Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-0820 Council Mtg PACKET Important: Any citizen attending Council meetings may speak on any item on the agenda, unless it is the subject of a public hearing which has been closed.. If you wish to speak, please rise and after you have been recognized by the Chair, give your name and address. The- Chair will then allow you to speak and also inform you as to the amount of time allotted to you. The time granted will be dependent to some extent on the nature of the item under discussion, the number of people who wish to be heard, and the length of the agenda. AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING ASHLAND CITY COUNCIL AUGUST 20, 1991 I. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: 7:30 P.M. , Civic Center Council Chambers II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Regular Meeting of August 6 and Adjourned Meeting of August 12, 1991. IV. CONSENT AGENDA- - 1. Minutes of Boards, Commissions & Committees.NvNG 2 . Monthly Departmental Reports - July 1991. 3. Memo from Energy Conservation Coordinator regarding Water Conservation Advisory Committee meeting to review water conservation study by Synergic Resources Corp. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (to conclude by 9:30 P.M. ) 1. Planning Action No. 91-122 , a request for modification of Final Plan for previously approved 18-lot subdivision near the intersection of Scenic and Grandview, involving a change in conditions limiting street grade on Logan Drive to 15% for all portions of the public street, except for a 35 ' long landing area at Scenic Dr. not to exceed 6%. (Ed Houghton, Applicant) VI. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1. Adoption of Findings of Fact approving P.A. No. 91-067 , a zone change from R-2 to E-1, and Comp. Plan Map change from Multi-family Residential to Employment on property at 250 N. Pioneer. - OA2 . Adoption of Findings of Fact denying P.A. No. 91-049, a zone change from R-2 to C-1-D at 80 Hargadine St. , 130 Hargadine, and 96 W. Fork St. VII. NEW & MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS: 1. Letter from League of Oregon Cities board member Lou Hannum requesting appointment of Ashland representative to LOC/AOC Committee in connection with Governor's regional meetings on Ballot Measure 5. 2. Confirmation of Mayor's appointment of Paul Nolte as City Attorney. 3 . Adoption of Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Orders on P.A. No. 91-068, a Comprehensive Plan Map change on Cl property located at 50 W. Nevada St. 4. Request by Councilor Laws to create ad hoc Transportation Committee to advise Planning Commission on preparation of Transportation Element of Comprehensive Plan. 5. Report by Fire Chief on temporary measures to enhance fire protection in Northwest Ashland. 6. Recommendation from Public Works Dir. concerning citizen request for water-based moratorium on Granite Street. 7 . Report from CPAC Chair on committee re-organization; and confirmation of Mayor's appointments to CPAC. 8. Request for authorization to expend funds for the design of water line, pump station and reservoir. VIII. PUBLIC 'FORUM: Business from the audience not included on the agenda. (Limited to 15 minutes) IX. ORDINANCES, RESOLUTIONS & CONTRACTS: r '1. First reading of an Ordinance adopting an amendment to the Ashland Comprehensive Plan Map from Open Space to Single- Family Residential. ✓g.J Second reading by title only of an ordinance of the City of ��3 8 Ashland re-zoning certain property from R-2 to E-1 (City of Ashland, Applicant) 3 .1 Second reading by title only of an ordinance adopting an a(b 3 9 amendment to the Ashland Comprehensive Plan Map from Multi- family Residential to Employment (City of Ashland, Applicant) 4 . Second reading by title only of an ordinance dispensing with an election within the City of Ashland on the question d Y of a proposed annexation and setting the time and place for a public hearing thereon; setting a public hearing date on the withdrawal of certain real property from Jackson County Fire District No. 5; directing publication of notices as required by ORS 222. 524 ; and declaring an emergency. (Crowson Road Annexation) . 5. Resolution replacing Resolution No. 91-28 in its entirety and setting affordable housing income levels and rental and purchased cost levels. JW)_ 6. Resolution calling a special election for November 5, 1991 to authorize the issuance of $2 , 060, 000 in General ��-j3 Obligation Bonds for water improvements. X. OTHER BUSINESS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS XI. ADJOURNMENT t MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ASHLAND CITY COUNCIL AUGUST 6, 1991 CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Golden called the meeting to order and led the Pledge of Allegiance at 7 : 34 P.M. on the above date in the Council Chambers. Laws, Reid, Williams, Winthrop, and Arnold were present. Acklin was absent. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: The minutes of the Regular Meeting of July 16, 1991 were approved as presented. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS & AWARDS: 1) Achievement. for Excellence in Financial .Reporting - Dottie Tryk, City of Grants Pass, presented the award to Finance Dir. Jill Turner. Tryk said only 1300 municipalities out of a possible 82, 000 received this award, and Ashland has done so three times. Turner thanked the Council, Budget Committee and her Staff .for their assistance in earning the award. 2) Super Good Cents - Mayor Golden presented Stu Smith, Ashland Conservation Division, with awards from Bonneville Power Administration's Super Good Cents Program for excellence in three categories, one of which is "Overall SGC Program Excellence". Robbin Pearce-Smith who oversees Ashland' s SOLVE program, accepted an award from the National Environmental Awards Council for air pollution reduction efforts. . 3) National Weather Service - Mike Brooks of this agency, presented the Mayor with a plaque in appreciation of the City's maintenance of a cooperative station at the Wastewater Treatment Plant. The National Weather Service is celebrating 100 years as a civilian .agency, and is recognizing 11 of the 350 Oregon cooperative stations as a, part of the celebration. Sadie Williams, on behalf of her late husband Clarence, accepted a certificate of appreciation from the City for maintaining the cooperative weather station in Ashland for 37 years. CONSENT AGENDA: Winthrop requested that item two be pulled for discussion, and moved to approve items 1) Minutes of Boards, Commissions and Committees; and 3) Memo from Dir. of Public Works regarding final EIS for Mt. Ashland Ski area; Arnold seconded, all AYES on voice vote. Winthrop asked that Public Wks. Dir. Hall update the Council on item 2) Memo regarding Wastewater Treatment Plant Facilities Plan. Hall said that due to Councilor Laws ' recent questions concerning the fish in Bear Creek, the DEQ, Oregon Dept. of Fish & Wildlife and City Staff have met and are discussing conditions which affect the fish, i.e. temperature of the water, flow volumes, and dissolved oxygen. As a result the D.E.Q. has granted the City a one-year extension to make a decision on a preferred alternative and submit a program plan. Winthrop moved to approve Brown & Caldwell 's corrections to the Facilities Plan, Reid seconded, all AYES on voice vote. PUBLIC HEARING: P.A. No: 91-068 - Comprehensive Plan Map Change. Planning Dir. Fregonese explained that this action is to correct a mapping error which was recently brought to his attention. The subject property, located behind 50 W. Nevada Street, should be shown as Single-family Residential, not Open Space. The public hearing was opened and there was no comment from the audience. Winthrop moved to approve the planning action, Laws seconded, all YES on roll call vote. Williams abstained because he is co-owner of the nurseries located on the property. Regular Meeting - Ashland City Council - August 6, 1991 - P. 1 UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1) Memo from Public Works Dir. - Emergency Generator at Ashland Creek Sewage Pump Station - Odors at Sewage Treatment Plant - Sink Hole on Iowa St. Public Works Director Steve Hall reviewed a memo included in the packet for Council information. Chemicals to reduce odors at the S.T.P. will cost $5, 000 - $6, 000 per year. Information only, no action necessary. 2) C.P.A.C. Appointments - Postponed until August 20th. NEW & MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS: 1) Adoption of Findings of Fact - P.A. 91-067 (Zone change at 250 N. Pioneer) - Postponed until August 20th. 2) Adoption of Findings - P.A. 91-049 (Zone change at 80 Hargadine St. ) - postponed until August 20th. 3) Adoption of Findings - Ashland Community Hospital - C.U.P. - Winthrop asked that this item be deferred until after the August 12th hearing on financing of northwest area water improvements. Arnold said this is the first time this issue has been discussed in conjunction with the project, which needs to move ahead. Williams said a building permit can be withheld if the Council decides to extend the water moratorium area. Arnold moved to adopt the Findings, Conclusions and Orders on P.A. 90-028, Williams seconded, and the motion failed on roll call vote as follows.: Reid, Winthrop and Laws, NO; Williams and Arnold; YES. 4) Cigarette Vending Machines - A communication from Dick Thierolf, Jr. , Acting City Attorney, said the State regulates these machines, and no action by Council is necessary. 5) Open Space Funding survey - It was agreed to hold a study session with the Parks Commission on Monday, August 12, 1991 from 6: 30 to 7 : 30 P.M. 6) Pavement Cut Request - D. June Smith, 113 High St. , is requesting permission to cut pavement for installation of a gas service. Hall said the paving is under the 5-year moratorium until September of 1992 . Laws moved to approve the request, Reid seconded, and the motion carried on voice vote with Winthrop dissenting. 7) Recycling Task Force - Concept Paper - For information only. Laws will serve as alternate Council liaison when Reid cannot attend the meetings. PUBLIC FORUM: Carl Oates, 351 Granite St. , read a letter from Granite Street residents asking that the Council again consider extending the northwest moratorium area to include Granite Street. Arnold moved to place the request on the agenda for the August 12th public hearing, Williams seconded, all AYES on voice vote. Brent Thompson, Vice- President of the Southern Oregon Land Conservancy, asked that the Council consider re-opening negotiations for the purchase of the Brevik property for open space. This 110 acres is near the Superior Lumber Co. land and Dr. Epstein's property. Thompson also suggested retaining portions of streets and/or alleys for walkways/trails at the time they are vacated. There was no further comment from the audience. Regular Meeting - Ashland City Council - August 6, 1991 - P. 2 . A � ORDINANCES RESOLUTIONS & CONTRACTS: 1) 250 N. Pioneer - An _ ordinance was read rezoning the property from Multi-family residential-low density to Employment. Winthrop moved to second reading, Laws seconded, all YES on roll call vote. 2) Amend Comp. Plan Map - 250 N. Pioneer - The ordinance was read and Laws moved to second reading, Williams seconded, all YES on roll call vote. r 3) Set Public Hg. - Crowson Rd. Annexation - An ordinance was read dispensing with an election and setting the public hearing for September 3, 1991. Williams moved to second reading and Winthrop seconded. Laws objects to the emergency clause and Winthrop agrees. The motion passed on roll call vote with Laws and Winthrop dissenting. 4) Affordable Housing Income Levels - Reid said the rental amounts shown are high and asked that Staff supply true income levels for Ashland. Winthrop suggested tabling the resolution until August 20th when this information can be presented by Staff. No further action taken. 5) City/County Insurance Services - Resolution authorizing membership in the City/County Insurance Service Trust Property Self-Insurance Pool for a three-year period. Williams moved to adopt same, Arnold seconded, all YES on roll call vote. (Reso. #91-30) 6) Set Public Hg. - Tolman Creek Rd. L.I.D. - Resolution setting public hearing for September 3, 1991. Arnold moved to adopt same, Winthrop seconded, all YES on roll call vote. Laws asked that information be provided concerning which properties are commercial, residential and vacant. (Reso. #91-31) 7) Regional Hazardous Materials Emergency Response Team - Fire Chief Woodley asked for authorization for the Mayor to sign the contract extension, effective through December 31, 1991. Arnold moved to authorize same, Reid seconded, all YES on roll call vote. OTHER BUSINESS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS: . Winthrop asked about the Greyhound bus depot situation. After a short discussion, Arnold said the Traffic Safety Commission will discuss possible locations and report back to Council. . ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 9: 20 P.M. Nan E. Franklin Catherine M. Golden City Recorder Mayor Regular Meeting - Ashland City Council - August 6, 1991 - P. 3 MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED MEETING ASHLAND CITY COUNCIL AUGUST 12 , 1991 CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Golden led the Pledge of Allegiance and called the meeting to order at 7:50 P.M. in the Council Chambers. Laws, Reid, Williams, Acklin, Winthrop, and Arnold were present. SPECIAL AGENDA ITEMS: Ashland Community Hospital Findings - Winthrop moved to adopt same, Reid seconded, all YES on roll call vote. Water Improvements Funding - Finance Dir. Turner explained the process for using certificates of participation to finance the improvements. A short discussion was held on using monies in existing funds in the city budget. On a question from Laws, Turner said general obligation bonds would be less expensive than certificates of participation (approximately $14, 000/year less) . The public hearing was opened. Stuart Austin, 521 Thornton Way, said immediate concern is fire protection and any type of funding should be used. Chris Hald, 600 Roca St. , is concerned about fire protection. Bob Reinholt, 270 Skycrest Dr. , urged immediate action and the use of certificates of participation. Jack Blackburn, 805 Oak St. , said funds from city budget should be looked at and he would support use of general obligation bonds. Leon Swartzberg, 361 Glenn St. , asked about the difference between G.O. bonds and COP's. Steve Morjig, 610 Chestnut, supports use of COP's. Charles Wiley, speaking for his Mother who lives At 200 Skycrest Dr. , urged Council to take action to get improvements done. JoAnne Houghton, 185 Scenic Dr. , spoke in support of COP's. Al Alsing, 970 Walker, said citizens should be able to vote on G.O. bonds with the understanding that COP's will be used if necessary. Jack Nicholson, 1575 Greenmeadows Way, submitted a letter for the record and said existing monies should be used. John Barton, 300 Kent St. , said the city has an obligation to provide water and fire protection, should commit to COP's and submit general obligation bonding to the voters. J. Ellen Austin, 521 Thornton Way, suggested using existing monies, G.O. bonds and COP's. George Duran, 539 Thornton Way, feels citizens should decide how improvements are financed. Carola Lacy, 140 Third St. , concurred with Jonn *Barton's comments. Mark & Jill Murphey, 492 Lynn St. , submitted a letter for the record asking that the financing issue be put before the voters. Ron Bolstad, 481 Thornton, supports using COP's. Michael Sanford, 2785 E. Main, supports general obligation bonds. Jon Lange, 442 Guthrie, supports COP's. Shawn Sullivan, 525 Sheridan, said existing funds should be used. Mary Lou Gross, 240 E. Hersey, the present situation is a reckless endangerment of homes and lives. Ed Houghton, 185 Scenic, said Council should commit to COP's and take g.o. bonds to voters. Henry Kneebone, 449 Orchard St. , spoke in support of COP's. Robert Leghorn, 1768 Crestview Dr. , said other city funds should be used if possible. The public hearing was closed. Adjourned Meeting - Ashland City Council - August 12 , 1991 - P. 1 Arnold suggested approving COP's and asking voters to approve general obligation bonds. Laws asked about abei&t existing monies to draw upon, and Turner said there are few unappropriated balances in the city. Williams moved to go ahead with COP's, and ask the voters to approve general obligation bonds. Winthrop seconded the motion. Acklin asked citizens in the audience about forming a committee to get approval of general obligation bonds in the November election. Arnold said the procedure, which can be a part of the motion, is to begin the Certificate of Participation process with the final resolution considered just after the vote on the general obligation bonds is presented. Williams and Winthrop agreed, all YES on roll call vote. Golden said an individual left a letter with her in support of COP's. Arnold moved to accept same, Laws seconded, all AYES on voice vote. Request to Extend Water Moratorium - Winthrop said that the area in question (Upper Granite Street) is served by a separate water system than the present water moratorium area. Oates said as. the dam goes down so does his water flow. Arnold moved to request that staff prepare a report on this request. Reid seconded, all AYES on voice vote. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 10: 30 P.M. Nan E. Franklin Catherine M. Golden City Recorder Mayor Adjourned Meeting - Ashland City Council - August 12 , 1.991 - P. 2 Monthly Building Activity Report: 07/91 Page 1 # Units Value SINGLE/MULTI-FAMILY & TOURIST ACCOMODATIONS: Undefined (Permit #2107027 ) : 1 0 Subtotal: $ 0 e Building: ADDITION 7 212 ,000 ADDITION/DECK 1 13 ,000 DEMOLITION 1 0 FENCE 6 6,396 FOUNDATION 1 3,000 FOUNDATION REPAIR 1 500 INTERIOR REMODEL 1 1,500 OFFICE 1 105:,.000 REMODEL 6 37y200 REROOF 5 29,872 SFR 13 13 1, 270,302 SOLARIUM 1 161000 STEPS 1 2,200 Undefined 2 151, 352 Subtotal: $ 1,848,322 Electrical: ELECTRIC -19 14,530 SEWER LINE 1 800 Subtotal: $ 15,330 Mechanical: GAS LINE 3 4,448 GFAU 2 9,025 MECHANICAL 4 9,532 MOVE GAS FURNACE 1 500 Subtotal: $ 23, 505 Plumbing: PLUMBING 2 3 , 500 Monthly Building Activity Report: 07/91 Page 2 # Units Value SINGLE/MULTI-FAMILY & TOURIST ACCOMODATIONS: Plumbing: SEWER AND WATER 2 800 SEWER LINE 1 100 WATER LINE 1 0 . Subtotal: $ 4 ,400 ***Total: $ 1,891,557 COMMERCIAL: Building: CONCESSION STAND 1 50, 000 EXCAVATION 1 1,200, 000 FENCE 1 400 INTERIOR REMODEL 2 16;500 NEW ART STUDIO 1 23;400 OFFICE/WAREHOUSE 1 85, 000 REMODEL 1 25, 000 REROOF 8 129, 687 SHOP 1 50, 000 Undefined 1 2, 000 Subtotal: $ 1,581,987 Electrical: ELECTRIC 11 9, 650 Subtotal: $ 9, 650 Mechanical: AIR CONDITIONER 1 - 0 MECHANICAL 2 5, 080 Subtotal: $ 5, 080 ***Total: $ 1,596,717 Monthly Building Activity Report: 07/91 Page 3 Total this month: 116 $ 3 ,488,274 Total this month last year: 88 $ 1,998, 134 Total year to date: 116 $ 3 ,488,274 Total last year: 88 $ 1,998, 134 This month This month This year last year Total Fees: 32, 945 21,789 32,945 Total Inspections: 364 441 364 NEW CONSTRUCTION: 7/91 RESIDENTIAL PAGE NO. 1 08/02/91 ADDRESS #UNITS CONTRACTOR VALUATION ** CONCESSION STAND 201 MOUNTAIN AV S DON GREENE-ASH HS 50000.00 ** Subtotal ** 50000. 00 ** EXCAVATION 0 TOLMAN CREEK RD 1200000. 00 ** Subtotal ** 1200000. 00 ** OFFICE/WAREHOUSE 415 WILLIAMSON WY TAYLOR-MADE 85000. 00 . ** Subtotal ** 85000. 00 *** Total *** 1335000. 00 NEW CONSTRUCTION: 7/91 ` COMMERCIAL PAGE NO. 1 08/02/91 ADDRESS #UNITS CONTRACTOR VALUATION ** OFFICE 540 CATALINA DR GREG CLAFLIN 105000. 00 ** Subtotal ** 105000. 00 ** SFR 0 BELLVIEW AV JON TURRELL 114608. 00 200 PATTERSON MC KENNA/MC KENNA 72488. 00 389 TAYLOR JON TURRELL 130000.00 , 1310 ROMEO JON TURRELL 71000.00 567 SCENIC OWNER 92040. 00 708 INDIANA CHRIS ADAMS 108350.00 200 DEAD INDIAN RD' TITUS 95000.00 537 PARKSIDE DR OWNER 107328. 00 680 FOREST OWNER 112736.00 2314 BLACK OAK WY OWNER 110000. 00 347 GUTHRIE FRED COX CONSTR 92560. 00 268 WALKER AV OWNER 88192. 00 541 PARKSIDE DR ARCHIT. CONSTR. 76000. 00 ** Subtotal ** i 1270302 . 00 QQzt! 1379302 . 00 . Ag t«a ASHLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT 1,44nthly Activities for July 1991 INVESTIGATIONS A detective is investigating a burglary at an Ashland business resulting in a loss. of $22 ,500 .00 of computer equipment . A. search warrant was served at a residence in Talent after a detective observed a marijuana plant growing in the yard of that residence . during a routine investigation. A male subject who resides at the residence was subsequently arrested for manufacturing a controlled substance. Ile was also arrested on an Ashland Municipal Court warrant charging failure to appear on a citation for driving while suspended . A detective was called to investigate a burglary that occurred at a dental office in Ashland . Entry was made through an attic access door . A standard gas cylinder containing nitrous oxide and a "dental scavenger unit " , consisting of a face mask and tubing was taken. Two Ashland juveniles were arrested on charges of Arson I and Criminal Mischief I after they started a fire in an Ashland residence while playing with a cigarette lighter . Damage was estimated at $75,000.00 to a garage and shop , along with an apartment above the same, a vehicle parked in the garage was also damaged . A female who resides in Medford reported being raped in Ashland . An investigation into this incident revealed that the female has lied to police in regards to her initial rape report . The District Attorneys office have advised that there will be no prosecution. The case has been classified as unfounded-. F, second rape is under investigation. A 19 year old woman was reportedly raped while passed out on alcohol . PATROL The 4th of July parade and fireworks took place without any major incidents . . Offices; Cunningham was at the Police Academy for the entire month of July . Swing shift and day shift have written a large number of crosswalk , seat belt , skateboard and bicycle violations during the month . Graveyard shift has concentrated efforts in the area of minors .in possession and curfew violations. They have made a significant number of arrests in both categories in July . CRIME PREVENTION 1 The bulk of the month was spent in continuing foot patrol in the downtown area . It has been remarkably quiet , with a few reported or on-view cases . Efforts have been intensified to stop skateboarding and bicycle violations, also pedestrian crosswalk. problems . A warning letter is being sent to on-view crosswalk violators who I witness and cannot stop . A meeting was Held with the Director of S.O .D.A . concerning working on their executive board and as a youth advisor . A tour of our department was given to a group of non--English-speaking Japanese students . POLICE RESERVE The reserve police officers put in 144 hours . 100 hours of patrol , 34 hours of special assignments , and 10 hours of training . The special operations reserves put in 31 hours . EXPLORERS The explorers put in an excess of 100 hours . There was heavy representation in the 4th of July parade. Training for the month covered Rape and Domestic violence topics . They . also had training on building searches . This wad .taught at SOSC . Two new explorers finished their basic training this month . COMMUNITY SERVICE VOLUNTEERS 61 volunteers reported , with a total 1 ,052 hours and a total of 329 days worked . MUNICIPAL COURT There were 11024 citations filed in the Municipal Court , which includes 307 traffic violations , 75 formal complaints , and 642 parking citations . Cases closed totaled 1 ,322 which includes 115 traffic violations ,- 54 formal complaints , 18 fines suspended , 386 citations dismissed ( including 313 completed diversions ) . There were 521 parking citations closed , 442 of these were issued in the Downtown Parking District . No parking citations were dismissed . There were 572 appearances , 407 before the Violations Bureau and 165 before the Court . There were 28 trials held , , and 0 no show; 120 persons were placed on diversion and 47 placed on probation. 2 COMMUNICATIONS/RECORDS Communications/Records personnel handled 789 Police cases and dispatched 19 fire/medical runs. CODE COMPLIANCE OFFICER There were 37 inspections performed this month , 2 warnings and O citation issued . JACNET JACNET activities in July included : CASES OPENED INTELLIGENCE CASES 11 42 SECTOR CASES PERSONS ARRESTED (address given) Ashland 0 0 Central Point 0 0 Medford :'`6 5 Jackson County 4 p There were 3 search warrants obtained , 2 served and 6 persons arrested or cited . Officers seized 0.00 grams of Methamphetamine, 0.00 gram of tar heroin, and 0.00 gram of psilocybin mushrooms. 1 weapons and 1 vehicle was seized . Cash seized totaled 23 ,500.00. 3 '•a of ASq APmorandnm o4too�a i Honorable Mayor and City Council �r W rom: Al Williams, Director of Electric Utilities �ix�jEC#: Electric Department Activities for JUNE 1991 THE FOLLOWING IS A CONDENSED REPORT OF THE ELECTRICAL DEPARTMENT ACTIVITIES FOR JUNE 1991 . WE INSTALLED 4 NEW UNDERGROUND SERVICES AND 2 OVERHEAD SERVICES. WE RECONDUCTORED 3 SECONDARY SERVICES DUE TO ELECTRICAL UPGRADES. WE INSTALLED 2070 FEET OF CONDUIT AND INSTALLED 3380 FEET OF CONDUCTOR. 5 TRANSFORMERS WERE INSTALLED FOR A TOTAL OF 492 KVA AND 5 WERE REMOVED FOR A NET GAIN OF 142 KVA ON THE SYSTEM. WE RESPONDED TO 84 REQUESTS FOR CABLE LOCATES. WE HAD 408 CONNECT ORDERS AND 420 DISCONNECT ORDERS FOR A TOTAL OF 828 . THERE WERE 468 DELINQUENT ACCOUNT NOTICES WORKED AND 57 DELINQUENT ACCOUNTS WERE DISCONNECTED. FIVE 45' POLES, AND THREE 30 ' POLES WERE SET IN CONJUNCTION WITH OUR POLE TESTING AND TREATMENT PROGRAM. EMPLOYEES ATTENDED MONTHLY SAFETY MEETING. i I I u ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT JUNE, 1991 PRIMARY CIRCUITS INSTALLED HELMAN STREET 600 ' -556 AAC 30 UNDERGROUND SERVICES INSTALLED 1078 OAK KNOLL 100 ' -410 UG 905 CYPRESS PT LOOP 120 ' -4/0 UG 692 B STREET 65' -4/0 UG 900 PALMER RD. 400 ' -4/0 UG OVERHEAD SERVICES INSTALLED . 492 ALLISON 75 ' -#6 DPX 360 GRANT STREET 240.' -1/0 TPX ALTERED SERVICES 93 CALIFORNIA 75 ' -#2 TPX 31E. MAIN 35 ' -1/0 TPX 59 N. MAIN 40 ' -4/0. UG r TEMPORARY SERVICES INSTALLED 867 E. MAIN 2693 TAKELMA TEMPORARY SERVICES REMOVED 905 CYPRESS PT LOOP 1078 OAK KNOLL 2528 SISKIYOU BLVD UNDERGROUND CONDUIT INSTALLED 2' PVC 950 ' 3' PVC 1120 ' 1 TRANSFORMERS INSTALLED . 1078 OAK KNOLL 50 KVA UG 311 N. MAIN 75 KVA OH'D 340 HIGH STREET 100 KVA UG SISKIYOU & TOLMAN 100 KVA OH'D 611 SISKIYOU 167 KVA UG TRANSFORMERS REMOVED 1078 OAK KNOLL 50 KVA UG 311. N. MAIN 50 KVA OH'D 340 HIGH STREET 75 KVA UG SISKIYOU & TOLMAN 75 KVA OH'D 611 TOLMAN 100 KVA UG POWER POLES INSTALLED (vole replacement Proaram) ROCA & FERN ST. 1-45' POLE WALNUT & WILEY 1-30 ' POLE 1094 B ST. 1-45 ' POLE 1311 LEE ST. 1-45' POLE 492 ALLISON 1-30 ' POLE DIANE & CLAY ST. 1-45' POLE 360 GRANT ST. 1-30 ' POLE SCENIC DR. (P7300) 1-45 ' POLE WIRE INSTALLED #6 DPXJ 75 ' #2 TPX. 75 ' 1/0 TPX. 240 ' 1/0 QUAD. 35 ' 1/0 TPX. 240 ' 4/0 URD TPX 725 ' 556 AAC 1670 ' 336 AAC 725 ' STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE CHURCH & HIGH STREET 1-100 WATT FIX. 492 ALLISON 1-100 WATT FIX. 486 ALLISON 1-100 WATT BULB SHERMAN & PARK 4-PHOTO CELLS it " 4-100 WATT BULBS CAMBRIDGE & YORK 1-PHOTO CELL 2 . LOCATES TOTAL 84 CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE RECONDUCTORED HELMAN STREET FROM HERSEY TO VAN NESS STREET WITH 30 #556 AAC; REPLACED EIGHT POWER POLES IN CONJUNCTION WITH OUR POLE TESTING PROGRAM; INSTALLED FIVE NEW TRANSFORMERS IN CONJUNCTION WITH OUR TRANSFORMER LOADING PROGRAM; INSTALLED FOUR NEW UNDERGROUND SERVICES, TWO NEW OVERHEAD SERVICES, AND THREE ALTERED . SERVICES; INSTALLED2070 FEET OF CONDUIT AND 3380 FEET OF CONDUCTOR; PERFORMED STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE; ATTENDED MONTHLY SAFETY MEETING. ELECTRIC #8 CONNECTS: 408 DISCONNECTS: 420 TOTAL : 828 DOOR HANGERS: 468 SHUTOFFS: 57 ELECTRIC #5 INSTALLED NEW FIX. AT THE ASHLAND CK. PUMP STATION; REPAIRED CONTROLLS ON BACKWASH PUMP AT THE FILTER PLANT; WIRED OUTLETS AT THE CEMETERY; REPAIRED. BOILER CONTROLLES AT THE SEWAGE PLANT; INSTALLED POWER FOR THE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AT THE GOLF COURSE; INSTALLED WIRING AT THE FIRE STATION #1; REPAIRED CONDUIT AND WIRE AT THE CLAY STREET PARK; WORKED ON STANDBY GENERATOR AT THE ASHLAND CK. PUMP STATION; REPAIRED RUNWAY LIGHTS AT THE AIRPORT; ATTENDED MONTHLY SAFETY MEETING. i METERMAN TESTED 1p AND 3p METERS; PERFORM CABLE LOCATES; TRASFORMER LOAD SURVEYS; TEST CAP. BANKS; BUILD CAP. BANK FOR HELMAN STREET; CHECK LOAD ON OPEN DELTA TRANSFORMER BANK ON OAK STRET; WIRE CT' S FOR THE NEW SERVICE AT MUNCHIES; ATTENDED MONTHLY SAFETY MEETING. 3 .'`ems"` ; Aemorandum ,.,.EGO �llL1. Honorable Mayor and City Council rom: IJ 4Al Williams , Director of Electric Utilities Electric Department Activities for JULY 1991 ' THE FOLLOWING IS A CONDENSED REPORT OF THE ELECTRICAL DEPARTMENT ACTIVITIES FOR JULY 1991 . WE INSTALLED 11 NEW UNDERGROUND SERVICES AND 2 OVERHEAD SERVICES. WE RECONDUCTORED 4 SECONDARY SERVICES DUE TO ELECTRICAL UPGRADES . WE INSTALLED 4210 FEET OF CONDUIT AND INSTALLED 2750 FEET OF CONDUCTOR. 