Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2003-1007 Council Mtg PACKET
Council Meeting Pkt. BARBARA CHRISTENSEN CITY RECORDER CiTY OF ASHLAND AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING ASHLAND CITY COUNCIL October 7, 2003 Civic Center Council Chambers, 1t75 E. Main Street 6:30 p.m. Executive Session: Evaluation of City Administrator pursua, nt to ORS 192.660(1)(0. 7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting: I. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: II. ROLL CALL: IlL APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Regular Council Meeting Minutes of September 16, Study Session of September 22 and Public Input Session of September 30, 2003. IV. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS & AWARDS: 1. Mayor's Proclamation of October 5 - 11, 2003 as "National Fire Prevention Week." 2. Mayor's Proclamation of October 8, 2003 as '~/Valk our Children t° School Day." CONSENT AGENDA: 1. Minutes of Boards, Commissions and Committees. 2. Liquor License Application from John Edwards dba Los Gordos at 33 Third Street, No. 3. 3. Liquor License Application from McCall, McLaughlin, dba McCall House at 153 Oak Street. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (Testimony limited to 5 minutes per speaker, unless it is the subject of a Land Use Appeal. All headngs must conclude by 9:30 p.m. or be continued to a subsequent meeting.) (None) VII. PUBLIC FORUM: Business from the audience no~t included on the agenda. (Total time allowed for Public Forum is 15 minutes. Speakers are limited to 5 minutes or less, depending on the number of individuals wishing to speak.) VIII. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: (None) COUNCII, MEETINGS ARE BROADCAST LIVE ON CHANNEL 9 VISIT THE CITY OF ASHLAND'S WEB SiTE AT WWW.ASHLAND.OR.US IX. NEW AND MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS: 1. Decision and Recommendations regarding Mt. Ashland Draft Environmental Impact Statement. 2. Request for Authorization to Participate in Downtown Planning Charrette - Copeland Lumber Block. 3. Police Chief Recruitment. 4. Seventh Annual Report on implementation of the Valdez Principles. 5. Update on Electric Rates. ORDINANCES1 RESOLUTIONS AND CONTRACTS: (None) OTHER BUSINESS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS/REPORTS FROM COUNCIL LIAISONS: Xll. ADJOURNMENT: REMINDER A Study Session will be held on Wednesday, October 8 at 12:00 p.m. in Council Chambers: Topics of discussion will include: 1 ) The State of Solar in Oregon; and, 2) Update of new City conservation initiatives. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Administrator's off/ce at (541) 488-6002 (TTY phone number 1-800-735- 2900). Notification 72 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to the meeting (28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title I). COUNCI L MEETINGS ARE BROADCA ST LIVE ON CH ANN EL 9 F~.~1 VISIT THE CITY OF ASHLAND'S WEB SiTE AT WWW.ASltLAND.OR.[,S MINUTES FOR THE REGULAR MEETING ASHLAND CITY COUNCIL September 16, 2003 - 7:00 p.m. Civic Center Council Chambers, 1175 E. Main Street CALL MEETING TO ORDER ROLL CALL Councilor Amarotico, Jackson, Morrison, and Hearn were present. Councilor Laws arrived at 7:04 p.m. Councilor Hartzell arrived at 7:30 p.m. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of September 2, 2003 were approved with the following corrections: 1) on pg. 1 under Presentation of Bicycle and Trail Route Map, it should read "townvith an emerald necklace", 2) in the 5th paragraph of same section "McCullom" was misspelled, should read McLellan. Councilor Hearn also made one correction to the September 3rd Study Session Minutes. The minutes stated that he was absent, but Councilor Hearn was in attendance, and there are recorded comments from him in the minutes that verify this. Councilor Amarofico / Morrison mis to approve minutes with noted corrections. Voice Vote: All AYES. Motion Passed. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS & AWARDS: Mayor's Proclamation of October 2003 as "Disability Employment Awareness Month" was read aloud by Councilor Morrison. Mayor noted he had the opportunity to meet with 11 representatives from Russia, and welcomed them to Ashland. Announcement in Memory of Ken Hagen. Mayor DeBoer read the announcement aloud. He also noted a proclamation request that had been received too late to make the agenda, but voiced his support for September 28th as "Good Neighbor Day". CONSENT AGENDA 1. Minutes of Boards, Commissions and Committees. 2. Termination of a Waterline Easement in Lot 39 of Clay Creek Gardens. Councilor Morrison/Jackson m/s to approve Consent Agenda. Voice Vote: All AYES. Motion Passed. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Public Hearing and Determination of the reallocation of unexpended Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. Assistant Planner Brandon Goldman addressed the council on the recent concerns regarding the carryover of unexpended CDBG funds, and the potential for the City to lose future allocations. He stated the intent of this hearing is to evaluate and receive direction from staff as to how to proceed with the reallocation of the previously awarded grant. Goldman stated that if the projects fail to be completed by November 1 st, the city will risk losing $208,000 this year, and $465,000 in the following year. Goldman stated there arc 4 strategies A371LAND CITY ('OUN(!II 5IEEI'I3,~G PAGE l OF 9 SEPTEMBER 16, 2003 being presented to the council, three of which where discussed at the September 3rd Study Session, and the 4th was added after being reviewed by the Housing Commission on September 10th. Goldman summarized these 4 strategies: 1) No Change No reallocation takes place relying on the confidence that the current awarded projects will go forward in a timely manner. 2) ACL T Retains award the remaining carryover to be recaptured Ashland Community Land Trust would retain its' $120,000 award, with the remainder of unexpended funds being reallocated. 3) The Recapture of all unexpended carryover ACLT would not retain it's $120,000 nor the Rogue Valley Community Development Corporation retain its' past awards, and as such all accumilated carryover being reprogrammed and put out for a competitive bid process for the coming year. 4) Housing Commission's Recommendation Allow RVCDC to combine their 2002 and 2003 CDBG awards to be applied toward the purchase of the property located at 2001 Siskiyou Blvd. for the construction of8-11 affordable housing units. Recommend that City Council direct staff to provide the RVCDC a deadline of January 30th, 2004 in order to accomplish the purchase of the property. In the event that the funds are not expended by that period, the funds would be recaptured and put up for a new RFP process at the beginning of February. (Though this would mean they would need to find a sub-recipient who could expend the funds by the November 1st, 2004 deadline) ACLT retains their $120,000 award, given confidence they will complete their project on time. All other carryover reallocated for the 2004 RFP process. Goldman stated Staff supports the recommendations of the Housing Commission in light of the testimony received at their Sept. 10th meeting by RVCDC. He also stated they had seen a copy of the option, indicating that the property owner does have intent to sell to RVCDC. Therefore, the purchase of the 2001 Siskiyou Blvd property could be expeditious enough to accomplish the goal of expending the accumilated carryover prior to the November, 2004 deadline. Goldman re-stated they are seeking direction from council as to how to proceed. After which, Staff will be in a position to go back through the Public Hearing process and modify the 2002 & 2003 action plans, as well as any other action plans that have accumilated carryover in order to reallocate those funds. He stated this can be done concurrently through one public review process and public hearing process, upon the council's detennination that the recommendation provided by the Housing Commission and StalTis the appropriate way to proceed. Goldman also noted them has been public notice given in regards to this meeting, and they have not received any written comments. Councilor Jackson stated this seems like a good direction to take, but voiced concern if RVCDC fails to complete the purchase by January 30th, and if there would be enough time to start over and still be completed by November 1st. Goldman stated they have had the same concern. He stated that the quickest turn around so far to acquire land has been 11 months, and they have seen no evidence that it can be done in 9 months. However, the Housing Commission felt it was warranted to allow RVCDC an additional 3 months to secure the property based on the confidence they have received on the Siskiyou Site. PUBLIC HEARING OPEN: 7:15 p.m. Jennifer Henderson/321 Clay #8/Ashland Community Land Trust President/Voiced her support of the Housing Commissions Recommendation #4. Initially, she was concerned that the CDBG funds would be pulled entirely back, and that the time frame would be too short to do anything. But in light of the Housing Commissions recommendations', feels that this is a win-win situation. ASIILAND CITI COCS¥CIL MEETING t'AGE 2 0t: 9 ?,EPTEMBER 16, 2003 Ron Demele/165 Crocker/Rogue Valley Community Development Corporation/Stated they are proposing to stick with one of the 3 original sites they looked at to do a tax credit project. Noted that an individual who owns one of the 3 properties has approached RVCDC and stated he would sign an option to sell, and this will be ready to close on the 30th of November. Demele also expressed that they are dependent upon the City's planning process. He stated they are ready to go, but are waiting on the internal process that is mandated. This site would produce 8-11 units, which would be at thevery affordable level (30%-50% median income). Demele clarified the partnership that makes this possible: the acquisition is through CDBG and the development of the houses comes through USDA World Development. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED: 7:20 Councilor Morrison / Jackson m/s to direct staff to proceed as outlined in Option #4. Voice Vote: Ali AYES. Discussion:Councilor Morrison expressed that this is not just a compromise, but a blue print to move this process ahead and builds on what they have already allocated. He stated he would hate to see a delay and to have to reallocate, as it takes up stafftime and wastes time of everyone involved. He hopes that everyone is on the same page since they are on a tight timeline, but feels that this is the best option at this timeMotion Passed. All AYES 2. Public Hearing and Decision on the 2002-2003 Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER). Assistant Planner Brandon Goldman addressed the Council to present their accomplishments from the past year. He stated there were a number of items that with the use of CDBG funds they were able to accomplish, including: · With the help of Jackson County Housing Authority, directed $33,000 towards the rehabilitation of 4 dilapidated homes in Ashland that were occupied by low to moderate income households. The Public Works Department, with the use of CDBG funds, completed the installation of a sidewalk on the East side of 8th Street, for a cost of $32,000. The RVCDC expended $7200 in CDBG funds for a relocation plan for the lower Pines site, unfortunately this site acquisition was not carried out, and as such that plan was not implemented. They have addressed Fair Housing in Ashland by hosting 2 separate training periods, one in June 2003, and another in November 2002. At each session a number of trainings were held, and were quite well attended. Goldman stated that they completed the CAPER as directed and it has been notified it in the Ashland Daily Tidings. They have received no comments, and Staff recommends approval of the 2002-2003 CAPER as presented. Councilor Jackson asked if it was easier to expend money toward social services through our Social Service Grant Programs than it is to have one or more recipients under the CDBG funds. Goldman clarified under the Social Service Grant Program the administrative work required by the City is minimal. However, for any CDBG funds over $2000 received, comes an entire regime of HUD requirements. Goldman suggested the Council may want to investigate Social Service agencies being involved in CDBG funds. PUBLIC HEARING OPEN: 7:30 p.m. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED: 7:30 p.m. Councilor Laws / Amarotico m/s to approve the 2002-2003 Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report. Voice Vote: All AYES. Motion Passed. A3'tlLAND CIT} C'OL~,¥CIL MEETLVG tMGE 3 OF 9 .~;EPTEMBER 16, 2003 PUBLIC FORUM Eric Navickas/711 Faith/Spoke regarding the Forest Service hikes into the Ski Ashland expansion area. He stated he had gone on several of the hikes and felt that they were somewhat biased. He stated the hikes showed less critical areas of the development as well as downplayed the potential impacts. Navickas invited the Council to join him on two upcoming hikes, the first is scheduled for tomorrow, Sept. 17th at 9:00 a.m., and the second will be held Saturday, Sept.27th, also at 9:00 a.m. Both will begin at Evos. He expressed his disappointment with the Council's direction to limit public voice in regards to the DEIS, and feels this is the wrong direction to take. Colin Swales/461 Allison/Stated he comes before the Council as a citizen, and questioned the legislative process. He stated there are two significant ordinances that are scheduled for first and second readings tonight, and expressed his confusion with the Speaker Request Forms, asking if they were going to be hearing any public testimony since the Public Hearing has already been closed. Mayor DeBoer clarified that they will allow public testimony on any of the agenda items, including the readings of the ordinances. Public Forum Closed: 7:35 p.m. Councilor Hartzell asked City Attorney Paul Nolte if there was a difference between public testimony taken on Land Use matters and that taken during first or second readings? Nolte clarified that the Land Use hearings involving quasi-judicial hearings is much different because those rules are prescribed by statute and implemented by the Council through Council Rules. The rule of taking no testimony after the Public Hearing has been closed is a rule that has been in effect for years and can be waived by the Council or the Mayor, if it so desires. Councilor Laws stated that the procedure of taking public testimony at the Public Hearing, as well as both the first and second readings, has never been done before and has the opportunity to stretch things out unnecessarily. He stated they are open to receiving comments after the Public Hearing is over and will take those into consideration. He cited the example that some individuals will state the same thing over and over again, which can be a waste of time. Councilor Jackson asked City Attorney Paul Nolte whether the ordinances on tonight's agenda were considered a quasi-judicialdecision? Nolte clarifiedthat they were not. Jackson stated she tends to agree with Laws in that they have already given direction to staff after the first reading. Councilor Heam expressed his concerns with this issue being 11 the Council's goal of encouraging public input, and 2) stated he had received approx. 8-10 calls from people who claim to not have understood or appreciated the issues until now. Suggested possibly opening Public Forum could be another way to get to the same place. Stated in his experience they have allowed people to comment on both the first and second readings. Councilor Laws stated that they have only allowed testimony at both readings when there has not been a formal Public Hearing. Councilor Hartzell suggested the need for the Council to have a discussion with the Mayor on this issue, and noted the upcoming the Study Session and not taking public input. Mayor DeBoer stated that typically there is not a Public Hearing on first and second readings, however in this case there are enough changes to the ordinance that warrants taking additional public input. etSIILA,¥D CITI' COI:3V(TL MEEIIN( i SEPTEMBER 16, 2003 I',{GE 4 Ob' 9 UNFINISHED BUSINESS (None) NEW AND MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS: 1. Designation of Voting Delegate for NLC meeting. Council docs not designate a voting delegate for the National League of Cities meeting to be held on December 13th. ORDINANCES, RESOLUTIONS AND CONTRACTS: 1. Second reading of"An Ordinance Amending Chapter 18.72 of the Ashland Municipal Code- Land Use Ordinance, Amending the Detail Site Review Zone Standards for Large Buildings, and Amending Section H-C-3a)2) of the Site Design and Use Standards." Director of Community Development John McLaughlin presented changes that the Council had requested at their prior meeting and requested approval of this second reading. Some highlights of the changes include: adding interior courtyards as part of the footprint adding rooftop parking to count towards to overal square footage automobile parking in a basement must be both within the footprint of the building and in the basement, for it not to counts towards to the overall square footage. McLaughlin showed examples of current structures in the downtown area that have underground parking for the Council's clarification. He stated that if exposure above grade is less than 6 feet and is for more than 50% of the perimeter, this constitutes a basement. McLaughlin clarified that parking on any other floors would count toward to the square footage. Some of the examples shown include: · Best Western Bard's Inn - parking would count as first floor and be included in the 45,000 sq.ft, limit. Mayor Deboer asked where the grade would be measured from. McLaughlin clarified that regulations state that if it's within 5 feet of the sidewalk, the sidewalk grade is used. If it's over 5 ft., the grade is measured from the bottom of the structure. · Plaza Suites Hotel- Around back, the wall face is fully exposed and greater than 6 feet, therefore parking would count as first floor and be included in the 45,000 sq.ft, limit. · Hargadine Parking Lot - McLaughlin stated that on the Hargadine side it is virtually zero. The rooftop parking would count as well as the 2nd floor, however is was hard to determine whether the lower floor would be included as well. · Stratfordlnn - McLaughlin stated this would count as a first floor even though it is not visible from Siskiyou Blvd. Councilor Hartzell asked if there are other other towns that have looked at this particular issue, and if they can take into consideration which street has the open view. (Especially in the downtown area where N. Main Street is on the downward slope) Hartzell also asked if someone used their interioir courtyard fOr parking, would that count towards the total square footage. McLaughlin clarified that yes, it would. Councilor Laws stated that what they are wanting is to maintain the appearance of bulk and scale, as well as keep away eorportations who will send their profits outside of the City, and that this ordinance as revised serves those purposes. Councilor Hartzell voiced that Council needs to keep in mind that these regulations are only for the downtown area, and that businesses have more freedom in other areas of town. A,$'IILA,¥1) CITY COL)¥CIL MEEITzV(i t>~4(iE 5 0t; 9 SEP'I'EMBER 16, 2003 Mayor DeBoer stated his concern was that we need parking downtown, and don't know why we discourage parking under a building. He cited the examples shown were much more pleasing than having a large lot next door for parking. Councilor Morrison stated he was in favor of taking public input at this time, since it seems that there is a significant amount of added sections. Ross Dale/585 Allison/Stated he was a developer, but likes to think of himself as a community builder. He explained that he travels all over, and seeks out communities that are similar to Ashland that face some of the same problems. He feels that parking is still a major issue, and is afraid there will be unintended consequenoes. Evan Archerd/120N. Second St/Agrees with a number of things that have been said at this council meeting, but thinks that there are a number of unintended consequences from the changes that were recently applied. He believes they make the development of a mixed-use building very difficult, unnecessarily restricts parking, forbids variances, and may restrict economic development and affordable housing. Feels the solution is to hold a public charette, and urges the Council to delay approval of this ordinance until a charette process is completed. Eric Navickas/711 Faith/Feels that developers want to combine tax lots in the downtown area in order to create one large lot, and feels this is a classic example of why we need this ordinance passed. He feels the character of our historic downtown is very important, explaining it is related to tourism. He wants for the Council to remove the parking exemption and strictly limit size to 45,000 square feet. He also stated developers have not been apart of this debate until recently and noted their interest is based on their acquisition of the Copeland Lumber site. Colin Swales/461 Allison Street/Spoke on the procedures for this process, and mentioned that there have been a couple of charettes in the past. He stated a lot of public input went in to the previous charettes, yet they still languished. He expressed his frustration that this item was pulled from the last agenda, stating a number of individuals have worked on this for some time and it appeared that one developer could come in and re- write the agenda. Swales urged the Council to pass the ordinance as is. Bryan Holley/324 Liberty St/Expressed his worries about the Speaker Request Form, and respectfully requests that the Staffre-work the form. He stated a lot of people who attend the Council Meetings are not regulars and are unfamiliar with this process, and their voices deserves to be heard. Holley mentioned Bill Street's memo and noted there were several good ideas, and asked when suggestions like this have their time to be seriously reviewed. Holley also mentioned undoinfluence and asked when will the citizens have the opportunity to have a one-on-one with the Staff as the developers do. Bill Street/180 Mead Sff Thanked Mayor DeBoer for allowing his input, and stated that sometimes it is necessaryto repeat yourself. Street focused on the footprint issue, and asked why they would want a building in the downtown that was the size of Albertson's. He stated only the Mark Anthony has that size, and the City has already agreed that they will not repeat that pattern. He urged the Council to bring down the footprint size, and asked that they apply the same vision they have for the Historic District to the downtown area. Tanya Beneis/398 Dead Indian Memorial Road/Stated a goal of Ashland should be to efficiently use the small area of downtown we have. She stated allowing businesses to have parking underneath their strnctures would be a more efficient use of space than having a separate lot adjacent, and does not understand why the council would penalize the builder for that. She also expressed that she had heard the possibility to add affordable housing to the City's parking structure, and stated this ordinance does not seem to be furthering that ASHI, AND (lit C'0U,¥(7[1~ MEEIING ,*,'EPTEMIIER 16, 2003 P~qGE 6 OF 9 cause. Councilor Hartzell acknowledged the request to update the Speaker Request Form, and spoke on the idea of having a public charette. Hartzell stated that if the charrette request was granted, it could give an implicit acknowledgemant that the charrette process would replace what has already been accomplished, and does not want to hold off on passing this ordinance to hold a different public process. Councilor Laws stated that at some point you have to quit taking input and make a decision. He expressed that he has received numerous emails and takes each one into consideration, but feels the Council has reached the decision-making point. Laws sited examples of changes that were made to the ordinance as a result of public input, and feels they have made a lot of progress. He expressed his uncertainty with the option of holding a charrette, but stated it might be a good option later. Laws stated that he is ready to act upon this ordinance. Councilor Jackson expressed the need to pass a limit of the total square footage. She mentioned the downtown area being a good place for affordable housing, and questioned whether we really needed more parking. Jackson stated she is not satisfied with the ordinance as it stands right now, but does want to set the 45,000 sq. ft. limit tonight. Councilor Heam noted the two extremes on this topic, and stated it is up to the Council to find the middle ground and make these decisions. He stated he is concerned with unintended consequences, and stated it bothers him that the ordinance does not provide the opportunity for variance. Councilor Hartzell asked if someone would be allowed to build aggregate lots downtown over the 300 ft. limit. Director McLaughlin explained that it could be possible, although there is no present space in the downtown area to do so, and that this clause was left out of the ordinance because there already exists contigious buildings in the downtown area. He clarified that design standards would mandate that the .exterior frontage of a building this size give the appearance of several buildings, but that there may be one large store behind the face. Councilor Morrison acknowledged to option to hold a charette and stated it should look at what they can do and what they want downtown to be, and does not believe this process would be dominated by developers. He stated he does not believe this ordinance is adequate, stating the footprint maximum should be less, and the lack of affordable housing, but will support this ordinance because it does reduce the total size of the building. Councilor Heam stated he would approve this ordinance with the elimination of section 1.E. Councilor Amarotico requested the removal of the words "automobile parking" in section 1.C, asking if that was really necessary since they are trying to preserve bulk and scale. Councilor Jackson m/s to approve the ordinance as presented, with the exception of Section 1.C and each time it's repeated to read:'~ParMng areas located within the building footprint shall not count toward the totalgrossfloor aretr" No Second, Motion Fails. Councilor Hearn m/s to approve the ordinance as presented, with the exception of Section 1.E being removed. No Second, Motion Fails. Councilor Hartzell / Laws m/s approval of ordinance as presented. Roll Call Vote: Laws, Morrison, Hartzell, Yes. Jackson, Amarotico, Hearn, No. Mayor DeBoer, No. Motion Fails. ..tSIIL,~Nt) (?Il'iF ('0~,¢~'C1t. ).IEETIN(i t'/IGE 70t~ 9 XE['TEMI~ER 16, 2003 Council discussed what compromises can be made in order to pass the ordinance tonight. Councilor Hearn / Laws m/s to approve ordinance, with the exceptions that Sections 1.E and 2.E are removed. Roll Call Vote: Laws, Hartzell, Morrison, Hearn, Yes. Amarotico, Jackson, No. Motion Passed. Councilor Jackson discussed the Housing Commissions' recommendation of passing the ordinance as is, with the possibility of adopting amendments at a later date. Councilor Jackson / HartzeH m/s to direct Staffto create amendments that deal with affordable housing downtown, within the next 3-6 months. Discussion: Councilor Laws stated that this motion is not necessary, explaining that the Housing Commission is always free to address the City Council with proposed changes, as are all of the Boards and Commissions. Jackson clarified that this would be directing Staffto develop the possibilities, and believes that continuing to work on housing action plan is a priority¥oice Vote: Hartzell, Jackson, Morrison and Hearn, YES; Laws and Amarotico, NO. Motion Passes, 4-2. 2. First and second readings by title only of "An Ordinance Amending Chapters 18.20, 18.24, and 18.28 of the Ashland Municipal Code - Land Use Ordinance, Establishing Limits on Maximum House sizes in the Historic District." Mayor DeBoer changed the agenda so that the first and second readings are done separately~ Director of Community Development John McLaughlin summarized the changes from the previous reading for the Council: FAR changed from .42 to .38 Included a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for structures to exceed the Maximum Permitted Floor Area (MFPA) by up to 25% Set an absolute MPFA for single family structures of 3,249 sq. ft. He also noted 2 minor changes that needed to be made: 1) Section 4, Table 2: the FAR for one unit needs to be amended from .42 to .38 2) Section 6, Table 2: the same amendment, .42 to .38 for a single unit. Councilor Hartzell / Jackson m/s to extend meeting to 10:30 p.m.. Voice Vote: All AYES. Motion Passed. Colin Swales/461 Allison/Noted he was the one who pointed out the mistake in Table 2. Swales feels that all tables should be reduced in the same way as the single unit. He also suggests the Council closely looks at the definition of basements and noted the differences in the 2 separate codes that could cause confusion. Jason Robison/55 Scenic/Feels this ordinance errs on the extreme side, and feels it should allow a little more breathing room and allow more living space. He stated he lives in the Historic District and has relatively modest goals for his house, but given this ordinance his family would not be able to achieve those goals. Councilor Hartzell pointed out an error in the wording in Section 6.K. Sentence should read'New structures and additions to existing structures within the Historic District..." Councilor Hartzell asked Director John McLaughlin to address the basement issue brought up by Colin Swales. McLaughlin.stated that he felt that people will always find a way to squeeze into the definition what they would like. He also stated that he felt that the current definition works, the language is good, and meets the intent of this ordinance. ASttI.AND CITY ( 'OUW(!I£ MEETLVG IUIGE ,~ OF ~ SI;'?TEMBI;?R 16, 2003 Councilor Hartzell/Jackson m/s to approve first reading and move to second reading of the ordinance, including the clarification brought by Staff to amend .42 to .38 for single units, and the word "structures" added to Section 6.K. Councilor Hartzell m/s to amend previous motion to include the FAR standard applied to the single unit, also applied to the the entirety of both Table 2's. (all would be reduced by. 04) Roll Call Vote: Morrison, Amarotico, Hearn, Laws, Hartzell, Jackson, Yes. First Reading Passed. Laws/Hartzeli m/s to amend the ordinance to include the emergency clause. Roll Call Vote: Laws, Hartzell, Yes. Amarotico, Jackson, Morrison, Hearn, No. Motion Fails 2-4. Morrison/Jackson m/s to adopt second reading of ordinance. Roll Call Vote: Morrison, Amarotico, Hearn, Laws, Hartzell, Jackson, Yes. Motion Passed. OTHER BUSINESS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS/REPORTS FROM COUNCIL LIAISONS: 1. Proposed advertisement to encourage public input on DEIS - Kate Jackson. Councilor Jackson mentioned the memo she had submitted regarding public input on the Mt. Ashland DEIS, which explained what issues the Council has directed staff to focus on, and the dates of the upcoming meetings. Councilor Hartzell expressed her concerns of constraining public input. Councilor Laws noted an error in the Study Session minutes stating that Councilor Amarotico was both present and absent. He clarified that he was-absent and Amarotico was present. ADJOURNMENT Meeting was adjourned at 10:30 p.m. April Lucas, Asst. to City Recorder Alan DeBoer, Mayor A,¥Itl.~4,¥D CtlT ( 'OU,¥CIL ),ltH;TING .PAGE 9 (~1 9 SEP'tEMBER 16, 2003 ASHLAND CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION Draft Minutes Wednesday, September 22, 2003 at 12:00 p.m. Council Chambers, 1175 East Main Street CALL TO ORDER Mayor DeBoer called the meeting to order at 12:03 p.m. ATTENDANCE City Council: Councilors Amarotico and Momson were present. Councilors Laws and Hearn were absent. Councilor Hartzell arrived at 12:13 p.m. Councilor Jackson arrived at 12:15 p.m. Staff: Paula Brown Public Works Director, Lee Tuneberg Finance Director, Paul Nolte City Attorney and Gino Grimaldi City Administrator. I. Draft Environmental Impact Statement - Mt Ashland. City Administrator Gino Grimaldi briefly explained that Staff had been directed to analyze four areas of the DEIS: Water Quality, Water Quantity, Fire Risk, and Financial Risk. Staff has reviewed these areas and came up with 19 comments and recommendations they are expecting to be submitted to the Forest Service. Staff is requesting the Council's feedback regarding these comments, including modifying, deleting, or adding new comments that will be submitted. Water Quality and Quantity Description of Impacts, presented by Pete Jones, Dave Steinfeld, Debbie Whitall, and Steve Johnson Forest Service Representatives Presented a model of annual sediment delivery for the entire project area. Noted there is a fair amount of material that comes out of this area on it's own. They predict that alternatives 4 and 5 will have the least impact, alternatives 2 and 3 will have the highest impact (at approx. 2.5 cubic yards per year), and alternative 6 lies somewhere in the middle. They stated that maintaining good soil cover is an important measure to take, and have found leaving timber on the ground works for retention and cover, and return of organic materials. Stated the largest area disturbance is the construction of ski runs, and expects to see very little bare soil in the ski runs when they are done. One of the assumptions they have is having a good buffer that will capture sediment within 100 to 300 1~ in distance. Councilor Hartzell asked what happens to displaced sediment over time? It was explained that it keeps depositing on top of itself, and that vegetation should start to grow on top and start securing it. Comments/Recommendation, presented by Paula Brown, Public Works Director Paula Brown stated when looking at water quality and quantity the biggest impact, although very minimal, is sedimentation. Sedimentation is defined as the erosion of soil material into creeks. Brown stated the two impacts that need to be minimized are vegetation removal and the erosion of specific soil types. She stated that when looking at the amount of sediment loading that will occur, it is absolutely minimal. She also stated she was concerned with construction Best Management Practices (BMP's), indicating work should not be started until these are in place. She noted some BMP's are: erosion control and storm-water management, over-snow work, and minimized work in mapped wetlands. Brown's recommendations include: 1) Hiring a QA/QC Team a) Community committee would select team. b) Team would be hired as part of the construction design completion. e) Team would develop control strategies, mitigation efforts, construction BMP's, and minimize wetlands impacts. Ashland City Council Study Session Page 1 of 5 September 22, 2003 d) Team would monitor construction activities, restoration and remediation, and post-construction practices 2) Monitor Ashland Creek at the 2060 Road a) Ensure that mediation measures have worked City Council Discussion Councilor John Morrison stated there where large increases in sedimentation when the ski area was first constructed (noting that logging was going on as well), and asked how this project differed. Brown clarified that the Forest Service has added in mitigation efforts on this project. Councilor Hartzell asked how they planned to build structures on top of the snow without disrupting what's down below. Pete Jones stated this area could be considered the Achilles Heal of the system, claiming it is where the sediment potential is greatest because there is water and activities at the same site. Jones stated they have done research and found that over-snow logging is one of the most effective ways to minimize soil surface disturbance or any other low growing vegetation. He stated that a minimum of 2 feet of snow is sufficient to protect the surface and vegetation. He also clarified that the original plans proposed an excavation of the bridge, but they are now planning a clearing with no grating at the site, and the footing plan has changed as well. Councilor Hartzell asked if the mitigation measures have been figured into the budget. Paula Brown stated that the QA/QC Team has not been added in, nor can they predict what changes or additional measures this team will request. It was clarified however, that mitigation has been included in all of the DEIS alternatives, and the BMP's have been figured in to the costs. Steve Johnson stated that all restoration projects and mitigation required were factored into the economic analysis. He also stated that construction techniques have changed compared to the work that was done in the 1970's. He stated they do not have a percent of area that is chosen each year for re-vegetation, rather they look at specific areas that have a higher need, and are trying to get back to a natural state. He commented on the difficulty in certain areas, but efforts have been successful, with a 70%-80% success rote. Paula Brown stated that she had recommended blasting be done at a minimum because she wanted to see if there where any other alternatives first. She did state, however, that blasting that may be done can be controlled, and that it may be the only way, in some cases, to remove the boulders. Steve Johnson noted that blasting has been done every summer as part of the annual mn maintenance and has been a long-standing practice. He noted that effects to the locations and the soil can be carefully controlled. Brown clarified that her caution for blasting was the very least of her concerns. Councilor Mordson asked what would be the timing for re-vegetation efforts. Brown stated this was something the QA/QC Team should look at. She clarified that re-vegetation should be addressed after the decision has been made and during the design efforts, prior to construction. Debbie Whitall mentioned Chapter 2 - Page 99, as a place where she sees room for the QA/QC recommendations to be implemented. Councilor Morrison questioned why alternative 3 seemed to have equally high erosion potential to alternatives 2 & 6, even though it is significantly reduced in size. Steve Johnson clarified that gaining access over to the lift would take a great deal of re-contouring and re-grating, and would cost them 3-4 branches of the East Fork of Ashland Creek. Paula Brown stated she strongly supports the City's involvement in the final construction activities. Ashland City Council Study Session Page 2 of 5 September 22, 2003 Councilor Jackson asked about the long-term impact of removing trees, especially in regards to fire risk and long-term health. It was clarified the same erosion rates were assumed for each of the developments, but once you cut down the trees it is no longer a forest in that area. The Forest Service Representatives stated it will most likely look like the present area, example Lower Tempest. It was also clarified that there will be change and there will be some edge effect, but they do not believe that effect will be large. Councilor Jackson noted that alternative 6 minimizes the areas disturbed verses alternative 2. Councilor Hartzell asked what impact the clear cut would have on the snow pack, and how rapidly that snow would melt. Debbie Whitall stated that the clear cut will shift the amount of snow retained on the mountain, however given the watersheds size it will be very minimal. Paula Brown stated the percentage change and impact would only be 1/2 a percent or less. Councilor Hartzell asked how much authority the proposed QA/QC Team would have. Paula Brown explained in her vision this team would report directly to the City and the Forest Service, and the City and the Forest Service would have the authority to go to the Mt. Ashland Association and request action. Financial Risk Reclamation Requirements & Lease Provisions Related to Restoration, presented by Paul Nolte, City Attorney City Attorney Paul Nolte explained he had concentrated on the City's legal responsibility for reclamation, in the event the Ski Area is shut down. He explained the City is responsible for reclamation because they are the holder of the permit, however that responsibility has been shifted to the Mt. Ashland Association. This does not mean that there is no recourse against the City, as the Forest Service would ultimately look to the City for the reclamation costs because the City is legally obligated to the Forest Service under the permit. Nolte stated they had looked at the needs assessment from 1992, and areas in Colorado that have recently gone through this reclamation process, and stated it would be the City's responsibility to remove structures and restore the area back to it's natural state through re-vegetation. However, through the lease the City has transferred responsibility, and would look towards the Mt. Ashland Association to carry out these tasks. Financial Risk, presented by Lee Tuneberg, Finance Director Finance Director Lee Tuneberg explained he had focused on the lease agreement. In 1992 this agreement identified the costs for reclamation at $200,000.00, and with the escalation clause applied, it would raise that amount to $267,000.00. However, it is undeterminable what exactly would need to be done and the associated costs. The lease identifies the hquidation value of assets, which appears to be valued at enough to be sold and pay for the reclamation costs as estimated. Lee Tuneberg stated his recommendations as: Require USFS to provide an updated estimate of cost and basis for the estimate for the ski area as it stands today Revise the lease agreement for the updated estimate of reclamation costs Restrict the use of any assets deemed City property from becoming security for any loans or operations without written consent from the City, and an independent asset inventory valuation for minimum liquidation value to assure reclamation coverage. City Council Discussion Councilor Morrison asked if the Mt. Ashland Association completed a fund drive, who would own those assets. Tuneberg clarified that according to the current lease, the assets would belong primarily to the City, with the exception that some assets were not part of the original agreement. Ashland City Council Study Session Page 3 of 5 September 22, 2003 City Attorney Paul Nolte stated that any replacement of current equipment or fixtures would become property of the City, and if new equipment is purchased the title remains with the lessee. If the lessee ceases to operate all of it's assets come to the City, but title during that interim period of new equipment is in Mt. Ashland Association's name. Councilor Jackson expressed her concern of valuing the assets, and questioned whether selling the lifts and other equipment would provide enough funds to cover the reclamation. Lee Tuneberg clarified that there has been no independent appraisal of the assets for market value, and it is one of his recommendations that this be done. Councilor Hartzell asked if there was a fee that the City pays to the Forest Service for the special permit use. Lee Tuneberg clarified that there is an amount that is paid to the Forest Service each year, but several years ago the Council transferred that fee, so that Ski Ashland now makes the payment. Councilor Hartzell asked for clarification on when the City obtains ownership of new equipment. Paul Nolte clarified that if it is replaced equipment in the current area the City has ownership, and if it is new equipment the Lessee has ownership. However there is no provision of this in the lease for the expansion area, and Nolte is recommending that this language be added. Councilor Hartzell asked if someone needed to be bonded to do logging work with the Forest Service, and if there was an equivalent bonding for ski resorts. Steve Johnson stated loggers are required to be bonded. He continued, for this project there are insurance requirements, but he did not believe there are any bonding requirements for tree removal, since it is done under a special use permit. Paul Nolte stated that bonding is something that could be done, but the thought at the time was, instead of them spending money on a premium, the City would ensure that all of their costs and liability would be covered through sufficient assets. Steve Johnson stated that mountain bike damage in the ski area has decreased significantly, and does not anticipate mountain bike usage being a problem in the expanded ski area. Councilor Jackson asked about the summer uses discussed in the DEIS, and wanted to know if the Forest Service would grant permission, under any circumstances, for mountain biking events. Steve Johnson clarified that they are not considering that at all right now, but can't say in certainty that they would never allow it in the future. Councilor Morfison received clarification that the current permit had been extended to 2017, and asked what the process for extending it further would be. Steve Johnson stated a new application would have to be filed, but if it is the same owner or operator it is a fairly simple process. Councilor Hartzell asked for clarification from Paul Nolte on page 6 of his report, Section 2.4.2, asking him to explain what the City's exposure is. Nolte stated the exposure is if the lessee folds, otherwise the lessee has been assigned all rights and responsibilities. Further clarifying, the City is ultimately responsible if the lessee folds, because the City is the holder of the Forest Service penmt. Councilor Ha'rtzell asked if the City could be held responsible if someone was injured on the slopes. Nolte stated we are completely protected against this, and pointed out the City requires Mt. Ashland to have insurance that gives the City indemnity. Hartzell also asked if the City does inspections or gets reports that ensure Mt. Ashland Association is providing adequate maintenance on their equipment and facilities. Nolte clarified that the Forest Service has accepted MAA as the operator, and if anything was going astray he is sure the City would have been informed. Ashland City Council Study Session Page 4 of 5 September 22, 2003 Steve Johnson clarified that one of the Forest Services' main jobs is to ensure that the ski area is following ENS Codes, and among other measures, performs a mandatory yearly insurance inspection. Nolte clarified for the Council that the arrangement with MAA is the same as the agreement with OSF, explaining all responsibility is on the lessee. Councilor Jackson mentioned Section 2.4.1 of Nolte's report, which stated "MAA has the right to make changes and improvements to the leased property without seeking consent of the city." Jackson stated she felt that this area was first our watershed, and second a ski area, and believes the City should be concerned when any activity takes place in the watershed. Paul Nolte stated that in the present lease this statement is correct, however this does not mean that the City does not play a role in what happens in the watershed, and noted the 1996 Memorandum of Understanding for further clarification. Fire Risk City Administrator, Gino Grimaldi summarized the report provided by Fire Chief Keith l'Voodley There is no historic evidence that the creation of the ski runs pose any specific wildfire risk to the watershed · There is no correlation between the increase of occupants and an increased risk of fire Suggests the new construction of buildings should take into consideration the need for fire protection to prevent the potential for building fires spreading into the watershed. City Council Discussion Councilor Hartzell expressed that she believes that more people will be visiting and utilizing this area after the work has been completed, and was concerned about fire potential during the summer months. Mayor DeBoer noted that the snow fences being used retain the snow very well. He stated that in the original creation of Mt. Ashland Association, the City became the place to store funds because MAA was a new organization and the City had some standing. The City also had the ability to collect and store money, and meet the concerns of donors. But now that MAA has run the ski area for a considerable number of years, he questioned transferring the permit to Ski Ashland and pulling the City out completely. Paula Brown stated the storm water management plan and the erosion control measures, should look at all available BMP's. She stated the QA/QC Team could present a plan that would have higher expectations than a DEQ review. She also recommended avoiding work in the wetlands under all possible circumstances, but noted there will be a construction element with the bridge. She stated she envisioned the QA/QC providing the best construction recommendations that will provide absolute minimal damage or impact to the mapped wetland areas. Other Business Mayor and Councilor Laws will not be able to attend the Public Meeting on September 30th. Meeting was adjourned at 2:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Barbara Christensen, City Recorder Ashland City Council Study Session Page 5 of 5 September 22, 2003 ASHLAND CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC INPUT/SPECIAL MEETING US ]FOREST SERVICE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (DEIS) MT ASHLAND EXPANSION Tuesday, September 30, 2003 at 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers, 1175 East Main Street CALL TO ORDER Council Chair John Morrison called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. ATTENDANCE /~ ~ City Council: Councilor Amarotico, Harlzell, and Jackson. Mayor DeBoer and Councilor Laws were absent. Staff: Panla Brown Public Works Director, Keith Woodley Fire Chief, Mike Bianca Police Lieutenant and Gino Grimaldi City Administrator. Dr. Aaron Corbet/148 4th Street/Spoke in opposition of the expansion and how he felt that this was about nothing more than money. Commented on the soil content in the expansion area and the possibility of erosion within our watershed. Noted Representative Lenn Haunon's voting record in regards to environmental issues. He does not trust the Forest Service and asks that the council consider the source. He favored the suggestion by Eric Navickas of Alternative 5. Katy Bazylewie/12$7 Siskiyou/Spoke on behalf of Southern Oregon University to say that Mt. Ashland ski area is an important recruitment tool. She stated that Mt. Ashland is a feature in their promotional materials and is listed as one of the top 10 reasons to attend SOU. She stated that two senior SOU students had studied the Mt. Ashland area for their capstone project part of which involved surveying students on their perception on the Mt. Ashland ski area. The principal question was to do determine "If Mt. Ashland was an influencing factor in their decision making process to enroll." The result of the survey indicated that 1/3 of the students stated that Mt. Ashland they were influenced by Mt. Ashland. Skip Knight/1060 Aspen St, Medford/Representative of Medford City Council. Read aloud a Resolution in favor of the expansion of Mt. Ashland. Eric Navickas/711 Faith StreeffFelt that it was inappropriate that the City of Medford supports an expansion into our municipal watershed. He stated that the fnrst thing the city needs to address is the currant conditions on the current development. He asked that the city request a separate NEPA analysis to determine how to clean up current conditions. He presented a slide show that indicated serious erosion problems. He supports Alternative 5, which he felt would create a larger beginner area. Tom Reid/918 Walker/Spoke in favor of expansion and Alternative 2. He stated his credentials and relationship with Mt. Ashland Ski Association. He shared the current financial status of Mt. Ashland Ski Association. He submitted a Statement of Financial Position as of June 30, 2003 and a summarization of the organi?ation over the time of its existence. He also included a break-even analysis for the expansion that is proposed by Mt. Ashland Association for Alternative 2. He addressed the issue of assuring the city of adeqnate assets to cover theoretical closure by explaining the current and future value of the ski facility. Joseph Flaherty/1423 E Main/Spoke in opposition of expansion and noted that he is an avid snowboarder. He commented on his concern regarding the building of a facility at the bottom of the bowl and felt that this is a major safety concern. He felt that there are problems with safety in regards to certain areas of the current ski facility. He does not believe the speeulatiun on how many visitors the mountain will draw due to expansion and that there is no certainty. He felt that the mountain belongs to the community. Andy Bayliss/201 Oaklawn/Commented on his familiarity with the terrain and how he had worked been working with the community alternative group to try and guide the NEPA process to help improve the area but not to go into the middle branch. He asked that the council look closely at what is being brought forward and noted that the Forest Service has been under a great deal of pressure to enlarge and promote Mt Ashland. He doesn't feel that there is anything being offered that the community as a whole could stand behind. He suggests improvements that do not enter the middle branch and not to expand the parking City Council Public Input Meeting 9/30/03 I of 7 lot. He doesn't feel that it is the city's responsibility to fill up the hotels in the area. Requests that to take our environmental viewpoint as city, when considering this expansion. Robert Matthews/309 E Jackson/Spoke in favor of the expansion. He shared his participation with the purchase of Mt. Ashland. He stated that one of the goals that they had when the ski area was purchased, was inclusion and participation by all residents of the city. He stated that environmentalist have been involved in the process from the beginning and have greatly improved the plan for expansion. Shared pictures on the condition of the dam and explained that this dam had been put in years ago and had been neglected I past. Stated that Mt Ashland is actively involved and spending money on mitigation matters. He noted that Mt Ashland has paid for erosion control mitigation. In regards to stream flow, he commented that the water that would go under the bridge is 2% of the water that would flow into Reeder Reservoir. He also commented on the notion that the city has a "sole" source of water is arguable given that the city is currently seeking other sources of water and does not believe that the city depends solely on Reeder Reservoir for our water needs. Rivers Brown/1067 Ashland St/Noted concern regarding erosion and sedimentation into Reeder Reservoir and the future problems associated with this. He felt that what we need is clean fresh water and we are betting against global warming. Sue Kuplllas/10 S Oakdale/Spoke on behalf of Jackson County ComnUssioners and read aloud a Resolution in favor of the expansion. She shared her experience as a skier on Mt Ashland and the difficulty level of the facility. The resolution noted the economic value of Mt. Ashland to the Rogue Valley. She noted her satisfaction that Mt. Ashland Association has properly addressed the environmental issues. Nick Joslin/327 Morton/Stated that he is a geologist for a company that has consulted for the city on a number of projects. He spoke in opposition to the expansion as he feels that there has not been adequate control of erosion problems. He voiced his concern with the possibility of damaging our water supply. Chris Fowler/966 Tyler Creek/Spoke in favor of improvements at Mt. Ashland that would better accommodate a wider variety of users. He does not support Alternative 2 or Alternative 6. He also does not support moving into the middle branch area as this too much of a pristine area to disturb. He is not willing to take the risk of mitigation in this area. He felt that there are better ways to improve beginner/intermediate terrain and access issues. Shawn Kampmann/1520 Pinecrest/He noted the increase use at Mt Ashland and the crowding that is occurring. He noted his support of Alternative 2 rather than Alternative 6, which would not be aesthetically pleasing. He shared his awareness of the area through mapping and has worked with experienced geologists and environmentalists. He provided copies of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement and pointed out the education and experience of contributors involved in the process. He does not see erosion as a problem and asked that the council listen to the experts. Scott Harding/2025 Tolman Creek/Noted his background in geology. Spoke regarding erosion and sediment delivery and the guesswork approach of the DEIS. He explained how sediment delivery is determined and how we have no reliable on-site data from Mt Ashland ski area. He explained that the DEIS was using data from Idaho and extrapolating those numbers to Mt. Ashland. He felt that by extrapolating Idaho's data to Mt. Ashland without on-site data for verification was a problem. He noted that a computer model called Disturbed WEPP was used and that WEPP does not account for variations in soil type, realistic topography, complexities of vegetatiun across a site or roads or other compacted soils. He stated that the bottom line on erosion rates is that there is no consistent data obtained on-site through direct measurement. Erosion rate data is highly uncertain and represents a best guess methodology. Matt Flotho/1257 Siskiyon/Requests staying out of the middle branch and that there are many things that could be done to improve the area without going into the middle branch. Commented on the need to improve the lodge, skier services and improvement of shuttle service. Suggests charging use for parking area. Need management that focuses on skier services before moving forward on the expansion. Jim Teeee/864 Nell Creek/Spoke for Ashland Chamber of Commerce and endorses and supports the expansion of Mt. Ashland noting the economic value. Melina Marvin/361 Idaho/She noted the relationship that the council has with the US Forest Service and noted that she had wrote a thesis on detailing the environmental history on Ashland Creek Watershed. City Council Public Input Meeting 9/30/0~ 2 of 7 While researching her thesis she found a 1929 document that states the City has something to say in what happens to the watershed due to involvement by individuals at that time. Requests that the council pass on the comments made at this public hearing to the US Forest Service. Questioned the need to expand Mt Ashland for economic reasons. Jay Liniger/1253 Tolman Creek/He felt that the decision made would symbolize the value of our community. He noted the uncertainties and his concern with harming the ecosystem, water supply and erosion control. He noted the risks that are being taken and how this has been monitored in similar expansions. He stated that the burden of proof rests with the proponents and that "zero" harm will affect the watershed and that mitigation has to be 100% effective. He commented that the middle branch is special and under appreciated in relation to our watershed. Requested that council support and alternative that does not move into the middle branch. Muriel Ames/195 Grandview/Spoke in favor of the expansion and noted the value of Mt Ashland. She noted the programs used by the students and adults in our community. She also noted the lack of progression slopes offered for skiers. Supports Alternative 2. George Badura/2840 David Lane, Medford/Stated that his evaluation is geared toward the municipal watershed and shared that he is very familiar with this area. His evaluation of the East Ford of Ashland Creek is that it is a creek channel from the Ski area down that is in a degraded condition. This was caused by the effects of added runoff from disturbed conditions such as roads, etc. causing the creek channel to can3' the added nmoff. The results are common sediment deposits and bank cutting. He felt that there was nothing that could be done for this condition now other than to not add to the effects. He explained that the East Fork proper is different terrain than the Middle Fork. That the soils from the Middle Fork are very deep deposits from mountain glaciation and are very permeable. He explained that the Middle Fork is in Dynamic equilibrium because it has not and is not currently affected by management activities or cumulative effects. The concern for the Middle Fork drainage is the effect management activities may have on wetlands and ground water, especially in the upland appearing Englemaun Spruce stands. If subsurface water is intercepted, this can adversely effect the municipal watershed character. In review of the DEIS, he finds that the costs for mitigation and restoration have been grossly underestimated. Jeff Hanson/13880 Greensprings Hwy/Commented favorably on the City's recommended provisions and offered the Associations willingness to work with the city to meet any concerns. Ken Crocker/134 Nutley/Commented that he is an avid skier but is opposed to the expansion due to a value statement. He felt that the council's responsibility is to protect and not to take risks. He does not feel that recreation takes precedence over our watershed. He cited issues regarding the reality of the political environment and the pressure on the US Forest Service. The sensitive sediment projectory as used by a computer model. And that the burden of proof had not been met as it relates to the risk for our watershed. He stated that mitigation has shown to be ineffective and costly. Requests that the council propose a resolution to stay out of the middle branch and to follow the Valdez Principles. City Council Public Input Meeting 9/30/0~ 3 of 7 Brian Almquist/128 Wimer/Spoke in strong support of Altemative 2. As City Administrator for the City of Ashland fi'om 1970 until 1998 he shared his familiarity with the Ashland watershed and its interface with the Mt. Ashland ski area. He reminded the council that the previous owners had announced that ifa buyer could not be found, it was their intention to close Mt. Ashland and to relocate the lifts to Stevens Pass. The loss to our region in regards to recreational and economic benefits were recognized and the community raised the $1.4 million that was needed to acquire the lease and facilities. He explained that a sub-lease was worked out with the newly created non-profit entity and that this sub-lease had built-in protections regarding the maintenance of a reserve fund and/or marketable assets, sufficient for restoration of the area if the enterprise were to fail. In addition, when the facility was acquired, the previous owners had spent over $200,000 on plans for future expansion, and the Forest Service had prepaid an EIS o the various alternatives. The city staff was an active participant in that planning process, and was successful in modifying the preferred alternative in several ways, to protect the watershed. He stated that now, over 10 years later, we are still discussing the same issues. That, following this new planning process, Alternative 2 has been crafted to meet all of the concerns raised and will have no significant impact on water quality in Reeder Reservoir. The monitoring proposed in this alternative both during and after construction, will insure that Ashland's water quality will not be adversely impacted. In closing, he stated the need to provide the terrain that will keep our ski area economically sound for years to come. Tonya Graham/418 Lit Way/Executive for HeadWaters. Asked that the council keep the following in focus, maintaining the health of watershed as a top priority, being aware of soil fragility on the mountain and the risks involved due to impact. She asked that the council consider other alternatives that address needed improvements. Requested that the council consider a resolution that modifies Alternative 3, which stays out of the middle branch. Gary MacGraw/423 Lit Way/Questioned why the city would not be interested in expanding the ski area when it has been proved that there would be no impact to our watershed. Noted that our community supports a livable environment. Does not believe that expansion is profit driven but to maintain its solvency and provide improved ski areas. Supports Alternative 2, which would bring the ski area into compliance. He does not support Alternative 6. Noted the economic value of the ski facility to our community. Bryan Holley/234 Liberty/Spoke regarding what he feels are flaws in logic, one of which is the fiscal reality of the city's obligation in the future. He questioned who would be interested in purchasing a ski facility that is experiencing difficulties. He raised his concern relating to the fund raising that will take place for the expansion. Pointed out the issue regarding the concern that environmental issues will be used for political reasons. He raised the point that at the public meetings with the Forest Service that the option of"no expansion" was not given opportunity for discussion. He felt that the council has the political power to tell the Forest Service how they should participate in the Mt Ashland expansion. Jimbo Jones/transient/Requested