HomeMy WebLinkAboutChurch_151_PA-2011-01377 IY OF
November 9,2011
Steve Schein
2208 Lupine Drive
Ashland, OR 97520
RE: Planning Action#2011-01377
Notice of Final Decision
On November 9, 2011,the Staff Advisor for the Ashland Planning Division administratively approved
your request for the following:
PLANNING ACTION: 2011-01377
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 151 Church Street
APPLICANT: Steve Schein
DESCRIPTION: A request for a Modification to a 2005 Minor Land Partition(2005-004)for a Building
Envelope Modification and a Tree Removal Permit to address six(6)trees which were removed without
permits following the partition approval. The request also involves the request to remove two(2)
additional trees which are located within the modified building envelope.Additionally, based on a slope
analysis conducted by an Oregon Licensed Surveyor,the Planning Director has determined the proposed
development is not subject to the Development Standards for Hillside Lands because the slope,based on
the natural grade of the property is less than 25%. The Development Standards for Hillside Land apply to
lands with slopes 25%and greater. The applicant has submitted a slope analysis establishing the natural
grade of the property between 18.8 and 20.3%. The subject property is located at 151 Church Street.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential;ZONING: R-1-7.5;
ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 08AA; TAX LOT: 5202
The Staff Advisor's decision becomes final and is effective on the 13th day after the Notice of Final
Decision is mailed.
Prior to the final decision date, anyone who was mailed this Notice Of Final Decision may request a
reconsideration of the action by the Staff Advisor as set forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance
(ALUO) 18.108.070(B)(2)(b)and/or file an appeal to the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in
the ALUO 18.108.070(B)(2)(c).
An appeal may not be made directly to the Land Use Board of Appeals. Oregon law states that failure to
raise an objection concerning this application,by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford
the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue,precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that
issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your right of
appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to
proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the
issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court.
The application,all associated documents and evidence submitted, and the applicable criteria are available
for review at no cost at the Ashland Community t3 Development Department, located at 51 Winburn Wa y.
i
Copies of file documents can be requested and are charged based on the City of Ashland copy fee
schedule.
i
i
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel:541.488-5305
51 Winburn Way Fax:541-552-2050
Ashland,Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900
www.ashland,or.us
i
i
If you have any questions regarding this decision,please contact the Community Development
Department between the hours of 8:00 am and 4:30 pm,Monday through Friday at(541)488-5305.
cc: Parties of record and property owners within 200 ft
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel:541-488-5305
51 Winburn Way Fax:541-552-2050
Ashland,Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900
www.ashland,or,us
ASHLAND PLANNING DIVISION
FINDINGS & ORDERS
PLANNING ACTION: 2011-01377
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 151 Church Street
APPLICANT: Steve Schein
DESCRIPTION: A request for a Modification to a 2005 Minor Land Partition (2005-004) for a
Building Envelope Modification and a Tree Removal Permit to address six(6)trees,which were removed
without, permits following the partition approval. The request also involves the request to remove two (2)
additional trees, which are located within the modified building envelope.Additionally, based on a slope
analysis conducted by an Oregon Licensed Surveyor, the Planning Director has determined the proposed
_development is not subject to the Development Standards for Hillside Lands because the slope,based on the
natural grade of the property is less than 25%. The Development Standards for Hillside Land apply to lands
with slopes 25%and greater. The applicant has submitted a slope analysis establishing the natural grade of
the property between 1-8.8 and 20.3%. The subject property is located at 151 Church Street. j
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential;
ZONING: R-1-7.5; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 08AA; TAX LOT: 5202
SUBMITTAL DATE: October 4, 2011
DEEMED COMPLETE DATE: October 20, 2011
STAFF APPROVAL DATE: November 9, 2011
APPEAL DEADLINE: November 21, 2011
FINAL DECISION DATE: November 22, 2011
APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE: November 22, 2012
DECISION
The subject property is located on the north side of Church Street between Scenic Dr. and Almond St.