9 TRANSFORMERS WERE INSTALLED FOR A TOTAL OF 312 KVA AND 2 WERE REMOVED FOR A NET GAIN OF 262 KVA ON THE SYSTEM. WE RESPONDED TO 78 REQUESTS FOR CABLE LOCATES . WE HAD 385 CONNECT ORDERS AND 362 DISCONNECT ORDERS FOR A TOTAL OF 647 . THERE WERE 459 DELINQUENT ACCOUNT NOTICES WORKED AND 82 DELINQUENT ACCOUNTS WERE DISCONNECTED. THREE 45 ' POLES , AND ONE 50 ' POLE WERE SET IN CONJUNCTION WITH OUR POLE TESTING AND TREATMENT PROGRAM. COMPLETED 60% OF A SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT RECONDUCTOR OF 7TH STREET TO 30 556AAC AS PER SYSTEM STUDY . EMPLOYEES ATTENDED MONTHLY SAFETY MEETING. ELECTRIC_ DEPARTHRMT_ MONTHLY REPORT JULY 1991 PRIMARY CIRCUITS INSTALLED PINECREST (Dig In) 250 ' -#2 PRIM UG 262 HERSEY 375 ' -#2 PRIM UG 220 DEAD INDIAN RD 450 ' -#2 PRIM UG 921 PINECREST 110 ' -#2 PRIM UG UNDERGROUND SERVICES INSTALLED 846 CYPRESS PT 65 ' -4/0 UG TPX 1245 MUNSON 35 ' -4/0 UG TPX 540 FORDYCE 130 ' -4/0 UG TPX 679 CUB CR 100 ' -1/0 -UG TPX 446 WALKER 40 ' -1/0 TPX 164-1/2 B ST 100 ' -350 UG TPX 262 HERSEY 80 ' -4/0 UG TPX 220 DEAD INDIAN RD 130 ' -4/0 UG TPX 1365 VERNON 35 ' -4/0 UG TPX 1015 ASHLAND 100 ' -4/0 UG TPX 921 PINECREST 350 ' -350 MCM UG TPX OVERHEAD SERVICES INSTALLED 676 LIBERTY 90 ' -1/0 TPX FORDYCE 130 ' -1/0 TPX ALTERED SERVICES 743 N MAIN 40 ' -1/0 TPX 327 BRIDGE 60 ' -1/0 TPX 486 SISKIYOU 40 ' -1/0 TPX 56 CHURCH 40 ' -#2 TPX TEMPORARY SERVICES INSTALLED 240 NUTLEY 391 GRANITE 708 INDIANA 347 GUTHRIE 1310 ROMEO DR 1043 .CANYON PARK 962 CYPRESS PT LP 225 SUNNYVIEW 1 TEMPORARY SERVICES. REMOVED 1482 WOODLAND UNDERGROUND CONDUIT INSTALLED 2" PVC 1750 ' 3 ' PVC 2020 ' 4" PVC 440 ' . TRANSFORMERS INSTALLED 90 NURSERY 50 KVA 865 PALMER 25 KVA 750 N MAIN 50 KVA 700 N MAIN 25 KVA 520 FORDYCE 25 KVA 657 FORDYCE 25 KVA 596 FORDYCE 25 KVA 474 FORDYCE 50 KVA 635 FORDYCE 37 KVA TRANSFORMERS REMOVED 90 NURSERY 25 KVA 865 PALMER 25 KVA POWER POLES INSTALLED (pole replacement program) MISTLETOE RD 1-45 ' POLE MAPLE & CHESTNUT 1-50 ' POLE 1484 WINDSOR 2-45 ' POLE WIRE INSTALLED #2 PRIM UG 1185 ' 4/0 UG TPX 575 ' 350 MCM UG TPX 450 ' 1/0 UG TPX 140 ' 1/0 OH TPX 360 ' #2 OH TPX 40 ' STREET LIGHT INSTALLED. 690 CHESTNUT STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE HWY 66 100 WATT HPS BULB 346 E MAIN 200 WATT BULB & 70 WATT BULB 648 N MAIN 200 WATT BULB & PHOTO CELL N MAIN & LAUREL 200 WATT BULB BEACH & SISKIYOU 200 WATT BULB WALKER & BLVD 400 WATT BULB 415 GRANITE 100 WATT BULB & PHOTO CELL 2 WIMER & SCENIC 100 WATT BULB & PHOTO CELL VANNESS 200 WATT BULB GRESHAM & E MAIN 200 WATT BULB GRANITE & N MAIN 200 WATT BULB MORTON & SISKIYOU 150 WATT BULB 97 MALLARD 100 WATT BULB LOCATES TOTAL 78 CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE THE CONSTRUCTION CREWS INSTALLED 1185 FEET OF PRIMARY CONDUCTOR; INSTALLED 4210 FEET OF CONDUIT; INSTALLED 11 NEW UNDERGROUND SERVICES TOTALING 1165 FEET OF SECONDARY WIRE; INSTALLED 2 NEW OVERHEAD SERVICES,. 4 ALTERED SERVICES, AND 8 TEMPORARY SERVICES; COMPLETED APPROX. 60% OF THE REBUILD PROJECT ON 7 TH. STREET, 30- 556 AAC AS PER OUR SYSTEM STUDY; INSTALLED DOUBLE LOCKS ON ALL TRANSFORMER VAULTS TO COMPLY WITH P.U.C. REGULATIONS; TRANSFERED ALL LOAD ON FORDYCE STREET TO CITY LINES AND REMOVED OVERHEAD PRIMARY LINES; INSTALLED 4 POWER POLES IN CONJUNCT ION=WITH OUR POLE TESTING PROGRAM; ATTENDED STANDARDS MEETING; ATTENDED MONTHLY SAFETY MEETING. ELECTRIC #8 CONNECTS: 385 DISCONNECTS: 262 TOTAL:, 647 DOOR HANGERS: 459 SHUTOFFS: 82 ELECTRIC #5 WIRED MOTOR FOR THE MIDDLE SCHOOL IRRIGATION SYSTEM; WORKED ON WIRING AT THE FIRE STATION #1 REMODEL; PULLED MAINTENANCE ON THE TRANSFORMER COOLING FANS AT CASCADE HALL; GRID NUMBERING ON SYSTEM DEVICES; WORKED ON SIREN AT FIRE STATION #1 ; INSTALLED NEW METERBASE FOR STREET LIGHTS ON SISKIYOU AND MORTON; REPAIR ELECTRICAL SERVICE FOR BAND SHELL; MAINTENANCE ON PUMP STATIONS WITH WATER DEPT. ; INSTALLED WIRING IN STEEL SHOP; COMPLETE WIRING AT THE FILTER PLANT; GENERATOR MAINTENANCE AT THE FILTER PLANT; WIRE AIR CONDITIONER AT THE PARKS DEPT. ; ATTENDED MONTHLY SAFETY MEETING. METERMAN INSTALLED NEW CT METERING AT THE HIGH SCHOOL; ASSIST E.#5 WITH WIRING FIRE STATION #1; TESTED 10 AND 30 METERS; TRANSFORMER LOAD CHECKS; LOCATES; ATTENDED MONTHLY SAFETY MEETING. 3 ASjj Z. AEmorandum '•,G4EG0�,• August 13, 1991 ED: Mayor and City Council ram: Dick Wanderscheid ahjg& WATER DEMAND SIDE RESOURCE STUDY You have all received a copy of the draft "Water Demand Side Resource Study" by the City's consultant, Synergic Resources Corporation. The study will be reviewed by the Water Conservation Advisory Committee which was appointed by the Mayor last fall. The first meeting of the committee will be Tuesday, September 3rd from 3:00 to 5:00 p.m. in Pioneer Hall at 73 Winburn Way. We anticipate committee review will take a couple of months, then the report will be forwarded to the City Council for. your consideration. At that time, we will arrange a work session, whereby the consultants can make a presentation to you, explain the report and answer any questions that may arise. August 15 , •1991 The Daily Tidings Letter to -the Editor We were shocked to read in John Sully ' s Comment of August 9th that Ashland ' s fire chief has stated that the steepest grade that Ashland ' s fire trucks can negogiate in the winter is 12%! A large, high density POD has been approved off the proposed Logan Drive which has a maximum grade of 15% and is a cul-de-sac street, which means there is only one way to get to these proposed homes ! Not only will fire trucks not be able to reach these homes in winter, the development is directly adjacent to the forest of the watershed, which raises the possibility of catastrophic fire . And, unfortunately, this development will be in northwest Ashland where water pressure is already dangerously low. Are prospective homeowners in the development aware of this danger? Don ' t we the citizens of Ashland pay the Planning Director to avoid these situations? Hopefully, it won ' t take a major disaster for the citizens of Ashland to demand accountablility from the Planning Director and C ' y C uncil . C� ark frown 171 Church Street Ashland c� Ask 16001 Notice is hereby given that a PUBLIC HEARING specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your on the following request with respect to the right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. ASHLAND LAND USE ORDINANCE will be held A copy of the application, all-documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will before the ASHLAND CITY COUNCIL onthe20th be provided at reasonable cost,if requested. A copy of the staff report Mlibe DAY OF AUGUST, 1991AT 7:30 P.M. at the available for inspection seven days prior to the hearing and will be provided at reasonable cost, if requested. All materials are available at the Ashland ASHLAND CIVIC CENTER, 1175 East Main Planning Department,City Hall,20 East Main,Ashland,OR 97520. Street, Ashland, Oregon. During the Public Hearing,the Ma}rorshali allowtu[imony from the applicant and those in attendance concerning this request.The Chairshail have the right The ordinance ctiteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. to limit the length of testimony and require that comments be restricted to the Oregon lawsta tea that failure to raise an objection conceming this application, applicable criteria. eitherin person orbyletter,orfailure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision makeran opportunityto respond to the issue,precludes yourright Uyou have anyquestionsorcomments conmmingthis request,please feel free of appeal to the Land Use Board ofAppeals(LUBA)on that issue. Failure to to contact Susan Yates at the Ashland Planning Department,City Hall,at 48& 5305. a !^L a p 0 i � l PLANNING ACTION 91-122 is a request for a Modification of a recent Final Plan modification approval (Planning Action 90-218) for a previously approved 18-lot subdivision near the intersection of Scenic and Grandview Drives. Modification involves a change in conditions limiting street grade on Logan Drive to 15% for all portions of the public street, except for a 35' long landing area at Scenic Drive not to exceed 6°/d. Comprehensive Plan Designation: Single Family Residential; Zoning: R- 1-10P; Assessor Map #: 8AA; Tax Lot#: 6900. APPLICANT: Ed Houghton I J ASHLAND PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT August 20, 1991 PLANNING ACTION: 91-122 APPLICANT: Ed Houghton LOCATION: Scenic and Grandview Drives ZONE DESIGNATION: R-1-10-P COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential ORDINANCE REFERENCE: 18.108 Procedures REQUEST: Modification of a recent Final Plan modification approval (Planning Action 90-218) for a previously approved 18-lot subdivision. Modification involves a change in conditions limiting street grade on Logan Drive to 15% for all portions of the public street, except for a 35' long landing area at Scenic Drive not to exceed 6%. I. Relevant Facts 1) Background - History of Application: This application has had a long history, with the most recent,planning action being the relocation of the intersection of Logan Drive and Scenic Drive (Planning Action 90-218). 2) Detailed Description of the Site and Proposal: This proposal involves the City's involvement with an agreemeht between the primary parties in the land use actions. The agreement is included as. a part of this packet Also included are the findings for the recent Final Plan modification (PA90-218). The agreement essentially has 3 portions involving the City: 1) That all portions of the newly constructed public street (Logan Drive) not exceed a grade of 15%. This includes the inside curve area of the drive. And that the landing portion of the street . as it intersects Scenic Drive shall not have a grade greater than 6% for any portion at-least 35' from Scenic Drive. 2) That Public Works shall ensure that the above grade requirements are met and that these requirements shall be enforceable as part of the subdivision approval by the City of Ashland. 3) That the erosion control be installed as soon as possible after street construction, and no later than November 30, 1991, unless extended for good cause. Additionally, there is reference to a fence variance for the Barnetts property. This variance has been approved by the Planning Commission, receiving final approval on August 13, 1991. . No requests for hearings were filed by neighbors, therefore, the action is final and not subject to further appeal. II. Project Impact The developer, Mr. Houghton, has submitted revised street drawings for Logan Drive. These indicate that inside curb has a grade of 6% for the first landing portion of the street. The centerline grade for the landing area ranges between 2.5% and 5.8%. The plans also indicate that the inside curb around the initial turn in the street does not exceed 15%. The centerline street grade for this portion of the street is indicated as 5.8% to 12.58%, ultimately reaching 15% after the comer. These plans are being fully reviewed by the Public Works Department, and Steve Hall will be available for comments during the hearing. Mr. Hall will also be available to address the concerns regarding inspection of the grades.as part of construction. III. Procedural - Required Burden of Proof Modification of a Final Plan must comply with the criteria for approval of Final Plan, which are as follows: Final Plan approval shall be granted upon funding of substantial conformance with-the outline plan. Nothing in this provision shall limit reduction in the number.of dwelling units or increased open space provided that, if this is done for one phase, the number of dwelling units shall not be transferred to another phase, nor the open space reduced below that permitted in the outline plan. This substantial conformance provision is intended solely to facilitate the minor modifications from one planning step to another. Substantial conformance shall exist when comparison of the outline plan with the final plan shows that. a) The number of dwelling units vary no more than 10% of those shown on the approved outline plan, but in no case shall the number of units exceed those permitted in the outline plan PA91-122 Ashland Planning Department — StSff Report Ed Houghton August 20, 1991 Page 2 b) The yard depths and distances between main buildings vary no more than 10% of those shown on the approved outline plan, but in 170 case shall these distances be reduced below the minimum established within this T itL. c) The open spaces vary no more than 10% of that provided on the outline plan. d) The building size does not exceed the building size shown on the outline plan by more than 10%. e) The building elevations and exterior material are in conformance with the purpose and intent of this Title and the approved outline plan. fl That the additional standards which resulted in the awarding of bonus points in the outline plan approval have been included in the final plan with substantial detail to ensure that the performance level committed to in the outline plan will be achieved g) Any amendment to an approved final plan shall follow a Type I procedure. IV. Conclusions and Recommendations Staff believes that the agreement and modifications proposed are in conformance with the criteria for Final Plan approval, and further, we believe that an opportunity to settle this issue through an amicable agreement between parties should be encouraged by the City. Staff is preparing findings, and will review them with the acting City Attorney, for adoption at the meeting. Therefore, we recommend approval of these changes, with the following conditions: 1) That the street grade for Logan Drive and all other public streets within the subdivision shall not exceed 15%. This grade requirement shall apply from curb to curb and shall not be for centerline only. Further, the landing area where Logan Drive meets Scenic shall not exceed a grade of 6%, curb-to-curb, and the length of the. landing shall be 35'. 2) That grade requirements of condition 1 above shall be determined and approved by the Ashland Public Works Department in accord with the requirements of Item 2 of the Settlement agreement, attached to and made a part of this decision. 3) That the erosion control and landscape measures required as Condition 3 of Planning Action 90-218 shall be installed by November 30, 1991 unless extended for good cause by the City of Ashland. PA91-122 Ashland Planning Department — Staff Report Ed Houghton August 20, 1991 Page 3 t SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement entered into between ED and JOANNE 11O0G11TON, hereinafter refered to as "Houghtons, " the CITY OF ASHLAND, hereinafter refered to as "City," and STEVE and CRISSY BARNETT, hereinafter refered to as "Barnetts, " T11AT WHEREAS, the Houghtons have applied and received approval for construction of a subdivision and a street known as "Logan Drive. " AND WHEREAS, Barnetts have filed an appeal with the Land Use Board of Appeal ( hereinafter "LUBA" ) concerning said street and subdivision which involves the Boughtons and the City, AND WHEREAS, the parties desire to resolve and settle the dispute in a manner which is acceptable and agreeable to all parties, NOW THEREFORE the parties do hereby agree as follows : 1 . The Houghtons and City agree that the subdivision final approval will be modified to. provide that all grades on Logan Drive, or any position which is a public way, but excluding private driveways i .e. , from curb to curb, shall not exceed 158 rather than the 17. 