Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-0812 Adjourned Mtg PACKET 724�� AGENDA ADJOURNED MEETING ASHLAND CITY COUNCIL August 12, 1991 6: 30 P.M. Study Session with Parks & Recreation Commission re: Survey of Public Opinion on Open Space funding. I. CALL TO ORDER: 7: 30 P.M. , Civic Center Council Chambers II. SPECIAL AGENDA ITEMS: 1. Request by Councilor Winthrop for reconsideration of vote tabling adoption of Findings on Conditional Use Permit for Ashland Community Hospital. 2 . Public Hearing on alternative methods of funding NW Water System Improvements. 3 . Request by Carl Oates to extend water moratorium area to include upper Granite Street area. III. ADJOURNMENT ..i emQXNndum ll August 8, 1991 .0080, : II: Mayor and City Council, Brian Almquist, Jim Watson ex rum: Rob Winthrop tbjec#: Hospital Offices Findings Before standing on principle its good to have one' s facts straight. In fact, the Hospital is about one block outside of the proposed water moratorium area. Mea Culpal I request that we approve the Findings for Planning Action No. 90-028 as soon as possible, and get this sordid moment behind me. cc: John Fregonese DRAFT COPY BEFORE THE ASHLAND CITY COUNCIL JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON AUGUST 6, 1991 IN THE MATTER OF PLANNING ACTION 090-028, REQUEST FOR A ) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE, CONSTRUCTION OF ) FINDINGS, , TWO, TWO-STORY MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDINGS WITH EACH LEVEL ) CONCLUSIONS COMPRISING . 2700 SQ. FT. , LOCATED AT ASHLAND COMMUNITY ) AND ORDERS HOSPITAL. ) APPLICANT: ASHLAND COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ) -------------------------------------------------------- RECITALS: 1) Tax lot 2100 of 391E 5DB is located at the corner of Catalina and Chestnut Streets and is zoned R-2; Multi Family Residential. 2) The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow for the construction of two, two-story medical office buildings. Site improvements are outlined on the site plan (Exhibit 2-B) on file at the Department of Community Development. 3) The criteria for approval of a Conditional Use Permit are found in . Chapter 18.104 and are as follows: A. The proposal is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. B. The location, size, design and operating .characteristics of the proposed development are such that the development will be reasonably compatible with and have minimal impact on the livability and appropriate development of abutting properties and the surrounding neighborhood. C. In determining the above, consideration shall be given to the following: 1) Harmony in scale, bulk, coverage and density. 2) The availability and capacity of public facilities p.nd utilities. 3) The generation of traffic and the capacity of surrounding streets. 4) Public safety and protection. 5) Architectural and aesthetic compatibility with the surrounding area. 4) The City Council, - following proper public notice, held a Public Hearing on June 18, 1991, at which time testimony was received and exhibits were presented. The City Council approved the application subject to conditions pertaining to the appropriate development of the site. Now, therefore, The City Council of the City of Ashland finds, concludes and recommends as follows: SECTION 1. EXHIBITS For the purposes of reference to these Findings, the attached in of exhibits, data, and testimony will be used. Staff Exhibits lettered with an "S" ; Proponent' s Exhibits, lettered with a "P"; Opponent's Exhibits, lettered with an 11011; Hearing Minutes, Notices, Miscellaneous Exhibits lettered with an limn Mediation Agreement Exhibit, lettered 11MA-111 ; and Approved Site Plan Exhibit (from BOORA) , lettered 112-B". SECTION 2. CONCLUSORY FINDINGS 2 . 1 The City Council finds that it has received all information necessary to make a decision based on the Staff Report, public hearing testimony and .the exhibits received. 2 .2 The . City Council finds that the request to allow for the construction of two, two-story medical office buildings, with each level comprising 2700 sq. ft. , meets all relevant criteria outlined in the Conditional Use Chapter 18. 104 . The City Council finds the proposal to be in conformance with the Ashland Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan Map designates this property to be used for future expansion of public facilities. At the time of adoption of the Plan Map, the hospital was existing and the surrounding land was deemed most appropriate for the expansion of hospital services. The Council believes the use of this property for medical offices is in keeping with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan designation. The Council finds that the construction of medical office space will have a minimal impact on surrounding properties. The hospital is surrounded by fully improved City streets with adequate capacity to serve the proposed use. Total traffic generation by the completed offices is expected to be 364 vehicle trips per day. The Council believes this may be reduced, however, by the proximity to the hospital and other offices, and the opportunities for combining visits and trips. The Council finds that the Site Plan (Exhibit 2-B) and Mediation Agreement (MA-1) , mutually accepted by the parties, complies with all relevant policies outlined in the Comprehensive Plan and insures that the proposal will be compatible with and have minimal impact on the livability of the surrounding neighborhood. The layout and size of buildings is in keeping with the residential character of the neighborhood. The primary orientation of the offices is towards the street, while the parking area will be located at the rear. Pedestrian access from Chestnut Street. and directly to the hospital will be provided. SECTION 3 . DECISION 3 . 1 Based on the record of the Public Hearing on this matter, the City Council concludes that the proposal to allow for the construction of two, two-story medical office buildings is supported by evidence contained in the whole record. Therefore, based on our overall conclusions, and upon the proposal being subject to each of the following conditions, we approve Planning Action #90-028. Further, if any one or more of the conditions below are found to be invalid, for any whatsoever, then Planning Action #90-028 is denied. The following are the conditions and they are attached to the approval: 1) That the terms agreed upon by the parties and outlined in the Mediation Agreement (Exhibit MA-1) be conditions of this approval. 