HomeMy WebLinkAboutOak_89-93_PA-2011-00335
CITY OF
ASHLAND
May 10,2011
Standing Stone Brewing Co.
101 Oak St.
Ashland OR 97520
Notice of Final Decision
On May 10, 2011, the Staff Advisor for the Ashland Planning Division administratively approved your
request for the following:
PLANNING ACTION: 2011-00335
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 89 - 93 Oak Street
APPLICANT: Carlos Delgado for Alex Amarotico
DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Review permit approval for a modification to the exterior of a structure listed as a
Primary Contributing Structure in the Ashland Histone Resources Inventory, The P.W. Paulson Building was
constructed circ 1905 as three retail / office spaces. The applicant is proposing to rehabilitate the original 1905 street
fagade through renovation based on early historical photos and postcards. The applicant is also working with the State
Historic Preservation Office to obtain Special Assessment Designation for the building, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
DESIGNATION: Commercial, Downtown;
ZONING: C-1-D; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 391E 09BB; TAX LOT: 10300
The Staff Advisor's decision becomes fInal and is effective on the 13th day after the Notice of Final
Decision is mailed.
Prior to that date, anyone who was mailed this Notice Of Final Decision may request a reconsideration of
the action by the Staff Advisor as set forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO)
18.108.070(B)(2)(b) and/or fIle an appeal to the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in the ALUO
18.1 08.070(B)(2)( c). \
An appeal may not be made directly to the Land Use Board of Appeals. Oregon law states that failure to
raise an objection concerning this application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specifIcity to afford
the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that
issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your right of
appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to
proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specifIcity to allow this Department to respond to the
issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court.
The application, all associated documents and evidence submitted, and the applicable criteria are available
for review at no cost at the Ashland Community Development Department, located at 51 Winburn Way.
Copies of fIle documents can be requested and are charged based on the City of Ashland copy fee
schedule.
If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact the Department of Community
Development between the hours of 8:00 am and 4:30 pm, Monday through Friday at (541) 488-5305.
cc: Parties of Record and Property owners within 200 ft
DEPT. OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
20 E. Main Street
Ashland, Oregon 97520
www.ashland.or.us
Tel: 541-488-5305
Fax: 541-552-2050
TTY: 800-735-2900
ASHLAND PLANNING COMMISSION
FINDINGS & ORDERS
PLANNING ACTION: 2011-00335
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 89 - 93 Oak Street
APPLICANT: Carlos Delgado for Alex Amarotico
DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Review permit approval for a modification to the exterior of a
structure listed as a Primary Contributing Structure in the Ashland Historic Resources Inventory. The
P.W. Paulson Building was constructed circ 1905 as three retail / office spaces. The applicant is
proposing to rehabilitate the original 1905 street fayade through renovation based on early historical
photos and postcards. The applicant is also working with the State Historic Preservation Office to obtain
Special Assessment Designation for the building.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial, Downtown;
ZONING: C-1-D; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 IE 09BB; TAX LOT: 10300
SUBMITTAL DATE:
DEEMED COMPLETE DATE:
STAFF APPROVAL DATE:
FINAL DECISION DATE:
APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE:
March 21,2011
April 21, 2011
May 11,2011
May 23,2011
May 23,2012
DECISION
The subject property is located between East Main Street and Lithia Way, on the west side of Oak
Street. The existing buildings are on the National Register of Historic Places and are in the Downtown
Historic District. The subject property is located at 89 - 93 Oak Street and is known as the P.W. Paulson
Building built in 1905. The structure has gone through many changes throughout the years, but still has
maintained its recessed entryways and essential character.
The applicant is proposing to reconstruct the fayade of the P. W. Paulson Building using historical
photographs. A previous approval allowed for the removal of the internal partitions and one small
restroom, and installation of an ADA compliant restroom, an office, and the relocated walk-in cooler in
the rear of the building.
Because this proposal involves modifications to the exterior of the structure, Ashland Municipal Code
(AMe) 18.72.030.A.g states that exterior changes to structures that are considered Historic Contributing
in the Ashland Historical Resources Inventory are subject to Site Review.
The P.W. Paulson building at 89 - 93 Oak is a single story masonry structure with three recessed retail
storefront bays. The structure had stucco applied at some point in the 1930s creating a smooth finish
without parapet or other embellishments. The building has three angled three-part bays with a central,
wood and glass door below a single fixed transom window.
The applicant has proposed to restore the exterior storefronts and public interior spaces to better reflect
the historic character of the building. The restoration will also utilize the full interior height of the
retails spaces by removing the drop ceilings. New wood and glass storefronts, reflecting the original
proportions and design will be constructed. Additionally the exterior brick elements of the fayade will be
re-exposed and recreated to re-establish the original design. The applicant has proposed to expose or
recreate the parapet and cornice and enhance with elements such as columns, varying finish textures and
rosettes. There were existing awnings over the storefronts but the applicant has chosen to not replace
PA #2011-00335
89 -93 Oak St/adg
Page 1
those. The applicant is using historic photographs and on-site exploration to determine the 'historical
elements' .
The applicant has also begun seismic upgrades to the building and has added steel beams and new 16 X
16 cast concrete columns to improve the structural support.
The proposed restoration will not detract from the historic character of the building but will add
significant character by restoring the building to its original design and fa<;ade. The proposal is in
compliance with the Site Review chapter and the Site Design and Use Standards handbook. There will
not be any impact on the capacity of the utilities, or transportation to ~d through the property.
The Historic Commission reviewed the application and recommended that the permit be approved as
submitted.
The criteria for Site Review Approval are described in AMC Chapter 18.72.070, as follows:
A. All applicable City ordinances have been met or will be met by the proposed development.
B. All requirements of the Site Review Chapter have been met or will be met.
C. The development complies with the Site Design Standards adopted by the City Council for implementation
of this Chapter.
D. That adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, paved access to and through the development,
electricity, urban storm drainage, and adequate transporlation can and will be provided to and through the
subject properly.
The application with the attached conditions complies with all applicable City ordinances.
Planning Action 2011-0335 is approved with the following conditions. Further, if anyone or more of the
following conditions are found to be invalid for any reason whatsoever, then Planning 2011-0335 is
denied. The following are the conditions and they are attached to the approval:
1) That all proposals of the applicant shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise modified here.
2) That the building permit submittals shall be in substantial conformance with those submitted as part
of this planning application. If the building permit submittals differ from those submitted as part of
the planning act,ion, a modification of this approval will be required.
3) That the previously recorded deed restriction to the property requiring that the owner shall be
responsible for proving a crane for work, repair, qr maintenance as deemed by the City of Ashland
Electric Department on the existing electrical transformer shall remain on the property.
4) That the applicant review final plans with both the Ashland Historic Review Board and the State
Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) before issuance of building permit if a building permit is found
ceSSt:h\---
PA #2011-00335
89 -93 Oak Stladg
Page 2
PA-2011-00335 391 E09BB 14400 PA-2011-00335 391 E09BB 10801 PA-2011-00335 391E09BB 10500
58 E MAIN STREET LLC CLAYCOMB GORDON E CONKLIN JAMES D ET AL
PO BOX 306 105 CHRISTY COURT PO BOX 246
ASHLAND OR 97520 PHOENIX OR 97535 ASHLAND OR 97520
PA-2011-00335 391 E09BB 13000 PA-2011-00335 391 E09BB 11900 PA-2011-00335 391 E09BB 11700
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK/OR NA GREG BAILEY ENTERPRISES II LLC HAINES LLOYD M
POBOX 2609 4902 MT ASHLAND SKI RD 96 MAIN ST
CARLS BAD CA 92018 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520
PA-2011-00335 391 E09BB 12000 PA-2011-00335 391 E09BB 14500 PA-2011-00335 391E09BB 11600
HOADLEY LLOYD A TRUSTEE ET AL OR SHAKESPEAREAN FEST ASSN PAGE JOSEPH
981 PARK ST 274 HARVARD 1 LOUDON LN
ASHLAND OR 97520 MEDFORD OR 97504 LOUDONVILLE NY 12211
PA-2011-00335 391 E09BB 14600 PA-2011-00335 391 E09BB 10300 PA-2011-00335 391E09BB 12100
SACKS STEPHEN STANDING STONE BREWING CO UHTOFF KATHERINE J TRUSTEE ET AL
50 W NEVADA 101 OAK ST 633 ROCA ST
ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520
PA-2011-00335 PA-2011-00335 P A~20 11-00335
State Historic Preservation Office Carlos Delgado 386 N Laurel
Susan Haylock 217 Fourth St Ashland OR 97520
725 Summer St NE, Ste C Ashland OR 97520
Salem, OR 97301-1266
15 NOD
89-93 (101) Oak
4-21-2011
ASHLAND HISTORIC COMMISSION
Type I - Recommendations to Staff Advisor
May 4th, 2011
CITY OF
ASHLAND
PLANNING ACTION: 2011-00335
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 89 - 93 Oak Street
APPLI CANT: Carlos Delgado for Alex Amarotico
DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Review permit approval for a
modification to the exterior of a structure listed as a Primary Contributing Structure in the
Ashland Historic Resources Inventory. The P. W. Paulson Building was constructed circ
1905 as three retail/office spaces. The applicant is proposing to rehabilitate the original
1905 street fa9ade through renovation based on early historical photos and postcards. The
applicant is also working with the State Historic Preservation Office to obtain Special
Assessment Designation for the building.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial, Downtown;
ZONING: C-I-D; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 IE 09BB; TAX LOT: 10300
Commission Recommendations:
The Commission recommended support of the application, recognizing that this type of application is exactly
what Historic Commissions dream about.
Commissioners recommended that the permit be approved as submitted,
May 4, 2011
BUILDING COLOR SUBMITTAL FOR HISTORIC COMMISSION
FOR HISTORIC FAC;ADE RENOVATION:
P. W. Paulson Building @ 89, 91, and 93 Oak Street
Address:
Map:
Tax lot:
Zoning:
Owner/Applicant:
Date:
Architect:
89 - 93 OAK STREET, ASHLAND, OR
39 1E 0988
10300
C-I-D (RETAIL COMMERCIAL DOWNTOWN o VERLA Y)
ALEX AMAROTlCO
02/09/11
CARLOS DELGADO ARCHITECT - 552.9502
,*
-.+
(Y)
<:t
(Y)
....
c
~
=e
~
-.+
(")
<:t
(Y)
.7\( Columns
Zimbra
Page 1 of 1
Zimbra
seversod@ashland.or.UI
:t Font size=-
Project # 2011-00335
From: Susan Haylock <susan.haylock@state.or.us> Mon, Apr 25, 2011 02:22 PM
Subject: Project # 2011-00335
To : Derek Severson <seversod@ashland.or.us>
Hi Mr. Severson
I received a copy of the "Notice of Application" from Mr. Delgado for Alex Amarotico regarding the P. W. Paulson Building proposed
storefront rehabilitation. As you know, the owner applied for the Special Assessment of Historic Property Tax benefit for this property,
which was recently certified by our office. The tax benefit will commence on July 1, 2011. The proposed Preservation Plan which
contains the storefront facade rehabilitation was approved by our office, as submitted.
Susan Haylock
Preservation Specialist
State Historic Preservation Office
725 Summer St NE Ste C
Salem OR 97301
503-986-0672
FAX 503-986-0793
susan. haylock@state.or.us
www.oreaonheritage.org
http://zimbra.ashland.or . us/zimbra/h/printmessage 7id=C: -40960
4/26/2011
Planning Department, 51 Winb-,". .ay, Ashland, Oregon 97520
541-488-5305 Fax: 541-552-2050 www,ashland,or,us TTY: 1-800-735-2900
CITY OF
AS LAN
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
PLANNING ACTION: 2011-00335
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 89 - 93 Oak Street
APPLICANT: Carlos Delgado for Alex Amarotico
DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Review permit approval for a modification to the exterior of a structure listed as a
Primary Contributing Structure in the Ashland Historic Resources Inventory. The P.W. Paulson Building was
constructed circ 1905 as three retail / office spaces. The applicant is proposing to rehabilitate the original 1905 street
fayade through renovation based on early historical photos and postcards. The applicant is also working with the State
Historic Preservation Office to obtain Special Assessment Designation for the building.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial, Downtown;
ZONING: C-I-D; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 IE 09BB; TAX LOT: 10300
NOTE: The Ashland Historic Commission will also review this Planning Action on May 4, 2011 at 6:00 PM in the Community Development
and Engineering Services building (Siskiyou Room), located at 51 Winburn Way.
NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: Apri/21, 2011
DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: May 5,2011
The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted above.
Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submit written comments to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland,
Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m. on the deadline date shown above,
Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a
notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for a 14 day comment period, After the
comment period and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the
application, A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision, An appeal to the Planning Commission of the Planning
Division Staff's decision must be made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC
18.108.040)
The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this
application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right
of appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also preclUdes
your right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval
with sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court.
A copy of the application, all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and
will be provided at reasonable cost, if requested. All materials are available at the Ashland Planning Division, Community Development & Engineering
Services Building, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520.
If you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contact the Ashland Planning Division at 541-488-5305.
G:lcomm-devlplanninglNotices Mailed\201 1\201 1-00335,doc
SITE DESIGN AND USE STANDARDS
18,72,070 Criteria for Approval
The following criteria shall be used to approve or deny an application:
A All applicable City ordinances have been met or will be met by the proposed development.
B. All requirements of the Site Review Chapter have been met or will be met.
C. The development complies with the Site Design Standards adopted by the City Council for implementation of this Chapter.
D, That adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, paved access to and through the development, electricity, urban storm drainage, and adequate
transportation can and will be provided to and through the subject property, All improvements in the street right-of-way shall comply with the Street
Standards in Chapter 18,88, Performance Standards Options,
(ORD 2655,1991; ORD 2836,1999)
G:\comm-dev\planninglNotices Mailed\20 11 \20 11-0033 5 .doc
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
STATE OF OREGON )
County of Jackson )
The undersigned being first duly sworn states that:
1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland,
Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department.
2. On April 21, 2011 I caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed
envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to
each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list
under each personls name for Planning Action #2011-00335, 89-93 Oak Street.