that better fuels and technologies be invested in. Stated that there is a need for middle ground that all could be comfortable with. JoAnne Eggers/221 Granite Street/Requested that the council respect the value and beauty of the middle branch. She pointed out the average length and width of the longest ski nm and how it would effect the middle branch area. Commented that global warming has not been given its due and is not just a theory. Advocated for staying out of the middle branch. Joanie McGowan/951 Clay/Felt strong about making a decision and supported the expansion through the management of Mt. Ashland Association. Noted that she based her decisions on her trust of Mt Ashland Association and the experts that have been involved. Requested that we work together to improve the ski area and that the council be clear with their decision. Noted that there is a need to move on and work on other issues at hand. David Allen/630 Ray Lane/Commented that most that speak in favor of the expansion noted the economic value of the mountain and that those that spoke in opposition commented on the environmental risks. Tom Rnse/430 Wiley/Commented that the Forest Service has stated that rain on snow events are the only serious threat to the watershed and Reeder Reservoir. He stated that the Forest Services had chosen to ignore the severe thunderstorms that occur on the mountain on a regular basis. He also noted that in the 1980% the Forest Service had redesigned the crossings over both the East and West Forks due to massive City Council Public Input Meeting 9/30/03 4 of 7 water in the re-flows at these two crossings. The purpose of the redesign was to make them impervious to future events like this. He shared that what happens on the North side can happen on the South side. Opposes moving into the middle branch. He supports the council seeking George Badura's and Richard Hart's expert opinion. David Spear/3827 Annettes Way/Commented on his use of the ski facility and his involvement with the Mt. Ashland Association. He stated that improvement is needed, specifically in regards to safety. He supports Alternative 6. He commented that nothing we do, will provide zero impact, and that we should consider growth and the needs associated with growth. George Sexton/1423 E Main/Commented on the role of the council as the protector of our environment. Spoke regarding the prior study session and how mitigation was being pushed rather than staying out of the middle branch. Read article regarding sediment trapping using wet model. Commented on how the US Forest Service had not been reliable in how they manage the forest service specifically in municipal watersheds. Voiced his concern regarding the US Forests Aquatic Conservation Strategy. He does not believe that the US Forest Service is an agency that supports water quality. Monica Partridge 535 Sutten Place/Spoke for Medford Chamber of Commerce and voiced the support of Alternative 2. Feels that this would offer the best recreational and economic value. The expansion will increase tourism and economic vitality. Feels that the expansion is well planned with low impact to water quality. Scan Gordon/100 Union Street/Supports keeping the mountain open and making the right decision. Expansion based on future growth is inappropriate and noted other improvements that could be done in place of expansiun. Would like to be assured that erosion mitigation is taking place. Valri Williams/744 Helman Street/Treasurer of the Ashland High School Ski Tean'L Noted the number of students participating in the ski club at Mt. Ashland. She commented that the available terrain is not adequate for racing and acknowledged the number of several students in attendance that supported the expansion. Larry Cooper/223 5th St/Commented that student programs will continue regardless of the expansion. Requested that all seasons be considered in regards to the proposed expansion. Voiced his concern regarding the impact to the middle branch. Requested that the council include in their statement to the DEIS the community values in regards to the proposed expansion area. Zach Stevenson/391 Beach Street/Voiced his concern that there is no middle ground in regards to making a decision on the expansion. He stated the importance of protecting our natural resources for the future. Stated that he had cataloged the process involving the expansion of Mt. Ashland. Commented on the impact of the endangered species. He implores the council to find a better way. Greg Williams/744 Helman/Commented that the Forest Service has done an excellent job with the DEIS and supported the efforts of the council. Would like to see the Forest Service eonsidar a long gentle slope for the benefit of the ski racers. Paul Copeland/462 Jennifer/Commented on his use and support for the ski facility. He does not support moving into the middle branch. He commented that the middle branch is an incredible pristine area and it is unbelievable to him that disturbing this area is being considered. He feels that there will be years of lawsuits if the expansion is approved. He feels that the Mt. Ashland Board is responsible for this becoming an ongoing battle and noted the amount of money that has been spent on this proposed expansion. He stated that the Mt. Ashland Board should resign and that a new Board should start over. Corky Gardner/4575 Hwy 66/Stated that as a student of Southern Oregon University she was not drawn to the community due to the benefits of Mt. Ashland. She does not support old growth cuts and opposes the expansion. Suzi Aufderheided321 N Mountain/Corrunented on the spirituality of the mountain and how air and water sustains us. Michael Goldman/198 Aleda/Stated that he come as a supporter of the expansion but after alter egos, global warning and various other fears commented that we should just close down the mountain and close City Council Public Input Meeting 9/30/03 5 of 7 down the streets because everything is going to be "so awful." He stated that Mt. Ashland has done a great job of being stewards of the land and that this is a very empowering recreational facility. That recreation is an important part of our lifestyle and our life. He stated, that given the testimony that evening opposing the expansion, that we should all just live in fear. He explained that only 5% of the expansion are in the watershed. Danny Gregg/411 Taylor/Not willing to take risks with our water. Should work toward simplicity. Steve Pearee/700 Butler Creek/Felt that the expansion and environmental issues can work hand in hand. Noted that Mt Ashland Association has worked hard to protect and improve the ski area. He felt that without the programs offered through Mt. Ashland Association our children may not experience the forest. Feels its time to move forward and time for decisive action. Shelley Elkovich/919 Oak Street/Spoke in opposition to the expansion. Commented that there is an abandoned beginner mn and does not understand the need for additional development. Feels that current improvements need to take place. She noted that the pristine middle branch area should be protected. Felt that the term "restoration" is absurd, that there is no going back. Requests that the council monitor current issues on the mountain. Pat Acklin/270 Scenic/Noted that she is a seven-year board member for Mt. Ashland Association and that there is a history of compromise and shared examples of past compromises. Commented there are too many arguments based on emotion rather than science. Commented on the sediment rates over the past years. Ron Roth/6950 Old Hwy 99S/Noted that he is a seven-year board member for Mt. Ashland Association and past board member of HeadWaters. It is his opinion that the problem with Mt. Ashland is that it is a "crowded park." Stated that additional terrain is needed. Explained that Alternative 6 does not enter into the middle branch. Problem with Alternative 2 is with crossing the creeks. Acknowledged that there would be minimal impact but that for the good of the community it should be done. Tracy Bungay/334 Bridge Street/Spoke in opposition to the expansion and stating that the risks are too great. She cannot understand the other side that supports the expansion. Does not trust the Mt. Ashland Association. Voiced her disappointment that the council did not hike the area with representatives who were not with the US Forest Service. Stephen Kindler Stout/130 Orange Street/Suggested that those that support the expansion not nsc the ski area during the busy times. Commented on the failure of democracy. Ryan Navickas/711 Faith Street/Feels that the city has under-reported the risks due to an expansion. Noted the deep political ties to those interested in the expansion. Requests that the council seek pure scientific data before expansion moves forward. He presented 1,000 signatures fi.om local residents who signed in opposition of the proposed expansion. Stated that this is our watershed not a playground for the rogue valley. Made known that there would be slrong opposition to the expansion. Jason Clark/142 6th Street/Spoke regarding the Englemarm spruce and that they are a unique plant community that does not occur anywhere else. Stated that the area that would be effected in regards to streams is larger than what was indicated. Commented that global warming is real and is beyond consideration in regards to this expansion. Feels that expansion into the middle branch is a bad idea. Requested that the council make a statement that puts expansion into the middle branch "to bed." Jim McCarthy/40 Granite Street/Spoke in opposition of the expansion into the watershed. He stated that consideration should be taken on what will be lost and that economic reason should not be the priority. He stated that safety concerns are based on the lack of enforcement. Commented on the need of improvement to the lodge and lifts. Marko Bey/1745 Ashland/Spoke in opposition of the expansion. He shared his experience with repairing damaged ecosystems. Questioned if those supporting the expansion had spent quality time in the middle branch area. Encouraged the council to do the right thing, that water is priceless. Strongly discouraged the council on moving into the middle branch. City Council Public Input Meeting 9/30/03 6 of 7 Chris Chambers/590 Elizabeth Avenue/Reminded the council of their moral responsibilities for the Valdez Principals. He stated that the Valdez Principals were adopted to guide our decisions with an eye on sustainability. He commented that in addition to the complex biological issues that are involved, there is an explosive social dilemma. Because of the divisive nature of the situation, he felt that the council has a unique opportunity to not satisfy any of the interested parties by supporting a middle ground. Requested that the council support Alternative 3 with modifications. Casey Bourgeouis/247 Granite/Represented the Sierra Club and stated that they do not support Altemafive 2 or 6. Commented that 80 football fields of old growth would be clear-cut in the middle branch. For this reason, the Sierra Club supports Alternative 5 with modifications to include removal of marine lodge, cut out parking lot expansion and to include a shuttle service. Stated that the proposed expansion cost is estimated at $6.1 million and that Mt. Ashland Association has indicated that they could raise $2 million, questioned where the remaining $4.1 million would come from. He felt that the cost of expansion is a figure that no has explained and will only increase. Derek Volkart/78 4th Street/Acknowledged that serious compromise has taken place, but that the mountain has compromised more than anyone had. He feels that the mountain is more than a ski area. Offered to take skiers into the backcountry. Urged those in opposition to the expansion to stay vigilant. Christopher Garvey/1250 Ashland Mine Road/Commented that he does not see "altemafives" but only "build or not build." Stated he is neither pro or anti expansion but pro common sense. That Ashland has an unbelievable unique situation and opportunity to mold community resources is a virtually unparalleled. He noted the need for improved attention to guest services and facilities. He thought that afier 20 years there would have been more significant progress with the little things that would inspire confidence when handling the larger things. He challenged the management to submit guest services analysis and then to prove their ability to complete the details. He felt that current practices do not practice a commitment to beginner or intermediate skiers and questioned why we should believe that fancy new lifts, runs and lodges would change this. In closing, he suggested that there are many ways in which Mt. Ashland could improve without the addition of new lifts, new mns, or new lodges. And, that there needs to be necessary common sense improvements to the current infrastructure. He believes that it is time for Mt. Ashland to truly behave as a community resort. Alexander Achegma/54 N Mountain/Spoke in opposition to the expansion based his reasons on photo documentation and destntction of wildlife. He felt that there are more sustainable ways of entertainment and skiing than expansion. Meeting was adjourned at 11:05 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Barbara Cbxistensen, City Recorder City Council Public Input Meeting 9/30/03 7 of 7 PROCLAMATION · Now that school is in session, more children are walking to and from neighborhood schools, many of them during the busiest time of the day. · It is vital to address the safety of children by making walking safer in our community. · Parents and caregivers should teach children about pedestrian safety and become aware of the difficulties and dangers that children face on their trip to school each day. · Community leaders and parents should determine the "walkability" of their community. · Residents can make a list of suggestions for changes and improvements to increase the safety of children who are walking in our communities. · Children, parents and commtmity leaders are joining together nationwide to walk to school and evaluate pedestrian safety in their community. Now, therefore, the City Council and Mayor, on behalf of the citizens of Ashland, hereby proclaim October 8, 2003, as "WALK OUR CHILDREN TO SCHOOL DAY" and encourage everyone to consider the safety of pedestrians today and every day. Dated this 7th day of October, 2003. Alan DeBoer, Mayor Barbara Christensen, City Recorder Public safety is a top priority within the community of Ashland. Safety from fire is important both to citizens and local firefighters, who put their lives on the line with every response to fire. Residents of Ashland must take action to prevent fires and protect themselves if fire strikes. Awareness of simple safety practices can help prevent fire deaths and injuries. Working smoke alarms on every level and a home fire escape plan and regular drills are essential for every household in Ashland. Ashland is joining the National Fire Protection Association in teaching lifesaving skills in conjunction with Fire Prevention Week. Remember the Fire Prevention Week 2003 caution, "When Fire Strikes: Get Out! Stay Out!" and urge all citizens to heed the advice to install smoke alarms and plan and practice fire drills. Now, therefore, the City Council and Mayor, on behalf of the citizens of Ashland, hereby proclaim the week of October 5 - 11, 2003, as This week commemorates the Great Chicago Fire of 1871, which killed more than 250 persons, left 100,000 homeless and destroyed more than 17,400 buildings. We call upon the people of Ashland to participate in fire prevention activities at home, work and school and to take the steps needed to make their homes and families safe from the leading causes of home fires, which include cooking, heating and electrical. Dated this 7th day of October, 2003.~ Barbara Christensen, City Recorder Bicycle and Pedestrian Commission August 21 2003 Regular Meeting Minutes Roll Call Catron, Baxter, Beaudoin, Chapman, Delgado, and Knickerbocker were present. Hartzell arrived at 5:25 p.m. RVTD's Matthew Barnes and Officers Steve MacLennan and Tom Cook of the Ashland Police Department (APD) were also present. Call to Order Chapman called the meeting to order at 5:15 p.m. Approval of Minutes Baxter. rl)elgado m/s to approve the minutes of July 24th, 2003 as presented. Voice vote: All AYES. Motion passed. Public Forum There was discussion of humanitarian efforts to take bicycle paris to Cuba, and classes taught by Carol Lee Rogers and Doug Staples at Lincoln School. Crosswalk Enforcement Cook noted that the next pedcs~ian safety operation would be condncted next Wednesday at 10:00 a.m. Chapman pointed out that one volunteer was still needed. Cook added for Knickerbocker that thc operation would be condnctcd at the comar of East Main Street and Gresham, near the library. There was discussion of letters to the editor, and it was noted that the Acting Chief of Police's letter was very good. Chapman asked Hartzell whether she felt a letter to the editor from the commission was still needed. Hartzell suggested that a letter was still needed to clarify the laws. MacLeunan noted that on January 1, 2004, Oregon law changes so that drivers must stop for pedestrians anywhere in a crosswalk and must remain stopped until the pedestrian clears the crosswalk. He added that this will apply on all streets, with both one-way and two- way traffic. MacLennan questioned whether the commissioners wanted to do some sort of public education in light of the changing law. Hartzell asked whether someone from the Police Depattment could assist in writing a letter to the editor. Baxter added that he felt a letter should be published nearer to the end of the year, closer to the time the new law takes effect. Hartzell stated that she felt there was still a perception that the city was being overzealous with the enforcement of pedestrian laws. Delgado suggested that letters focus on the reasons behind the laws rather than simply stating the laws themselves. She also suggested that the basic rules be put on the city website. Hah-is noted that there are brochures available, and stated that she could speak with Telecommunications and Marketing Manager Ann Seltzer about posting something on the web. She also suggested putting brochures at banks, schools, and other locations around town. Gatron suggested that brochures should also be provided at the Chamber of Commerce and its plaza information booth. Baxter agreed that web posting was important as commissioners could refer people to the website. Hartzell suggested contacting the state for more explanation of the ORS. Delgado stated that she felt that the brochures were pretW user friendly. Hams suggested a contact person be named on the website for people with more involved questions. Bike Safety Education/Safe Routes to School Baxter stated that he had spoken to John O'Malley, and O'Malley had reiterated his desire to get the bike education curriculum going again. Baxter added that Scott Bricker from the BTA would be in town to meet with O'Malley on August 28~ at 2:30 p.m. He explained that O'Malley is interested in developing a curriculum that integrates well with that the school is already doing and that can become their own. Baxter invited any commissioners who were available to attend this meeting. Baxter added that Bricker is willing to meet with anyone who is interested, and he added that he will also be meeting with Siskiyou Velo. Hartzell questioned whether Bricker was familiar with other cumculums; Baxter responded that he wasn't sure. Baxter added that it was up to the Middle School to move forward now, with the commission's assistance. He stated that he believed there are plenty of resources available. Chapman noted that he had received e-mail from Carol Lee Rogers stating that Doug Staples would be conducting classes at two elementary schools in the fall. Delgedo added that she had spoken to Todd Contreras, an elementary school P.E. teacher, and she stated that he was enthusiastic about doing classes. She added that she had also spoken to former commissioner Tom Powell and he was 2005-0821BIke & Ped Min,doc Page lof2 interested in having these classes as an SOU practicum. She noted that in the past, the times BTA set hadn't worked for SOU. Baxter noted that he had the impression that one middle school teacher was opposed to the program, and he noted that this teacher was no longer around. Delgado questioned what the commission was aiming toward. Baxter stated that he thought things had evolved fi.om the commission doing the program on its own, to a parmership with BTA that would lead to the program coming out of the schools rather than something that the commission had to take into the schools. Baxter added that BTA is willing to continue on its own. Catron stated that he thought the commission was going to focus on the Middle School. Baxter responded that the commission had decided to focus on the Middle School because the program was there before and because all Ashland students go there. Delgado stated that one issue was determining how to work with the BTA in the future, and how to address what is working and what is not. There was discussion of sanding brochures home with children. Cook noted that ODOT may have separate brochures available oriented toward children. Barnes noted that RVTD has a fifty minute bicycle class that they present to second through seventh graders. RV'I'D Gar Free Day Barnes noted that the event would be Friday, September 26~h, and that bus service would be free district-wide. He added that RVTD was working with Minute Markets to provide free refreshments. He added that they would also be promoting the BTA Bike Commute Challenge. Hartzell noted that a parade had been discussed at the last meeting, rather than just a critical mass ride. Barnes stated that RVTD could not organize people in the street, but he added that could send a photographer. Chapman suggested that this could be done downtown, where it is easy to get up high for a photograph. Hartzell questioned who was interested in working on this item; Chapman responded that it sounded interesting to him. Delgado stated that she was interested, depending on the amount of time involved. Ca~'on suggested finding a way to promote carpooling. Hartzell suggested having booths for kids to decorate their bikes, and she added that the parade/photo could be the culmination of the event. Delgado suggested focusing on a school and having the event during the day. Chapman suggested a pseudo-critical mass, with everyone who rides a bike riding as much as they could during the day. Chapman and Delgado agreed to work with Hartzell on this item. Chapman added that he would repaint the Car Free Day banner. Harris noted the need to get permission for posting the banner. Hartzell stated that she would like to see something fun and creative. Chapman added that people from outside the commission needed to be involved. Delgado suggested advertising in the Community Notes section of the Tid'mgs. It was agreed that there would be a lunch meeting in the Siskiyou Room on September 4~. New Business Baxter questioned the law under discussion in Salem that would allow cyclists to do rolling stops at intersections. Hartzell asked about the light distribution program. Harris noted the upcoming ACTS Conference in Eugene in October. There was discussion of the North Mountain bike lanes and the upcoming improvements in the vicinity of North Mountain Park. Chapman noted that he had been appointed to an advisory committee of the Metropolitan Planning Organization (iMPO) and would be reporting back on their efforts. Agenda Items for Next Meeting · Bike Safety/Safe Routes, Crosswalk Enforcement, Car Free Event, Elections, Bike Lights, ACTS brochure, and Budget Update. Adiournment There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 7:15 P.M. Next Meeting 5:15 p.m. on September 18°~, 2003 2005-0821Bike & Ped Min.doc Page 2of2 CITY OF SHLAND ASHLAND HISTORIC COMMISSION Minutes September 17, 2003 At 5:00 p.m., the Historic Commission met for its annual orientation meeting. Present were members Dale Shostrom, Terry Skibby, Joanne Kdppaehne, Tom Giordano, Rob Saladoff, Alex Krach, Jay Leighton and Sam Whitford. In addition, Associate Planner Mark Knox and Secretary $onja Akerman were in attendance. Keith Chambers is on sabbatical. ORIENTATION Land Use Basics Knox explained the basics of land use planning, noting differences between the Ashland Comprehensive Plan and the Ashland Municipal Code. The Comp Plan serves as a guiding document for all development within the City. The Land Use Ordinance, which is chapter 18 of the Municipal Code, contains all the policies of the Comp Plan. Because the Land Use Ordinance incorporates adopted ordinances, it is more specific and includes the criterion necessary for implementing the Comp Plan. Knox also described the sections of the Site Design and Use Standards that pertain to the Histodc Districts and the Downtown District, and stressed the importance of becoming familiar with the specific sections. Land Use Entitlements Entitlements (or planning actions) the Historic Commission is involved with include Site Reviews, Conditional Use Permits and Variances. Knox explained what is involved with each. Land Use Procedures Knox described the differences between projects involving only Building Permits and projects requiring Staff Permits, Type I, Type II and Type III planning actions. Discussion was based on procedures that entail public notices, time frames and appeal pedods. There was also a discussion on whether the Commission should seek more authority in decision making. Knox assured the Commission that all recommendations and advice from the Commission are held in high regard from the staff level to the City Council. He then explained the functions of the Planning Commission and the Headngs Board. In discussing the Histodc Commission Review Board, the design review form was brought up to consider its revision. Saladoff volunteered to spearhead this. Maximum House Size Ordinance Knox informed the Commission the ordinance was unanimously passed by the City Council and has now gone through the first and second readings. It will become effective on October 16. Leighton volunteered to work on a handout with simple illustrations that will be helpful to homeowners, contractors and designers. Bi,q Box Ordinance Knox explained this ordinance, which amends the Site Design and Use Standards, was also passed by the Council and will become effective on October 16. Items Not On Aqenda Knox advised the Commission to not set goals in October. He would rather see the members study and cleady understand the ordinances, implement them, and educate themselves and then the public. In discussing this, the members acknowledged they already have the goals of getting the Lithia Spdngs proper~ on the National Register, making sure the Brown Bag Workshops take place, being able to articulate recommendations and suggestions clearly to the public, and redoing the design review form. Therefore, the October 18 meeting was postponed. Because the Commission still has the need to discuss and understand such elements as styles, remodels, likes/ dislikes and how far to go with mimicking certain elements, the members agreed to meet from 5:30 to 7:30 p.m. Ashland Historic Commission Orientation Meeting Minutes September 17, 2003 CiTY OF -ASHLAND on October 21. It was also decided it would be helpful to have photos of buildings in Ashland and graphics so current interpretation of historic styles can be discussed. The members would also like to talk about the National Histodc Preservation Standards and how they work/don't work. It is hoped that as a result of the meeting, something will be created that can be presented to the community, perhaps through a Brown Bag Workshop. ADJOURNMENT At 7:30 p.m. the meeting adjourned. Ashland Historic Commission Orientation Meeting Minutes 2 September 17, 2003 CiTY OF SHLAND ASHLAND HISTORIC COMMISSION Minutes September 3, 2003 CALL TO ORDER At 7:07 p.m.,'Acting Chairperson Terry Skibby called the meeting to order in the Siskiyou Room, located in the Community Development/Engineering Services Building at 51 Winbum Way. In addition to Skibby, members present were Alex Krach, Jay Leighton, Tom Giordano, Joanne Kdppaehne, Rob Saladoff and Sam Whifford. Also present were Associate Planner Mark Knox, Council Liaison John Morrison and Secretary Sonja Akerman. Member Dale Shostrom was unable to attend and member Keith Chambers is on sabbatical. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Kdppaehne moved and Giordano seconded to approve the minutes of the August 6, 2003 meeting as submitted. The motion passed with a unanimous vote. PUBLIC HEARING Planning Action 2003-108 Conditional Use Permit 115 Church Street Nancy Seward and Tim Bond Knox reported this application is for the construction of an 818 square foot accessory residential unit that will be located at the rear of the property and occupied by a family member. There is currently an existing non-historic building that occupies the space where the new unit will be built. The unit, which will be 42 feet from the front property line, will also include an attached single car garage with access off Church Street. A pedestrian walkway will connect the new unit to Chumh Street. Because the unit will be built behind the existing house, only half the structure will be visible from the street. The design incorporates a hipped roofline with two gables on the south side. Six-inch horizontal siding (hardi-plank), vinyl windows, composition roofing and 1" x 4" comer and window/door tdm will be utilized. Knox also related that most of the existing landscaping will remain. However, the removal of an apple tree near the west property line is proposed due to the placement of the accessory unit. Skibby opened the public headng. Applicant Nancy Seward stated the existing garage/workshop building that will be removed is made of corrugated tin with a plastic roof. The new unit will basically be built on that site. Designer Doyle Brightenburg clarified that the new structure will be located a little closer to the property line to preserve as much of the backyard as possible. As a result, the removal of one tree is necessary. Also, some of the existing retaining will need to be removed but it will be replaced and incorporated with the foundation of the new accessory unit. He also noted there is an easement that runs down the side of the property, which although not part of the property, can be utilized. The existing house does not have exterior historic detail because of previous remodeling. Since there is a variety of structural styles in the neighborhood, Brightenburg said he did not try to emulate any of them, including the existing house. He also stressed the fact that only half the unit will be visible from the street; Giordano stated he has two minor concems. One is that backing out into Church Street can be hazardous because of speeding cars coming down the steep street. He wondered if the applicants looked at providing a turn around Ashland Historic Co~ssion Minutes September 3, 2003 CITY OF ,SHLAND on the property. The second concem is the contemporary use of the windows on the south elevation. Bdghtenburg responded that a turnaround on the properly would take up too much room. As for the windows, he acknowledged they are contemporary but that portion of the unit will be hidden behind the existing home. Krach asked if there were plans to renovate the existing house. Seward replied they will not be doing anything to the house right now except to paint it to match the new unit. It will also need a new roof before long. Krach proclaimed the design of the new unit feels very contemporary. Brightenburg stated he created the gable on the unit to be sympathetic with the main house. The number of windows grew as they were considering designs to make it more comfortable. The family liked the feel and the design. He admitted it looks a little contemporary, but there will be landscaping and the unit will be partially hidden. Skibby stated the applicants came to the Review Board and the visibility of the new unit was discussed at that time. Whitford said he sees no problem with the proposal, as it will be mostly hidden from the street. He would, however, like to see the existing house renovated as it was rather than remodeled to look like the new unit when the time comes. Seward agreed and stated that Skibby was looking for a histodc photo of the house. Knox related that staff had discussed the safety issues of backing onto Church Street, but it had to look at the existing conditions and it was difficult to assess how bad the situation would be. If a turnaround were provided, it would use up a large portion of the property, as Bdghtenburg stated. As a result, staff felt there would not be enough of an impact to require redesigning the project. Skibby closed the public headng. Whifford moved to recommend approval of Planning Action 2003-108. Giordano seconded the motion and it passed with a unanimous vote. Planning Action 2003-110 Modification of Previously Approved Site Review and Variance 230 and 232 Van Ness Avenue Serin Eggling This application, Knox explained, is being requested in order to modify one of the conditions of a previously approved planning action. The original request was to replace the existing garage with a third dwelling unit on the property. At the time of approval, the adjacent neighbors had given verbal agreement for the shared use of their. driveway, thus enabling the owner to provide four off-street parking spaces. These neighbors have changed their minds, however, so the owner will need to provide one more on-street parking space. Knox further explained that several years ago, this property was partitioned. At that time, each property needed at least 20 feet of access to a public street. Since the lot that was created to the north would have only had alley access, it was necessary for it to have a 20 foot "flag" to maintain access off Van Ness Avenue, although only a pedestrian path was constructed from the street to the rear property. Since then, the necessity of having a 20-foot access has changed. Therefore, the owner has received permission from the property owner to the north to use his 20 feet in order to count it in the required footage for on-street credit. Whifford asked for clarification on the 20-foot access. Knox explained that now, only an 8-foot pedestrian path is needed; 20 feet of access is no longer required. Skibby opened the public hearing. Designer Doyle Bdghtenburg cladfied that the owner had a reciprocal easement with the neighbors, but afier the garage was tom down, it was found that the proper names were not on the easement and they backed down. After he met with the owner, he found out she had a legal agreement with the owner of the property to the north that she would maintain the pedestrian walkway and had the dght to use the rest of the flag for her landscaping. There is Ashland Historic Commission Minutes 2 Scptcmb~ 3, 2003 CITY OF SHLAND a possibility that she may be able to purchase the 12-foot strip. Since the 20-foot strip does not need to remain open, they are all hoping this solution will work in order to provide the required number of parking spaces for the project. Giordano stated he feels the design layout with the landscaping and sidewalk is better than what was previously approved. Bdghtenburg added they had to encroach a little on the 5-foot buffer but also agreed it looks better. Skibby closed the public heating. Giordano moved to recommend approval of Planning Action 2003-110. With a second by Kdppaehne,.the motion was unanimously approved. Planning Action 2003-092 Site Review and Variance 124 Alida Street Kirt Meyer and Vadim Agakhanov Because he is the amhitect for this project, Giordano stated he has a conflict of interest with this Planning Action and stepped out of the room. Knox reported this project was heard last month and involves the relocation of the existing home to the south side of the property and the construction of two additional units in a single structure. The Commission had voted to recommend the Headngs Board call the project up for a public headng because of the massive scale on the Blaine Street side. The following day, the applicants decided to postpone their application and focus on the scale of the project. As a result, the square footage of the new duplex has been reduced by 291 square feet. The applicants feel strongly that this is a better application. They are proposing to put the sidewalk along the curb rather than as a parkrow, allowing 14~ feet of landscaping between the sidewalk and the building. Knox stated Shostrom and Chambers were the most outspoken about this project at last month's meeting and pointed to the letter submitted by Shostrom. In it he offers numbers and thoughts about the bulk and scale of the proposed duplex and stated if the existing house was located on the comer rather than moved south, it could mask the bulk of the proposed duplex and be an anchor for the Historic District. Knox confirmed for Saladoff the biggest concems were that the existing house would no longer be on the comer and the scale of the design for the new duplex is massive. Knox stated that to remedy these concerns, the applicants have removed square footage to soften the bulk and scale. In order to assess the project, it is necessary to look at it as a pedestrian feeling the effects of the design. Knox said he feels a parkrow would be better for the sidewalk because it is more traditional, but by locating the sidewalk next to the curb allows more buffer (landscaping) between the sidewalk and the building. Leighton asked how the height of a building determines the distance between buildings and Knox replied to establish the distance, the top of the gable points of the two buildings are added, then divided by 2. The existing building is 23 feet high and the proposed dupleX will be 24 feet, so the required separation would be 23% feet. The applicants are requesting 14 feet of distance. Skibby opened the public heating. Applicant Kirt Meyer listed changes they had made since last month. According to calculations, the average distance between buildings in the neighborhood is 11' 8", so the request of 14 feet does not seem out of the question, The overall size of the duplex has been reduced by 291 square feet, so it is now proposed for 3,470 square feet. He also tariffed that Shostmm's calculations in the letter were incorrect and he stated he felt they were treated unfairly last month because the Commission focused on the maximum house size ordinance and how it would relate to this project, and it hadn't even been adopted. Meyer then pointed out the landscaping would exceed the requirements, thus providing more of a buffer. The mass and bulk of the project were heavily criticized last Ashland Historic Commission Minutes September 3, 2OO3 CITY OF ASHLAND month, so the wall has been reduced from 35' to 29', the wall well is now more articulated, entrances will be on Alida and Blaine Stm ets, and the ovem II height of the new building is now only one foot higher than the existing house. He also pointed out the existing duplex across the street is about 120 feet long. He then stated he thought it was mom important to blend a project into the neighborhood than to meet all the ordinances. The total square footage of the duplex will now be 3,470. Each unit will be approximately 1,700 square feet, including garages. The last point he wanted to make was that the existing house is mom compatible with the neighborhood on Alida and that it would blend in better than the new duplex. Applicant Vadim Agakhanov added that even if the ordinance limiting the maximum square footage were in place, they would only exceed the maximum by approximately the size of a gain ge. If the garage was not built or was detached, the project would comply. He also pointed out that most people usually ddve on Alida, not Blaine Street. By keeping the existing house on Alida Street, it keeps the distdct more historic. Skibby asked if it would be possible to move the existing house to the corner and build the duplex on the south portion of the lot. Meyer said it would be doable if that was the only way to get approval, but that they pm ferred the layout as submitted. Leighton asked if any adjustments could be made to inset the duplex mom. Knox explained a conceptual drawing has been done. Leighton commented that the 25% Variance is a planning action so there should not be an automatic assumption. She also acknowledged the new maximum house size ordinance is not in effect and agreed the Commission wasn't exactly fair to the applicants last month in this mspect. This application needs to be reviewed with cdtedon now in effect. Knox interjected that if the Commission requests the applicant to switch the plans and m locate the existing house to the comer, the proposal would need to be m-noticed, thus delaying it further. All concerns need to be addmssed by the Site Design & Use Standards, which is in effect. In closing Agakhanov stated he thought Giordano had addressed the mass issue - the duplex is not as bulky and he thinks it looks much better. He added there have been no objections from the neighbom. Skibby closed the public hearing. Whitford commended Giordano for addmssing concerns the Commission had last month. He disagm ed with Commission concerns about locating the existing house on the comer. He does have an issue with building such a large structure on such a small parcel of land. Kdppaehne stated she thinks it is legitimate to discuss the new ordinance with this pm ject because it serves as proxy as most membem feel about this issue. She also doesn't necessarily agree with the ordinance. To her, the pm posed duplex feels compatible with the neighborhood and provides for multi-family housing. Once the decision was made for the ama to be zoned for multi-family units, legitimate pm posals and ideas should be accepted. She said that moving the house to the south and building a larger stmctum on the corner is a good tm atment for the pm perty. It adds mom vadety. She feels Giordano made a successful effort to pm vide an interesting facing to Blaine Street and she is in favor of appmval. Saladoff said there am severn I issues hem - variances and exceptions, bulk and scale. He would not necessarily recommend switching the proposal. The scale (as it is now), as well as the articulation and entry, will improve the corner. Giordano's elevations on Blaine Street m pm sent an improvement over what is them now. He admitted having mixed feelings because of the bulk and scale issue, but feels this would be an appmpriate addition to the neighborhood. Although the building is a little large, it will benefit the neighborhood. Kmch stated them was strong opposition to moving the existing house last month and undemtands the value of not moving historic structures. However, if newer larger structure s are built between historic ones, it ruins the pm gm ssion of size on the block. He said his only concem with the pm ject at this moment is the size. Ashland Historic Commission Minutes September 3, 2003 4 CITY OF SHLAND Leighton commented she also has mixed feelings about this application. If the existing structure is left as is, a garage would need to be added, thus creating about the same scale. The proposed duplex still has bulk to it and is larger than the histodc home. Referring to the long duplex across the street, Leighton noted it does not have the bulk because it is one story. The proposed duplex will have more bulk. Skibby said he feels much better about moving the house now than he did last month and can see the benefits. The duplex has been scaled down, the application could have been a house with a large addition, and the applicants have responded to concams resulting from the meeting last month. He also stated this project is at the edge of the Historic District and it is necessary to look at the fact that the historic house will be saved. Knox asked for input on the sidewalk placement - curb v. parkrow. Leighton stated that as a pedestrian, she personally prefers parkrows. She also said it needs to be acknowledged that landscaping comes and goes and is not necossadly permanent. Kdppaehne said that this does not do much to mitigate other issues. By providing trees along the street, there is more to mitigate. Mordson reminded the Commission that the new ordinance is not in effect and the criterion that is in effect is what must be taken into consideration. It may be six weeks before the new ordinance is in effect. Skibby commented the design is now varied so it is not so massive. He also noted the applicants have worked with the Review Board to scale it down. Krippaehne moved to recommend approval of this application as presented with the exception of the sidewalk, which would preferably be constructed as a parkrow and Krach seconded the motion. It passed with Krippaehne, Skibby, Saladoff, Krach and Whitford voting YES and Leighton voting NO. Giordano did not vote. OLD BUSINESS Review Board - Following is the September schedule for the Review Board, which meets every Thursday from 3:00 to at least 3:30 p.m. in the Planning Department: September 4th September 11th September 18th September 25th Skibby, Leighton and Giordano Skibby, Saladoff and Kdppaehne Skibby, Krach and Saladoff Skibby and Whitford Proiect Assi.qnments for PlanninR Actions PA #2000-120 PA #2002-075 PA #2002-100 PA #2002-125 PA #2002-127 PA #2003-005 PA #2003-035 PA #2003-045/110 PA #2003-090 PA #2003-094 PA #2003-108 PA #2003-092 485 "A" Street (Steve Hoxmeier) SE Comer of "A" & Pioneer Streets (Alan Sandier) 142 East Main Street (Earthly Goods) 44 North Second Street (Trinity Episcopal Church) NW Comer North Main & Maple Streets Intersection (ACHF) 35 S. Second Street (Winchester Inn) 665 East Main Street (Kirk McAllister) 230/232 VanNess Avenue (Sedn Eggling/Sherri Morgan) 125 North Main Street (Lynn Thompson) 45 Wimer Street (Paul Crafft) 115 Church Street (Nancy Seward and Tim Bond) 124 Alida Street (Kirt Meyer and Vadim Agakhanov) Shostrom Saladoff Leighton Skibby Kdppaehne Krippaehne Shostrom Saladoff Krippaehne Camel:lie Library Restoration - Whitford explained he is on the Jackson County Library Board and there is currently no money to finish the restoration work in the back of Ashland's library. He suggested the Ashland Friends of the Ashland Historic Co~.~,,ission Minutes 5 Septembei~ 3, 2003 CITY OF kSHLAND Library have a fundraiser. Skibby stated he is a member of the group and will bdng it up. He will also compose a letter for the Histodc Commission to send to the Mayor and Council asking that this not be forgotten. Possible National Re.qister Nomination for Lithia Spdnqs ProperLy - There has been no change on this as there is no longer an intern available to work on it. Knox will keep the Commission informed on the status. NEW BUSINESS: Topics for Potential Goals - Goal topics will be discussed at the orientation meeting on September 17 and the regular meeting on October 8. Election of Officers - This was postponed until the next meeting, since Shostrom was not in attendance. ITEMS NOT ON AGENDA: Leighton stated an Ashland citizen had spoken to her about the Letter to the Editor written by Andy Kuzmitz pertaining to light pollution, what the City of Ashland is doing about it and Kuzmitz' solicitation in support of an ordinance compliant with the International Dark Sky Association. The citizen thought it was an issue that the Histodc Commission should address. Knox stated the City of Ashland's lighting policy has been to replace streetlights as needed with those in conformance with Dark Sky. The Electdc Department also has standards for new developments. Giordano suggested asking someone from the Electdc Department do a presentation to the Histodc Commission. Skibby said that while he basically agrees with Kuzmitz, perhaps there could be a few exceptions, as he would not want to change the lights on such histodc structures as the Perozzi Fountain. He also noted he has photos of all the streetlights throughout the years since the 1860s. He will put these together and bdng in for further discussion. Skibby related a person whose mother had recently passed away had contacted him regarding the possible donation of an histodc steam train bell. The bell was actually pumhased in Adzona. The Commission felt that since the bell most probably didn't have anything to do with the history of Ashland, this person should contact the Medford Railroad Park. ANNOUNCEMENTS Election of officers will be on the October 8~ agenda. Officers include Chair, Vice Chair, Planning Commission Liaison and City Council Liaison. Project sites to visit on October 18"~ will be on the October 8t~ agenda, as well as topics for potential goals. Leighton announced she will have to miss the Goal Setting meeting on October 18 due to a conflict. She will be overseeing a booth for Southem Oregon Historical Society at North Mountain Park. The booth will have information about "Food through the Ages". ADJOURNMENT With a motion by Leighton and second by Kdppaehne, it was the unanimous decision of the Commission to adjoum the meeting at 9:50 p.m. Ashland Historic Commission Minutes September 3, 2003 ASHLAND FOREST LANDS COMMISSION August 13, 2003 4:30 - 6:00 PM MINUTES MEMBERS PRESENT: Members Absent: Staff Present: Non Voting Members: Frank Betlejewski, Richard Brock, Elizabeth Crosson (Vice Chair), Jo Anne Eggers, Stephen Jensen (Chair), Anthony Kerwin, Bill Robertson None Nancy Slocum, Keith Woodley, Pieter Smeenk Marty Main (Consultant) I. CALL TO ORDER AT 4:30 PM 1I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: July 9, 2003 minutes were unanimously approved as submitted. III. PUBLIC FORUM: No one spoke. STAFF REPORTS A. Keith Woodley clarified the commission's budget. He explained the budget has been funded by the Water Department since 1994 and is approximately $60,000 to $80,000 per year. Expenditures typically include contracts for Bill Hicks and Marty Main, surveys and thinning. Revenue would include any trees sold. The fund can't be touched or traded. Additionally, potential and actual grant monies are included in the adopted budget. Chris Chamber's salary is funded with grant administration monies. The budget also includes $1000 for commission training and education. Woodley met with Hicks, Main and Sitton to take a second look at the geological hazard mapping. It was decided that additional mapping would not be area wide, but done on a case by case basis. Main reported on the ongoing groundwork. The prescriptions for the lower parcel are nearly complete. The remaining units (N, most of K, and S) are in process, but have been on hold because of slope instability. Historically hazardous slope areas are mapped off and no trees are removed. With the last of this information he can figure out the relative cost for each unit. Eggers wondered if, because of the relocation on the city waterline, Main should wait to evaluate that area. Main also toured the important interface areas with John Schulyer, interim Forest Ranger. REVIEW OF PROJECTS PENDING/REQUIRING ACTION Crosson handed out an example of an "Action Plan" similar to what other commissions C:\WINDOWS\TEMP~AUG 13.doc VI. use to track activities, deliverables, responsible party and deadlines. She thought it would be useful to the commission as an organizational tool and history. Jensen recommended Crosson be responsible for updating and reporting on the Action Plan each meeting. Commission agreed. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION: Agenda Realign and Minutes Protocol - Jensen introduced the new agenda format designed to facilitate the meeting and help staff organize minutes. Citizens would be allowed to speak only during Public Forum. Also, Jensen researched other commissions' minutes and found that the Forest Commission minutes more abbreviated than most. He suggested more detailed minutes that include all main points working toward a decision. The commission also discussed electronic versus paper commission packets. Jensen recommended paper, as email is not always reliable. Robertson and Jensen requested, to save time, the commissioners read the minutes before each meeting. Crosson preferred electronic and would arrange that option with staff. August 12th Public Hike Update - Eggers reported that nine people went on this final hike to the lower watershed. She was pleased to see some new aspects of the watershed. Slocum said that KOBI was interested in knowing when and where future hikes would be held. The commission decided that, although open to the public, future hikes would not have the same extensive public outreach. C. Restoration Project Draft - The discussion and vote on prescribed burning inclusion was tabled until next meeting. Woodley said the City Council was anxious to see the final project, especially the economic piece. Main said he would have the lower watershed prescriptions finished by the end of September then he and Woodley can project a budget. Woodley will schedule the commission's presentation of the final proposal to City Council for October 21st. The commission will review the budget during the October 8th meeting. Regarding the frustration over City Councilors not attending hikes, Woodley thought the Council had high confidence in the commission and therefore they didn't feel the need to attend. Eggers would like the commission to educate the Council on the difference between the "economic" and "financial" issues of this project. Betlejewski reminded Main that the treatment of slash is an associated cost. Main recommended a separate contract to address slash. Slash crews/prescribed underburning should be done immediately after helicopter work. Response to Mayor's Proposal - Referring the last month's minutes, Crosson wondered if the commission should respond to Mayor DeBoer's request (via Heam) for two proposals. Because the Mayor's comments were not firsthand, some commissioners decided that a small subcommittee should talk to Heam. Robertson moved that the commission not formally respond to the Mayor's comments. Brock seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. c:\WINDOWS\TEMP~AUG 13.doc Contract Options - Jensen commented that when the details are identified a logging company would probably bid and do the work, however, what about small diameter (4-8") utilization? Woodley said there has been some success with demonstration projects (i.e. the Hayfork Group). However, Ashland watershed terrain is primarily roadless, steep and labor intensive. Main said there is a huge difference in the amount of soil disturbance in dragging logs versus lifting logs. He would have to map all the existing helicopter landings. Jensen asked the commission if they wanted Hayfork to make a presentation during the September meeting. Eggers supported exploring that option. The commission agreed, but wanted Jensen to make sure they were aware of the terrain issues. Crosson said there was a potential for $50,000 in grant money for small diameter utilization. She will also research the process and cost for the Seattle Watershed Group. Commission Development Suggestions ~ Jensen asked the commission if they would like speakers to give 20 minute educational talks on such subjects as meeting protocol, facilitation skills and legal issues. Roberston thought all the topics could be covered in one study session. Brock suggested postponement until December or January. Eggers appreciated Jensen's desire to educate the commission on such issues. V. OTHER BUS1NESS Robertson suggested that all commission email correspondence be "reply to all" to allow all commissioners access to the same information. Woodley cautioned the commission not to deliberate toward a decision via email. Brock asked the Commission if they would like to give the City Council input on the Mount Ski Ashland Environmental Impact Statement. Jensen suggested this be an agenda item for next meeting. He said Paula Brown had some input. Eggers reminded the commission that there is a schedule of tours in the area. VI. REViEW AND SET COMMISSION CALENDAR / NEXT MEETING A. Next scheduled meeting was set for Wednesday, September 10, 2003. VII. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 6:08 PM C:\WIN DOWS\TEiVIp'~AUG 13.doc ASHLAND FOREST LANDS COMMISSION August 13, 2003 4:30 - 6:00 PM MINUTES MEMBERS PRESENT: Members Absent: Staff Present: Non Voting Members: Frank Betlejewski, Jo Anne Eggers, Stephen Jensen (Chair), Anthony Kerwin, Bill Robertson Richard Brock,Elizabeth Crosson (Vice Chair) Nancy Slocum, Keith Woodley Chris Heam (Council Liaison), January Jennings (Tree Commission Liaison), Marty Main (Consultant) I. CALL TO ORDER AT 4:35 PM II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: August 13, 2003 minutes were unanimously approved as submitted. III. PUBLIC FORUM: No one spoke. STAFF REPORTS A. Keith Woodley voiced a concern about the current geological assessment contracted through Hicks and Sitton. To date they have spent $2,000 of the $8,000 contract on base maps and background data. Such data is not of practical use for the current project. The commission needs a geologist to review example markings and assess the geological hazards. The goal of the commission is to be working on the ground this fall. Wpodley let the consultants know we needed to focus on the work proposed (i.e. the new waterline and Units P, Q and K). Jensen suggested Betlejewski and Kerwin meet with Woodley and the consultants to emphasize the immediate needs of the commission. Main added the consultant's work should complement similar inventories used by the Forest Service. B. Main would like the commission to visit Unit L. The unit, located outside of Reeder Reservoir, contains lots of mistletoe, low densities, logging slash and large trees. Main showed the commission a Map of Areas, Unit Status. He reported that 99% of the needed marking is complete (approximately 183 acres of 485 acres). Areas that can't be marked include previously thinned areas, areas with no helicopter turnaround and areas with diversity openings. There are three available helicopter landings with one more possible; each has a flying distance of less than Yn mile. The contractors will need to access Forest Service roads, These roads are in need of renovation. The Forest Service may want to join commercial sale and use City helicopter landing pads. C:\WIIqDOWS\TEMP~SEP 10.doc Eggers asked if the marked trees were commemially viable. Main said 1/3 of the marked trees are dead and still viable, but probably not for long. Five pement of the marked trees are greater than 17". Main reported that there is a lot of inventory data to compare units before and after treatment. REVIEW OF PROJECTS PENDING/REQUIRING ACTION City Council public heating is scheduled for October 21st. Woodley will be responsible for writing the Council Communication that explains the need, methodology and economics of the project. During the staff report a couple of commissioners should be present to answer councilor questions. Jensen asked Main if his financial and prescription information would be ready for review at the next commission meeting (October 8). Main said yes. Woodley added that small adjustments could be made after council approves the final plan. VI. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION: A. Hayfork Group Presentation - The Hayfork Group presentation was postponed due to a scheduling conflict. Woodley suggested that the Group visit the site with Main before rescheduling. Discussion / Vote on "Prescribed Burning" Inclusion to Restoration Project Draft - Betlejewski presented the commission with a reworked section. Kerwin wondered about the sentence, "The fuel moistures within the unit would be the same as those outside the unit, making containment of the fire within the unit difficult." B etlejewski explained that high moisture conditions outside the unit facilitate holding making it successful in competing the burn. Robertson moved to accept the draft for inclusion into the Restoration Project draft. Betlejewski seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. Restoration Project Draft - Jensen said Slocum was unable to find a reference to Howard Heiner's goal in previous minutes. Jensen will rework the goal and email it to the commissioners for consensus. Winburn Parcel: Clarity and Consensus - Robertson moved to continue work on the Winburn Parcel in the same manner as was done in the Lower Watershed parcel (i.e. mark example units, estimate the number of trees to be removed, schedule public hikes and generally handle issues as they arise). Kerwin seconded the motion. Discussion: An "Alternative Approach" draft was offered by Betlejewski as originally authored by Brock. Betlejewski noted that research from the adjacent Little Applegate watershed on how old growth develops compared the average 1 O-year radial growth of old-growth trees and'young overstory trees. Research showed a change in old growth rates as a result of fire exclusion; lower growth rates with fire exclusion. Betlejewski extrapolated this to include treatment. Main added that additional benefits include more vigorous trees less prone to insect attack. C:\WINDOWS\TF~IP~EP 10.doc Eggers thought the motion unnecessary and could not support it. Robertson said if mortality continued to increase, we would loose value in lower watershed. He wants to keep continue with the process to keep contracting options open. Vote: Motioned passed 4 to 1. Comment on Mount Ashland Ski Expansion - Brock was not present at the meeting. Woodley reported that Paula Brown prepared an 11 page briefing on how the potential expansion would affect soil and water quality. Woodley commented on the fire issue. Both memos would not be available until after the September 22th council meeting. Jensen asked Woodley if the commission should wait until the council asks for a comment or recommendation. Woodley said the council was following a specific process. Councilor Heam agreed, but acknowledged the commission's technical expertise. Eggers sorted out the values within the draft that were relevant to any project within the watershed. They included: protect, restoration, geology, soil, water, biodiversity, riparian, course woody material, grasses, shrubs and the ecosystem. She thought the commission could draft a memo outlining and supporting these values. Jensen wondered if the commission could really add anything to the discussion. Heams thought that with the scope of the current commission project, it was best not to add additional work. Commission voted to continue the meeting ten minutes. V. OTHER BUSINESS A. Robertson requested a hike to the Winbum Parcel be scheduled for next month. Jensen suggested that a hike be scheduled next meeting. B. Betlejewski said the snag inventory is nearly done and the down log inventory was complete. VI. REVIEW AND SET COMMISSION CALENDAR / NEXT MEETING A. A special meeting was set for Wednesday, October 1, 2003 ~ 4:30PM B. Next regular meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, October 8, 2003. Vll. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 6:10 PM C:\WINDOWS\TEMP~SEP 10.doc Ashland Traffic Safety Commission Minutes 2003 Members Present: William Snell, Doris Mannion, Terry Doyle, Keith Massie, Terry Doyle, David Chapman, Pam Hammond, Corey VanLandingham Staff Present: Jim Olson, Dawn Lamb,' Officer Cook Members Absent: John Morrison, Patti Busse, George Fardlemann I. CALL TO ORDER II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: June 26th Minutes approved as written. III. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION: A. PUBLIC FORUM ITEMS: None B. REVIEW OF TRAFFIC REQUESTS / PRO.1ECTS PENDING/ACTION REQUIRED 1. REQUEST FOR STOP SIGNS AT HARGADINE & S. PIONEER STREETS Aha Calantini, 301 Hillcrest observed that few if any vehicles stop or even slow down at the yield sign on Hargadine at S. Pioneer Street. She has noted several close calls and near accidents in that intersection and feels that the yield sign should be replaced with a stop sign. The intersection of Hargadine / S. Pioneer/Fork Street is an uncommon intersection due to the approach angles and grades of the legs of the intersection. The intersection is not comprised of a ~~ 'SICal cnaractensecs or me m~:ersecoon are as fOllOWS: Width 32' 32' 30' 30' Parking East side Both sides Both sides South side Sidewalk Both sides West side Both sides Both sides Traffic Control None Yield None Yield Approach Grade 14.0% 5.5% 17.0% 5.5% Marked Crosswalks 0 0 0 0 Pavement Surface New Good Good New Pavement Markings 0 0 0 0 View at Approach Good Fair Good Fair During observations, two traffic maneuvers were noted that have a negative impact on the intersection safety. The first movement constitutes approximately :1.3% of traffic moving south on S. Pioneer Street making a u-turn within the intersection. The second hazardous maneuver also originated from the south traffic on S. Pioneer Street turning left onto Hargadine Street. During this turn approximately 45% of the traffic severely cut the corner so that the turning vehicle was completely in the west bound lane on Hargadine Street. Both of these maneuvers caused some confusion in the intersection and resulted in some near misses. Due to the nature of this intersection, safety could be improved by the installation of stop signs on Hargadine Street and on S. Pioneer Street. It is recommended that the yield signs be removed and replaced with stop signs and that prominent stop bars be painted at the stop locations to help define the intersection and the various travel lanes. Discussion: Staff would like to recommend putting stop signs instead of yield signs and put in a bold stop line to try and stop people from making the u-turn movement. Doyle asked if a painted center line would help. C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\July 31 03.doc Page 1 of 5 Smith considered but the configuration of the intersection this wouldn't be effective. The stop bar and stop sign will give oncoming traffic and the stopped vehicle more of an opportunity to assess the situation at the intersection. Massie asked if a traffic island or planter could be engineered into the intersection, Other options such as curb bump-outs may be an option. Bump-outs would also offer safer pedestrian crossings for this area. This area is very pedestrian heaw because of the theatre, Smith recalls an old plan for this location that was never constructed. Massie asked if the plans could be resurrected for review, Decision: Motion to re-evaluate engineefing's previous proposal for curb-bump outs and other improvements to this intersection. Seconded by Chapman and passed unanimously. 