2) That a separate application for a Site Review be processed by the Ashland Planning Commission. 3) That all landscaping, including street trees, be installed prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any structure 4) That all parking and access be paved and striped prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any structure. 5) That the applicant work with the Energy Conservation Division on designing the offices with assistance from the Energy Smart Design Program. 6) That the hydrant requirements of the Ashland Fire Department be met. 7) That all requirements of the Electric Department be met. 8) That all signage comply with the Ashland Sign Code for conditional uses within a residential district and that all appropriate permits be obtained. 9) That a drainage plan for the site be submitted at the time of building permit applications for review by Public Works. 10) That bike parking be provided in convenient proximity to the office buildings. 11) That a recycling area be provided for each building. Dated this day of August 1991. Nan Franklin, Recorder Catherine Golden, Mayor July 16, 1991 TO: Honorable 4emcers of the Ashland _ity .Ccuncil . RE . : Water Plan . City of Ashland . R . W. Beck , April !991 COMMENTS AND CONCERNS : We agree with the conclusions of the Beck report and the Public Works Director that the Northwest Moratorium Area should be continued and expanded until such time that the facilities recommmended by the consultant are in place . The issue is not the availability of water , but the adequacy of the distribution system . The Beck report states that the system is inadequate. Our concerns are that the moratorium area hoes not extend far enough up Granite Street to protect the existing residential areas against losses by fire and to maintain or increase water pressure in the existing service to residences in the area . The report repeatedly refers to the age , deterioration , and inadequacies of the system: pages 1-3 , 1I-1 , iI-3, II-5 , II-6. We have tested the water pressure at 351 Granite street , 355 Granite Street , 365 Granite Street, and 381 Granite Street using an Ashcroft pressure test gauge model E-16 , rated to 300 lbs . , manufactured by the Kiener Company , Los Angeles . Tests were conducted over a period of several days at various times to cover variations in pressure . Maximum pressures at the sites never exceeded 35 psi . The lowest readings were at 381 Granite Street and varied between 30 and 33 psi . These pressures are well below the minimum operating pressures , 40 psi , specified by the consultant on page II-3 for the proposed system. The consultant , in the present report , has pointed out the deficiencies of the fire protection system on pages II-6 and 1I-7 of the Comprehensive Plan . Those of us living on upper Granite Street feel that the danger of fire is greater for us because we live closer to the urban / forest interface and the heavy and careless use of upper Lithia Park in summer . The lower water pressures must be corrected before there is any more aevelopement In this area . John Sully and Carl Oates met with Fire Chief Keith W000ley July 12 to discuss water flow rates , water pressure=_ and sire suppression . His perceptions of the problem of fire protection in the City of Ashland strongly support the conclusions of the Beck report . : f you have not already requested Kis testimony with regard to water volumns , warier pressure, and riry danger in Ashland we asp: _hat you do so befcre deciding this mat`_eo . In aOdl `_idn , vi= Statements concerning `ne ability t ` =ire Department to combat lines at he _rban/ Vares_ t interfaces lees to be heard , and ieedec . not on : , :y 10 _.a .jvy Council , cut oy 41 ; the citizens _T Ashland and by _he -sh. iand ? lnn.^. :nq Deoar-ment . ( 2 ) it is our belief that there has been no recognition of the danger of fire by the Planning Department in permitting development in the urban/forest interface. contrary to whatever the Planning Director may claim. The City of Ashland is courting another disaster such as the power failure in December 1990, if action is not taken to solve the problem of water distribution . The margin of safety for the power distribution system was low, as a result of ignoring the system capacity and allowing continued developement. That power failure was a clear warning concerning developement without planning . A major /catastrophic fire is inevitable if fire is not considered in the planning process . Placing houses in the forest interface, as in the Bend area or as in Santa Barbara, without adequate consideration is inviting disaster. There is no evidence that the Ashland Planning Department has properly considered the eventuality of fire . We, therefore, urgently request that Granite Street from Winburn Way to the National Forest boundry be included in any expansion of the moratorium area. Carl & Rosalie Oates ; Dennis & Linda Friend ; John & Jean Sully; Bradley & Carol LaVine. U , �,O`OlG/ �n.2i U - ASHLAND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: FIRE EMERGENCY & NORTHWEST ASHLAND CITY MAYOR KATHY GOLDEN PERIMETER PRESENT FIRE DANGER IN NORTHWEST ASHLAND Risk of a potential Fire Catastrophe in Northwest Ashland increases year by year. The principal causes are: — Continued drought conditions & prevailing strong winds. — An antiquated city water system, identified as inadequate by city consultants 10 years ago&costly studies made. — Continued residential construction in the Northwest,despite building"moratoriums" &water pressure problems. Although opinions vary concerning what the first priority should be (more moratoriums, methods of financing, actual modernization of the system, and other city matters) it is clear to the undersigned that the first two priorities to avoid a devastating catastrophe should be the following: t. Commence immediately,and complete ASAP, modernization of the Northwest Ashland water supply system. 2. Provide EMERGENCY self-contained water storage and pumping facilities at high-risk, high altitude Northwest locations,to function until the modernization program is 'on-stream'! NAME ADDRESS DATE c N CJ v C C` 7-1 f „ �N c — 50 - - 7 -22 (o'Ct :�„v✓ �ws r� g y - >