G:lcomm-devlplanningIForms & HandoutslAffidavit of Mailing_Planning Action Notice,doc
PA-2011-00335 391 E09BB 14400 PA-2011-00335 391 E09BB 10801 PA-2011-00335 391 E09BB 10500
58 E MAIN STREET LLC CLAYCOMB GORDON E CONKLIN JAMES D ET AL
PO BOX 306 105 CHRISTY COURT PO BOX 246
ASHLAND OR 97520 PHOENIX OR 97535 ASHLAND OR 97520
PA-2011-00335 391 E09BB 13000 PA-2011-00335 391E09BB 11900 PA-2011-00335 391E09BB 11700
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK/OR NA GREG BAILEY ENTERPRISES II LLC HAINES LLOYD M
POBOX 2609 4902 MT ASHLAND SKI RD 96 MAIN ST
CARLSBAD CA 92018 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520
PA-2011-00335 391 E09BB 12000 PA-2011-00335 391 E09BB 14500 PA-2011-00335 391E09BB 11600
HOADLEY LLOYD A TRUSTEE ET AL OR SHAKESPEAREAN FEST ASSN PAGE JOSEPH
981 PARK ST 274 HARVARD 1 LOUDON LN
ASHLAND OR 97520 MEDFORD OR 97504 LOUDONVILLE NY 12211
PA-2011-00335 391 E09BB 14600 PA-2011-00335 391 E09BB 10300 PA-2011-00335 391E09BB 12100
SACKS STEPHEN STANDING STONE BREWING CO UHTOFF KATHERINE J TRUSTEE ET AL
50 W NEVADA 101 OAK ST 633 ROCA ST
ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520
PA-2011-00335 PA-2011-00335 14
State Historic Preservation Office Carlos Delgado 89-93 (101) Oak
Susan Haylock 217 Fourth St 4-21-2011
725 Summer St NE, Ste C Ashland OR 97520
Salem, OR 97301-1266
"'-""'"
,/
,.;;,.r-........
..' ....,/'.......... .".......
// ;/ ') ,
...." 1100 /7 \/ >., "
.... /,'/~// "'~~:... JACKSON
,'/ ,'.(........~.......... .......~J"'~./t' ,/~ /:00 / ~ ):. Th"~. :.~~~~~~_
./ otitLf'tj','", VV I <,.... ..,/). ';,' complied by Jackson County From a variety
,.vvv,' l'" .J.i i~ _,,/' . . .',_ /'/:,l500 of sources, Jackson County cannot accept
/?"-,~ /:" '~Jt I.:I~" ,/ ~~itl~~~~I~c~~r:;~r~h~~I~~~~~ or
;. -.' warranties, expressed or Implied.
Created with MapMaker Map created on 4/20/2011 9:54:58 AJ..IJ usIng web,jacksoncounty.org
,I
,./
/
,
/" ....... --'- -----{ "
. ..... ~..'. ----'r' ..........,.l
Ir-..~l ,,- ft60 IV-,V't'
1~ /. ,1-"'" 16(JOO '//I~~:::!j ./
V 'bl/'{"" ~t;'~ <;/
/ l....;. I ~~---..;;; /
-Ml.tlOO. ~.v';t.......:... .,.,...//
l
i
...
\., }
l
'. '\..' '''.. ""'1",//
I'"
/ """-,
""<".,
,/'
"
,,/i;:.:
t/'~.J
"
,I SOO
i
,/
""'~
,~j'!' -"0',
'~~J., \:.>..
~,("'J'~ .<""~~
.1:..... ~"!. "- ...
:;:;-p ',8;00(1()'
:' ' ~OOO.'. 2. .1'~11'~~)
, ./ \.J1 ;{
\" ..... )i......J.""~l
\, ......-.. / ,l
\9100 ,/ /
lj)' /
'l~} ~l
, '96:0()"
\\',':;( //
. l"
... /
/
10100
/
"
/", "."'''''.
/
/
10000
9.200
}>'
"""'''",-l \ ....--
,.: ,l~~)-,.
//? ~'(1....d{'
,I }~
/i rt~ t.] .~
./ (~l ~i1j:]
'~.jl
12~)/
!ll
i
.~~
,~OO,.
3600
l
./'/
../
"
11Soo
/
J
asoo
."'.,
8400
70000
J.r..-."..
1 z...;;;-:E.::....
l ~
Jt..( l 114007
-!b,. /
/..,""'.~)~, .//
. "'" '.""",
I )~,.:"
'11-3.00 / ...... '"
l ,ill ,i)(
\"'" ,/11:001,."
:0:,"" X/ i/
~~ ,/11100/
"'"~~~(" I,i/
~(iOO
",,:;;
"i::
1800 . I
..", u.' .1
11001
SO(J01 r I
"H I
~~
\
@ Please recycle wIth colored office grade paper
Map Maker
Application
Frollt Counter Legend
Highlighted Feature
the Buffer
lheBuflerTarget
Tax Lot oumnes
Tax Lot Numbers
.
Mobile Home Parks
Apartments
/'/ Buildings
CITY OF
ASHLA 0
\/\1'" d'I.J, ,
",,t,, \..' " th
February 25 , 2011
State Historic Preservation Office
Attn: Susan Q. Haylock, Preservation Specialist
725 Summer St NE, Ste C
Salem, OR 97301-1266
Re: Special Assessment of Historic Property at 89-93 Oak Street
Dear Ms. Haylock,
After reviewing the materials you forwarded on February 25th concerning an application for Special
Assessment of Historic Property at 89-83 Oak Street in Ashland, the City of Ashland would like to
express our support for the application. The subject property, identified as the P.W. Paulson Building in
our survey of the Ashland Downtown Historic District, is considered to be a Primary Contributing
Resource. Our survey document indicates that as originally built the building featured an elaborate brick
cornice with corbelling and other details that were subsequently removed. The storefronts have been
altered as well, but our survey notes that the building generally retains its recessed central entryways and
essential character with sufficient integrity to relate its development history. Preliminary review of the
preservation plan you've provided, and meetings on site with the applicant, suggest that the proposal
will lead to significant exterior improvements to the existing resource which would replicate the
previously removed details based on historic photos, significantly enhancing the building's presence in
the Oak Street streetscape (which has already greatly benefitted from the applicant's work to restore the
adjacent Whittle Garage building).
The applicants have recently submitted a land use application for the improvements proposed which will
be reviewed by Ashland's Planning staff and the Ashland Historic Commission shortly. I've provided a
copy of that application with this letter, and can forward Historic Commission recommendations and the
findings document once that review is complete.
If you have questions, or if I can provide any further information, assistance or clarification, please don't
hesitate to contact me at 541-552-2040 or e-mail derek.severson@ashland.or.us.
Sincerely,
,~r2-~
Derek Severson, Associate Planner
StcifJ Liaison to the Ashland Historic Commission
Cc:
File, Property Owner, Historic Commission
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Planning Division Voice: 541-552-2040
51 Winburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050
Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY:1-800-735-2900
W\WJ.ashland,or,us derek.severson(ijJ.ashland ,or. us
~~
John A. Kitzhaber, MD, Governor
Parks and Recreation Department
State Historic Preservation Office
725 Summer St NE, Ste C
Salem, OR 97301-1266
(503) 986-0671
Fax (503) 986-0793
www,oregonheritage,org
-1 r.::
,:/-0";)
February ,Y(,2011
Nature
HISTORY
Discol'ery
Derek Severson
Ashland Dept of Community Development
51 Winburn Wy
Ashalnd OR 97520
Dear Mr. Severson:
Enclosed is a copy of an application for the Special Assessment of Historic Property program for
a property located in your jurisdiction. We have performed an initial review, and would like to
afford you the opportunity to review the application and provide your comments.
As you may be aware, the current statute for the program allows the owner to bypass
SHPO review for projects in their Preservation Plan that would be subject to local design
review. So, in addition to any overall comments on the application we are also asking that
you identify those projects in the enclosed Plan that would trigger local design review.
Please respond within 30-days from the date of this letter, We will consider your comments with
those of the county assessor during the final review of the application. Information may be
provided via e-mail.
If approved, special assessment for this property would become effective for the tax year
beginning July 1, 2011.
Thank you for your time. Please contact me at 503-986-0672, or Susan.Haylock@state.or.us if
you have any questions.
Sincerely,
~;~L~/d---
Preservation Specialist
SQH:sqh
Enclosures
John A. Kitzhabel~ MD, Governor
Parks and Recreation Department
State Historic Preservation Office
725 Summer St NE, Ste C
Salem, OR 97301-1266
(503) 986-0671
Fax (503) 986-0793
www.oregonheritage,org
March 31,2001
Nature
HISTORY
Dfscovery
Derek Severson
City of Ashland Dept. of Comm. Dev.
51 Winburn Way
Ashalnd OR 97520
Dear Mr. Severson:
Enclosed please find a copy of the SHPO-signed Celiificate of Participation form for the
historic property in your jurisdiction known as the P. W. Paulson Building located at 89-
93 Oak Street. This certificate serves as official approval for the owner of this property
to pmiicipate in the Special Assessment of Historic Property tax benefit program
beginning July 1, 2011.
The back ofthe certificate outlines the owner, SHPO, and local government
requirements,
If you have any questions, please contact me at (503)-986-0672, or
Susan,Haylock@state.or.us.
Sincerely,
~ If~/ntc-
Susan Haylock
Special Assessment Program Coordinator
Enclosure
Parks and Recreation Dept._736_0)O
r'~g.t;.J Ul 1 J.
(3) The SEPO shall monitor owner compliance with program requirements by requesting such information from
owners as is directly related to matters set forth in ORS 358.475 to 358.545 or in this division. If an owner does
not respond to the request by providing the required information within the specitled time, the SIIPO may seek
mandatory remedial action and/or initiate rcmoval of the property's special assessment pursuant to OAR 736-
050-0135,
(4) Participants who entered the program prior to September 28,2009:
(n) Must submit Preservation Plan \lpdates to the SEPO in the 5th, 10th and 14th year of the 15-year benefit
period in lieu of the reporting schedule in ORS 358,500(1); and
(b) Are exempt from the requirement to submit a report by the end of the fifth year demonstrating compliance
with the expenditure commitment under the Preservation Plan us described in ORS 358.487(2)(a),
Sta\. Auth,; ORS 358,545
8Ms, Implemented: ORS 358.480,358,500, & 358.515
His!.; PR 7-1984, f, & ef, ]2-6-84; PR 2-]992, f, & cer\. ef, 5-1-92; PR 1]-1995, f, & cer\. ef, ]2-21-95; PRD 4-
2002, f, & eel'\. ef. 4-]0-02; PRD 3.2006, f, & cer!. ef, 5-8-06; PRD 2-2007, f, & cer\. ef, 2.8.07; PRD 3-2007,
r. & cer\. ef, 4-13-07: PRD ]4-2009(Temp), f, & cert. ef, 9-28-09 thru 3-26-10; PRD 4-20]0, f, & eel'\. ef, 2-3..
10
736-050.0125
Changes and Alterations to Propel'ties Approved for Special Assessment
(1) Pursuant to ORS 358,565, the SEPO delcgates special ussessment upplication and design review approval
authority to the Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer (DSEPO), The DSHPO shull rely on the expertise of
qualified staff in making program decisions,
(2) Owners shall apply in writing on forms provided by the SEPO or the governing body, whichever is
appropriate, for review and written approval before undertaking any work on specially-assessed property,
(3) Additional material may include photos, drawings, as well as product and work descriptions.
(4) A change permissible in one circumstance does not necessarily constitute justification or a precedent for a
similar change in another circumstance. The SHPO shall evc1luate proposed changes on a case-by-ease basis,
(5) Governing bodies approved by the SHPO for conducting historic reviews must have:
(a) A historic preservation ordinance or historic design guidelines based on the historic rehabilitation standards,
11S defined in ORS 358.480(12); and
(b) Demonstrated expe11ise interpreting and implementing the historic rehabilitation sl<llldards,
(6) Governing bodies shall address in their decision-making proc.ess, and in the written record of their decision,
any recommendations provided to them by the SEPO as part of its review, including justification for eHhel'
nbcepting 01' rejecting those recommendations,
Stat, Auth,: ORS 358,545
Stats, Implemented; ORS 358.487, 358.490 & 358,565
His\.: PR 7-1984, f. & ef. 12-6-84; PR 2-] 992, f, & cer\. ef. 5-1-92; PR 11-] 995,1', & cert. ef, ] 2-2]-95; PRD 4-
2002, f, & cert, ef, 4-10-02; PRD 3-2006, f. & cert. ef, 5-8-06; PRD 14-2009(Temp), f. & cel'l. ef. 9-28-09 thl'u
http://arcweb,sos,state,or,us/nlles/OARS_700/0AR..736/736_050.htI111
]/11/2011
MUSEUMS; HIS'l'ORIC PRESERVA'l'ION
358,505
(3) PrDperty may not be classified and
speciall)' assessed pursuant to application
filed under ORS 358,487 or :158.540 if the ap.
plication is filed on 01' after July 1, 2020,
11995 ..693 119; 2001 ..510 i7; 2009 ,,892 H8l
Note: Sea note under 358.476.
Note, 358.199 WM eno.tad into low by tho Legisla.
tivo Assembly but wus not added to or made u purt of
ORS chapter 358 01' fUlY series tllf.H'oin by legislative
action, See Preface to Oregon Revised Statures for fur-
thel' explanation.
(Reports)
358,500 Repol'ting requiroment; work
'lPpl'Oval. (1) The owner of propel'ty certiiied
I'DI' special assessment as historic property
under ORS 358.490 shall submit written
progress reports concerning the preservation
plan to tho State Hiatm'ic Preservatiun Offi-
cer in a form prescribed by the officer on or
before Deceml:ier 31 of the third, sixth and
ninth years of the historic property special
assessment pel10rl under ORS 358,487 to
:158.54:3.
(2) In addition to the reports required
under subsection (1) of this section, at tho
end of the first five years for which historic:
prDperty srecial assessment is granted, the
Dwner shall submit 1'1 report demonstrating
cDmpliance with the expenditure commitment
under the preservation plan as described in
ORB 358.487 (2)(a).
(3)(a) The State Historic PreservatiDn
Officer is at all times authDrized to demand
and receive reports from Dwners of property
classified and specially assessed as historic
property under ORS a58.487 to a58,543 as to
the continued qualification of the property
fDr historic prDperty classification and spe-
cial assessment, The content of reports and
times for reporting under this subsectiDn
shall be determined by the Dfficer, If' the
Dwner fails, after 30 days' wdtten netice by
mail, return receipt requested, to comply
with the officer~s demand, tho officer shall
immediately notify the assessor and the as-
sessor shall witharaw the property frDm spo-
cial assessment and apply the penalties
pl'Ovided by ORS a58.525,
(b) 1'he State Historic Preservation Offi-
cel' may conduct on-site. inspections of his-
toric proporty granted speCIal assessment,
with 01' withollt cause, upon :30 days' nDtice,
('1)(a) Befor(J starting an)' work that is
described in a preservation plan Dr that af.
fects historic features Df property certified
as historic property pursuant to this chapter,
the owner Df the property must apply for and
receive written aPP1'oval;
(A) l"rom the local governing bDdy if:
(I) The gDverning body has a historic
preservation ordinance and review process
that has been approved by the State Historic
Title 30
Pl'eservation Officer and under which the
historic property is already regulated;
(ii) The proposed work requires histDric
review by the governing body's histodc pres.
ervation ordinance and review process; and
(Hi) The governing body has not re-
quested that apprDval Df work pursuant to
this section be handled by the State Historic
Preservation Officer; or
(B) If' the conditiDns in subparagraph (A)
of this paragraph have not been met, frDm
the State Historic Preservation Officel',
(b) All 1V0rk must meet the historic re-
habilitation standards,
(5) If the gDverning body's apprDval is
required undel' subsection (4) of this section,
the governing body shall notily the State
Historic Preservation Officer of the proposed
work. The governing bDdy shall allDw the of-
ficer at least 14 days to comment on the
proposed work before making a decision on
the application, 12009 c,892 i7}
Note: See note under 358.475.