2. REQUEST FOR 3-WAY STOP AT THE HILLCREST/GLENV[EVV / VISTA STREETS INTERSECTZON Ana Calantini, 301 Hillcrest, requested a 3-way stop at the intersection of Hillcrest, Glenview and Vista Streets. The intersection of Hillcrest, Glenview and Vista Streets is an uncommon intersection due to the approach angles and steep grades of two legs of the intersection. There are no fight angles in this configuration. The last traffic counts performed in this area were completed over ten years ago, these locations are listed to be recounted during the next school year. The previous counts clearly indicated the major flow as being on Vista Street. Vista Street: Glenview Drive: Hillcrest Street: Meade to Fork 660 VPD 8/27/93 Ridge to Vista 28 VPD 7/20/77 Summit to Vista 98 VPD 11/03/80 Even projecting a typical 3-2% increase per year, the Glenview and Hillcrest legs of the intersection do not met warrants for stop signs, however due to the uncommon approach angles and reduced sight distances, staff recommends that Yield signs be placed on Hillcrest Street and on Glenview Drive at their intersection with Vista Street remaining unimpeded. Discussion: Hammond commented that drivers seem to instinctively stop at this intersection so why not just put in the stop sign and make it official. Doyle asked if yield signs are effective, Smith responded that they help to determine liability. Staff usually supports the warrants but in this situation the slope and angles make the intersection difficult to maneuver and it would be justified. Doyle considered Ravenwood a better choice for a stop sign. Chapman felt that the Meade intersection was more in need of a stop sign more than on Vista because if you stop on a hill it is hard to get going again. Massie asked if action needed to be taken. Smith said that at Glenview and Hillcrest he felt something needs to be done but it does not need to be overkill. Decision: Hammond motioned to install a stop sign at the corner of Glenview and Hillcrest. Motion dies due to no second. No further motion was stated, no changes will be implemented. 3. REQUEST TO RES ~ F, ICT PARKING ON ONE-SIDE OF HILLCREST STREET Paul Nicholson suggested parking may need to be restricted on Hillcrest Street between Vista and Iowa Streets. Hillcrest Street is a very narrow, straight street which extends from Vista Street to Holly Street, parallel to Meade and Terrace Streets. The street has a curb to curb width of only 18 feet which is less than the current minimum street width even with no allowed parking. Currently there is no parking allowed on the west side of Hi.crest Street from Summit Street north. Recent building activity on the north C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\July 31 03.doc Pase 2 of 5 section of the street has created safety problems as multiple vehicles are parking on the east side forcing two lanes of traffic into a single lane. Ordinarily with extremely Iow traffic volumes and good visibility this situation could still offer a safe travel way. However the grade of Hillcrest Street breaks sharply midway between Summit and Vista Street. The grade from Vista Street is over 15% while the upper grade is only 5%. The grade change blocks the view of oncoming traffic from either direction, which could result in a potential head- on crash. Staff recommends that as a minimum parking be prohibited on the east side of Hillcrest Street from Vista Street to approximately 100 feet south of the crest of the hill. Discussion: There will still be 250 feet of remaining parking on the hill. Decision: Snell motioned to accept staff's recommendation to prohibit parking on the east side of Hillcrest Street from Vista Street approximately 100 feet south of the crest of the hill. 4. TRAFFIC CONCERNS ON GRANi i ~ STREET William Sauers sent in a letter which lists some traffic concerns on Granite Street. Mr, Sauers suggests that speed humps be installed to help reduce the speed of traffic. As stressed in my response to Hr. Sauers, speed humps have not been well received and should be considered only in very extreme instances. There are other features in the traffic calming toolbox that can be as effective as a speed hump and might be more appropriate to the area. Granite Street is a busy street which passes through residential neighborhoods as well as through a portion of Lithia Park. The street has a large volume of commuter traffic as well as toudst traffic and local traffic. Pedestrian traffic is also heavy especially along Lithia Park south of Pioneer Street. The traffic flows along Granite Street should be carefully analyzed to determine the best methods to slow traffic and warrants a full traffic study. Staff recommends that the Granite Street neighborhood be invited to attend the next meeting to share their concerns, insight and possible solutions to the speeding traffic an that the following schedule be considered: July 31, 2003 -Receive testimony from individuals on Granite Street or who travel the street on a regular basis. August 1~ to September 25~ - Conduct the following studies: Traffic volume count at several locations. Speed study. Intersection study. Determine predominant pedestrian mutes and usage. Research accident records. Specific recommendations would be presented at the September 25t~ meeting. Discussion: Staff would like to conduct studies and look at options for calming other than speed humps, maybe more along the lines of bump outs and raised crosswalks. Studies won't begin until after the start of the school year. The traffic count IocaUons will be ranged between Strawberry Lane and High Street. Pedestrian counts will be taken dudng peak hours and traffic accidents will be researched back ten C:\WlNDOWS\TEMP\July 31 03.doc Page 3 of 5 years. Doyle asked why the wait until school starts and Smith informed him that counts can change up to 25% with the advent of school. Frances Sharkey, 163 Granite St., agrees that there is a problem with speeding and safety. She has noticed significant change in the last few years with cars zooming down the street. She would love to have speed bumps. She would like to see the radar reader board set up on the street. The trees on the park side of the road hide pedestrians that emerge from the park onto Granite. Counts need to be done away from the vicinity of the stop sign. Lois Sharkey, :~63 Granite, has a Bed & Breakfast that faces a street curve and she asks her guests not to park on the curve because cars come around that blind corner to quickly and she fears a car being hit. The street has also been hectic since construction on Strawberry began. John, 102 Granite, concerned with speeds after Nutiey and then continue on there is a great amount of speeding. No one seems to look at the speed limit signs. He likes that idea of islands and the raised crosswalks. Smith commented that the city hadn't implemented traffic islands but the curb bumpouts are the most workable. Massie asked if enforcement could be increased on Granite and please note the speed of the construction vehicles and if they are the offenders that they are to also be ticketed. This enforcement should last until mid-September. Chapman asked if the residents could inform the patrol officers when during the day they noticed the most speeders. Mannion asked if the radar reader board could be put up on one of the longer stretches Decision: Chapman motioned to have the traffic classifier installed next week along Granite Street. Seconded by Snell. Motion passed unanimously. 5. PEDICAB PERM~ City Council approved the second reading of the pedicab ordinance. It has a thirty day waiting period before it will be in effect. Traffic Safety needs to make relative changes to the special vehicle permit. Discussion: The ordinance is awkwardly written. The commission discussed how the licensing should work for the pedicab operaUon. They felt that all operators should have to be required to have a chauffeur's license, not just the owner. This license should be displayed clearly on the vehicle, much like a taxi driver's license is. Decision: Massie motioned to require all operators have a chauffeur's license and it should be displayed clearly on the vehicle. 6. RAILROAD AT-GRADE CROSSINGS The City has contracted with HDR Engineering to conduct an in-depth study of our existing at-grade railroad crossings. The study will be available in draft form in another month. The study sets priorities for the improvement of the crossings as well as potential new crossings, closure of existing crossing and estimated costs, Many crossings require complete reconstruction as well as crossing gates and pedestrian improvements. The preliminary schedule list the pdority crossings as: 1. E. Main Street 2. Walker Avenue 3, Laurel / Hersey Street C:\WiNDOWS\TEMP\July 3]. 03.doc Page 4 of 5 4. Helman Street 5. Oak Street The above crossings have been tentatively placed in the short term improvement schedule which extends to five years. To secure funding and provide for a future crossing at Fourth Street and a possible public crossing at Normal Avenue it may be necessary to consider closing two crossings. Based on traffic volumes two possible locations are Wightman and Glenn Street. This issue will again be placed on the agenda for further discussion when the draft report is available. Discussion: The project has been in need for the last couple years. The areas around the crossings aro deteriorated and dangerous for pedestrians especially. There is talk of closing two crossings, Smith feels this means the recommendation will be to dead end the streets. Chapman asked if pedestrian/ bike paths could be continued through the dead ends. The addition of crossing gates to the crossings is also being considered. Decision: No action requJrod. Follow-Up On Previous Actions: 1. Welcome Signs? Olson will need to follow up. Traffic Safety Education 1. Making Work Zones Better, October 2-3, 2003 OSU Development Review 1. Bike &Ped Commission Report - Pedestrian safety enforcement went great, 54 stops and 34 citations. Need decoys for the pedestrian stings. Commission liked the idea of making people who are cited be decoys at a future pedestrian operations. Lamb can send out an email to Lieutenant Walsh and ]udge Droscher asking if this is appropriate and feasible. 2. Planning Commission Agendas - 3. Hearings Board Agenda Capital Projects Update Chapman asked for an update on N. Ashland Bikepath. Other 1. Utility Billing Insert 2. Miscellaneous Communication - Additional Items 1. Groat Escapes Trolley - The trolley is now working stdctly on a charter service and no longer requires having a special vehicle permit. Adjoumed 8:40 PM C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\July 31 03.doc Page 5 of 5 CiTY OF -ASHLAND Council Communication Title: Date: Submitted By: Approved By: Synopsis: Liquor License Application from John Edwards dba Los Gordos at 33 Third Street #3 City Recorder/Treasurer ctober7, 2003 tx arbara Chfisteg~e~ no Grimaldi ~ Application process of Oregon Liquor License as provided by OLCC. Recommendation: Endorse the application with the following: The city has determined that the location of this business complies with the city's land use requirements and that the applicant has a business license and has registered as a restaurant, if applicable. The city council recommends that the OLCC proceed with processing of this application. Background Information: Application for liquor license is for an ownership change. The City has determined that the license application review by the city is set forth in AMC Chpt. 6.32 which requires that a determination be made to determine if the applicant complies with the city's land use, business license and restaurant registration requirements (AMC Chpt. 6.32). In May 1999, the council decided it would make the above recommendation on all liquor license applications. CITY OF kSHLAND Council Communication Title: Dept: Date: Submitted By: Approved By: Synopsis: Liquor License Application from McCall, McLaughlin, dba McCall House at 153 Oak Street City Recorder/Treasurer .October 7, 2003 Barbara Christen~ Gino Grimaldi .,~ Application process of Oregon Liquor License as provided by OLCC. Recommendation: Endorse the application with the following: The city has determined that the location of this business complies with the city's land use requirements and that the applicant has a business license and has registered as a restaurant, if applicable. The city council recommends that the OLCC proceed with processing of this application. Background Information: Application for liquor license is for a new license. The City has determined that the license application review by the city is set forth in AMC Chpt. 6.32 which requires that a determination be made to determine if the applicant complies with the city's land use, business license and restaurant registration requirements (AMC Chpt. 6.32). In May 1999, the council decided it would make the abOve recommendation on all liquor license applications. CITY OF ,ASHLAND Council Communication Title: Dept: Date: Submitted By: Discussion and recommendations regarding Mount Ashland Draft Environmental Impact Statement Administration October 7, 2003 Gino Grimaldi, City Administrator Synopsis: The Forest Service has released the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the Mt. Ashland Ski Area Expansion. The DEIS is available for a 90-day comment period that began on July 25, 2003. The Mayor and City Council have directed staffto review the DEIS with a focus on four areas: water quality, water quantity, fire and financial risk. The results of the review were presented at a study session of September 22, 2003. A public input session was held on September 30, 2003. Staffis seeking Council discussion and direction regarding the proposed DEIS comments (Attachment 1) and other recommendations (Attachment 2). Recommendation: It is recommended that the comments and recommendations be forwarded to the Forest Service as comments to the DEIS and that staff be directed to proceed with implementing several recommendations that are not part of the DEIS. Fiscal Impact: None. Background: The proposed comments and recommendations, if implemented, are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the expansion of the Mt. Ashland Ski Area will not have a significant measurable impact on water quality and quantity. In addition, should Mt. Ashland cease to operate, the comments and recommendations are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the financial condition of the city is not negatively impacted. A recommendation has been made that buildings constructed as part of the expansion should take into consideration the need for fire protection features within the buildings to prevent the potential for building fires spreading into adjacent wildland resources. Several questions regarding fire risk were raised at the study session. Attachment 3 addresses those issues. The deadline for filing comments with the Forest Service is October 23, 2003. As a result, should the Council require additional information regarding the impact of the proposed expansion or if the discussion of the comments and recommendations cannot be completed at this meeting, the October 21st meeting is available for a continuation of the discussion. Attachment 4 contains the comments received from the community as of October 1, 2003 regarding the proposed expansion as well as written material submitted during the public input session. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Proposed DEIS comments Attachment 2 - Other Recommendations Attachment 3 - Analysis of potential wildfire threat Attachment 4 - Comments received during Public Input session and from the community. DEIS COMMENTS SUBMITTED BY THE CITY OF ASHLAND, OREGON October 7, 2003 on the DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (DEIS) MT. ASHLAND SKI AREA EXPANSION Ashland Ranger District Rogue River National Forest Jackson County, Oregon Scott River Ranger District Klamath National Forest Jackson County, Oregon The following comments are provided by the City of Ashland (City) in response to the July 2003 Forest Service request for Comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Mt. Ashland Ski Area Expansion. These comments were approved by the Ashland City Council on October 7, 2003. Comments are organized under topic headings for ease of consideration. However, issues are interrelated and commonly impact or encompass other issues under other topic headings. Issues should not be narrowly construed or evaluated, based on topic headings. If additional information or clarification is needed, please contact: Gino Grimaldi City Administrator City of Ashland, Oregon City Hall 20 East Main Street Ashland, OR 97520 541-488-6002 Fax: 541-488-5311 www.ashland.or.us Attachment 1 I. WA TER QUALITY & QUANTITY - Any development in the Ashland Creek Watershed has the ~' potential to affect water quality and quantity for the citizens of Ashland. Water quafity and quantity is of the utmost importance to the City and the City urges the Forest Service to take all steps necessary to protect this resource. A. The Forest Service should require the Mt. Ashland Association (MAA) to hire an independent third party Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Team of 2-4 persons highly specialized in the soils and hydrology. The QA/QC Team should be selected by a community team of 6-9 persons, including City Staff, Forest Service Staff, and interested community groups. The QA/QC Team should be paid for by MAA and should report directly to the City and Forest Service and give direction to MAA and its contractor. The QA/QC Team should be hired prior to construction design completion so that the erosion control, mitigation, restoration/remediation activities can be defined through a specific erosion and sediment control strategy prior to construction bidding. Once a contractor is selected, that contractor must understand the authority of the QA/QC Team and be responsive to its recommendations. The QA/QC Team should monitor: 1. Effects of expansion on soils: QA/QC Team should analyze each specific area of construction impact to define the mitigation/restoration activities associated with each soils type. 2. Effects of erosion: The QA/QC Team should provide specific BMP (best management practices) to significantly reduce or control the negative impacts due to erosion. This set of BMPs must be specific to the alternative selected and be fully defined for the soils types. 3. Over-snow timber removal: It is recommended that this be the primary removal method and that if work cannot be completed over snow, then that proposal be submitted to the QA/QC Team for advice and approval. 4. Construction methods to control erosion and sedimentation: Just as standard erosion control strategies are in place, specific BMPs to control sedimentation loading should be included in the erosion and sediment control strategy developed by the QA/QC Team. 5. During construction and after construction completion, the QA/QC Team should define a monitoring strategy to ensure post-construction BMPs are in place to minimize disruption to restoration activities due to storms and snow melt. 6. To meet state and federal requirements, a Stormwater NPDES permit must be provided. The permit will necessitate an Erosion Control Plan and a Stormwater Management Plan for construction. The QA/QC Team should develop this strategy for the Contractor. 7. To eliminate the potential for petroleum leaks from construction equipment, the ~' QA/QC Team should evaluate the use of vehicle diapers or other petroleum containment practices. 8. The QA/QC Team should evaluate whether any work should be allowed in the mapped wetlands area. This will affect the construction of the bridge for options 2 or 6, and the QA/QC Team should make specific recommendations for that area of construction. If there is any impact (direct or otherwise), mitigation measures should be defined and directed to fully restore the wetlands. 9. Along with this wetlands area impact, the QA/QC Team may support the recommendation to complete work within the riparian reserve area to be completed as an over-snow operation, or that work be completed toward the end of the dry season (end of summer) to minimize effects. 10. Whether there is complete vegetation clearing within the stream reaches should be clarified as a part of the construction design. This should be monitored by the QA/QC Team. If there is significant vegetation clearing, then mitigation measures to restore vegetation should be defined and implemented. 11. Any significant use of blasting is to be discouraged and should be referred to the QA/QC Team for its analysis and recommendation. 12. The lifts have a straight haul rope and are typically cleared to a width of 40 feet. As clearing can impact erosion, the width should be as narrow as practical to allow for maintenance and safety. 13. Erosion control methods should include silt fencing and fabric. These are only two of the BMPs available. The QA/QC Team should provide a detailed mitigation plan. 14. There may be areas to add seeding, mulching and re-vegetation to reduce erosion. The QA/QC Team should evaluate those opportunities. B. The Forest Service and the MAA should be required to monitor creek impacts (erosion and sediment loading primarily) at the 2060 Road at the crossing of the middle fork of the east fork of Ashland Creek. ¢. MAA must provide assurances to the City and FS that they will take corrective actions as recommended by the QA/QC Team. II. FINANCIAL RISK Financial commitments of the City and MAA for reclamation of the site, should the ski area ever be closed, need to be quantified and qualified in the final ElS. A. The ElS should address and quantify the reclamation costs for both the existing ski area and the selected alternative. The Forest Service should require from the city, as the permit holder, written assurance that it has agreed with the ski area operator that sufficient assets exist to cover the quantified reclamation costs. B. The ElS should specify the reclamation requirements or standards for the ski area. II. FIRE RISK The location, design and type of construction for additional ski area guest services buildings should take into consideration the need for fire protection features within these buildings to prevent the potential for building fires spreading to adjacent wi/d/and resources. Mount Ashland DEIS Other Recommendations (Not part of the DEIS process) Lease Recommendations: 1. Since the lease between the city and MAA does not address the reclamation costs of the expanded ski area, the lease should be modified to reflect a minimum liquidation value that includes these new costs. The lease does not have a mechanism to reconcile reclamation costs that may exceed the initial estimate of costs because of new information or the imposition of new standards that may increase costs. The lease should be modified to incorporate a reconciliation clause. Reexamine the "Minimum Liquidation Value" formula in the lease, in light of clearer rehabilitation and restoration requirements, to determine whether or not it will provide adequate financial guarantees to meet termination costs. Restrict the use of any assets deemed City property from becoming security for any loans or operations without (a) prior written consent from the City and, (b) an independent asset inventory and valuation for minimum liquidation value to assure reclamation coverage. Permit Recommendations: 1. Explore with the Forest Service the feasibility to revise the Special Use Permit to include language that more clearly defines what "a condition satisfactory to the authorized officer" would likely entail and provide for periodic updating of this provision to reflect changing standards or regulations. The Role of the City in the Ashland Watershed under a,qreements with the Forest Service. To strengthen the city's role in post-termination uses for the ski area, the city should seek to add language to the existing Memorandum of Understanding to specifically address the ski area. Such language should outline the process that will be pursued after any termination of the ski area special use permit and delineate the role the city will play in determining future uses. Attachment 2 CITY OF - SHLAND Council Communication Title: Dept: Date: Submitted By: Synopsis: Analysis of Potential Wildfire Threat to the Ashland Watershed From The Proposed Mt. Ashland Ski Area Expansion Ashland Fire & Rescue October 7, 2003 'N Keith E. Woodley, Fire Chief '.d~, The Mt. Ashland Association has submitted a proposal to the Forest Service for an expansion of the existing Mt. Ashland Ski Area. The City Council is reviewing this proposal, and associated alternate proposals, to determine if they pose threats to the ecology of the Ashland Watershed. At their September 22n° council study session, the City Council requested additional information relating to the impact, if any, that increased human activity at the ski resort would have on the wildfire threat. This communication addresses that issue. Recommendation: Information only. Fiscal Impact: N/A Background: An analySis of fire cause factors within the Ashland Watershed requires an understanding of the synoptic weather scale for the region. The summertime weather pattem in the Ashland area is dominated by pacific high pressure. The Pacific high-pressure cell moves from its southern wintertime position and migrates into the northern Pacific during the summer months. Moisture and cold air mass movement and location are influenced by the position of the pacific high pressure. During the summer months, many storms with moisture are diverted to the north of the interior southwest Oregon due to the influence of the pacific high pressure. The global position of interior southwest Oregon results in exposure from cold storms of the north and warm tropical storms from the south. These cold air masses influence snow and rainfall during the cooler months. The upper air tropical moisture influxes influence lightning activity during the summer months. In Ashland, the average rainfall is a little less than 20 inches, at 3,500 feet, the Ashland Watershed receives 30 inches average rainfall, and near the top of Mt. Ashland 60 inches of average rainfall is received. Typically, at higher elevation wildfire fuel moisture increases and the corresponding threat of ignition are reduced as compared to the interior valley zone. An analysis of fire cause statistics available from the Ashland Ranger District since 1902, overwhelmingly identify lightning as the primary fire cause above 3,500 feet elevation. Below 3,500, and within the wildland urban intermix especially, human caused fires are the most prevalent. The suggestion that increased human activity stimulates additional fire starts is applicable to the lower elevation areas, but has not been statistically shown as a concern for elevations above 3,500 feet. It is not the presence of the increased populations that is the primary fire cause factor, but rather the type of human activity Attachment 3 involved. Property maintenance activities, such as the use of fire, off-road vehicles and other power- driven equipment are the primary causes of these fires. These activities take place at lower elevations due to regulations and controlled access imposed by the Forest Service in the upper elevations of the Watershed. Road closures routinely occur when fire risk indices suggest closures are prudent. In July 2002, a gathering of 900 persons occurred at the ski resort under a Forest Service permit without incident. Historically, fires that burned into thb Ashland Watershed originated at lower elevations at the north end of the Watershed and burned south in response to slope, upslope surface winds, upslope canyon winds and upvalley winds. Mount Ashland Draft Environmental Impact Statement Comments received from the community as of October 1,2003 and, Written material submitted during the Public Input Session of September 30, 2003. (A complete packet of comments and submitted material is available for viewing in the Administration Department) Attachment 4 TESTIMONY IN SUPPORT OF THE EXPANSION OF THE MT. ASHLAND SKI AREA Good evening. My name is Brian Almquist, and I reside at 128 Wimer Street in Ashland. I am here tonight to express my strong support for Alternative No. 2 of the proposed expansion of the Mt. Ashland Ski Area. As the Council is aware, I served as City Administrator of the City of Ashland from 1970 until my retirement in 1998. During my 28 year tenure with the City, I had the opportunity to become intimately familiar with the Ashland watershed and its interface with the Mt. Ashland Ski Area, which had been under the management of four different entities before the lease and facilities were acquired by the City of Ashland in April of 1992. Several members of the Council will recall that the previous owners, who were also the owners of the Stevens Pass Ski Area in Washington State, had announced that if a buyer could not be found, it was their intention to close Mt. Ashland, and relocate the lifts to Stevens Pass. Recognizing the recreational and economic benefits that would be lost to our region, the council authorized me to call a community meeting of concerned citizens, to determine if there was sufficient interest in developing a strategy to save the Ski Area. Twenty-five individuals were invited to a meeting at Ashland Hills Inn (now the Windmill Inn)....but nearly 75 attended! Out of that meeting came a steering committee which worked with city staff and service clubs from throughout the region, to raise the $1.4 million that was needed to acquire the lease and facilities from the owners in Seattle. As you know, the money was raised by hundreds of people in the Valley and the Grants Pass area in the form of small donations, together with a $500,000 grant from the Governor's economic development fund, and one $100,000 anonymous donation. All of these funds were deposited with the City, to insure the tax deductibility for the donors. The City then worked out a sub-lease with a newly created non-profit entity, named the Mt. Ashland Association, to operate the facility. That sub-lease has built-in protections regarding the maintenance of a reserve fund and/or marketable assets, sufficient for restoration of the area if the enterprise were to fail. In addition, when the facility was acquired, the previous owners had spent over $200,000 on plans for future expansion, and the Forest Service had prepared an ElS on the various alternatives. The City Staff was an active participant in that planning process, and was successful in modifying the preferred alternative in several ways, to protect the watershed. We also recognized at that time, that unless improvements could be made to the facility, it would have a difficult time attracting the full range of skiers, and may have a difficult time surviving, economically. Here we find ourselves, over 10 years later, still discussing the same issues. Following this new planning process, Alternative 2 has been crafted to meet all of the concerns raised during the current process, and will have no significant impact on water quality in Reeder Reservoir. The monitoring proposed in this alternative both during and after construction, will absolutely insure that Ashland's water quality will not be adversely impacted. Finally, let me say that the issues and challenges we recognized when the City of Ashland acquired Mt. Ashland in 1992, remain the same today, lfwe truly want to keep this facility an attractive, safe area for beginning and intermediate skiers, we desperately need to provide the terrain that will keep our ski area economically sound for years to come. l URGE YOU TO CONTINUE TO SUPPORT THE MT. ASHLAND SKI AREA AS YOU DID IN 1992, AND TO ALLOW THE FOREST SERVICE TO COMPLETE ITS PROCESS, WITH THE ADOPTION OF PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE NO. 2. Ashland Ski Expansion Sept. 30, 2003 My evaluation tonight is geared to the Municipal Watershed for the city of Ashland. I have worked in this area for many years and in the past have extensively walked the area I am talking about. The latest walk was this past August. First, my evaluation of the East Fork of Ashland Creek:- Here the creek channel from the Ski area down is in a degraded condition. This was undoubtedly caused by the effects of added runoff from disturbed conditions such as roads, etc. causing the creek channel to carry the added nmoff. The results are common sediment deposits in the channel and bank cutting which has created channel bank sloughing and small debris slides. These have added to the unstable channel by diverting water flow into the banks. The bank side slopes, oRen in excess of 70 to 80 % slopes are steeper than the noncohesive soils can stand so they slough (basically like a sand castle). There is really nothing we can do for this condition now other than not add to the effects. We do that by addressing cumulative effects of planned projects that may add to the runoff volume and velocity. As a side note, I walked down this East Fk. in the 80's and again, as mentioned in Aug of this year. The channel in the 80's had just been sluiced out by flood waters so was open for flow. Today there are relatively large and many sediment deposits that have built up in the channel and are ready for another high water event. My observations are that the channel is in a more degraded condition today than it was in the 80's. (raw, eroding banks) Now the East Fork proper is differem terrain than the Middle fork of the East fork. This East fork has overall steeper slopes and the soils are relatively shallower and developed in place with some ravel near the toeslopes. The Middle fork is a mix of gentle and steep slopes but the soils are generally very deepdeposits from Mountain glaciation and are very permeable. The soils textures are basically of the same noncohesive sandy, highly erodible material but generally occur on 4 land conditions. They are: 1. Gemly sloping grassed wetlands with surface and ground water saturation. 2. Gently sloping timbered wetlands with surface and ground water. Both with G.W.pipes. 3. Uplands with timber stands and no significant ground water. 4. Upland appearing timber stands with E. Spruce. These areas appear visually the same as the Uplands without the E. Spruce but differ in having ground water at depths of 1 to 3 feet during most of the year. Recognition of this type and ground water is very critical. The Middle Fork drainage is in (what I call Dynamic equilibrium) because it has not and is not currently affected by any management activities or cumulative effects from above. There are signs of erosion & sediment on some of the grassed wetlands due to piping failures and storm runoffbut it is trapped on site. The concern for the Middle fork drainage is the effect management activities may have on wetlands & the ground water, especially in the (upland appearing E. Spruce stands). Here, as mentioned the area appears dry to the eye but the subsurface water, if intercepted by excavations such as the C6 terminal base may/will be intercepted and a new surface flow (creek) will be created. This can adversely effect the Municipal watershed character. Interception has happened in many road cuts on other areas of the Forest with new water channels being created. If excavation occurs while the watertable is low or below it then mitigation may be overlooked until erosion damage occurs in the spring. In review of the DEIS, I find the costs for mitigation and restoration have been grossly underestimated. I say this from experience in trying to restore past soil resource problems. Examples of costs are: air lifting rock rip rap to the needed site and manually hand placing the rock down channels, etc. These soils and this terrain once adversely impacted is extremely hard and costly to restore or in most cases cannot be restored to past conditions in human terms of time. George J. Badura Professional Soil Scientist 2 590 Glenview Drive Ashland, Oregon 97520 October 1, 2003 CITY COUNCIL Ashland, Oregon 97520 Re: PROPOSED NIT. ASHLAND EXPANSION Speaking as an individual avid skier, and former 6 year full-time ski instructor at Mt. Ashland, I find Alternative #3 as the ONLY proposal to SUBSTANTIALLY fulfill MASA needs and validate MASA'S claim of a "sound plan that utilizes modern stewardship principles and prudent use of our resources". Alt. #3 can do that and yet be in accordance with the Hippocratic Oath, "TO DO NO HARM". Specifically, to do no harm to the City Council's four key issues: water quality, water quantity, fire and financial risk. Paula Brown's idea of an overview committee is good, but the BEST ASSURANCE is NOT to enter the most sensitive areas AT ALL. Each public hearing I've attended has been a well-orchestrated rally for Alternative #?, by proponents who were uniformly MASA employees, retired employees, board members, or special program directors, but not everyday users. On the other hand, with a wide range of opinions, the opponents were from Sierra Club, Headwaters, and the general public. I recently attended an AIA conference in Portland where the topic was "Architecture in an Environment of Public Participation". Repeatedly, conference speakers said the "buy-in" to the project by consensus among the stakeholders is critical to success!! It is called the "ownership-loop", that is, "the final design needs to be MEANINGFUL TO MANY or the PROJECT WON'T BE USED", (i.e.,"economic return")!!! The citizens of Ashland, through City Council, are the primary stakeholders in this case. After all, it is OUR one and only watershed. The expressed support of the Medford City Council and the Jackson County Commissioners for Alternative #2 has lesser importance than that of our own citizens and Council because the expansion will directly effect potential damages to our City watershed, and any future necessity, to restore the mountain to its undeveloped state at City taxpayer expense! There is a huge force crying for an "expansion" of existing runs which I don't think can be totally denied. However, "to do no harm" means a consensus, a COMPROMISE, which is offered in Alternative #3 as follows: (ref. DEIS) 1. MOST IMPORTANTLY, Chairlift LC-6 is sited furthest to the east so it and the runs DO NOT go into the Engleman Spruce area nor interfere with wetlands and riparian reserves. The proposed runs will definitely fulfill the needs of beginners WITHOUT management's' claim of the necessity of Run #12. Z. 42 acres of tree removal are far less intrusive than 76 acres. 3. This is the only alternative that puts a "chair" lift on the existing old Poma run which is ideal for race training, (as it had been used in past years), which will free-up space now used for race training on the general public runs. 4. There is NO Moraine Lodge to clutter up the pristine Bowl. There are simple toilet facilities and ski patrol hut proposed in that area. (Those 2 structures should be combined for utility efficiency and sited against the trees for less intrusion upon the environment). 5. Approximately 51 acres of gladed skiing are included offering new runs for experts. 6. It's the only plan that puts crucial remodeling of the existing Lodge in Phase I. 7. The parking increase is less intrusive environmentally. (Actually, instead of increasing parking, management should develop a shuttle system on weekends and holidays). 8. It reduces effects on Mt. Ashland lupine and Henderson's horkelia, and reduces effects with the McDonald Peak Roadless Area. 9. The user-unfriendly surface lift, (rope tow), from the base of Windsor up to the .Skiway is eliminated. Hurrah. 10. It is the LEAST EXPENSIVE ALTERNATIVE at 1.9 million dollars. · However, the following weak points of Alternative #3 should be eliminated: I. Proposed SEPARATE "arrival services" building and "ticket" building are not cost effective. Logically, it seems that the "extensive" existing lodge remodel could incorporate some of these uses. (I know changing the lodge footprint takes special permits, but the balconies could be enclosed). At the least, combine the 2 proposed buildings into one structure for utility efficiency and less intrusion upon the environment. 2. NO scenario makes the Tubing Facility a necessity! Where are the people clamoring for this facility? Population and financial statistics are missing. Expecting people to pay $1 5 per pass to ride an inner tube is akin to expecting people to pay to use a state-of-the-art hop- scotch grid. It is theoretically foolish, environmentally intrusive, and significantly dilutes the PRIMARY commitment of MASA---TO SERVE SKIERS AND BOARDERS!! It is a little mountain; it can't do everything. There are 2 elements in Alt. #5 that might be included in a later phase using money saved by eliminating the Tubing Facility. 1). Replace the existing old Ariel Chairlift. 2). Perhaps add Lift LC-5 which is located on sparsely treed slopes at right angles to the top of Sonnet chairlift which would provide more easy terrain fairly close to Sonnet and the lodge. Please do not chose an alternative that will bring in tree-sitters fr°m all across the country. Without a BROAD BASED CONSENSUS, via a compromise, the "ownership-loop" is severely constrained, and thus I~IASA fundraising will fall short for Phase 1. Alternative #3, with slight modifications, is a win-win choice!! Apart from the DEIS, I suggest that management choose lift/run names that stay with the Shakespearean theme as "community specific" as well as a general educational tool. Names might include King Lear, Lady Macbeth, Dogberry, Hamlet, Shylock, Desdemona, Peaseblossom, Portia, Fool, etc. Respectfully submitted, M a,r~ilyn Brig g.s~-----~, Cloer 815 Creek Stone Way Ashland, OR 97520-9118 (541) 482-8364 10/1/2003 To: The Council From: Hal Cloer [~ Ski Ashland Expansion Most of the front page of today's Tidings is taken up by two pictures: one featuring a "Stop the expansion" T-shirt, the other a large "No more runs" sign--and page 3 features a nice looking lady holding up a "Resist Mt. Ashland Expansion" sign. I'd not planned on putting in my two cents, since I'm sure the council has enough input on which to evaluate the validity of the proposed expansion. But I'm beginning to worry that the balancing of conflicting values may be tilted by which values are presented most forcefully-- rather than by a dispassionate weighing of conflicting values. As an ex-planning commissioner, I can show councilors a couple of developments in which the commission's efforts to achieve affordability, emergency vehicle access, pedestrian safety, and open space values were all eliminated when neighbors, anxious and uncertain about development of open areas, stormed the council and converted problem-solving to political theater. In this instance supporters of"the environment" clearly have the wind of the ethos behind them, and are thus freer to be more passionate in their support than are suppot~ters of more mundane values. But, while balancing conflicting values as well as can be done for the attainment of all, the council must attempt to decide what is best for the community and the area. 1 feel reassured that sufficient attention will be given to protection of Ashland's water supply and to environmental factors. But, from media coverage, I worry that sufficient weight may not be given to the viability of Ski Ashland. I think that the importance of Ski Ashland to the winter economy of the community and to Southern Oregon is reflected in the proportion of the cost of the "Save Mt. Ashland" effort that was paid by the state. The effect of the ski development on SOWs winter term is reflected in the decision of the college to undertake its operation for awhile. And while they'll not be carrying signs or packing your hearings, there are many people in the valley whose well-being in the winter is related to the viability of Ski Ashland. As an individual, I greatly valued the opportunity to leave my fogb~y home and in 30 minutes be skiing in a glittering snow-covered alpine setting. But I can testify that the absence of easier slopes is clearly limiting the safety and viability of Ski Ashland. I hope that councilors will balance conflicting values carefully. I'm L.C. of 223 Fifth St. in Ashland. My family,~includ~ng 3 kids learned to ski on Mt. Ashland, and we continue to use the ski area as well as the undeveloped areas for winter fun. We also spend time on the mountain after the snow is gone in the Summer and Fall. We hike and explore the beautiful ridges, streams, alpine meadows and enjoy the spectacular views. Tonight, we need to discuss all of the seasons on Mt. Ashland, not just the ski season. The proposed expansion would forever change some of the most beautiful and unique places on the mountain. The proposed Middle Fork crossing and adjacent ski runs requires cuffing a swath through virgin forest including rare tree species. About a month ago, I participated in a hike sponsored by the U.S. Forest Service through the proposed expansion area. When we stopped to look closely at the Middle Fork area, I asked Steve Johnson of the Forest Service what would happen to the beautiful glade of Engleman Spruce and the sort of spongy bog that we were standing on, when the trees were removed to create the new ski trail. He said that opening that spot to the full sun would cause significant change to the plants as well as the natural sponge that mediates the water of the Middle Fork. I asked, "what will it look like when this is opened up?" His answer was refreshingly honest, "We don't know". This was a very different answer than most of the statements in the Draft ElS that speak very "knowingly" based on educated guesses. Unfortunately, "we don't know" applies to one of the most sensitive areas that is proposed to be altered. I ask the Council to include the following comment on the Draft ElS: Environmental Impact Statements are required to address community values when deciding on appropriate alternatives for proposed activities in the National Forest. In the case of the Mt. Ashland Ski Expansion Proposal, community values are extremely important to evaluate. Not only do the proposed activities take place in the City of Ashland Watershed; the proposal also calls for clearing of old growth trees and cutting adjacent to very sensitive riparian areas. The changes proposed would forever alter the landscape, soils and water features in and around an exisiting roadless area. Therefore, the question must be asked of the community, "What is the value of the proposed project area to you as local citizens, users of the forest, users of the watershed, gazers at the mountain top from the valley, concerned environmentalists? Is the proposed project area better left undisturbed, or do we, as a community, find the area more valuable as an expanded downhill ski area?" This question has not been answered in the Draft ElS. Dear Council Members, I am an Ashland citizen who is an avid skier, season pass holder, and someone who chose to move to Ashland largely due to the proximity of a community ski area. However, I have serious concerns about the ski area expansion and it's potential adverse effects upon our community. I have looked closely at the methodology used to predict the impact of the expansion on the delivery of sedimentation into our water supply and am deeply concerned about the reliability of the results. The projections were based on computer modeling which is an area that I have a strong background in. I worked for Intel Corp. in a research and development lab where we made extensive use of various modeling techniques. Based on my experience I have strong reservations about the reliability of the analysis presented in the DEIS. Request: I urge you to take the following actions: 1. Pass a resolution requesting that no expansion occur in the middle fork. This is in order to safeguard our financial assets and the integrity of our water supply. 2. Pass a resolution stating that we do not want the expansion to occur in the middle fork on the basis of values per the Valdez Principals. 3. Pass a resolution requesting that the M_AA implement the erosion mitigation measures outlined in the DEIS for the proposed expansion on the existing ski area before any expansion occurs. 4. Pass a resolution requiring that collateral for restoration costs be in real dollars and not depreciating assets Council's Job One: These requests are based on the following (see sections below for more details): 1. City Council's job-one is to not take risks with city assets: · Water quality - the DEIS underestimates erosion and sedimentation. · Water quantity - the middle fork supplies 2-3x the water of the east fork City infrastructure and private property- Sedimentation processes load channels for flood events. The mitigation and restoration measures proposed appear to be inadequate. · Ensure responsibility as the Special Use Permit holder: Restoration plans must be thorough and estimated restoration costs must be realistic. · Precedence has been set by Other communities - such as Seattle, WA; Vancouver, B.C.; Santa FE, NM, and Boulder, CO - that have decided to close their watersheds to all recreational use. Demanding that the expansion stay out of the middle fork is certainly a reasonable request in comparison to these examples. · Recreation does not show up on the same radar screen as protecting vital city assets. 2. Council's job is to reflect the values of the citizens it represents. You passed a proposal pledging to adhere to the Valdez Principals on the behalf of the citizens of Ashland, now it is time for us to follow through. Is Council Action Warranted?? In order to assess if there is sufficient doubt in the DEIS results to warrant action by Council one should consider the following: 1. Sediment Delivery / Integrity of the Data: The projections on the amount of sediment that might be delivered into our channels do not appear to be reliable for the following reasons: a. The analysis did not involve the levels of scientifically accepted monitoring and on-site data collection that is required. b. The computer model used for the simulations (called Disturbed WEPP) has an accuracy range of+- 50% assuming a very controlled study (per the model's documentation). c. Because of the lack of on-site data, studies from Idaho were used in order to get numbers to feed into a computer model. Lack of actual on-site data also prevented the correlation of local soil characteristics against those analyzed in the Idaho studies. Such correlation is required in order to justify using the Idaho data for input into the computer model. d. A lack of weather data from Mt. Ashland necessitated the use of data from Big Red Mountain (BRM). While BRM is relatively close (7.5mi) to Mt. Ashland significant errors can still be introduced due possible differences in micro- climates. The computer model is especially sensitive to weather assumptions. e. The computer model used for the simulations is so sensitive to the inputs that the results can vary by 2-3 orders of magnitude depending on normal variations (weather, site-to-site differences in soils, eto). This is based on a scientific paper published by the USFS's chief scientist in charge of the model. To put this in perspective, if the DEIS predicts that 10 cu yards of sediment will be delivered then the actual amount might be 10,000 cu yards. £ Development and use of computer models is a complex field of specialization. I worked for Intel Corp as a specialist in the development and use of computer models to simulate the behavior of complex systems. While the types of models I worked with were different than was used for this analysis, the methodologies and pitfalls of using such models are universal. Unfortunately, the temptation to use a computer model to answer such questions is overwhelming when quick results are demanded. Models produce a bottom line number that is easily accepted by managers and the public. Unfortunately, the number of pitfalls associated with modeling is huge - especially when the users are either not experts or under intense pressure to generate results quickly. g. The analysis does not take many factors into consideration. The documentation for the computer model states it is not intended for: i. "Watersheds having incised, permanent channels (classical gullies and stream channels)" ii. "Sites where soil is severely disturbed or compacted, such as roads and trails" iii. "Headcut erosion" iv. "Sloughing'of gully sidewalls" v. "Effects of seepage on erosion in concentrated flow channels" The following graphic summarizes many of the concerns about the reliability of the projections: Inability to do proper correlation due to insufficient local data Sensitivity to Inputs: Model results can vary by 2-3 orders of magnitude Model Validation: Insufficient local data to validate Idaho Red / Mountain / - Model Accuracy: Unreliabte +- 50% Resu;ts (disturbed WEPP) I i I-I ? ?.~;~- ] (Many Factors not ! Modeled) / In summary, there is substantial reason to doubt the projections concerning the amount of sediment that might be delivered into our water supply. 2. Political environment not conducive to good science: The politic environment within the USFS prevents well-intentioned scientists from doing good work. Senator Smith - someone with great influence on USFS funding - wrote a letter to Linda Duffy urging "favorable consideration of Alternative 2 so this project can move forward." This placed significant pressure on the regional office to favor one alternative over the others. Based on discussions with ex-employees of the USFS it is evident that the local managers are graded based on how well they complete projects - not on the objectivity of their team's scientific analysis. Additionally, our regional office has already seen reductions in headcount and will see a further reduction in headcount of 30-50% next year. The same managers that are under pressure to complete projects are the ones who will decide who gets laid off. Hence, the scientists are under severe pressure to tow the party line and come up with results that support expansion. Note that in a climate of career survival the safeguarding of Ashland's water supply is not their main concern. You are the only people in the world with the ability to safeguard our assets based on an objective decision making process. 3. Staffing and Resource Limitations: Because of project loads and reduced staffing the existing USFS staffis being asked to do more with less. Even in the absence of political pressures it is impossible to place such burdens on a scientific team and expect to come away with results based on good scientific methodologies. 4. Financial Risk to the City: The financial risk to the city appears to have been understated for the following reasons: a. Damage due to floods. Any additional loading of sediment into the watershed channels represents the potential for additional damage in the case of a flood. The next major flood will result in the unloading of that sediment causing deposition in Reeder Res. ~long with additional damage to properties downstream. Additionally, increased runoff from the ski area increases the amount of water coming down the channels during a big storm. This also increases the potential for greater flood damage. b. Cost of restoration is expected to be much higher since the condition of the soils is not conducive to re-vegetation efforts. Mt. Ashland lacks topsoil and nutrients and has some of the most erosive soils found anywhere. Restoring the roads and ski runs will be a long-term effort and very costly. Ironically, it is in the city's best interest to ensure such restoration efforts are done well for water quality reasons. c. The stated values of the ski area assets appear inflated. Large ski areas typically buy new high-speed chair lifts and many small ski areas have closed recently - factors that result in a reduced available market for old, slow, two-person chairlifts. Additionally, the equipment will depreciate over time leaving the city with a large financial liability in case the ski area folds. d. The possibility of global warming has been ignored in the DEIS. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric administration predicts snow levels will rise by 1100' in this region over the next 15-20 years. If this happens then the ski area will not be viable and there will be little market for the assets. An additional negative effect of this will be an increased amount of rain reaching the erosive soils due to reduced levels of snow. Summary: In summary, the burden of proof lies upon the Forest Service and the MAA to show undue risk will not be placed upon every citizen and business in Ashland. Clearly, there is substantial reason to doubt the reliability of the analysis that the DEIS sediment delivery projections were based on. The analysis - per USFS documentation and peer reviewed papers - might be offby two to three orders of magnitude. Additionally, credible and independent scientists have questioned the effectiveness and the cost of mitigation measures. The potential risk to our water supply warrants action by Council. From a financial standpoint the expansion poses additional risk to the city. The threat of additional flood damage and the liability of unknown restoration costs also leads to the conclusion that action is warranted. Once again, please consider the following actions: 1. Pass a resolution requesting that no expansion occur in the middle fork. This is in order to safeguard our financial assets and the integrity of our water supply. 2. Pass a resolution stating that we do not want the expansion to occur in the middle fork on the basis of values per the Valdez Principals. 3. Pass a resolution requesting that the MAA implement the erosion mitigation measures outlined in the DEIS for the proposed expansion on the existing ski area before any expansion occurs. 4. Collateral for Restoration costs should be in real dollars, not depreciating assets Respectively, Ken Crocker 134 Nutley St. Ashland, OR (.,OP¥ District RanEer A.nhland Ranger District , 645 WashinL~on gtxeet A.,Mand, OR 97520 lnitul tate ;enate WASHINGTON, DC 20510-3704 I have been contacted by the Board of Directors of Ski A nhland and other interested citiz,.,~ regarding ~e Draft Envirohmeatal Impact Statement for the -.ki area on Mr.'Ashland. As~wan, to again let you know of my support for th.i, project) The oporato= of Mt. ye proven their ability to be fiscally responsible, envi~nmentally sensitive, and good stewards .of publi¢,l, aads. The benefits of the expa-sion ofthls facility outweigh any potential nc~ti~ ,"'pacts. (Al~tive 2 i) the best choioe and ~ Vro*ide ~r sa-~ic~ and ~fety in an economic and eh-,6ronmenl~l~'y sound way. I urge favorable consideration of Alternative 2 so this project em move forward and ~nefit economic, recreational, and environmental concernS. Sincerely, Gordon H. Smith United States S~nator. GHS:--mk www.aen al e.go~l~gsmiih PO Box 3217 Ashland, OR 97520 September 20, 2003 Paula Brown, Public Works Director, City of Ashtand Ashland City Council Ashland, OR Dear Ladies and Gentlemen: In 2000, I attended many meetings where the expansion of the Mt. Ashland Ski Resort was discussed. Thus far, the new 2003 expansion information has not changed my mind: I remain convinced that any expansion is wrong. I openly acknowledge the fine experiences of skiing on Mt. Ashland. Some individuals have expressed to me their reasons for returning to the resort: Namely, the proximity to Ashland, and the small scale of the mountain. On-the-other-hand, in a recent letter to the editor in the Dally Tidings, it was stated, "if Mt. Ashland does not expand - it will have to shut down." Is it logical for this business to expand when the demand for its product is decreasing? Has the MAA proved that its existing difficulties are solely the result of size? Furthermore, reports showed that the MAA annual net operating income has steadily declined. I am grateful that my drinking water originates from a higher altitude in the forest. The 2000 Oregon State of the Environment Report stated that poor or very poor water is more likely to be found in "non-forested lands where intensive land uses and land conversion have occurred." The gravitational forces on the mountain move the water through a matrix of earthen and plant materials. Some engineering studies have cited case situations where construction and the unsettling of the land caused the nearby underground and surface water patterns to change. In my opinion, the July 2003 DEIS has not shown proof that the changes to the environment will not permanently disturb the water flow and discharge in the Watershed. The July 2003 Draft Environmental Impact Statement - Mt. Ashland Ski Expansion expressed low to potential risk for indirect and cumulative effects on sedimentation and soil compaction. I am not comfortable with the conclusions. During the meetings and the testimonies on the 2000 DEFS, there were scientist who strongly objected to the expansion because of the short-long t~Lm negative erosion and sedimentation in the Watershed. Also, there were scientists who minimized the potential for harm. Since, Science is not absolute--I am not willing to compromise our welfare and safety in AsMand by putting recreation first. The facts are that Ashland has experienced two major floods and on the average, a 10 year frequency. The 1974 flood caused the city to be without water for 10 days. We, the citizens of Ashland, are currently paying taxes on the 1997 Flood Bonds. It takes approximately 10 to 12 years to repay the debt. The 1974 flood was paid off in eleven years. In 2000, the Forest Service accepted public comments on the Ski Expansion that offered concern with factual basis. The comments required only a signature; no age or residence information was required; and group signatures were accepted into the comment tally. The taxpayers of Ashland have a moral, a social, and an economic interest in the Ashland Watershed. Why not let the Ashland comments "hold more weight" or have a stronger voice in the decision process? I can identify several flood victims who paid $10,000 plus dollars (out-of-pocket) because of the 1997 flood damages. The more ominous the consequences, the more caution. Our community has many financial troubles: To name a few, The Food Bank, School textbooks - programs, AFN, and more. In addition, the Forest Service continues to cut back which could affect the future monitoring and surveys in the Ashland Watershed. Please say NO to ALL Expansion in the Watershed. Choose a policy that is closest to a way nature does things. Our mistakes always mn downhill. Sincerely, Elizabeth Cross c.c: Rogue River National Forest -Comment for DEIS - Mt. Ashland Area Expansion TO: FROM: DATE: Ashland City Council Elizabeth Cross 760 Clay Street Ashland, OR 97520 September 30, 2003 Ashland's Watershed exists within a larger environmental system. If it is damaged or lost, Ashland will be damaged or lost. What if the proposed expansion/s into the Watershed alters the environment more rapidly than its natural adaptability can accommodate? Contemplate the COST of another catastrophic flood or landslide that descends on our community. Are you 100% sure that the environmental risks are AFFORDABLE? As our Ashland elected officials, you have the authority to speak for the people. Please, represent the opinions of Ashland's majority. Mt. Ashland Expansion DEIS Comments to Ashland City Council Paul Copeland October 1, 2003 I recommend that the City of Ashland take the following steps with respect to the Mt. Ashland Ski Area expansion plan: 1. Comprehensive Watershed Monitorin.q The City should use the momentum from the DEIS review process to start a comprehensive watershed monitoring program. Lakeview supports such a program for its watershed at a cost of around $120,000 per year to scientifically monitor plant and soil measurements at multiple locations. This is on a larger acreage than the size of the Ashland watershed. The City should also look into what other municipalities are doing in this regard. Paula Brown's monitoring proposal is the right idea, but it needs to go further than measuring sediment at one point in the stream and should be designed and managed scientifically. The City needs to budget for an ongoing program because not all of the watershed is the responsibility of the ski area, because the ski area does not have sufficient financial resources, and because the Forest Service budget is vulnerable to annual appropriation swings. 