public sidewalk unless the area is used for pedestrian activities such as plazas or outside eating areas. If more than one structure is proposed for a site} at least 25% of the aggregate building frontage shall be within 20 feet of the sidewalk. The building already exists and the application is for a small deck located above an existing first floor area. II-C-2c) Parking & On-site Circulation 1) Protected, raised walkways shall be installed through parking areas of 50 or more spaces or more than 100 feet in average width or depth. 2) Parking lots with 50 spaces or more shall be divided into separate areas and divided by landscaped areas or walkways at least 10 feet in width, or by a building or group of buildings. 3) Developments of one acre or more must provide a pedestrian and bicycle circulation plan for the site. On-site pedestrian walkways must be lighted to a level where the system can be used at night by employees, residents and customers. Pedestrian walkways shall be directly linked to entrances and the internal circulation of the building. Not applicable as the project is not proposing any new parking. II-C-2d Buffering and Screening 1) Landscape buffers and screening shall be located between incompatible uses on an adjacent lot. Those buffers can consist of either plant material or building materials and must be compatible with proposed buildings. Not applicable as the proposed building will be occupied solely by tenants who have uses that are pennitted within the C-l zoning district. _fe."'<-;.. ;'.'''?;''~' '., ~:~.;: ~",.c.-" ;.; ____.I 8 residentially zoned land. Not applicable. There is no parking required in the C-I-D Zoning District and no parking is being proposed with this application. II-C-2e) Lighting Lighting shall include adequate lights that are scaled for pedestrians by including light standards or placements of no greater than 14 feet in height along pedestrian path ways. The applicant will provide wall mounted lights directed downward to avoid light and glare, II-C-2f) Building Materials 1) Buildings shall include changes in relief such as cornices, bases, fenestration, fluted masonry, for at least 15% of the exterior waU area. The building already exists and the application is for a small deck located above an existing first floor area. The materials are to be metal painted to match the building. 2) Bright or neon paint colors used extensively to attract attention to the building or use are prohibited. Buildings may not incorporate glass as a majority of the building skin. The proposed colors for the deck will match the buildings. VI DOWNTO'VN DESIGN STANDARDS: VI-A) Height 1) Building height shall 'vary from adjacent builds, using either "stepped" parapets or slightly dissimilar overall height to maintain the traditional" staggered" streetscape appearance. An exception to this standard would be buildings that have a distinctive vertical division/facade treatment that "visually" separates it from adjacent building. The building already exists and the application is for a small deck located above an existing first floor area. The above standard appears to only apply to new buildings or additions to the front fayade. 2) Multi-story development is encouraged in the do\vntown. The building already exists and the application is for a small deck Ioc~t~<:l~b~:J~:c&f .. existing first floor area. ,1 t.JJ\1 ') {, 9 3) VI-B) Setback 1) Except for arcades, alcoves and other recessed features, buildings shall maintain a zero setback from the sidewalk or property line. Areas having public utility easements or similar restricting conditions shall be exempt from this standard The building already exists and the application is for a small deck located above an existing first floor area. 2) Ground level entries are encouraged to be recessed from the public right-of-way to create a "sense of entry" through design or use of materials. The building already exists and the application is for a small deck located above an existing first floor area. 3) Recessed or projection balconies, verandas or other useable space above the ground level on existing and new buildings shall not be incorporated in a street facing elevation. No balconies or other projections/recessed elements are proposed along the street facing elevation. However, the proposed deck will be located along the rear alley. VI -C) Width 1) The width of a building shall extend from side lot line to side lot line. An exception to this standard would be an area specifically designed as plaza space, courtyard space, dining space or rear access for pedestrian walkways. The building already exists and the application is for a small deck located above an existing first floor area. The building does extend lot line to lot line. 2) Lots greater than 80' in width shall respect the traditional width of buildings in the downtown area by incorporation a rhythmic division of the facade in the building's design. The building already exists and the application is for a small deck located above an existing first floor area located at the rear of the building. Regardless, the illustrations referenced in this standard illustrate a fi:ont facing elevation and not a rear facing elevation. This fact is further substantiated below in Standard VI-J #1. VI-D) Openings 1) Ground level elevations facing a street shall maintain a consistent proportions of transparency (Le., windows) compatible with the pattern found in thejdY)Yllfow:rC :~...