358.502 [1957 e,198 i1; repe.led by 1957 d9G !10)
358.W111957 c.198 !3, repCll1cd by 1957 ..196 !101
(Benefit Computation)
358.505 Determination of specially a~.
sessed value, maximum assessed value
and assessed value of historic pl'opertYl
appeals. (l)(a) Except as provided in para-
graphs (b) and (c) of this subsection, for
pl'Operty certified for special assessment as
historic property \mder ORB 858.490, the
cDunty assessor shall for 10 consecutive tax
years list on the assessment and tax roll a
specially assessed value that eC[uals the as-
sessed value Df the property at the time ap-
plication was made under ORS :158,487.
(b) If' the prDperty certified for special
assessment as histDric prDperty was exempt
01' specially assessed at the time the applica-
tion was made, the county asseSSDr shall for
10 consecutive tax years list Dn the assess-
ment and tax rDll a specially assessed value
that equals the product of the real market
vahle of the property fDr the tax year in
which the application was made multiplied
by tho ratio of the average maximum as-
sessed vahle over the average real market
value for that tax year Df property in the
same area and property class.
(c) If' the property certified for special
assessment as histodc property is a condo-
minium unit being assessed upon initial sale
by the develDpor, the CD\lnty asseSSOl' shall
fOl' the tax years of the remaining tenn of
historie property special assessment list on
the assessment and tax roll a specially as-
sessed value that eq\lals the Pl'oduct of the
real market value of the property for the tax
Page 17
(2009 Edition)
;,
SPECI~ ' SSESSMENT OF HISTORIC PROPERTY PROGp,
Application Form/Certification
Instructions: Please fill out the form completely. Type or print In Ink. Be sure to read the paragraph above the
signature line before signing. Submit this form along with the Preservation Plan and all supplementary material as
indicated on the enclosed checklist. Incomplete applications will be returned.
1. Property Information
Historic Name of Property.: PAULSON. P.W. BuildinCl
Property Address:
Street: 89-93 OAK STREET
City: ASHLAND'
COl,lnty:. JACKSON (029)
Zip 97520
National Register District and rank (if applicable): Ashland Downtown HD. Site #38.0 (Survev #291)
Date Listed on the National Register: 5-Mav-2000. NRIS #98000631
2. Property Tax Information:
Tax Account Number: 1-006685-3
Does owner reside in property? 0 Yes 0 No
Current Assessed Value: $222,600.00 Current Real Market Value (RMV): $411.480,00
d- 91') d~ D
Application Fee (Assessed Value x .001 ~rPlease see attached correspondence from Jackson Countvl
3. Preservation Plan Overview:
Current Use: 0 Residential 0 Res.lMulti-family 0 Commercial 0 Agricultural 0 Industrial
FIRST TERM: Ii!l
SECOND TERM: 0
Estimated Cost of Rehabilitation:
$ 125.000
4. Owner Information:
Owner Name: Attn: Alex Amarotico
Organization/business: Standin~ Stone ElrewinCl Co LLC
Address: 101 Oak Street
City: Ashland
State: Ore!:lon ,
Phone:1!i4+.84G:-&499--' 5.'-1-1 ~ ~ 9 j..- ;zJfft5
Zip: 97520
E-mail: a!ex(wstandinClstonebrewinq.com
Representative: Geor!:le Kramer
Phone: 541-482-9504. g,e..Qffi.~llreserveOl'eqon.com
I certify that I have read and understand that this application and any attachments accurately represent the property
to be specially-assessed. I agree to grant access for the viewing of the property by the State Historic Preservation
Officer, the Stl;lte Historic Preservation Officer's staff, and the Historic Assessment Review Committee.
)
\ \
SHPO Authorized Signature and Date
Date Special Assessment Begins:
Date Special Assessment Ends:
Carolyn Schwendener
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Carlos Delgado [carlos@mind.net]
Monday, March 21, 2011 3:55 PM
'Carolyn Schwendener'
FW: Paulson Building, 89-93 Oak
Carolyn -
Below is an email from Susan Haylock that should serve as an approval to the amended SHPO
application that I mentioned was pending in the Site Review application. Could you include
this email in the packet?
Carlos
Carlos Delgado
Arc hit e c t
217 Fourth Street
Ashland) OR 97520
541.552.9502
carlos@CarlosDelgadoArchitect.com
www.CarlosDelgadoArchitect.com
-----Original Message-----
From: George Kramer [mailto:george@preserveoregon.com]
Sent: Monday) March 21) 2011 3:16 PM
To: 'Susan Haylock'
Cc: carlos@mind.netj alex@standingstonebrewing.com
Subject: RE: Paulson Building) 89-93 Oak
Thanks Suzie... I will make the changes in our copies and make sure that the City is aware of
SHPO's acknowledgement.
GK
George Kramer
Ashland) Oregon
-----Original Message-----
From: Susan Haylock [mailto:susan.haylock@state.or.us]
Sent: Monday) March 21) 2011 2:52 PM
To: George Kramer
Subject: Re: Paulson Building) 89-93 Oak
Hi George
No need to resubmit the Plan. I agree that we can just do some "lining out" a portion of the
first sentence of the last paragraph of Item 2 (proposal side). I think we want to leave the
beginning portion of that sentence that states) "Existing awnings will be removed during
construction" and then delete everything else) but the last sentence.
I will also file a copy of this e-mail in the file) which makes it crystal clear what the
revised intention is. Thanks for alerting me to this change.
1
Suzie
>>> "George Kramer" <george(alpreserveoregon.com> 3/21/2011 9:55 AM >>>
Suzie,
Upon further consideration, the owner of this project has determined that they will NOT re-
install the awnings currently on the building as proposed in Item 2 (Storefronts) of the
Preservation Plan that we submitted in early
February. As you will recall the proposal was to remove the
existing,
non-historic, canvas and metal awnings during construction and then re-install them at a
slightly higher elevation to allow increased light from the re-opened/restored transom
panels. Now we are simply proposing to remove the awnings and, upon completion of the
project, leave the full fa?ade open.
Do you require a modified Item 2 or an amendment to the plan? I am comfortable with simply
lining out the first sentence of the final paragraph in Item #2 Proposed Treatment but it
would not be at all difficult to send you a revised item, clarifying our intent.
Please advise? We need to inform the City of Ashland as to SHPO?s position on this change, as
part of the local planning process.
Thanksl
George Kramer, M.S.
Kramer & Company
386 North Laurel
Ashland, Oregon 97520
voice: 541.482.9504
fax:541.482.9438
www.preserveoregon.com
http://thepreserveoregonblog.blogspot.com/
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.894 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3518 - Release Date: 03/21/11 00:34:00
2
II
Carlos Delgado
ARCHITECT
Mar 18, 2011
Findings of Fact
for
Detail Site Review, Historic District Design Standards and Downtown Design
Standards
Request for approval for exterior modifications to contributing historic fa~ade
Subject Property:
89,91,93 Oak Street
Assessor's Map 39 1 E 0988 Tax Lot 10300
Zoning C-1-D, Retail Employment District
Proposed Scope of Work:
Exterior modifications to building fagade listed as contributing on the
Historic Resources Inventory
Submitted to:
City of Ashland Planning Department
Submitted for:
Alex Amarotico
Prepared by:
Carlos Delgado Architect
217 Fourth Street
Ashland, Oregon 97520
541.552.9502
217 Fourth Street · Ashland, Oregon 97520 541.552.9502 carlos@CarlosDelgadoArchitect.com
Amarotico - 89, 91, 93 O~ "ltreet (Paulson Building) Map 391 E09: - Lot 10300
Findings of Fact: Site Revlt:::vv
03/18/11
Findings of Fact for Detail Site Review, Historic District Design Standards and Downtown Design
Standards
Exterior modifications to building fac;ade listed as contributing on the Historic Resources Inventory
The scope of work: Fac;ade renovation and Special Assessment of Historic Property application supplied
by George Kramer enclosed.
This application demonstrates compliance to Development Standards for Basic Site and Detail Site
Review pursuant to City of Ashland Land Use Ordinance. Sections of the Ordinance and the Design
Standards as deemed applicable, in whole or in part, are described in the following 'Findings of Fact.'
Findings by the Applicant/Agent are inserted immediately following each section of the ordinance.
Respectfully Submitted,
Carlos Delgado
Architect
Ordinances
18.32 - C-1 Retail Commercial District
18.32.050 C-1-D Downtown Overlay District
18.61 - Tree Preservation and Protection
18.68 - General Regulations
18.70 - Solar Access
18. 72 - Site Design & Use Standards
18.92 - Off-Street Parking
PAGE
3
4
5
8
8
12
Site Design and Use Standards
Section II - Approval Standards and Policies
A. Ordinance Landscaping Requirements
C. Commercial, Employment, and Industrial Development
1. Basic Site Review
2. Detail Site Review
D. Parking lot Landscaping and Screening Standards
E. Street Tree Standards
Section III - Water Conserving Landscaping Guidelines and Policies
Section IV - Historic District Development
13
13
15
17
18
20
20
ATTACHMENTS:
1) Amended Special Assessment of Historic Property application (NOTE amended application with
elimination of existing awnings under section 2 SHPO will be notified of this modification to the
submittal. (emailletter attached - approval pending)
2) Sheet AS1.0 Architectural Site Plan & Vicinity Map
Tree protection, Existing Planting / Tree Inventory Plan
3) Sheet H1.1 Elevation, Fac;ade Section
217 Fourth Street. Ashland, Oregon 97520 541.552.9502 carlos@CarlosDelgadoArchitect.com
2
Amarotico - 89, 91, 93 Oat treet (Paulson Building) Map 391 E09f - Lot 10300
Findings of Fact: Site Review
03/18/11
C-1 Retail Commercial District (C-1-D - Downtown Overlay District)
18.32.010 Purpose
This district is designed to stabilize, improve and protect the characteristics of those
areas providing commercial commodities and services.
The proposed exterior renovation enhances and restores the historic character of the
commercial building.
18.32.020 Permitted Uses
The following uses and their accessory uses are permitted outright:
C. Restaurants. (Ord 2812, S21998)
o Complies: The existing and proposed use is the same: restaurant and retail use is in
the list of Permitted Uses.
18.32.040 General Regulations
A. Area, Width, Yard Requirements. There shall be no lot area, width, coverage, front
yard, side yard, or rear yard, except as required under the Off-Street Parking and Solar
Access Chapters; where required or increased for conditional uses; where required by
the Site Review Chapter or where abutting a residential district, where such setback
shall be maintained at ten feet per story for rear yards and ten feet for side yards.
(Ord 2859 Sl, 2000)
Complies: The property is not abutting a residential district.
B. Maximum Building Height. No structure shall be greater than 40 feet in height.
Complies:
Complies: The existing building height is 18' - 6". The proposed restoration of the
parapet is 21'-6"
18.32.050 liD" Downtown Overlay District
A. In all areas within the "D" Downtown Overlay District, all uses are not required to
provide off-street parking or loading areas, except for hotel, motel, or hostel uses. All
parking areas provided shall comply with the Off-Street Parking chapter and the Site
Review chapter.
217 Fourth Street. Ashland, Oregon 97520 541.552.9502 carlos@CarlosDelgadoArchitect.com
3
Amarotico - 89, 91, 93 Of 'Street (Paulson Building) Map 391 E09 - Lot 10300
Findings of Fact: Site Review
03/18/11
Complies: no parking is required
B. Structures which are greater than 40 feet in height, but less than 55 feet, may be
permitted as a conditional use.
Not applicable: structure is less than 40 feet in height
C. The solar access setback does not apply in the "D" Overlay district." (Ord. 2688-1992)
Chapter 18.61 - Tree Preservation and Protection
18.61.010 Purpose
18.61.030 Regulated Activities
A. All tree removal and tree topping activities, unless exempted below, shall be carried
out in accordance with the requirements of this chapter.
o Not applicable: No trees are to be removed or topped in area of development.
B. No person who is required to install or maintain tree protection measures pursuant
this chapter shall do any development activities including, but not limited to clearing,
grading, excavation or demolition work on a property or site which requires a planning
action without approved tree protection measures properly installed and maintained
pursuant to this Chapter.
o Complies: tree protection plan is submitted under this application
18.61.035 Exempt Tree Removal Activities
The following activities are exempt from the requirement for tree removal permits:
A. Those activities associated with the establishment or alteration of any public park
under the Ashland Parks and Recreation Commission. However, the Ashland Parks and
Recreation Department shall provide an annual plan in January to the Tree Commission
outlining proposed tree removal and topping activities, and reporting on tree removal and
topping activities that were carried out in the previous year.
o Not Applicable.
B. Removal of trees in single family residential zones on lots occupied only by a single
family detached dwelling and associated accessory structures, except as othenuise
regulated by the Physical and Environmental Constraints ordinance (18.62.
o Not Applicable: No trees are to be removed or topped in area of development.
C. Removal of trees in multi-family residential zones on lots occupied only by a single
family detached dwelling and associated accessory structures, except as othenuise
regulated by the Physical and Environmental Constraints ordinance (18.62).
o Not Applicable: Project is not in a multi-family residential zone.
D. Removal of trees less than 6" DBH in any zone, excluding those trees located within
217 Fourth Street. Ashland, Oregon 97520 541.552.9502 carlos@CarlosDelgadoArchitect.com
4
Amarotico - 89, 91, 93 Oaf treet (Paulson Building) Map 391 E09f,.- Lot
Findings of Fact: Site Review
03/18/11
the public right of way or required as conditions of approval with landscape
improvements for planning actions.
o Not applicable: No trees are proposed for removal.
E. Removal of trees less than 18" DBH on any public school lands, Southern Oregon
University, and other public land; but excluding Heritage trees and street trees within
the public right of way.
o Not Applicable: Property is not on any public school land.