2. Permanent Middle Branch Set-Aside The values of City residents must be respected and the watershed, the Engelmann Spruce groves, and the sensitive wetlands must be protected. Please insist on a zero development permanent set aside of the Middle Fork of the East Fork of Ashland Creek (i.e., the expansion area in Alternatives 2 and 6). The City has this kind of leverage under the 1929 watershed agreement with the Forest Service. Ashland should enter into an agreement with the ski area and the Forest Service stipulating this requirement before the City approves any expansion plan. 3. MAA Board Reor.qanization Mount Ashland Association (MAA) has doggedly pursed an expansion into the Middle Branch area for many years in spite of determined opposition from the community and all of the local environmental groups. Even after several revisions and two rounds of DEIS documents, the central problems with this plan remain virtually unchanged. The MAA refusal to engage in dialog and look at viable alternatives ensures that environmental lawsuits will delay implementation of improvements for years, if ever. Meanwhile ski area finances are deteriorating and the concerns of skiers and the community are being ignored. Skiers are unhappy with parking conditions and deficiencies with the lodge. Snowboarders are going to Shasta in increasing numbers because the terrain park at Mt. Ashland is not competitive. Environmentalists are cdtical of inadequate mitigation measures. These are things that could have and should have been fixed already. A perfect storm financial crisis is brewing. A string of bad snow years such as last occurred in the 1989 to 1991 pedod is certain to come again and is certain to wipe out the working capital operating reserves of the ski area which are marginal even in normal snowfall years. When this happens, fund raising will be required just to keep the ski area open. A multi-million dollar expansion in the midst of a financial collapse will look like very poor judgment. This impending cdsis at Mt. Ashland needs to be dealt with starting at the top. The MAA board is failing its responsibility to skiers and snowboarders and the broader community. They are alienating the very base of support that enabled the purchase of the ski area in the first place. That base of support will be needed again to keep the ski area open in lean times. The current MAA board lacks diversity, accountability, accessibility, leadership, openness, and transparency. The MAA board is not elected by the membership or appointed by the City or accountable to anyone but themselves. The board is self appointed and they select their own successors. MAA was given a multi- million dollar ski area on a 25 year lease for one dollar a year. We gave them the keys and we can't get them back. The City of Ashland should go on record recommending that the Mt. Ashland Association take steps to ensure community input and community support. MAA must revise its bylaws to require election of the board by an inclusive membership, including appointment of some board members by the City of Ashland. These changes are a necessary first step to unite the community behind improvements needed for the economic viability of the ski area within a context of respect for environmental values demanded by the community. The City cannot force the Mt. Ashland board to take these steps, but we should start asking now in advance of the time when circumstances will force a change. September 19, 2003 To: Ashland City Councilors Re: Mt. Ashland Ski Area Expansion Proposals From: JoAnne Eggcrs I ask you to oppose any expansion of the Mount Ashland Ski Area into the Middle Branch of the East Fork of Ashland Creek. Too many natural and community values are at risk. Our city in the Valdez Principles says it will preserve and protect the environment. These community values certainly come into play in the decision re: how to improve the ski area. I expect you will represent the whole community in this matter, and not just the subset of downhill skiers and snowboarders and some commercial interests who advocate expansion into this precious area. I have been on field trips through this area at least three times since the summer of 2000, guided by Forest Service, Ski Area, and environmental and resource experts. Some of my specific concerns relate to · The loss of opportunities for people to experience the pristine quality of this rich and fragile area. Ski lifts and ski runs would permanently clearcut 60 to 120 foot wide swaths of trees down the mountainside and impact wetlands and streams. · The value of the MacDonald Peak Roadless Area and the Siskiyou Crest as habitat and connectivity for wildlife and plants. I do not want to be a part of a community that has no regard for other than human life for its own sake, not only for what we can get out of it. · The threat to the integrity of the Englemann Spruce grove by development and management activities that would damage the trees or change the way water flows to and within it. · Changes, including the cutting of trees and loss of soil cover, that would accelerate the flow of water. Even though the granitic soils on the ski slopes may move only a few meters in a given season or two, the accelerated water flows move huge amounts of granitic materials "parked" in the drainages between there and Reeder Reservoir. Some say our children need this ski area expansion into the Middle Branch of the East Fork in order to have healthy wintertime activities. I know in my heart that what they need even more is for us adults, particularly the decision-makers, to be models of honesty, vision, and responsible behavior. Let's help the children find a variety of exciting and healthy activities and guide them toward an appreciation of what the earth has to offer. Our example is critical to their well being and to sustaining life on this planet. Good afternoon. 1 am here because I see a need for an alternative that has not been openly discussed. Let me begin by saying that I am neither pro- or anti- expansion, but that I am pro-community use. In essence, Mt Ashland is a community owned ski ama, but is it operated for the community? In the Membership news that Mt. Ashland has published on it's website, under the headline "It's Now or Never", it states;"...back in 1984, ski area managers recognized the impending need for greater terrain balance and enhanced guest service facilities...". I have been skiing at Mt. Ashland for only three seasons, but have certainly recognized that need for greater attention to guest service facilities. I would have thought that twenty years would see some significant progress in the little things that would inspire confidence that the larger items would be handled with the same care and responsibility. Having not been here that duration I thought that I would share some observations and a plan that may find a niche in tbe juxtaposed camps that currently exist. A.) In terms of the area into which the expansion is proposed: In Tahoe, at a resort called Sierra-at-Tahoe, John Rice and Casey Blahn negotiated and compromised with the Forest Service to come up with a plan whereby Gates were installed at the top of the expansion area. When conditions are good, the gates are open and guests are welcome to ski that area. When conditions are not favorable, the gates are closed. Limited and selective pruning could easily be agreed upon as an alternative to football fields worth of cut, and the soun-to-be- famous Mt. Ashland glades are born. To transport skiers out of the area, A LMC 3700 snowcat, which Mt. Ashland already owns could be cut down by reducing the width of the tracks and blade by approximately a third, and a cat track could then be easily cut across the bottom of the expansion area as the snow cat would need much less width within which to travel. This solution is already in use at other resorts and is a proven method with positive results. No new lifts, no new clearcut runs, but a bigger, better mountain for the marketing department to work with. B.)BUT, how would this address the problem of not enough beginner to intermediate terrain? It would not directly affect that problem but would affect it indirectly very significantly. By giving upper-intermediates and experts an area to call their own other than the nebulous "south side", you would remove a terrifying element from the beginner/intermediate's skiing experience. Much more terrifying than any terrain to those new snow enthusiasts is the advanced skier/boarder who whips by at what are reasonable speeds to them but seem terrifying to the new guest. Anyone who has spoken to a flrst4hne snows porter has heard them bemoaning the proximity of others while they work their way down the hill. C.)ln addition, by granting the area beyond the lodge and using that area for race training as is proposed, you would also return a significant amount of terrain to the intermediate. Currently, runs such as Dream, Winter, Romeo, and Juliet are used for race training and then lef~ carelessly in horrible condition. Those are your intermediate and beginner runs, and what could be more intimidating to a beginner than to have to- them inexplicable foot-deep ruts in the runs they see on the map as suitable for them. Even an advanced skier is easily tossed by these rots as they are frequently unmarked and little effort is made to sideslip them or fill them back in. By granting the race department and MARA a desperately needed space, you will actually increase your skiable intermediate runs, and give the race teams a more effective training space. This would also take the pressure of the race teams offthe lif~ lines, opening them up for other guests. It is possible that a new surface litt would be necessary on the new race area, but that is a no-impact item which is a small trade-off for the benefits it would afford the rest of the mountain and the race programs simultaneously. D.)The tubing area should be an area of no contention. This facility is the most community-minded and revenne-generating concept in any of the plans. Although it takes an extraordinary amount of snow to create the necessary lanes to operate a tubing facility, there is negligible and easily mitigated environmental impact. It does not take any skill to ride a tube down a tubing lane, but not much is as fun. This facility would open the mountain to people who would otherwise have no interest in visiting. Even if these people never become avid snowsport enthusiasts, they will return with their families again and again and introduce their kids to the world ofsnowsports. Those kids could easily be Mt. Ashland's next generation of visitors. E.)Anyone who visited the mountain during the Holiday week Christmas through New Year's 2003 should be willing to admit there is a need for additional parking. Walking half to three-quarters of a mile from your vehicle to the resort, and waiting in line for a half-hour or mom just to turn around to do so is silly and unjustified. In addition there is a desperate need for better parking lot oversight, such as the presence ora parking attendant down on the road during that week informing guests of the situation and parking them along the road. Another huge issue is the on-site sale of sno-park permits. It is possible for a person to have to walk from the back of the back parking lot to the lodge to buy a mo-park permit, only to return to a ticket on their vehicle for not having one. Then begins the hassle of trying to explain that to the ticketing agency. Would it really be so difficult to put a guardhouse on skids and drag it out there, especially on busy days, to alleviate those guest service nightmares? Was this not part of 1984's vision of enhanced guest service by ski area managers? Please grant them additional parking alternatives. Don't you think it would be easier to just provide a shuttle? In closing, [ suggest that there are many ways in which Mt. Ashland could improve without the addition of new lifts, new runs, or new lodges. I believe that those improvements would be moot without the necessary common-sense improvements in current infrastructure. There are myriad improvements possible without the construction of any new facilities. Some are possible with the construction of minimal or no new facilities, only services, such as the addition of a groomed Nordic trail to Grouse Gap Shelter, which would greatly benefit not only the Mt. Ashland Resort, but the community to which it is beholden. I believe it is time for Mt. Ashland to txuly behave as a community'resort. Thank you, Chris Garvey In terms of qualifications to make such a proposal: **Speaker and conference committee member California Ski Industries Association **Operations consultant Swatch Boardercross tour **Operations consultant Vans Triple Crown of Snowboarding **Speaker-Transworld Snowboarding lndus~ry Conferences **Department head-Booth Creek Holdings **Internationally certified Jodge-International Snowboard Federation **Certified Judge-United States of America Snowboard Association (USASA-two-time judge for Nationals-) **Race/Freestyle Coach Heavenly Ski Foundation **Board of Directors-Sierra Educational Foundation **Six year supervisor- Snowboard Instruction Sean Gordon I00 Union St. October 1, 2003 Members of the Ashland City Council, It is clear that expansion into the middle fork region at this time is environmentally, socially, and financially irresponsible, and would not appropriately address the most pertinent overflow and terrain problems the current facility has in servicing our community. These problems have viable, cost effective, and appropriately scaled solutions that we have not considered with enough attention. The most proficient young skiers are free to ski at Shasta in order to satisfy their needs for extended terrain, and have no real need for this to be made available at Mt. Ashland simply for their convenience at the expense of the security and enlightened interest of the greater community. As city council please infom~ the forest service that expansion into the middle fork is absolutely unacceptable and inappropriate at this time, that new beginner terrain near the lodge, improvements to the lodge, and upgrading Ariel to a four chair are desirable and appropriate courses of action in response to our needs, and that expanding the parking lot is not appropriate at this time. Thank you ~ mm ! · Headwaters To conserve, protect, and restore forest ecosystems, clean water and biological diversity in the Klamath-Siskiyou Bioregion P 0 Box 729 Ashland, OR 97520 482-4459 (ph) 482-7282 (fax) Contact: Tonya Graham, Executive Director Introduction Thank you so much for holding a special forum to gather public input about the Mt. Ashland expansion proposal. As you know, Headwaters has been working with a group of ski area users since May of 2002 to create a Community Alternative Mt. Ashland Improvement Proposal that improves the recreational experience at the Mt. Ashland Ski Area while protecting our watershed. As you are aware, the current proposal put forward by the Mt. Ashland Association has been surrounded by intense controversy in our community for many years. Now that the new Draft Environmental Impact Statement is completed, our community is once again faced with an expansion proposal that has the potential to cause serious and irreparable damage to our watershed. The Council's Role Some have argued that the City Council's relationship to the Mt. Ashland Ski Area is the same as its relationship to the Ashland Community Hospital or the Oregon Shakespeare Festival and that the operation of the facility is the business of the Mt. Ashland Association. Nothing could be further from the truth. The hospital and the theater are not located at the headwaters of our watershed. If the organizations in charge of those enterprises do a poor job, the City of Ashland's water supply will not be damaged. The same cannot be said for the Mt. Ashland Ski Area. Even if the City of Ashland did not hold the permit for the ski area, the Council would be responsible for commenting to the Forest Service about this proposal simply because of the potential damage to our water supply. As citizens of Ashland, we are very fortunate that our City Council is in such a strong position to protect our drinking water and our community. Over the next few weeks, the Council will have to come to a decision about what comments to make to the Forest Service with regard to this project. While recreational values are important, we must remember that our water supply and the safety of our citizens are the most important values on the mountain. Other city councils around the country have had to weigh the potential benefits of development against the potential damage to their municipal watersheds. Many cities have come to understand the importance of a functional watershed and have chosen to simply prohibit all recreation in their watershed. We are not advocating that the Ashland City Council take this stand, but we are advocating that the Council take active steps to protect our water supply. What Is At Risk? Our water supply is at risk, but because of a lack of monitoring data, we do not have the information needed to properly assess that risk. Mt. Ashland is a dynamic system that changes over time and the monitoring required to give us the information we need to make an informed decision has not been done by the Forest Service, Mt. Ashland Association, or the City of Ashland. We do know, however, that the soils on Mt. Ashland are decomposed granitics and they are very prone to erosion when disturbed. This soil type combined with the steep slopes creates the most erosive conditions for soils anywhere. The construction of the current ski area has created erosion problems that we will likely never be able to solve. Rather than creating more problems that future generations may not be able to solve, we are obligated as a community to gather the information needed before making a decision about development in the Middle Branch Area. Some people wonder why erosion is such a problem. Most of the productivity of the soil (75 - 90%) is found in the topsoil. Mt. Ashland generally has a very thin layer of topsoil that forms a mat on top of sterile decomposed granite. That mat absorbs water much in the same way that a sponge does, allowing rain and snow melt to be released slowly off of the mountain. Unfortunately, when that topsoil layer is disturbed, two 'separate problems are created. First, because the highly erosive soil below the top soil mat is now exposed, the process of erosion starts to move sediment downhill. This soil ends up staged in the gullies and stream beds until the next major summer thunderstorm or a rain on snow event like the one that caused the 1997 flood. When these extreme weather events happen a large volume of water is deposited onto the mountain in a very short period of time. The disturbed areas are essentially useless at slowing it down because the top soil mat has been removed, so instead of having the mat absorb a large amount of the water and release it slowly, the water immediately cuts down through the stream channels. The sediment that has been deposited in those channels over the past 10-20 years is very lightweight and it moves easily in water. The end result is water comes off the mountain faster than it has to because of the disturbed soils and then picks up the sediment that is now in the stream channels due to ongoing erosion from the disturbed soils. This water continues to move downstream until is reaches downtown Ashland with high sediment loads. In the process, Reeder Reservoir fills up with sediment and the City of Ashland has to pay to have the reservoir dredged. It is important to note that we are not saying that the operation of the current Mt. Ashland Ski Area caused the 1997 flood. What we are saying is that disturbing those particular soils on that mountain have the effect of decreasing the ecosystem's ability to absorb extreme precipitation events. The Middle Fork already has far more water in it than does the area that houses the existing ski area facilities. If the Middle Fork is developed we may see more frequent floods with larger volumes of material coming from our watershed into our town. Sediment Delivery to Our Watershed A number of flaws exist in the analysis used to estimate the amount of sediment that will be delivered to Ashland's municipal water supply. Models are only as good as the data that is used to run them. The Forest Service's analysis relied on computer simulations whose results can vary by 2-3 orders of magnitude depending on the assumptions used as inputs to the model. Input variables that have such a huge impact on the results include assumptions used for effectiveness of mitigation measures, soil variability, site-specific differences, weather, etc. There is a noticeable lack of on-site data collection to validate the assumptions used for the input parameters and to validate the model's results. Also, the documentation for the model states that it is not intended to be used to analyze watersheds with gullies and stream channels, severely disturbed sites (roads and trails), or sloughing of gully sidewalls. Because methodologies that would stand up to scientific peer review standards were not used, all projections for sediment delivery should be considered invalid. The burden of proof has not been met so the city should not allow any actions in the watershed that might impact water quality and quantity. Existing Restoration and Monitoring Efforts Currently, there are no comprehensive restoration efforts happening at the Mt. Ashland Ski Area. The Mt. Ashland Association routinely has school children plant grass plugs on the ski runs, but as grass is not an effective erosion control method for this particular situation, this effort has very little effect. The Mt. Ashland Association also does not monitor the effectiveness of their limited efforts to determine whether those efforts are having a positive impact. They have also fallen behind on the maintenance of erosion control measures, such as outsloped roads. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement includes restoration projects, many of which are needed as a result of the ongoing operation of the ski area. It is not necessary to have those projects analyzed in a DEIS and in fact, the Mt. Ashland Association could have gotten started on those projects years ago because it is their responsibility to mitigate the effects of their operation on our watershed. Instead, they have invested their time and resources into public relations campaigns to convince our community that their expansion proposal will benefit Ashland and the larger Rogue Valley. The current proposal includes restoration projects and mitigation measures along with monitoring efforts. Unfortunately, the budget presented by the Mt. Ashland Association does not include a line item for restoration projects, mitigation measures, or monitoring. While they claim that they are going to use rock rip rap to cross the stream channel in the Middle Fork area, there is no indication that they have properly estimated the cost of transporting the rock via helicopter as they cannot get the rock from the site and the skiway road will not be engineered to handle large trucks. Restoring the Land If the ski area fails, the task of restoring the area may fall ultimately to the City of Ashland as the permit holder. Even if the city did not hold the permit, however, the problems created by this disturbance would still create significant costs for the city as our community is dependent on the clean water provided by the watershed. When the ski area was considering closing in the early 1990s, the Forest Service did an Environmental Assessment to determine what measures were necessary for the permit holder to restore the land. That estimate is what the Mt. Ashland Association has been basing their restoration projections on. However, we have learned quite a lot in the last 10 years and if the ski area goes under, there will be significant pressure from the community to ensure adequate restoration takes place. There is no way at this point to determine how much that will cost. Some have suggested transferring the permit to the Mt. Ashland Association to reduce financial risk to the City of Ashland. However, the city has a responsibility that has nothing at all to do with the legal relationship between the city and the Mt. Ashland Association. The Mt. Ashland Ski Area is built at the headwaters of our municipal watershed and protecting our water supply must be the first priority for the council. Residents of this community raised the money to purchase this area for our community. The Mt. Ashland Association has shown that it is not terribly interested in the thoughts of a majority of our community and in fact, has organized itself in such a way that accountability to the community does not exist. The only way the association is accountable to the community is through the relationship they have with the City of Ashland. It is imperative that the City Council protect that relationship so that our community may continue to have a say in the operations of our community ski area. What Are Our Options? Fortunately, the Draft Environmental Impact Statement contains a range of possibilities, some of which are less risky financially and ecologically according to the analysis in the DEIS. The question is not, "Do we develop the Middle Branch area or do we do nothing?" The question is, "How can we improve the recreational experience of the Mt. Ashland Ski Area while protecting our municipal watershed?" The Forest Service's Alternative 3 is based on the recommendations of Headwaters and ski area users. Essentially, this alternative aims to reduce environmental impacts by restricting development to the far eastern side of the Middle Branch area. We are recommending that the Forest Service analyze Alternative 3 with the following modifications: · Move the base of the LC6 lift so that it is not in the Middle Branch area and is out of the McDonald Peak Roadless Area. Remove the main parking lot expansion from the proposal. The need for additional parking on selected weekends and holidays can be handled adequately with an access road shuttle. Add the R-21 (North Ridge Novice Run) from Alternative 5 to this alternative to provide significant new beginner terrain near the base lodge where beginner skiers will be more likely to use it. Rearrange phasing so that the watershed restoration projects, novice terrain near Poma area and the Skier services buildings are done first. Additional projects should be completed after the ski area has created the necessary infrastructure to handle additional skiers. Issue two separate decisions - one for the non-controversial elements, such a~ the skier services buildings and the Poma area beginner terrain. A second decision should be issued for the more controversial aspects of the proposal. (By doing this, the Forest Service will reduce the potential of the non-controversial work being held up by the more controversial elements of the proposal.) The restoration projects included in this proposal do not require this level of environmental analysis and should be started immediately. We hope you will consider this information and make your decision in support of protecting our watershed for future Ashlanders. We have inherited many problems in our society that were created by reckless decisions of our predecessors. It is our responsibility to ensure that we are not saddling our children and grandchildren with problems in their watershed that cannot be solved. The Ashland City Council has the right and responsibility to protect our municipal watershed. The City Council should request that expansion of the Mt. Ashland Ski Area be confined to the area outside of the Middle Branch Area. Long-term monitoring is required before our community can consider allowing development in the Middle Branch Area. I am a22-year msklent afA.,b, land and a skier -mcstly t~ but I HAVEocca~omlly akiedon ~he M~ Ashland SId Are~ This isto registera peviously unvoiced, but strong q~dfion, ~o may tm~osal cf Mt Afl~wl Ex0ansiontt~ w~d ~1~ exFanffmginto fl~e 1V~:~e Bmm~ c~l?ast Fonk ~ ~ C~hem will have subrni~ed exler~4ve data ~egad~gthe following which I will nat repeat 1 waatto emphasize my ~t with: WATERQUADH'Y/QUANHTY - Theriskistoog~t!!! DON'TTAMPER WITHCIq~WATERSUFI~Y. Soil erosion fallows scil d~srupio~ I bdieve t!4slS a major concern A '~)uality Cora~ Te~n" (9-25Tidngs) mayfinditsdfmonitcdng ~:sultsthat aveout ffcc~a~.Xoolae! FINANCIAL RISK - I tax, mi:er ve~3, wdl ye~s whenthe ski a~a did pocdy ,and was originally"saveff' by the dtyanditsd~ A aki ~eais at the mercy ~the weather- it needs mow. The p~fetred allemafives inthe 1V~ddle Fod~ ~,m ~ m ~a gdnginto lowerdevafion~ Inthelang-run (shcC~w~ glol~l warming seems like a very lik~dy reality. Un. the dry invesfgates this and fu-ds defvu~daubatan/mMdamthaqm~ls amud~ mo~ sdidfinal~al ~ lhanthat which w~s found by SiermClubinvesfigg/ors, then I say we would be very much fl~ gamblers(fools~ MAINFOINF SUMMARY: No expardon into the 1V~ldle Fa~ NOT ~intl~s way couldwetl save MountAslfland as a ski mm operation aswdlas vdding suchint~onal fisk~othe dty's water. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Region - Pacific Southwest Region July 2003 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Mt. Ashland Ski Area Expansion Rogue River National Forest Ashland Ranger District Klamath National Forest Scott River Ranger Distdct CHAPTER VI LIST OF PREPARERS AND CONTRIBUTORS CHAPTER VI LIST OF PREPARERS AND CONTRIBUTORS This Draft EIS document was prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rogue River National Forest. A Forest Service Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) developed the range of alternatives in the EIS, prepared portions of the EIS, and provided technical review of consultant research and analysis. The following coordinators, resource specialists, and consultants participated in the overall preparation of the Draft EIS. A. FOREST SERVICE PROJECT COORDINATORS The following Rogue River National Forest personnel provided leadership for this project or served as project coordinators during different phases of the project. Chief responsibilities included conducting the environmental analysis process, public participation and review, organization of drai~ and final reports, and documentation under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). CONTRIBUTOR EDUCAllON & EXPERIENCE CONTRIBUTION Linda Doily (lOT) Undergraduate studies in communication and Managemen! of NEPA process; District Ranger, Ashland leadership, office ad~nistmtton, and environmental delogalad Responsible Official for RD resources and education. 23 years FS; 8 yearn as analysis and public partidpalion. District Ranger on Ashland Ranger District; previously served as Forest Staff for Recreaiton, Lands, and Minerals and Forest Public Affaim Officer. Ken Gfigsby (lOT) BA Biology. 30yearn in FS environmental planning, WrfleflEditor; overall document Forest NEPA Coordinator public involvement, and NEPA review, analysis and compilation, editing, and review. Supervisor's Office documentation. Analysis and documentation of Land Uses and Regulations ioduding Roadless and Forest Plan Amendments. Steve Johnson (lOT) BA English; gmduata work in American Iitemtum. 23 Interdisciplioary Team Leader and Recrea~on Spec~ist, years. FS; 13 years Snow Ranger/Permit Project Coordinator. Analysis and Siskiyou Zone Administmtor/Wintar Sports specialist and Cultural documentation of Recreation, Resource Coordinator, 9 years ski industry: ski Snowfall, Avalanche, Noise, Minerals, instructor- race director. Heritage sections, and overall '~witing/editiog. Don Boucher (IDT) Undergraduate studies Fomsby and Engineering. 24 Analysis and documentation of Resource Planner and years FS; in FS planning, NEPA documentation and Proposed Action, Roads and Analyst, Cascade Zone Ecological Assessment Documentation; and Watershed Analysis, Arc-Vlaw Geographic Information Systan'~s. mapping, cumulate effects, consequence analysis and overall writing/editing. Draft ElS (July 2003) VI, 1 Mt. Ashland Ski Area Expansion B. FOREST SERVICE RESOURCE SPECIALISTS The following Rogue River and Siskiyou National Forest personnel provided resource analysis and documentation for this project and/or provided review for the analysis that was conducted. A few individuals currently work at other locations or for other agencies. CONI~IBUTOR EDUCATION & EXPERIENCE CONTRIBUTION Thomas Atzet, Ph.D. BS Forest Science; MS Physiological Ecology; Ph.D. Analysis and documentation for Southwesl Oregon Area Forest Ecology. 34 yearn FS and 28 years as Area landscape ecology and review of the Ecologist, Supervisor's Ecologist for the Rogue River, Siskiyou, and Umpqua Physical and Biological sections. Office National Forests. Has written numerous published articles. Brad Cownover BA Visual Art; graduate work in landscape architecture. Anaiysis and documentation of scenic Landscape Architect, 5 years at FS and 4 year at BLM as Landscape quality, three-dimensional renderings, BLM, Washington D.C. Architect. parking iol design, and selected map preparation. David Clayton BS Biology. 10 years as FS Wildlife Biologist. 3 years Wildlife analysis and documentation, Wildlife Biologist, USFWS, wilh USFWS. including review of Northwest Forest Roseburg, OR Plan Survey and Manage wildlife species. Ellen Gohsen BS Forestry, MS Plant Pathology. 20 years Pacific Analysis and documentation of Forest Plant Pathologlal, SW Northwest Region insect and Disease Group, last nine Health (insects and disease). Oregon Insect and years in SW Oregon. Disease Service Center Brent Hasty BS Geography and seonndary teaching certificata. 13 Update of the District's database and Geographic Information years with FS with 10 years in GIS. information resource support. Systems Manager, Siskiyou Zone Peter Jones (IDT) BS Geology and MS Geological Engineering. 22 years Analysis and documentation of Geotechnicat Engineer, pdmafily as geologist Cert. Engineedog Geologist, sediment production, slope stability Supervisor's Office OR; Reg. Professional Geologist, OR. computer analysis, snow compaction, and parking lot design. Jeff LaLande, Ph.D. BS International Affairs; MA Archaeology and History; Completed hedtage analysis and Forest Archaeologist, Ph.D. History. 22yeareasForestArchaeologist Has documentation in compliance with the Supervisors Office written several published books and numerous articles. Nationa~ Histodc Preservation Act and conducted archaeological surveys and documentation. Susan Mayo (IDT) BS Biology. 12 years es FS Fish and Aquatic Biologisl, Fisheries and aquatics. Provided Fish and Aquatic Biologist, resource management monilodog, and watershed analysis and documentation of Sisldyou Zone restoration. Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive fish species. Pabicia Madinez BS Forest and Resource ManagemanL 13 years FS Provided Plant Series and Plant Ecologist, Southwest with 12 years in the Ecology program in Southwest Association information. Oregon, Sisldyou NF Oregon. Joel Pagel BS Wildlife Management; cun'entiy in Ph.D. ixogram - Provided Wild~ife review and Wildllife Biologist, status changes of Federally listed Threatened and documentation. Siskiyou Zone Endangered species. 19 years Wildlife Biologist; ioduding seven years as Foresl ESA specialist. Les Ropertson AA Technical Aris. 32 years FS experience in timber Timber removal analysis and Staff Off'ruer, Recreation, harvesl adminislration, special femst products, range, decumentation. Range, Wilderness, and and recreation. Contracting Officer for timber sales. Timber, Siskiyou Zone Cunently Fire Managemenl Officer on Sisldyou Zone. Draft ElS (July 2003) VI - 2 Mt. Ashland Ski Area Expansion CONTRIBUTOR EDUCATION & EXPERIENCE CON~,IBUTION Wayne Rolle (IDT) BS Science-Ma[q; graduate studies in botany. 14 years Botanical analysis and documentation, Forest Botanist, as Forest Botanist and several years as private including review of NW Forest Plan Supe~isor's Office consultanl botanist. Survey and Manage botanical species, Dan Sitton (ID'r) BS Geology. 24 years FS experience in engineering Slope stability and landslide analysis, Engineering Geologist, geology and 5 years private consulting. Reg. documentation, and mapping. Supervisor's Office Professional Geologist~ OR. Dave Steinfeld (IDT) BS Soil Science; post-graduate studies in geology. 9 Analysis and docomentalJon of soil Soil Scientist, Assistant years as FS soil .scientist and 20 years at J. Herberl processes including erosion, Nursery Manager- J. Stone Nursery as a seedling culturisl and Assistant sedimentation, and site productivity. Herbert Stone Nursery Manager. Fred Way BS Resource Management and Wildland Ecology; MS Conducted and led 2001/2202 spotted Wildlife BiologisL Currentiy Intemalional Agricultural Developmenl/Range and owl surveys. Bist~c~ Ranger, Greenbrier Wildlife Ecology; graduate studies in TES species and RD, Mnenegahela NF wildlife biology. 23 years FS. Lee Webb (IDT) BS Wildlife Biology; MS Wildlife Management. ;'7 years Wildlife analysis and documentation, Wildlife Biologist as Siskiyou NF Wildlife Biologist and the last 7 years in including review of NW Forest Plan Supervisor's Office same capaci~ for the Rogue River NF. botanical species. Tami Zaldana Undergmduata work in general office management. 4 Managed mail Iisi and mailings, Office Autcmation years FS. assisted in document prepara~on. Ashland RD The following personnel from the K!amath National Forest provided input and review during thc planning and compiling of this Draft EIS. These individuals generally worked directly with their respective counterparts on the Rogue River and Sisldyou National Forests, ~m Cuen~ BS ~l~e Ma~ment. 17 ysam as Dis~ct Wildl~e Pm~ed ~ldl~e input ~ E~ ~ldl~ Bi~ ~i~ on ~ Na~o~l Forest. NEPA pr~. ~ R~r RD ~n~ ~k~l~ BA ~ro~l~y, 6 yearn as Dis~t and F~est , He~ge mv~w ~(s ~m ~ist. Juan ~ ta Fuea~ ~ ~y. 32 yearn of expe~n~ ~ ~ Forest ReV~ geol~l and hydml~i~l F~t ~l~t ~wi~; expe~ in ~ng f~st mana~ment info~a~ and a~l~s. ~pe~s ~ eff~ ~ geom~hic p~. ~n ~ BA in m~ma~, MS in ~1~, 10 ~am ~n~bu~ daa and ~o~ for ~, ~ expe~ in ~ ~ ~ FS. ~mu~ve wa~mhed ~ec~ ~el. Jan Fo~ ~ ~li~ Ma~ge~nt, 23 yearn r~ NEPA p~ r~i~, ~sul~n S~ ~r, Su~wi~Ys ~ment ex~ ~ ~ Na~l Fmests. and input a~ ~i~n of Kla~ ~, ~nni~, R~n, NF s~l~t m~. a~ ~ ~ Hau~ AS ~i~l S~, BS Natural R~ D~ ElS rev~ and ~inafion D~ Ranger, S~ Manhunt, graduate ~ F~st ~ginee6~. 26 ~ama~ NF in~ve~nt. Riv~ RD ~am FS~ 5 ~am ~ D~t ~nger. Ly~a ~ BA E~li~, BS F~s~. ~ yearn ~ur~ Rev~w, anal~is and Foma NEPA Planner ~n~ment and 14 yearn in en~ron~n~l of Forest Ptan amend~nts. Su~i~s ~ ~rdi~aon and f~st planni~ wi~ ~e FS. Jim Ki~m ~ ~y. t0 y~m as fi~ a~ aqua~ bio~ist w~ Provide ma~ a~ aquatic info~fion F~ a~ Aqcaac Biol~ist, emp~ ~ dete~ini~ eff~ ~ pm~d relative to C~on~ and Gmu~ ~ River RD pr~as on aqua~c s~des. Creeks. Draft ElS (July 2003) VI - 3 Mt. Ashland Ski Area Expansion CONTRIBUTOR EDUCATION & EXPERIENCE CONTRIBUTION Jen7 Mosier BS Landscape Architecture. 26 ynam FS experience in Assisled project Landscape Architecl Landscape Amhilect wiidland management, planning, & design, emphasis in in integrating scenic quality and Supervisor's Office scene[,/conservation of recreation settings, recreation setting considerations. Jay Power BS Geology, BA Envimnrnental Studies. 28 yearn Geology and watershed review of Geologist expe~nce as geologisl, 19 yearn FS. pa,king lot design and construction. Scott River RD Ed Rose BS Geology, MS Geology, MS Geotachnisal Parking lot design review and analysis. No,hem California Prov~nce Engineering. 24 years FS. 24 years experience with Geo~echnical Engineer, the FS in geotechnicat engineering. Supervisors Office C. MT. ASHLAND ASSOCIATION AND CONSULTANTS The following non-Forest Service personnel provided input, proposals and coordinated consulting surveys and design for the Proposed Action for Mt. Ashland ski area expansion. Mt. Ashland Association Jeff Hanson BS Biology and Psychology. MS Outdoor Education. Responsible for coordinating, General Manager, 23 yeem ski area operation and 3 yearn environmental developing and planning ali aspects of Ashland, OR educetion camp director, the MAA proposal. Contributed project deschptions for MAA proposal. Gene Landsmann BS Geography. Completed course work for MS in Provided use tigums and assisted in Marketing Director, geography. Trained in land use planning. 38 yearn in ski run layout and dssig~ Ashland, OR ski industry, considemUons. Bruce Meek B.S. Social Sdence, Nationel Avalanche School, Contributed to avalanche section, Outdoor Operations American Avalanche Institute Studies, thtemational parlJoulariy ruouul distances specific to Supe,Mser, Ashland, OR Snow Science Workshops (5). Founding member Mt. Ashland and provided information American Association of Avalanche Pmfessionels. relative to skier injuP/and evacuation. SE GROUP Chris Cushing BS Civil Engineering. 18 yearn experience in resort Contribuled to ski mn/lift design and Prindpel, Mountain and mountain planning, layout, and analysis of mountain Pionnlog Practice Leader. capadty. Park City, Utah Bill Granger BA Biology. Master of Environmental Management. 15 Contributed to wetland and stream Senior Environmental yeem in environmental consulting N EPA process delineations, mst. oration, altamative Mgr., Environmental administration, ski ama analysis, and wetlands and project deschplJons, ACS, and Practice Co4eeder, delineation and permitting provided NEPA process review, Bellevue, WA consultation and inpul Ford Hubbard BA Physical Education. 30 plus years experience in ski contributed to ski run/tiff design and conslmolion Management run planning and construction, layout. Specialist, Littleton, NH. Currently mlJred. Claire Humber, ASIA Bachelor of Landscape Archilectum (BLA.) 12 yearn Developed capacity analysis for runs, Senior Associate, of experience in resort and mountain planning, lifts, and base area. Burlington~ Vermont John Ruple BA Demography and Environmental Policy. MS Contributed to air quality analysis and Environmental Associate, Environmental Planning and Policy. 4 years experience documentation. Performed air quality Frisco, CO. in environmental consulting and NEPA process. No modeling. longer with SE GROUP. Draft ElS (July 2003) VI - 4 Mt. Ashland Ski Area Expansion CONTRIBI.rrOR EDUCAI'H~N & EXPERIENCE CONTRIBUTION Kent Sharp BA Economics. 14 years experience in NEPA process Contributed to alternative and project Senior Envimnmenta~ Mgr., adminisl~ation, ski area analysis, and ski area permit descriplJons, and provided NEPA Environmental Practice Co- administration, process review, consultation and input. leader, Fhsce, CO Travis Spikes BS Environmental Science. 5 yearn experience as Contributed to delinealion of wetlands-- Ecologist, Bellevue, WA environmental consultant in wetland biology, hydrology , and streams in SUP ama, restomlJon and geomorphokxjy, and NEPA process, concepts, and ACS analysis. Cogan Owens Cogan Matt Hastie BS Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, MS Lead responsibility for research, Pdndpal, Porttand, OR Regional Planning. 10 years experience land use, writing, and analysis of sodoeconomic transportation, planning, policy analysis and public and skiing demand sec~ons. involvement projects. Daniel J. Heffeman BS Geography, MBA/MPA, Willamette University. 2~ Conducted financial feasibility; Senior ~ate, years experience in land uss planning, community and assisted in reviewing recreational Portland, OR. CurrenUy economic development, public finaece and urban skiing demand sections. wi~h Angelo Eaton and service delivery. Associates. Jim Owens BA Political Science. 27 years experience in Oversaw analysis and documentation Principal, Podland, OR environmental and land uss planning, project of socioeconomic, skiing demand, and management, and public involvement. Specialist in feasibility analysis ssctions. NEPA process and ElS planning for ski areas. Bamtan Pitt BA Sociology, MS Community and Regional Planning. Assisfed wilh ressarch and writing of Associate Planner, Two years land use and environmental planning, socioeconomic and skiing demand Portland, OR ssctions. Other Consultants Mahmoed Az. ad BS Fisheries Biology, MS Civil Engineering (Water and Technical analysis and conceptual Senior Engineer, Parsons Wasfewafer). 20 years experience in wnstawoter design of proposed wastewatar Engineering Sciences, design and restoration. Registered Professional disposal system for the Skier Services Reno NV Engineer, OR and NV. Building. Tim Bossard BS Civil Engineering. 29 years expeder~ce in dvil Analyzed potential parking areas and Owner, T.J. Bossard, Inc., engineering, 26 years in southwest Oregon. provided preliminary design and Grants Pass, OR Registered Professional Engineer, OR. construction cost estimates. Kevln Coulton BS Landscape Archileofure, BS CMl Engineering, MS Conducted peak ~w and stage Sen'rer Associate, Phillip Civil Engi~edng with emphasis in hydraulic discharge analysis resulting in Willia ms and Associatas, engineering. 16 years expaience in dvil engloeering pmliminaP/design factors for Ltd., Portland, OR with 8 years specialized in water resource engineering, proposed bridge. Also contribufed Registered Professional Engineer, OR. forest snewpad~ discussion. Scott English BS Community Service and Public Affairs, graduate Led an interdisciplinary team of private Principal, Northwest work in biegeography. Founded NBC in 1978. consultants in delineating we~nds, Biological Consulting, Extensive experience in we~nd delineation, planning analyzieg ski run location altamatives AsNand, OR and design of wetlands and watershed mslorstion and within wotiands and riparian areas, enhancemant projects, and designing bridge specifications. Shaw,n Kampmann Licensed Land Surveyor, OR and AK. 20 years Surveyed and mapped lower wetiands Owner, Polaris Surveying, experience in land survey and mapping, area, proposed LC-6 terminals, Ashland, OR Skiway, and Moraine Lodge. Calculated cut and fill soil displacement at various locations. Bill Malcolm MS Business Administration. 28 years experience in Contributed to socioeconomic, skiing Senior Principal, Bamhart winter resort planhlng and development, demand, and feasibility analysis Malcolm, Inc. Lyme, NH ssctions. Mark Reitenger Undergmduafe and graduate work in art and Designed and provided preliminary Principal, Reilenger and architecture. 15 years building designer and 8 years ski arcbtiectural drawing for Skier Asssclafes~ Ashland, OR I indust~. Services Building. Draft ElS (July 2003) VI - 5 Mt. Ashland Ski Area Expansion September 28, 2003 Ashland Mayor & City Councilors Ann Seltzer City Hall, 20 East Main Street Ashland, Oregon 97520 Re: Mount Ashland Dear Mayor & Councilors, We are writing to urge you to support the Mount Ashland Ski Area Expansion Alternate 2 in the Forest Service DEIS. We have been enjoying the benefits offered by our locally owned & operated winter snow park for over 30 years. It is a very important asset to our community, recreationally, socially and economically, but it is in dire need of this very well thought out proposed expansion that is necessary for it to continue to be financially viable. Even though Alternate 6 is similar in scope, it would be more expensive and involve a lift crossing diagonally across the mountain and would not be very esthetically pleasing. The other proposed alternatives do not meet the primary goal of creating a more balanced mix of beginner, intermediate and advanced terrain without adding unaffordable expense. We have talked with countless numbers of people & families over the years who are intimidated by its predominately advanced trails and who will drive two or more hours each way to Mount Shasta or Bend for the weekend because Mount Ashland seriously lacks beginner & intermediate terrain. Alternate 2 will finally give us that kind of terrain. Also, Shawn has been a Ski Patroller here for 15 of his 30 years at Mount Ashland and have seen first hand, the effects of overcrowded slopes and that relationship to increased injuries and more dangerous conditions on the mountain. This is currently a very small ski area and the population of the Rogue Valley has tripled since the ski area opened over 30 years ago. This is an extremely modest expansion proposal, especially compared to the large resorts like Mount Bachelor in Bend that covers over 20 times the acreage. The Mount Ashland Association (MAA) has developed a well-planned, environmentally friendly proposal that will not harm the Ashland watershed or degrade our drinking water quality or quantity. Paula Brown, the City Engineer, reports that any impacts on erosion and water quality by the proposed expansion would be "negligible" (Webster's dictionary: "So unimportant that it may be safely discarded..."). Also, the City's own Finance Director has said that MAA's assets far exceed the cost of site restoration required by the Forest Service lease should it ever become insolvent and can be mitigated by an appraisal and funding agreement with M_AA. The fire hazard issue, although remote, can also be mitigated by prevention and precautionary measures. Shawn is a Professional Land Surveyor and performed all the surveying and wetlands mapping for the expansion project. He worked very closely with the inter-disciplinary teams and scientists assembled by the Forest Service, MAA and ski area consultants which included experts in geology, soil science, hydrology, wildlife biologists, botanists, etc, with lifetimes of experience, PhD's & Masters degrees in their fields of expertise. Having the privilege to work with these people made him realize the commitment involved by all parties to make this project environmentally sound, not because they had to, but because they wanted to. Unfortunately, the very vocal minority that oppose the expansion, do not offer their opinions based on such expertise and knowledge, but emotional hysteria and not facts. It appears to us that their campaign of instilling fear and dread is a ploy to attempt to persuade the many people that are not skiers (calling it an elitist sport) and do not know the real facts. One would think by reading the letters to the Daily Tidings, which are written by the same four or five people over and over, that the Mount Ashland management was a bunch of rape and pillagers rather than people that love, respect and are committed to protect the beauty and magic of our natural world up there. We have been life-long ardent proponents of wilderness preservation and environmental protection and have spent more time on Mount Ashland than probably all the expansion opponents combined, and we feel that Alternate 2 is a quality and meticulously well- thought out proposal and ask you to endorse it. If you don't believe us, just come up sometime and look into the happy smiling faces of all the little kids (and big kids) and you will see the joy and magic this easily accessible winter mountain experience brings to people of all ages and diverse backgrounds and what a great asset it is to our community. And if you don not believe us on the technical and environmental effects, just read ail the expert testimony and reports of the Forest Service DEIS and the City's own experts. Respectfully, Shawn Kampmann & Laurie Miller 1520 Pinecrest Terrace Ashland, Oregon 97520 (541) 488-1464 MT. ASHLAND ASSOCIATION dba SKI ASHLAND STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION JUNE 30, 2003 ASSETS Cash & Investments Receivables Inventories Deposits Total Current Assets $ 614,057 2,442 26,357 2,250 645,106 Capital Assets - Net of Accumulated Depreciation Contributed Facility Lease -Net of Accumulated Amortization Total Fixed Assets Total Assets 1,551,843 1,059,045 2,610,888 $3.255.994 LIABILITIES Accounts Payable & Accrued Expenses Capital Lease Payment Total Current Liabilities 57,241 48,759 106,000 Deferred Revenue (Advance Pass Sales) Total Liabilities 87,385 193,385 NET ASSETS Total Liabilities & Net Assets 3,062,609 $3.255.99~4 Summarized from June 30, 2003 reviewed financial statements prepared by Moss Adams LLP Net Working Capital (Current Assets Minus Current Liabilities) $539,106 Current Ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) 6.1 to 1 Net assets include board-designated working capital reserves that are available to support operations before the season begins MT. ASHLAND ASSOCIATION dba SKI ASHLAND EXPANSION BREAK-EVEN ANALYSIS Mt. Ashland Association operates a ski area that incurs substantial fixed costs that are more than covered by operations of the existing area. It is useful when analyzing the effect of expansion on the financial security of the area to focus on the marginal costs of operating the expanded area, without taking into account the fixed costs of operation that do not increase because of the expansion. Marginal cost analysis is a good measure of the amount of risk involved in the expansion. Estimated additional operating costs for the first phase of expansion under Alternative 2: Building operating costs $ 36,100 Expanded parking operating costs 1,800 Lift operation and maintenance expenses 62,690 Additional power costs 16,800 Additional grooming costs 32,000 Additional ski patrol costs 20,800 Additional monitoring and slope restoration costs 17,000 Total marginal operating cost of expansion $187,190 The estimates above are for a normal season of operations beginning approximately December 10 and extending to the middle of April. These costs are variable with the number of days of operation. In reality, most of the costs would not be incurred until operations begin, and they would be proportionally less in a short season. How many visitors would it take-to cover the marginal cost of operations in a normal year? That is the best news of all - not many. Assumptions are as follows: Tubing Facility Revenue - estimated minimum annual usage, based on other areas' experience, is a low of 4,600 users. The DEIS economic analysis anticipates $15 per visit in revenue including $5 of food and beverage for the users and the people who bring them up to the area. The DEIS analysis did not take into account the approximate 33% cost of sales of the $5 portion of the revenue. Using an estimate of $13 per visit net of food and beverage costs, projected minimum revenue from tubing is $59,800. Skier & Boarder Revenue - The DEIS economic analysis anticipates $25.22 average revenue per skier and snow boarder visit. Assuming a food and beverage cost of $3.22 per visit, the estimated revenue per visit net of food and beverage costs is $22. So how many skiers and boarders does it take to break even after the tubing revenue? Mt. Ashland Association Expansion Breakeven Analysis Page 2 Breakeven calculation: Revenue needed to cover marginal operating costs Tubing revenue projected Revenue needed from skiers and boarders $187,190 <59,800> $127.390 Anticipated revenue per visit $22 Additional skier and boarder visits required 5.790 Ski Ashland's average attendance over the last eleven years has been a little over 88,000 skier and boarder visits. Our break-even point for all other operations is about 75,000 skiers. The additional lift added in the expansion increases our capacity by 34 percent. Increases needed to break even on the marginal costs of operating the expanded area only require a 6.6 percent increase based on our eleven-year average usage. Breakeven only requires that the new lift receive a 19 percent utilization rate to cover the additional variable costs for operating the expansion area. It is difficult to find comparative numbers from expansions of other ski areas that really make any sense. It is extremely Unusual to have a 40 year old established ski area making a modest expansion of this nature. Our present terrain is so far out of balance with expected ski area norms (too steep, short, and difficult for the novice and family skier) that expectation of an increase in usage sufficient to cover increased operating costs is not only reasonable, but also extremely conservative. The expansion is a "slam dunk" when it comes to the financial viability. The opponents of the expansion are not ski area operators - nor are they experienced business pe6ple with a reasonable ability to analyze the financial condition and operations of the Organization. The management of the Mt. Ashland Association has a combined 125 years of experience in the ski industry, and they receive the benefit of active input and policy setting from a local volunteer board of directors. They have drawn, at considerable expense, on the expertise of the best ski area designers available. The expansion is well thought out, conservative, and financially reasonable for the association to enter into. Expansion will not threaten the long-term viability of the ski area, but will instead insure a future that will provide great family recreation and wonderful educational experiences to the children of our region. $ Camila Thomdike AHS Student 369 Granite St. Ashland, OR 97520 Dear Sir: I am so grateful to the Forest Service for all the time and effort its employees have put into the proposed Mt. Ashland Expansion since 1984, and I hope beyond hope that this last attempt to approve it will succeed. There are so many important reasons why the Expansion needs to happen that it is difficult for me to see the reasons behind the opposition. Mt. Ashland means a great deal to me and has been a huge part of my life growing up. I started my life on the snow cross country skiing with my family as an infant and toddler, then joined MARA and began downhill skiing at the age of six. I ski raced for MARA until High School, where I joined the ski team and have been a member of it for two years. I love skiing, I love the snow, and ! love Mt. Ashland. I also do my part in maintaining it. In Middle School I participated in the summer clean-up community service program, and just this summer my family and I (plus my boyfriend whom I dragged along with me) went up to the mountain and picked up trash, as we did the summer before. I am a member of the NRDC and Greenpeace, and try to do my part to keep our world a green and beautiful place. But I know that the Mt. Ashland Association also cares about doing the least possible amount of damage (which is barely significant) to the mountain, and has spent huge amounts of money conducting research to find the best possible plan to create the least environmental impact. I support Alternative 2 in the Mt. Ashland DEIS for a variety of reasons. Our mountain desperately needs more beginner and intermediate terrain: the runs are ovemrowded, dangerous, and much too steep for inexperienced skiers and snowboarders. A hazardous conflict exists between racers, snowboardeirs, children, Special Olympics athletes, beginners, experts, and all athletes using the mountain: we are caught in the struggle for space. I've been brutally knocked down by a snowboarder as a young racer near Windsor Chair, and can assuredly state that the reason was the high density of people merging and the uneven distribution of skiiers and snowboarders. My sister has been injured by another skier as well, and ! could name many others who have collided due to crowded rnns. Also, our guest service facilities are antiquated and crowded. The lines for food and the restroom in the lodge are much too long and there's barely any eating space at lunchtime anymore. We need new facilies to serve the various needs of all on the mountain, such as the new base area building, the facilities at the top of the new LC-6 chairlift, the "arrival services" near the present rental shop, and the "moraine lodge" at the base of the bowl, ail proposed by Alternative 2. The proposed tubing facilities would be a wonderful addition to recreational activities on the mountain. While there are locations before getting to the actual resort where people can tube, there are many times when there is insufficient snow and too many people to tube safely. There are many people who don't necessarily have the interest or money to ski or snowboard and would be greatly benefit from the tubing area. Lastly, the Mt. Ashland Expansion needs to happen because so many people have dedicated years and years of their lives to this cause. Mt. Ashland is completely community-owned and operated, a situation that just a few other mountains in the whole US can boast of. We are so very lucky to be able to recreate at a resort that w~e own, not some private group completely disconnected from the citizens. Mt. Ashland is an important part of our community and needs to grow as its usage increases, otherwise it could see a devastating decrease in profit, interest, and safety. Sincerely, Camila Thomdike Page SULA Technolo~lies From: To: Sent: Subject: SULA Technologies <sula@mindnet> <berteauf@aslhand.or. us> Thursday, October 02, 2003 11:20 AM Mt Ashland Comment 01 October 2003 Dear Mr. Mayor and City Council Members: Thank you for requesting opinions on the Mt Ashland Ski Expansion. I wish you patience and open minds during the challenging debates to follow. Recent headlines in the Daily Tidings remind us that Murphy's Law stating that "In business anything that can go wrong, will go wrong" is still alive and well: -Denny's Restaurant shuts down without ever having made a profit in Ashland - not even close. -Ashland Soy Works is forced to close after 25 years in business. -Project A eliminates a significant number of its positions and curtails some of its activities. -Darex - yes, I said Darex - undergoes downsizing and is obliged to sell its Drill Doctor division. -Ashland Fiber Network announces millions of dollars of debt, with no relief in sight. As you know, the Forest Service (using funds provided by Mt Ashland Ski Assoc) hired a Portland consulting agency to do a financial analysis of the various ski expansion proposals. Their report concluded that future revenue figures, developed by the consultant agency, show that the ski area is unlikely to make enough money to pay for the final stage of expansion. They also concluded that the only proposal in the DEIS which is predicted to be successful even if attendance is below average is an option resembling an alternative put forth by a local environmental group collaborating with a skier & snow boarder coalition. Please seriously ponder the following: We may reasonably conclude from the DEIS that a dedicated volunteer group of outdoor enthusiasts came up with a proposal which in some important regards is financially more responsible than the option proposed by Mt Ashland Ski Association. Of course the board was quick to differ with this implication by having their accountant and board member Mr. Tom Reid state that the future revenues assumed were "ridiculously conservative". In addition, the manager (Mr. Hanson) claims that the viewfrom proposed run 12 (an intrusion hotly contested by environmentalists) "would be a stepping stone for people to come into the sports of skiing and snowboarding". If these comments are representative of the board's depth of thinking, I fear for the citizens of Ashland, who ultimately bear the burden of financial risk. Need I remind the council of the anguishing AFN scenario? If the experienced businesses cited above are encountering financial difficulty, why should we put our faith in the crystal ball predictions of an accountant/board member and the manager of a community non-profit organization who as far as I know are not held to the gut-wrenching decisions, and consequences of those decisions, which make up the day-to-day life of a for-profit business-owner? And no, Mr. Mayor, I am not suggesting that the council cop out and turn the ski area over to private hands, In spite of some regrettable outbursts during Tuesday's meeting, I hope you came away with an appreciation for the dedication, intelligence and eloquence of the many participants - often representing our younger generation - who are asking you to take a position opposing options #2 and #6. Ignoring those numerous solicited comments could forever brand as a sham your future calls for public input. 1 Itl Page 2 of 2 In closing I ask you to mull over the relevance of Murphy's Law to the Mt Ashland expansion and to consider the following quotations as well: "What I need is a one-handed economist!" A quote from Harry Truman, commenting on his frustration in trying to follow the recommendations of economists, who by nature are prone to say "On one hand ........ ; but on the other hand ........ ". I suspect you may be in sympathy with Pres. Truman's predicament in that you are receiving reports from experts who can draw radically different conclusions. Since the ultimate truth behind many of the scientific and financial issues facing you may never be known, I ask you to accept that to "err on the side of caution" is a public official's right and even his or her duty. "When in doubt, don't". A quote from my mother-in-law. Of course this is not to be applied universally, but nevertheless this is a useful tool for government officials who have accepted the responsibility of protecting a city's resources. Thanking you again for devoting precious time to this important issue, I remain Respectfully yours, Darwin Thusius, Ph.D. Owner & Founder Sula Technologies 415 Williamson Way Ashland, OR 97520 USA Tel. +1-(541)-552-0140 Fax +1-(541)552-0139 e-mail sul_a(~_m~n d~net website http/!,¢A~/w sulat,=.ch o3rl~ 10/2/03 Page 1 of l SULA Technolo~lies From: To: Sent: Attach: Subject: SULA Technologies <sula@mind.net> <berteauf@ashland.or.us> Thursday, October 02, 2003 11:30 AM Mt Ashland Comment.emi Mt Ashland Ms Berteau: Thank you for accepting my comments today (see attachment)- Infostructure was down yesterday afternoon & evening. Best wishes, D. Thusius l U/2/UJ KENTRO' III KENTRO® Body Balance · P.O. Box 963, Ashland, OR 97520 · 541/552-0922 KENTRO' KENTRO® Body Balance · P.O. Box 963, Ashland, OR 97520 · 541/552-0922 September 24, 2003 Mayor Alan DeBoer and Ashland City Council Members 20 East Main Street Ashland, OR 97520 RI~: Letter of Support for Alternative 2 of the Mt. Ashland Ski Area Expansion Hearing Tuesday, September 24, 2003 Dear Mayor DeBoer and City Council Members: I am writing to you on behalf of the Board of Directors of the Ashland Chamber of Commerce for your next City Council Meeting, Tuesday, September 30t~, 2003. We wish to express our total and unanimous support of Alteruative 2 of the Mt. Ashland Ski Area Expansion plan now being studied in the revised Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DESI) as required by the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) review by the Forest Service. The Mt. Ashland Ski Area is a unique recreational asset which has served Rogue Valley residents and visitors to our region for over 39 years. The Mt. Ashland's Association's modest proposal for the addition of novice intermediate terrain will benefit the area, environment and the local economy. The ski area not only provides a positive environment for children and families, it also boosts the local and regional economy in the winter when our existing attractions and amenities are underutilized. Mt Ashland is a community owned organization which has demonstrated uncommon service and programs to our entire region. They have developed a thoughtful and well-planned alternative to meet the growing recreational, economic and social needs of the region. The Ashland Chamber of Commerce represents over 600 businesses and is a major supporter of the ski area's endeavoi' to improve their facility. Not only does the ski area attract new business and families to our area, it also greatly enhances the livability in Southern Oregon. The proposal would insure the economic viability of one of the few community owned ski areas (which is losing its market share to other areas) and make sure that Mt. Ashland can serve the needs of future generations~ We are proud to have been part of the "Save the Mt. Ashland Campaign" that created one of a few community-owned ski areas in North America. For a four decades history, it has pioneered skiing and snowboarding in the region serving local residents. The organization is successful due to the over 300 volunteers within the community who serve as Board of Directors and assists as hosts for guests of the mountain. Each season, 2,700 school age youth in the Rogue Valley benefit from participating in their ski and snowboard programs. As a community partner, over $1.5 million is given back to community organizations in the form of donated lift tickets, instruction and special events. The organization offers over 200 jobs each year to residents and students creating an economic impact of $8.5 million annually into the regional economy. It is a community asset in serving the entire region in a thoughtful, planned manner to meet the growing recreational, social and economic needs. l~o East Main Street · P.O. Box136o · Ashland, Oregon 9752o~oo46 (541) 482-3486, ext 15 · (541) 482-2350, fax www.ashla ndcha m her. corn Letter of Suppo~l for Alternative 2 Page 2 of 2 The Chamber of Commerce promotes Ashland as a place to visit year round, with special events created to target the winter season, such as the Festival of Light. Cooperative advertising campaigns highlighting the ski area with area amenities draw people in the winter to Ashland bringing in lodging and dining tax revenues and supporting small businesses. The proposed improvements will enhance the economic viability of Mt. Ashland. By building a larger local skier/snowboarder base, and by having the capacity to serve more skiers and snowboarders during good snow years, Mt. Ashland will be able to set aside more money for improvements, and create a better cushion against poor snow years. The long-term economic viability of the ski area will thus be enb, anced. Tubing and similar Iow-skill level programs provide an outdoor activity that the whole family can do together regardless of experience or athletic ability. There are no specialized clothing requirements and costs are modest. Most importantly, tubing and similar activities introduce new participants to outdoor winter recreation with the prospect of conversion to boarding and skiing. This of course, adds to our ability to attract a wider market to Ashland in the winter. In closing, the Ashland Chamber of Commerce is in total and unanimous support of Alternative 2 for the Mt. Ashland Ski Area Expansion plan now being studied in the revised Draft Environmental Impact Statement as required by the National Environmental Protection Act review by the Forest Service, for all of the above reasons. Sincerely, Dana W~lsh President, Ashland Chamber of Commerce ~anda';a Executive Director SS:ce Cz John Schuyler, Acting Ashland District Ranger, U.S. Forest Service Scott Conroy, Forest Supervisor, Rogue River National Forest RESOLUTION NO. o,~t~O ~ -,~%-~ A RESOLUTION in support of the Mt. Ashland Ski Area expansion project. WHEREAS, the expansion of the Mt. Ashland Ski Area will provide economic development for'the region and tourism and recreation for the entire valley;, and WHEREAS, all environmental issues in the EIS have determined the expansion will not harm the Ashland Watershed or the endangered plants; and , WHEREAS, the expanded area will develop more easy and intermediate runs, which will be much safer for the nov/ce skier and the s.enior citizen skier; and WHEREAS, the Current area is at capacity, which creates safety problems with the mixed downhill uses, i.e. sr~owboarding and skiing and by developing more area we will be able to meet the capacity needs} now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MEDFORD, OREGON, that the City of Medford hereby supports the Mt. Ashland Ski Area expansion project PASSEI~ by th~ Council and signed by me in authentication of its passage this [.~ day of ~_~__ q~lfi~q .~l_ ~ J/- ,2003. . ~ /~ ATTEST: ~ ACI'ING City Recorder Mayor STATE OF OREGON ) COUNTY OF JACKSON ) I, Beverly Sandblast, City._Recorde[ of the City of I~edford, do hereby certify that I have prepared the foregoing copy of f-<'¢~,~ tt~gTg, - ;~ -~5 have carefully oompared the same with the original thereof on file in my office, and that it is correct, true and complete transcript there from and of the whole thereof. Dated at Medford, omgon, this "~.~ dayof ~L~;E'j~' .2003. OFFICE OF THE CITY MAYOE www. ci.medford.or, us September 10, 2003 The Honorable Alan DeBoer and City Council 20 E. Main St. Ashland, OR 97520 CITY OF MEDFORD 411 WEST 8TH STREET MEDFORD, OREGON 97501 TELEPHONE (541) 774-2000 FAX: (541) 774-2522 E-mail: cnctmed{~ci.medford.or, us Dear Mayor DeBoer and City Council: On behalf of the City of Medford, we wish to express our support oftha Mt. Ashland Ski Area Expansion. We feel the Mt. Ashland Ski Area is critical to the economic furore of our community and the Southern Oregon Region. The EIS determined the expansion will not harm the Ashland Watershed or the endangered plants. The Mt. Ashland Ski Area is a unique, recreational asset, which has served guests and residents of our region for the past 37 years. The ski area provides a positive environment for children and families. It also boosts the local and regional economy in the winter when the extensive tourist facilities are underutilized. They are a non-profit, community owned organization, which has demonstrated uncommon service and programs to our entire area. The Medford City Council, as stated in Resolution No. 7066, "recognizes and acknowledges the importance of the Mt. Ashland Ski Area to the present and future economy of the City of Medford and to the quality of life enjoyed by the City's residents." We support the expansion of the Mt. Ashland Ski Area, which will meet the capacity needs and provide for improved safety for all users. Sincerely, Lindsay D. Berry~ffan / Mayor cc: John Schuyler, Forest Service JeffHansen, Mt. Ashland Continuous Improvement - Customer Service Mayor's Statement in Support of the Mt Ashland Ski Area Expansion WHEREAS, the expansion of the Mt. Ashland Ski Area will provide economic development for the region and tourism and recreation for the entire valley; and WHEREAS, all environmental issues in the ElS have determined the expansion will not harm the Ashland Watershed or the endangered plants; and WHEREAS, the expanded area will develop more easy and intermediate runs, which will be much safer for the novice skier and the senior citizen skier; and WHEREAS, the current area is at capacity, which creates safety problems with the mixed downhill uses, i.e. snowboarding and skiing and by developing more area we will be able to meet the capacity needs. Be It Resolved, that the undersigned Southern Oregon Mayors do hereby support the expansion of the Mt. Ashland Ski Area. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WE hereunto set our hand this Ca day of September 2003 Lindsay D. BefSryman, Mayor oJ~Medford Tom fnalr;o , 3/~h~dy Cove PH 510 West 1st Street · P.O. Box 666 · Phoenix, Oregon 97535 · (541) 535.1955 O'R'E'G'O'N FAX (541) 535-5769 September 17, 2003 Mayor Lindsay Berryman 411 West 8th Street Medford, OR 97504 RE: Mt. Ashland Ski Expansion Dear Mayor Berryman, On Monday, September 15, 2003 the City of Phoenix voted to support the Ski Ashland Expansion Project. Although we have great respect and acknowledge the merit in both sides of this issue, it is our belief that the sixty five acre expansion will enhance the current Mt. Ashland Ski Area through the creation of an intermediate slope, provide greater economic development for Jackson County and still protect the integrity of the local environment. Sincerely, __ Mayor Larry Parducci Phoenix City Council Mayor's Statement in Support of the ML Ashland Ski Area Expansion WHEREAS, the expansion of the Mt. Ashland Ski Area will provide economic development for the region and tourism and recreation for the entire valley; and WHEREAS, all environmental issues in the ElS have determined the expansion will not harm the Ashland Watershed or the endangered plants; and WHEREAS, the expanded area will develop more easy and intermediate runs, which will be much safer for the novice skier and the senior citizen skier; and WHEREAS, the current area is' at capacity, which creates safety problems with the mixed downhill uses, i.e. snowboarding and skiing and by developing more area we will be able to meet the capacity needs. Be It Resolved, that the understgned Southern Oregon Mayors do hereby support the expansion of the Mt. Ashland Ski Area. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WE hereunto set our hand this 9th day of September 2003 ~y D. Berry~n~r of Medford , September 15, 2003 City of Ashland Oregon 20 E. Main Street Ashland, Oregon 97520 City pf Central Point Mayor ' M~'~!~'4'G£RS O2FiC~ Hank Williams Mayor Deanna Gregory Deputy City Recorder Re: Supoort of Mt. Ashland ski area ex;~ansio~ Dear Ashland City Council: This letter is to express my support of the Mt. Ashland Ski Area expansion. I will not comment further on the environmental impacts or endangered plants of the ski area expansion since the environmental impact statement adequately addresses them and they will be minimal. My comments will focus on the economic impacts to the area and safety. Numerous executives of firms that want to locate here are skiers and would not locate in the Rogue Valley if the area were not active. The same can be said for the doctors who the hospitals are trying to .attract. The ski area is an important part of the livability that we all want to preserve. The school children from Central Point schools are bussed to the ski area, which provides good activity for them in snow boarding and skiing. This keeps them busy and out of other trouble. I personally give up skiing since Mt. Ashland lacks intermediate areas. I got tired of the "bunny hili" and rook the lift to the top and on the wa), down injured my knee. The intermediate area that would be created would, however, reduce injury to others and is a safety factor. Also people from the Rogue Valley would not need to travel to Bend in the winter for skiing and auto accidents involved in that travel would be reduced. Please approve the expansion of the Mt. Ashland Ski area. Sincerely, Hank Williams Mayor 155 South Second Street · Central Point, OR 97502 · (541) 664-3321 · Fax (541)664-6384 Mayor's Statement in Support of the Mt. Ashland Ski Area Expansion WHEREAS, the expansion of the Mt. Ashland Ski Area will provide economic development for the region and tourism and recreation for the entire valley; and WHEREAS, all environmental issues in the ElS have determined the expansion will not harm the Ashland Watershed or the endangered plants; and WHEREAS, the expanded area will develop more easy and intermediate runs, which will be much safer for the novice skier and the senior citizen skier; and WHEREAS, the current area is at capacity, which creates safety problems with the mixed downhill uses, i.e. snowboarding and skiing and by developing more area we will be able to meet the capacity needs. Be It Resolved, that the undersigned Southern Oregon Mayors do hereby support the expansion of the Mt. Ashland Ski Area. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WE hereunto set our hand this 9th day of September 2003 Lindsay D. Berryman, Mayor of Medford 0§/19/2003 FRI 15:39 FAX 541 582 0937 CITY OF ROGUE RIYER ~01/00! Mayor's Statement in Support of the Mt. Ashland Ski Area Expansion WHEREAS, the expan.*'ion of the Mt. Ashland Sk~' Area wili provide economic development for the region and tourism and recreation for ~l~e entire valley; and W'tIEREA$, all environmental issues in the ElS have determined the expansion will not harm the Ashland Watershed or the endangered plan&~: and WHEREAS, the expanded area will develop more easy and intermediate runs, which will be much safer for the novice skier and the senior citizen skier: and VFHER~, the current area ix at capacity, which creates safety problems with the mixed downhill us~, i.e. snowboarding and skiing and by developing more area we will be able to meet the capacity need~. Be It]Resolved, that the undersigned Southern Oregon Mayors do herel~y support the expansion of the Mt. Ashland Ski Area. iN WITNESS WHEREOF, WE hereunto set our hand this 9~ day of Septemher 2003 Leigh Luca$, MOyor City of Rogue River Mayor's Statement in Support of the Mt. Ashland Ski Area Expanslon WHEREAS, the expansion of the Mt. Ashland Ski Area will provide economic development for the region and tourism and recreation for the entire valley; and WHEREAS, all environmental i~sues in the ElS have determined the expansion will not harm the Ashland Watershed or the endangered plants: and WHEREAS, lhe expanded area will develop mom eazy and intermediate runs. which will be much safer for the novice sider and the senior citizen skier; and WHERE.4S, the current area is at capacity, which creates safety problems with the mixed downhdl gse~, i.e. snowboarding and siding and by developing more area we will be able to meet the capacity need~. Be It Resolved, that the undersigned Southern Oregon Mayors do hereby support the expansion of the Mt. Ashland Sid Area. iN WITME$5 WHEREOF, WE hereunto set our hand this ~ ~ay of September 2003 Leigh Luca$, Mayor City of Rooue River CHAMBER OF COMMERCE E-MAIL: gpcoc@grantspasschamber, org WEB: www. grantspasschamber, org September 17, 2003 Scott Conroy, Forest Rogue River National P.O. Box 520 Medford, OR 97504 Supervisor Forest Dear Sir: The Grants Pass/Josephine County Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors wants you to know that we continue to be supportive of the expansion of the Mt. Ashland Ski Area. We believe that the proposed expansion plan is sound and addresses a long standing need for more novice-intermediate ski/snowboard runs. For the good of the area, and the communities that benefit, we fully support Alternative 2, the proposed action. We appreciate all of the hard work you and your staff have put into this decision. Thanks for the opportunity to comment. ~esq~iel~e, Roberts ~ '-- P.O. BOX 970 · PHONE (541) 476-7717 · FAX: (541) 476-9574 · GRANTS PASS, OREGON 97528-0290 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS COUNTY OF JACKSON, STATE OF OREGON IN THE MATTER OF SUPPORT OF ) ALTERNATWE 2 EXPANSION ) OF MT. ASHLAND ) ORDER No...q~:23q93 Whereas the Jackson County Board of Commissioners recognizes the environmental concerns have been met on the proposed expansion under Alternative 2 of the EIS; and Whereas current available ski runs are 78% advanced/expert and only 11% beginner and novice ski hms; and Whereas Jackson County and the region has a growing population of senior citizens needing the gentle beginner and novice runs; and Whereas the advanced/expert mas are a safety hazard when mas are crowded and when used by inexperienced skiers. With growing populations using the area, more of the hms are crowded; and Whereas the expanded area will balance distribution of skiers and snowboarders, offer beginner and intermediate runs, widen trails and allow access without having to use expert runs; and Whereas Mt. Ashland Ski Area is a great economic boon to the region, providing much needed tourism and recreation during the season when the seasonal Shakespeare Theater is not operating. Now, therefore, be it resolved the Jackson County Board of Commissioners supports the expansion .of Mt. Ashland under 61temative 2 in the 2003 Environmental.Impact Statemen!. ~ ff DatedVthis 31Y~ day of September, 2003, at Medford, Oregon. fi),,~ JACKSON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Sue i~illa~, Con~issio~ner Dave Gilmour' CommissiSfi~ ~ ~ JACKSON COUNTY oFcgoll Board of Commissioners Dave Gilmour, MD (54 I) 774-6117 Jack Walker (541) 774-6118 Sue Kupilla$ (541) 774-6119 Fax (541 ) 774-6705 10 South Oakdale, Room 200 Medford, Oregon 97501 Mt Ashland testimony Tonight I speak on behalf of the entire board of commissioners in support of the expansion of the Mt. Ashland Ski Area. I bring you a resolution, that outlines support from the Jackson County Board of Commissioners. We agree with the expansion, yet believe, the decision is yours. We defer to minor changes that might deviate from Alt. 2. I have experience skiing on Mt. Ashland, in fact learned how to ski there. Therefore I have a personal interest in supporting the expansion, but it is not my personal gratification that brings me to speak to you tonight. It is because of my concerns regarding regional economic development, ski safety and making sure environmental issues are addressed. Jackson County has growing population and a growing number of skiers and snowboarders using the mountain. With only 11% novice and intermediate slopes, many inexperienced skiers are trying to ski and snowboard on the less populated advanced/expert runs. This causes a safety issue not only for the inexperienced individual, but for all skiers and snowboarders on the slope. Many of our skiers are senior citizens and this puts them/us at risk both on the intermediate and novice slopes which are very crowded and on the advanced/expert slopes. So Safety is a great concern. 78% of slopes are advanced/expert. I have skied in 10 or more US ski areas and even in Europe. All of the other areas have far more balance between Advanced/expert and novice/beginning slopes. Like many skiers, I learned to ski as an adult, and Mt. Ashland was a very very difficult place to learn. I have heard stories about people who have quit skiing because of the difficulty of our slopes at Mt. Ashland. Furthermore, Mt. Ashland expansion will benefit tourism. Ashland is a great tourist town, with shops and Shakespear as well as the other theater events during the spring, summer and fall. The winter season in Ashland would suffer if it weren't for Mt. Ashland and the skiers. Mt. Ashland not only provides healthy recreation for our youth, and young adult college students, but attracts visitors from a large regional area. We need the trade during the winter. It certainly is an attraction for Southern Oregon University students as accessible and affordable recreation. The expansion will provide additional employment, especially helping SOU students. As one very active in economic development and attracting good companies with family wage jobs, I can tell you, having a ski area within I hour of most of our populated areas in the county, is a huge selling factor. Winter as well as summer recreation is important to attract people in management of large companies like Bear Creek Corporation, one of the counties largest employers. As chair of the Jackson County Urban renewal project in White City, I work to keep companies like Kodak, BOC gases and CertainTeed, as well as Boise, all in our industrial park. Having winter recreation so close is a big selling factor alOng with our education facilities, and cultural attractions. I have 'seen how this EIS addresses all the environmental issues that have been raised. Yes, a few trees will be cut down, but very few. The ski area will not affect the Ashland watershed and with the winter snow pack, the streams are not affected. I am satisfied that all the sensitive environmental issues have been carefully addressed. Every human action requires trade offs with the environment. We must be certain that the trade offs are acceptable, looking at the entire forest system. The forests were created with the intention of multiple use, and this meets the goals. Finally, I personally am only an intermediate skier, but will have a birthday tomorrow. I'm getting closer to the age where I might have to be more careful and only ski the gentle slopes. Many of my friends are already looking for easier skiing. So I personally want to see the ski area expanded to accommodate our senior citizens. Thank you for allowing me to speak. I urge you to support the expansion of Mt. Ashland. Sue Kupillas Jackson County Commissioner From: To: Date: Subject: "bob altaras" <bobsai@hotmail.com> <council@ashland.or.us> 10/1/03 3:57PM Expansion of Mt Ashland Ski Area Dear city council members, Though I attended last night's study session meeting, I chose not to speak, preferring this short e-mail. I strongly support the "alternative 5" plan. I think that you should be approaching this matter from a very conservative point of view since we ,ARE talking about our water supply. Most decisions involve some kind of risk-benifit ratio and in this case it would seem that the small benefit to be gained from the expansion doesn't warrent ANY risk to our water supply. Since it's apparent that some kind of development is going to take place, I encourage you to throw your support behind alternative 5. Since the Mt Ashalnd Association has been so unresponsive to community concern on this matter, it's up to you, our elected representatives to listen and act. Thank you for the good work you do on our behalf. Bob Altaras Barabara Wanderer 222 No Mountain Ave High-speed Intemet access as Iow as $29.95/month (depending on the local service providers in your area). Click here. https://broadband.msn.com From: To: Date: Subject: chris ammon <earthdakini@yahoo.com> <berteauf@ashland.or.us> 9/27/03 11:09AM Mt. A After sifting through an array of persepctives and scientific claims about the potential effects of the expansion on Mt. Ashland, I find myself frustrated. What information can we rely on when we ourselves ara not experts in biology, watershed hydrology etc? For myself, I step back, look at the big picture, and go with intuition. When I take a global perspective and consider the amount of people who are starving on this earth, or who are sick, or can only afford to live in the most rustic conditions, this debate about expanding a ski area seems absurd. We are se lucky to be able to recreate in the first place, why do we need to insist on more, more, more? Because it's the American Way? I think it is time to hold off on our consumption and be grateful for what we have. Will more trees cut down, more SUVs buzzing up the access road, more sedimentation really get us toward a better America, a better world? We all know deep down that this country has it wrong and is ruining the planet with its lifestyle. Why must Ashland perpetuate the problem? I think it is time to do something that is truly difficult; say 'no' to more. It is one thing to speak our beliefs in the streets and in letters, but quite another to sacrifice our personal luxuries. Yet, this is where the true revolutions take place--in NOT buying the SUV that we can afford, in NOT driving, buying cosmetics, getting plastic surgery, turning on the t.v. Can we really bring ourselves to shed our own personal vanities? We HAVE to draw the line if we want the degradation of our lives and the planet to stop. Ashland needs to give up its personal fantasy of being a ski town and appreciate what it has--which is so much already. Beyond the conflicting scientific claims, the oposing opinions is this simple fact: expanding the ski mountain does nothing towards making the planet a healthier place, and in these times, this is where are attention should be--not on making a bigger, badder, more "rad" place to recreate. Let's not sink into further denial about the kind of changes that really needs to happen in this world. Chris Ammon Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahool Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com From: To: Date: Subject: Jaimie S Bernhagen <jaimiesclan@juno.com> <berteauf@ashland.or.us> 9/21/03 11:51AM Mt. Ashland expansion ......... Begin forwarded message .......... From: Jaimie S Bemhagen <jaimiesclan@juno.com> To: comments-pacificnorthwest-rogueriver-ashland@fs.fed.us Cc: jaimiesclan@juno.com Subject: Mt. Ashland expansion Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 19:18:05 -0700 Message-ID: <20030907.191807.6630.0 jaimiesclan@juno.com> John Schuyler, City of Ashland, Thank you for the opportunity to respond. I'm not familiar with the details of each proposed plan, nor am I invested--either physically or emotionally--in the decision. My feeling about the expansion is fairly objective, I believe. My three children participate in winter sports each year on the mountain, and our family has enjoyed the snowboarding availability for some years now. Yet, we would not be heart-broken if the park stayed just as it is. My opinion is that this is the top of a unique and beautiful mountain. It already has an existing snow park area that is well-used by local people as well as out-of-town travelers. Once the top of this precious mountain (old growth habitat, etc.) is altered, it is gone forever. WE as people are versatile--we can move around, travel to and find the perfect snow parks to fit our families' needs. The trees are hundreds of years old and have hundreds of years to live, if allowed. For me, this is a no-brainer! Once the top of Mt. Ashland is "shaved off' for the sake of people and their well-loved sports, it's gone forever. As much as my kids love to snowboard, and I'm sure they would like any new runs, I don't think that desire for "more and better" preempts the destruction of old growth and sensitive habitat. This is an "extra" for our community. Yes, an expansion would be nice. There are many things that would and could make our lives in Ashland nice. But I think we already have it pretty good, and I'd be willing to leave it at that and save the trees, They do not have a voice (except in great literature like Tolkien!), and I feel this is a time we as Ashlanders are better off using restraint. About the watershed--if the expansion IN ANY WAY compromises the quality and/or quantity of Ashland's water supply, once again I feel this is a no-brainer. Sustainable good water MUST come before winter sports! We can't very well equip our children and their children with ski/snowboard goodies and expect them to have water problems in future decades to come. This would be irresponsible land management. Another aspect of an expansion that is purely factual and needs no opinion one way or the other is that we don't always have an adequate snow pack to sustain the park as it is NOW. It seems we're sort of marginal--about every other year is an adequate year for the existing runs. Wouldn't we be banking on many good years in a row to pay for this? If that's a gamble, I think our weather history speaks for itself--we would Iosel Thank you and good luck with the decision--one way or the other. Sincerely, Jaimie Bernhagen 300 Creekside Ashland, OR 97520 The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand! Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER! Only $14.95/month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today! CC: <jaimiesclan@juno.com> From: To: Date: Subject: "Richard Brock" <juniper@mind.net> <council@ashland .or.us> 9/29/03 10:27PM Mt Ashland Mount Ashland Ski Area Expansion Proposal Engleman Spruce Fen Dear Councilors; I am a professional botanist and have worked in southwest Oregon forests for 26 years. One of my concerns regarding the proposed expansion of the ski area centers around the damage it would cause to a one-of -a kind plant community. I spent three days working on the wetland inventory in this wetland forest and got to know it quite well. This rare forest community best described as a Picea engelmaniiNaccinium coccineum/Carex nervina (Spruce/Siskiyou Huckleberry/Nerved Sedge) plant association. Old growth Engleman spruce grows over a dense stand of Siskiyou huckleberry (only found in the Siskiyou Mountains)and Carex nervina (nerved sedge This siteis a geographical outpost for all three species; spruce from the noah, sedge from the south and Siskiyou huckleberry from the west. In addition, an extremely rare fungus occurs in this stand. This plant community is truly found nowhere else on the planet! It is a biological museum-piece that is in our stewardship. This unique plant community is growing in an equally rare soil hydrology. A series of fens feeds a system of ground water piping within which rodent activity alters the degree of wetness at any one time and at any one place. Any crushing of the piping/rodent runs will bring the water to the surface because of internal flow restriction and redirection of this surface flow could lead to downcutting of channels. Down-cutting of channels will drain the water table in these soils which may then lose their wetland characteristics. This in turn would deprive the spruce and sedge of the wet soil that they need. Cutting a 100 foot wide swath through a stand of trees with shallow root systems and active root rot has a high probability of affecting much more of the stand through windthrow and fungus infection. The estimated 10% impact could very easily be a 20% impact within one decade. This level of intentional disturbance would be quite irresponsible from the standpoint of good stewardship. The benefit of a few more ski runs would come at a very high moral cost. The City of Ashland has taken pride in the past at being an ecosystem friendly community. Our we to turn away from our principles of sustainablity now? I urge you to discourage the Forest Service from approving any proposal which cuts into this spruce/fen ecosystem. Sincerely, Richard Brock 64 Dewey St 821-1635 From: Rivers Brown <jrivers@mind.net> To: Chris Hearn <cehearn@aol.com>, Alan DeBoer <awdb@aol.com>, Kate Jackson <katejackson@opendoor.com>, Don Laws <donlaws@mind.net>, John Morrison <jmorrison@rvcog.org>, Ann Seltzer <berteauf@ashland.or.us>, Cate Hartzell <cate@mind.net> Date: 9/26/03 6:45PM Subject: Mount Ashland Mount Ashland Dear Mayor and Council members, I believe it would be an unwise move for our city to enlarge the ski area above us, at the summit of our watershed. There are a number of reasonings for this, among which economically risky and environmentally unsound stand out the most. The ski area, as an economic entity, has failed in the past and will fail again, for reasons beyond our control. Because of these defaults, our town now "owns" it, and should not move forward with such an over-scaled, aggressive expansion that could burden taxpayers for years to come. We could all be looking up at an un-snowcovered Mount Ashland during this global warming period, and wondering why we should still be paying for this great, not- well-thought-out expansion. Since the city is responsible for the costs of dredging, sluicing, excavating, and maintaining Reeder Reservoir, which holds all of our drinking water, why would we ask for these expenses to potentially increase by tampering with our watershed above? A possible scenario for global warming's game plan for our little part of the world is less snow, more rain. More rain to transport our exponentially tampered with, exceptionally erosive soils into our reservoir, to be expensively removed. Why burden our "Water Quality Limited" (for sedimentation) reservoir or our pocketbooks by entering into a long-term expense such as this? From an environmental standpoint, this doubling of size by removing umpty-ump dozen football fields of rather rare virgin forests at the top of our watershed, is just plain dumb, even with the deal that's been cut to pay for the expansion from profits from this old growth clear-cut. Cutting through and altering meadows, wetlands, riparian areas, streams, and springs is also not environmental sanity. Are we to trust vested interest, conflicted, scientific analysis done by parties proposing this mockery of sustainable development? Only if we have short memories, deep pockets, and empty consciences. They may tell us everything is all right, don't worry about it, but, when the system collapses, it will be us holding the bag (or empty moneybag) and these folks will be nowhere in sight or will extoll us to not cry over spilt milk. Maybe, under alternative 5 (Alt.5), our ski slopes could be improved and expanded within the area we already have cleared of natural habitat, and damage avoided or mitigated, to further assure us of good clear and clean water for all our residents. It certainly would be more economical and ecological, without much treat of running MAA into a bankruptcy that might attract a future privately owned enterprise; something i don't think any of us want. Let's stop thinking more thrills or dollars and become responsible custodians of this special mountain and watershed we are blessed with, Thanks for your consideration on this issue, Rivers Brown From: Jared Cruce <jdcruce@yahoo.com> To: <council@ashland.or.us>, <awdb@aol.com>, <berteauf@ashland.or. us>, <wildmountashland@yahoo.com> Date: 9/29/03 1:01 PM Subject: Concerns About Negative Impacts of Mt. Ashland Ski Area Expansion Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by Jared Cruce (jdcruce@yahoo.com) on Monday, September 29, 2003 at 16:00:58 message: Dear Ashland City Council & Mayor DeBoer, PLEASE REJECT the large and expensive expansion plans that are currently under consideration for the Mt. Ashland Ski Area. I am a Mt. Ashland Ski Area Season Pass holder and avid skier and I am against this expansion proposal for the following reasons: -Before expanding, existing facilities are in need of improvements. How can Mt. Ashland financially maintain more terrain, more equipment, and protect our watershed, when the existing area shows itself as old and rundown. Specifically, antiquated, unreliable,chairlifts - marginally clean, and undersupplied restrooms - understaffed and antiquated, food services - and non-handicapped accessible. -The environmental impact is large and the financial gain is undocumented, inconsequential, and linked directly to snow depths that have historically been sporadic. As an investment by the residents of our city this is a bad investmenfiH I am a supporter of Mt. Ashland Ski Area, but I DO NOT SUPPORT it's current expansion proposal I would support the renovation and improvement to existing facilities. Sincerely, Jared Cruce address: Ashland Resident source: This comment was sent to you by the individual named above via the Wild Mount Ashland website at www.mountashland.com. Comments are individually submitted through the site and represent the concerns and opinions of the sender and do not necessarily represent those of Wild Mount Ashland. From: Constance Dean <cdonline@mind.net> To: <comments-pacificnorthwest-rogueriver-ashland@fs.fed.us>, <council@ashland.or.us>, <berteauf@ashland.or.us>, <awdb@aol.com>, <wildmountashland@yahoo.com> Date: 10/2/03 3:31 PM Subject: Concerns About Negative Impacts of Mt. Ashland Ski Area Expansion Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by Constance Dean (cdonline@mind.net)on Thursday, October 02, 2003 at 18:30:49 message: Dear US Forest Service, Ashland City Council, & Mayor DeBoer, I, as an Ashland resident, am very concerned about the proposed expansion of Mt. Ashland's ski resort into our water shed. I am a business owner here in Aahland, and, while I stand to profit from an increased tourist draw in the winter months, I sincerely believe the risks are NOT worth the benefits. Many years ago, I worked for Mt. Ashland as their snow phone operator, and later, helped in the offices on Ashland Street. I was convinced then, as I am now, that this business is very precarious as it is, let alone compounding its debts with an expansion. A larger ski area must be supported both locally, regionally, and by cooperative weather! I don't think any of these factors are in place to support expansion. I love our town, the opportunities here, the beauty and abundant opportuniies for recreation. I have made many tripe to the mountain, ferrying both my sons and myself to ski and board throughout the winter. My experience is that there are so few days that draw large crowds, so little snow to run the current program, I cannot believe that people are still radically pushing this expansion. It does not serve us to expand something that already is struggling, let alone the environmental impact. I will allow others who have more facts articulate that concern, tho it remains a huge issue for me, as well. I simply do not see the benefits of this idea, and am accutely aware of the dangers and negative impact on our town, as well as the possibility of bankrupting an already struggling enterprise. Please vote against this expansion. I think it is a dangerous idea, both for our town, and for the business itself! Thank you, Constance Dean Ashland resident address: Ashland Source: This comment was sent to you by the individual named above via the Wild Mount Ashland website at http://www.mountashland.com. Comments are individually submitted through the site and represent the concerns and opinions of the sender and do not necessarily represent those of Wild Mount Ashland. From: To: Date: Subject: "Adrian Dorris" <azd@hakatai.com> <council@ashland .or.us> 10/1/03 8:48AM Opposing Mt. Ashland Expansion Dear Council Members: I passionately and vehemently oppose any further development of the Mt. Ashland Ski Area, especially in our pristine and delicate watershed area. This proposal makes no environmental, fiscal, or "recreational" sense. Recently, I purchased a map of all Ashland-area trails, made possible by the good work of the Ashland Wildlands and Trails Association. On the back of this map, there are some rules for hiking, biking, and just being present in the watershed. And while I'm drawing on memory here, the gist of those rules are as follows: 1 ) no camping; 2) no tree cutting without a permit; 3) no explosive devices or fireworks; 4) no smoking; and, 5) no motorized vehicles. I agree with all of these rules and currently have no problem abiding them. I imagine theywere established to protect an environmentally sensitive area from fire and potential contamination. And since I count on the water that comes from this area for my health and survival, these rules make complete sense to me. Also recently, I hiked the proposed Mt. Ashland ski expansion area, which, for some strange and heretofore unknown reason, just happens to be in our public watershed. Now, I'm no ski development expert, but I imagine that such an expansion would require at least one of the following: 1) tree cutting (70 acres or 2 million board feet. Do you need a permit for this?) 2) blasting of massive boulders to clear the runs (perhaps Mt. Ashland can fund and host next year's 4th of July celebrations) 3) equipment and timber transport via motorized vehicles (this is supposed to be a roadless area). So, I'm experiencing some dissonance. I have one authority saying certain activities are verboten and another saying that these same activities are perfectly acceptable as long as they have the imprimatur of government and private enterprise. Simply, I'm confused. I do have a solution, however. Either 1) dump the Mt. Ashland ski expansion proposal and tell developers that they must abide by the same set of watershed rules that the rest of us follow or 2) begin issuing permits (available at City Hall) to the general public for camping, detonation of fireworks, firewood harvesting, and ATV vehicle operation within the watershed, This makes about as much sense as going forward with a ski expansion. On a personal note, I am thirty years old and was looking forward to learning how to ski this winter. Initially, I was going to do so on Mt. Ashland, where I would also spend large sums of money on ski rentals, lift tickets, food, and drink. However, if this expansion is approved, I will happily learn elsewhere. I cannot and will not endorse degradation of our watershed with my money or my time. Thank you for your time and attention. Sincerely, Adrian Z. Dorris 811 Roca Street Ashland, OR 97520 From: Krista Findley <kfindley2@yahoo.com> To: <council@ashland.or.us>, <awdb@aol.com>, <bedeauf@ashland.or.us>, <wild@mountashland.com > Date: 9/29/03 5:27AM Subject: Concerns About Negative Impacts of Mt. Ashland Ski Area Expansion Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by Krista Findley (kfindley2@yahoo.com) on Monday, September 29, 2003 at 08:25:36 message: Dear Ashland City Council & Mayor DeBoer, Hello. I do not live in Ashland, but I have spent summers nearby on the Rogue River and I have many friends who do live in your town and the surrounding area. I was horrified to hear of the proposed plan to expand Mt. Ashland! Please do not support this...below are some reasons why. The only certain way to protect Ashland's watershed is to avoid the highest impact actions. Expanding into the untouched Middle Branch drainage creates a risk of degrading water quality as is acknowledged in the DEIS. The DEIS, though well-intentioned, contain significant errors and omissions, especially the reseamh behind erosion and sedimentation. No reliable on-site measurements of erosion and sedimentation have been made at the ski area; instead the DEIS relies on data from Idaho with uncertain corroborative evidence from Mount Ashland. This is not sound science--we deserve better when our watershed is at risk. As has been the case in the past, the ski area may be in financial jeopardy if there are consecutive years of poor snowpack--even without the additional costs of expansion factored in. Mount Ashland is a grsat resource for the local area but due to its sporadic snowfall, variable quality snow, topography, and location far from major metropolitan centers, it will never be able to compete with regional ski areas like Bachelor, Hood, or Tahoe. We need to accept Mount Ashland for what it is and work to improve what is there before trying to compete with the bigger ski areas. We need to restore damage already caused by the existing ski area before even thinking of expanding. The current expansion alternatives all tie restoration of existing problems to construction of even more. If the planned erosion & sedimentation mitigation features of the proposed expansion should fail, our watershed will bear the brunt of the problem. Dependency on a sediment trap to capture the known increase in erosion is not security for our watershed. Sediment traps at the ski area in the 1970% and 80's failed more often than they worked according to the DEIS. A vibrant, fun, safe, and successful ski area is possible without expanding into the Middle Branch watershed. A modified version of Alternative 5 would open up diverse, new terrain, widen existing runs, help relieve congestion, and keep costs down--all with far lesser environmental impacts. By choosing to support Alternative 5 minus the expensive Moraine Lodge, expanded parking, and LC-13 lift, City Council is supporting a clean, healthy Mount Ashland while allowing the ski area to grow modestly an enhance its existing infrastructure. It is a compromise we all can live with. Thank you, Krista Findley source: This comment was sent to you by the individual named above via the Wild Mount Ashland website at www.mountashland.com. Comments are individually submitted through the site and represent the concerns and opinions of the sender and do not necessarily represent those of Wild Mount Ashland. From: To: Date: Subject: "Amber Fyfe-Johnson" <amberfyfejohnson@hotmail.com> <berteauf@ashland.or.us> 10/1/03 3:47PM MOUNT ASHLAND To whom it may concern, I grew up in Ashland for nearly my whole life, and was on the ski team throughout high school. Currently I am in medical school, with the intentions of returning to Ashland to live. The existing ski runs have provided the community what is needed to teach our kids to ski and participate in MARA. Expanding the ski area into sensitive watershed and forest areas is not an appropriate use of our watershed and the remaining unspoiled areas of the mountain. The people of this community value mountain wilderness and watershed protection more highly than enlarging ski runs. It might be better to put ski area funds into improving parking and the existing lodge rather than building more ski runs. Sincerely, Amber Fyfe-Johnson From: Scott Harding <class5paddler@yahoo.com> To: <council@ashland.or.us>, <awdb@aol.com>, <berteauf@ashland.or.us>, <wildmountashland@yahoo.com> Date: 9~29/03 11:51AM Subject: Concerns About Negative Impacts of Mt. Ashland Ski Area Expansion Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by Scott Harding (class5paddler@yahoo.com) on Monday, September 29, 2003 at 14:51:41 message: Dear Ashland City Council & Mayor DeBoer, The proposed Mount Ashland Sk~ Area expansion represents an unnecessary risk to our watershed's health, too large of a financial risk both to the City and the Mount Ashland Association, and degrades the quality of our backyard wildlands--something that contributes immeasurable to the quality of life in Ashland. The alternatives outlined in the DEIS are unacceptable because they all tie restoration of current problems at the ski area to the creation of even more problems. This is illogical. We have current erosion and sedimentation problems yet to remediata them we should create more disturbed ground, clear 70 acres of sediment-filtering forest, and install nearly two miles of trenched sewage and utility lines? This sort of reasoning may make sense to a hungry MAA but to more reason-oriented folks it just seems plain dumb. What the Forest Service neglected to mention in their presentation to city staff last week is that they have no reliable onsite data of erosion and sedimentation at the ski area despite its 40 years of operation and known problems with hillslope erosion and stream sedimentation. All of the figures they presented to you were numbers from research in Idaho--yes, Idaho--that they extrapolated to Mount Ashland. The Forest Service attempted to measure stream sedimentation below the ski area from 1978-1983 but their sediment traps overflowed or failed all but two of those years (and two questionable data points does not represent sound science yet the Forest Service ignores this problem). And now the Forest Service says that they will catch all of the increased erosion from an expanded ski area and take it off site? They are asking us to believe the unbelievable. Placing the continued health of our water supply in the trust of a sediment trap is not my idea of watershed secur! ity. Please read the DEIS yourself, especially "Adverse Environmental Impacts Which Cannot Be Avoided" (starting on p. lV-291). Do not rely on other s summaries of the document. Look at the assumptions made in that document: eroded material doesn't travel over 100 feet downslope even in a storm event (300 feet at most under certain circumstances), erosion magically decreases to insignificant levels after two years, there will be plenty of snow in the lower elevations of an expanded ski area (if you do the math on their own data there will be many times when there is less than 2 feet of snow at the base of the proposed new lifts), that a mechanical device will protect our watershed from the increased erosion (at least double what it is right now according to the DEIS). The DEIS, though well-intentioned, contain errors, unfounded assumptions, poor science, and bias. It is not the full story; remove an assumption here and an assumption there from the document and their whole case falls apart. The city would never manage its own forest lands this way. Why would be give a wink and nod to the MAA and Forest Service doing so? The 1929 agreement between the Forest Service and the City gives the city substantial power over the management of the watershed. The city's own charter charges City Council with protecting the watershed, even outside of city limits (Article IX, Section 7). The people of Ashland expect City Council to uphold its duty as prescribed by law. With all of the uncertainty, assumptions, and missing information regarding the ski expansion as proposed, I see no way that this duty can be upheld while allowing terrain expansion into the Middle Branch watershed (Alternatives 2,3, & 6 in the DEIS). I urge the Council to issue its own comments on the DEIS to the Forest Service and to uphold its duty to protect our watershed. Council must endorse either Alternative 1 (no action) or a modified Alternative 5 (no expansion into the Middle Branch; modified to use a shuttle bus in place of expanding the parking area, removing the Moraine Lodge from the bowl and placing a yurt with composting toilet facilities in its place, and removing the LC-13 lift.) Finally, I'd like to raise the point of conflict of interest and possible collusion. We all know--or should know--that the new LC-6 ski lift already sits at Town & Country Chevrolet on DeBoer family property. Mayor DeBoer is a former president of the MAA and remains in close contact with them. Are we to believe that he is being honest and straightforward in his role as a public figure and leader of City Council? Did he not recently help stall and delay the maximum housing size ordinance to benefit his family?. Did he not use his influence to rearrange the City Council race last year to stack the council his preferred way? Is he not the same mayor who ordered the felling of the controversial gingko tree at 6am to avoid public protest (violating the city's noise ordinance in the process)? There is a track record of surreptitious behavior here that needs to be examined in light of the current situation. We have the fox guarding the henhouse, all with a grin and twinkle i! n the eye. Sincerely, Scoff Harding address: PO Box 202, Ashland, OR 97520 source: This comment was sent to you by the individual named above via the Wild Mount Ashland website at www. mountashland.com. Comments are individually submitted through the site and represent the concerns and opinions of the sender and do not necessarily represent those of Wild Mount Ashland. From: To: Date: Subject: "jane hogan" <janehogan@charter.net> <council@ashland.or.us> 10/1/03 11:34AM re Mt Ashland expansion proposal Dear Members of the City Council, Thank you very much to the members who were able to attend last evenings public input meeting. I realize this whole expansion question takes a tremendous amount of your time and energy to evaluate and I thank you for giving of yourselves for public service to our town. I wanted to write before today's deadline to all of you. I really felt like I have kept an open mind about the expansion question and last evenings meeting helped me to clarify a great deal. I am a former business executive who moved to Ashland a year ago with my family including our young pre-school aged daughter. Indeed we are the type offamilythat Ashland is trying toattract tothis wonderful community. So much was said a great value last eve and I don't want to waste your precious time other than to offer a few thoughts. 1)This expansion question has tremendous consequences for the town of Ashland and I implore you to weigh in on this issue and decide what each of you feels is best for our town. This may be one of the most important decisions you will make as a council member. 2) There is so much passion and valuable scientific evidence being expressed by those against plans 2 & 6 that I pray each of you will be able to come up with a compromise that protects the Middle Fork while at the same time addressing the needs to bring an expanded ski area for beginners and novices. Ashland is a town with a greatly admired social responsibility, let us continue that legacy now with this critical issue. 3) Why would we ever want to take any risks when it comes to our watershed? We are so blessed to have a viable source for our water needs, unlike the town/area we came from. I hope we all realize in Ashland how terribly fortunate we are and not abuse that privilege. There are a great many who predict water rights and scamity will be THE issue in all of our communities before too long. 4) Please do not harm and please protect our natural resources solely for economic reasons. (I know such a decision will come back and haunt this town forever--it always does!l!) The Middle Fork is a treasure of old growth trees. Please come up with a creative solution that protects that area while also addressing many of the needs of the ski area. I know we can all come up with such a solution. Thank you for your time in reading this and good luck. Sincerely, Jane Hogan 607 Forest Street Ashland From: "Scott Kaden" <skaden@gorge.net> To: <awdb@aol.com>, <jmorrison@rvcog.org>, <dna@mind,net>, <cate@mind.net>, <cehearn@aoLcom>, <katejackson@opendoor.com>, <donlaws@mind.net> Date: 9/24/03 5:21 PM Subject: Mt. Ashland Ski Area Expansion Dear Distinguished Public Servants, On September 30, 2003, the Ashland City Council will discuss the proposed expansion at the Mt. Ashland winter sports facility. Prior to this session, I wanted to provide my interpretation of Mt. Ashland Association's (MAA's) proposed development. While I am sure you are being deluged with a wide spectrum of commentary from members of the public, I will limit my input to my concern for the long-term, economic viability of the Mt. Ashland winter sports facility. As I review the plans for expansion, I am pleased to see MAA taking strategic steps to address deficiencies in their existing ski area infrastructure ... and I see them doing so in a fashion that will favorably influence the long-term economic sustainability of the facility. The "C-6" expansion will attract additional visitation - and additional revenues -- because C-6 will ultimately provide a better snow experience for those new to winter sports, those families who desire to ski as a family, and those guests -- .young and cid alike - who prefer a more gentle, longer continuous fall-line experience. The C-6 terrain will also allow Mt. Ashland to perform at more optimal levels dUring periods of inclement weather (particularly when high winds and blowing snow closes the chairlifts higher up the mountain). The addition of a snow tubing facility not only broadens the winter recreational spectrum of this portion of the National Forest System, it will also attract additional'revenues from those guests who prefer a form of snow play that does not require, specialized recreational equipment and apparel. Lift-served snow tubing will be popular in Mt. Ashland's tharketplace and will represent a significant stream of additional revenues. MAA will be able to use snow tubing to attract a type of guest that presently doesn't frequent the Mt. Ashland facility -- a type of guest that might be willing to try skiing and snowboarding after enjoying a positive experience at the Mt. Ashland snow tubing fac ity In the long-term, I view the C-6 lift and trails and the snow-tubing facilities as having the greatest impact on the marketability of Mt. Ashland (of any of the economically feasible ski area enhancements that have been under consideration at Mt. Ashland during the last 20 years of planning). In addition to adding 400 vertical feet, and broadening the recreational appeal of the facility, these improvements will help Mt. Ashland compete head-to-head with other winter sports facilities (namely Mt. Shasta, Mt. Bachelor, and to a lesser degree Willamette Pass and Warner Canyon). New terrain, which improves a ski area's overall mix of terrain - and helps to "wind-proof" a facility - is one of the most highly desired types of ski area expansion available to an operator. Our state's winter sports facilities provide major economic assistance to the rural areas of Oregon.' Mt. Ashland Ski and Snowboard Resort is a classic example. The ski area has a combined direct and indirect impact of $8.5 million to the local economy. Each winter,'MAA employs'more than 200 people (an estimated payroll of $1,258,380.00), many from sectors of the employment that have opposite, seasonal employment peaks. But maybe more important than its sheer dollar amount, your region's winter-based tourism helps buffer the City of Ashland's tourism-based economy during .the months of November, December, and January, which as you know ara opposite of the City's peak tourism season. Out of every $'1 spent by skiers, snowboarders, and accompanying family members, it is estimated that less than 20 cents directly benefits the Ashland ski facility. Day use winter sports facilities like Mt. Ashland, create off-site demand for services provided by Ashland's restaurants, motels and B&Bs, gas stations, grocery stores, and purveyors of sporting goods and active wear. The ski industry is committed to ensuring environmentally sound development of winter sport facilities. The industry is sustainable in the long-run and it can be of tremendous benefit to a community like Ashland because it provides recreational opportunities, employment, and tax revenues that help fund schools and other essential human services. The challenge is for the City of Ashland and MAA to collaborate, in good faith, to ensure a healthy environment and an economically viable winter sports facility. I ask you to support the energy that MAA has collectively put forth on behalf of the City of Ashland and its residents. On behalf of the Pacific Northwest Ski Areas Association, I write in full support of the decision criteria used to formulate the Mt. Ashland ski area expansion. Best regards, Scott Kaden President Pacific Northwest Ski Areas Association Post Office Box 1720 Hood River, Oregon 97031 541.386.9600 (tele) 541,386,9700 (fax) The Pacific Northwest Ski Areas Association is a non-profit trade association, which represents the interests of ski and snowboard facilities located in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington. The Association's members collectively host 4.5 million visits annually, most of which occur on the National Forest System lands. CC: "Jeff Hanson" <jhanson@mtashland.com> From: To: Date: Subject: "Dr. Rick Kirschner" <dr.rick@talknatural.com> <council@ashland.or.us> 9/19/03 6:48PM I support Alternative 5 for Mt. Ashland Expansion Dear Council, Regarding the proposed expansion of the Mt. Ashland ski area, I wish to add my voice in support of Alternative 5. rve done my best to understand all the points of view and alternatives, and this one seems best to me. My main concern is that there be no clear cutting, and that our fragile watershed habitat be preserved. With global warming on the increase, and the fact that our mountain is about 1000 feet too short for fairly predictable snow years in the best of times, I think that Alternative 5 is the prudent choice to meet the needs (not wants) of almost all concerned. Sincerely, Rick Kirschner Dr. Rick Kirschner Author, Speaker http://www.talknatural.com From: To: Date: Subject: "Connie & Jeff Lynn" <lynn@jeffnet.org> <berteauf@ashland.or.us> 9/29/03 1:22PM Mt. Ashland To: Ashland City Council The City of Ashland has a responsibility to its citizens for ensuring the safety of its water supply. Neither the Forest Service nor Mt. Ashland Ski Association (MASA) has this enormous responsibility. Therefore, the City cannot rely on data presented by the Forest Service or MASA, which may be wrought with self-serving erroneous conclusions based on sketchy science. Until the City can afford to hire its own unbiased analysts, the City Council must recommend the No-Action Alternative to safeguard the City's water supply and be accountable to its residents. Though I love to ski Mt. Ashland, safe drinking water is much more important to me and the community. Sincerely, Connie Lynn 74 Granite St. Ashland From: To: Date: Subject: "Corinne Lombardi" <lombardi@mind.net> <council@ashland .or.us> 10/1/03 3:13PM Comments on Mt. Ashland Expansion Dear Council, I am in favor of the Ski Ashland expansion. Alternative 2 is a reasonable approach that solves many of the current concerns for the environment, the winter sports public and the ski area management. Promotion of outdoor sports during the winter is important to improving the health of our general population and, more specifically, our youth. Providing a safe and controtled space to do it in is the responsible approach. The area now used by Ski Ashland is well managed environmentally. The environment is minimally impacted. The area provides plenty of bathrooms, hauls trash away and limits parking to the parking lots. The plant and wild life is protected by snow coverage. When snow coverage is minimal, runs are closed to the public. This is not true of other winter sports, such as back country skiing, snow shoeing or backcountry boarding. Outside the ski resort, nature is often the bathroom, trash buried in the snow or left and parking is as far in as the vehicle can go. Contrary to popular belief, many backcountry users do not pack it out, but leave their refuse (organic and inorganic) for the next user to enjoy. The issue of safety is always important. With ticket prices set to encourage participation from all income brackets, the resort has seen a dramatic increase in use. It is great for getting folks active in the winter, but the hills are more crowded. There are limited beginner slopes, so the beginners migrate over to slopes that are often beyond their ability. This causes traffic flow problems and can result in accidents to both the new and experienced skiers. The ski patrol does a great job, but they are not police nor should they be asked to become police, Opening new beginner/intermediate terrain will relieve the congestion and remove the hazard of beginning skier/boarders on the expert runs. The ski area also provides avalanche control within the boundary but not outside the north west boundary, where many extreme boarders/skiers try out their skills. Small releases happen fairly regularly in that area. It is a matter of time until some out-of-bounds skier/boarder is caught in a slide. This risk would be managed with the expansion. · There are many logical reasons for expanding the ski resort. The arguments in opposition, while loud and repetitive, are emotional and not based in either good science or concern for the population in the valley. Once again the hysteria of the vocal minority seems to be getting more credence than the well thought out planned expansion that considers the environment and the local population. Please support the expansion. It is in the best interest of the environment and the people of the Rogue Valley. Corinne Lombardi CC: "Cindy Weaver" <cindykl l@hotmail.com> From: To: Date: Subject: <S71 marshall@cs.com> <council@ashland .or.us> 9/30/03 9:40PM Mt.Ashland expansion comment i am for the expansion.i am 32 years old .we work as a team at work.my job requires this as a member.i am sure as a team player.we come up with problems and we solve them.and this will to pass thank you, From: Malena Marvin <malenamarvin@hotmail.com> To: <council@ashland.or. us>, <berteauf@ashland.or.us>, <awdb@aol.com>, <wildmountashland@yahoo.com> Date: 9/30/03 3:54PM Subject: Concerns About Negative Impacts of Mt. Ashland Ski Area Expansion Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by Malena Marvin (malenamarvin@hotmail.com) on Tuesday, September 30, 2003 at 18:54:06 message: Dear Ashland City Council & Mayor DeBoer, While researching my thesis regarding the history of human activity in the Ashland Creek Watershed, I discovered a document, dating from 1929, that gives the City of Ashland decision-making power on matters affecting the municipal watershed. It is my understanding that this document has been amended at certain points since, but has never changed in a substantive way. Although more recent environmental legislation does take precedence, we should continue to look at this document as an emblem of a special and unique relationship between a community and the land that produces its water. Ashland is one of only two watersheds in the entire nation that possesses such an agreement with the Forest Service. My research showed that this is specifically because the citizens of Ashland have continually demanded decision-making power regarding the uses of their watershed. Such a legacy is something to be proud of, not something to ignore or take lightly, as it seems the Deboer-dominated council would like to do. When so many of our community members oppose expansion into the middle branch of our watershed, it would be callous and undemocratic to forge ahead with the expansion just because the Forest Service's ElS claims it would be alright. The truth is that the ElS is based on questionable science (as I'm sure other citizens have informed you), and that the people of Ashland are NOT in unanimous support of clearcutting 80 football fields worth of land (450 logging truck loads) out of the headwaters of our drinking supply. I did not agree with Alan's ramming through of the expansionist water inter-tie project, and I would much rather our community figure out how to conserve and protect the amazing and unique water supply we already have. I urge you, as a native-bom Ashland citizen, to listen to the people, and pass along our sentiments to the Forest Service. We do not need Ski Ashland to expand. We do not want Ski Ashland to expand. Alan can take that ski-lift off the car lot and "donate" it to a place that actually gets snow in the winter. Thanks for your time, Malena Marvin source: This comment was sent to you by the individual named above via the Wild Mount Ashland website at http://www.mountashland.com. Comments are individually submitted through the site and represent the concerns and opinions of the sender and do not necessarily represent those of Wild Mount Ashland. From: Jim McCarthy <jmccarthy@opendoor.com> To: <council@ashland.or.us>, <berteauf@ashland.or.us>, <awdb@aol.com>, <wildmountashland@yahoo.com> Date: 9/30/03 2:34PM Subject: Concerns About Negative Impacts of Mt. Ashland Ski Area Expansion Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by Jim McCarthy (jmccarthy@opendoor.com) on Tuesday, September 30, 2003 at 17:33:56 message: Dear Ashland City Council & Mayor DeBoer, As an avid skiier, and former Mt. Ashland pass holder, I am writing to express my strong opposition to the Mt. Ashland expansion. I don't think the supposed benefits of expanding the ski area into our watershed make up for the environmental impacts and loss of our precious forest. I want that forest to stay as it is! Moreover, I'm unconvinced the proposed expansion is even necessary or financially viable. The management apparently believes expansion will bring more novice skiiers to the mountain, and if they don't do it, the ski area's future will be less secure. As someone who has worked at ski areas on both coasts, I find this rationale pretty suspect. There are two big reasons that novice families may NOT come to Mt. A, and niether has to do with terrain. The reasons are: 1)The management allows hotdog skiiers the mn of the mountian. I have repeatedly observed mountain staff ignore dangerous skiing behavior, such as speeding in congested areas, that would not be tol! erated at any of the resorts I worked at. I've not seen this level of hotdogger tolerance at any other ski resort I've skiied throughout North America, and this makes even an expert skiier like myself nervous when I'm skiing there. Novices and families with kids must be scared away by this. 2) The lodge and lifts are not in good shape or attractive to novice families. The lifts seem dangerous and old, and novices are particularly sensitive to getting on shady lifts. Novice families also like to spend a lot of time in the lodge (they get tired of falling down), but that place is so poorly laid-out, I don't see non-skiing mothers and dads looking forward to spending time there while their kids are out taking a lesson. They'd probably rather drive a little further to sit in a nice lodge and know the moutain staff take their children's safety seriously. Terrain is just not the issue on their minds. So I'd say the management needs to get their act together, work on the safety atmosphere on the slopes, and re-do the current lodge and lifts, not expand. Finally, I just don't believe that an ski area that serves as the winter playground for a place that's growing as fast as the Rogue Valley has anything to worry about future attendance. What they really should worry about is efficient access. They don't take responsibility for plowing the read up there, and the state doesn't do a snappy job getting the snow plowed- it's just not a priority for them. So you end up with the read closed on the biggest powder days-- which are also some of the biggest money-making days for any ski area. Ridiculous! They should trade in that big new expansion lift they bought for a few plows and a couple big 4X4 shuttles to get folks up there from Callahan's parking lot, so skiiers can park below snowline and won't have to wait in line on a slippery, windy road in a white out behind a hundred other care. That's my two cents as an Ashland resident and skiier. Thanks for listening- Jim McCarthy source: This comment was sent to you by the individual named above via the Wild Mount Ashland website at http://www.mountashland.com. Comments are individually submitted through the site and represent the concerns and opinions of the sender and do not necessarily represent those of Wild Mount Ashland. From: To: Date: Subject: "Lynette McDqugal" <mcdougal@sou.edu> <council@ashland.or.us> 10/1/03 3:05PM Mt Ashland Expansion Comment Council members- I am writing this email as a skier/outdoor enthusiast in favor of expanding Mt Ashland terrain. I came to Ashland 6 years ago to start a new life and go back to school (SOU). Six years later, I've received a B.