HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005-0719 MIN
ASHLAND CITY COUNCIL MEETING
JULY 19,2005
PAGE] of 10
MINUTES FOR THE REGULAR MEETING
ASHLAND CITY COUNCIL
July 19, 2005
Civic Center Council Chambers, 1175 E. Main Street
CALL TO ORDER
Council Chair Kate Jackson called the meeting to order at 7: 15 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Councilor Hardesty, Amarotico, Hartzell, Jackson, Silbiger and Chapman were present.
Mayor Morrison was absent.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of June 21, 2005 were approved as presented.
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS & AWARDS
Electric Director Dick Wanderschied offered an explanation of the "Power Shift" program, 3.nd an award
for the program was presented to the City of Ashland by the Bonneville Power Administration.
Presentation by Charter Review Committee and Final Report to City Council.
Members of the Committee John Enders, Carole Wheeldon, Laurie MacGraw, Pam Marsh, Don
Montgomery, Michael Riedeman, Hal Cloer and Staff Liaison Ann Seltzer presented the committee's final
report to the council.
Co-Chair Enders briefly explained the amount of time and work that went into the final report. He stated
that the committee had ten recommendations for the Council to consider for ballot placement; the report
listed items contained in the current Charter that the committee has agreed should be removed, and stated
that the committee has recommended further study into two areas. Mr. Enders requested that the council
dissolve the committee upon the completion of their report.
Committee Member Pam Marsh noted the areas that the commission focused on, which included "house
keeping" issues. These issues included: Mayor-manager relationship, Mayoral veto/ability to vote on
council issues, appointment of city commission/committees, election of city council positions, election of
city recorder, election of municipal judge, election/power of the Parks Commission and related issues, and
City and council salaries.
The key recommendations from the commission are as follows:
1) That the City of Ashland should be governed by a partnership between the elected mayor (the
political leader), a city manager (the administrative leader), and the council (the legislative body).
The commission felt that the elected officials are charged with responsibility for developing policy
and the city manager should implement that policy. The manager's administrative power should
be expanded to include staff supervision (hiring, firing and general accountability).
2) The Ashland Mayor should vote on all issues before the council; at the same time, the mayor's
veto power should be eliminated. If approved, the mayoral vote will eliminate an anomaly in the
existing charter. Under current conditions, the council is allowed to meet if three members plus
the mayor are present. In this circumstance, as few as two council members can constitute a
majority. If the mayor becomes a voting member, at least three votes will be required to approve
any measure.
3) The current position for selecting council members should be eliminated in favor of citywide, at-
large elections in which the top three vote getters win the council seats at issue
ASHLAND CITY CC}UNCJL MEETING
JULY 19,2005
PAGE 2 ofl 0
4) The Ashland City Band should be retained in the charter; however funding language should be
removed and budget issues delegated to the Citizen's Budget Committee. The commission
recommended that the Band be placed under the authority of the Parks and Recreation
Department.
5) The city council should convene a citizen-based Charter Review Commission at least every 10
years.
Committee Member Carole Wheeldon spoke regarding charter clean-up and explained that there are
numerous items in the current Charter that are superseded by State law and can be removed. She stated
that retaining the language would have no bearing on the Charter and clutters the document with
unnecessary language.
Ms. Wheeldon presented the following examples of clean-up items:
1) Article IV Section 2 - Duties of the Mayor
2) Article VI Section 2 - Powers and duties of Recorder
3) Article IX - Special powers of the council
4) Article XIV Section 2 - Monthly report of the court to city council
Committee Member Michael Riedeman presented the items recommended for additional study, which are:
1) Judge and Recorder, and 2) Public Utilities (water language), Hospital and Cemetery.
Mr. Riedeman noted the concerns regarding the Recorder's treasury duties and also the lack of mandatory
qualifications for this position. In regards to the Municipal Judge, the concerns were regarding the salary
for this position.
The committee also recommended that the Council further study and clarify the language in Article XVI,
Section 2 regarding the Water Works provision. Concerns regarding the current language were brought to
the attention of the committee and it was noted that the City Attorney had prepared alternative language for
the Council to consider. It was noted that the committee did feel they had adequate time to review and
understand the particulars and that the language associated with the selling of water would be best handled
by the Council.
In regards to the Hospital and Cemetery provisions, the committee felt it was important to indude a
reference to these items; however they did not have a full understanding of the relationships as they exist
today and felt it appropriate for the Council to addresses these two provisions.
