HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994-0719 Council Mtg PACKET Important: Any citizen attending Council meetings may speak on any item on the agenda, unless it is the
subject of a public hearing which has been closed. If you wish to speak, please fill out the Speaker
Request form located near the entrance to the Council Chambers. The-Chair will recognize you and
inform you as to the amount of time allotted to you. The time granted will be dependent to some extent
on the nature of the item under discussion, the number of people who wish to be h d, and the length of
the agenda.
AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING
ASHLAND CITY COUNCIL
July 19, 1994
I. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: 7:00 p.m., Civic Center Council Chambers
II. ROLL CALL
M. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Regular Meeting of July 5, 1994.
IV. CONSENT AGENDA:
1. Minutes of Boards, Commissions and Committees.
2. Monthly departmental reports - June, 1994.
3. Confirmation of Mayor's appointment of Nancy Kerr to the Tree Commission for a term
expiring April 30, 1995.
4. Letter from City of Medford regarding protection of water quality in Bear Creek. /
5. Confirmation of appointment of City Attorney Paul Nolte as judge pro tempore for July 24,
1994 only.
6. Ratification of Historic Commission decision for demolition of house only at 168 Meade
Street, Ashland.
7. Ratification of wage rates for Electrical Workers pursuant to existing contract formula` -
V. PUBLIC FORUM: Business from the audience not included on the agenda (limited to 3 minutes per
speaker and 15 minutes total).
Vl. UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
1. Letter from A. Anderson and C. Wood, requesting that Council overturn Parks Commission
rule regarding drumming and amplified instruments in City Parks.
2. Report from City Attorney on application of ADA to proposed pedestrian walkway on Clark
Avenue (PA #94-056, Don Greene , applicant).
3. Set date for study session for sewage treatment alternatives.
VII. NEW & MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS:
1. Request by Councillor Hauck to discuss merger of SOREDI and SOEDD, and Ashland grant.
2. Draft of proposed Ordinance by Councillor Laws regarding amendments to Charter and
Ashland Municipal Code on sale of water outside the city limits.
VIII. ORDINANCES. RESOLUTIONS & CONTRACTS:
x1. First reading by title only of "An Ordinance adding Section 15.04.110 to the Ashland
Municipal Code to adopt Oregon park trailer installation standards, recreational vehicle
accessory structure and accessory building standards and Oregon recreational vehicle siting
standards; providing for the issuance of permits and the collection of fees.
2. First reading by title only of "An Ordinance adding Chapter 4.27 to the Ashland Municipal
Code concerning the establishment of a storm drainage utility and storm drainage utility fees.
3. Reading by title only of "A Resolutign of the City Council of the City of Ashland authorizing
preliminary marketing activities relating to the sale of water revenue bonds under the
Uniform Revenue Bond Act".
-/4. Reading by title only of "A Resolution-adopting a Transportation and Storm Drain Utility
— --T l Rate Schedule pursuant to Section 4.26.020 of the Ashland Municipal Code".
9 . Reading by title only of "A Resolution-dedicating property for park purposes pursuant to
[ Article M, Section 3, of the City Charter (Gunter properties)".
IX. OTHER BUSINESS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS
X. ADJOURNMENT
MINUTM FOR THE REGULAR MEETING
ASHLAND CITY COUNCIL
July 5, 1994
CALLED TO ORDER
Mayor Golden called'the meeting to order at 5:03 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Councillors Laws, Reid, Hauck, Acklin, Winthrop and Arnold were present.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Minutes of the Regulai'meeting of June 21,`4994 were amended to read: Public Hearing,
page 2, 13, change "He-was in favor of..." to "He was opposed to..."; ew and
Miscellaneous Business, item #1, page 3, 12, insert "Laws/Amold m/s to accept reports
presented and tavi staff'gather the information...". Minutes were accepted as amended.,
CONSENT AGENDA"''`'`"
1. Minutes of Boards, Commissions and Committees.
2. 'Monthly depac'tmenia_1 reports_June;1994.
3. City Administrator's Monthly Report -June, 1994.
4. Adoption of findings of fad, conclusion and order for PA #94-057, a conditional
use permit and site review for an electrical substation on Mountain Avenue (City
of Ashland, applicant),
Councillor Winthrop requested Item #4 be moved to New Business.
Councillors Winthrop/Reid m/s adoption of Consent Agenda items #1-3. Voice vote all
AYES. Motion passed.
'PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Proposed adoption of revised water rate schedules.
Director of Finance Jill Turner presented_information on proposed adoption of revised water
rate schedules. Raise in'rates is needed for planned bond sale; in anticipation of limits
•imposed under new tax law ("Son of 5"); guarantee "rate covenant" enough to be raised to
cover debt service. Turner advised Council that it was possible there would no increase
needed for at least 2 years. Turner noted that the "block design" rate schedule was chosen.
Public Hearing was opened at 5:15 p.m.
Rick Landt, 487 Rock Street, spoke to Council in support of water rate increases. He
requested that in addition to tiered water rates, Council consider seasonal rates that would be
increased during summer months and decreased during winter months.
(r.Mkxe=N73-94.mW Page I
I !
Public Hearing closed at 5:25,p.m.
Councillors Acklin/Reid m/s adoption of Resolution 9444. Councillor Reid suggested a need
for a Conservation Commission to be established. Roll call vote: Laws, Reid, Hauck,
Acklin, Winthrop, Arnold YES. Motion passed.
PUBLIC FORUM: Business from the audience not included on the agenda (limited to 3
minutes per speaker and 15 minutes total).
None.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Staff report on recommendation on administration of low-income heating
assistance program.
City Administrator Brian Almquist read the memorandum from Senior Program Director
. Sharon Laws recommending City administration'of program. Councillors Amold/Winthrop
m/s approval of staff recommendation. Voice vote all AYES. Motion passed.
2. Report from City Attorney on application of ADA to proposed pedestrian
walkway on Clark Avenue (PA 1/94-056;Don-Greene , applicant).
Continued to July 19, 1994 meeting.
3. Set date for study session for sewage treatment alternatives.
Continued to July 19, 1994 meeting.
Consent Agenda item #4. Adoption of findings of fact, conclusion and order for PA
//94-057, a conditional use permit and site review for an
electrical substation on Mountain Avenue (City of Ashland,
applicant).
Councillor Winthrop suggested changing findings to read: page 8, 1.8.6 ..."Even if it were to
be considered, we find that the construction of the substation will not cause significantly
greater exposure of EMF to adjacent properties or to the public, using the park or Mountain
Avenue. is negligible.
Councillors Arnold/Winthrop m/s to approve amended adoption of findings of fact,
conclusion and order. Voice vote all AYES. Motion passed. .
(r.Mmwa\73-93.meJ Me 2
NEW & MiSCELLANFAUS BUSINESS
1. Letter from Arthur Anderson and Chris Wood requesting that City Council
overturn Parks & Recreation Commission rule regarding drumming and
amplified instruments in Uthia Park.
Councillor Laws asked what authority Council has over Parks & Recreation Commission
rulings. City Attorney presented AMC 10.68.030 for clarification on process.
Speaking in opposition to the ban on drumming:.----'-
Arthur Anderson, 13 N. Main #1,,read his letter to Council.opposing the ban on drumming.
Anderson also stated he supports drumming;Ibut is more,concerned with what he perceives
as the complaints from a few people effecting,the actions taken by'the Police Department and
the Parks & Recreation Commission at the expense of those in favor of drumming in the
Park
Kenneth Baldwin, 917 Buckhorn Road, Happy Camp, California, supports outdoor drumming
and feels it is a part of Ashland's cultural mix. '
Gwen Davies, 860 Harmony Lane, read her,lettei to Council opposing the ban on drumming.
She requested one standard be imposed.
Kim Clough, 134 Church Street, spoke in opposition to the ban on drumming and to moving
drumming to another location.
Gina Dusenberry, 343 Granite Street, spoke in opposition to the ban on drumming. She lives
on the perameter of Uthia Park and has experienced a variety of musical instruments being
played in the Park at different times. She hopes the Council will honor all types of music.
Pam Vellutini, 181 Patrick Lane, is an elementary school teacher in Ashland School District
who teaches drumming.to students. She has found drumming to be a therapeutic exercise for
at-risk students to aid in their emotional expression.
Patricia Aulik, 456 N. Laurel, is a percussion teacher. - -
Malana Kim Love, 2474/2 N. Laurel, is a drumming student.
Katrina Hill, 477 Scenic Drive, spoke in favor of drumming being allowed in Ashland Parks.
She suggested the Bandshell.be used for "casual" drumming during unoccupied hours and
asked that specific hours be designated.
Chris Wood, 121 Strawberry Lane, spoke in favor of drumming being allowed in Lithia
Park. He is an acoustic consultant. Wood-was the individual that contracted with the Parks
(r.MmmcsV4-94.mio)page
Department for the drumming event on June 18. He hoped a compromise solution could be
negotiated.
A letter from Frances Sharkey and Louise Samuelson, 163 Granite Street, was made part of
the record.
Speaking in favor of the ban on drumming:
Robert J. Malone, 47 Granite Street, Parks & Recreation Commissioner, spoke to Council on
background process for decision made by Commission. Commission had decided after
weighing effects of drumming being allowed versus other varieties of parks use. A
compromise solution is being considered to allow drumming in the center field area of the
Ashland Middle School property during non-school hours.
Councillor Reid stated neighbors on Granite Street felt a compromise had been reached
regarding this issue. They understood that drumming would be allowed during certain hours.
Councillor Winthrop stated Council should defer to the Parks & Recreation Commission's
decision. Councillor Winthrop suggested Parks & Recreation Commission present further
information to Council during the July 19 Council meeting.
Councillor Arnold asked that Council postpone any decision until the Parks & Recreation
Commission can be present during the July 19 meeting.
Councillor Laws stated he was concerned by the letter of appeal and would defer to the
decision made by the Parks & Recreation Commission unless there appeared to be a glaring
error in that decision.
Councillor Hauck supported a reasonable regulation and feels a complete ban is
discriminatory.
Councillor Acklin stated the right to peace and quiet in the Parks needed to be acknowledged
as necessary, too. Councillor Acklin hoped the Parks & Recreation Commission would be
open to a compromise resolution.
i
Councillors Winthrop/Reid m/s to continue this discussion in conjunction with the Parks &
Recreation Commission at the July 19 Council meeting. Voice vote: Laws, Reid, Acklin,
Winthrop, Arnold YES; Hauck NO. Motion passed.
2. Letter from Brent Thompson requesting permission to sandblast building exterior
in the downtown area between 12 midnight and 9:00 a.m.
City Administrator Almquist stated it was not necessary to bring this request before Council
because the AMC referred to construction noise in residential areas and this would take place
(r.MmuIm%75-94.mua)page 4
in a commercial district. Councillor Acklin has information on damaging effects of
sandblasting historic buildings and will provide it to Almquist. Almquist will notify Brent
Thompson with the information.
3. Letter from Glen M. Ward requesting reconsideration of agreement to exchange
access easement relocation on city-owned land for City water connection.
Glen M. Ward, 537 Dead Indian Memorial Road, read his letter to Council requesting
Council reconsider his original request. This property has three wells that have failed. Water
has been trucked in to property for last six years. City previously allowed water connection
to Ashland Bible Church on Dead Indian Memorial Road and to Ashland Vineyards on Bast
Main Street.
Councillor Reid moved to reconsider the request. Motion died for lack of a sedond. .
Council discussed pros and cons of establishing set policy on selling water to residents
outside of City limits.
George F. Ward, 841 Beswick Way, requested Council reconsider policy to allow "good
faith" policy between Ashland Municipal Airport property and the property at 537 Dead
Indian Memorial Road to continue. Fire protection at airport is of concern to City and to
Ward family.
ORDINANCES RESOLUTIONS & CONTRACTS
1. Second reading by title only of "An Ordinance establislft a.Municipal Electrical
Program for the Administration and Enforcement of the Electrical Code".
Councillors Hauck/Arnold m/s adoption of Ordinance 2738. Roll call vote: Laws, Reid,
Hauck, Acklin, Winthrop, Arnold YES. Motion passed.
2. Second reading by title only of "An Ordinance amending the franchise with TCI
Cablevision regarding PEG access fee".
Councillors Hauck/Arnold m/s adoption of Ordinance 2737. Roll call vote: Laws, Reid,
Hauck, Acklin, Winthrop, Arnold YES. Motion passed.
3. First reading by title only of "An Ordinance adding Section 15.04.110 to the
Ashland Municipal Code to adopt Oregon park trailer installation standards,
recreational vehicle accessory structure and accessory building standards and
Oregon recreational vehicle siting standards; providing for the issuance of
permits and the collection of fees.
Continued to July 19. `
4. Reading by title only of "A Resolution adopting Water Rate Schedules pursuant
to Section 14.04.030 of the Ashland Municipal Code".
See Public Hearing item.
5. Reading by title only of "A Resolution adopting a Transportation and Storm
Drain Utility Rate Schedule pursuant to Section 4.26.020 of the Ashland
Municipal Code".
Continued to July 19 meeting.
6. Reading by title only of "A Resolution authorizing the acquisition of an easement
for the purpose of construction of the Ashland Municipal Airport tie-down apron
expansion and taxi-way connector".
Councillors Hauck/Laws m/s adoption of Resolution 94-45. Roll call vote: Laws, Reid,
Hauck, Ackiin, Winthrop, Arnold YES. Motion passed.
OTHER BUSINESS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS
Councillors Winthrop/Hauck m/s to place memorandum from City Attorney regarding
Sullivan v. City of Ashland, LUBA No. 94-034 on Agenda. Voice vote all AYES.
City Attorney reviewed memorandum with Council. Councillors Acklin/Arnold m/s to
approve recommendation to appeal LUBA decision to the Court of Appeals. Voice vote all
AYES.
ADJOURNMENT
Meeting was adjourned at 7:10 p.m.