998 that existed in some .locations and which the City approved . Houghtons and the City will further reduce the landing area where Logan Drive meets Scenic from 6.68 to 6 .08 and will make the landing 35 feet long instead of the 30 feet. 2. Compliance with the above grade and landing provisions shall be determined by Steve Hall, the City' s engineer according to standard engineering principles. It is agreed that Houghtons or their contractor shall give not less than two days notice to hall of when the finish grade, prior to paving, is completed. Hall shall then within the next 46 hours view the finish grade and determine if the same is in compliance with the terms of this agreement and the approval . If it is, he shall so state in writing. If it is not , he shall designate in writing the areas which are not in compliance so that the contractor can bring them to proper grade . prior to any paving or other permanent structures being placed. Any report by Ball shall be submitted to Robert Blanton P.E. for review. If Blanton agrees with such report then it shall be deemed conclusive. If he does not then Hall and Blanton shall select a mutually agreeable professional engineer to review the slopes and findings and that engineer ' s opinion shall be conclusive. Neither Houghton nor ' the City shall have any financial responsibility for Blanton' s' work in reviewing the grades and landing area. 3 . It is agreed that the revisions to the final approval contained herein shall be considered a portion of the subdivision approval and a part of the conditions of the approval so that in the event the above grades and landing areas are not complied. with, it shall be deemed that the subdivision and .Logan Drive are. not being prepared in accordance with the existing approval as amended by this agreement. 4 . The parties have mutual concerns relative to erosion control and landscaping on the area which has previously been excavated. The City has imposed certain erosion control and ground cover requirements upon the subdivision and the Iloughtons agree that they will , as soon as weather and construction permits , proceed forthwith to put the erosion control structures in place and will diligently proceed to place any plantings and ground cover required by the City of Ashland as soon as the weather permits, but in no event later than November 30, 1991 , unless such date is extended by the City in writing for good Cause. 5 . Barnetts desire to place a fence with steel or reinforced ballards on their property line facing Scenic Drive for purposes of protecting their property from any vehicles or other objects which may come down Logan Drive and cross Scenic. It is understood that Iloughtons are not responsible for this fence or any of its effects nor do they have any responsibility for paying for it. however, erection of the fence, which is contemplated to be approximately 5 feet froln the curb line of Scenic and a maximum of 7 feet tall with approximately 5 feet above the curb line, will require a variance by the City. Barnetts agree that they will promptly apply for such variance And the City agrees that it will promptly and expeditiously process the same. Noughtons agree that they will not oppose allowance of the variance or construction of the fence and hallards and further agree that. they will not encourage others to oppose the same. It is understood by all parties, t-haC because the request for variance is a land use matter, no guarantee can be made that other persons will not protest or object to the variance. This agreement is not subject to the final outcome of the variance request, but it is subject to the parties good faith efforts to process the same. 6 . In consideration of these agreements, Barnetts agree, upon execution hereof , that they will dismiss with prejudice, . their pending appeal to LUBA and will file no other proceedings in LUBA, Circuit Court, or any other jurisdiction relative to the subdivision. 7 . Iloughtons and Barnetts agree that 'they release, remise, and discharge the other from any and all claims, demands, .causes of action , exsisting or anticipated which either may believe has arisen or could arise as a result of the proceedings before the City, processing of the application, objections to the subdivision, hearings, etc. , the intention being. that this Settlement Agreement will settle any and all claims whatsoever between Barnetts and Houghtons of any kind or nature. Dated: Ed Houghton Dated: Joanne Houghton Dated: j/S/g(. Steve Barnett t 'L�cJ�fGZc Dated: Cc � :. Crissy Barnett 4 Dated: Representative for City of Ashland . TCII/nes/6.25 BEFORE THE ASHLAND CITY COUNCIL February 5; 1991 IN THE MATTER OF PLANNING ACTION .#90-2181 REQUEST FOR ) FINAL PLAN MODIFICATION TO MODIFY THE STREET LOCATION ) FINDINGS, . AND LOT LAYOUT FOR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED 18-LOT ) CONCLUSIONS SUBDIVISION. MODIFICATION INVOLVES THE RELOCATION OF ) AND DECISION THE INTERSECTION OF THE PROPOSED LOGAN DRIVE AND SCENIC ) (AMENDED) DRIVE AWAY FROM-THE SCENIC/GRANDVIEW INTERSECTION, AND ) THE ASSOCIATED MODIFICATIONS OF LOT LINES. ) APPLICANT: ED HOUGHTON ) ' SECTION 1. RECITALS 1.1 Tax lot 6900 of 391E08AA -is located at or near the intersection of Scenic and Grandview Drives at 185 Scenic Drive and is zoned R-1-10P, Single Family Residential. 1.2 The- applicant is requesting modification of a. previously approved Final Plan regarding 'street location for an 18-lot subdivision. 1.3 The criteria for. modification of a previously approved final plane are the same as for Final Plan approval which are found in 18.88.030 B. 1.4 The Ashland Planning .Commission, following proper public notice, held a Public Hearing on November 13, 1990. and December 11, 1990, at which time testimony was received and exhibits were presented. The Planning. Commission approved the application subject to conditions pertaining to the appropriate development of the site. 1.5 The action was appealed to the City Council- in a timUly manner by Steve and Chrissy Barnett, 182 Scenic Drive Ashland, OR, following the Procedures in '18.108 of the -Ashland Municipal Code. The appeal was filed on their. behalf by their. attorney, Mr. .Thomas C. Howser, of the firm Howser & Munsell, Ashland, OR. 1.6 The, Ashland City Council, following proper public notice, held a Public.Hearing on February 5, 3,991 at which time testimony was received and exhibits presented. The City Council approved the application subject to conditions pertaining to the appropriate development of the site. 1 SECTION 2 . CRITERIA 2 . 1 The criteria for modification of a previously approved final plan sion are the same as for Final P1?which approval found in se ti In 18 88 030 B. Performance Standards Option, 2.2 The criteria relating to street grade for a new city street developed as part of a subdivision under the Performance Standards option are found in 18.88.050 B. 2.3 The Planning Commission attached as a condition of approval for outline plan specific requirements regarding street grade and landing area, and listed as Condition 2 of that approval. Condition 2 of PA88- 013 , outline Plan approval, is as follows: That the street grade not exceed 15% for any portion' of the improved City Street, and that the cul-de-sac portion. not exceed 10%. Also, that the grade be limited to 6% for a distance of 35' from Scenic Drive. The criteria for the above is whether the proposed modification. is in substantial conformance therewith. SECTION 3. RECORD -AND EXHIBITS 3.1 All matters of record in the previous applications and hearings are incorporated herein by reference. For purposes of these Findings, the attached index refers to exhibits, data, and testimony incorporated into the record and considered by the Council in its decision. Staff Exhibits are lettered with an "S" Proponent's Exhibits are lettered with a "P" Opponent's Exhibits are lettered with an' "O" Hearing Minutes, Notices, Miscellaneous Exhibits are lettered with an "M" •M SECTION 4. TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE 4.1 Duane Schultz, attorney for the applicant, stated during the City Council hearing that he requested that all documents from previous hearings and applications be included- - as part of the record for this action. He said that the applicnt had presented two plausible locations for the intersection during the previous application, and that the City Council had sent the issue back to the Planning Commission, via a denial, for a decision. He stated that two public hearings were held before the Planning Commission and the Commission did establish the location of the intersection and determined that the location presented by the applicant was in substantial conformance with the outline plan. "t 4 . 2 Evidence was submitted by Professional Engineer Robert S_ Blanton regarding street grades, and stating that the design did not meet requirements. Additional engineering information regarding street grades and design was submitted by Professional Engineer Roger Kauble for the applicant, indicating that all grade. and design requirements of the City of Ashland would be met. This information of both engineers was reviewed by Public the Works Director Steve Hall, Professional Engineer, who December 5, 1990 that he recommended approval of the street design proposal presented by Kauble. The information presented by Kauble and Hall was further rebutted by Engineer Blanton in a letter dated December 11, 1990. 4.3 Engineer Kauble presented additional information to the City, further explaining the slopes associated with the street construction. This information was received by the City of Ashland January 25, 1991. 4.4 Engineer Blanton presented testimony during the public hearing on February 5, 1991, concluding that after review of the submitted information presented by Kauble, that the street grade on the inside radius of the proposed street would be greater than 15%, approaching a maximum of 17.99%. He also stated that the plans indicated that the landing area before entrance onto Scenic Drive was not 6% for 35' as required but 6.6% for the last 51 . He submitted further testimony regarding location and safety. 4.5 Engineer Kauble presented oral testimony during the public hearing on February 5, 1991, stating that the design was based on a centerline grade for the street being 15%. Kauble testified that his calculations provide a centerline grade of no more than 15% for the entire street. He stated that if the ,criteria require all portions of the street, including inside curves, to not exceed 15%, then he has made an error in his calculations. 4. 6 Planning Director John Fregonese presented information during the public hearing stating that the intent of kha.. ordinance regarding street grades was to measure those 'grades from the centerline and .that that had been the historic interpretation by both the Planning Department and Public Works. He also stated that the area that is indicated. as 6.6% for the landing area actually only results in a difference of a few inches in grade and is not substantially. different from 6%. 4.7 Fregonese also presented testimony regarding the criteria for approval of a Final Plan, in that issues of safety are not a part of these criteria, but rather were discussed during the Outline Plan approval and considered safe at that time. Therefore, the safety issues raised by the appellants in their appeal letter dated December 24 , 1990 -are. not germane to this .decision. 4 . 8 City Attorney Salter stated during the meeting that Final Plan criteria does not. state "strict conformance"v erefore 'allo allowing the conformance" with the outline plan apP engineering information. Council latitude in its acceptance of SECTION 5. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 5. 1 The City Council make a decision based ron the entire record to information necessary ublic .hearing testimony and herein, including the Staff Report, p the exhibits received. 5.2 The City Council finds that the proposal for modification of a previously approved Final Plan, allowing for the modification the street location and modifications of lot' lines, meets all criteria outlined in 18.88.030 B. , 18.88.050 B. , and Condition 2 of PA88-013 Outline Plan approval. 5.3 The City Council oval of as modification to ladpreviouslysapPr° d criteria for app Final Plan: Final Plan approval shall be granted upon finding of substantial conformance in with the outline plan. Nothing in this provision shall ro unit reduc iothis the number of .dwelling units or increased open sp ace P is done for one phase, the number paceW reduced below hthat permitted be- transferred to another phase, nor the open space to another. outline plan. This' substantial conformance provision is intended solely o facilitate the minor modifications from one p Substantial conformance shall exist when comparison of the outline :plan with the final plan shows that: a) The number of dwellilan,units but in r no n r n caseshallthe number oof units on the approved outline p plan. exceed those per in the .outline p No change in the number of dwelling units has been proposed by the applicant as part of this application, and the submitted-glans of the applicant do not indicate any r changes in the numbe of dwelling units. The Council finds that the number of dwelling units has not varied more than 10% of those shown on the approved outline plan. b) The yard depths and distances etweeoutline plan buildings but in no case than 10% of those shown on the approved shall these distances be reduced below the minimum established within this Title. d indicated on the materi The modifications proposed and distances between submitted buildingss have.not modified the yard depths Council finds that this criterion has been met. r MW IMF C) The open spaces vary no more than lob of that provided on the outline plan. The modifications proposed and indicated on the submitted materials indicate that the proposed open spaces areas have not varied more than 10t from that provided on the outline plan. d) The building size does not exceed the building size shown on the outline plan by more than 10%. The modifications proposed and indicated on the submitted materials indicate that the proposed building sizes will not be modified by this action. e) The building elevations and exterior material are in conformance with the.purpose and intent of this Title and the approved outline plan. The modifications proposed and indicated on the submitted materials indicate that no changes have been proposed regarding this criterion and from the approval g;anted during Outline Plan. f) That. the additional standards which resulted in the awarding of bonus points in the outline plan approval have been included in the final plan with substantial detail to ensure that the performance level committed to in the outline plan will be achieved. All standards included with the previous outline and final plan approvals shall remain in effect, and the applicant has not requested any changes to these previous approvals as part of this modification. The Council finds that this criterion has been met. g) Any amendment to an approved final plan shall follow a Type I procedure. Any future amendments to this subdivision shall be processed under this procedure. .. 