The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutClark_1610 (PA-2010-00586) CITY Of ASHLAND June 8, 2010 Judy Beyer PO Box 3536 Ashland, OR 97520 Notice of Final Decision On June 8, 2010, the Staff Advisor for the Ashland Planning Division administratively approved your request for the following: I Planning Action: 2010-00586 Subject Property: 1610 Clark Street Owner/Applicant: Ashland Supportive Housing Description: A request for a Conditional Use Permit and Tree Removal Permit for a respite home and resource center for persons with developmental disabilities. The applicant proposes remodel the interior of the existing structures to fit the needs of the proposed use. The applicant is also proposing to remove 9 trees greater than 6" DBH on their property. Comprehensive Plan Designation: Single Family Residnetial, Zoning: R-1-7.5; Jackson County Assessor's Map: 39 IE l5ACj Tax Lot: 9100 The Staff Advisor's decision becomes final and is effective on the 13 th day after the Notice of Final Decision is mailed. Prior to that date, anyone who was mailed this Notice Of Final Decision may request a reconsideration of the action by the Staff Advisor as set forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO) 18.108,070(B)(2)(b) and/or file an appeal to the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in the ALUO 18.108.070(B)(2)(c), An appeal may not be made directly to the Land Use Board of Appeals. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court. The application, all associated documents and evidence submitted, and the applicable criteria are available for review at no cost at the Ashland Community Development Department, located at 51 Winburn Way. Copies of file documents can be requested and are charged based on the City of Ashland copy fee schedule. If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact the Department of Community Development between the hours of 8:00 am and 4:30 pm, Monday through Friday at (541) 488-5305. cc: Ashland Supportive Housing Parties of record and property owners within 200 ft DEPT. OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 20 E, Main Street Ashland, Oregon 97520 www.ashland.or.us Tel: 541-488-5305 Fax: 541-552-2050 TTY: 800-735-2900 r., ASHLAND PLANNING DIVISION FINDINGS & ORDERS Planning Action: 2010-00586 Subject Property: 1610 Clark Street Owner/Applicant: Ashland Supportive Housing Description: A request for a Conditional Use Permit and Tree Removal Permit for a respite home and resource center for persons with developmental disabilities. The applicant proposes remodel the interior of the existing structures to fit the needs of the proposed use. The applicant is also proposing to remove 9 trees greater than 6" DBH on their property. Comprehensive Plan Designation: Single Family Residnetial, Zoning: R-I-7.5 Jackson County Assessor's Map: 39 IE 15AC; Tax Lot: 9100 SUBMITT AL DATE: DEEMED COMPLETE DATE: STAFF APPROVAL DATE: FINAL DECISION DATE: APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE: May 12" 2010 May 21,2010 June 8, 2010 June 22, 2010 June 22, 2011 DECISION The subject propertyis located at 1610 Clark Street (dba 720 Walker Street), and is zoned R-I-7.5, Single-Family Residential. The lot is approximately 14,800 square feet. The property was previously used as a group horne, and more recently a kindergarten. There are two existing houses on the site, making the property non-conforming, as the zoning only allows for one single-family house. Although large enough, the lot is configured in such a way as not to be dividable. The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit approval for a respite home and resource center to provide families and caregivers a location to drop off individual as they take a break from their duties. The applicant is proposing to use the existing buildings with only minor interior changes. The property has existing fencing and mature landscaping. The applicant is proposing to keep the on-site landscaping relatively unchanged, with the exception of nine trees to be removed. The Conditional Use criteria states that the project must be found to have no greater adverse material effect on the livability of the impact area other than the target use of the zone, which is a single-family neighborhood. Potential impacts from the use would primarily be from increased traffic from pick-up and drop-off of users. However, with the low capacity of the proposed use, it would seem unlikely any potential effects would be noticed. The applicants are proposing to have the pick-up/drop off area in front of the building on Clark Street. In terms of parking, the respite home is unlike any other uses defined by code. Therefore, staff has associated the use closely to a private school or nursing horne, which would require two spaces for staff and one space per three beds; a total of three parking spaces. Their are no off-street parking spaces on site, however a credit of 12 on-street parking spaces may be used abutting Walker and Clark streets. A parking agreement with the First Presbyterian Church would provide additional parking if needed. PA # 2010-00586 1610 Clark SUMP Page I The applicant has requested the removal of nine trees, a combination of four within the r-o-w and five on the subject property. The four trees along Clark Street had previously been approved for removal by the Tree Commission due to constant interference with the overhead utility lines. The Tree Commission had also previously recommended that street trees be planted along Walker Street, however since this is not the frontage being used for pick-up and drop-off, sidewalks are not required at this time, and placement of the trees prior to installation of the sidewalk could result in later damage to the trees. Instead of installing street trees or other improvements at this time, the applicants are being required to sign in favor of a Local Improvement District for the future improvement of Walker A venue. The previous CUP approval for the preschool required the installation of sidewalks. The proposal would not intensify the use from previous approvals and with the removal of the four trees along the Clark Street frontage, a curbside sidewalk can be installed. Due to slight slope towards Clark, a small retaining wall will likely be necessary. It is important that the pedestrian improvements be of a functional quality due to their importance to the proposed use, the existing neighborhood, and as a connection to the adjacent City Park. Staff has conditioned the application that curbside sidewalks be installed and replace the Cedars with approved street trees. Although the proposed use is to be located in an R-l zone, the proximity to Siskiyou, Southern Oregon University, and other commercial zones provides to be an excellent location for this type of transitional use. Therefore, Staff recommends approval of the respite care facility and resource center. The criteria for a Conditional Use Permit are described in AMC Chapter 18.104.050, as follows: A, That the use would be in conformance with all standards within the zoning district in which the use is proposed to be located, and in coriformance with relevant Comprehensive plan policies that are not implemented by any City, State, or Federal law or program. B, That adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, paved access to and through the development, electricity, urban storm drainage, and adequate transportation can and will be provided to and through the subject property, C. That the conditional use will have no greater adverse material effect on the livability of the impact area when compared to the development of the subject lot with the target use of the zone, When evaluating the effect of the proposed use on the impact area, the followingfactors of livability of the impact area shall be considered in relation to the target use of the zone: ], Similarity in scale, bulk, and coyerage, 2. Generation of traffic and effects on surrounding streets, Increases in pedestrian, bicycle, and mass transit use are considered beneficial regardless of capacity of facilities, 3. Architectural compatibility with the impact area, 4. Air quality, including the generation of dust, odors, or other environmental pollutants, 5. Generation of noise, light, and glare. 