Nan E. Franklin, Recorder Catherine M. Golden, Mayor
(r.Mi. tr%7-5-94=iO pogo 6
Monthly Building Activity Report: 05/94 Page 1
# Units Value
SINGLE/MULTI-FAMILY & TOURIST ACCOMODATIONS:
Building:
ADDENDUM TO REMODEL 1 1,000
ADDITION 2 69,500
ADDITION OF 72 SUITES 1 1,485,000
CARPORT 1 3 ,577
DEMOLITION OF SHED 1 0
DRYWELL 1 525
FENCE 5 3 ,575
GAS LINE/GAS STOVE 1 1,938
INTERIOR REMODEL/GARAGE 1 5,000
INTERIOR SPRINKLER SYSTEM 1 4 ,000
MANUFACT HOME/ATTACH GAR 1 45., 300
REAPPLICATION AS CONTRACT 1 0
REBUILD PORCH/SERVICE CHG 1 5,000
REMODEL 1 2,500
REMODEL & ADDITION 4 432,000
REROOF 1 5,900
REROOF & TWO SKYLIGHTS 1 12 ,000
REVISION OF PLANS 1 0
SFR 9 1, 358,288
Subtotal: $ 3 , 435, 103
Electrical:
1 BR CIR FOR GAS FURNACE 1 200
2 BR CIR FOR HEAT PUMP 1 200
RAISING RISER ON SERVICE 1 190
SECURITY SYSTEM 1 1,270
SERVICE CHANGE 1 500
TEMP POWER 1 137
Subtotal: $ 2,497
Mechanical:
3 TON HEAT PUMP (NO ELECT 1 2 ,816
A/C & 1 BR CIR 1 2, 620
GAS LINE TO GAS RANGE 1 200
GAS LINE/FURN (NO ELECT) 1 4,519
GAS LINE/FURN/ 1 BR CIR 1 1,958
GAS LINE/FURN/l BR CIR 1 2,038
GAS LINE/FURN/ELECT 1 2 ,830
Monthly Building Activity Report: 05/94 Page 2
# Units Value
SINGLE/MULTI-FAMILY & TOURIST ACCOMODATIONS:
Mechanical:
GAS LINES TO 4 APPLIANCES 1 200
GFAU & A/C / 1 BR CIR 1 4, 200
INSTALL GAS FURNACE 1 3,400
ZERO CLEARANCE FIREPLACE 1 675
Subtotal: $ 25,456
Plumbing:
ADD 3 BATHROOM FIXTURES 1 1, 300
ELECT TO GAS WATER HEATER 1 50
IRRIGATION SPRINKLER SYS 1 3 , 000
REPL PLMG FIX/ELECTRICAL 1 2 ,700
REPLACE ELECT WATER HTR 2 250
SEWER LINE 1 500
WATER LINE 1 500
Subtotal: $ 8, 300
***Total: $ 3 , 471, 356
COMMERCIAL:
Building:
FOUNDATION 1 1, 124
INT. SPRINKLER SYS. 1 12,800
INTERIOR REMODEL 1 900
REMODEL 2 9, 000
REVISION TENANT IMPROVEMT 1 15, 000
STAINGLASS WINDOW 1 2, 000
TENANT IMPROVEMENT 1 85, 000
Subtotal: $ 125, 824
Electrical:
1 BR CIR FOR MCNEAL HALL 1 300
1 BR CIR FOR PINE HALL 1 400
1 BR CIR FOR SCI II,RM261 1 400
1 BR CIR/SISKIYOU COMMONS 1 285
21 BRANCH CIRCUITS 1 19, 000
ALARM SYSTEM 1 150
ELECTRIC FOR SIGN 1 125
Monthly Building Activity Report: 05/94 Page 3
# Units Value
COMMERCIAL:
Electrical:
SECURITY SYSTEM 1 1,000
SERVICE CHANGE 2 1,350
Subtotal: $ 23 ,010
Mechanical:
GAS PAC/1 BR CIR 1 4,724
TWO BOILERS 1 35,000
Subtotal: $ 39 ,724
Plumbing:
SPRINKLER SYSTEM 1 3 ,500
WATER HEATER 1 250
Subtotal: $ 3 ,750
***Total: $ 192 ,308
Total this month: 82 $ 3 , 663 ,664
Total this month last year: 95 $ 2, 278,727
Total year to date: 1007 $18, 114, 632
Total last year: 1059 $20, 075,424
This month This month This year
last year
Total Fees: 38, 189 24 , 364 227 ,498
Total Inspections: 544 458 6201
i
NEW CONSTRUCTION: 5/94
RESIDENTIAL
PAGE NO. 1
06/30/94
ADDRESS #UNITS CONTRACTOR VALUATION
** MANUFACT HOME/ATTACH GAR
1361 EAST MAIN ST OWNER 45300. 00
** Subtotal **
45300.00
** SFR
201 GLENVIEW DR GREENEWOOD HOMES 200000.00
173 PATTERSON ST MEDINGER CONST. CO. INC. 55000.00
163 NO ADDRESS MEDINGER CONST. CO. INC. 62000.00
1230 KIRK LN OWNER 83161.00
485 WATERLINE RD LEWIS CONSTRUCTION 229812.00
461 WATERLINE RD LEWIS CONSTRUCTION 195000.00
125 TERRACE ST WARREN CONSTRUCTION CO. 164315.00
491 ASHLAND LOOP RD WARREN CONSTRUCTION CO. 200000.00
421 WILEY ST OLSON, TOM 169000.00
** Subtotal **
1358288.00
*** Total ***
1403588.00
NEW CONSTRUCTION: 5/94
COMMERCIAL
PAGE NO. 1
06/30/94
ADDRESS #UNITS CONTRACTOR VALUATION
** ADDITION OF 72 SUITES
2525 ASHLAND ST JELDWEN INC 1485000.00
** Subtotal **
1485000.00
** TENANT IMPROVEMENT
695 MISTLETOE RD PRATT CONSTRUCTION 85000.00
** Subtotal **
85000.00
*** Total ***
1570000.00
i
�4`pF ASN;°,Q Memorandum
°Rroo� . July 10, 1994
v1 0. Mayor and City Council
r
ram: Steven M. Hall, Director of Public Works
p�'lt�IjPtt. Monthly Reports
Attached are the monthly reports for the Public Works department for the month
of June, 1994.
Enclosures
(CAPWI OTt-MM)
A
Water Quality Monthly report for June 1994
Water:
Repaired 14 leaks in customer service and or meter.
Replaced 6 broken or leaking angle stops.
Replaced 1 leaking water service line.
Repaired 4 Lithia leaks along East Main.
Changed out 22 water meters 20 3/4", 1-2" and 1- 1 1/211.
Changed out SOSC all water meter, including new vault wall and
remote read-outs.
Installed 18 new water meters with hand valves.
Installed 3 customer hand valves.
Relocated fire hydrant at Washington Street.
Installed 9 new 3/4" water services and one 1" water service
Installed one 4" fire service.
Installed two 6" main line taps.
Chlorinated Diane Hill Subdivision and put it into service.
Installed two new 6" fire hydrants, one on Terrace and one at
Fordyce.
Sewer:
Installed 4 new 4" sewer laterals.
Repaired 1 sewer and 9 manholes.
Responded to 2 service calls.
Jet rodded 17,892' of City sewer mains using 43000 gallons of
water.
Mechanical rodded 745 feet of City sewer mains.
Miscellaneous:
There were 75 requests for Utility locate calls.
There was 142. 13 million gallons of water treated at the Water
Treatment Plant and 51.20 million gallons of water treated at the
Waste Water Treatment Plant.
Used 105 yards of 3/4" minus rock at various job sites.
City of Ashland
Street Division ;
June 1994 Report
SWEEPER:
Swept 126 miles of streets.
Collected 45 yards of debris.
Responded to 107 utility location requests.
Graded several streets and alleys._. _ .
Patched pot-holes and sunken services.
Removed and patched back large area at 347 High St. : B tons..
Continued pre-patching re-surface list: saw7cutting . and. removin,g bad
sections of asphalt and patching back (353. 52 tons) , replacing'. bad
sections of curb and gutter and profiling the streets with the grinder.
NOTE: Preparing the streets to be re-surfaced consumes 90% of our. time. .
STORM DRAINS:
Flushed and/or nodded several storm drain systems. .
Cleaned off catch basin grates.
Cleaned out catch basins.
Began cleaning several hundred feet of drainage ditch on Mistletoe Rd . .
Fabricated a steel diamond plate cover for a sidewalk over a storm drain
on No. Mountain above Iowa.
Replaced a broken cross-over on Winburn Way at the „upper duck pond, using
27 feet of 12 inch P.V.C. pipe, back-filling with 1 - sack slurry and
patching with 1/2 inch A.C. .
Tested a catch basin floor on No. Mountain for possible leak .
SIGNS and FAINT:
Continued painting downtown . Put a second crew. on to ,get caught ,up. on
the yellow, green , blue, and white curbs.
Made large sign for closure of No. Mountain for pre-patching and
re-surfacing .
Installed another 4 hour limited parking sign in the Hargadine parking
lot.
Installed a no parking sign in the. hammer head 'on Ashland Loop Rd: above
Morton St. .
Made and installed a new street sign at the corner -of. Lit Way and Ray Ln
Made and installed a new street sign, at, Churrh and Scenic,.
Replaced the stop sign on Ashland at Peach
Re-set the limosine parking only sign on 1st: street above E. Main .
Made and installed a new street sign on MaryJane at Siskiyou.
Straightened the stop/street sign post an Maple at No. Main .
Installed a new 10 minute parking sign post on Indiana above Siskiyou.
Pioneer parking lot: revised the arrows on several signs . and installed
3 new no parking signs along Copeland, Lumber.
MISC. :
The entire crew, plus the temporary employees, attended an all da_y
Flagging Certifacation class.
Completed drainage. trough,and ..gr.outed_ the .pit, for the„tack .truck ._
Picked up the following items .Iri .Medford : Fabric ; c'ross7bow, oil,and
chains for chain saws, and fittings for tack trough. , ' -
Set out cones for cross-walk week ._ :, .,
Steve Burkhalter: training on paver.
Trimmed tree on Crestview at 'Par,,k f.or...?top sign visability, . .
Picked up a wood stove for' the Conservation Dept. .
Pushed up the asphalt grindings pile at B St. yard .
Seeded newly poured Handi-Cap. ramps.,-and. curb and gutter at .15 locations.
Watered trees at the granite pit.
'Raised a valve boot at 1260 Prospect.
Hauled 10 yards of old concrete . from :B St, -to. our concrete, pit -on .
Glenview Dr. .
Cleaned up facilities and' equipment-"ori'-`a` wee'kly basis.
Helped in shop when needed_.
Held monthly safety meeting .
c;r,
s
City of Ashland
Fleet Maintenance •
June 1994 Report
�: 3 mechanics completed work on 168 word: orders on various types of City _"'
equipment and vehicles
With the new numbering system in effect, work orders will no longer be
reported on an individual department or, division basis
The emergency generators at :City Hall and. the. Civic Center'were'^manually:b„
tested on a weekly basis.'
• WSJ Hax Aw
I and t9 certificates issued, .for the Month: 1,
City o,f` Ashland:- 1`
;yam
ENGINEERING DIVISION
MONTHLY REPORT FOR:
JUNE 1994
1. Issued 20 Street Excavation permits.
2. Issued 4 Address Change or Assignment forms.
3. Issued 4 Miscellaneous Construction Permits.
4. Responded to 16 Certificate of Occupancy reviews.
5. Completed 5 Pre-applications for Planning Actions.
6. Completed 41 "One-Stop" permit forms.
7. Performed field and office checks on 4 partition plats.
8. Performed the following work on the Airport Improvement Project:
a. prepared design report.
b. submitted plans and contract documents to F.A.A. for approval.
C. contracted with P.P. & L. to lower power lines.
d. submitted D.B.E. goals and information to F.A.A. civil rights section.
e. negotiated with owners regarding relocation of access road.
9. Received from the Oregon State Health Department an exemption of water line review requirements.
10. Performed the following work on the Bluebird Park handrail repair:
a. designed and prepared plans for a new handrail.
b. sent plans and request for quotation to 10 contractors.
C. awarded contract for construction.
11. Located and referenced all centerline monuments on Liberty Street.
12. Completed a comprehensive intersection study involving Wightman/Siskiyou/Indiana.
13. Operated traffic counters at several locations.
JHOM\euf rptjw ftfm t.m
Engineering Division Monthly Report for June 1994
Page 2
14. Met with property owner regarding the acquisition of a right-of-way extension on Westwood Street.
15. Performed the following work on the Diane's Hill Subdivision:
a. issued notice to proceed.
b. inspected work performed by contractor.
C. conducted final inspection and prepared a final "punch list".
16. Attended and helped prepare the Hosler Dam E.A.P. table top exercise.
17. Continued digitizing tax lot maps into the computer.
18. Performed the following work on the North Mountain Avenue Sanitary Sewer Improvement L.I.D.
a. held pre-construction conference.
b. issued notice to proceed.
C. inspected work performed by contractor.
19. Prepared a memo regarding an affidavit of consent by B.P.A. for the N. Mountain Avenue
substation.
20. Responded to numerous vision clearance complaints.
21. Performed the following work on the North Main and Ashland Street Water Line project:
a. survey information of right-of-way location.
b. reviewed preliminary location maps.
C. transmitted utility and right-of-way information to engineers.
22. Prepared contract for the 1994 Miscellaneous Concrete Repair project.
23. Completed preparation of easements for the Railroad Village Subdivision Improvement project.
24. Reviewed plans for future storm drain construction over lot 1 of Terrace Pines Subdivision.
25. Prepared memo to Parks Department regarding the requirements for installing an irrigation well at
Oak Knoll.
26. Performed the following work on the Struve Subdivision:
JHO:n\5UffV Jw-n+Lmmt.m
Engineering Division Monthly Report for June 1994
Page 3
a. inspected work performed by contractor.
b. approved revised sewer service plan.
C. checked subdivision monumentation.
27. Performed the following work on the Odor Control Facility:
a. inspected work performed by contractors.
b. prepared pay estimate no 3.
28. Performed the following work on the Ashland Audubon Subdivision:
a. approved subdivision improvement plans.
b. prepared construction and inspection agreement forms.
C. held pre-construction conference and issued notice to proceed.
29. Performed the following work on the Strawberry Lane Sewer project:
a. prepared topo map showing contours.
b. mapped right-of-way lines and proposed acquisition.
C. began design of sewer and water lines.
fHO:nWafttju stafm Lmu
i
v`pF �ry4yG g PLit V L Gandu LLB
'.pRE6pa,
June 29, 1994
City Council Members
rum: Catherine Golden, Mayor
p�LCDjPCt: Tree Commission Appointment
There is an opening'on the Tme Commission due to the recent resignation of Leslie VanGelder firm her position
which expires April 30, 1995. I would like to appoint Nancy Kerr to this vacancy.Ms. Kerr requested
appointment to this Commission in February, 1994. A copy of her resumd, is attached.
(rcommwppoiocmw)
Attachments - 2
P°Of ASI1,
City of Ashland
° OFFICE Of THE MAYOR
II• 20 E.Main Street Ashland, OR 97520
too
CATHY GOLDEN
I, MAYOR
(503)482-3211 -
February 9,.1994
A
Ms. Nancy Kerr
335 Orange Avenue
Ashland OR 97520
f Dear Nancy:
[ Thank you for applying for the recent opening on the
Tree Commission. The Council appointed Sharon Dvora
at the February 1, 1994 meeting.
Your letter will be kept on file for future appointments to
this commission. Your interest in serving your
community is very much appreciated.
Cordially,
Catherine 15f Golden
I Mayor
(C-NUYO ACom Awl IOQ-IW
J '
7
.i
It
f
F
i
a
T
JAN 2 5 1994 :;
Nancy Kerr
335 Orange ave. -----------
Ashland, OR 97520
482-4749
Mayor Cathy Golden
20 E. Main Street
Ashland, OR 97520
Dear Mayor,
Please consider my qualifications for the Tree Commission committee. I
am a local resident of Ashland and I am interested in the planned growth
and beautification of our city. I am very proud of Ashland's progress so
far. The City Planning Department has developed design idea's that
encourage a growing quality of life for those that join our community. 1
would enjoy a small part in participating in the further development and
design of the community.
I have long had an interest in Botany and Design. When I had the
opportunity in high school, years ago, 1 took a class in Botany.
I have always taken Design classes and would be excited about being
involved with landscape design.
Thank you for this opportunity to apply for this.position on the Ashland
Tree Commission.
Sincerely,
Nancy Kerr
I
NANCY KERR
335 Orange Street
Ashland, Oregon 97520
(503) 4824749
POSITION OBJECTIVE: Business Management/Administration
SKILLS & ABILITIES:
• Computer - WordPerfect, Quattro Pro, Minitab
• Typing (45 wpm)
• Adding machine - 2 years experience
• Phone - 5 line system
Organizational Skills:
Organized work projects and activities successfully for 25 years. Owned a business in
the printing and graphic arts field and supervised 12 employees. '
Communication Skills:
Teaching of toddlers through the elderly. Numerous presentations in many types of
settings. Presentations through speech, drama, video, music, overhead projector,
handouts and demonstrations. Topics to include: Gross National Product (GNP),
Financial Risk for Business, Restructuring for Profit, etc. Sales on a one-to-one basis and
have worked well in many group projects. Major research projects.
Artistic Skills:
Produced videos. I have classes needed to teach high school art. 3 Design, 3 Art
History, Photography, Drawing, Painting, Sculpture, Weaving, Printing, and Graphics.
EDUCATION:
Southern Oregon State College, Ashland, Oregon
• BA Business 3/92 (Marketing Major)
• BA Humanities 3/92 (Includes 3 years of Chinese Language)
Other courses taken: Marketing, International Marketing, Sales, Advertising, Industrial
Marketing, Group Processes in Business, Video Production, Broadcasting, Newswriting,
Speech, Business Communications, Business Research, and Accounting.