5.4 The Council finds that the intersection location presented by the applicant, and indicated on the submitted materials, is in substantial conformance with the original location as submitted on the outline Plan. The. centerline location of Logan Drive, 90.00' southeast down scenic Drive from an existing street monument, as proposed on the applicant's submitted materials, provides the intersection location farthest away from the Scenic/Grandview intersection while maintaining the allowable grades established by ordinance and the Public Works Department. 5.5 The Council finds that items 2 , 3 ,4,5, 6 and 10 of the appellants appeal letter dated December 24, 1990 related to safety issues which were fully addressed during outline plan for this MW development and do not relate to the criteria for approval of a Final Plan. 5. 6 The Council finds that item 1 of the appeal letter has been .remedied through the de novo evidentiary hearing held before the City Council on February 5, 1991. 5.7 The Council finds that item 7 of the appeal letter involves a completely separate planning action which has not reached final approval of the Planning Commission and is therefore not an issue to be addressed as part of this action 5.8 The Council finds that items 8 and 9 of the appeal letter were not raised with sufficient specificity to allow the Council an opportunity to respond and was therefore not an issue , addressed during the hearing. 5.9 The Council finds that based on the evidence submitted by Kauble and its recommended approval by City Engineer Hall, that the differences between the plans and requirements of the ordinance ce and Condition 2 of Outline Plan app and that centerline versus 17.99% a inside cur grades s� conformance with the the street gr conditions of approval of outline Plan for the construction of t e Logan Drive/Scenic Or.ive intersection. 5.10 The Council finds that the area indicated as 6.6% on the landing area prior to Scenic Drive is only a few inches different in grade from the 6% required, and is therefore not substantially different from the . 6% requirement of Condition 2 of outline Plan approval. The Council finds that the landing area is therefore in substantial conformance with the outline Plan approval. SECTION 6. DECISION 6. 1 Based on the entire record and testimony received on this matter, the City Council hereby decides that the request for modification of a previously approved Final Plan for an 18-lot subdivieldn under the Performance Standards.. Option; including street grades, location, and landing, is supported by substantial evidence contained in the whole record. Therefore, based on our overall.conclusions, and upon the proposal being subject to each of the following conditions, we approve Planning Action 190-218. Further, if an �foroany reason whatsoever, then Planning _re of the conditions below are complied with by the app licant Action 190-218 is denied. The following are the conditions and they are attached to the approval: 1) That all proposals of the applicant be conditions of approval unless otherwise modified here. E r 2) That all relevant conditions of PA88-0133 and PA88-070 shall remain in effect. 3) That the landscape .plan for the filled open area of the former street location include trees (8 '-10' ht. ) on 30 ' center spacing, ground cover to provide 50% coverage in one year,. trees. (8 '-10' ht. ) in drilled planters on the terraced area of the cut slope with additional ground cover, and a full irrigation plan for all planted areas. The remaining area of this larger cut slope area to have a dry rock masonry wall on the upper slope. All other cut and fill banks associated with the street construction to be treated as indicated on the previous street construction plans, with rock wall facing on street cuts and erosion control netting and appropriate plantings on fill slopes, with adequate irrigation. All plans to be reviewed by the Tree Commission and approved under the Type I procedure, with notice to surrounding property owners. ayor Date Attest '- City. Recorder a 1 BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL ASHLAND, OREGON July 16, 1991 IN THE MATTER OF PLANNING ACTION #91-067, REQUEST FOR A ) ZONING MAP AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP CHANGE TO CORRECT ) FINDINGS, A MAP DRAFTING ERROR. CHANGE IS FROM R-2 TO E-1 AND ) CONCLUSIONS MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO EMPLOYMENT FOR THE PROPERTY ) AND ORDERS LOCATED AT 250 NORTH PIONEER STREET AND FIRST STREET. ) APPLICANT: CITY OF ASHLAND ) -------------------------------------------------------- RECITALS: 1) Tax lot 13400 of 391E 9BA is located at 250 North Pioneer and is zoned R-2; Multi-Family Residential. 2) The applicant is requesting a Zoning Map and Comprehensive Plan Map change to correct a drafting error. The change is from R-2 to E-1 and Multi-Family Residential to Employment. A site plan is on file at the Department of Community Development. 3) The criteria for approval of a Type III amendment (zone change, comprehensive plan map change) are as follows: Type III amendments may be approved when one of the following conditions exist: a) A public need, supported by the Comprehensive Plan. b) The need to correct mistakes. c) The need to adjust to new conditions. d) where compelling circumstances relating to the general public welfare require such an action. The Council believes that Criterion b) , the need to correct mistakes is the relevant criterion. 4) The City Council, following proper public notice, held a Public Hearing on July 16, 1991, at which time testimony was received and exhibits were presented. The Council approved the application as presented. Now, therefore, the Common Council of the City of Ashland finds and concludes as follows: SECTION 1. EXHIBITS For the purposes of reference to these Findings, the attached index of exhibits, data, and testimony will be used. r Staff Exhibits lettered with an "S" Proponent' s Exhibits, lettered with a "P" Opponent's Exhibits, lettered with an "O" Hearing Minutes, Notices, Miscellaneous Exhibits lettered with an "Mu SECTION 2 . CONCLUSORY FINDINGS 2 . 1 The City Council finds that it has received all information necessary to make a decision based on the Staff Report, public hearing testimony and the exhibits received. 2 .2 The City Council finds that the proposal for a Zoning Map and Comprehensive Plan Map change from R-2 , Multi-Family Residential, to E-1, Employment, meets criterion "b" as outlined in 18 . 108 . 060B(l) . Historically, this land was developed as the Twin Plunges natatorium. From historical aerial photographs, it has been shown that the extent of the building improvements for the natatorium (which also included a dance floor) was to near the rear property lines of those developed residential properties along "B" Street. Therefore, the Council finds that the historical pattern of development was that residential occupied the row of properties along "B" Street, and commercial uses were behind these lots. In 1978, when the Valley of the Rogue Bank received initial approval for a bank at this location, the zoning was C-1, Heavy Commercial. This designation was taken from the 1978 Comprehensive Plan and is what was in effect at that time. In the 1978 Comprehensive Plan, the City had 4 different commercial zones -- Downtown Commercial, Retail Commercial, Highway Commercial, and Heavy Commercial. There were also two industrial zones, Light Industrial and Heavy Industrial. r In the 1981 Comprehensive Plan, a new zone was created -- Employment (E-1) . This zone combined many of the uses spread between Heavy Commercial and Light Industrial, while also allowing many of the uses of the Retail Commercial and Highway Commercial. In developing the new zoning map of the City incorporating the E- 1 zone, areas previously designated as heavy commercial were converted to the E-1 zone. It was during this conversion that the Council believes a drafting error was made on this parcel. The maps were converted and drawn by an intern from Southern Oregon State College during the development of the 1981 Comprehensive Plan. The error made during the conversion was not detected by the Planning Staff at that time, and has continued in error since plan adoption. The 1978 Comprehensive Plan map is included as part of this report. Recently, the Valley of the' Rogue Bank received an approval for a minor land partition for this parcel. Staff had assumed that the entire parcel was zoned E-1, and processed the partition upon this assumption. Therefore, the Council finds that based upon the historical development of the property, the zoning and comprehensive plan designations of the 1978 Comprehensive Plan, previous planning actions, and recollections of the intern who drafted the 1981 plan maps, there was a drafting error made on the maps and that the proper zoning for this area is E-1. SECTION 3 . DECISION 3 . 1 Based on the record of the Public Hearing on this matter, the City Council concludes that the proposal for a Zoning Map and Comprehensive Plan Map change from R-2, Multi-Family Residential, to E-1, Employment, is supported by evidence contained in the record. Therefore, based on our overall conclusions, approve Planning Action #91-067. Catherine Golden, Mayor Attest - City Recorder Dated this day of August, 1991. _ -i j i i ' 4, i BEFORE THE ASHLAND CITY COUNCIL July 2, 1991 IN THE MATTER OF PLANNING ACTION #91-049, REQUEST FOR A ) A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP CHANGE AND ZONE CHANGE ) FINDINGS, FROM R-2 TO C-1-D FOR THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 80 ) CONCLUSIONS HARGADINE STREET AND 130 HARGADINE STREET, AND 96 ) AND DECISION WEST FORK STREET. APPLICATION ALSO INVOLVES A ) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO OPERATE A MOTEL AT 80 ) HARGADINE STREET, 130 HARGADINE STREET AND 96 WEST ) FORK STREET. ) APPLICANT: PHILIP AND SHARON THORMAHLEN ) AGENT: THE RICHARD STEVENS COMPANY ) SECTION 1. RECITALS 1.1 Tax lots 4900 and 5000 of 391E09BC are located at and near the intersection of Hargadine, Fork, and Pioneer Streets and are zoned R-2, Multi-Family Residential. 1.2 The applicants are requesting a Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Map change from R-2 to C-1-1) (Downtown Commercial), and a Conditional Use Permit to allow for use of the properties for motel purposes. 1.3 The criteria for approval of a Type III amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Map or Zoning Map are found in 18.108.060 of the Ashland Land Use Ordinance, and the criteria for approval of a Conditional Use Permit are found in 18.104.020. 1.4 The Ashland Planning Commission, following proper public notice, held a Public Hearing on May 14, 1991, at which time testimony was received and exhibits were presented. The Planning Commission recommended denial of the application. 1.5 The Ashland City Council, following proper public notice, held a Public Hearing on July 2, 1991, at which time testimony was received and exhibits were presented. The City Council denied the request for a Comprehensive Plan Map change, Zoning Map change, and Conditional Use Permit for the subject properties. SECTION 2. CRITERIA 2.1 The criteria for approval of a Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Map Change are found in 18.104.020 of the Ashland Land Use Ordinance. Map changes,such as those proposed, are Type III Amendments, and are subject to the following criteria: 1 A Type III amendments may be approved when one of the following conditions exist: a) A public need, supported by the Comprehensive Plan. b) The need to correct mistakes. c) The need to adjust to new conditions. d) Where compelling circumstances relating to thegeneral public welfare require such an action. 2.2 The criteria for approval of a Conditional Use Permit are found in 18.104.020 of the Ashland Land Use Ordinance, and are as follows: A. The proposal is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. B. The location, size, design and operating characteristics of the proposed development are such that the development will be reasonably compatible with and have minimal impact on the livability and appropriate development of abutting properties and the surrounding neighborhood C. In determining the above, consideration shall be given to the.following. 1) Harmony in scale bully coverage and density. 2) The availability and capacity of public facilities and utilities 3) The generation of traffic and the capacity of surrounding streets. 4) Public safety and protection. 5) Architectural and aesthetic compatibility.with the surrounding area SECTION 3. RECORD AND EXHIBITS 3.1 For purposes of these Findings, the attached index at the end of this document refers to exhibits, data, and testimony incorporated in the record and considered by the Council in its decision. SECTION 4. TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE 4.1 Richard Stevens, agent for the applicants, presented oral testimony in support of the application, and submitted his written comments. Mr. Stevens spoke to the four criteria for approval of a Type III amendment, and stated that the application met all four. He stated that the written findings document submitted by his office contained the factual evidence necessary for the City-to find that the application met the applicable criteria. Stevens said that criterion a) was met in that there was a public need for additional land 2 since the City's vacant land inventory indicated that very little C-1-D was currently vacant and that there was a need to rezone other properties to increase the amount of land zoned C-1-D. . Stevens stated that criterion b) was met in that the property was improperly zoned. He stated that it is more appropriate to have zoning lines along the rear property.lines between parcels rather than along public streets, and that this change would help minimize the impacts between the commercial zones and the residential areas. Stevens said that criterion c) was met in that many changes regarding street lighting, on- street parking, street closures, and development of the Shakespeare Festival had occurred over time and had dramatically changed the neighborhood. He also stated that a recent change in the Traveller's Accommodation ordinance also required them to have a commercial zoning designation for the property in order to operate it as requested by the Thormahlens. Stevens said that criterion d) was met in that the property owners had been impacted by many land use issues in the City. Stevens further stated that the City had approved a similar zone change request at the intersection of Helman and Hersey Streets, and that the precedent set by that zone change supported this request also. 4.2 John McLaughlin, Senior Planner for the City of Ashland, explained the vacant lands inventory and concurred that there was very little vacant land in the C-1-D zoning designation. He further went on to read Policy XR-1 of the Comprehensive Plan which refers to "need" for additional lands, which is as follows: WI-I: The City shall strive to maintain at least a 5-year supply of land for any particular need in the City limits. The 5-year supply shall be determined by the rate of consumption necessitated in the projections made in the Comprehensive Plan." McLaughlin said that the policy refers to a "supply for a particular need" and not a supply of land in any particular zone. McLaughlin further stated that the uses, or needs, of the C-1-D zone are the same commercial uses allowed in the C-1 zone, and many of the uses are allowed in the E-1 and M-1 zones also. The only use, or need, which is particular to the C-1-D zone is adult book stores or adult movie houses, but that all other needs could . be accommodated on vacant lands in the C-1, E-1, or M-1 zones. McLaughlin further said that individual zone change applications are decided by the applicable criteria for each request, and that individual planning actions do not establish a precedent. 