6, The development of adjacent properties as envisioned in the Comprehensive Plan. 7, Other factorsfound to be relevant by the Hearing Authority for review of the proposed use, The criteria for Site Review Approval are described in AMC Chapter 18.72.070, as follows: A, All applicable City ordinances have been met or will be met by the proposed development. B. All requirements of the Site Review Chapter have been met or will be met. PA # 2010-00586 1610 Clark St./MP Page 2 C. The development complies with the Site Design Standards adopted by the City Council for implementation of this Chapter, D, That adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, paved access to and through the development, electricity, urban storm drainage, and adequate transportation can and will be provided to and through the subject property, The criteria for a Tree Removal Permit are described in AMC Chapter 18.61.080, as follows: An applicant for a Tree Removal Permit shall demonstrate that the following criteria are satisfied. The Staff Advisor may require an arborist's report to substantiate the criteria for a permit. A. Hazard Tree: The Staff Advisor shall issue a tree removal permitfor a hazard tree tfthe applicant demonstrates that a tree is a hazard and warrants removal. ], A hazard tree is a tree that is physically damaged to the degree that it is clear that it is likely to fall and injure persons or property, A hazard tree may also include a tree that is located within public rights of way and is causing damage to existing public or private facilities or services and such facilities or services cannot be relocated or the damage alleviated. The applicant must demonstrate that the condition or location of the tree presents a clear public safety hazard or a foreseeable danger of property damage to an existing structure and such hazard or danger cannot reasonably be alleviated by treatment or pruning. 2. The City may require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each hazard tree pursuant to AMC ]8,6],084, Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit, B, Tree that is Not a Hazard: The City shall issue a tree removal permit for a tree that is not a hazard tfthe applicant demonstrates all of the following: ], The tree is proposedfor removal in order to permit the application to be consistent with other applicable Ashland Land Use Ordinance requirements and standards, (e,g. other applicable Site Design and Use Standards). The Staff Advisor may require the building footprint of the development to be staked to allow for accurate verification of the permit application,' and 2, Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on erosion, soil stability, flow of surface waters, protection of adjacent trees, or existing windbreaks,' and 3. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on the tree densities, sizes, canopies, and ,species diversity within 200feet o/the subject property. The City shall grant an exception to this criterion when alternatives to the tree removal have been considered and no reasonable alternative exists to allow the property to be used as permitted in the zone. Nothing in this section shall require that the residential density be reduced below the permitted density allowed by the zone. In making this determination, the City may consider alternative site plans or placement of structures or alternate landscaping designs that would lessen the impact on trees, so long as the alternatives continue to comply with other provisions of the Ashland Land Use Ordinance. PA # 2010-00586 1610 Clark SUMP Page 3 4, The City shall require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each tree granted approval pursuant to AMC 18,61. 084. Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval , of the permit, The criteria for an Exception to Street Standards are described in AMC Chapter 18.88.050.F, as follows: A. There is demonstrable d(fJiculty in meeting the specific requirements of this chapter due to a unique or unusual aspect of the site or proposed use of the site,' B, The variance will result in equal or superior transportation.facilities and connectivity; C. The variance is the minimum necessary to alleviate the difficulty,' D. The variance is consistent with the stated Purpose and Intent of the Performance Standards Options Chapter The application with the attached conditions complies with all applicable City ordinances. Planning Action 2010-00586 is herby approved with the following conditions: 1) All proposals of the applicant shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise modified here. 2) Changes to the exterior of the buildings, additions, or new structures, or changes to the site layout and landscaping shall require additional Site Review approvals. 3) Applicants shall obtain a sign permit prior to the installation of any signage on the site. Signage shall be subject to the requirements of the Sign Regulations found in Chapter 18.96 of the Ashland Municipal Code and to the limitations placed on Conditional Use Permit signage found in Chapter 18.24.070.B.2. 4) That all public improvements including curbside sidewalk and street trees along the Clark Street frontage shall be installed under permit from the Public Works Department and in accordance with the approved plan prior to Certificate of Occupancy. 5) That the engineered construction drawings for the public sidewalk along Clark Street shall be submitted for review and approval of the Ashland Planning, Engineering, and Electrical Divisions prior to work in the street right-of-way and prior to installation of improvements in the pedestrian corridor. The installed sidewalk shall match the existing curbside sidewalk along Clark Street. It shall be a minimum of five feet in width. All frontage improvements, including but not limited to the sidewalk, street trees, and street lighting, shall be constructed across the entire frontage of the site. The sidewalk shall be constructed to City of Ashland Street Standards. If necessary for alignment of frontage improvements, area for street improvements shall be dedicated as public street right-of-way. The right-of-way dedication shall be submitted for review and approval of the Ashland. 6) That street trees, 1 per 30 feet of street frontage, shall be installed on the Clark Street frontage at the time of sidewalk installation. All street trees shall be chosen from the adopted Street Tree List and shall be installed in accordance with the specifications noted in Section E of the Site Design and Use Standards. The street trees shall be irrigated. 7) A Tree Removal Permit will be obtained for removal of the cedar trees in the right-of-way if they are larger than 18-inches diameter-breast-height. Coordinate with the Electric Department for the trees along Clark Street before removal. 8) A fence permit is required for any new fencing or change in fence heights apd all fence heights must meet the limitations of Section 18.68.010 ofthe Ashland Municipal Code. PA # 2010-00586 1610 Clark SUMP Page 4 9) That the property owner shall sign in favor of Local Improvement District (LID) for the future street improvements, including but not limited to paving, curb gutter, storm drainage and sidewalks for Walker Street prior to signature of the final survey plat a) A performance bond or a financial guarantee for 120% of the value of the required public right- of-improvements, including sidewalk and street trees on Clark A venue shall be provided. b) That the curb cut adjacent to Clark Street will be closed to eliminate conflicts with the pick up drop and off area. c) That the applicants shall submit to the Staff Advisor a copy of the parking agreement between the applicant and the church. The agreement shall identify the days and hours that the parking is available for use. The agreement shall be signed, notarized, and recorded. 