F. Removal of trees within the Wildfire Lands area of the City, as defined on adopted
maps, for the purposes of wildfire fuel management, and in accord with the
requirements of the Physical and Environmental Constraints Chapter- 18.62.
o Not Applicable: Property is not within the Wildfire Lands area of the City.
G. Removal of dead trees.
o Not Applicable: No dead trees exist within proposed area of development.
H. Those activities associated with tree trimming for safety reasons, as mandated by the
Oregon Public Utilities Commission, by the City's Electric and Telecommunication Utility.
However, the Utility shall provide an annual plan to the Tree Commission outlining tree
trimming activities and reporting on tree trimming activities that were carried out in the
previous year. Tree trimming shall be done, at a minimum, by a Journeyman Tree
Trimmer, as defined by the Utility, and will be done in confonnance and to comply with
OPUC regulations.
o Not Applicable: No tree trimming is proposed as part of this application.
Chapter 18.68 - General Regulations
18.68.010 Fences
Fences, walls, hedges and screen planting shall be subject to the following standards:
A. In any required front yard, provided they do not exceed three and one-half (3 1,12) feet
in height.
o Not Applicable: No fences, wall, hedges or screen planting are proposed in the front
yard.
B. In any rear or side yard, provided they do not exceed six and one-half (6 1,12) feet in
height.
o Complies: No fences, hedges or screen planting are proposed in the rear or side
yards.
C. The height of fences or walls in rear or sideyard setback areas abutting a public
217 Fourth Street. Ashland, Oregon 97520 541.552.9502 carlos@CarlosDelgadoArchitect.com
5
Amarotico - 89, 91 J 93 0\ ~treet (Paulson Building) Map 391 EOQ , - Lot 10300
Findings of Fact: Site Revlt::\IV
03/18/11
street shall be forty-eight (48) inches or less if said fences or walls are within ten (10)
feet of any public street except an alley.
o Not Applicable: No fences or walls are proposed in the rear or side yard abutting any
public street.
D. The framework for newly constructed fences and walls shallface toward the builder's
property) except where fences are jointly constructed.
o Not Applicable: No fences are proposed.
E. Fences shall lean at an angle from the vertical plane no greater than five (5%) percent.
In cases where this limitation is exceeded and a written complaint is received by the
Planning Department) the property owner shall be notified) in writing) of the problem.
The Planning Department shall take action only on the basis of a written complaint) or
on its own action.
o Not Applicable: No fences are proposed.
18.68.020 Vision Clearance Area
Vision clearance areas shall be provided with the following distances establishing the
size of the vision clearance area:
A. In any R district) the minimum distance shall be twenty-jive (25) feet or) at
intersections including an alley) ten (10) feet.
o Not applicable: project is within C-1-D zone
B. In all other districts except the C-l and E-l districts) the minimum distance shall be
fifteen (15) feet or) at intersections) including an alley) ten (10) feet. When the angle of
intersection between streets) other than an alley) is less than thirty (30) degrees) the
distance shall be twenty-jive (25) feet.
o Not applicable: project is within C-1-D zone
C. The vision clearance area shall contain no plantings) fences) walls) structures) or
temporary or permanent obstructions exceeding two and one-half (2 -'h) feet in height)
measured from the top of the curb) except that street trees exceeding this height may be
located in this area) provided all branches and foliage are removed to a height of eight
(8) feet above the grade.
o Not applicable: project is within C-1-D zone
D. The vision clearance standards established by this section are not subject to the
Variance section of this title. (Ord. 2605) Sl) 1990)
18.68.030 Access
Each lot shall abut a minimum width of forty (40) feet upon a public street (other than an
217 Fourth Street. Ashland, Oregon 97520 541.552.9502 carlos@CarlosDelgadoArchitect.com
6
Amarotico - 89, 91, 93 Oar ~reet (Paulson Building) Map 391 E09~- Lot 10300
Findings of Fact: Site Review
03/18/11
alley}. This requirement may be decreased to twenty-five {25} feet on a cul-de-sac vehicle
turn-around area. Except with an approved flag partition) no lot
for a width of less than twenty-five {25} feet.
o Complies: Lot has a 84' - 4" width along Oak Street.
18.68.050 Special Setback Requirements
To permit or afford better light) air and vision on more heavily
streets of substandard width, to protect arterial streets) and to permit the eventual
widening of hereinafter named streets) every yard abutting a street) or portion thereof,
shall be measured from the special base line setbacks listed below instead of the lot line
separating the lot from the street.
Street Setback
East Main Street) between City
limits and Lithia Way 35 feet
Ashland Street {Highway 66} between
City limits and Siskiyou Boulevard 65 feet
Also) front yards for properties abutting all arterial streets shall be no less than twenty
(20}feet) with the exception of the C-1-D district.
o Not Applicable. Property under this application not on above referenced streets.
18.68.140 Accessory Buildings and Structures
Accessory buildings and structures shall comply with all requirements for the principal
use except where specifically modified by this Title and shall comply with the following
limitations:
A. A greenhouse or hothouse may be maintained accessory to a dwelling in an R district.
o Not Applicable: No accessory buildings are proposed.
B. A guest house may be maintained accessory to a single-family dwelling provided
there are no kitchen cooking facilities in the guest house.
o Not Applicable: No guest house is proposed.
C. Mechanical equipment shall be subject to the provisions of this Section. Such
equipment shall not be located between the main structure on the site and any street
adjacent to a front or sideyard) and every attempt shall be made to place such
equipment so that it is not visible from adjacent public streets. Any installation of
mechanical equipment shall require a building permit. (Ord. 2289 S4) 1984}
o Complies: No mechanical equipment is to be located between the main structure on
the site and any street.
D. Regardless of the side and rear yard requirements of the district) in a residential
district) a side or rear yard may be reduced to three {3} feet for an accessory structure
217 Fourth Street. Ashland, Oregon 97520 541.552.9502 carlos@CarlosDelgadoArchitect.com
7
Amarotico - 89, 91, 93 Or Street (Paulson Building) Map 391 EO~ ~. - Lot 10300
Findings of Fact: Site Revll:i,^,
03/18/11
erected more than .fifty (SOjfeet from any street) other than alleys} provided the structure
is detached and separated from other buildings and structures by ten (10) feet or more}
and is no more than .fifteen (lS) feet in height. (Ord. 2228) 1982; Ord. 2289 S3} 1984)
o Not Applicable, not in residential district.
18.68.160 Driveway Grades
Grades for new driveways in all zones shall not exceed a grade of 20% for any portion of
the driveway. All driveways shall be designed in accord with the criteria of the Ashland
Public Works Department and approved prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for
new construction. If required by the City} the developer or owner shall provide
certification of driveway grade by a licensed land surveyor. All vision clearance
standards associated with driveway entrances onto public streets shall not be subject to
the Variance section of this title. (Ord. 2604 S2) 1990; Ord. 2663 S3} 1992)
o Complies: Driveway grade is less than 20% slope.
18.70.070 Solar Access Permit for Protection from Shading by
Vegetation
18.70.080 Hearing Procedure
18.70.090 Limits On Solar Access Permits
18.70.100 Entry of Solar Access Permit Into Register
o Not Applicable: No Solar Access Permit is being requested.
18.70.110 Effect and Enforcement
Chapter 18. 72 - Site Design & Use Standards
18.72.040 Approval Process
o The application for this project requires a Type I procedure.
18.72.050 Detail Site Review Zone
A. The Detail Site Review Zone is that area defined in the Site Design Standards
adopted pursuant to Section 18.72.080.
o Applicable: The project is within the Detail Site Review Zone.
B. Any development in the Detail Site Review Zone as defined in the Site Review
Standards adopted pursuant to this chapter} which exceeds 1 O} 000 square feet or is
217 Fourth Street. Ashland, Oregon 97520 541.552.9502 carlos@CarlosDelgadoArchitect.com
8
Amarotico - 89, 91, 93 Oal treet (Paulson Building) Map 391 E09~- Lot 10300
Findings of Fact: Site Review
03/18/11
longer than 100 feet in length or width} shall be reviewed according to the Type 2
procedure.
o Not Applicable: The project scope does not increase existing gross square footage
of 6,947 SF nor changes the existing 86 feet for total building length.
C. No new buildings or contiguous groups of buildings in the Detail Site Review Zone
shall exceed a gross square footage of 45} 000 square feet or a combined contiguous
building length of 300 feet. Any building or contiguous group of buildings which exceed
these limitations} which were in existence in 1992} may expand up to 15% in area or
length beyond their 1992 area or length. Neither the gross square footage or combined
contiguous building length as set forth in this section shall be subject to any..variance
authorized in the Land Use Ordinance.
o Not Applicable: as outlined above in 18.72.050.8
18.72.070 - Criteria for Approval
The following criteria shall be used to approve or deny an
A. All applicable City ordinances have been met or will be met by the proposed
development.
o Complies: The proposed development meets or exceeds all the requirements of the
C-1 district. See findings for Chapter 18.32 C-1 Retail Commercial District included
these findings.
B. All requirements of the Site Review Chapter have been met or will be met.
o Complies: All applicable requirements of the Site Review Chapter have been or will
be met. See 'Site Design and Use Standards' findings that follow.
C. The development complies with the Site Design Standards adopted by the City
Council for implementation of this Chapter.
o The development complies with the applicable Site Design Standards outlined in
Chapter 18,72 Site, Design & Use Standards. See findings that follow.
D. That adequate capacity of City facilities for water} sewer} paved access to and
through the development} electricity} urban storm drainage} and adequate transportation
can and will be provided to and through the subject property. All improvements in the
street right-of-way shall comply with the Street Standards in Chapter 18.88}
Performance Standards Options. (Ord. 2655) 1991; Ord 2836 S6} 1999)
o Complies: Adequate facilities exist. Proposed enclosure of covered porch has no
impact on water, sewer, storm, electrical utility demand
18.72.115 - Recycling Requirements
217 Fourth Street. Ashland, Oregon 97520 541.552.9502 carlos@CarlosDelgadoArchitect.com
9
Amarotico - 89, 91, 93 Or '?treet (Paulson Building) Map 391 EO~ 1 - Lot 10300
Findings of Fact: Site Revl~w
03/18/11
All commercial and multi-family developments} requiring a site review as indicated in
18. 72.040} shall provide an opportunity-to-recycle site for use of the project occupants.
A. Commercial. Commercial developments having a solid waste receptacle shall provide
a site of equal or greater size adjacent to or with access comparable to the solid waste
receptacle to accommodate materials collected by the local solid waste franchisee under
its on-route collection program for purposes of recycling. Both the opportunity-to-recycle
site and the common solid waste receptacle shall be screened by fencing or landscaping
such as to limit the view from adjacent properties or public rights-of-way.
D Compliance pending review by Ashland Sanitary and Recycling and Code
Compliance officer: trash and recycling area adjacent to the service entrance to the
restaurant is limited to public right of way and adjacent property (see sheet AS1.0
Site Plan).
B. Multi-Family Residential. All newly constructed multi-family units} either as part of an
existing development or as a new development} shall provide an opportunity-to-recycle
site in accord with the following standards:
1. Multi-family developments NOT sharing a common solid waste receptacle shall
provide an individual curbside recycling container for each dwelling unit in the
development.
2. Multi-family developments sharing a common solid waste receptacle shall provide a
site of equal or greater size adjacent to or with access comparable to the common solid
waste receptacle to accommodate materials collected by the local solid waste franchisee
under its residential on-route collection program for purposes of recycling. Both the
opportunity-to-recycle site and the common solid waste receptacle shall be screened by
fencing or landscaping such as to limit the view from adjacent properties or public rights-
of-way.
D Not applicable: not a multifamily zone.
18.72.120 Controlled access
A. Prior to any partitioning of property located in an R-2} R-3} C-l} E-l or M-l zone}
controlled access standards shall be applied and} ifnecessary} cross easements shall
be required so that access to all properties created by the partitioning can be made from
one or more points.
D Not Applicable: No partitioning is proposed with this application.
B. Access points shall be limited to the following:
1. Distance between driveways.
On arterial streets - 1 00 feet;
on collector streets - 75 feet;
on residential streets - 50 feet.
2. Distance from intersections.
On arterial streets - 1 00 feet;
on collector streets - 50 feet;
on residential streets - 35 feet.
217 Fourth Street. Ashland, Oregon 97520 541.552.9502 carlos@CarlosDelgadoArchitect.com
10
Amarotico - 89, 91, 93 Oar treet (Paulson Building) Map 391 E09F '- Lot 10300
Findings of Fact: Site Review
03/18/11
o Complies: No new access points are proposed.
C. Vision clearance standards.
1. No obstructions greater than two and one half feet high} nor any landscaping which
will grow greater than two and one halffeet high with the exception of trees whose
canopy heights are at all times greater than eight feet} may be placed in a vision
clearance area determined as follows:
The vision clearance area at the intersection of two streets is the triangle formed by a
line connecting points 25 feet from the intersection of property lines. In the case of an
intersection involving an alley and a street} the triangle is formed by a line connecting
points tenfeet along the alley and 25 feet along the street. When the angle of
intersection between the street and the alley is less than 30 degrees} the distance shall
be 25 feet. No structure or portion thereof shall be erected within ten feet of the
driveways.
o Not applicable: there is not an intersection of 2 streets.
2. State of Oregon Vision Clearance Standards. The following stopping site distances
shall apply to all State Highways within the City with the prescribed speed limits.
Vertical stopping sight distance to be based on distance from three and one half feet
above pavement to a point sixfeet above the pavement. (Ord.2544 Sl) 1989)
30 mph200 feet
35 mph225feet
40 mph275feet
45 mph325 feet
55 mph450 feet
o Not Applicable: Oak Street is a City maintained road and is not a State Highway.
3, The vision clearance standards established by this section are not subject to the
variance section of this title. (Ord. 2605 S2) 1990)
D. Access Requirements for Multi-jamily Developments.
1. All multi-jamily developments which will have automobile trip generation in excess of
250 vehicle trips per day shall provide at least two driveway access points to the
development. Trip generation shall be determined by the methods established by the
Institute of Transportation Engineers.
o Not Applicable: Project is not a multi-family development.
2, Creating an obstructed street} as defined in 18.88.020. G} is prohibited.
(Ord, 2544 S2) 1989; Ord 2836 S7} 1999)
o Not Applicable: No streets are being created as part of this
18.72.140 Light and Glare Performance Standards
217 Fourth Street. Ashland, Oregon 97520 541.552.9502 carlos@CarlosDelgadoArchitect.com
11
Amarotico - 89, 91, 93 Of "?treet (Paulson Building) Map 391 EO~' \ - Lot 10300
Findings of Fact: Site Rev)t;1IV
03/18/11
There shall be no direct illumination of any residential zone from a lighting standard in
any other residential lot, C-1, E-1 or M-1, SO, or HC lot.
o Complies: development shall not have direct illumination on the adjacent lot.
