HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011-1003 Study Session MIN CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
October 3, 2011
Page I of 3
JOINT STUDY SESSION WITH
ASHLAND CITY COUNCIL AND RVTD BOARD OF DIRECTORS
AGENDA
Monday,October 3,2011
SOU Stevenson Union Arena, 1250 Siskiyou Blvd.
5:30 p.m. Study Session
Mayor Stromberg called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. in the Siskiyou Room.
Councilor Slattery, Lemhouse, Chapman, Silbiger, Morris, and Voisin were present.
RVTD BOARD OF DIRECTORS: RVTD Staff.
Connie Skillman Julie Brown,General Manager
William Mansfield Paige Townsend, Senior Planner
Sharon Kohlmeier Luanne Spencer, Executive Assistant
Stan Littrell Nathan Broom, TDM Planner
Wade Six Tim D'Alessandro, Operations Manager
Joel Marks Scott Eason, Transportation Manager
Rick Dyer
1. Will the City Council and the RVTD Board agree on near and long term transit goals that
impact Ashland?
Rogue Valley Transit District (RVTD) General Manager Julie Brown explained RVTD had been stable
for the.past three years and could continue to provide service at the current level through 2015 without
additional funds or increased taxes. However, a demand to extend bus runs in the evenings and have
Saturday service prompted RVTD to apply for a $983,000 competitive Congestion Mitigation Air Quality
(CMAQ) Grant. If awarded, they could match the funds and provide the requested extended service for
three years. Additionally, RVTD could have a ballot measure in 2012 or 2014 to secure more hinds
through a tax increase. Ms. Brown stressed the need for the region to work together to leverage more
dollars and support projects.
Ms. Brown described how an enhancement or addition to the service RVTD provided pulled resources
from other areas within the District and used reinstating Route 15 as an example.
The City of Ashland needed to determine trip generators, resolve parking issues, encourage Southern
Oregon University (SOU) Student Services and employers to create pass programs, prioritize bike and
pedestrian transit, and commit to a three year plan with RVTD. It was a cost and resource burden for
RVTD to go through the contract renewal process annually.
She went on to provide a summary of the long-term Tier Plan that included:
Tier One,Extended Hours and Minor Service Ex ansion
Region Mayor Destination
Southeast Medford Barnett Rd x N Phoenix Rd/RVMC
Ex and service hours-4am 10 m All Routes except low productivity routes
West White City Table Rd x Antelope Rd
Saturday Service Base service from Sam to 6 m
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
October 3, 2011
Page 2 of 3
Tier Two,Tier One,Additional Routes,Express Routes,Peak Service
Region Mayor Destination
West and southwest Central Point Twin Creeks TOD
East Medford McAndrews Ed x Foothill Rd
Ashland Talent Phoenix Circulators West.of Hwy 99 in Talent and Phoenix/East of
Hwy 99 in Ashland
4 Hour Peak Service All Routes except low productivity routes
Southwest Medford/Jacksonville Stewart Ave x Lozier Rd
Express Routes(15 min)-to Ashland & White City Front St to Ashland Plaza & Front St to Cascade
Shopping Center
Northwest Medford Sae Rd x Rossanle Dr(North Gate Centre
Tier Three,Tier Two,Additional Routes/Grid Sy stem
Region Mayor Destination
Foothills Rd Corridor from Barnett to Coker Butte
Table Rock Rd Corridor from Midway Rd to Antelope Rd
Hwy 99 Corridor from Table Rock Rd to Scenic Ave
Delta Waters TOD Region not yet defined
South Ashland Region not yet defined
Direct airport service was not included in the plan. RVTD currently served the airport through their
Medford transfer hub. Alternately, private shuttles effectively addressed airport service. Saturday service
was limited from 5:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. with hourly runs but could change in the future once RVTD
better understood whom they were serving. Council was concerned Saturday hours were not compatible
with employees traveling to Ashland for work. RVTD would conduct a rider survey fall 2011. Mayor
Stromberg suggested collaborating with the Ashland Chamber of Commerce to determine rider focus.
Senior Planner Paige Townsend added RVTD was in contact with larger businesses, hospitals, and SOU
to tailor expanded service hours to hit key shift and class time changes.
Council suggested a cost study on Saturday service from 6:00 a.m. to midnight for people traveling to
jobs in Ashland. SOU had established a new research center in their Economics Department that could
possibly help with the study. Another Council concern was the City bearing the majority of cost and
resources for a bus pass subsidy when participating organizations should contribute.
Council and the Board discussed forming a team possibly consisting of Mayor Stromberg, Councilor
Chapman, Ms. Brown, Ms. Townsend, and other Board members to strategize lobbying for RVTD to
receive the CMAQ Grant.
Public Works Director Mike Faught noted the December 31, 2011 deadline regarding the reduced fare
program and summarized three possible options. One would end the reduced fare program and increase
free fare for low-income riders at an estimated cost of$50,000. The second option would create a new
program to provide a 50% subsidy for Ashland businesses at an estimated cost of $20,000. The third
would subsidize private shuttles for Ashland tourists.
Ms. Brown thought the highest priority was subsidizing low-income constituents. As for subsidizing bus
pass programs for businesses, she suggested the City meet with RVTD TDM Planner Nathan Broom and
work with a small committee to explore that option. RVTD had funds and the City should only pay a
small subsidy, if any. An alternative would have businesses subsidize bus passes enough so the employee
could purchase the pass at a deep discount. She did not encourage developing a private shuttle service
unless the City felt the need. She thought the City should invest in Option 1 and Option 2 only if the
CITY COUNCIL STUDYSESSION
October 3, 2011
Page 3 of 3
amount allocated to subsidize business pass programs was lower. She reiterated the cost effectiveness of
having a longer contract with RVTD.
Council supported subsidizing low-income riders. There was a concern committing to a two year contract
to buy down bus fares when there was no supporting data. Additionally, some thought employers should
develop their own bus pass programs.
Ms. Townsend explained Ashland could establish parking management policies through the planning
process that require major trip generators to consider vehicular reduction strategies like car sharing,
commuter resources, buss pass programs, and car pooling at no cost to the City.
If RVTD failed to obtain the CMAQ grant, they would maintain present service without Saturday runs or
extended hours. However, RVTD would continue to look for money to fund those services.
Meeting adjourned at 6:55 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Dana Smith
Assistant to the City Recorder