10) If anyone or more of the following conditions are found to be invalid for any reason whatsoever, c_Jh~n Planning Action 2008-01181 shall be denied ,~"e ) ('~"" , , C:;-LA -' 1, 08 holb te I PA # 2010-00586 1610 Clark SUMP Page 5 Easy Peellil) Labels Use Avery@ Template 5160@ PA-201O-00586 391EI5AC 9100 ASHLAND SUPPORTIVE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY PO BOX 3536 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-201O-00586 391EI5AB 8500 FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHI ASH POBOX62 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-20IO-00586 391EI5BA 4800 KUNKEL EILEEN 725 WALKER AVE ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2010-00586 391E15AC 8800 MENDELSOHN ALEXANDRA W 740 WALKER AVE ASHLAND, OR 97520 P A-20 1 0-00586 Dan & Tanua Morley 726 Walker Ave Ashland, OR 97520 ~tJquettes faclles a peler UtiliC:A7 IA n;lh;lrit AVFRV@ 51fiO@ A Feed Paper Bend along line to expose Pop-Up Edge™ PA-201O-00586 391EI5BA 4601 BUTCHER ALBERT TRUSTEE 1633 NEWCASTLE DR LOS ALTOS, CA 94024 PA-201O-00586 391E15AB 8400 FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CH/ASH POBOX 62 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-201O-00586 391E15BA 4900 LANDES JONATHAN 796 LIBERTY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-201O-00586 391EI5AC 9000 MORLEY DANIEL LEE TRUSTEE 428 SILVER CREEK DR CENTRAL POINT, OR 97502 Judy Beyer PO Box 3536 Ashland, OR 97520-0318 A Sens de _L_..M________ I Repliez ilia hachure afIn de I fAVAI.., I.. N>hnrrl Pnn-llnTM ! I ~ AVERY@ 5~ 1 PA-2010-00586 391E15BA 5000 DEERFIELD LEARNING ASSOC 15097 HWY 66 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-201O-00586 391E15AB 8304 KELLY MARK A TRUSTEE ET AL 1630 SISKIYOU BL YD ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2010-00586 391E15AC 8900 MC HUGH BARBARA POBOX 3364 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2010-00586 391E15BA 4700 NAMANNY LINDA J ET AL PO BOX 793 ASHLAND, OR 97520 www.avery.com 1..Rnn..r.n.A VFnv Page 1 of 1 Amy Gunter - Planning Action 2010-00586 From: To: Date: Subject: comm-dev Amy Gunter; Derek Severson 5/30/20108:22 AM Planning Action 2010-00586 D Planning Action: 2010-00586 May 30, 2010 Weare the owners of the property directly next door to 1610 Clark Street, and are in fact, their only neighbor. I wish to thank Sue Crader of Ashland Supportive Housing for sending us a letter explaining their plans for a Respite Home and Resource Center. What a wonderful group of people to come up with this plan to support the developmentally disabled population and their caregivers, We applaud and support their efforts and think the buildings on the property are well suited for this use. We also wish to thank Judy Beyer, Assistant Director of ASH, for meeting with us to discuss the removal of a few problem trees near our property line. These trees have been a constant problem for us, with dripping honeydew, suckers, annual pruning, and heavy seeding. We look forward to welcoming them as our new neighbors, Sincerely, Dan and Tanua Morley 726 Walker Ave Ashland, Oregon 97520 Work Phone: 774-2653 file:/ /C :\Documents and Settings\andersona\Local Settings\ Temp\XPgrpwise\4C022056Ash... 6/1/2010 From: To: CC: Date: Subject: Derek Severson Michael Pina Amy Gunter 5/17/2010 11:50 AM Department Comments for 1610 Clark Street Electric: The Electric Department indicated that they were supportive of the proposed removal of the cedars given their impacts to the power lines above, and they have met with the applicants on this issue. Electric indicated that they would cut the trees to a point below the lowest line on the poles (phone lines) and that the applicants' arborist/tree cutter would be responsible for cutting the remainder of the trees and cleaning up. Electric asked that the applicants tree cutter contact them to coordinate tree removal prior to beginning any tree work on site. Replacement trees selected should be appropriate for placement under power lines (see list in Street Tree Guide) and should be placed and spaced to accommodate future sidewalk installation - assuming we support an Exception to Street Standards not to install sidewalks here, Engineering: Sidewalk installation on Clark Street would be very complex due to the existing trees and the associated grade diFFerential within their root zones, The root zone area is 3-4 feet higher than the street in places, There is also at least one electrical pole that would need to be addressed with sidewalk installation, and the applicants would be in a position of either installing retaining walls or routing the sidewalk into the property and providing easements where it is to be placed outside of the eXisting right-oF-way, Generally, Engineering agreed that it may be preFerable to grant an Exception and deal with the sidewalk at a future date through a comprehensively planned LID process. They did note that the selection and placement of the street trees would be important so as not to create barriers to a standard sidewalk installation in the Future. The applicants had indicated in the pre-app that they may wish to request a handicapped accessible space be installed on the street frontage of Walker Avenue, with a curb cut ramp to allow handicapped access to the house. Engineering indicated that this request would need to be presented to the Transportation Commission For consideration, and that assuming the request were approved, the applicants would have to pay the costs of the installation. Derek Severson, Associate Planner City of Ashland, Department of Community Development 20 East Main Street, Ashland OR 97520 (541)552-2040 or (541)488-5305, TTY: 1-800-735-2900 FAX: (541) 552-2050 This email transmission is oFficial business of the City of Ashland, and it is subject to Oregon Public Records law for disclosure and retention. If you have received this message in error, please contact me at (541)552-2040. Thank you. Planning Department, 51 wil.. ,/1 Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 541-488-5305 Fax: 541-552-2050 www,ashland.or.us TTY: 1-800-735-2900 CITY OF LA NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING ACTION: 2010-00586 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1610 Clark Street OWNER/APPLICANT: Ashland Supportive Housing DESCRIPTION: A request for a Conditional Use Permit and Tree Removal Permit for a respite home and resource center for persons with developmental disabilities. The applicant proposes remodel the interior of the existing structure to fit the needs of the proposed use. The applicant is also proposing to remove 9 trees greater than 6" DBH on their property. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-75; ASSESSOR'S MAP #: 39 1E 15AC; TAX LOT: 9100 NOTE: The Ashland Tree Commission will also review this Planning Action on June 3, 2010 at 6:00 p.m. in the Community Development and Engineering Services building (Siskiyou Room) located at 51 Winburn Way, NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: May 20,2010 DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: June 3, 2010 , ',,:r~~~be~~-:;~o~~r~~~1 ~A-~~_1~:~~.?~(3__ The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted above, Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submit written comments to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p,m, on the deadline date shown above, Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for a 14 day comment period, After the comment period and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the application, A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision, An appeal to the Planning Commission of the Planning Division Staff's decision must be made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision, (AMC 18,108,040) The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice, Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue, Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion, Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court, A copy of the application, all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be provided at reasonable cost, if requested, All materials are available at the Ashland Planning Division, Community Development & Engineering Services Building, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520, If you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contact the Ashland Planning Division at 541-488-5305, G:lcomm-devlplanninglNotices