18.72.160 Landscaping Maintenance
A. All landscaped areas must be maintained in a weed-free condition.
E. All landscaped areas required by this Chapter must be maintained according to the
approved landscaping plans. (Ord. 2228, 1982)
o Complies: Owner has existing landscape maintained and agrees to maintain all
landscaped areas according to these requirements.
Chapter 18.92 - Off-Street Parking
18.92.010 Generally
In all districts, except those specifically exempted, whenever any building is erected,
enlarged, or the use is changed, off-street parking shall be provided as set forth in this
Chapter.
18.92.020 Automobile Parking Spaces Required
Not applicable: under section 18.32.050 "0" Downtown Overlay District - no automobile
parking is required
18.92.040 Bicycle Parking
A. All uses, with the exception of detached single-family residences and uses in the C-1-
D zone, shall provide a minimum of two sheltered bike parking spaces.
o Not applicable: Project is in the C-1-D zone.
SITE DESIGN AND USE STANDARDS
SECTION II - APPROVAL STANDARDS & POLICIES
A. ORDINANCE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS
The following percentages of landscaping are required for all properties falling under the
Site Design and Use Standards.
C-1-D: 0%
o Not applicable: no landscaping required in this zone
217 Fourth Street. Ashland, Oregon 97520 541.552.9502 carlos@CarlosDelgadoArchitect.com
12
Amarotico - 89, 91, 93 q \Street (Paulson Building) Map 391 EQ'8 - Lot 10300
Findings of Fact: Site Re\lIew
03/18/11
C. COMMERCIAL) EMPLOYMENT, AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
II-C-l. BASIC SITE REVIEW STANDARDS
APPROVAL STANDARDS: Development in all commercial and
confonn to the following development standards:
II-C-l a) Orientation and Scale
1) Buildings shall have their primary orientation toward the street rctther than)the
parking area. Building entrances shall be oriented toward the street and shall be
accessed from a public sidewalk. Public sidewalks shall be provided adjacent to a
public street along the street frontage.
o Complies: The existing building has its primary orientation towards Oak street -
proposed enclosure on the rear of the property has no effect on primary orientation.
2) Buildings that are within 30 feet of the street shall have an entrance for pedestrians
directly from the street to the building interior. This entrance shall be designed to be
attractive and functional, and shall be open to the public during all business hours.
o Not applicable. Refer to narrative above in previous section.
3) These requirements may be waived if the building is not accessed by pedestrians,
such as warehouses and industrial buildings without attached offices, and
automotive service uses such as service stations and tire stores,
o Not Applicable: No waiver is requested.
II-C-1 b) Streets cape
One street tree chosen from the street tree list shall be placed for each 30 feet of
frontage for the portion of the development fronting the street.
o Complies: Frontage on Oak Street is 86 FT - 3 street trees are required and are
existing and established (a quantity of (3) 4" maples are spaced 29'-6", 24'-6" apart)
II-C-1 c) Landscaping
1) Landscaping shall be designed so that 50% coverage occurs after one year and 90%
coverage occurs after 5 years.
2) Landscaping design use a variety of low water use deciduous and evergreen trees
and shrubs andjlowering plant species.
3) Buildings adjacent to streets shall be buffered by landscaped areas at least 10 feet
in width, except in the Ashland Historic District. Outdoor storage areas shall be
screened from view from adjacent public rights-ot-way, except in M-1 zones. Loading
facilities shall be screened and buffered when adjacent to residentially zoned land.
217 Fourth Street. Ashland, Oregon 97520 541.552.9502 carlos@CarlosDelgadoArchitect.com
13
Amarotico - 89,91, 93 Oak(~"~eet (Paulson Building) Map 391 E09Br Lot 10300
Findings of Fact: Site Revi~\t.
03/18/11
4) Irrigation systems shall be installed to assure landscaping success.
5) Efforts shall be made to save as many existing healthy trees and shrubs on the site
as possible
o Not applicable: no landscaping is required.
II-C-l d) Parking
1) Parking areas shall be located behind buildings or on one or both sides.
2) Parking areas shall be shaded by deciduous trees) bufferedfrom adjacent non-
residential uses and screened from non-residential uses.
o Not applicable: no parking is required.
II-C-le) Designated Creek Protection
1) Designated creek protection areas shall be considered positive design elements and
incorporated in the overall design of a given project.
o Not Applicable: No creek area is near development thus no creek protection area
has been designated.
2) Native riparian plant materials shall be planted in and adjacent to the creek to
enhance the creek habitat.
o Not Applicable.
II-C-lj) Noise and Glare
Special attention to glare (AMC 18.72.110) and noise (AMC 9. 08.170(c) & AMC
9.08.175) shall be considered in the project design to ensure compliance with these
standards.
o Complies: The existing lighting meets this requirement and any new will be installed
with shielding to minimize the glare to surrounding areas and to the night sky.
II-C-lg) Expansions of Existing Sites and Buildings
For sites which do not confonn to these requirements) an equal percentage of the site
must be made to comply with these standards as the percentage of the building
expansion) e.g.) if building area is to expand by 25%) then 25% of the site must be
brought up to the standards required by this document. .
o Not applicable: no expansion proposed.
217 Fourth Street. Ashland, Oregon 97520 541.552.9502 carlos@CarlosDelgadoArchitect.com
14
Amarotico - 89, 91, 93 q Street (Paulson Building) Map 391 EQ~' 8 - Lot 10300
Findings of Fact: Site Re\tll:lw
03/18/11
II-C-2, DETAIL SITE REVIEW
II-C-2a) Orientation and Scale
1) Development shall have a minimum Floor Area Ratio of.35 and shall not exceed a
maximum Floor Area Ratio of.5 for all areas outside the Historic District. Plazas and
pedestrian areas shall count as floor area for the purposes of meeting the minimum
floor area ratio.
o Compliant: Floor Area is 6,947 SF. Lot area is 9,583 SF. Floor Area Ratio is .70 for
building to lot area.
2) Building frontages greater than 100 feet in length shall have offsets, jogs, or have
other distinctive changes in the building facade.
o Complies. The building frontage is 86 feet (with offsets in the building fagade).
3) Any wall which is within 30 feet of the street, plaza or other public open space shall
contain at least 20% of the wall areafacing the street in display areas, windows, or
doorways. Windows must allow views into working areas or lobbies, pedestrian
entrances or display areas. Blank walls within 30 feet of the street are prohibited.
Up to 40% of the length of the building perimeter can be exemptedfrom this standard
if oriented toward loading or service areas.
o Complies: The existing fagade on the street is 1,634 SF. 20% = 327 SF openings
are required. The existing and proposed area of openings is 705 SF and therefore
meets this requirement.
4) Buildings shall incorporate lighting and changes in mass, surface or finish to give
emphasis to entrances,
o Complies: Covered entry ways, metal trim adjacent to openings for accents are
indicated on the exterior elevations. Emphasis is also added to the entrance by
offsetting the wall plane and providing an awning on the main face of the building.
5) Infill of buildings, adjacent to pubic sidewalks, in existing parking lots is encouraged
and desirable.
o Complies: existing structures infilllot in accordance to this section.
6) Buildings shall incorporate arcades, roofs, alcoves, porticoes and awnings that
protect pedestrians from the rain and sun.
o Complies: The existing structure incorporates these features through the use of the
following:
a) Main entry of the building is recessed into the entryway.
2 f 7 Fourth Street. Ashland, Oregon 97520 54 f .552.9502 carlos@CarlosDelgadoArchitect.com
15
Amarotico - 89, 91, 93 Oak( ~'':'eet (Paulson Building) Map 391 E09Br . Lot 10300
Findings of Fact: Site Reviel".
03/18/11
b) An existing awning protects pedestrians from sun and rain.
II-C-2b) Streetscape
1) Hardscape (paving material) shall be utilized to designate (people)) areas. Sample
materials could be unit masonry) scored and colored concrete) grass crete) or
combinations of the above.
o Complies: The existing concrete sidewalk (12'-0") with park bench creates protection
from vehicular traffic and plaza area for pedestrians.
2) A building shall be setback not more than 20 feet from a pubic sidewalk unless the
area is used for pedestrian activities such as plazas or outside eating areas. If more
than one structure is proposed for a site) at least 25% of the aggregate building
frontage sheill be within 20 feet of the sidewalk.
o Not applicable: existing sidewalk is 12 feet in width.
II-C-2c) Parking & On-site Circulation
1) Protected) raised walkways shall be installed through parking areas of 50 or more
spaces or more than 100 feet in average width or depth.
2) Parking lots with 50 spaces or more shall be divided by landscaped areas or
walkways at least 10 feet in width) or by a building or group of buildings.
3) Developments of one acre or more must provide a pedestrian and bicycle circulation
plan for the site. On-site pedestrian walkways must be lighted to a level where the
system can be used at night by employees) residents and customers. Pedestrian
walkways shall be directly linked to entrances and the internal circulation of the
building.
o Not Applicable.
II-C-d) Buffering and Screening
1) Landscape buffers and screening shall be located between incompatible uses on an
adjacent lot. Those buffers can consist of either plant material or building materials
and must be compatible with proposed buildings.
o Not Applicable. Adjacent uses of retail are compatible.
2) Parking lots shall be bufferedfrom the main street) cross streets and screenedform
residentially zoned land.
o Not applicable.
II-C-2e) Lighting
Lighting shall include adequate lights that are scaled for pedestrians by including
light standards or placements of no greater than 14 feet in height along pedestrian
path ways.
217 Fourth Street. Ashland, Oregon 97520 541.552.9502 carlos@CarlosDelgadoArchitect.com
16
Amarotico - 89, 91, 93 ('Street (Paulson Building) Map 391 EQ'
Findings of Fact: Site Review
03/18/11
10300
o Not applicable: entryway is off of existing sidewalk.
II-C-2j) Building Materials
1) Buildings shall include changes in relief such as cornices, bases, fenestration, fluted
masonry, for at least 15% of the exterior wall area.
o Complies: Refer to photos and exterior elevations.
2) Bright or neon paint colors used extensively to attract attention to the building or use
are prohibited. Buildings may not incorporate glass as a majority of the building
skin.
o Complies: No bright or neon paint colors will be used.
D. PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING STANDARDS
II-D-1) Screening at Required Yards
II-D-l-1) Parking abutting a required landscaped front or exterior yard shall incorporate
a sight obscuring hedge screen into the required landscaped yard.
II-D-1-2) The screen shall grow to at least 36 inches higher than the finished grade of the
parking area, exceptfor required vision Clearance areas.
II-D-1-3) The screen height may be achieved by a combination of earth mounding and
plant materials.
II-D-1-4) Elevated parking lots shall screen both the parking and the retaining wall.
o Not Applicable.
II-D-2) Screening Abutting Property Lines
Parking abutting a property line shall be screened by a 5' landscaped strip. Where a
buffer between zones is required, the screening shall be incorporated into the required
buffer strip, and will not be an additional requirement.
o Not applicable: No parking abuts property line to adjacent property.
II-D-3) Landscape Standards
II-D-3-1) Parking lot landscaping shall consist of a minimum of 7 % of the total parking
area plus a ratio of 1 tree for each seven parking spaces to create a canopy effect.
II-D-3-2) The tree species shall be an appropriate large canopied shade tree and shall be
selected from the street tree list to avoid root damage to pavement and utilities, and
damage from droppings to parked cars and pedestrians.
Complies: Existing 4" maples are established and provide canopies per standard.
II-D-3-3) The tree shall be planted in a landscaped area such that the tree bole is at least
2 feet from any curb or paved area.
217 Fourth Street. Ashland, Oregon 97520 541.552.9502 carlos@CarlosDelgadoArchitect.com
17
Amarotico - 89, 91, 93 Oak( . \eet (Paulson Building) Map 391 E09Br Lot 10300
Findings of Fact: Site Revie\t.
03/18/11
II-D-3-4) The landscaped area shall be planted with shrubs and/ or living ground cover
to assure 50% coverage within 1 year and 90% within 5 years.
II-D-3-5) Landscaped areas shall be evenly distributed throughout the parking area and
parking perimeter at the required ratio.
II-D-3-6) That portion of a required landscaped yard, buffer strip or screening strip
abutting parking stalls may be counted toward required parking lot landscaping but
only for those stalls abutting landscaping as long as the tree species, living plant
material coverage and placement distribution criteria are also met. Front or exterior
yard landscaping may not be substituted for the interior landscaping required for
interior parking stalls.
o Not applicable. No landscaping required other than street trees as addressed in
appropriate ordinances under this section.
II-D-4-1) Parking areas adjacent to residential dwelling shall be set back at least 8 feet
from the building, and shall provide a continuous hedge screen.
o Not Applicable.
II-D-5) Hedge Screening
II-D-5-1) Evergreen shrubs shall be planted so that 50% of the desired screening is
achieved within 2 years, 100% within 4 years.
II-D-5-2) Living groundcover in the screen strip shall be planted such that 100% coverage
is achieved within 2 years.
o Not applicable: no landscaping required in this zone
II-D-6) Other Screening
II-D-6-1) Other screening and buffering shall be provided as follow:
Refuse Container Screen, Service Corridor Screen, Light and Glare Screen:
o Complies: Structural measures are in place to screen refuse and service area
(existing retaining walls, existing exterior walls)
E. STREET TREE STANDARDS
APPROVAL STANDARD: All development fronting on public or private streets
shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with the following standards
and chosen from the recommended list of street trees found in this section.
II-E-l) Location for Street Trees
1. Street trees shall be located behind the sidewalk except in cases where
there is a designated planting strip in the right-of-way, or the sidewalk is
greater than 8 feet wide. Street trees shall include irrigation) root barriers)
and generally confonn to the standard established by the Department of
Community Development.
217 Fourth Street. Ashland, Oregon 97520 541.552.9502 carlos@CarlosDelgadoArchitect.com
18
Amarotico - 89, 91, 93 q' Street (Paulson Building) Map 391 Eq 'B - Lot 10300
Findings of Fact: Site Review
03/18/11
Compliant: Existing street trees are established on the 12 foot wide sidewalk.