Committee Member Don Montgomery presented the suggested next steps for the council:
1) Voter awareness campaign (first priority)
2) Ballot language
3) Additional research committees
4) Develop timeline
He made several suggestions on how to engage voter awareness, noted the need to work with consultant to
draft the charter language, noted the need for a timeline, and invited the Council to seek the committee
members for help or advice.
Mr. Enders concluded the presentation by giving thanks to City staff.
Art Bullock/791 GlendowerlDistributed the ashlandconstitution.org newspaper to the Council. Mr.
ASHLAND CITY COUNCIL MEETING
JULY 19,2005
PAGE 3 ofl 0
Bullock explained the organization's goal and stated that their work has been a parallel process to the
Charter Review Committee. He noted the number of people involved and the variety of activities they had
organized, including dialogue sessions, conversation cafes, and support surveys. Mr. Bullock stated that
the result of this process has produced five specific amendments that should be added to the current
Charter:
1) Articulate seven core values guiding city government,
2) Establish an Ashland Code of Ethics for public servants,
3) Revamp the public forum process,
4) Public interest vote, the purpose of which is to give a voice to the "silent majority", and
5) Process of condemnation of private property and LIDs
Mr. Bullock requested time at an upcoming meeting to present these five draft amendments and to present
the results of the survey regarding the charter committee's recommendations. He also noted that his
organization had studied the water rights issue and their results are listed on their website and in the paper
distributed to the Council.
Pam Vavra/2800 Dead Indian Memorial Road/Spoke regarding her high regard to the committee
members and staff for their work in this process. Ms. Vavra requested the need for clearly specified
criteria on which to base decisions on which items should be considered, how they would be prioritized
and how to decide on which ones to place on the ballot. She stated that this criteria was lackilng from the
committee's process and hoped that the council incorporated it into theirs.
Council voiced their appreciation of the committee. When asked why the committee did not recommend
IRV to the Council, Mr. Enders explained that the committee did not have consensus on this issue and did
not have enough information to feel comfortable making this recommendation to the CounciL Mr.
Riedeman added that, in general, the committee found the idea of IR V intriguing, however there were
certain concerns including the conflict with state law and budgetary implications that prohibited the
committee from making this recommendation.
Mr. Enders requested that the committee be disbanded. Request was made by to postpone the formal
disbandment of the committee until the Mayor is present, and suggestion was made to take formal action at
an upcoming Study Session.
Councilor Amarotico requested that the Endangered Species Pledge be postponed until the n~xt agenda
and council agreed.
CONSENT AGENDA
1. Minutes of Boards, Commissions and Committees.
2. Liquor License Application from Susan Powell dba Pilaf Restaurant at 18 Calle Guanajuato.
3. Annual Approval of Renewals on Liquor Licenses.
4. Bid Award for Replacement Ambulance.
5. Authorization to dispose of surplus property in excess of $10,000 for two fire engines.
6. Request for an easement for a Residential Gas Service across Parks Property.
7. Approval of a Personal Services Contract for Police Consultant Services.
8. Agreement for Services with Rogue Valley Public Television.
9. Confirmation of Mayor's appointments to the Ashland Fiber Network Options COInmittee.
10. Confirmation of Mayor's appointment of James Olney to the Ashland Fiber Network
Programming Committee for a term to expire April 30, 2007.
11. Confirmation of Mayor's appointment of David Chapman as council liaison to the Bear Creek
Greenway Committee.
12. Confirmation of Mayor's appointment of Christina Lacy to the Bicycle & Pedestrian
ASHLAND CITY COUNCIL MEETING
JULY 19,2005
PAGE 4 ofj 0
Commission for a term to expire April 30, 2006.
Councilor Amarotico requested that Consent Agenda item #3 be removed for discussion and Councilor
Hartzell requested that Consent Agenda item #9 be removed for discussion.
Councilor Hardesty/Chapman m/s to approve Consent Agenda items #1, #2, #4, #5, #6, #8, #10, #11,
and #12. Voice Vote: all AYES. Motion passed.
Councilor Hartzell/Chapman m/s to approve allowing Councilor Amarotico to abstain from
Consent Agenda item #3 due to conflict of interest. Voice Vote: all AYES. Motion passed.
Councilor Hartzell/Chapman m/s to approve Consent Agenda item #3. DISCUSSION: City Recorder
Barbara Christensen briefly explained the process used for approving Liquor Licenses. V oic.~ Vote: all
AYES. Motion passed.