Mailed\20 1 0\20 1 0-00586,doc CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS 18.104.050 Approval Criteria A conditional use permit shall be granted if the approval authority finds that the proposed use conforms, or can be made to conform through the imposition of conditions, with the following approval criteria. A. That the use would be in conformance with all standards within the zoning district in which the use is proposed to be located, and in conformance with relevant Comprehensive plan policies that are not implemented by any City, State, or Federal law or program. S. That adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, paved access to and through the development, electricity, urban storm drainage, and adequate transportation can and will be provided to and through the subject property. C. That the conditional use will have no greater adverse material effect on the livability of the impact area when compared to the development of the subject lot with the target use of the zone. When evaluating the effect of the proposed use on the impact area, the following factors of livability of the impact area shall be considered in relation to the target use of the zone: 1. Similarity in scale, bulk, and coverage, 2. Generation of traffic and effects on surrounding streets, Increases in pedestrian, bicycle, and mass transit use are considered beneficial regardless of capacity of facilities. 3. Architectural compatibility with the impact area. 4. Air quality, including the generation of dust, odors, or other environmental pollutants. 5. Generation of noise, light, and glare. 6. The development of adjacent properties as envisioned in the Comprehensive Plan. 7. Other factors found to be relevant by the Hearing Authority for review of the proposed use. TREE REMOVAL 18.61.080 Criteria for Issuance of Tree Removal - Staff Permit An applicant for a Tree Removal Permit shall demonstrate that the following criteria are satisfied. The Staff Advisor may require an arborist's report to substantiate the criteria for a permit A. Hazard Tree: The Staff Advisor shall issue a tree removal permit for a hazard tree if the applicant demonstrates that a tree is a hazard and warrants removal. 1. A hazard tree is a tree that is physically damaged to the degree that it is clear that it is likely to fall and injure persons or property. A hazard tree may also include a tree that is located within public rights of way and is causing damage to existing public or private facilities or services and such facilities or services cannot be relocated or the damage alleviated. The applicant must demonstrate that the condition or location of the tree presents a clear public safety hazard or a foreseeable danger of property damage to an existing structure and such hazard or danger cannot reasonably be alleviated by treatment or pruning, 2. The City may require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each hazard tree pursuant to AMC 18.61.084, Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit S. Tree that is Not a Hazard: The City shall issue a tree removal permit for a tree that is not a hazard if the applicant demonstrates all of the following: 1, The tree is proposed for removal in order to permit the application to be consistent with other applicable Ashland Land Use Ordinance requirements and standards, including but not limited to applicable Site Design and Use Standards and Physical and Environmental Constraints. The Staff Advisor may require the building footprint of the development to be staked to allow for accurate verification of the permit application; and 2. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on erosion, soil stability, flow of surface waters, protection of adjacent trees, or existing windbreaks; and 3. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on the tree densities, sizes, canopies, and species diversity within 200 feet of the subject property. The City shall grant an exception to this criterion when alternatives to the tree removal have been considered and no reasonable alternative exists to allow the property to be used as permitted in the zone. Nothing in this section shall require that the residential density be reduced below the permitted density allowed by the zone, In making this determination, the City may consider alternative site plans or placement of structures or alternate landscaping designs that would lessen the impact on trees, so long as the alternatives continue to comply with other provisions of the Ashland Land Use Ordinance, 4. The City shall require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each tree granted approval pursuant to AMC 18,61.084. Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit (ORD 2951,2008; ORD 2883,2002) G:lcomm-devlplanninglNotices Mailed\20 1 0\20 1 0-00586,doc .~.,I JACKSON COUNTY INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY e.ooo Map Maker Application Front Counter Legend Highlighted Feature 6100 I(j.fl;OO theBuffer theBufferTargel 4600 Tax Lot Outlines Tax Lot Numbers j.(l/ Sifl.OO a~,/ , i (a300 ~5 I 5161 5100 8100 6400 OOG1 aOO3 300 .2:00 100 900 lJJOO2 ~ I I I This map Is based on a dIgital database complied by Jackson County From a variety of sources, Jackson County cannot accept I respon"slblly for errors, omissions, or positIonal accuracy. There are no warrantfes, expressed or Implied. Map created on 5/19/2010 2:46:42 PM using web.jacksoncounty.org JACKSON COUNTY Oregoll 8fiOO aOO4 I'< I uooF'ooo 6!)(J() @ Please recycle with colored office grade paper Created with Map Maker PA-2010-00586 391E15AC 9100 ASHLAND SUPPORTIVE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY PO BOX 3536 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-201O-00586 391E15AB 8500 FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHI ASH POBOX 62 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-201O-00586 391E15BA 4800 KUNKEL EILEEN 725 WALKER AVE ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2010-00586 391E15AC 8800 MENDELSOHN ALEXANDRA W 740 WALKER AVE ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2010-00586 391E15BA 4601 BUTCHER ALBERT TRUSTEE 1633 NEWCASTLE DR LOS ALTOS, CA 94024 PA-2010-00586 391E15BA 5000 DEERFIELD LEARNING ASSOC 15097 HWY 66 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-201O-00586 391E15AB 8400 FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHI ASH POBOX 62 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2010-00586 391E15AB 8304 KELLY MARK. A TRUSTEE ET AL 1630 SISKIYOU BLVD ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2010-00586 391E15BA 4900 LANDES JONATHAN 796 LIBERTY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2010-00586 391E15AC 8900 MC HUGH BARBARA POBOX 3364 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2010-00586 391E15AC 9000 MORLEY DANIEL LEE TRUSTEE ET AL 428 SILVER CREEK DR CENTRAL POINT, OR 97502 PA-2010-00586 391El5BA 4700 NAMANNY LINDA J ET AL PO BOX 793 ASHLAND, OR 97520 Ashland Supportive Housing Application for Conditional Use Permit, Site Review and Tree Removal Permit to operate a Respite Home and Resource Center in an R-l. 75 Zone Property Address: Property Zoning: Legal Description: 1610 Clark Street R-1-7.5 39 lE 15AC Tax Lot 9100 Applicant: Sue Crader 79 Nutley St. Ashland, Oregon 97520 (541) 840-2930 Owner: Ashland Supportive Housing and Community Outreach 693B Washington St. PO Box 3536 Ashland, Oregon 97520 (541) 488-2870 18.20 R-1 Single-Family Residential District 18.20.020 Permitted Uses This application is for a conditional use in this zone. 18.20.030 Conditional Uses The following uses and their accessory uses are permitted when authorized in accordance with Chapter 18,104, Conditional Use Permits. This application includes a conditional use permit to operate a Resource Center and Respite Home which is in keeping with 18.20.030 C conditionally permitted uses of rest or convalescent home and private school. 