HOBBIES:
Horseback riding, sailing, tennis, biking and the arts.
of MFd
JUL g 1994
OREGON Y' W `•
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR CITY OF MEDFORD
TELEPHONE(503) 770-4432 411 WEST 8TH STREET
.....
FAX: (503) 770-4444 MEDFORD, OREGON 97501 MEO DS Sl r Cm
ALBA, ITALY
July 8, 1994
Mayor Cathy Golden
City of Ashland
20 E. Main Street
Ashland, OR 97520
Subject: Protection of Water Quality in Bear Creek
Dear �en:
The City of Medford wants to thank the City of Ashland for keeping
us informed regarding your wastewater treatment plant facility
planning efforts to improve the water quality in Bear Creek. It is
apparent that you have made every effort to evaluate all possible
alternatives, including both time tested and emerging technologies.
As you are aware, Bear Creek runs through the heart of Medford, and
we value it as a community resource in the same manner that you
value Lithia Creek. The concerted effort and financial
participation on the part of the City of Medford, Medford Water
Commission, and Medford Urban Renewal Agency, in cooperation with
other agencies in the valley, to get the Jackson Street dam removal
project off the ground is an example of our level of commitment to
the improvement of Bear Creek.
In your search for the appropriate wastewater treatment and
disposal process, we wish to support the selection of a solution
that provides the reliability and flexibility to ensure long term
compliance with discharge requirements under a variety of current
and future operating conditions. This is an excellent opportunity
to greatly improve the water quality in Bear Creek.
Sincerely,
er Lausfiann, Mayor
JH/JL/cvn
c:. shlandJC t-Xc ounE j;@members
Ashland Public Works Director
Ashland City Manager
�F & e. em ,orn >� nm
Rio
July 13, 1994
V1 R- Council Members
rain: Catherine M. Golden, Mayor
'1I�IjEtt: Pro Tempore Judge Appointment
Pursuant to Municipal Code 2.28.200, please mnSrm the appointment of City Attorney Paul Nolte as judge pro
tempore for July 24, 1994. He has been asked to perform a wedding ceremony for a friend of his on that day.
<r.Mryorleia®.me�
Attachment - 1
l
4
4 CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF ASHLAND
20 EAST MAIN STREET
(503) 482-3211, EXT. 59
MEMORANDUM
July 14, 1994
To: Mayor Catherine'Golden and City Councilors
(j From: Paul Nolte
I Subject: Request for Judge Pro Tern Appointment
Lynna Murray, an employee in the Finance Department, plans to be married in
Ashland on July 24, 1994, and has asked if I could preside over the ceremony.
' Through this memorandum I am asking for your approval and confirmation to serve as
the pro tem municipal court judge for this one day only (Sunday, July 24). 1 have
discussed this matter with Administrator Brian Almquist and Municipal Court Judge
Allen Drescher,.neither having any objections.
i
(s9Pro-tan.rey) -
1
,
oft AS&
memarandnm
p4$60
July 13, 1994
��- Mayor and City Council
.11 XIIrit: Ashland Historic Commission
,SubjCCt: DEMOLITION REQUEST FOR 168 MEADE STREET
The Ashland Historic Commission has agreed the house at 168 Meade
Street is no longer structurally sound and is supporting the demolition
request for the house only.
Attached are criteria submitted by Ted .Clay, the Cultural Resource
Inventory Survey Form completed by Kay Atwood in March of 1990,
the evaluation/rating sheet which she used in determining the final
score, and the July 6, 1994 minutes of the Historic Commission
meeting.
Application for Permit for Demolition
Applicant: Ted Clay, 219 Meade St., Ashland 482-6435
Address of structure: 168 Meade St.
Age: built 1906 (est)
Ranking: Secondary
Point rating:
Architecture: 11
Environment: 9
History: 24 (15 of which are from "fair/poor" items)
Total 44
Reason for demolition: House is fire-damaged, and is the site of a murder. Owner wants
to build a new house, using location of the existing house.
Zoning: RI-7.5
Criteria list:
1. Not on Heritage Landmark List.
2. Has been condemned after fire. Architect determined that restoration would be more
costly than building a new house and would be difficult to integrate with additional
construction in an aesthetically pleasing manner.
3. No
4. Necessary both for cost and appearance reasons as stated above. But also high on the
list of reasons is the psychological burden of living in a house where an unsolved murder
took place, possibly with a continued fire smell which is still quite noticeable after more
than one year.
5. The new house will be compatible with the architectural styles in the neighborhood.
6. It will be replaced by a single-family house.
7. The change will definitely upgrade the neighborhood.
8. N/A
9.. Possible use: temporary illegal shelter for transients. What do you say?
10. N/A
11. We plan to attempt to salvage as much of the old wood as possible, both for
construction or for firewood. This may not be a negotiable item with the demolition
contractor, however.
12..N/A
13. N/A
14. No.
EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR MOVING/DEMOLITION
IN THE ASHLAND HISTORIC DISTRICT
The following is a list of questions to be answered when applying for a permit to either
move or demolish a structure in the Ashland Historic District:
1) What is the address of the structure?
2) What is the age of the structure?
3) If the structure has been included on the Heritage Landmarks List, what is its
ranking (Primary, Secondary, Compatible or Non-contributing)?
4) What is its overall point rating?
5) What are the ratings in the Architectural, Environmental and Historical categories?
6) If this is a primary or secondary structure, what are the reasons behind the request
for this moving/demolition permit?
7) What is/are the specific section(s) of the Ashland City Code which are being cited
as reasons for the move/demolition?
8) What is the current zoning of the structure?
9) If it is to be moved, what is the zoning into which it will be moved?
The following is a list of the criteria used to evaluate the merits of granting a
moving/demolition permit in the Ashland Historic District:
1) Does the structure meet the minimum criteria adopted for inclusion on the final
Heritage Landmarks List?
2) Is the building structurally sound? Has it been condemned? Can the structure be
restored for costs comparable to constructing a new building of the same size and
value?
3) Do the existing configuration of the house and the uses permitted in the zone
make the retention of the structure unfeasible and an unreasonable hardship on
the property owner?
4) Why is it necessary to move or demolish the structure?
5) How will moving or demolishing this structure contribute to the historic character
of the neighborhood?
6) What will replace the structure if it is moved or demolished?
7) What impact will this new use of the property have on the historic character of the
neighborhood?
8) If the structure is to be moved, what impact will the building have in its new locale?
9) If left in place, what use could the structure be put to in its current zone?
10) If the structure is to be moved, will it be restored? Briefly, how will the restoration
be accomplished?
11) If the structure is to be demolished, will the materials be recycled?
12) What effect will the move have on the structure's chances of being included on the
National Historic Register?
13) if this is a proposed move, what will become of the structure if the application is
denied?
14) Based on the numerical ratings,.are there compelling arguments with regards to
Architecture, Environment, or History. which would be grounds for denying a
moving or demolition permit?
ASHLAND CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY
SURVEY FORM
COUNTY: JACKSON
IDENTIFICATION:
Hist. Name Roach, Earl J. House Date of Construction: 1906 (est. )
Common Name: Original Use: Residence
Address: 168 Meade St. Present Use: Resi ence
_ Ashland, Oregon ' Architect :
Owner: _Krahel', Edward Builder: .
168 Meade St. Style: Vernacular
Ashland, Oregon x Bldg. _Strut. _Dist . Obj .
T/R/S: _ 39S RIE 9 Ranking: Secondary
Map No: 9CA Tax Lot : 9100
Addition: Highland Park (1888)
Block: Lot : 8-1D Quad: Ashland
THEME:
Statewide Inventory of Historic Properties Theme:
_Archaeology _Industry _Mining
_Agricu'lture _Military Social/Education
x Commerce —Politics/Government—Transportation
Exploration and Settlement _Religion Other
DESCRIPTION:
Plan Type/Shape: Rectangular No. of Stories : One
Foundation Material: Woo s i.rting Basement (Y/N) :
Roof Form and Material: Hip; wood shingle, regular cut
Wall Construction : Frame Structural Frame:
Primary Window Type: One-over-one ou a lung sash
Exterior Surfacing Materials : Horizontal double drop
Decorative Features:
Other:
Condition: _Excellent x Good _Fair_ Poor —Moved(Date )
Exterior Alterations/Additions (Dated)
Noteworthy Landscape Features:
Associated Structures : Detached garage
Known Archaeological Features :
Negative No: Roll 17-7 Recorded By:
Clay/Atwood
Slide No: Date: 1984/ 7 March 1990
SHPO Inventory No:
472
SETTING:
This single story, wood frame dwelling stands on a site on the
east side of Meade Street, between Pearl and Iowa Streets .
SIGNIFICANCE:
This property, originally part of the Reeser Addition to Ashland,
(now known as the Highland Park Addition) , was sold by Matilda
Reeser to E.M. Olmstead in May, 1910. The Reesers may, have
constructed this house as a rental property about 1906 . Eliza-
beth Roach purchased Lots 9 and l0 in December , 1913. Earl J.
Roach worked as a driver for the Ashland Transfer and Storage
Company. The Roaches sold the property to James Shelton in
October , 1919.
f
SOURCES CONSULTED:.
Jackson County Deed Records, Volume 80, Page 369; Volume 98, Page
453; Volume 125, Page 375.
Polk's Jackson County Directory, 1.914..
• - . . f • . .
L ✓ - 'rtQ f y 42 • 41.E l.i J it
1+ � ,
1 ,+�
ASHLAND CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY'
. Evaluation/Rating Sheet
Architecture
I ( 35 possible SITE NUMBER
points ) /
ADDRESS 1
A. Style
E FINAL SCORE
VG
RANK
F/P N---
B. Design/Artistic Quality ' .
E
VG
G J!
F/P J
C. Materials/Construction
E
VG G.
G 1 - -
F/P
D. Integrity
E
VG
G
F/P
E. Rarity History
E
VG I (49 possible points )
G A. Person
F/P E
Environment VG
( 21 possible points ) G
..F/P
A. Landmark
E B. Event
VG E
G VG
F/P F/P g
B. Setting C. Patterns
E E
VG VG
G G
F/P F/P
C. Continuity
E D. Information
VG E
G VG
F/P G
F/P
y '
Ennis reminded the applicants their request cannot be approved without public hearings and
'ty Council approval of ordinance changes.
Cha ers stated there is an issue of symmetry here, as the awning looks o ofi f balance.
If every a wanted a bigger sign, we would have what Ashland looked li 30 years ago.
He can see, owever, a reduction of size.
Skibby said he es not feel bound by the fact the awning is Yrea y existing. E nnis noted
if the sign permit lication came in and it were being re from scratch, it simply
would not be approve Skibby then stated a standard awnin n on the building could
be approved. He said feels the sign should be re gu 'ted by the ordinance and the
applicants should start ove , since'it was put up withou a permit.
Ennis stated he can see a speci need for havin the sign facing East Main Street, and
personally agrees with the variance r facing t Main Street:
Cardinale stated he has a similar circumst ce with his business (Handyman). His building
is located below Ashland Street and op have a very difficult time finding it. He
personally feels the ordinance should a more �nient, but he does not have a say in it, so
the ordinance should be followed. \
Winston remarked while she preciated the applicant efforts, the signs are out of scale
and she felt they should ha been wiser. She advised the ntractor should be financially
responsible. �\
Wood moved to re mmend denial of the application to the Planning Commission, and
Winston seconde he motion. Chambers asked for clarification. Winston stated the intent
would be to re ove the signs. Chambers said the massing and scale are too large, but he
is not agains a variance for the placement of a 24 square foot sign. 1766.motion carried
with all vo ng aye except Ennis and Chambers, who both stated they were not in favor of
what ex' s, but felt the owners should be allowed to have a_sign facing East Main Street.
En s suggested the applicants go to the Planning Commission meeting agreeing to reduce
e size of the signs and ask for a variance for the side location only.
DEMOLITION REQUEST - 168 MEADE STREET .
Skibby clarified the house is on the Heritage Landmarks List. Ted Clay, new owner of the
property, acknowledged he was in error when he stated it was not. Skibby then gave a short
history of 168 Meade Street and passed around photos of the property.
When questioned by Skibby if the garage would remain, Clay answered it would. Skibby
stated he felt the garage had more architectural merit than the house.
Ashland Historic Commission
Minutes
July 6, 1994 Page 3
Clay conveyed he has had several people take a look at the house. One was a house mover
and one was an architect, and neither felt the house was worth saving. Because of the fire,
the house has been condemned. Everything above four feet on the main floor has been
scorched and suffered fire damage. When asked what will occupy the site, Clay said he will
be building a single family residence. The design will not be similar, but it will be
compatible. Also, it will be one and one-half stories.
Skibby stated that by keeping the garage, it will keep the history of the site, and he can
understand the request for demolition of the house. Ennis also understands and added the
existing house sits much too low.
Ennis moved to recommend approval of the demolition request given the condition of the
existing house, the recent history, and the fact it is ranked as a secondary structure on the
Heritage Landmarks List. Furthermore, as part of the motion, the Commission agreed the
garage structure shall be retained. Chambers seconded the motion and it passed
unanimously.
Clay then asked if it would be most important to keep the garage as it is and have it
compatible but not similar, or change the windows and siding. The Commission agreed the
garage should retain as much of the original siding and windows as possible. If adding on,
the siding and windows should match the existing.
Proposed Central Avenue/Water Street Railroad Spur /
Vail presented a railroad slide show. He stated he would like to get -ra�ihoad line,
at le om Ashland to Shasta, on the National Register because SP.Win the process of
tearing up line and taking out the old crossings, etc. He also st e8 he owns the railroad
right-of-way spu etween Water Street and Central Avenue. Has three nice old rail cars
and needs a buildin house them. The design would bimilar to the old depot hotel
with a porch, only on a smaller scale and it would be-shed. Eventually, he will probably
give the cars to the State of bregon. The structure will be for storage of the cars, and
possible a museum at the most. If�and when the railroad ever runs over the Siskiyou
Mountains again, his cars can be used"Ijhe meantime, he needs to shelter them.
Vail then presented elevations,af the proposed building, which would be 250 feet long. He
said he chose an Eastlake
,Msign because all the depots SP built in the northwest at that
time were of this style. \
Ennis stated ario e Commission agreed it would be very important to drawings of the
massing of f1 e building and streetscape. Vail said he is not in a hurry at this-point and he
will wor ith the Review Board.
Ashland Historic Commission
Minutes
July 6, 1994 Page 4
r Y.W..
II IF,
j � 4 •t
i
9�� Q��lsrhliaLdcB� � ��� 1 k/
Local Union No.659
241/2 South Grape Street • P.O. Box 669
MEDFORD, OREGON 97501
(503)772-5271 • FAX(503)772-3520
July 8, 1994
Mr. Brian L. Almquist
City Administrator
City of Ashland
City Hall
Ashland, OR 97520
Dear Brian:
Enclosed is the addendum to the Electrical Agreement for the
1994 wage rates. Again as outlined in my letter of last week, if
adjustments are needed on the rates based on Portland we agree to
any adjustments needed. If you find the addendum in order will
you please sign and return 5 copies to our office for
International Office approval. Also I have included the 1993
addendum which was lost in the process last year. For the record
I will appreciate the signing of same in order to keep the
records in order and correct the oversight.
Thank you.