The subject property was created through a two-lot partition in 2005. The parcel slopes at approximately
20 percent to the northeast. There is an existing flag driveway and developed flag lot behind the subject
property.
i
At the time of the partition,there were seventeen trees on the subject parcel. In May 2006, a
Modification of the 2005 Partition was applied for to allow for the removal of four trees from the
property. Following the tree removal approval in 2006, six of the remaining trees on the property were
removed without permits. Two additional trees are requested to be removed as part of this application.
This application is to address the removed trees and to modify the approved building footprint.
Additionally,the adopted Physical and Environmental Constraints map shows the northeast portion of
the property in the Hillside Zone and subject to the requirements of the Physical and Environmental
Constraints ordinance (18.62). The applicant had a slope analysis performed by an Oregon Licensed
Surveyor and that analysis demonstrates that the properties slope is not the natural grade, was likely cuts,
and fill created when the home was constructed at 157 Church Street in the 1970s.
The applicant's findings state that a number of the trees have been replanted on the subject property and
on other properties under the ownership of the property owner. The application requests to mitigate the
PA#2011-01377
151 Church Street/adg
Page 1
removals on site and on other property owned by the applicant and by the person purchasing the
property. In staff's opinion, some of the trees should be mitigated for on-site and the remaining trees
shall have a payment in lieu of planting fee paid into the City of Ashland tree fund. That way the
mitigated trees and the verification of compliance is not scattered over numerous properties throughout
town. A condition to this effect has been added.
The application includes a request to modify the approved building footprint. The previously approved
footprint,though conceptual, was generally in keeping with the building footprints of structures in the
impact area. This was demonstrated through having a detached garage, front porch near the front
property line, narrow facade and longer projection towards rear of the property. The previous.footprint
size and the width of the front facade at the street are consistent with the development pattern in the
neighborhood. The average front facade near the property is 40-feet. The proposed front facade length is
50-feet. The Historic Commission reviewed the proposal at their November 2, 2011 meeting and felt
that based on the footprint and the setback the structure would not be in keeping with the historic
development pattern in the neighborhood and suggested that the garage be offset from the front facade of
the house by at a minimum of 10-feet. The applicant could also add a front porch that is within 8-feet of
the front property line. This would achieve two things, front porches are common design features in the
neighborhood and the addition of a porch would break-up the linear facade line and add some
architectural details to the front of the structure. These are recommendations since the construction is not
subject to the Site Design and Use Standards as it is single-family home construction presumably
meeting the other criteria from the code.
Staff finds that the applicant's findings for tree removal and subsequent mitigation measures, on-site or
payment in lieu of planting addresses the criteria from the code. Additionally,the building envelop
modification is approved and due to finding of the Oregon Registered Surveyor that the parcels natural
grade is less than 25% slopes and that the areas shown in the City's adopted maps are not accurate of the
topography on the site.
The criteria for a Tree Removal Permit are described in AMC Chapter 18.61.080, as follows:
!
An applicant for a Tree Removal Permit shall demonstrate that the following criteria are satisfied. The
Staff Advisor may require an arborist's report to substantiate the criteria for a permit.
i
A. Hazard Tree: The StaffAdvisor shall issue a tree removal permit for a hazard tree if the
applicant demonstrates that a tree is a hazard and warrants removal.
I
1. A hazard tree is a tree that is physically damaged to the degree that it is clear that it is likely
to fall and injure persons or property. A hazard tree may also include a tree that is located
within public rights of way and is causing damage to existing public or private facilities or
services and such facilities or services cannot be relocated or the damage alleviated. The
applicant must demonstrate that the condition or location of the tree presents a clear public
safety hazard or a foreseeable danger of property damage to an existing structure and such'
hazard or danger cannot reasonably be alleviated by treatment or pruning.