18.20.040 General Regulations A. Minimum lot area: Basic minimum lot area in the R-I zone shall be five thousand (5,000) square feet, except six thousand (6,000) square feet for corner lots. R-I areas may be designed for seventy-five hundred (7,500), or ten thousand (10,000) square foot minimum lot sizes where slopes or other conditions make larger sizes necessary. Permitted lot sizes shall be indicated by a number following the R-I notation which respresents allowable minimum square footage in thousands of square feet, as follows: R-I-5 R-I-7,5 R-I-IO 5,000 square feet 7,500 square feet 10,000 square feet This lot is 0.34 acres or 14,810 square feet 1 B, Minimum lot width: Interior lots Corner lots All R-I-7.5 lots All R-l-lO lots 50 feet 60 feet 65 feet 75 feet This is a corner lot. If viewed as Clark Street being the front it is an average of 150 feet wide. This is a pre-existing lot. C. Lot Depth: All lots shall have a minimum depth of eighty (80) feet, and a maximum depth of one hundred fifty (150) feet unless lot configuration prevents further development of the back of the lot. Maximum lot depth requirements shall not apply to lots created by a minor land partition. No lot shall have a width greater than its depth, and no lot shall exceed one hundred fifty (150) feet in width, (Ord. 2052,1979; Ord, 2425 S3, 1988) This is a corner lot, if viewed as Clark Street being the front it is an average of 98 feet deep. This is a pre-existing lot. D, Standard Yard Requirements: Front yards shall be a minimum of fifteen (15) feet, excluding garages. Unenclosed porches shall be permitted with a minimum setback of eight (8) feet or the width of any existing public utility easement, whichever is greater, from the front propelty line, All garages accessed from the fi'ont shall have a minimum setback oftwenty (20) feet from the front property line; side yards, six (6) feet; the side yard of a corner lot abutting a public street shall have a ten (10) foot setback; rear yard, ten (10) feet for each story in excess of one (1) story, In addition, the setbacks must comply with Chapter 18,70 which provides for Solar Access. (Ord.2097 S5, 1980; Ord, 2121 Se, 1981; Ord. 2752,1995) The lot and buildings are both pre-existing. The buildings are set back thirteen (13) feet from the Clark Street Right of Way, and thirty-two (32) from the Walker Avenue Right of Way. E. Maximum Building Height: No structure shall be over thirty-five (35) feet or two and one-half (2 Yz) stories in height, whichever is less. Structures within the Historic District shall not exceed a height of 30 feet. Both buildings are single story and under the 35 feet maximum. F, Maximum Coverage: Maximum lot coverage shall be fifty (50%) percent in an R-I-5 District, fOlty-five (45%0 in an R-I-7.5 District, and forty (40%) in an R-l-lO District. The two buildings on the property are under a single roof with a concrete patio between. The area covered by the buildings and patio is 3,768 square feet currently. Replacement of the concrete patio will keep the same footprint. With the inclusion of the concrete driveway the total lot coverage is 4,755 square feet, for a total of 32% lot coverage. G. Maximum Permitted Floor Area for dwellings within the Historic District. This project is not within the Historic District. 2 18.104.010 Conditional Use Permits Generally Certain uses are permitted in each zoning district only as conditional uses. This chapter provides substantive approval criteria by which applications for conditional use permits are to be evaluated and describes applicable procedures, No conditionally permitted use may be established, enlarged or altered unless the city first issues a conditional use permit in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. 18.104.030 Procedure An application for a conditional use permit shall be submitted by the owner ofthe subject property or authorized agent on a form prescribed by the city and accompanied by the required filing fee, The application shall include a plan or drawing meeting the requirements of Section 18,104,040 and shall be processed as provided in Chapter 18,108 of this Title. 18.104.040 Plan Requirements A. The plan or drawing accompanying the application shall include the following information: 1, Vicinity map, Provided in drawing set 2, North arrow, On all maps 3, Depiction and names of all streets abutting the subject property, Provided in drawing set 4, Depiction of the subject property, including the dimensions of all lot lines, Provided in drawing set 5, Location and use of all buildings existing and proposed on the subject property and schematic architectural elevations of all proposed structures. Provided in drawing set. No new building proposed. 6, Location of all parking areas, parking spaces, and ingress, egress and traffic circulation for the subject property, Provided in drawing set. 7, Schematic landscaping plan showing area and type of landscaping proposed, Existing landscape covers 63%of lot. Landscaping will be improved but not decreased. 8, A topographic map of the site showing contour intervals offive feet or less. Provided in drawing set. 9, Approximate location of all existing natural features in areas which are planned to be disturbed, including, but not 3 limited to, all existing trees of greater than six inch dbh, any natural drainage ways, ponds or wetlands, and any substantial outcroppings of rocks or boulders, There are four Deodar Cedars on site which the Tree Commission has said must be removed due to height and interference with utility lines. In addition there are 4 Cork Elms and one diseased Willow which we would like to remove. These are noted on the Tree Protection plan. The Elms are overly prolific, highly allergenic, and have caused problems for the neighbor, who has written letters of complaint to the City. The Willow is diseased and mostly dead wood. It has torn up the concrete patio, which is slated for renovation, and interferes with site drainage. We will do one to one replacement within the same location with the exception of the Willow tree, whose replacement will be located in an area that will not affect site drainage. August Schilling of The Village Arborist will supervise all Tree Protection Plans during construction. Removal of trees is requested for August 2010. B, An application for a conditional use permit may, but need not be, made concurrently with any required application for site design approval under Chapter 18,72, The provisions of paragraph (1) above are not intended to alter the detailed site plan requirements of Section 18,72,040 for site design approval. 18.104.050 Approval Criteria A conditional use permit shall be granted if the approval authority finds that the proposed use conforms, or can be made to conform through the imposition of conditions, with,the following approval criteria, A. That the use would be in conformance with all standards within the zoning district in which the use is proposed to be located, and in conformance with relevant Comprehensive plan policies that are not implemented by any City, State, or Federal law or program, The buildings on site are pre-existing. The proposed Respite Home which faces Walker Avenue was built in the 1930s and the proposed Resource Center which faces Clark Street in the 1960s. All underlying zone criteria are met with the exception of the set-back on the building facing Clark Street, which has a set-back of 13 feet. Zone standard is a minimum set- back of 15 feet. B, That adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, paved access to and through the development, electricity, urban storm drainage, and adequate transportation can and will be provided to and through the subject property. This is a pre-existing development which historically has been used as a group home and as a school. There are full City services to serve the site. C, That the conditional use will have no greater adverse material effect on the livability of the impact area when compared to the development of the subject lot with the target use of the zone, When evaluating the effect of the proposed use on the impact area, the following factors of livability of the impact area shall be considered in relation to the target use of the zone: 1, Similarity in scale, bulk, and coverage, This is a pre-existing building, smaller than zone maximums in bulk and scale. 