~..,. 'I; :" ~--. -' H c, .0. -.. c", JUN 1 '{ 10 area. The building already exists and the application is for a s111al1 deck located above an existing first floor area located at the rear of the building, 2) Scale and proportion of altered or added building elements, such as the size and relationship of new windows, doors, entrances, columns and other building features shall be visually compatible with the original architectural character of the building. The scale and proportion of the new deck and mechanical equipment screening is compatible with the building's rear fayade. The deck and screening are significant improvements. 3) Upper floor window orientation shall primarily be vertical (height greater than width). The building already exists and the application is for a s111all deck located above an existing first floor area located at the rear of the building. No windows are proposed. 4) Except for transom windows, windows shall not break the front plane of the building. The building already exists and the application is for a small deck located above an existing first floor area located at the rear of the building. No windows are proposed. 5) Ground level entry doors shall be primarily transparent. The building already exists and the application is for a small deck located above an existing first floor area located at the rear of the building. The illustrations referenced in this standard illustrate a front facing elevation and not a rear facing elevation. This fact is further substantiated below in Standard VI-] #1. 6) Windows and other, features of interest to pedestrians such as decorative columns or decorative corbeling shall be provided adjacent to the sidewalk. Blank walls adjacent to a public sidewalk is prohibited. The building already exists and the application is for a small deck located above an existing first floor area located at the rear of the building. VI-E) Horizontal Rhythms 1) Prominent horizontal lines at similar levels along the street's street front shall be maintained The building already exists and the application is for a small deck locatedC;:tbgvY""lUJ,'''', ;r-." .'-' -- ".'-., 11 .JUN ] 7 ( existing first floor area located at the rear of the building. However, the elevations illustrate how the proposed deck is designed to maintain the building's horizontal rhythms, 2) A clear visual division shall be maintained between ground level floor and upper floors. The building already exists and the application is for a small deck located above an existing first floor area located at the rear of the building. 3) Buildings shall provide a foundation or base, typically from ground to the bottom of the lower window sills, with changes in volume or material, in order to give the building a "sense of strength". The building already exists and the application is for a small deck located above an existing first floor area located at the rear of the building, VI-F) Vertical Rhythms 1) New construction or storefront remodels shall reflect a vertical orientation, either through actual volumes or the use of surface details to divide large walls, so as to reflect the underlying historic property lines. The building already exists and the application is for a small deck located above an existing first floor area located at the rear of the building. Regardless, the illustrations referenced in this standard illustrate a front facing elevation and not a rear facing elevation. This fact is further substantiated below in Standard VI-J #1. 2) Storefront remodeling or upper-story additions shall reflect the traditional structural system of the volume by matching the spacing and rhythm of historic openings and surface detailing. The proposed deck meets this standard. The new deck and mechanical equipment screening improve on a space that has historically been altered for a variety of utilitarian reasons - none of which considered the building's architecture. Regardless, the illustrations referenced in this standard illustrate a front facing elevation and not a rear facing elevation, This fact is further substantiated below in Standard VI-] #1. VI-G) Roof Forms 1) Sloped or residential style roof forms are discouraged in the do,'mtown area unless visually screened for the right-of-way by either a parapet or a false front. The false front shall incorporate a well defined cornice line or "cap" along all primary elevations. The building already exists and the application is for a small deck located 12 Lij"',,! existing first floor area located at tbe rear of tbe building. No roof is proposed. VI-H) Materials 1) Exterior building materials shall consist of traditional building materials found in the downtown area including block, brick, painted wood, smooth stucco, or natural stone. All materials to be used are consistent witb traditional building matetials including steel metal panels for screening and metal bars for the railings. 