2. The City may require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each hazard tree pursuant
to AMC 18.61.084. Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the
permit.
i
PA#2011-01377
151 Church Street/adg
Page 2
B. Tree that is Not a Hazard.- The City shall issue a tree removal permit for a tree that is not a
hazard if the applicant demonstrates all of the following:
1. The tree is proposed for removal in order to permit the application to be consistent with
other applicable Ashland Land Use Ordinance requirements and standards. (e.g. other
applicable Site Design and Use Standards). The StaffAdvisor may require the building
footprint of the development to be staked to allow for accurate verification-of the permit
application; and
2. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on erosion, -soil stability,flow
of surface waters,protection of adjacent trees, oP existing windbreaks; and
3. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on the tree densities, sizes,
canopies, and species diversity within 200 feet of the subject property.
The City shall grant an exception to this criterion when alternatives to the tree removal have
been considered and no reasonable alternative exists to allow the property to be used as
permitted in the zone. Nothing in this section shall require that the residential density be
reduced below the permitted density allowed by the zone. In making this determination, the
City may consider alternative site plans or placement of structures or alternate landscaping
designs that would lessen the impact on trees, so long as the alternatives continue to comply
with other provisions of the Ashland Land Use Ordinance.
4. The City shall require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each tree granted approval
pursuant to AMC 18.61.084. Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval
of the permit.
The application with the attached conditions complies with all applicable City ordinances.
Planning Action 2 011-013 77 is approved with the following conditions. Further, if any one or more of
the following conditions are found to be invalid for any reason whatsoever, then Planning Action 2011-
01377 is denied. The following are the conditions and they are attached to the approval:
1) That all proposals of the applicant shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise modified
here.
2) That all recommendations of the Historic Commission from their November 2nd meeting,.where
consistent with applicable standards and with final approval by the Staff Advisor, shall be
conditions of approval unless otherwise modified herein.
i
3) That all recommendations of the Tree Commission from their November 3rd meeting,where
consistent with applicable standards and with final approval by the Staff Advisor, shall be
conditions of approval unless otherwise modified herein.
4) That building permit submittals shall include:
a) Solar setback calculations demonstrating that all new construction complies with Solar
Setback Standard A in the formula [(Height—6)/(0.445 +Slope).=Required Solar Setback]
I
PA#2011-01377
151 Church Street/adg
Page 3
and elevations or cross section drawings clearly identifying the highest shadow producing
point(s) and the height(s) from natural grade.
b) That calculations demonstrating compliance with the Maximum Permitted Floor Area in the
Historic District shall be submitted with the building permit.
c) Lot coverage calculations including all building footprints, driveways, parking, and
circulation areas. Lot coverage shall be limited to no more than the 45 percent allowed in the
R-1-7.5 zoning district.
5) That prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy:
a) That five (5), five—six foot tall conifer trees which will achieve similar size and stature at
maturity as the five (5) conifer trees removed shall be planted on-site and irrigated prior to the
issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the new residence. The trees shall be planted and
maintained according to the specifications in the City Tree Planting and Maintenance Guidelines.
b) That two (2) 1 %2 - inch caliper, eight-foot minimum height deciduous mitigation trees which will
equal or exceed the removed trees size and stature at maturity shall be planted on site prior to the
issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the new residence. The trees shall be planted and
maintained according to the specifications in the City Tree Planting and Maintenance Guidelines.
c) The applicant may also pay into the tree account the amount equivalent to the cost of buying and
planting the trees that would otherwise have been required to be planted on site,or a minimum of
$400.00. The applicant shall submit to the City of Ashland Planning Division, in writing, their
chosen option for mitigation prior to the tree removal.