Yours truly,
LOC L UNION NO. 659 , I .B.E.W.
im McLean
s Hess Manager
JM/des
enclosures
cc: Bill MacDowell
Cs
ADDENDUM TO AGREEMENT
betwe@rn
T H E C S T Y O F ASHLAND , ORE GO N
a n d
LOCAL UN=O N WC) E3 5 9
=NT ERNAT=ONAL BROTH ERH 00 D
O F E L E C TR=CAL WORKER S
WHEREAS, there presently exists an Agreement between the
parties effective July 1 , 1991 through June 30 , 1995 covering
wages, hours and working conditions, and
WHEREAS, the existing Agreement provides under "Appendix B"
for revisions to the wage rates July 1 , 1994 . In accordance with
those provisions, the wage rates for each classification are as
follows:
"APPENDIX B° _
PAY SCHEDULE
CLASSIFICATION: WAGE SCALE EFFECTIVE 7-1-94
Lead Working Line Installer . . . . • . . . . . $ 23 .88
Line Installer/Serviceperson. 22 .09 22 09
Line Installer. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . •
Apprentice Line Installer: • . • 15 . 46
1st 6-months (70% of line installer rate) 16 . 13
2nd 6-months (73% of line installer rate) • • ' • 16.79
3rd 6-months (76% of line installer rate) • • ' • 17.67
4th 6-months (80% of line installer rate) 18.56
5th 6-months (84% of line installer rate) . • ' . 19,88
6th 6-months (90% of line installer rate) 22 ,09
Electrician. . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • 22 .09
Electric Meter Repairer . . . . . . . . . . • 17 .47
Line Truck Driver . . . . . 15. 83
'Connect-Disconnect 15. 03
Meter Reader. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • . 15.03
Groundperson . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Groundperson, Meter Reader,
Connect-Disconnect: 7 ,03
1st 6-months. . . . . . . . . • • • • ' ' 9 .06
2nd 6-months. . . . . . . . . . . • • • ' • ' 11.04
3rd 6-months. . . . . . . . . . . . • • • ' ' . . 13 .04
4th 6-months. . . . . . . . • .
Mapping Specialist 10. 24
1st 6-months. . . . . . . . . . . • 10.87
Next 12 months. . . . . . . . . . • • • • ' 11.48
Next 12 months. . . . . . . , . • • • • ' ' . 12.19
Next 12 months. . . . . . . . • • ' . . . 12 .94
Thereafter. . . . . .
'To be increased by 2 . 5% for State Supervisory Electrician's
license.
2Connect-Disconnect increase by 5% for duties primarily centered
around hand-held computer meter reading devices.
CITY OF ASHLAND, OREGON LOCAL UNION NO. 659
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD
OF ELECTICAL WORKERS
B 2 By
acs
1/
Date /� 7 Date
APPROVF SHLAND CITY COUNCIL
By
Date
CITY ATTORNEY
'CITY OF ASHLAND
26 EAST MAIN STREET
(503) 482-3211, EXT. 59
MEMORANDUM
July 5, 1994
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Paul Nolte
Subject: Park and Recreation Commission.Ban on Drumming in City Parks.
You have received an appeal regarding the park commission rule banning drumming
in the parks. For the reasons given below, I advised the commission that it has the
authority to adopt such a rule and that the rule is constitutional.
The park rule being appealed was adopted by the park commission on May 23, 1994,
and reads as follows:
'Effective May 28, 1994, the sounding of drums or other percussion instruments
or the use of a sound amplifier with a musical instrument in any of the parks is
prohibited. Provided, however, that this prohibition shall not apply to:
A. Drums or other percussion instruments approved as a part of an
event authorized by the Parks and Recreation Commission.
B. The use of sound amplifiers approved by the Parks and Recreation
Commission for special events.
C. Drums or other percussion instruments sounded in areas designated
by the Parks and Recreation Commission for such use."
In July, 1993, the council, at the request of the commission, considered the adoption
of a similar prohibition in the form of an ordinance'. The council chose not to adopt
the ordinance.
' The ordinance proposed in July, 1993, read as follows (shaded words were to
be added to the existing ordinance adopted in 1916):
Section 10.68.180 of the Ashland Municipal Code is amended to read:
'10.68.180 Whistles \mss prohibited Vsltors shall not
sound.whistles trtletl.. aOC itSB� S
b NOW
1
OPINION FOR MAYOR AND COUNCIL
JULY 5, 1994
PAGE 2
The commission has the authority to adopt park rules under AMC 10.68.030:
"Park Commission—Authoft. The Park Commission of the city is
authorized to make such rules and regulations not in conflict with the
ordinances of the.city as it may think necessary for the better control and
management of the parks. If any person feels aggrieved by any such
rule or regulation, such person may appeal to the Council for its
amendment or repeal by filing with the City Recorder, a petition which
shall be presented to the Council at its next regular meeting, but until
amended or repealed by the Council, such rule or regulation shall be in
full force and effect as if it were an ordinance!
Banning forms of expression in the city parks has constitutional implications. The
commission and the council have the authority to enact reasonable legislation to
regulate conduct thought to be detrimental to the public interest. City of Portland v.
Gatewood, 76 Or App 74, 79 (1985). The city (or commission) has broad
constitutional latitude in fashioning a content-neutral law that regulates the manner of
expression, so long as the limitation is reasonable. 'The (city's) concern may be with
the medium, not the message, as when park regulations ban fireworks even for a
Fourth of July celebration." City of Portland v. Tidyman, 306 Or 174, 184 (1988).
When a law does not focus on the content of speech, but rather the sound made or
medium used to deliver the expression, the law is analyzed to determine if it is overly
broad. Cf. City of Eugene v. Powlowsld, 116 Or 186 (1992). The analysis for
overbreadth looks at, for instance, whether or not the rule is limited to those
circumstances when, because of noise or abuse, the public interest may be
implicated. The commission determined that the limitation was necessary not only for
peace and enjoyment for those outside the park, but also for the persons using the
park for its serenity and natural amenities. In addition, the commission has provided
for exceptions to the prohibition for approved events.
(p:aswka,-dr .opt
• a „ Y/ V/ ee ./1�.pc.wa
To : Ashland City Council JUN 271994
RE : Parks and Recreation Rule prohibiting percussion instruments and
amplified instruments in Lithia Park.
To Whom It May Concern,
Pursuant to Ashland Municipal Code #10. 68 . 030 we request that
the Ashland City Council nullify the rule adopted by the Parks & Rec ,
Department that prohibits drumming (percussion) instruments and amplified,
instruments in Lithia Park. It is our contention that this rule is
discriminatory and arbitrary for the following reasons :
#1 ) This rule singles out a specific instrument or group of instruments ,
which suggests that -it is aimed at a particular style of music rather
than any concerns of noise levels . Bagpipes and trumpets are allowed,
conga drums are not .
#2 ) Pre-existing noise ordinances (decibel ) were never enforced against
drummers in the park, thereby denying due process of law. No one who
has ever complained about drumming ever has agreed to sign a formal
complaint which would have then permitted the police to issue a citation
which then would have afforded the accused the right to defend their
actions in court . The police went so far as to waive the normal. criteria
of two signatories to the complaint and said only one would be necessary.
Still no one ever was willing to ever sign a complaint. They chose to
have the police enforce their will on others without any formal commit-
ment to a process that would have afforded the accused an opportunity
to defend themself . '
#3)The Parks & Rec dept . acted in the interests of the few complaintants
( some of whom repeatedly complained thereby creating the impression of
numerous complaintants in any given month) _ At a meeting of theParks&
Rec Department a petition was presented signed by 270 Ashland. resisdents
supporting the right to drum in the Park. Obviously for every complaintant
there is someone who enjoys the drumming.
#4)The park is a public use area and those uses can ' t be dictated by
residents that own realestate adjacent to the park. It amounts to
a minority -viewpoint being enforced on the rest of the population . For
_,_
should be recinded and other compromises that include the interests
of everyone, musicians and property owners alike, should be studied
and adopted .
Sincerely, f � _ /� i�----
Arthur Anderson
13 N. Main #1
Ashland , Oregon
Chris ood
121 Strawberry Ln .
Ashland , Oregon
July 5, 1994
Ashland City Council
Ashland, OR 97520
RE: Drumming m Ashland City Parks
Dear Council Members,
The two recent drumming concerts in Butler Bandshell(June 18th and July 4th)have shown
that there are two different forms of drumming taking place in Lithia Park.
First,the musical drumming concerts in the bandshell are of a high quality and are clearly
enjoyed by sizable audiences. They are an artistic asset to Ashland and should come under the
same considerations as any other group that rents the bandshell and they should not be banned.
The problem with the community has arisen because of the random, spontaneous,often endless
drumming(sometimes occurring at midnight)that has occurred throughout the park in the past.
This is usually attributable to a minority of drummers who disrupt the peace and ambiance of the
park and surrounding neighborhood for many. These few have given dnmuning in the park a
negative connotation and have brought about the banning of drumming in the park.
It is very difficult to listen to drumming every day or for a period of more than two hours unless
you are doing the drumming. Until a permanent place can be found for drumming perhaps the
following suggestion could help the situation.
There are eight city parks. Why not allow drumming in a different park each day for a two
how period of time,for drummers of all levels? If need shows that a longer period of time is
required then there could be a two hour morning session in one park and a two hour afternoon
session in another. A schedule could be posted in each park,on the kiosks on the plaza and near
Soundpeace and in the Tidings so that drummers are aware of where they can drum on a specific'
day. Also, this will allow the neighbors to know when drumming is permitted in their
neighborhood park and to plan their schedules accordingly.
We hope you will consider our thoughts on this subject and that this compromise will make the
parks enjoyable to everyone.
Sincer ,
�j�t�ltS .54*/
Frances Sharkey
Louise Samuelson
163 Granite Street, Ashland
cc: Cathy Golden, Mayor
Kcn Mickelsen,Director Ashland Parks and Recreation Deprtment
Chris Wood
City of Ashland
PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES
LITHIA PARK - Winburn Way; picnic areas, nature
trail, tennis courts, playground.
HUNTER PARK - Homes Avenue: tennis courts, ballfields,
playground, Meyer Pool, community building.
GARFIELD PARK - Corner E. Main & Garfield Sts.;
picnic area, playground, water play.
volleyball and basketball courts.
YMCA CITY PARK - Tolman Creek Rd.; soccer fields,
picnic tables—playground.
GARDEN WAY PARK - Corner of Clark St. & Garden
Way; picnic area, playground.
GLENWOOD PARK - Corner of Ashland & Glenwood Sts:
picnic area.
SHERWOOD PARK . - Off Hwy. 66 on Sherwood Ave.;
playground.
RAILROAD DISTRICT PARK - On "A" St. between 6th & 8th;
picnic shelter, playground, rose garden,
1/2 basketball court.
To: Ashland City Council
I have just recently been apprised of the petition presented by
Arthur Anderson and Chris Wood. After reading the proposal, it
became quite apparent that many misstatements appear.'
First, the rule does not single out a single group.. The rule was
written to include percussion instruments that do create a noise
level beyond city codes and the well being of individuals
enjoying the park ambiance.
Second, the Commission worked very closely with the Ashland
police to come to some kind of way to enforce tolerable. noise
levels. Complaints were received, but as noted in.testimony from
some of those who complained, they did not want to go to court.
The police nor the Park Commission can force people to give a
written statement.
Third, the Commissions action was not on the impulse of a few
complaints but testimony from people all over town who use the
park system. Commissioners personally received phone calls from
citizens who complained about drumming and the fact that they
"appreciated someone's musical interest, but that their rights as
a citizen to use the parks without the intrusive drumming had
been sorely ignored Certainly the cross section of public
opinion and the important history of Lithia Park were the
deciding factors in deciding to ban drumming in Ashland's Parks.
At no time, in any discussion, did the Commission attack cultural
expression. The Commission feels that drumming can still be
experienced by an individual . We have not tried to 'address
drumming in any other location other than Ashland Parks . The
Commission has, since our ban, worked very hard to come up with
an out location for drumming. Unfortunately, we .have
encountered many concerns from surrounding residents about using
other park sights for drumming. In a continuing effort to find
location for drummers, the Commissions work in cooperation with
the Ashland School System has established an area where drumming
will be allowed. The area is the open space field directly
behind the Ashland Middle School. In establishing 'an area that
has a park like setting for drumming, it is the hope of the
Commission that this area will provide the outdoor experience
that drummers are seeking.
Last, as a Park Commissioner and an elected official, I would
hope that the City Council will appreciate our decision and
realize that we did not make this decision with a hidden agenda.
Our oath of office states that we will protect the Ashland Park
System and make decisions that enhance, safeguard, and maintain
the greatest standard possible for the populous to enjoy as a
whole.
Patricia Adams, Park Commissioner
To: Ashland Park and Recreation Commission
Date:
Lithia Park was developed to protect the natural woodland
of Ashland Creek Canyon, and designed to provide a place
of beauty in the heart of Ashland.
In consideration hose who enjoy the traquility of
the park, and in deference to its neighbors , public events
and performances are regulated . Active parks are
maintained throughout the community for a variety,.of
recreational pursuits.
In respect for the established tradition of Lithia Park,
the undersigned are opposed to drumming in the park. We
recognize that this is not a petition, rather an opportunity
for us to express an opinion.
July. 5, 1994
City Council of Ashland
I am here to speak about the issue of drumming in the park. I
know there is a history here over at least the last few months .
I attended the drumming performance several weeks ago after which
the ban was imposed, and I have been reading the letters to the
editor in The Tidings. People seem to be seeing many of the
issues I see; however I still wish to strongly add my voice to
this process .
Our government is supposedly by, for, and of the people, but
because we are all human beings, we need to constantly fight to
maintain that balance so decisions are not made by, for, and of
the rich, influential, politicians, special interests, etc . The
principles of our Constitution and Bill of Rights are one of our
main protections of our ideal way of life. I believe that having
two standards by which performances in the Lithia Park Bandshell
are judged violates both the letter and the spirit of our
Constitution and Bill of Rights. As at least one letter to the
editor has pointed out, having differing standards leaves room
for prejudices and fears to make community decisions . Certainly
individual musical tastes have no validity in social decisions .
The USSR lost many of its .greatest dancers because they could
only dance ballet choreographed in- certain acceptable ways and
coup not even explore other forms of dance at all . Having a
different standard apply to the City Band and to other city
sponsered performances and another standard to all other
performances is the same thing. One standard must apply to
performances in the Bandshell .
Other issues involved in this are inclusivity, diversity, and
creativity. Ashland has been formed by welcoming the creative
people, the intellectuals and artists, and providing an
environment in which they can express themselves . If this
changes and we now only have certain approved forms of music or
other artistic expression, the heart of Ashland will be changed
forever into something very different . . . something that will
probably stultify and die . I would rather see us embrace our
city' s traditions of encouraging creative people and forms of
expression.
Obviously, living above the park, just like living next to OSF or
the High School or College football fields, entails accepting
certain conditions that all renters or buyers must consider
before they make any commitments to live in those neighborhoods .
Obviously, also, certain standards must be in effect in any
community. I support one' uniform, fair, reasonable standard for
all performances in the bandshell,. It might be based on a number
of factors such as decible level-, hours of the day, days' of the
week for performances and days of none, months of the year, etc .
I also believe it is appropriate to consider having different
standards apply in neighborhood parks vs . Lithia Park or the
Bandshell . I hope a committee could be put together to form such
a standard and a meeting or another discussion before city
council to accept, modify, and endorse such a standard. I hope
that is the decision you will come to tonight. In some instances
Ashland does a great job of looking at issues like I have just
discussed; we need to get back on track on this one and apply
these same principles to other decisions that face us .
Sincerely,
Gwen C. Davies
860 Harmony Lane
JULY 14, 1994
The Editor
THE DAILY Tidings
Some of the letters in the Tidings concernig drumming in Lithia
park seem to. feel that the park should reflect the diversity of
our community.
I fail to see any connection.
If this were the case we should certainly allow park privileges
to our young citizens and their boom boxes.
. To reflect the diversity of our adult population, perhaps we
should scatter soap boxes through the park with bull horns
attached to express their political and philosophical
differences.
Another misconception on the part of the pro-drumming advocates
is that everyone who wants the park a Passive Tranquil Park
hates drums. No such thing. I. and many of my friends love
good rhythmic drumming, especially those danceable rhythms.