Councilor Jackson noted that one of the six candidates selected by the Mayor has asked to be: removed, so
the item before the council is to confirm the remaining five candidates to the AFN Options Committee.
Councilor Hartzell requested postponing this item until she has had time to consult with the lV1ayor and
stated that she was not comfortable with the make-up of the committee. Councilor Jackson provided an
explanation of how the Mayor came to this selection of members. Comment was made noting that
originally, there were only suppose to be five members on the committee and support was voiced for
moving ahead with the appointment.
Former Mayor Catherine Shaw addressed the Council and stated that it is the job of the Mayor to
appointment committee members, and if a councilor does not agree with his selection, they should vote no.
Councilor Silbiger/Chapman m/s to approve Consent Agenda item #9. DISCUSSION: Councilor
Hartzell responded to Ms. Shaw's remarks and stated that she was not willing to support the proposed
committee. It was suggested that Councilor Hartzell speak to the Mayor about appointing a sixth member
to the committee. Support was voiced for allowing the Mayor to appoint one more person if he so chooses.
Voice Vote: Councilor Amarotico, Silbiger, Jackson, Chapman, YES; Councilor Hart~!:ell and
Hardesty, NO. Motion passed 4-2.
Councilor Chapman/Silbiger m/s to approve Consent Agenda item #7 . Voice Vote: all AYES.
Motion passed.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Continuation of Public Hearing of Planning Action 2005-008 - Annexation, Complrehensive
Plan and Zoning Map change from Jackson County zoning RR-5 (Rural Residenti:al) to City of
Ashland Zoning E-l (Employment) for an approximately 1.6 acre parcel located at 593
Crowson Road. The portion of the parcel adjacent to Crowson Road is proposed in the
Residential Overlay (R-Overlay) that allows a residential component and in the Detail Site
Review Zone which requires additional building design features.
Public Hearing Re-Opened: 8:38 p.m.
Senior Planner Maria Harris addressed the Council and noted that the applicant and the neighbor who had
voiced objection at the last hearing had come to an agreement. Ms. Harris noted the two additional
conditions recommended by Staff and requested that the Council include these if they choosl~ to approve
the application.
ASHLAND CITY COUNCIL MEETING
JULY 19,2005
PAGE 5 ofl 0
Alan Harper/717 Murphy Rd, Medford/Attorney for the Application/Stated that after extensive
negotiations between the applicant and the Bustamante's, they were able to come to an agreement and
submitted into the record the statement from the Bustamante's, withdrawing their objection to the
annexation. Mr. Harper provided a brief explanation of the elements in the agreement.
Cody BustamanteN oiced his support for the agreement reached.
It was noted that the agreement had not yet been submitted to Staff and questioned if it would become part
of the record for this Planning Action. Mr. Harper stated that he had no objections to providiing this to
Staff.
Public Hearing Closed: 8:41 p.m.
Continued Council Deliberation
Comment was made that the Council was not required to approve an annexation just because it meets the
criteria; however support was voiced for this approval.
Councilor Hartzell! Amarotico m/s to approve the application for Annexation, Comprehensive Plan
and Zoning Map change in P A 2005-008 with the three attached conditions recommended by the
Planning Commission on March 8, 2005; Condition #4 and #5 as stated in the Council :Memo;
Condition #6 be compliance with the agreement that was presented by the applicant tonight. Voice
Vote: all AYES. Motion passed.
2. Public Hearing re Adoption of "A Resolution Levying Special Benefit Assessments in the
amount of $415,847.98 for the Strawberry Local Improvement District for Improvements to
Strawberry Lane, Scenic Drive, Nutley Street, Alnutt Street and Westwood Street (~onsisting of
Paving, Curbs, Gutters, Storm Drains, Sidewalk, and Associated Improvements."
City Engineer Jim Olson explained that the purpose of this public hearing was to hear any o1:~ections in
regards to the formation and final assessment of the Strawberry Local Improvement District. Mr. Olson
presented a brief background regarding this LID and noted that the development of the Strawberry
Meadows Subvision and aided in this project.
Mr. Olson presented the one comment that was submitted by Linda and Barry Katzen voicing objection.
He noted their concerns and explained his prepared response, which is included with the Council Memo.
Public Hearing Open: 9:03 p.m.
Public Hearing Closed: 9:03 p.m.