l
-- i
0 f
B' olnar, irector Pate
epartment o. Community Development
i
I
i
1
PA#2011-01377
151 Church Street/adg
Page 4
i
PA-2011-01377 391E08AA 5500 PA-2011-01377 391E08AA 5200 PA-2011-01377 391E08AA 8600
AKER GLORIA N BECKER PORTIA BROWN ERIK E/NORTH JAMIE V
1209 NORTH VALLEY VIEW RD 157 CHURCH ST 164 CHURCH ST
ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520
PA-2011-01377 391EO8AA 5300 PA-2011-01377 391E08AA 5600 PA-2011-01377 391E08AA 8900
BROWN MARK K/CYNTHIA 0 HOLMAN MARGARET ETAL HOME DAVID A TRUSTEE FBO
171 CHURCH ST 1257 SISKIYOU BLVD#234 174 CHURCH ST
ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520
PA-2011-01377 391E08AA 5101 PA-2011-01377 391E08AA 5700 PA-2011-01377 391E08AA 8700
PLUMMER LOUIS PRENTISS TRUSTEE RITTLING ROBERT PETER/O-SHEA SALADOFF ROBERT TRUSTEE ET AL
117 ALMOND ST ANNEMARIE 151 MERGED AVE 150 CHURCH ST
ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94127
PA-2011-01377 391EO8AA 5202 PA-2011-01377 391E08AA 5800 PA-2011-01377 391E08AD 3301
SCHEIN STEVEN AARON TRUSTEE ET AL SHAFFER SUSAN ELIZABETH HAVARD TOEVS CORALIE
2208 LUPINE DR 129 ALMOND ST 170 CHURCH ST
ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520
PA-2011-01377 391E08AA 5000 PA-2011-01377 391E08AA 5400 PA-2011-01377 391E08AA 8100
WELCH LOUISE ANNA TRUSTEE ETAL WHITTEN J LORRAINE WIDNEY DOUGLAS
147 CHURCH ST 175 CHURCH ST 128 HILL PATH ST
ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 CORTE MADERA CA 94925
PA-2011-01377 391E08AA 8800 16
WILLIAMS JAMES LTRUSTEE ETAL 11-09-2011
160 CHURCH ST 151 Church
ASHLAND OR 97520 NOD
i
i
ii
Planning Department,51 Winb- Nay,Ashland,Oregon 97520 IT
541-488-5305 Fax:541-552-2050 www,ashland,orms TTY: 1-800-735-2900 ASHLAND
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
PLANNING ACTION: 2011-01377
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 151 Church
OWN E RIAPPLI CANT: Steve Schein
DESCRIPTION: A request for a Modification to a 2005 Minor Land Partition(2005-004) for a Building Envelope Modification
and a Tree Removal Permit to address six(6) trees which were removed without permits following the partition approval. The
request also involves the request to remove two(2)additional trees which are located within the modified building envelope.
Additionally, based on a slope analysis conducted by an Oregon Licensed Surveyor, the Planning Director has determined
the proposed development is not subject to the Development Standards for Hillside Lands because the slope, based on the
natural grade of the property is less than 25%. The Development Standards for Hillside Land apply to lands with slopes 25%
and greater. The applicant has submitted a slope analysis establishing the natural grade of the property between 18.8 and
20.3%. The subject property is located at 151 Church Street. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family
Residential,ZONING:R-1-7.5;ASSESSOR'S MAP:391E 08AA; TAX LOT:5202
NOTE: The Ashland Historic Commission will also review this Planning Action on November 2,2011 at 6:00 PM in the
Community Development and Engineering Services building(Siskiyou Room),located at 51 Winburn Way.
NOTE: The Ashland Tree Commission will also review this Planning Action on November 3,2011 at 6:00 p.m.in the Community
Development and Engineering Services building(Siskiyou Room)located at 51 Winburn Way.
NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: October 20, 2011
DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: November 3, 2011
y �
y
n.
t
�i�imrz�ro*ap t
\\ `\
' Y
a ?
l\
N
0 10 20 40 Kea{
The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted above.
Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submit written comments to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn
Way,Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m. on the deadline date shown above.
Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a
notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for a 14 day comment period. After the
comment period and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the
application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision, An appeal to the Planning Commission of the Planning
Division Staff's decision must be made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC
18.108.040)
The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this
application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of
appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals(LUBA)on that issue, Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your
right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with
sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court.
A copy of the application,all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be j
provided at reasonable cost, if requested. All materials are available at the Ashland Planning Division, Community Development&Engineering Services j
Building,51 Winburn Way,Ashland,Oregon 97520.