Also the splendid rhythms of the Carribbean steel bands, or
native African drummers, or a tabla drummer accompanying their
chanting songs.
The physical fact is that the park is located in a narrow canyon
with natural acoustics that carries percussive sounds from one
end of the park to the other.
Drumming, carte blanche, disturbs the the soothing sounds of the
creek, the wind in the trees, the conversation of ducks, as well
as meditators, those who are reading or studying or maybe just
having a quiet conversation with a friend_
Liit�thia/ park itself displays to us its enveloping diversity_
Marcie Mizerak .
316 Scenic, Ashland
JUL 13 1s94 1�
Ashland, OR
July 11, 1994
Ashland City Council
Ashland, OR
Dear city Council Members:
I understand that you will soon consider the ban on drumming
in Lithia Park. I am convinced that you should uphold this
ban.
Drumming is noise pollution. I see no reason why people
should be subjected to this against their will. (One is
reminded of the problems of secondhand smoke. )
In fact, I see no reason why drumming should be allowed
within the Ashland city limits. People who wish to make
offensive noise for their own pleasure should go far out
into rural areas to do so.
Please ban drumming.
Sincerely,
Virginia Lemon
332 Hargadine St.
Ashland, OR 97520
JUL y 1994
766 Palmer Poad. }[j
Ashland , OR 99520 1_
July 12 , 1994----------- -.-- ------------—
Ashland City Council
Ashland, Oregon
Let me add another voice to the great drumming
controversy.
As I see ft , there are two vastly different types of
drumming. We all know drumming as part of a musical com-
position. It is a vital and. welcome part of band and
symphony concerts . Most of us love tt when the drums come
in, authoritative, exciting, satisfying. Those concerts
are usually once a week and only in the summer .
A very different thing is the meditative, therapy
type of drumming, the non-stop perpetual motion type of
sound which for many people produces a transcendent exper-
ience . I envy these people. But for me it produces , as
does the thump of loud rock music, an absolutely "I gotta
get outta here" experience . I cannot stand it. If I were
the only one so affected, I 'd figure it was my peculiar
problem. There are however, many others similarly affected .
As in the realm of tobacco, I feel I have a right to
breathe air unpolluted by other people ' s smoke , so in the
realm of the auditory, I have a right to experience air
unpolluted by other people ' s intentional noise .
I go to Lithia Park for the outdoor experience of tall
cool trees , running water, ducks in a pond, flowers, groves ,
soft white sounds at the most. If Lithia Park is a place
for drumming, I have to stay home; it is ruined for me. ( W� �c CruY�c
Lithia Park should remain a PARK - not a theme park, as
demonstration park, an amusement park, a forum Fjusta
real PARK;
The Park Commission knew what it was doing when it
banned drumming in the park. Let its decision stand.
Sincerely,
Joan Hertzberg
JUL. 1 2 1994
i 445 Gran:W Street
- Ashland, 'UR--`97520
July 9, 1994
Mayor Catherine .Golden
City Council
20 E. Main Street
Ashland, OR 97520
Dear Editor:
In reference to the pending decision regarding
regarding drumming in Lithia Park, we are writing to urge
you -- implore you -- to keep in mind the purposes for which
_ our beautiful and unique park was created and vote against
any provision permitting drumming.
Since we live on Granite Street, we obviously have a
vested interest in this .issue. However, as others do, we go
into the park when we're looking for quiet, tranquility and
the kind of experience we don't find elsewhere in town,
especially as traffic and noise increase everywhere.
We understand that you as a governmental body are
trying to encourage an environment that is accepting of
diversity. However, we view this as an issue that, while it
fosters the rights of one group, infringes on the rights of
many. How does this issue differ from that of cigarette
smoking? Noise made by one person can invade the auditory
space of another as surely as secondary cigarette smoke is
an invasion of another's breathing space. To compromise by
allowing certain times of the day for drumming is to say
that the park becomes the exclusive province of those few
during those times of day.
We are both musicians. We love music and appreciate
the special qualities of drums. However; we would not
consider taking our flute and viola into the park where they
might disturb the peace of park visitors. Drums are even
more invasive than other acoustic instruments. one can
hear, and feel, the vibration at great distances. This is
not an issue of "cultural diversity" and it is not an
appropriate use of our park., .
Please have the courage to say no to this special
interest group. Perhaps a nonpublic place could be found
for drummers to use.
Thank you for your consideration of our letter.
Yours sincerely,
Su an Wiesenfeld and Ca 1 ufer
A.4.
i
j
July 13 , 1994
TO: Mayor and City Council
City of Ashland
FROM: Robert B . Reinholdt , 270 Skycrest Dr . , Ashland
RE : Drumming in Lithia Park
I request this letter be made a part of your file on the above
captioned matter .
As a former member of the Ashland Park Commission and its chairman
for several years , and as a drummer since 1935, I feel I have an
understanding of the .problem which has been presented to the Council
and the Commission , and am qualified to leave you with my opinion .
In addition , as a Trustee with the Fred A. Tayler Memorial Foundation
which since 1988 has donated $101 ,828 for improvements to Lithia
Park and with a current project which will involve an additional
sum of $11 , 250 this year , I 'm well acquainted with parks ' operations .
I feel the amount of money we have donated to the Commission speaks well
for the confidence we have in their management abilities .
I seriously question the Council ' s entry into this matter and feel
that the question has been thoughtfully and thoroughly dealt with
by the Park Commission . After all , Lithia Park, is a. gem in Ashland ' s
crown and must be dealt with in a manner which recognizes the park
as a passive place for rest and relaxation and not as a site for
the entertainment of a few. I reject the notion that there is some
esoteric psychological benefit to be derived from banging a drum in
the park .
If the Council decides to override the decision of the Park Commission ,
it will be an action unprecedented in Ashland ' s governmental history,
flying in the face of a considered judgment made by a body specifically
elected to manage the parks . In addition , the Council will end up
being the arbiter of every dispute or perceived grievance that arises ,
from park operations from here on out .
Our citizens and our visitors view Lithia Park as something very
special . I know of no other issue at this time that could immediately
cause an outcry and divide the community should the Council decide to
impose their views over those of the Park Commission . It appears to
me the Mayor and Council have many problems occurring, outside the
confines of Lithia Park that need solving and I would respectfully
request you leave park management to the Park Commission .
cc : Alan Alsing
�nr lr'n: r
JUL 14 1994
July 12,. 1
Mr. Brian Almquist "--`---
---------------
City Administrator
20 E. Main
Ashland, Or 97520
I maybe out of town on the night of July 19 when the issue of drumming in Lithia
Park is to be reviewed by the City Council and I want to express my views for the
record.
My wife and I live at 152 Strawberry Lane, just up the hill from the bandshell.
The noise from drumming at the band shell reverberates throughout our property and
because of the loudness I have to go inside and shut all windows and doors or leave
the area. I don't believe I should be forced to make these choices.
I was in favor of the policy of trying to reach some compromise with the
drummers. However, based upon their actions when they had a permit to drum and
were requested to tone down the volume and responded by bringing more drummers
on stage to increase the noise, I am in favor of the ban.
The drummers demonstrated a complete lack of concern for the rights of
the residents of the neighborhood who object to the loud drumming, abrogated their
contract with the Parks & Recreation Commission, and defied the police. Based upon
these actions, I strongly urge the City Council to maintain the ban!
Sincerely,
g
Larry Bressler
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF ASHLAND
20 EAST MAIN STREET
(503) 482-3211, EXT. 59
MEMORANDUM
July 13, 1994
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Paul Nolte
Subject: Application of Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) to walkway from
Clark Avenue to Siskiyou Boulevard (PA #94-056, Don Greene)
At the public hearing before the council regarding this planning action, an issue was
raised regarding the requirements of the ADA for the existing footpath on the property.
1. Requirements of the ADA if the footpath is dedicated to the public: If the footpath
is dedicated to the public and improved in any manner, it must meet ADA
requirements'.
2. Requirements of the ADA if the footpath remains private: If the footpath remains
private, the ADA does not impose requirements to meet disability standardS2 but
' 28 CFR § 35.151 requires each "facility . . . constructed by, on behalf of, or for
the use of a public entity shall be designed and constructed in such manner that the
facility . . . is readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities . . . .°
A "facility" is defined for purposes of the ADA as °all or any portion of buildings,
structures, sites. . . . roads, walks, passageways, parking lots . . . .° 28 CFR § 35.104
(Emphasis added.) An analysis published by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission and the U.S. Department of Justice in Americans with Disabilities Act
Handbook adds that a °facility° includes °both indoor and outdoor areas where human-
constructed improvements, structures, equipment, or property have been added to the
natural environment."
P For private ownerships the ADA prohibits discrimination non the basis of
disability in the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities . . . or
accommodations of any place of public accommodation." 28 CFR § 36.201(a)
(Emphasis added). "Facilities" has the same definition as set forth in footnote 1.
28 CFR § 36.104. The pathway would not be a °place of public accommodation,"
however, because it does not fall within one of the twelve enumerated categories
specified in the act. Those twelve categories include hotels, restaurants, theaters,
auditoriums, retail and service establishments, depots, museums, parks, schools,
social service centers and gymnasiums.
MEMO TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
JULY 13, 1994
PAGE 2
Title 31 of the State Structural Specialty Code (the Uniform Building Code as modified
by the State) may (see paragraph 3 below).
3. Requirements of the State Structural Specialty Code (UBC) if the footpath remains
private: To meet the.accessibility requirements of this development an accessible
route must be provided from the lower (and only) parking lot to the apartment units on
the upper level off Clark Street. If the pathway is the accessible route then it must
meet ADA standards as incorporated in Title 31 of the UBC3. (A waiver of this UBC
requirement is possible, however, under ORS 447.250.)
a:do��atr�.�l
3 Title 31 of the UBC is intended to implement the requirements of the ADA in
Oregon. Nevertheless, the requirements of both the ADA and the UBC must be
followed. Because the city's zoning code requires parking to be provided with this
housing development, the parking area must meet disability standards incorporated in
Title 31. See § 3104(a). An accessible route is required from the accessible parking
area to the accessible building entries. See § 3104(d). Since the parking lot is on the
lower level of this development (off Siskiyou Boulevard) and there are building entries
on both the lower and upper levels (the upper level is off Clark Street), an accessible
route is required from the lower level to the upper level building entries.
of ASA(,•.,,,
EZttartt-ndum
�4F6o� • i . . , _
June 30, 1994
V1 II• Brian Almquist, City Administrator
ram: Steven Hall, Public Works Director
p�lI�jEtf: -Work Session - Wastewater.Treatment Plant Facilities Plan
ACTION REOUESTED
City Council select a date for a study session to'review:
I. DEQ evaluation of the effect of Ashland meeting established TMDL's on salmon fish habitat and overall
biological enhancement of Bear Creek.
2. Reliability and consistency of Howard Prairie municipal and industrial stored water rights.
3. Determination of DEQ requirements for modeling/pilot testing wetlands and soil filtration systems. (This
may include estimated costs.)
4. DEQ requirements for simulation of model/test flows from was water ftmftnaa plant to pilot wdbnds/soil
filtration tests.
5. Report from Oregon Water Resauoes Department on water replacement issues. The repott includes legal,
political and practical analysis and conclusions.
6. An evaluation of environmental benefits of each option under consideration.
7. An evaluation of the options based on how "experimental" each may be, based on c unent information.
8. Reconsideration of options previously rejected because of the Talent Irrigation Districts initial mfusal of
Ashland's proposal to commingle heated effluent with TID iaigation water. The MD Board of Directors Ins
expressed an interest in working with Ashland if a Class IV effluent is produced and polished through a
wetland.
9. Review minutes of meeting in Eugene with the Governor's office(Anne Squier),Oregon Departments of
Environmental Quality,Fish and WMife,Wafer Resources and Agriculture,2050 Committee,RVCOG and
Ashland.
10. Discus process to reach a final selection of the preferred alternative to meeting established TM DL's in
Bear Creek.
BACKGROUND
See memorandum submitted to City Council at June 21st meeting.
A packet of information will be available at the July 5th City Council meeting which will provide a basis for
discussion of issues outlined above.
If the Council has other items they wish to discuss, please let Caralyn.or I know of your wishes.
cc: Dennis Barnts, Water Quality Superintendent
Dick Marshall, Wastewater Plant Supervisor
Jim Hill, Medford Wastewater Reclamation Administrator
Marc Prevost, RVCOG Water Quality Coordinator
Gary Schrodt, Ashland Wetlands Coalition
Nancy Abelle, Ashland Clean Air Coalition
Klaas Van de Pol, League of Women Voters
Date: 8-Jul-94 17:42
From: STEVEH (Steve Hauck Council)
To: BRIAN
Copies-to: PEGGY,RHONDA
Subject: SOREDI/SOEDD
Importance: HIGH
Message-id: F58FlD2E01AEAEAE
BRIAN: Per the information 'in your monthly report and todays (July 8) Mail
Tribune article on the probable merger between SOREDI and SOEDD, I would
like you to place this item on our next council agenda. This would be to-
discuss this merger and what effect our recent budget decision to drop
funding to SOREDI will have on our participation and influence in this new
setup. It may be that we should reconsider this decision. Representatives .
from SOREDI/SOEDD and our representative, Mary Lee Christensen should be
invited.
Steve H
r' gaga o,n$': o y E vow, e
a; ry wa c'-y fc v
C�_mmm
c mc °u E ac `oV c yuc'o H pc `° d ° mLUi �iO
lam' Od u amZ and o cy p u 3 y "E y o
1\ ACpd > 0-.- o Q w � y�N dL �N O �CJ Td ° A
Go E� >pnCo'? '> od Lryajvi vw "m'c� .d.
\C' W EE E o..i0-. .-T' � �a� C E$ o.dacn d�oomr a,
`u'Ery mo cyoum Eyce E E aio .. E m020 ` .. cc
c Q.- o .. E Em. E ° d :_ r.. ° � g --D a ao ° o
r ay b'c Cu��u VcY Ok. F mO1 a o2� c �W wow
K .
�Iml - mL ma>i � �� y0dau. e Ea� d� �o= '°
QNE ,dn v aa�ao ova 3 ar� $ o L�nm $ 3`o
c�0e cais � Eomau ran c °�." c�°"0':aEw
Wcwv EmLV cd5LL
m d o E A u d O v a a
Ey3 > aA°° wLV.Ero dv dwFc v Ko` .o
C y O vdi
1 Eya,O yL ° � and Y.°jL y0a Fc'a.E: nu C °^°'L
O ` cco .°_F me 0OO93 L`-N �i+ iEw..'' � °' °� c'.:
m v� y mo c .i0. is E'O W:; �L °`V$ 3 C E oj: ;ad
Nc3 $Go Noy a Z` v mo,o`5c
.. by dap o `._ cdE y8i_ pm E .
°'9L.+L+ itlW V 'o^w > OOO� b mod pi-1 vov ti°, EoV
rnmmc t° a` W dL
6v- c m3m ° ovO .v. `oo E:: mC yiao �um Fias
t m: m m c m E._ y r r c o d T a d i: >
m � m;vpw caEcyy oL� c�m 0 3
vc u aw�pm m-° pcu"� vy `b t03S ° E:;�`tr
»o.mmm Anna aW �5 wa csa E�� E vt4 cc
0"ae6a ,E
Eu m?cojJ H �W¢ A ,n.o E'E uV COa� E
O �_. � Ew `i0' E E ° cm hG yco• vUac3cv y .
ma o `o � „ EW my 3 °" catg r
y -'E y m ao acy me v ° d
w.n93 nE � ETg odvop nE Ce g
it
L A .o_aa v
wx �,o_ yx' � sr mN� E Yb, EF O3 = vc awcroa E
tL
AW,,; .°,a3o Ec o °nS LdEaL of v
Emc 3-� v�n a� ore aL VEo yavv Lm" L
o n a a p.+ - u .". yE a = d.., e
E >
ELL c .d. dm
O Sdv
o F" c .. u `�' v � � �oW and Svoc" NUd
V `o
�
py `u' o o - 6 �'c
E ,u w y E oc r w ;°
Z-m yn co WE' o NF, c y w
v _Y
W'3c 0EF
¢ :Cea o m-• ' V no >
vE On yy0 E E aa -ME. °C3ua a 'ac`
Io „ Q a
E E y
OO o, Ai- ED .d. mOy WE vim
m amv
=�E;] 'c
o a
E . yoa'S&maoy y
°A go C -LaO E c .e.