Councilor Chapman/ Amarotico m/s to approve Resolution #2005-29. Roll Call Vote: Councilor
Hartzell, Silbiger, Jackson, Chapman and Amarotico, YES. Councilor Hardesty, NO. Motion
passed 5-1.
PUBLIC FORUM
Daniel Rueff/240 Ohio Street/Noted that he had organized a rally in support of Police Chief Mike Bianca
and stated that Mr. Bianca was the best Chief of Police the City ever had. Mr. Rueff stated that a police
officer tried to hit him with a police car during a peace rally, and stated that he would continue to fight for
Police Chief Bianca.
Albert Pepe/321 Clay Street #21/Spoke regarding continued development of open space and annexation
of large parcels of land into the city for development. Mr. Pepe stated that he moved to Ash]and because
ASHLAND CITY COUNCIL MEETING
JULY 19,2005
PAGE 6 ofl 0
of its community feel and that the City will lose that by annexing large parcels of land. He noted the
division of class lines and stated that it is getting very difficult for families to afford to live h(:re. Mr. Pepe
requested that the 10 acre parcel located on Clay Street remain open space.
Pam Vavra/2800 Dead Indian Memorial Road/Requested that the council pass a resolution to place the
IRV proposed charter amendment on the ballot. Ms. Vavra clarified that they are not being asked to
support IRV, only to place it on the ballot and let the voters decide. She noted that the Chart,~r Review
Committee received more comments on the need for IRV than comment received on all other issues
combined, and requested the Council's help to place this issue on the ballot.
Catherine Shaw/886 Oak StreetJExpressed support of placing the IRV on the ballot. She stated this was
not about putting policy to a vote of the people, but was simply about putting to the vote how policy
makers would be elected. Ms. Shaw asked the Council to allow the proponents ofIRV to pn:sent their
case to the voters and to let the voters decide if this is something they support.
Marilu Johnson/ll02 Holton Rd, Talent/Expressed her support for IRV and read an article which
supports alternative methods for electing candidates.
Councilor Hardesty/Hartzell m/s to have a discussion on IRV under Unfinished Business.
DISCUSSION: Objection was voiced to placing this under Unfinished Business, which would place it in
front of other items already on the Agenda.
Councilor Hardesty/Hartzell amended motion to place the discussion on IRV under Other Business
from Council Members. Voice Vote: all AYES.
Voice Vote on amended motion: All AYES.
Bruce Davis/4120 Douglas Blvd #306, Granite Bay, CA/Representing the LLC that owns Siskiyou
Village, stated that the Crowson Road Business Park has created a conflict. Mr. Davis provided a brief
explanation of his issue and noted that he had submitted a letter to the developer of the proje1ct requesting
that they split some of the costs.
Council questioned if this issue should have been voiced during the public hearing. City Administrator
Gino Grimaldi stated that Staff would work with Mr. Davis and report back to the Council.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS (None)
NEW AND MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS
1. Adoption of Findings and Fact and Conclusions of Law for Planning Action 2004-Jl50-
Unitarian Universal Fellowship Church - 87 Fourth Street.
Councilor Silbiger requested two modifications to the Findings:
Section 2.3 - Amend sentence to read "The Councilfinds that the addition of five spaces is an
improvement in the non-conforming parking situation given that the sanctuary will not be expanded."
(and delete the remainder of the sentence "...and services and secondary church activities will remain at the
same level as current services and activities")
Section 2.6 - Amend sentence to read "Since the social hall addition will not result in a change in the
size of the sanctuary, the material effect on the surrounding neighborhood should remain similar to
current levels."
ASHLAND CITY COUNCIL MEETING
JULY 19,2005
PAGE 7 oflO
Comment was made regarding the language in the Findings pertaining to the sanctuary being the
equivalent of nine houses. It was clarified that this language was used in the applicant's materials as well
as the Staff Report; in addition, the Conditional Use Criteria requires that the proposed use b~ compared to
the target use.
Assistant City Attorney Mike Reeder clarified for the Council that the Findings were prepared by the
Planning Staff, and reviewed and edited by the Legal Department. City Attorney Mike Franell stated that
he did not feel the conditions would be confusing for future councils, but suggested that at some point in
the future the applicant may come back and apply to have the conditions changed or removed because they
are so restrictive.
Councilor Amarotico/Silbiger m/s to approve Findings for P A 2004-150 with proposed amendments
by Councilor Silbiger.
Councilor Hartzell! Amarotico m/s to allow Councilor Chapman to abstain. Voice Vote:: all AYES.