If you have questions or comments concerning this request,please feel free to contact the Ashland Planning Division at 541-488-5305,
comm- ev p ammng o ices ai a — j
TREE REMOVAL
18.61.080 Criteria for Issuance of Tree RE ,jval -Staff Permit
An applicant for a Tree Removal Permit shall demonstrate that the following criteria are satisfied. The Staff Advisor may require an
arborist's report to substantiate the criteria for a permit.
A. Hazard Tree: The Staff Advisor shall issue a tree removal permit for a hazard tree if the applicant demonstrates that a tree is a
hazard and warrants removal.
1. A hazard tree is a tree that is physically damaged to the degree that it is clear that it is likely to fall and injure persons or
property. A hazard tree may also include a tree that is located within public rights of way and is causing damage to existing
public or private facilities or services and such facilities or services cannot be relocated or the damage alleviated. The applicant
must demonstrate that the condition or location of the tree presents a clear public safety hazard or a foreseeable danger of
property damage to an existing structure and such hazard or danger cannot reasonably be alleviated by treatment or pruning.
2. The City may require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each hazard tree pursuant to AMC 18.61.084. Such
mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit.
B. Tree that is Not a Hazard: The City shall issue a tree removal permit for a tree that is not a hazard if the applicant demonstrates
all of the following:
1. The tree is proposed for removal in order to permit the application to be consistent with other applicable Ashland Land Use
Ordinance requirements and standards, including but not limited to applicable Site Design and Use Standards and Physical and
Environmental Constraints. The Staff Advisor may require the building footprint of the development to be staked to allow for
accurate verification of the permit application; and
2. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on erosion, soil stability, flow of surface waters, protection of
adjacent trees, or existing windbreaks; and
3. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on the tree densities, sizes, canopies, and species diversity
within 200 feet of the subject property. The City shall grant an exception to this criterion when alternatives to the tree removal
have been considered and no reasonable alternative exists to allow the property to be used as permitted in the zone. Nothing in
this section shall require that the residential density be reduced below the permitted density allowed by the zone. In making this
determination, the City may consider alternative site plans or placement of structures or alternate landscaping designs that
would lessen the impact on trees, so long as the alternatives continue to comply with other provisions of the Ashland Land Use
Ordinance.
4. The City shall require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each tree granted approval pursuant to AMC 18.61.084.
Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit.
(ORD 2951, 2008; ORD 2883, 2002)
GAcomm-dev\planningNotices Mailed\2011\2011.01377.docx
PA-2011-01377 391E08AA 5500 I'A-2011-01377 391E08AA 5200 rA-2011-01377 391E08AA 8600
AKER GLORIA N BECKER PORTIA BROWN ERIK E/NORTH JAMIE V
1209 NORTH VALLEY VIEW RD 157 CHURCH ST 164 CHURCH ST
ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520
PA-2011-01377 391E08AA 5300 PA-2011-01377 391E08AA 5600 PA-2011-01377 391E08AA 8900
BROWN MARK K/CYNTHIA 0 HOLMAN MARGARET ET AL HOME DAVID A TRUSTEE FBO
171 CHURCH ST 1257 SISKIYOU BLVD#234 174 CHURCH ST
ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520
PA-2011-01377 391E08AA 5101 PA-2011-01377 391E08AA 5700 PA-2011-01377 391E08AA 8700
PLUMMER LOUIS PRENTISS TRUSTEE ET RITTLING ROBERT PETER/O'SHEA SALADOFF ROBERT TRUSTEE ETAL
AL ANNEMARIE 150 CHURCH ST
117 ALMOND ST 151 MERCED AVE ASHLAND OR 97520
ASHLAND OR 97520 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94127
PA-2011-01377 391E08AA 5202 PA-2011-01377 391E0BAA 5800 PA-2011-01377 391E08AD 3301
SCHEIN STEVEN AARON TRUSTEE ETAL SHAFFER SUSAN ELIZABETH HAVARD TOEVS CORALIE
2208 LUPINE DR TRU ETAL 170 CHURCH ST
ASHLAND OR 97520 129 ALMOND ST ASHLAND OR 97520
ASHLAND OR 97520
PA-2011-01377 391E08AA 5000 PA-2011-01377 391E08AA 5400 PA-2011-01377 391E08AA 8100
WELCH LOUISE ANNA TRUSTEE ET AL WHITTEN J LORRAINE WIDNEY DOUGLAS
147 CHURCH ST 175 CHURCH ST 128 HILL PATH ST
ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 CORTE MADERA CA 94925
PA-2011-01377 391E08AA 8800 16
WILLIAMS JAMES L TRUSTEE ET AL 10-20-2011
160 CHURCH ST 151 church
ASHLAND OR 97520 NOC
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
STATE OF OREGON )
County of Jackson )
The undersigned being first duly sworn states that:
1. 1 am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland,
Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department.