Description and placement is described under Site Design and Use Standard II c 1.b
II-E-2) Spacing, Placement, and Pruning of street Trees
All tree spacing may be made subject to special site conditions which may for reasons
such as safety, affect the decision. Any such proposed special condition shall be subject
to the Staff Advisor's review and approval. The placement, spacing, and pruning of
street trees shall be as follows:
a. street trees shall be placed at the rate of one tree for every 30 feet of street
frontage. Trees shall be evenly spaced, with variations to the spacing pennitted
for specific site limitations, such as driveway approaches.
b. Trees shall not be planted closer than 25 feet from the curb line of intersections of
streets or alleys, and not closer than 10 feet from private driveways (measured at
the back edge of the sidewalk), fire hydrants or utility poles.
c. street trees shall not be planted closer than 20 feet to light standards. Exceptfor
public safety, no new light standard location shall be positioned closer than 10
feet to any existing street tree, and preferably such locations will be at least 20
feet distant.
d. Trees shall not be planted closer than 2 % feet from the face of the curb except at
intersections where it shall be 5 feet from the curb, in a curb return area.
e. Where there are overhead power lines, tree species are to be chosen that will not
interfere with those lines.
f Trees shall not be planted within 2 feet of any pennanent hard surface paving or
walkway. Sidewalk cuts in concrete for trees shall be at least 10 square feet,
however, larger cuts are encouraged because they allow additional air and water
into the root system and add to the health of the tree. Space between the tree
and such hard surface may be covered by penneable non-pennanent hard
surfaces such as grates, bricks on sand, or paver blocks.
Compliant: Existing street trees are established on the 12 foot wide sidewalk.
Description and placement is described under Site Design and Use Standard II c 1.b
g. Trees, as they grow, shall be pruned to provide at least 8 feet of clearance
above sidewalks and 12 feet above street roadway surfaces.
o Complies: The Owner agrees to prune the trees adjacent to sidewalks and
driveways to the clearances indicated by this requirement.
217 Fourth Street. Ashland, Oregon 97520 541.552.9502 carlos@CarlosDelgadoArchitect.com
19
Amarotico - 89, 91, 93 Oak r ~et (Paulson Building) Map 391 E09BIf Lot 10300
Findings of Fact: Site Revievv
03/18/11
h. Existing trees may be used as street trees if there will be no damage from
the development which will kill or weaken the tree. Sidewalks of variable
width and elevation may be utilized to save existing street trees, subject to
approval by the Staff Advisor.
o Complies: existing street trees will not be damaged from scope of work under this
proposal. The area of work does not impact the area near the existing street trees.
II-E-3) Replacement of Street Trees
Existing street trees removed by development projects shall be replaced by the developer
with those from the approved street tree list. The replacement trees shall be of size and
species similar to the trees that are approved by the Staff Advisor.
o Not Applicable: No existing street trees to be replaced.
II-E-4) Recommended Street Trees
Street trees shall conform to the street tree list approved by the Ashland Tree
Commission.
o Complies: No new street trees are proposed.
SECTION III - WATER CONSERVING LANDSCAPING GUIDELINES &
POLICIES
o Complies: Street trees and conifer in rear of property are watered with drip system
SECTION IV - HISTORIC DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT
HEIGHT: The project will increase its current height by 4 ft by re-instating the original
gable peaked parapet wall of the existing structure. Per special assessment application,
the proposed height is appropriate for the building and within context of adjacent
building.
SCALE: The project will slightly increase its current historic frontage back to its true
historic character. The scale increases appropriately in conjuction with the massing and
shape in keeping with front fagade scales along Oak Street.
MASSING: The project will not significantly increase its current massing along the street
frontage as indicated above in the "SCALE" section. This slightly varied massing impact
along the street frontage is similar to massing along Oak Street.
SETBACK: The project will maintain its current historic setback. Refer to assessment
application that address improvement with the feel and use of the proposed fagade.
217 Fourth Street. Ashland, Oregon 97520 541.552.9502 carlos@CarlosDelgadoArchitect.com
20
Amarotico - 89, 91, 93 ( . Street (Paulson Building) Map 391 Eq 'B - Lot 10300
Findings of Fact: Site RevIew
03/18/11
ROOF SHAPES: The apparent roof shape from the front be expressed as a parapet
gable - the same shape as the pre-existing shape of the facade - this variety and
change adds to the historic character of the neighborhood.
RHYTHM OF OPENINGS: The proposed historic fagade openings will be enlarged to
express the historical retail commercial use and exposure of the interior - this scale is
consistent with the rhythm of opening of adjacent buildings.
PLATFORMS: The project will remain at sidewalk level similar its neighbor to the north..
DIRECTIONAL EXPRESSION: The project will maintain its historical sense of
directional expression towards Oak Street.
SENSE OF ENTRY: There is significant improvement of this standard due to the the
increase in glazing and apparent opening of the front of the existing building.
IMITATIONS: The fagade of the project will be built to be close to the originally built
structure determined by on-site matching to materials and expression of the historical
fagade (studies from selective demolition and historical photos).
217 Fourth Street. Ashland, Oregon 97520 541.552.9502 carlos@CarlosDelgadoArchitect.com
21
Carlos Delgado
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
George Kramer [george@preserveoregon.com]
Monday, March 21, 2011 9:56 AM
'Susan Haylock'
alex@standingstonebrewing.com; carlos@mind.net
Paulson Building, 89-93 Oak
Suzie,
Upon further consideration, the owner of this project has determined that they will NOT re-install the awnings
currently on the building as proposed in Item 2 (Storefronts) of the Preservation Plan that we submitted in
early February. As you will recall the proposal was to remove the existing, non-historic, canvas and metal
awnings during construction and then re-install them at a slightly higher elevation to allow increased light
from the re-openedjrestored transom panels. Now we are simply proposing to remove the awnings and,
upon completion of the project, leave the full fac;:ade open.
Do you require a modified Item 2 or an amendment to the plan? I am comfortable with simply lining out the
first sentence of the final paragraph in Item #2 Proposed Treatment but it would not be at all difficult to send
you a revised item, clarifying our intent.
Please advise... We need to inform the City of Ashland as to SHPO's position on this change, as part of the local
planning process.
Thanks!
George Kramer, M.S.
Kramer & Company
386 North Laurel
Ashland, Oregon 97520
voice: 541.482.9504
fax:541.482.9438
www.preserveoreqon.com
http://thepreserveoreqon bloq .bloqspot. com/
1
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT OF HISTORIC PROPERTY PROGRAM
Application Form/Certification
Instructions: Please fill out the form completely. Type or print in ink. Be sure to read the paragraph above the
signature line before signing. Submit this form along with the Preservation Plan and all supplemMtary material as
indicated on the enclosed checklist. Incomplete applications will be returned.
1. Property Information
Historic Name of Property: PAULSON. P.W. Buildina
Property Address:
Street: 89-93 OAK STREET
City: ASHLAND
County: JACKSON (029)
Zip 97520
National Register District and rank (if applicable): Ashland Downtown HD. Site #38.0 (Survev #291)
Date Listed on the National Register: 5-May-2000. NRIS #98000631
2. Property Tax Information:
Tax Account Number: 1-006685-3
Does owner reside in property? 0 Yes Ii21 No
Current Assessed Value: $222.600.00
Current Real Market Value (RMV): $411.480.00
Application Fee (Assessed Value x .001): $411.48 [Please see attached correspondence from Jackson Countvl
3. Preservation Plan Overview:
Current Use: 0 Residential 0 Res./Multi-farnily Ii21 Commercial 0 Agricultural 0 Industrial
FIRST TERM: Ii21
SECOND TERM: 0
Estimated Cost of Rehabilitation:
$ 125.000
4. Owner Information:
Owner Name: Attn: Alex Amarotico
Organization/business: Standina Stone Brewina Co LLC
City: Ashland
Address: 101 Oak Street
State: Oreaon
Zip: 97520
Phone: 541.840.8499
E-mail: alex@standinqstonebrewinq.com
Representative: Georae Kramer
Phone: 541-482-9504. qeorqe@preserveoreqon.com
I certify that I have read and understand that this application and any attachments accurately represent the property
to be specially-assessed. I agree to grant access for the viewing of the property by the State Historic Preservation
Officer, the State Historic Preservation Officer's staff, and the Historic Assessment Review Committee.
Owner Signature
Date
SHPOU 0 I
se mv
Application submission received and reviewed:
SHPO Authorized Signature and Date
Property is approved for Special Assessment:
SHPO Authorized Signature and Date
Date Special Assessment Begins: Date Special Assessment Ends:
Historic Name: P.W. Paulson Buildinq
Street: 89-93 Oak Street
City: Ashland
County: Jackson (029)
5. Detailed description of rehabilitation/preservation/maintenance/renovation work. In the boxes belowdesc:ribe what YOlJ plan to do
and why, clarifying both what is already there and what you plan to do to it/replace it with. Be sure to include any projects that may involve
site work, new construction, or alterations.
1 I Architectural feature: Paulson Buildin\!, General Proiect
Approximate date of feature: 1905, as modified
Describe existing feature and its condition:
A single story, three-bay masonry structure, the Paulson Building
was constructed circa 1905 and has subsequently served as a
variety of small retail and professional spaces. Most recently the
building was occupied by a used book store and a soap/lotions
company,
Initially built with exposed red brick exterior and three full-height
wood and glass storefronts, the building exterior was clad in
stucco at some undocumented point (c1930s), which also likely
included the removal of the original stepped parapet. Recessed
spandrel areas and engaged pilaster columns were "filled" to
create a smooth, uniform, facade that largely obscured the
original character. Storefronts were again modified, probably in
the 1950s or 1960s, to create angled recessed entryways that
deviated from the original, in plane, design with recessed entries.
Early or original transom frarning (and glazing, in some cases) was
encased behind stucco panels on the exterior, continuing the
smooth stucco character. The transom level was hidden above
dropped ceilings on the interior, reducing the original sense of
volume.
Other interior surfaces and details (walls, flooring trim, lighting,
etc) have been significantly modified by years of occupancy and
renovation. The only early or original appearing interior detail to
remain is at the rear (west) elevation, where original 1/1 wood
sash windows and trim survives. All other interior surfaces have
been modified,
Photo no,: ALL I Drawing no,: ALL
2 Architectural feature: STOREFRONTS
Approximate date of feature: circa 1950s
Describe existing feature and its condition:
Existing storefronts consist of three angled three-part bays with
fixed windows flanking a central, recessed, wood/glass door that
is set below a single fixed transom. Interior supports of the
storefront system are 4x4 posts, assumed to be original, although
most of the existing design is not assumed original. Bulkheads are
of stucco. Grade surfaces for the storefronts at 89 and 91 Oak are
of concrete, with minor slope to accommodate height issues
between the public right-of-way and the interior floor level. The
storefront at 93 Oak Street is, conversely, filled with a carpeted
step that leads to a higher interior floor grade. Overall storefront
height is approximately 13'-0" tall. Original bearing masonry
columns (clad in stucco) create the interior divisions and lined up
with interior partitions to create three retail spaces.
Construction is generally substandard, with stick-built wood trim
and low-head height doorways. Variation exists in the transom
design, with both single fixed panel and three-part panels, Wood
and glass doors are of various designs, none assurned to be
original. Upper transom areas (enclosed) are hidden geHlnd'
stucco panels. Exterior canvas awnings on metal frameS were
installed c2000. All surfaces are painted.
Photo no.:8-15.17. 19-20
Drawing no,:H1.1
Proposed treatment and impact on existing feature:
The intent of tHe proposed restoration is to restore the exterior
storefronts and public interior spaces of the Paulson Building to
better reflect their historic character while creating a modified
interior floor plan that results in attractive retail spaces tHat utilize
the original full-Height interior volumes and natural ligHting of tHe
structure. As described in the following Items, new wood and glass
storefronts, reflecting the original proportions and design of tHose
features, will be constructed along tHe Oak Street fac;:ade, retaining
surviving framing and trim as feasible. Exterior brick elements of the
facade will be re-exposed or recreated in a mixture of wood, stucco,
and sheet metal, to reestablisH the original design and proportions.
Interior spaces will be restored and reconfigured to create useable
storefront areas on the eastern portion of the building (facing the
public rigHt-of-way) while tHe rear 1/3 of the building will be divided
laterally to create office/storage spaces that support the existing
restaurant (Standing Stone Brewing Company) tHat is located in tHat
jointly-owned NR-Lfsted (Cert ReHab) structure. The Whittle Garage
(Standing Stone) and the Paulson Bldg are located on the same tax
lot.
All interior retail spaces in tHe Paulson Building will return to tHe
original full ceiling Height, witH new systems, and new or re-exposed
surfaces tHat support the original character of the space to a high
degree, including finishes, trim and fixtures, The divided spaces to
the rear, providing support areas for the adjacent restaurant, will be
of compatible but less detailed design as described below.
Proposed treatment and impact on existing feature:
Existing storefronts will be removed to reopen the original, full
height proportions as documented in available images, supported by
physical evidence on-site, Three new storefronts that follow the
original design, with a small angled entryway, will be site-built of
wood and wood-encased steel frame as per building code. New
double-pane glazing (clear), including new transom panels, will be
installed to create a full-height, historically-based storefront design.
New bulkheads will be of paint-grade exterior paint grade wood,
crating framed panels with projecting sills, derived from historic
details. Concrete stemwalls will provide for a durable, water-
resistant ground contact.
Historic Name: P.W. Paulson B\.._~..4inq
Preservation/Renovation Plarr
Street: 89.93 Oak Street
City: Ashland
3 I Architectural feature: Parapet/Cornice Detail fStuccol
Approximate date of feature: n/d
Describe existing feature and its condition:
Historic photographs of the Paulson Building (See Figures 8 ft 9)
document it was originally designed with a central gabled
"pediment" that extended about the parapet level, as part of a
detailed cornice treatment. Engaged, detailed, pilasters
extended beyond the wall plain at the outer corners to create a
"framed" fa~ade with horizontal lines above the transom band
and, at the parapet, dividing the exterior surface into a regular,
three-part, pattern. None of this detail, both above the parapet
level or the projecting bands of the building fa~ade survives.
Original details are assumed to have been built of exposed and
corbelled brick, integrated into the bearing masonry walls. This
detail was removed or covered to create the present, uniform,
flat exterior surface, covered with stucco applied directly over
the brick.
Preliminary investigation on the site reveals that the original brick
spandrel fields, below the cornice line and framed by the
pilasters, remains largely intact behind a stucco-clad panel that
floats over an approximate 4" deep cavity. (See H1, 1, Section).
The exact condition of this recessed area, behind the stucco panel
is not entirely known, but it is assumed to be of the original brick
surface.
Photo no.:8-11
I Drawing no.:H.1.1
4 Architectural feature:: Parapet/Cornice Detail fMetall
Approximate date of feature: n/d
Describe existing feature and its condition:
Historic photographs document a built-up cornice and stringcourse
line that in combination with the engaged columns "framed" the
brick fields of the upper parapet and created a visually dominant
cornice line that defined the upper facade. All this detail was
removed as part of the modernization of the building circa 1930
and later, when the brick detailing was sacrificed to create the
current, flat, stucco facade character.