4 2, Generation of traffic and effects on surrounding streets. Increases in pedestrian, bicycle, and mass transit use are considered beneficial regardless of capacity of facilities. In the 1992 Findings & Orders from the Ashland Planning Commission on ASH's original application for a Conditional Use Permit for a ten bedroom group home it was stated that, "...the impact of auto traffic would be similar or less than that of single family residences, due to the fact that the residents will not be driving, and that only the support staff will require automobiles. The number of trips generated by staff is less than that of an average household, since the staff functions as employees, and the traffic is limited to trips to work, but do not generally include the myriad of different trips generated in the normal household." This would also hold true for the respite home. This home will have no more than six guests and two staff at any given time on premises, with only planned vehicle trips to special activities. In regards to the Resource Center, the number of people on site at any given time will be limited to small groups of 4 to 8, with heavy use not being anticipated due to the specialized nature of the services. Classes will be made available to the developmentally disabled population in Jackson County. Some individual instruction may also be offered. It is anticipated that approximately 4 differing classes will be offered at a time. Proposed classes may include money management, art, specialized exercise classes, social support groups, gardening, and other classes as developed with community input. Class duration is expected to be from 1 to 2 hours per session. Classes will be scheduled at times when church is not in session. Traffic generated will be limited to mostly daytime hours, with one or two evening meetings per month. This usage is consistent with the overall traffic and use patterns for Clark Street. On the same side of Clark as the proposed Center, adjacent to the Center is Garden Way, Park. Next to that on the next block is the Seventh Day Adventist church which has housed the former ICCA and currently operates a Food pantry one day per week. Directly across from the proposed Resource Center is the Presbyterian Church, which houses many meetings per week, including AA, AIAnon, and other support groups. Next to the Presbyterian Church is a row of multiple family dwellings. At the far, opposite end of Clark Street are three small, single family residences - the only ones on Clark Street. It is anticipated that that there will be some increase in pedestrian and mass transit use as guests of the respite home will not have vehicles. 3. Architectural compatibility with the impact area, These are pre-existing buildings that were constructed in the 1930s and 1960s. The building proposed to be used as the Respite Center was originally the main residence. The building proposed to be used as the Resource Center was originally a workshop. Since the 1960s this building housing the proposed Resource Center was rehabilitated and used as a daycare, a college meeting hall, a 5 bed group home in conjunction with the other building also used as another 5 bed group home, and most recently a kindergarten. 4, Air quality, including the generation of dust, odors, or other environmental pollutants, The proposed uses will not generate any dust, odors, or other environmental pollutants. 5 5, Generation of noise, light, and glare, The proposed uses will not generate any more noise, light, or glare than the uses typical in an R-1-7.S zone. The Respite Home, which will be in the building facing Walker Ave., is in keeping with the residential use of that street and zone. It is intended to be a place of peace and tranquility for guests and is being developed with that in mind. No more than 6 guests and one staff will be on site overnight. The Resource Center, which will be in the building facing Clark Street, will have small sized classes of 4 to 8 people during mostly weekday, daytime hours. Activities will be conducted mostly indoors and in the interior of the property during daylight hours. There may be 2 to 3 evening meetings per month, none of which will run late or generate excessive noise, light, or glare. 6, The development of adjacent properties as envisioned in the Comprehensive Plan, These are pre-existing buildings from the 1930s and 1960s. 7, Other factors found to be relevant by the Hearing Authority for review of the proposed use, Signage: The applicant had initially proposed to have two wall signs, l'x3', one for each use/building, attached adjacent to each entry door designating that buildings use. In lieu of the possibility of having a sign for each use/building, the applicant proposes to have a small wooden sign, 2'x4' or 8 sq. ft., attached to the wall of the building on Clark Street proposed as a Resource Center, next to the entryway. The applicant would appreciate any advice on how permission could be obtained to have a small sign attached to each building by the entrance designating the use of that building to clearly denote proper entrance based on usage. 6 18.72 Site Design Review 18.72.030 Applicability Site design standards shall apply to all zones of the city as outlined below. A. Applicability, The following development is subject to Site Design Review: 1. Commercial, Industrial, Non-Residential and Mixed uses: e. Any change of occupancy from a less intensive to a more intensive occupancy, as defined in the City building code, or any change in use which requires a greater number of parking spaces, The proposed uses are considered an intensification of occupancy from the zone where it is located, which is zoned single family residential. The proposed uses would have one to three employees on site at a time, with two during the day and one overnight being the norm. Clientele benefitting from the proposed uses are considered disabled and generally do not drive or own vehicles; use of mass transit is expected to increase because of this. There are 12 on street parking credits, six on Walker Ave., and six on Clark St. which will be sufficient for these uses. 18.72.070 Criteria for Approval The following criteria shall be used to approve or deny an application: A. All applicable City ordinances have been met or will be met by the proposed development. All City ordinances will be met by the proposed development. B. All requirements of the Site Review Chapter have been met or will be met. There are no onsite parking credits; there is a small driveway that is too short for City standards and which will be used for loading and unloading only. There are 12 on street credits for this site which will be more than sufficient. Three parking spaces are required for the Respite Home per City standards and 3.5 for the Resource Center. There will be a maximum of three employees working on site at a time with two employees being the norm during the day. Covered bicycle parking will be provided. Clientele of the Respite Home and Resource Center are all developmentally disabled and as a general rule do not drive or own vehicles. It is expected that mass transit will be used by many to reach the facility; there is a bus stop within one block. No onsite parking is being proposed. C, The development complies with the Site Design Standards adopted by the City Council for implementation of this Chapter, The Development will comply with Site Design Standards. 7 D, That adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, paved access to and through the development, electricity, urban storm drainage, and adequate transportation can and will be provided to and through the subject property. All improvements in the street right-of-way shall comply with the Street Standards in Chapter 18,88, Perfonnance Standards Options, (Ord, 2655, 1991; Ord 2836 S6, 1999) These are existing buildings with adequate city facilities. There are no changes proposed for the exterior of the buildings. 