$. degree in Chemistry, got married and started a family. I am excited to raise a child (and later, maybe children) in this community for many reasons. One of those reasons being the outdoor opportunities that this valley provides. I am in favor of Alternative II of the expansion because more terrain needs to be opened up for more people. I hear opponents saying how they've skied/hiked through the proposed expansion area and how beautiful it is. Well, if the expansion is done properly (taking environmental concerns into ac, count), more people would also be able to enjoy the beautiful areas that have already been zoned as a recreation area. rm sure you've got a lot more emails to thumb through, so I close my comment by requesting that you come to some sort of decision. Hopefully, it will be in favor of Alternative I1. Either way, let's put this issue to rest. Lynette McDougal 364 Helman St Ashland, Or From: oso <oso@o2collective.org> To: <awdb@aol.com>, <alex@standingstonebrewing.com>, <cate@mind.net>, <cehearn@aol.com>, <katejackson@opendoor.com>, <donlaws@mind.net>, <jmorrison@rvcog.org> Date: 10/1/03 10:11AM Subject: Oppose Ski Ashland expansion Ashland City Council and Mayor, First, let me begin by saying that if I actually believed you would hear my voice, I would have spent more time preparing my statement. I have watched the Council operate over the years and have come to believe that the voices of citizens are often not heard. None the less, I am writing you today to speak out in opposition to the proposed expansion of Ski Ashland in our Municipal Watershed. As the so-called 'representative' body of this community, it is your responsibility to defend the integrity of our Municipal Watershed. The proposed expansion is short sighted and will only benefit the interests of growth and development that have taken over our community. Unchecked growth and development is destroying the character of our town. And now with this proposed expansion, it threatens to destroy the integrity of our Watershed. If you refuse to stand up to these interests and defend our Watershed, we will. In the future, history will look back at this time and recognize the government officials and bureaucrats who helped facilitate the continued destruction of ecosystems and communities as criminals. And history will remember your names. It's your choice. For the earth, Stuart O'Neill This message was sent via InternetCDS Webmail CC: <christeb@ashland.or.us>, <grimaldg@ashland.or. us> From: To: Date: Subject: "Linde M. Richards" <lmrich@mind.net> <council@ashland.or.us> 9/30/03 10:59PM mt. a comments Who really owns this mountain anyway, maybe the Shasta tribe? Maybe Takilma? Perhaps we should contact the true owners of the mountain and ask them what they think should be done. I heard a speaker in San Francisco say Native Tribes took care of this land and now because of genocide, there is really is no one to preserve it. I am very confident we are supposed to only use this land while we live here not destroy it in our lifetime for recreation, or profit, but preserve it for the 7th generation. Richard Hart, a consulting ecologist with national and international expertise in watershed and land use biophysical assessment and monitoring, supports ongoing monitoring of the watershed. Incredibly, there is no substantive ongoing environmental monitoring of the watershed. He expressed frustration that our affluent town has been unwilling to allocate resources to a municipal watershed-monitoring program. George Badura, a retired Forest Service Soil Scientist with 40 years experience in the Pacific Northwest; his last 3 decades were spent in the Ashland and other Rogue Basin watersheds. Mr. Badura has also that there is a dire need for monitoring and the Forest Service's constant deprioritization of environmental monitoring programs is a danger. Badura stressed, "Mt. Ashland has the most erosive conditions for soil anywhere." In slide after slide, Badura demonstrated erosion problems within the current ski area development. The native soil, which is largely decomposed granitics with a thin layer of protective forest material (where trees are still present), is extremely erosive and grasses are of no value in holding the granitic soil. Badura reported that the DEIS soil surveys are terdbly flawed, The DEIS does not factor in the variety of soil types on the mountain. The report extrapolates East Fork conditions onto the very different soil conditions of the Middle Fork. The Middle Fork supports 2-3 times more water than the East Fork, said Badura. In further criticism of DEIS soil surveys, Badura stated that the report uses methods that are far too general for the design and management phase of a project. He stated the soil surveys upon which the DEIS relies are more suitable for the initial planning stage of a project, and that while the DEiS claims that new soil maps and reporting are more site specific, "That is the case in name only. They are actually now more general." Notably absent from the informative presentation were Mayor DeBoer, city staff, Mt. Ashland Board Members, Mt. Ashland management, Forest Service employees, Daily Tidings reporters, and all members of the City Council except Cate Hartzell. I would like to stress in my comment that as a person who received a BS in Science interdisciplinary degree from SOU, the tendency to embrace the opinions of government scientists as the "experts" is in and of itself a contributing factor to the constant destruction of our ece systems, and the perpetual disordering of our natural world. The problem with many government scientists is the research they are instructed to do is compartmentalized and doesn't actually give a broad enough look at the implications of the destruction. For instance, a physicist from Lawrence Livermore Labs was at SOU giving a lecture about the safety of the casks she had constructed for transporting nuclear waste. Her work allowed a certain amount of radioactivity to leak, meeting certain government "allowable leaks". When asked where did the scientists arrive at that number, what studies showed that was an acceptable amount of leakage, she couldn't answer, she had been so focused on only attaining that number which implies safety but is not necessarily safe. I spoke at length with her after the lecture and she had no grasp of the larger problems with the data she had used to base her work on. It is government experts who have brought us nuclear waste, nuclear pollution, nuclear weapons, toxic food, global warming cover-ups, and next the experts will bring havoc to a one of the few remaining watersheds in the country whose ecosystem, through an intricate balance of plants and underground springs filter the water providing water for our community. As David Orr, a great scientist and educator at Oberlin College writes, "The great ecological issues of our time have to do one way or another with our failure to see things in their entirety...The disordering of ecological systems and of the great biochemical cycles of the earth reflects a prior disorder into thought, perception, imagination, intellectual priorities, and loyalties inherent in the industrial mind. Ultimately the ecological crisis is a crisis of education that purports to shape and refine the capacity of minds to think clearly, to imagine what could be and is not and to act faithfully." As city councilors, it is your duty to follow the Valdez Principles endorsed by the Ashland City Council in 1990. VALDEZ PRINCIPLES By endorsing these Principles, we publicly affirm our belief that the City of Ashland, Oregon, has a direct responsibility for the environment. We believe that we must conduct the public's business as responsible stewards of the environment and seek goals only in a manner that leaves the Earth healthy and safe. We believe that the City must not compromise the ability of future generations to sustain their needs. We recognize this to be a long-term commitment to update our practices continually in light of advances in technology and new understandings in health and envirenmental science. We intend to make consistent, measurable progress toward the ideal that these principles describe, and to apply them wherever we operate, in a manner consistent with our other obligations under law. 1. Protection of the Biosphere. We will minimize and strive to eliminate the release of any pollutant that may cause environmental damage to air, water, or earth or its inhabitants. We will safeguard habitats in creeks, ponds, wetlands, natural areas, and will minimize contributing to global warming, depletion of the ozone layer, acid rain, or smog. 2. Sustainable Use of Natural Resources. We will make sustainable use of renewable natural resources, such as water, soils and forests. We will conserve nonrenewable natural resources through efficient use and careful planning. We will protect wildlife habitat, open spaces, and wilderness, while preserving biodiversity. 3. Reduction and Disposal of Waste. We will minimize the creation of waste, and wherever possible, recycle materials. We will dispose of all wastes through safe and responsible methods. 4. Wise Use of Energy. We will make every effort to use environmentally safe and sustainable energy sources to meet our needs. We will invest in and promote energy efficiency and conservation in our operations and that of our citizens, 5. Risk Reduction. We will minimize the environmental, health and safety risks to our employees and the communities in which we operate by employing safe technologies and operating procedures and by being constantly prepared for emergencies. 6. Safe Products and Services. We will provide services that minimize adverse environmental impacts and that are safe for consumers. We will inform consumers of the environmental impacts of our services. 7. Damage Compensation. We will take responsibility for any harm we cause to the environment by making every effort to fully restore the environment and to compensate those persons who are adversely affected. 8. Disclosure. We will disclose to our employees and to the public incidents relating to our operations that cause environmental harm or pose health or safety hazards. We will disclose potential environmental, health, or safety hazards posed by our operations, and we will not take any action against employees who report any condition that creates a danger to the environment or poses health and safety hazards. 9. Environmental Directors and Managers. At least one member of management will be a person qualified to represent environmental interests, and will commit management resources to implement these Principles. 10. Annual Assessment. We will conduct and make public an annual self-evaluation of our progress in implementing these Principles and in complying with all applicable laws and regulations. Endorsed by the Ashland City Council - May 15, 1990. An old growth forest is not only irreplaceable but non-renewable, and that is science speaking. No one knows how to create an old growth alpine ecology like the one on Mt.Ashland that supports our life and gives us water, another limited resource. Drinkable water is non-renewable, more Science, not opinion.The Valdez Principles are Ken Hagen's legacy and some of you sifting here today promised at his memorial service to honor him in your future work. He left you a guide to follow and embrace. Losing Ken has been an unbearable tragedy for me, but losing his legacy hurts me more than I have words for. As City Councilors it is your role to see the big picture, and an educated person knows on a world scale the environment is being degraded quickly and we are losing to extinction 137,129 species in just the last 3 years. Distinguished scientists estimate an average of 137 species of life forms are driven into extinction every day; or 50,000 each year. The global rates of destruction: 2.4 acres per second, which is equivalent to two U.S. football fields per second 149 acres per minute 214,000 acres per day: an area larger than New York City 78 million acres (31 million hectares) per year: an area larger than Poland. Within the next hour approximately 6 species will become extinct. While extinction is a natural process, the alarming rate of extinction today is comparable only to the extinction of the dinosaurs, and it is specifically human-induced and unprecedented. Experts agree that the number one cause of extinction is habitat destruction. Quite simply, when habitat is reduced, species disappear. But all conservation is local. The line is drawn here. Will we preserve what we can of the remaining old growth that is sitting where ski runs are planned to be? Are we willing to clearcut 70+ acres of old growth, cut into an untouched roadless area, build in mountain Wetlands, add 200 new paved parking spaces on the mountain and 2 miles of power & sewage lines, a lodge in the Bowl, and impacted endemic plant populations. All for a fairly marginal ski area which gets dense, sporadic snow. The clearcutting alone on any steep mountain would carry risk, but because of the Mt. Ashland rocky soil that you can see today eroding down the mountain from previous clearcutting to make the current ski runs. Mt. Ashland provides us with drinking water and are you willing to endanger that soume? Have you ever heard of the "Cautionary Principle" in Science? It means if you are planning to do something, the burden of proof is on those who want to make changes by proving it is SAFE to do it. The evidence and my education shows it is dramatically unsafe, but because of the need of busy Ashlanders to trust in the FS experts, people in Ashland honestly believe in lies. They want to believe it is all okay, but I would assert strongly things in our world are fragile and not going to be here for us if we don't actively protect them from those who would stop at nothing to profit. Water wars are predicted and already being experienced as the global drinkable water supply shrinks due to contamination as only 1% of the water on earth is drinkable. It seems almost criminal to risk losing a drinking source for skiing. The sedimentation is already a problem from the first round of ski runs. I have been privileged to spend time on the mountain hiking and running thanks to the preservation of the mountain thus far. The problems created by the erosion on the mountain is already in need of reclamation, and visible to the naked eye. How can the city endorse an action risking our environment to build a ski run for recreation in this pristine environment? Would it honor the Valdez Principles? Would it sustain the 7th generation? Perhaps altemative 5 with the following changes would be tolerable, if the Moraine Lodge and LC-13 lift were removed, if a shuttle were used instead of new parking, and if the extended night lights were removed. And before you cast your vote, please take a hike in the proposed ski run area. It is a unique and loved environment and it is worth seeing before it is obliterated. Don't miss the meadows. They are so beautiful, rare and fresh...thus far, survivors of our destruction. Thank you, Linda M. Richards, 245 E. Nevada St. Ashland, 97520 488-1230 From: To: Date: Subject: 'q'he Richmond's" <modine@jeffnet,org> <council@ashland .or.us> 9/29/03 9:28PM say no to expansion To City Council members; Our family would like to voice our concern regarding the proposed Mt. Ashland expansion. In addition to the threat to water quality, our concern is in protecting one of the few remaining affordable and family oriented ski areas in the country. My husband and I are from Salt Lake City and worked in the ski industry there during the 1980s and early 90s. We witnessed first hand the expansion of several ski areas, and the subsequent increase in the cost of lift tickets. The end result was that for a lot of local families, winter sports at the ski areas simply werent affordable anymore. A second point is that Utah had the consistent snowfall to support those expansions, Southern Oregon can have some mild winters with Iow snowpack. We have enjoyed skiing at Mt. Ashland since our move here in 1997, and our two children are learning to ski and enjoy the mountain as well. Please consider the impact that this expansion could have on the local residents who enjoy the mountain just as it is. Sincerely; Rachel Richmond From: Benjamin M. Root <ben.roo@homepower.com> To: <comments-pacificnorthwest-rogueriver-ashland@fs.fed.us>, <council@ashland.or.us>, <berteauf@ashland.or.us>, <awdb@aol.com>, <wildmountashland@yahoo.com> Date: 10/2/03 2:26PM Subject: Concerns About Negative Impacts of Mt. Ashland Ski Area Expansion Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by Benjamin M. Root (ben.roo@homepower.com) on Thursday, October 02, 2003 at 17:25:59 message: Dear US Forest Service, Ashland City Council, & Mayor DeBoer, I am an avid snowboarder and cross country skier. So I was initially excited about the prospect of an expansion the skiable area at Mt. Ashland. However, after reviewing the pros and cons of the situaton, I can not support this proposal. The fragile environment in the proposed expansion area is much more valuable to me, this community, and the ecosystem of the entire planet, than the potential for a few extra turns in dubious snow or a few extra dollars in the hands of a few extra people. Please accept my opinion as an informed Ashland citizen, home owner, hopefull life-long resident, and avid winter athelete. Do not approve the Mt Ashland expansion project. Please contact me if you have any questions about my stance on this issue. Sincerely, Benjamin M. root address: 108 S. Pioneer St. Ashland, OR 97520 Source: This comment was sent to you by the individual named above via the Wild Mount Ashland website at http://www.mountashland.com. Comments are individually submitted through the site and represent the concerns and opinions of the sender and do not necessarily represent those of Wild Mount Ashland. From: Marguerite Peggy Sawyer <peggyl@jenet.org> To: <council@ashland.or.us>, <awdb@aol.com>, <berteauf@ashland.or.us>, <wildmountashland@yahoo.com> Date: 9/29/03 6:48PM Subject: Concerns About Negative Impacts of Mt. Ashland Ski Area Expansion Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by Marguerite (Peggy) Sawyer (peggyl@jenet.org) on Monday, September 29, 2003 at 21:48:18 message: Dear Ashland City council & Mayor DeBoer, As neighbors of Ashland, with several children who regularly use Mt. Ashland's snowboarding slopes, our family wants you to know that we are opposed to the proposed Mt. Ashland ski expansion. We appreciate Mt. Ashland for what it is: a small, local ski area that serves our community. However, with its sporadic snowfall and variable snow quality, Mt. Ashland will never be a desitination ski resort like Mt. Bachelor. Building a bigger ski area will not make deeper or more reliable snow. We are also concerned about the serious environmental damage that the ski expansion would cause in this sensitive roadless area. Expanding into the untouched Middle Branch drainage creates a risk of degrading water quality as is acknowledged in the DEIS. We need to restore damage already caused by the existing ski area before even thinking of expanding. The current expansion alternatives all tie restoration of existing problems to construction of even more. We urge you to endorse modified alternative five, As much as we love to use Mt. Ashland, we could never condone clearcutting Mt. Ashlands's slopes. We have all agreed that if you proceed with the damaging expansion, our family will stop buying season passes and discontinue all use of Mt. Ashland. Marguerite (Peggy) Sawyer and family address: 10798 Yank Gulch Road, Talent, Oregon 97540 source: This comment was sent to you by the individual named above via the Wild Mount Ashland website at www.mountashland.com. Comments are individually submitted through the site and represent the concerns and opinions of the sender and do not necessarily represent those of Wild Mount Ashland, From: <Mturbo2u@aol.com> To: <council@ashland.or.us> Date: 9/30/03 10:55PM Subject: Mt. Ashland Expansion My name is Mary Smelcar, I live at '1 '15 CYPress Circle, Ashland Oregon. I have lived here since 1988. I have been watching and invotved in the Mt. Ashland Expansion since that time. (phone 482-5822) I attended in part and watched on TV with great interest, the commentary to the City Council on the proposed Mt. Ashland Ski Area Expansion. I offer my comment for your full and equal consideration. I expect professional staff analysis and consideration of facts and the best science on this proposal. Some of what I heard in opposition to the expansion was emotional response, feelings, and at most - perceived rhetoric from anti-expansion radical viewpoints. I expect you, the elected City council, should weigh in and separate emotional view points (real emotion, granted) from real science. You should not confuse these two issues. They both have a valid place, but they do not cross over and replace each other - iea person's emotions are not science based, and science doesn't represent a person passion, values, or beliefs. The Forest Service has nothing to gain from supporting this expansion - they have a very serious charge to protect the Ashland Watershed values - you should rely heavily on their extensive scientific analysis, which was carefully reviewed by your staff as well, for City interests. People like George Sexton will go to any means, with rhetoric, emotion, and slander to sway your views. He says he represents "the citizens of Ashland" - he has no clue - he just moved here with his paid environmental obstructionist job to work on issues like this for a living. George Badura says he represents an objective view as a retired Forest Service employee - take note that he is a disgruntled retired employee, and is on the board of Headwaters, anti- expansion, and is often paid by Headwaters to represent their views and positions on soils issues. The Ski Area expansion need is extremely well documented, from a safety, children, youth, business, and balanced recreation need. There is so much other roadless area opportunity in the area - this 77 acres is no significant impact to Wagner Butte roedless area. Keep a realistic view of the whole picture, not the micro impacts. 42 Engleman spruce trees will not impact our old growth dependent species, nor a recreationist experience. A few things I did not hear mentioned - perhaps I missed them: The construction practices employed when the ski area was built decades ago, which some of the past soils issues concern arose from - are no longer of issue. Back then, they used cut slol~e excavation - in particular in some of the runs - ie baring soil, and cutting below top soils. Current construction practices are so much less impacting - That's why the FS hydrology and soils experts support the conclusion of minimal impact with this new expansion. MAA has been doing a tremendous job over the past 10 years to reduce erosion from past practicies, and their more recent construction projects show clearly, on the ground the viability of less impacting techniques that are porosed in this project. One last critical point I want you to be aware of - please carefully consider all that has been done to try and find the best solution to expansion. This debate has gone on for so many years. Don't just listen to the here and now issue of the day, There was great effort to compromise, understanding all the interests and coming to a solution that best met the needs in developing this expansion plan in 1991. There was a significant change made at that time to drop any expansion on the South side of the Mountain and to include the North side, and the knoll, Sierra Club, and Headwaters both signed on in support of this revised expansion proposal in 1991. A letter of support was written and is on record at the Forest Service. They now want to raise the bar - and once again the Forest Service and the MAA have made significant changes to be as environmentally responsive and yet still meet the basic critical need - to expand the intermediate terrain. Finally - Let the MAA make the business decisions for what's needed and affordable, and let the Forest Service make the environmental analysis decisions, City Council role is to state to the FS your expectation that water quality is protected - not mandate how that is done, If you have ANY doubt or concern - hire a paid consultant from out of the area to give you another objective evaluvation of the science. This debate reminds me of the sewer issue. Its sad that the City council chose to waste so much money (hundreds of thousands of dollars) to experiment with a wetlands project so the environmental citizens could feel good about our effort to try something out. It failed to adequately address our sewer system needs, we finally had to move on to fix the sewer treatment plant. Don't burden this expansion decision with input from City council that will cause a waste of funds, time, or overreaction to emotional issues. Do ensure that our water is adequately protected, and the Forest Service decade of analysis, shows that to be the case with this expansion proposal. Thanks Mary Smelcer From: To: Date: Subject: "Alisa Stucky" <ams@hakatai.com> <council@ashland .or.us> 10/1/03 8:12AM Oppose Ski Expansion Hello City Council Members, Please oppose any and all development in the middle fork of the East branch of Ashland Creek as well as anyand all development in our watershed. You are our elected representatives and you have the power and responsibility to protect our watershed. You should not take risks with our precious resources. As a community, we also need to stop thinking that every outdoor space is there to be plundered and developed for human recreational use. It is imperative that we value nature for what it is intrinsically and not how it can be manipulated to meet human wants. Clean Water = Life Sincerely, Alisa Stucky 811 Roca Street Ashland, OR 97520 astucky@jeffnet.org From: To: Date: Subject: Diane Taudvin <dianetara@mac.com> <berteauf@ashland,or. us> 9130103 1:14PM expansion comment > To the city council members of Ashland. > I am opposed to a ski expansion that sacrifices old ~irowth trees, > sensitive plants and jeopardizes the watershed. > I support the compromise expansion proposal offered by the Sierra club. > Please let the council wei~lh in on this to protect our beautiful · mountain. We don't really need more ski runs -- we need water and a · bit of wilderness to remain unharmed. · Thank you for all your hard work on behalf of the citizens of Ashland. · Diane laudvin · '135 Nutley St. · Ashland, Or. From: To: Date: Subject: "wil thomson" <wil@mind.net> <berteauf@ashland.or.us> 9/29/03 9:04AM Mount Ashland Dear Council members, Please step back and take a good, objective look at Mt. Ashland and the ski area. It should be obvious that any expansion of the ski area and clear cutting of more forest can only bring harm to our precarious water quantity and degrade water quality through erosion and sewage contamination. The area in question is full of granitic soils which are extremely prone to erosion. Our 75 year old water storage facility at Reeder Reservoir is barely able to keep up with demand when we have a normal rain year, and we are experiencing more drought years all the time. The best way to avoid fire disasters is to leave an old growth forest alone. Unfortunately we have destroyed most of our old growth in Southern Oregon, so the best thing we can do now is clear out underbrush, keep a diligent watch and let our trees grow. The financial viability of Mt. Ashland has always been precarious. Southern Oregon doesn't get very much snow. Some years there is barely enough to open the ski area by Christmas. I have lived here since 1989 and can't remember ever seeing long lines or unreasonable waits to use the lift's and lodge. In the mid 1990's the private owner of the ski facility couldn't succeed and the only reason we still have a facility is because the City of Ashland bought it. It is unconscionable to ask the taxpayers to provide more money to further degrade our enviornment and invest in such a risky business. Under the current leadership, the U.S. Forest Service is only concerned with making more money by any means possible, in this case timber to sell and space to lease. Please think of our quality of life and reject any expansion of the ski facilities on Mt. Ashland. Thank you. Sincerely, William Thomson From: To: Date: Subject: "Dan Thorndike" <biciloco~medfab.com> <berteauf@ashland.or. us> 9/22/03 3:58PM Mount Ashland Dear Mayor and Council Members, I have commented previously in favor of the expansion proposed by the Mount Ashland Association, and, frankly, I am beginning to suffer from what might be called "public input fatigue". Nevertheless, I feel compelled to briefly touch upon three of the matters designated by the Council as "key issues": water quality, water quantity and financial risk. As a resident of Ashland, with my family, I am certainly concerned about the quantity and quality of our water supply. As chair of the Oregon Water Commission and voting member of the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board, too, these are issues I have some familiarity with (though I stress that the opinions expressed herein are my own, and not necessarily those of the Commission or Board). Simply put, I do not believe that the proposed expansion places Ashland's water supply at any measurable risk, either with regard to quantity or quality. Mt. Ashland itself represents an environment that regularly accommodates significant snowpacks and resulting spring-to-summer melting and discharge. If significant amounts of debris were to be washed into our reservoir directly from Mt. Ashland, this would have occurred regularly already, with or without the expansion or, for that matter, with or without any ski area at all. To my knowledge, it has not. Moreover, the on-going operation of the ski area, including the proposed expansion, is carried out with systematic and specific efforts to limit and control erosion. Arguably, the natural risk of landslides, without such efforts at control, is much larger. For example, during the 1997 flood, our house, together with three others, was in the path of 10,000 cubic yards of slurried decomposed granite (not to be confused with the landslide further up the canyon). The city's geological report characterized this as a natural slide, not caused by uphill development. Although it was no fun, we were able to divert and control this slide by redirecting the waterflow, and by well-placed landscape cloth and open-mesh galvanized fencing. Had such measures been in place before the flood (as, in essence, they are at Ski Ashland), we presumably could have all stayed in bed that night. Ironically, the best thing Ski Ashland could do for our water supply would be to install signiflcent snowmaking facilities. Ashland, as most of western Oregon, is ultimately much more dependent upon snowpack than reservoirs. Unfortunately, this is not part of the proposal, nor do I believe would such a component be welcomed by those now in opposition. Finally, I do not see how the City's financial risk is increased by the proposed expansion. With or without the expansion, the City, as permit holder, bears potential financial responsibility for restoration of the permit area, but only over and above the value of Ski Ashland's assets available for that purpose. To the extent the expansion incorporates new assets, the funds potentially available from their disposition increase likewise. Moreover, an improved ski area would be much more attractive to a potential successor, further reducing the speculative possibility that the city might be at financial risk. Also, much more importantly, the expansion is designed precisely to lessen the possibility that market forces will ever force Ski Ashland to cease operation. Ski Ashland's preferred alternative is based upon years of well-thought-out analysis to determine economically justifiable, and needed, skier improvements. To stay locked in the pre-snowboard, pre-Shasta Skipark world is itself a recipe for increased financial risk for both Ski Ashland and the City. Consequently, I urge the Council to strongly support Ski Ashland's preferred alternative for the proposed Mount Ashland Ski Area expansion. Dan Thorndike 369 Granite Street Ashland, Oregon 97520 From: To: Date: Subject: "jack ward" <jward 1932@hotmail.com> <council@ashland.or,us> 9/30/03 10:10PM Mt. Ashland Expansion Ashland City Council: The citizens of Ashland depend on you to protect our watershed and our water. You are the ultimate managers of Mt. Ashland. The obvious compromise between the extremes is to support Alternative 5 which protects the middle fork and the most sensitive areas, and would be acceptable to both expansionists and conservationists. This is a no brainer. Do it. J. Ward Ashland, Oregon Instant message with integrated webcam using MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com From: Douglas Falkner <drfalkner@qwest.net> To: <comments-pacificn0rthwest-roguedver-ashland@fs.fed.us>, <council@ashland.or. us>, <berteauf@ashland.or, us>, <awdb@aoLcom>, <wildmountashland@yahoo.com> Date: 10/2/03 6:30PM Subject: Concerns About Negative Impacts of Mt. Ashland Ski Area Expansion Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by Douglas Falkner (drfalkner@qwest. net) on Thursday, October 02, 2003 at 21:29:54 message: Dear US Forest Service, Ashland City Council, & Mayor DeBoer, I am new to the area. I love skiing, but I also appreciate conservation and wildland protection. I don't think economic arguments in favor of the expansion address all the intangible assets that will possibly be threatened or damaged with such an expansion. It is nice to have a downscale ski area in our own backyard that is simple and imperfect. Our world is overtaxed on so many levels. We simply don't need to be so greedy. Let's improve what we have, repair what damage the current area needs to have repaired, and for once choose in favor of conservation values. Doing otherwise dsks our looking back with regret, perhaps in the very near future. My vote is against the expansion except for improving the existing trails and facilities. Sincerely, Douglas Falkner, MD, MHom address: 456 Drager STreet, Ashland Source: This comment was sent to you by the individual named above via the Wild Mount Ashland website at http://www, mountashland.com. Comments are individually submitted through the site and represent the concerns and opinions of the sender and do not necessarily represent those of Wild Mount Ashland. ~-rS-ara chns'--tense--'-~ ~ :'(~n-~e-i'ns A-b~~cts of ~Ski Are~a~ .................................... Pa~e From: Ellen Falkner <efalkner@qwest. net> To: <comments-pacificnorthwest-roguedver-ashland@fs.fed.us>, <council@ashland.or. us>, <berteauf@ashland.or. us>, <awdb@aol.com>, <wildmountashland@yahoo.com> Date: 10/2/03 6:34PM Subject: Concerns About Negative Impacts of Mt. Ashland Ski Area Expansion Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by Ellen Falkner (efalkner@qwest. net) on Thursday, October 02, 2003 at 21:34:19 message: Dear US Forest Service, Ashland City Council, & Mayor DeBoer, I am an average green and blue run skier. Andmy 3 children are learning age. when I go to Mt. Ashland I am definitely challenged. But for me the issue is not to have the mountain suit my needs so much as to preserve its natural beauty and protect our ddnking water. We are custodians of the environment, and I am commited to raising my family with these values. Please reconsider your expansion ideas. address: 456 Dreger STreet, Ashland Soume: This comment was sent to you by the individual named above via the Wild Mount Ashland website at http://www.mountashland.com. Comments are individually submitted through the site and represent the concerns and opinions of'the sender and do not necessarily represent those of Wild Mount Ashland. From: Chds Ammon <earthdakini@yahoo.com> To: <comments-paciflcnorthwest-rogueriver-ashland@fs.fed.us>, <council@ashland.or. us>, <berteauf@ashland.or. us>, <awdb@aol.com>, <wildmountashland@yahoo.com> Date: '10/2/03 7:07PM Subject: Concerns About Negative Impacts of Mt. Ashland Ski Area Expansion Belowisthe result ofyour feedback form. It was submitted by Chris Ammon (earthdakini@yahoo.com) on Thursday, October 02, 2003 at 22:06:41 message: Dear US Forest Service, Ashland City Council, & Mayor DeBoer, Beyond the conflicting scientific claims and the oposing opinions is this simple fact: expanding the ski mountain does nothing towards making the planet a healthier place, and in these times, this is where are attention should bo-not on making a bigger, hadder, more "tad" place to recreate. Let's not sink into further denial about the kind of changes that really needs to happen in this world. Chris Ammon Source: This comment was sent to you by the individual named above via the Wild Mount Ashland website at http://www, mountashland.com. Comments are individually submitted through the site and represent the concerns and opinions of the sender and do not necessarily represent those of Wild Mount Ashland. From: Todd Kemp <todd@ashlandcreek.net> To: <comments-pacificnorthwest-rogueriver-ashland@fs.fed.us>, <council@ashland.or.us>, <berteauf@ashland.or. us>, <awdb@aol.com>, <wildmountashland@yahoo.com> Date: 10/3/03 8:01AM Subject: Concerns About Negative Impacts of Mt. Ashland Ski Area Expansion Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by Todd Kemp (todd@ashlandcreek.net) on Friday, October 03, 2003 at 11:00:23 message: Dear US Forest Service, Ashland City Council, & Mayor DeBoer, This is my official comment on how I would like to see the public lands (City and National Forest) that make up the City of Ashland municipal waterehed and area known as the Mt. Ashland Downhill Ski Area managed in the future. It seems that the Ashland creek watemhed has been the center of controvemy on and off since Ashland was settled. There are a couple of cases of the city hiring pdvate consultants to prepare reports on sedimentation causes and soumes that continue to fill in Reeder Reservoir and reduces it s capacity to hold the city s water supply. The Forest Service has prepared severel reports over the yeare admitting that roads, read building, timber harvest and the current ski area have all escalated the rate of erosion and down-stream sedimentation in the Ashland Creek Watershed (ACW). Water has been and remains a vary important issue in Ashland. The conifer Forests that cover the mountain sides in the ACW not only provide habitat to many rere wildlife species, they also work as a protective layer that protects the highly erosive soils known as Decomposed Granite, or DG. These forests also shade the forest floor keeping it moist and cool throughout the summer months. They act as a huge sponge that soak up water in the winter and spdng and slowly releases it into the many tributaries that form Ashland Creek throughout the summer. Each time the Forest Service or the City of Ashland has harvested timber or built roads in the ACW they have in effect reduced its carrying capacity for wildlife and its ability to provide the city of Ashland s citizens with clean water. I have walked the entire watershed many times over the twelve years that I have lived in Ashland. I have walked from Wagner Butte to McDonald Peak, Wagner Glades down Weasel creek to the old Jessie Winbum property. I have performed Great Grey Owl surveys for the Forest Service, Mollusk surveys for a pdvate contrector, terrestrial salamander surveys for a pdvate client, spent countless hours with cameras trying to document the mustelid (weasels, martens and fishers) population. I have performed stream surveys, snorkeled in Ashland creek to collect data on fish species, population densities, and habitat utilization and generally spent a lot of time in the ACW. I have seen first hand the effects that reducing or eliminating the forest canopy have on the soils, creeks and wildlife. I have walked all of the existing ski runs at the current ski area during the summer months and am profoundly disappointed at how peody the mitigation efforts (wooden water-bars and sediment cellec! tion ponds) to control erosion have failed to work. Although I have still not found the time to read the entire latest Environmental Impact Statement, I have read most of it and past ElS s and EA s pertaining to this project. I feel that although lengthy and full of seemingly exhaustive study data, this document still avoids the mention of many possible effects that we know from past experience could be potentially detrimental to the health of the ACW and its many other species of inhabitants. I truly can t believe that the City of Ashland and the Rogue River National Forest are actually considering plans as large-scale and invasive as Alternative 2 or 6. I am in favor of leaving the ski area as it is and concentrating on controlling existing erosion and creating some sort of shuttle system for the skiers and Mt. Ashland employees that insist on drinking copious amounts of alcohol and then tp/ing to negotiate the treacherous Mt. Ashland access road down to Interstate 5 in the dark (addressing this problem would truly make the ski area a safer place). If the city feels that they need to do some sort of expansion than I would have to say that Alternative #5 is the closest thing to a responsible action. Even though Alternative 5 makes the most sense, I do not think added night-lights, the Moraine lodge and the LC-13 lift are good ideas and would like to see them omitted. As a resident of Ashland I want to see the City and Forest Service start truly managing the ACW for what it is. First and foremost a municipal watershed used by over 20,000 people, a Late Successional Reserve and a truly unique, special place that represents what most of these mountains looked like for tens of thousands of years pdor to our settling here. Sincerely, Todd A. Kemp address: f32 VanNess Ave. #3, Asland, Oregon, 97520 Source: This comment was sent to you by the individual named above via the Wild Mount Ashland website at http://www.mountashland.com. Comments are individually submitted through the site and represent the concerns and opinions of the sender and do not necessarily represent those of Wild Mount Ashland. We, the undersigned community members, oppose the proposed Mt. Ashland ski expansion. We feel protection of our city's drinking water supply and these pristine wildlands should be prioritized over recreational development. We feel that the Ski Ashland Board should be reorganized to give the community decision making power. We, the undersigned community members, oppose the proposed Mt. Ashland ski expansion. We feel protection of our city's drinking water supply aad these pristine wildlands should be pri~rkized over recreational development. We feel that the Ski Ashland Board should be reorganized to give the community decision making power. DATE SIGNATURE PRINTED NAME ~7~.g,.~::~' ~.~.' < >.YA ,,,,~ ., ,, . ' ~7~c', · - '~"=~ ~ . ~f T~ ~-~'~ ~D ~ ~ ~ I ' '~"~'~' .~'~ We, the undersigned community members, oppose the proposed Mt. Ashland ski expansion. We feel protection of our city's drinking water supply and these pristine wildlands should be prioritized over recreational development. We feel that the Ski Ashland Board should be reorganized to give the community decision making power. ,~D. ATE~7 //SIGI~""~RE PRINTED NAME ADDRESS We, the undersigned community members, oppose the proposed Mt. Ashland Ski expan.~l~.~We feel protection of our city's drinking water supply and these pristine wfldlancls should be prioritized over recreational development. We feel that the Ski Ashland Board should be reorganiTcd to give the community decision making power. We, the undersigned community members, oppose the proposed Mt. Ashland ski expansion. We feel protection of our city's drinking water supply and these pristine wildlands should be prioritized over recreational development. We feel that the Ski Ashland Board should be reorganized to give the community decision making power DATE SIG~I~ .A, TURE ~ PRINTED NAME ADDRESS. [/~ ~. - .... We, the undersigned community members, oppose the proposed Mt. Ashland ski expansion. We feel protection of Our city's drinking water supply and these pristine wildlands should be prioritized over recreational development. We feel that ~he Ski Ashland Board should be reorganized to give the commtlnity decision making power. DATE .SIGNATURE PRINTED NAME ADDR~=~ I-'/-~o~/,,..~'/~' gr{~ J"l[l[¢( I~,l A- ;.~.~:' ~ ~c,w ~et~' ~ ~ ~ ~i~ ~FZ ~/~/ ~'1]~'~ ~r~ . , .: '. . _ , We, the undersigned community members, oppose the proposed Mt. Ashland ski expansion. We feel protection of our ~ty s drinking water supply and these pnsune wildlands should be prioritized over recreational development. We feel that the Ski Ashland Board should be reorganized to give the community decision making power. Ve, the undersigned community members, oppose the proposed Mt. Ashland sld expansion. We feel protection of ,ur city's drinking water supply and these pristine wildlands should be prioritized over recreational development. ~e feel that the Ski Ashland Board should be reorganized to give the community deoision making power. DATE ...-SIGN, ATURE ..._ PRINTED NAME ADDRESS We, the undersigned community members, oppose the proposed Mt. Ashland ski expansion. W~ feel protection of our city's drinking water supply and these pristine wildlands should be prioritized over recreati,' hal development. We feel that the Ski Ashland Board should be reorganized to give the community decision making power. We, the undersigned community members, oppose the proposed Mt. Ashland ski expansion. We feel protection of our city's drinking water supply and these pristine wildlands should be prioritized over recreational development. We feel that the Ski Ashland Board should be reorganized to give the community decision making power. DATE .~SlGN~TURE PRINTED NAME ADDR, ESS, I~.;l~t' ~3~ ~'~,tI,W~r~,~ 5d,~ ~ ~ /~,~ ~.; We, the undersigned community members, oppose the proposed Mt. Ashland ski expansion. We feel protection of our city's drinking water supply and thesepristine wildlands should be prioritized over recreational development. We feel that the Ski Ashland Board should be reorganized to give the community decision making power. III We, the undersigned community members, oppose the proposed Mt. Ashland ski expansion. We feel protection of our city's drinking water supply and these pristine wildlands should be prioritized over recreational development. We feel that the Ski Ashland Board should be reorganized to give the community decision making power. D4TE ,~ I~II~iI'4A'I'U RE. PRI,N'~.D NAME ADDRESS /2.'/'Z~ /,~l'/a~ ~-~ow.... -~ Fo=,~e_r '-/z)~'z_ :Dl~er ~'~1--. '~ (' "/r ' ~9/~ :~-~,~ ~a ~,:,~er~ ~LT~~ -' , / t~'lO~ ~ ~) '~,~ ~ ~, --. ,, -,~ .,,. -,-. 't~.41~ ~3~, (~ff ~:o~ ~ ,, a ,, ,, ,, ,, We, the Undersigned community members, oppose the proposed Mt. Ashland ski expansion. We feel protection of our city's drinking water supply and these pristine wildlands should be prioritized over recreational development. We feel that the Ski Ashland Board should be reorganized to give the community decision making power. We, the undersigned community members, oppose the proposed Mt. Ashland ski expansion. We feel protection of our cit,y's drinking water supply and these pristine wildlands should be prioritized over recreational development. We feel that the Ski Ashland Board should be reorganized to give the community decision making power. DATE SIGNATURE PRINTED NAME ADDRESS "~'~ ~ ~f&f '1 ~' ' ' ~ ' " ' We, the undersigned community members, oppose 'the proposed Mt. Ashland ski expansion. We feel protection of our city's drinking water supply and these pristine wildlands should be prioritized over recreational development. We feel that the Ski Ashland Board shoUld be reorganized to give the community decision making power. We, the undersigned community members, oppose the proposed Mt. Ashland ski expansion. We feel protection of our city's drinidng water supply and these pristine wildlands should be prioritized over recreational development. We feel that the Ski Ashland Board should be reorganized to give the community decision making power. DATE qNATUR~E~, 7 PRINTED NAME ADDRESS ~1~ ~ F~ 1~4 ~ ~/L ~ ',. i/~ ~ We, the undersigned community members, oppose the proposed Mt. Ashland ski expansion. We feel protection of our city's drinking w.ater supply and these pristine wildlands should be prioritized over recreational development. We feel that the Ski Ashland Board should be reorganized to give the community decision making power. DATE ~,IGI~ATUP~E PI~INTED NAM~ ADDRESS ' , ~-fi, ~.~/~'~', ~'~ '%%6 R Ig~U¢~ ~4. We, the undersigned communiLy members, oppose the proposed Mt. Ashland ski expansion. We feel protection of our city's drinking water supply and these pristine wildlands should be prioritized over recreational development. We feel that the Slci Ashland Board should be reorganized to give the community decision making power. We, the undersigned community members, oppose the proposed Mt. Ashland ski expansion. We feel protection of our city's drinking water supply and these pristine wildlands should be prioritized over recreational development. We feel that the Ski Ashland Board should be reorganized to g~ve the community decision making power. DATE SlI~IATURE PRINTED NAME ADDRESS t'l~lo~ ~~~. ~on~ ~n;,,~ i+~' mitt ~%dl We, the undersigned community members, oppose the proposed Mt. Ashland ski expansion. We feel protection of our city's drinking water supply and these pristine wildlands should be prioritized over recreational development. We feel that the Ski Ashland Board should be morgan/zed to give the community decision making power. DA~ r-.~IGNCq-"URE PRINTED NAME ADDRESS //¢/o'z. ¢¢.t-¢ -¢.,~l,~.",,y, ' I ? 9 'T4z-.,/., J'~ / -<: ..~4.....~_-F_,Z-~,~',, u . /~.--,--:~':¢ ~ 2~ ~. / ~n~< r-- We, the undersigned community members, oppose the proposed Mt. Ashland ski expansion. We feel protection of o r city s drinking water supply and these pristine wildlands should be prioritized over recreational development. We feel that the Ski Ashland Board should be reorganized to give the community decision making power. We, the undersigned community members, oppose the proposed Mt. Ashland ski expansion. We feel protection of our city's drinking water supply and these pristine wildlands should be prioritized over recreational development. We feel ~hat the Ski Ashland Board should be reorganized to give the community decision making power. DATE _ SIGNAIURE PRINTED NAME ADDRESS '/' "-' ~ s ~.l ~ 7..,.N~..Z c. We, the undersigned community members, oppose the proposed Mt. Ashland ski expansion. We feel protection of our city's drinking water supply and these pristine wildlands should be prioritized over recreational development. We feel that the Ski Ashland Board should be reorganized to give the community decision making power. We, the undersigned community members, oppose the proposed Mt. Ashland ski expansion. We feel protection of our city's drinking water supply and these pristine wildlands should be prioritized over recreational development. We feel 'that the Ski Ashland Board should be reorganized to give the community decision making power. We, the undersigned community members, oppose the proposed Mt. Ashland ski expansion. We feel protection of our city's drinking water supply and these pristine wildlands should be prioritized over recreational development. We feel that the Ski Ashland Board should be reorganized to give the community decision making power. DATE .---~GNATUBE PRINTED NAME ADDRESS I! October 7, 2003 Dear Councilors, I am hoping that in your deliberations tonight regarding the Mt. Ashland Expansion Project you will keep several things in mind. There has been much made of this project since the original acceptance of the Master Plan. I realize that there are divergent views of the world based on your own personal perspectives. We all tend to color our current reality based upon those views. True objectivity is difficult to come by. I understand the passions and depth of feelings that the anti-expansion element is feeling. To take a look at the condition of the world's environment today is indeed alarming. I also understand that the Forest Service may be paying for their past sins. No one can effectively argue that the USFS did not have a commodity based view of the world in the past. However, the dedication and expertise of our Ashland Ranger District foresters and the multitude of highly educated and eco-health minded scientists that have been involved in this project should be beyond reproach. These individual have no preset agenda, no axes to grind or any vested interests in this project. The exhaustive compilation of the data in the DEIS is a true testament to their dedication and expertise. One only has to read the document to come to this realization. To dismiss and disregard this document as inadequate can only be construed as biased based on a reactive view of our global environment. The world situation cannot be equated to our local situation. In addition, the dedication and expertise of the City of Ashland Public Works staff, the Finance Department staff, the City Attorney, the City Fire Chief and the staff at City Administration is extraordinary. To dismiss their input and not support this project would be an affront to their dedication and expertise. With the overwhelming informed and expert evaluation that the impact on the Ashland Watershed is insignificant, the only responsible conclusion that council can honestly come to is in support of the findings of the DEIS and Alternative 2. Anything less is simply disregarding the data. I am counting on you all to step forward with your strong support of this project. It will only add to the livability and charm to our beautiful city. Sincerely, Gary MacGraw Laurie MacGraw 423 Lit Way Ashland, Oregon Jan.,Feb. Snow Depth (Inches-Averaged) % % % % % ~% Snow Depth (inches) CITY OF -ASHLAND Council Communication Title: Date: Submitted By: Approved By: Synopsis: Request for Authorization to Participate in Downtown Planning Charrette - Copeland Lumber Block Planning Deparhnent October 7, 2003./~ ' John McLaughlin, Director of Com~y Development Gino G-rimaldi, City Administrator x~o,~. Local developers Russell Dale and Evan Archerd will be holding a public charrette process for the Copeland Lumber site. Bill Lennertz will be leading the charrette, with OBD Architects from Portland assisting with the presentation of designs and graphic materials. Local professionals will also be on the charrette team, including local architect Jerome White, historic consultant George Kramer, and landscape architect John Galbraith. A pre-charrette kick-offmeeting is scheduled for October 30, 2003. This meeting will allow for a description of the process, as well as an introduction of the team members involved with the process. The actual charrette is scheduled for the first week of December (approximately December 1-4). The developers are looking at opportunities for addressing concerns regarding downtown development, and using the charrette process as a tool to incorporate public input in a design process. From the National Charrette Institute, the description cfa charrette "is a collaborative planning process that harnesses the talents and energies of all interested parties to create and support a bulldable plan." Since the Copeland site is adjacent to the City parking lot at the comer of Pioneer and Lithia Way, it would appear to be in the City's interest to participate in the Charrette, both as a property owner, and the governing body regulating development in the downtown area. Further, the City's Housing Action Plan encourages affordable housing utilizing the City's surface parking lots. (Utilize)Existing city-owned surface parking lots in or in close proximity to the downtown. These sites could be targeted for application of recently enacted vertical housing development tax exemptions. The new law provides a partial tax exemption for certified projects that include a ground floor or lower floors occupied by commercial uses and one or more upper floors of residential uses. The allowable exemption is for 20% of assessed value on land and improvements for each floor up to four floors of residential use with a maximum partial tax exemption of 80%. Other than these relatively small lots, the City does not own any parcels suitable for affordable housing development. The current Downtown Plan (1988) also contains the following regarding downtown housing: · Although downtown housing was thought to be incompatible with the development of urban centers, in recent years the value of a downtown resident population has increased. The downtown resident's round-the-clock eyes and ears reduce crime. Downtown apartments suit many lifestyles - that of the single person, student, actor, writer, and senior. They offer independence from automobiles in a stimulating urban atmosphere. · Downtown housing also provides a profitable use for second and third stories which often stand vacant .... Housing should be introduced downtown on upper stories. · Permit housing downtown above the ground floor as an outright use, with special regulations that consider the unique needs of downtown housing. The City has historically considered surface parking lots as opportunity areas for activities that could provide a public benefit. Past actions include the temporary use of the Winburn Way parking lot as a skating rink in the winter, former use of the Water Street parking lots for the Grower's Market, and the recent partnership with OSF on using the Hargadine parking lots for a portion of the new theater and construction of a new parking structure, increasing overall downtown parking. Recommendation: Staffrecommends that the City participate in the charrette process for the Copeland block, both as a property owner of the Lithia/Pioneer parking lot, and as the governing body for downtown development. Further, such participation shall be geared towards looking at potential oppommiti~s for positive development options for the City's property including affordable housing, as wall as participating regarding the overall interests of the downtown core. Fiscal Impact: City participation will result in stafftime being expended on the project. However, it is a focused procoss with a limited time flame. The City may also participate in the public noticing of the charrette process, to ensure broad based public involvement. Consultant costs, as well as the provision of meeting facilities, will be borne by the developers. Background: A letter previously sent to the Council fi.om Russell Dale and Evan Archerd is attached, as well as a description of the eharrette process and a map of the potential redevelopment area. ARCHERD & DRESN ER LLC ~O. BOX 699 ASH LAND, OR 97520 September 9, 2003 Mayor and City Council City of Ashland 20 Main Street Ashland, Oregon 97520 Dear Mayor and Council Members; We would appreciate it very much if you would defer taking further action on the "Big Box Ordnance", or limit its scope to those areas outside of the downtown area, subjed to a variance procedure, until a public charrette can be conduded that would allow the public and stakeholders an opportunity to participate and understand the scope and consequences of the proposal, for the following reasons; l) During the public discussion process the draft ordnance did not pertain to the downtown area. 2) The downtown area is a very sensitive and special area that serves as the focal point of our economic basis and deserves special consideration. 