4.3 Philip Thormahlen, Applicant, spoke of the impacts that surrounding uses had on their property, and that this request was only to allow them to operate a traveller's accommodation without living on the site. 3 4.4 Craig Stone,Planning Consultant representing the Oregon Shakespeare Festival(OSF), stated that the zone change request did not meet any of the criteria for approval. He then referred to the facts submitted in his letter dated May 9, 1991 and submitted as part of the record. Stone stated that the OSF had been in operation at this location for 50 years and that the number of performances in the outdoor theatre had remained essentially unchanged since 1977 and that there has not been a substantial change in the operation of the festival over the time period that the neighboring property has been occupied by the Thormahlens. Stone stated that many of the noise related complaints of the applicants concerning the operation of the outdoor theatre would be substantially mitigated by the construction of the recently approved pavilion, which will result in a 10-20 decibel reduction in noise generated by the plays. Stone stated that the designation of the zoning boundary along a public street is a standard zoning practice, and is not an error in defining zones. He said that the area of the right- of-way can serve as the buffer between zoning uses when a street is the boundary. Stone referred to the Vacant Land inventory and his written comments and stated that the amount of vacant land in the C-1, E-1, and C-1-D zones exceeded the required amounts in the Comprehensive Plan for commercial uses as stated in Policy X11-1, and that there was no public need for this land to be zoned C-1-1): Stone said that the findings for the Conditional Use Permit application were incomplete, and that all factors that constitute "livability" as outlined in McCoy vs.Linn County, had not been addressed by the applicant. Therefore, the application did not meet the burden of proof for approval of a conditional use permit. SECTION 5. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 5.1 The City Council finds that it has received all information necessary to make a decision based on the entire record herein, including the Staff Report, public hearing testimony and the exhibits received. 5.2 The City Council fords that the proposal for a Comprehensive Plan Mag change and Zone change from,R-2 to C-1-D does not meet any one of the criteria for approval of a Type III amendment. 5.3 The City Council finds that the request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow for use of the existing structures as motel units is only allowed as a conditional use in a commercial zone and is therefore inextricably linked to the comprehensive plan map/zone change request. Therefore, the Council denies the conditional use permit request based upon denial of the concurrent comprehensive plan map/zone change request and also upon finding that the motel use is not an allowed use, either permitted or conditional, in the existing R-2 zone. 5.4 The City Council makes the following findings addressing the criteria for approval of 4 a Type III amendment: a) A public need, supported by the Comprehensive Plan. The Policy governing need for additional lands is Policy XII-1 of the Ashland Comprehensive Plan and is as follows: "The City shall strive to maintain at least a 5-year supply of land for any particular need in the City limits. The 5-year supply shall be determined by the rate of consumption necessitated in the projections made in the Comprehensive Plan." The plan policy refers to a supply of land for a particular need in the City and not a supply of land in a particular zoning designation. The needs allowed under the C- 1-D zoning designation can be accommodated by lands zoned C-1,E-1,and M-1,with the exception of adult book stores and adult movie houses. The vacant lands currently in the C-1-D inventory would allow for adult uses, as would vacant structures and redevelopment of structures elsewhere in the C-1-13 zone. The Council also finds that the need is not great for adult uses, noting that no applications for adult book stores or movie houses have been received in the last 10 years and that there is a 5-year supply of C-1-D lands available for such adult uses. Therefore, the vacant lands inventory, included as part of the letter and materials submitted by Craig Stone on May 9, 1991, clearly shows that adequate lands in these zoning designations are vacant for the prescribed uses allowed. Therefore the City Council finds that adequate commercial lands exist within the City to accommodate particular commercial needs and that the applicant has failed to meet the burden of proof for showing approval under this criterion, thereby not proving that there is a public need for additional lands zoned C-1-D. b) The need to correct mistakes. The City finds that this land has been zoned in this manner even prior to the adoption of the current comprehensive plan in November, 1982. _further, the property at 80 Hargadine Street was upzoned from R-1-10 to R-2 in November, 1983, as stated in the Staff Report of May 14, 1991, and its approval by the City Council at that time did not constitute a mistake. The Council further finds that zoning boundaries along City streets is a common and normal zoning practice and does not constitute a mistake in zoning of this. area. Therefore, the City finds that the application does not meet the burden of proof for a Type III amendment under this criterion. c) The need to adjust to new conditions. The applicant provided statements that conditions of the neighborhood including 5 i _I parking, noise, performances at the OSF, and street closures had changed over time. The City Council finds that the applicant has not provided facts to support that these specific conditions had changed. The applicant has stated that"traffic impacts are substantial'(Supplemental Findings document). The City does not dispute that there may be traffic impacts. However, the applicant has failed to provide facts that this traffic situation is a new condition. Therefore, the City Council finds that no evidence has been presented to indicate that the traffic is a new condition in this area. The applicant has stated that'Parking impacts on abutting property owners from the Festival use is massive." Again, the City does not dispute that there may be parking impacts. However, the applicant has failed to provide facts that these parking impacts constitute a new condition for the area. Therefore, the City Council fords that no evidence has been presented to indicate that the parking impacts are a new condition in this area. The applicant has stated that 'Noise impacts on the residential use of this property by the Festival and the accompanying auto traffic is beyond the scope of what is considered normal in a residential neighborhood." The applicant has failed to provide facts that the impacts constitute a new condition to the area. Further, the OSF has received approval for a pavilion at the site of the outdoor theatre which acoustic experts have stated will reduce decibel levels from the stage by 10-20 decibels. Therefore,.the City Council finds that no evidence has been presented that the noise impacts have changed in the area, and that the upcoming pavilion construction at the outdoor theatre of the OSF will result in lower noise levels in the immediate vicinity. The Council, in fording that no factual basis has been presented by the applicant to support the approval under this criterion, adopts the facts presented in the Staff Report of May 14, 1991, and the letter of May.9, 1991 of Craig Stone. The Council finds that the number of outdoor performances at the OSF has not significantly changed from 1977 to the time of this application. Therefore, the City Council finds that the application as submitted fails.to supply adequate facts to support the statements that new conditions have occurred at this . location. d) Where compelling circumstances relating to the general public welfare require such an action. The applicant has stated in their supplemental findings document that the conflicts between the applicant and OSF can be mitigated by the approval of the zone change, and that it is in the interest of the City to reduce such conflicts. The Council finds that zone change requests are not the proper forum for mitigation of conflicts of the nature described here, and find that this conflict is not a 6 compelling circumstance relating to the general public welfare. The applicant has further stated in their supplemental findings document that the general public welfare of Ashland is dependent to a certain degree upon tourism and that this zone change would be in support of that tourism component of the economy. The Council finds that there is adequate vacant lands in other commercial zones to accommodate tourist housing for future uses, and that it is not a compelling circumstance relating to the general public welfare to provide additional tourist housing at this location. The City Council therefore finds that the application as submitted fails to meet any of the four criteria for approval of a Type III amendment. SECTION 6. DECISION 6.1 Based on the entire record and the testimony received on this matter, the City Council hereby denies the request for a Comprehensive Plan Map and Zone Change, finding that .the applicant has failed to meet the burden of proof for approval of such change. 6.2 Based on the entire.record and the testimony received on this matter, the City Council finds that the request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow for use of the existing structures as motel units is only allowed as a conditional use in a commercial zone and is therefore inextricably linked to the comprehensive plan map/zone change request. Therefore, the Council denies the conditional use permit request based upon denial of the concurrent comprehensive plan map/zone change request and also upon finding that the motel use is not an allowed use, either permitted or conditional, in the existing R-2 zone. 63 Therefore, based on our overall conclusions, we deny Planning Action #91-049 in its entirety. Mayor Date Attest - City Recorder Date 7 . � & .. �r0 s F' 4 a py§a T' ,. ,f. ��y . . a � . . - - ' . , ,r ]v{j} i _ _ - . . r a ._ ti 's§ j �f a , �� �p � F . �� { Of MFG O U � G OREGON CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MEDFORD TELEPHONE (503) 770-4432 411 WEST 8TH STREET . MEDFORD, OREGON 97501 August 8, 1991 TO: Mayors of Jackson County Cities SUBJECT: Meeting of Key Communities Wednesday, August 14 , 1991 REFERENCE: July 26, 1991 letter from LOC-AOC requesting selection of a key communicator from each city. The League of Oregon Cities and the Association of Oregon Counties have established a joint program to assist in resolving tax concerns resulting from the passage of Ballot Measure 5. In order to assist in this program, the LOC Board has asked me to coordinate the efforts in Jackson County by scheduling an orientation session during the week of August 12, 1991. Accordingly, a meeting has been set for Wednesday. August 14 . 1991 at 7:00 p.m. in the Alba Room. Room 312. at Medford City Hall. This is an important step in establishing an effective communication network to prepare for the Governor's regional meetings. I hope that each city will take advantage of this opportunity and have a representative attend this meeting. If you have any questions, please call me at 772-3972 (Home) or 770-4432 (Medford City Hall) . Sincerely, Lou Hannum Medford City Council President 1 �/ r AEmaranAum August 16, 1991 OREOO, ,. Q� City Council rum: Mayor Cathy Golden $Ubjert: City Attorney It is with great pleasure that I bring forward the appointment of Paul Nolte as the next city attorney for Ashland. The review committee rated four finalists out of our many qualified applicants, and found Mr. Nolte to overall have more of the desired qualities for the city than any of the other candidates being considered. Both Brian and I spoke with a number of people in the Roseburg area, both within and outside of County government, and we have found his reputation to be without a blemish. In addition to his solid legal background, he is well liked by his fellow department heads, and he and his wife have been active in a variety of local civic activities outside of County government. Paul Nolte is also well versed in land use matters. Brian spoke with County Planning Director Keith Cubic, who stated that Paul has a special interest in land-use law and has been helpful in drafting ordinances and policies for Douglas County. Mr. Cubic ' s assessment of Paul ' s abilities in this area verifies what the interview panel found. Everyone with whom we spoke related that he is very easy to get along with, has a good sense of humor, and is a person you immediately like. Paul is respected by his peers, having served as the President of the Oregon County Counsel 's Association, and is acquainted with many City Attorneys and Counsels throughout the State. In addition to this the interview panel also saw in Paul a level of interest in our city and creativity that is so necessary in this difficult position. I 1 i BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL ASHLAND, OREGON August 6, 1991 IN THE MATTER OF PLANNING ACTION #91-068, REQUEST FOR ) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AMENDMENT TO CORRECT A MAP ) FINDINGS, DRAFTING ERROR. CHANGE IS FROM OPEN SPACE TO SINGLE ) CONCLUSIONS FAMILY RESIDENTIAL FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED BEHIND 50 W. ) AND ORDERS NEVADA STREET. ) APPLICANT: CITY OF ASHLAND ) -------------------------------------------------------- RECITALS: 1) Tax lot 700 of 391E 4BB is located at 50 W. Nevada , Street and is under Jackson County zoning. 2) The applicant is requesting a Comprehensive Plan Map change from Open Space to Single Family Residential. A site plan is on file at the Department of Community Development. 3) The criteria for approval of a Type III amendment (Comprehensive Plan Map Change) are as follows: Type III amendments may be approved when one of the following conditions exist: a) A public need, supported by the Comprehensive Plan. b) The need to correct mistakes. c) The need to adjust to new conditions. d) where compelling circumstances relating to the general public welfare require such an action. 