2. On October 20, 2011 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed
envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to
each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list
under each person's name for Planning Action #2011-01377, 151 Church.
' t jg� e%P
Signatye of Employee
I
i
i
i
i
I
I
i
i
i
Gkomm-devlplanningTorms&HandoutslAfBdavit of Mailing—Planning Action Notice.doc
i
i
i
' ''• IHNOLOG Y
�y.a ,• �� ' ker
Application
Property Data Online Legend
g g
� Hi hl{ ht eld Feature
theBuffer
^
theBufferTarget
Tex Loi Outlines
i
Tax Lot Numbers
°
,
^
1804 mo
�3
s r
U �
3400
410
70-2
q�
a
720 41
e_ w
i
a
420 4101 'fit
4102 00
a f
440 4100 �
e,
, t
{
{
101
o'
,i
�d, { d
^t."Y11Rr
tY
JACKSON
A COUNTY
•e g p tt
This ma Is based on a digital database
-•.y '�. �y,�, a' 9 compiled by Jackson County From a variety
` a ..= of sources,Jackson County annot accept
4100 ( '� r 2700
sr '+ rasp nsiblly for errors missions,or
f positional accuracy.There are no
warranties,expressed or Implied.
Please recycle with colored office grade paper Created with MapMaker Map created on 1012012011 12:13:30 PM using web.lacksoncounty.org
Proposed building envelope modification for Vacant lot on 151 Church st.
As recommended in the pre-application meeting,the following is designed to show a history of what has
been approved for this lot, and what is being requested as a modification for the last approval period.
There are many maps in existence for this lot. For the purposes of this process I am including as exibit#1
a map that shows all the trees originally located on the lot.
Over several approval proceses,there was permission granted to remove 8 trees from the property.
Referencing Exhibit 1 those trees were numbered as follows, 1,3,4,5,15,16,17,21. These trees were
mitigate as follows. (use exhibit 2 to reference mitigated trees)
1. Oak tree, replaced by Mimosa Tree (a)
3. Pine with Scotch Pine (b)
4. Pine with Arbor Vita (c)
5. Maple with Maple (d)
15. Pine with Arbor Vita (e)
16. Birch with Magnolia (f)
17. Pine with Arbor Vita (g) Has since died, needs to be remittigated.
21. Pine from Lot 2 was mitigated with a pine on lot 1 not on the map.
Additional Trees to be removed (all but 2 are already dead or gone from the lot as stated in the
Preapp.
2,6,7,8,9,10,11,14.
Including the tree that has died above for 17,this makes a total of 9 trees to be mitigated on the lot
in lieu of those already gone and those to be removed (6,7)
Trees 6,and 7 need to be removed in order to allow for the construction of the proposed footprint
of the residence exibit 3, and who's root system would not survive the excavation necessary for the
foundation.
Builder of the new home proposed for the lot has agreed to plant the 9 trees on the lot to mitigate
the trees removed for the building.This would be done in accordance with the AMC 18.61 . and
meet the approval criteria as outlined under the "Tree protection Measures Required" see exhibit
#4(please note new numbers on trees for clarity purposes)
All of the trees listed above that remain on the property are fully watered by an-active drip and
sprinkler system that has been operating successfully since 2005.