18.72.090 Administrative Variance from Site Design and Use Standards An administrative variance to the requirements of this chapter may be granted with respect to the requirements of the Site Design Standards adopted under section 18,72,080 if, on the basis of the application, investigation and evidence submitted, all of the following circumstances are found to exist: A. There is a demonstrable difficulty in meeting the specific requirements of the Site Design Standards due to a unique or unusual aspect of the proposed use of a site; The buildings on this property are pre-existing and non-conforming to Site Design Standards; there are two separate buildings under a single roof in a duplex type setup on a single lot, .34 acres, zoned R-1-7.5. One building faces Walker Avenue, one faces Clark Street. The building facing Clark Street has a set-back of 13 ft.; zone standard is a set-back of 15 feet. This property has a long history of usages requiring a Conditional Use Permit, which includes a dance hall, a meeting hall, a day-care, a ten bedroom group home, and most recently a kindergarten. The proposed uses are as a Resource Center for the building facing Clark Street and a Respite Home for the building facing Walker Avenue, both of which will be a benefit to the community by providing much needed services to developmentally disabled adults. All proposed changes to the structure are on the interior and are to improve accessibility and code updates, and will not alter the footprint of the buildings. B. Approval of the variance will not substantially negatively impact adjacent properties; Approval of this application will have no greater adverse material effect on adjacent or surrounding properties. ASH will work to develop and maintain an atmosphere of calm and tranquility as is appropriate for a home providing respite. The building facing Walker Avenue has retained its residential use over the years and has continued to function as a home. This is in keeping with the residential feel of the neighborhood. This property is the beginning boundary of the residential zone as it is the first home on the block past the commercial zone of the previous block. The proposed use as a Respite Home would keep this residential feel and provide a smooth transition from the commercial zone to the residential. Over the years the building facing Clark Street has mostly not had a residential use. It has been a dance hall, a meeting hall, a day-care, a five bedroom group home, and most recently was converted back to a classroom set-up for use as a kindergarten. Its proposed use is as a Resource Center, which will provide a meeting hall for support groups and small classes for 8 persons with disabilities. This is in keeping with both the previous uses and with current activity on Clark Street, which is a C-1 zone on the opposite side of the street. The Presbyterian Church directly across the street has group meetings on a daily basis, and on the same side of Clark Street there is a community park and another church, the Seventh Day Adventists, that runs a weekly food bank. C. Approval ofthe variance is consistent with the stated purpose of the Site Design and Use Chapter; and This application is to make use of an existing property that has been in non-conforming use in the neighborhood since the 1960s. In 2004 the property was listed for sale. There were very few serious inquiries. Those who considered purchase were not viewing the property for a residential use and would have made an application for a conditional use. As it is currently developed, it is not suitable for a strictly residential use. The property was leased on a lease/option plan in 2008, and returned to the owners, Ashland Supportive Housing, in January 2010. This proposal is to make use of the property in a manner that has a low impact on the surrounding neighborhood and provides a benefit to the community. The proposed uses are similar in kind, type, and function to the conditionally permitted uses of a rest or convalescent home and to a private school. The proposed uses are consistent with the past uses with a residence or group home in the building facing Walker Avenue concurrent with a group home or kindergarten or day care in the building facing Clark Street. There will be less traffic generated by the proposed uses as they are both less intensive uses than in past usage configurations, and will generate an increase in mass transit use. The main entrance to the Resource Center will be from Clark Street. The main entrance to the Respite Home will be from Walker Avenue. D. The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the difficulty, This request represents the minimum needed to allow this project to move forward with the existing structure. 18.72.110 Landscaping Standards A. Area Required, The following areas shall be required to be landscaped in the following zones: R-l - 45% of total developed lot area, This project is in the R-1-7.5 zone which requires 45% of the total area to be landscaped. The actual area of the landscaping for the final proposal equals 63%. B. Location, Landscaping shall be located so that it is visible from public right-of-way or provide buffering from adjacent uses, Landscaping shall be distributed in those areas where it provides for visual and acoustical buffering, open space uses, shading and wind buffering, and aesthetic qualities, This property has established landscaping with mature trees and lawn. There are four 9 Deodar Cedars along the Clark Street right of way that are to be removed through city decree due their interference with utility lines. These are indicated on the Tree Protection plan. They are to be replaced 1:1 with Persian Parrotia, which is on the recommended Street Tree list. There are also 4 Cork Elms that are slated for removal; these are also identified on the Tree Protection plan. Reasons for removal of the Elms is their rampant production of seedlings and suckers; high allergenic properties; and, complaints from a neighbor of overly abundant production of seedlings and suckers and dropping of sap. These are to be replaced on a 1:1 basis with some variation in location to protect concrete and site drainage. The remainder of the property is to be kept in its current state. C, Irrigation. All landscaping plans shall either be irrigated or shall be certified that they can be maintained and survive without artificial irrigation, Ifthe plantings fail to survive, the property owner shall replace them, All landscaping plans will be maintained for survival or plantings will be replaced. It is important for the proposed usage of this property that the landscaping be well maintained to provide a sense of rest and repose to the facility. D. Parking Lots. Seven percent of all the parking lot area shall be landscaped, Such landscaping shall consist of the proper mixture of deciduous trees and shrubs so that all of the landscaped areas shall be covered within five years by a spreading evergreen ground cover or by shrubs and shaded by the trees, There is no parking lot on site and there are no plans to include one. There are twelve on street parking credits which will be more than sufficient to meet parking needs. Individuals receiving services as a rule do not drive or own vehicles. This project should increase mass transit use. E, One street tree per 30 feet of frontage shall be required on all projects, This application involves an existing building on a corner lot with existing landscaping. The proposal includes the removal of four Deodar Cedars along the Clark Street frontage per City recommendations which will be replaced with Persian Parrotias on a 1:1 basis, with an additional Cercis along the frontage. 18.72.115 - Recycling Requirements All commercial and multi-family developments, requiring a site review as indicated in 18,72.040, shall provide an opportunity-to-recycle site for use of the project occupants, A. Commercial. Commercial developments having a solid waste receptacle shall provide a site of equal or greater size adjacent to or with access comparable to the solid waste receptacle to accommodate materials collected by the local solid waste fi:anchisee under its on-route collection program for purposes of recycling, Both the opportunity-to- recycle site and the common solid waste receptacle shall be screened by fencing or landscaping such as to limit the view from adjacent properties or public rights-of-way, A recycling area will be provided in an enclosed area on the interior of the property. 