4) -The City Council, following proper public notice, held a Public Hearing on August 6, 1991, at which time testimony was received and exhibits were presented. The City Council approved the application as presented. Now, therefore, the Common Council of the City of Ashland finds and concludes as. follows: SECTION 1. EXHIBITS For the purposes of reference to these Findings, the attached index of exhibits, data, and testimony will be used. Staff Exhibits lettered with an "S" Proponent' s Exhibits, lettered with a "P" I Opponent' s Exhibits, lettered with an "O" Hearing Minutes, Notices, Miscellaneous Exhibits, lettered with an nM" SECTION 2 . CONCLUSORY FINDINGS 2 . 1 The City Council finds that it has received all information necessary to make a decision based on the Staff Report, public hearing testimony and the exhibits received. 2 . 2 The City Council finds that the proposal for a Comprehensive Plan Map change from Open Space to Single Family Residential meets criterion "b" as outlined in section 18. 108 .060B(l) . When the 1981 version of the Comprehensive Plan map was being drafted, a new designation was added for lands in the floodplain, or undeveloped land owned by the City -- Open Space. The City owned land along Ashland Creek and the sewer treatment plant were . indicated as open Space. An intern from Southern Oregon State College Geography Department assumed from the maps that this 4 .72 acre parcel was owned by the City and included it as part of the Open Space designation. As shown in the 1978 Comprehensive Plan map, this area was indicated as SR (suburban residential) , and not as Open Space, and not as City-owned land (P - Public and Parks) . Therefore, the City Council finds that a drafting error occurred during the transition from the 1978 plan to the 1981 plan. SECTION 3 . DECISION 3 . 1 Based on the record of the Public Hearing on this matter, the City Council concludes that the proposal for a Comprehensive Plan Map change from Open Space to Single Family Residential is supported by evidence contained in the record. Therefore, based on our overall conclusions, we approve planning Action #91-068. Catherine Golden, Mayor Attest - City Recorder Dated this day of August, 1991. OF ��`'y �HPmorttn � um August 16, 1991 OREGOl� Ell: City Council Members from: Cathy Golden '$Ubjpty: Transportation Planning Advisory Committee Recently Don Laws, John Fregonese, Carl Oates, Carol Wheeldon, Steve Hall and I met regarding the establishment of an ad-hoc transportation planning advisory committee (TPAC) for the City. The general consensus of the group was for a separate committee from the bicycle or traffic safety group that would focus on the development of a comprehensive transportation and implementation strategy for the City of Ashland. The idea was to comprise this committee with representatives from the County, Chamber, CPAC, City Council, SOSC, public schools, RVTD, Bicycle, Traffic Safety, Planning Commission, public works and citizens who might be interested in a joint venture with planning working toward education of our citizens, comp plan review on transportation, and development of a transportation model . A list of some of the individuals who might be interested follows. Although none of these have been formally notified, with council approval I will begin the process of contacting each one upon my return. I will also ask for suggestions from committees or organizations not included in the names below. Don Laws Jim Sims Roger Noyes Doug Pilant (ex officio) plus a board member Ron Bolstead or Kevin Talbert Wes Reynolds Michael Donovan Carole Wheeldon Carl Oates I ASHLAND F=RE DEPARTMENT M E M O R A N D U M August 14, 1991 TO Mayor Golden and City Council FROM Keith E. Woodley, Fire Chief SUBJECT Fire Protection In NW Ashland The Ashland Fire Department has been reviewing fire risk factors in the NW Ashland area at the request of the City Council. This analysis has two basic components; ( 1) the nature and distribution of structures in the area and their proximity to natural wildlands, and ( 2) the availability of adequate water for fire suppression activities. Vegetation management in proximity to structures in the wildland area of NW Ashland can best be accomplished through the education -of property owners and the enforcement of City nuisance ordinances. A comprehensive planning ordinance has been jointly prepared by Fire and Planning Departments directed at better control of con- struction activities and vegetation management within wildland areas. Educational efforts are being directed at residents of the area with positive results. The issue of adequate water supplies for fire protection activities is more difficult to resolve. The areas of Skycrest Drive, Alta Avenue, Grandview Drive, upper Strawberry and the 1200-1300 block of Ashland Mine Road show seriously deficient water supplies from hydrant-flow testing. The long-term solution is extensive water- works construction. The short-term fire protection needs can be resolved through a change in operating procedures by the fire department, and the acquisition of large diameter 5" supply hose. The current fire hose system used by the fire department relies on 2 1/2" or 3" hose which requires a number of personnel to set-up and flows a limited amount of water with high pressure losses due to friction. Large diameter hose can be laid 1200-1500 feet by one firefighter and will flow up to 1500 gallons per minutes with little pressure loss due to friction. This would enable the fire department to tap strong hydrants farther away from the fire scene without "daisy-chain" pumping operations. An example of this operation would be to connect to a hydrant at Grandview and Sunnyview Streets with a strong flow and lay large diameter hose up to a structure fire on Skycrest. Simply stated, large diameter hose makes better use of available water supplies and compensates for water deficient areas. The Ashland Fire Department does not presently have the necessary funds but intends to budget for large diameter hose next year at an anticipated cost of $15,000. This is the only viable "stop-gap" measure as impounded water supplies would be of much greater expense and of limited value to a fire suppression operation. 1 i AEmorandnm A- « August 15, 1991 p�'EG ,. 0. Brian Almquist, City Administrator Steven Hall, Public Works Director roar pa $Uhjert. Water Moratorium Request - Granite Street ACTION REQUESTED .City Council deny request to consider placing a water based moratorium on Granite Street. BACKGROUND Carl Oates (351 Granite Street) requested the City Council to consider institution of a water based moratorium on upper Granite Street. As the Council is aware, the NW Moratorium and Granite Street areas are served by two totally independent water distribution systems, with the exception of the unpaved section of Granite Street: The NW Moratorium area is served through Crowson Reservoir which is located at the intersection of Terrace Street and Ashland Loop Road. Crowson Reservoir is the central distribution point for water in the city water system. Granite Street is served by the Granite Street Reservoir located near the end of the pavement on Granite Street. In each case, the water pressure in a given area is dependent on two items, the depth of the water in the reservoir and the friction loss caused by water flowing through a given water main. As an example, the pressure in Granite Street could vary about 8 pounds -pet square inch between a full and empty reservoir. The pressure in the water system is not dependent on the height or volume of water in Reeder Reservoir behind Hosler Dam. The upper unpaved portion of Granite Street has two lines serving the area. One is from the Granite Street Reservoir and the other is from Crowson Reservoir. The age of the pipes serving the upper Granite Street area vary in size and age. From the Granite Street Reservoir to about 600 feet south of South Pioneer, the line is 14 inches in diameter and was constructed in 1939. From that point to Strawberry Lane the line is 12 inches in diameter and was constructed in 1924 . The section from Strawberry Lane to Nutley Street is 12 inches in diameter and was constructed in 1916. The section of line from Nutley Street to North Main Street was replaced. The old line was 12 inches in diameter and constructed in 1910. The new high pressure zone pipe in the unpaved portion of Granite street is 12 and 8 inches in diameter and was constructed in 1983 . Staff has reviewed recent fire department data on fire flows in the area and compared that to the computer model of the water system_ . The results are excellent which gives me a high level of confidence in the computer model. --------------------------------------------------------- Location Hydrant Test Model Results Static Residual Flow 1990 2000 --------------------------------------------------------- 119 Granite 90 psi 40 psi 2359 gpm 92 psi 76 psi 227 Granite 70 psi 65 psi 1668 gpm 72 psi 59 psi Granite/Pioneer 67 psi 57 psi 365 Granite 60 psi 50 psi 1180 gpm 433 Granite 46 psi 40 psi 746 gpm 440 Granite 140 psi 110 psi 3120 gpm 140 psi 112 psi --------------------------------------------------------- As an example, at Carl Oates' location, based on static pressure from fire flow tests, a pressure of 20 psi could be maintained about 90 feet in elevation above Granite Street. This assumes no friction loss in the pipe. Carl indicated that he could not get adequate pressure to fight a fire on his roof. This is possible, but the lack of pressure is due to friction losses in the small service line and within the hose itself. . If he has a small, old service line from the meter to his home, the friction losses can be enormous if a high volume demand is placed on the system. Also, old service lines tend to corrode internally further reducing the pipe diameter and increasing the friction losses. The situation is similar to trying to drink a thick milkshake through a straw-it takes a lot of effort! As the model projects, there will be pressure losses due to growth in the city. As demand and volume increases, friction losses increase and line pressure decreases. State law requires the City of Ashland to provide a minimum of 20 psi at the meter. At Carl Oates residence, the city is providing about 60 psi static pressure and 50 psi pressure when flowing a hydrant at 1180 gallons per minute. There is no evidence to substantiate the need for a water based moratorium in the upper Granite Street area. SUMMARY 1. Council requested staff report on request for water based moratorium on Granite Street. 2. Current hydrant tests indicate pressures and volumes exceed minimum standards. 3. Computer model indicates that there will not be pressure problems in the area in the year 2000. 4. Staff recommends denial of the request for a water based moratorium on upper Granite Street. .v r 0�� yr" MEMORANDUM � , TO: Ashland City Council and Planning Commission FROM Tom Giordano, CPAC Chairperson SURTECE Future-Role;-of CPAC Attached please find the. proposed changes in CPACs future role, structure, and functioning. After much thought and discussion at the regularly-scheduled CPAC meetings, the committee has developed these recommendations to forward to the Planning Commission and City Council: We feel that CPACs role is an important one in the planning process; especially in the ability to provide long-range planning for the Ashland community. We are excited about these changes and feel that this is a positive direction for CPAC. We appreciate any opinions and/or suggestions from both the City Council and Planning Commission. Thank you GV4 to PROPOSED CHANGES v IN <D cU CPAC'S ROLE, STRUCTURE AND ,FUNCTIONING N�� r CO .. V ]7 pi First , it is agreed that CPAC potentially has a valuable role to play in planning. Second, there is a -good consensus that CPAC needs to be revamped in order to meet that potential . Both LCDC. Goal 1 and the Goal of our Comp Plan, Chapter III mandate "a citizen involvement program that insures the opportunity for citizens to be involved in all phases of the planning process . " Currently, CPAC is the mechanism for insuring compliance with this `:Goal . From the rest of Goal - 1 ; it is- clear- that CPAC cannot "be" the citizen involvement., but rather it is the "means of obtaining" citizen . involvement. CPAC' s role is further spelled. out in Chapter III of the Comp Plan and Chapter.;2.27 of the Ashland City Ordinances. (See attached) It is felt that the mandate given. CPAC in all three of these documents is still valid and needs very little revision. What may need revision is the manner in which CPAC carries out these . mandates . . The following is a series of suggestions about how to re-organize CPAC. 1 . ROLE: it is felt that CPAC has been reactive, i .e. , it usually simply responds to the issues and planning actions brought to it. In order to meet the .mandates above, it is felt that CPAC must become proactive, i .e. , it must seek citizen input in order to identify potential problems . It must then use that. citizen input to . assist the City to develop plans to guide both short . and long term growth. More specifically, CPAC would: a. assist in the development and implementation of City Council goals , (suggest goals to CC and assist with implementation. at CC's direction) , ` b. continue to have a major role in periodic review of the Comp Plan, C. mid-point between periodic reviews , CPAC would review the progress of the City in reaching the Goals and Policies of the Comp plan and report the findings to the City and its residents , d. through citizen input , assist in identifying problem areas in land use planning and suggest appropriate policies and ordiganoes to meet the identified need(s) , and e. assist the City to gather citizen input on other issues which may impinge on land use planning or livability and act as liaison between the City and ad hoc City committees , e.g. , on issues like the siting of the electric utility substation or wood burning regulations . 2. OBJECTIVES: a. finish the current Comp Plan periodic review b. review existing CPAC neighborhood boundaries and suggest .revisions as necessary in order to make these area divisions more meaningful , c. define areas where growth is likely to occur and develop "area plans" , d. as part of the. mid—course review of the Comp Plan, hold a Future Plan Festival at least once every five years, e. develop a viable mechanism for gathering citizen input and giving- feedback to the community, and f. by •November :of each year begin the process of `formulating goals . for the City to be given as input to the City Council as .it sets its own goals for the following year. 3.. FUNCTIONING: It is agreed that CPAC should no longer duplicate the work of the Planning Commission in regards to individual planning actions (Type III ' s) involving specific developments . Instead we will : a., have a rotating sub—committee to review Type III ' s which might serve as examples of problem . areas .for the entire City, i .e. , the review will focus on conceptual or philosophic issues for the. City, not on the issues for the particular site or project; if the sub—committee identifies conceptual problems, these will be reviewed by the entire CPAC b. continue to meet monthly or as needed to accomplish the work outlined above c: sponsor and publicize meetings to. gather citizen input on particular issues and facilitate discussion between neighborhoods and developers on selected application's. ` b0a.Yry` t�+pF AS&�O . - �IEmarrxn � �xm August 2, 1991 pREGpd .