2) In order to add visual interest, buildings are encouraged to incorporate complex "paneled" exteriors with colunms, framed bays, transoms and windows to created multiple surface levels. The building already exists and the application is for a small deck located above an existing first floor area located at the rear of the building. VI-I) Awnings, Marquees or Similar Pedestrian Shelters 1) Awnings, marquee or similar pedestrian shelters shall be proportionate to the building and shall not obscure the building's architectural details. If mezzanine or transom windows exist, awning placement shall be placed below the mezzanine or transom windows where feasible. Tbe illustrations referenced in tbis standard illustrate a front facing elevation and not a rear facing elevation. This fact is further substantiated below in Standard VI-J #1. The building already exists and the application is for a small deck located above an existing first floor area located at the rear of the building. 2) Except for marquees - similar pedestrian shelters such as awnings shall be placed between the pilasters. The illustrations referenced in this standard illustrate a front facing elevation and not a rear facing elevation. This fact is further substantiated below in Standard VI-J #1. The building already exists and the application is for a small deck located above an existing first floor area located at the rear of the building. 3) Storefronts with prominent horizontal lines at similar levels along the street's streetfront shall be maintained by their respective sidewalk coverings. The illustrations referenced in this standard illustrate a front facing elevation and not a rear facing elevation. This fact is further substantiated below in Standard VI-J #1. The building already exists and the application is for a small deck located above an existing first floor area located at the rear of the building. JUN i? 13 VI-J) Other 1) Non-street or alley facing elevations are less significant than street facing elevations. Rear and sidewalls of buildings should therefore be fairly simple, i.e., wood, block, brick, stucco, cast stone, masonry clad, with or without windows. The rear or alley facing elevation of the building is relatively simple compared to the East Main Street fayade. However, the proposed deck addition still respects the fact that Will Dodge Way is used as a corridor for not only refuse pick-up and unloading of goods, but also for pedestrians, access to rear apmiments or patronizing nearby businesses. As such, the deck addition should provide for a "sense of security" for customers/employees accessing the adjacent uses. 2) Visual integrity of the original building shall be maintained when altering or adding building elements. This shall include such features as the vertical lines of colunms, piers, the horizontal definition of spandrels and cornices and, and other primary structural and decorative elements. The visual integrity of the rear building fayade will remain. The deck addition will not alter the building's architectural details as there are none. 3) Restoration, rehabilitation or remodeling projects shall incorporate, whenever possible, original design elements that were previously removed, remodeled or covered over. To the applicant's knowledge, no original design elements (architectural elements) were ever on the rear of this building. 4) Parking lots adjacent to the pedestrian path are prohibited (Refer to Design and Use Standards, Section II-D, for Parking Lot Landscaping and Screening Standards). An exception to this standard would be paths required for handicapped accessibility . Not applicable as the building already exists and the application is for a small deck located above an existing first floor area located at the rear of the building. 5) Pedestrian amenities such as broad sidewalks, surface details on sidewalks, arcades, alcoves, colonnades, porticoes, awnings, and sidewalk seating shall be provided where possible and feasible. Not applicable as the building already exists and the application is for a small deck located above an existing first floor area located at the rear of the building. 6) Uses which are exclusively automotive such as service stations~ drive-up windows, auto sales~ and tire stores are discouraged in the downtown. The city shall use its discretionary powers, such as Conditional Use Permits, to deny l!