<� oyIvEO� mo' 3� o � EO E
vc .M �L' v° 3
aL NUm Fu� tO O ° Cdt oy00y F V °O oy ER FNL
T-
m o m O m
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF ASHLAND
20 EAST MAIN STREET
(503) 482-3211, EXT. 59
MEMORANDUM
July 14, 1994
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Paul Nolte
Subject: Amendments to Charter and Code Regarding Sale of Water Outside the
City Limits.
Councilor Laws has suggested some charter and code amendments regarding the
sale of water outside the city. The code amendments are attached. The charter
amendments are set forth below. To make the November general election, the notice
of election to amend the charter would have to be submitted by September 8, 1994.
PROPOSED CHARTER AMENDMENT
ANNOTATED TO SHOW DELETIONS AND ADDITIONS. DELETIONS ARE 1 1N€B-THRANGH AND
ADDITIONS ARE
Article XVI, Section 1. Public Utilities - Water Works. The City of Ashland, a
municipal corporation, shall have the power to provide the residents of said City
with such services as water, sewer, electric power, public transportation and
such other public utilities as the people desire by majority vote; and to exact
and collect compensation from the users of such public utility; provided,
however, that any and all water and water works and water rights now owned
or which may hereafter be acquired by said City, for the purpose of supplying
the inhabitants thereof with water shall never be rented, sold or otherwise
disposed of; nor shall the City ever grant any franchise to any person or
corporation for the purpose of supplying the inhabitants of said City with water.
�'tt@:. �.:)•e; :6�,�-a.:' «��„Ti�:=is 'i'.�BtE�rtitlitil�a�ki3�:;"., .P_ �;.... n:.:.::. @T1?'� M,
.. E...,.°„. .:Vo ,'R,'�' >'°>'�34,•'.'�a+.`,y<gk.:�Q .a y R.'2,`3 's e'�.m"oo.`�'M�,'..'r.e.>".^ru`a`.'`E7
s..ei�`pm(x�i���''yF s}��a54
t"'!WWg�"w. >.�5 1E-
n
....... IDo. e���
MEMO TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL
JULY 14, 1994
PAGE 2
I��rpr��ti»rts�s�t;de�ems necessary ssr�Ey�?'flE'�at+��t�;��'S�'t�ut�ihes�der
vis� ii :. . ...
(P:ord\cn-we[w.m" -
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING CONDITIONS FOR
THE SALE OF WATER OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMITS
THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF ASHLAND DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The following section 14.04.050 is added to the Ashland Municipal Code:
14.04.050 Connection - Outside City. Inside Urban Growth Boundary.
Premises located outside the City of Ashland and inside the urban growth
boundary may be connected to the city water system when such connection is
determined by the Ashland City Council to be in the best interest of the City of
Ashland and to not be detrimental to the City's water facilities. Such connection
shall be made only upon the following conditions:
A. The applicant for water service pay the water connection fee and the
systems development charges established by the City.
B. In the event dwellings or buildings connected to the water system are
subsequently replaced for any reason, then the replacement building or dwelling
may continue to be connected to the water system of the City as long as the
use of the water system will not be increased as determined by the Director of
Public Works.
C. There is an existing Ashland water main or line to which the premises
can be connected.
D. The applicant furnish to the City a consent to the annexation of the
land, signed by the owners of record and notarized so that it may be recorded
by the City and binding on future owners of the land.
E. The applicant shall provide for the payment to the City by the owners,
at the time of annexation, an amount equal to the current assessment for
liabilities and indebtedness previously contracted by a public service district,
such as Jackson County Fire District No. 5, multiplied by the number of years
remaining on such indebtedness, so that the land may be withdrawn from such
public service districts in accord with ORS 222.520 and at no present or future
expense to the City.
F. The owner shall execute a deed restriction preventing the partitioning
or subdivision of the land prior to annexation to the City. ..
G. The premises are within the Urban Growth Boundary.
H. The property owner shall execute a contract with the City of Ashland
which provides for payment of all charges connected with the provision of water
PAGE 1-ORDINANCE (p:mAweterupb.Ord)
service to the property; compliance with all ordinances of the city related to
water service and that failure to pay for charges when due shall automatically
become a lien upon the property. A memorandum of the contract shall be
recorded in the county deed records with the cost of recording to be paid by
the property owner.
SECTION 2. The following section 14.04.060 is added to the Ashland Municipal Code:
14.04.060 Connection - Outside Urban Growth Boundary. Premises located
outside the urban growth boundary may be connected to the city water system
when such connection is determined by the Ashland City Council to be in the
best interest of the City of Ashland and to not be detrimental to the City's water
facilities. Such connection shall be made only upon the following conditions:
A. The applicant for water service pays the water connection fee and the
systems development charges established by the City Council.
B. The connection is for the use and benefit of dwellings and buildings
completed and existing on July 1, 1994.
C. An Ashland water main or line exists within 100 feet of the premises.
No water main or lines will be extended to serve properties outside of the urban
growth boundary.
D. The applicant shall secure, in writing, a statement from the
Environmental Health Division, Health Department, Jackson County, Oregon,
that the existing water system for the premises has failed.
E. The applicant shall secure, in writing, a statement from Jackson
County that the provision of water by the City of Ashland does not conflict with
the Jackson County Comprehensive Plan, support documents, rules or
regulations.
F. There is no other feasible source of water for the premises.
G. The property owner shall execute a deed restriction on the property
that states that no further buildings or additions to existing buildings shall be
connected to the water service.
H. The property owner shall execute a contract with the .City of Ashland
which provides for payment of all charges connected with the provision of water
service to the property; compliance with all ordinances of the city related to .
water service and that failure to pay for charges when due shall automatically
become a lien upon the property. A memorandum of the contract shall be
recorded in the county deed records with the cost of recording to be paid by
the property owner.
PAGE 2-ORDINANCE (o:crakwatmub.ord)
The City Council may also provide water service outside the urban growth
boundary by special contract under such terms and conditions the Council
deems appropriate when such connection is in the best interest of the City.
PAGE 3-ORDINANCE �n:«mwac«wn.o,a�
emorandum
June 16, 1994
I
t
I 1110. Mayor and City Council
i
i
C29 rom: Mike Broomfield
llCijEtt: NEW PARK TRAILER INSTALLATION AND SITING STANDARDS
U
i
Effective January 1, 1994, the Oregon Building Codes Division will be enforcing
Oregon Administrative Rule 918-530 for installation of park trailers.
Like other Oregon specialty codes, the park trailer standard is preemptive
statewide and cannot be amended or added to by local municipalities. Unlike
the other specialty codes, however, the standard is only enforceable within
State jurisdictions and those municipalities.who have specifically adopted
these standards through local ordinance.
Unlike the Oregon manufactured home installation standard, the new park trailer
installation standard is a stand alone document and is not secondary to the
manufacturers installation instructions. The new standard only applies to park
f trailers which are over 8-1/2 feet wide.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, I will be present at your
t July 5, 1994 City Council Meeting.
f
i
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION 15.04.110 TO THE ASHLAND
MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADOPT OREGON PARK TRAILER
INSTALLATION STANDARDS, RECREATIONAL VEHICLE
ACCESSORY STRUCTURE AND ACCESSORY BUILDING
STANDARDS AND OREGON RECREATIONAL VEHICLE SITING
STANDARDS; PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS AND
THE COLLECTION OF FEES.
THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF ASHLAND DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:,,
SECTION 1. Section 15.04.110 it added to the Ashland Municipal Code as follows:
S ct on 1504 110 Park Trailer and Recreational Vehicle Standards. A. The following
standards are adopted by reference, and each standard is incorporated'and made
part of this chapter, except,aS specifically provided*by this section. .,
1. The State of Oregon Administrative Rules-(OAR) for recreational-vehicles
(RV), parli_trailers and RV!accessory structures as of January 4, 1994,>as follows'
OAR 918-525-005 Definitions
OAR 918-525-040(6) Park Trailer Installations . .
OAR 918-525-040(7) Recreational Vehicle Siting
OAR 918-525-MM Recreational
Accessory Structures
OAR 918-525-310(4) Required Inspections
OAR 918-525-310(5) Inspection Fees
OAR 918-525-020 Notice of Violations
OAR 918-525-350 Alteration and Repair
OAR 918-525.370 Permit Requirements
OAR 918-525-410 Insignia Requirements
OAR 918-525-420 Insignia Not Required
OAR 918-525-510(23) Park Trailer Installation Fee
OAR 918-525-510(24) Installation Reinspection Fee
OAR 918-525-520 Additional
OAR 918-530 Trailer Installation Standards
OAR 918-535-010 through
918-535-050 RV Accessory Structure Standards.
OAR 918-525-070 RV Fire Protection Standards
2. Permit required. No person shall install a park trailer over 8'/z feet wide nor
work on a park trailer, recreational vehicle, cabana, or RV accessory structure for
which a permit has not been issued by the city.
B. A person affected by a ruling of the building official may appeal the ruling to the
Board of Appeals established pursuant to AMC § 15.04.200 within 30 days of the
ruling with further appeal to the State Manufactured Structures and Parlcs,Advisory
PAGE 1-PARK TRAILER/RECREATIONAL VEHICLE ORDINANCE a:«mtr�i�.o ei
Board. The City recognizes that a person may request a ruling from the Administrator
of the State Building Codes Division prior to submitting an application to the city for a
permit or after withdrawing a previously submitted application.
C. In addition to any other authority and power granted to the building official or
delegated inspector, except where inconsistent with other provisions of the law, the
building official or delegated inspector may enforce the provisions of the Oregon
Administrative Rules against any person regardless of whether a permit, certificate,
license, or other indicia of authority has been issued. The building official or delegated
inspector may investigate, order corrective action, and if any immediate hazard to
health and safety is imminent, issue and order to stop all or any work under the
applicable Oregon Administrative Rule.
D. It shall be unlawful for a person, firm, or corporation:
1. To erect, construct, enlarge, after, repair, move, improve, remove, convert,
or demolish, equip, use, occupy, or maintain any recreational vehicle accessory
structure, mechanical system or equipment, plumbing system or fixtures, electrical
system or equipment, or cause or permit the same to be done in violation of an
Oregon Administrative Rule adopted in this chapter.
2. it shall be unlawful for a person, firm, or corporation to construct, erect,
after, repair, move, improve, convert, use, occupy, or maintain any park trailer
installation or permit the same to be done in violation of an Oregon Administrative Rule
adopted by this chapter.
3. The provisions in this section and the penalties provided in AMC § 15.04.230
are in addition to those remedies established for trades licensing under ORS 446, 447,
455, 479, and 693 and more specifically ORS 446.990, 447.160, 455.895, and 693.190
penalty provisions.
The foregoing ordinance was first read by title only in accordance with Article X,
Section 2(C) of the City Charter on the day of , 1994, and
duly PASSED and ADOPTED this day of 1994.
Nan E. Franklin, City Recorder
SIGNED.and APPROVED this day of 1994.
Catherine M. Golden, Mayor
Approved as to form:
Paul Nolte, City Attorney
PAGE 2-PARK TRAILER/RECREATIONAL VEHICLE ORDINANCEjp:ormrrder.�a
Armoran >� nm
p4EGp�
July 11, 1994
a: Brian Almquist, City Administrator
ram: Steven Hall, Public Works Director
1t�IjEC#: Transportation/Storm Drain Utility Rates
ACTION REQUESTED
City Council adopt the attached resolution increasing the Transportation Utility Fee to cover expenses for the
Rogue Valley Transit District (RVTD) subsidized fare in Ashland.
BACKGROUND
The City of Ashland, Southern Oregon State College, RVTD and the Oregon Department of Transportation
worked together to provide a no Bost fare for SOSC students throughout the RVTD system and a$0.25 in City
fare for Ashland, with 15 minute service. The original in City fare was$1.00. The City provided$20,000
SOSC $8,000 and ODOT $52,000 for this program.
The program was extremely suocesdul and had an impact by reducing automobile traffic in Ashland. For the first
12 months of the program,it is estimated that 18,000 vehicle trips were removed from City stress and SOSC
student ridership rose from 12,000 to 61,000.
It is rattier unforhaiate that ODOT could only participate for one year in this highly suooess[id program. Federal
regulations will not allow a oontinued "subsidy" for fares. I find it ironic that the Federal regulations do not
allow a "credit" for benefit gained. If they would, the subsidy issue would be moot.
The increase in the Transportation Utility Fee is partially the inflation increase as approved in the existing
resolution. The balance of the increase is to pay for the bus fare program in the amount of$50,000. This was
approved by the Budget Committee and City Council.
Initially,it was assumed Ashland's share would be$72,000[$20,000 subsidy,$52,000 grant replacement]but
Don Laws worked with Doug Pilant of RVTD to produce a"net"increase in cost to RVTD of$50,000.
The analysis of the increase in cost is on the attached sheet.
The Storm Drain Utility Ordinance and rate resolution will be presented to you at the July 19th City Council
Meeting.
Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution.
cc: Jim Olson, Assistant City Engineer
Jerry Glossop, Street Superintendent
Enc: Resolution w/Exhibit A
Fee Increase Computation
Bus Program Cost Analysis
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A TRANSPORTATION AND STORM DRAIN UTILITY RATE
SCHEDULE PURSUANT TO SECTION 4.26.020 OF THE ASHLAND MUNICIPAL CODE.
THE CITY OF ASHLAND RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The 'Transportation and Storm Drain Utility Rate Schedule" marked "Exhibit A" and attached to
this Resolution is adopted as the transportation and storm drain user fees.
SECTION 2. The rates adopted on "Exhibit A" shall be increased annually on July 1st, based on the
Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index (ENR). The initial ENR is established at 5407.89. The City
Administrator will provide the City Council with a review of the rate structure within 5 years from the date of
this Resolution.
SECTION 3. Three (3) copies of this Resolution and "Exhibit.A" shall be maintained in the office of the City
Recorder and shall be available for public inspection during regular business hours.
SECTION 4. The rates adopted pursuant to this Resolution shall be effective on or after August 1, 1994.
SECTION 5. Resolution 92-17 is repealed on the effective date of this Resolution.
SECTION 6. The fees imposed by this Resolution are classified as not subject to the limits of Section 11b
of Article XI of the Oregon Constitution (Ballot Measure No. 5).
This.resolution was read by title only in accordance with Ashland Municipal Code§2.04.090 duly PASSED and
ADOPTED this 5th day of July, 1994.
Nan E. Franklin, City Recorder
SIGNED and APPROVED this day of July, 1994.
Catherine M. Golden, Mayor
Reviewed as to form:
Paul Nolte, City Attorney
Ic:1&W%fftatmf".m"ml
a .
EXHIBIT A
Resolution 44-
city of A5nl acid
Btr'et'$torm iJt Iiity
• irilat2 of uadateS
isst Male: 06124 194
nsiE i)7101/44
ITEM FEE UNIT
r` :Y.,W I Ohl
A. single Family Residential 31.21 /month
B:
MultinIe Family ;kilts $1.34 lmmth
Setall Stores $0.24 il;k) 54
";olesaie Users $0.14 11N r
_. _'irE !sec $li.i) 111e1 S.
D_-1tai Li5Er5 $41."L• I100 Sf
_. _,er•r.ts Users KI.-2 ilf�li s11
=LLrEnts and Bar 11SE c $0, 1Oil e.