Photo no.: 8-11
Drawing no.: H.1.1
County: Jackson (029)
Proposed treatment and impact on existing feature:
Existing stucco will be removed from the brick spandrel fields, to re-
expose that original surface. This area will be cleaned either with a
non-corrosive chemical paint striper (DevStrip or similar) and
retained as part of the new design. If damage is too extreme, these
brick areas will be repainted in appropriate "terra cotta" or brick line
tones,
Stucco pilasters will be repaired as needed and remain, highlighted
by the re-establishment of inset storefront construction as per Item
#2, recreating the exposed column "edges" that were originally an
element of this storefront design.
The upper, pyramidal tympanum or parapet extension will be
recreated as per historic images. This feature will be built of light
frame construction with true stucco surfaces. Flanking, projecting,
columns will extend from the original features. Surviving column
tops/plaster caps at the outermost edges of the building will provide
models for the duplication of matching features to be installed atop
the interior columns that flank the parapet detail. All stucco details
will be brown tones, compatible with the surviving or repainted terra
cotta brick.
Proposed treatment and impact on existing feature:
Parapet details, cornice and stringcourse lines, including all
decorative elements, will be custom manufactured from pre-finished
or powder-coated sheet metal installed over wood frame to re-
establish the original three-bay, three-part, divisions of the facade.
The details of the original design of these elements is uncertain,
however likely included ogee profiles and flats similar to as shown in
H1.1-Building Section.
Decorative panels at the four column tops, just below and engaged
with the cornice line, will be of WF Norman No. 527 Rosettes (or
similar, see below), mounted as shown in the H1.1. East Elevation.
These rosettes will be part of a framed detail to be located at the
intersection of the vertical columns and cornice detail. All sheet
metal elements will be powder-coated in shades of brown for
durability and compatibility with the exterior scheme.
Historic Name: P.W. Paulson Buildina
Street: 89-93 Oak Street
City: Ashland
Preservation/Renovation Plan
County: Jackson (029)
5 I Architectural feature: Seismic Up!lrades
Approximate date of feature: n/d
Describe existing feature and its condition:
Built over a century ago, the existing building envelope offers
little in the way of lateral support or mechanical ties between
vertical and horizontal members as required under current
building code.
Photo no.: 16
I Drawing no,:A 1.1
6
Architectural feature: Interior
Approximate date of feature: n/d, Serially Modified
Describe existing feature and its condition:
The original interior character of the three retail/professional
spaces at the Paulson Building is largely unknown. Original-
appearing painted wood window trim remaining at the rear
elevation provides some clue as to probable design (See Figures 16
and 18). Interior wall finishes are assumed to have been painted
paper over the brick masonry
Ceilings were originally high lath and plaster surfaces mounted to
directly to the bottom of the rafters. Later, dropped ceilings
reduced interior volume approximately 36" overall.
There is no evidence of any sort regarding interior fixtures. All
existing plumbing, electrical and heat/cooling all non-original.
In preparation for the current project, most interior finishes were
removed to all the installation of new systems and improvements
to the structural system, This process revealed significant
information about the storefront design, including surviving
portions of what are assumed to be the original storefront
framing, transoms and other detailing (See Figure 17, 19 and 20)
Photo no.: 16.20
Drawing no.: A 1.1
Proposed treatment and impact on existing feature:
As a part of the project, two new 16" x 16" cast concrete columns
will be sistered behind the existing masonry columns along the
facade, creating a minor incursion into the interior but no other
visual impact. These features will be tied into new structural
supports (steel beams) that will improve structural support,
continuing through the volume to engage existing 16" x 16" cast
concrete columns already present at the exterior, in connection with
prior expansion of the restaurant storage facilities.
New 10" x 10" engaged cast concrete columns will be installed along
the south elevation (at the alley) to provide additional
reinforcement. These features are similar in design and character to
those installed at the related Whittle Garage nearly 15 years ago.
Proposed treatment and impact on existing feature:
New interior partition walls, finishes, systems and all elements will
be installed to create the modified floor plan as shown, splitting the
interior longitudinally to maintain three retail areas facing Oak
Street. The northern, full-depth, bay will be 15x38' (+/ -), including
a new unisex/ADA compatible restroom at the rear. The central and
southern bays, each approximately 20' deep and 15' wide will be
joined internally, to create a since retail, also with a new unisex
restroom.
The rear 18' -8" of the center and southern bay will be separated by
anew partition wall to create additional storage, office and service
spaces related to the adjacent restaurant use.
Interior finishes will be generally modest, New cavity walls, as shown
in plan, will be constructed along a portion of the southern interior to
allow for insulation and services, finished in plasterboard finishes
with wood baseboard. All trim will be of simple painted wood,
modeled after the existing rear window trim, so as to respect historic
character. 4" tongue and groove flooring, typical of this, will be
installed th.~ou~hQutJhe public ar~as. Finishesin the rear, service
areas, of themodi[ieP floor plan will be simple, l,Itilitarian detailing.
Historic Name: P.W. Paulson B! lina
Street: 89-93 Oak Street '
City: Ashland
County: Jack., ,j (029)
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT APPLICATION-SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURES
AVE.
ASHLAND
Figure 1, Location Map
From ODOT, Ashland City Map
Annotated
- 1 -
Historic Name: P.W. Paulson Buildina
Street: 89-93 Oak Street
City: Ashland
County: Jackson (029)
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT APPLICATION-SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURES
I
/
l
/
j
I
&
-~
l:
,.
~,
;&.
,.
z
:(
?:
/'" \"';""
'-
\
\
I
I
1
I l.~. /i,,,,,,,
l /tv'/
-,i
:--Ii
,/
/''''''''."
l1i :'p~{
o
Ii
\
\~.t:~
f
I
/
/
:::S'f"J.;
WAY
('
,^",/'
ShE \L\i''?<~
:'
Figure 2. Assessor's Plat Map
Jackson County, 391E09BB, Tax Lot 10300
Annotated
-2-
Historic Name: P.W. Paulson B! 'inCl
Street: 89-93 Oak Street
City: Ashland
County: Jack>.. ,(029)
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT APPLICATION-SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURES
Figure 3. Aerial Photo Map
Jackson County, 2005 County Wide Aerials
Annotated
- 3 -
Historic Name: P.W. Paulson Buildina
Street: 89-93 Oak Street
City: Ashland
County: Jackson (029)
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT APPLICATION-SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURES
rm~;;>t~)
L.,~L .Iitf
....,.
i...
~.""~".\.
..... f! ,
" ;..' .
I ;! (....
b.., .1) ,'j
L...I\._f"~]
...""'--- ~.- ~"'"'_..........:..:.t__......"~N ,"......_.._v'>':"..
I
t"~\ /'l~, I
0S-)Y:. f' M~~-;;;;)". I , t~
l~~~\\ \! )./e""/ '. ~-%1"'''H'''''O>'_-''~----;'''#_-'~=
f ,It, / // \ ~"~;,' \ hJ~ "., ',:~, i~:
/:>/ \y \ W~~. ~,~ I
./..., \~ l.~:~<t.
// \ !
/(J1ff'~) ////' \ Vl~-J;;&I"~~
" I" -' \ r:\ ' \{;- ,,~",.'1.1.' '""')
IJ "".roo" \ I. ;,~ t, r"e, I
,/', , "';f~ ..<:-1\ \ U ..; 'J.1;, "":)...~, '.I?f.,.. - -
~. ,d',',~'('~. '\f'!:.~:'> \ ~' louM
! I' . -"\ ,tfp...... \\o1i.~ ....\: : ');,;4; ..
~ ~ -< . <J I{lf)1 "'~~ ,--"
~/ '" \A' ,,'
" S ~ ./{~",. , - .-..-- I.....
$.<1' ':t~. · // ____.~.--_...-. .. C"~.f.'
, ~tt. "'~,.,: ,'- ...- .-.-" .-,.,~,--. \ r7~1
.\ 'r" ..\ C'''' ~J \.......J u
.~~ 0(1: \>/ ,., "1;:;- N'rY~4},' n,u
~.\ ~y-<,.../,\. !T"..:\ .....i1;,~
"I, .Ai. ~ \.... ~ I '1""'""1,' -, 05 ;" '
~.. I },,,(.' " ' f' -- ,~ I I, I I I ' 1'7'"' , 'IT I
,A, ,,/~ - '.17""'t"'s..~- \ In\ ~ I I I. ". '< ~ I
"'''.,,,''''' \1 1\1 I t....<+~ ~t... -.r;- -.;'" ,p ...~ ~ '
\\ if I I ~. \ 7 f1:"Y ..." ')?;:; ~~:;; t",,, 4<. ~, I ""
~ . ,f " 01 r' - I 1 '< \ < ~ (., t. " 'i-. ~ ""
\ \ ~\ I 1~ \ v ~ 1\'~'" t '~.;f I t t: ~ (\~ ft Ij ~ J ~
, , ~~\ [','v. .,;.:) "(, .::;, I. ~ l( 1\: ~"; I~' !(~," i: I \I) ~} t 'i
~~ ~ 1\" JiJ'~ ~ "~l\~ ';:\I"/~ ~ ,~,($!,:;...; t., , L, "if
~ ....~... , \'\: ~ ~ 5ill ' tip J (> Nt ";.j-~ .$!1
'~ \1: }l" xiI i ,.. 0', I '.:f..-S'::____._),._d,,,,_'=r,,=;:I,'" - /. ,
.. ,~ v\:..' --.r" ,... --r" 7 /J " "Y ~ .
~ ~",...~,#~L>I'I~1 y o~,,~1't 6~J ,_~~.___"".,t
'l- {J' --,')-.-.~,",_.--,~-
~~~ 6' .0/1 (",'11:' ~~ t= ~>~..~ ~ ~~ tii:"41~ '\;<r..+:~"'I1't ~ 'W
. $."\ .., ",..';;:; ~_~"l:~ ....~ "'~ -...
..~~ :t". ~ ~j!ll, l':: ",H ~ -
\@
'\
'\
'\
;:'j.
,,-,
IY\AIN
/'l->>{.
to: '. It<~'_
~ "'"
f." .\' .
!r'~ %
P l;,RZ:;<l:
f'/ '~.v _ ~l/?I.l
Figure 4. Sanborn Fire Insurance Map
June 1907, Sheet 8 (Detail)
- 4 -
n
w
n
~ \::
~
d
~f. ~II
II
Il
II
II
II~
II <(
110
II
II
n
II
111.10'
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
f!
')
"
t~l
tot
".
t
M
~
,,)
!1M./)l..,..,..
r:L'%J
.~
"'.~-~,.--r:
~_J
, ~
l. J.;
h,,~ 'l:':'=:'
,In
~;
.'-r, ~_.'* '''''~"
""1 I &.1.11 hi
I I~ " \2:.1
. ".x...:r~
~
'>,
r;tiJ It '.~K
: ,1); :.
1,,1 .~ ,- ..1?:E:
1.._,""--":"
:1.1 ~;
I :VY:1t'
k"'l~~ -.
";tl.I".'~.'~)(".,~/%~ ......;
I N"'f' ?"'i
I_h.~~_., '
I I
I Ih;hl.. j
,";'''''-.,J
r.1 . '.N"/. -~,
,J\ I V
\. ;'::J,!.-t I ~
\,:::"~-4",~:
r)>..,..::"i'?4....t
--- 4',-'
.,./,."
...." 2;;;; """ ''-' 'M
o .. "T\~<<'t
::.q t::::;# ~
Historic Name: P.W. Paulson Br;nQ
Street: 89-93 Oak Street
City: Ashland
County: Jack~_.1 (029)
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT APPLICATION-SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURES
\\
~
II
II
II
II
U
II
I!
il
II "'t.('
H .~~
,j
,!
II
l'
It
II
II
II
II
II
H
,iJ
"
1/
H
If
H
II
!l
"
it:
i~ {j'Oi
jj:
,~l
jj
H
'-l[
"* ',1
~ ' . ", 'i\1" , .,'~ tjj;,t. - - - ~
" ~.i1; [,'MA.ln ' co :; . 1 . . ,,!l.!J ~
Figure 5. Sanborn Fire Insurance Map
June 1911, Sheet 10 (Detail)
- 5 -
Historic Name: P.W. Paulson Buildina
Street: 89-93 Oak Street
City: Ashland
County: Jackson (029)
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT APPLICATION-SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURES
\\
\\
\ \
\\ "r4:
\\ // \
1~' .~~~ \
/11> 0
/"<;;"\@'" ',~
/ -..e:-- (j fl).
A '0," ptr~tl.
".. , ,",' r~
/f'
t: 0' ":\ r~
Oft,li- )trl' \ \
$PJJ'.S \
,
~
~
~,
" f,
~ "
t
~1'l..,~Ioc_
~~~
\':>
,
f
,
I
~
t
\ . rlf
~,
";'l .~ .. !4!' "'"' '*
~:,~ @
~,
'I
.~
;?oJ. ~~. ~."lO\ ~'1 >4i.g ..-:l - ~
'" ~E't.'1\
PLf{Z!4
i
Figure 6. Sanbom Fire Insurance Map
August 1928, Sheet 17 (Detail)
Note Construction of Whittle Garage Building, to North
~!
hI
~..,
....:;
J
I
~
I
l
I.
I
,
I
,
I
I _'fJl
I b~
(,
- 6 -
Historic Name: P.W. Paulson Sr 'no
Street: 89-93 Oak Street
City: Ashland
County: Jack~_.. (029)
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT APPLICATION-SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURES
{:
H@
MA 1 '~L @'ItA'_, ""' 'k. ?-
""~.",., \..,.",..,.
\ Jprl
\_-"_ ___h_
":),
\
\
\-.-
A'< If(
t~,,~
_~J
""-. "...'.< ....., ._, ':\:i-.~""...._.,," . <
fjj}i"......",...._ij ,71
I'L'7) 1
, j
,
~ --~.I
~
I
....i~
""",,
, 0
n'tJE.m
.:Jr$,1;,
'1?:'t~iW"
(It''"/'
t:(kV~ 111/,,1('. tJ
(J l"~iI".
I
<,' ~
'~' s:;~
iU.
I',
\ \ IN-eN,:
\ " .
~ ',',,:
~ ~ ,.
, ~ COO,
OJ/C',; VI . '
~ r:, c f.f'()&O"~f,..$ "fJ \
P opJPt)SS fJ.CiJ.f"/f,. II
'P (ft?! CO 51 c. (5
y/cos~ f{J,/lea"! Sjt. /Cp "
1'(1 ) UfOSft< V "":' (,
~ 1b ....'