~-w,~"y.s~~, 14 JUN ;"'-,' / r~ although improvements to existing facilities may be permitted. The proposal does not include any uses that are automotive in nature or would require a Conditional Use Penuit. VI-K) Exception to Standards: An exception to the Downtown Design Standard is not subject to the Variance requirements of Section 18.100 of the Ashland Municipal Code and maybe granted with respect to the Downtown Design Standards if all the following circumstances are found: 1) There is demonstnble difficulty in meeting the specific requirements of this Chapter due to a unique or unusual aspect of the site, an existing structure or proposed use of the site; 2) There is demonstrable evidence that the alternative design accomplishes the purpose of the Downtown Design Standards and Downtown Plan in a manner that is equal or superior to a project designed pursuant to this Standard or historical precedent; 3) The exception requested is the minimum necessary to alleviate the difficulty of meeting the Downtown Design Standards. Not applicable. There are no requests for exceptions to the Downtown Design Standards or any other regulating documents. IV-C HISTORIC DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS In addition to the standards found in Section II, the following standards will be used by the Planning and Historic Commissions for new development and renovation of existing structures within the Historic District. NOTE: The following standard) appear to be "residential design standards" and not applicable to this "commerciar project. However, in order to insure compliance and avoid procedural error, the applicants have submitted the following responses to the standards. 1) Construct buildings to a height of existing buildings from the historic period on and across the street. A void construction that greatly varies in height (too high or too low) from older buildings in the vicinity. Not applicable as the building already exists and the application is for a small deck located above an existing first floor area located at the rear of the building. 2) Relate the size and proportions of new structures to the scale of adjllfentr' 15 f-,j r ,~ buildings. A void buildings that in height, width, or massing~ violate the existing scale of the area. Not applicable as the building already exists and the application is for a small deck located above an existing first floor area located at the rear of the building. 3) Break up uninteresting boxlike forms into smaller, varied masses which are common on most building from the historic period. A void single, monolithic forms that are not relieved by variations in massing Not applicable as the building already exists and the application is for a small deck located above an existing first floor area located at the rear of the building. 4) Maintain the historic facade lines of streetscapes by locating front walls of new buildings in the same plane as the facades of adjacent buildings. Avoid violating the existing setback pattern by placing new buildings in front or behind the historic facade line. Not applicable as the building already exists and the application is for a small deck located above an existing first floor area located at the rear of the building. However, the proposed deck is maintaining the same plane as the existing building. 5) Relate the new roof forms of the building to those found in the area. A void introducing roof shapes, pitches, or materials not traditionally used in the area. Not applicable as the building already exists and the application is for a small deck located above an existing first floor area located at the rear of the building. No roofs are proposed. 6) Respect the alternation of the wall areas with door and window elements in the fa~ade. Also consider the width-to-height ratio of bays in the fa~ade. Avoid introducing incompatible fa~ade patterns that upset the rhythm of openings established by the surrounding structures. Even though the addition is at the rear of the building, it is visible from the public right- of-way. That said, the Architects have designed the deck addition and mechanical equipment screening in an attempt to improve the fac;ade's eclectic appearance. 7) The use of a raised platform is a traditional siting characteristics of most of the older buildings in Ashland. Avoid bringing the walls of the building straight out of the ground without a sense of platform. Not applicable as the building already exists and the application is for a small deck located above an existing first floor area located at the rear of the building. 8) Relate the vertical, horizontal or non-directional fa~ade character of new buildings to the predominant directional expression of nearby buildings. Avoid horizontal or vertical fa~adc expressions unless they are compatible w\tnHie'" 16 L} j\! character of structures in the immediate area. Not applicable as the building already exists and the application is for a small deck located above an existing first floor area located at the rear of the building. 9) Articulate the main entrances to the building with covered porches, porticos, and other pronounced architectural forms. Avoid facades with no strong sense of entry. Not applicable as the building already exists and the application is for a small deck located above an existing first floor area located at the rear of the building. 10) Utilize accurate restoration of, or visually compatible additions to, existing buildings. For new construction, traditional architecture that well represents our own time, yet enhances the nature and character of the historic district should be used. Avoid replicating or imitating the styles, motifs, or details of older periods. Such attempts are rarely successful and, even if well done, present a confusing picture of the true character of the historical area. Even though the addition is at the rear of the building, it is visible from the public right- of-way. That said, the Architects have designed the deck addition and mechanical equipment screening in an attempt to improve the fayade's eclectic appearance without impacting the building's or the areas character. 