.-. . turinm users 1;1.14 /100 s
rarehoa5ing Users $O.Og +•(10 5f
oral and all $0.64 ;row
no-
!T-Tt: Lis 9,S wlth'.G ..s Dowrmwo iverlay District SMI t
'rnsrOEd On 'he SHE DESL e5 elsewhere within Lne city. .
.._._.._., -ee tur ary cnT, c;-' arrnun.t
2. _=;ilk: TRANBFORTATIMd .
A, Z.rigl Family Re- L-: $l i, /with
B. kiltiple Family Units $0.16 /manth
etail Bore $0.fn /100 5;
D. thoieeale Users $0.(12 /ICK, Sf
c. Office L!sers $0,(12 11 G0 sf
F< Medical/Dental Users $0.0'• /100 sf
B. Bervice Users $O,o3 1101 Sf
'. Restaurants and Ear Users $0.08 /100 Sf
;. Manufacturing Users $0.02 iI ) sf
J. Warehousing Users $0.01 /100 sf
Hotel and Motel User $D.OB /room
L. Institutional and all $0.00 /row
other a¢ounts not classified
above
NICE: Users within the Downtown Overlay District'Shaii b
charmed on the same basis as elsewhere within the City.
minimum fee for any commercial account is $0.,
. � . � . .
mm : :
mmm� .
:9 , »w .
gym . .
Updates
,,7i
moms
.Egp 7
orl A
. 3 � . .
: 1=..1, . U s »
: eK, +9 +mm m» ma
E m oq I Pi a m9 m !
: mae m6a eY m e
: e . Fam 4> we cm .m.!
E ma _; w Tr a 1:e!-
mrPl ee¥ � " . .
/ ! r-d MsHtuLuul-1 M . \ _
s/ f
LU
; .. � .
FOR 1TYM51
Lis' 'L�-date z )6120194
> . $ Est mlmzl !
Ugk
Is > » :o .» $7,945 a
, kin RH% S.» t= %m P» .
fouTtatim 5 SIQU := Gw *%w . .
ferfal Two U 6 » W E e• am
monwmaim Gw R= SM2 $16,W2 :
m at i m $« is sjmt.1 ««
e , mwe9 » m $344,50v
m. 9 ,e & » W %a Ge
me mess » e AS 9w
Use 91WE Afly IOWA! FEE as a bans.
.
FEE ! Est » ! 1 999
» hanxGual Net cz t» mob m .
a , ma m, c= tx r= : $m
tnul,
TOTk\�.F a . //Tr
y
P a'-INCREASE FOR F . sm
« c, .
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION DEDICATING PROPERTY FOR PARK PURPOSES
PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIX, SECTION 3, OF THE CITY CHARTER
(GUNTER PROPERTIES) .
THE CITY OF ASHLAND RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The land described on the attached Exhibits A and
B is dedicated for park purposes pursuant to Article XIX,
Section 3, of the Ashland City Charter.
This resolution was read by title only in accordance with Ashland
Municipal Code S 2.04 .090 duly PASSED and ADOPTED this day
of , 1994.
Nan E. Franklin, City Recorder
SIGNED and APPROVED this day of , 1994.
Catherine M. Golden, Mayor
Reviewed as to form:
Paul Nolte, City Attorney
PAGE 1-RESOLUTION DESIGNATING PROPERTY FOR PARK PURPOSES (GUNTER
PROPERTIES)(p:pub*=w.m)
IA-59790
EXHIBIT A
TRACE A - Beginning at a point on the east line of North Mountain Avenue, which paint
bears 30.0 feet Fsst and 692.70 feet North of the aoutheest corner of Donation Land Claim
No. 41 in Township 39 South, Range 1 East of the Willamette Meridian in Jadcam County,
Oregon;"thane North 89'30' Fast 156.20 feet; thence North 169.30 feet; thence South
89'30' West 156.20 feet; thane South 169.30 feet to the point of beginning.
Ml de 5-1, Account #1-5115-4, Map #391MM, Tax Eat 4200)
TRACP B - PARCEL I -
Commencing at a 5/8" ixxn pin located at the nnruwe t comer of lot Thirty-sevai (37) of
Ashland Acres, amorlding to the official plat thereof, ro
w of record; thence South
slag the west 11ne of said Lot, being also the east lire of Mountain
Avenue, 367.52 feet to the west-souttagest miner of that tract described in instrument
recorded as No. 71-13153 of the Official Records of Jadrsm County, Oregon for the true
Point of beginning; thence continua South 0.04'50" West (Record South) aleng'said line,
320.00 feet; thence East 647.62•feet, more or less, to a point on the southerly line of
said tract described in deed recorded as Lbanent No. 71-13153 said Official Records;
thence along the southerly line of said tract, the following courses: North 44.32'00" East
325.48 feet, North 72.21'20" West 132.49 feet and North 80.43'10" West 296.53 feet to the
true paint of beginning.
(Code 5-1, Amount #1-5066-1, Map #391ED4Aru, Tax Lot #300)
PARCeI, II - Commencing at the southeast COMer of DOnatim Land Claim No. 41 in Tawlsmp
39 South Range 1 East of the Wi u n&wtbB Meridian in Jackson County, .Oregon; thence ce North
0104150" Fast (Record North) 570.10 feet; thence East 30.00 feet to the east Hine of
Mountain Aver we and the true point of beginning; thanes mntirue East 581.20 feet; there .
South 211.70 feet; thane East 475.90 feet to the meandered lion of Bear Creek as it
appears in deed recorded in Volume 96 page 198 of the Deed Records of Jackson Conty, -
Ora3an, being also the swduesterly line of Lot Thirty-seven (37) of Ashland Acres,
according to the official plat thereof, now of record; thence along said line, the
following musses: North 08'15'00" West 4.30 feet, North 39'29100" West 140.00 feet, North
04'20100" East 191.90 feet to the most southerly line of tract described in deed recorded
in Doamart No. 71-13153 of the Official Records of Jackson County, Oregon; thane Wrest,
along said southerly lire, 9.70 feet to the most southwest corner of said tract; thence continue a.lmg the fly line of said tract, the following oases: North
53'41'00" West 122.20 feet, (Record 120.20 feat), .North 56.18'00" West 229.06 feet, North
44.32'00" West 49.38 feet; thence leavirg said sarulesterly line, West 647.62 feet, more
or less, to the east lire of Mxmtain Avaom Said point being North 0.04'50" Fast 896.70
feet and Fast 30.00 feet from the southeast corner of said Dmatim Land Claim No. 41;
thane South 0'04'50" Wrest (Record South) along said east line, 34.70 feet to the .
northwest corner of tract descried in inStrwMt recorded in Volume 499 page 372 of the
Deed Records of Jackson Canty, Oregon; thane North 89°30'00" Fast 156.20 feet to the .
northeast comer thereof;'thence South 169.30 feet to the southeast ro er thereof,
located an the north lire of tract described in instrument recorded in Volume 499 page 371 .
of the Deed Raoeds of Jackson County, Oregon; thence North 89.30100" Fast, along said .
Lim, 146.90 feet to the northeast comer of said tract; thane South 111.80 feet to the
southeast corner thereof; thane South 89.30'00" West along the south line of said tract, -
303.10 feet to the southimst Corner thereof, located on the east lire of Mountain Avenue;
thence South 0.04'50" West (Rec rd South), along said east line, 10.80 feet to the true
point of beginning.
(Code 5-1, Account #1-05114-8,. Mp #39JE04m, Tax lot #100)
(Code 5-8, Ao=mt #1-11369-9, Map #391BDdM, Tax lot #100)
Joduon Counly, Orapai
Rea xded
omaAL RKORDs
'.'/a JUN 0 3 1994 YN
KATHLMN s. mocErT
CM and RECORDER
r� wm-
d� �
• 94=211,130
I.A-59874 -
EXHIBIT B
Beginning at a point on the east line of North Maintain Avenue, which point hears 30.0
feet Ea§t and 580.90 feet North of the southeast corner of Donation lard C,lai. No. 41,
Township 39 South, Range 1 East of the Willamette Meridian in Jackson County, Ooego i;
thence North 111.8 feet; thence North 89.30' East 303,10 feet; thence South 111.8 feet;
thence South 89'30' West 303.10 feet to the point of beginning.
(Code 5-1, Acc0unt #1-5116-2, Map 439lE4DD, Tax Lot #300)
Subject To: .
1. The effect of said property, or any part thereof, lying within the Talent Irrigation
District, and subject to all water and irrigation rights, easements for ditches and
canals, and all regulations of said District, including any and all assessments, liens and
- charges assessed, and to be assessed.
jo&an Cb my, Ore-pm
Recorded
OEHOAL RECORDS
JUN 0 3 1994 7°M
KATHLEEN & BECKEfT
.GLHtK and RECORDER
BDUh
�REGO
July 12, 1994
D: Brian Almquist, City Administrator
(19 ram: Steven Hall, Public Works Director
�ubjt?Ct: Ordinance-Storm Drain Utility
ACTION REQUESTED
City Council adopt the attached Ordinance setting the framework for the Storm Drain Utility in conformance with
Oregon state law and legal precedence.
(NOTE: The ordinance has been published and needs to be read by title only.)
BACKGROUND '
There have been several cdhallenges to street and star, drain utilities over the last decade 'Ibis form of utility is
common throughout cities in Oregon, Washington and Idaho. I am sure more states use this form of utility as it
is often the subject of national meetings I have attended.
Recently, the City of Roseburg went tuo*a legal chhallenge to their storm drain utility and withstood the legal
challenge. Roseburg is the most recent litigated storm drain utility and was used as the basis for Ashland's new
storm drain utility ordinance.
One of the major changes is the method of computng the fee. Cunwdy, Ashland's storm drain fee is based on
the water meter size for the individual home or business. This was one of the methods used early in the
formation of the utility. The commonly accepted method for computing storm drainage fees is based on
"impervious area". Impervious area is the measurement of all hard surfaces on an individual parcel of land such
as roofs, driveways,parking lots and sidewalks. This methodology has withstood many legal challenges.
City staff has spent the last several months gathering information on impervious area for each commercial and
industrial property in Ashland. Each single family residence is based on an impwmm area of 3000 square feet
as an "average". This is a figure used by many cities including Roseburg and Medford.
For multi-family units,2 through 9 units, several typical units for each shze were measured and the average use
for each multi-family unit in this category and range. Those multi-family units of 10 or more units were each
individually measured as were all commercial properties.
For the larger units, such as Southern Oregon State College, maps or aerial photographs were used to compute the
impervious area.
If any commercial or industrial property owner disagrees with the computation, there is a method for correction
within the system.
Another issue that was critical in the legal challenges of storm drain utilities was the exemption for a parcel of
land that does not drain into a public storm drainage system. An example would be properties that abut Ashland
Creek or Bear Creek and do not utilize public storm drainage facilities. There is an,exemption for such cases.
These will be handled on an individual request basis.
Paul Nolte and Jill Turner have reviewed the proposed ordinance and recommend approval.
The resolution and rate structure will follow within the next 30 to 60 days. Computations are being completed at
this point in time.
Enc: Proposed Ordinance
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTER 4.27 TO THE ASHLAND
MUNICIPAL CODE CONCERNING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A
STORM DRAINAGE UTILITY AND STORM DRAINAGE UTILITY
FEES.
THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF ASHLAND DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Chapter 4.27 is established in the Ashland Municipal Code and shall read as
follows:
Chapter 4.27
STORM DRAINAGE UTILITY
Sections:
4.27.010 Findings.
4.27.020 Definitions.
4.27.030 Storm Drainage Policy.
4.27.040 Establishment of a Storm Drainage Utility.
4.27.050 Establishment of a Storm Drainage Utility Fee.
4.27.060 Storm Drainage Utility Fee--Dedicated:
4.27.070 Billing for Fee.
4.27.080 Enforcement.
4.27.090 Administrative Review--Appeals.
4.27.100 Notice of Decision.
4.27.110 Exemptions.
4.27.120 Discount for the Elderly.
4.27.010 Findings.
A. The City provides a valuable public service by providing storm.drainage facilities
for the collection and disposal of storm water discharged from properties and public right-
of-ways within the City. The storm drainage facilities constitute a public utility owned and
operated by the City. The utility exists for the benefit of any person within the City who
wants to have the public storm drainage facilities available for the diversion, collection
and/or disposal of storm drainage and other runoff water from the person's property and
represents a municipal service in a developed urban environment which is essential to the
public health, safety and welfare.
B. Persons who use the public storm drainage facilities ought to be charged fees
that reflect the cost of the management, maintenance, extension and.construction of.the
public storm drainage facility as a public utility in the City. Persons ought not be
compelled to use this utility, nor to pay monthly utility fees, if the utility is not to be used
by the person responsible. Persons who undertake the installation of runoff control
1
facilities on their property that reduce or eliminate the discharge of storm water into public
storm drainage facilities ought to be given credit, in proportion to the degree of reduction,
against storm drainage utility fees that would otherwise be due.
C. Accordingly, the structure of the storm drainage utility is intended to be a fee
for service and not a charge against property. Although this structure is intended to
constitute a service fee, even if it is viewed as a fee against property or against the
person responsible, as a direct consequence of ownership of that property, the utility's
fee structure should allow the person responsible to have the ability to control the amount
of the fee. Similarly, the utility fee structure should reflect the actual cost of providing the
service and not impose fees on persons not receiving a service. The actual costs may
include all costs the utility might incur were it in private ownership.
D. Persons using water from the City potable water facilities, City irrigation water
facilities and/or the Talent Irrigation District irrigation facilities use substantial amounts of
water for irrigating lawns and gardens, washing structures, sidewalks, driveways and
parking lots, and.for other activities which result in the discharge of runoff into the public
storm drainage facilities. These uses of water demonstrate a substantial relationship
between persons' use of these water facilities and their use of the public storm drainage
facilities.
4.27.020 Definitions. Except where the context otherwise .requires, the definitions
contained in this section shall govern the construction of this chapter.
A. Commercial or Industrial Unit shall be as defined in AMC 18.08 as "Commercial,
or commercial use" and "Industrial, or industrial use".
B. Development shall mean any constructed change to improved or unimproved
property including, but not limited to, buildings or other structures, private storm drainage
facilities, mining, dredging, filling, grading, paving, excavation or drilling operations.
C. Director shall mean the City Director of Public Works/City Engineer or the
person designated by the Director.
D. Duplex shall be as defined in AMC 18.08 as "Dwelling, two family or duplex".
E. Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU) shall mean an area which is estimated to
place approximately equal demand on the public storm drainage facilities as defined in
AMC 18.08 as "Dwelling, single family". One (1) ERU shall be equal to 3,000 square feet
of impervious surface.
F. Impervious Surfaces are those surface areas which either prevent or retard
saturation of water into the land surface and cause water to run off the land surface in
greater quantities or at an increased rate of flow from that present under natural
conditions pre-existent to development. Examples of impervious surfaces include, but are
not limited to, rooftops, concrete or asphalt sidewalks, walkways, patio areas, driveways,
parking lots or storage areas and gravel, oil, macadam or other surfaces which similarly
impact the natural saturation or runoff patterns which existed prior to development.
G. Improved Property shall mean any area which has been altered such that the
runoff from the site is greater than that which could historically have been expected.
Such a condition shall be determined by the Director.
H. Master Plan shall mean the 'City of Ashland Drainage Master Plan" prepared
by Kramer, Chin and Mayo, Incorporated, dated July 1985 including such amendments
to such plan.
2
I, Mobile Home Park shall be as defined in AMC 18.08 as °Mobile home court,
park or subdivision".
J. Multiple-family unit (MFU) shall be as defined in AMC 18.08 as a "Dwelling,
multiple-family".
K. Open Drainageway shall mean a natural or constructed path, ditch or channel
which has the specific function of transmitting natural stream water or storm water from
a point of higher elevation to a point of lower elevation.