3) There are only seven or eight possible opportunity sites in the downtown area that are either underutilized or are occupied by strudures that are at, or near, the end of their economic lives. 4) It is very unlikely that any of these opportunity sites are going to be utilized by out of town, site-specific, mono-use developers in the immediate future. 5) It is in the City's best interest if local community builders who are sensitive to the need for investment in our cultural center and who are responsive to solving long-term, village-wide problems, be involved and participate in the development of these very special sites. 6) The existing downtown plan and specific site design standards require a process and level of scrutiny that currently precludes undesirable consequences but does nat discourage creativity and problem solving mechanisms that are necessary for long term adaptability. Page Two - "Big Box Ordnance" We respectfully request that we be allowed to speak briefly at the September 16'h City Council meeting about the upcoming public charrette that is planned for October 2003. The charrette will incorporate a community-wide input process which will help illuminate the needs, values and how our remaining opportunity sites can best be used to answer our long term goals. Russell Dale 585 Allison Ashland, Oregon 97520 Evan Archerd 120 N. Second Ashland, Oreg ~treet 97520 the Charrette Process as an Agent for Change http://www.charretteinstitute.org/charrettes/article.htrnl Techniques Get all interested parties and key stakeholders on a bus and visit places that can serve as models for the project. These tours can be invaluable In getting a shared set of visual references for the Charrette. For example, when the discussion turns to something as specialized, yet critical, as curb radii, referring to that partlcelar corner in Leesburg can quickly bring clarity to the problem. The Final Public Presentation Crowd Control How do you handle an unpredictable flow of people visiting the studio and get anything done? A core production team needs to be working continuously. Therefore, it is crucial to have a person dedicated to greeting visitors. Information is delivered to the design team from the greeter and those attending meetings with stakeholders. The Charrette Gallery One way to Involve a la~ge number of visitors is to establish a gallery of ongoing work at the entrance area of the Charrette studio. When visitors arrive they are greeted and shown the ongoing work without disturbing the design team. The greeter explains the work and records their ideas. Of course, anyone with an importa~qt role, such as adjacent landowners OF poliUcal representatives may need to work with a designer, but generally these people are Involved through scheduled meetings. This article Is an excerpt from the forthcoming book The Charrette Workbook, a tool for the New Urbanism by Bill Lennertz © 2003 National Charrette Institute 3439 NE Sandy Blvd. #349} Portland, OR 97232 tel: (503) 233-8486 fax: (503) 233-1811 emalh Info@charretteinsUtute.org 4 of 4 10/1/03 2:37 PM the Charrette Process as an Agent for Change http://www.charretteinstitute.org/charrettes/article.html Healthy Communities What Is a Charrette? Dynamic P{annlng Mission & Values People Programs/Products News & Updates Clients & Feedback Connections Contact The Charrette Process as an Agent for Change Wlnter~ 1999 By B_[U_L.eJ~IZ for New Urban News The term Charrette is being used these days to describe anything from a fifteen minute presentation to a week-long, 14 hour a day design marathon. A Charrette is not as simple as getting everyone around a map and handing out pens. A real Charrette bungs about real change- change to a plan, change in people's understanding of a problem, and even political change. For the uninitiated, a Charrette is a dgorous and Inclusive planning process undertaken by an Inter-disciplinary design team over a brief Ume period. The term charrette is derived from a French word moaning "little cart" and refers to the final intense work effort expended by architecture students to meet a project deadline. At the Ecele des Beaux Arts in Paris during the 19th century, proctors circulated with carts to collect final drawings, and students would Jump on the cha. =~.~.¢ with their work and frantically put finishing touches on their drawings. ~l~ls Intense bura-t of activity Is similar to the environment of the Charrette process described in this article. The result of the modem-day Charmtte is not Just momentary, but profound change. After a Charrette, people have been heard to say: "! have been prectldng transporteflon engineering for 20 years and unUI today ! never knew why the fire depertrnent needs 20 feet of street clearance," or "Now ! understand why alleys are so important," or "This Is the most exciting professional experience I have had since college," and "I may not agree with the entire proposal, but my concerns were Iletened to and considered; ! like how ! was treated." Achieving such change requires a carefully planned and orchestrated process that starts well before the actual Charretta and continues long after it. Four Principles of the Charrette Process There are four guiding principles for a Charrette that brings about real change: Xnvolve Everyone from the Start That Is, anyone who might build, use, sell, approve or attempt to block the project. When Involved at the inception, people are more likely to contribute their unique talents and vlev~polnts for the betterment of the project. Local citizens, offldals, and approval board representatives meet and work with the design team throughout the Charmtte to create a plan, which incorporates their concerns. The Charrette process gives the plan mutual authorship and a vision shared by all participants. This is especially Important for those who will offidally review the plan for a public agency or body. Having contributed to It, they are in a position both to understand and to support Its rationale. This approach is initially more work, but, in the long nJn, it will save Umo in rework and most certelnly produce a higher quality product with a greater chance of implemontation. Work Concurrently and Cross-Functionally ~ All design work must be done cencurrontiy by a cross-functional team that usually tndudes architects, planners, engineers, economists, market experts, staff, and citizens, incorporating usar input, so that decisions are measurable and realistic every step of the way. This cress-functional team worldeg together from the beginning, further assures elimination of rework because the design work Is continually reBecting the wisdom of each specialty, During the Charrette, the 1 of 4 10/1/03 2:37 PM the Charrette Process as an Agent for Change Ill http ://www.charretteinstitute.org/charrettes/article.html collaboration of the design and development disciplines also help to ,,~, I I ' ii u:_ produce a set of finished documents that address all aspects and phases of a Tile [cole des Beaux project. Detailed designs are ,&-ds 'charrette' undertaken individually or in small groups. At other times, larger caucuses occur, and often there are simultaneous meetings. Periodically everyone gets together for a briefing, discussion or presentation. Work in Short Feedback Loops A feedback loop happens when a design is proposed, reviewed, changed, and represented for further review. The shorter this cycle, the greater the level of influence and buy-in by the reviewing parties. In conventional planning precosses, the design team presents plans to the community and Input is gathered through various methods such as surveys, or small discussion groups. The designers then retreat to their office and return weeks later with a revised plan. Often during these weeks, some degree of misunderstanding occurs In the community. People who attended the meeting come away with different undemtandlngs. People, who don't like to speak in public, speak to others In the parking lot afterwards. The result is often a crystallization of opinions against the plan that send the design team back to step one. In a Charrette, the participants are told to come back the next evening to review the changes. The misunderstandings are resolved quickly before they have had a chance to crystallize. With convenUonal planning methods the design and feedback cycle can last up to four to six weeks. The Charmtte shortens it to 24 hours. During the day, and often late into the night, the Charrette studio is a forum for Ideas with the unique advantage of this immediate feedback. At the same Ume that someone is designing a street, another Is locating a tree, and an engineer is determining the effects on drainage, Questions to design problems are answered on the spot. Nost importantly, simultaneous brainstorming and negotiation during a Charrette can change minds and encourage unique solutions to problems. The number and variety of solutions and ideas generated and considered is far greater than those under conventional planning methods, A better product results from this creative effort. Work in Detail True buy-in can only be achieved by designing in detail. This way the cdtlcal issues are surfaced and addressed. This can only be accomplished by looking at the details (building types, block sizes, and public space) and the big picture (site circulation~ transit, land use, and major public amenities), concurrently. Studies at these two scales also Inform each other and reduce the likelihood that a fatal flaw will be overlooked In the plan. The Four Step Charrette pr~___~ The following steps detail the Charrette process: Step I: Stsrt-Up The purpose of the start-up phase is to ensure the best project process Is developed by the entire project team. The project team holds a one-day meeting to design the Charrette process and reach agreement on desired outcomes of the Charrette, a list of key stakeholders, outreach plans, schedules, roles and responsibilities, and the preparation plan for the Charcette. The first public meeting Is planned and schedduled. The underlying mission here Is to ensure that all the right Information and all the rtght people are at the Charrette. Step 2: Research, Educationi and Concepts At the Charrette, the team needs to be confident that it has all the resources necessary to make accureta design and strategy decisions. To ensure this, all relevant base data are colleeted and analyzed, participants are educated about the project, the process, and their role In it, and input is gathered from stakeholders. A kick-off public meeting Pre-Charrette Site is held to introduce the project and to Tour and Analysis ask citizens for their opinions of the base data, their Interest In the project, and their needs. [t Is essential that 2 of 4 10/1/03 2:37 PM the charrette Process as an Agent for Change http://www.charretteinstitute.org/charrettes/article.html collaboration of the design and - -- -, development disciplines also help to ~'~ ,r~',, produce a set of finished documents that address all aspects and phases of a The Ecole des ~eaux project. Detailed designs are .~rts 'eltarrette' undertaken Individually or In small groups. At other times, larger caucuses occur, and often there are simultaneous meetings. Periodically everyone gets together for a briefing, discussion or presentation. Work in Short Feedback Loops A feedback loop happens when a design is proposed, reviewed, changed, and represented for further review. The shorter this cycle, the greater the level of Influence and buy-in by the reviewing parties. In conventional planning processes, the design team presents plans to the community and input is gathered through various methods such as surveys, or small discussion groups. The designers then retreat to their office and retum weeks later with a revised plan. Often during these weeks, some degree of misunderstanding occurs In the community. People who attended the meeting come away with different understandings. People, who don't like to speak in public, speak to others In the parking lot afterwards. The result Is often a crystallization of opinions against the plan that send the design team beck to step one. In a Char~tte, the participants are told to come back the next evening to review the changes. The misunderstandings are resolved quickly before they have had a chance to crystallize. With conventional planning methods the design and feedback o/de can last up to four to slx weeks. The Charrette shortens It to 24 hours. During the day, and often late Into the night, the Charrette studio Is a forum for Ideas with the unique advantage of this immediate feedback. At the same Ume that someone Is designing a street, another Is locating a tree, and an engineer Is determining the effects on drainage. Questions to design problems are answered on the spot. Host ImpertanUy, simultaneous brainstorming and negotiation during a CharreL~e con change minds and encourage unique seluflons to problems. The number and variety of seluflons and Ideas generated and considered Is far greater than those under convenUonal planning methods. A better product results fiom this creative effort. Work in Detail True buy-in can only be achieved by designing In detail This way the critical Issues are surfaced and addressed. This can only be accomplished by looking at the details (building types, block sizes, and public space) and the big picture (site circulation, transit, land use, and major public amenities), concurrently. Studies at these two scales also inform each other and reduce the likelihood that a fatal flaw will be overlooked In the plan. The Four Step Charrette Pr~__~_~ The following steps detail the Charrotte process: Step 1: Start-Up The purpose of the start-up phase is to ensure the best project process is developed by the entire project team. The project team holds a one-day meeting to design the Charretta process and reach agreement on desired outcomes of the Charrette, a list of key stakeholders, outreach plans, schedules, roles end responsibilities, and the preparation plan for the Charratte. The first public meeting Is planned and scheduled. The underlying mission here Is to ensure that all the right Information and all the right people ara at the Charrette. Step 2: Research/Education, and Concepts At the Charrette, the team needs to be confident that It has all the resources necessary to make accurate design and strategy decisions. To ensure this, all relevant base data are collected and analyzed, participants are educated about the project, the process, and their role In it, and Input Is gathered fcom stakeholders. A kick-off public meeung ~re-Charrette Site is held to Introduce the project and to Tour and .4~lysis ask citizens for their opinions of the base data, their Interest In the project, and their needs. It Is essential that 2 of 4 10/1/03 2:37 PM the Charrette Process as an Agent for Change http://www.charretteinstitute.org/charrettes/article.html all participants be treated with respect. People should leave the meeting wanting to come back. They should feel a sincere interest on behalf of the project leaders that their participation is critical and will make the project better. Some Initial development concepts are often sketched and tested in-house, as part of Step Two, for purposes of determining a range of feasible options, exposing areas requiring further research, and to allow the designers to get their hands dirty with the project so that they can work more efficiently during the Charrette. Step 3: Charrette, "The best plans are made by many hands" The design team establishes a full working studio on or near the site, complete with drafting equipment, supplies, computers, copiers, and fax machines. Design, engineering, production, marketing, sales, and all levels of project management are assembled for approximately one week. The first day features tours of the site followed by a team meeting and meetings with key individuals. In the evening a public meeting is held featuring a lecture on the Principles of Town Planning followed by an open public discussion. During the day, while a core design team Is working on developing the plan, meetings are held with staff, landowners, developers, and interested citizens. The plans are continually revised in response to the constant flow of Input beth from pertidpents and from other team members. The studio Is open to the public at all times. The Charrette catches people who usually slip through the cracks. The day and night meetings accommodate people's various schedules. Over the three days, word gets out to those who n~y not have heard of the event, and they start showing up. open public review of the day's work, resembling a traditional architectural "pin-up." These sessions prevlde the powerful short feedback loops that are crucial to the success of the Charrette. Because all stakeholders are present, everyone's perspective is heard and the perceptions of problems change. Participants learn that the prelect is mere complex they first thought, and The Design Studio that there are other needs that must be accommodated. People should feel that their concerns are legitimate and have been addressed in the plan. Since it is not uncommon for more than 60% of the bartlclpants to come to every The Charrette ends with a final public presentation. The entire plan is presented In slide format. For those who have followed the Charrette fi'om the first evening, the Impact Is dramatic. The atmosphere reminds many of college design studios where weary students present their set of finished drawings. Virtually all final presentations end wlth a round of applause from the local participants who appredete the sincere work from the design team, who have lived In their town fur a week. Some presentations have been held In conjunction with city council meetings. At one memorable Char~tte held in Stuart, Florida, the council voted to accept the Charrette recommendations on the spot. After the Char~tte it Is Important to quickly review the work, make any necessary adjustments and get back to the public for a last look. To the greatest extent passible, criUcol stakeholders should be involved In the testing for market, financial, physical, and pelltical foaslblllty. A final public review Is held, sometimes on two consecutive evenings with a team work session in between. This can help to catch those who missed the Charrette. The two meetings also allow people who felt left out of the Charrette the oppertunlty to see their concerns addressed before the final plan is adopted. On the first evening, the revised Charrette plan Is presented and comments are recorded. The next day the planning team makes any necessary changes to reflect the new Input and they present the plan one more Ume at a public meeting on the second night. The team con then proceed to make final revisions and submit a final plan. A Few Helpful Charrette 3 of 4 10/1/03 2:37 PM the Charrette Process as an Agent for Change http://www.charretteinstitute.org/charrettes/article.html Techniques Get all interested parties and key stakeholders on a bus and visit places that can serve as models for the project, ql~ese tours can be invaluable in getting a shared set of visual something as specialized, yet critical, as The Final Public curb radii, referring to that particular Presentation comer in Leesburg can quickly bring clarity to the problem, Crowd Control How do you handle an unpredictable flow of people visiting the studio and get anything done? A core production team needs to be working visitors. [nformation is delivered to the design team from the greeter and those attending meetings with stakeholders. The Charrette Gallery One way to Involve a large number of visitors is to establish a gallery of ongoing work at the entrance area of the Charrette studio. When visitors arrive they are greeted and shown the ongoing work without disturbing the design team. ~l~e greeter explains the work and records their ideas. Of political representatives may need to work with a designer, but generally these people are involved through scheduled meetings. This article is an excerpt from the forthcoming book The Charrette Workbook~ a tool for the New Urbanism by Bill Lennertz © 2003 National Charrette Institute 3439 NE Sandy Blvd. #349, Portland, OR 97232 tel: (503) 233-8486 fax: (503) 233-181! email: infoOcharretteinstitute.org 4 of 4 10/1/03 2:37 PM Page Two - "Big BoX Ordnanceu We respectfully request that we be allowed to speak briefly at the September 16*h City Council meeting about the upcoming public charrelte that is planned for October 2003. The charrette will incorporate a community-wide input process which will help illuminate the needs, values and how our remaining opportunity sites can best be used to answer our long term goals. Russell Dale 585 Allison Ashland, Oregon 97520 Evan Archerd 120 N. Second Ashland, Oreg ~treet 97520 CITY OF -ASHLAND Council Communication Title: Dept: Date: Submitted By: Police Chief Recruitment Administration October 7, 2003 Gino Grimaldi, City Administrator Synopsis: The city of Ashland is currently in the process of recruiting for a new Police Chief. Interviews are scheduled for November 6th and 7th, 2003. Staffis requesting that two members of the City Council be selected to participate in the interview process. Recommendation: Select two members of the City Council to participate in the interview process for the selection of a new Police Chief. Fiscal Impact: None. Background: The interview process will consist of three panel interviews, a hospitality event open to the community and an interview with the City Administrator. It is anticipated that five to seven candidates will participate in the interview process. The city's department heads and City Recorder will participate on one panel. A second panel will consist of a City Councilor, representatives from the District Attorney's Office, Oregon Shakespeare Festival, Southern Oregon University, the local chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and a law enforcement manager from outside of the Ashland Police Department. A third panel will consist of a City Councilor, representatives from Peace House, the Ashland Chamber of Commerce, Ashland Community Hospital, the Ashland School District and a law enforcement manager from outside of the Ashland Police Department. Specific individuals have not been contacted to serve on the interview panels. The actual makeup of the panels may change due to scheduling conflicts. In addition, efforts will be made to balance the panels based on gender. City Councilors participating in the process will work with the recruitment firm and the City Administrator to formulate the questions used by the interview panel. Representatives from the recruitment firm will provide staff support to each panel. Community members and members of the Ashland Police Department will be invited to attend a reception for the candidates. This will provide those attending an opportunity to briefly engage with the candidates in a social setting. Feedback forms will be available for those that wish to provide comments regarding the candidates. At the end of the interview process it is anticipated that one to three top candidates will emerge. Follow- up interviews with the City Administrator may take place to explore in more detail issues identified by the interview panels. An extensive background check and site visit (if the successful candidate is from outside of the area) will take place prior to City Council action regarding the appointment of the Police Chief. According to the City Charter, the Mayor makes appointment of the Police Chief with confirmation by the Council. Attachments: None. CITY OF kSHLAND Council Communication TITLE: DEPT: DATE: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: Synopsis: Recommendation: Fiscal Impact: Background: Seventh annual report on implementation of the Valdez Principles Electric & Telecommunication October 07, 2003 Dick Wandersc ~J(...~[~~ Gino Gfimaldi{.fft/~. ' The 10th Valdez Principle requires an annual report on implementation. Informational presentation only; no Council action is required. None The Ashland City Council adopted the ten Valdez Principles in May of 1990. The tenth principle requires an annual report on implementation. This is the seventh annual report presented to the Council. The report consists of the listing of programs, initiatives and City activities that support each of the principles. It is an ongoing> growing list with new items added each year in Italics including a brief description of the new initiative. Also attached is a copy of the original Valdez Principles adopted by the Council in 1990. Eleca'ic/Telecommunicatico Dept. Dick Wanderscheid, Director 90 N. Mountain Ave Phone: (541) 488-5357 Ashland, OR 97520 Fax: (541) 552-2436 City Activities and Initiatives that Support the Valdez Principles October, 2003 (Items in Italics are new to the list this year) PROTECTION OF THE BIOSPHERE a) b) c) d) e) f) g) h) i) J) k) ~) m) n) o) P) q) r) s) t) u) Environmental and Physical Constraints Ordinance Flood Plain Ordinance Herbicide Policy Ashland Watershed Partnership Participation and Policy Roca Creek Project Ashland WTP Wetlands Demonstration Project Hillside Development Ordinance Ashland Creek Restoration Project Air Quality Programs Storm Water Master Plan Fire Department Vehicle Washing Policy Riparian Ordinance Revisions Ashland WW'I'P Upgrade Street Standard Revisions Storm Drainage Cleaning and Maintenance Erosion control planning and bank stabilization measures in Public Works projects Installation of storm ceptor in new Winburn Way bddge Construction Training for creek protection by Public Works Granite Street Quarry Restoration Project Pistol range restoration project Tree Preservation Ordinance Pag= 1 of 6 m v) Installation of storm ceptor in Gresham Street as part of the Library Project w) Bioswale on the Elk's parking lot x) Oil and grease separator at the new Fire Station-- The new fire station was constructed with a grease and oil separation system to prevent contaminants from entering the storm sewer system and reaching Bear Creek. The old stetion didn,t have this enhancement. y) Riparian & Wetland Area Inventory The City hired Fishman Environmental Services to identify and evaluate wetland and streams within the City's Urban Growth Boundary. z) Tree Replacement Rebate Program The City has started a rebate program for the replacement of street trees with powerline friendly trees in areas of the City that have overhead poweriines. SUSTAINABLE USE OF NATURAL RESOURCES a) Renewable Resource Generation Policy (net metering) b) City's Solar Water Heating Program c) Performance Standards Development Ordinance d) Transportation Plan e) Bicycle Commission activities f) City Open Space Acquisition Plan g) Comprehensive Water Supply Study h) Ashland Solar Pioneer Program i) New bike path along Railroad ROW j) Certified Wood Program k) 20% water conservation goal of Comprehensive Study I) Chamber of Commerce Wise Resource Usage Booklet provided to every household in Ashland (was distributed in the fall of 2001) Water efficient landscaping tour Green Power purchase by the City Natural gas vehicle Transportation, Transit and Parking Initiative m) n) o) P) Page 2 of 6 = q) r) s) t) u) v) w) aa) "B" Street subsurface drip irrigation system and signage a) b) c) Irrigation signage at Copeland lot and Wilderness Charter School Solar Electric Rebate Program Rate Mitigation Agreement with BPA Use of certified wood in Hillah Temple Project Solar electric system installation at Ashland Middle School Affiliated Marketing agreement with the Bonneville Environmental Foundation (BEF) for the sale of Green Tags This agreement with BEF helps direct Ashland's citizens to BEF for the purchase of Green Tags directly from BEF. They in turn will reimburse the City $1.00 for each green tag purchased by Ashland Etectdc Utility customers. New Solar Electric System at Wilderness Charter School The Green tag affiliated marketing agreement with the Bonneville Environmental Foundation provided $2,500 and the City's solar electdc rebate of $990.00, helped to fund a 660W system on the Wilderness Charter School. Increased Solar Electric and Water Heater Rebate The City increased the incentives paid for solar water heating and solar electdc systems to be equivalent to programs offered by the Energy Trust of Oregon which administers the public purpose funding paid by customers of the State Investor owned Utilities. Efficient Refrigerator Incentive The City instituted a new rebate pregram for energy efficient residential refrigerator. Earth Advantage Program The city has implemented a new resource efficient new home program to replace the City's Super Good Cents program. Page 3 of 6 REDUC~ON AND D~SI'OSAL OF WASTE City's recycling programs Styrofoam Ban Composting Programs d) Conservation Commission activities 1) Tree free paper utility bill insert 2) Green Schools Program 3) Conservation Commission video productions e) f) g) h) i) J) 4) Jefferson Monthly articles 5) Green Business Program 6) Adopt-A-Street Program 7) Water efficient landscaping tour 8) Water wise newspaper articles 9) Energy conservation newspaper article series 10) TID education project 11) Newspaper article series on recycling 12) Earth Day event at North Mountain Park, 2r~ annual event held in 2003 13) Rain Water Catchment Class Over 30 participants attended a class, which taught and demonstrated various uses of rainwater catchment systems in August, 2003 14) Solar Home Tour The city co-sponsored with Power Magazine a tour of Solar Energy Systems in Ashland in October, 2003. Minimize the use of chemicals in City Public Works operations Asphalt reuse by Public Works Revision to City's Styrofoam Ordinance Water based street paint Switch from diesel fuel to propane for fire extinguisher training conducted by Fire Department Ashland Sanitary's new Yard Debds Pick-Up Program Recycled Paper The City is transitioning from 30% post consumer recycled paperto 100% pest consumer recycled paper. Because 100% paper is now part of the State Bid, we are able to make this transaction for no additional cost. Increase Recycling Opportunities Ashland Sanitary has increased recycling opportunities for Ashland citizens by now accepting mixed waste paper at the recycling depot and also by now accepting all plastic bottles as a part of their curbside program. 4. WISE USE ENERGY Page 4 of 6 a) b) c) d) e) f) g) h) i) J) Performance Standards Development Ordinance Transportation Plan Conservation Commission activities Resource Conservation Manager Program (City, SOU, School District and Ashland Chamber of Commerce) Energy and Water Conservation Programs Certified Wood Program City's natural gas vehicle Conservation Augmentation Agreement with BPA Council allocation of money to provide flee bus services in Ashland in FY 2002-03 New Commercial Resource Conservation Audit cost-share program conducted in conjunction with Oregon Manufacturing Extension Partnership (OMEP) 5. RISK REDUCTION a) Herbicide Policy b) EMF Policy c) Revisions to City Emergency Management Plan d) Ongoing training and simulations of emergency situations e) Ongoing safety training of City field personnel f) Y2K preparedness g) Community Emergency Response Team Program h) Fire and Police Department videos i) School safety programs j) New fuel tanks at the City yards and airport k) Riparian video I) Riparian workshops m) Wildfire forums 6. SAFE PRODUCTS AND SERVICES Page 5 of 6 a) b) c) d) e) Herbicide Policy Environmental training for Public Works field personnel Consultation by Public Works with AWP members or other local experts on appropriate environmental techniques Construction notices to affected properties in advance of Public Works projects Certified Wood Program DAMAGE COMPENSATION a) Ashland Creek Restoration Project DISCLOSURE a) b) c) d) e) f) g) *h) i) J) k) Herbicide Policy EMF Policy Environmental training for City field personnel Construction notices for City projects 1998 Water Quality Report (published July 1999) 1999 Water Quality Report (published June 2000) 2000 Water Quality Report 2001 Water Quality Report City Source Energy Conservation video City Source Water Conservation video Wildfire Hot Line The city now has a dedicated phone line for citizens to get information about fires and fire hazards. 9. ENVIRONMENTAL DIRECTORS AND MANAGERS Dick Wanderscheid has Environmental Affairs as a designated responsibility, 10. ANNUAL ASSESSMENT This is the seventh annual report submitted to the City Council as required by the 10t' of the Valdez Principles. Page 6 of 6 Valdez Principles By endorsing these Principles, we publicly affirm our belief that the City of Ashland, Oregon, has a direct responsibility for the envimnmeet. We believe that we must conduct the public's business as responsible stewards of the environment and seek goals only in a manner that leaves the Earth healthy and safe. We believe that the City must not compromise the ability of futura generations to sustain their needs. We recognize this to be a long-term commitment to update our practices continually in light of advances in technology and new understandings in health and environmental science. We intend to make consistent, measurable progress toward the ideal that these pdnciples describe, and to apply them wherever we operate, in a manner consistent with our other obligations under law. 1. Protection of the Biosphere. 6. We will minimize and strive to eliminate the release of any pollutant that may cause environmental damage to air, water or earth or its inhabitants. We will safeguard habitats in creeks, ponds, wetlands, natural areas and will minimize contributleg to global warming, depletion of the ozone layer, acid rain or smog. Sustainable Use of Natural Resources. We will make sustainable use of renewable natural resources, such as water, soils and forests. We will conserve nonrenewable natural resources through efficient use and careful planning. We will protect wildlife habitat, open spaces and wilderness, while preserving biodiversity. Reduction and Disposal of Waste. We will minimize the creation of waste, and wherever possible, recycle materials. We will dispose of all wastes through safe and responsible melhods. Wise Use of Energy. We will make every effort to use environmentally safe and sustainable energy sources to meet our needs. We will invest in and promote energy efficiency and conservation in our operations and that of our citizens. Risk Reduction. We wilt minimize the environmental, health and safety Hsks to our employees and the communities in which we operate by employing safe technologies and operating procedures and by being constantly prepared for emergencies. Safe Products and Services. We will provide services that minimize adverse environmental impacts and that are safe for consumers. We will inform consumem of the environmental impacts of our service. Damage Compensation. We will take responsibility for any harm we cause to the environment by making every effort to fully restore the environment and to compensate those persons who are adversely affected. Disclosure. We will disclose to our employees and to the public incidents relating to our operations that cause environmental harm or pose health or safety hazards. We will disclose potential environmental, health or safety hazards posed by our operations, and we will not take any action against employees who report any condition that creates a danger to the environment or poses health and safety hazards. 9. Environmental Directors and Managers. 10. At least one member of management will be a person qualified to represent environmental interests and will commit management resources to implement these Principles. Annual Assessment. We will conduct and make public an annual self- evaluation of our progress in implementing these Principles and in complying with all applicable laws and regulations. Endorsed by the Ashland City Council May 15, 1990 CITY OF SHLAND Council Communication TITLE: DEPT: DATE: SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: Synopsis: Recommendation: Fiscal Impact: Background: Update on Electric Rates Electric & Telecommunication October 07, 2003~4-~ Dick Wandersel~/~fl/~'~ Gino Grimaldi The City increased both electricity rotes and the BPA surcharge in July 2003. At that time, the Council was informed that BPA was considering imposing an additional Cost Recovery Adjustment Clause (CRAC) in October 2003, and that depending on the outcome of that process, the City may need to increase rates to cover that cost. BPA did enact a rate increase that amounts to a net 2.2% increase over current rates, for the rate period (Oct 1 to Sept. 30, 2004). Because of the size and timing of this increase, current electric rotes are adequate to cover this cost increase and no adjustments are needed at this time. Our rates will be re- evaluated during budget process next year along with the utility's capital needs to see if any adjustment is needed in July, 2004. No action is required, this is for informational purpose only. The increase of 2.2% on BPA bills amounts to about a $28,000 increase in our wholesale power bill from BPA. The City increased electric rotes by 7.5% and the BPA surcharge from 16% to 20.8% on July 1, 2003. This rote resolution was approved on May 6, 2003. At this time we informed the Council that BPA was considering triggering the third Cost Recovery Adjustmem Clause (CRAC) in October, 2003 and that rates may need to be increased again, depending on the size and timing of that increase. BPA was able to trim the increase to 2.23% over current rotes, for the entire rote period. This amounts to about $28,000 in additional wholesale power costs to the City. The results of all the Cost Recovery Adjustments are $1,302,000 above our wholesale bill prior to these adjustments. The BPA surcharge of 20% currently collects about $1,353,600 in total dollars so the surcharge is adequate to cover this increased costs for the remainder of this current budget year. Therefore, there is no need to increase the BPA surcharge at this time. Electric/Telecommunication Dept. I)i~ Wandea~h~id, Dir~tor 90 N. Mountain Ave Phe~e: (541) 488-5357 Ashland, OR 97520 Fax: (541) 552-2436 BPA has projected what their Adjustments Clauses will be over the remainder for the rate period, and this projection has been attached to the communication for your information. The City will soon be receiving our Electric System Study which will identify future capital needs in the Electric Utility. Staffwill present their results to the council when they become available. BPA wholesale rates and this information will then be evaluated during the budget process in order to decide electric rate levels for next year. Electric/Telecommunication Dept. Dick Wanderscheid, Director 90 N. Mountain Ave Phone: (541) 488-5357 Ashland, OR 97520 Fax: (541) 552-2436 ~.~ ~ J~A0 M~g~JOUl elh~lue'~,led From: To: Date: Subject: "Linda M. Richards" <lmrich@mind.net> <council@ashland .or.us> 9/30/03 10:59PM mt. a comments Who really owns this mountain anyway, maybe the Shasta tribe? Maybe Takilma? Perhaps we should contact the true owners of the mountain and ask them what they think should be done. I heard a speaker in San Francisco say Native Tribes took care of this land 'and now because of genocide, there is really is no one to preserve it. I am very confident we are supposed to only use this land while we live here not destroy it in our lifetime for recreation, or profit, but preserve it for the 7th generation. Richard Hart, a consulting ecologist with national and international expertise in watershed and land use biophysical assessment and monitoring, supports ongoing monitoring of the watershed. Incredibly, there is no substantive ongoing environmental monitoring of the watershed. He expressed frustration that our affluent town has been unwilling to allocate resources to a municipal watershed-monitoring program. George Badura, a retired Forest Service Soil Scientist with 40 years experience in the Pacific Northwest; his last 3 decades were spent in the Ashland and other Rogue Basin watersheds. Mr. Badura has also that there is a dire need for monitoring and the Forest Service's constant deprioritization of environmental monitoring programs is a danger. Badura stressed, "Mt. Ashland has the most erosive conditions for soil anywhere." In slide after slide, Badura demonstrated erosion problems within the current ski area development. The native soil, which is largely decomposed granitics with a thin layer of protective forest material (where trees are still present), is extremely erosive and grasses are of no value in holding the granitic soil. Badura reported that the DEIS soil surveys are terribly flawed. The DEIS does not factor in the variety of soil types on the mountain. The report extrapolates East Fork conditions onto the very different soil conditions of the Middle Fork. The Middle Fork supports 2-3 times more water than the East Fork, said Badura. In further criticism of DEIS soil surveys, Badura stated that the report uses methods that are far too general for the design and management phase of a project. He stated the soil surveys upon which the DEIS relies are more suitable for the initial planning stage of a project, and that while the DEIS claims that new soil maps and reporting are more site specific, "That is the case in name only. They are actually now more general." Notably absent from the informative presentation were Mayor DeBoer, city staff, Mt. Ashland Board Members, Mt. Ashland management, Forest Service employees, Daily Tidings reporters, and all members of the City Council except Cate Hartzell. I would like to stress in my comment that as a person who received a BS in Science interdisciplinary degree from SOU, the tendency to embrace the opinions of government scientists as the "experts" is in and of itself a contributing factor to the constant destruction of our eco systems, and the perpetual disordering of our natural world. The problem with many government scientists is the research they are instructed to do is compartmentalized and doesn't actually give a broad enough look at the implications of the destruction. For instance, a physicist from Lawrence Livermore Labs was at SOU giving a lecture about the safety of the casks she had constructed for transporting nuclear waste. Her work allowed a certain amount of radioactivity to leak, meeting cedain government "allowable leaks". When asked where did the scientists arrive at that number, what studies showed that was an acceptable amount of leakage, she couldn't answer, she had been so focused on only attaining that number which implies safety but is not necessarily safe. I spoke at length with her after the lecture and she had no grasp of the larger problems with the data she had used to base her work on. It is government experts who have brought us nuclear waste, nuclear pollution, nuclear weapons, toxic food, global warming cover-ups, and next the experts will bring havoc to a one of the few remaining watersheds in the country whose ecosystem, through an intricate balance of plants and underground springs filter the water providing water for our community. As David Orr, a great scientist and educator at Oberlin College writes, "The groat ecological issues of our time have to do one way or another with our failure to see things in their entirety...The disordering of ecological systems and of the great biochemical cycles of the earth reflects a prior disorder into thought, pemeption, imagination, intellectual priorities, and loyalties inherent in the industrial mind. Ultimately the ecological crisis is a crisis of education that purports to shape and refine the capacity of minds to think clearly, to imagine what could be and is not and to act faithfully." As city councilors, it is your duty to follow the Valdez Principles endorsed by the Ashland City Council in 1990. VALDEZ PRINCIPLES By endorsing these Principles, we publicly affirm our belief that the. City of Ashland, Oregon, has a direct responsibility for the environment. We believe that we must conduct the public's business as responsible stewards of the environment and seek goals only in a manner that leaves the Earth healthy and safe. We believe that the City must not compromise the ability of future generations to sustain their needs. We recognize this to be a long-term commitment to update our practices continually in light of advances in technology and new understandings in health and environmental science. We intend to make consistent, measurable progress toward the ideal that these principles describe, and to apply them wherever we operate, in a manner consistent with our other obligations under law. 1. Protection of the Biosphere. We will minimize and strive to eliminate the release of any pollutant that may cause environmental damage to air, water, or earth or its inhabitants. We will safeguard habitats in creeks, ponds, wetlands, natural areas, and will minimize contributing to global warming, depletion of the ozone layer, acid rain, or smog. 2. Sustainable Use of Natural Resources. We will make sustainable use of renewable natural resources, such as water, soils and forests. We will conserve nonrenewable natural resources through efficient use and careful planning. We will protect wildlife habitat, open spaces, and wilderness, while preserving biodiversity. 3. Reduction and Disposal of Waste. We will minimize the creation of waste, and wherever possible, recycle materials. We will dispose of all wastes through safe and responsible methods. 4. Wise Use of Energy. We will make every effort to use environmentally safe and sustainable energy sources to meet our needs. We will invest in and promote energy efficiency and conservation in our operations and that of our citizens. 5. Risk Reduction. We will minimize the environmental, health and safety risks to our employees and the communities in which we operate by employing safe technologies and operating procedures and by being constantly prepared for emergencies. 6. Safe Products and Services. We will provide services that minimize adverse environmental impacts and that are safe for consumers. We will inform consumers of the environmental impacts of our services. 7. Damage Compensation. We will take responsibility for any harm we cause to the environment by making every effort to fully restore the environment and to compensate those persons who are adversely affected. 8. Disclosure. We will disclose to our employees and to the public incidents relating to our operations that cause environmental harm or pose health or safety hazards. We will disclose potential environmental, health, or safety hazards posed by our operations, and we will not take any action against employees who report any condition that creates a danger to the environment or poses health and safety hazards. 9. Environmental Directors and Managers. At least one member of management will be a person qualified to represent environmental interests, and will commit management resoumes to implement these Principles. 10, Annual Assessment, We will conduct and make public an annual self-evaluation of our progress in implementing these Principles and in complying with all applicable laws and regulations. Endorsed by the Ashland City Council - May 15, 1990. An old growth forest is not only irreplaceable but non-renewable, and that is science speaking. No one knows how to create an old growth alpine ecology like the one on Mt. Ashland that supports our life and gives us water, another limited resource. Drinkable water is non-renewable, more Science, not opinion.The Valdez Principles are Ken Hagen's legacy and some of you sitting here today promised at his memorial service to honor him in your future work. He left you a guide to follow and embrace. Losing Ken has been an unbearable tragedy for me, but losing his legacy hurts me more than I have words for, As City Councilors it is your role to see the big picture, and an educated person knows on a world scale the environment is being degraded quickly and we are losing to extinction 137,129 species in just the last 3 years. Distinguished scientists estimate an average of 137 species of life forms are driven into extinction every day; or 50,000 each year. The global rates of destruction: 2.4 acres per second, which is equivalent to two U.S. football fields per second 149 acres per minute 214,000 acres per day: an area larger than New York City 78 million acres (31 million hectares) per year: an area larger than Poland. Within the next hour approximately 6 species will become extinct. While extinction is a natural process, the alarming rate of extinction today is comparable only to the extinction of the dinosaurs, and it is specifically human-induced and unprecedented. Experts agree that the number one cause of extinction is habitat destruction. Quite simply, when habitat is reduced, species disappear, But all conservation is local. The line is drawn here, Will we preserve what we can of the remaining old growth that is sitting where ski runs are planned to be? Are we willing to clearcut 70+ acres of old growth, cut into an untouched roadless area, build in mountain wetlands, add 200 new paved parking spaces on the mountain and 2 miles of power & sewage lines, a lodge in the Bowl, and impacted endemic plant populations. All for a fairly marginal ski area which gets dense, sporadic snow. The clearcutting alone on any steep mountain would carry risk, but because of the Mt. Ashland rocky soil that you can see today eroding down the mountain from previous clearcutting to make the current ski runs. Mt. Ashland provides us with drinking water and are you willing to endanger that source? Have you ever heard of the "Cautionary Principle" in Science? It means if you are planning to do something, the burden of proof is on those who want to make changes by proving it is SAFE to do it. The evidence and my education shows it is dramatically unsafe, but because of the need of busy Ashlanders to trust in the FS experts, people in Ashland honestly believe in ties. They want to believe it is all okay, but I would assert strongly things in our world are fragile and not going to be here for us if we don't actively protect them from those who would stop at nothing to profit. Water wars are predicted and already being experienced as the global drinkable water supply shrinks due to contamination as only 1% of the water on earth is drinkable. It seems almost criminal to risk losing a drinking source for skiing. The sedimentation is already a problem from the first round of ski runs. I have been privileged to spend time on the mountain hiking and running thanks to the preservation of the mountain thus far. The problems created by the erosion on the mountain is already in need of reclamation, and visible to the naked eye. How can the city endorse an action risking our environment to build a ski run for recreation in this pristine environment? Would it honor the Valdez Principles? Would it sustain the 7th generation? Perhaps alternative 5 with the following changes would be tolerable, if the Moraine Lodge and LC-13 lift were removed, if a shuttle were used instead of new parking, and if the extended night lights were removed. And before you cast your vote, please take a hike in the proposed ski run area. It is a unique and loved environment and it is worth seeing before it is obliterated. Don't miss the meadows. They are so beautiful, rare and fresh...thus far, survivors of our destruction. Thank you, Linda M. Richards, 245 E. Nevada St. Ashland, 97520 488-1230 From: To: Date: Subject: "bob aftaras" <bobsai@hotmail.com> <council@ashland.or.us> 10/1/03 3:57PM Expansion of Mt Ashland Ski Area Dear city council members, Though I attended last night's study session meeting, I chose not to speak, preferring this short e-mail. I strongly support the "alternative 5" plan. I think that you should be approaching this matter from a very conservative point of view since we ARE talking about our water supply. Most decisions involve some kind of risk-benifit ratio and in this case it would seem that the small benefit to be gained from the expansion doesn't warrent ANY risk to our water supply. Since it's apparent that some kind of development is going to take place, I encourage you to throw your support behind alternative 5. Since the Mt Ashalnd Association has been so unresponsive to community concern on this matter, it's up to you, our ejected representatives to listen and act. Thank you for the good work you do on our behalf. yOUrS, Bob Altaras Barabara Wanderer 222 No Mountain Ave High-speed Internet access as Iow as $29.95/month (depending on the local service providers in your area). Click here. https://broadband.msn.com From: To: Date: Subject: chris ammon <earthdakini@yahoo.com> <berteauf@ashland.or.us> 9/27/03 11:09AM Mt. A After sifting through an array of persepctives and scientific claims about the potential effects of the expansion on Mt. Ashland, I find myself frustrated. What information can we rely on when we ourselves are not experts in biology, watershed hydrology etc? For myself, I step back, look at the big picture, and go with intuition. When I take a global perspective and consider the amount of people who are starving on this earth, or who are sick, or can only afford to live in the most rustic conditions, this debate about expanding a ski area seems absurd. We are so lucky to be able to recreate in the first place, why do we need to insist on more, more, more? Because it's the American Way? I think it is time to hold off on our consumption and be grateful for what we have. Will more trees cut down, more SUVs buzzing up the access road, more sedimentation really get us toward a better America, a better world? We all know deep down that this country has it wrong and is ruining the planet with its lifestyle. Why must Ashland perpetuate the problem? I think it is time to do something that is truly difficult; say 'no' to more. It is one thing to speak our beliefs in the streets and in letters, but quite another to sacrifice our personal luxuries. Yet, this is where the true revolutions take place--in NOT buying the SUV that we can afford, in NOT driving, buying cosmetics, getting plastic surgery, turning on the t.v. Can we really bring ourselves to shed our own personal vanities? We HAVE to draw the line if we want the degradation of our lives and the planet to stop. Ashland needs to give up its personal fantasy of being a ski town and appreciate what it has--which is so much already. Beyond the conflicting scientific claims, the oposing opinions is this simple fact: expanding the ski mountain does nothing towards making the planet a healthier place, and in these times, this is where are attention should be--not on making a bigger, badder, more "rad" place to recreate. Let's not sink into further denial about the kind of changes that really needs to happen in this world. Chris Ammon Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com From: To: Date: Subject: Jaimie S Bernhagen <jaimiesclan@juno.com> <berteauf@ashland.or.us> 9/21/03 11:51 AM Mt. Ashland expansion ......... Begin forwarded message .......... From: Jaimie S Bernhagen <jaimiesclan@juno.com> To: corn ments-pacificnorthwest-rogueriver-ashland@fs.fed.us Cc: jaimiesclan@juno.com Subject: Mt. Ashland expansion Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 19:18:05 -0700 Message-ID: <20030907.191807.6630.0.jaimiesclan@juno.com> John Schuyler, City of Ashland, Thank you for the opportunity to respond. I'm not familiar with the details of each proposed plan, nor am I invested--either physically or emotionally--in the decision. My feeling about the expansion is fairly objective, I believe. My three children participate in winter sports each year on the mountain, and our family has enjoyed the snowboarding availability for some years now. Yet, we would not be heart-broken if the park stayed just as it is. My opinion is that this is the top of a unique and beautiful mountain. It already has an existing snow park area that is well-used by local people as well as out-of-town travelers. Once the top of this precious mountain (old growth habitat, etc.) is altered, it is gone forever. WE as people are versatile-we can move around, travel to and find the perfect snow parks to fit our families' needs. The trees are hundreds of years old and have hundreds of years to live, if allowed. For me, this is a no-brainer! Once the top of Mt. Ashland is "shaved off' for the sake of people and their well-loved sports, it's gone forever. As much as my kids love to snowboard, and I'm sure they would like any new runs, I don't think that desire for "more and better" preempts the destruction of old growth and sensitive habitat. This is an "extra" for our community. Yes, an expansion would be nice. There are many things that would and could make our lives in Ashland nice. But I think we already have it pretty good, and rd be willing to leave it at that and save the trees. They do not have a voice (except in great literature like Tolkien!), and I feel this is a time we as Ashlanders are better off using restraint. About the watershed--if the expansion IN ANY WAY compromises the quality and/or quantity of Ashland's water supply, once again I feel this is a no-breiner. Sustainable good water MUST come before winter sports! We can't very well equip our children and their children with ski/snowboard goodies and expect them to have water problems in future decades to come. This would be irresponsible land management. Another aspect of an expansion that is purely factual and needs no opinion one way or the other is that we don't always have an adequate snow pack to sustain the park as it is NOW. It seems we're sort of marginal--about every other year is an adequate year for the existing runs. Wouldn't we be banking on many good years in a row to pay for this? If that's a gamble, I think our weather history speaks for itself--we would lose! Thank you and good luck with the decision--one way or the other. Sincerely, Jaimie Bernhagen 300 Creekside Ashland, OR 97520 The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand! Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER! Only $14.95/month - visit wwwjuno.com to sign up today! CC: <jaimiesclan@juno.com> From: To: Date: Subjeot: "Richard Brock" <juniper@mind.net> <council@ashland .or.us> 9/29/03 10:27PM Mt Ashland Mount Ashland Ski Area Expansion Proposal Engleman Spruce Fen Dear Councilors; I am a professional botanist and have worked in southwest Oregon forests for 26 years. One of my concerns regarding the proposed expansion of the ski area centers around the damage it would cause to a one-of -a kind plant community. I spent three days working on the wetland inventory in this wetland forest and got to know it quite well. This rare forest community best described as a Picea engelmaniiNaccinium coccineum/Carex nervina (Spruce/Siskiyou Huckleberry/Nerved Sedge) plant association. Old growth Engleman spruce grows over a dense stand of Siskiyou huckleberry (only found in the Siskiyou Mountains)and Carex nervina (nerved sedge This site is a geographical outpost for all three species; spruce from the no[th, sedge from the south and Siskiyou huckleberry from the west. In addition, an extremely rare fungus occurs in this stand. This plant community is truly found nowhere else on the planet! It is a biological museum-piece that is in our stewardship, This unique plant community is growing in an equally rare soil hydrology. A series of fens feeds a system of ground water piping within which rodent activity alters the degree of wetness at any one time and at any one place. Any crushing of the piping/rodent runs will bring the water to the surface because of internal flow restriction and redirection of this surface flow could lead to downcutting of channels. Down-cutting of channels will drain the water table in these soils which may then lose their wetland characteristics. This in turn would deprive the spruce and sedge of the wet soil that they need. Cutting a 100 foot wide swath through a stand of trees with shallow root systems and active root rot has a high probability of affecting much more of the stand through windthrow and fungus infection. The estimated 10% impact could very easily be a 20% impact within one decade, This level of intentional disturbance would be quite irresponsible from the standpoint of good stewardship. The benefit of a few more ski runs would come at a very high moral cost. The City of Ashland has taken pride in the past at being an ecosystem friendly community. Our we to turn away from our principles of sustainablity now? I urge you to discourage the Forest Service from approving any proposal which cuts into this spruce/fen ecosystem. Sincerely, Richard Brock 64 Dewey St 821-1635 From: Rivers Brown <jrivers@mind.net> To: Chris Hearn <cehearn@aol.com>, Alan DeBoer <awdb@aol.com>, Kate Jackson <katejackson@opendoor.com>, Don Laws <donlaws@mind.net>, John Morrison <jmorrison@rvcog.org>, Ann Seltzer <berteauf@ashland.or.us>, Cate Hadzell <cate@mind.net> Date: 9/26/03 6:45PM Subject: Mount Ashland Mount Ashland Dear Mayor and Council members, I believe it would be an unwise move for our city to enlarge the ski area above us, at the summit of our watershed. There are a number of reasonings for this, among which economically risky and environmentally unsound stand out the most. The ski area, as an economic entity, has failed in the past and will fail again, for reasons beyond our control. Because of these defaults, our town now "owns" it, and should not move forward with such an over-scaled, aggressive expansion that could burden taxpayers for years to come. We could all be looking up at an un-snowcovered Mount Ashland during this global warming period, and wondering why we should still be paying for this great, not- well-thought-out expansion. Since the city is responsible for the costs of dredging, sluicing, excavating, and maintaining Reeder Reservoir, which holds all of our drinking water, why would we ask for these expenses to potentially increase by tampering with our watershed above? A possible scenario for global warming's game plan for our little part of the world is less snow, more rain. More rain to transport our exponentially tampered with, exceptionally erosive soils into our reservoir, to be expensively removed. Why burden our "Water Quality Limited" (for sedimentation) reservoir or our pocketbooks by entering into a long-term expense such as this? From an environmental standpoint, this doubling of size by removing umpty-ump dozen football fields of rather rare virgin forests at the top of our watershed, is just plain dumb, even with the deal that's been cut to pay for the expansion from profits from this old growth clear-cut. Cutting through and altering meadows, wetlands, riparian areas, streams, and springs is also not environmental sanity. Are we to trust vested interest, conflicted, scientific analysis done by parties proposing this mockery of sustainable development? Only if we have short memories, deep pockets, and empty consciences. They may tell us everything is all right, don't worry about it, but, when the system collapses, it will be us holding the bag (or empty moneybag) and these folks will be nowhere in sight or will extoll us to not cry over spilt milk. Maybe, under alternative 5 (Alt.5), our ski slopes could be improved and expanded within the area we already have cleared of natural habitat, and damage avoided or mitigated, to further assure us of good clear and clean water for all our residents. It certainly would be more economical and ecological, without much treat of running MAA into a bankruptcy that might attract a future privately owned enterprise; something i don't think any of us want. Let's stop thinking more thrills or dollars and become responsible custodians of this special mountain and watershed we are blessed with. Thanks for your consideration on this issue, Rivers Brown From: Jared Cruce <jdcruce@yahoo.com> To: <council@ashland.or.us>, <awdb@aol.com>, <berteauf@ashland.or.us>, <wildmountashland@yahoo.com> Date: 9/29/03 1:01 PM Subject: Concerns About Negative Impacts of Mt. Ashland Ski Area Expansion Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by Jared Cruce (jdcruce@yahoo.com) on Monday, September 29, 2003 at 16:00:58 message: Dear Ashland City Council & Mayor DeBoer, PLEASE REJECT the large and expensive expansion plans that are currently under consideration for the Mt. Ashland Ski Area. I am a Mt. Ashland Ski Area Season Pass holder and avid skier and I am against this expansion proposal for the following reasons: -Before expanding, existing facilities are in need of improvements. How can Mt. Ashland financially maintain more terrain, more equipment, and protect our watershed, when the existing area shows itself as old and rundown. Specifically, antiquated, unreliable,chairlifts - marginally clean, and undersupplied restrooms - understaffed and antiquated, food services - and non-handicapped accessible. -The environmental impact is large and the financial gain is undocumented, inconsequential, and linked directly to snow depths that have historically been sporadic. As an investment by the residents of our city this is a bad investmentH! I am a supporter of Mt. Ashland Ski Area, but I DO NOT SUPPORT it's current expansion proposal. I would support the renovation and improvement to existing facilities. Sincerely, Jared Cruca address: Ashland Resident source: This comment was sent to you by the individual named above via the Wild Mount Ashland website at www.mountashland.com. Comments are individually submitted through the site and represent the concerns and opinions of the sender and do not necessarily represent those of Wild Mount Ashland. From: Constance Dean <cdonline@mind.net> To: <comments-pacificnorthwest-rogueriver-ashland@fs.fed.us>, <council@ashland.or.us>, <berteauf@ashland.or.us>, <awdb@aol.com>, <wildmountashland@yahoo.com> Date: 10/2/03 3:31 PM Subject: Concerns About Negative Impacts of Mt. Ashland Ski Area Expansion Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by Constance Dean (cdonline@mind.net) on Thursday, October 02, 2003 at 18:30:49 message: Dear US Forest Service, Ashland City Council, & Mayor DeBoer, I, as an Ashland resident, am very concerned about the proposed expansion of Mt. Ashland's ski resort into our water shed. I am a business owner here in Aahland, and, while I stand to profit from an increased tourist draw in the winter months, I sincerely believe the risks are NOT worth the benefits. Many years ago, I worked for Mt. Ashland as their snow phone operator, and later, helped in the offices on Ashland Street. I was convinced then, as I am now, that this business is very precarious as it is, let alone compounding its debts with an expansion. A larger ski area must be supported both locally, regionally, and by cooperative weather! I don't think any of these factors are in place to support expansion. I love our town, the opportunities here, the beauty and abundant opportuniies for recreation. I have made many tripe to the mountain, ferrying both my sons and myself to ski and board throughout the winter. My experience is that there are so few days that draw large crowds, so little snow to run the current program, I cannot believe that people are still radically pushing this expansion. It does not serve us to expand something that already is struggling, let alone the environmental impact. I will allow others who have more facts articulate that concern, tho it remains a huge issue for me, as well. I simply do not see the benefits of this idea, and am accutely aware of the dangers and negative impact on our town, as well es the possibility of bankrupting an already struggling enterprise. Please vote against this expansion. I think it is a dangerous idea, both for our town, and for the business itself! Thank you, Constance Dean Ashland resident address: Ashland Source: This comment was sent to you by the individual named above via the Wild Mount Ashland website at http://www.mountashland.com. Comments are individually submitted through the site and represent the concerns and opinions of the sender and do not necessarily represent those of Wild Mount Ashland. From: To: Date: Subject: "Adrian Dorris" <azd@hakatai.com> <council@ashland.or.us> 10/1/03 8:48AM Opposing Mt. Ashland Expansion Dear Council Members: I passionately and vehemently oppose any further development of the Mt. Ashland Ski Area, especially in our pristine and delicate watershed area. This proposal makes no environmental, fiscal, or "recreational" sense. Recently, I purchased a map of all Ashland-area trails, made possible by the good work of the Ashland Wildlands and Trails Association. On the back of this map, there are some rules for hiking, biking, and just being present in the watershed. And while I'm drawing on memory here, the gist of those rules are as follows: 1 ) no camping; 2) no tree cuffing without a permit; 3) no explosive devices or fireworks; 4) no smoking; and, 5) no motorized vehicles. I agree with all of these rules and currently have no problem abiding them. I imagine they were established to protect an environmentally sensitive area from fire and potential contamination. And since I count on the water that comes from this area for my health and survival, these rules make complete sense to me. Also recently, I hiked the proposed Mt. Ashland ski expansion area, which, for some strange and heretofore unknown reason, just happens to be in our public watershed. Now, I'm no ski development expert, but I imagine that such an expansion would require at least one of the following: 1) tree cutting (70 acres or 2 million board feet. Do you need a permit for this?) 2) blasting of massive boulders to clear the runs (perhaps Mt. Ashland can fund and host next year's 4th of July celebrations) 3) equipment and timber transport via motorized vehicles (this is supposed to be a roadless area). So, I'm experiencing some dissonance. I have one authority saying certain activities are verboten and another saying that these same activities are perfectly acceptable as long as they have the imprimatur of government and private enterprise. Simply, I'm confused. I do have a solution, however. Either 1) dump the Mt. Ashland ski expansion proposal and tell developers that they must abide by the same set of watershed rules that the rest of us follow or 2) begin issuing permits (available at City Hall) to the general public for camping, detonation of fireworks, firewood harvesting, and ATV vehicle operation within the watershed. This makes about as much sense as going forward with a ski expansion. On a personal note, I am thirty years old and was looking forward to learning how to ski this winter. Initially, I was going to do so on Mt. Ashland, where I would also spend large sums of money on ski rentals, lift tickets, food, and drink. However, if this expansion is approved, I will happily learn elsewhere. I cannot and will not endorse degradation of our watershed with my money or my time. Thank you for your time and attention. Sincerely, Adrian Z. Dorris 811 Roca Street Ashland, OR 97520 From: Krista Findley <kfindley2@yahoo.com> To: <council@ashland.or.us>, <awdb@aol.com>, <berteauf@ashland.or.us>, <wild@mountashland.com > Date: 9129103 5:27AM Subject: Concerns About Negative Impacts of Mt. Ashland Ski Area Expansion Below is the result of your feedback form. Itwas submitted by Krista Findley (kfindley2@yahoo.com) on Monday, September 29, 2003 at 08:25:36 message: Dear Ashland City Council & Mayor DeBoer, Hello. I do not live in Ashland, but I have spent summers nearby on the Rogue River and I have many friends who do live in your town and the surrounding area. I was horrified to hear of the proposed plan to expand Mt. Ashland! Please do not support this...below are some reasons why. The only certain way to protect Ashland's watershed is to avoid the highest impact actions. Expanding into the untouched Middle Branch drainage creates a risk of degrading water quality as is acknowledged in the DEIS. The DEIS, though well-intentioned, contain significant errors and omissions, especially the research behind erosion and sedimentation. No reliable on-site measurements of erosion and sedimentation have been made at the ski area; instead the DEIS relies on data from Idaho with uncertain corroborative evidence from Mount Ashland. This is not sound science--we deserve better when our watershed is at risk. As has been the case in the past, the ski area may be in financial jeopardy if there are consecutive years of poor snowpack--even without the additional costs of expansion factored in. Mount Ashland is a great resource for the local area but due to its sporadic snowfall, variable quality snow, topography, and location far from major metropolitan centers, it will never be able to compete with regional ski areas like Bachelor, Hood, or Tahoe. We need to accept Mount Ashland for what it is and work to improve what is there before trying to compete with the bigger ski areas. We need to restore damage already caused by the existing ski area before even thinking of expanding. The current expansion alternatives all tie restoration of existing problems to construction of even more. If the planned erosion & sedimentation mitigation features of the proposed expansion should fail, our watershed will bear the brunt of the problem. Dependency on a sediment trap to capture the known increase in erosion is not security for our watershed. Sediment traps at the ski area in the 1970's and 80's failed more often than they worked according to the DEIS. A vibrant, fun, safe, and successful ski area is possible without expanding into the Middle Branch watershed. A modified version of Alternative 5 would open up diverse, new terrain, widen existing runs, help relieve congestion, and keep costs down--all with far lesser environmental impacts. By choosing to support Alternative 5 minus the expensive Moraine Lodge, expanded parking, and LC-13 lift, City Council is supporting a clean, healthy Mount Ashland while allowing the ski area to grow modestly an enhance its existing infrastructure. It is a compromise we all can live with. Thank you, Krista Findley source: This comment was sent to you by the individual named above via the Wild Mount Ashland website at www.mountashland.com. Comments are individually submitted through the site and represent the concerns and opinions of the sender and do not necessarily represent those of Wild Mount Ashland. From: To: Date: Subject: "Amber Fyfe-Johnson" <amberfyfejohnson@hotmail.com> <berteauf@ashland.or.us> 10/1/03 3:47PM MOUNT ASHLAND To whom it may concern, I grew up in Ashland for nearly my whole life, and was on the ski team throughout high school. Currently I am in medical school, with the intentions of returning to Ashland to live. The existing ski runs have provided the community what is needed to teach our kids to ski and participate in MAP, A. Expanding the ski area into sensitive watershed and forest areas is not an appropriate use of our watershed and the remaining unspoiled areas of the mountain. The people of this community value mountain wilderness and watershed protection more highly than enlarging ski runs. It might be better to put ski area funds into improving parking and the existing lodge rather than building more ski runs. Sincerely, Amber Fyfe-Johnson From: Scott Harding <class5paddler@yahoo.com> To: <council@ashland.or.us>, <awdb@aol.com>, <berteauf@ashland.or.us>, <wildmountashland@yahoo.com> Date: 9/29/03 11:51AM Subject: Concerns About Negative Impacts of Mt. Ashland Ski Area Expansion Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by Scott Harding (class5paddler@yahoo.com) on Monday, September 29, 2003 at 14:51:41 message: Dear Ashland City Council & Mayor DeBoer, The proposed Mount Ashland Ski Area expansion represents an unnecessary risk to our watershed's health, too large of a financial risk both to the City and the Mount Ashland Association, and degrades the quality of our backyard wildlands--something that contributes immeasurable to the quality of life in Ashland. The alternatives outlined in the DEIS are unacceptable because they all tie restoration of current problems at the ski area to the creation of even more problems. This is illogical. We have current erosion and sedimentation problems yet to remediate them we should create more disturbed ground, clear 70 acres of sediment-filtering forest, and install nearly two miles of trenched sewage and utility lines? This sort of reasoning may make sense to a hungry MAA but to more reason-oriented folks it just seems plain dumb. What the Forest Service neglected to mention in their presentation to city staff last week is that they have no reliable onsite data of erosion and sedimentation at the ski area despite its 40 years of operation and known problems with hillslope erosion and stream sedimentation. All of the figures they presented to you were numbers from research in Idaho--yes, Idaho--that they extrapolated to Mount Ashland. The Forest Service attempted to measure stream sedimentation below the ski area from 1978-1983 but their sediment traps overflowed or failed all but two of those years (and two questionable data points does not represent sound science yet the Forest Service ignores this problem). And now the Forest Service says that they will catch all of the increased erosion from an expanded ski area and take it off site? They are asking us to believe the unbelievable. Placing the continued health of our water supply in the trust of a sediment trap is not my idea of watershed secuH ity. Please read the DEIS yourself, especially "Adverse Environmental Impacts Which Cannot Be Avoided" (starting on p. IV-291). Do not rely on other s summaries of the document. Look at the assumptions made in that document: eroded material doesn't travel over 100 feet downslope even in a storm event (300 feet at most under certain circumstances), erosion magically decreases to insignificant levels after two years, there will be plenty of snow in the lower elevations of an expanded ski area (if you do the math on their own data there will be many times when there is less than 2 feet of snow at the base of the proposed new lifts), that a mechanical device will protect our watershed from the increased erosion (at least double what it is right now according to the DEIS). The DEIS, though well-intentioned, contain errors, unfounded assumptions, poor science, and bias. It is not the full story; remove an assumption here and an assumption there from the document and their whole case falls apart. The city would never manage its own forest lands this way. Why would be give a wink and nod to the MAA and Forest Service doing so? The 1929 agreement between the Forest Service and the City gives the city substantial power over the management of the watershed. The city's own charter charges City Council with protecting the watershed, even outside of city limits (Article IX, Section 7). The people of Ashland expect City Council to uphold its duty as prescribed by law. With all of the uncertainty, assumptions, and missing information regarding the ski expansion as proposed, I see no way that this duty can be upheld while allowing terrain expansion into the Middle Branch watershed (Alternatives 2,3, & 6 in the DEIS). I urge the Council to issue its own comments on the DEIS to the Forest Service and to uphold its duty to protect our watershed. Council must endorse either Alternative 1 (no action) or a modified Alternative 5 (no expansion into the Middle Branch; modified to use a shuttle bus in place of expanding the parking area, removing the Moraine Lodge from the bowl and placing a yurt with composfing toilet facilities in its place, and removing the LC-13 lift.) Finally, I'd like to raise the point of conflict of interest and possible collusion. We ail know--or should know--that the new LC-6 ski lift already sits at Town & Country Chevrolet on DeBoer family property. Mayor DeBoer is a former president of the MAA and remains in close contact with them. Are we to believe that he is being honest and straightforward in his role as a public figure and leader of City Council? Did he not recently help stall and delay the maximum housing size ordinance to benefit his family? Did he not use his influence to rearrange the City Council race last year to stack the council his preferred way? Is he not the same mayor who ordered the felling of the controversial gingko tree at 6am to avoid public protest (violating the city's noise ordinance in the process)? There is a track record of surreptitious behavior here that needs to be examined in light of the current situation. We have the fox guarding the henhouse, all with a grin and twinkle i! n the eye. Sincerely, Scott Harding address: PO Box 202, Ashland, OR 97520 source: This comment was sent to you by the individual named above via the Wild Mount Ashland website at www.mountashland.com. Comments are individually submitted through the site and represent the concerns and opinions of the sender and do not necessarily represent those of Wild Mount Ashland. From: To: Date: Subject: "jane hogan" <janehogan@charter.net> <council@ashland.or.us> 10/1/03 11:34AM re Mt Ashland expansion proposal Dear Members of the City Council, Thank you very much to the members who were able to attend last evenings public input meeting. I realize this whole expansion question takes a tremendous amount of your time and energy to evaluate and I thank you for giving of yourselves for public service to our town. I wanted to write before today's deadline to all of you. I really felt like I have kept an open mind about the expansion question and last evenings meeting helped me to clarify a great deal. I am a former business executive who moved to Ashland a year ago with my family including our young pre-school aged daughter. Indeed we are the type of family that Ashland is trying to attract to this wonderful community. So much was said a great value last eve and I don't want to waste your precious time other than to offer a few thoughts. 1 )This expansion question has tremendous consequences for the town of Ashland and I implore you to weigh in on this issue and decide what each of you feels is best for our town. This may be one of the most important decisions you will make as a council member. 2) There is so much passion and valuable scientific evidence being expressed by those against plans 2 & 6 that I pray each of you will be able to come up with a compromise that protects the Middle Fork while at the same time addressing the needs to bring an expanded ski area for beginners and novices. Ashland is a town with a greatly admired social responsibility, let us continue that legacy now with this critical issue. 3) Why would we ever want to take any risks when it comes to our watershed? We are so blessed to have a viable source for our water needs, unlike the town/area we came from. I hope we all realize in Ashland how terribly fortunate we are and not abuse that privilege. There are a great many who predict water rights and scarcity will be THE issue in all of our communities before too long. 4) Please do not harm and please protect our natural resources solely for economic masons. (I know such a decision will come back and haunt this town forever---it always does!!!) The Middle Fork is a treasure of old growth trees. Please come up with a creative solution that protects that area while also addressing many of the needs of the ski area. I know we can all come up with such a solution. Thank you for your time in reading this and good luck. Sincerely, Jane Hogan 607 Forest Street Ashland From: "Scott Kaden" <skaden@gorge.net> To: <awdb@aol.com>, <jmorrison@rvcog.org>, <dna@mind.net>, <cate@mind.net>, <cehearn@aol.com>, <katejackson@opendoor.com>, <donlaws@mind.net> Date: 9/24/03 5:21 PM Subject: Mt. Ashland Ski Area Expansion Dear Distinguished Public Servants, On September 30, 2003, the Ashland City Council will discuss the proposed expansion at the Mt. Ashland winter sports facility. Prior to this session, I wanted to provide my interpretation of Mt. Ashland Association's (MAA's) proposed development. While I am sure you are being deluged with a wide spectrum of commentary from members of the public, I will limit my input to my concern for the long-term, economic viability of the Mt. Ashland winter sports facility. As I review the plans for expansion, I am pleased to see MAA taking strategic steps to address deficiencies in their existing ski area infrastructure ... and I see them doing so in a fashion that will favorably influence the long-term economic sustainability of the facility. The "C-6" expansion will attract additional visitation -- and additional revenues o- because C-6 will ultimately provide a better snow experience for those new to winter sports, those families who desire to ski as a family, and those guests -- 'young and old alike -- who prefer a more gentle, longer continuous fall-line experience. The C-6 terrain will also allow Mt. Ashland to perform at more optimal levels during periods of inclement weather (particularly when high winds and blowing snow closes the chairlifts higher up the mountain). The addition of a snow tubing facility not only broadens the winter recreational spectrum of this portion of the National Forest System, it will also attract additional.revenues from those guests who prefer a form of snow play that does not require, specialized recreational equipment and apparel. Lift-served snow tubing will be popular in Mt. Ashland~s hnarketplace and will represent a significant stream of additional revenues. MAA will be able to use snow tubing to attract a type of guest that presently doesn't frequent the Mt. Ashland facility -- a type of guest that might be willing to try skiing and snowboarding after enjoying a positive experience at the Mt. Ashland snow tubing facility. In the long-term, I view the C-6 lift and trails and the snow-tubing facilities as having the greatest impact on the marketability of Mt. Ashland (of any of the economically feasible ski area enhancements that have been under consideration at Mt. Ashland during the last 20 years of planning). In addition to adding 400 vertical feet, and broadening the recreational appeal of the facility, these improvements will help Mt. Ashland compete head-to-head with other winter sports facilities (namely Mt. Shasta, Mt. Bachelor, and to a lesser degree Willamette Pass and Wamer Canyon). New terrain, which improves a ski area's overall mix of terrain - and helps to "wind-proof" a facility - is one of the most highly desired types of ski area expansion available to an operator. Our state's winter sports facilities provide major economic assistance to the rural areas of Oregon. Mt. Ashland Ski and Snowboard Resort is a classic example. The ski area has a combined direct and indirect impact of $8.5 million to the local economy. Each winter,'MAA employs more than 200 people (an estimated payroll of $1,258,380.00), many from sectors of the employment that have opposite, seasonal employment peaks. But maybe more important than its sheer dollar amount, your region's winter-based tourism helps buffer the City of Ashland's tourism-based economy during.the months of November, December, and January, which as you know are opposite of the City's peak tourism season. Out of every $1 spent by skiers, snowboarders, and accompanying family members, it is estimated that less than 20 cents directly benefits the Ashland ski facility. Day use winter sports facilities like Mt. Ashland, create off-site demand for services provided by Ashland's restaurants, motels and B&Bs, gas stations, grocery stores, and purveyors of sporting goods and active wear. The ski industry is committed to ensuring environmentally sound development of winter sport facilities. The industry is sustainable in the long-run and it can be of tremendous benefit to a community like Ashland because it provides recreational opportunities, employment, and tax revenues that help fund schools and other essential human services. The challenge is for the City of Ashland and MAA to collaborate, in good faith, to ensure a healthy environment and an economically viable winter spods facility. I ask you to support the energy that MAA has collectively put fodh on behalf of the City of Ashland and its residents. On behalf of the Pacific Northwest Ski Areas Association, I write in full support of the decision criteria used to formulate the Mt. Ashland ski area expansion. Best regards, Scott Kaden President Pacific Northwest Ski Areas Association Post Office Box 1720 Hood River, Oregon 97031 541.386.9600 (tale) 541.386.9700 (fax) The Pacific Northwest Ski Areas Association is a non-profit trade association, which represents the interests of ski and snowboard facilities located in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington. The Association's members collectively host 4.5 million visits annually, most of which occur an the National Forest System lands. CC: "Jeff Hanson" <jhanson@mtashland.com> From: To: Date: Subject: "Dr. Rick Kirschner" <dr.rick@talknatural.com> <council@ashland.or.us> 9/19/03 6:48PM I support Alternative 5 for Mt. Ashland Expansion Dear Council, Regarding the proposed expansion of the Mt. Ashland ski area, I wish to add my voice in support of Alternative 5. I've done my best to understand all the points of view and alternatives, and this one seems best to me. My main concern is that there be no clear cutting, and that our fragile watershed habitat be preserved. With global warming on the increase, and the fact that our mountain is about 1000 feet too shod for fairly predictable snow years in the best of times, I think that Alternative 5 is the prudent choice to meet the needs (not wants) of almost all concerned. Sincerely, Rick Kirschner Dr. Rick Kirschner Author, Speaker http://www.talknatural.com From: To: Date: Subject: "Connie & Jeff Lynn" <tynn@jeffnet.org> <berteauf@ashland.or.us> 9129103 1:22PM Mt. Ashland To: Ashland City Council The City of Ashland has a responsibility to its citizens for ensuring the safety of its water supply. Neither the Forest Service nor Mt. Ashland Ski Association (MASA) has this enormous responsibility. Therefore, the City cannot rety on data presented by the Forest Service or MASA, which may be wrought with self-serving erroneous conclusions based on sketchy science. Until the City can afford to hire its own unbiased analysts, the City Council must recommend the No-Action Alternative to safeguard the City's water supply and be accountable to its residents. Though I love to ski Mt. Ashland, safe drinking water is much more important to me and the community. Sincerely, Connie Lynn 74 Granite St. Ashland From: To: Date: Subject: "Corinne Lombardi" <lombardi@mind,net> <council@ashland ,or.us> 10/1/03 3:13PM Comments on Mt, Ashland Expansion Dear Council, I am in favor of the Ski Ashland expansion. Alternative 2 is a reasonable approach that solves many of the current concerns for the environment, the winter sports public and the ski area management. Promotion of outdoor spods during the winter is important to improving the health of our general population and, more specifically, our youth. Providing a safe and controlled space to do it in is the responsible approach, The area now used by Ski Ashland is well managed environmentally. The environment is minitnally impacted. The area provides plenty of bathrooms, hauls trash away and limits parking to the parking lots. The plant and wild life is protected by snow coverage. When snow coverage is minimal, runs are closed to the public. This is not true of other winter sports, such as back country skiing, snow shoeing or backcountry boarding. Outside the ski resod, nature is often the bathroom, trash buried in the snow or left and parking is as far in as the vehicle can go. Contrary to popular belief, many backcountry users do not pack it out, but leave their refuse (organic and inorganic) for the next user to enjoy. The issue of safety is always important. With ticket prices set to encourage participation from all income brackets, the resort has seen a dramatic increase in use. It is great for getting folks active in the winter, but the hills are more crowded. There are limited beginner slopes, so the beginners migrate over to slopes that are often beyond their ability. This causes traffic flow problems and can result in accidents to both the new and experienced skiers. The ski patrol does a great job, but they are not police nor should they be asked to become police. Opening new beginnedintermediate terrain will relieve the congestion and remove the hazard of beginning skiedboarders on the exped runs. The ski area also provides avalanche control within the boundary but not outside the north west boundary, where many extreme boarders/skiers try out their skills. Small releases happen fairly regularly in that area, It is a matter of time until some out-of-bounds skier/boarder is caught in a slide, This risk would be managed with the expansion. · There are many logical reasons for expanding the ski resort. The arguments in opposition, while loud and repetitive, are emotional and not based in either good science or concern for the population in the valley. Once again the hysteria of the vocal minority seems to be getting more credence than the well thought out planned expansion that considers the environment and the local population. Please support the expansion. It is in the best interest of the environment and the people of the Rogue Valley. Corinne Lombardi CC: "Cindy Weaver'' <cindykl l@hotmail.com> From: To: Date: Subject: <S71 marshall@cs.com> <council@ashland .or.us> 9/30/03 9:40PM Mt. Ashland expansion comment i am for the expansion.i am 32 years old .we work as a team at work.my job requires this as a member.i am sure as a team player,we come up with problems and we solve them.and this will to pass thank you. From: Malena Marvin <malenamarvin@hotmail.com> To: <council@ashland.or.us>, <berteauf@ashland.or.us>, <awdb@aol.com>, <wildmountashland@yahoo.com> Date: 9/30/03 3:54PM Subject: Concerns About Negative Impacts of Mt. Ashland Ski Area Expansion Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by Malena Marvin (malenamarvin@hotmail.com) en Tuesday, September 30, 2003 at 18:54:06 message: Dear Ashland City Council & Mayor DeBoer, While researching my thesis regarding the history of human activity in the Ashland Creek Watershed, I discovered a document, dating from 1929, that gives the City of Ashland decision-making power on matters affecting the municipal watershed. It is my understanding that this document has been amended at certain points since, but has never changed in a substantive way. Although more recent environmental legislation does take precedence, we should continue to look at this document as an emblem of a special and unique relationship between a community and the land that produces its water. Ashland is one of only two watersheds in the entire nation that possesses such an agreement with the Forest Service. My research showed that this is specifically because the citizens of Ashland have continually demanded decision-making power regarding the uses of their watershed. Such a legacy is something to be proud of, not something to ignore or take lightly, as it seems the Deboer-dominated council would like to do. When so many of our community members oppose expansion into the middle branch of our watershed, it would be callous and undemocratic to forge ahead with the expansion just because the Forest Service's ElS claims it would be alright. The truth is that the ElS is based on questionable science (as I'm sure other citizens have informed you), and that the people of Ashland are NOT in unanimous support of clearcutting 80 football fields worth of land (450 logging truck loads) out of the headwaters of our drinking supply. I did not agree with Alan's ramming through of the expansionist water inter-tie project, and I would much rather our community figure out how to conserve and protect the amazing and unique water supply we already have. I urge you, as a native-born Ashland citizen, to listen to the people, and pass along our sentiments to the Forest Service. We do not need Ski Ashland to expand. We do not want Ski Ashland to expand. Alan can take that ski-lift off the car lot and "donate" it to a place that actually gets snow in the winter. Thanks for your time, Malena Marvin source: This comment was sent to you by the individual named above via the Wild Mount Ashland website at http://www.mountashland.com. Comments are individually submitted through the site and represent the concerns and opinions of the sender and do net necessarily represent those of Wild Mount Ashland. From: Jim McCarthy <jmccarthy@opendoor.com> To: <council@ashland.or.us>, <berteauf@ashland.or.us>, <awdb@aol.com>, <wildmountashland@yahoo.com> Date: 9/30/03 2:34PM Subject: Concerns About Negative Impacts of Mt. Ashland Ski Area Expansion Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by Jim McCarthy (jmccarthy@opendoor.com) on Tuesday, September 30, 2003 at 17:33:56 message: Dear Ashland City Council & Mayor DeBoer, As an avid skiier, and former Mt. Ashland pass holder, I am writing to express my strong opposition to the Mt. Ashland expansion. I don't think the supposed benefits of expanding the ski area into our watershed make up for the environmental impacts and loss of our precious forest. I want that forest to stay as it is! Moreover, I'm unconvinced the proposed expansion is even necessary or financially viable. The management apparently believes expansion will bring more novice skiiers to the mountain, and if they don't do it, the ski area's future will be less secure. As someone who has worked at ski areas on both coasts, I find this rationale pretty suspect. There are two big reasons that novice families may NOT come to Mt. A, and niether has to do with terrain. The reasons are: 1) The management allows hotdog skiiers the run of the mountian. I have repeatedly observed mountain staff ignore dangerous skiing behavior, such as speeding in congested areas, that would not be tel! erated at any of the resorts I worked at. I've not seen this level of hotdogger tolerance at any other ski resort I've skiied throughout'North America, and this makes even an expert skiier like myself nervous when I'm skiing there. Novices and families with kids must be scared away by this. 2) The lodge and lifts are not in good shape or attractive to novice families. The lifts seem dangerous and old, and novices are particularly sensitive to getting on shady lifts. Novice families also like to spend a lot of time in the lodge (they get tired of falling down), but that place is so poorly laid-out, I don't see non-skiing mothers and dads looking forward to spending time there while their kids are out taking a lessen. They'd probably rather drive a little further to sit in a nice lodge and know the moutain staff take their children's safety seriously. Terrain is just not the issue on their minds. So I'd say the management needs to get their act together, work on the safety atmosphere on the slopes, and re-do the current lodge and lifts, not expand. Finally, I just don't believe that an ski area that serves as the winter playground for a place that's growing as fast as the Rogue Valley has anything to worry about future attendance. What they really should worry about is efficient access. They don't take responsibility for plowing the read up there, and the state doesn't do a snappy job getting the snow plowed-- it's just not a priority for them. So you end up with the read closed on the biggest powder days-- which are also some of the biggest money-making days for any ski area. Ridiculous! They should trade in that big new expansion lift they bought for a few plows and a couple big 4X4 shuttles to get folks up there from Callahan's parking lot, so skiiers can park below snowline and won't have to wait in line on a slippery, windy road in a white out behind a hundred other cars. That's my two cents as an Ashland resident and skiier. Thanks for listening- Jim McCarthy source: This comment was sent to you by the individual named above via the Wild Mount Ashland website at http:/Avww.mountashland.com. Comments are individually submitted through the site and represent the concerns and opinions of the sender and do not necessarily represent those of Wild Mount Ashland. From: To: Date: Subject: "Lynette McDqugal" <mcdougal@sou.edu> <council@ashland.or.us> 10/1/03 3:05PM Mt Ashland Expansion Comment Council members- I am writing this email as a skier/outdoor enthusiast in favor of expanding Mt Ashland terrain. I came to Ashland 6 years ago to start a new life and go back to school (SOU). Six years later, I've received a B.S. degree in Chemistry, got married and started a family. I am excited to raise a child (and later, maybe children) in this community for many reasons. One of those rsasons being the outdoor opportunities that this valley provides. I am in favor of Alternative II of the expansion because more terrain needs to be opened up for more people. I hear opponents saying how they've skied/hiked through the proposed expansion area and how beautiful it is. Well, if the expansion is done properly (taking environmental concerns into account), more people would also be able to enjoy the beautiful areas that have already been zoned as a recreation area. I'm sure you've got a lot more emails to thumb through, so I close my comment by requesting that you come to some sort of decision. Hopefully, it will be in favor of Alternative I1. Either way, let's put this issue to rest. Lynette McDougal 364 Helman St Ashland, Or From: ese <oso@o2collective.org> To: <awdb@aol.com>, <alex@standingstonebrewing.com>, <cate@mind.net>, <cehearn@aol.com>, <katejackson@opendoor.com>, <donlaws@mind.net>, <jmorrison@rvcog.org> Date: 10/1/03 10:1lAM Subject: Oppose Ski Ashland expansion Ashland City Council and Mayor, First, let me begin by saying that if I actually believed you would hear my voice, I would have spent more time preparing my statement. I have watched the Council operate over the years and have come to believe that the voices of citizens are often not heard. None the less, I am writing you today to speak out in opposition to the proposed expansion of Ski Ashland in our Municipal Watershed. As the so-called 'representative' body of this community, it is your responsibility to defend the integrity of our Municipal Watershed. The proposed expansion is short sighted and will only benefit the interests of growth and development that have taken over our community. Unchecked growth and development is destroying the character of our town. And now with this proposed expansion, it threatens to destroy the integrity of our Watershed. If you refuse to stand up to these interests and defend our Watershed, we will. In the future, history will look back at this time and recognize the government officials and bureaucrats who helped facilitate the continued destruction of ecosystems and communities as criminals. And history will remember your names. It's your choice. For the earth, Stuart O'Neill This message was sent via InternetCDS Webmail CC: <christeb@ashland.or.us>, <grimaldg@ashland.or.us> From: To: Date: Subject: "The Richmond's" <modine@jeffnet.org> <council@ashland .or.us> 9/29/03 9:28PM say no to expansion To City Council members; Our family would like to voice our concern regarding the proposed Mt. Ashland expansion. In addition to the threat to water quality, our concern is in protecting one of the few remaining affordable and family oriented ski areas in the country. My husband and I are from Salt Lake City and worked in the ski industry there during the 1980s and early 90s. We witnessed first hand the expansion of several ski areas, and the subsequent increase in the cost of lift tickets. The end result was that for a lot of local families, winter sports at the ski areas simply werent affordable anymore. A second point is that Utah had the consistent snowfall to support those expansions, Southern Oregon can have some mild winters with iow snowpack. We have enjoyed skiing at Mt. Ashland since our move here in 1997, and our two children are learning to ski and enjoy the mountain as well. Please consider the impact that this expansion could have on the local residents who enjoy the mountain just as it is. Sincerely; Rachel Richmond From: Benjamin M. Root <ben.roo@homepower.com> To: <comments~pacificnorthwest-rogueriver-ashland@fs.fed.us>, <council@ashland.or.us>, <berteauf@ashland.or.us>, <awdb@aol.com>, <wildmountashland@yahoo.com> Date: 10/2/03 2:26PM Subject: Concerns About Negative Impacts of Mt. Ashland Ski Area Expansion Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by Benjamin M Root (ben.roo@homepower.com) on Thursday, October 02, 2003 at 17:25:59 message: Dear US Forest Service, Ashland City Council, & Mayor DeBoer, I am an avid snowboarder and cross country skier. So I was initially excited about the prospect of an expansion the skiable area at Mt. Ashland. However, after reviewing the pros and cons of the situaton, I can not support this proposal. The fragile environment in the proposed expansion area is much more valuable to me, this community, and the ecosystem of the entire planet, than the potential for a few extra turns in dubious snow or a few extra dollars in the hands of a few extra people. Please accept my opinion as an informed Ashland citizen, home owner, hopefull life-long resident, and avid winter athelete. Do not approve the Mt Ashland expansion project. Please contact me if you have any questions about my stance on this issue. Sincerely, Benjamin M. root address: 108 S. Pioneer St. Ashland, OR 97520 Soume: This comment was sent to you by the individual named above via the Wild Mount Ashland website at http://www.mountashland.com. Comments are individually submitted through the site and represent the concerns and opinions of the sender and do not necessarily represent those of Wild Mount Ashland. From: Marguerite Peggy Sawyer <peggyl@jenet.org> To: <council@ashland.or.us>, <awdb@aol.com>, <berteauf@ashland.or.us>, <wildmountashland@yahoo.com > Date: 9/29/03 6:48PM Subject: Concerns About Negative Impacts of Mt. Ashland Ski Area Expansion Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by Marguerite (Peggy) Sawyer (peggyl@jenet.org) on Monday, September 29, 2003 at 21:48:18 message: Dear Ashland City Council & Mayor DeBoer, As neighbors of Ashland, with several children who regularly use Mt. Ashland's snowboarding slopes, our family wants you to know that we are opposed to the proposed Mt. Ashland ski expansion. We appreciate Mt. Ashland for what it is: a small, local ski area that serves our community. However, with its sporadic snowfall and variable snow quality, Mt. Ashland will never be a desitination ski resort like Mt. Bachelor. Building a bigger ski area will not make deeper or more reliable snow. We are also concerned about the serious environmental damage that the ski expansion would cause in this sensitive roadless area. Expanding into the untouched Middle Branch drainage creates a risk of degrading water quality as is acknowledged in the DEIS. We need to restore damage already caused by the existing ski area before even thinking of expanding. The current expansion alternatives all tie restoration of existing problems to construction of even more. We urge you to endorse modified alternative five. As much as we love to use Mt. Ashland, we could never condone clearcutting Mt. Ashlands's slopes. We have all agreed that if you proceed with the damaging expansion, our family will stop buying season passes and discontinue all use of Mt, Ashland. Marguerite (Peggy) Sawyer and family address: 10798 Yank Gulch Road, Talent, Oregon 97540 source: This comment was sent to you by the individual named above via the Wild Mount Ashland website at www.mountashland.com. Comments are individually submitted through the site and represent the concerns and opinions of the sender and do not necessarily represent those of Wild Mount Ashland. From: <Mturbo2u@aol.com> To: <council@ashland .or.us> Date: 9/30/03 10:55PM Subject: Mt. Ashland Expansion My name is Mary Smelcer. I live at 115 Cypress Circle, Ashland Oregon. have lived here since 1988. I have been watching and involved in the Mt. Ashland Expansion since that time. (phone 482-5822) I attended in part and watched on TV with great interest, the commentary to the City Council on the proposed Mt. Ashland Ski Area Expansion. I offer my comment for your full and equal consideration. I expect professional staff analysis and consideration of facts and the best science on this proposal. Some of what I heard in opposition to the expansion was emotional response, feelings, and at most - perceived rhetoric from anti-expansion radical viewpoints. I expect you, the elected City council, should weigh in and separate emotional view points (real emotion, granted) from real science. You should not confuse these two issues. They both have a valid place, but they do not cross over and replace each other - iea person's emotions are not science based, and science doesn't represent a person passion, values, or beliefs. The Forest Service has nothing to gain from supporting this expansion - they have a very serious charge to protect the Ashland Watershed values - you should rely heavily on their extensive scientific analysis, which was carefully reviewed by your staff as well, for City interests. People like George Sexton will go to any means, with rhetoric, emotion, and slander to sway your views. He says he represents "the citizens of Ashland" - he has no clue - he just moved here with his paid environmental obstructionist job to work on issues like this for a living. George Badura says he represents an objective view as a retired Forest Service employee - take note that he is a disgruntled retired employee, and is on the board of Headwaters, anti- expansion, and is often paid by Headwaters to represent their views and positions on soils issues. The Ski Area expansion need is extremely well documented, from a safety, children, youth, business, and balanced recreation need. There is so much other roadless area opportunity in the area - this 77 acres is no significant impact to Wagner Butte roadless area. Keep a realistic view of the whole picture, not the micro impacts. 42 Engleman spruce trees will not impact our old growth dependent species, nor a recreationist experience. A few things I did not hear mentioned - perhaps I missed them: The construction practices employed when the ski area was built decades ago, which some of the past soils issues concern arose from - are no longer of issue. Back then, they used cut slope excavation - in particular in some of the runs - ie baring soil, and cutting below top soils. Current construction practices are so much less impacting - That's why the FS hydrology and soils experts support the conclusion of minimal impact with this new expansion. MAA has been doing a tremendous job over the past 10 years to reduce erosion from past practicies, and their more recent construction projects show clearly, on the ground the viability of less impacting techniques that are porosed in this project. One last critical point I want you to be aware of - please carefully consider all that has been done to try and find the best solution to expansion. This debate has gone on for so many years. Don't just listen to the here and now issue of the day. There was great effort to compromise, understanding all the interests and coming to a solution that best met the needs in developing this expansion plan in 1991. There was a significant change made at that time to drop any expansion on the South side of the Mountain and to include the North side, and the knolh Sierra Club, and Headwaters both signed on in support of this revised expansion proposal in 1991. A letter of support was written and is on record at the Forest Service. They now want to raise the bar - and once again the Forest Service and the MAA have made significant changes to be as environmentally responsive and yet still meet the basic critical need - to expand the intermediate terrain. Finally - Let the MAA make the business decisions for what's needed and affordable, and let the Forest Service make the environmental analysis decisions. City Council role is to state to the FS your expectation that water quality is protected - not mandate how that is done. If you have ANY doubt or concern - hire a paid consultant from out of the area to give you another objective evaluvation of the science. This debate reminds me of the sewer issue. Its sad that the City council chose to waste so much money (hundreds of thousands of dollars) to experiment with a wetlands project so the environmental citizens could feel good about our effort to try something out. It failed to adequately address our sewer system needs, we finally had to move on to fix the sewer treatment plant. Don't burden this expansion decision with input from City council that will cause a waste of funds, time, or overreaction to emotional issues. Do ensure that our water is adequately protected, and the Forest Service decade of analysis, shows that to be the case with this expansion proposal. Thanks Mary Smelcer From: To: Date: Subject: "Alisa Stucky" <ams@hakatai.com> <council@ashland.or.us> 10/1/03 8:12AM Oppose Ski Expansion Hello City Council Members, Please oppose any and all development in the middle fork of the East branch of Ashland Creek as well as any and all development in our watershed. You are our elected representatives and you have the power and responsibility to protect our watershed. You should not take risks with our precious resources. As a community, we also need to stop thinking that every outdoor space is there to be plundered and developed for human recreational use. It is imperative that we value nature for what it is intrinsically and not how it can be manipulated to meet human wants. Clean Water = Life Sincerely, Alisa Stucky 811 Roca Street Ashland, OR 97520 astucky@jeffnet.org From: To: Date: Subject: Diane Taudvin <dianetara@mac.com> <berteauf@ashland.or.us> 9/30/03 1:14PM expansion comment > To the city council members of Ashland. > > I am opposed to a ski expansion that sacrifices old growth trees, > sensitive plants and jeopardizes the watershed. > I support the compromise expansion proposal offered by the Sierra club. > Please let the council weigh in on this to protect our beautiful > mountain. We don't really need more ski runs .... we need water and a > bit of wilderness to remain unharmed. > Thank you for all your hard work on behalf of the citizens of Ashland. > Diane Taudvin > 135 Nutley St. > Ashland, Or. > 201-1111 From: To: Date: Subject: "wil thomson" <wil@mind.net> <berteauf@ashland.or.us> 9/29/03 9:04AM Mount Ashland Dear Council members, Please step back and take a good, objective look at Mt. Ashland and the ski area. It should be obvious that any expansion of the ski area and clear cutting of more forest can only bring harm to our precarious water quantity and degrade water quality through erosion and sewage contamination. The area in question is full of granitic soils which are extremely prone to erosion. Our 75 year old water storage facility at Reeder Reservoir is barely able to keep up with demand when we have a normal rain year, and we are experiencing more drought years all the time. The best way to avoid fire disasters is to leave an old growth forest alone. Unfortunately we have destroyed most of our old growth in Southern Oregon, so the best thing we can de now is clear out underbrush, keep a diligent watch and let our trees grow. The financial viability of Mt. Ashland has always been precarious. Southern Oregon doesn't get very much snow. Some years there is barely enough to open the ski area by Christmas. I have lived here since 1989 and can't remember ever seeing long lines or unreasonable waits to use the lift's and lodge. In the mid 1990's the private owner of the ski facility couldn't succeed and the only reason we still have a facility is because the City of Ashland bought it. It is unconscionable to ask the taxpayers to provide more money to further degrade our enviornment and invest in such a risky business. Under the current leadership, the U.S. Forest Service is only concerned with making more money by any means possible, in this case timber to sell and space to lease. Please think of our quality of life and reject any expansion of the ski facilities on Mt. Ashland. Thank you. Sincerely, William Thomson From: To: Date: Subject: "Dan Thorndike" <biciloco@medfab.com> <berteauf@ashiand.or.us> 9~22~03 3:58PM Mount Ashland Dear Mayor and Council Members, I have commented previously in favor of the expansion proposed by the Mount Ashland Association, and, frankly, I am beginning to suffer from what might be called "public input fatigue". Nevertheless, I feel compelled to briefly touch upon three of the matters designated by the Council as "key issues": water quality, water quantity and financial risk. As a resident of Ashland, with my family, I am certainly concerned about the quantity and quality of our water supply. As chair of the Oregon Water Commission and voting member of the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board, too, these are issues I have some familiarity with (though I stress that the opinions expressed herein are my own, and not necessarily those of the Commission or Board). Simply put, I do not believe that the proposed expansion places Ashland's water supply at any measurable risk, either with regard to quantity or quality. Mt. Ashland itself represents an environment that regularly accommodates significant snowpacks and resulting spring-to-summer melting and discharge. If significant amounts of debris were to be washed into our reservoir directly from Mt. Ashland, this would have occurred regularly already, with or without the expansion or, for that matter, with or without any ski area at all. To my knowledge, it has not. Moreover, the on-going operation of the ski area, including the proposed expansion, is carried out with systematic and specific efforts to limit and control erosion. Arguably, the natural risk of landslides, without such efforts at control, is much larger. For example, during the 1997 flood, our house, together with three others, was in the path of 10,000 cubic yards of slurried decomposed granite (not to be confused with the landslide further up the canyon). The city's geological report characterized this as a natural slide, not caused by uphill development. Although it was no fun, we were able to divert and control this slide by radiracting the wate~ow, and by well-placed landscape cloth and open-mesh galvanized fencing. Had such measures been in place before the flood (as, in essence, they are at Ski Ashland), we presumably could have all stayed in bed that night. Ironically, the best thing Ski Ashland could do for our water supply would be to install significant snowmaking facilities. Ashland, as most of western Oregon, is ultimately much more dependent upon snowpack than reservoirs. Unfortunately, this is not part of the proposal, nor do I believe would such a component be welcomed by those now in opposition. Finally, I do not see how the City's financial risk is increased by the proposed expansion. With or without the expansion, the City, as permit holder, bears potential financial responsibility for restoration of the permit area, but only over and above the value of Ski Ashland's assets available for that purpose. To the extent the expansion incorporates new assets, the funds potentially available from their disposition increase likewise. Moreover, an improved ski area would be much more attractive to a potential successor, further reducing the speculative possibility that the city might be at financial risk. Also, much more importantly, the expansion is designed precisely to lessen the possibility that market forces will ever force Ski Ashland to cease operation. Ski Ashtand's preferred alternative is based upon years of well-thought-out analysis to determine economically justifiable, and needed, skier improvements. To stay locked in the pre-snowboard, pre-Shasta Skipark world is itself a recipe for increased financial risk for both Ski Ashland and the City. Consequently, I urge the Council to strongly support Ski Ashland's preferred alternative for the proposed Mount Ashland Ski Area expansion. Dan Thorndike 369 Granite Street Ashland, Oregon 97520 From: To: Date: Subject: "jack ward" <jward1932@hotmail.com> <council@ashland .or.us> 9/30/03 10:10PM Mt. Ashland Expansion Ashland City Council: The citizens of Ashland depend on you to protect our watershed and our water. You are the ultimate managers of Mt. Ashland. The obvious compromise between the extremes is to support Alternative 5 which protects the middle fork and the most sensitive areas, and would be acceptable to both expansionists and conservationists. This is a no brainer. Do it. J. Ward Ashland, Oregon Instant message with integrated webcam using MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com From: Todd Kemp <todd@ashlandcreek.net> To: <comments-pacificnorthwest-rogueriver-ashland@fs.fed.us>, <council@ashland.or. us>, <berteauf@ashland.or.us>, <awdb@aol.com>, <wildmountashland@yahoo.com> Date: 10/3/03 8:01AM Subject: Concerns About Negative Impacts of Mt. Ashland Ski Area Expansion Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by Todd Kemp (todd@ashlandcreek.net) on Friday, October 03, 2003 at 11:00:23 message: Dear US Forest Service, Ashland City Council, & Mayor DeBoer, This is my official comment on how I would like to see the public lands (City and National Forest) that make up the City of Ashland municipal watershed and area known as the Mt. Ashland Downhill Ski Area managed in the future. It seems that the Ashland creek watershed has been the center of controversy on and off since Ashland was settled. There are a couple of cases of the city hiring private consultants to prepare reports on sedimentation causes and soumes that continue to fill in Reeder Reservoir and reduces it s capacity to hold the city s water supply. The Forest Service has prepared several reports over the years admitting that roads, road building, timber harvest and the current ski area have all escalated the rate of erosion and down-stream sedimentation in the Ashland Creek Watershed (ACW). Water has been and remains a vary important issue in Ashland. The conifer Forests that cover the mountain sides in the ACW not only provide habitat to many rare wildlife species, they also work as a protective layer that protects the highly erosive soils known as Decomposed Granite, or DG These forests also shade the forest floor keeping it moist and cool throughout the summer months. They act as a huge sponge that soak up water in the winter and spring and slowly releases it into the many tributaries that form Ashland Creek throughout the summer. Each time the Forest Service or the City of Ashland has harvested timber or built roads in the ACW they have in effect reduced its carrying capacity for wildlife and its ability to provide the city of Ashland s citizens with clean water. I have walked the entire watershed many times over the twelve years that I have lived in Ashland. I have walked from Wagner Butte to McDonald Peek, Wagner Glades down Weasel creek to the old Jessie Winburn property. I have performed Great Grey Owl surveys for the Forest Service, Mollusk surveys for a private contractor, terrestrial salamander surveys for a private client, spent countless hours with cameras trying to document the mustelid (weasels, martens and fishers) population. I have performed stream surveys, snorkeled in Ashland creek to collect data on fish species, population densities and habitat utilization and generally spent a lot of time in the ACW. I have seen first hand the effects that reducing or eliminating the forest canopy have on the soils, creeks and wildlife. I have walked all of the existing ski runs at the current ski area during the summer months and am profoundly disappointed at how poorly the mitigation efforts (wooden water-bars and sediment collec! tion ponds) to control erosion have failed to work. Although I have still not found the time to read the entire latest Environmental Impact Statement, I have read most of it and past ElS s and EA s pertaining to this project, I feel that although lengthy and full of seemingly exhaustive study data, this document still avoids the mention of many possible effects that we know from past experience could be potentially detrimental to the health of the ACW and its many other species of inhabitants. I truly can t believe that the City of Ashland and the Rogue River National Forest are actually considering plans as large-scale and invasive as Alternative 2 or 6. I am in favor of leaving the ski area as it is and concentrating on controlling existing erosion and creating some sort of shuttle system for the skiers and Mt. Ashland employees that insist on drinking copious amounts of alcohol and then trying to negotiate the treacherous Mt. Ashland access road down to Interstate 5 in the dark (addressing this problem would truly make the ski area a safer place). If the city feels that they need to do some sort of expansion than I would have to say that Alternative #5 is the closest thing to a responsible action. Even though Alternative 5 makes the most sense, I do not think added night-lights, the Moraine lodge and the LC-13 lift are good ideas and would like to see them omitted. As a resident of Ashland I want to see the City and Forest Service start truly managing the ACW for what it is. First and foremost a municipal watershed used by over 20,000 people, a Late Successional Reserve and a truly unique, special place that represents what most of these mountains looked like for tens of thousands of years pdor to our settling hera. Sincerely, Todd A. Kemp address: 132 VanNess Ave. #3, Asland, Oregon, 97520 Source: This comment was sent to you by the individual named above via the W~ld Mount Ashland website at http:/hNww.mountashland.com. Comments are individually submitted through the site and represent the concerns and opinions of the sender and do not necessarily represent those of Wild Mount Ashland. From: Chris Ammon <earthdakini@yahoo.com> To: <comments-pacificnorthwest-roguedver-ashland@fs.fed.us>, <council@ashland.or. us>, <berteauf@ashland.or. us>, <awdb@aol.com>, <wildmountashland@yahoo.com> Date: 10/2/03 7:07PM Subject: Concerns About Negative Impacts of Mt. Ashland Ski Area Expansion Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by Chris Ammon (earthdakini@yahoo.com) on Thursday, October 02, 2003 at 22:06:41 message: Dear US Forest Service, Ashland City Council, & Mayor DeBoer, Beyond the conflicting scientific claims and the oposing opinions is this simple fact: expanding the ski mountain does nothing towards making the planet a healthier place, and in these times, this is where are attention should be-not on making a bigger, badder, more "rad" place to recreate. Let's not sink into further denial about the kind of changes that really needs to happen in this world. Chris Ammon Source: This comment was sent to you by the individual named above via the Wild Mount Ashland website at http://www, mountashland.com. Comments are individually submitted through the site and represent the concerns and opinions of the sender and do not necessarily represent those of Wild Mount Ashland. From: Ellen Falkner <efalkner@qwest.net> To: <comments-pacificnorthwest-rogueriver-ashland@fs.fed.us>, <council@ashland.or.us> <berteauf@ashland.or. us>, <awdb@aol.com>, <wildmountashland@yahoo.com> Date: 10/2/03 6:34PM Subject: Concerns About Negative Impacts of Mt. Ashland Ski Area Expansion Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by Ellen Falkner (efalkner@qwest.net) on Thursday, October 02, 2003 at 21:34:19 message: Dear US Forest Service, Ashland City Council, & Mayor DeBoer, I am an average green and blue run skier. And my 3 children are learning age. when I go to Mt. Ashland am definitely challenged. But for me the issue is not to have the mountain suit my needs so much as to preserve its natural beauty and protect our drinking water. We are custodians of the environment, and I am commited to raising my family with these values. Please reconsider your expansion ideas. address: 456 Drager STreet, Ashland Source: This comment was sent to you by the individual named above via the Wild Mount Ashland website at http://www.mountashland.com. Comments are individually submitted through the site and represent the concerns and opinions of the sender and do not necessarily represent those of Wild Mount Ashland. From: Douglas Falkner <drfalkner@qwest. net> To: <comments-pacificnorthwest-roguedver-ashland@fs.fed.us>, <council@ashland.or. us>, <berteauf@ashland.or. us>, <awdb@aol.com>, <wildmountashland@yahoo.com> Date: 10/2/03 6:30PM Subject: Concerns About Negative Impacts of Mt. Ashland Ski Area Expansion Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by Douglas Falkner (drfalkner@qwest.net) on Thursday, October 02, 2003 at 21:29:54 message: Dear US Forest Service, Ashland City Council, & Mayor DeBoer, I am new to the area. I love skiing, but I also appreciate conservation and wildland protection. I don't think economic arguments in favor of the expansion address all the intangible assets that will possibly be threatened or damaged with such an expansion. It is nice to have a downscale ski area in our own backyard that is simple and imperfect. Our world is overtaxed on so many levels. We simply don't need to be so greedy. Let's improve what we have, repair what damage the current area needs to have repaired, and for once choose in favor of conservation values. Doing otherwise risks our looking back with regret, perhaps in the very near future. My vote is against the expansion ex(~ept for improving the existing trails and facilities. Sincerely, Douglas Falkner, MD, MHom address: 456 Dreger STreet, Ashland Source: This comment was sent to you by the individual named above via the Wild Mount Ashland website at http://www.mountashland.com. Comments are individually submitted through the site and represent the concerns and opinions of the sender and do not necessarily represent those of W~ld Mount Ashland.