17 ~ ~ ) , 'U?' n6 0;>< ;U - --- - --- --- --- "" '" ~ ~ (' "'\ ~ ~ ~ <:l 1 '4 """<. ~ ;s:: :r> 'l:i G:l t.O I:ij ~ :r> () ~ ~ -... c.. t; S7: ;::; Ju. N " '" ~.. I' _ ., Planning Department 51 Winburn Way, Ashland OR 97520 CITY OF ASHLAND 541-488-5305 Fax 541-488-6006 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT lO-'111Yl DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Street Address 2. c- ~ f;_~ tI\ A \ N S ~E..El Assessor's Map No. 39 1 E D ~u~-b Tax Lol( s) Zoning COM 1'V\E..R.C.iA.L_- Comp Plan Designalion ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION FILE# ~OO 9 -00 7f:r:;- ~dc' 'i'foo APPLICANT NameJ1 S \4LAN 1> [L't..<;~~l{ Phones::! I "'5?~ -~4LO E-Mail e\ l<:..S 9~t.(eC4Sk~~ ........ a a"'~2"''''~ \~~.o~ Address_.. \.....0 'Be X ~(() I _ City 1\s\-\\.A,.,J\) Zip '''' J...... ... PROPERTY OWN~.B Name ~ l..HJ\ N~ f L \~ S :tf1 '1'-1 Address 1> 0 b (5 'X. c;- G:> '1 Phone S-4 (- '=SZCO -S-'12o E-Mail e\ k.s9"-1tf et:\.~""~e\ k:.t.~ .... City.f\SJ1{..A,t-J b _ Zip 1 f <)( c) SURVEYOR. ENGINEER. ARCHITECT, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, OTHER Title Mr. Name J~c.. N i eke I S Address 110 S- S \ OS k...\ 1f\. J ~ \ Vd Title ff} r Name MA.f" \<... ~o 'i- Address 6y 'fi)' t.J, N ~ \NrV .t S'/'o Phone 5'{t. yge. 01/~E-Mail j NGA\)Wa.n:.~.\-~c.t:~ City ~S'n.\a~ Zip ~VS-2.c..:> Phone E-Mail J<flO.f..QW\iV\.~.ne~ City As'" l4.A.d Zip 11 ~?-C,.) I hereby certify that the statements and information contained in this application, including the enclosed drawings and the required findings of facl, are in a/l respects, tlUe and correct. I understand that all property pins must be sllOwn on the drawings and visible upon the site inspection. In the event the pins are not shown or their location found to be incorrecl, the owner assumes full responsibilily. I further understand that if this request is subsequenNy contested, the burden will be on me to establish: 1) thaf I produced sufficient factual evidence at the hearing to support Ihis request; 2) thai the findings of feel furnished justifies the granting of the request; 3) that the findings of feet furnished by me are adequate; end further 4) that all structures or improvements are properly located on the ground. t likely in not only the request being set aside, bui elso possibly in my structures being built in reliance thereon being required to e any jiDubts, I am apvised to seek competent professional advice and assistance. r ~ c. v' -( /rA v 11tf. 'I 2-0 I Z () () 7 Date arty i alved in this request, I have read and understood the complete application and its consequences to me as a property {;C Vf rty Owner's Signature (required) !1"'r- lDt l--ODj Date [T. b. "'"'I""tod by Dly stoll] Dale Received ~/! 7 / 0 7_ _ Zoning PermitType f r!&/nm S~ ~ Filing Fee $ /0 / 1, {J 0 Planning Action Type OVER * C:\!:){)(,lJME--l\h:mks::t";UX'AI.s-I',Tc<<lp'.i'...oniog Permil A~I!o;:-ali(5;l Fono_doc Owner's Name: ASHLAND LODGE #944/B P 0 E Phone: Customer #: 05316 State Lie No: ASHLAND ELKS #944 City Lie No: Applicant: 255 E MAIN ST Address: ASHLAND OR 97520 Sub-Contractor: Phone: (541) 326-5920 Address: Applied: 06/17/2009 Issued: Expires: 12/14/2009 Phone: State Lie No: Maplot: 391 E09BD4400 City Lie No: DESCRIPTION: Site Review - Ashland Elks Lodge #944 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 20 East Main St Ashland, OR 97520 'IMW.ashland.or.us Tel: 541-488-5305 Fax: 541-488-5311 TTY; 800-735-2900 Inspection Request Line; 541-552-2080 CITY OF ASHLAND I hereby certify the contents of this application to be correct to the best of my knowledge, and furthermore, that I have read, Fee Summary Paid Amounts understood and agreed to the following: Building; $ 0.00 $ 0.00 1. This permit shall remain valid only in accordance with code State Surcharge: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 or regulation provisions relating to time lapse and revocation Development Fees: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 (180 days). 2. Work shall not proceed past approved inspection stage. All Systems Development Charges; $ 0.00 $ 0.00 required inspections shall be called for 24 hours in advance. Utility Connection Fees; $ 0.00 $ 0.00 3. Any modifications in plans or work shall be reported in advance to the department. Public Works Fees; $ 0.00 $ 0.00 4. Responsibility for complying with all applicable federal, state, Planning Fees; $ 1,017.00 $ 1,017.00 or local laws, ordinances, or regulations rests solely with the Sub-Total: $ 1,017.00 applicant. Fees Paid; $ 1,017.00 Total Amount Due; $ 0 Applicant Date COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 20 East Main St Ashland, OR 97520 'IMW.ashland.or.us Tel; 541-488-5305 Fax: 541-488-5311 TTY; 800-735-2900 Inspection Request Line: 541-552-2080 CITY OF ASHLAND