L. Person responsible shall mean the owner, agent, occupant, lessee, tenant,
contract purchaser or other person having possession or control of property or the
supervision of an improvement on the property.
M. Runoff Control shall mean any measure approved by the Director that reduces
storm water runoff from land surfaces on which development exists.
N. Single Family Unit (SFU) shall be as defined in AMC 18.08 as "Dwelling, single-
family" or individual units of "Condominiums". A SFU is presumed-to have 3,000 square
feet of impervious surface area for purposes of this chapter. The term SFU shall be
inclusive of those units identified as detached single-family residences, unit ownerships,
and condominiums, and etc.
O. Storm Drainage Facilities shall mean any structure(s) or configuration of the
ground that is used or by its location becomes a place where storm water flows or is
accumulated including, but not limited to, pipes, sewers, gutters, manholes, catch basins,
ponds, open drainage-ways and their appurtenances. Ashland Creek, Bear Creek,
Wrights Creek, Neil Creek, Emigrant Creek, Hamilton Creek, Clay Creek, Tolman Creek,
Roca Canyon Drainageway or creeks excluded by action of the Council are not storm
drainage facilities.
P. Storm Water shall mean water from precipitation, surface or subterranean water
from any source, drainage and non-septic waste water.
4.27,030 Storm Drainage Policy, A. Council declares its intention to acquire, own,
manage, construct, equip, operate and maintain within the City open drainageways,
underground storm drains, equipment and appurtenances necessary, useful, or
convenient for public storm drainage facilities. The Council also declares its intention to
manage, maintain and extend existing public storm drainage facilities.
B. The improvement of both public and private storm drainage facilities through
or adjacent to a new development shall be the responsibility of the person responsible.
The improvements shall comply with all applicable City ordinances, policies, standards
and Master Plan.
C. No portion of this ordinance or statement or subsequent.Council interpretation
or policies shall relieve the person responsible of assessments levied against their
property for public facility improvement projects.
D. It is the policy of the City to participate in improvements to storm drainage
facilities when authorized by the Director. To be considered for approval by the Director,
a storm drainage facility must:
1. be public; and
2. be a major benefit to the community; and
3. be located in or on a City property, City right=of-way or City easement;
and
4. if a piped system, be a `design equivalent to larger than a 24 inch
diameter circular concrete pipe; and
3
5. be identified as a project in the Master Plan; or
6. be a rehabilitation and/or replacement of existing public storm drainage
facilities.
E. The City shall maintain public storm drainage facilities located on City property,
City right-of-way or City easements. Public storm drainage facilities to be managed by
the City include, but are not limited to;
1. open drainageways serving a drainage basin of at least 100 acres, when
on City property, City right-of-way or City easement;
2. a piped drainage system and related appurtenances which has been
designed and constructed expressly for use by the general public and accepted by the
Director;
3. roadside drainage ditches along unimproved City streets;
4. flood control facilities (levees, dikes, overflow channels, detention basins,
retention basins, dams, pump stations, groundwater recharging basins, etc.) that have
been designed and constructed expressly for use by the general public and accepted by
the City. ' .
F. Storm drainage facilities not to be maintained by the City include, but are not
limited to:
1. storm drainage facilities not located on City property, City right-of-way,
or City easement;
2. private parking lot storm drainages;
3. roof, footing, and area drainages;
4. drainages not designed and constructed for use by the general public;
5. drainage swales which collect storm water from a basin less than 100
acres that are not located on City property, right-of-way or easement;
6. access drive culverts;
7. those portions of streams or drainageways specified in AMC 4.27.010.0
located on privately owned land;
8. ditches, swales, culverts and similar facilities owned and operated by the
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation or the Talent Irrigation District.
4.27.040 Establishment of a Storm Drainage Utility. A Storm Drainage Utility is
created for the purpose of providing funds for the management, maintenance, extension
and construction of public storm drainage facilities within the City. Council finds,
determines and declares the necessity of providing for the management, maintenance,
extension and construction of City storm drainage facilities for its inhabitants.
4.27.050 Establishment of.a Storm Drainage Util'dy Fee. A storm drainage utility
fee shall be paid by each person(s) responsible and shall be established by resolution of
the Council for commercial or industrial units, duplexes, mobile home parks, multiple
family units, single family units and equivalent residential units.
1. Such fee shall be established in amounts which will provide sufficient
funds to properly manage and maintain public storm drainage facilities.
2. Such fee may be used for the construction of new storm drainage
facilities or for the extension of existing storm drainage faciliities.
3. Council may from time to time by resolution, change the fees based
upon revised estimates of the cost of properly managing, maintaining, extending
and constructing public storm drainage facilities.
4
4. Credit will be allowed for runoff control measures. When approved by
the Director, storm drainage utility fees may be reduced for a property where
approved runoff control measures have been taken. A fee reduction shall be on
a straight line basis with conditions existing on the date of the passage of this
ordinance, being considered as starting or initial conditions. If the person
responsible establishes, to the satisfaction of the Director, that all runoff from a
property is disposed of without utilizing public storm drainage facilities either
directly or indirectly, there will be no fees charged under the provisions of this
chapter.
5. Property not used for single family dwelling purposes shall be considered
to be furnished service in proportion to the amount of the property's impervious
surface, and that for each 3,000 square feet (or increment of 100 square feet) of
impervious surface, the property is furnished service equivalent to that furnished
a single family unit and that the minimum service charge shall be that established
for a single family unit.
4 27 060 Storm Drainage Utilky Fee--Dedicated All fees collected for the purposes
specked in this chapter shall be paid into the storm drainage accounts and accounted
for by dedicated line items including, but not limited to, Storm Drainage Maintenance and
Storm Drainage Construction. Such revenues shall be used for the purposes of the
management, maintenance, extension and construction of public storm drainage facilities.
4.27.070 Billing For Fee. The fee shall be billed and collected with the monthly utility bill.
All such bills shall be rendered monthly by the City and shall become due and payable
in accordance with the rules and regulations of the City Department of Fnance pertaining
to the collection of utility fees. All fees collected will be placed in the storm drainage
accounts as required by this chapter.
4.27.080 Enforcement. Any fee due which is not paid when due may be recovered in
an action at law by the City. In addition to any other remedies or penalties provided by
this or any other City ordinance, failure of any person responsible to pay fees promptly
when due shall subject the person responsible to discontinuance of any utility services
provided by the City and the City Administrator is empowered and directed to enforce this
provision against such delinquent users. The employees of the City shall, at all
reasonable times, have access to any improved property served by the City for
inspection, repair, or the enforcement of the provisions of this chapter.
4.27.090 Administrative Review - Appeals.
A. Any person responsible who disputes the amount of the fee, or disputes any
determination made by or on behalf of the City pursuant to and by the authority of this
chapter may.petition the Council for a.hearing on a revision or modification of such fee
or determination. Such petitions may be filed only once in connection with any fee for
determination, except upon the showing of changed circumstances sufficient to justify the
filing of an additional petition.
B. Such petitions, including all facts and figures, shall be submitted in writing and
filed with the City Recorder at least 14 days prior to a hearing scheduled by the Council.
The petitioner shall have the burden of proof.
5
C. Within 30 days of filing of the petition, the Council shall make findings of fact
based on all relevant information, shall make a determination based upon such findings
and, if appropriate, modify such fee or determination accordingly. Such determination by
the Council shall be considered a final order.
4.27.100 Notice of Decision. Every determination of the Council shall be in writing, and
notice shall be mailed to or served upon the petitioner within a reasonable time from the
date of such action. Service by certified mail, return receipt requested, shall be
conclusive evidence of service for the purpose of this chapter.
4.27.110 Exemptions. The Council may, by resolution, exempt any class of user when
the Council determines that the public interest deems it necessary or that the contribution
to storm drainage facility use by the class to be insignificant.
4.27.120 Discount for the Elderly. Discounts applying to low income elderly persons for
water, sewer and electric utility fees shall also apply to storm drainage utility fees.
SECTION 2. Classification of the fee. The fee specified in Section 4.27.050 as set forth
in Section 1 of this ordinance is classified as not subject to the limits of Section 11 b of
Article XI of the Oregon Constitution (Ballot Measure No. 5).
The foregoing ordinance was first READ by title only in accordance with Article X, Section 2(C)
of the City Charter on the 19th day of July , 1994, and duly PASSED.and ADOPTED this 2nd
day of August , 1994.
Nan E. Franklin, City Recorder
SIGNED and APPROVED this day of August, 1994.
Catherine M. Golden, Mayor
Ap roved as to form:
Paul Nolte, City Attorney
(cAWeetletmut194.ord)
6
RESOLUTION NO. 94-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASHLAND
AUTHORIZING PRELIMINARY MARKETING ACTIVITIES RELATING TO THE
SALE OF WATER REVENUE BONDS UNDER THE UNIFORM REVENUE BOND
ACT.
THE CITY OF ASHLAND RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Findings
1. 1 Prior Authorization. The City has previously enacted
Resolution No. 94-15, authorizing the issuance of not more than two
million three hundred thousand dollars in aggregate principal .
amount of water revenue bonds pursuant to Oregon's Uniform Revenue
Bond Act (ORS 288.805 to 288.945) .
1.2 Sale Authorized. Notice that the City authorized issuance of
revenue bonds was published as provided in the Uniform Revenue Bond
Act; more than 60 days have passed since publication of the notice
and no petitions have been received requesting that the question of
issuing the bonds be placed on the ballot at the next legally
available election date. The City is now authorized to issue the
bonds described in Resolution No. 94-15 (the "Bonds") .
1.3 Comments from rating agencies and insurers are desirable.
City staff has caused a bond resolution to be drafted which
describes the terms under which the City would issue the Bonds and
has caused that draft to be circulated to bond rating agencies and
bond insurers. The rating agencies and insurers are reviewing the
draft bond resolution and may request changes which would improve
the rating for the Bonds, make bond insurance available for the
Bonds, or decrease the price for bond insurance. An improved
rating or the use of bond insurance could reduce the interest rates
which the City would be required to pay on the Bonds. A reduction
in Bond interest rates would reduce the cost of providing water
service to the citizens of Ashland. In order to avoid delaying the
proposed sale of the Bonds, but to allow the rating agencies and
insurers time to make comments; and to have any comments
incorporated into the bond resolution, it is desirable to authorize
City staff to engage in preliminary marketing activities relating
to the Bonds.
SECTION 2. Preliminary Marketing Activities Authorized
2. 1 The City Administrator or the Director of Finance may, on
behalf of the City and without further action by the Council:
2.1. 1 Participate in the preparation of, authorize the
distribution. of, and deem final a preliminary official
statement for the Bonds; .
2.1.2 Appoint a Bond trustee, registrar and ,paying agent;
2.1.3 Negotiate the terms under which bond insurance or a
reserve credit facility for the Bonds would be offered to the
City;
2.1.4 Establish the final principal amounts, redemption terms,
payment dates and other terms of the Bonds which will be
offered for sale;
2. 1.5 Finalize the draft bond resolution, incorporating any
comments of the bond rating agencies and bond insurers;
2.1.6 Publish notices of sale for the Bonds, describing the
terms under which the Bonds will be offered for sale by the
city;
2.1.7 Tender the final bond resolution to the City Council for
action; and,
2. 1.8 take any other action which is reasonably required to
carry out the purposes of this resolution.
This resolution was read by title only in accordance with Ashland
Municipal Code §2.04.090 duly PASSED and ADOPTED this day of
1994 .
Nan E. Franklin, City Recorder
SIGNED and APPROVED this day of , 1994.
Catherine M. Golden., Mayor
Revipgwed as to farm:
Paul Nolte, City Attorney
(L•p�cwooTrtobood.doe) .
h.
-Y.
`` SpF!ISIr�o � P •i� V 4 N L� � .l4 41�
A.
�REGO
July 19, 1994
��. Brian Almquist, City Administrator
�XIIY_ItI: Steven Hall, Public Works Director
1t�jPCt: Water Report-July 19, 1994
Several factors are bringing our water situation to a level of concern. At this point in time I am not
recommending mandatory curtailment. The information is being monitored daily and analyzed in a computer
model.
The factors being evaluated based on todays data are:
Ashland Creek 1.87 million gallons-lowest in recorded history
Reeder Reservoir About 3% above normal drawdown curve
Water Produced 6.43 million gallons
TID water requested July 8, 1994; started July 14, 1994 - see note below .
TID water used 1.82 million gallons (included in water produced)
TID cutoff date September 1, 1994 (changed from September 15, 1994)
Reeder water used 2.74 million gallons
Reeder reserve 87 days based on todays data. This calculation assumes that current
=x ihons and water petters for today will continue dough dhe 87 days.
TID has mused a few anxious moments this year. Because of dear operations, we were supplied with our initial
water a week later than we requested. They have had problems with the Ashland Canal that has caused a few
interruptions in the last few days.
The flow from TID will be uxrementally increased to about 3 million galkms per day which will extend our turn
of "Reeder reserve".
It is intemsdng to look at the use patens this year compared to 1992. In 1992 we had a wet and cool July which
kept water production at 4 to 4.5 million gallons per day. For the same period this year with no rain and higtw
lrmperahues, the water production is at 6 to 6.5 million gallons per day. The only assumpton I can make is that
the extra 2 million gallons per day consumption is due to landscape and garden irrigation.
J
I hope the citizens of Ashland realize our situation and respond by having some "lightly tanned" lawns and think
about how they used water differently last year and in particular during 1992 when we had mandatory water
curtailment.
I will keep you informed of our situation.
cc: Dennis Barms, Water Quality Superintendent
Daryl McVey, Water Filter Plant Supervisor
Keith Woodley, Fire Chief
Ashland Daily Tidings
Medford Mail Tribune
Enc: Reeder Reservoir
Reeder Reservoir (June 1 through July 19)
Ashland Creek
Ashland Creek (June 1 through July 19)
Water Plant Production (June 1 through July 19)
(o:�w.vaYcpf094) .
REEDER RESERVOIR VOLUME
MARCH 1994 THROUGH FEBRUARY 1.995
100%
90%- .-€.................._......_.........._... ................. ......._............................. ...._.............. .._._...._......
80% . .................. ................................... ................._.. __............_.............................._............................-...- --------------
J
ii ........ _...._....-i-....__._._..._._..._.
w
U ; i
w
20% _.._._;._. —_......_.:-.__....... ......_._.. ._.._....... .
10% -i-. ........_....._....._...._............._......................................................._................_......_.._.............__............_. ....._....-'
--- -
. .....
0%
03/01 04/20 06/'10 07/30 09/20 11/10 12/30 02/20
DATE
—�— Theoretical + Actual
f .
Reeder Reservoir
June 1 through August 31
100% _
95%
TO began 7/14/94
90% ,
LL 85%
,
/C •
W `\`
U 80% `•
N ,
d '
75%
70%
65%
1 1 19 25 31 6 12 18 24 30
41925
July August
1994 ----- 1992 ---°•° Standard Curve
ro
CITY OF ASHLAND
ASHLAND CREEK FLOWS
Q 12
D
w 10 ........ ..............................._. ...........__ ...-..._............................... ..........
.... 7/19/94 flow = 1.87 MGD
z i
J
J € j
Q
(13 6 - ` - - ; - ----'-------•--•-
Z
O
J 4 ` ... - ----- ..i.. . .
....
J_
O
JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV
DATE
-�- AVG 1976-1993 1994 M- 1992
Ashland Creek Flow
June 1 through August 31
6
D
5
CL
N •
4 #
2
1111 +1111 11111hill 7r=,
1
1 7 13 19 . 25 1 � 19 25 31 6, 19 1 24 30
June July August
1994 -- ° ••1992
Plant Production
June 1 through August 31
7-
6.5- ;
6- '
C) 5.5-
v
a) A
CL
All
2 4.5- -
jif
OD 4- /
3.5-
2.5- -
2
1 7 13 19 25 1 19 25 31 6- 12 1 24 30
June July August
F1994 1992