()Ff': &')
N .'
j
_ . I
<1/;;;;,.",_ . ,t
1<.3' .....;"
'::t. .=:~, " e cC, ... << ... .. '!'2.
"f.::t ';:, 'Qj; ~
~
1I
~ll
ltl ~
".) <(
IrO
II
r
~
n
r.
11
~
II
II
{I
<<
II
H
h
~
~
II
~
,
I
Ii
It
II
II
II
II
II ,
6t?
II
II
II
II
~
~
"'\
I
Figure 7, Sanborn Fire Insurance Map
August 1928, UPDATED to 1949, Sheet 17 (Detail)
- 7 -
~
.,
u' Z f---L., I
lJ ,
2
.
J(
~m
~
~
"
r ~~,' ~~
)( L
N
~
1~1 lil!'::vr
'1J I
L~ )!;.~
~
I ~ffr.
I
Historic Name: P.W. Paulson BuildinCl
Street: 89-93 Oak Street
City: Ashland
County: Jackson (029)
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT APPLICATION-SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURES
Figure 8. Historic Postcard Image, c1910
G. Kramer Image
Figure 9. Historic Postcard DETAIL, c1910
G. Kramer Image
- 8 -
Historic Name: P.W. Paulson e 'ina
Street: 89-93 Oak Street
City: Ashland
County: Jack",,,,n (029)
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT APPLICATION-SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURES
Figure 1 O. Current Image
Looking NW, Showing Oak Street Fa~ade
Figure 11. Current Image
Looking NW, Showing South Elevation and Oak Street Fa9ade
- 9 -
Historic Name: P.W. Paulson Buildina
Street: 89-93 Oak Street
City: Ashland
County: Jackson (029)
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT APPLICATION-SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURES
Figure 12. Current Image
Looking SW, Showing Existing Storefront (89 & 91 Oak St)
Figure 13. Current Image
Looking West, Showing Existing Storefront (89 Oak)
- 10 -
Historic Name: P.W. Paulson f iina
Street: 89-93 Oak Street .
City: Ashland
County: Jack.....m (029)
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT APPLICATION-SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURES
Figure 14. Current Image
Looking West, Showing Existing Storefront (91 Oak)
Figure 15. Current Image
Looking West, Showing Existing Storefront (93 Oak) Note Step
- 11 -
Historic Name: P.W. Paulson Buildina
Street: 89-93 Oak Street
City: Ashland
County: Jackson (029)
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT APPLICATION-SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURES
Figure 16. Current Image (rotated left)
Looking E, Showing Rear Elevation, structural bracing etc.
Figure 17. Current Interior Image
Looking East, showing exposed storefronts, ceiling height and original transom framing
- 12-
Historic Name: P.W. Paulson B,' '\na
Street: 89-93 Oak Street
City: Ashland
County: JaCkl>~ll (029)
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT APPLICATION-SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURES
Figure 18. Current Interior Image
Looking SW, Showing Rear Elevation, entryway etc.
Figure 19. Current Interior Image, Detail 89 Oak Storefront
Showing exposed framing, note original glazing line at arrow (inline with fa~ade)
- 13 -
Historic Name: P.W. Paulson Buildina
Street: 89-93 Oak Street
City: Ashland
County: Jackson (029)
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT APPLICATION-SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURES
Figure 20. Current Interior Image, Detail 91 Oak Storefront
Note original storefront frame, beadboard soffit, etc.
- 14 -
d:-'it~T 1tb
~- c il~
~oo
e\ -OJ....
~ ~
10]
UlOO-~:;uvope6l&qsoJ.reO@OJU!
lOSS":Z:S!nvs
OZSL6 ~O PU81t[S\f" laaQ.S ljJ.Ino;;;( LtZ
-~- I ootOt 'ON~Ol XVl. aeso 3~6Z 'ON dVW S.CfOSS3SSV r ~ I
OZSL6 ~o ON'IlHSV to 0 0 I"
::> ~g ;..:2 I- ~
.133~lS)('l10 S6 '~6 'S9 0:: ..~
~a; oJ- llJ ......
'0::> 9NIM3:Ha 300lS BNIGMf.LS J- 0 a~
en llJ
'Z NOll. \;f ^ON3tl 3a\;f~\;f.:l z ~ .~.;;:; :r: (j)
-~.._- 0 if:. rf) <(
311fO NOJ1dICl:>S3a V u ~~ <( ~
1\;fI~tl311\111\10~ 0::
0
u..
3~dl\fH 3av'S433HSL~X~~
l:l 3 II H:l <l \f
op~.2pa SOl:mJ
1.33CJ..LS
>I'VO
"
;<
::>
"
::>
;<
"
-;
~
11:
o
z
o I-
01- g
ClW ><
ZWo<(
~~[{jl-
wrf)"tll
CC~mtll
tll<(ccm
wOOo
50 0 I;':!
I-~zm
(/)c/l::5C:
~bi.ti~
150; <(a..
~g ~
I- (/)
(/) ii::
o
(/)
(/)
W
(/)
(/)
<(
'"
0'"
@:ffi~
~5
w
o
o
'"
o
~
- .:. :"-=--1= - -:.: -
~ I-- I ~ I--
~ w ~I'" I
uJ ~ UJ ~ I
~z '" (\! '" (\ II
~Q w'<""' I lm
l1..!:i: --...0> I <:0
~> 1
og. I',
ii:' I
II
: I!i~
j II~
~---r~i;
--T---+ ...~ 1[11g;
I If"": w Ill:::
i ~Il ~~ ~ 11"-
I ~ I! @~ ~
1m I I
!" , - .---'~r-I
~~J 1':= I
I I:
~
!
'"
/
I
<( .~I .~ .'1
>- l- ~I " ~~ .- ,> -
0 <( .~
a:: ~ Cl ~~I N ~~ - ~~I-
<( I
::a: ~ w U1;; U1' U.
::a: Cl ~ ;;;'~i i
/"
::> ~I 0 i ~":::::?'" . m" " ~I'
(J) ~ II u .......,: ~I '
c:> iI c:> ~I ~ ~~~ ~; ~I i
3'
z .1 z
- ';i!~ $1 - ;;: ~I ~s [~~ ~I~ ~I ~
z "0- ~I Cl ~
i~ ~ ~:t mmm
Z -' ~~ 31 ~~ ~ ~~ d 31~
~"': Il;:i -
<( ~~ ! ::> ~'" w ;:> ~~ ~~~ ~
-' ~, (D I~I!! . r
a.. ,0 " .' ~ ~
.0 ~~
.~ f ".~ ~I ~I" ~ I"
~~ '" <<<>,:"o!l p g~ ~i ~ ~ ~~~ ql" ~ ~ :
llS<>> - illl :~ ~! ~ : ~ ~ ~
00. s ,"
, 0, ~i -< m l'l. ::;
~~ ~I ~~~C) ~
"..8 ..~ ~ ,.;:,,~ . w
Iii !Ii 1 ~i~ i~ i ~
~~~ ~~~ u ~i5 ffiJ ~ ~ g
~~ s ~: ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ I
*~~ ;gl ~ ~@~ ~~ ~]! ~
~~.8 ~~o ~ .g~~ &~ ~~:; ~
g~:2 ~8f ~ ~i~ J: ~ r~. ~
ffi.~ E~m ~ smE ~E ~.~ ~
~i~ ~!i i $~~ ~~ ~ 5~~~
~~~ ~~~ E sag; ~J!! 2 ~.E~E
~~~ k~g ~ ~~g g~ ~ g~go
~i
~I
:!
~
~!
g]
~
.,
~:
~I
II ~;il:~IJ~'~~~!~~l:~I~J~;
!
~~
~
<<
Ii'
;:)
t;
;:)
'"
I--
'"
-;
Cl
"
ill:
Z
<(
..J
0...
is ~
~ ~~S;
C::l rJ'.i i ~ ~
"
"4
" ~
~"...,,~ <t' 6
" "<7v~o.j)~.?,%
6~ '&"p~J.I
W
I-
z
o
i=
u
llJ
b
[,
llJ
llJ
0::
I-
(f)
~zo x .~
~ ~h~~
! ~ ~ili~ i
~ ~ ~~~ ~.
~. 0 ~ii _
~z_ LLlU ~
~~g: ~ ~~go
~ ! ~~~ !
0: ji;: ~~~ ~
t; ~ ~:s': ~o<~w
8 8 !!.bffi
o ~~~
~. ~ )..~~ ~
~ ;~ffi ~
~ ~ ggg
if 2 :t{~i ::l
~ ;t~!:L~
~ ir. ili;:::>.::Jz
~"~,~ ~ iZ~~~~
_ ~ m~3i:i~
~ ~8~~~
~ ! ~~~g~
~ ~ !~~~~
~ ~~~g~~~
o O~Z5~C1~
8 ~~~~.tu~~
~ .il~~~.8
~ ~~~~~~~
~! : ~~:~~i~
,+,
.
~
'<:
bJ
'"
~
k,
a
>-
f...
to
;z
&~ WOCl-pa~!l/::>JVopt:!fiIaoSOl1e~@oJU! I Q0C01.- .ON.101XV'.L 0060 3\..6~ .ON dVV\I S,C1OSS3SSV Ii ~ I
Z096.t;gg-~y9 0 f!!
!f i~ Ol9L€ 00 P1JIaitlS'l:f .. J:3aJ:tS lnmO::f L 1.(: OZSL6 ClO ON'iflHS\f ~8 ill:: <.> I- -r- lli
B. o'~1$ 133crlS >WO 86 '1,.6 '613 g UJ :c
J.:> 3 J. I H :> <l '<f .OQ5NIM3C18 3NOl.S 8NIONV'LS .. ~~ UJ -r- '"
~ ~ Op'B~;)a SOp:'BJ :sz: NOI1'V^ON3~ 30'V:J'V.::l ~ o~ I I :c
;f~ en ~
31'0'0 NOlldlWS30 V 1'V1:J~3V\1I1\10:J Cl 0
fi:
31\iOS:::I"WH 3Wi S133HS HXt I,.
I
, I .
I 1> ,
- I--- l.'lil=
I -I XfXX Mf
I; +, J :1'~ ~
~~ U o ;;g ~ ~!ii !ii i ~ ~.
ffi* ~ E~ ~ offi ~ ~ ! .~
h mil g ~ ~~ ~ *~
, ,
Ii
~g: ": S
~.~ ~ ~
i~ ~ i
~
~ ~ i
~ ~ ~
~ ~
~
""
<(
o
~
ill
~
I-
Z
0 ill
IY
lL CJ
I- ~
rJl
"" Z
<( 0
Q. IY
lL
I-
Z rJl
0 ""
<(
I- Q.
<(
> 5:
UJ UJ
-'
W >
I- Z
en <(
<( -'
w (L
11;
~
_0
~
z
o
~
w
en
(!)
z
5
-'
5
o:l
e
ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION
Planning Division
51 Winburn Way, Ashland OR 97520
CITY OF
AS H LAN D 541-488-5305 Fax 541-488-6006
FILE
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTjo
Street Address ! 0 / ~(t/f) ~-t
Assessor's Map No, 39 1 E 0 Cj g6
C-/-D
Zoning
Pursuing LEED@ Certification? 0 YES 0 NO
Tax Lot(s)
/0.300
Comp Plan Designation
APPLICANT
0\~6r:v\j'll'it $1'0"'" tBr... winO Co
Name """M"T"("..'f v
Address I 0 I
Gl\v Sf'
Ph S Lj I - <640 - ~l.fCf Lf EM 'I
one - al
C '8 "I J q I I q -:3 c)" W) City I'd) h I (> Y> (~
~ I e-'f~ S,,,,,,.,J,,..,(}:,'tun,,b...-c. -.}'''':1
" c..~ 1'1-)
Zip q 7 'S 7- 6
PROPERTY OWNER
Name STC, nJ ,n~ S'ion e [? r<'1r' IIlO Co
Address \ 0 I 0^ w '=> r- '-
/....~"----<~,...--- .~"""'"""''''--~'--....
SURVEYOR. ENGINEER-,ARCHITECI.kANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. OTHER
Title ~i1A/:: Na~e Cay/OS (}/SClC/O Phone 05~ - ~CJgg-Mail
Address /C /7 '1~..k City ~
Phone
'5 '-'II - 8110- 81.-/1 L.f E-Mail qIG)<@51an..l.nO ~J-QIl(brcw/>1
City At,h It! nd Zip q 7'5 'Cd' Go(}y
Zip 77~ 0
Title
Name
Phone
E-Mail
Address
City
Zip
I hereby certify that the statements and information contained in this application, including the enclosed drawings and the required findings of fact, are in all respects,
true and correct. I understand that all property pins must be shown on the drawings and visible upon the site inspection. In the event the pins are not shown or their
location found to be incorrect, the owner assumes full responsibility, I further understand that if this request is subsequently contested, the burden will be on me to
establish:
1) that I produced sufficient factual evidence at the hearing to support this request;
2) that the findings of fact furnished justifies the granting of the request;
3) that the findings of fact furnished by me are adequate; and further
4) that all structures or improvements are properly located on the ground.
Failure :~~ will re ~. In not only the request being set aside, but also possibly in my structures being built in reliance thereon being required to
ba r, ';;:;:d;t:r:xp, a, If! oubls, I am advised loseek compelenl professional advice '/ asslslance
,/ /',t. ._._o___'__.. '3 '2.- / I J
ppticant's Si ature Date '
As owne 6~P~rtY i v6 v in's request, I have read and understood the complete application and its consequences to me as a property
own., ../" -/. "<. ( . (
/ ,) '2- il
Pro y Own :!.s Signature (required) Date
IT 0 be completed by City Staff]
Date Received
Zoning Permjt Type
1-
Filing Fee
OVER ~~
(""'.,n,..,,,.....,,..... "...-I t....":.."~,l,,~.....,, n"'nl.._~_,7,...;..,. n.._..:. ~.._1:......:.... ........
Job Address:
Owner's Name: STANDING STONE BREWING CO Phone:
Customer #: 01827 State Lic No:
STANDING STONE BREWING CO City Lic No:
Applicant: 101 OAK ST
Address: ASHLAND OR 97520
Sub-Contractor:
Phone: Address:
Applied: 03/21/2011
Issued: 03/21/2011
Expires: 09/17/2011 Phone:
State Lic No:
Maplot: 391 E09BB10300 City Lic No:
DESCRIPTION: Type 1 Commercial Site Review
Fee Description
Amount
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
20 East Main St.
Ashland, OR 97520
www.ashland.or.us
Tel: 541-488-5305
Fax: 541-488-5311
TTY: 800-735-2900
Inspection Request Line: 541-552-2080
CITY Of
ASHLAND