10 18.72.140 Light and Glare Performance Standards There shall be no direct illumination of any residential zone from a lighting standard in any other residential lot, C-1, E-1 or M-1, SO, or HC lot. There will be residential type night usage for the building facing Walker Avenue for the proposed Respite Home. There will be minimal early evening use on an infrequent basis for the building facing Clark Street. This proposal includes the addition of a decorative light pole to provide minimal illumination to the entrance and sidewalk to the Respite Home entryway on Walker Street. Lighting will be shielded. The rest of the existing lighting is adequate for the proposed purposes. 11 O'C~i.6 ~'<:lN't~'t ~O'C~ :LBa2lL';' NO.L0N~'t^ 'Cr~ 1):I1IU))l'V )l:IND'V M G)l'VU)J2I s::: () .p l\1 Ii E 0 ~ ",' () 'C q.... \\'l s:::~ ..( .p ~. \l \\l (\) ~ '-'~ ()~ ~ ... 0--6 o Il) ..:;~ Ill, \\'l~ IU, :.:Ii , .. oJ~ "\\l :5~ ... .. Oil) z~ ID~ ~, ,Ii ..: iii d) ~ r- O~(ri~1l) o \\l \\l \\l II) 1T ~ :i ~ ~ \\l \\l ... 'C ":>~>\\'l~ 'lij O:s\\'l;}\\'l E ~g~~~ ~ ~ 0 3 d) 0 ~ -g \J oJ III \jd)~Ill~ ~ .(..f\\'l\\'lO 'C ... \) \\l..J ~ o ... '" '5 III ..{ \\l III m III '" III ~ ..{ \\l 0 1ii " \\l > n. (1 ~ \\'l 0 E ...... \\'l Il.. ... \\l ~ ... ... n. l!? 'C \\l \\l \ij w :;::i >.s::...,1U1ll O~OO'x oJ 0 I- Z IU \\l "\\l ~ '- ,~ 1-", ......'C ~\\'l \\'llll o::~ "iili >- O~ E\\l \\l> Ii~ <ot\\l 'C", ,2\\l ~..n ~ \lO <:: \\l..., '5l. -0= L ... <ot \\'l Il..~~ IL \\l'_O ~]!~ t-~E \\l...O ~.2E *' (1 Il) I i:. .'- Ii~ T "0 IIU ]\fl Il) iiim :; ~ ~r;- \ij ~ "i:;T- ~ ...a.J, ~ ~li j 3 ! @ I @ Y ~--- ~-.J ---~ I! ... s:: X s:: 0 !~ 0 I\'l ~~ ..\)~ III "- "G ~'\ij .n'-3 !o E ::>> ll)E "-"-0 I 3~~ ~ E ll) u...ll) "- 0 "- --0 ~,n~ ~ V u:: ~ o<:~a. b uoB~.JO ~USI4S'i iaa.Jig '1.JSI? 0 ~ 9 ~ ~.,sa..l~I"lO 1i~!UI"lWWO':? t BU!SI"lOH a^!~..IoadI"lS t'USI~S~ o o .. Iii ~ I- I-~ IU ..{:so IU n~ ili iii \\l \l \\'j n. III (1 ~ \\l (1 ~ \\l \\l '- ~ III I n. 010 / I- III "- ll) .n E i= "- ll) o n. ~ (G ..n <P!;U>,~ ~ ll) 1\'l5!'.s:: ;r," "G :n ~,~ > 1) ~ ~ OlOq:: ~v "f II.. III' (!) I ~~rr-....L- <1)- >0 ~ ~ IV ~ :( a('1Na^~a'>li~M ! e _....L____ I -.J; ~ ,i~Qt '\ tG II) g- ~ ~~t ~~ ~ I Ii d) '" I\) lij oJ Ifl () 1: '-- , 0- lij 1: ::n ~ s;:: .\) > s::: ~! 0- ~I 0- I 31 (\)1 .-1- >!O (\)~ Ii i= I~ (\) I" .p~ .- \\'j \O~ -) :l! Ii: i ~ , ... .!l uo6aJO 'PUBILlS"if anU8AV J8l11BM O~L J8JU8:) &:UnOS8H " awoH qdS8H HSV '" <<; gl:( ;'w !;;M! O~ Uo WZ u=> zo )~ o ~ b~ 12 ; ~ i J; ~~ ~ ~~ @ ~~~ !~U ~ ~~ 8 6~i€ ~j j~~i 5 ~5~~8~g~~~~ g ~~~~Hl~@5-~:1~ ~ ~g?;jiE~Gg~~~~ ~ ~~n:~i6~!f~5~~ .:(f-!l:r"'~wt;{j'}~)-, fj;wR(jlli80::z~w~ ~~1ft~~Dlli8i5~~ j~@g~ffi;~~ffl~ ~~g~~~g~~~~ ~~mE~~~~~~~ ~~Mi6~~:S~o5~ ~m~~~~S:J~f5~ o~~i5~~~~~~ ~z~c:::j:;~~~~~o I-Qmo~<(<(f-<(o~ ~gg~~~l:i:~~g~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ :8~~:~S:~~~ ct:I m.~.~ cgggg octlmroCts t5~'7(LC:- ~c:::c:::d:c::: ,g~~~~ '5 . C""C ""C"'C "C ~88.~~~ o 0..0..0..0.. ~(i)f2f2~~ > 0 -:';:::C ~~ m ~-oooo 0 ~ ~oooo fl. Cl c a. a. a.. a.. ~~~~~~~~~~oo~~mooro~~~~~~~~~ro o~ (I) ell ell :5~i-I-'-~ -g -g ~ ~mmmctl~m~ u~o E Cts~ ~E ~C:::~Q)~Q)~Q)~Q)~eIl (I)(I)~EEE~EEEOO o~ Q) OOOO~OE~~~--2~---(I) ~ 0.. ~~m~m""CWWoowww~m~ m~ W ~~~~'0B~m~8oom~~oomOOe~mill ~2oo ~ ~ '- '- ~ ~ ~ 0._ 0 ~ ~ ~ ro ~ ~ ~ ~ ID x- E ~ '-'~ o ~~~~5Q)E~~mEE=~EEE~~=~~~2l~ ~ ~~~~2a58~o55~~555ao~~~o~~ m O~N~~~m~romO~NMv~ ~ ~N~v~m~rom~~~~~~~~~~NNNNN c:::c::: 0)0) f-f- c::: 0) f- c:::c:::c::: 0)0)0) f-f-f- t; 0 <{9 z E2 t:;- ill III '" ~ C9 t:- <:: ill ~ T'i ",'<:' --1 <:: <D Q) Q) (j Z > 0 0 ~ lJ.. E I- <:: i= Q) E "., 0 U 0:: 0. n ill <D Q) 0 2 l- E <:: 0 .c Q) '" e 0:: .9 0 u c.. <1l c.. <D 0- <D Q) ill ~ <D ~ ~ ill I- 0:: I- g:X@ 0 3nN3^\f C/3>11\fM i .... I ..:. z a >= () w I- a 0:: 0.. W w 0:: f- z: :s a. ..J ~ o :Ii ill fI!: II/l z: o i= (,) ill ~ a. ill ill fI!: I- Q) Contractor: Address: Phone: State Lie No: City Lie No: Sub-Contractor: Address: Phone: State Lic No: City Lic No: Valuation $110,000 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 20 East Main SI. Ashland, OR 97520 www.ashland.or.us Tel: 541-488-5305 Fax: 541-488-5311 TTY: 800-735-2900 Inspection Request Line: 541-552-2080 CITY OF ASHLAND ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION FILE # ~() /(J tJCJ5? & Planning Department 51 Winburn Way, Ashland OR 97520 CITY OF AS H LAN D 541-488-5305 Fax 541-488-6006 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Street Address lIP /0 CJay fe, 6/1" ee ~ Assessor's Map No, 39 1 E 16- ./}-C. Tax Lot(s) Zoning Comp Plan Designation APPLICANT Name ::]/Iokj 73 .e L1 e y Address P (J f?,cJ j. .3 S' ~'3& PROPERTY OWNER Phone ,"T'-II - ~ '6' 'If - .,~ g 70 E-Mail jb.e~...-.-(2)~?:f).I...anla.sA <c!J City /1-.).'5 h / /J(. Y\ ()il C) 12'- Zip Cj '7,':102 0 Name 1~:>hltt>)-lt.{ S~{pp,'rf.lvt.. 1.J{.,"USlVlj Phone S~I / - 1218 -,,:;l8"7D Address &13 B \;)ash lh ,j ft.'->--" 54 ' SURVEYOR, ENGINEER. ARCHITECT. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. OTHER Title '3/A.rveJ~(' Name /-Ie.d'> P'a-d?el- Phone 5'1/. (Pt,1-_S5'-?1 E-Mail Address .LIEf eJaks-l.. (ev~l-ra/ F2-Yi/rl oR. City teYl'frajp.J, /dc. I E-Mail a.shil\ .....o)c...:j'J1Jct.Y\dc:.?V'c;:;~M. CJ '-q City ;4sh / a.V\.cJI 61<? Zip C; 75~~ 0 ..J Zip Cj'7 So ,;;(." Title A reo.!, I -+ e c.:f- Name 12 J' ch e1 V' d l<.Jct-J VI e r Phone 5',//- .1./8.2 . ,::F<l8..1.. E-Mail nuLL.1sul..f(1.;\.1..\it>c~.net Address 51;1. lA)a sA in j <)rM"1 S I, City IJ:7h let Mr:4 e) R. Zip ~1'7S Q..o I hereby certify that the statements and information contained in this application, including the enclosed drawings and the required findings of fact, are in all respects, true and correct. I understand that all property pins must be shown on the drawings and visible upon the site inspection, In the event the pins are not shown or their location found to be incorrect, the owner assumes full responsibility, I further understand that if this request is subsequently contested, the burden will be on me to establish: 1) that I produced sufficient factual evidence at the hearing to support this request; 2) that the findings of fact furnished justifies the granting of the request; 3) that the findings of fact furnished by me are adequate; and further 4) that all structures or improvements are properly located on the ground. Failure in this regard will result most likely in not only the request being set aside, but also possibly in my structures being built in reliance thereon being required to be removed at my expense, If I have any doubts, I am advised to seek competent professional advice and assistance, ~a~~:/ /t~.t3I'tA-.w 5 //~ /,;Le> J D ,. / , Applic t's gnature Date As owner of the property involved in this request, I have read and understood the complete application and its consequences to me as a property owner, Prope ,/Vl.. , re (required) Date S!JcP, ~:;'I}I D I. I' IT 0 be completed by City Staff] Date Received tft2} 0 Zoning Permit Type I Filing Fee $ :Jv:P8tf OVER ~~ (;'\{'"nllll-~p\l\nl!lllninl,\Fllrn1~}?' Hnnrlnllf..\7"nil\u ppnnit An"lir:tlinn Fnrm dn,. From: To: CC: Date: Subject: David Wood Amy Gunter johnsons@ashland.or.us 2/22/2010 7:29 AM Re: 1610 Clark Street Amy, I went by and looked at the trees and they are closer than 10' to the power lines, If she gets the permit to remove them, I will have to go and clear them back 10' away before a private arborist can remove them, David >>> Amy Gunter 2/16/2010 9:51 AM >>> Hello all, Judy Beyer from Ashland Supportive Housing came in regarding the Cedar Trees at 1610 Clark (formerly 720 Walker Ave.) they are N eight inches into the public right of way but they are directly under the overhead lines. She is contemplating a tree removal permit but said they are way closer to the lines than lO-feet. Do you have time to run by there and check them out? Judy can be reached at 541-488-2870 or 541-601-4017, Thanks. Amy Amy D. Gunter, Assistant Planner City of Ashland, Dept. of Community Development 20 E Main Street Ashland, OR 97520 phone: 541.552,2044 fax: 541.552.2050 TIY: 800,735,2900 This email transmission is official business of the City of Ash/an~ and it is subject to Oregon Public Records law for disclosure and retention, If you have received this message in erro/~ please contact me at 541.552.2044, Thank you,