OCT 4 11
j
Supplemental.
In order to address required items as listed in preapp, please reference this document.
Plan requirements,
Part A,#2, a, exhibit A shows locations and specific diameters of trees. City of Ashland has on file,
specific species information for all trees that were on property through all application processes.
Newer trees have been listed on exibit#2.
B, each tree has its own drip already to it. And has existed since 2005, health of these trees is
directly related to working drip system
C, proposed residence and driveway, Exhibit#4, utilities, easements etc, exhibit#1.
D, no dry wells,
E, exhibits#1,#3,#4 have existing and proposed structures on the properties.
F, builder working with City to determine what if any slope issues may affect this particular issue.
G, Exibit#1, show existing impervious surfaces, Exhibit#3 and#4 show proposed new impervious
surfaces.
H,To be provided.
I, Exibit#4 shows this.
Plans Addressing submittal requirements for tree removal Permit
All these are addressed clearly in the proposal, except as contained here.
B.trees will be removed prior to start of construction.
C.Trees need to be removed to accomdate footprint of proposed residence for lot.
D. Builder will mitigate all trees identified in the plan, with all necessary drip systems in place for
healthy growth.
E. The 2 Trees proposed for removal are clearly marked with fluorescent tape/ribbon.
OCT II
I
4 2011 l
i
-Z
0
COED LL2 L-7
it
11
it v i
it
ii
ui
ID
A Asti
LL:
ti ji
it
CD til
-------- ----------
----------
LI
C,4
t/
wa
LL
vc,
Vaz
W& la l
4,
I
A
I
�JJ J,
1111
ZZ
LLJ
a3j r�y�; ,lli
I
J
N
ti
r y -.
'®r �
R 2A
�
3ffx n=ma��m Em m Qm ISmm .v a�m� e m m vNT,
a�=rmiow° $m �m�Q fig_ c� v Q
°-
�
..'9raa N�i°-mm;° °
'Pig H = ._m 1 E EQ= _ - o
� Hui � p ��b h�v we°a'SS ma m��r "w pnnav gym° s � N
��
o � � � 'c�°w'v� QOr=�iNd�¢
�L9°d lJ
jig$ r a` Qa=tu m._�aU���muic vli�3:? (7 mimeo 33S a y N o
_
a
U O p ti 0
t O
M �
v 3
XS Yi � 3t a
z i
Pip
St
t
y $
U
J O
IFI�
Z� U U o
5: LLI Lo Q 0310
C4 LO N m
4,C.�C) It '.I N -I� 0 UW� Q M 010 I
If wo wj zT �xU(y W•-
W E RI2 RR °F E w w (n®W00 000
�w� axm o W al�d 2
ci;
ap � a � I j a�A oa<x" a aZ OnQU
zto ,0
ct)
r-
0
N
v
0
z
3Nl GUM 9NLLS1X3 X 9-91 --,,
,80'6Z - 3„04,Z,-.6,- N - Ld
9/r�. A _ .00o �C
I eti m
0
J Y 8Z Lti 5
i
i
Lei OO�ZgZ s I �I m
I y WSW I I O
�� I New � Ilyy a
4 Q I n W 11 ry 9 1S Ho�1HHJ L91 y
ZONING MIT APPLICATI ON
Planning Division
51 Winbum Way,Ashland OR 97520 4
ASHLAND
CITY o F 541-488-5305 Fax 541-488-6006 FILE# // f
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Pursuing LEED®Certification? 1:1 YES 11 NO
Street Address 15,) k r 34
Assessor's Map No.39 1 E Tax Lots)
Zoning r 75 Comp Plan Designation
APPLICANT / //
Name �1' Jec Ae r �`1 Phone ` q E-Mail YC n e,05� (P S6,4,ec
Address ) )O� �`�P'°" City A hV-Jc`'1o( Zip 0
PROPERTY OWNER /f /r
Name s F1 t Phone 9y I !,Q(v E-Mail
Address . City A 0pe"dX Zip
SURVEYOR ENGINEER ARCHITECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT,OTHER �� �7
Title � � Name l/ Phone.-ql ' 72 E-Mail
Address City 14SIgl� /" ) Zip Zr
Title Name Phone E-Mail
Address City Zip
I hereby certify that the statements and information contained in this application,including the enclosed drawings and the required findings of fact, are in all respects,
true and correct. I understand that all property pins must be shown on the drawings and visible upon the site inspection. In the event the pins are not shown or their
location found to be incorrect, the owner assumes full responsibility. I further understand that if this request is subsequently contested, the burden will be on me to
establish:
1) that I produced sufficient factual evidence at the hearing to support this request;
2) that the findings of fact furnished justifies the granting of the request;
3) that the findings of fact furnished by me are adequate;and further
4) that all structures or improvements are properly located on the ground.