Motion passed.
Voice Vote on original motion: all AYES. Motion passed.
2. Discussion of Electric Rate Increase.
Electric Director Dick Wanderschied explained that the city has a 10-year Power Sales contract with
Bonneville Power Administration (BP A), and stated that this contract runs from October 2001 through
September 2001. The first five years of the contract included a 5-year rate period of which the final year
commences on October 1,2005.
Mr. Wanderschied explained that in the budget, the city estimated that the whole sale power cost would go
up by about 3.3% and Staff included a 5% rate increase and a 10% reduction in the BP A surcharges as part
of the budget. It was noted that this issue came before the Council at their June ih meeting, Ibut was pulled
from the Agenda with the Council request to look at an AFN subsidy that was outside of the electric rates.
In addition, a recent court ruling was noted in which could increase Bonneville's costs by approximately
$70 million dollars a year. BP A has appealed that ruling and should find out whether the ruling will be
overturned in the next week.
Given the situation, Staff recommended that the City postpone the electric rate increase and leave the rates
at their current level until the BP A informs the City of the CRAC levels for October 2005. Once the City
has been given this information, Staff will return to council with an appropriate electric rate increase. Mr.
Wanderschied noted the Council's two options, which are outlined in the memo, and stated that the main
disadvantage to having no increase, is that it will affect the General Fund by roughly $90,000. He again
stated that Staff believed it would be most appropriate to leave rates as they are until more information
from BP A is received.
Finance Director Lee Tuneberg stated that he supports postponing the rate increase at this time and waiting
for more information. He stated that it may not have end up having an impact on the budget, but would
like to have the opportunity to come back later in the year and proposed a rate increase if they see a change
in the costs.
Council agreed to Stafr s recommendation to hold off on the rate increase and to bring this issue back to
the Council in the fall.
3. Council Consideration of Citizen Request for Council to call up Planning Action no. 2005-00328
on Appeal.
ASHLAND CITY CC)UNCIL MEETING
JULY 19,2005
PAGE 8 ofl 0
City Attorney Mike Franell presented the Staff Memo and stated that this was before the council upon
request from a citizen. He explained that the Council could only call up an action within 15 days of the
findings being adopted and mailed, and stated that if the Council wished to take action they would need to
do so tonight.
Mr. Franell provided an explanation of the issues raised by Mr. Swales, one of which being whether
Commissioner KenCairn had an actual conflict of interest in Planning Action 2005-00328. ~,,1r. Franell
stated that KenCairn did declare a potential conflict of interest at the hearing. He noted Ms. Kencairn
served as the Landscape Architect when the initial building was constructed, but that this portion of the
landscape was installed over a year ago and the Legal Staff did not feel that this created a direct conflict of
interest.
Mr. Franell noted that concern has been raised regarding KenCairn's contractual relationship with Archerd
& Dresner and whether or not this presented an actual conflict of interest given that they list her as a team
member on their website. Mr. Franell stated that Legal did not find that this was an actual conflict, and
explained that it would only have be an actual conflict if she were the Landscape Architect on the
application being presented to the commission. Mr. Franell clarified that in these situations, the potential
conflict needs to be declared at the hearing, but if no one challenges her ability to make an unbiased
decision, that defect is waived'. In this instance, there was no challenge to her ability to make an unbiased
decision.
Councilor Hartzell!Amarotico m/s to extend meeting until 10:30 p.m. Voice Vote: all AYES. Motion
passed.
Mr. Franell noted the interpretation regarding the definition of a motel. He stated that the He:arings Board
decided that the application met the definition of a motel, however it was an interpretation and the council
does have the option to call this issue up due to the policy implications.
Mr. Franell clarified that a citizen has the right to request that a hearing be moved from the Hearings Board
to the Planning Commission, but Staff is not required to accommodate their request. In this instance, Staff
reviewed the potential implications and determined that given the work load that the planning commission
had, they did not feel they could move this to the Planning Commission.
Colin Swales/461 Allison Street/Stated the conflict of issues is just one part and noted the importance for
the Hearings Boards process to be fair and equitable. Mr. Swales noted a memo from Planning
Department employee, indicating that it is common practice for commissioners to fill in for one another on
the Hearings Board. He stated that the powers & duties of the Hearings Board do not allow them to hear a
CUP application on a new commercial building, and stated that half of this building was still unbuilt and
stated that the Hearings Board should not have heard this application in the first place. He added that the
interpretation that a new condo could be turned into a motel with a conditional use permit had huge policy
issues and ramifications.