• Q. City Council Members ram: Catherine Golden, Mayor � uQjetf: Appointments to CPAC Please confirm the appointment of the John Berger, Hunton Conrad, and Bill Huntley to CPAC. Thank you. i 1 John Berger 396 Bridge St.g1 Ashland, Or. 97520 Mayor Catherine Golden Ashland City Hall 20 E. Main Street Ashland, Or. 97520 Dear Cathy, I 'm writeng to express my sincere interest in serving as a volunteer on the Citizens Planning Advisory Committee. But first, I would like to thank you for appointing me to the ad hoc Water Conservation Committee. I 'm looking forward to working with Dick Wonderscheid, SRC, Inc. , and the other committee members in helping to implement necessary water conservation measures in our community. I am a man in my middle years, 45, who is presently enrolled at SOSC, in my Junior year. My major area of study is Geography, with an emphasis in ecology and the environment. I have entered my third year of residence here in Ashland, having moved here from Seattle. For most of my working years I. have labored in the build- ing trades, primarily as "a licenced electrician. During the past several years I have actively sought personal growth in a way that would both benefit myself and my society in a fulfilling way. During the period 1987-1988 I worked for the environmental organization Greenpeace, in Seattle. I worked full-time in the areas of fund raising, public education, and direct environmental action. Being thus immersed, encouraged my deep growth in under- standing of the vital challanges facing our society in environmen- tal , conservation, and peace issues . Before moving to the west coast in 1985, I worked and lived in Florida and Texas. While residing in Florida I obtained my real estate licence and worked as a Realtor for two years in the Central Florida area. In both Dallas, . Texas and Central Florida I have seen. some of the results of poor city planning. I 'm happy to say that I 've seen more citizen involvement and intelligent idecision making here in Ashland than anywhere else I 've lived. At present I am also an active member of the local groups: Headwaters and the local chapter of the .'Sierra Club. At the Nation- al level, I support the Natural Resource Defense Council and The World Watch Institute. I hope that you will find my varied backround in the build- ing industry, real estate field and the environmental movement valuabe in allowing me a balanced viewpoint in evaluating the chall- anges taken on by the Citizens Planning Advisory Committee. With your approval, I look forward to serving! Yours S ' cerly; Sohn 'Berger January 18, 1991 Dear Mayor: I am interested in serving on CPAC. I read that you were asking for citizens willing to volunteer. I am a new member of the community. My wife and I moved here from Hawaii in early August of 1990 . We have purchased a house here and have made Ashland our home. I have a B. S . degree in Photography/Theatre from Southern Oregon State College, so I have some history here. I left Ashland in 1976 , after two years at SOSC, to return to Hawaii where I grew up. I have been a practicing landscape designer on Maui since 1978 . My career has been varied as I have always been interested in the whole environment that we live and work in. This has lead me to designing buildings and their interiors as well . I have tried to look at the environment we live in as a whole, and have worked to blend our architecture into the environment . My strongest professional interest is in enhancing the relationship between people, the exterior of buildings , and the surrounding landscape. The most exciting challenge of my career has been the remodeling design of a 10-story hotel in Waikiki . My responsibilities were to harmonize the entire building inside and out ; to design and coordinate everything from the skin of the building to the bedspreads and furnishings, and on to the landscaping. (See enclosure. ) Because of my desire to participate in the creation of harmonious spaces , and my wish to serve the community I live in, I would like to volunteer to be a member of CPAC. I have been on the Maui Historical Society Board and worked to plan the museum' s,. future expansion. I also served on the Board of an Arts Education and Promotion Society, "The Hui Noeau" . I served as chairman of the exhibition ' s committee and assisted on the committee to renovate and preserve the historical building and grounds that the "Hui Noeau" occupies . I am also a partici-pating member of Big Brothers, Big Sisters of Maui , and maintain my connection with my " little brother" there. I am now setting up a practice here, and look forward to participating fully in the community of Ashland. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, fi Hunton Conrad 895 N. Mountain Ave. Ashland, OR 97520 482-2496 Country Willows Bed and Breakfast Inn 1313 Clay Street • Ashland, OR 97520 • (503)488-1590 October 20, 1990 The Honorable Kathy Golden Mayor of Ashland City Hall Ashland, Oregon 97520 Dear Mayor Golden: I would like to be appointed to CPAC to represent the southern section of Ashland. As for my qualifications, I was a school teacher for 29 years in Oregon and California. I had 14 years on a negotiating and district management council and I chaired i several committees dealing with future school growth. I had 8 years of scouting work and council committee work for The i Boy Scouts of America. For the past 24 years I have led Sierra Club National Trips and have also been a member of the Outing Committee, working for the awareness of conservation issues. In 1985, my wife, Barbara, and myself took apart a farm house and totally rebuilt what is now Country Willows Bed and Breakfast. We have negotiated for several years with the different state, county and city commissions to bring our B & B from 4 rooms to 7 rooms. I have been a member of the Lodging Association and have also worked on the Food, Wine and Arts Committee. 1 As Ashland continues to grow, I would like to be a member pf CPAC and work for its future. Sincerely, Bill Huntley - __ I August 14, 1991 G4EG0� 0. Brian Almquist, City Administrator `� Steven Hall, Public Works Director ram: *bjert- NW Water Moratorium - Request for Proposals ACTION REQUESTED City Council authorize expenditure of funds for the design of the water line, pump station and reservoir. The funds will initially be from the Capital Improvement Fund and will later be reimbursed from proceeds from either general obligation bonds or certificates of participation. BACKGROUND City Council has committed to funding the project to eliminate the water pressure problems in NW Ashland. Staff will have to accomplish several items to be ready to bid the project in 1992. The following table is a rough estimate of the time frames to complete the process. ---------------------------------------------------------- Item Time To Complete Date of Completion ---------------------------------------------------------- Select Consultant: 30 days September, 1991 Negotiate Engineering • Contract: 30 days October, 1991 Design Project: 120 days February, 1992 Bid/Award Project: 60 days March, 1992 Begin Construction: 30 days May, 1992 Complete Project: 1 year May, 1993 - ------------------------- ------------------------------ =-- cc: Jill Turner, Finance Director Jim Olson, Assistant City Engineer Pam Barlow, Administrative Assistant ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE ASHLAND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP FROM OPEN SPACE TO SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. (CITY OF ASHLAND, APPLICANT) THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF ASHLAND DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Ashland Comprehensive Plan Map as adopted by Ordinance No. 2227 is hereby amended by changing the designation of Tax Lot 39-lE-4BB-700 from Open Space to Single-Family Residential. The foregoing ordinance was first read on the day of 1991, and duly PASSED and ADOPTED . this day of , 1991. Nan E. Franklin City Recorder SIGNED and APPROVED this day of 1991. Catherine Golden Mayor ;'of aaN,' Memorandum °REGOa , August 13, 1991 0: Mayor and City Council retw. �_ John Fregonese and Dick Wandersche' .l , 1$AjC& AFFORDABLE HOUSING RESOLUTION On Monday, August 12, we met with Councilors Reid and Winthrop to discuss the proposed rent levels contained in the Affordable Housing Resolution. After much discussion, it was decided to leave the income levels as originally proposed, but to adjust the rent levels downward to 23% of monthly income. The attached resolution reflects this change. Please give us a call prior to the meeting if you have questions or desire further assistance in this matter. RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASHLAND, OREGON REPLACING RESOLUTION NO. 91-28 IN ITS ENTIRETY AND SETTING AFFORDABLE HOUSING INCOME LEVELS AND RENTAL AND PURCHASED COST LEVELS . WHEREAS, the City of Ashland desires to provide affordable housing for its citizens; and WHEREAS, the City's Land Use Ordinance has been amended to provide density bonuses for providing affordable housing; and WHEREAS, the City's Land Use Ordinance requires the City Council to adopt a resolution to establish affordability standards to implement the affordable housing density bonuses. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Ashland, Oregon as follows: SECTION 1. RENTAL HOUSING In order to qualify for the density bonuses allowed in the City's Land Use Ordinance, designated affordable units must be rented to individuals or families whose annual income does not exceed the following: Annual # of People Income Level (80% of Median Income) 1 $18,050 2 $20,600 3 $23,200 4 $25,750 5 $27,800 6 $29,900 7 $31,950 8 $34,000 Rents for the affordable units shall not exceed the following (23% of monthly income): Maximum Apt. Type Rent Level Studio $346/month 1 Bedroom ' $395/month 2 Bedroom $445/month 3 Bedroom $494/month 4 Bedroom $533/month The applicant shall sign a 20-year rental agreement which guarantees these rent levels will be maintained (with inflation factors) and agree to rent only to families that meet the income guidelines. This rental agreement will travel with the property deed to bind future owners who purchase the property during this 20 year period. The agreement will also require the owner to rent to HUD Section 8 qualified applicants and agree to accept rent vouchers for all of the affordable rental units where applicable. SECTION 2. PURCHASED HOUSING A. INCOME In order to qualify for the density bonuses allowed in the City's Land Use Ordinance, designated affordable units must be sold to individuals or families whose annual income does not exceed the following: Annual # of People Income Level (1.3 x Median Income) 1 $29,331 2 $33,475 3 $37,700 4 $41,843 5 $45,175 6 $48,875 7 $51,918 8 $55,250 B. ASSETS Excluding the down payment (to a maximum of 20 percent of the purchase price) and closing costs, net assets (not including pension plans and IRA's) shall not exceed $20,000 for a family or$130,000 if one family member is 65 years or older. C. PURCHASE PRICE To qualify for the density bonus, the purchase price of designated affordable units shall not exceed the following amounts: Estimated Monthly Type of Unit Purchase Price Payment Studio $69,711 $622 1 Bedroom $79,558 $710 2 Bedroom $89,601 $800 3 Bedroom $99,446 $888 4 Bedroom $107,365 $959 D. GUARANTEEING AFFORDABILITY 1. FARMERS HOME ADMINISTRATION - For housing financed by the Farmer's Home Administration, affordability will be assured by the recapture provisions required by FmHA which requires sellers to repay FmHA for all the subsidies accrued during the period that they resided in the housing. In addition, it will be required that there be a provision in the CC&R's that for the first five years after the initial purchase, resale can only be to individuals from the same income category as the original purchasers. 2. ALL OTHER DEVELOPMENTS - For all other developments, affordability will be guaranteed by requiring that "sleeping second" mortgages be recorded on the deeds of all units used to qualify for the affordable housing density bonus if the appraised value of the units exceeds the selling price by 10% or more. SECTION 3. This Resolution replaces previously adopted Resolution No. 91-28 in its entirety. The foregoing resolution was READ and DULY ADOPTED at the regular meeting of the Ashland City Council on the day of 1991. Nan Franklin City Recorder o SIGNED and APPROVED this day of 1991. - Catherine Golden Mayor RESOLUTION 91-_ A RESOLUTION CALLING AN ELECTION ON THE 5TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1991, IN THE CITY OF ASHLAND FOR THE PURPOSE OF SUBMITTING TO THE LEGAL VOTERS OF THE CITY A MEASURE AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF $2,060,000 IN GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ASHLAND AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. A general election is hereby called to be held in the City of Ashland, Oregon. All ballots must be delivered in person or by mail to the Jackson County Elections Department, Jackson County Court house by 8: 00 p.m. on the 5th day of November, 1991, at which time there shall be submitted to the legal voters of said City for their adoption or rejection the . following purposed measure, to wit: CAPTION: GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND AUTHORIZATION. QUESTION: Shall the City of Ashland issue general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $2,060,_000. 00 for water improvements? If the -- Bonds are approved, they will be payable from taxes imposed on property or property ownership that are not subject to the limitations of section llb, Article XI of the Oregon Constitution. EXPLANATION: This measure authorizes the City to issue general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $2,060, 000.00. If approved bond proceeds will be used to finance the construction of a new reservoir, water lines, related improvements, and to pay all incidental costs. The bonds will mature over a period not to exceed 25 years. Section 2 . The City Recorder is hereby requested and directed to give due notice of such special election hereby called as provided in the laws of the State of Oregon and the Charter and Ordinances of the City of Ashland, Oregon. Section 3 . For the purposes of this election, the polling places shall be by mail as directed by the Jackson County Clerk. The foregoing Resolution was duly passed at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 20th day of August, 1991. Dated this day of August,. 1991. APPROVED: Catherine Golden, Mayor ATTEST: Nan E. Franklin City Recorder