Failure in this regar "i!1 result most li �iry of only the request being set aside, but also possibly in my structures being built in reliance thereon being required to
be removed at my l he 1b m advised to seek competent professional advice 'd as tance.
; 1 /
Applicant' ignature Date
o owner of the pro erty involved i 4"reuest q , I have read and understood the complete application and its consequences to me as a property
owner. 9 Lr3
Property ner's Sig tune (required) Date
[To be completed by City Staff)
Date Received ` _ �` Zoning Permit Type2 Filing Fee$ � '
f
OVER 0
C:\Documents and Settings\lucasa\Desktop�Zoning Permit Application.doc
ua,
...........
Job Address: 151 CHURCH ST Contractor:
ASHLAND OR 97520 Address:
G;
A Owner's Name: SCHEIN STEVEN A/PATRICIA A Phone:
Customer#: 02178 State Lic No:.
SCHEIN STEVEN A/PATRICIA A 1 City Lic No:
�- Applicant: 167 CHURCH ST ER'
Address: ASHLAND OR 97520 A
G, Sub-Contractor:
A Phone: T Address:
N Applied: 10/04/2011
Issued:
Expires: 04101/2012 Phone:
State Lic No:
Maplot: 391 E08AA5202 City Lic No:
DESCRIPTION: Building envelope modification for vacant lot
Address is 151 Church St.
VALUATION
Occupancy Type Construction Units Rate Amt Actual Amt Constuction Description
Total for Valuation:
MEC14ANIGAL .
ELGTRICL
STRUCTURAL
PERMIT FEE DETAIL
Fee Description Amount Fee Description Amount
Residential Site Review 963.00
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tel: 541-488-5305
20 East Main St. Fax: 541-488-5311
Ashland, OR 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900
www.ashland.or.us
Inspection Request Line: 541-552-2080 CITY F
P'
I hereby certify the contents of this application to be correct to the
best of my knowledge, and furthermore,that I have read, Fee Summary Paid Amounts
understood and agreed to the following:
Building: $ 0.00 $ 0.00
1. This permit shall remain valid only in accordance with code State Surcharge: $ 0.00 $ 0.00
or regulation provisions relating to time lapse and revocation Development Fees: $ 0.00 $ 0.00
(180 days).
2. Work shall not proceed past approved inspection stage. All Systems Development Charges: $ 0.00 $ 0.00
required inspections shall be called for 24 hours in advance. Utility Connection Fees: $ 0.00 $ 0.00
3. Any modifications in plans or work shall be reported in
advance to the department. Public Works Fees: $ 0.00 . $ 0.00
4. Responsibility for complying with all applicable federal, state, Planning Fees: $ 963.00 $ 963.00
or local laws, ordinances, or regulations rests solely with the
applicant. Sub-Total: $ 963.00
Fees Paid: $ 963.00
Applicant Date Total Amount Due: $ 0
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tel: 541-488-5305
20 East Main St. Fax: 541-488-5311
Ashland,OR 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900
www.ashland.or.us
I T OF
Inspection Request Line: 541-552-2080
Y