Kerry Kencairn/147 Central Avenue/Stated that she was at the Hearings Board because she felt she was
clean. She commented on the value of having planning commissioners that understand planning issues,
and stated that the reason she is on the Planning Commission is because she cares about this community
and has an understanding of how projects are built and the ramifications of decisions. She noted the
amount of support she has received from the community, and stated that there are only two clltizens who
wish her to step down. Ms. KenCairn stated that her volunteer position on the Planning Commission was a
hard job and stated that she does not make more money because she is on the Planning Commission; she
actually loses work because of it. Stated that she did state her potential conflict for that planning action,
and stated that she has and will continue to be clean in her process.
ASHLAND CITY COUNCIL MEETING
JULY 19,2005
PAGE 9 of 10
Mike Morris/720 S Mountain/Spoke in support of Kerry Kencairn and cited instances where Mr. Swales
has been wrong.
Art Bullock/791 Glendower/Stated that the process being followed does not follow the law, and quoted a
State statute regarding this, which states that the conflict must be declared in writing, it must sent to the
appointing authority, which in this situation is the Mayor and the Council, it requires that the written
document explain the conflict, and the appointing authority resolves the conflict.
Eric Navickas/711 Faith Street/Stated the Council has an obligation to stop this process and to challenge
what Ms. KenCairn has done. He encouraged the council to reinforce what Mr. Swales has brought
forward.
Gary Turner/l08 N Second Street/Stated that the issue with the hotel was a matter of interpretation, but
both staff and the hearings board agreed that it qualified as a motel. Noted that the commissioner in
question had already offered her explanation and stated that given the record it would be right for the
council to exercise their discretion to take this matter up, but should let the citizen do so.
Randall Hopkins/Statement was submitted into the record and read aloud by the City Recorder.
Councilor Hardesty/Hartzell m/s that the Council call up P A 2005-00328 on appeal. DISCUSSION:
Mr. Reeder clarified that currently the city code does not have any criteria for how an action gets placed
before the Hearings Board rather than the Planning Commission, other than the limitations that are
imposed on the Hearings Board in the code. He stated that the Hearings Board did have the auhority to
hear the Planning Action in question. He added that currently, it is the discretion of the Planning Staff
whether to move the action before the full commission. Mr. Franell stated that there are many gray areas in
our code and interpretations get made all the time. He stated that just because there is an interpretation
made, doesn't mean it rises to the level of establishing policy. He noted that the council is not bound by
the the interpretations made by staff or the commission. If the council sees something that thl~y feel does
not meet the intent of the Compo Plan or the code, than it is incumbet upon them to make a change.
Voice Vote: Councilor Harzell, Silbiger, Jackson, Hardesty, and Chapman, YES; Amarotico, NO.
Motion passed 5-1.
Councilor Chapman/Hartzell m/s to ask Legal to look at the items presented to the council
regarding Mt. Ashland Expansion and see what their options are for looking at the lease. Voice
Vote: all AYES.
Councilor Hartzell/Hardesty m/s to continue this meeting to tomorrow's Study Session. Voice Vote
all AYES. Motion passed.
ORDINANCES~ RESOLUTIONS AND CONTRACTS
1. Reading by title only of "A Resolution Authorizing the Amendment of the Fire Proltection Plans
Review and Inspection Fee Schedule Adopted by Resolution 04-16.
Item postponed to the July 20th Continued Meeting.
2. Reading by title only of "A Resolution Updating the Forest Lands Commission Membership,
Quorum, Powers and Duties and Repealing Resolution 96-21."
Item postponed to the July 20th Continued Meeting.
ASHLAND Crl'Y COUNC:IL Mr~:ETING
JULY 19,2005
PAGE JO 01'10
OTHER BUSINESS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS/REPORTS FROM COUNCIL LIAISONS:
1. Request by Councilors Cate Hartzell and Jack Hardesty regarding Proposed ResollLltion for
Follow-up to Mount Ashland Expansion Activities.
Item postponed to the July 20th Continued Meeting.
2. Discussion regarding Instant Runoff Voting.
Item postponed to the July 20th Continued Meeting.
ADJOURNMENT
Meeting was adjourned at 10:30 p.m.
~~.~
Barbara Christensen, City Recorder
~~ O-~
Kate Jackson, Council Chair